Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20250989 Rt 9/South Broadway Special Use Permit SEQRA Part 3SEQR Part 3 Narrative Hemlock Woods Mixed Use Project South Broadway / U.S. Route 9 City of Saratoga Springs Saratoga County, New York LEAD AGENCY: City of Saratoga Springs Planning Board November 2, 2026 1 SEQR FEAF Part 3 Narrative Hemlock Woods Mixed Use Project November 2, 2026 This narrative has been prepared to support Part 3 of the Full Environmental Assessment Form for the Hemlock Woods Mixed Use Project located along South Broadway/U.S. Route 9 in the City of Saratoga Springs, Saratoga County, New York. The proposed action includes a mixed-use development with residential, commercial, and hotel components, associated parking, internal circulation, pedestrian facilities, stormwater management practices, wetland buffers, and related site improvements. The Concept Site Plan (Attachment 2) identifies two, three-story residential buildings containing 26 residential units each, two three-story buildings containing 22 residential units each, a three-story mixed-use building containing approximately 32 residential units and 9,800 square feet of commercial space, a three-story hotel with approximately 120 rooms, porous pavement areas, stormwater planters, stormwater basins, land -banked parking, multi-use path connections, and NYSDEC-regulated wetlands. The overall tax parcels comprise approximately 55.8 acres located in the Gateway Commercial – Rural (“GC-R”) zoning district. For clarity, references in the supporting studies describe different portions or stages of the project. The threatened and endangered species assessment evaluated the approximately eight -acre proposed development area along Route 9, while the cultural resources survey evaluated an approximately 16-acre archaeological project area encompassing the area of potential ground disturbance. Attachment 11 evaluated an earlier approximately 8,000 -square-foot commercial program; the current site plan identifies approximately 9,800 square feet of commercial space. The environmental findings in this Part 3 are based on the current site plan and the 9,800-square-foot commercial program, except where an attachment is expressly described as evaluating an earlier plan. Part 3 is intended to identify each impact evaluated in Part 2 as having the potential for a Moderate to Large Impact, describe the magnitude and importance of each impact, and explain whether the potential impact may result in a significant adverse enviro nmental impact after consideration of the project setting, probability of occurrence, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope, magnitude, cumulative effects, and proposed avoidance, minimization, or mitigation measures. This evaluation is based on the draft FEAF Part 2 (Attachment 1), the Concept Site Plan (Attachment 2), and the currently available project information. 1. Impact on Land Due to the Property being currently undeveloped, the proposed action will involve substantial physical alteration of the project site to accommodate new buildings, parking areas, drive aisles, utilities, pedestrian facilities, grading, and stormwater management infrastructure. The draft FEAF Part 2 identifies potential land-related impacts associated 2 with: the proposed action may involve construction on land where the depth of the water table is less than 3 feet; excavation and removal of more than 1,000 tons of natural material; construction occurring over more than one year or in multiple phases; and potential erosion resulting from physical disturbance or vegetation removal. These impacts are expected to occur primarily during construction and will be limited to the estimated 16 acre area of potential ground disturbance and immediately adjacent areas. The magnitude of land disturbance is moderate to large because the project involves new development of a sizeable tract and construction of multiple buildings and supporting infrastructure. However, the impacts are not expected to be significant if appropriately controlled through final site plan review, construction phasing, erosion and sediment control measures, and compliance with the New York State SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activity. Following construction, the proposed site plan incorporates stormwater management and green infrastructure elements including porous pavement, stormwater planters, a dry swale, pretreatment areas, and an infiltration basin. These measures are intended to manage runoff generated by impervious surfaces and reduce erosion, sedimentation, and downstream drainage impacts. With these measures in place, the project’s permanent impacts on the land will be mitigated, limited in geographic scope on the site and/or completely avoided – resulting in a site that will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Construction-level impacts will be minimized through a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, stabilized construction entrances, temporary sediment basins or traps as needed, silt fence or equivalent perimeter controls, inlet protection, temporary and permanent stabilization, sequencing of disturbed areas, and inspection and maintenance protocols. With these measures incorporated into the approval and construction process, the potential land disturbance and erosion impacts are anticipated to be adequately avoided or mitigated and are not expected to result in a significant adverse environmental impact. 4. Impact on Groundwater The draft FEAF Part 2 identifies one groundwater-related item as having the potential for a moderate to large impact: the proposed action may involve the commercial application of pesticides within 100 feet of potable drinking water or irrigation sources . The proposed mixed-use development will include landscaped areas, lawn or planting beds, stormwater landscape features, and other maintained open space areas that may require ongoing vegetation management. If commercial pesticide or herbicide applications occur near stormwater management areas, which likely eventually interact with groundwater flow there is a potential for contaminants to migrate into groundwater or affect water quality. The impact is considered Moderate to Large for purposes of Part 2 solely because of the proximity threshold identified in the FEAF, not because routine landscaping activities are expected to result in an unmitigated significant impact. 3 Potential impacts to groundwater from pesticide or herbicide use will be mitigated through restrictions on the type, location, frequency, and method of application. The project will employ an integrated pest management approach that prioritizes native or adaptive plantings, proper soil preparation, mechanical weed control, mulch, mowing, and other non-chemical practices before chemical treatment is considered. Any pesticide or herbicide use will be limited to targeted, spot applications by a properly licensed commercial applicator, applied strictly in accordance with product labeling and applicable State and federal requirements. Broadcast application will be restricted near stormwater infiltration practices, wetlands, wetland buffers, drainage ways, and areas where runoff could convey chemicals toward downstream groundwater resources. Additional mitigation would include maintaining records of any commercial applications, avoiding application before forecasted rain events, and ensuring that all pesticide and herbicide storage, mixing, loading, and disposal occur in a manner that prevents spills or releases to soil, stormwater systems, or groundwater. The final landscaping and site maintenance plan will identify any areas where chemical applications are prohibited or restricted and will require maintenance contractors to comply with those restrictions. With these controls incorporated into Site Plan Review Process and long-term property maintenance requirements, the potential groundwater impact associated with commercial pesticide application is expected to be avoided or reduced to a level that is not significant. 7. Impact on Plants, Animals, and Habitat The FEAF Part 2 identified potential impacts related to threatened or endangered species because the NYSDEC Environmental Assessment Form Mapper indicated that the Karner blue butterfly and frosted elfin may occur on or in the vicinity of the project site. To evaluate those mapped screening results, Ecological Solutions, LLC completed a Threatened and Endangered Species Habitat Suitability Assessment dated October 5, 2026 (Attachment 4). The assessment included an October 2, 2026 field review of the proposed development area, which encompasses approximately eight acres along Route 9 and consists of maturing mixed upland forest with oaks, white pine, maples, and birches, varying tree sizes, and little ground cover. Karner blue butterfly habitat is generally limited to dry, sandy, open or partially shaded areas supporting wild blue lupine, including pine barrens, oak savannas, clearings, and other early-successional communities. The assessment found that the proposed development area instead contains a somewhat dense mixed upland forest, with no open clearings or savanna-like habitat and no wild blue lupine observed. Because the larval host plant and associated habitat conditions are absent, the report concludes that t he proposed development is not likely to affect potential Karner blue butterfly habitat or the species. Frosted elfin similarly relies on pine barrens, oak savannas, or dry oak forest and uses wild blue lupine or wild indigo as principal host plants, depending on the population. The habitat assessment found neither suitable pine -barren or savanna habitat nor wild blue 4 lupine within the proposed development area. It therefore concludes that the development area does not provide suitable habitat for frosted elfin and that impacts to the species are not anticipated. Accordingly, the species-related items initially identified in FEAF Part 2 based on the EAF Mapper screening do not represent a moderate-to-large project impact when evaluated against the site-specific field investigation. The Mapper indicates only the pot ential presence of listed species on or near a site; the completed habitat assessment establishes that the proposed impact area lacks the habitat and host plants required by the two identified species. Ecological Solutions, LLC therefore recommends no spec ies- specific mitigation or conservation measures for Karner blue butterfly or frosted elfin. The project will nevertheless minimize general habitat effects through defined limits of disturbance, preservation of wetlands and adjacent buffers, retention of substantial forested and undeveloped portions of the property outside the development area , stabilization and restoration of disturbed areas, use of native or non-invasive landscaping, and avoidance of unnecessary chemical vegetation management. Based on the October 5, 2026 habitat assessment, the absence of wild blue lupine and suitable barrens, savanna, or open sandy habitat within the proposed development area , and the project’s preservation measures, the proposed action is not expected to result in a significant adverse impact to plants, animals, or habitat. 9. Impact on Aesthetic Resources The FEAF Part 2 identifies potential Moderate to Large impacts to aesthetic resources because the proposed action may be visible from publicly accessible vantage points and from scenic or aesthetic resources associated with the South Broadway/U.S. Route 9 gateway corridor and Saratoga Spa State Park. The project site is located along a prominent southern approach into the City of Saratoga Springs, where travelers on Route 9 experience a gateway corridor characterized by a mix of natural vegetation, open space, hospitality and commercial uses, and proximity to Saratoga Spa State Park. Because the project will convert presently undeveloped land to a mixed -use development with residential, commercial, hotel, parking, lighting, internal circulation, and stormwater facilities, the visual condition of the site will change and may be visible to motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists, visitors, and park users depending on viewpoint, season, intervening vegetation, and final site design. Views from South Broadway/Route 9 are expected to be the primary public views of the proposed development. These views will generally occur during routine travel by residents, employees, visitors, and tourists entering or leaving the City. The proposed buildings, access drives, parking areas, signage, lighting, and landscape improvements will be visible from the public right-of-way. However, these views will occur in the context of an existing gateway corridor that already contains hotel, brewery, commercial, roadway, and recreational uses. Furthermore, the proposed development will cluster towards the already existing portion of the corridor, thereby mitigating those effects and not unnecessarily spreading the developed area. 5 Further, all existing trees measuring eight inches in diameter or greater along the project frontage have been surveyed and located. The mapped tree inventory will be used during final grading, utility, landscape, and construction-plan development to preserve these trees where practicable along the Route 9 frontage. Final site plans will clearly distinguish trees to remain from trees requiring removal and will establish limits of disturbance and tree-protection measures for retained trees. The principal aesthetic safeguards will be incorporated into the final site plan and approval conditions rather than deferred as general design objectives. Final plans will also provide a coordinated gateway design; retain the approximately 50-foot Route 9 vegetated frontage except where access, pedestrian and bicycle accommodations, utilities, sight distance, stormwater management and approved grading require disturbance; provide layered native or adaptive landscaping between Route 9 and frontage parking; screen refuse, loading, mechanical, and service areas; use full -cutoff, downward-directed lighting; and identify enforceable maintenance and replacement obligations for required landscaping. These measures will reduce the visibility of pavement and service functions and provide a defined transition from the public corridor to the new development. Potential views from Saratoga Spa State Park and park-related approaches are also important because the park is a major scenic, recreational, cultural, and tourism resource. The project is located east of Route 9 and outside the park itself, and the extent of visibility from park lands will depend on distance, topography, existing tree cover, seasonal leaf - on and leaf-off conditions, and the location of viewers within the park. To minimize any potential aesthetic effect on the State Park setting, the final site plan will preserve existing vegetation along the southern and western portions of the site where practicable, maintain meaningful landscaped buffers, avoid unnecessary clearing beyond the limits of disturbance, and use building materials, colors, lighting, and land scape design that are compatible with the Gateway and park-adjacent context. The project will also avoid lighting glare, sky-glow, or visually prominent illuminated signage that would detract from nighttime views or the character of the park-adjacent corridor. Further, as discussed above, the preservation of existing trees contained in the mapped tree inventory will aid in screening the full extent of this project from viewers in the Saratoga Spa State Park. Any potential aesthetic impact is expected to be further reduced through the Site Plan Review Process, including review of architectural elevations, landscape plans, lighting plans, signage, grading, retaining walls if any, utility placement, refuse and service screening, and the relationship of buildings and parking areas to the Route 9 frontage. Moreover, the project will incorporate full-cutoff, downward-directed lighting; avoid excessive pole heights; use photometric controls to limit spillover; and select fixture styles appropriate for a gateway corridor. Landscape design will establish a layered visual buffer using native or adaptive trees, shrubs, and groundcovers, while preserving wetland buffers and stormwater management areas as functional open space. Where feasible, parking will be visually softened through internal planting islands, perimeter landscaping, 6 and building placement that reduces the amount of uninterrupted pavement visible from Route 9 or the State Park. Furthermore, the City of Saratoga Springs Design Review Board (“DRB”) reviewed the proposal at its September 23 and October 7, 2026 meetings and issued an advisory opinion to the Planning Board (Attachment 12). The DRB found that the proposed building heights conform to the GC-R zoning requirements and recognized the clustering of structures, the mixed-use building breezeway, and the rooftop amenity area as positive design features. The DRB also recommended further refinement of building -height variation, façade articulation, materials, fenestration, landscaping, the hotel entrance and porte -cochère, internal roadway geometry, pedestrian circulation, and screening of parking areas so the development more fully reflects the rural gateway character contemplated by the GC -R standards. To make those recommendations effective, the Proposed Project has since been modified in its architectural and landscape materials demonstrating: differentiated rooflines and building forms; façade modules no wider than permitted by the UDO, with meaningful recesses, projections, material changes, and shadow lines; a less formal and more rural architectural and landscape treatment at the hotel entrance and porte -cochère; curvilinearinternal roadway geometry where practicable without compromising emergency access; a direct north-side pedestrian connection serving the mixed-use building and rear residential area; multi-tiered indigenous or native landscaping; a tree- preservation and replacement plan based on the survey-located inventory of trees eight inches in diameter or greater; and year-round screening of frontage parking. These refinements are reflected in the revised architectural elevations and perspective views prepared by Balzer & Tuck Architecture, including the revised west elevation of Building A, the hotel, which replaces the previously more uniform façade with a series of distinct building modules. A red clapboard-style main block with front-facing gables and a cupola anchors the hotel entrance, while white gable-front pavilions, gray-sided sections, a recessed connector, varied ridge lines, and a continuous stone base create the recesses, projections, material changes, and shadow lines recommended by the DRB. The porte-cochère has also been redesigned as an open, heavy-timber structure on stone piers, giving the hotel entrance a less formal, carriage -house character consistent with the rural gateway setting. Buildings D/G are designed with an agrarian, barn -inspired character. Gambrel-roofed end pavilions clad in white board-and-batten siding frame the building, while recessed navy-blue sections with stacked balconies and a central gray-sided module with dormers and a copper-roofed cupola break the long façade into smaller, residential -scale components. A brick or stone masonry base, a covered timber entry canopy, and varied roof heights and dormer placements add depth and shadow lines. The multiple roof forms and cupolas also give the building a varied roofscape when seen from surrounding vantage points. 7 Buildings E/F use a complementary but distinct design, combining steep front-facing gables, cupolas, and light gray and white clapboard-style siding with recessed dark-gray connectors featuring stacked balconies and copper-tone accent roofs, all set on a continuous masonry base with timber-framed entry canopies that divide each elevation into distinct modules. Varying the architectural vocabulary among the hotel, Buildings D/G, and Buildings E/F avoids a repetitive appearance and creates the impression of a collection of rural buildings rather than a single uniform complex , with each building dimensioned to the 40-foot maximum building height consistent with the DRB's finding that the proposed heights conform to the GC-R requirements. Together, the revised elevations replace uniform façades with gabled, gambrel, and cupola -topped forms, clapboard and board-and-batten siding, masonry bases, and timber detailing that reflect the rural gateway character contemplated by the GC -R standards and the park-adjacent setting along South Broadway. With these mitigation measures incorporated, the proposed action is not expected to result in a significant adverse impact to aesthetic resources. Although the project will introduce new built elements into views from South Broadway/Route 9 and may be seasonally visible from areas associated with Saratoga Spa State Park, the visual change can be moderated through thoughtful site planning, architectural treatment, preservation of vegetation, enhanced landscaping, lighting controls, signage review, and contin ued coordination with the City during the Site Plan Review and Architectural Review processes. These measures will allow the project to contribute to a more defined and attractive South Broadway gateway while avoiding substantial diminishment of public enjoyment of nearby scenic, recreational, or park-related resources. 10. Impact on Historic and Archaeological Resources The draft FEAF Part 2 identifies potential impacts to historic and archaeological resources because the proposed action occurs in an area that was determined to have archaeological sensitivity and is located near known cultural resources. A Phase I and Phase II Cultural Resources Survey was completed for the Hemlock Woods Mixed Use Commercial Development by Columbia Heritage, LLC in July 2026 (Attachment 5). The survey evaluated approximately 16 acres of the 55.79-acre parcel proposed for development and included Phase IA background research and reconnaissance, Phase IB shovel testing, and Phase II site evaluation of the previously identified J. Rouse Historic Site. The survey documented no Native American -era archaeological sites and no potentially eligible buildings, structures, cemeteries, or historic districts within or adjacent to the project area. The survey did identify one European Ame rican-era archaeological resource, the J. Rouse Historic Site, in the southwestern portion of the project area. The archaeological investigation found that the J. Rouse Historic Site contains domestic and architectural material dating from the mid -nineteenth through mid-twentieth century, including foundation remains, structural wall features, domestic refuse deposi ts, glass, ceramics, nails, slate, brick fragments, and food remains. 8 The principal house foundation is located outside the limits of proposed project impact and will be surrounded by a 20-foot no-touch buffer. Portions of the surrounding archaeological deposits were subject to Phase IB and Phase II testing, due to the intention to disturb those areas. Based on the documentary research and field investigation, the survey concluded that the J. Rouse Historic Site does not appear to have the potential to produce significant additional cultural information, is not associated with a significant local person or event, and is unlikely to meet National Register of Historic Places eligibility criteria. The survey therefore recommended that the area of the proposed development outside of the 20-foot buffer would have no impact on potentially significant cultural resources and that no further archaeological investigation is necessary for the proposed project area. If future development were to affect the preserved principal house foundation remains and immediate vicinity that are currently excluded from impact, additional archaeological investigation would be recommended at that time. The New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation reviewed the Phase I and Phase II Cultural Resources Survey under Section 14.09 of the New York State Historic Preservation Act. In correspondence dated August 6, 2026 (Attachment 6), OPRHP concurred with the report recommendation that the J. Rouse Historic Site is not eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places and that no additional archaeological work is necessary. OPRHP further stated that no properties, including archaeological and/or historic resources listed in or eligible for the New York State and National Registers of Historic Places, will be impacted by the project. Accordingly, the potential impacts identifi ed in FEAF Part 2 have been resolved through completion of the archaeological survey, Phase II evaluation, and OPRHP consultation, and the proposed action is not expected to result in a significant adverse impact to historic or archaeological resources. 13. Impact on Transportation The FEAF Part 2 identifies potential transportation concerns related to Route 9 safety, driveway access, street lighting, pedestrian connectivity, bicycle accommodations, and the potential for project-generated traffic to affect existing operations. These issues were evaluated in the Updated Traffic Impact Study prepared by GTS Consulting (Attachment 7), the July 22, 2026 response to comments (Attachment 8), and the City’s third-party traffic review. Creighton Manning concluded its review on August 14, 2026, confirming that the concerns raised in its comment letters had been addressed (Attachment 9 ). Subsequent NYSDOT comments on the proposed access plan, and the revised analysis prepared in response, are summarized below. NYSDOT provided comments on the traffic impact study via email on October 20, 2026, indicating that the northern access will be restricted to right-in/right-out movements only and that the southern access should be reduced to a single entering lane. In res ponse, GTS Consulting revised the 2028 build conditions capacity analysis to incorporate both 9 modifications, using the 2028 build traffic volumes from the updated June 2026 traffic study reassigned to reflect the restricted northern access (Attachment 1 0). The revised analysis demonstrates that the northern access restriction will have no impact on operations at the adjacent signalized intersections of U.S. Route 9 with Crescent Avenue and East West Road during any of the three peak hours studied; levels of service, delays, and queues at those intersections are unchanged from the original build analysis. With the restriction in place, traffic exiting the northern access improves from Level of Service C to Level of Service B during all three peak hours, with 95th -percentile queues of five feet or less. Restricting the northern access to right -in/right-out movements also eliminates left-turn conflicts at that driveway, further supporting safe operations along the Route 9 frontage. Because outbound left turns are consolidated at the southern access, traffic exiting that driveway will experience modest increases in delay compared with the original build analysis. It remains at Level of Service C during the weekday morning peak hour (a n increase of approximately four seconds of average delay), changes to Level of Service D during the weekday evening peak hour (an increase of approximately five seconds), and remains at Level of Service C during the Saturday midday peak hour (an increase of approximately four seconds). These results are consistent with the conservative single-access sensitivity condition described below, and the 95th-percentile queue for this movement is projected at no more than approximately 55 feet. The southbound left -turn movement into the southern access continues to operate at Level of Service B during all three peak hours, with queues well within the available 150 feet of storage. GTS Consulting concluded that the access restriction results in only minor impacts at the site driveways, has no impact on adjacent intersection operations, and raises no operational concerns. The traffic analysis characterizes the project as a moderate traffic generator, with approximately 54 entering and 74 exiting trips during the weekday morning peak hour, 94 entering and 77 exiting trips during the weekday evening peak hour, and 77 entering and 91 exiting trips during the Saturday peak hour. When distributed across the Route 9 corridor and the two proposed site driveways, these trips are not expected to create capacity, delay, or safety impacts that would constitute a significant adverse transportation impact. This conclusion is supported by the project’s access design, available roadway capacity, adequate sight distance, the existing center turn lane, and planned multimodal facilities. The traffic study found that existing movements in the study area operate acceptably and that, under 2028 build conditions, the signalized intersections of U.S. Route 9 with Crescent Avenue and East West Road will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service. The proposed two-driveway configuration, with the northern access restricted to right- in/right-out movements, distributes entering and exiting traffic between the northern and 10 southern access points, thereby avoiding an undue concentration of traffic at either driveway. To test a more conservative scenario, the July 22, 2026 response to comments also evaluated a single-access condition in which all site traffic was assigned to one driveway. Under that sensitivity condition, the stop-controlled side-street approach was projected to operate at Level of Service C during the weekday morning peak hour, Level of Service D during the weekday evening peak hour, and Level of Service C during the Saturday midday peak hour. These results demonstrate acceptable peak-hour operations under the conservative single-access test; they are not findings that both proposed driveways would operate at Level of Service C during every analyzed period . The corridor’s physical characteristics and the proposed site design further address safety. Field measurements documented more than 1,500 feet of available intersection sight distance in both directions from each proposed driveway, exceeding the AASHTO - recommended values used in the traffic study. Stopping sight distance approaching the driveways also exceeds the applicable recommended values. U.S. Route 9 also includes a two-way center left-turn lane along the site frontage, which accommodates left turns into the site and allows outbound left turns from the southern access to be completed in two stages, reducing conflict exposure and improving operational flexibility. The crash-history review did not identify the study area as a severe crash location or severe crash roadway, and the supplemental review did not indicate a material change in crash frequency following the opening of the neighboring Tree House Brewery. Final driveway geometry, entrance radii, lane configuration, spacing, signing, striping, drainage, and work within the State right-of-way will remain subject to NYSDOT Highway Work Permit review. The Planning Board’s SEQR finding is based on the studied two - driveway configuration, with a right-in/right-out northern access and a single entering lane at the southern access as requested by NYSDOT and does not authorize a materially different access arrangement without further environmental review. Pedestrian and bicycle impacts are addressed through the proposed Route 9 frontage multi-use path and an internal walkway system connecting the residential, hotel, commercial, and parking areas. Together, these facilities provide a coordinated non - vehicular circulation network within the project and connect the site to the broader South Broadway/Broadway pedestrian system. A direct connection from the hotel side of the project to the multi-use path is proposed via the walkway north of the southern driveway. This alignment reduces unnecessary pedestrian crossings of the driveway while preserving existing native vegetation south of it. Access to Saratoga Spa State Park, SPAC, downtown Saratoga Springs, Congress Park, and nearby commercial destinations can occur through the existing South Broadway/Broadway network, including the signalized crossing at Crescent Avenue. 11 Additional pedestrian connections south of the project site or from the rear of the development to Hemlock Trail or Crescent Avenue would require wetland disturbance and NYSDEC Article 24 permitting and would be impermissible under the City of Saratoga Springs UDO wetland permitting process. Avoiding those connections therefore balances transportation connectivity with wetland protection and constitutes an appropriate impact- avoidance measure. Lighting, emergency access, parking, and internal circulation will be refined through the Site Plan Review process. Driveway lighting will be evaluated to determine whether limited, code-compliant illumination is warranted to improve visibility without creating unnecessary glare, spillover, or inconsistency with the Route 9 corridor. Signage and landscaping will be located to preserve driveway sight lines, and fire-truck turning templates demonstrate emergency access to all proposed buildings. The site will provide sufficient parking to meet UDO requirements, with land -banked parking and reciprocal or shared parking easements contemplated so the hotel, residential, and commercial components can operate as a cohesive development. Snow- storage areas will be finalized using available green space within and around the parking fields so that stored snow does not interfere with parking, circulation, pedestrian facilities, drainage, visibility, or emergency access. Traffic-signal warrants were evaluated for both the proposed access plan and the conservative single-access sensitivity condition. Under the proposed two-driveway configuration, distributing site traffic between the access points reduces the volume at each driveway, and the July 22, 2026 response concludes that the reduced warrant thresholds would not be met at either location. NYSDOT provided comments via email on October 20, 2026 indicating that two driveways are permissible, with the northern access restricted to right-in/right-out movements and the southern access reduced to one entering lane, and that no signal or roundabout is warranted. The supplemental single-access analysis used Route 9 hourly traffic counts, separate ITE time-of-day distributions for the apartment, retail, and hotel components, and the reduced MUTCD volume thresholds applicable where operating speeds exceed 40 miles per hour. Under that sensitivity condition, Signal Warrant 1, Condition A was not met; Signal Warrant 1, Condition B was met; the combined Conditions A and B test was not met; Signal Warrant 2, the four-hour vehicular-volume warrant, was met; and Signal Warrant 3, the peak-hour delay warrant, was not met. Meeting an individual numerical warrant does not, by itself, require installation of a traffic signal. Engineering judgment, roadway context, access configuration, safety considerations, and NYSDOT review remain necessary. Moreover, the single -access analysis was prepared only as a conservative sensitivity test and does not represent the access plan proposed for approval. Further, as stated above, NYSDOT has accepted the two-driveway configuration, subject to the access modifications described above, and does not deem a signal necessary. 12 Based on the completed analyses, the July 22, 2026 responses in Attachment 8, the City consultant’s sign-off in Attachment 9, NYSDOT’s October 20, 2026 comments, the GTS Consulting revised build analysis dated October 22, 2026 (Attachment 1 0), and the mitigation incorporated into the project design and review process, potential transportation impacts will be avoided or reduced through adequate sight distance, the existing two-way center left-turn lane, the studied two-driveway configuration with a right- in/right-out northern access, NYSDOT Highway Work Permit review, the frontage multi- use path, internal pedestrian circulation, emergency -access design, sight-line controls, and continued review of lighting, parking, and snow storage. Accordingly, the proposed action is not expected to result in a significant adverse transportation impact. 14. Impact on Energy The FEAF Part 2 identifies an energy-related consideration for review of the potential for renewable energy. The FEAF also identified potential moderate to large impact for: The proposed action will increase energy demand through construction and operation of residential, commercial, and hotel uses, involving the heating and cooling of more than 100,000 square feet of building area. The scale of the proposed development warrants coordination with utility providers to confirm electric, gas, and other service capacity. The importance of this impact is expected to be localized and operational in nature, and it can be reduced through energ y- efficient building design, code-compliant mechanical systems, high-efficiency lighting, electric vehicle readiness where appropriate, and consideration of rooftop or site - integrated renewable energy opportunities. Renewable energy options for the site were evaluated including rooftop solar photovoltaic panels, solar canopies over portions of the parking areas, and building-integrated solar features. However, these options may not be practical as primary project mitigation based on the current site and program constraints. The site is proposed for a relatively dense mixed -use development with multiple three- story buildings, surface parking, internal circulation, stormwater management areas, wetland buffers, landscaped gateway treatments, and preserved natural areas. Rooftop solar opportunities are limited by roof area needed for mechanical equipment, hotel and residential building systems, roof access, fire code clearances, structural loading, shading, building orientation and specific GC-R criteria requiring rural roof forms. Solar parking canopies would conflict with required parking circulation, snow storage, lighting, emergency access, stormwater design, cost feasibility, and the desired visual character of the South Broadway gateway. Ground -mounted solar would likely require additional clearing or disturbance and could conflict with wetland buffers, existing vegetation preservation, landscaped screening, and available developable area. Although these renewable energy options may not be practical as required mitigation, the project will include electric vehicle charging stations throughout the site to support lower - emission transportation options and provide charging access for residents, hotel guests, 13 commercial patrons, and employees. For these reasons, renewable energy will remain a consideration during final design, but it is not expected to be a practicable or required mitigation measure necessary to avoid a significant adverse energy impact. Because the FEAF Part 2 does not identify a specific threshold exceedance for electrical consumption, substation upgrades, or heating and cooling area beyond the general need for energy review, the potential energy impact is not expected to be significant if the final design confirms available utility capacity and incorporates applicable energy code requirements and practical conservation measures. 15. Impact on Noise, Odor, and Light The FEAF Part 2 identifies potential impacts associated with outdoor lighting, including the potential for light to shine onto adjoining properties and the potential for lighting to increase sky-glow relative to existing conditions. The proposed development will require site lighting for parking areas, walkways, building entrances, internal circulation, and safety. Construction may also generate temporary noise from equipment, grading, paving, and building activities. Routine operational odors are not expected to be a significant component of the proposed mixed-use, residential, and hotel development, provided that refuse areas are properly screened, managed, and maintained. Lighting impacts can be minimized through a photometric plan demonstrating full cutoff fixtures, downward-directed lighting, appropriate pole heights, shielding near residential and wetland-adjacent areas, controls to reduce unnecessary overnight lighting, and compliance with applicable City standards. Temporary construction noise will be limited through adherence to permitted work hours, properly maintained equipment, and standard construction management practices. Further, by clustering the area of development on site towards existing developments, the potential environmental effects of noise, order and light on undeveloped lands are further mitigated. With these measures, potential noise and lighting impacts are expected to be localized, controllable, and not significant. 17. Consistency with Community Plans The FEAF Part 2 identifies potential impacts related to consistency with adopted community plans. This evaluation has been prepared in relation to the City of Saratoga Springs 2015 Comprehensive Plan, the UDO, the Open Space Management Plan and the Urban Forestry Management Plan. All these documents are organized around the City’s “City in the Country” vision and the guiding principles of economic strength and stability, environmental health and resiliency, transportation and mobility, and community character. 2015 Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan emphasizes maintaining a compact and vibrant urban core; protecting open space and natural resources; improving multimodal transportation; 14 encouraging diverse housing and compatible economic activity; and enhancing the City’s gateways. The proposed Hemlock Woods Mixed Use Project is located along South Broadway/U.S. Route 9, a gateway corridor near Saratoga Spa State Park, with existing hospitality and commercial uses, and undeveloped lands. Accordingly, the project has been evaluated to determine whether its location, mix of uses, access, environmental protections, and public-realm improvements advance the Plan’s objectives for this portion of the City. The Comprehensive Plan identifies South Broadway as a priority gateway and designates it within the Specialty Mixed Use–Gateway land use category, which is intended to accommodate low- to moderate-intensity commercial uses that complement the Downtown Core and Complementary Core while improving the corridor’s appearance and attractiveness. The Plan calls for aesthetically pleasing buildings and streetscape landscaping, context-sensitive gateway treatments, protection of natural resources, pedestrian and bicycle connections, and development that supports the City’s economic vitality without undermining surrounding community character. The proposed project advances these objectives by transforming vacant land along Route 9 into a coordinated mixed-use development containing residential, commercial, and hotel uses. The site plan clusters these uses within a planned development pattern, provides internal pedestrian circulation and a multi-use path along the Route 9 frontage, integrates landscaping and stormwater features into the site design, and preserves wetlands and associated buffer areas as a meaningful transition between the built environment and the site’s natural setting. The project also supports the Comprehensive Plan’s environmental health, resiliency, transportation, and mobility objectives. As shown on the Concept Site Plan and Wetland Validation Map (Attachments 2 and 3), the project avoids mapped wetland areas to the maximum extent practicable, maintains a 100-foot wetland buffer, and incorporates green infrastructure and stormwater management practices , including porous pavement, stormwater planters, dry swales, pretreatment areas, and stormwater management areas. These measures are consistent with the Plan’s emphasis on protecting wetlands, preserving ecosystem functions, managing stormwater through green infrastructure, and integrating development with the natural environment. In addition, the proposed frontage multi-use path, internal walkways, connections among on-site uses, and relationship to the existing South Broadway/Broadway pedestrian network advance the Plan’s Complete Streets and multimodal-access objectives. The Socio-Economic Evaluation prepared by Planning & Development Advisors , dated December 8, 2025 (Attachment 11), further supports the project’s consistency with the Comprehensive Plan’s economic strength and stability objectives. The evaluation estimates approximately $81.8 million in private investment, an increase of approximately $415,147 in annual real property tax revenue across City, County, and school taxing jurisdictions compared with existing conditions, approximately 175 to 200 temporary construction jobs, and approximately 71 to 83 permanent full-time jobs. 15 It also estimates that the 128 proposed households could generate approximately $5.5 million in annual discretionary spending within the local and regional economy, in addition to potential sales, occupancy, and mortgage-recording tax revenues not quantified in the evaluation. These projected benefits indicate that the proposed mix of residential, commercial, and hotel uses can strengthen the local tax base, support employment, and increase year-round economic activity. Transportation considerations have likewise been addressed through the completed traffic analysis, coordination with NYSDOT through the Highway Work Permit process, adequate sight distance, use of the existing two-way center left-turn lane, and a two- driveway access design that distributes site traffic. Collectively, the project’s coordinated land uses, gateway design, environmental protections, multimodal improvements, economic benefits, and transportation measures support the Comprehensive Plan’s principal objectives. With these measures incorporated, the project is not expected to result in a significant adverse impact related to consistency with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. City of Saratoga Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) The project is also consistent with the purpose and intent of the City’s Gateway Commercial-RuralDistrict regulations, particularly the Gateway Commercial – Rural District standards applicable to this portion of South Broadway. The UDO describes the GC-R as intended to accommodate commercial development of a suitably rural, low - intensity character that creates a gateway at the edge of the City and into key character areas while celebrating and preserving natural beauty and rural character. The proposed development advances this intent by locating a coordinated mix of residential, commercial, and lodging uses along an established arterial gateway corridor rather than extending development into more sensitive interior areas of the property. All proposed uses are either principally permitted or permitted with special use permit approval. The project maintains a substantial front setback along South Broadway, preserves wetlands and wetland buffers, and organizes the development as a planned, campus -like gateway project that is compatible with the surrounding corridor uses and nearby park setting. The proposed residential density of 128 units is well below the permitted density for the site, which would exceed 165 units if committed solely to residential development. The proposed site layout incorporates several features that support compliance with the Gateway Commercial District design objectives. Buildings, parking areas, access drives, stormwater features, and pedestrian routes are arranged to create a cohesive development character rather than an auto-oriented strip pattern. The project includes internal pedestrian circulation and a frontage multi-use path, consistent with the UDO’s emphasis on safe pedestrian and bicycle access and the South Broadway gateway requirement for trail systems linking commercial nodes to other use areas. 