Loading...
20200852 Simpson Demolition Application f FOR OFFICE USE10G.4• CITY OF � �� �u � ��SPRINGS o� �» � ,� DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION (Application#) w �r City Hall -474 Broadway ' Saratoga'zits„'zits„ Springs,� New York 12866 **on co � Tel:S|858z355Ox5|5 fax:58'58O�48O ^` � (Date received) vpww.saratoga.sp,'ngsurQ ARCHITECTURAL / A|3TO0CREVIEW APPLICATION APPLICANT(S)* OYYNEn/s (If not ATTORNEY/AGENT Helen CaseLLC TonyaYaaenohak PE (agent) Name ' ' P.O. Box174 EnQinaehngAmehoaAddress � Co. Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 76 Washington St., Saratoga, NY 518/859-1911 518/587134O Phone / / - / Email hoimpoon1O@gmoi|.00m tonyay@nycap.rr.com Identify primary contact person: EJ Applicant 0 Owner ElAttornev/Agent *An applicant must be the property owner, lessee, or one with an option to lease or purchase the property in question. Applicant's interest in premises: @ Owner 0 Lessee 0 Under option to lease or purchase PROPERTY INFORMATION St.68Phi|a165 68 1 67 Prope�yAddness/Loco1ion: Tax Parcel #: (for example: /65.5Z-4—J7) UR-4 Current Zoning District: Property use: IN Residential 0 Non-residential/mixed-use Type of Review: 0 Architectural I@ Historic 0 Extension/modification (of current approval) Summary description of proposed action: Demolition of Existing Multi-Family Residence and Construction of New Single Family Residence (unknown) Has a previous application been filed with the DRC for this property? 0 No INYes—da1e/s\? -App. No./6? Revised 01/2019 APPLICATION FEE (payable to "Commissioner of Finance"): Residential Structures(principal, accessory) $50 Non-residential/mixed-use structures(principal) $500 Residential approval —extension/mod $50 Non-residential signs, awnings, accessory structures $125 Non-residential mixed-use sketch $150 Non-residential approval —extension/mod $125 Demolition $350 "A "complete" application consists of 1 hard copy (original) ,and I electronic copy of application &ALL other materials as required below: New Construction /Additions ❑ Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures and adjacent properties ❑ Site plan, drawn to scale,showing existing&proposed construction, property lines&dimensions, required &proposed setbacks&lot coverage,site features(fences, walks,trees, etc.); on no larger than 2'x3' sheet—smaller preferred if legible ❑ Elevation drawings showing design of all sides of existing&proposed construction—label dimensions, colors, materials, lighting(fixture &lamp type, wattage), etc. -include compass bearing&scale; no larger than 2'x3' sheet—smaller permitted if legible ❑ Floor plans for proposed structure; on sheet no larger than 2'x3'—smaller permitted if legible ❑ Product literature, specifications and samples of proposed materials and colors Change in exterior building materials (windows, doors, roof, siding, etc.), or color (in non-residential districts only) ❑ Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures and that illustrate affected features El Elevation drawings showing all sides of existing&proposed construction—label dimensions,colors, materials, lighting(fixture&lamp type,wattage), etc. - include compass bearing&scale; no larger than 2'x3'sheet—smaller permitted if legible ❑ Product literature, specifications and samples of proposed materials and colors Within front yard setbacks in Historic Districts only (Front setbacks:UR-I &INST-HTR=30';UR-4=25';UR-2,UR-3&NCUD-I=10') - Installation, removal or change in material of drive-and walkways - Installation or removal of architectural, sculptural or vegetative screening over 3'in height - Installation of accessory utility structures or radio/satellite transmission/reception devices (more than 2' diameter) For any of above: ❑ Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures, and of adjacent properties El Site plan showing existing&proposed construction: include property lines&dimensions, required &proposed setbacks&lot coverage,site features (fences, walks,trees, etc.) street names,compass bearing&scale; no larger than 2'x3'sheet—smaller preferred if legible ❑ Product literature, specifications and samples of proposed materials and colors Signage/Awnings ❑ Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures,and adjacent properties ❑ Plan showing location of proposed sign/awning structure on building/premises: no larger than I I"x 17" ❑ Scaled illustration of proposed sign/awning structure and lettering(front view& profile): include all dimensions of structure;type, dimensions and style of lettering or logo;description of colors, materials, mounting method and hardware ❑ Descriptions, specifications of proposed lighting including fixture&lamp type, wattage, mounting method,and location ❑ Product literature, specifications and samples of proposed materials and colors Demolition ▪ Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures,and of adjacent properties N Site plan showing existing and any proposed structures - include dimensions, setbacks,street names,compass bearing,and scale 8 Written description of reasons for demolition and, in addition: ® For structures of"architectural/historical significance", demonstrate"good cause"why structure cannot be preserved 8 For structures in an architectural district that might be eligible for listing on National Register of Historic Places, or for a "contributing" structure in a National Register district(contact City staff), provide plans for site development following demolition- include a timetable and letter of credit for project completion Telecommunication facilities El Color photographs showing site/existing structures,and of adjacent properties El Site plan showing existing and proposed structures: include dimensions,setbacks,street names, compass bearing, and scale E l Scaled illustration of proposed structures: include all dimensions; colors, materials, lighting, mounting details O Consult Article 240-12.22 of the City's Zoning Ordinance and City staff to ensure compliance with requirements for visual impact assessment and existing and proposed vegetative screening Revised 01/2019 Request for extension of current approval ❑ Identify date of original DRC approval: Current expiration date: Org.App. No. 0 Describe why this extension is necessary and whether any significant changes have occurred either on the site or in the neighborhood. SEQR Environmental Assessment Form I l Applicants proposing the following must complete "Part I"of the SEQR Short Environmental Assessment Form(available here: http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/permits_ej operations_pdf/seafpartone.pdf): -Construction or expansion of a multi-family residential structure(4 units +) -Construction or expansion(exceeding 4,000 sq.ft.gross floor area) of a principal or accessory non-residential structure -Telecommunications facility, radio antennae, satellite dishes - Demolition Disclosure Does any City officer, employee or family member thereof have a financial interest (as defined by General Municipal Law Section 809) in this application? © No ❑ Yes - If yes, a statement disclosing the name, residence, nature, and extent of this interest must be filed with this application. Certification I/we, the property owner(s), or purchaser(s)/lessee(s) under contract, of the land in question, hereby request an appearance before the Design Review Commission. By the signature(s) attached hereto, I/we certify that the information provided within this application and accompanying documentation is, to the best of my/our knowledge, true and accurate. I/we further understand that intentionally providing false or misleading information is grounds for immediate denial of this application. I/we hereby authorize the members of the Design Review Commission and designated City staff to enter the property associated with this application for purposes of conducting any necessary site inspections relating to this application. Furthermore, I/we agree to meet all requirements under Article VII for Historic Review or Article VIII for Architectural Review of theoning Codeofthe City of Saratoga Springs. /-7i2 L..../ 7\/ i* ! � Date: ,r/ / , % (---' (applicant signature) Date: (applicant signature) If applicant is not the currently the owner of the property, the current owner must also sign. Owner Signature: Date: Owner Signature: Date: Revised 01/2019 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY This application has been reviewed by the Zoning Enforcement Officer and is being forwarded to the Commission. Signature: Date: Additional Comments: Revised 01/2019 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part I - Project Information Instructions for Completing Part I—Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1 –Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: 69 Phila St.-Demolition&New Construction Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 69 Phila St.-Fourth lot on the Left(North)side of Phila St.from the intersection of Henry St. Brief Description of Proposed Action: Demolition of existing multi-family residence. Construction of new single family residence Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: Case H.Simpson&Helen Chelstowski E-Mail: HSimpson10@gmail.com Address: P.O. Box 174 City/PO: State: Zip Code: Saratoga Springs New York 12866 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that I v may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. I v — 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other government Agency? NO YES If Yes, list agency(s)name and permit or approval:City of Saratoga Springs Zoning Board of Appeals&Building Dept. ri 3. a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 0.12 acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 0.1 acres c. Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 0.24 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,are adjoining or near the proposed action: 5. m Urban n Rural (non-agriculture) ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial ❑ Residential (suburban) Forest n Agriculture n Aquatic ❑ Other(Specify): n Parkland Page I of 3 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? ✓ I- NO YES 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes, identify: ✓ — NO YES 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? ✓ b. Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? 1-1✓ c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed — action? I v 1 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies: Any new construction is required to be compliant with the Energy Conservation Code of NYS. Insulation materials,windows and ✓ doors will be compliant with the ECC and reviewed with a RES Check Energy Analysis. 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: II ✓ 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: - I✓ 12. a. Does the project site contain,or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site,or district NO YES which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places,or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the ✓ State Register of Historic Places? b. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for ✓ archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)archaeological site inventory? 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? b. Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: Page 2 of 3 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: ❑Shoreline ❑ Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑ Early mid-successional ❑Wetland m Urban ❑ Suburban 15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed by the State or NO YES Federal government as threatened or endangered? ❑✓ ❑ 16. Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan? NO YES ❑✓ ❑ 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? ❑ If Yes,briefly describe: 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water NO YES or other liquids(e.g.,retention pond,waste lagoon, dam)? If Yes,explain the purpose and size of the impoundment: 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste NO YES management facility? If Yes, describe: ✓ 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes, describe: � ❑ A remediation site locted at 53 Putnam St.is within the referenced neighborhood area for the 65 Phila St.project. Although due to the distance,the project site is not effected. I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor/name: St Date: 11/6/2020 Signature: Title:Owner /I/6/2-0 PRINT FORM Page 3 of 3 EAF Mapper Summary Report Monday, November 2, 2020 1:00 PM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist _ , project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental 165 �i-:___1.65' 65.60-2,,..'65.1165-(tit}-2-6 5'2 assessment form(EAF).Not all questions asked in the EAF are 18 60=2 t 1 65 60.2_ 1 answered by the EAF Mapper.Additional information on any EAF f question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although 1 A30-1 75 f= ,i r r-a I:-, --`----____ the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to i 165.6o-1-1i .1 ;'�`- .4 ,y r DEC,you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order I ) 165.6$-1 l 8.2 165 68-4 2 5--- to obtain data not provided by the Mapper.Digital data is not a �� f -L� ``---�__� substitute for agency determinations. �-�---,:-�� �� .. 65 X68-i-2� 14'' 1-22 t 1 -,i,,;•57 i -- 165.68-1-17 r Ir•1 5.68-1.74 �165.68-1-12if65 6$-1-75 .F -__ 1 i.,...,,,4,':,.- i -�_i� 5 6$ t+ 1 65 08-1--E ` ` _„ r tta�r+ �f�toattrat I tr�j 165.6$ l 1$ f l , I ---L-� r I Sara P1 y rine. 1 _� -_ --_� F 65.6 -1-721 -- • = , ;L 165.66 e4d-tr '.68-'1 67 i 165 68-1-37 1, Totontio • i ---165.68-4401 _- __-�_:_y, 165:68+1--3216,68-1/:34 --_- fi 1. F Hilo GF?ael? lgr: 1165 63=4-302 -�__ ? ; t ' -lib' l i a -.0 :f tigi ?. ,6ra�tcxY j 1. ,`: `�___-_-L_--___L_____;165-68-'1-71 t ,i. - Itr 11 I ti 16-5 68_44.191 f-`- -;--__ Phi - i�t ?- ii - S --? �. Gt :til ti - . �rrPolstenra Cd}IYC147 1t71 tY3rB,st �l f T T-____7_4__- 165•16$.4-493185.68-I-54 ) � -� i - __ __ Vi r,,, t, 1165' 3.4'2&t ; 15.68-150 1�Y'f 65. 1 1 165.484-4-.5 _ - 4 {tel,m . i iPitt:.i ar' Philadelphia 3a'nntt U ,liit 'lin apj INCRE 4EI'1T ,TlRCi n,Esn Ja•aI1 Mpl,Esnl51tuaYlM io'rfcj Kon Esti QEF lEr ITrF fl .,ii E.n Japan I,lEll Esti china(Hong Komi,Esli .115e :')='s4•i iT41ancl),t1IG i,i 't}p.inS#r•e �1ata cor ributo�s, and the GIS User Comlli ung, tOc irienStre#1 tal?�_,�ntnbyti, ri r cl0 1e GIS User Comm urirty Part 1 / Question 7 [Critical Environmental No Area] Part 1 / Question 12a [National or State Yes Register of Historic Places or State Eligible Sites] Part 1 / Question 12b [Archeological Sites] Yes Part 1 / Question 13a [Wetlands or Other No Regulated Waterbodies] Part 1 /Question 15 [Threatened or No Endangered Animal] Part 1 /Question 16 [100 Year Flood Plain] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Part 1 /Question 20 [Remediation Site] Yes Short Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 1 nvironmentat aue Kemeaiation Database aearcn haps://w ww.dec.ny.gov/crmx/extapps/derextemal/haz/details.cfm fiNEW YORK - Qepartment of STATE n� eWP P3Fairre Environmental Conservation Environmental Site Remediation Database Search Details Site Record Document Repository Site-related documents are available for review through the DEClnfo Locator on line at DECInfoLocator Administrative Information Site Name: 53 Putnam Street Site Code: C546057 Program: Brownfield Cleanup Program Classification: A EPA ID Number: Location DEC Region: 5 Address: 53 Putnam Street City:Saratoga Springs Zip: 12866 County:Saratoga Latitude: 43.081111111 Longitude: -73.784461111 Site Type: Estimated Size: 0.3 Acres Site Owner(s) and Operator(s) Current Owner Name: 53 Putnam Street Inc. Current Owner(s) Address: 159 Fifth Avenue Saratoga Springs,NY, 12866 Site Document Repository Name: Saratoga Springs Public Library Address: 49 Henry Street Saratoga Springs,NY 12866 Site Description Location: The 53 Putnam Street site is located in an urban area along the west side of Putnam of 5 11/2/2020, 1:19 PM nvironmental Site Remediation Database Search https://www.dec.ny.gov/cfmx/extapps/derexternaUhaz/details.cfm Street within the Business District of the City of Saratoga Springs, New York. The site is north of the intersection of Putnam and Phila Streets and south of the intersection of Putnam and Gardner Streets. Site Features: The approximate 0.3 acre property is open land consisting of a combination of gravel and crushed concrete and part of a crumbling concrete pad. Current Zoning and Land Use: The site is zoned for commercial use and residential accessory use (with City approval), and is currently inactive and vacant. The surrounding parcels are currently used for commercial use and may potentially provide residential accessory use according to zoning. The nearest residential neighborhood is approximately 400 feet to the east of the site. Past Use of the Site: The former one-story, concrete block, slab-on-grade building was constructed in 1905. The property was initially used as an ice skating rink during the winter months and a garage during the summer. The property is listed in the 1925 City Directory as doing business as a ,Steam Laundry ,. The 1932 City Directory and the Sanborn Map list the site again as Laundry. The 1954 Sanborn Map of the area lists the site as a Laundry/Dry Cleaners. The City Directory listings indicate that the site was vacant or not listed between the late 1960s to 1986. In 1986 C&B Sanitation used the site as a parking garage for waste hauling vehicles, however, it is assumed that the site has been vacant since truck storage operations ceased on or about the early 20006s. According to the Sanborn Maps for the location, several underground petroleum storage tanks were shown to be present on the property. In 2002 a former 10,000 gallon No. 6 fuel oil UST was removed from the area immediately west of the building. Approximately 173 tons of petroleum impacted soil was removed from the vicinity of the former fuel oil tank in March 2002. NYSDEC spill #0109572 was issued in association with the aforementioned tank removal and documented soil impacts. Site Geology and Hydrogeology: The site is covered by a layer of fill material ranging from approximately eight (8) to twelve (12) feet thick. The fill generally consists of coarse-medium-fine sand with varying amounts of silt and gravel. The fill also contains brick, cinders and slag. Beneath the fill is soil consisting