16 Parking areas are supported by landscaped edges, interior landscaping, land -banked parking, and stormwater landscape features, which help soften views from the public right-of-way and reduce the visual dominance of pavement. The use of porous pavement, stormwater planters, dry swales, pretreatment areas, and infiltration basins further supports the UDO’s broader emphasis on integrating site design with stormwater management and environmental protection. The project will remain subject to detailed Site Plan Review and Architectural Review to confirm compliance with the applicable Gateway Commercial District dimensional, design, landscaping, lighting, parking, and circulation standards. The Design Review Board’s advisory opinion dated October 7, 2026 (Attachment 12) provides additional guidance for those reviews, as noted above. . Those recommendations have been addressed in the instant submission to the Planning Board, as detailed herein. Additionally, mechanical and service-area screening, sight distance, driveway spacing and NYSDOT access coordination, exterior lighting, signage, and pedestrian and bicycle connectivity. Through this review process, the City can ensure that the project provides an attractive and context-sensitive South Broadway gateway condition, preserves meaningful natural features, supports multimodal access, and remains consistent with the adopted land use policies and regulatory framework applicable to the GC-R District. 2023 City of Saratoga Springs Open Space Plan The project is also consistent with the City of Saratoga Springs Open Space Plan, which emphasizes protection of the “City in the Country,” stewardship of wetlands, forests, wildlife habitat, groundwater recharge areas, scenic gateways, and interconnected open space resources. The Open Space Plan identifies the City’s remaining natural areas, wetlands, wooded lands, recreational corridors, and gateway landscapes as important resources that support environmental health, quality of life, scenic character, and climate resiliency. The proposed project responds to these objectives by concentrating development within the upland portion of the site along the established South Broadway/Route 9 corridor while preserving NYSDEC-regulated wetlands and maintaining a 100-foot wetland buffer, as shown on the Concept Site Plan and Wetland Validation Map (Attachments 2 and 3). The site design also incorporates stormwater management and green infrastructure practices, including porous pavement, stormwater planters, dry swales, and stormwater management areas, which help protect water quality, maintain infiltration, and reduce runoff impacts to nearby wetland and open space resources. The Open Space Plan also prioritizes linkages between open space resources, trails, parks, and neighborhoods, and recognizes the importance of gateway corridors and pedestrian and bicycle connections in supporting access to open space. The proposed frontage multi-use path, internal pedestrian circulation, and connections among the hotel, residential, and commercial components support these goals by improving non -vehicular 17 access along the South Broadway gateway and by positioning the site to connect with the broader pedestrian and bicycle network serving Saratoga Spa State Park, SPAC, downtown Saratoga Springs, and other nearby recreational and cultural destinations. By preserving sensitive environmental features, limiting development to appropriate portions of the site, enhancing the gateway corridor, and incorporating multimodal access improvements, the project is consistent with the Open Space Plan’s objectives to b alance compatible development with conservation, recreation access, scenic character, and long-term environmental resiliency. 2022 City of Saratoga Urban Forestry Management Plan The project is also consistent with the City of Saratoga Springs Urban Forestry Management Plan, which establishes a framework to maintain, protect, and enhance the City’s urban forest as essential green infrastructure. The plan emphasizes preservation and expansion of tree canopy, protection of mature trees where practicable, use of best management practices for tree planting and maintenance, species diversity, and “right tree, right place” design. The proposed project supports these objectives by preserving wetlands and associated buffer areas, limiting disturbance to the developed portions of the site, retaining existing native vegetation where feasible, and incorporating landscaping, street trees, stormwater planters, porous pavement, dry swales, and infiltration practices as functional components of the site design. Specifically, as discussed above, the preservation of existing trees contained in the mapped tree inventory will work to preserve native vegetation along the publicly visible South Broadway frontage, serving as a transition area between the fully vegetated lands to the south of the project and the open lands north at Homewood Suites, Tree House Brewery and Saratoga Honda. Importantly, more than 40 acres of the overall property will remain undeveloped, including the protected wetland areas, associated buffer areas, and perimeter/open space lands that will continue to provide vegetative cover, habitat value, visual buffering, and green infrastructure benefits. These features help maintain canopy and vegetative cover, reduce stormwater runoff, improve water quality, soften views from the South Broadway gateway corridor, and integrate the built environment with the site’s remaining natural resources. In addition, the project intends to retain an approximately 50-foot-wide area of existing native vegetation along the Route 9 corridor frontage where feasible. Specifically, as discussed above, the preservation of existing trees contained in the mapped tree inventory will work to preserve native vegetation along the publicly visible South Broadway frontage, serving as a transition area between the fully vegetated lands to the south of the project and the open lands north at Homewood Suites, Tree House Brewery and Saratoga Honda. 18 This retained vegetated frontage will further aid in preserving the rural,wooded character of the gateway corridor, provide a natural visual transition between the public roadway and new development, reduce the perceived scale of buildings and parking areas, and support the Urban Forestry Management Plan’s emphasis on tree canop y preservation, green infrastructure, and context-sensitive planting and maintenance practices. The final landscape design will provide an opportunity to further advance the Urban Forestry Management Plan through thoughtful species selection, appropriate planting locations, and long-term maintenance commitments. New trees and landscape plantings will emphasize native or adaptive species, avoid invasive species, increase species diversity, and be located to provide adequate soil volume, root space, utility clearance, pedestrian visibility, and long-term survivability. Landscape and frontage plantings will also be coordinated with sidewalks, the proposed multi-use path, parking areas, lighting, utilities, snow storage, and stormwater practices so that trees can mature without creating avoidable conflicts. Through the Site Plan Review process, the City can ensure that tree preservation, replacement, planting specifications, maintenance responsibilities, and ongoing stewardship are incorporated into the approval documents, thereby supporting the Urban Forestry Management Plan’s goals of a healthier, more resilient, and more beneficial urban forest. 18. Consistency with Community Character The FEAF Part 2 also identifies potential impacts related to consistency with the existing community character, namely: the proposed development may create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, fire, police); and the proposed action is inconsistent with the predominant architectural scale and character. As to community services, the Planning Board noted a need for agreement from Public Safety. City Public Safety Commissioner Tim Coll has provided a letter indicating the ability to serve the Proposed Development. The developed parcels immediately north of the site include the Homewood Suites hotel, Tree House Brewing, and Saratoga Honda, while the project site and lands nearer Saratoga Spa State Park retain substantial wooded and undeveloped character. The proposed action therefore represents a material change from existing site conditions and is not identical in scale or form to every surrounding property. Its consistency with community character depends on the clustering of development near the existing Route 9 development pattern, retention of wetlands and substantial undeveloped land, compliance with permitted building heights and density, and incorporation of the architectural, circulation, landscaping, and parking-screening measures described in the DRB response. This context-sensitive comparison provides a more reliable basis for the finding than a categorical conclusion that the project simply matches its neighbors. The Project serves as a transition development from the substantially wooded, undeveloped lands to the south to the more fully developed and grasslands to the north at Tree House, Homewood Suites and Saratoga Honda. 19 By preserving a portion of the existing vegetation along the Broadway frontage, the development provides a natural transition from dense forest to open grassland-type sites to the North. The project retains all the vegetation in the southern portion of the 55+ acre parcel, consistent with the neighboring lot to the south and by clustering the development area to the north, the less dense but still natural vegetation calms the transition into the existing, open developments to the North. Although the proposed project will change the site from largely undeveloped land to a mixed-use development, the change is not expected to be inconsistent with the character of this corridor if the project is designed and reviewed as a cohesive gateway development rather than as isolated strip commercial development. The building program is organized as a campus-like, mixed-use setting with residential, commercial, hotel, parking, pedestrian, landscape, and stormwater elements coordinated within a single site plan framework. Potential community character impacts are mitigated through the project’s site design, landscape treatment, preservation of environmental features, and continuing site plan review. The proposed setbacks, landscaped frontage, preservation of native vegetati on where feasible, wetland and buffer protection, coordinated internal circulation, pedestrian connections, and stormwater management landscape features help reduce the visual effect of new development and support an attractive gateway condition. The proposed mix of housing, commercial space, and lodging can contribute to year - round activity and complement nearby tourism, recreational, and commercial destinations without directly competing with the Downtown Core. Lighting, signage, architectural treatment, landscaping, parking layout, snow storage, and screening will remain subject to detailed site plan review to ensure that the final design is compatible with the surrounding corridor and the City’s desired gateway character. Attachment 10 identifies projected socioeconomic benefits, including increased real property tax revenue, private investment, temporary and permanent employment, and resident spending. Those benefits are relevant to the project’s relationship to the City’s economic-development objectives and its potential fiscal context. They are not treated as mitigation for traffic, habitat, aesthetic, community-character, or other environmental effects, and they are not relied upon to offset an otherwise significant adve rse environmental impact. Each environmental topic is evaluated independently on the basis of the applicable study, project design, agency review, and enforceable approval conditions. The Design Review Board’s October 7, 2026 advisory opinion (Attachment 11) also concluded that the project can be successful with changes to site design, building characteristics, and the priority given to greenspace. The DRB’s recommendations concerning differentiated building forms, façade treatment, rural roadway character, pedestrian connectivity, indigenous landscaping, vegetation preservation, and parking screening have been considered and the project plans updated accordingly. They will be further considered through Site Plan Review and later review of architectural and landscape details by the DRB. 20 Overall, potential community character impacts are expected to be avoided or reduced through those refinements, architectural and landscape design, lighting controls, signage review, preservation of wetland and buffer areas, stormwater design, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and continued coordination with the City and involved agencies. With these measures incorporated, the proposed action is not expected to result in a significant adverse impact to community character. Summary and Planning Board Review Public and Planning Board concerns have focused principally on traffic and access, the scale and density of development, the rural gateway and park-adjacent setting, wetlands and habitat, lighting, and public services. These concerns are substantive review topics regardless of the number of comments received or whether a commenter supports or opposes the project. The Planning Board has evaluated them through the project-specific technical studies, agency and third-party reviews, and defined avoidance and mitigation measures contained in the record. Transportation issues are addressed through the Updated Traffic Impact Study, responses to comments, the City’s third -party traffic review, and required NYSDOT Highway Work Permit review. Scale and gateway-character concerns are addressed through the GC-R standards, the Design Review Board advisory opinion, and the architectural, circulation, landscaping, pedestrian, and parking-screening commitments described above. Wetland and habitat concerns are addressed through avoidance, buffers, limits of disturbance, the October 5, 2026 habitat assessment, and retention of substantial undeveloped areas , while lighting and public-service concerns are addressed through photometric controls, operations and maintenance requirements, emergency-access review, and the Public Safety Commissioner’s ability-to-serve correspondence. Based on this record, the moderate-to-large impacts identified in the FEAF Part 2 relate primarily to land disturbance and erosion, groundwater protection, wetlands and surface water, habitat conversion, aesthetic and community character, archaeological resources, transportation safety and pedestrian connectivity, energy use, outdoor lighting, and consistency with community plans. Where final details remain subject to Site Plan or Architectural review, this Part 3 identifies the applicable performance standard or approval condition, including stormwater controls, wetland avoidance and buffers, landscape preservation and replacement, DRB - responsive architectural and circulation revisions, photometric controls, pedestrian facilities, archaeological protection, and NYSDOT approval of work within the State right- of-way. The Planning Board’s determination rests on this technical and regulatory record and on enforceable conditions, not on the relative level of public support or opposition , and the projected economic benefits identified in Attachment 11 have not been used to offset environmental impacts. 21 Subject to incorporation of the identified mitigation measures and approval conditions, and provided that the final plans remain materially consistent with the studied project, the proposed action is not expected to result in significant adverse environmen tal impacts. A material increase in the development program, disturbance area, or traffic generation; a material change in the access configuration; or new information identifying a potentially significant impact would require the Lead Agency to determine whether supplemental SEQR review is warranted. 22 Attachments Attachment 1 Part 1 & 2 Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Attachment 2 Concept Site Plan Attachment 3 Wetland Validation Map Attachment 4 Threatened and Endangered Species Study Attachment 5 Phase I and Phase II Cultural Resources Survey Attachment 6 OPRHP/SHPO Concurrence Letter Attachment 7 Updated Traffic Impact Study Attachment 8 Traffic Responses to Comments Attachment 9 Third-Party Traffic Consultant Sign-Off Letter Attachment 10 Revised Traffic Analysis, North Access Right-In/Right-Out Only Attachment 11 Market and Socioeconomic Study Attachment 12 Design Review Board Opinion Attachment 1 Part 1 & 2 Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Page 1 of 13 Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project and Setting Instructions for Completing Part 1 Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information; indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor; and, when possible, generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A & B. In Sections C, D & E, most items contain an initial question that must be answered either “Yes” or “No”. If the answer to the initial question is “Yes”, complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is “No”, proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the applicant or project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part 1is accurate and complete. A.Project and Applicant/Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: Project Location (describe, and attach a general location map): Brief Description of Proposed Action (include purpose or need): Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: Project Contact (if not same as sponsor; give name and title/role): Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO:State: Zip Code: Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO:State: Zip Code: Page 2 of 13 B. Government Approvals B.Government Approvals, Funding, or Sponsorship. (“Funding” includes grants, loans, tax relief, and any other forms of financial assistance.) Government Entity If Yes: Identify Agency and Approval(s) Required Application Date (Actual or projected) a.City Counsel, Town Board, 9 Yes 9 No or Village Board of Trustees b. City, Town or Village 9 Yes 9 No Planning Board or Commission c.City, Town or 9 Yes 9 No Village Zoning Board of Appeals d. Other local agencies 9 Yes 9 No e. County agencies 9 Yes 9 No f. Regional agencies 9 Yes 9 No g. State agencies 9 Yes 9 No h. Federal agencies 9 Yes 9 No i. Coastal Resources. i.Is the project site within a Coastal Area, or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway?9 Yes 9 No ii.Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? 9 Yes 9 No iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area?9 Yes 9 No C. Planning and Zoning C.1. Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption, or amendment of a plan, local law, ordinance, rule or regulation be the 9 Yes 9 No only approval(s) which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? •If Yes, complete sections C, F and G. •If No, proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1 C.2. Adopted land use plans. a. Do any municipally- adopted (city, town, village or county) comprehensive land use plan(s) include the site 9 Yes 9 No where the proposed action would be located? If Yes, does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action 9 Yes 9 No would be located? b. Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district (for example: Greenway; 9 Yes 9 No Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA); designated State or Federal heritage area; watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes, identify the plan(s): _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, 9 Yes 9 No or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes, identify the plan(s): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 3 of 13 C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance.9 Yes 9 No If Yes, what is the zoning classification(s) including any applicable overlay district? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit?9 Yes 9 No c. Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action?9 Yes 9 No If Yes, i.What is the proposed new zoning for the site? ___________________________________________________________________ C.4. Existing community services. a. In what school district is the project site located? ________________________________________________________________ b. What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ d. What parks serve the project site? __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ D. Project Details D.1. Proposed and Potential Development a. What is the general nature of the proposed action (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial, recreational; if mixed, include all components)? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action?_____________ acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed?_____________ acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor?_____________ acres c. Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use?9 Yes 9 No i.If Yes, what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units (e.g., acres, miles, housing units, square feet)? % ____________________ Units: ____________________ d. Is the proposed action a subdivision, or does it include a subdivision? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes, i.Purpose or type of subdivision? (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial; if mixed, specify types) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? 9 Yes 9 No iii.Number of lots proposed? ________ iv.Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum __________ Maximum __________ 9 Yes 9 No _____ months _____ _____ month _____ year e.Will the proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? i.If No, anticipated period of construction: ii.If Yes: •Total number of phases anticipated •Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) •Anticipated completion date of final phase _____ month _____year •Generally describe connections or relationships among phases, including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: _______________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 4 of 13 f. Does the project include new residential uses?9 Yes 9 No If Yes, show numbers of units proposed. One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Family (four or more) Initial Phase ___________ ___________ ____________ ________________________ At completion of all phases ___________ ___________ ____________ ________________________ g. Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction (including expansions)? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes, i. Total number of structures ___________ ii.Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: ________height; ________width; and _______ length iii.Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: ______________________ square feet h. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any 9 Yes 9 No liquids, such as creation of a water supply, reservoir, pond, lake, waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, i.Purpose of the impoundment: ________________________________________________________________________________ ii.If a water impoundment, the principal source of the water: 9 Ground water 9 Surface water streams 9 Other specify: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.If other than water, identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv.Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: ____________ million gallons; surface area: ____________ acres v.Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: ________ height; _______ length vi.Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure (e.g., earth fill, rock, wood, concrete): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ D.2. Project Operations a. Does the proposed action include any excavation, mining, or dredging, during construction, operations, or both? 9 Yes 9 No (Not including general site preparation, grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i .What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? _______________________________________________________________ ii.How much material (including rock, earth, sediments, etc.) is proposed to be removed from the site? •Volume (specify tons or cubic yards): ____________________________________________ •Over what duration of time? ____________________________________________________ iii.Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged, and plans to use, manage or dispose of them. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv.Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? 9 Yes 9 No If yes, describe. ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ v.What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? _____________________________________acres vi.What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? _______________________________ acres vii.What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? __________________________ feet viii.Will the excavation require blasting?9 Yes 9 No ix.Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: _____________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of, increase or decrease in size of, or encroachment 9 Yes 9 No into any existing wetland, waterbody, shoreline, beach or adjacent area? If Yes: i.Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected (by name, water index number, wetland map number or geographic description): ______________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 5 of 13 ii. iii. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland, e.g. excavation, fill, placement of structures, or alteration of channels, banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities, alterations and additions in square feet or acres: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Will the proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? Yes 9 No If Yes, describe: __________________________________________________________________________________________ iv.Will the proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: •acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed: ___________________________________________________________ •expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion:________________________________________ •purpose of proposed removal (e.g. beach clearing, invasive species control, boat access): ____________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ •proposed method of plant removal: ________________________________________________________________________ •if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used, specify product(s): _________________________________________________ v.Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Will the proposed action use, or create a new demand for water? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i.Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: __________________________ gallons/day ii.Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: •Name of district or service area: _________________________________________________________________________ •Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? 9 Yes 9 No •Is the project site in the existing district? 9 Yes 9 No •Is expansion of the district needed? 9 Yes 9 No •Do existing lines serve the project site? 9 Yes 9 No iii.Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: •Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ •Source(s) of supply for the district: ________________________________________________________________________ iv.Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? 9 Yes 9 No If, Yes: •Applicant/sponsor for new district: ________________________________________________________________________ •Date application submitted or anticipated: __________________________________________________________________ •Proposed source(s) of supply for new district: _______________________________________________________________ v.If a public water supply will not be used, describe plans to provide water supply for the project: ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ vi.If water supply will be from wells (public or private), what is the maximum pumping capacity: _______ gallons/minute. d. Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i.Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: _______________ gallons/day ii.Nature of liquid wastes to be generated (e.g., sanitary wastewater, industrial; if combination, describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): __________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: •Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: _____________________________________________________________ •Name of district: ______________________________________________________________________________________ •Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project?9 Yes 9 No • Is the project site in the existing district?9 Yes 9 No • Is expansion of the district needed?9 Yes 9 No Page 6 of 13 9 Yes 9 No •Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? •Will a line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: •Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ____________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv.Will a new wastewater (sewage) treatment district be formed to serve the project site?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: •Applicant/sponsor for new district: ____________________________________________________________________ •Date application submitted or anticipated: _______________________________________________________________ •What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? __________________________________________________ v.If public facilities will not be used, describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project, including specifying proposed receiving water (name and classification if surface discharge or describe subsurface disposal plans): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ vi.Describe any plans or designs to capture, recycle or reuse liquid waste: _______________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ e. Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff, either from new point 9 Yes 9 No sources (i.e. ditches, pipes, swales, curbs, gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater) or non-point source (i.e. sheet flow) during construction or post construction? If Yes: i.How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? _____ Square feet or _____ acres (impervious surface) _____ Square feet or _____ acres (parcel size) ii.Describe types of new point sources. __________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Where will the stormwater runoff be directed (i.e. on-site stormwater management facility/structures, adjacent properties, groundwater, on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ •If to surface waters, identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: ________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ •Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties?9 Yes 9 No iv.Does the proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces, use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater?9 Yes 9 No f. Does the proposed action include, or will it use on-site, one or more sources of air emissions, including fuel 9 Yes 9 No combustion, waste incineration, or other processes or operations? If Yes, identify: i. Mobile sources during project operations (e.g., heavy equipment, fleet or delivery vehicles) _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Stationary sources during construction (e.g., power generation, structural heating, batch plant, crushers) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Stationary sources during operations (e.g., process emissions, large boilers, electric generation) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ g. Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f (above), require a NY State Air Registration, Air Facility Permit,9 Yes 9 No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: i.Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet 9 Yes 9 No ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) ii.In addition to emissions as calculated in the application, the project will generate: •___________Tons/year (short tons) of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) •___________Tons/year (short tons) of Nitrous Oxide (N2O) •___________Tons/year (short tons) of Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) •___________Tons/year (short tons) of Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) •___________Tons/year (short tons) of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflourocarbons (HFCs) •___________Tons/year (short tons) of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) Page 7 of 13 h. Will the proposed action generate or emit methane (including, but not limited to, sewage treatment plants,9 Yes 9 No landfills, composting facilities)? If Yes: i.Estimate methane generation in tons/year (metric): ________________________________________________________________ ii. Describe any methane capture, control or elimination measures included in project design (e.g., combustion to generate heat or electricity, flaring): ________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i. Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes, such as 9 Yes 9 No quarry or landfill operations? If Yes: Describe operations and nature of emissions (e.g., diesel exhaust, rock particulates/dust): _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ j. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial 9 Yes 9 No new demand for transportation facilities or services? If Yes: i.When is the peak traffic expected (Check all that apply): † Morning † Evening †Weekend † Randomly between hours of __________ to ________. ii.For commercial activities only, projected number of truck trips/day and type (e.g., semi trailers and dump trucks): _____________ iii. iv. v. Parking spaces: Existing ___________________ Proposed ___________ Net increase/decrease _____________________ Does the proposed action include any shared use parking? Yes No 9 Yes 9 No vi.Are public/private transportation service(s) or facilities available within ½ mile of the proposed site? vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid, electric 9 Yes 9 No or other alternative fueled vehicles? viii. Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing 9 Yes 9 No pedestrian or bicycle routes? k. Will the proposed action (for commercial or industrial projects only) generate new or additional demand 9 Yes 9 No for energy? If Yes: i.Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: ____________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project (e.g., on-site combustion, on-site renewable, via grid/local utility, or other): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Will the proposed action require a new, or an upgrade, to an existing substation?9 Yes 9 No l. Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply. i. During Construction:ii.During Operations: •Monday - Friday: _________________________•Monday - Friday: ____________________________ •Saturday: ________________________________•Saturday: ___________________________________ •Sunday: _________________________________•Sunday: ____________________________________ •Holidays: ________________________________•Holidays: ___________________________________ If the proposed action includes any modification of existing roads, creation of new roads or change in existing access, describe: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 8 of 13 m. Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction,9 Yes 9 No operation, or both? If yes: i.Provide details including sources, time of day and duration: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Will the proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen?9 Yes 9 No Describe: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ n. W th ill prop e os actio ed hav n e outd ligh oor ting? 9 Yes 9 No If yes: i.Describe source(s), location(s), height of fixture(s), direction/aim, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen?9 Yes 9 No Describe: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ o.Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day?9 Yes 9 No If Yes, describe possible sources, potential frequency and duration of odor emissions, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: ______________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ p.9 Yes 9 No Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum (combined capacity of over 1,100 gallons) or chemical products 185 gallons in above ground storage or any amount in underground storage? If Yes: i.Product(s) to be stored ______________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Volume(s) ______ per unit time ___________ (e.g., month, year) iii.Generally, describe the proposed storage facilities:________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ q. Will the proposed action (commercial, industrial and recreational projects only) use pesticides (i.e., herbicides,9 Yes 9 No insecticides) during construction or operation? If Yes: i.Describe proposed treatment(s): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices?9 Yes 9 No r. Will the proposed action (commercial or industrial projects only) involve or require the management or disposal 9 Yes 9 No of solid waste (excluding hazardous materials)? If Yes: i.Describe any solid waste(s) to be generated during construction or operation of the facility: •Construction: ____________________ tons per ________________ (unit of time) •Operation : ____________________ tons per ________________ (unit of time) ii.Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste: •Construction: ________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ •Operation: __________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site: •Construction: ________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ •Operation: __________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 9 of 13 s. Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i.Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site (e.g., recycling or transfer station, composting, landfill, or other disposal activities): ___________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Anticipated rate of disposal/processing: •________ Tons/month, if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment, or •________ Tons/hour, if combustion or thermal treatment iii.If landfill, anticipated site life: ________________________________ years t. Will the proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation, treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous 9 Yes 9 No waste? If Yes: i.Name(s) of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated, handled or managed at facility: ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: ___________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated _____ tons/month iv.Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: ____________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ v.Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: provide name and location of facility: _______________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ If No: describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ E. Site and Setting of Proposed Action E.1. Land uses on and surrounding the project site a. Existing land uses. i.Check all uses that occur on, adjoining and near the project site. 9 Urban 9 Industrial 9 Commercial 9 Residential (suburban) 9 Rural (non-farm) 9 Forest 9 Agriculture 9 Aquatic 9 Other (specify): ____________________________________ ii.If mix of uses, generally describe: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Land uses and covertypes on the project site. Land use or Covertype Current Acreage Acreage After Project Completion Change (Acres +/-) •Roads, buildings, and other paved or impervious surfaces •Forested •Meadows, grasslands or brushlands (non- agricultural, including abandoned agricultural) •Agricultural (includes active orchards, field, greenhouse etc.) •Surface water features (lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, etc.) •Wetlands (freshwater or tidal) •Non-vegetated (bare rock, earth or fill) •Other Describe: _______________________________ ________________________________________ Page 10 of 13 c. Is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation?9 Yes 9 No i.If Yes: explain: __________________________________________________________________________________________ d. Are there any facilities serving children, the elderly, people with disabilities (e.g., schools, hospitals, licensed 9 Yes 9 No day care centers, or group homes) within 1500 feet of the project site? If Yes, i.Identify Facilities: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ e. Does the project site contain an existing dam?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i.Dimensions of the dam and impoundment: •Dam height: _________________________________ feet •Dam length: _________________________________ feet •Surface area: _________________________________ acres •Volume impounded: _______________________________ gallons OR acre-feet ii.Dam=s existing hazard classification: _________________________________________________________________________ iii.Provide date and summarize results of last inspection: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ f. Has the project site ever been used as a municipal, commercial or industrial solid waste management facility,9 Yes 9 No or does the project site adjoin property which is now, or was at one time, used as a solid waste management facility? If Yes: i. Has the facility been formally closed?9 Yes 9 No •If yes, cite sources/documentation: _______________________________________________________________________ ii.Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities: __________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ g. Have hazardous wastes been generated, treated and/or disposed of at the site, or does the project site adjoin 9 Yes 9 No property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste? If Yes: i.Describe waste(s) handled and waste management activities, including approximate time when activities occurred: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site, or have any 9 Yes 9 No remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site? If Yes: i.Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site 9 Yes 9 No Remediation database? Check all that apply: 9 Yes – Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): ________________________________ 9 Yes – Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID number(s): ________________________________ 9 Neither database ii.If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities, describe control measures:_______________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database?9 Yes 9 No If yes, provide DEC ID number(s): ______________________________________________________________________________ iv.If yes to (i), (ii) or (iii) above, describe current status of site(s): _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 11 of 13 v.Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses?9 Yes 9 No •If yes, DEC site ID number: ____________________________________________________________________________ •Describe the type of institutional control (e.g., deed restriction or easement): ____________________________________ •Describe any use limitations: ___________________________________________________________________________ •Describe any engineering controls: _______________________________________________________________________ •Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place?9 Yes 9 No •Explain: ____________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site a. What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? ________________ feet b. Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site?9 Yes 9 No If Yes, what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? __________________% c. Predominant soil type(s) present on project site: ___________________________ __________% ___________________________ __________% ____________________________ __________% d. What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: _________ feet e. Drainage status of project site soils: 9 Well Drained:_____% of site 9 Moderately Well Drained: _____% of site 9 Poorly Drained _____% of site f. Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: 9 0-10%:_____% of site 9 10-15%: _____% of site 9 15% or greater: _____% of site g. Are there any unique geologic features on the project site?9 Yes 9 No If Yes, describe: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ h. Surface water features. i.Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies (including streams, rivers,9 Yes 9 No ponds or lakes)? ii.Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site?9 Yes 9 No If Yes to either i or ii, continue. If No, skip to E.2.i. iii.Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal,9 Yes 9 No state or local agency? iv.For each identified regulated wetland and waterbody on the project site, provide the following information: •Streams: Name ____________________________________________ Classification _______________________ •Lakes or Ponds: Name ____________________________________________ Classification _______________________•Wetlands: Name ____________________________________________ Approximate Size ___________________ •Wetland No. (if regulated by DEC) _____________________________ v.Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired 9 Yes 9 No waterbodies? If yes, name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: _____________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i.Is the project site in a designated Floo dway?9 Yes 9 No j.Is the project site in the 100-year Floodplain?9 Yes 9 No k.Is the project site in the 500-year Floodplain?9 Yes 9 No l. Is the project site located over, or immediately adjoining, a primary, principal or sole source aquifer?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i.Name of aquifer: _________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 12 of 13 m. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site: ______________________________ ______________________________ _______________________________ ______________________________ ______________________________ _______________________________ ______________________________ n. Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i.Describe the habitat/community (composition, function, and basis for designation): _____________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Source(s) of description or evaluation: ________________________________________________________________________ iii.Extent of community/habitat: •Currently: ______________________ acres •Following completion of project as proposed: _____________________ acres •Gain or loss (indicate + or -): ______________________ acres o. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as 9 Yes 9 No endangered or threatened, or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species? p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare, or as a species of 9 Yes 9 No special concern? q. Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting, trapping, fishing or shell fishing?9 Yes 9 No If yes, give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: ___________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site a. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to 9 Yes 9 No Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: _________________________________________________________________ b. Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present?9 Yes 9 No i.If Yes: acreage(s) on project site? ___________________________________________________________________________ ii.Source(s) of soil rating(s): _________________________________________________________________________________ c. Does the project site contain all or part of, or is it substantially contiguous to, a registered National 9 Yes 9 No Natural Landmark? If Yes: i.Nature of the natural landmark: 9 Biological Community 9 Geological Feature ii.Provide brief description of landmark, including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: ___________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ d. Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i.CEA name: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Basis for designation: _____________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Designating agency and date: ______________________________________________________________________________ If Yes: i.Species and listing (endangered or threatened):______________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ If Yes: i.Species and listing:____________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 13 of 13 e. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district 9 Yes 9 No which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? If Yes: i.Nature of historic/archaeological resource: 9 Archaeological Site 9 Historic Building or District ii.Name: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Brief description of attributes on which listing is based: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ f. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for 9 Yes 9 No archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory? g. Have additional archaeological or historic site(s) or resources been identified on the project site?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i. Describe possible resource(s): _______________________________________________________________________________ ii.Basis for identification: ___________________________________________________________________________________ h.9 Yes 9 No Is the project site within fives miles of any officially designated and publicly accessible federal, state, or local scenic or aesthetic resource? If Yes: i.Identify resource: _________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Nature of, or basis for, designation (e.g., established highway overlook, state or local park, state historic trail or scenic byway, etc.): ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Distance between project and resource: _____________________ miles. i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers 9 Yes 9 No Program 6 NYCRR 666? If Yes: i.Identify the name of the river and its designation: ________________________________________________________________ ii.Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666?9 Yes 9 No F. Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project. If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal, please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them. G. Verification I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name ___________________________________ Date_______________________________________ Signature________________________________________________ Title_______________________________________ EAF Mapper Summary Report Monday, October 20, 2025 2:00 PM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources to confirm data provided by the Mapper or to obtain data not provided by the Mapper. B.i.i [Coastal or Waterfront Area]No B.i.ii [Local Waterfront Revitalization Area]No C.2.b. [Special Planning District]Yes - Digital mapping data are not available for all Special Planning Districts. Refer to EAF Workbook. C.2.b. [Special Planning District - Name]NYS Heritage Areas:Mohawk Valley Heritage Corridor E.1.h [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Potential Contamination History] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Listed] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Environmental Site Remediation Database] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.1.h.iii [Within 2,000' of DEC Remediation Site] No E.2.g [Unique Geologic Features]No E.2.h.i [Surface Water Features]Yes - Digital mapping information on local, New York State, and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to the EAF Workbook. E.2.h.ii [Surface Water Features]Yes - Digital mapping information on local, New York State, and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to the EAF Workbook. E.2.h.iii [Surface Water Features]Yes - Digital mapping information on local, New York State, and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to the EAF Workbook. E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Stream Name] 941-137.1 E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Stream Classification] C(TS) E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Wetlands Name] Federal Waters 1Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report E.2.h.v [Impaired Water Bodies]No E.2.i. [Floodway]Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.2.j. [100 Year Floodplain]Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.2.k. [500 Year Floodplain]Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.2.l. [Aquifers]Yes E.2.l. [Aquifer Names]Principal Aquifer E.2.n. [Natural Communities]Yes E.2.n.i [Natural Communities - Name]Red Maple-Swamp White Oak Swamp E.2.n.i [Natural Communities - Acres]2.67 E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species]Yes E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species - Name] Frosted Elfin, Karner Blue E.2.p. [Rare Plants or Animals]No E.3.a. [Agricultural District]No E.3.c. [National Natural Landmark]No E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area]No E.3.e. [National or State Register of Historic Places or State Eligible Sites] Yes - Digital mapping data for archaeological site boundaries are not available. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.3.e.ii [National or State Register of Historic Places or State Eligible Sites - Name] Saratoga Spa State Park District E.3.f. [Archeological Sites]Yes E.3.i. [Designated River Corridor]No 2Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report Page 1 of 13 FEAF 2026                   Agency Use Only [If applicable] Full Environmental Assessment Form Project : Part 2 - Identification of Potential Project Impacts Date : Part 2 is to be completed by the lead agency. Part 2 is designed to help the lead agency inventory all potential resources that could be affected by a proposed project or action. We recognize that the lead agency=s reviewer(s) will not necessarily be environmental professionals. So, the questions are designed to walk a reviewer through the assessment process by providing a series of questions that can be answered using the information found in Part 1. To further assist the lead agency in completing Part 2, the form identifies the most relevant questions in Part 1 that will provide the information needed to answer the Part 2 question. When Part 2 is completed, the lead agency will have identified the relevant environmental areas that may be impacted by the proposed activity. If the lead agency is a state agency and the action is in any Coastal Area, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Tips for completing Part 2:  Review all of the information provided in Part 1.  Review any application, maps, supporting materials and the Full EAF Workbook.  Answer each of the 18 questions in Part 2.  If you answer “Yes” to a numbered question, please complete all the questions that follow in that section.  If you answer “No” to a numbered question, move on to the next numbered question.  Check appropriate column to indicate the anticipated size of the impact.  Proposed projects that would exceed a numeric threshold contained in a question should result in the reviewing agency checking the box “Moderate to large impact may occur.”  The reviewer is not expected to be an expert in environmental analysis.  If you are not sure or undecided about the size of an impact, it may help to review the sub-questions for the general question and consult the workbook.  When answering a question consider all components of the proposed activity, that is, the whole action.  Consider the possibility for long-term and cumulative impacts as well as direct impacts.  Answer the question in a reasonable manner considering the scale and context of the project. 1. Impact on Land Proposed action may involve construction on, or physical alteration of, the land surface of the proposed site. (See Part 1. D.1) If “Yes”, answer questions a - j. If “No”, move on to Section 2. NO YES Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may involve construction on land where depth to water table is less than 3 feet. E2d b. The proposed action may involve construction on slopes of 15% or greater. E2f c. The proposed action may involve construction on land where bedrock is exposed, or generally within 5 feet of existing ground surface. E2a d. The proposed action may involve the excavation and removal of more than 1,000 tons of natural material. D2a e. The proposed action may involve construction that continues for more than one year or in multiple phases. D1e f. The proposed action may result in increased erosion, whether from physical disturbance or vegetation removal (including from treatment by herbicides). D2e, D2q g. The proposed action is, or may be, located within a Coastal Erosion hazard area. B1i h. Other impacts: Page 2 of 13 FEAF 2026    9 9 99 99  9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 2.Impact on Geological Features The proposed action may result in the modification or destruction of, or inhibit access to, any unique or unusual land forms on the site (e.g., cliffs, dunes, NO YES minerals, fossils, caves). (See Part 1. E.2.g) If “Yes”, answer questions a - c. If “No”, move on to Section 3. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. Identify the specific land form(s) attached:E2g b.The proposed action may affect or is adjacent to a geological feature listed as a registered National Natural Landmark. Specific feature: E3c c. Other impacts: 3.Impacts on Surface Water The proposed action may affect one or more wetlands or other surface water bodies (e.g., streams, rivers, ponds or lakes). (See Part 1. D.2, E.2.h) If “Yes”, answer questions a - l. If “No”, move on to Section 4. NO YES Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a.The proposed action may create a new water body.D2b, D1h b.The proposed action may result in an increase or decrease of over 10% or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water. D2b c. The proposed action may involve dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from a wetland or water body. D2a d.The proposed action may involve construction within or adjoining a freshwater or tidal wetland, or in the bed or banks of any other water body. E2h e. The proposed action may create turbidity in a waterbody, either from upland erosion, runoff or by disturbing bottom sediments. D2a, D2h f.The proposed action may include construction of one or more intake(s) for withdrawal of water from surface water. D2c g.The proposed action may include construction of one or more outfall(s) for discharge of wastewater to surface water(s). D2d h.The proposed action may cause soil erosion, or otherwise create a source of stormwater discharge that may lead to siltation or other degradation of receiving water bodies. D2e i. The proposed action may affect the water quality of any water bodies within or downstream of the site of the proposed action. E2h j. The proposed action may involve the application of pesticides or herbicides in or around any water body. D2q, E2h 9 k.The proposed action may require the construction of new, or expansion of existing, wastewater treatment facilities. D1a, D2d Page 3 of 13 FEAF 2026   9 9  9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9  l. Other impacts: 4. Impact on groundwater The proposed action may result in new or additional use of ground water, or NO YES may have the potential to introduce contaminants to ground water or an aquifer. (See Part 1. D.2.a, D.2.c, D.2.d, D.2.p, D.2.q, D.2.t) If “Yes”, answer questions a - h. If “No”, move on to Section 5. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact may occur impact may occur a. The proposed action may require new water supply wells, or create additional demand on supplies from existing water supply wells. D2c b. Water supply demand from the proposed action may exceed safe and sustainable withdrawal capacity rate of the local supply or aquifer. Cite Source: D2c c. The proposed action may allow or result in residential uses in areas without water and sewer services. D1a, D2c d. The proposed action may include or require wastewater discharged to groundwater. D2d, E2l e. The proposed action may result in the construction of water supply wells in locations where groundwater is, or is suspected to be, contaminated. D2c, E1f, E1g, E1h f. The proposed action may require the bulk storage of petroleum or chemical products over ground water or an aquifer. D2p, E2l g. The proposed action may involve the commercial application of pesticides within 100 feet of potable drinking water or irrigation sources. E2h, D2q, E2l, D2c h. Other impacts: 5. Impact on Flooding The proposed action may result in development on lands subject to flooding. (See Part 1. E.2) If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, move on to Section 6. NO YES Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may result in development in a designated floodway. E2i b. The proposed action may result in development within a 100-year or a 500-year floodplain. E2j, E5a, E5b c. The proposed action may result in development in an area potentially affected by sea level rise. E2k, E5c d. The proposed action may result in, or require, modification of existing drainage patterns. D2b, D2e e. The proposed action may change flood water flows that contribute to flooding. D2b, E2i, E2j, E2k f. If there is a dam located on the site of the proposed action, is the dam in need of repair, or upgrade? E1e Page 4 of 13 FEAF 2026   9 9   g. Other impacts: 6. Impacts on Air and Climate The proposed action may include a state regulated air emission source. NO YES (See Part 1. D.2.f., D.2.h, D.2.g) or generate greenhouse gas emissions over 10,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents (See Part 1. D.2.h) If “Yes”, answer questions a - i. If “No”, move on to Section 7. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact may occur impact may occur a. If the proposed action requires federal or state air emission permits, the action may also have the potential to emit one or more regulated air contaminants at or above the following levels: D2g i. More than 100 short tons/year of carbon monoxide (CO) ii. More than 100 short tons/year of oxides of nitrogen (NOx) outside the NYC Metropolitan Area or Long Island OR 25 short tons/year within the NYC D2g Metropolitan Area or Long Island D2g iii. More than 100 short tons/year of particulate matter (PM-10, PM-2.5) iv. More than 50 short tons/year of volatile organic compounds (VOC) outside the NYC Metropolitan Area or Long Island OR 25 short tons/year within the NYC D2g Metropolitan Area or Long Island v. More than 100 short tons/year of sulfur dioxide (SO2) D2g b. The proposed action has the potential to emit 10 short tons/year or more of any one designated hazardous air pollutant, or 25 short tons/year or more of any combination of such hazardous air pollutants. D2g c. The proposed action may include a heat source capable of producing more than 20 million BTUs per hour. D2f, D2g d. The proposed action may exceed 50% of any of the thresholds in “a” or “b”, above. D2g e. The proposed action may result in the combustion or thermal treatment of solid, hazardous, or hospital/medical/infectious waste. D2f, D2s f. The proposed action is subject to the Nonattainment New Source Review or Prevention of Significant Deterioration requirements discussed in 6 NYCRR Part 231. D2g g. The proposed action will emit more than 10,000 metric tons of CO2 equivalents per year. D2h h. A municipality adopted comprehensive or individual plan addressing climate change applies to the proposed action and the proposed action would materially conflict with the achievement of one or more goals of the plan related to climate change. C2d i. Other impacts: Page 5 of 13 FEAF 2026 7. Impact on Plants and Animals The proposed action may result in a loss of flora or fauna. (See Part 1. E.2. m.-q.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - j. If “No”, move on to Section 8. NO YES Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may cause reduction in population or loss of individuals of any threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. E2o b. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by any rare, threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the federal government. E2o c. The proposed action may cause reduction in population, or loss of individuals, of any species of special concern or conservation need, as listed by New York State or the Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. E2p d. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by any species of special concern and conservation need, as listed by New York State or the Federal government. E2p Page 6 of 13 FEAF 2026  9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9  9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 e. The proposed action may diminish the capacity of a registered National Natural Landmark to support the biological community it was established to protect. E3c f. The proposed action may result in the removal of, or ground disturbance in, any portion of a designated significant natural community. Source: E2n g. The proposed action may substantially interfere with nesting/breeding, foraging, or over-wintering habitat for the predominant species that occupy or use the project site. E2m h. The proposed action requires the conversion of more than 10 acres of forest, grassland or any other regionally or locally important habitat. Habitat type & information source: E1b i. Proposed action (commercial, industrial or recreational projects, only) involves use of herbicides or pesticides. D2q j. Other impacts: 8. Impact on Agricultural Resources The proposed action may impact agricultural resources. (See Part 1. E.3.a. and b.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - h. If “No”, move on to Section 9. NO YES Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may impact soil classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System. E2c, E3b b. The proposed action may sever, cross or otherwise limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc). E1a, Elb c. The proposed action may result in the excavation or compaction of the soil profile of active agricultural land. E3b d. The proposed action may irreversibly convert agricultural land to non-agricultural uses, either more than 2.5 acres if located in an Agricultural District, or more than 10 acres if not within an Agricultural District. E1b, E3a e. The proposed action may disrupt or prevent installation of an agricultural land management system. El a, E1b f. The proposed action may result, directly or indirectly, in increased development potential or pressure on farmland. C2c, C3, D2c, D2d g. The proposed project is not consistent with the adopted municipal Farmland Protection Plan. C2c h. Other impacts: Page 7 of 13 FEAF 2026    9 9 9 9 9 999 9 999 99 9 9 9 9  9 9 9 9 9 9 9. Impact on Aesthetic Resources The land use of the proposed action is obviously different from, or are in sharp contrast to, current land use patterns between the proposed project and a scenic or aesthetic resource. (Part 1. E.1.a, E.1.b, E.3.h.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, go to Section 10. NO YES Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact may occur impact may occur a. Proposed action may be visible from any officially designated federal, state, or local scenic or aesthetic resource. E3h b. The proposed action may result in the obstruction, elimination or significant screening of one or more officially designated scenic views. E3h, C2b c. The proposed action may be visible from publicly accessible vantage points: i. Seasonally (e.g., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) ii. Year round E3h d. The situation or activity in which viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is: i. Routine travel by residents, including travel to and from work ii. Recreational or tourism-based activities E3h E2q, E1c e. The proposed action may cause a diminishment of the public enjoyment and appreciation of the designated aesthetic resource. E3h f. There are similar projects visible within the following distance of the proposed project: 0-1/2 mile ½ -3 mile 3-5 mile 5+ mile D1a, E1a, D1f, D1g g. Other impacts: 10. Impact on Historic and Archeological Resources The proposed action may occur in or adjacent to a historic or archaeological resource. (Part 1. E.3.e, f. and g.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, go to Section 11. NO YES Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact may occur impact may occur a. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous to, any buildings, archaeological site or district which is listed on the National or State Register of Historical Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places. E3e b. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous to, an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory. E3f c. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous to, an archaeological site not included on the NY SHPO inventory. Source: E3g Page 8 of 13 FEAF 2026   9 9 9 9 9 9 99  9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9  9 9 9 9 9 9 d. Other impacts: If any of the above (a-d) are answered “Moderate to large impact may e. occur”, continue with the following questions to help support conclusions in Part 3: i. The proposed action may result in the destruction or alteration of all or part of the site or property. ii. The proposed action may result in the alteration of the property’s setting or integrity. iii. The proposed action may result in the introduction of visual elements which are out of character with the site or property, or that may alter its setting. E3e, E3g, E3f E3e, E3f, E3g, E1a, E1b E3e, E3f, E3g, E3h, C2, C3 11. Impact on Open Space and Recreation The proposed action may result in a loss of recreational opportunities or a NO YES reduction of an open space resource as designated in any adopted municipal open space plan. (See Part 1. C.2.c, E.1.c., E.2.q.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, go to Section 12. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact may occur impact may occur a. The proposed action may result in an impairment of natural functions, or “ecosystem D2e, E1b services”, provided by an undeveloped area, including but not limited to stormwater E2h, storage, nutrient cycling, wildlife habitat. E2m, E2o, E2n, E2p b. The proposed action may result in the loss of a current or future recreational resource. C2a, E1c, C2c, E2q c. The proposed action may eliminate open space or recreational resource in an area with few such resources. C2a, C2c E1c, E2q d. The proposed action may result in loss of an area now used informally by the community as an open space resource. C2c, E1c e. Other impacts: 12. Impact on Critical Environmental Areas The proposed action may be located within or adjacent to a critical environmental area (CEA). (See Part 1. E.3.d) If “Yes”, answer questions a - c. If “No”, go to Section 13. NO YES Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource or characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. E3d b. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quality of the resource or characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. E3d c. Other impacts: Page 9 of 13 FEAF 2026     99 99 9 9 99 99  99 9 9 9 9 9 9  9 9 9 9 9 9 13.Impact on Transportation The proposed action may result in a change to existing transportation systems.NO YES (See Part 1. D.2.j) If “Yes”, answer questions a - f. If “No”, go to Section 14. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. Projected traffic increase may exceed capacity of existing road network.D2j b.The proposed action may result in the construction of paved parking area for 500 or more vehicles. D2j c. The proposed action will degrade existing transit access.D2j d. The proposed action will degrade existing pedestrian or bicycle accommodations.D2j e. The proposed action may alter the present pattern of movement of people or goods.D2j f.Other impacts: 14.Impact on Energy The proposed action may cause an increase in the use of any form of energy. (See Part 1. D.2.k) If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, go to Section 15. NO YES Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action will require a new, or an upgrade to an existing, substation.D2k b.The proposed action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two-family residences or to serve a commercial or industrial use. D1f, D1q, D2k c. The proposed action may utilize more than 2,500 MWhrs per year of electricity.D2k d.The proposed action may involve heating and/or cooling of more than 100,000 square feet of building area when completed. D1g e. Other Impacts: 15.Impact on Noise, Odor, and Light The proposed action may result in an increase in noise, odors, or outdoor lighting.NO (See Part 1. D.2.m., n., and o.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - f. If “No”, go to Section 16. YES Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may produce sound above noise levels established by local regulation. D2m b.The proposed action may result in blasting within 1,500 feet of any residence, hospital, school, licensed day care center, or nursing home. D2m, E1d c.The proposed action may result in routine odors for more than one hour per day.D2o Page 10 of 13 FEAF 2026  9 9 9 9 9 9  9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 d. The proposed action may result in light shining onto adjoining properties. D2n e. The proposed action may result in lighting creating sky-glow brighter than existing area conditions. D2n, E1a f. Other impacts: 16. Impact on Human Health The proposed action may have an impact on human health from exposure NO to new or existing sources of contaminants. (See Part 1.D.2.q., E.1. d. f. g. and h.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - m. If “No”, go to Section 17. YES Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action is located within 1500 feet of a school, hospital, licensed day care center, group home, nursing home or retirement community. E1d b. The site of the proposed action is currently undergoing remediation. E1g, E1h c. There is a completed emergency spill remediation, or a completed environmental site remediation on, or adjacent to, the site of the proposed action. E1g, E1h d. The site of the action is subject to an institutional control limiting the use of the property (e.g., easement or deed restriction). E1g, E1h e. The proposed action may affect institutional control measures that were put in place to ensure that the site remains protective of the environment and human health. E1g, E1h f. The proposed action has adequate control measures in place to ensure that future generation, treatment and/or disposal of hazardous wastes will be protective of the environment and human health. D2t g. The proposed action involves construction or modification of a solid waste management facility. D2q, E1f h. The proposed action may result in the unearthing of solid or hazardous waste. D2q, E1f i. The proposed action may result in an increase in the rate of disposal, or processing, of solid waste. D2r, D2s j. The proposed action may result in excavation or other disturbance within 2000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. E1f, E1g E1h k. The proposed action may result in the migration of explosive gases from a landfill site to adjacent off-site structures. E1f, E1g l. The proposed action may result in the release of contaminated leachate from the project site. D2s, E1f, D2r m. Other impacts: Page 11 of 13 FEAF 2026    9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9  9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 17. Consistency with Community Plans The proposed action is not consistent with adopted land use plans. (See Part 1. C.1, C.2. and C.3.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - h. If “No”, go to Section 18. NO YES Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact may occur impact may occur a. The proposed action’s land use components may be different from, or in sharp contrast to, current surrounding land use pattern(s). C2, C3, D1a E1a, E1b b. The proposed action will cause the permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located to grow by more than 5%. C2 c. The proposed action is inconsistent with local land use plans or zoning regulations. C2, C2, C3 d. The proposed action is inconsistent with any County plans, or other regional land use plans. C2, C2 e. The proposed action may cause a change in the density of development that is not supported by existing infrastructure or is distant from existing infrastructure. C3, D1c, D1d, D1f, D1d, Elb f. The proposed action is in an area characterized by low density development that will require new or expanded public infrastructure. C4, D2c, D2d D2j g. The proposed action may induce secondary development impacts (e.g., residential or commercial development not included in the proposed action) C2a h. Other: 18. Consistency with Community Character The proposed project is inconsistent with the existing community character. (See Part 1. C.2, C.3, D.2, E.3) If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, proceed to Part 3. NO YES Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact may occur impact may occur a. The proposed action may replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures, or areas of historic importance to the community. E3e, E3f, E3g b. The proposed action may create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire) C4 c. The proposed action may displace affordable or low-income housing in an area where there is a shortage of such housing. C2, C3, D1f D1g, E1a d. The proposed action may interfere with the use or enjoyment of officially recognized or designated public resources. C2, E3 e. The proposed action is inconsistent with the predominant architectural scale and character. C2, C3 f. Proposed action is inconsistent with the character of the existing natural landscape. C2, C3 E1a, E1b E2g, E2h g. Other impacts: Page 12 of 13 FEAF 2026 19. Impact on Disadvantaged Communities The proposed project may impact a disadvantaged community. NO YES (See Part 1. E.4) If “Yes”, answer questions a - g . If “No”, proceed to Part 3. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact may occur impact may occur a. Is the potentially affected disadvantaged community identified as having comparatively higher burdens or vulnerabilities by the Disadvantaged Community Assessment Tool? E.4.c b. The proposed action may create new air emissions or increase existing air emissions within a disadvantaged community. D.2.f-i, E.4 c. The proposed action may create new wastewater treatment or discharges, or expand existing wastewater treatment or discharges, within a disadvantaged community. D.2.d d. The proposed action creates or expands a solid or hazardous waste management facility, or involves the generation of solid or hazardous waste, within or near a disadvantaged community. D.2.r, D.2.s, D.2.t, E.1.f, E.1.g e. The proposed action may increase traffic within a disadvantaged community. D.2.j f. The proposed action affects or involves one or more of the following facility C.3.c, D.1.a, types: D.1.g, D.2.a, i. landfill; ii. other industrial, manufacturing, or mining land uses; D.2.d, D.2.f, E.1.a, E.1.b. E.1.h, E.1.v, iii. major oil or chemical bulk storage facility; iv. municipal waste combustor; v. power generation facility; vi. risk management plan site; vii. remediation site; or viii. scrap metal processor. E.4 g. Other impacts: Page 13 of 13 FEAF 2026 20.Future Physical Climate Risks The proposed project may be vulnerable to future physical climate risks or increase the vulnerability of human or ecological communities to future physical climate risks. NO YES (See Part 1. E.5) If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, proceed to Part 3. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact may occur impact may occur a. The proposed action is vulnerable to damage from a projected 100-year flood.E2j, E5a b.The proposed action is vulnerable to damage from a 500-year flood.E2k, E5b c. The proposed action is in an area potentially affected by sea level rise.E5c d.The proposed action may increase the vulnerability of human or ecological communities to the following: i. drought ii.temperature extremes (hot or cold) iii.extreme storms, including high winds iv.landslides v.coastal erosion vi. stormwater flooding vii. other climate or weather hazards? If yes, describe: _______________________ E5d e.Other impacts: Attachment 2 Concept Site Plan W E S N A D 8 3 W E S N A D 8 3 N19°49'08"E 66.25' N16°56'08"E 616.80' N18°27'35"E 242.44' S 8 0 ° 5 4 ' 4 1 " E 5 7 1 . 8 3 ' N17°05'41"E 400.00' S 8 0 ° 5 2 ' 4 3 " E 3 2 1 . 2 7 ' 0° 5 5 ' 0 4 " W 1 6 5 9 . 9 9 ' 55 ' 0 4 " E 1 6 5 8 . 1 3 ' N19°54'41"E 224.82' SOUTH BROADWAY( U. S. ROUTE 9 ) LANDS N/F 3368 S BROADWAY HOTEL, LLC INSTR. #2022031739 TAX ID: 178.00-2-16 ST. NO. 3368 12 0 . 5 ' PATIO POOL 3 - S T O R Y R E S I D E N T I A L 2 6 U N I T S 3 9 P A R K I N G S P A C E S ( 1 2 P A R K I N G S P A C E S A T G R O U N D F L O O R ) 3- S T O R Y R E S I D E N T I A L 26 U N I T S 39 P A R K I N G S P A C E S (1 2 P A R K I N G S P A C E S A T G R O U N D F L O O R ) 3 - S T O R Y R E S I D E N T I A L 2 2 U N I T S 3 3 P A R K I N G S P A C E S ( 8 P A R K I N G S P A C E S A T G R O U N D F L O O R ) 3 - S T O R Y R E S I D E N T I A L 2 2 U N I T S 3 3 P A R K I N G S P A C E S ( 8 P A R K I N G S P A C E S A T G R O U N D F L O O R ) 9' 24 ' 100' WETLAND BUFFER 3-STORY MIXED-USE 32 UNITS (RES) 15 PARKING SPACES 9,800 SF (COMM) 48 PARKING SPACES 18 ' 24 ' 36' 9 18 ' 24 ' 18 ' 24' PHASE II ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION AREA - SHPO REVIEW PENDING 18'24'18'18'24' 20 19 24 24 18 20 16 22 30 18' 13 18 ' 24 ' 4 4 4 4 STORMWATER PLANTER 360 SF (TYP) PROP. MONUMENT SIGN PROP. DIRECTIONAL SIGN TO NORTHWAY SOUTH TRASH ENCLOSURE TRASH ENCLOSURE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT LANDSCAPE FEATURE POROUS PAVEMENT POROUS PAVEMENT POROUS PAVEMENT DRY SWALE SPILL WAY SPILL WAY 80' 20' 5' 5' BUILDING FOUNDATION 20' ARCHEOLOGICAL BUFFER 3-STORY HOTEL 120 ROOMS 135 PARKING SPACES 24' 66 6 6 33.3' 8' 40' 32 3 25 LAND BANKED PARKING 60' FRONT YARD SETBACK 4 0 ' S I D E Y A R D S E T B A C K 10' PARKING SETBACK 1 0 ' P A R K I N G S E T B A C K 4 0 ' S I D E Y A R D S E T B A C K 1 0 ' P A R K I N G S E T B A C K HOMEWOOD SUITES NY HILTON SARATOGA SPRINGS 3368 S BROADWAY GATEWAY RURAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT UNDEVELOPED LAND GATEWAY RURAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT DE F G WETLANDS WETLANDS WETLANDS MULTI-USE PATH MULTI-USE PATH PRETREATMENT AREA 72 LAND BANKED PARKING 17 LAND BANKED PARKING A INFILTRATION BASIN 15 4 . 6 ' C B 14 55.7' 20 18 PROP. RIGHT-IN / RIGHT OUT ACCESS PROP. FULL ACCESS BOULEVARD ENTRANCE TREE 8" OR LARGER TO BE PRESERVED (TYP.) 24' C-301 CONCEPT PLAN THIS PLAN TO BE UTILIZED FOR SITE LAYOUT PURPOSES ONLY DI S C L A I M E R PROJECT No.: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: CAD I.D.: PROJECT: FOR \\ E G N Y T E D R I V E \ P R O J E C T S \ M A \ 2 0 2 5 \ N Y B 2 5 0 0 9 8 . 0 0 \ C A D \ D R A W I N G S \ P L A N S E T S \ C I V I L S I T E P L A N S \ P - C I V L - S I T E - N Y B 2 5 0 0 9 8 . 0 0 - 1 A - - - - - > L A Y O U T : C - 3 0 1 S I T E SG THIS DRAWING IS INTENDED FOR MUNICIPAL AND/OR AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVAL. IT IS NOT INTENDED AS A CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE. SHEET NUMBER: SHEET TITLE: NYB250098.00-1A SG SRW 12/15/2025 P-CIVL-SITE PROP. SITE PLAN DOCUMENTS HEMLOCK WOODS PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT SOUTH BROADWAY ROUTE 9 CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS SARATOGA COUNTY, NEW YORK TAX MAP NO. 178-2-17.11 & 17.12 1 REVISION 1 - REVISIONS REV DATE COMMENT DRAWN BY CHECKED BY 10/29/2026 PER CITY COMMENTS SG SRW 10/29/2026 FOR CONCEPT PURPOSES ONLY THIS DRAWING IS NOT INTENDED AS A CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE. TH E I N F O R M A T I O N , D E S I G N A N D C O N T E N T O F T H I S P L A N A R E P R O P R I E T A R Y A N D S H A L L N O T B E C O P I E D O R U S E D F O R A N Y P U R P O S E W I T H O U T P R I O R W R I T T E N AU T H O R I Z A T I O N F R O M B O H L E R . O N L Y A P P R O V E D , S I G N E D A N D S E A L E D P L A N S S H A L L B E U T I L I Z E D F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N P U R P O S E S © SI T E C I V I L A N D C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R I N G LA N D S U R V E Y I N G PR O G R A M M A N A G E M E N T LA N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E SU S T A I N A B L E D E S I G N PE R M I T T I N G S E R V I C E S TR A N S P O R T A T I O N S E R V I C E S TM BO H L E R N o v 0 2 , 2 0 2 6 Know what's below. Call before you dig. ALWAYS CALL 811 It's fast. It's free. It's the law. 59 WOLF ROAD, FLOOR 2 ALBANY, NY 12205 Phone: (518) 438-9900 www.BohlerEngineering.com BOHLER PLANNING, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING NY, PLLC TM 1"=50' 0 5012.52550 ZONING TABLE ZONE: GATEWAY RURAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (GC-R) USE: MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT TAX MAP NO. 178-2-17.11 & 17.12 APPLICANT/ OWNER INFORMATION APPLICANT:MATRIX BDC JV, LLC 11 HERBERT DRIVE, SUITE 3, LATHAM, NY 12110 PROPERTY OWNER:EFF-JAY REALTY LLC 171 MADISON AVE STE 1300, NEW YORK, NY 10016 BULK REQUIREMENTS ITEM CODE PERMITTED EXISTING PROPOSED MIN LOT AREA § 240-4.6 20,000 SF (0.46 AC)2,575,272.8 SF (59.1 AC)2,575,272.8 SF (59.1 AC) MIN LOT WIDTH § 240-4.6 100.0'915.3'915.3' MIN LOT DEPTH § 240-4.6 N/A 1,508.0'1,508.0' MIN FRONT YARD SETBACK § 240-4.6 60.0'N/A 120.5' MIN SIDE YARD SETBACK § 240-4.6 20.0'N/A 55.7' MIN REAR YARD SETBACK § 240-4.6 25.0'N/A 918.5' MIN BUILDING HEIGHT § 240-4.6 18.0'N/A TBD MAX BUILDING HEIGHT § 240-4.6 40.0'N/A TBD MAX BUILDING COVERAGE § 240-4.6 35.0%N/A 3.4% MAX IMPERVIOUS SURFACE § 240-4.6 60.0%N/A 10.8% KEY =VARIANCE REQUIRED Attachment 3 Wetland Validation Map Attachment 4 Threatened and Endangered Species Study Threatened and Endangered Species Habitat Suitability Assessment Report South Broadway Mixed Use Development Site Route 9 City of Saratoga Springs Saratoga County, NY October 5, 2026 Prepared by: Michael Nowicki Ecological Solutions, LLC 121 Leon Stocker Drive Stratton, VT 05360 (203) 910-4716 Threatened and Endangered Species Habitat Assessment Report South Broadway Mixed Use Site - City of Saratoga Springs Page 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 3 TABLE 1 COVER TYPES IDENTIFIED ON THE SITE ...................................................................... 3 2.0 HABITAT SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT/CONCLUSION ....................................................................... 4 2.1 Karner blue butterfly .......................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Frosted elfin ....................................................................................................................................... 5 3.0 PHOTOGRAPHS ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 1 Location Map .................................................................................................................... 7 Threatened and Endangered Species Habitat Assessment Report South Broadway Mixed Use Site - City of Saratoga Springs Page 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION Ecological Solutions, LLC completed a threatened and endangered species habitat suitability assessment for the South Broadway mixed use project site consisting of 41.52(+-) acres in the City of Saratoga Springs, Saratoga County, New York (Figure 1). About 8 acres of the front or western part of the site along Route 9 is to be developed as a clustered, mixed-use development containing an extended stay hotel, multi -family residential apartments along with ground floor nonresidential space within a portion of the residential development area. The part of the site to be developed consists of mixed hardwood forest with the remainder of the site containing this habitat type as well as forested wetland with a tributary . The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Environmental Assessment Form Mapper indicates that the karner blue butterfly (Lycaeides melissa samuelis) and frosted elfin (Callophrys irus) are threatened and endangered species potentially located on or in the vicinity of the site. This assessment was completed to determine if suitable habitat exists in the proposed impact area on the site for these species. Habitat was observed on the site on October 2, 2026 and is listed in Table 1. TABLE 1 COVER TYPES IDENTIFIED ON THE SITE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 Mixed Upland Forest Mixed Upland Forest - The proposed development area of about 8 acres or so contains maturing mixed upland forest containing oaks, white pine, maples, birch es in varying dbh sizes and little ground cover. Threatened and Endangered Species Habitat Assessment Report South Broadway Mixed Use Site - City of Saratoga Springs Page 4 2.0 HABITAT SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT/CONCLUSION 2.1 Karner blue butterfly In New York, the karner blue butterfly is found in certain parts of the Hudson Valley sand belt which extends from the Albany Pine Bush north to the Glens Falls area. Within its range, this species is restricted to dry sandy areas with open woods and clearings supporting lupine. This type of habitat is usually associated with pitch pine/scrub oak or oak savannah communities that are maintained by fire at an early stage of plant succession.1 Lupines can occur in power line rights-of-ways and utility corridors, military installations, forest trails, and other open areas that are maintained as early successional landscapes. Without natural or artificial disturbance, savanna and barrens communities yield to shrubs or forests. Lupines in shaded habitats may survive, but u sually with poor vigor and without flowering. Eventually, the lupines are shaded out, making the site unsuitable for Karner blues. Karner blue caterpillars feed only on the leaves of the wild lupine plant. Adults feed on the nectar of flowering plants. This severely restricts where they can survive. The Karner blue butterfly usually has two generations, and thus two hatches, each year. In April, the first group of caterpillars hatch from eggs that were laid the previous year. The caterpillars feed only on wild lupine plant leaves. By about mid-May, the caterpillars pupate and adult butterflies emerge from their cocoon-like chrysalis by the end of May or in early June. These adults mate, laying their eggs in June on or near wild lupine plants. The eggs hatch in about one week and the caterpillars feed for about three weeks. They then pupate and the summer's second generation of adult butterflies appears in July. These adults mate and lay eggs that will not hatch until the following spring. Conclusion - Blue lupine on which karner blue butterflies rely is a perennial plant primarily found on dry, sandy soils in open to partially shaded habitats. Many of the areas where the lupine grows are oak savanna and pine barrens plant communities. The most common trees are the jack pine, red pine, pitch pine, blackjack oak, and scrub oak; a scattering of larger oaks is not unusual. The understory includes grasses, sedges, and forbs. The proposed development part of the site contains a somewhat dense mixed upland forest with no lupine observed and no openings or clearings or savannah like habitat. Since this habitat is not located in the proposed development area there is no impact likely to potential habitat or this species. No mit igation or conservation measures are proposed. 1https://www.dec.ny.gov/animals/7118.html#:~:text=In%20New%20York%2C%20the%20butterfly,clearings%20supporting%20wil d%20blue%20lupine. Threatened and Endangered Species Habitat Assessment Report South Broadway Mixed Use Site - City of Saratoga Springs Page 5 2.2 Frosted elfin This species just like karner blue butterflies relies on pine barrens, oak savannas, or dry oak forest. Frosted elfin also feeds mostly on the flowers or seed pods of blue lupine (Lupinus perennis) or wild indigo depending on the population. Conclusion - Similar to the karner blue butterfly the frosted elfin utilizes pine barren habitat and relies upon blue lupine. Neither this habitat nor the blue lupine was observed in the proposed development area of the site and no conservation measures are proposed. Threatened and Endangered Species Habitat Assessment Report South Broadway Mixed Use Site - City of Saratoga Springs Page 6 3.0 PHOTOGRAPHS Typical habitat in development area of the site. . Threatened and Endangered Species Habitat Assessment Report South Broadway Mixed Use Site - City of Saratoga Springs Page 7 Figure 1 Location Map Attachment 5 Phase I and Phase II Cultural Resources Survey Attachment 6 OPRHP/SHPO Concurrence Letter KATHY HOCHUL Governor KATHY MOSER Commissioner DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION | P.O. BOX 189, WATERFORD, N.Y. 12188 | PARKS.NY.GOV | (518) 237-8643 August 6, 2026 Jennifer Betsworth NYS Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway Albany, NY 12207 Re: DEC South Broadway Commercial Development South Broadway Parcel Id: 178.