primarily of course-medium-fine sand with varying amounts of gravel, silt and clay. Layers of organic peat ranging in thickness from less than one (1) inch to as much as two (2) feet are present in the sand. The depth to groundwater ranges from approximately six (6) to nine (9) feet below the current floor and approximately eight (8) to ten (10) feet below grade surface to the west of the building footprint. Groundwater flow in the vicinity of the building is to the south, east and southeast; however the variability of the groundwater measurements suggests that flow directions on a localized scale may vary depending on seasonal fluctuations and control exerted by subsurface structures and conditions. Contaminants of Concern (Including Materials Disposed) Contaminant Name/Type DDT dibenz[a,h]anthracene of 5 11/2/2020, 1:19 PM nvironmental Site Remediation Database Search https://www.dec.ny.gov/cfmx/extapps/derexternallhazidetails.cfm ethylbenzene toluene vinyl chloride benzo(a)pyrene DDE tetrachloroethane xylene (mixed) benzene benzo(b)fluoranthene chrysene Perfluorooctane Sulfonic Acid benzo(a)anthracene indeno(1,2,3-CD)pyrene mercury 1,1,1-trichloroethane benzo(k)fluoranthene cis-1,2-dichloroethene perfluorooctanoic acid trans-1,2-dichloroethene trichloroethene (TCE) lead naphthalene Site Environmental Assessment Nature and Extent of Contamination: For OU 1: On-Site Soil and groundwater were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), metals, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), pesticides, and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Based upon investigations conducted to date, the primary contaminants of concern (COCs) for OU 1 include petroleum-related VOCs: benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene and xylenes; chlorinated VOCs: cis-1,2-dichloroethene(cis-1,2-DCE), tetrachloroethene (PCE), trans-1,2-dichloroethene, trichloroethylene (TCE), 1,1,1-trichloroethane and vinyl chloride; SVOCs: benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene, benzo(b,k)fluoranthene, chrysene, indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene, dibenzo(a,h)anthracene, and naphthalene; metals: mercury and lead; pesticide compounds: 4,4- DDT and 4,4-DDE; and PFAS: perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). Soil- Metals and pesticide compounds are found in the shallow soils (0-2466 bgs) within the urban fill throughout the site. Petroleum-related VOCs are found at 10 to 25 feet (ft) below ground surface (bgs) in the west end of the site. Chlorinated VOCs are found at 10 to 15 ft bgs in the northeast end of the site. Concentrations of mercury found on site ranged from 0.18 ppm to 3.22 ppm with concentrations exceeding soil cleanup objectives for restricted residential (0.81 ppm). Concentrations of lead ranged from 67.4 ppm to 349 ppm with concentrations exceeding soil of 5 11/2/2020, 1:19 PM nvironmental Site Remediat ion Database Search https://www.c1ec.ny.gov/cfrnx/extappS/dereXterflal/hadeta s. Ti cleanup objectives for protection of ecological resources (63 ppm), but below restricted residential (400 ppm). Pesticide concentrations ranged from 0.00363 ppm (4,4-DDT) to 0.0482 ppm (4,4-DDE) with concentrations exceeding soil cleanup objectives for protection of ecological resources (0.0033 ppm), but below restricted residential (7.9 ppm- 4,4-DDT, 8.9 ppm-4,4-DDE). Petroleum-related VOC concentrations range from 0.700 ppm (benzene) to 21 ppm (m/p-xylene) with concentrations exceeding protection of groundwater (0.06 ppm-benzene, 1.6 ppm-xylene), but below soil cleanup objectives for restricted residential (4.8 ppm-benzene, 100 ppm-xylene). However, free product indicative of#6 fuel oil is present in multiple soil borings within the west end of the site. Chlorinated VOCs were detected at concentrations ranging from 0.00019 ppm (PCE) to 22 ppm (cis-1,2-DCE) with concentrations exceeding protection of groundwater (0.25 ppm-cis-1,2-DCE) but below soil cleanup objectives for restricted residential (19 ppm-PCE, 100 ppm-cis-1,2-DCE). SVOC concentrations range from 0.82 ppm (dibenzo(a,h)anthracene) to 23 ppm (naphthalene). Off-site soil was analyzed for VOCs and SVOCs. Petroleum-related VOCs were not detected above soil cleanup objectives for unrestricted use. Chlorinated VOCs were not detected above soil cleanup objectives for unrestricted use. SVOCs were detected above soil cleanup objectives for unrestricted use and restricted residential use. Groundwater- Petroleum-related VOCs are present in groundwater at the west end of the site at concentrations greater than groundwater standards (typically 5 ppb), with a maximum concentration of 21 ppb (benzene). There are also monitoring wells indicating petroleum free product on the surface of groundwater. Chlorinated VOCs are present in groundwater at the east end of the site at concentrations greater than groundwater standards, with a maximum concentration of 1,000 ppb (cis-1,2-DCE). PFAS are present in groundwater throughout the site at concentrations greater than EPA6s health advisory for combined PFOS and PFOA (70 ppt), with a maximum combined concentration of 209.7 ppt (PFOS and PFOA) at the east end of the site. SVOCs are present in groundwater at the west end of the site at concentrations greater than groundwater standards (10 ppb 6 naphthalene to 0.002 ppb6chrysene), with a maximum concentration of 32 ppb for naphthalene and 1.1 ppb for chrysene. Chlorinated VOCs (PCE, vinyl chloride and cis-1,2-DCE) were detected in off-site monitoring wells north and east of the site at concentrations slightly greater than groundwater standards, with maximum concentrations of PCE at 5.1 ppb, vinyl chloride at 6.0 ppb and cis-1,2- DCE at 13 ppb. Soil Vapor- Benzene was detected at concentrations ranging from 0.847 to 4.15 micrograms per cubic meter. Toluene was detected at concentrations ranging from 0.874 to 2.43 micrograms per cubic meter. PCE was detected at concentrations ranging from 4.87 to 2,530 micrograms per cubic meter. TCE was detected at concentrations ranging from 1.42 to 206 micrograms per cubic meter. Cis-1,2-DCE was detected at concentrations ranging from 6.07 to 42.8 micrograms per cubic meter. 1,1,1-trichloroethane was detected at concentrations ranging from 2.72 to 84.6 micrograms per cubic meter. There is currently no data for off-site soil vapor impacts. Iof5 11/2/2020, 1:19 I'M -invtronmental Site Kemecilation Database Search https://),vww.decnny.gov/cfmx/extapps/derexternal/haz/details.cfrn Site Health Assessment The site is completely fenced, which restricts public access. However, persons who enter the site could contact contaminants in the soil by walking on the site, digging or otherwise disturbing the soil. People are not drinking the contaminated groundwater because the area is served by a public water supply that is not affected by this contamination. Volatile organic compounds may move into the soil vapor (air spaces within the soil), which in turn may move into nearby buildings and affect the indoor air quality. This process, which is similar to the movement of radon gas from the subsurface into the indoor air of buildings, is referred to as soil vapor intrusion. Because there is no onsite building, inhalation of site contaminants in indoor air due to soil vapor intrusion does not represent a concern for the site in its current condition. However, the potential exists for the inhalation of site contaminants due to soil vapor intrusion for any future onsite development. Additional investigation is necessary to determine if the potential exists for the indoor air impacts due to soil vapor intrusion in offsite structures. For more Information: E-mail Us Return To Results Refine This Search of 5 11/2/2020, 1:19 PM • "N '4 s, City of. aratoga Sng5 OFFICE OF CITY ENGINEER PAut.x MALE,P.E.,P.L.S. 1. CITY ENGINEER .A.1. _ ; CITY HALL DEBORAH M.LASRZCH;I F ,?y' •'. 474 Broadway ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER ` t �j Saratoga Springs, New York 1Q8$8 v r.". „-kea : STAN BORDEN • ` .u,iso sEN1OR ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN * ORhTCQ , `h Telephone 518-587-3660 Fax 618-680.6484 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Dan Cogan, Code Enforcement Officer FROM: Paul Male, City Engineer DATE: April 10, 2002 RE: Report of Findings of 65 and 69 Phila Street Saratoga Springs, NY The following comments are being provided as ordered by the Court regarding the subject residences: We visited the site on April 8t', 2003. Also representing the City were Asst. City Engineer Debbie LaBreche, Fire Lt. John Betor, the property owner Helen Simpson and yourself. Our department was present to evaluate the structural integrity of these structures. Based on our walk through of these structures we made the following engineering observations: 65 Phila Street: The property is comprised of a main structure and attached accessory structures. The accessory structures attached to the rear of the main structure should be removed. The main structure appears to be structurally intact and is restorable. 69 Phila Street: The property is comprised of a main structure with accessory porches. This entire structure is severely deteriorated and, by law, is an unsafe structure. This structure should be removed. NMAXIM ENGINEERING /`"`our,,bfE, Bus1Nlrs-4i COMMUNITY December 3, 2003 Ms. Helen Simpson PO Box 174 Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 Re: Building Evaluation 65 & 69 Phila Street City of Saratoga Springs Saratoga County Dear Ms. Simpson: On Monday,April 7, 2003 at your request, I inspected two vacant buildings on Phila Street.At the time of my inspection, you were considering development opportunities at the site and wanted to be satisfied whether either building could or should be salvaged. A.written report was not required at the time; this present report is being prepared From my original inspection notes—it therefore will not reflect any improvements or further deterioration (if any) over the past 8 months. Facing the two adjacent buildings from Phila Street, #65 is on the left,or west side. It is a white, wood-framed structure, two stories high at the main portion, and showing evidence of successive additions from the rear of the building. The main house has a stone foundation and low basement height typical of the era of its con- struction. While having the usual deficiencies of being vacant and exposed to the weather, I found the main house to be structurally sound. The front staircase was sound and salvageable; a rear staircase has tread/riser dimensions and winders that would not meet present codes. The second floor ceiling height at 7'-6" is the current code minimum; the second floor hall width at 2'-11" falls 1" shy of the current minimum. The additions to the rear, while having proper foundations, were in poor condition. Included in the addition space was a bathing chamber. The front porch beams and roof are substantially deteriorated and require , replacement. In my opinion, the main house and front porch could and should be salvaged and renovated — in particular considering the historic contribution to the neighborhood core of a city that treasures its past. The rear additions in my opinion are not significant architecturally and can be demolished and replaced with new construction. The house requires installation of all mechanicals. #69 The right hand building, a red brick two-story structure featuring mansard roofs and some historic charm, was Found unfortunately to be in an advanced state of deterioration. The main/original house has a stone foundation, 8" thick brick walls, and timber framed floors. In the base- II-I I_ ase-ILII_ N 518. 383- 1703 1353 VI%( IIFIt 1'1-tilt1 R ,l, r 'rc 'Milt 518.383 .3041 (:liEIt,\ I'tltk NIA YOli1, I`1)h5 wWw.111axirn•rnginrerin8 cant Maxim Engineering Building Evaluation- December 3, 2003 page 2 of 2 ment, a principal timber bearing beam was observed to be failing; it had been propped with a temporary brace. All floors and stairs were in poor condition. An addition to the rear and side (with mansard roof) was also of brick masonry construction.The foundation could not be observed — possibly the walls are founded directly on rock Part of the floor and a section of masonry floor collapsed and were lost during attempted renovation. In my opinion it is not feasible economically for a private owner to salvage this building; the required repairs would prohibit any reasonable return on the investment. One could retain the front foundation and masonry walls but the work within the shell amounts to complete replacement. In my opinion, only if this were an individually listed historic property would the expense of repairs be warranted. Its SJIMMARY This concludes my assessment, which should be considered advisory. Please understand that my inspection was not to the level of detail necessary to serve as the required inspection for a real estate transaction — this report should not be used for such purpose. There are additional considerations (zoning, building setbacks, parking limitations) that seem to prevent any intensive redevelopment of the site. The best use, in my opinion, appears to be renovation of#65, replace- ment of#69 and use of both as 1-2 family residences with or without First floor small office space. I hope you find this document useful. Please call with any questions and good luck. Sincerely, Maxim Engineering OF NE, ` T> Stephen J. Rutkey, P.E. r ct`y tea: � V cc: File [03-806b] Sip 07636g `6 pA0FESSVt31P • Saratoga Springs Fire Department Occupancy: 69 Phila St Address: 69 Phila ST Saratoga Springs NY 12866 Inspection Type: Complaint Based Inspection • Inspection Date: 7/10/2017 By: Donnelly, Jack Time In: 15:43 Time Out: 15:43 Form: 2017 Property Authorized Date: 07/10/2017 By: Donnelly, Jack Maintenance Inspection Form � W 2017 Property Maintenance Inspection Form for all occuoanr ies and properties. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 108.1.3 Structure unfit for human occupancy A structure is unfit for human occupancy whenever such struc.u:,e is unsafeunlawful or,because of the degree to which the structure is in disrepair or lacks maintenance,is insanitary,vermin or rat infested,contains filth and coma iticrr.or lacks ventilation,illumination, sanitary or heating facilities or other essential equipment required by this code,or because the location of the steL,,,-:,:re constitutes a hazard to the occupants of the structure or to the public. Status: FAIL Notes: Structure is in a hazardous condition Additional Time Spent on inspection: Category Start Date/Time End Date/ Time Notes: No Additional time recorded Total Additional Time: 0 minutes Inspection Time: 0 minutes Total Time: 0 minutes Summary: Overall Result: Order to Vacate Numerous Life safety violations or structure is not fit for occupancy • Inspector Notes: The structure has been condemned by Code Administrator Jack Donnelly. No one is to enter the property without permission from the Code Administrator. You are hereby ordered to repair or demolish the building immediately. Obtain the proper permits from the Building permit. If you have questions, please contact me either by phone or email. Jack Donnelly Code Administrator Saratoga Springs, New York john.donnelly@saratoga-springs org Inspector: Name: Donnelly, Jack Email(s): john.donnelly@saratoga-springs.org gyp,. d J�e 074:2- Signature Date Printed on 7/11/17 at 05:10:37 Page 1 of 2 THE 1iihtzn \Engineers CAPITAL DISTRICT OFFICE Land Surveyors Planners 547 River Street C®MPANIES`' Environmental&Safety Professionals Troy, NY 12180 Landscape Architects 1947— 2017 YEARS P: 518.273.0055 or 888.539.9073 www.chazencompanies.corn July 7, 2017 Jack Donnelly Code Enforcer City Hall—474 Broadway Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 Re: Emergency Building Stability Assessment(BSA)at 6.9 Philo Street City of Saratoga Springs, New York Project No.31704.06 Dear Mr. Donnelly: As requested, Chazen performed a limited emergency structural stability assessment of the residential building (subject structure) Located at 69 Phila Street in the City of Saratoga Springs, Saratoga County, New York (project site). The site visit was performed at the request of the City on the morning of June 14, 2017. We met with City Code Enforcement and Fire Department representatives on site. The purpose of this assessment was to determine the overall stability of the subject structure and to provide the City with our opinion and recommendations with regard to structural conditions, remedial measures if necessary to support public safety and identify unsafe and other conditions in accordance with the 2012 International Property Maintenance Code and NYS supplements (PMCNYS) which has been adopted by State and local municipalities. The building is currently not occupied and is placarded with the fire department red "X". Building Description The building is a two-story residential building with a low-slope gable roof likely built in the late 1800s to early 1900s. Real estate records indicate a construction date of 1906 which seems appropriate based upon the City's history, architectural language of the building and materials observed. Exterior walls and foundations are comprised of load bearing brick masonry. The interior framing is comprised of traditional wood framing (timber posts within walls, timber joists and wood plank floors). A portion of the building in the rear has been demolished and the building has been enclosed with a wood framed wall with plywood sheathing. • HUDSON VALLEY • CAPITAL DISTRICT • NORTH COUNTRY • CENTRAL NEW YORK • NASHVILLE,TN Chazen Engineering, Land Surveying&Landscape Architecture Co., D.P.C. (New York) Chazen Engineering Consultants, LLC(Tennessee) 69 Phlla Street July 7,2016 Page 2 Observations and Assessments In general, it is our opinion that the residential building is in an unsafe condition due to local interior instabilities and deterioration, exterior fall hazards and unstable portions of brick masonry walls. However, the building appears to be maintaining short-term global stability and is not in immediate danger of collapse Considering the observed interior and exterior hazards,the building does pose a risk to public safety and is unsafe for emergency service responders, property owners or occupants. It is our opinion that the property is not in compliance with the Property Maintenance Code of New York State (PMCNYS) including but not