-2-17.11, Saratoga Springs, Saratoga County, NY 25PR07972 Dear Jennifer Betsworth: Thank you for requesting the comments of the Division for Historic Preservation of the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP). We have reviewed the submitted materials in accordance with the New York State Historic Preservation Act of 1980 (Section 14.09 of the New York Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law). These comments are those of the Division for Historic Preservation and relate only to Historic/Cultural resources. They do not include potential environmental impact to New York State Parkland that may be involved in or near your project. The OPRHP has reviewed the archaeological survey report entitled “Phase I and Phase II Cultural Resources Survey, South Broadway Mixed-Use Commercial Development, City of Saratoga Springs, Saratoga County, New York.” (July 2026, 26SR00344). The archaeological survey identified the J. Rouse Historic Site (09140.001522). Based on the report findings, OPRHP recommends that the J. Rouse Historic Site is Not Eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places and we concur with the report recommendation that no additional archaeological work is necessary. It is the opinion of the OPRHP that no properties, including archaeological and/or historic resources, listed in or eligible for the New York State and National Registers of Historic Places will be impacted by this project. If you have any questions, I can be reached at Jessica.Vavrasek@parks.ny.gov. Sincerely, Jessica Vavrasek, Ph.D. Scientist – Archaeology/NAGPRA Attachment 7 Updated Traffic Impact Study 1396 White Bridge Road Chittenango, NY 13037 Tel: (315) 391-5110 June 8, 2026 Bohler Engineering 17 Computer Drive West Albany, NY 12205 Attn: Mr. Steve Wilson Re: Updated Traffic Impact Study – Proposed Mixed Use Development US Route 9, Saratoga Springs, NY Dear Mr. Wilson: I have completed my review of traffic operations associated with the proposed mixed use development on the east side of US Route 9 in Saratoga Springs, NY. This letter summarizes the work completed in this review as well as my findings. This study has been updated in response to comment s received from Creighton Manning Engineering on April 21 st, 2026. Project Understanding The project site is located on the east side of US Route 9 (South Broadway), immediately south of the Homewood Suites hotel, in Saratoga Springs, NY. The site is currently vacant. The proposed development includes a 120 room hotel, 128 apartments, and 9,800 SF of commercial space. Access will be provided to/from US Route 9 via two full access driveways located approximately 310 feet and 580 feet to the south of Homewood Suites driveway. Conceptual site plans prepared by Bohler have been attached. Data Collection Site visits were conducted on Thursday, November 6th and Saturday, November 8 th, 2025 to collect the following information: • Existing Traffic Volume Counts – Traffic turning movement counts were collected at intersections of US Route 9 with Crescent Avenue and E West Road during the weekday morning (7-9am) and evening (4-6pm) peak travel periods on the 6th, and during the Saturday midday (11am-1pm) peak travel period on the 8 th, to ensure that actual peak hours of the adjacent street were captured. The traffic counts included separate heavy vehicle counts on each approach and pedestrians. • US Route 9 Gap Data – Gap data was collected to assess the ability for vehicles to turn in and out of the site driveways on US Route 9. In order for a vehicle to turn right out of either driveway, or left into either driveway, the vehicle only requires a gap in the northbound direction on US Route 9. A vehicle requires a gap in traffic in both directions at the same time Mr. Wilson June 8, 2026 Page 2 of 11 Re: Updated Traffic Impact Study – Proposed Mixed Use Development US Route 9, Saratoga Springs, NY to turn left out of either driveway onto US Route 9. These gaps in traffic were observed and timed on US Route 9 passing the site during the three traffic count periods. The gaps were then converted to a number of vehicles that could turn left or right out of the proposed site driveways during each gap and then totaled for the peak hour. For example, one vehicle can turn from the driveway with a 6-9 second gap in traffic, two can turn with a 10 -13 second gap, 3 with a 14-17 second gap, 4 with an 18 -19 second gap, etc. • Spot Speed Measurements – 50 speed measurements were collected in each direction on US Route 9 to identify average and 85 th percentile operating speeds in the area passing the site. The data was collected for free flow traffic during off -peak times. The weather was sunny and the roadway was dry. • Sight Distance Measurements – Sight lines looking north/south along US Route 9 from the site driveways were collected for comparison to design standards in order to confirm that adequate sight lines are available for safe ingress and egress from the site. • Operational Data - Other data needed to evaluate traffic operations, such as intersection geometry, control, and speeds limits were also collected. Existing signal timing data was obtained from NYSDOT to ensure that the signals at the study area intersections were properly modeled. Additional site visits were conducted on Wednesday, May 27 th and Saturday May 30th, 2026 to collect turning movement counts at the existing Tree House Brewing driveways to the north of the site. Existing Operations US Route 9 is classified as a principal urban arterial roadway that has two lanes in each direction with a two way center left turn lane through the study area. There is an auxiliary southbound left turn lane at the Crescent Avenue intersection. There is an auxiliary northbound left turn lane and an auxiliary southbound right turn lane at the E West Road intersection. The posted speed limit on US Route 9 is 55 mph. The US Route 9/Crescent Avenue intersection is control by a fully actuated, uncoordinated traffic signal under the jurisdiction of NYSDOT (#5011). The signal operation includes protected/permitted southbound left turn phasing. The US Route 9/E West Road intersection is control by a fully actuated, uncoordinated traffic signal under the jurisdiction of NYSDOT (#5038). The signal operation includes protected/permitted northbound left turn phasing. Mr. Wilson June 8, 2026 Page 3 of 11 Re: Updated Traffic Impact Study – Proposed Mixed Use Development US Route 9, Saratoga Springs, NY Based on the traffic counts collected, the peak hours were identified as follows: Weekday Morning Peak Hour – 7:30 am to 8:30am Weekday Evening Peak Hour – 4:30pm to 5:30pm Saturday Midday Peak Hour – 12:00pm to 1:00pm The 2025 existing traffic volumes collected in November are shown in the attached Figure 1 for the weekday morning, weekday evening, and Saturday midday peak hours. The traffic count data has been attached The existing traffic counts were reviewed and compared to historical traffic volume data on US Route 9 to identify necessary adjustments, if any, to account for seasonal variations. Specifically, July 9th, 10th, and 11th, 2024 directional traffic counts on US Route 9 to the north of E West Road were taken from the NYSDOT Traffic Data Viewer website and reviewed. The averaged July 2024 traffic counts on US Route 9 had 957 vehicles northbound/716 vehicles southbound during the weekday morning peak hour, and 1038 vehicles northbound/979 vehicles southbound during the weekday evening peak hour passing the site. Based on the 2025 counts collected for this study, there were 959 vehicles northbound/752 vehicles southbound during the weekday morning peak hour, and 961 vehicles northbound/1019 vehicles southbound during the weekday evening peak hour. The combined directional counts collected in 2025 are 2% higher than the 2024 counts during the morning peak hour and 2% lower than the 2024 traffic counts during the evening peak hour. The historical count data has been attached. Since the 2025 traffic counts collected in November are within 2% of the 2024 July traffic counts during both the morning and evening peak hours, there were no adjustments made to the existing traffic volumes. Based on the gap data collected, there are sufficient gaps in traffic to accommodate over 260 vehicles turning right onto US Route 9 from either driveway during each peak hour. These gaps would also be available for vehicles turning left into either driveway. There were sufficient gaps observed to accommodate 100 or more vehicles turning left out of either driveway onto US Route 9 during the three peak hours. There are no concerns with available gaps in traffic to accommodate the proposed development. The gap data is attached. The posted speed limit passing the site is 55 mph on US Route 9. The speed data collected on US Route 9 indicates that the average speeds passing the site are 53 mph northbound and 55 mph southbound. The 85th percentile speeds based on the data collected are 57 mph northbound/57.5 mph southbound on US Route 9 passing the site. The speed data has been attached. Mr. Wilson June 8, 2026 Page 4 of 11 Re: Updated Traffic Impact Study – Proposed Mixed Use Development US Route 9, Saratoga Springs, NY The following table provides a summary of the recommended sight distances along US Route 9 from the AASHTO A Policy on Design of Highways and Street s as well as the available sight distances at the two driveway locations based on field measurements. The speed limit in the area is 55 mph on US Route 9, however the speed data collected indicates that the operating speed is closer to 60 mph in both directions. Therefore 60 mph was used for the sight distance review. The recommended sight distance for vehicles turning left out of the driveways was adjusted to account for the second northbound lane and center turn lane that need to be crossed when exiting the site. Intersection Sight Distance Summary Location Operating Speed Direction AASHTO Recommended Sight Distance Available Sight Distance North Access @ US Route 9 – Turning Left 60 mph Looking Left Looking Right 750 feet 750 feet 1,500+ feet 1,500+ feet North Access @ US Route 9 – Turning Right 60 mph Looking Left 575 feet 1,500+ feet South Access @ US Route 9 – Turning Left 60 mph Looking Left Looking Right 750 feet 750 feet 1,500+ feet 1,500+ feet South Access @ US Route 9 – Turning Right 60 mph Looking Left 575 feet 1,500+ feet There are more than adequate sight distances available in both directions on US Route 9 from both driveways. The recommended stopping sight distance on US Route 9 using the 60 mph operating speed is 570 feet in both the northbound and southbound direction. The roadway is generally level with available stopping sight distances of over 1,000 feet approaching the proposed site driveways in both directions. There are no concerns with intersection or stopping sight distances and safety for ingress and egress from either roadway. Capacity analysis of the existing traffic operations was completed using Synchro 12, the industry accepted standard for the analysis of both signalized and unsignalized intersections that is based on methodologies developed in the Highway Capacity Manual. Intersection and individual movement operations are graded in terms of Level of Service ranging from A to F, as descri bed in the HCM. For example, an un signalized intersection movement with an average delay of 5 seconds per vehicle is considered a Level of Service A while an average delay per vehicle of 2 0 seconds is considered a C. A Level of Service D or better is generally considered acceptable for a signalized intersection while a Level of Service E or better is generally considered acceptable for a n unsignalized intersection. The Synchro capacity analysis of the existing traffic operations indicates that all traffic movements in the study area are operating at an acceptable Level of Service C or better during all three peak hours. The detailed Level of Service and queue summary, and capacity analysis printouts, have been attached. Mr. Wilson June 8, 2026 Page 5 of 11 Re: Updated Traffic Impact Study – Proposed Mixed Use Development US Route 9, Saratoga Springs, NY There are no concerns with existing traffic operations on US Route 9 in the vicinity of the project site as there are ample gaps in traffic and clear sight lines in both directions. There are no capacity concerns with traffic turning on or off US Route 9 at the study area intersections . These findings are consistent with observations made during the data collection effort. Crash Analysis An crash analysis was completed for US Route 9 between Crescent Avenue and E West Road using history reports obtained for a four year period from May 2022 through May 2026. Over the four year period, there were 34 total crashes in the study area. There were 6 crashes at the Crescent Avenue intersection (4 rearend crashes and 2 left turn crashes), 6 crashes at the E West Road intersection (5 rearend crashes and 1 animal related crash ), and 18 midblock crashes along US Route 9 (9 animal related crashes, 3 fixed object crashes, 3 left turn crashes, 2 rearend crashes, and 1 right angle crash). There were 4 crashes in area parking lots included in the data. Based on the US Route 9/Crescent Avenue intersection geometry and annual average daily traffic volumes, the predicted NYSDOT Safety Performance Function is 2.58 total crashes per year and 0.87 injury/fatality crashes per year. The calculated number of total crashes per year were 1.50. The calculated number of injury/fatality crashes per year were 0.00. This intersection has been identified to have a LOSS 2 rating based on total crash history and LOSS 2 rating based on injury crash history. This is not considered a severe crash location. Based on the US Route 9/E West Road intersection geometry and annual average daily traffic volumes, the predicted NYSDOT Safety Performance Function is 1.59 total crashes per year and 0.56 injury/fatality crashes per year. The calculated number of total crashes per year were 1.50. The calculated number of injury/fatality crashes per year were 0.33. This intersection has been identified to have a LOSS 2 rating based on total crash history and LOSS 2 rating based on injury crash history. This is not considered a severe crash location. Based on the US Route 9 roadway geometry and annual average daily traffic volumes, the predicted NYSDOT Safety Performance Function is 22.05 total crashes per year and 4.65 injury/fatality crashes per year. The calculated number of total crashes per year were 4.50. The calculated number of injury/fatality crashes per year were 1.00. This roadway segment has been identified to have a LOSS 2 rating based on total crash history and LOSS 2 rating based on injury crash history. This is not considered a severe crash roadway. Overall, there were 30 property damage only crashes with 4 injury crashes and 1 fatality crashes. The fatality crash occurred on September 30 th, 2025 involving a tractor trailer traveling southbound on US Route 9 striking at pickup truck that stopped on the southbound shoulder of the roadway. The detailed crash summary and calculations have been attached. Mr. Wilson June 8, 2026 Page 6 of 11 Re: Updated Traffic Impact Study – Proposed Mixed Use Development US Route 9, Saratoga Springs, NY 2028 Background Operations The proposed mixed use development is expected to be completed over approximately 3 years, therefore 2028 was used as the design year for this study. In order to fully understand the impacts of the development on the adjacent roadway system, analysis of the operations immediately before the project completion must first be completed. The existing traffic volumes were first adjusted by a growth rate to account for any unknown development that may occur prior to completion of the project. Historical traffic volumes along US Route 9 passing the site, and along Crescent Avenue to the east of US Route 9, were taken from the NYSDOT Traffic Data Viewer website and reviewed in order to identify an appropriate ba ckground growth rate. Long term growth rates in the area have been positive on US Route 9 around +1.1% per year and negative on Crescent Avenue around -2.8% per year between 2015 and 2024. In order to maintain a conservative analysis, a positive +1.0% per year growth was chosen and used to grow the 2025 existing traffic volumes to the 2028 background condition. There are no known specific approved developments in the area that need to be included in the growth projections. The 2030 background traffic volumes with 1% growth per year (3% total) are shown in Figure 2. Capacity analysis of the background operations indicates that there will be minor increases in delay during all three peak hours. The analysis indicates that all traffic movements in the study area will continue to operate at an acceptable Level of Service C or better during the three peak hours. The detailed Level of Service and queue summary, and capacity analysis printouts, have been attached. Trip Generation Estimate and Distribution The proposed development includes 128 apartments, 9,800 SF of commercial/retail space, and a 120 room hotel. Trips generated by the proposed development were estimated using the ITE Trip Generation, 12th Edition, which is the industry accepted standard for estimating traffic generated by new developments. Land Use 220 – Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise), Land Use 822 – Strip Retail (<40K), and Land Use 310 – Hotel, were used. A portion of the retail traffic generated will be drawn from traffic already passing the site on US Route 9 and is referred to as pass-by trips. Pass-by trips are vehicles that are already traveling through the study area but will now stop at the development on their way to another destination, such as stopping on their way to or from work. Based on data from the ITE Trip Generation, the average pass-by trip percentage for Land Use 821 is 40% during the evening peak hour and 31% during the Saturday midday peak hour. A 10% pass -by rate was assumed during the morning peak hour and 25% was Mr. Wilson June 8, 2026 Page 7 of 11 Re: Updated Traffic Impact Study – Proposed Mixed Use Development US Route 9, Saratoga Springs, NY assumed during the evening and Saturday peak hours. All trips associated with the apartments and hotel were assumed to be new trips. The following table summarizes the trip generation estimate for the proposed mixed use development on US Route 9 in the Saratoga Springs. Trip Generation Summary Morning Peak Hour Evening Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour Entering Exiting Entering Exiting Entering Exiting Apartments – 128 Units 13 39 42 25 24 39 Commercial/Retail – 9,800 SF 22 17 31 31 33 32 Hotel – 120 Rooms 21 20 28 28 28 28 Total Trips Generated 56 76 101 84 85 99 Retail Pass-by Trips -2 -2 -7 -7 -8 -8 Total New Trips Generated 54 74 94 77 77 91 Many people expect that residential land uses will generate an average of 2 trips per unit during peak hours. The trip generation rates for residential land uses are generally less than 1 trip per unit for a number of reasons. The primary reason is that people work different times, some may leave for work at 6:30 in the morning while others may leave at 7:30 or 8:30. Subsequently, the arrival patterns home in the evening will also be staggered over multiple hours. Some people work evenings while others may stay at home or work from home. The rates contained in the ITE Trip Generation have been verified and provide an accurate representation of what may be expected for this development during the peak hours of the adjacent streets. The detailed trip generation calculations have been attached. Overall, the mixed use development is expected to be a moderate traffic generator with 56 trips entering/76 trips exiting during the morning peak hour , 101 trips entering/84 trips exiting during the evening peak hour, and 85 trips entering/99 trips exiting during the Saturday peak hour. Based on existing traffic patterns and population centers in the area, 50% of the new trips generated are expected to travel to/from the south on US Route 9, 40% are expected to travel to/from the north on US Route 9, and 10% are expected to travel to/from the east on Crescent Avenue. The expected arrival/departure distribution is shown in Figure 3. The trips generated are shown in Figure 4. The resultant full build traffic volumes are shown in Figure 5. Mr. Wilson June 8, 2026 Page 8 of 11 Re: Updated Traffic Impact Study – Proposed Mixed Use Development US Route 9, Saratoga Springs, NY Build Operations Based on the projected turning movements on US Route 9 at the site driveways, there are more than sufficient gaps available to accommodate the proposed development. Both site driveways are proposed to have two lanes entering the site and one lane exiting the site with stop sign control on the driveways and free flow traffic on US Route 9. Capacity analysis of the build condition with the proposed mixed use development indicates that the development will have only minor impacts on traffic operations at the existing signalized US Route 9 intersections with Crescent Avenue and E West Road. All traffic movements will continue to operate at acceptable Levels of Service C or better during all three peak hour s with the following minor drops in Level of Service noted: • US Route 9 @ Crescent Avenue o Overall Intersection – LOS A to B - +1 second average delay – Morning Peak Hour o WB Left/Right – LOS B to C - +3 seconds average delay – Morning Peak Hour • US Route 9 @ E West Road o EB Left/Right – LOS B to C - +2 seconds average delay – Evening Peak Hour The additional traffic generated by the development will have no notable impacts on traffic operations at the Tree House Brewery driveway s. The driveways are project to operate at Level of Service C or better through the build condition. The site driveways are projected to operate at Level of Service C during all three peak hours with minimal delays on US Route 9. The detailed Level of Service and queue summary, and capacity analysis printouts, have been attached. Signal Warrant Analysis A signal warrant analysis was completed for the site driveway intersections at US Route 9 to confirm that signals are not warranted at either location with the proposed full build out of the proposed mixed use development. The 2028 weekday morning and evening peak hour build traffic volumes for the approaches to both intersections were extrapolated over a typical day from 6am to 7pm based on the typical variation in hourly volumes on urban streets, developed by the Traffic Institute at Northwestern University. The morning peak hour volumes were extrapolated from 6am to 12pm, and the evening peak hour volumes were extrapolated from 12pm to 7pm. Both the typical variation in traffic graphic and estimated hourly traffic volumes at each intersection have been attached. Mr. Wilson June 8, 2026 Page 9 of 11 Re: Updated Traffic Impact Study – Proposed Mixed Use Development US Route 9, Saratoga Springs, NY Traffic Signal Warrant #1 – Eight Hour Vehicular Volume . Condition A – Minimum Vehicular Volume A signal is warranted when the mainline volume exceeds 600 vehicles in both directions combined and the side street exceeds 150 vehicles on one side for 8 hours in one day. The side street volume thresholds are not met for any hour at either driveway. Condition A is not met at Either Driveway. Condition B – Interruption of Continuous Traffic A signal is warranted when the mainline volume exceeds 900 vehicles in both directions combined and the side street exceeds 75 vehicles on one side for 8 hours in one day. The side street volume thresholds are not met for any hour at either driveway. Condition B is not met at Either Driveway. Combination of Conditions A and B A signal is warranted when volumes meet 80% of the requirements for both Conditions A and B. The mainline volume must exceed 720 vehicles in both directions combined and the side street must exceed 120 vehicles on one side for 8 hours in one day. The side street volume thresholds are not met for any hour at either driveway. Combination of Conditions A and B is not met at Either Driveway. Traffic Signal Warrant #1 is Not Met at Either Driveway Traffic Signal Warrant #2 – Four-Hour Vehicular Volume This warrant is similar to Warrant #1 however is based on only four hours and requires higher side street volumes as shown in Figure 4C -1 of the MUTCD manual. The side street volume thresholds are not met for any hour at either driveway. Traffic Signal Warrant #2 is not met at Either Driveway. Traffic Signal Warrant #3 – Peak Hour This warrant requires failing side street operations during the peak hour with a total hourly delay over 5 hours, more than 100 vehicles on the side street and a total intersection volume over 800 vehicles. Mr. Wilson June 8, 2026 Page 10 of 11 Re: Updated Traffic Impact Study – Proposed Mixed Use Development US Route 9, Saratoga Springs, NY The projected volumes and delays without a traffic signal do not meet the required threshold s at either driveway Traffic Signal Warrant #3 is Not Met at Either Driveway Traffic Signal Warrant #4 – Pedestrian Volume This warrant requires high pedestrian volumes with less than 60 available gaps in traffic for the pedestrians to safely cross. Traffic Signal Warrant #4 is Not Met at Either Driveway. Traffic Signal Warrant #5 – School Crossing This warrant requires high student pedestrian volumes with few gaps in traffic for the pedestrians to safely cross. Traffic Signal Warrant #5 is Not Applicable at Either Driveway Traffic Signal Warrant #6 – Coordinated Signal System This warrant applies when a traffic signal would be beneficial to maintain traffic progression through a coordinated corridor. Traffic Signal Warrant #6 is Not Applicable at Either Driveway Traffic Signal Warrant #7 – Crash Experience This warrant can be applied based on crash history if the signal will improve safety. There is no significant crash history in the study area. Traffic Signal Warrant #7 is Not Applicable at Either Driveway Traffic Signal Warrant #8 – Roadway Network This warrant applies when a traffic signal would be beneficial to maintain traffic progression, platooning or improve traffic operations in some other manner in a roadway network. Traffic Signal Warrant #8 is Not Applicable at Either Driveway A traffic signal is not warranted at either of the two proposed site driveways. Mr. Wilson June 8, 2026 Page 11 of 11 Re: Updated Traffic Impact Study – Proposed Mixed Use Development US Route 9, Saratoga Springs, NY The detailed signal warrant analysis has been attached. Conclusions The additional traffic generated by the proposed mixed use development will have no notable or significant impact on traffic operations on US Route 9. The development will only average 1-2 vehicles entering and exiting per minute during the peak hours. There are excellent site lines at both driveways exiting onto US Route 9 , more than sufficient gaps in traffic to accommodate the development, and no notable crash history in the area. There are no capacity concerns noted. There are no off-site mitigation measures recommended. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call. Sincerely, Gordon T. Stansbury, P.E., P.T.O.E. GTS Consulting Attachments – Site Plan Traffic Volume Figures 1-5 Gap Calculations Spot Speed Data Growth Rate Calculations Trip Generation Estimate Crash Data Historical Count Data Count Data MV-104 Crash Reports Synchro Capacity Printouts Signal Warrant Analysis Proposed Mixed Use Development US Route 9 – Saratoga Springs, NY Intersection Level of Service Summary Weekday Morning Peak Hour Intersection Available Storage 2025 Existing 2028 Background 2028 Build LOS Max Queue LOS Max Queue LOS Max Queue US Route 9 @ Crescent Avenue A(10) A(10) B(11) WB Left/Right - B(15) 59 B(15) 62 B(17) 69 NB Through/Right - B(14) 234 B(14) 245 B(14) 262 SB Left 200 A(4) 22 A(4) 23 A(4) 23 SB Through - A(4) 81 A(4) 85 A(4) 92 US Route 9 @ E West Road A(3) A(3) A(3) EB Left 400 B(16) 7 B(16) 7 B(17) 7 EB Right - B(14) 6 B(14) 6 B(14) 6 NB Left 375 A(1) 6 A(2) 6 A(1) 6 NB Through - A(1) 81 A(1) 84 A(1) 87 SB Through - A(6) 176 A(6) 183 A(6) 193 SB Right 200 A(6) 4 A(6) 4 A(6) 4 US Route 9 @ Tree House Entrance Drive NB Through/Right - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 SB Left 150 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 SB Through - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 US Route 9 @ Tree House Exit Drive WB Left/Right - b(13) 0 b(14) 0 b(14) 0 NB Through - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 SB Through - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 US Route 9 @ North Access WB Left/Right - - - - - c(18) 10 NB Through - - - - - a(0) 0 SB Left 150 - - - - b(11) 3 SB Through - - - - - a(0) 0 US Route 9 @ South Access WB Left/Right - - - - - c(20) 15 NB Through - - - - a(0) 0 SB Left 150 - - - - b(11) 3 SB Through - - - - - a(0) 0 B(12) – Signalized Level of Service (Average Delay per Vehicle in Seconds) a(9) – Unsignalized Level of Service (Average Delay per Vehicle in Seconds) Max Queue – 95th Percentile Queue in Feet Proposed Mixed Use Development US Route 9 – Saratoga Springs, NY Intersection Level of Service Summary Weekday Evening Peak Hour Intersection Available Storage 2025 Existing 2028 Background 2028 Build LOS Max Queue LOS Max Queue LOS Max Queue US Route 9 @ Crescent Avenue B(11) B(12) B(12) WB Left/Right - C(21) 87 C(22) 92 C(24) 108 NB Through/Right - B(17) 248 B(17) 262 B(18) 283 SB Left 200 A(5) 32 A(6) 33 A(6) 35 SB Through - A(5) 111 A(5) 118 A(5) 132 US Route 9 @ E West Road A(5) A(5) A(5) EB Left 400 B(19) 17 B(19) 17 C(21) 17 EB Right - B(11) 21 B(11) 22 B(11) 22 NB Left 375 A(1) 3 A(1) 3 A(1) 3 NB Through - A(3) 74 A(3) 76 A(3) 81 SB Through - A(7) 242 A(7) 252 A(7) 263 SB Right 200 A(6) 5 A(6) 5 A(6) 5 US Route 9 @ Tree House Entrance Drive NB Through/Right - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 SB Left 150 b(11) 3 b(11) 4 b(11) 4 SB Through - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 US Route 9 @ Tree House Exit Drive WB Left/Right - c(18) 8 c(19) 8 c(19) 8 NB Through - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 SB Through - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 US Route 9 @ North Access WB Left/Right - - - - - c(19) 13 NB Through - - - - - a(0) 0 SB Left 150 - - - - b(11) 3 SB Through - - - - - a(0) 0 US Route 9 @ South Access WB Left/Right - - - - - c(22) 18 NB Through - - - - a(0) 0 SB Left 150 - - - - b(11) 3 SB Through - - - - - a(0) 0 B(12) – Signalized Level of Service (Average Delay per Vehicle in Seconds) a(9) – Unsignalized Level of Service (Average Delay per Vehicle in Seconds) Max Queue – 95th Percentile Queue in Feet Proposed Mixed Use Development US Route 9 – Saratoga Springs, NY Intersection Level of Service Summary Saturday Midday Peak Hour Intersection Available Storage 2025 Existing 2028 Background 2028 Build LOS Max Queue LOS Max Queue LOS Max Queue US Route 9 @ Crescent Avenue B(12) B(12) B(13) WB Left/Right - B(20) 89 C(21) 95 C(23) 112 NB Through/Right - B(17) 225 B(18) 241 B(18) 270 SB Left 200 A(5) 36 A(6) 38 A(6) 40 SB Through - A(4) 71 A(5) 75 A(5) 86 US Route 9 @ E West Road A(6) A(6) A(6) EB Left 400 B(17) 32 B(17) 32 B(17) 33 EB Right - A(9) 19 A(9) 20 A(9) 20 NB Left 375 A(2) 7 A(2) 7 A(2) 7 NB Through - A(4) 65 A(4) 67 A(4) 71 SB Through - A(8) 138 A(8) 143 A(8) 153 SB Right 200 A(6) 9 A(6) 9 A(6) 9 US Route 9 @ Tree House Entrance Drive NB Through/Right - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 SB Left 150 b(11) 9 b(11) 9 b(12) 10 SB Through - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 US Route 9 @ Tree House Exit Drive WB Left/Right - c(16) 10 c(16) 10 c(17) 10 NB Through - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 SB Through - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 US Route 9 @ North Access WB Left/Right - - - - - c(17) 13 NB Through - - - - - a(0) 0 SB Left 150 - - - - b(11) 3 SB Through - - - - - a(0) 0 US Route 9 @ South Access WB Left/Right - - - - - c(19) 18 NB Through - - - - a(0) 0 SB Left 150 - - - - b(11) 3 SB Through - - - - - a(0) 0 B(12) – Signalized Level of Service (Average Delay per Vehicle in Seconds) a(9) – Unsignalized Level of Service (Average Delay per Vehicle in Seconds) Max Queue – 95th Percentile Queue in Feet O N EW GTS Consulting Proposed Mixed Use Development - US Route 9 - Saratoga Springs,NY Not to Scale 2025 Existing Traffic Volumes Collected November 6th & 8th, 2025 Weekday Morning (Weekday Evening) {Saturday Midday} Peak Hour Figure 1 Proposed Development US Route 9 US Route 9 Crescent Avenue E West Road 21 (7) {29} 957 (952) {871} 2 (9){33}2 (25){29} 2 (4) {11} 750 (1015) {644} 88 (87){101} 30 (53) {51} 959 (961) {904} 0 (0) {0} 836 (829){687} 71 (115) {146} 752 (1019) {655} 0 (0) {0} 727 (871) {584} 83 (112) {127} Weekday Morning Peak Hour -7:30-8:30pm Weekday Evening Peak Hour - 4:30-5:30pm Saturday Midday Peak hour - 12:00am-1:00pm 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 959 (961) {904} 0 (0) {0} 752 (1019) {655} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} Tree House Brewing 942 (981) {918} 763 (1029) {731} 2 (12) {24} 0 (11) {16} 942 (981) {918} 2 (33) {68) 763 (1017) {662} 0 (23) {64} Tree House Counts Collected on 5/27/26 & 5/30/26 O N EW GTS Consulting Proposed Mixed Use Development - US Route 9 - Saratoga Springs,NY Not to Scale 2028 Background Traffic Volumes - With 1% Growth per Year (3% Total) Weekday Morning (Weekday Evening) {Saturday Midday} Peak Hour Figure 2 Proposed Development US Route 9 US Route 9 Crescent Avenue E West Road 22 (7) {30} 986 (981) {897} 2 (9){34}2 (26){30} 2 (4) {11} 773 (1045) {663} 91 (90){104} 31 (55) {53} 988 (990) {931} 0 (0) {0} 861 (854){708} 73 (118) {150} 775 (1049) {674} 0 (0) {0} 749 (897) {602} 85 (115) {131} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 988 (990) {931} 0 (0) {0} 775 (1049) {674} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} 0 (0) {0} Tree House Brewing 970 (1010) {946} 786 (1060) {753} 2 (12) {25} 0 (11) {16} 970 (1010) {946} 2 (34) {70) 786 (1048) {682} 0 (27) {66} O N EW GTS Consulting Proposed Mixed Use Development - US Route 9 - Saratoga Springs,NY Not to Scale Arrival / Departure Trip Distribution New (Pass-by) Trip Percentage Figure 3 Proposed Development US Route 9 US Route 9 Crescent Avenue E West Road 50% 50% 10% 20% (-40%) 30% (+40%) 40% 10% 30% (-40%) 25% (+10%) 40% 25%(+10%) 30%(+40%) 25% (-40%) 20% (+10%) 25% (-40%) 25% (+40%) 25%(+40%) 20%(+10%) Tree House Brewing 50% 50% 50% 50% O N EW GTS Consulting Proposed Mixed Use Development - US Route 9 - Saratoga Springs,NY Not to Scale Trips Generated Weekday Morning (Weekday Evening) {Saturday Midday} Peak Hour Figure 4 Proposed Development US Route 9 US Route 9 Crescent Avenue E West Road 27 (47) {39} 37 (38) {45} 5 (9) {8} 10 (16) {13} 17 (31) {26} 30 (30) {37} 7 (8) {9} 14 (12) {15} 14 (24) {20} 22 (38) {30} 19 (21) {24} 23 (26) {30} 18 (16) {20} 11 (20) {17} 13 (21) {16} 14 (26) {22} 19 (22) {26} 15 (15) {19} Tree House Brewing 37 (38) {46} 27 (47) {38} 37 (38) {46} 27 (47) {38} O N EW GTS Consulting Proposed Mixed Use Development - US Route 9 - Saratoga Springs,NY Not to Scale 2028 Build Traffic Volumes Weekday Morning (Weekday Evening) {Saturday Midday} Peak Hour Figure 5 Proposed Development US Route 9 US Route 9 Crescent Avenue E West Road 22 (7) {30} 1013 (1028) {936} 2 (9){34}2 (26){30} 2 (4) {11} 810 (1083) {708} 91 (90){104} 36 (64) {61} 998 (1006) {944} 17 (31) {26} 891 (884){745} 80 (126) {159} 789 (1061) {689} 14 (24) {20} 771 (935) {632} 85 (115) {131} 1006 (1009) {948} 11 (20) {17} 788 (1070) {690} 14 (26) {22} 1007 (1048) {992} 813 (1107) {791} 2 (12) {25} 0 (11) {16} 1007 (1048) {992} 2 (34) {70) 813 (1095) {720} 0 (27) {66} 19 (21) {24} 23 (26) {30} 19 (22) {26} 15 (15) {19} Intersection Gap Study Project: Proposed Mixed Use Development - US Route 9 - Saratoga Springs, NY Date: 11/6/2025 & 11/8/2025 Intersection: Proposed Site Access @ US Route 9 Movement: Right Turns Exiting / Left Turns Entering 6-9 sec 10-13 sec 14-17 sec 18-19 sec 20-23 sec 24-25 sec 26-29 sec >29 sec Interval Hour Time Interval x 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x 5 x 6 x 7 x 8 Total Total Morning Peak Hour 7:30-7:45am # of Gaps 17 8 6 1 1 0 2 1 # of Vehicles 17 16 18 4 5 0 14 8 82 7:45-8:00am # of Gaps 20 7 3 2 1 1 0 0 # of Vehicles 20 14 9 8 5 6 0 0 62 8:00-8:15am # of Gaps 15 7 4 3 1 1 0 1 # of Vehicles 15 14 12 12 5 6 0 8 72 8:15-8:30am # of Gaps 18 7 3 1 4 1 0 1 # of Vehicles 18 14 9 4 20 6 0 8 79 295 Evening Peak Hour 4:30-4:45pm # of Gaps 15 8 6 0 1 1 0 2 # of Vehicles 15 16 18 0 5 6 0 16 76 4:45-5:00pm # of Gaps 16 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 # of Vehicles 16 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 28 5:00-5:15pm # of Gaps 9 12 6 2 4 1 0 1 # of Vehicles 9 24 18 8 20 6 0 8 93 5:15-5:30pm # of Gaps 14 9 6 0 3 0 1 0 # of Vehicles 14 18 18 0 15 0 7 0 72 269 Saturday Peak Hour 12:00-12:15pm # of Gaps 16 7 5 3 0 3 0 1 # of Vehicles 16 14 15 12 0 18 0 8 83 12:15-12:30pm # of Gaps 17 7 4 1 0 1 1 2 # of Vehicles 17 14 12 4 0 6 7 16 76 12:30-12:45pm # of Gaps 12 7 1 0 2 2 4 2 # of Vehicles 12 14 3 0 10 12 28 16 95 12:45-1:00pm # of Gaps 11 8 4 4 3 0 0 1 # of Vehicles 11 16 12 16 15 0 0 8 78 332 Intersection Gap Study Project: Proposed Mixed Use Development - US Route 9 - Saratoga Springs, NY Date: 11/6/2025 & 11/8/2025 Intersection: Proposed Site Access @ US Route 9 Movement: Left Turns Exiting 6-9 sec 10-13 sec 14-17 sec 18-19 sec 20-23 sec 24-25 sec 26-29 sec >29 sec Interval Hour Time Interval x 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x 5 x 6 x 7 x 8 Total Total Morning Peak Hour 7:30-7:45am # of Gaps 14 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 # of Vehicles 14 12 12 0 0 0 0 0 38 7:45-8:00am # of Gaps 10 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 # of Vehicles 10 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 19 8:00-8:15am # of Gaps 13 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 # of Vehicles 13 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 22 8:15-8:30am # of Gaps 15 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 # of Vehicles 15 10 3 4 0 0 0 0 32 111 Evening Peak Hour 4:30-4:45pm # of Gaps 14 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 # of Vehicles 14 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 23 4:45-5:00pm # of Gaps 9 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 # of Vehicles 9 2 6 4 0 0 0 0 21 5:00-5:15pm # of Gaps 12 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 # of Vehicles 12 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 31 5:15-5:30pm # of Gaps 12 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 # of Vehicles 12 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 25 100 Saturday Peak Hour 12:00-12:15pm # of Gaps 13 4 1 2 0 0 0 1 # of Vehicles 13 8 3 8 0 0 0 8 40 12:15-12:30pm # of Gaps 18 5 0 1 2 0 0 0 # of Vehicles 18 10 0 4 10 0 0 0 42 12:30-12:45pm # of Gaps 17 5 4 0 3 0 0 0 # of Vehicles 17 10 12 0 15 0 0 0 54 12:45-1:00pm # of Gaps 11 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 # of Vehicles 11 14 9 4 0 0 0 0 38 174 Distance Travelled (ft) =275 50 Speed Measurements per Direction Speed Limit 55 mph NB Time Calculated NB Time Calculated SB Time Calculated SB Time Calculated Seconds Speed Seconds Speed Seconds Speed Seconds Speed 4.21 45 3.58 52 4.09 46 3.41 55 4.05 46 3.57 53 4.00 47 3.40 55 3.99 47 3.55 53 3.82 49 3.37 56 3.87 48 3.55 53 3.81 49 3.36 56 3.84 49 3.55 53 3.78 50 3.36 56 3.77 50 3.52 53 3.76 50 3.35 56 3.77 50 3.48 54 3.73 50 3.35 56 3.75 50 3.46 54 3.66 51 3.32 56 3.75 50 3.45 54 3.65 51 3.32 56 3.74 50 3.43 55 3.63 52 3.32 56 3.74 50 3.42 55 3.62 52 3.31 57 3.71 51 3.42 55 3.56 53 3.31 57 3.71 51 3.36 56 3.53 53 3.29 57 3.71 51 3.36 56 3.52 53 3.28 57 3.67 51 3.34 56 3.52 53 3.28 57 3.67 51 3.30 57 3.50 54 3.28 57 3.65 51 3.30 57 3.47 54 3.28 57 3.64 52 3.27 57 3.45 54 3.25 58 3.64 52 3.24 58 3.44 55 3.25 58 3.64 52 3.23 58 3.43 55 3.25 58 3.64 52 3.21 58 3.43 55 3.22 58 3.58 52 3.21 58 3.42 55 3.22 58 3.58 52 3.18 59 3.41 55 3.19 59 3.58 52 3.15 60 3.41 55 3.12 60 3.58 52 3.14 60 3.41 55 3.00 63 Northbound Southbound Average Speed =53 mph Average Speed =55 mph 85th Percentile Speed =57 mph 85th Percentile Speed =57.5 mph Proposed Mixed Use Development - US Route 9 - Saratoga Springs, NY Speed Study Measurements - US Route 9 Passing Site 11/6/2025 Background Traffic Grow th Calculations Proposed Mixed Use Development US Route 9 -Saratoga Springs,NY Historical Traffic Counts Taken from the NYSDOT Traffic Data Viewer Wesbsite US Route 9 - Between Crescent Avenue and South City Line 2024 2021 2018 2015 21,338 veh 17,438 veh 21,854 veh 19,358 veh Crescent Avenue - Between US Route 9 and County Route 64 2024 2021 2018 2015 4,279 veh 4,711 veh 5,330 veh 5,740 veh Use +1.0% annual growth for traffic projections +7.5% per year -6.7% per year -3.1% per year -2.8% per year -3.3% per year -2.4% per year-3.9% per year -0.4% per year +4.3% per year +1.1% per year Proposed Development 128 Apartments 9,800 SF - Commercial/Retail Space 120 Room - Hotel ITE Trip Generation - 12th Edition Land Use 220 - Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise) - Not Close To Rail Transit Morning Peak Hour 0.41 Trips/Unit 24%Enter 76%Exit Evening Peak Hour 0.52 Trips/Unit 62%Enter 38%Exit Saturday Peak Hour 0.49 Trips/Unit 38%Enter 62%Exit Land Use 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (<40K) Morning Peak Hour 3.93 Trips/1,000 SF 55%Enter 45%Exit Evening Peak Hour 6.29 Trips/1,000 SF 50%Enter 50%Exit Saturday Peak Hour 6.63 Trips/1,000 SF 51%Enter 49%Exit Land Use 310 - Hotel Morning Peak Hour 0.34 Trips/Room 52%Enter 48%Exit Evening Peak Hour 0.47 Trips/Room 51%Enter 49%Exit Saturday Peak Hour 0.47 Trips/Room 51%Enter 49%Exit ITE Trip Generation Land Use 821 - Avg PM Pass-by - 40%, Avg Sat Pass-by - 31% - Assume AM - 10%, PM/Sat - 25% Development Size Total Trips Entering Exiting Total Trips Entering Exiting Total Trips Entering Exiting Apartments 128 52 13 39 67 42 25 63 24 39 Commercial/Retail 9,800 SF 39 22 17 62 31 31 65 33 32 Hotel 80 Rooms 41 21 20 56 28 28 56 28 28 132 56 76 185 101 84 184 85 99 -4 -2 -2 -14 -7 -7 -16 -8 -8 128 54 74 171 94 77 168 77 91 Proposed Mixed Use Development US Route 9 - Saratoga Springs, NY Trip Generation Estimate Retail Pass-by Trips Generated (AM-10%, PM/Sat-25%) Total New Trips Generated Trip Generation Estimate - Proposed Mixed Use Development Total Trips Generated Saturday Peak HourMorning Peak Hour Evening Peak Hour Crash #Date Location Type # Cars Severity Direction Conditions Contributing Factors 1 5/4/2022 US 9 - 300' S of Crescent Right Angle 2 PDO SB Uturn / SB Wet Failure to Yield ROW 2 6/17/2022 Crescent Ave @ US 9 Rearend 2 PDO WB / WB Dry Glare 3 7/9/2022 US 9 - 300' S of Crescent Animal 1 PDO NB / Deer Dry Animal's Actions 4 9/10/2022 Crescent Ave @ US 9 Left Turn 2 PDO SB Left / NB Dry Failure to Yield ROW 5 9/15/2022 US 9 - 500' N of Crescent Animal 1 PDO NB / Deer Dry Animal's Actions 6 11/8/2022 Crescent Ave @ US 9 Rearend 2 PDO SB / SB Stopped Dry Following Too Closely 7 10/24/2022 Crescent Ave @ US 9 Rearend 2 PDO NB / NB Dry Following Too Closely 8 3/16/2022 US 9 - Homewood Suites Left Turn 2 INJ SB Left / NB Dry Failure to Yield ROW 9 12/31/2022 US 9 - 0.1mi S of Crescent Animal 1 PDO SB / Deer Wet Animal's Actions 10 6/10/2023 E West Rd @ US 9 Rearend 2 PDO NB / NB Stopped Dry Following Too Closely 11 6/15/2023 US 9 - 100' N of E West Animal 1 PDO NB / Deer Dry Animal's Actions 12 8/7/2023 P-Lot - 3402 US 9 Backing 2 PDO NB Backing / WB Parked Wet Backing Unsafely 13 8/14/2023 US 9 near 3304 US 9 Fixed Object 1 PDO SB / Curb Dry Unknown 14 8/16/2023 E West Rd @ US 9 Rearend 2 PDO SB / SB Stopped Dry Following Too Closely 15 12/14/2023 US 9 - 400' N of E West Animal 1 PDO SB / Coyote Dry Animal's Actions 16 2/10/2024 E West Rd @ US 9 Rearend 2 PDO SB / SB Stopped Wet Following Too Closely 17 1/25/2024 US 9 - 100' N of Crescent Fixed Object 1 PDO SB / Median Wet Reaction to Another Vehicle 18 4/19/2024 E West Rd @ US 9 Rearend 3 INJ SB / SB Stopped (2) Dry Alcohol Involvement 19 5/11/2024 Crescent Ave @ US 9 Rearend 2 PDO NB / NB Dry Following Too Closely 20 8/3/2024 Crescent Ave @ US 9 Left Turn 2 PDO SB Uturn / NB Dry Turning Improper 21 9/24/2024 P-Lot - Homewood Suites Sideswipe 2 PDO NB / SB Parked Dry Opened Door into Travel Lane 22 11/8/2024 US 9 - 0.5mi N of E West Animal 1 PDO NB / Deer Dry Animal's Actions 23 11/17/2024 US 9 - 1000' S of E West Animal 1 PDO SB / Deer Dry Animal's Actions 24 6/18/2025 P-Lot - Honda City Sideswipe 2 PDO EB / EB Parked Dry Driver Inattention 25 7/25/2025 US 9 - Honda Left Turn 2 PDO WB Left / NB Dry Failure to Yield ROW 26 9/30/2025 US 9 - 305' N of E West Rearend 2 INJ NB / NB / NB Dry Distracted Driver 27 10/21/2025 E West Rd @ US 9 Rearend 2 PDO NB / NB Stopped Dry Following Too Closely 28 9/30/2025 US 9 - North of E West Rearend 2 FAT SB / SB Parked on Shoulder Unknown Failure to Keep Left 29 10/29/2025 US 9 - 0.5mi S of Crescent Animal 1 PDO NB / Deer Dry Animal's Actions 30 11/12/2025 E West Rd @ US 9 Animal 1 PDO NB / Deer Wet Animal's Actions 31 11/22/2025 US 9 - 500' S of E West Animal 1 PDO NB / Deer Dry Animal's Actions 32 3/24/2026 US 9 - Homewood Suites Left Turn 2 INJ SB Left / NB Dry Failure to Yield ROW 33 5/1/2026 P-Lot - Honda City Backing 2 PDO WB Backing / SB Dry Backing Unsafely 34 5/18/2026 US 9 - 0.22mi N of E West Fixed Object 1 PDO SB / Guide Rail Dry Fell Asleep Crash History Summaries - May 2022 Through May 2026 Proposed Mixed Use Development - US Route 9 - Saratoga Springs, NY US 9 @ Crescent Avenue - 6 Crashes US 9 @ E West Road - 6 Crashes US Route 9 Midblock - 18 Crashes 4 - Rearend Crashes 5 - Rearend Crashes 9 - Animal Related Crashes 2 - Left Turn Crashes 1 - Animal Related Crash 3 - Fixed Object Crashes 3 - Left Turn Crashes 2 - Rearend Crashes Area Parking Lots - 4 Crashes Included in Data 1 - Right Angle Crash US 9 @ Crescent Avenue Intersection - Evening Peak Hour - 140 Veh EW / 1927 Veh NS. Assumed PM Peak is 9% of AADT, AADT = 1556 Veh EW / 21411 Veh N/S US 9 @ E West Road Intersection - Evening Peak Hour - 34 Veh EW / 1978 Veh NS. Assumed PM Peak is 9% of AADT, AADT = 378 Veh EW / 21978 Veh N/S US Route 9 - NYSDOT Traffic Data Viewer - AADT = 21,338 Vehicles. Intersection Crash Severity - 4 Years Basic US 9 @ Crescent Avenue - 6 Crashes LOSS 6 Total Crashes NYSDOT Saftey Performance Function = 2.58 Crashes/Year Calculated Rate = 1.50 Crashes/Year 2 0 Injury Crashes / 0 Fatality Crash NYSDOT Saftey Performance Function = 0.87 Crashes/Year Calculated Rate = 0.00 Crashes/Year 2 High Crashes Location / Low Severity US 9 @ E West Road - 6 Crashes 6 Total Crashes NYSDOT Saftey Performance Function = 1.59 Crashes/Year Calculated Rate = 1.50 Crashes/Year 2 1 Injury Crash / 0 Fatality Crashes NYSDOT Saftey Performance Function = 0.56 Crashes/Year Calculated Rate = 0.33 Crashes/Year 2 Not a Severe Crash Location Link Crash Severity Basic US Route 9 Midblock - 18 Crashes LOSS 18 Total Crashes NYSDOT Saftey Performance Function = 22.05 Crashes/Year Calculated Rate = 4.50 Crashes/Year 2 3 Injury Crash / 1 Fatality Crashes NYSDOT Saftey Performance Function = 4.65 Crashes/Year Calculated Rate = 1.00 Crashes/Year 2 Not a Severe Crash Roadway Multi-DayVolumeReportNYSDOT_SC150050000000Tuesday,July9,2024toThursday,July11,2024 SiteName SiteID Description Region County DOTID CountyOrder Tue Wed Thu Total 2024-07-09 2024-07-10 2024-07-11 Workday 7Day Count 00:00:00 13 19 18 17 50 00:15:00 12 16 17 15 45 00:30:00 8 10 15 11 33 00:45:00 11 7 14 11 32 01:00:00 17 7 7 10 31 01:15:00 9 7 9 8 25 01:30:00 4 3 9 5 16 01:45:00 4 4 9 6 17 02:00:00 2 2 11 5 15 02:15:00 2 3 5 3 10 02:30:00 1 3 8 4 12 02:45:00 4 9 7 7 20 03:00:00 4 5 3 4 12 03:15:00 3 0 7 3 10 03:30:00 4 5 6 5 15 03:45:00 9 5 14 9 28 04:00:00 8 9 11 9 28 04:15:00 13 14 12 13 39 04:30:00 20 14 19 18 53 04:45:00 19 17 20 19 56 05:00:00 16 17 19 17 52 05:15:00 19 31 28 26 78 05:30:00 46 35 43 41 124 05:45:00 53 64 78 65 195 06:00:00 61 72 77 70 210 06:15:00 101 91 102 98 294 06:30:00 139 171 140 150 450 06:45:00 175 185 196 185 556 07:00:00 126 123 125 125 374 07:15:00 141 140 182 154 463 07:30:00 229 228 238 232 695 07:45:00 319 282 267 289 868 08:00:00 203 204 191 199 598 08:15:00 230 229 252 237 711 08:30:00 239 248 257 248 744 08:45:00 271 271 313 285 855 09:00:00 229 188 229 215 646 09:15:00 230 200 214 215 644 09:30:00 177 196 214 196 587 09:45:00 234 187 245 222 666 10:00:00 187 149 213 183 549 10:15:00 164 165 224 184 553 10:30:00 197 198 252 216 647 10:45:00 205 194 282 227 681 11:00:00 157 200 303 220 660 AllNorthbound Average 9 150050 150050000000 SBROADWAY US9fromCITYOFSARATOGASPRINGStoCRESCENTAVE 1 Saratoga 100514 11:15:00 167 177 302 215 646 11:30:00 188 207 342 246 737 11:45:00 176 217 345 246 738 12:00:00 177 178 325 227 680 12:15:00 170 157 303 210 630 12:30:00 222 187 324 244 733 12:45:00 215 191 296 234 702 13:00:00 182 194 309 228 685 13:15:00 153 212 283 216 648 13:30:00 174 229 246 216 649 13:45:00 171 186 240 199 597 14:00:00 185 183 195 188 563 14:15:00 189 170 236 198 595 14:30:00 192 195 212 200 599 14:45:00 219 205 228 217 652 15:00:00 163 161 210 178 534 15:15:00 195 213 227 212 635 15:30:00 201 224 222 216 647 15:45:00 253 246 247 249 746 16:00:00 197 202 229 209 628 16:15:00 206 215 244 222 665 16:30:00 241 261 262 255 764 16:45:00 249 266 283 266 798 17:00:00 231 278 235 248 744 17:15:00 249 280 279 269 808 17:30:00 227 261 260 249 748 17:45:00 224 258 259 247 741 18:00:00 180 235 198 204 613 18:15:00 178 269 217 221 664 18:30:00 189 231 210 210 630 18:45:00 175 221 205 200 601 19:00:00 127 138 148 138 413 19:15:00 109 112 128 116 349 19:30:00 91 100 129 107 320 19:45:00 85 80 103 89 268 20:00:00 76 111 107 98 294 20:15:00 77 76 94 82 247 20:30:00 74 80 99 84 253 20:45:00 75 77 97 83 249 21:00:00 65 72 87 75 224 21:15:00 53 54 77 61 184 21:30:00 49 57 75 60 181 21:45:00 41 51 81 58 173 22:00:00 41 63 67 57 171 22:15:00 36 58 54 49 148 22:30:00 42 37 60 46 139 22:45:00 38 34 36 36 108 23:00:00 22 27 26 25 75 23:15:00 21 30 28 26 79 23:30:00 19 19 28 22 66 23:45:00 18 20 19 19 57 7am-7pm 9676 10111 11974 10587 31761 6am-10pm 11074 11638 13714 12142 36426 6am-12am 11311 11926 14032 12423 37269 12am-12am 11612 12232 14421 12755 38265 amPeak 7:45:00 7:45:00 11:00:00 8:15:00 PeakVolume 991 963 1292 985 pmPeak 16:30:00 16:30:00 12:00:00 16:30:00 PeakVolume 970 1085 1248 1038 Tue Wed Thu Total 2024-07-09 2024-07-10 2024-07-11 Workday 7Day Count 00:00:00 13 14 13 13 40 00:15:00 14 13 14 14 41 00:30:00 8 9 14 10 31 00:45:00 8 11 15 11 34 01:00:00 9 6 9 8 24 01:15:00 7 10 12 10 29 01:30:00 4 5 4 4 13 01:45:00 3 5 5 4 13 02:00:00 7 5 5 6 17 02:15:00 9 6 4 6 19 02:30:00 2 2 4 3 8 02:45:00 4 9 6 6 19 03:00:00 9 5 8 7 22 03:15:00 6 9 7 7 22 03:30:00 13 10 11 11 34 03:45:00 10 15 13 13 38 04:00:00 9 11 16 12 36 04:15:00 16 18 12 