limited to the following sections: • Section 304: Exterior Structure. o Protective treatment. Paint along wood siding is cracked / peeling and deteriorated throughout. o Decorative features including cornices are in poor condition. Portions of the cornices / facias and soffits are unsecure and pose a fall hazard to pedestrians and occupants. • Section 305: Interior Structure. o Unsafe conditions exist such as partially collapsed / missing 1st floor framing, deteriorated 1st, 2nd and roof level framing and unstable brick masonry walls. Brick masonry walls were observed to be partially removed in the rear of the building. Brick walls rely on their continuity to provide stability. Portions of brick masonry walls that do not tie into floor or wall diaphragms are not stable. This condition was observed in several locations at the rear of the building. o Additional items include non-weather tight roof and building envelope, and unsecure / deteriorated interior finishes. Organic growth was also observed throughout the building although a mold test was not performed. • The property is vacant, without functional utilities, unsanitary, unsafe, not fit for occupancy and does not satisfy the requirements of the PMCNYS. It is our opinion that the cost of work required to stabilize, reinforce and repair the primary structural systems, and the work required to make the house secure, sanitary and safe will be near the salvage value of the building, and therefore, we recommend further evaluation and cost studies / estimates be prepared as quickly as practicable to determine if the building will be salvaged or demolished. Z1`011-31799,31704.xx-City Saratoga Springs',317 04.06-4 b:dlding etructarai assesnm..,'ENC',50 Crescent Street\31 iO4 00._90170610_50 Crescent Street 13SA.doe 69 PhiLa Street July 7,2016 Page 3 Recommendations The residential building structure is in an unsafe condition due to local areas of failed framing and is not fit for occupancy due to the unsafe conditions as well as there being no operable windows, doors, utilities, and the suspect organic growth. Therefore, the building is appropriately placarded with a red X in accordance with the Building Code and we have the following recommendations: • Ensure all utilities servicing the property are disconnected at the street. • The AHJ (authority having jurisdiction) should serve a notice of violation in accordance with section 106.2 and 107 of the PMCNYS based on the findings of this report and associated unsafe conditions. • The building should be condemned by the AH1 due to the unsafe conditions observed. The building can be accessed, but access should be limited to areas beyond the collapsed / deteriorated first and second floor framing until the area is properly shored, reinforced and/ or replaced. The building should be placarded with the word "condemned" in accordance with section 108.4 of the PMCNYS. • We recommend the following to stabilize the structure and make weather tight: o Remove overhead fall hazards along the street elevation immediately to protect public safety. This includes removing unsecure cornice / facia/ soffit materials and replace / make weather tight as required. o Remove and replace deteriorated/collapsed first and second floor framing. o Make repairs to leaking roof along the north elevation (near the chimney). o Repair deteriorated brick masonry at interior headers and provide support for interior floor and roof joists. o Stabilize brick walls at rear of building that are not currently tied to wall or floor diaphragms. Recommended repairs are intended to make the building safe for contractors to perform additional work needed to make the building safe, secure and sanitary to be considered for occupancy in accordance with the PMCNYS. Closure This correspondence and the recommendations contained herein have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted engineering practices for the exclusive use of you and your representatives for specific application to the project site and is applicable until November 1, 2017 (due to the building envelope not being weather tight and associated additional deterioration that will occur over time). projects'131700-31799`31904 xx-City Saratoga Springs\31704.06-4 building structz,raj assessments`ENG\50 Crescent Street-. 704.60201:0619_50 Crescent Street BSA.doc 69 Phila Street July 7,2016 Page 4 Our observations and assessments were limited to those portions of the building envelope and structure that were visible and accessible at the time of our visit. No destructive investigation, code-compliance (such as occupancy,ventilation requirements, energy requirements etc.), accessibility, egress, laboratory testing or hazardous building material survey was performed, no equipment was disassembled or moved unless where explicitly described in this report or its appendices. Please feel free to contact me directly at (518) 266-7329 if you have any comments or questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, Lanson A. Cosh, P.E. Project Manager/Structural Project Engineer Attached: Appendix A:June 14, 2017 Photographic Documentation Cc:Joseph M Lanaro P.E.; Project File • Z:,projects'.31500-31799\31704.sx-City Saratoga Springs\31704-06.1 buildIrg structural assessments`ENG\S0 Crescent set\31704 00 2201'0610 50 Crescent Street BSA doc 69 Philo Street July 7,2016 Page S Appendix A. June 14, 2017 Photographic Documentation Z:\projects\21700-31799\31704.xx-City Saratoga Springs\31704.06-•4 building structural assessments\ENG\59 Crescent Street\31709.00_20170619_50 Crescent Street BSiVdnc • ;11 .�� Q, Photograph (1): General view of building. South t _ elevation. • Photograph (2): General view of building. West elevation. 014Photograph (3): General view of building. North elevation. 69 Phila Street BSA Thehazen Companies Page 1 Appendix A—Photographic Documentation r. , ,, ,, ,,,,...,,. . ,. . „, . , ..- gC . , S4 ,. .. .. ,.. ., ,, , , . , ,.. . - 1 , W. ..,...„, 0 ..,-- , _ Photograph (4): General view of building. East .,,,i''.,,,, ' " • elevation. 4 z i lie _,,,, ,v... ...„-L.,„...-: 1 F T 4 ?i s i " - Photograph (5): Deteriorated finishes (peeling -';:,....-*4' paint). Unsecure cornice/facia /soffit, -,,,4'.., r .. Photograph (6): Unsecure cornice /facia /soffit. X14 aftrioi 69 Phila Street BSA The Chazen Companies Appendix A—Photographic Documentation Page 2 4. r: ter. " • ,,.''' Photograph (7): Unsecure built-up post at front porch. r: 1 ` Photograph (8): Unstable portion of brick wall at z_ _ rear of building. Itt i M yy #f .fid 5 t;' Photograph (9): Step cracking along west • "" elevation windows. ;00004w • IOP 69 Phila Street BSA The Chazen Companies Appendix A—Photographic Documentation Page 3 4" Photograph (10): Cracked precast window header along west elevation. lAC Photograph (11): Stepped cracking along east L elevation. Photograph (12): Missing portion of first floor framing. Cracked/deteriorated /failed first floor r � h framing. Unsafe condition. 69 Phila Street BSA The Chazen Companies Appendix A—Photographic Documentation Page 4 K• ey K`uPhotograph (13): Cracked/failed first floor framing and unsupported plywood sub-floor. Unsafe condition. 4._ is 0 14 701 s, w .w Photograph (14): Unstable first floor framing. Rotated girder at tally column support posts. Unsafe condition. 711 For ..q o Photograph (15): Unsupported 2"d floor joists at " M=w deteriorated masonry header. Unsafe condition. Yd.F / per, as . '.mews 69 Phila Street BSA The Chazen Companies Appendix A—Photographic Documentation Page 5 yet Photograph (16): Deteriorated roof framing near r• . -- , -ry rear chimney. Evidence of roof leak. mak., w ; ' .4 , x{. , , , ,,, ,. 41 • y-, `'.r , egtrot Photograph (17): Unstable portion of brick wall ,,a w- at rear of building. Organic growth and /or • 7a . ° lir—',,,,,,,, water staining along wood framing. f , '. . 4 69 Phila Street BSA The Chazen Companies Appendix A—Photographic Documentation Page 6 L�fLIIIIII SCHAFER ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES r®VIII Engineering Consultants:Civil,Structural,Building Design,Highway,Water&Waste Systems,Site Development June 10, 2020 Helen Case, LLC P.O. Box 174 Saratoga Springs,NY 12866 Attn: Mr. Helen Simpson RE: Structural Observation & Evaluation of 69 Phila Street,Saratoga Springs NY Dear Helen: Per your request, Schafer Engineering Associates (SEA)has completed its structural observation (May 8, 2020) and evaluation of the residential building located at 69 Phila Street in Saratoga Springs NY. We understand that the purpose of our inspection and evaluation of this building is to evaluate its current structural condition, stability, and integrity for the purposes of determining the extent of repairs needed. The following summarizes our findings, evaluation, and professional opinion on this building. 69 PHILA STREET Construction: The building is a 2-story wood-framed structure with predominantly exterior and interior brick bearing walls and piers. A small wood exterior-framed mansard story exists at the rear of the building (starting on the 2nd floor level), that sets on the exterior and interior brick bearing walls below it. While the interior brick bearing walls and piers continue to the basement, the exterior brick bearing walls are set on a laid mortar and stone foundation system (likely bearing directly below/on grade without a footing). The structure has a membrane covered low sloped roof, which short parapets on three sides, that pitches toward/off its rear edge. The front of the building has a roof overhang with some decorative repeating cornice brackets, as well as, an ornamental wooden front porch system (posts, railing, stairs, decking, overhang) that also has a membrane roof and pitches toward/off its front edges. The building faces are of painted brick, except for the rear and approximately Y2 of the east elevation faces that are covered with painted plywood sheathing. Multiple windows (although currently boarded) exist on the front and sides of the building, along with some exterior doors. The building contains multiple rooms, all of which have wooden planked floors (all interior wall and ceiling finishes had previously been removed). A wooden stair accesses both the basement and 2nd floor. Observations/Evaluation: Very severe deterioration (rot, cracking, blistering, checking, splitting, etc.) and partially collapsed conditions were observed during SEA's site visit within this building. The roof system was heavily deteriorated with many of its framing members cracked and showing signs of rot, sagging and structural instability. The l' and rd floor systems were in a partially collapsed state and, also structurally unstable. Both had framing members that were heavily cracked and split, sagging them toward the interior of the structure. Temporary supports, in the form of steel tally columns and wood framing, were used to shore up the sagging framing members to help resist against their complete collapse. Both the exterior and interior brick walls exhibited signs of settlement cracking and, in the case of the interior brick walls, were structurally unstable. The F:\Work\65-69 Philo Street Demolition\69 Phila Street Demolition Report 6-10-20.doc 1885 State Street • Schenectady,New York 12304 • PH:(518)393-0100 • FAX: (518)393-3510 16-18 Reynolds Avenue • Oneonta,New York 13820 • PH: (607)432-0200 • FAX:(518)393-3510 30 Industrial Drive • Northampton,Massachusetts 01060 • PH: (413)584-7444 • FAX: (518)393-3510 Page 2 June 10, 2020 69 Phila Street, Saratoga Springs NY rear brick wall was reportedly removed and replaced in 2001 with a temporary wood-framed and plywood- sheathed wall due to extensive deterioration. Interior brick walls and piers were deteriorated and falling apart, as were the mortar joints between them. The lateral stability of the building has been compromised with the above combined deficiencies. Continue deterioration and collapse is highly probably and would eventually lead to the collapse of its perimeter walls (potentially affecting nearby public accessways such as driveways/sidewalks/streets). The structure's front porch is also severely deteriorated and weathered, particularly its floor/roof framing, wood decking and supporting posts. The current posts are not adequately supporting the porch's existing roof system (a condition exasperated by the heavily deteriorated framing systems located at each end) and in danger of collapse. Should one or more of these posts collapse, the existing porch roof structure will likely fall toward and into the above-mentioned nearby public accessways. The majority of laid stone foundation wall system is heavily deteriorated with excessive signs of infiltrating waters through the walls. Sections of stone have fallen from the walls and the joints are severely eroded. Major repairs to this foundation system are required to restore its structural strength. Professional Opinion: This structure is in a serious state of disrepair and has been h :,<nd on reports dating back to 2003. The building is structurally compromised and should be demolished in i;:; mtirety, as soon as possible. There is nothing of any potential within the structure worth saving and/or repairing. Its proximity to public accessways presents a potential danger to the public. Please note that the above referenced site visit was based on visual observations.No testing of materials or systems were conducted in pursuit of this report. Should you have any questions regarding this report, please feel free to give me a call 518-393-0100. Sincerely, SCIIA ER. I L 'i'I G A .00IATES Ay , ,,..7 ,dich''ael Schafer,P.E. Priv.ipal i Page 3 June 10, 2020 69 Phila Street,Saratoga Springs IVY 69 PHILT STREET .. / .,-,,..." ----,- '.- '. \' ' )0, sib ..-.'._., x .o�r .. a I I ,..0..., -: v-r _� ti, ] w g Ma , n Front(South)Elevation/Severely Deteriorated Porch System Side(West)Elevation/Severely Deteriorated Porch System way �. '" i gra-, r lk4 ti "'^ma: � 'p,?f f tip. to 3QY FST 4 I ltl...: f ry Rear(North)Elevation/Painted Plywood Face Side(East)Elevation/Rear Half Painted Plywood Face Page 4 June 10, 2020 69 Phila Street, Saratoga Springs NY - . 1 "14';,•, .';:4. . „... '...,.' ..•-. ..„,, ..,„,,-'''''..;:,1- ' /P.N.' .....- ' • : i • . — ,‘ • ,'"--"'"-- ---a . , _• , , AK, .t•- , „. ,.... s .. • ., .....• . ..• ., n. - ....•.. . . . .. ., ._, • -, ., '' 4 I --'-- •-- - ' . :. 1 -, -- . .: ',r..r.:.,••-.6, 4 ....V . , . INAk• ,., 1.s•---.:'--- • ... . .1 . . 1 .,......... • „ .___..., ,..... I . . , • ...:... •• --,3.2; .' ,1.1 ".-7-641 .. ...r.. ,i-',,...) ' it. ....,,,, . .'. , - • • • : 1 ___L__1--...., : .•'!'.,. ,..„. /it .........,„, „...„ ,.... . .\„. . .._ ,, . ., _ .„..,„ , . .. , ._ .,......._ . ..., . ,, ,. . . . ,, . . .,.. ., , , . ,.,_...5..„._.... , ..:i .;_ ....;,„. „ „,..,.....,,,;;.„.... ...,_ ...r.,4„, --- ''''''...:"'''....,....':,•"__ . .1„..;,f,„4...,.. .,...,..zit,„...„.„..... . . .......„....„ , ,'„',11t,";,-,"-'/.:-..' prirri'r'.;',,;.,__ — " • _, r•-1.,-. .,....- ',.' Side(East)Elevation Severely Deteriorated Front Porch/Structurally Unstable -.. . .. . •rr r 74,;,..P, ,r` .' --,?"'''' '',",..,:"••,,g,...::.,."1:',"- 7- "., ' ''.• ''', '' ' , ,,, ,-.,-,7.-.^,,,,,—•-,- ^ •'-'4'.•.. ' . '''. ' '"r... .."' 14'1,rilisof 44,,,r,;,4 • . A41.:,,e.A.i.,„411-,;,t,-.1 lit. ''' . . , : \'' -. .....:6, :ii— : , :-, " ' j'''--'''' ''' -4- 4 . ,,'4; , , . ,;,,, .46 ..,v,..;•,,, ..,.., „*, ..--„;.:::: .'.•''.... ..,-- bk • .- ' , ,•• • -. '.""rfnil..•t - .7 ' .'9:'. 1. ' : :,,'•IA'''4,,,-.47 , • °It_A.,,,,•;'' '_ '- irIK ' ' • • • *5,, ..,•.- 1, „,44.:,,,,,,„ .,4 ",;. -...:....2.-..., -. .:,, '..' ',.,....,,,s,,l, --'•„-.T-.. . r ti'n'f''',..--....-m.,;,:41t,..•••!...,.;,-.-:. -.......Z, , .; f, ,- , .....440..;-. ,,:*0.4./, '.;,,-.: ••- -:•:,.'- '..v..... -•••''...... :7,17riitolefo.51:,,titi, . ''' .4..,k- -....,,, 1 ,..:::,p4...vol-4,; •••,, ,,,....T...... -• •...:.. .......4., ,,,..,,,-...., ,06,410, p ..,. ....... . .. _ . . .. • -• .. ...._. .,. . ..._: . .. . . .. . . . . ._.__..... . . ..... . . L...., .... , -..„-.• . • • . .. .. • .... .• .. _ . . • - -.-. . „.... • • • . •• _ . .. . Large Differential Settlement Cracks Large Differential Settlement Cracks Page 5 June 10, 2020 69 Phila Street, Saratoga Springs NY I „- �' yp .`•+J'.”T .' " VM'' il :l! ,JV ' r 4"._m A' J i' M 'ti r s. 410 v ' ` ' �, I 1 Severely Deteriorated Brick/Joint Walls&Structurally Unstable Severely Deteriorated Roof Structure/Structurally Unstable �. 1 I j 1 I ' r !_� I 1 I I Or M ,11 S sa '� x �ef1�XYi"h { r _ V • Differentially Settled Brick Wall/Structurally Unstable Missing/Severely Damaged 1"Floor System/Structurally Unstable --- l 4 . sem' �. a S g ^n4 y M '.` r.` J6o•„ , J'ms CYi''d'. rA "hew- :rk a ark �;,. ,. Severely Deteriorated Rear Roof System/Structurally Unstable Severely Deteriorated Rear 1"Floor System/Structurally Unstable Page 6 June 10, 2020 69 Phila Street, Saratoga Springs NY �f .. ,1,,,,4L.:,,, s.n ' r yr • - �, p .. ' • °§ - • ,. - Sw 4 `.:': ,;,,,,',:,.."-",:,.'..-..:•1„."; S • ' 0grr oilIt'e Severely Deteriorated 2nd Floor System/5tructurally Unstable Severely Deteriorated 2nd Floor System/Structurally Unstable -. _ '-ix_ • ,. 1 , � w t • u ... r . ..• 4t ', s II • y Deteriorated Rear 2nd Floor System/Structurally Unstable Severely Deteriorated 2nd Floor Framing/Structurally Unstable Page 7 June 10, 2020 69 Philo Street, Saratoga Springs NY TM , °t .�. .- , �. { 2. - _ " ,r' `,', , Severe Brick/Joint Deterioration of Interior Brick Wall Severe Brick/Joint Deterioration of Inner Basement Pier &Structurally Unstable Floor Framing/Vertical Supports --: ";. II- 4+,p. 10;jffigt, - N a, 2 — krft. 4- - 3g ni $ :,11,04,74 R y Earthen Crawl Space Below Rear of Building Severe Brick/Joint Deterioration of Inner Pier Above Basement 69 Phila St - Aerial 165 I65 66-1.1c p .68-1-162 165.68- f if ."°� 1_24 � 111111/ vilii ;165.68-1-17 165!68-1 25 165.•8 1 74 ��""� r 165.68.-1-?3 rV y 165 6 w 4 '' 41. 4 ,� �.. MP 165.68-1-18 165.60 1-63 s `--� ' '] )1 165.68 165.68-1-67 165.bk�-1 rr t 165.68-1-3.16` 1 f �°�," 165:68-134 -4011:4* .10104 .. w:"xt i — w..—. •• ' 1 165.68-1 7 `� November 6,2020 1:564 0 0 D.01 0.01 mi ti Counties J Towns 2019 0 0.01 0.01 0.02 Ian NYS ITS GIS Program Moe Cities ❑ Villages 2019 Labels 69 Phila St.,Saratoga Springs,NY -West&South Elevation of Existing Structure(to be Go gle Maps removed)as viewed facing North East from Phila St. > ` - • . ., �,, • $ ' $ y x' • ,' 514,, ,5- ',+ k -a:, �.. kF i F - . v v� 44: �w MIL . R .A. „, r. ....