15 46 04:30:00 15 15 14 15 44 04:45:00 24 20 23 22 67 05:00:00 34 32 29 32 95 05:15:00 44 23 40 36 107 05:30:00 43 50 40 44 133 05:45:00 53 53 47 51 153 06:00:00 90 71 61 74 222 06:15:00 98 96 76 90 270 06:30:00 100 96 94 97 290 06:45:00 120 119 110 116 349 07:00:00 139 143 147 143 429 07:15:00 195 170 182 182 547 07:30:00 171 201 179 184 551 07:45:00 182 182 171 178 535 08:00:00 206 179 157 181 542 08:15:00 154 192 172 173 518 08:30:00 156 150 162 156 468 08:45:00 181 188 142 170 511 09:00:00 173 176 160 170 509 09:15:00 132 150 128 137 410 09:30:00 135 134 171 147 440 09:45:00 141 143 138 141 422 10:00:00 161 139 143 148 443 10:15:00 155 146 136 146 437 10:30:00 160 120 139 140 419 10:45:00 134 138 154 142 426 11:00:00 174 155 133 154 462 11:15:00 142 189 144 158 475 11:30:00 166 173 146 162 485 11:45:00 149 187 146 161 482 12:00:00 177 173 159 170 509 12:15:00 155 181 185 174 521 12:30:00 154 167 140 154 461 12:45:00 139 162 151 151 452 13:00:00 153 172 187 171 512 13:15:00 168 158 149 158 475 13:30:00 158 145 152 152 455 13:45:00 134 157 156 149 447 14:00:00 183 161 177 174 521 Average AllSouthbound 14:15:00 152 176 165 164 493 14:30:00 178 158 175 170 511 14:45:00 196 185 166 182 547 15:00:00 209 212 205 209 626 15:15:00 184 210 238 211 632 15:30:00 197 270 240 236 707 15:45:00 197 184 208 196 589 16:00:00 227 213 250 230 690 16:15:00 215 225 269 236 709 16:30:00 190 212 295 232 697 16:45:00 228 195 333 252 756 17:00:00 220 267 288 258 775 17:15:00 202 250 259 237 711 17:30:00 165 185 206 185 556 17:45:00 142 182 175 166 499 18:00:00 159 135 195 163 489 18:15:00 129 151 217 166 497 18:30:00 120 123 166 136 409 18:45:00 104 149 160 138 413 19:00:00 99 151 191 147 441 19:15:00 105 101 180 129 386 19:30:00 91 112 126 110 329 19:45:00 72 109 92 91 273 20:00:00 89 109 109 102 307 20:15:00 83 103 101 96 287 20:30:00 101 94 97 97 292 20:45:00 78 72 96 82 246 21:00:00 86 77 110 91 273 21:15:00 122 79 109 103 310 21:30:00 144 67 80 97 291 21:45:00 76 48 93 72 217 22:00:00 58 67 192 106 317 22:15:00 44 79 101 75 224 22:30:00 37 59 68 55 164 22:45:00 34 29 61 41 124 23:00:00 37 34 55 42 126 23:15:00 35 37 44 39 116 23:30:00 33 32 25 30 90 23:45:00 16 22 28 22 66 7am-7pm 8041 8413 8716 8390 25170 6am-10pm 9595 9917 10441 9984 29953 6am-12am 9889 10276 11015 10393 31180 12am-12am 10253 10632 11380 10755 32265 amPeak 7:15:00 7:30:00 7:15:00 7:15:00 PeakVolume 754 754 689 725 pmPeak 16:00:00 16:30:00 16:15:00 16:30:00 PeakVolume 860 924 1185 980 File Name : US Route 9 @ Crescent Avenue - AMPM Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 11/6/2025 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Cars & HV US Route 9 Southbound Crescent Avenue Westbound US Route 9 Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left HV Right Thru Left HV Right Thru Left HV Right Thru Left HV Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 182 18 1 15 0 5 1 10 125 0 8 0 0 0 0 365 07:15 AM 0 175 21 8 26 0 10 1 9 155 0 9 0 0 0 0 414 07:30 AM 0 193 9 7 35 0 12 1 11 211 0 11 0 0 0 0 490 07:45 AM 0 203 29 7 21 0 8 0 19 236 0 11 0 0 0 0 534 Total 0 753 77 23 97 0 35 3 49 727 0 39 0 0 0 0 1803 08:00 AM 0 185 30 6 14 0 5 2 14 190 0 9 0 0 0 0 455 08:15 AM 0 146 15 6 18 0 5 0 27 199 0 11 0 0 0 0 427 08:30 AM 0 161 27 9 23 0 14 1 24 209 0 10 0 0 0 0 478 08:45 AM 0 137 29 8 17 0 7 1 29 229 0 12 0 0 0 0 469 Total 0 629 101 29 72 0 31 4 94 827 0 42 0 0 0 0 1829 04:00 PM 0 170 33 4 30 0 21 1 28 183 0 2 0 0 0 0 472 04:15 PM 0 209 22 4 35 0 12 0 21 169 0 3 0 0 0 0 475 04:30 PM 0 223 41 5 23 0 6 0 24 185 0 0 0 0 0 0 507 04:45 PM 0 200 22 5 20 0 17 1 31 246 0 1 0 0 0 0 543 Total 0 802 118 18 108 0 56 2 104 783 0 6 0 0 0 0 1997 05:00 PM 0 231 22 2 21 0 16 0 28 200 0 4 0 0 0 0 524 05:15 PM 0 217 27 3 23 0 14 0 32 198 0 0 0 0 0 0 514 05:30 PM 0 132 28 2 17 0 16 1 30 172 0 2 0 0 0 0 400 05:45 PM 0 132 27 3 15 0 9 0 24 215 0 3 0 0 0 0 428 Total 0 712 104 10 76 0 55 1 114 785 0 9 0 0 0 0 1866 Grand Total 0 2896 400 80 353 0 177 10 361 3122 0 96 0 0 0 0 7495 Apprch %0 85.8 11.8 2.4 65.4 0 32.8 1.9 10.1 87.2 0 2.7 0 0 0 0 Total %0 38.6 5.3 1.1 4.7 0 2.4 0.1 4.8 41.7 0 1.3 0 0 0 0 File Name : US Route 9 @ Crescent Avenue - AMPM Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 11/6/2025 Page No : 2 US Route 9 Southbound Crescent Avenue Westbound US Route 9 Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 0 193 9 7 209 35 0 12 1 48 11 211 0 11 233 0 0 0 0 0 490 07:45 AM 0 203 29 7 239 21 0 8 0 29 19 236 0 11 266 0 0 0 0 0 534 08:00 AM 0 185 30 6 221 14 0 5 2 21 14 190 0 9 213 0 0 0 0 0 455 08:15 AM 0 146 15 6 167 18 0 5 0 23 27 199 0 11 237 0 0 0 0 0 427 Total Volume 0 727 83 26 836 88 0 30 3 121 71 836 0 42 949 0 0 0 0 0 1906 % App. Total 0 87 9.9 3.1 72.7 0 24.8 2.5 7.5 88.1 0 4.4 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .895 .692 .929 .874 .629 .000 .625 .375 .630 .657 .886 .000 .955 .892 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .892 US Route 9 Crescent Avenue US Route 9 Right 0 Thru 727 Left 83 HV 26 InOut Total 924 836 1760 Right 88 Thru 0 Left 30 HV 3 Out Total In 154 121 275 Left 0 Thru 836 Right 71 HV 42 Out TotalIn 757 949 1706 Left0 Thru0 Right0 HV 0 Total Out In 0 0 0 Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM Cars & HV Peak Hour Data North File Name : US Route 9 @ Crescent Avenue - AMPM Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 11/6/2025 Page No : 3 US Route 9 Southbound Crescent Avenue Westbound US Route 9 Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 0 223 41 5 269 23 0 6 0 29 24 185 0 0 209 0 0 0 0 0 507 04:45 PM 0 200 22 5 227 20 0 17 1 38 31 246 0 1 278 0 0 0 0 0 543 05:00 PM 0 231 22 2 255 21 0 16 0 37 28 200 0 4 232 0 0 0 0 0 524 05:15 PM 0 217 27 3 247 23 0 14 0 37 32 198 0 0 230 0 0 0 0 0 514 Total Volume 0 871 112 15 998 87 0 53 1 141 115 829 0 5 949 0 0 0 0 0 2088 % App. Total 0 87.3 11.2 1.5 61.7 0 37.6 0.7 12.1 87.4 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .943 .683 .750 .928 .946 .000 .779 .250 .928 .898 .842 .000 .313 .853 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .961 US Route 9 Crescent Avenue US Route 9 Right 0 Thru 871 Left 112 HV 15 InOut Total 916 998 1914 Right 87 Thru 0 Left 53 HV 1 Out Total In 227 141 368 Left 0 Thru 829 Right 115 HV 5 Out TotalIn 924 949 1873 Left0 Thru0 Right0 HV 0 Total Out In 0 0 0 Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM Cars & HV Peak Hour Data North File Name : US Route 9 @ Crescent Avenue - AMPM Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 11/6/2025 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Peds US Route 9 Southbound Crescent Avenue Westbound US Route 9 Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Apprch %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 File Name : US Route 9 @ Crescent Avenue - Sat Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 11/8/2025 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Cars & HV US Route 9 Southbound Crescent Avenue Westbound US Route 9 Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left HV Right Thru Left HV Right Thru Left HV Right Thru Left HV Int. Total 11:00 AM 0 136 18 0 16 0 9 4 25 149 0 1 0 0 0 0 358 11:15 AM 0 135 26 0 17 0 11 0 28 134 0 1 0 0 0 0 352 11:30 AM 0 156 29 1 29 0 14 0 33 154 0 5 0 0 0 0 421 11:45 AM 0 119 26 2 16 0 10 0 33 174 0 2 0 0 0 0 382 Total 0 546 99 3 78 0 44 4 119 611 0 9 0 0 0 0 1513 12:00 PM 0 175 30 4 22 0 10 0 33 140 0 0 0 0 0 0 414 12:15 PM 0 146 34 0 27 0 17 0 45 186 0 2 0 0 0 0 457 12:30 PM 0 134 31 0 29 0 10 0 38 193 0 3 0 0 0 0 438 12:45 PM 0 129 32 3 23 0 14 0 30 168 0 3 0 0 0 0 402 Total 0 584 127 7 101 0 51 0 146 687 0 8 0 0 0 0 1711 Grand Total 0 1130 226 10 179 0 95 4 265 1298 0 17 0 0 0 0 3224 Apprch %0 82.7 16.5 0.7 64.4 0 34.2 1.4 16.8 82.2 0 1.1 0 0 0 0 Total %0 35 7 0.3 5.6 0 2.9 0.1 8.2 40.3 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 File Name : US Route 9 @ Crescent Avenue - Sat Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 11/8/2025 Page No : 2 US Route 9 Southbound Crescent Avenue Westbound US Route 9 Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 11:00 AM to 12:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 0 175 30 4 209 22 0 10 0 32 33 140 0 0 173 0 0 0 0 0 414 12:15 PM 0 146 34 0 180 27 0 17 0 44 45 186 0 2 233 0 0 0 0 0 457 12:30 PM 0 134 31 0 165 29 0 10 0 39 38 193 0 3 234 0 0 0 0 0 438 12:45 PM 0 129 32 3 164 23 0 14 0 37 30 168 0 3 201 0 0 0 0 0 402 Total Volume 0 584 127 7 718 101 0 51 0 152 146 687 0 8 841 0 0 0 0 0 1711 % App. Total 0 81.3 17.7 1 66.4 0 33.6 0 17.4 81.7 0 1 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .834 .934 .438 .859 .871 .000 .750 .000 .864 .811 .890 .000 .667 .899 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .936 US Route 9 Crescent Avenue US Route 9 Right 0 Thru 584 Left 127 HV 7 InOut Total 788 718 1506 Right 101 Thru 0 Left 51 HV 0 Out Total In 273 152 425 Left 0 Thru 687 Right 146 HV 8 Out TotalIn 635 841 1476 Left0 Thru0 Right0 HV 0 Total Out In 0 0 0 Peak Hour Begins at 12:00 PM Cars & HV Peak Hour Data North File Name : US Route 9 @ Crescent Avenue - Sat Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 11/8/2025 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Peds US Route 9 Southbound Crescent Avenue Westbound US Route 9 Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int. Total 11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 11:15 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 11:45 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Total 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Grand Total 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 Apprch %0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total %0 0 0 15 0 0 0 85 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 File Name : US Route 9 @ E West Road - AMPM Site Code : 00000002 Start Date : 11/6/2025 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Cars & HV US Route 9 Southbound Driveway Westbound US Route 9 Northbound E West Road Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left HV Right Thru Left HV Right Thru Left HV Right Thru Left HV Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 159 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 124 3 12 1 0 0 1 301 07:15 AM 1 177 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 150 3 9 0 0 0 0 346 07:30 AM 0 182 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 220 7 12 2 0 1 1 434 07:45 AM 1 207 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 267 4 11 0 0 0 0 497 Total 2 725 1 22 0 0 0 0 0 761 17 44 3 0 1 2 1578 08:00 AM 0 194 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 227 7 10 0 0 0 0 446 08:15 AM 1 167 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 243 3 9 0 0 1 0 431 08:30 AM 2 157 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 228 2 7 1 0 0 0 406 08:45 AM 3 133 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 274 3 12 0 0 0 0 435 Total 6 651 1 32 0 0 1 0 0 972 15 38 1 0 1 0 1718 04:00 PM 4 217 0 6 1 0 0 0 1 191 5 3 11 0 1 0 440 04:15 PM 0 253 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 192 1 2 4 0 0 0 457 04:30 PM 1 243 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 207 3 2 11 0 5 0 474 04:45 PM 0 244 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 257 3 1 4 0 1 0 515 Total 5 957 0 18 1 0 0 0 1 847 12 8 30 0 7 0 1886 05:00 PM 1 271 0 3 1 0 0 0 4 260 1 3 7 1 2 0 554 05:15 PM 2 257 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 228 0 0 3 0 1 0 497 05:30 PM 0 158 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 204 0 0 1 0 1 0 365 05:45 PM 1 140 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 250 1 1 1 1 3 0 401 Total 4 826 1 12 1 0 0 0 4 942 2 4 12 2 7 0 1817 Grand Total 17 3159 3 84 2 0 1 0 5 3522 46 94 46 2 16 2 6999 Apprch %0.5 96.8 0.1 2.6 66.7 0 33.3 0 0.1 96 1.3 2.6 69.7 3 24.2 3 Total %0.2 45.1 0 1.2 0 0 0 0 0.1 50.3 0.7 1.3 0.7 0 0.2 0 File Name : US Route 9 @ E West Road - AMPM Site Code : 00000002 Start Date : 11/6/2025 Page No : 2 US Route 9 Southbound Driveway Westbound US Route 9 Northbound E West Road Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 0 182 1 8 191 0 0 0 0 0 0 220 7 12 239 2 0 1 1 4 434 07:45 AM 1 207 0 7 215 0 0 0 0 0 0 267 4 11 282 0 0 0 0 0 497 08:00 AM 0 194 1 7 202 0 0 0 0 0 0 227 7 10 244 0 0 0 0 0 446 08:15 AM 1 167 0 6 174 0 0 1 0 1 0 243 3 9 255 0 0 1 0 1 431 Total Volume 2 750 2 28 782 0 0 1 0 1 0 957 21 42 1020 2 0 2 1 5 1808 % App. Total 0.3 95.9 0.3 3.6 0 0 100 0 0 93.8 2.1 4.1 40 0 40 20 PHF .500 .906 .500 .875 .909 .000 .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .896 .750 .875 .904 .250 .000 .500 .250 .313 .909 US Route 9 E West Road Driveway US Route 9 Right 2 Thru 750 Left 2 HV 28 InOut Total 959 782 1741 Right 0 Thru 0 Left 1 HV 0 Out Total In 2 1 3 Left 21 Thru 957 Right 0 HV 42 Out TotalIn 753 1020 1773 Left2 Thru0 Right2 HV 1 Total Out In 23 5 28 Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM Cars & HV Peak Hour Data North File Name : US Route 9 @ E West Road - AMPM Site Code : 00000002 Start Date : 11/6/2025 Page No : 3 US Route 9 Southbound Driveway Westbound US Route 9 Northbound E West Road Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 1 243 0 2 246 0 0 0 0 0 0 207 3 2 212 11 0 5 0 16 474 04:45 PM 0 244 0 5 249 0 0 0 0 0 0 257 3 1 261 4 0 1 0 5 515 05:00 PM 1 271 0 3 275 1 0 0 0 1 4 260 1 3 268 7 1 2 0 10 554 05:15 PM 2 257 1 5 265 0 0 0 0 0 0 228 0 0 228 3 0 1 0 4 497 Total Volume 4 1015 1 15 1035 1 0 0 0 1 4 952 7 6 969 25 1 9 0 35 2040 % App. Total 0.4 98.1 0.1 1.4 100 0 0 0 0.4 98.2 0.7 0.6 71.4 2.9 25.7 0 PHF .500 .936 .250 .750 .941 .250 .000 .000 .000 .250 .250 .915 .583 .500 .904 .568 .250 .450 .000 .547 .921 US Route 9 E West Road Driveway US Route 9 Right 4 Thru 1015 Left 1 HV 15 InOut Total 962 1035 1997 Right 1 Thru 0 Left 0 HV 0 Out Total In 6 1 7 Left 7 Thru 952 Right 4 HV 6 Out TotalIn 1040 969 2009 Left9 Thru1 Right 25 HV 0 Total Out In 11 35 46 Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM Cars & HV Peak Hour Data North File Name : US Route 9 @ E West Road - AMPM Site Code : 00000002 Start Date : 11/6/2025 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Peds US Route 9 Southbound Driveway Westbound US Route 9 Northbound E West Road Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int. Total Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Apprch %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % File Name : US Route 9 @ E West Road - Sat Site Code : 00000002 Start Date : 11/8/2025 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Cars & HV US Route 9 Southbound Driveway Westbound US Route 9 Northbound E West Road Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left HV Right Thru Left HV Right Thru Left HV Right Thru Left HV Int. Total 11:00 AM 5 164 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 162 5 1 4 1 4 0 351 11:15 AM 4 129 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 168 9 3 11 0 0 0 325 11:30 AM 2 173 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 192 4 5 5 0 3 0 387 11:45 AM 3 144 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 223 1 2 4 0 4 0 383 Total 14 610 1 4 1 0 2 0 3 745 19 11 24 1 11 0 1446 12:00 PM 2 202 1 5 0 0 1 0 0 182 7 0 9 0 3 0 412 12:15 PM 3 157 2 0 2 0 0 0 3 241 7 3 3 0 12 0 433 12:30 PM 3 145 1 0 4 0 1 0 1 218 7 5 9 0 11 0 405 12:45 PM 3 140 1 5 6 0 0 0 9 230 8 3 8 0 7 0 420 Total 11 644 5 10 12 0 2 0 13 871 29 11 29 0 33 0 1670 Grand Total 25 1254 6 14 13 0 4 0 16 1616 48 22 53 1 44 0 3116 Apprch %1.9 96.5 0.5 1.1 76.5 0 23.5 0 0.9 94.9 2.8 1.3 54.1 1 44.9 0 Total %0.8 40.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 0 0.1 0 0.5 51.9 1.5 0.7 1.7 0 1.4 0 File Name : US Route 9 @ E West Road - Sat Site Code : 00000002 Start Date : 11/8/2025 Page No : 2 US Route 9 Southbound Driveway Westbound US Route 9 Northbound E West Road Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 11:00 AM to 12:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 2 202 1 5 210 0 0 1 0 1 0 182 7 0 189 9 0 3 0 12 412 12:15 PM 3 157 2 0 162 2 0 0 0 2 3 241 7 3 254 3 0 12 0 15 433 12:30 PM 3 145 1 0 149 4 0 1 0 5 1 218 7 5 231 9 0 11 0 20 405 12:45 PM 3 140 1 5 149 6 0 0 0 6 9 230 8 3 250 8 0 7 0 15 420 Total Volume 11 644 5 10 670 12 0 2 0 14 13 871 29 11 924 29 0 33 0 62 1670 % App. Total 1.6 96.1 0.7 1.5 85.7 0 14.3 0 1.4 94.3 3.1 1.2 46.8 0 53.2 0 PHF .917 .797 .625 .500 .798 .500 .000 .500 .000 .583 .361 .904 .906 .550 .909 .806 .000 .688 .000 .775 .964 US Route 9 E West Road Driveway US Route 9 Right 11 Thru 644 Left 5 HV 10 InOut Total 916 670 1586 Right 12 Thru 0 Left 2 HV 0 Out Total In 18 14 32 Left 29 Thru 871 Right 13 HV 11 Out TotalIn 675 924 1599 Left33 Thru0 Right 29 HV 0 Total Out In 40 62 102 Peak Hour Begins at 12:00 PM Cars & HV Peak Hour Data North File Name : US Route 9 @ E West Road - Sat Site Code : 00000002 Start Date : 11/8/2025 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Peds US Route 9 Southbound Driveway Westbound US Route 9 Northbound E West Road Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int. Total Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Apprch %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % File Name : Route 9 @ Treehouse Enter Driveway - Weekday Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 5/27/2026 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Cars & Hv US Route 9 Southbound Treehouse Enter Driveway Westbound US Route 9 Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left HV Right Thru Left HV Right Thru Left HV Right Thru Left HV Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 191 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 154 0 7 0 0 0 0 356 07:15 AM 0 184 1 12 0 0 0 0 0 195 0 10 0 0 0 0 402 07:30 AM 0 190 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 225 0 11 0 0 0 0 438 07:45 AM 0 205 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 270 0 11 0 0 0 0 490 Total 0 770 1 31 0 0 0 0 1 844 0 39 0 0 0 0 1686 08:00 AM 0 183 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 221 0 6 0 0 0 0 420 08:15 AM 0 185 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 226 0 10 0 0 0 0 426 08:30 AM 0 162 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 230 0 20 0 0 0 0 419 08:45 AM 0 145 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 250 0 8 0 0 0 0 407 Total 0 675 1 23 0 0 0 0 2 927 0 44 0 0 0 0 1672 04:00 PM 0 245 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 207 0 2 0 0 0 0 461 04:15 PM 0 229 1 8 0 0 0 0 5 214 0 6 0 0 0 0 463 04:30 PM 0 240 2 6 0 0 0 0 9 223 0 3 0 0 0 0 483 04:45 PM 0 243 5 8 0 0 0 0 5 231 0 5 0 0 0 0 497 Total 0 957 9 23 0 0 0 0 24 875 0 16 0 0 0 0 1904 05:00 PM 0 274 8 5 0 0 0 0 7 271 0 5 0 0 0 0 570 05:15 PM 0 260 8 6 0 0 0 0 12 256 0 5 0 0 0 0 547 05:30 PM 0 220 16 5 0 0 0 0 9 230 0 0 0 0 0 0 480 05:45 PM 0 199 7 2 0 0 0 0 1 223 0 2 0 0 0 0 434 Total 0 953 39 18 0 0 0 0 29 980 0 12 0 0 0 0 2031 Grand Total 0 3355 50 95 0 0 0 0 56 3626 0 111 0 0 0 0 7293 Apprch %0 95.9 1.4 2.7 0 0 0 0 1.5 95.6 0 2.9 0 0 0 0 Total %0 46 0.7 1.3 0 0 0 0 0.8 49.7 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 File Name : Route 9 @ Treehouse Enter Driveway - Weekday Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 5/27/2026 Page No : 2 US Route 9 Southbound Treehouse Enter Driveway Westbound US Route 9 Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 0 190 0 12 202 0 0 0 0 0 0 225 0 11 236 0 0 0 0 0 438 07:45 AM 0 205 0 3 208 0 0 0 0 0 1 270 0 11 282 0 0 0 0 0 490 08:00 AM 0 183 0 10 193 0 0 0 0 0 0 221 0 6 227 0 0 0 0 0 420 08:15 AM 0 185 0 4 189 0 0 0 0 0 1 226 0 10 237 0 0 0 0 0 426 Total Volume 0 763 0 29 792 0 0 0 0 0 2 942 0 38 982 0 0 0 0 0 1774 % App. Total 0 96.3 0 3.7 0 0 0 0 0.2 95.9 0 3.9 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .930 .000 .604 .952 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .872 .000 .864 .871 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .905 US Route 9 Treehouse Enter Driveway US Route 9 Right 0 Thru 763 Left 0 HV 29 InOut Total 942 792 1734 Right 0 Thru 0 Left 0 HV 0 Out Total In 2 0 2 Left 0 Thru 942 Right 2 HV 38 Out TotalIn 763 982 1745 Left0 Thru0 Right0 HV 0 Total Out In 0 0 0 Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM Cars & Hv Peak Hour Data North File Name : Route 9 @ Treehouse Enter Driveway - Weekday Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 5/27/2026 Page No : 3 US Route 9 Southbound Treehouse Enter Driveway Westbound US Route 9 Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 0 240 2 6 248 0 0 0 0 0 9 223 0 3 235 0 0 0 0 0 483 04:45 PM 0 243 5 8 256 0 0 0 0 0 5 231 0 5 241 0 0 0 0 0 497 05:00 PM 0 274 8 5 287 0 0 0 0 0 7 271 0 5 283 0 0 0 0 0 570 05:15 PM 0 260 8 6 274 0 0 0 0 0 12 256 0 5 273 0 0 0 0 0 547 Total Volume 0 1017 23 25 1065 0 0 0 0 0 33 981 0 18 1032 0 0 0 0 0 2097 % App. Total 0 95.5 2.2 2.3 0 0 0 0 3.2 95.1 0 1.7 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .928 .719 .781 .928 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .688 .905 .000 .900 .912 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .920 US Route 9 Treehouse Enter Driveway US Route 9 Right 0 Thru 1017 Left 23 HV 25 InOut Total 981 1065 2046 Right 0 Thru 0 Left 0 HV 0 Out Total In 56 0 56 Left 0 Thru 981 Right 33 HV 18 Out TotalIn 1017 1032 2049 Left0 Thru0 Right0 HV 0 Total Out In 0 0 0 Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM Cars & Hv Peak Hour Data North File Name : Route 9 @ Treehouse Enter Driveway - Weekday Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 5/27/2026 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Peds US Route 9 Southbound Treehouse Enter Driveway Westbound US Route 9 Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Apprch %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 File Name : Route 9 @ Treehouse Enter Driveway - Saturday Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 5/30/2026 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Cars & HV US Route 9 Southbound Treehouse Enter Driveway Westbound US Route 9 Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left HV Right Thru Left HV Right Thru Left HV Right Thru Left HV Int. Total 11:00 AM 0 144 8 1 0 0 0 0 10 206 0 2 0 0 0 0 371 11:15 AM 0 137 11 5 0 0 0 0 10 199 0 2 0 0 0 0 364 11:30 AM 0 126 6 3 0 0 0 0 11 215 0 2 0 0 0 0 363 11:45 AM 0 141 9 3 0 0 0 0 11 228 0 6 0 0 0 0 398 Total 0 548 34 12 0 0 0 0 42 848 0 12 0 0 0 0 1496 12:00 PM 0 155 10 7 0 0 0 0 11 204 0 2 0 0 0 0 389 12:15 PM 0 203 12 3 0 0 0 0 21 211 0 2 0 0 0 0 452 12:30 PM 0 154 19 1 0 0 0 0 18 268 0 9 0 0 0 0 469 12:45 PM 0 150 23 1 0 0 0 0 18 235 0 4 0 0 0 0 431 Total 0 662 64 12 0 0 0 0 68 918 0 17 0 0 0 0 1741 Grand Total 0 1210 98 24 0 0 0 0 110 1766 0 29 0 0 0 0 3237 Apprch %0 90.8 7.4 1.8 0 0 0 0 5.8 92.7 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 Total %0 37.4 3 0.7 0 0 0 0 3.4 54.6 0 0.9 0 0 0 0 File Name : Route 9 @ Treehouse Enter Driveway - Saturday Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 5/30/2026 Page No : 2 US Route 9 Southbound Treehouse Enter Driveway Westbound US Route 9 Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 11:00 AM to 12:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 0 155 10 7 172 0 0 0 0 0 11 204 0 2 217 0 0 0 0 0 389 12:15 PM 0 203 12 3 218 0 0 0 0 0 21 211 0 2 234 0 0 0 0 0 452 12:30 PM 0 154 19 1 174 0 0 0 0 0 18 268 0 9 295 0 0 0 0 0 469 12:45 PM 0 150 23 1 174 0 0 0 0 0 18 235 0 4 257 0 0 0 0 0 431 Total Volume 0 662 64 12 738 0 0 0 0 0 68 918 0 17 1003 0 0 0 0 0 1741 % App. Total 0 89.7 8.7 1.6 0 0 0 0 6.8 91.5 0 1.7 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .815 .696 .429 .846 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .810 .856 .000 .472 .850 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .928 US Route 9 Treehouse Enter Driveway US Route 9 Right 0 Thru 662 Left 64 HV 12 InOut Total 918 738 1656 Right 0 Thru 0 Left 0 HV 0 Out Total In 132 0 132 Left 0 Thru 918 Right 68 HV 17 Out TotalIn 662 1003 1665 Left0 Thru0 Right0 HV 0 Total Out In 0 0 0 Peak Hour Begins at 12:00 PM Cars & HV Peak Hour Data North File Name : Route 9 @ Treehouse Enter Driveway - Saturday Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 5/30/2026 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Peds US Route 9 Southbound Treehouse Enter Driveway Westbound US Route 9 Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int. Total 12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Apprch %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 File Name : Route 9 @ Treehouse Exit Driveway - Weekday Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 5/27/2026 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Cars & Hv US Route 9 Southbound Treehouse Exit Driveway Westbound US Route 9 Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left HV Right Thru Left HV Right Thru Left HV Right Thru Left HV Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 191 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 154 0 7 0 0 0 0 356 07:15 AM 0 185 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 195 0 10 0 0 0 0 402 07:30 AM 0 190 0 12 1 0 0 0 0 225 0 11 0 0 0 0 439 07:45 AM 0 205 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 270 0 11 0 0 0 0 489 Total 0 771 0 31 1 0 0 0 0 844 0 39 0 0 0 0 1686 08:00 AM 0 183 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 221 0 6 0 0 0 0 420 08:15 AM 0 185 0 4 1 0 0 1 0 226 0 10 0 0 0 0 427 08:30 AM 0 162 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 230 0 20 0 0 0 0 418 08:45 AM 0 146 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 250 0 8 0 0 0 0 407 Total 0 676 0 23 1 0 0 1 0 927 0 44 0 0 0 0 1672 04:00 PM 0 243 0 1 2 0 4 0 0 207 0 2 0 0 0 0 459 04:15 PM 0 225 0 8 1 0 5 0 0 214 0 6 0 0 0 0 459 04:30 PM 0 240 0 6 2 0 2 0 0 223 0 3 0 0 0 0 476 04:45 PM 0 243 0 8 2 0 5 0 0 231 0 5 0 0 0 0 494 Total 0 951 0 23 7 0 16 0 0 875 0 16 0 0 0 0 1888 05:00 PM 0 281 0 5 4 0 1 0 0 271 0 5 0 0 0 0 567 05:15 PM 0 265 0 6 4 0 3 0 0 256 0 5 0 0 0 0 539 05:30 PM 0 232 0 5 4 0 4 0 0 230 0 0 0 0 0 0 475 05:45 PM 0 164 0 2 3 0 2 0 0 223 0 2 0 0 0 0 396 Total 0 942 0 18 15 0 10 0 0 980 0 12 0 0 0 0 1977 Grand Total 0 3340 0 95 24 0 26 1 0 3626 0 111 0 0 0 0 7223 Apprch %0 97.2 0 2.8 47.1 0 51 2 0 97 0 3 0 0 0 0 Total %0 46.2 0 1.3 0.3 0 0.4 0 0 50.2 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 File Name : Route 9 @ Treehouse Exit Driveway - Weekday Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 5/27/2026 Page No : 2 US Route 9 Southbound Treehouse Exit Driveway Westbound US Route 9 Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 0 190 0 12 202 1 0 0 0 1 0 225 0 11 236 0 0 0 0 0 439 07:45 AM 0 205 0 3 208 0 0 0 0 0 0 270 0 11 281 0 0 0 0 0 489 08:00 AM 0 183 0 10 193 0 0 0 0 0 0 221 0 6 227 0 0 0 0 0 420 08:15 AM 0 185 0 4 189 1 0 0 1 2 0 226 0 10 236 0 0 0 0 0 427 Total Volume 0 763 0 29 792 2 0 0 1 3 0 942 0 38 980 0 0 0 0 0 1775 % App. Total 0 96.3 0 3.7 66.7 0 0 33.3 0 96.1 0 3.9 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .930 .000 .604 .952 .500 .000 .000 .250 .375 .000 .872 .000 .864 .872 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .907 US Route 9 Treehouse Exit Driveway US Route 9 Right 0 Thru 763 Left 0 HV 29 InOut Total 944 792 1736 Right 2 Thru 0 Left 0 HV 1 Out Total In 0 3 3 Left 0 Thru 942 Right 0 HV 38 Out TotalIn 763 980 1743 Left0 Thru0 Right0 HV 0 Total Out In 0 0 0 Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM Cars & Hv Peak Hour Data North File Name : Route 9 @ Treehouse Exit Driveway - Weekday Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 5/27/2026 Page No : 3 US Route 9 Southbound Treehouse Exit Driveway Westbound US Route 9 Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 0 240 0 6 246 2 0 2 0 4 0 223 0 3 226 0 0 0 0 0 476 04:45 PM 0 243 0 8 251 2 0 5 0 7 0 231 0 5 236 0 0 0 0 0 494 05:00 PM 0 281 0 5 286 4 0 1 0 5 0 271 0 5 276 0 0 0 0 0 567 05:15 PM 0 265 0 6 271 4 0 3 0 7 0 256 0 5 261 0 0 0 0 0 539 Total Volume 0 1029 0 25 1054 12 0 11 0 23 0 981 0 18 999 0 0 0 0 0 2076 % App. Total 0 97.6 0 2.4 52.2 0 47.8 0 0 98.2 0 1.8 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .915 .000 .781 .921 .750 .000 .550 .000 .821 .000 .905 .000 .900 .905 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .915 US Route 9 Treehouse Exit Driveway US Route 9 Right 0 Thru 1029 Left 0 HV 25 InOut Total 993 1054 2047 Right 12 Thru 0 Left 11 HV 0 Out Total In 0 23 23 Left 0 Thru 981 Right 0 HV 18 Out TotalIn 1040 999 2039 Left0 Thru0 Right0 HV 0 Total Out In 0 0 0 Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM Cars & Hv Peak Hour Data North File Name : Route 9 @ Treehouse Exit Driveway - Weekday Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 5/27/2026 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Peds US Route 9 Southbound Treehouse Exit Driveway Westbound US Route 9 Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Apprch %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 File Name : Route 9 @ Treehouse Exit Driveway - Saturday Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 5/30/2026 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Cars & HV US Route 9 Southbound Treehouse Exit Driveway Westbound US Route 9 Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left HV Right Thru Left HV Right Thru Left HV Right Thru Left HV Int. Total 11:00 AM 0 156 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 206 0 2 0 0 0 0 367 11:15 AM 0 151 0 5 5 0 2 0 0 199 0 2 0 0 0 0 364 11:30 AM 0 135 0 3 6 0 2 0 0 215 0 2 0 0 0 0 363 11:45 AM 0 149 0 3 6 0 6 0 0 228 0 6 0 0 0 0 398 Total 0 591 0 12 18 0 11 0 0 848 0 12 0 0 0 0 1492 12:00 PM 0 168 0 7 4 0 2 0 0 204 0 2 0 0 0 0 387 12:15 PM 0 216 0 3 10 0 4 0 0 211 0 2 0 0 0 0 446 12:30 PM 0 176 0 1 3 0 2 0 0 268 0 9 0 0 0 0 459 12:45 PM 0 171 0 1 7 0 8 0 0 235 0 4 0 0 0 0 426 Total 0 731 0 12 24 0 16 0 0 918 0 17 0 0 0 0 1718 Grand Total 0 1322 0 24 42 0 27 0 0 1766 0 29 0 0 0 0 3210 Apprch %0 98.2 0 1.8 60.9 0 39.1 0 0 98.4 0 1.6 0 0 0 0 Total %0 41.2 0 0.7 1.3 0 0.8 0 0 55 0 0.9 0 0 0 0 File Name : Route 9 @ Treehouse Exit Driveway - Saturday Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 5/30/2026 Page No : 2 US Route 9 Southbound Treehouse Exit Driveway Westbound US Route 9 Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Right Thru Left HV App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 11:00 AM to 12:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 0 168 0 7 175 4 0 2 0 6 0 204 0 2 206 0 0 0 0 0 387 12:15 PM 0 216 0 3 219 10 0 4 0 14 0 211 0 2 213 0 0 0 0 0 446 12:30 PM 0 176 0 1 177 3 0 2 0 5 0 268 0 9 277 0 0 0 0 0 459 12:45 PM 0 171 0 1 172 7 0 8 0 15 0 235 0 4 239 0 0 0 0 0 426 Total Volume 0 731 0 12 743 24 0 16 0 40 0 918 0 17 935 0 0 0 0 0 1718 % App. Total 0 98.4 0 1.6 60 0 40 0 0 98.2 0 1.8 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .846 .000 .429 .848 .600 .000 .500 .000 .667 .000 .856 .000 .472 .844 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .936 US Route 9 Treehouse Exit Driveway US Route 9 Right 0 Thru 731 Left 0 HV 12 InOut Total 942 743 1685 Right 24 Thru 0 Left 16 HV 0 Out Total In 0 40 40 Left 0 Thru 918 Right 0 HV 17 Out TotalIn 747 935 1682 Left0 Thru0 Right0 HV 0 Total Out In 0 0 0 Peak Hour Begins at 12:00 PM Cars & HV Peak Hour Data North File Name : Route 9 @ Treehouse Exit Driveway - Saturday Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 5/30/2026 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Peds US Route 9 Southbound Treehouse Exit Driveway Westbound US Route 9 Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int. Total 12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Apprch %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ReleasedHaz. Mat. Code Month Day Year Place Where Accident Occurred: County _____________________ of _______________________________________. Road on which accident occurred ________________________________________________________________________ at 1) intersecting street_________________________________________________________________________________ or 2) ______ ______ _________________________________________________________________ City Village Town N S E W of N Date of Death Only Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. Public Property Damaged Accident Date Day of Week Month Day Year Military Time No. of Vehicles No. Injured No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Accident Reconstructed Police Photos Yes No VEHICLE 1 - Driver License ID Number Driver Name -exactly as printed on license Driver Name - exactly as printed on license VEHICLE 2 - Driver License ID Number Name–exactly as printed on registration Name–exactly as printed on registration Address (Include Number & Street) Address (Include Number & Street) City or Town Date of Birth Date of Birth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. CodePlate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Apt. No.Apt. No. Address (Include Number & Street)Address (Include Number & Street)Apt. No.Apt. No. V E H I C L E 2 V E H I C L E 1 VEHICLE 1 DAMAGE CODES Left Scene VEHICLE 1 VEHICLE 2 BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN Sex 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 BY TO 18 Names of all involved 9. Coordinates (if available) Latitude/Northing: _____________________ Longitude/Easting: _______________________ Accident Description/Officer’s Notes Officer’s Rank and Signature Print Name in Full Badge/ID No. NCIC No. Precinct/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat/ Sector Reviewing Officer Date/Time Reviewed A L L I N V O L V E D A B C D E F Month Day Year Month Day Year Month Day Year Sex Public Property Damaged Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. Vehicle By Towed: To Vehicle By Towed: To VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13. SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 20 22 USE COVER SHEET Rear End Sideswipe (same direction) Sideswipe (opposite direction) Left Turn Right Angle Right Turn Head On 1. 2.4.6.8. 3.5.7. Right TurnLeft Turn ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 0. Reference Marker Haz.Released Mat . Code Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes VEHICLE 2 DAMAGE CODES Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes 1 445533 122 Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. Unknown/Unable to Determine Yes No Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Feet Miles (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER Page of Pages Local Codes New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) DMV COPYAMENDED REPORT J H CAUWENBERGHS SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF 1 - ALBERT STANLEY KUREK - x X 05 - 1 NY 14:55 NL4209FDT5WD STATE ROUTE 9 J H CAUWENBERGHS 11 13 CASTLETON ON H 2015 1 47 TOOL L TOTAL O EAST PEMBROKE 1 1573 03 PO BOX 110 1 2022 E PEMBROKE 3 1 MATTS 02 ADAM BAKER 1444 2419 MAIN RD MATTS 18 2 4 x 04501 12 - 7 vehicle 1 traveling south on state route 9 in the easternmost lane. vehicle 2 traveling east attempting to make a U turn from the western side of the roadway failed to yield to vehicle 1 causing a reportable motor vehicle collision. 2016 1 GWS3628 - 1 1 1 83 NY WEDNESDAY 1939 270 BAUER RD 12033 52469MH NY 300 1974 12 - 533592955513398286 4 0 2022/05/27 NY RAM ALBERT S KUREK 4 2 1 3 NY PTL 5 4DSD 1 ALBERT STANLEY KUREK NY 18 - 1 - 140560000 - AVERILL PARK 14056 SARA 04 01 - - PICK 120180000 39362886 03 10 KIDS LANE 22 - 1 NY 3 1 X x 3 06 0 TOYT 1 crescent ave - 1939 NY CADORET, JASON ReleasedHaz. Mat. Code Month Day Year Place Where Accident Occurred: County _____________________ of _______________________________________. Road on which accident occurred ________________________________________________________________________ at 1) intersecting street_________________________________________________________________________________ or 2) ______ ______ _________________________________________________________________ City Village Town N S E W of N Date of Death Only Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. Public Property Damaged Accident Date Day of Week Month Day Year Military Time No. of Vehicles No. Injured No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Accident Reconstructed Police Photos Yes No VEHICLE 1 - Driver License ID Number Driver Name -exactly as printed on license Driver Name - exactly as printed on license VEHICLE 2 - Driver License ID Number Name–exactly as printed on registration Name–exactly as printed on registration Address (Include Number & Street) Address (Include Number & Street) City or Town Date of Birth Date of Birth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. CodePlate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Apt. No.Apt. No. Address (Include Number & Street)Address (Include Number & Street)Apt. No.Apt. No. V E H I C L E 2 V E H I C L E 1 VEHICLE 1 DAMAGE CODES Left Scene VEHICLE 1 VEHICLE 2 BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN Sex 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 BY TO 18 Names of all involved 9. Coordinates (if available) Latitude/Northing: _____________________ Longitude/Easting: _______________________ Accident Description/Officer’s Notes Officer’s Rank and Signature Print Name in Full Badge/ID No. NCIC No. Precinct/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat/ Sector Reviewing Officer Date/Time Reviewed A L L I N V O L V E D A B C D E F Month Day Year Month Day Year Month Day Year Sex Public Property Damaged Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. Vehicle By Towed: To Vehicle By Towed: To VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13. SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 20 22 USE COVER SHEET Rear End Sideswipe (same direction) Sideswipe (opposite direction) Left Turn Right Angle Right Turn Head On 1. 2.4.6.8. 3.5.7. Right TurnLeft Turn ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 0. Reference Marker Haz.Released Mat . Code Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes VEHICLE 2 DAMAGE CODES Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes 1 445533 122 Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. Unknown/Unable to Determine Yes No Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Feet Miles (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER Page of Pages Local Codes New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) DMV COPYAMENDED REPORT ADAM A KRZESKI SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF 1 - MARY M MACCOLLUM - x O 06 - 1 NY 09:32 NL4212FKJC1W CRESCENT AVENUE ADAM A KRZESKI 11 - WELLS 2012 1 38 ADAM A KRZESKI STILLWATER 1 01 2344 06 55 BRICKHOUSE RD 2 2022 STILLWATER 2 2 02 KRISTOFER CAMARRO 1533 07 55 BRICKHOUSE RD 30 1 RT 9 7 x 04501 8 - - V1 was traveling west on Crescent Avenue following too closely to V2. Operator of V1 reported that the glare from the sun blinded him and he crashed into the vehicle in front of him causing a property damage accident. 2020 1 KWH5085 62 1 1 1 71 NY FRIDAY 1950 M PO BOX 21 121900000 44695MN NY 1984 1984 8 - 968017584481952346 4 0 2022/06/20 NY CHEV MARY M MACCOLLUM 4 2 1 2 NY officer 1129A 7 4DSD 1 MARY M MACCOLLUM NY 30 9 2 - 121700000 - WELLS 12170 SARA 17 01 - - PICK 121900000 4212FKJCV2 - 39395234 06 PO BOX 21 07 - 1 NY 1 1 X x 7 01 0 FORD 1 - 1950 NY FORT, EVAN Released o Haz. Mat. Code Month Day Year Place Where Accident Occurred: County _____________________ of _______________________________________. Road on which accident occurred ________________________________________________________________________ at 1) intersecting street_________________________________________________________________________________ or 2) ______ ______ _________________________________________________________________ o City o Village o Town o N o S o E o W of N Date of Death Only Check if involved vehicle is: o more than 95 inches wide; o more than 34 feet long; o operated with an overweight permit; o operated with an overdimension permit. Check if involved vehicle is: o more than 95 inches wide; o more than 34 feet long; o operated with an overweight permit; o operated with an overdimension permit. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. Public Property Damaged Accident Date Day of Week Month Day Year Military Time o o o No. of Vehicles No. Injured No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Accident Reconstructed o Police Photos o Yes o No VEHICLE 1 - Driver License ID Number Driver Name -exactly as printed on license Driver Name - exactly as printed on license VEHICLE 2 - Driver License ID Number Name–exactly as printed on registration Name–exactly as printed on registration Address (Include Number & Street)Address (Include Number & Street) City or Town Date of Birth Date of Birth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed o No. of Occupants State of Lic. State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. CodePlate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Apt. No.Apt. No. Address (Include Number & Street)Address (Include Number & Street)Apt. No.Apt. No. V E H I C L E 2 V E H I C L E 1 VEHICLE 1 DAMAGE CODES Left Scene VEHICLE 1 VEHICLE 2 o BICYCLIST o o PEDESTRIAN o OTHER PEDESTRIAN Sex 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 BY TO 18 Names of all involved 9. Coordinates (if available) Latitude/Northing: _____________________ Longitude/Easting: _______________________ Accident Description/Officer’s Notes Officer’s Rank and Signature Print Name in Full Badge/ID No.NCIC No. Precinct/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat/ Sector Reviewing Officer Date/Time Reviewed A L L I N V O L V E D A B C D E F ç Month Day Year Month Day Year Month Day Year Sex Public Property Damaged o Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed o No. of Occupants State of Lic. Vehicle By Towed: To Vehicle By Towed: To VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13. SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14.UNDERCARRIAGE 15.TRAILER 16.OVERTURNED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 20 22 USE COVER SHEET Rear End Sideswipe (same direction) Sideswipe (opposite direction) Left Turn Right Angle Right Turn Head On 1. 2.4.6.8. 3.5.7. Right TurnLeft Turn ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 0. Reference Marker Haz.Released Mat . Code o Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes VEHICLE 2 DAMAGE CODES Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes 1 4 45 533 12 2 Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. o Yes o No Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Feet Miles (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) 17.DEMOLISHED 18.NO DAMAGE 19.OTHER Page of Pages Local Codes New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (5/22) o AMENDED REPORT LATHAM NY 121100000 03 08 1966 M 1 KRILL, NIKOLAUS R 03 08 1966 1 NELSON AVE LATHAM NY 12110 KXL3755 NY 2022 DODG 4DSD 639 2 2 1 3 SARA X SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF ROUTE 9 300 X crescant ave 01 1 4 1 56 M ---KRILL, JOHN R patrolma AARON PERKINS 2385 04501 CADORET, JASON 07/24/2022 13:28 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 7X V1 WAS TRAVELING NORTH ON ROUTE 9 TOWARDS CRESCENT AVE AND STRUCK A DEER IN THE ROADWAY. See the second page for the accident diagram 1 1 NL4207FMW6D6 61 -07 09 2022 SATURD 20:48 1 0 0 X - 918789510 -KRILL, JOHN R 1 NELSON AVE NY ReleasedHaz. Mat. Code Month Day Year Place Where Accident Occurred: County _____________________ of _______________________________________. Road on which accident occurred ________________________________________________________________________ at 1) intersecting street_________________________________________________________________________________ or 2) ______ ______ _________________________________________________________________ City Village Town N S E W of N Date of Death Only Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. Public Property Damaged Accident Date Day of Week Month Day Year Military Time No. of Vehicles No. Injured No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Accident Reconstructed Police Photos Yes No VEHICLE 1 - Driver License ID Number Driver Name -exactly as printed on license Driver Name - exactly as printed on license VEHICLE 2 - Driver License ID Number Name–exactly as printed on registration Name–exactly as printed on registration Address (Include Number & Street) Address (Include Number & Street) City or Town Date of Birth Date of Birth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. CodePlate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Apt. No.Apt. No. Address (Include Number & Street)Address (Include Number & Street)Apt. No.Apt. No. V E H I C L E 2 V E H I C L E 1 VEHICLE 1 DAMAGE CODES Left Scene VEHICLE 1 VEHICLE 2 BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN Sex 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 BY TO 18 Names of all involved 9. Coordinates (if available) Latitude/Northing: _____________________ Longitude/Easting: _______________________ Accident Description/Officer’s Notes Officer’s Rank and Signature Print Name in Full Badge/ID No. NCIC No. Precinct/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat/ Sector Reviewing Officer Date/Time Reviewed A L L I N V O L V E D A B C D E F Month Day Year Month Day Year Month Day Year Sex Public Property Damaged Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. Vehicle By Towed: To Vehicle By Towed: To VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13. SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 20 22 USE COVER SHEET Rear End Sideswipe (same direction) Sideswipe (opposite direction) Left Turn Right Angle Right Turn Head On 1. 2.4.6.8. 3.5.7. Right TurnLeft Turn ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 0. Reference Marker Haz.Released Mat . Code Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes VEHICLE 2 DAMAGE CODES Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes 1 445533 122 Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. Unknown/Unable to Determine Yes No Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Feet Miles (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER Page of Pages Local Codes New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) DMV COPYAMENDED REPORT JODY L KEEFER SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF 1 - ROBERT C SPATHELF - x 09 - 1 NY 03:44 NL4210FVLTS1 ROUTE 9 JODY L KEEFER 12 - MALTA 2006 1 44 ABDELLATIFF ahmed MATTS DURYEA 1 2883 03 806 GLEN ST 1 2022 DURYEA 4 2 MATTS 02 ALEX LAMBIASO 2102 806 GLEN ST MATTS 22 1 CRESCENT AVE 1 x 04501 2 - - V2 was traveling north on Route 9 and had a yellow light at the intersection of Crescent Ave. V1 was turning left from Route 9 onto Crescent Ave and did not have a turning arrow. V1 failed to yield to V2 and was struck by V2 on the passenger side. V1 sustained major damage to the passenger side. V2 sustained major damage to the front bumper. Both vehicles were towed by Matt's. Operator of V1 was issued UTT for failure to yield in an intersection. 2012 2 GJA4038 - 1 1 M 3 48 DIAGRAM IS PRINTED ON LAST PAGE NY SATURDAY 1974 C 17 MALTA AVE APT 2B 12020 17285LY NY 1978 2 - 23241125520055829 4 0 2022/09/15 PA HOND ROBERT c SPATHELF 4 2 2 4 NY PTL 1141 3 SUBN 1 ROBERT C SPATHELF PA 22 7 1 - MATTS 186420000 - BALLSTON SPA 186420000 SARA 10 01 - - 4DSD 120200000 4210FVLVD7 - 39509909 03 15 CHERRY CHOKE RD 03 - 1 PA 1 1 X x 1 O 03 0 NISS 4 - 1974 PA LAMKINS, NICHOLAS ACCIDENT DIAGRAM Page of Pages New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT Accident Diagram 2 2 ReleasedHaz. Mat. Code Month Day Year Place Where Accident Occurred: County _____________________ of _______________________________________. Road on which accident occurred ________________________________________________________________________ at 1) intersecting street_________________________________________________________________________________ or 2) ______ ______ _________________________________________________________________ City Village Town N S E W of N Date of Death Only Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. Public Property Damaged Accident Date Day of Week Month Day Year Military Time No. of Vehicles No. Injured No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Accident Reconstructed Police Photos Yes No VEHICLE 1 - Driver License ID Number Driver Name -exactly as printed on license Driver Name - exactly as printed on license VEHICLE 2 - Driver License ID Number Name–exactly as printed on registration Name–exactly as printed on registration Address (Include Number & Street) Address (Include Number & Street) City or Town Date of Birth Date of Birth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. CodePlate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Apt. No.Apt. No. Address (Include Number & Street)Address (Include Number & Street)Apt. No.Apt. No. V E H I C L E 2 V E H I C L E 1 VEHICLE 1 DAMAGE CODES Left Scene VEHICLE 1 VEHICLE 2 BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN Sex 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 BY TO 18 Names of all involved 9. Coordinates (if available) Latitude/Northing: _____________________ Longitude/Easting: _______________________ Accident Description/Officer’s Notes Officer’s Rank and Signature Print Name in Full Badge/ID No. NCIC No. Precinct/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat/ Sector Reviewing Officer Date/Time Reviewed A L L I N V O L V E D A B C D E F Month Day Year Month Day Year Month Day Year Sex Public Property Damaged Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. Vehicle By Towed: To Vehicle By Towed: To VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13. SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 20 22 USE COVER SHEET Rear End Sideswipe (same direction) Sideswipe (opposite direction) Left Turn Right Angle Right Turn Head On 1. 