-- *irk :_- '' , - �� / J w w 6{1 L Y , Image capture:Jul 2019 ©2020 Google Saratoga Springs,New York Google Street View Phil,Sr Spring Sr r1 Ii"-1—.. Sn.r.. A 1 of 2 11/6/2020,1:24 PM 69 Phila St.,Saratoga Springs,NY Go gle Maps -East&South Elevations of existing structure(to be removed)as viewed facing North West from Phila St. .,, r -�. y. l' ..,_7_:;_,.._:T...__:::L____________.__._. _____.____.____.___ • T v --- "" w., s r _ ,. . It Oil r - .� Google Image capture:Jul 2019 ©2020 Google Saratoga Springs,New York Google Street View k Phiia Sr Spring S.! 6.1 IiVI--.. Sn.r.. A 1 of 2 11/6/2020,1:28 PM 69 Phila St.,Saratoga Springs,NY -Adjacent properties to the East of project site as Go gle Maps viewed facing North East from Phila St. r ,_ ,. �I ,, , i••'0. �!'yyy'' r.'�•. .-..., ~ n r - 4" . / ---- t,1 1 tt. i \ ar ` LW Y " mo� - I a 4.,, 1FNmua�g y -. - � JY '�•ly��,y�l 7 ..0 1 tl ---77G,0-0--g-le I ^ Image capture:Jul 2019 ©2020 Google Saratoga Springs,New York Google Street View 4 •I Phiia Sr Spring S.! 1 of 2 11/6/2020,1:30 PM 69 Phila St.,Saratoga Springs,NY -Properties to the South East of project site as viewed Go gle Maps facing South East across Phila St. ~'— ®k: u " ' ter- � ., a n. e� . 9 i * a{ 11. ., --- ._..__a ,.i mef.. cap 4 �. .�.. �, x;f,. 4 - t 1, i.-4 *� m 4Crt ;,,,,,' ' ',.. I ,,,qt i,&. . .,-4 tiff .,. _ _ 111111 li 4 Google �, 3 M Image capture:Jul 2019 ©2020 Google Saratoga Springs,New York Google Street View w IFF ♦ Phil,er SpringSt 61 Ira VI.--.. Sn.r.. A 1 of 2 11/6/2020,1:37 PM 69 Phila St.,Saratoga Springs,NY -Property directly South from project site as viewed Go gle Maps facing South across Phila St. 41‘*"' , i r , . .,..,, . :� t.. .,.... _ ,4,,,. ,„,,,,4,.:...,,,„,., ,,,..„,:,._ , 1,, „II: ,,„:,,p,„„.z,y.r..: „.,. ..,,.,, , ii,„, , 6 I e. ,fir _ � . 01 G p ogle --____ __ Image capture:Jul 2019 ©2020 Google Saratoga Springs,New York FP;ii Google Street View 4, T. P6rl.1 Sr SpringSt 61 IiVI--.. Sn.r.. A 1 of 2 11/6/2020,1:39 PM 69 Phila St.,Saratoga Springs,NY -Properties to the South West of project site as viewed Go gle Maps facing South West across Phila St. i:kG ' -it i., -w' , i y 4. r� .r .._ w C .. .. -_, = s. Rte''./ i ° .p 1 ry . ..�.. ' _r tifT 'rye. a 4 r ,-y ..... ..... tee.' ..„fi ..ci w,,> r .i'fi x � w _......... _.„P.W...�..».,,.., uc .r Www - __ ,tt,+ s-. - Google �-- Image capture:Jul 2019 ©2020 Google Saratoga Springs,New York Google Street View W ',t ' Pdi(,"S( 3pringSt kJ .:irikrvl Sn.r.. A 1 of 2 11/6/2020,1:40 PM 69 Phila St.,Saratoga Springs,NY -Adjacent properties to the direct West of project Go gle Maps site as viewed facing North West from Phila St. e JJ '< J � yO 1 r' .. i _ . ..__ . .,. , 0 __ k � r ' i=Wig: . _ __ . , — Is i ,„, „,.. ....5, , fillollill„ ,----,,--1: ' . - - - .... , ,..,_ .. . ...,,,,,..„,.....„.. , ._,_..„.._ . , , r ,..., ..,, rii. i ,, . ,..4,. I il A '— .. .. ....tom _- _ mTM ,-r:-.717"...1-" _....�. , �� a �r li Google Image capture:Jul 2019 ©2020 Google Saratoga Springs,New York nGoogle Street View Phiia Sr 39ringSt 1 of 2 11/6/2020,1:42 PM . , i LANDS N/F OF BASTIAN 1257/111 32 3 .33 1 a 584°1064E R5 LANDS N/F OF 21 BUTCHER/REYNOLDS Di '...L., 25.00' 4 le I 1481/251 6 03 Is, CI LANDS N/7 OF 1 I rn 0 • cv CLARY EI' 6 97O/266 SEE a 2 co a a --- a I &0 S64.18'656 1R9 IRS S84'25'28'5 1125 ‘'.-.16.508.60' 2.50' 141- i BLDG.CDR OIL LOC 1 ORIGINAL OF LOTS BUILDING Driveway Easement Exists ; - over adjacent property for I t:':, 17 / I2 Access to Rear Yard of 69 0: 5 087•96 sq.ft. LANDS N/ 20 : 1 Phila S U.12 acres ' !''' 0.12 acres 1 m_ kl CLAR1 9 970/3I R I 0 11 u7 II rA Existing Structure • to be Removed a LANDS N/F OF t I , , 16 FUNICIELLO , 1029/544 /' - ____ ----....--"6.„.„ -- _ — — — — — 1 i 1 . Existing Structure .3 on Property Line I I . 14' 1.2 19 1 il I No On-site parking ,':z i pri i 2 (proposed on new plan , I 1111111k. —it 1– . , BUILDING ",o =11 ._ . .' 4.79 — PORCH PORCH Las i. ' ik rogai 62.50' NO4'10'08•W N541008'W GONG. WALK At__ . . __ • • ... • FRONT OF PORCHES ON PROPERTY LINE ES: PHILA STREET N <I ____ 394 47 MAP REFERENCE: OISHE MAP OF LANDS CALLED –THE HOMESTEAD– COPY OF SURVEY FOR i BELONGING TO 70 SAMUEL TWITCHELL, JR. '.9 DATED: JUNE 1, 1840 69 PHILA ST. . Du s VIOLONORRED ALIIRR1101 OR 9101131 10 A SUR. e...i MO OF.1910 A 1.109099 410 SUM.,OLY.9• Map of a Survey made for & W.A.OF 1.1101.1 7.*Me-WWI 1 OF FM KY YORK BIM 11199•1199...• teves ,OKY 0:r./%94 off ORLi9O Or 11•21 Who( WARD tom 9.19999.1l RC Wu 0.596315 SM.9.1 OCCONS10191,10 IX MO lilt COM. ,111179.41199.19.41110 N..WO,11.1 H. CASE and HELEN SIMPSON ORS 9914,MR PRO•911"1.909044C1 WM DE urveyors, LLC SOSIIMO COW OP PRAC1ICE.4.40.%111391 9001910 eV DK XLY1'MK 111119 ASZOO91104 OF PRO.1161K WIC SUM9VORO LW 195111194110/4 9.1•9 ROY ONLY TO 119 PERSON FM MOM 119 9.1199,K1 PROM..MO OM HO NICU 19 THE mu.11191.GOVIER1991114 Queenebury, New York 12804r',,,, ',.......' ,''''''.4"'""L".°r".'""' City of Saratoga Springs, Saratoga County, New York New York Lic. No. 50135 165.68-1-21 & 67 S64 10 04E 25.0' I 1 co co N N &ic' 1 'N 0 ) L564 855E 16.5' 2G *. 111 ft ..0 TM# 165.68-1-67 (0.12a = 5,087.96 o co 0, 1 ,0 '4 (2) , (2)OFF STREET PARKING SPACES /3'-6" I I X .\) 111111 \ 41.1" 1.1 ...41A111 Z6 c) w 0 0 ¢ 1% cn N I II IIPI I 4 I 2 2:. Iss`') w 0) -,c w >- (-' C) C) w L_ . .. .. .. ._. .._. et. • I ;),„L._ 4750' N64 10 08W CONCRETE SIDEWALK -) ____ ......._ PHILA ST. NOTE 69 PHILA ST. SURVEY DATA USED KITH PERMISSION FROM VANDUSEN&STEVES LAND SURVEYORS.LLC. SARATOGA SPRINGS,NY THIS SKETCH ISA LOT LAYOUT ONLY TO DEPICT THE REQUIRED ZONING SETBACKS PROPOSED THIS SKETCH IS ROTA SURVEY AND SHALL NOT BE USED FOR PERMITTING OR CONSTRUCTION. PLOT PLA IV ENGINEERING AMERICA CO -TONYA YASENCHAK,PE 76 WASHINGTON ST.,SARATOGA SPRINGS,NY 518/587-1340 NOVEMBER 6.2020 SCALE:1"=10' 69PH1AST SARATOGA SPRINGS,NY PROPOSED El - , SOUTH ELEVATION ..,...; 2 NOVEMBER 6,2020 SCALE I/4"3 1'0"1 /N. BRICK CHIMNEY--s 728.2.1.7 ,,,,,,..,,,, , llitidliMMITIMINEMIINEAMMUNIMNINININETAVORIIIMAIND_IMETRINEVIENIMEITIMINKIII DESIGN 612 '''""Y" ID r„• ... N-,ri.i...,.....IMMIUMiarEIZIIIIIMUllikioulanallEUMMIUDINEZIEEZ ENGINEERING AMERICA CO.-TONYA YASENCHAK,PE DETAIL / ' "miniffloautanaminimminifflonimanimonwamonianimortummumm 76 WASHINGTON ST,SARATOGA SPRINGS,NY mummenininnummENTRIONIMMIUMMUJOIIIIMEMILIENZIUMILIMILE 518/387-1340 '1.471111NMINNAIMURIIMUMINVIIMEI1PERAVAROUNIMIESILVIIIMIAITA1MIIR Mg111011361112111191111EMIIIIMMIRMI/RMIZIBRIZIMIEGIMMEM111111101K111112 WOOD BRACKETS---- .....,.... METAL / MOININININI, -vortinarniammifflualEVIMMINIRMNIMIPENIMILINEMINVINVIVI "iii 'ELIMIXIIMILIIIIMMMIRIIIIMIMUIRIMIZIMIZIMMIEMILIMEINEMIZ r WOOD FACIA -.7-4=2. I CRICKB/4114 14st 311 ,, magniannimammvimmuummoommiummaigamn -gar- 6"WOOD TRIM -8"!= / \IIIIIIMMIllih 'In IIII IIMUIRMIIIMIIIIIIMILIEMEEMMILIMIMEMMEMIZILMIMEMIld '-447115:411PF NNi , minmairldiTIVAIVINEFIlrarTarirganquvar 14"244VA11111111111111.11.1111.1.11111111110W N I , , i ,i r, ,r , or i 541,14,11111 fiffid t 11 IKE SECOND FLOOR CEILING -7.000.".1" A II II El Ill 1111 "II 'LMIIIIIIIIIII6- '3ftinn81ftftVlftiggftftdftTiftnk4uftftftfaft—IAiSTEAN TNADL'sUEfiwsM 1111111 L/DE 1 ) IIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIII - 111111 I 6"WOOD FACIA a 1111111111MMINNI111 111111111111111 .-411111 ,..111111M VENTED SOFFIT ham MMMM Emma MIN mommum OMMOMMU WOOD SIDING 6"WOOD TRIM A MIMMMMN iii mos omm . 2.1 r I ------,..._ IIIIIII MINIM "Mill =3 6 MOD TRIM ,.. ' 1.."' III —1 — 1111111111111111 I mmi ......= IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII 1111111111111 ' 41 MI' ____,, 11111111111111111 IIIII IIMIIIIIIII1 WOOD SIDING 1*: I.- NNNNN................ NNIIIIIINIIE 111111111111N _____ WOOD WINDOWS . • = 111111 . 11111111111 11111111 I N. .1 _ kill.. STANDING SEAM . METAL ROOF SECOND FLOOR LEVEL 31IN 1- -1111 FIRST FLOOR CEILING T \ -1M WOOD WRAPPED BEAM I DBREACOCKREATTSIV E WOOD — ,S0 WOOD COLUMNS 8"SQ.WOOD COLUMN Nii) 1111111111111 111111111 = 'li NNIIIII — 1111111111111IN 11111111111111111111 g *: — simil i=mow aim iiiii mom WOOD RALLUSTRADE Im.r; Imin mmiiii X*" NOM 111111111111111111M IIINNIIIIIII XIII I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIMI arliTOTOT TOD .1 1/ . . . . .......•all um ima '1.i,, simmlims iminim.m. =MN.= ir IHOWDM if# I" "1" 11""Iiii III 1111111111011 WOOD STAIRS -FIRST FLOOR LEVEL iftiftft........ft I I I 111111 I I I IIIIIIIIIII I....iiiiiii.=iiiiiiiiiii iii......ii_ Emas (HANDRAIL ..,- ' 11111.11111110 NOT DEPICTED) MAHOGANY DECKING W000 DPEON RAD ECK :' =kC),, 11221111121111 111121111111111 :--,EMI 411111111111111111•11M : :II".•'• ilitalling6911:9 169:9M169:91169 -',.+I,:` 11111161111 11.111111 33' " WOOD LATTICE PANED'S i 0 / MTH 3 1/2"TRIM SAgATOBASTIFBN-GS;NY PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION NOVEMBER 6,2020 SG/16E1/41A l'01 • al DESIGN BY ENGINEERING AMERICA CO-TONYA YASENCHAK,PE 76 WASHINGTON ST,SARATOGA SPRINGS,NY 518/567-1340 lailitinaliablimiilimialibliV—Vititillaliniiiiiiiiiiiiku—inanithilliiiiitiuzittizaumintermunimummizouna kINVIIMIVIIMMANWHINVIIINIMINVIIMILICIMINUMINCW '101imimmommaava 11118141118thaliVirINOVINVIIFIVNTAIIMENVIVATariita EIRIZIMEZNIKEURIMMIZEMIGIUMIMEIMMIUMUllinv - nglaL0111112MILUNIZZEI11112011110111Z1110111114111EMOMILIUMIIMILIMI LI IMINIMILIMUNIVIIIMELMINININMEMILINORINer" Amink, mulimeammumii ffitimowifflartinumnimitnimAnwassuninnammunica ii MIZMISIMMUMILIERIZEIMUM11111111111011111111Er" Alimmili. "NIMILIMILIIIIIMMILI',AMMILIUMERLIIMIZIEWLEImuumunzEm illiNINIMMINIVIINIRIMMINEIMENIINIVILIMAIr Aniiimmili. AMMANIMINVIIMILINIUMPRIMNIVIIMEINNIRMILIMARMAIVERAIIIIM 0121011111UUZIEIMILIUMMZEILIUMIIIMMIEUV Al .....—...-2 1111111106. -N11181111MIZIOUll ,Voruarautamarpinnuounannuatantivnua 111111111ENIIMIIMANIMIRIEVIIIIVINIMINIAIr AMMO= 11.111.- NINININIINIMIMEMINIZIMINIKERIMMANTAINIIMMINCIMINKI UMIUMINIIIIKEZMUNIN IIZIMIUMBITE -.4 alliM...=. - 'INIF1113111111'.411311111UUMMIZIMINAZTWIII IE11.1__ ____ IINUMMINIMINVINVIIIIINTRIMIVIVERAW" Alion=amih„ NWINEMMIE111111gRIVIIVIIIMIWN my iteingaimrs_itim IlLEUMMERIZEIUMULUMMIZZIMETEW Amis..................mi......., -911M1111001U6 Inplaummentaunultantammunna onwinammmanimartmammenr, ""Aiiiimsolminiiiiiiii— ii, --.vinguniumwananummomanivo warn malumiumuluminumummum r N -711numumntmmuumminammunent Itavaimanummuma MINEIIIFF ::--".11.4102111KENMEIMNIAILEVIIINTRIEWEISMIINEVIII - .---MAIMIEU111111111112011111311111ZUWELIMICIMIZI STANDING SEAM Banialawarraalarr .,, -..........wonwonimrfammanimunimn METAL SNOW SLIDE 1111:Elps N. -.-44411 .__------4110mmi SECOND FLOOR CEILING r ,, ---- Ili A _ I ---1111111111 17'-' '''' - 6"WOOD FACIA ... = VENTED SOFFIT.. II II II WOOD SIDING IN ... .. immen. E - 6"WOOD TRIM III6„woo,TRIM = • MMl •••1 -- --- _ • •••••••• _ 1•• _ STANDING SEAM il MiNNEMPI _ ' WOOD SIDING Il METAL ROOF N ON PORCH ll14111 116101111 . . . . , SECOND FLOOR LEVEL -.o Mii I all I 111111.1. ,__FIRST FLOOR CEILING OMMOMMOMMOMMOMMOOMMOM i =I 111111WOOD BRACKET ri.'. ..111M1 .4 I rUll , MMMMMMMMMMMMMOI MOM= 8'SQ6OWLUTADN OMMMMMMMMMI " MMOOMMII MMMMMMMMMMMMM II BALLUSTRADE IIITRTOPONII T ir r 11111 MI11111111 1111111111 1111111111111111111111. .11,11111.11111,11 DECKING , FIRSTFLOOR LEVEL - - .... ='ir0.W -,6 "".. APPROX GRADE ...r.T..--:...... ,..,.•.1.1•11111111.11.11BIEIM MIIIIIIIIIIIII."ls-74 INIMEIMA.M., L...... m i i i iiiii um iii um r--11-•-- \\N-GRADE VARIES LATTICE PANEL PARGED CONCRETE WALL 16"BRICK PIER / 46,0" / 69 PH/LA ST. SARATOGA SPRINGS,NY PROPOSED ri 6"WOOD FACIA FIM924"Z1/2I NORTH ELEVATION ABLE END VENT 6, NOVEMBER 2020 SCALE'114"=1'0" G DESIGN BY' 6WOOD TRIM A. :7:: /4-BRICK CHIMNEY " ...m.o... ENGINEERING AMERICA CO.-TONYA YASENCHAK,PE aallanalitaaaritaaaNialataaaaaalaar AL444 r—..9...../ 76 WASHINGTON ST,SARATOGA SPRINGS,NY LEIIIIMMIZ1661/13ENZIEMILIERIMIUMMUNIZIEIWZMEZNIUM1101111111/111/r Amwair. r.---m%I 518/587-1340 IVIIMARIMIMILIIMINUVINCEMMIUMNIMI=11211=TAIIIMEIP ANNEWAMM, N. ra-.47"--7: 11111111311111111121011WEIMIEIMIZIONZI=121111111MITE=M11111117 - 1=....-- N Mr.= IVIWIRRIMINIFEMMITIMEWILIKEMMILMOVIIM=INIMINITAILr AIM=MN, N METAL -- w--- z 7. IMMIZIEMITIM111111112161111111111111111111MMIZIMINIUZIEMIKEUP al......=MUM' N 4ICKET rz---7, mumnampulamismunumannwommaiamminnimonar Asimm w--- ..---alink- N 2....,—.;,%_= 6'WOOD FACIA 4 Al111111N A... .MIN G 11013111EUREIMIUMMIZMIUMMILI==111/0111MMIIV Ammo==si=ime„ '',,, , E—:"..-E.-E 6"WOOD TRIM -OE MISIMRIMUINVII Mg affiglaiMMEM61 I 6 II 1.1,7 • 11111MMIMM' *"."I ill I II I I I ,• 7''.%-7:All i Aksss si‘ METALSTSNOWANDLIDSSE' par ' N AM ON PORCH ROOF "411 /111111111111111111111111111111•11111111111.111111111111111111111111h .14,44,...,SECOND FLOOR CEILING --,......--10. 1 • _„.I.I.,,•••i„ .H= i=.rccd........MNIMINIII ,,,,,,,"1114 , r4,61 6 WOOD FACIA 8"SO WOOD Fill 1 II - Ill VENTED SOFFIT CoLUMN In IIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I 1111.10.1111111111 ,„., = MIN 1111111111111111 =IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II ...... 6"WOOD TRIM WOOD BALLUSTRADE - NIMMIIII IMINIIIIIIIIIII .11111111111111111 . NM F7= WOOD SIDING RI r klffi11 , 11111,1 W11111111 r..% MAHOGANY DECKING 1 1 4 1..a I 1 1 I WOOD DECK FRAME PA SECOND FLOOR LEVEL LilljIIIIIIIIIIp al.11.11M11.1. :FM: __.„__HRST FLOOR CEILING WOOD BRACKET 11.111111111.111111111.111111111 1 111. 11 11 riE" 8"SQ WOOD 1 AmaniilL'l IV COLUMN AN II iiiit El I MI I I I`I I MIII r=MI i ... mom on in : ... ‘......" ailli 111 la Millinillilli l'1'. 11 MINIM- 1111111111111111111 7417; ..... 111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111, NI Eil ,4 I I Ili = NI . , 11111.1111111•111 J IIIIIIIIIIIIINIII MI 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Mill11111111111 NI II::: 1111111 I IIIIIIIIIIIIII M ri III.I1 111 .111.1111 MEM :TE: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN 11111=111111111 NI = IIIMM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I= ammiggimm iiii No imimaiiimmONAL TA! IRS DON LEVEL • - m N \- A PPROX GRADE / 35-5, / El El 69 PH1LA ST. SARATOGA SPRINGS,NY nimuidni—le.i mar a -5-i177;771-517T;17 717,1;IM IF,, ir-7117-7,75-77T71-;PTTrFiTr;Tilri,71,1779--rtfirs-form.7;77,-77,;4;17,477777; 'I F]]'R Olt'it 0,1 IF 0, 6,il 7 IF ,I.,,,1 0,,, 41,, !,,*af! ,1 9 ,. ,1,11roPo,1 IF TI a la in ilia III I'I ,,Piltili '' MINIM a 0'6 0 0'6,0,6 6 0 0 6 1, 1 tl01 * IF] ,0 1,,41 0 311,i 6 0 0"+I a alai , 21111E Mid Elia TIT ,Plii MUM mmma,a1/1/a la I,I,,,/F]]] ,,,,,, I,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,, 6 I I,4 t,I.4,,I1 4 ,zi'otam,,Iittuom,11111milynh , it A,,,,i, ,,I,,,Awl,, /0,,einsminzq ,, ,A,,,,6 4 tl° 7,0 07 0 tl°01 a ill ' Nil 6 0 0 6 o 0 6 ,I r h 0'1 o,,,7 I ,,7 0,,,I 07,,f,I.4,di 4 ,'o,,077 4,,I t, ,I'1, 'II 0,,7 74,017 4,,.0,tf,I.6 i. .l .PENW44-1=2M 4 ill'li 4 il I imi ,4 ill,4 I 1 i,414'4 pyl ,1 ,1 .4,, 91,, ti , .',, cl, ' --wravaan,—,g7,1 ia 1,I I I I I ,,I /I I il 411 il li i iI 4 II ii 01 1'I h i 671117 ill t 04,,I 0,111 li il' *,I " iblIMAI I ' I'','I" II*"I 'I' ',iffill11t1,11 , *. .d .. ill Id fi 1111 11 07 hi I, , + o 6 0 i dmummEnumuunimumialeymmaummanamummumumumulamima.-6 ,a,d'I,IF]'d,d F1'dd d i'IF 1 1'I1 '''I1 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION NOVEMBER 8 2020 DESIGN BE SCALE 114.=I'0" ENGINEERING AMERICA CO.-TONYA YASENCHAK,PE 76 WASHINGTON ST,SARATOGA SPRINGS NY 518/587-1340 11191MWIN,INMV6r1INUNIVAIMINETAILIIMMENIINEVIMINIMINEMNAMMIAMINITIINITIMEMIWINIONir="4=g6=7411/11MINIVIINInviquiyamion ,;„,,,,,,. ,Ani,,h,1,'4,1:, ',,l',,;',:,, ,'I:4,''4, ,,4,"„r,:i 4',"'4, ' ,'',,t,*,'4'F'',,,'', .761,2i. ',, :,01', ''d' '',, " STANDING SEAM SECOND FLOOR CEILING 1 ( 1 • a ,1 R d ,,7 I, d 51 77 1 , di. t911,i1 tP,1 . al PI, ,O w,,,i,0 7 1 mram: / METAL SNOW SLIDE graMMUNdffira • rAnnewaft=ag II"WOOD FACIA Mr 1 a SI IN I IA I RM Fa 6"WOOD TRIM SI .1. millillillimil NIIIIIIIbrawajer,Xer VENTED SOFFIT = WOOD SIDING 6"WOOD TRIM 'I • /-2 . -7- WOOD SIDING 6"WOOD FACIA FE-,, „i-1 , 6”WOOD TRIM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIMI• .IMIIMIIM 7"'IA6W1..-6 1%10. 12 OMME11111111111111111110 %40100111(211.6014 SECOND FLOOR LEEEL - '..."'6:=•ar. FIRST FLOOR CEILING IIIMINIMilciti611111111111 -- 111111111111111111111111Mennar—41111111111111.1111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIW 4: __ 1111 WOOD BRACKET IIIIIM%-witasimasa 1 , iiiiill1111111111L 714A' wAralimin 1111 m ' am 8"SO WOOD IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII DIM" COLUMN • - • - • "" .:--? AE LLUSTRADE MIIIIIIIIIIMMIMIMIMMIMIIIMIIk =• -411111=11.1 I I 1 1 I 1 I 1111 ...........-...i............1111111 . I.i.i MAHOGANY DECKING FIRST FLOOR LEVEL .....66........66.661 .666666,644......446 _ Ladd 10"WOOD DECK FRAME APPROX GRADE 16"BRICK PIER IRIMIN=D:1 INEEEEM ri74.1 GRADE VARIES-0/ PARGED CONCRETE WALL LATTICE PANEL / 46'0" / / 35'-0" / / / / \ \ TRANSITION STOOP TO PATIO AT GRADE I— —, • • ii II u tii--1?-1I • 7 / / 11.-7" '1 ,- - 1 KITCHEN N L '6 11. DINING AREA COVERED MUD PORCH to / ./ .1> -6 L'VI 11- 11 \ \ 16-7' _ 1 ° \ § = DN _— b C. , - \ i. =,- HOME OFFICE/ GREAT ROOM GUEST SUITE GAS FP / 1V-61/2" .— L UP— 1 \ \ , .1.1-11 • • • -r- 0. " O 1 . 3- b • J .II. -II • ;-- E N COVERED PORCH UP \ L / / / 35-0" / 69 PH/LA ST. SARATOGA SPRINGS,NY PROPOSED 1ST FLOOR PLAN • NOVEMBER 6,2020 SCALE:1/4" 1'0" 1,148 SQ.FT. 1st FLOOR (7,690 SOFT FOOTPRINT INCLUDES FORCES&ROOF) DESIGN BY: ENGINEERING AMERICA CO.-TONYA YASENCHAK,PE 76 WASHINGTON ST.,SARATOGA SPRINGS,NY 618/567-1340 \ / 35,0" / / 33'-0" / / 21-0" / 12'-0" / I— —, • 11=11 I \ • , / 0 0 -,„ CO BEDROOM#1 0 -.co< COVERED PORCH .,.. 12'-0" / 4) . \ \11 "il \ \ / 5'-10A" /111100, pr- T-41/2" I. \ 'NI cv CI ,--•`: WALK IN !? .- \CLOSET > ...I. _ LINEN • 8'41" / \ § \ DN \ N 4,1 Q = --= 111 ZO = / "ai....., W •/ 0...I W ../ M = I' z/ BEDROOM#3 ;. Lu ,_ o_ 0 — / — \ / 11-61/2" Zs, BEDROOM#2 WALK IN —th ---11 \ \ -,' CLOSET / 10,-0" / / \ I h--11 • i 1_4 p____II b --.- • / // \ • L / / / 35'-0" / 69 PH/LA ST. SARATOGA SPRINGS,NY PROPOSED 2nd FLOOR PLAN NOVEMBER 6,2020 SCALE:1/4"=I'D" 1,136 SQ.FT. 1st FLOOR (1,675 SOFT.FOOTPRINT INCLUDES PORCHS&ROOF) DESIGNBY: ENGINEERING AMERICA CO.-TONYA YASENCHAK,PE 76 WASHINGTON ST,SARATOGA SPRINGS,NY 518/587-1340 69 Phila St.—Porch rim- Saratoga Springs, NY (Details are not to scale) Porch—Bracket (18" x 18" - Painted Wood) , ... f IC=)/ 1'-d r 111111111111 Porch—Top Rail (4" Painted Wood) Porch—Rail System (4" Painted Wood) r,,1 ,L,,:i1111,1,1 Front Porch Post , (6" Painted Wood) Porch—Balluster (3" Painted Wood)