2.4.6.8. 3.5.7. Right TurnLeft Turn ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 0. Reference Marker Haz.Released Mat . Code Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes VEHICLE 2 DAMAGE CODES Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes 1 445533 122 Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. Unknown/Unable to Determine Yes No Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Feet Miles (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER Page of Pages Local Codes New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) DMV COPYAMENDED REPORT JOSEPH A REPETTI SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF 1 - - x 09 - 3 NY 12:51 NL4218FW4LL5 BROADWAY JOSEPH A REPETTI 1 FORT EDWARD 1 X 39 JOSEPH A REPETTI 1 04 3105 2022 2 1 01 SHANNON SMITH 1921 21 1 x 04501 V1 struck a deer while heading in a northernly direction past the intersection of Crescent Ave while traveling on Route 9. 2017 1 - 1 7 1 29 DIAGRAM IS PRINTED ON LAST PAGE NY THURSDAY 102 RESERVOIR RD 12828 KUP2751 NY 500 1983 1983 - 713711034 4 0 2022/09/23 CHEV 4 1 2 2 NY PTL 1 1 JUSTINE L HOWE 61 2 - - FORT EDWARD SARA 15 01 - PICK 128280000 39519251 102 RESERVOIR RD 21 - 2 1 1 x 04 0 4 Crescent Ave - FORT, EVAN ACCIDENT DIAGRAM Page of Pages New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT Accident Diagram 2 2 ReleasedHaz. Mat. Code Month Day Year Place Where Accident Occurred: County _____________________ of _______________________________________. Road on which accident occurred ________________________________________________________________________ at 1) intersecting street_________________________________________________________________________________ or 2) ______ ______ _________________________________________________________________ City Village Town N S E W of N Date of Death Only Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. Public Property Damaged Accident Date Day of Week Month Day Year Military Time No. of Vehicles No. Injured No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Accident Reconstructed Police Photos Yes No VEHICLE 1 - Driver License ID Number Driver Name -exactly as printed on license Driver Name - exactly as printed on license VEHICLE 2 - Driver License ID Number Name–exactly as printed on registration Name–exactly as printed on registration Address (Include Number & Street) Address (Include Number & Street) City or Town Date of Birth Date of Birth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. CodePlate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Apt. No.Apt. No. Address (Include Number & Street)Address (Include Number & Street)Apt. No.Apt. No. V E H I C L E 2 V E H I C L E 1 VEHICLE 1 DAMAGE CODES Left Scene VEHICLE 1 VEHICLE 2 BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN Sex 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 BY TO 18 Names of all involved 9. Coordinates (if available) Latitude/Northing: _____________________ Longitude/Easting: _______________________ Accident Description/Officer’s Notes Officer’s Rank and Signature Print Name in Full Badge/ID No. NCIC No. Precinct/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat/ Sector Reviewing Officer Date/Time Reviewed A L L I N V O L V E D A B C D E F Month Day Year Month Day Year Month Day Year Sex Public Property Damaged Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. Vehicle By Towed: To Vehicle By Towed: To VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13. SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 20 22 USE COVER SHEET Rear End Sideswipe (same direction) Sideswipe (opposite direction) Left Turn Right Angle Right Turn Head On 1. 2.4.6.8. 3.5.7. Right TurnLeft Turn ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 0. Reference Marker Haz.Released Mat . Code Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes VEHICLE 2 DAMAGE CODES Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes 1 445533 122 Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. Unknown/Unable to Determine Yes No Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Feet Miles (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER Page of Pages Local Codes New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) DMV COPYAMENDED REPORT JUSTICE J HONSINGER SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF 1 - ALLYSON MARY BYRNE - x O 11 - 1 NY 23:59 NL4219G2VWHL SOUTH BROADWAY JUSTICE J HONSINGER 11 - WATERFORD 2016 1 X 25 JUSTICE J HONSINGER SARATOGA SPGS 1 04 2151 12 18 DIVISION ST 411 2 2022 SARATOGA SPRGS 2 2 02 WILLIAM ARPEI 1536 11 52 JENNA JO AVE 1 8 x 04501 8 - - V2 was stopping at the red light when V1 struck the rear of V2 causing minor damage to both vehicles. 2012 1 JDW7036 - 1 1 C 1 45 DIAGRAM IS PRINTED ON LAST PAGE NY TUESDAY 1976 M 45 SAGE RD 121880000 JKP9570 NY 50 1997 1997 8 - 638944920498219806 4 0 2022/11/12 NY DODG CANAL E ROOT 4 2 2 2 NY PTL 1129A 5 SUBN 1 ALLYSON MARY BYRNE NY 14 9 2 - 128660000 - WATERFORD 12866 SARA 08 01 - - PICK 121880000 4219G2VWSB - 39587487 45 SAGE RD 11 - 1 NY 1 1 X x 5 04 0 LNDR 1 Crescent Avenue - NY MCGOVERN, ANGELA ACCIDENT DIAGRAM Page of Pages New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT Accident Diagram 2 2 ReleasedHaz. Mat. Code Month Day Year Place Where Accident Occurred: County _____________________ of _______________________________________. Road on which accident occurred ________________________________________________________________________ at 1) intersecting street_________________________________________________________________________________ or 2) ______ ______ _________________________________________________________________ City Village Town N S E W of N Date of Death Only Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. Public Property Damaged Accident Date Day of Week Month Day Year Military Time No. of Vehicles No. Injured No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Accident Reconstructed Police Photos Yes No VEHICLE 1 - Driver License ID Number Driver Name -exactly as printed on license Driver Name - exactly as printed on license VEHICLE 2 - Driver License ID Number Name–exactly as printed on registration Name–exactly as printed on registration Address (Include Number & Street) Address (Include Number & Street) City or Town Date of Birth Date of Birth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. CodePlate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Apt. No.Apt. No. Address (Include Number & Street)Address (Include Number & Street)Apt. No.Apt. No. V E H I C L E 2 V E H I C L E 1 VEHICLE 1 DAMAGE CODES Left Scene VEHICLE 1 VEHICLE 2 BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN Sex 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 BY TO 18 Names of all involved 9. Coordinates (if available) Latitude/Northing: _____________________ Longitude/Easting: _______________________ Accident Description/Officer’s Notes Officer’s Rank and Signature Print Name in Full Badge/ID No. NCIC No. Precinct/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat/ Sector Reviewing Officer Date/Time Reviewed A L L I N V O L V E D A B C D E F Month Day Year Month Day Year Month Day Year Sex Public Property Damaged Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. Vehicle By Towed: To Vehicle By Towed: To VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13. SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 20 22 USE COVER SHEET Rear End Sideswipe (same direction) Sideswipe (opposite direction) Left Turn Right Angle Right Turn Head On 1. 2.4.6.8. 3.5.7. Right TurnLeft Turn ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 0. Reference Marker Haz.Released Mat . Code Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes VEHICLE 2 DAMAGE CODES Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes 1 445533 122 Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. Unknown/Unable to Determine Yes No Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Feet Miles (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER Page of Pages Local Codes New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) DMV COPYAMENDED REPORT RALPH A PITCHERALLE SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF 1 - JESSICA MARY DOWNEY RAVENSTAR - x O 10 - 1 NY 14:08 NL4207G17QBR SOUTH BROADWAY RALPH A PITCHERALLE 11 - MECHANICVILLE 2023 1 67 RALPH A PITCHERALLE MATT'S SARATOGA SPRING 1 09 2739 06 14 RESERVATION AVE 2 2022 SARATOGA SPGS 3 2 MATT'S 02 SHANE MARSHALL 0649 03 14 RESERVATION AVE MATT'S 20 1 CRESCENT AVENUE 1 x 04501 9 - - V1 was traveling northbound on Route 9 when it was following too closely to V2, which was also northbound on Route 9. V1 struck V2 and then continued into the field on the east side of Route 9, north of Crescent Avenue. 2005 1 KAM2070 - 1 1 F 1 43 DIAGRAM IS PRINTED ON LAST PAGE NY MONDAY 1979 M 55 HARRIS AVE 12118 RALPH NY 1955 1955 9 - 835463497796624190 4 0 2022/11/30 NY CHRY JESSICA M RAVENSTAR - 2 2 3 NY PTL 1129A 1 SUBN 1 JESSICA MARY DOWNEY RAVENSTAR NY 20 9 2 - MATT'S 128660000 - MECHANICVILLE 12866 SARA 24 01 - - CONV 121180000 4207G17QS1 - 39612599 06 55 HARRIS AVE 03 - 1 NY 2 1 X x 1 09 0 HOND 4 - 1979 NY CALLAHAN, CHRIS ACCIDENT DIAGRAM Page of Pages New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT Accident Diagram 2 2 ReleasedHaz. Mat. Code Month Day Year Place Where Accident Occurred: County _____________________ of _______________________________________. Road on which accident occurred ________________________________________________________________________ at 1) intersecting street_________________________________________________________________________________ or 2) ______ ______ _________________________________________________________________ City Village Town N S E W of N Date of Death Only Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. Public Property Damaged Accident Date Day of Week Month Day Year Military Time No. of Vehicles No. Injured No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Accident Reconstructed Police Photos Yes No VEHICLE 1 - Driver License ID Number Driver Name -exactly as printed on license Driver Name - exactly as printed on license VEHICLE 2 - Driver License ID Number Name–exactly as printed on registration Name–exactly as printed on registration Address (Include Number & Street) Address (Include Number & Street) City or Town Date of Birth Date of Birth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. CodePlate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Apt. No.Apt. No. Address (Include Number & Street)Address (Include Number & Street)Apt. No.Apt. No. V E H I C L E 2 V E H I C L E 1 VEHICLE 1 DAMAGE CODES Left Scene VEHICLE 1 VEHICLE 2 BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN Sex 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 BY TO 18 Names of all involved 9. Coordinates (if available) Latitude/Northing: _____________________ Longitude/Easting: _______________________ Accident Description/Officer’s Notes Officer’s Rank and Signature Print Name in Full Badge/ID No. NCIC No. Precinct/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat/ Sector Reviewing Officer Date/Time Reviewed A L L I N V O L V E D A B C D E F Month Day Year Month Day Year Month Day Year Sex Public Property Damaged Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. Vehicle By Towed: To Vehicle By Towed: To VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13. SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 20 22 USE COVER SHEET Rear End Sideswipe (same direction) Sideswipe (opposite direction) Left Turn Right Angle Right Turn Head On 1. 2.4.6.8. 3.5.7. Right TurnLeft Turn ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 0. Reference Marker Haz.Released Mat . Code Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes VEHICLE 2 DAMAGE CODES Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes 1 445533 122 Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. Unknown/Unable to Determine Yes No Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Feet Miles (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER Page of Pages Local Codes New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) DMV COPYAMENDED REPORT 4 VALENTINA ALLISHA SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF 1 4 - 01 ADRIAN JACOB APPLEMAN - x X 03 - 3 NY 2 06:25 NL4210GJK76C ROUTE 50 VALENTINA ALLISHA 2 4 2 1 - ALBANY 2014 1 1 54 ASLLAW ALLISHA TOWAWAY COHOES 1 FARIGA SHAMETI 03 3105 06 371 DANIELS RD 11 1 2023 1 SARATOGA SPRINGS 3 1 TOWAWAY EMMA K FUHRMEISTER1 01 SHANNON SMITH 2101 26 57 RIVERWALK WAY TOWAWAY 23 1 12 4501 1 x 04501 2 - - ADRIAN JACOB APPLEMAN V2 was traveling in a Northerly direction on Route 50 when V1 was in the left turn lane traveling in a Southerly direction. V1 failed to yield the right away and attempted to pull into the hotel driveway. V2 struck V1 causing both cars to have significant damage. 2015 2 EMS GTZ7548 - 1 1 M 3 1 58 1 DIAGRAM IS PRINTED ON LAST PAGE NY THURSDAY 1993 66 401 - M 7 NEAL DR 12205 BGY4909 NY 1800 1964 - 1968 2 - 370383534565347999 4 0 2023/04/08 -- NY FORD 29 ADRIAN J APPLEMAN 4 29 2 2 3 NY PTL 1141 5 4DSD 1 ASLLAW ALLISHA NY 23 7 1 -- - 3 02 - TOWAWAY 120470000 - ALBANY 12866 SARA 16 68 01 JETNOR SHAMETI - - 1 - PICK 12205 4210GJK7TM - - 39784775 06 7 NEAL DRIVE 6 12 - 4 NY 1 1 X x 02 1 4 12 1 KIA 5 Crescent Avenue - 1993 NY 2 5 LAMKINS, NICHOLAS ACCIDENT DIAGRAM Page of Pages New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT Accident Diagram 2 2 ReleasedHaz. Mat. Code Month Day Year Place Where Accident Occurred: County _____________________ of _______________________________________. Road on which accident occurred ________________________________________________________________________ at 1) intersecting street_________________________________________________________________________________ or 2) ______ ______ _________________________________________________________________ City Village Town N S E W of N Date of Death Only Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. Public Property Damaged Accident Date Day of Week Month Day Year Military Time No. of Vehicles No. Injured No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Accident Reconstructed Police Photos Yes No VEHICLE 1 - Driver License ID Number Driver Name -exactly as printed on license Driver Name - exactly as printed on license VEHICLE 2 - Driver License ID Number Name–exactly as printed on registration Name–exactly as printed on registration Address (Include Number & Street) Address (Include Number & Street) City or Town Date of Birth Date of Birth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. CodePlate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Apt. No.Apt. No. Address (Include Number & Street)Address (Include Number & Street)Apt. No.Apt. No. V E H I C L E 2 V E H I C L E 1 VEHICLE 1 DAMAGE CODES Left Scene VEHICLE 1 VEHICLE 2 BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN Sex 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 BY TO 18 Names of all involved 9. Coordinates (if available) Latitude/Northing: _____________________ Longitude/Easting: _______________________ Accident Description/Officer’s Notes Officer’s Rank and Signature Print Name in Full Badge/ID No. NCIC No. Precinct/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat/ Sector Reviewing Officer Date/Time Reviewed A L L I N V O L V E D A B C D E F Month Day Year Month Day Year Month Day Year Sex Public Property Damaged Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. Vehicle By Towed: To Vehicle By Towed: To VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13. SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 20 22 USE COVER SHEET Rear End Sideswipe (same direction) Sideswipe (opposite direction) Left Turn Right Angle Right Turn Head On 1. 2.4.6.8. 3.5.7. Right TurnLeft Turn ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 0. Reference Marker Haz.Released Mat . Code Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes VEHICLE 2 DAMAGE CODES Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes 1 445533 122 Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. Unknown/Unable to Determine Yes No Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Feet Miles (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER Page of Pages Local Codes New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) DMV COPYAMENDED REPORT PATRICK JAMES CRONIN SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF 1 - x X 12 - NY .1 02:37 NL4218G8JNT3 RT9 PATRICK JAMES CRONIN 1 MALTA 58 PATRICK J CRONIN MATTS 1 08 2344 2022 2 1 KRISTOFER CAMARRO 1650 05 2 x 04501 V1 was traveling south on RT9 near Crescent Avenue when a deer ran in front of path causing a property damage accident. 2020 1 - 1 7 1 DIAGRAM IS PRINTED ON LAST PAGE NY SATURDAY M 5 BASSWOOD CT 12020 KER8901 NY 1964 1964 - 771977644 0 2023/01/15 TOYT 4 1 2 2 NY officer 5 1 61 MATTS - MALTA SARA 31 01 - SUBN 120200000 - 39808547 5 BASSWOOD CT 05 1 3 1 x 08 0 5 south of crescent ave near homewood suites - HILTZ, JENNA ACCIDENT DIAGRAM Page of Pages New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT Accident Diagram 2 2 ReleasedHaz. Mat. Code Month Day Year Place Where Accident Occurred: County _____________________ of _______________________________________. Road on which accident occurred ________________________________________________________________________ at 1) intersecting street_________________________________________________________________________________ or 2) ______ ______ _________________________________________________________________ City Village Town N S E W of N Date of Death Only Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. Public Property Damaged Accident Date Day of Week Month Day Year Military Time No. of Vehicles No. Injured No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Accident Reconstructed Police Photos Yes No VEHICLE 1 - Driver License ID Number Driver Name -exactly as printed on license Driver Name - exactly as printed on license VEHICLE 2 - Driver License ID Number Name–exactly as printed on registration Name–exactly as printed on registration Address (Include Number & Street) Address (Include Number & Street) City or Town Date of Birth Date of Birth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. CodePlate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Apt. No.Apt. No. Address (Include Number & Street)Address (Include Number & Street)Apt. No.Apt. No. V E H I C L E 2 V E H I C L E 1 VEHICLE 1 DAMAGE CODES Left Scene VEHICLE 1 VEHICLE 2 BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN Sex 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 BY TO 18 Names of all involved 9. Coordinates (if available) Latitude/Northing: _____________________ Longitude/Easting: _______________________ Accident Description/Officer’s Notes Officer’s Rank and Signature Print Name in Full Badge/ID No. NCIC No. Precinct/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat/ Sector Reviewing Officer Date/Time Reviewed A L L I N V O L V E D A B C D E F Month Day Year Month Day Year Month Day Year Sex Public Property Damaged Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. Vehicle By Towed: To Vehicle By Towed: To VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13. SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 20 22 USE COVER SHEET Rear End Sideswipe (same direction) Sideswipe (opposite direction) Left Turn Right Angle Right Turn Head On 1. 2.4.6.8. 3.5.7. Right TurnLeft Turn ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 0. Reference Marker Haz.Released Mat . Code Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes VEHICLE 2 DAMAGE CODES Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes 1 445533 122 Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. Unknown/Unable to Determine Yes No Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Feet Miles (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER Page of Pages Local Codes New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) DMV COPYAMENDED REPORT RITA A USHER SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF 1 - JOSEPH F JR PAOLUCCI - x O 06 - 1 NY 08:59 NL4210GTPWJ8 RT9 RITA A USHER 22 1 4 SARATOGA SPGS 2022 1 68 RITA A USHER ALBANY 1 01 2344 07 36 LINDEN RD 1 2023 ALBANY 2 2 02 KRISTOFER CAMARRO 1702 19 36 LINDEN RD 18 1 EAST WEST ROAD 1 x 04501 8 - 9 The operator of V2 was traveling in a northerly direction on RT9 approaching East West Road. V2 was following too closely to a vehicle in front of him when the light turned red he advised that he had to slam on his breaks to avoid a collision. V1 also following too closely to V2 collided with V2 causing minor damage to both vehicles. 2008 2 LAA7110 4 1 1 M 1 62 1 NY SATURDAY 1960 402 - 29 GLENHAM AV 12866 DDC4396 NY 1955 - 1955 8 - 379967314192275923 4 0 2023/06/15 NY HOND JOSEPH F PAOLUCCI 4 2 1 2 NY officer 1 SUBN 1 JOSEPH F JR PAOLUCCI NY 18 9 1 - - 122080000 - SARATOGA SPGS 12208 SARA 10 49 01 GREGORY M WOOD - - 4DSD 128660000 - 39875100 07 29 GLENHAM AV 3 19 - 1 NY 1 1 X x 1 01 0 GMC 1 - 1960 NY CADORET, JASON ReleasedHaz. Mat. Code Month Day Year Place Where Accident Occurred: County _____________________ of _______________________________________. Road on which accident occurred ________________________________________________________________________ at 1) intersecting street_________________________________________________________________________________ or 2) ______ ______ _________________________________________________________________ City Village Town N S E W of N Date of Death Only Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. Public Property Damaged Accident Date Day of Week Month Day Year Military Time No. of Vehicles No. Injured No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Accident Reconstructed Police Photos Yes No VEHICLE 1 - Driver License ID Number Driver Name -exactly as printed on license Driver Name - exactly as printed on license VEHICLE 2 - Driver License ID Number Name–exactly as printed on registration Name–exactly as printed on registration Address (Include Number & Street) Address (Include Number & Street) City or Town Date of Birth Date of Birth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. CodePlate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Apt. No.Apt. No. Address (Include Number & Street)Address (Include Number & Street)Apt. No.Apt. No. V E H I C L E 2 V E H I C L E 1 VEHICLE 1 DAMAGE CODES Left Scene VEHICLE 1 VEHICLE 2 BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN Sex 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 BY TO 18 Names of all involved 9. Coordinates (if available) Latitude/Northing: _____________________ Longitude/Easting: _______________________ Accident Description/Officer’s Notes Officer’s Rank and Signature Print Name in Full Badge/ID No. NCIC No. Precinct/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat/ Sector Reviewing Officer Date/Time Reviewed A L L I N V O L V E D A B C D E F Month Day Year Month Day Year Month Day Year Sex Public Property Damaged Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. Vehicle By Towed: To Vehicle By Towed: To VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13. SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 20 22 USE COVER SHEET Rear End Sideswipe (same direction) Sideswipe (opposite direction) Left Turn Right Angle Right Turn Head On 1. 2.4.6.8. 3.5.7. Right TurnLeft Turn ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 0. Reference Marker Haz.Released Mat . Code Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes VEHICLE 2 DAMAGE CODES Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes 1 445533 122 Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. Unknown/Unable to Determine Yes No Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Feet Miles (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER Page of Pages Local Codes New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) DMV COPYAMENDED REPORT TIMOTHY NUGENT SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF 1 - x 06 - NY 15:34 NS0999GV8F99 ROUTE 9 TIMOTHY NUGENT 1 SARATOGA SPRINGS X 69 VICTORIA A MINERVA 1 08 622 2023 3 1 RYAN CADY 2115 13 1 x 04529 Vehicle 1 struck deer in roadway 2016 1 - 1 7 1 DIAGRAM IS PRINTED ON LAST PAGE NY THURSDAY -73.78 F 86 GREEN AVE 12866 HVSA KVE3942 43.04 NY 100 1953 1953 - 976457616 0 2023/06/29 MAZD 2 1 2 3 NY PO 2 1 61 - CASTLETON SARA 15 01 - 4DSD 12033 - 39888195 1 FURLONG ST 08 1 2 1 x 08 0 5 East west road - SCHILLINGER, THOMAS ACCIDENT DIAGRAM Page of Pages New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT Accident Diagram 2 2 Officer's Rank and Signature PTL 2598 Badge/ID No. 04501 NCIC No.Precint/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat Sector NORTHRUP, REBECCA Reviewing Officer 8/16/2023 20:50 Date/Time Reviewed JARED DUCHESNEPrint Name in Full - 1 - 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 2 6 2 7 2 23-017986 Local Codes AMENDED REPORTNL4209H1WBR4 8 7 2023YearMonth Accident Date Day MONDAY Day of Week 16:02 Military Time 2Vehicles No. of 0 No. Injured 0 No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Left Scene NoYes Police Photos Accident Reconstructed of PagesPage1 POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) New York State Department of Motor Vehicles - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 4 1 63 F ---IVERSON, DINA VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13 SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER O See the last page of the MV-104A for the accident diagram. Unknown/Unable to determine Yes No Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 9. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. 1VEHICLE VEHICLE BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN2 3 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 1 23 7 24 15 25 10 26 2 27 1 28 - 29 - 30 more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. 1 1 VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 8 1 18 2 3 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. 2 2 VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 6 1 7 2 6 3 7 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes milesfeet (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Reference Marker Latitude/Northing SARATOGACounty City Village Town SARATOGA SPRINGSof 3402 ROUTE 9, SARATOGA SPRINGSRoad on which accident occurred at 1) intersecting streetLongitude/Easting W S E N ROUTE 9300 V1 was backing up when it collided and caused damage to the rear of V2 which was parked in a parking spot. WITNESS #1 CHRISTIAN BAKER 3402 STATE ROUTE 9 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 (518) 290-8422 Accident Description/Officer's notes - - - - - - - - - - or 2) Place Where Accident Occurred:Coordinates (if available) of 560935291 VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number 1 NY State of Lic. IVERSON, DINA Driver Name - exactly as printed on license 777 TRUESDALE HILL ROAD Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. LAKE GEORGECity or Town NYState 12845 Zip Code 3 9 1960 Day YearMonth Date of Birth F Sex Unlicensed 01 No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged IVERSON, DENNIS A Name - exactly as printed on registration M Sex 1959312 Date of Birth Month Day Year 777 TRUESDALE HILL ROAD Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.-Mat.Haz. Code Released LAKE GEORGE City or Town NY State 12845 Zip Code HGH1320 Plate Number NY State of Reg. 2021 HOND Vehicle Year & Make 4DSD Vehicle Type 639 Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number 2 State of Lic. PARKED, Driver Name - exactly as printed on license Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. City or Town State Zip Code Day YearMonth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed 00 No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged NAVIN, ANDREW K Name - exactly as printed on registration M Sex 1984122 Date of Birth Month Day Year 809 COUNTY ROUTE 43 Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.-Mat.Haz. Code Released FORT EDWARD City or Town NY State 12828 Zip Code GTR5198 Plate Number NY State of Reg. 2022 HOND Vehicle Year & Make 4DSD Vehicle Type 054 Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - A L L I N V O L V E D F E D C B A 8 9 10 11 12 13 17 BY14 15 16 Officer's Rank and Signature PTL 3109 Badge/ID No. 04501 NCIC No.Precint/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat Sector AHIGIAN, JUSTIN Reviewing Officer 9/18/2023 14:37 Date/Time Reviewed RYAN NICHOLSONPrint Name in Full - 1 - 2 1 3 4 4 2 5 1 6 2 7 2 23018589 Local Codes AMENDED REPORTNLPD25H2L63W 8 14 2023 YearMonth Accident Date Day MONDAY Day of Week 02:52 Military Time 1Vehicles No. of 0 No. Injured 0 No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Left Scene NoYes Police Photos Accident Reconstructed of PagesPage1 POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) New York State Department of Motor Vehicles - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 4 1 69 M ---COMMISSIONG, MARCUS VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13 SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER See the last page of the MV-104A for the accident diagram. Unknown/Unable to determine Yes No Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 9. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. 1VEHICLE VEHICLE BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN 2 19 - 20 21 22 4 23 24 1 25 26 2 27 18 28 - 29 30 more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. 1 1 VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 2 1 3 2 2 3 3 4 1 5 MATTSVehicle By: MATTSTowed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 1 2 3 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes milesfeet (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Reference Marker Latitude/Northing SARATOGACounty City Village Town SARATOGA SPRINGSof ROUTE 9Road on which accident occurred at 1) intersecting streetLongitude/Easting W S E N 15 FEET INTO THE DRIVEWAY OF 3304 ROU15 V1 was traveling southbound on Route 9 when V1 crossed over the median and proceeded into oncoming traffic, then striking the curb, flower bed, and black fence on the property of 3304 Route 9. PROPERTY DAMAGED BY VEHICLE #01- BLACK FENCE AND FLOWER BED CHARLES F BRYNER 3304 ROUTE 9 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 Accident Description/Officer's notes - - - - - - - - - - or 2) Place Where Accident Occurred:Coordinates (if available) of 185017611 VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number 1 NY State of Lic. COMMISSIONG, MARCUS Driver Name - exactly as printed on license 11562 LEFFERTS 2 Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. S OZONE PARKCity or Town NYState 11420 Zip Code 8 5 1954 Day YearMonth Date of Birth M Sex Unlicensed 01 No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged COMMISSIONG, MARCUS Name - exactly as printed on registration M Sex 195458 Date of Birth Month Day Year 11562 LEFFERTS 2 Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.-Mat.Haz. Code Released S OZONE PARK City or Town NY State 11420 Zip Code LAN9306 Plate Number NY State of Reg. 2023 KIA Vehicle Year & Make SUBN Vehicle Type 618 Ins. Code PD04H2L4TS, PD04H2C48B, PD04H2L5MXTicket/Arrest Number(s) 1128C, 11923, 11922AAViolation Section(s) - - - - VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number State of Lic. Driver Name - exactly as printed on license Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. City or Town State Zip Code Day YearMonth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged Name - exactly as printed on registration Sex Date of Birth Month Day Year Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.Mat.Haz. Code Released City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - A L L I N V O L V E D F E D C B A 8 9 10 11 12 13 17 BY14 15 16 ReleasedHaz. Mat. Code Month Day Year Place Where Accident Occurred: County _____________________ of _______________________________________. Road on which accident occurred ________________________________________________________________________ at 1) intersecting street_________________________________________________________________________________ or 2) ______ ______ _________________________________________________________________ City Village Town N S E W of N Date of Death Only Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. Public Property Damaged Accident Date Day of Week Month Day Year Military Time No. of Vehicles No. Injured No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Accident Reconstructed Police Photos Yes No VEHICLE 1 - Driver License ID Number Driver Name -exactly as printed on license Driver Name - exactly as printed on license VEHICLE 2 - Driver License ID Number Name–exactly as printed on registration Name–exactly as printed on registration Address (Include Number & Street) Address (Include Number & Street) City or Town Date of Birth Date of Birth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. CodePlate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Apt. No.Apt. No. Address (Include Number & Street)Address (Include Number & Street)Apt. No.Apt. No. V E H I C L E 2 V E H I C L E 1 VEHICLE 1 DAMAGE CODES Left Scene VEHICLE 1 VEHICLE 2 BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN Sex 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 BY TO 18 Names of all involved 9. Coordinates (if available) Latitude/Northing: _____________________ Longitude/Easting: _______________________ Accident Description/Officer’s Notes Officer’s Rank and Signature Print Name in Full Badge/ID No. NCIC No. Precinct/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat/ Sector Reviewing Officer Date/Time Reviewed A L L I N V O L V E D A B C D E F Month Day Year Month Day Year Month Day Year Sex Public Property Damaged Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. Vehicle By Towed: To Vehicle By Towed: To VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13. SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 20 22 USE COVER SHEET Rear End Sideswipe (same direction) Sideswipe (opposite direction) Left Turn Right Angle Right Turn Head On 1. 2.4.6.8. 3.5.7. Right TurnLeft Turn ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 0. Reference Marker Haz.Released Mat . Code Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes VEHICLE 2 DAMAGE CODES Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes 1 445533 122 Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. Unknown/Unable to Determine Yes No Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Feet Miles (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER Page of Pages Local Codes New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) DMV COPYAMENDED REPORT LEAH G BATTLE SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF 1 - JOSEPH E KOPER - x O 08 - 1 NY 19:42 x NL4210H2VLJ6 ROUTE 9 LEAH G BATTLE 12 - FLORAL PARK 2023 2 58 LEAH G BATTLE MALTA 1 09 2881 06 202 NORTH BROADWAY 1 2023 MALTA 2 2 02 LOGAN MURPHY 1920 09 202 NORTH BROADWAY 28 1 EAST WEST ROAD 8 x 04501 8 - - V2 was stopped at a red light facing south on Route 9 at the intersection with East West Road. V1 was traveling South on Route 9 and followed V2 too closely. V1 struck V2, causing a property damage accident. 2019 2 91UB77 - 1 1 M 7 58 NY WEDNESDAY 1965 F 10 MAYFAIR AVE 110010000 JKC2683 NY 1964 1964 8 - 784297456714444243 1 0 2023/08/17 NY CHEV JOSEPH E KOPER 4 2 1 2 NY PTL 1129A 5 MCY 1 JOSEPH E KOPER NY 28 4 1 - 12020 - FLORAL PARK 12020 SARA 16 01 - - SUBN 110010000 3210H2VM9R - 39952848 06 10 MAYFAIR AVE 09 - 1 NY 1 1 X 5 09 0 INDI 1 - 1965 NY NORTHRUP, REBECCA ReleasedHaz. Mat. Code Month Day Year Place Where Accident Occurred: County _____________________ of _______________________________________. Road on which accident occurred ________________________________________________________________________ at 1) intersecting street_________________________________________________________________________________ or 2) ______ ______ _________________________________________________________________ City Village Town N S E W of N Date of Death Only Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. Public Property Damaged Accident Date Day of Week Month Day Year Military Time No. of Vehicles No. Injured No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Accident Reconstructed Police Photos Yes No VEHICLE 1 - Driver License ID Number Driver Name -exactly as printed on license Driver Name - exactly as printed on license VEHICLE 2 - Driver License ID Number Name–exactly as printed on registration Name–exactly as printed on registration Address (Include Number & Street) Address (Include Number & Street) City or Town Date of Birth Date of Birth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. CodePlate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Apt. No.Apt. No. Address (Include Number & Street)Address (Include Number & Street)Apt. No.Apt. No. V E H I C L E 2 V E H I C L E 1 VEHICLE 1 DAMAGE CODES Left Scene VEHICLE 1 VEHICLE 2 BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN Sex 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 BY TO 18 Names of all involved 9. Coordinates (if available) Latitude/Northing: _____________________ Longitude/Easting: _______________________ Accident Description/Officer’s Notes Officer’s Rank and Signature Print Name in Full Badge/ID No. NCIC No. Precinct/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat/ Sector Reviewing Officer Date/Time Reviewed A L L I N V O L V E D A B C D E F Month Day Year Month Day Year Month Day Year Sex Public Property Damaged Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. Vehicle By Towed: To Vehicle By Towed: To VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13. SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 20 22 USE COVER SHEET Rear End Sideswipe (same direction) Sideswipe (opposite direction) Left Turn Right Angle Right Turn Head On 1. 2.4.6.8. 3.5.7. Right TurnLeft Turn ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 0. Reference Marker Haz.Released Mat . Code Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes VEHICLE 2 DAMAGE CODES Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes 1 445533 122 Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. Unknown/Unable to Determine Yes No Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Feet Miles (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER Page of Pages Local Codes New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) DMV COPYAMENDED REPORT LSA SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF 1 - JENNIFER A LURIE - x O 08 - 1 14:35 NLSRV2H4B0CZ RT 9 S LSA 1U - 2020 1 X LSA E GREENBUSH 1 x 1704 10 17 PONDEROSA BLVD 2 2023 E GREENBUSH 2 02 AARON MOORE 1520 17 PONDEROSA BLVD 07 1 CRESCENT AVE 3 x 04501 7 - Vehicle 2 was preparing to take a left hand turn from Rt 9S on to Crescent Avenue in a south easterly direction, when Vehicle 1, traveling south, struck her from behind. Vehicle 1 subsequently left the scene of the accident. No injuries were reported. U GEZ5270 - 1 1 M 1 51 TUESDAY 1971 x U UNKNOWN 7 - 114202548 4 0 2023/09/02 NY eric s lurie X 2 1 PTL 5 SUBN 1 JENNIFER A LURIE NY 10 9 2 - 12061 - 12061 SARA 29 01 - - - 39973333 06 - X NY 1 1 X x 4 0 NISS 1 - 1971 NY CADORET, JASON Officer's Rank and Signature PTL 2264 Badge/ID No. 04501 NCIC No.Precint/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat Sector CADORET, JASON Reviewing Officer 12/22/2023 06:20 Date/Time Reviewed KRISTEN VANWERTPrint Name in Full - 1 - 2 1 3 5 4 1 5 1 6 2 7 2 23-027670 Local Codes AMENDED REPORTNL4213HHNC21 12 14 2023 YearMonth Accident Date Day THURSDAY Day of Week 17:35 Military Time 1Vehicles No. of 0 No. Injured 0 No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Left Scene NoYes Police Photos Accident Reconstructed of PagesPage1 POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) New York State Department of Motor Vehicles - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 4 1 37 M ---EAVES II, PHILLIP W 1 3 4 1 31 F ---EAVES, AMANDA A VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13 SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER See the last page of the MV-104A for the accident diagram. Unknown/Unable to determine Yes No Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 9. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. 1VEHICLE VEHICLE BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN 61 19 - 20 21 22 5 23 24 1 25 26 1 27 4 28 29 30 more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. 1 1 VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 3 1 3 2 4 3 2 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 1 2 3 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes milesfeet (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) 9 _ Reference Marker Latitude/Northing SARATOGACounty City Village Town SARATOGA SPRINGSof STATE ROUTE 9Road on which accident occurred 1 5 0 9 at 1) intersecting streetLongitude/Easting 1 1 7 1 W S E N EAST WEST ROAD400 Operator of Vehicle #1 states that as he was traveling southbound on Rte. 9 a coyote ran out in front of Vehicle #1 casing the collision to occur. Accident Description/Officer's notes - - - - - - - - - - or 2) Place Where Accident Occurred:Coordinates (if available) of 960731172 VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number 1 NY State of Lic. EAVES II, PHILLIP W Driver Name - exactly as printed on license 35 ARBOR AVE Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. MECHANICVILLECity or Town NYState 12118 Zip Code 2 3 1986 Day YearMonth Date of Birth M Sex Unlicensed 02 No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged EAN HOLDINGS LLC, Name - exactly as printed on registration C Sex Date of Birth Month Day Year 14002 E 21ST ST STE 1500 Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.-Mat.Haz. Code Released TULSA City or Town OK State 74134 Zip Code KBC2092 Plate Number NY State of Reg. 2023 HYUN Vehicle Year & Make SUBN Vehicle Type 993 Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number State of Lic. Driver Name - exactly as printed on license Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. City or Town State Zip Code Day YearMonth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged Name - exactly as printed on registration Sex Date of Birth Month Day Year Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.Mat.Haz. Code Released City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - A L L I N V O L V E D F E D C B A 8 9 10 11 12 13 17 BY14 15 16 ReleasedHaz. Mat. Code Month Day Year Place Where Accident Occurred: County _____________________ of _______________________________________. Road on which accident occurred ________________________________________________________________________ at 1) intersecting street_________________________________________________________________________________ or 2) ______ ______ _________________________________________________________________ City Village Town N S E W of N Date of Death Only Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. Public Property Damaged Accident Date Day of Week Month Day Year Military Time No. of Vehicles No. Injured No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Accident Reconstructed Police Photos Yes No VEHICLE 1 - Driver License ID Number Driver Name -exactly as printed on license Driver Name - exactly as printed on license VEHICLE 2 - Driver License ID Number Name–exactly as printed on registration Name–exactly as printed on registration Address (Include Number & Street) Address (Include Number & Street) City or Town Date of Birth Date of Birth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. CodePlate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Apt. No.Apt. No. Address (Include Number & Street)Address (Include Number & Street)Apt. No.Apt. No. V E H I C L E 2 V E H I C L E 1 VEHICLE 1 DAMAGE CODES Left Scene VEHICLE 1 VEHICLE 2 BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN Sex 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 BY TO 18 Names of all involved 9. Coordinates (if available) Latitude/Northing: _____________________ Longitude/Easting: _______________________ Accident Description/Officer’s Notes Officer’s Rank and Signature Print Name in Full Badge/ID No. NCIC No. Precinct/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat/ Sector Reviewing Officer Date/Time Reviewed A L L I N V O L V E D A B C D E F Month Day Year Month Day Year Month Day Year Sex Public Property Damaged Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. Vehicle By Towed: To Vehicle By Towed: To VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13. SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 20 22 USE COVER SHEET Rear End Sideswipe (same direction) Sideswipe (opposite direction) Left Turn Right Angle Right Turn Head On 1. 2.4.6.8. 3.5.7. Right TurnLeft Turn ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 0. Reference Marker Haz.Released Mat . Code Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes VEHICLE 2 DAMAGE CODES Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes 1 445533 122 Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. Unknown/Unable to Determine Yes No Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Feet Miles (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER Page of Pages Local Codes New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) DMV COPYAMENDED REPORT DALE EDWARD MCKAY SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF 1 - FREDERICK STEVEN STEFANIK - x O 02 - 1 NY 12:59 NL4207HPTMLQ SOUTH BROADWAY DALE EDWARD MCKAY 11 - COHOES 2018 1 28 DALE E MCKAY VERONA 1 02 2150 04 6021 ROCK RD 1 2024 VERONA 2 2 02 KIEL VANWAGNER 1513 17 6021 ROCK RD 26 2 EAST WEST RD 8 x 04501 8 - - v2 was south bound on rt 9 and stopped in traffic at east west rd. V1 rear ended v2 causing damage. 2012 1 JRN4287 4 1 1 7 66 NY SATURDAY 1957 22 LEONARD ST 12047 JCS5925 NY 1995 1995 8 - 797149570616686774 4 0 2024/02/11 NY GMC FREDERICK S STEFANIK 4 2 1 2 NY PTL 1129A 5 SUBN 1 FREDERICK STEVEN STEFANIK NY 26 9 1 - 134780000 - MECHANICVILLE 13478 SARA 10 01 - - PICK 121180000 4207HPTMLQ - 40199769 04 74 3RD ST FL 2 17 - 1 NY 1 1 X x 5 02 0 AUDI 1 - 1957 NY DUCHESNE, JARED ReleasedHaz. Mat. Code Month Day Year Place Where Accident Occurred: County _____________________ of _______________________________________. Road on which accident occurred ________________________________________________________________________ at 1) intersecting street_________________________________________________________________________________ or 2) ______ ______ _________________________________________________________________ City Village Town N S E W of N Date of Death Only Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. Public Property Damaged Accident Date Day of Week Month Day Year Military Time No. of Vehicles No. Injured No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Accident Reconstructed Police Photos Yes No VEHICLE 1 - Driver License ID Number Driver Name -exactly as printed on license Driver Name - exactly as printed on license VEHICLE 2 - Driver License ID Number Name–exactly as printed on registration Name–exactly as printed on registration Address (Include Number & Street) Address (Include Number & Street) City or Town Date of Birth Date of Birth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. CodePlate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Apt. No.Apt. No. Address (Include Number & Street)Address (Include Number & Street)Apt. No.Apt. No. V E H I C L E 2 V E H I C L E 1 VEHICLE 1 DAMAGE CODES Left Scene VEHICLE 1 VEHICLE 2 BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN Sex 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 BY TO 18 Names of all involved 9. Coordinates (if available) Latitude/Northing: _____________________ Longitude/Easting: _______________________ Accident Description/Officer’s Notes Officer’s Rank and Signature Print Name in Full Badge/ID No. NCIC No. Precinct/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat/ Sector Reviewing Officer Date/Time Reviewed A L L I N V O L V E D A B C D E F Month Day Year Month Day Year Month Day Year Sex Public Property Damaged Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. Vehicle By Towed: To Vehicle By Towed: To VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13. SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 20 22 USE COVER SHEET Rear End Sideswipe (same direction) Sideswipe (opposite direction) Left Turn Right Angle Right Turn Head On 1. 2.4.6.8. 3.5.7. Right TurnLeft Turn ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 0. Reference Marker Haz.Released Mat . Code Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes VEHICLE 2 DAMAGE CODES Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes 1 445533 122 Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. Unknown/Unable to Determine Yes No Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Feet Miles (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER Page of Pages Local Codes New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) DMV COPYAMENDED REPORT ALEXIS T RIFFELBACH SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF 1 - LSA - x X O 01 - 3 NY 20:35 x NLPD41HN2F8F RT 9 ALEXIS T RIFFELBACH 12 1 - x MIDDLE GROVE 1 26 ALEXIS T RIFFELBACH 1 09 3033 U 2024 3 1 01 KYLE CLINTON 2245 07 2 1 x 04501 X V1 was traveling in a Southerly direction when it appears that V1 struck what looks like another vehicles tire. V1 went off the road onto the median regaining control and traveling back onto RT9 in a southerly direction. 2018 2 UNKNOWN - 1 1 1 51 U DIAGRAM IS PRINTED ON LAST PAGE NY THURSDAY X02 - F 3540 BOYHAVEN RD 128500000 KTH5985 NY 100 1997 - 1997 - 197099848 4 0 2024/02/19 CHEV LSA 4 2 2 3 NY PTL 1128A 5 - 1 GARY P EMERY 2 1 - - - MIDDLE GROVE SARA 25 X 01 LSA - - 4DSD 128500000 PD41HN2GLQ 40209398 3540 BOYHAVEN RD 1 07 - 2 3 1 X 5 09 0 4 Crescent street - DUCHESNE, JARED ACCIDENT DIAGRAM Page of Pages New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT Accident Diagram 2 2 ReleasedHaz. Mat. Code Month Day Year Place Where Accident Occurred: County _____________________ of _______________________________________. Road on which accident occurred ________________________________________________________________________ at 1) intersecting street_________________________________________________________________________________ or 2) ______ ______ _________________________________________________________________ City Village Town N S E W of N Date of Death Only Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. Public Property Damaged Accident Date Day of Week Month Day Year Military Time No. of Vehicles No. Injured No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Accident Reconstructed Police Photos Yes No VEHICLE 1 - Driver License ID Number Driver Name -exactly as printed on license Driver Name - exactly as printed on license VEHICLE 2 - Driver License ID Number Name–exactly as printed on registration Name–exactly as printed on registration Address (Include Number & Street) Address (Include Number & Street) City or Town Date of Birth Date of Birth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. CodePlate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Apt. No.Apt. No. Address (Include Number & Street)Address (Include Number & Street)Apt. No.Apt. No. V E H I C L E 2 V E H I C L E 1 VEHICLE 1 DAMAGE CODES Left Scene VEHICLE 1 VEHICLE 2 BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN Sex 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 BY TO 18 Names of all involved 9. Coordinates (if available) Latitude/Northing: _____________________ Longitude/Easting: _______________________ Accident Description/Officer’s Notes Officer’s Rank and Signature Print Name in Full Badge/ID No. NCIC No. Precinct/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat/ Sector Reviewing Officer Date/Time Reviewed A L L I N V O L V E D A B C D E F Month Day Year Month Day Year Month Day Year Sex Public Property Damaged Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. Vehicle By Towed: To Vehicle By Towed: To VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13. SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 20 22 USE COVER SHEET Rear End Sideswipe (same direction) Sideswipe (opposite direction) Left Turn Right Angle Right Turn Head On 1. 2.4.6.8. 3.5.7. Right TurnLeft Turn ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 0. Reference Marker Haz.Released Mat . Code Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes VEHICLE 2 DAMAGE CODES Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes 1 445533 122 Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. Unknown/Unable to Determine Yes No Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Feet Miles (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER Page of Pages Local Codes New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) DMV COPYAMENDED REPORT ANNETTE A JEWETT SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF 1 - 9999 NATALIE DANIELLE SHEA 6 x 04 - 1 NY 10:30 NL4204HZ72FM ROUTE 9 ANNETTE A JEWETT 12 17 LATHAM 2021 1 61 ANNETTE A JEWETT DAB SARATOGA SPRING 1128C 1 06 3105 1180A 10 19 SEWARD ST APT 17 4204HZ406 2 1192A 2024 SARATOGA SPRIN 7 2 DAB 02 SHANNON SMITH 1920 07 19 SEWARD ST APT 17 DAB 11 1 EAST WEST ROAD 1 x 04501 1 1 2 Officer notes are too long to fit this space. They are printed in whole on a separate page. 2022 2 KLX1996 - 1 1 F 8 30 DIAGRAM IS PRINTED ON LAST PAGE NY FRIDAY 1993 F 63A SPRING AVE 121100000 KMS6387 NY 1962 1962 1 12 827853825168439637 4 0 4501 2024/04/22 NY KIA NATALIE D SHEA 4 3 4 7 NY PTL 5 4DSD 1 NATALIE DANIELLE SHEA NY 11 - 2 - 4204HZ74BL DAB 128660000 - LATHAM 12866 SARA 19 01 - - 4DSD 121100000 - 40288298 10 63A SPRING AVE 07 - 1 NY 1 1 X x 4204HZ74HK 5 06 1 NISS 1 6 1993 NY CALLAHAN, CHRIS ReleasedHaz. Mat. Code Month Day Year Place Where Accident Occurred: County _____________________ of _______________________________________. Road on which accident occurred ________________________________________________________________________ at 1) intersecting street_________________________________________________________________________________ or 2) ______ ______ _________________________________________________________________ City Village Town N S E W of N Date of Death Only Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. Public Property Damaged Accident Date Day of Week Month Day Year Military Time No. of Vehicles No. Injured No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Accident Reconstructed Police Photos Yes No VEHICLE 1 - Driver License ID Number Driver Name -exactly as printed on license Driver Name - exactly as printed on license VEHICLE 2 - Driver License ID Number Name–exactly as printed on registration Name–exactly as printed on registration Address (Include Number & Street) Address (Include Number & Street) City or Town Date of Birth Date of Birth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. CodePlate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Apt. No.Apt. No. Address (Include Number & Street)Address (Include Number & Street)Apt. No.Apt. No. V E H I C L E 2 V E H I C L E 1 VEHICLE 1 DAMAGE CODES Left Scene VEHICLE 1 VEHICLE 2 BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN Sex 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 BY TO 18 Names of all involved 9. Coordinates (if available) Latitude/Northing: _____________________ Longitude/Easting: _______________________ Accident Description/Officer’s Notes Officer’s Rank and Signature Print Name in Full Badge/ID No. NCIC No. Precinct/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat/ Sector Reviewing Officer Date/Time Reviewed A L L I N V O L V E D A B C D E F Month Day Year Month Day Year Month Day Year Sex Public Property Damaged Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. Vehicle By Towed: To Vehicle By Towed: To VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13. SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 20 22 USE COVER SHEET Rear End Sideswipe (same direction) Sideswipe (opposite direction) Left Turn Right Angle Right Turn Head On 1. 2.4.6.8. 3.5.7. Right TurnLeft Turn ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 0. Reference Marker Haz.Released Mat . Code Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes VEHICLE 2 DAMAGE CODES Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes 1 445533 122 Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. Unknown/Unable to Determine Yes No Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Feet Miles (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER Page of Pages Local Codes New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) DMV COPYAMENDED REPORT STANLEY GERARD ANTHONY DYBAS SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF 1 - - x 04 - 3 NY 10:30 NL4204HZ72FM ROUTE 9 STANLEY GERARD ANTHONY DYBAS 1 AMSTERDAM 1 73 STANLEY DYBAS DAB 1 03 3105 2024 10 2 03 SHANNON SMITH 1920 22 1 EAST WEST ROAD x 04501 Officer notes are too long to fit this space. They are printed in whole on a separate page. 2020 1 - 2 1 8 69 DIAGRAM IS PRINTED ON LAST PAGE NY FRIDAY M 58 VAN DERVEER ST 12010 GGK8904 NY 1951 1951 - 808028517 4 0 2024/04/22 CADI 4 3 4 10 NY PTL 5 1 JACQUELYN A GRECO - 2 - DAB - AMSTERDAM SARA 19 03 - 4DSD 120100000 1 40288298 58 VANDERVEER ST 22 - 2 1 1 x 03 1 1 - CALLAHAN, CHRIS Accident Description/Officer’s Notes Page of Pages New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT Accident Description/Officer’s Notes 3 V1 and V3 were stopped in traffic at a red light on Route 9, headed south bound at the intersection of East West Road. V2 was driving Southbound on Route 9 at a high rate of speed and disregarded the red light and did not attempt to stop. V2 attempted to get in between V1 and V3 by splitting the lane at which time V2 struck V1 at a high rate of speed. V2 then bounced off of V1 and struck V3. V2 caused heavy damage to all vehicles involved in the accident. W1 was behind V1 stopped at the red light and provided Officers with a statement of V2 operators actions. V1, V2, and V3 were all towed from the scene. V2 never attempted to brake or slow down. The operator of V2 was subsuquently arrested for driving while intoxicated. - WITNESS 1 PETRONE, ALLYSON L 45 TAMARACK DR DELMAR NY 12054 3193219312 Tickets Issued: NATALIE DANIELLE SHEA Driver of vehicle number (2) tickets: Ticket Number: 4204HZ74HK Violation: 1180A Ticket Number: 4204HZ74BL Violation: 1128C Ticket Number: 4204HZ406 Violation: 1192A Ticket Number: PD76HZ78GK Violation: 11923 Ticket Number: PD76HZ78QZ Violation: 11941B; 4 ACCIDENT DIAGRAM Page of Pages New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT Accident Diagram 4 4 ReleasedHaz. Mat. Code Month Day Year Place Where Accident Occurred: County _____________________ of _______________________________________. Road on which accident occurred ________________________________________________________________________ at 1) intersecting street_________________________________________________________________________________ or 2) ______ ______ _________________________________________________________________ City Village Town N S E W of N Date of Death Only Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. Public Property Damaged Accident Date Day of Week Month Day Year Military Time No. of Vehicles No. Injured No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Accident Reconstructed Police Photos Yes No VEHICLE 1 - Driver License ID Number Driver Name -exactly as printed on license Driver Name - exactly as printed on license VEHICLE 2 - Driver License ID Number Name–exactly as printed on registration Name–exactly as printed on registration Address (Include Number & Street) Address (Include Number & Street) City or Town Date of Birth Date of Birth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. CodePlate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Apt. No.Apt. No. Address (Include Number & Street)Address (Include Number & Street)Apt. No.Apt. No. V E H I C L E 2 V E H I C L E 1 VEHICLE 1 DAMAGE CODES Left Scene VEHICLE 1 VEHICLE 2 BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN Sex 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 BY TO 18 Names of all involved 9. Coordinates (if available) Latitude/Northing: _____________________ Longitude/Easting: _______________________ Accident Description/Officer’s Notes Officer’s Rank and Signature Print Name in Full Badge/ID No. NCIC No. Precinct/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat/ Sector Reviewing Officer Date/Time Reviewed A L L I N V O L V E D A B C D E F Month Day Year Month Day Year Month Day Year Sex Public Property Damaged Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. Vehicle By Towed: To Vehicle By Towed: To VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13. SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 20 22 USE COVER SHEET Rear End Sideswipe (same direction) Sideswipe (opposite direction) Left Turn Right Angle Right Turn Head On 1. 2.4.6.8. 3.5.7. Right TurnLeft Turn ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 0. Reference Marker Haz.Released Mat . Code Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes VEHICLE 2 DAMAGE CODES Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes 1 445533 122 Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. Unknown/Unable to Determine Yes No Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Feet Miles (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER Page of Pages Local Codes New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) DMV COPYAMENDED REPORT DEBORAH M DELLAPORTE SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF 1 - MARYJANE ORECKI - x X O 05 - 1 FL 17:23 NL4219J1JHQH SOUTH BROADWAY DEBORAH M DELLAPORTE 12 - NEW PORT RICHEY 2023 1 22 DEBORAH M DELLAPORTE WYNANTSKILL 1 11 2151 06 81 MENEMSHA LN 2 2024 WYNANTSKILL 2 1 02 WILLIAM ARPEI 1242 20 81 MENEMSHA LN 11 1 8 x 04501 8 - - V1-FL Insurance policy number K984755A0659 State Farm. V2 was stopped in traffic when V1 rear ended V2 causing minor damage to both vehicles. 2016 2 LAR7770 - 1 1 1 63 DIAGRAM IS PRINTED ON LAST PAGE FL SATURDAY 1960 F 8611 SHALLOW CREEK CT 346537028 LXDC89 FL 30 2001 2001 8 - 508371065D416173019200 4 0 2024/05/11 NY HOND PETER M ORECKI 4 2 2 2 FL PTL 1129A 1 SUBN 1 MARYJANE ORECKI NY 11 9 2 - 121980000 - NEW PORT RICHEY 12198 SARA 11 01 - - 4DSD 346537028 4219J1JJB4 - 40310622 06 8611 SHALLOW CREEK CT 20 - 1 NY 1 1 X x 1 11 0 HOND 1 crescent avenue - 1960 NY STREIM, ANDREW ACCIDENT DIAGRAM Page of Pages New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT Accident Diagram 2 2 Officer's Rank and Signature PTL 2980 Badge/ID No. 04501 NCIC No.Precint/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat Sector LAMKINS, NICHOLAS Reviewing Officer 8/21/2024 19:28 Date/Time Reviewed MATTHEW CAVANAUGHPrint Name in Full - 1 - 2 2 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 2 24-016149 Local Codes AMENDED REPORTNL4213JBHQ8C 8 3 2024YearMonth Accident Date Day SATURDAY Day of Week 15:45 Military Time 2Vehicles No. of 0 No. Injured 0 No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Left Scene NoYes Police Photos Accident Reconstructed of PagesPage1 POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) New York State Department of Motor Vehicles - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 4 1 29 M ---GONZALEZ, LUIS J 1 3 4 1 16 M ---ORTIZ MARQUEZ, EDGA 2 1 4 1 20 F ---ARATARE, ALEXANDRA VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13 SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER O See the last page of the MV-104A for the accident diagram. Unknown/Unable to determine Yes No Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 9. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. 1VEHICLE VEHICLE BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN2 18 19 7 20 - 21 - 22 1 23 1 24 4 25 1 26 1 27 1 28 - 29 - 30 more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. 1 1 VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 3 1 3 2 2 3 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. 2 2 VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 11 1 11 2 10 3 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes milesfeet (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Reference Marker Latitude/Northing SARATOGACounty City Village Town SARATOGA SPRINGSof STATE ROUTE 9Road on which accident occurred CRESENT AVEat 1) intersecting streetLongitude/Easting W S E N V1 was making an improper U-Turn at the intersection of State Route 9 and Crescent Ave. Traveling in a northern direction V1 side swiped V2 on the driver side front and rear doors causing damage. V1 sustained damage to the front passenger side bumper of the vehicle. Accident Description/Officer's notes - - - - - - - - - - or 2) Place Where Accident Occurred:Coordinates (if available) of S09511141 VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number 1 MA State of Lic. GONZALEZ, LUIS J Driver Name - exactly as printed on license 49 LEIGHTON ST Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. FITCHBURGCity or Town MAState 014204246 Zip Code 4 21 1995 Day YearMonth Date of Birth M Sex Unlicensed 02 No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged GONZALEZ, LUIS J Name - exactly as printed on registration M Sex 1995214 Date of Birth Month Day Year 49 LEIGHTON ST Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.-Mat.Haz. Code Released FITCHBURG City or Town MA State 01420-4246 Zip Code 2VKD62 Plate Number MA State of Reg. 2005 TOYT Vehicle Year & Make 4DSD Vehicle Type 989 Ins. Code 4213JBHRHKTicket/Arrest Number(s) 1160EViolation Section(s) - - - - 850776010 VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number 2 NY State of Lic. ARATARE, ALEXANDRA GWEN Driver Name - exactly as printed on license 29 ALLEN RD TRLR 9 Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. PORTER CORSCity or Town NYState 128590000 Zip Code 9 6 2003 Day YearMonth Date of Birth F Sex Unlicensed 01 No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged ARATARE, ALEXANDRA G Name - exactly as printed on registration F Sex 200369 Date of Birth Month Day Year 380 ALLEN RD Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.-Mat.Haz. Code Released PORTER CORNERS City or Town NY State 12859 Zip Code KSU9926 Plate Number NY State of Reg. 2017 DODG Vehicle Year & Make 4DSD Vehicle Type 337 Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - A L L I N V O L V E D F E D C B A 8 9 10 11 12 13 17 BY14 15 16 ReleasedHaz. Mat. Code Month Day Year Place Where Accident Occurred: County _____________________ of _______________________________________. Road on which accident occurred ________________________________________________________________________ at 1) intersecting street_________________________________________________________________________________ or 2) ______ ______ _________________________________________________________________ City Village Town N S E W of N Date of Death Only Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. Public Property Damaged Accident Date Day of Week Month Day Year Military Time No. of Vehicles No. Injured No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Accident Reconstructed Police Photos Yes No VEHICLE 1 - Driver License ID Number Driver Name -exactly as printed on license Driver Name - exactly as printed on license VEHICLE 2 - Driver License ID Number Name–exactly as printed on registration Name–exactly as printed on registration Address (Include Number & Street) Address (Include Number & Street) City or Town Date of Birth Date of Birth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. CodePlate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Apt. No.Apt. No. Address (Include Number & Street)Address (Include Number & Street)Apt. No.Apt. No. V E H I C L E 2 V E H I C L E 1 VEHICLE 1 DAMAGE CODES Left Scene VEHICLE 1 VEHICLE 2 BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN Sex 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 BY TO 18 Names of all involved 9. Coordinates (if available) Latitude/Northing: _____________________ Longitude/Easting: _______________________ Accident Description/Officer’s Notes Officer’s Rank and Signature Print Name in Full Badge/ID No. NCIC No. Precinct/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat/ Sector Reviewing Officer Date/Time Reviewed A L L I N V O L V E D A B C D E F Month Day Year Month Day Year Month Day Year Sex Public Property Damaged Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. Vehicle By Towed: To Vehicle By Towed: To VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13. SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 20 22 USE COVER SHEET Rear End Sideswipe (same direction) Sideswipe (opposite direction) Left Turn Right Angle Right Turn Head On 1. 2.4.6.8. 3.5.7. Right TurnLeft Turn ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 0. Reference Marker Haz.Released Mat . Code Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes VEHICLE 2 DAMAGE CODES Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes 1 445533 122 Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. Unknown/Unable to Determine Yes No Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Feet Miles (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER Page of Pages Local Codes New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) DMV COPYAMENDED REPORT 4 ZEKRIYA BAZ MOHAMMAD SARATOGA SPRINGS, CITY OF 1 4 - 02 SHANE P ROCCABRUNA - x O 09 - 5 NY 2 17:07 NL4207JJ00V1 3368 ROUTE 9 ZEKRIYA BAZ MOHAMMAD 5 4 1 1 - LATHAM 2018 5 X 47 ZEKRIYA BAZ MOHAMMAD PITTSFIELD 3 WENDY DIAZ 06 3353 10 86 MAPLE GROVE DR - 1 2024 2 PITTSFIELD 11 1 SAMARY CARDONA1 01 JAKE HYNES 2354 29 86 MAPLE GROVE DR 14 1 - 1 x 04501 3 - - TAHNEERA DICKERSON V2 was heading in a northerly direction in the parking lot of 3368 Route 9, the Homewood Suites, when they struck the rear driver side door of V1.V1 was in a parked position when an unknown passenger opened their door unsafely into V2's lane of travel through the parking lot, while V2 was driving around V1on the left hand side. 2014 1 3ADJ46 - 1 1 F 10 1 X 1 NY TUESDAY 2005 36 402 - M 8 OXFORD DR APT 7 121100000 JET5561 NY 100 1977 - 1977 3 - SA7250568363392162 X 0 2024/09/28 -- MA TOYT 33 ERICA L ROCCABRUNA 4 32 2 X 2 11 NY PTL 1 SUBN 1 UNKNOWN MA 02 12 2 -- - 3 02 - 012015655 - LATHAM 012015655 SARA 24 18 01 SHANE P ROCCABRUNA - - 1 - 4DSD 121100000 - - 40491321 03 8 OXFORD DR APT 7 1 29 - 2 MA 1 2 X x 02 1 4 06 0 HYUN 4 Route 9 - 1984 MA 2 - STREIM, ANDREW ReleasedHaz. Mat. Code Month Day Year Place Where Accident Occurred: County _____________________ of _______________________________________. Road on which accident occurred ________________________________________________________________________ at 1) intersecting street_________________________________________________________________________________ or 2) ______ ______ _________________________________________________________________ City Village Town N S E W of N Date of Death Only Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Check if involved vehicle is: more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. Public Property Damaged Accident Date Day of Week Month Day Year Military Time No. of Vehicles No. Injured No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Accident Reconstructed Police Photos Yes No VEHICLE 1 - Driver License ID Number Driver Name -exactly as printed on license Driver Name - exactly as printed on license VEHICLE 2 - Driver License ID Number Name–exactly as printed on registration Name–exactly as printed on registration Address (Include Number & Street) Address (Include Number & Street) City or Town Date of Birth Date of Birth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. CodePlate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Apt. No.Apt. No. Address (Include Number & Street)Address (Include Number & Street)Apt. No.Apt. No. V E H I C L E 2 V E H I C L E 1 VEHICLE 1 DAMAGE CODES Left Scene VEHICLE 1 VEHICLE 2 BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN Sex 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 BY TO 18 Names of all involved 9. Coordinates (if available) Latitude/Northing: _____________________ Longitude/Easting: _______________________ Accident Description/Officer’s Notes Officer’s Rank and Signature Print Name in Full Badge/ID No. NCIC No. Precinct/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat/ Sector Reviewing Officer Date/Time Reviewed A L L I N V O L V E D A B C D E F Month Day Year Month Day Year Month Day Year Sex Public Property Damaged Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants State of Lic. Vehicle By Towed: To Vehicle By Towed: To VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13. SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 20 22 USE COVER SHEET Rear End Sideswipe (same direction) Sideswipe (opposite direction) Left Turn Right Angle Right Turn Head On 1. 2.4.6.8. 3.5.7. Right TurnLeft Turn ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 0. Reference Marker Haz.Released Mat . Code Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes VEHICLE 2 DAMAGE CODES Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more Damage Codes 1 445533 122 Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. Unknown/Unable to Determine Yes No Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Feet Miles (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER Page of Pages Local Codes New York State Department of Motor Vehicles POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) DMV COPYAMENDED REPORT Officer's Rank and Signature PTL 3340 Badge/ID No. 04501 NCIC No.Precint/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat Sector DINGMON, ADAM Reviewing Officer 11/13/2024 08:33 Date/Time Reviewed DOMINIC MARTUSCELLOPrint Name in Full - 1 - 2 1 3 5 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 2 24-023779 Local Codes AMENDED REPORTNL4209JP23FJ 11 8 2024YearMonth Accident Date Day FRIDAY Day of Week 19:15 Military Time 1Vehicles No. of 0 No. Injured 0 No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Left Scene NoYes Police Photos Accident Reconstructed of PagesPage1 POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) New York State Department of Motor Vehicles - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 4 1 42 F ---WHIPPLE, OLENNA LOU VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13 SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER See the last page of the MV-104A for the accident diagram. Unknown/Unable to determine Yes No Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 9. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. 1VEHICLE VEHICLE BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN 61 19 - 20 21 22 1 23 24 1 25 26 1 27 4 28 - 29 30 more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. 1 1 VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 3 1 3 2 2 3 4 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 1 2 3 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes milesfeet (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Reference Marker Latitude/Northing SARATOGACounty City Village Town SARATOGA SPRINGSof ROUTE 9Road on which accident occurred at 1) intersecting streetLongitude/Easting .5 W S E N EAST WEST RD V1 was traveling in a northerly direction on Route 9. V1 struck a deer and damaged the front right bumper, headlight, and front right quarter panel. V1 left scene of accident and reported it on 11/10/2024. Accident Description/Officer's notes - - - - - - - - - - or 2) Place Where Accident Occurred:Coordinates (if available) of 364126321 VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number 1 NY State of Lic. WHIPPLE, OLENNA LOUISE Driver Name - exactly as printed on license 53 OAK ST UNIT A Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. SARATOGA SPRINGCity or Town NYState 128660000 Zip Code 10 16 1982 Day YearMonth Date of Birth F Sex Unlicensed 01 No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged WHIPPLE, OLENNA L Name - exactly as printed on registration F Sex 19821610 Date of Birth Month Day Year 53 OAK ST UNIT A Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.-Mat.Haz. Code Released SARATOGA SPRING City or Town NY State 12866-0000 Zip Code LJU8071 Plate Number NY State of Reg. 2024 VOLK Vehicle Year & Make SUBN Vehicle Type 678 Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number State of Lic. Driver Name - exactly as printed on license Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. City or Town State Zip Code Day YearMonth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged Name - exactly as printed on registration Sex Date of Birth Month Day Year Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.Mat.Haz. Code Released City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - A L L I N V O L V E D F E D C B A 8 9 10 11 12 13 17 BY14 15 16 Officer's Rank and Signature PTL 3108 Badge/ID No. 04501 NCIC No.Precint/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat Sector DINGMON, ADAM Reviewing Officer 11/18/2024 11:52 Date/Time Reviewed WILLIAM FERRAROPrint Name in Full - 1 - 2 1 3 5 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 2 24-024278 Local Codes AMENDED REPORTNL4218JPR2V9 11 17 2024 YearMonth Accident Date Day SUNDAY Day of Week 02:00 Military Time 1Vehicles No. of 0 No. Injured 0 No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Left Scene NoYes Police Photos Accident Reconstructed of PagesPage1 POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) New York State Department of Motor Vehicles - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 4 1 20 M ---DEUEL, BRANDEN WILL 1 3 4 1 19 M ---BISSELL, JACKSON S VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13 SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER See the last page of the MV-104A for the accident diagram. Unknown/Unable to determine Yes No Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 9. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. 1VEHICLE VEHICLE BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN 61 19 - 20 21 22 5 23 24 1 25 26 1 27 4 28 X 29 30 more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. 1 1 VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 3 1 3 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 TOWAWAYVehicle By: TOWAWAYTowed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 1 2 3 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes milesfeet (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Reference Marker Latitude/Northing SARATOGACounty City Village Town SARATOGA SPRINGSof ROUTE 9Road on which accident occurred at 1) intersecting streetLongitude/Easting W S E N EAST WEST ROAD1000 V1 was traveling in a southerly direction on Route 9. As the operator was driving V1, a deer ran out in front of V1 striking it. Accident Description/Officer's notes - - - - - - - - - - or 2) Place Where Accident Occurred:Coordinates (if available) of 381785141 VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number 1 NY State of Lic. DEUEL, BRANDEN WILLIAM Driver Name - exactly as printed on license 39 DENIM DR Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. CLIFTON PARKCity or Town NYState 120650000 Zip Code 8 31 2004 Day YearMonth Date of Birth M Sex Unlicensed 02 No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged DEUEL, JEFFREY B Name - exactly as printed on registration M Sex 1975711 Date of Birth Month Day Year 39 DENIM DR Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.-Mat.Haz. Code Released CLIFTON PARK City or Town NY State 12065 Zip Code LGX9651 Plate Number NY State of Reg. 2024 VOLK Vehicle Year & Make 4DSD Vehicle Type 639 Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number State of Lic. Driver Name - exactly as printed on license Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. City or Town State Zip Code Day YearMonth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged Name - exactly as printed on registration Sex Date of Birth Month Day Year Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.Mat.Haz. Code Released City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - A L L I N V O L V E D F E D C B A 8 9 10 11 12 13 17 BY14 15 16 Officer's Rank and Signature PTL 2943 Badge/ID No. 04501 NCIC No.Precint/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat Sector COLLINS, WADE Reviewing Officer 6/18/2025 12:03 Date/Time Reviewed DEAN GAETANOPrint Name in Full - 1 - 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 2 7 1 25-012673 Local Codes AMENDED REPORTNL4222KGHR7L 6 18 2025 YearMonth Accident Date Day WEDNESDAY Day of Week 10:00 Military Time 2Vehicles No. of 0 No. Injured 0 No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Left Scene NoYes Police Photos Accident Reconstructed of PagesPage1 POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) New York State Department of Motor Vehicles - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 4 1 79 F ---CAMERON, NANCY ELLE VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13 SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER O Unknown/Unable to determine Yes No Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 9. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. 1VEHICLE VEHICLE BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN2 13 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 3 23 3 24 1 25 10 26 2 27 1 28 - 29 - 30 more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. 1 1 VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 5 1 5 2 5 3 6 4 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. 2 2 VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 12 1 12 2 12 3 11 4 1 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes milesfeet (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Reference Marker Latitude/Northing SARATOGACounty City Village Town SARATOGA SPRINGSof 3402 ROUTE 9Road on which accident occurred at 1) intersecting streetLongitude/Easting W S E N ROUTE 9500 V1 was in the service garage at Saratoga Honda in the City of Saratoga Springs traveling East when it side swiped V2 causing a property damage accident. V2 was parked facing East at the time and V1 was attempting to pass it. Accident Description/Officer's notes - - - - - - - - - - or 2) Place Where Accident Occurred:Coordinates (if available) of 339729394 VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number 1 NY State of Lic. CAMERON, NANCY ELLEN Driver Name - exactly as printed on license 6 JULIANS WAY Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. SARATOGA SPRINGCity or Town NYState 128660000 Zip Code 2 15 1946 Day YearMonth Date of Birth F Sex Unlicensed 01 No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged CAMERON, NANCY E Name - exactly as printed on registration F Sex 1946152 Date of Birth Month Day Year 6 JULIANS WAY Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.-Mat.Haz. Code Released SARATOGA SPGS City or Town NY State 12866 Zip Code LLL1265 Plate Number NY State of Reg. 2024 HOND Vehicle Year & Make 4DSD Vehicle Type 770 Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - 968042498 VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number 2 NY State of Lic. PARKED, Driver Name - exactly as printed on license 857 MIDDLELINE ROAD Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. BALLSTON SPACity or Town NYState 120200000 Zip Code 9 28 1966 Day YearMonth Date of Birth F Sex Unlicensed 00 No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged PELLETIER, MARY A Name - exactly as printed on registration F Sex 1966289 Date of Birth Month Day Year 857 MIDDLELINE RD Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.-Mat.Haz. Code Released BALLSTON SPA City or Town NY State 12020 Zip Code BYP5095 Plate Number NY State of Reg. 2019 HOND Vehicle Year & Make 4DSD Vehicle Type 011 Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - A L L I N V O L V E D F E D C B A 8 9 10 11 12 13 17 BY14 15 16 Officer's Rank and Signature PTL 3102 Badge/ID No. 04501 NCIC No.Precint/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat Sector HILTZ, JENNA Reviewing Officer 7/31/2025 19:42 Date/Time Reviewed KEVIN QUIGLEYPrint Name in Full - 1 - 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 3 25-016018 Local Codes AMENDED REPORTNL4218KLGW5K 7 25 2025 YearMonth Accident Date Day FRIDAY Day of Week 15:25 Military Time 2Vehicles No. of 0 No. Injured 0 No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Left Scene NoYes Police Photos Accident Reconstructed of PagesPage1 POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) New York State Department of Motor Vehicles - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 8 1 26 F ---LIZANO PINEDO, CLAU 2 1 8 1 30 F ---TIGNER, SELINA 2 3 8 1 33 M ---COSBERT, JAMAL O VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13 SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER O See the last page of the MV-104A for the accident diagram. Unknown/Unable to determine Yes No Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 9. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. 1VEHICLE VEHICLE BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN2 7 19 26 20 - 21 - 22 7 23 1 24 3 25 1 26 1 27 1 28 - 29 - 30 more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. 1 1 VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 11 1 11 2 103 12 4 5 DABVehicle By: DABTowed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. 2 2 VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 2 1 2 2 3 3 1 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes milesfeet (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Reference Marker Latitude/Northing SARATOGACounty City Village Town SARATOGA SPRINGSof ROUTE 9Road on which accident occurred at 1) intersecting streetLongitude/Easting W S E N CRESCENT AVENUE50 V2 was traveling northbound on Route 9 in the outer most left lane approaching Saratoga Honda. V1 was driving westbound out of the Saratoga Honda Parking lot, and waiting to make a left hand turn to enter the roadway of Route 9. An uninvolved vehicle (UV) was traveling northbound on Route 9 in the inner most right lane. UV stopped his vehicle at the entrance of Saratoga Honda and waived at V1 to enter the roadway. V1 then proceeded into the Accident Description/Officer's notes - - - - - - - - - - or 2) Place Where Accident Occurred:Coordinates (if available) of 347171247 VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number 1 NY State of Lic. LIZANO PINEDO, CLAUDIA A Driver Name - exactly as printed on license 437 ROUTE 146 Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. HALFMOONCity or Town NYState 120650000 Zip Code 4 9 1999 Day YearMonth Date of Birth F Sex Unlicensed 01 No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged LIZANO PINEDO, CLAUDIA A Name - exactly as printed on registration F Sex 199994 Date of Birth Month Day Year 437 ROUTE 146 Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.-Mat.Haz. Code Released HALFMOON City or Town NY State 12065-0000 Zip Code JNV4634 Plate Number NY State of Reg. 2023 HOND Vehicle Year & Make SUBN Vehicle Type 211 Ins. Code 4218KLGX5DTicket/Arrest Number(s) 1143Violation Section(s) - - - - 381672215 VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number 2 NY State of Lic. TIGNER, SELINA Driver Name - exactly as printed on license 2101 VAN VRANKEN AVE Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. SCHENECTADYCity or Town NYState 123080000 Zip Code 12 16 1994 Day YearMonth Date of Birth F Sex Unlicensed 02 No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged TIGNER, SELINA Name - exactly as printed on registration F Sex 19941612 Date of Birth Month Day Year 2101 VAN VRANKEN AV Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.-Mat.Haz. Code Released SCHENECTADY City or Town NY State 12308 Zip Code LKV2750 Plate Number NY State of Reg. 2020 NISS Vehicle Year & Make 4DSD Vehicle Type 100 Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - A L L I N V O L V E D F E D C B A 8 9 10 11 12 13 17 BY14 15 16 Officer's Rank and Signature PTL 3102 Badge/ID No. 04501 NCIC No.Precint/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat Sector HILTZ, JENNA Reviewing Officer 7/31/2025 19:42 Date/Time Reviewed KEVIN QUIGLEYPrint Name in Full 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3 25-016018 Local Codes AMENDED REPORTNL4218KLGW5K 7 25 2025 YearMonth Accident Date Day FRIDAY Day of Week 15:25 Military Time 2Vehicles No. of 0 No. Injured 0 No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Left Scene NoYes Police Photos Accident Reconstructed of PagesPage2 POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) New York State Department of Motor Vehicles - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13 SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER Unknown/Unable to determine Yes No Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 9. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. VEHICLE VEHICLE BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 1 2 3 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 1 2 3 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes milesfeet (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Reference Marker Latitude/Northing SARATOGACounty City Village Town of Road on which accident occurred at 1) intersecting streetLongitude/Easting W S E N roadway and failed to yield the right of way to V2, causing a collision. WITNESS #1 MICHAEL C KRANZ 51 APPLETREE LANE CLIFTON PARK, NY 12065 (518) 258-8784 Accident Description/Officer's notes - - - - - - - - - - or 2) Place Where Accident Occurred:Coordinates (if available) of VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number State of Lic. Driver Name - exactly as printed on license Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. City or Town State Zip Code Day YearMonth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged Name - exactly as printed on registration Sex Date of Birth Month Day Year Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.Mat.Haz. Code Released City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number State of Lic. Driver Name - exactly as printed on license Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. City or Town State Zip Code Day YearMonth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged Name - exactly as printed on registration Sex Date of Birth Month Day Year Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.Mat.Haz. Code Released City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - A L L I N V O L V E D F E D C B A 8 9 10 11 12 13 17 BY14 15 16 Officer's Rank and Signature PTL 3414 Badge/ID No. 04501 NCIC No.Precint/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat Sector NORTHRUP, REBECCA Reviewing Officer 10/15/2025 03:31 Date/Time Reviewed KURT DACHTLERPrint Name in Full - 1 - 2 1 3 2 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 3 25-021720 Local Codes AMENDED REPORTNL4211KTL43P 9 30 2025 YearMonth Accident Date Day TUESDAY Day of Week 06:52 Military Time 3Vehicles No. of 0 No. Injured 0 No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Left Scene NoYes Police Photos Accident Reconstructed of PagesPage1 POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) New York State Department of Motor Vehicles - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 4 1 66 F ---PEASE, CRYSTAL A 2 1 4 1 20 F ---COLLINS, ASIANNA VE 3 1 4 1 34 F ---FRANK, KAILEEN M VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13 SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER See the last page of the MV-104A for the accident diagram. Unknown/Unable to determine Yes No Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 9. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. 1VEHICLE VEHICLE BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN2 9 19 26 20 - 21 - 22 1 23 1 24 1 25 1 26 1 27 1 28 1 29 - 30 more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. 1 1 VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 5 TOWAWAYVehicle By: TOWAWAYTowed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. 2 2 VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 8 1 8 2 1 3 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes milesfeet (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Reference Marker Latitude/Northing SARATOGACounty City Village Town SARATOGA SPRINGSof ROUTE 9Road on which accident occurred at 1) intersecting streetLongitude/Easting W S E N NORTH OF EAST WEST ROAD305 After a motor vehicle occurred in the southbound lane of Route 9, V1 struck V2 and V3 resulting in damage to all three vehicles. V1 operator was transported to Saratoga Hospital for medical conditions unrelated to the accident. V2 did not have insurance according to NYS DMV at the time of the accident. Accident Description/Officer's notes - - - - - - - - - - or 2) Place Where Accident Occurred:Coordinates (if available) of 857037262 VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number 1 NY State of Lic. PEASE, CRYSTAL A Driver Name - exactly as printed on license 1203 N CREEK RD 20 Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. PORTER CORSCity or Town NYState 128590000 Zip Code 9 30 1959 Day YearMonth Date of Birth F Sex Unlicensed 01 No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged PEASE, CRYSTAL A Name - exactly as printed on registration F Sex 1959309 Date of Birth Month Day Year 1203 N CREEK RD 20 Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.-Mat.Haz. Code Released PORTER CORS City or Town NY State 12859-0000 Zip Code JML8860 Plate Number NY State of Reg. 2021 TOYT Vehicle Year & Make 4DSD Vehicle Type 626 Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - 963630219 VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number 2 NY State of Lic. COLLINS, ASIANNA VERNEA Driver Name - exactly as printed on license 1107 JACOB ST Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. TROYCity or Town NYState 121800000 Zip Code 5 23 2005 Day YearMonth Date of Birth F Sex Unlicensed 01 No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged COLLINS, ASIANNA V Name - exactly as printed on registration F Sex 1905235 Date of Birth Month Day Year 1475 NY 40 Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.-Mat.Haz. Code Released SCHAGHTICOKE City or Town NY State 12154 Zip Code LRF3114 Plate Number NY State of Reg. 2017 KIA Vehicle Year & Make 4DSD Vehicle Type 000 Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - A L L I N V O L V E D F E D C B A 8 9 10 11 12 13 17 BY14 15 16 Officer's Rank and Signature PTL 3414 Badge/ID No. 04501 NCIC No.Precint/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat Sector NORTHRUP, REBECCA Reviewing Officer 10/15/2025 03:31 Date/Time Reviewed KURT DACHTLERPrint Name in Full 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3 25-021720 Local Codes AMENDED REPORTNL4211KTL43P 9 30 2025 YearMonth Accident Date Day TUESDAY Day of Week 06:52 Military Time 3Vehicles No. of 0 No. Injured 0 No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Left Scene NoYes Police Photos Accident Reconstructed of PagesPage2 POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) New York State Department of Motor Vehicles - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13 SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER Unknown/Unable to determine Yes No Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 9. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. 3VEHICLE VEHICLE BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN - 19 - 20 21 22 1 23 24 1 25 26 27 28 - 29 30 more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. 3 3 VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 7 1 7 2 3 4 5 TOWAWAYVehicle By: TOWAWAYTowed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 1 2 3 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes milesfeet (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Reference Marker Latitude/Northing SARATOGACounty City Village Town of Road on which accident occurred at 1) intersecting streetLongitude/Easting W S E N Accident Description/Officer's notes - - - - - - - - - - or 2) Place Where Accident Occurred:Coordinates (if available) of 618314143 VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number 3 NY State of Lic. FRANK, KAILEEN M Driver Name - exactly as printed on license 111 WINEBERRY LN Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. MALTACity or Town NYState 120200000 Zip Code 10 22 1990 Day YearMonth Date of Birth F Sex Unlicensed 01 No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged FRANK, KAILEEN M Name - exactly as printed on registration F Sex 19902210 Date of Birth Month Day Year 111 WINEBERRY LN Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.Mat.Haz. Code Released MALTA City or Town NY State 12020-0000 Zip Code GMD8917 Plate Number NY State of Reg. 2021 NISS Vehicle Year & Make 4DSD Vehicle Type 039 Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number State of Lic. Driver Name - exactly as printed on license Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. City or Town State Zip Code Day YearMonth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged Name - exactly as printed on registration Sex Date of Birth Month Day Year Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.Mat.Haz. Code Released City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - A L L I N V O L V E D F E D C B A 8 9 10 11 12 13 17 BY14 15 16 Officer's Rank and Signature PTL 2881 Badge/ID No. 04501 NCIC No.Precint/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat Sector PERKINS, AARON Reviewing Officer 11/12/2025 08:40 Date/Time Reviewed LOGAN MURPHYPrint Name in Full - 1 - 2 2 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 2 25-023247 Local Codes AMENDED REPORTNL4215KWTRXN 10 21 2025 YearMonth Accident Date Day TUESDAY Day of Week 10:15 Military Time 2Vehicles No. of 0 No. Injured 0 No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Left Scene NoYes Police Photos Accident Reconstructed of PagesPage1 POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) New York State Department of Motor Vehicles - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 4 1 23 M ---LAWRENCE, CHRISTOPH 2 1 4 1 63 M ---FENSTERER, CHARLES VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13 SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER O See the last page of the MV-104A for the accident diagram. Unknown/Unable to determine Yes No Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 9. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. 1VEHICLE VEHICLE BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN2 9 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 1 23 1 24 7 25 8 26 1 27 1 28 - 29 - 30 more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. 1 1 VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 2 1 2 2 2 3 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. 2 2 VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 8 1 8 2 8 3 9 4 7 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes milesfeet (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Reference Marker Latitude/Northing SARATOGACounty City Village Town SARATOGA SPRINGSof STATE ROUTE 9Road on which accident occurred EAST WEST ROADat 1) intersecting streetLongitude/Easting W S E N V2 was traveling North on Route 9 approaching the intersection with East West Road. V1 was traveling North on Route 9 behind V2. V2 stopped at the stoplight at the intersection and V1 was following too closely and struck V2, causing a property damage accident. Accident Description/Officer's notes - - - - - - - - - - or 2) Place Where Accident Occurred:Coordinates (if available) of 825861581 VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number 1 NY State of Lic. LAWRENCE, CHRISTOPHER C Driver Name - exactly as printed on license 2 COLLEEN COURT Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. WILTONCity or Town NYState 12831 Zip Code 8 16 2002 Day YearMonth Date of Birth M Sex Unlicensed 01 No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged LAWRENCE, CLANCY C Name - exactly as printed on registration M Sex 1972318 Date of Birth Month Day Year 2 COLLEEN COURT Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.-Mat.Haz. Code Released WILTON City or Town NY State 12831 Zip Code LHG7074 Plate Number NY State of Reg. 2013 MNNI Vehicle Year & Make 2DSD Vehicle Type 769 Ins. Code 4215KWTSBTTicket/Arrest Number(s) 1129AViolation Section(s) - - - - 921301898 VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number 2 NY State of Lic. FENSTERER, CHARLES A Driver Name - exactly as printed on license 100 LOWER NEWTON ROAD Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. WATERFORDCity or Town NYState 12188 Zip Code 12 8 1961 Day YearMonth Date of Birth M Sex Unlicensed 01 No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged FENSTERER, CHARLES A Name - exactly as printed on registration M Sex 1961812 Date of Birth Month Day Year 100 LOWER NEWTON ROAD Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.-Mat.Haz. Code Released WATERFORD City or Town NY State 12188 Zip Code 54000NB Plate Number NY State of Reg. 2022 FORD Vehicle Year & Make VAN Vehicle Type 606 Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - A L L I N V O L V E D F E D C B A 8 9 10 11 12 13 17 BY14 15 16 Saratoga Springs PD 5 Lake Ave Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 (518) 584-1800 Rossi, Curtis 10/01/2025 Rossi: I was dispatched to a 2 car MVA, a tractor-trailer vs. pick-up truck at the intersection of Route 9 and Crescent Avenue. Dispatch advised there was personal injury, the tractor-trailer operator was out of the vehicle, and the pick-up truck operator was unaccounted for. Upon arrival, I observed a pick-up truck and tractor-trailer off the side of the road, crashed into trees, and vehicle and cargo debris spread across Route 9. I observed a group of people standing next to the tractor-trailer and was met by the tractor-trailer operator, SAMET ABAK. Abak sustained a laceration to his left wrist and both ankles. Abak stated he was driving around 60 MPH when he looked down within his vehicle to set the cruise control and when he looked up, his truck collided with the rear of a pick-up truck. Abak stated he was not injured but he was advised he was being transported to Saratoga Hospital for an evaluation. I went to investigate the pick-up truck that the tractor-trailer collided with. Upon arrival, I spoke with a Saratoga Springs Firefighter who advised the pick-up truck was parked on the side of the road at the time of the collision, and the pick-up truck operator was unaccounted for. While approaching the pick-up truck, I observed what looked like 2 boots underneath of the frame of the pick-up truck cab. After further investigation, I was able to identify a human body pinned down underneath the pick-up truck frame. I noticed both legs of the body underneath the pick-up truck were shaking. I called out to the person but heard no response. I attempted to remove the body from underneath the pick-up truck with negative results due to the frame crushing the top of the individual's body. The Saratoga Springs Firefighters were able to lift the pick-up truck frame, remove the person, and transport them. Officer Michalowski advised me he met with a subject that heard, and possibly witnessed the vehicle collision occur. I met with the witness identified as JOHN POLLAY. Pollay stated he was mowing the grass at a nearby golf course when he heard what he described to be a loud explosion. When Pollay looked toward the direction of the noise, he observed a pick-up truck strike a tree and then a tractor-trailer travel further down the road and strike multiple other trees. Pollay stated he went to check the status of the pick-up truck operator. Pollay approached the vehicle, opened the driver side door, and stated there was no one inside the pick-up truck. Pollay explained he then approached the tractor-trailer and spoke with the operator outside the vehicle who stated he was ok. I secured a statement from Pollay. I visited Abak at Saratoga Hospital to administer a field sobriety test. I advised Abak I was going to check his eyes. I asked Abak if he had any underlying medical conditions, asthma, or if he has diabetes. Abak stated no to each question. I asked Abak if he wore glasses. Abak stated he wears glasses at night to see better in dark conditions. Abak also stated he did not drink any alcohol the day of the incident and the Narrative (1) Saratoga Springs PD 5 Lake Ave Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 (518) 584-1800 Officer (2) Reporting Officer:09/30/2025 06:41:41Rossi, Curtis (Ptl.) Approving Officer:10/05/2025 00:09:34Ferris, Zachary (Sgt) night prior. Abak stated he is not currently taking any prescribed medications. Abak explained he slept for 9 hours the night prior and woke up around 4:00 am, did not eat anything, and traveled from his residence in Schenectady to Saratoga Springs for work. Abak explained when he arrived to work at Saratoga Eagle, he inspected his truck and began to drive from Saratoga Springs to Albany to deliver a load of beer. I administered a field sobriety test. Abak's successfully provided a PBT sample with a BAC reading of 0.00. I completed a Saratoga Hospital medical release form with Abak and submitted it to hospital staff. Saratoga Springs PD 5 Lake Ave Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 (518) 584-1800 Person Interviewed Data (4) Kluck, Eugene Buckley, Zachary Incident Saratoga Springs PD 5 Lake Ave Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 (518) 584-1800 Brand, Spencer James Davidson Johnson, Nancy Other Data (2) Sturgiss, Antonio Coroner Saratoga Springs PD 5 Lake Ave Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 (518) 584-1800 Abak, Raven Offense(s) (0) Vehicle(s) (0) Property (1) Autopsy Photos Drug(s) (0) Saratoga Springs PD 5 Lake Ave Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 (518) 584-1800 Gun(s) (0) Rose, Vanessa On 9/30/25 at 7:00 am, I responded to the scene of the reported crash. SSPD, SCSO and SSFD units were already on scene upon my arrival. I reported to Sgt. Callahan who advised me to assist in taking a statement from the Eagle Driver, Samet Abak. Mr. Abak walked with me to my vehicle where my statement forms were located. While we were walking, he described the direction he was travelling which was in the outermost south bound lane. He stated he was heading to Albany and there was a truck in front of him which quickly moved over to the left /inner lane and then Mr. Abak saw the stopped vehicle and could not avoid it and struck the stopped vehicle. Mr. Abak was very cooperative throughout the investigation. When we got to my vehicle we stood outside, I began to take down Mr. Abak's phone number when SSFD paramedics approached. They advised that due to the impacted condition of his vehicle they felt Mr. Abak should be evaluated for any possible internal injuries. Mr. Abak agreed to be evaluated, and the paramedics brought him to the ambulance on scene, Unit 5654. I later checked on Mr. Abak in the ambulance and saw that he had his work phone which a firefighter advised was found in the debris outside of the truck. Mr. Abak had called his employer, and he advised he would be enroute, a Nick Barker. I asked Mr. Abak if I could secure his work phone as it is part of the original scene and he agreed. The work cell number is , the pass code is Officer Michalowski advised that he located another cell phone in the debris of the Eagle truck believed to be the drivers personal cell. I asked Mr. Abak about securing his personal cell also and he agreed and provided the pass code to his personal cell phone, The paramedics advised they would be transporting Mr. Abak to Saratoga Hospital. I secured the phones in a faraday bag in my vehicle. I advised Sgt. Cadoret of the phones and that Mr. Abak is going to Saratoga Hospital and that Nick Barker from Eagle is enroute. He advised they would retrieve the phones from me at the station and that Officer Guzek would be responding to the hospital to secure statement and further needed investigation. I remained on scene to assist further. Sgt. Callahan advised that he was provided with an emergency contact for the victim, Denise Howard and made the call on my department cell phone. There was no answer. We then had the call placed through the station main line and got through. Sgt. Callahan made notification to Nancy Johnson that Ms. Howard was in an accident and has been transported to Albany Med, time was 07:45 am. Sgt. Callahan directed me to the East West Rd where Officer Gaetano was posted and advising that HMA Contracting may have video from their truck dashcam. I spoke with Eugene Kluck the project GM on scene that morning. It was determined that they did not Narrative (1) Saratoga Springs PD 5 Lake Ave Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 (518) 584-1800 have any video that they could access, but Mr. Kluck advised that he believes the camera should have something. He advised the cameras are through Verizon Connect. I relayed the information to Inv. Reside who was also on scene. It was determined that the SD card should be secured. Mr. Kluck advised that we can do whatever we need. He signed a permission to search device form for the dashcam. I advised Inv. Reside that we had the permission to search. Inv. Reside handled the SD card retrieval and access, see his supplemental for further. Mr. Kluck advised that he was still enroute to the job site at the time of the crash and did not witness anything. He stated that they were contracted with the State Park and had just completed milling the East West Rd. He advised that the victim should not have been where she was and he was not sure why or what she was doing there. I asked if she could have been setting up signs and he advised that the signs were not needed today as they were done with that portion of the work. They only had the signs set up along 9 previously to help guide and control traffic entering the park while they were milling, which was now complete. I spoke with the two other employees that were there in the morning, neither witnessed the crash. Zachary Buckley advised that the previous day he and the victim had set up the signs and broken them down. He stated that he did not know why she would be setting up signs this morning. He stated he texted her the evening before that they were to meet on site at 6:30 am and she responded with thumbs up. They were supposed to meet where the equipment was located in the park. He stated that she did not show up and they went to the spring which is where they were to be working next. He tried calling the victim several times but got no answer. It wasn't until they came back to the East West Rd and saw all of the traffic and the police officer at the intersection that he found out what happened. He approached Officer Gaetano in the intersection to advise him that they are expecting another employee. Officer Gaetano checked with the officers on scene and they advised that a HMA truck was involved in the crash. Spencer James Davidson Brand, the other employee, did not have any different information to add. Sgt. Callahan asked me to follow up with the Eagle driver's wife who was asking about her husbands property and Sgt. Cadoret advised he believed that Mr. Abak has been released from the hospital and requested assistance in obtaining a permission to search form for Mr. Abak's personnel cell phone . I contacted Mrs. Abak and arranged to meet them in Malta where they had to go for Mr. Abak's DOT requirement. I met them outside in the parking lot. I took note of the items that Mr. Abak wanted if found in the cab, a black Volvo car key, an ipad, a black Casio wristwatch and a small black case that contained black earbuds. He also mentioned there was a company printer that goes with the company phone. He also mentioned he has a lunch box and a coffee cup, which he was not as concerned about. I forwarded the list to Sgt. Cadoret. I asked if he would sign a permission to search form for his personal cell and he stated he would and he signed same. I asked if he had any injuries and he stated that he did not have any that he knew of at this time. His wife advised that the hospital however, did not do any x- rays or scans. I advised Sgt. Cadoret that I had the form and asked if I was still needed on scene. He advised that I was no longer needed and someone would collect the paperwork and phones from me when they get back to the station. Saratoga Springs PD 5 Lake Ave Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 (518) 584-1800 Officer (2) Reporting Officer:10/01/2025 07:36:00Rose, Vanessa (Inv) Approving Officer:11/07/2025 12:32:56Callahan, Christopher (Sgt) I secured the phones in my working locker until Officer Hargett later responded to the Investigations office where I turned over my original notes, the permission to search forms, and the cellphones. The victims wife, Nancy Johnson contacted the station seeking information about what happened. I had the call put through to me. I asked the condition of her wife. She advised she was critical and in surgery. She advised she was too upset and no longer wanted to speak about what happened. She advised she would try again later. I texted her a photo of my business card and let her know that I was the person she spoke to and that she can contact me when she is ready. Before end of shift, I messaged her that I wanted to check in with her before leaving. She advised that her wife was out of surgery but still critical and staff was requesting to speak with someone who can make the medical decisions. On the morning of 10/1/25, Albany County Coroner Sturgiss contacted the station and relayed to Sgt. Northrup that the victim at Albany Med died at 4:52 am and that a Autopsy was scheduled for that day. Sgt. Northrup advised me that she already notified Sgt. Cadoret and that the coroner was requesting a call. I contacted the coroner who advised the autopsy was scheduled for 10:00 am at Ellis Hospital and I was to bring any photos and video available. I responded to Ellis and attended the autopsy which was conducted by Dr. Bernard Ng and autopsy assistant James Schaeffer. I provided Dr. Ng with a thumb drive containing photographs taken by Officer Guzek and the HMA Contracting dashcam video, which he reviewed. The findings were death from severe trauma. He was unable to provide me with a draft copy of the death certificate at autopsy as the coroner still had to make data entry but he would e-mail me a copy when ready. I advised Sgt. Cadoret of the findings. I called and spoke with the victim's wife and advised her of same. I secured photos during autopsy which have been uploaded to this case in evidence.com. On the morning of 10/2/25, I received the draft copy of the autopsy from Dr. Ng. The manner of death is listed as accident, immediate cause of death is hemorrhagic shock due to or as a consequence of severe trauma due to or as a consequence of struck by a motor vehicle. Copy TOT Traffic Division. Saratoga Springs PD 5 Lake Ave Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 (518) 584-1800 Suspects (2) ABAK, SAMET HOWARD, DENISE J Incident 3332 - 3399 Route 9 Saratoga Springs - 12866, NEW YORK 12866 Saratoga Springs PD 5 Lake Ave Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 (518) 584-1800 Offense(s) (0) Vehicle(s) (3) 2023 TRAILER 2007 General Motors Corp. VAN 2020 Freightliner Corp. Saratoga Springs PD 5 Lake Ave Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 (518) 584-1800 Property (2) blue silk bandanna Samsara camera, memory and router Drug(s) (0) Gun(s) (0) Guzek, John Officer Guzek- On 9/30/2025 I responded to South Broadway on State Route 9 for a serious personal injury accident. Upon arrival the female injured in the crash, Denise Howard had been removed from the scene by EMS and transported to the hospital. Sgt Cadoret gave me details to the incident and I was instructed to start taking pictures immediately. I took pictures of the vehicles, inside of the box trailer Narrative (1) Saratoga Springs PD 5 Lake Ave Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 (518) 584-1800 Officer (2) Reporting Officer:Guzek, John (Inv) Approving Officer:10/07/2025 07:42:00Cadoret, Jason (Sgt) and the surrounding area. After I was finished with the photographs I went to the Saratoga Hospital and took a statement from the operator of the Freightliner tractor and trailer. Samet Abak. Abak was cooperative and signed off on the medical records form in which I submitted to the hospital staff. An email will be sent to my department address with the medical results, incluting a toresults. I will add the records to the case at that time. I did collect a blue silk bandanna and it has been entered into evidence. I spoke with DOT Inspector Danielle Adaire and will be scheduling an examination of the vehicles involved. Saratoga Springs PD 5 Lake Ave Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 (518) 584-1800 Officer (2) Reporting Officer:10/09/2025 14:14:00Guzek, John (Inv) Approving Officer:10/24/2025 14:36:26Cadoret, Jason (Sgt) Guzek, John Officer Guzek- On 10/09/2025 I went to the NYSP Crime Lab and dropped off the camera, router and black box that was taken as evidence from the tractor in this case. NYSP evidence receipt was placed into the case file. Evidence chain of custody log adjusted. Narrative (1) Saratoga Springs PD 5 Lake Ave Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 (518) 584-1800 Officer (2) Reporting Officer:10/01/2025 18:01:00Hargett, Jeffrey (Ptl) Approving Officer:10/16/2025 10:27:43Cadoret, Jason (Sgt) Hargett, Jeff 2754 - On 09/30/2025 I received a call out from Sgt Cadoret for an accident that occurred on Route 9 at approximately 0630 hours. I responded to the location and observed a tractor trailer commercial motor vehicle crashed in the trees on Route 9 adjacent to the golf course as well as a utility truck crashed in the trees as well. I began to walk the scene with Sgt. Cadoret, Officer Guzek, and members of the SCSO accident reconstruction unit. I observed a large amount of diesel spilled on the roadway, skid marks, and gouges in the roadway where the accident took place. I observed a large gouge in the roadway that I believed to be the point of maximum engagement accompanied with skid marks containing striations from the Tractor Trailer. The tractor trailer was a Saratoga Eagle truck bearing with an enclosed box trailer bearing The utility truck was an HMA truck bearing I remained on scene with SCSO s accident reconstruction team who completed scans of the accident scene using a FARO scanner. SCSO called in a drone operator who flew a drone on scene to secure further pictures. After the scans and photos were complete I gathered the registration and insurance information from the vehicles for the accident report. I walked Route 9 from the scene to the Homewood Suites to check for any other evidence related to this case with negative results. A road sign stating Road Work Ahead 1 Mile was set up approximately 600 feet before the accident. The signs were being placed and set up by Howard for road work that was being completed that day on East West Road. The scene was cleaned as I completed a tow sheet for the HMA truck and placed a hold on said truck. After completing a tow sheet KJ Sterns began unloading the tractor trailer and preparing to tow both vehicles from the scene. I then cleared the scene. I returned to HQ where I scanned all consent forms, voluntary statements, tow sheets, and notes. They were placed on a hard drive and scene photographs were secured on said hard drive as well. I then gathered the video footage from the HMA truck dash camera for the flash drive, that was provided to me by Inv. Reside. I began the accident report as I waited for video footage to be secured by officers from Saratoga Eagle s truck. The video footage was unavailable to be downloaded and viewed on today s date Narrative (1) Saratoga Springs PD 5 Lake Ave Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 (518) 584-1800 Saratoga Springs PD 5 Lake Ave Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 (518) 584-1800 Officer (2) Reporting Officer:10/02/2025 14:25:00Hargett, Jeffrey (Ptl) Approving Officer:10/16/2025 10:27:20Cadoret, Jason (Sgt) Hargett, Jeff 2754 - 2754 - On today s date 10/02/2025 I turned over a flash drive to SCSO s accident reconstruction team containing all consent forms, voluntary statements, notes, photographs, and tow sheets for their completion of the reconstruction. Narrative (1) Saratoga Springs PD 5 Lake Ave Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 (518) 584-1800 Officer (2) Reporting Officer:10/16/2025 21:26:00Coyner, William (Inv) Approving Officer:11/07/2025 12:33:48Callahan, Christopher (Sgt) Coyner, William On 10/1/2025 I received two cell phones which were sealed in faraday bags with consent forms for each phone from Sgt. Cadoret. Sgt. Cadoret asked if I could get the cell phone information dumped off of the phones for analysis. I took custody of the cell phones and subsequently contacted Sr. Inv. Matt Robinson with SCSO. On 10/06/2025 I turned over the phones to Sr. Inv. Robinson at SCSO HQ. On 10/09/2025 I picked up the cell phones from SCSO HQ and a USB drive was provided with the cell phone dump information. I transported the phones back to SSPD HQ and turned them over to Sgt. Cadoret in person. I did not open, or manipulate the cell phones in any way during this process. Narrative (1) Saratoga Springs PD 5 Lake Ave Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 (518) 584-1800 Offense(s) (0) Vehicle(s) (0) Property (1) Micro SD Card from HMA Dashcam Drug(s) (0) Gun(s) (0) Incident Reside, Steven 1828: On 09/30/25, I left my house for work and heard this incident dispatched via police radio. I Narrative (1) Saratoga Springs PD 5 Lake Ave Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 (518) 584-1800 Officer (2) Reporting Officer:10/01/2025 08:25:00Reside, Steven (Inv) Approving Officer:11/21/2025 13:55:28Callahan, Christopher (Sgt) responded to the scene, observing a small dump truck off the east side of Route 9, north of East West Road. I also observed a Saratoga Eagle tractor trailer off the road, just south of the dump truck. The operator of the dump truck was being loaded on a SSFD ambulance for transport. I started taking digital photos of the accident scene, and employees from Saratoga Eagle arrived. I spoke with Nick Barker who advised that there is a dashcam in the cab of their vehicle. Safety Director John Kileen also arrived, bringing a company laptop to view archived video of the incident. They attempted to download the accident video, but the video cut out approximately 10 seconds before impact. Barker advised that he would contact the manufacturer, Samsara, for further guidance. Inv. Rose advised that she was speaking with employees from HMA contracting, the owner of the dump truck, and that it also had a dash camera. I observed a SmartWitness KP2 camera attached to the inside of the windshield. I viewed the users manual to find that there is a micro SD card in the camera. Inv. Rose received signed consent to search the camera. I took the cover plate off of the camera and removed the SD card, replacing the cover plate. On return to HQ, I attempted to view the video from the HMA vehicle via the Verizon Connect Integrated Video software, but was prompted for a password. I spoke at length with Brandon Gardy from HMA, who conferenced me in with their Verizon representative, who after a time was able to provide the password, I viewed the video, which shows the impact to her vehicle. I secured the SD card in locker #1. Officer's Rank and Signature PTL 2882 Badge/ID No. 04501 NCIC No.Precint/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat Sector STREIM, ANDREW Reviewing Officer 11/3/2025 17:18 Date/Time Reviewed DANIEL ROBERTSONPrint Name in Full - 1 - 2 1 3 5 4 1 5 1 6 2 7 2 25-023821 Local Codes AMENDED REPORTNL4212KXQK0J 10 29 2025 YearMonth Accident Date Day WEDNESDAY Day of Week 18:53 Military Time 1Vehicles No. of 0 No. Injured 0 No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Left Scene NoYes Police Photos Accident Reconstructed of PagesPage1 POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) New York State Department of Motor Vehicles - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 4 1 22 F ---BENNETT, LAKYN RAIN VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13 SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER See the last page of the MV-104A for the accident diagram. Unknown/Unable to determine Yes No Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 9. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. 1VEHICLE VEHICLE BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN 61 19 - 20 21 22 1 23 24 1 25 26 1 27 4 28 - 29 30 more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. 1 1 VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 3 1 3 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 1 2 3 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes milesfeet (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Reference Marker Latitude/Northing SARATOGACounty City Village Town SARATOGA SPRINGSof ROUTE 9Road on which accident occurred at 1) intersecting streetLongitude/Easting .5 W S E N CRESCENT AVENUE V1 was traveling in a northerly direction on state route 9 when a deer crossed V1's path. Due to the vehicles speed and the deers movement, V1 operator was unable to avoid a collision. Substantial damage to the front passenger side of the vehicle caused by animals action. Accident Description/Officer's notes - - - - - - - - - - or 2) Place Where Accident Occurred:Coordinates (if available) of 627447305 VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number 1 NY State of Lic. BENNETT, LAKYN RAIN Driver Name - exactly as printed on license 4 N CENTER LN Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. BALLSTON LAKECity or Town NYState 120190000 Zip Code 12 16 2002 Day YearMonth Date of Birth F Sex Unlicensed 01 No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged BENNETT, ERIC J Name - exactly as printed on registration M Sex 1967247 Date of Birth Month Day Year 4 N CENTER LN Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.-Mat.Haz. Code Released BALLSTON LAKE City or Town NY State 12019-0000 Zip Code KLJ5238 Plate Number NY State of Reg. 2016 FORD Vehicle Year & Make 4DSD Vehicle Type 639 Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number State of Lic. Driver Name - exactly as printed on license Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. City or Town State Zip Code Day YearMonth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged Name - exactly as printed on registration Sex Date of Birth Month Day Year Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.Mat.Haz. Code Released City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - A L L I N V O L V E D F E D C B A 8 9 10 11 12 13 17 BY14 15 16 Officer's Rank and Signature PTL 3269 Badge/ID No. 04501 NCIC No.Precint/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat Sector WILSON, PARKER Reviewing Officer 11/19/2025 02:02 Date/Time Reviewed VINAY RATHOREPrint Name in Full - 1 - 2 1 3 4 4 1 5 2 6 2 7 2 25-024851 Local Codes AMENDED REPORTNL4210L07X5L 11 12 2025 YearMonth Accident Date Day WEDNESDAY Day of Week 23:24 Military Time 1Vehicles No. of 0 No. Injured 0 No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Left Scene NoYes Police Photos Accident Reconstructed of PagesPage1 POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) New York State Department of Motor Vehicles - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 4 1 76 M ---AUGUSTE, VERDI H 1 4 4 1 23 M ---BARCLAY, DUSTIN R 1 6 4 1 22 F ---SARGENT, SAYDI A VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13 SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER See the last page of the MV-104A for the accident diagram. Unknown/Unable to determine Yes No Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 9. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. 1VEHICLE VEHICLE BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN 61 19 - 20 21 22 1 23 24 1 25 26 1 27 7 28 29 30 more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. 1 1 VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 4 3 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 1 2 3 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes milesfeet (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Reference Marker Latitude/Northing SARATOGACounty City Village Town SARATOGA SPRINGSof ROUTE 9Road on which accident occurred EAST WEST ROADat 1) intersecting streetLongitude/Easting W S E N V1 was traveling in a northerly direction on route 9. V1 struck a deer in the roadway causing significant damage to his vehicle. Accident Description/Officer's notes - - - - - - - - - - or 2) Place Where Accident Occurred:Coordinates (if available) of 513861099 VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number 1 NY State of Lic. AUGUSTE, VERDI H Driver Name - exactly as printed on license 932 WENDELL AVE Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. SCHENECTADYCity or Town NYState 123080000 Zip Code 12 30 1948 Day YearMonth Date of Birth M Sex Unlicensed 03 No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged AUGUSTE, VERDI H Name - exactly as printed on registration M Sex 19483012 Date of Birth Month Day Year 932 WENDELL AVE Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.-Mat.Haz. Code Released SCHENECTADY City or Town NY State 12308-0000 Zip Code JEG Plate Number NY State of Reg. 2021 HOND Vehicle Year & Make SUBN Vehicle Type 639 Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number State of Lic. Driver Name - exactly as printed on license Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. City or Town State Zip Code Day YearMonth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged Name - exactly as printed on registration Sex Date of Birth Month Day Year Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.Mat.Haz. Code Released City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - A L L I N V O L V E D F E D C B A 8 9 10 11 12 13 17 BY14 15 16 Officer's Rank and Signature PTL 2882 Badge/ID No. 04501 NCIC No.Precint/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat Sector STREIM, ANDREW Reviewing Officer 12/10/2025 16:19 Date/Time Reviewed DANIEL ROBERTSONPrint Name in Full - 1 - 2 1 3 5 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 2 25-025554 Local Codes AMENDED REPORTNL4213L195R2 11 22 2025 YearMonth Accident Date Day SATURDAY Day of Week 17:51 Military Time 1Vehicles No. of 0 No. Injured 0 No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Left Scene NoYes Police Photos Accident Reconstructed of PagesPage1 POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) New York State Department of Motor Vehicles - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 4 1 67 M ---SUTTON, STEVEN VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13 SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER See the last page of the MV-104A for the accident diagram. Unknown/Unable to determine Yes No Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 9. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. 1VEHICLE VEHICLE BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN 61 19 - 20 21 22 1 23 24 1 25 26 1 27 7 28 - 29 30 more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. 1 1 VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 3 1 3 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 1 2 3 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes milesfeet (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Reference Marker Latitude/Northing SARATOGACounty City Village Town SARATOGA SPRINGSof ROUTE 9Road on which accident occurred at 1) intersecting streetLongitude/Easting W S E N EAST WEST ROAD500 V1 was traveling in a northerly direction on Route 9 when a deer crossed V1's path from the left, causing a property damage accident. Accident Description/Officer's notes - - - - - - - - - - or 2) Place Where Accident Occurred:Coordinates (if available) of 349282258 VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number 1 NY State of Lic. SUTTON, STEVEN Driver Name - exactly as printed on license 397 ANGEL RD Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. CORINTHCity or Town NYState 128220000 Zip Code 3 10 1958 Day YearMonth Date of Birth M Sex Unlicensed 01 No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged SUTTON, STEVEN Name - exactly as printed on registration M Sex 1958103 Date of Birth Month Day Year 397 ANGEL RD Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.-Mat.Haz. Code Released CORINTH City or Town NY State 12822 Zip Code HRH1842 Plate Number NY State of Reg. 2014 TOYT Vehicle Year & Make 4DSD Vehicle Type 219 Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number State of Lic. Driver Name - exactly as printed on license Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. City or Town State Zip Code Day YearMonth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged Name - exactly as printed on registration Sex Date of Birth Month Day Year Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.Mat.Haz. Code Released City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - A L L I N V O L V E D F E D C B A 8 9 10 11 12 13 17 BY14 15 16 Officer's Rank and Signature PTL 2754 Badge/ID No. 04501 NCIC No.Precint/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat Sector CADORET, JASON Reviewing Officer 3/31/2026 14:26 Date/Time Reviewed JEFF HARGETTPrint Name in Full - 1 - 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 2 26-006560 Local Codes AMENDED REPORTNL4224LG8GG0 3 24 2026 YearMonth Accident Date Day TUESDAY Day of Week 09:33 Military Time 2Vehicles No. of 1 No. Injured 0 No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Left Scene NoYes Police Photos Accident Reconstructed of PagesPage1 POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) New York State Department of Motor Vehicles - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 4 1 77 F 08 10 6 DENHAM, DOROTHY J 2 1 4 1 69 F ---BABSON, MONICA L VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13 SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER O Unknown/Unable to determine Yes No Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 9. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. 1VEHICLE VEHICLE BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN2 7 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 3 23 1 24 3 25 1 26 1 27 1 28 - 29 - 30 more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. 1 1 VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 3 1 3 2 3 3 2 4 1 5 MATTS TOWINGVehicle By: MATTS TOWINGTowed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. 2 2 VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 1 1 1 2 16 3 1 4 2 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes milesfeet (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Reference Marker Latitude/Northing SARATOGACounty City Village Town SARATOGA SPRINGSof ROUTE 9Road on which accident occurred at 1) intersecting streetLongitude/Easting W S E N CRESCENT AVENUE1700 V1 was traveling in a southerly direction on Route 9. V2 was traveling in a northerly direction on Route 9. V1 entered the center turn lane with the intention to make a left turn in an easterly direction and pull into the parking lot of the Homewood Suites, located at 3368 US-9. V1 failed to yield the right of way to V2 and made said left turn across the northbound lanes of Route 9, in front of V2. V2 swerved, striking V1 in a right angle Accident Description/Officer's notes - - - - - - - - - - or 2) Place Where Accident Occurred:Coordinates (if available) of 623846448 VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number 1 NY State of Lic. DENHAM, DOROTHY J Driver Name - exactly as printed on license 4 SKYLARK DR Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. BALLSTON SPACity or Town NYState 120200000 Zip Code 10 26 1948 Day YearMonth Date of Birth F Sex Unlicensed 01 No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged DENHAM, DOROTHY J Name - exactly as printed on registration F Sex 19482610 Date of Birth Month Day Year 4 SKYLARK DR Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.-Mat.Haz. Code Released BALLSTON SPA City or Town NY State 12020-0000 Zip Code HFN1489 Plate Number NY State of Reg. 2014 FORD Vehicle Year & Make SUBN Vehicle Type 240 Ins. Code 4224LG8HC5Ticket/Arrest Number(s) 1141Violation Section(s) - - - - 528721826 VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number 2 NY State of Lic. BABSON, MONICA L Driver Name - exactly as printed on license 58 FEEDER ST Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. HUDSON FALLSCity or Town NYState 128390000 Zip Code 5 21 1956 Day YearMonth Date of Birth F Sex Unlicensed 01 No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged BABSON, MONICA L Name - exactly as printed on registration F Sex 1956215 Date of Birth Month Day Year 58 FEEDER ST Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.-Mat.Haz. Code Released HUDSON FALLS City or Town NY State 12839-0000 Zip Code KSP6573 Plate Number NY State of Reg. 2008 CHEV Vehicle Year & Make SUBN Vehicle Type 618 Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - A L L I N V O L V E D F E D C B A 8 9 10 11 12 13 17 BY14 15 16 Officer's Rank and Signature PTL 2754 Badge/ID No. 04501 NCIC No.Precint/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat Sector CADORET, JASON Reviewing Officer 3/31/2026 14:26 Date/Time Reviewed JEFF HARGETTPrint Name in Full 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2 26-006560 Local Codes AMENDED REPORTNL4224LG8GG0 3 24 2026 YearMonth Accident Date Day TUESDAY Day of Week 09:33 Military Time 2Vehicles No. of 1 No. Injured 0 No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Left Scene NoYes Police Photos Accident Reconstructed of PagesPage2 POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) New York State Department of Motor Vehicles - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13 SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER Unknown/Unable to determine Yes No Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 9. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. VEHICLE VEHICLE BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 1 2 3 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 1 2 3 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes milesfeet (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Reference Marker Latitude/Northing SARATOGACounty City Village Town of Road on which accident occurred at 1) intersecting streetLongitude/Easting W S E N collision, before continuing into an embankment and overturning, coming to final rest on its side. Accident Description/Officer's notes - - - - - - - - - - or 2) Place Where Accident Occurred:Coordinates (if available) of VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number State of Lic. Driver Name - exactly as printed on license Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. City or Town State Zip Code Day YearMonth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged Name - exactly as printed on registration Sex Date of Birth Month Day Year Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.Mat.Haz. Code Released City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number State of Lic. Driver Name - exactly as printed on license Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. City or Town State Zip Code Day YearMonth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged Name - exactly as printed on registration Sex Date of Birth Month Day Year Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.Mat.Haz. Code Released City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - A L L I N V O L V E D F E D C B A 8 9 10 11 12 13 17 BY14 15 16 Officer's Rank and Signature PTL 2753 Badge/ID No. 04501 NCIC No.Precint/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat Sector HILTZ, JENNA Reviewing Officer 5/12/2026 15:54 Date/Time Reviewed NICOLLE CHRISTIANSENPrint Name in Full - 1 - 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 3 26-009642 Local Codes AMENDED REPORTNL4215LLBMJR 5 1 2026YearMonth Accident Date Day FRIDAY Day of Week 13:55 Military Time 2Vehicles No. of 0 No. Injured 0 No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Left Scene NoYes Police Photos Accident Reconstructed of PagesPage1 POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) New York State Department of Motor Vehicles - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 4 1 64 M ---LOTITO, STEPHEN 1 3 4 1 77 F ---PICCOLLO, DORTHY R 2 1 4 1 84 M ---SCHNEIDER, JOHN VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13 SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER See the last page of the MV-104A for the accident diagram. Unknown/Unable to determine Yes No Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 9. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. 1VEHICLE VEHICLE BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN2 3 19 69 20 - 21 - 22 7 23 5 24 15 25 1 26 2 27 1 28 - 29 - 30 more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. 1 1 VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 8 1 18 2 3 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. 2 2 VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 11 1 11 2 3 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes milesfeet (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Reference Marker Latitude/Northing SARATOGACounty City Village Town SARATOGA SPRINGSof 3402 ROUTE 9Road on which accident occurred at 1) intersecting streetLongitude/Easting W S E N ROUTE 9100 V1 had been parked in a parking spot in front of Saratoga Honda facing a eastern direction. V2 was traveling in a southern direction in the parking lot of Saratoga Honda. See diagram for reference. V1 had been backing out of his parking space in a western direction, as V2 had been traveling in a southern direction behind him, and struck V2. V1 states that his view was blocked by the police vehicles that had been parked just north of him next Accident Description/Officer's notes - - - - - - - - - - or 2) Place Where Accident Occurred:Coordinates (if available) of 382955920 VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number 1 NY State of Lic. LOTITO, STEPHEN Driver Name - exactly as printed on license 4021 RT 30 Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. WELLSCity or Town VTState 057740000 Zip Code 12 26 1961 Day YearMonth Date of Birth M Sex Unlicensed 02 No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged LOTITO, STEPHEN Name - exactly as printed on registration M Sex 19612612 Date of Birth Month Day Year 4021 RT 30 Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.-Mat.Haz. Code Released WELLS City or Town VT State 05774-0000 Zip Code 505A424 Plate Number VT State of Reg. 2024 CHEV Vehicle Year & Make PICK Vehicle Type 989 Ins. Code 4215LLBNHNTicket/Arrest Number(s) 1211AViolation Section(s) - - - - 970046740 VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number 2 NY State of Lic. SCHNEIDER, JOHN Driver Name - exactly as printed on license 94 LANCASTER CT Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. BALLSTON LAKECity or Town NYState 120190000 Zip Code 1 23 1942 Day YearMonth Date of Birth M Sex Unlicensed 01 No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged SCHNEIDER, JOHN Name - exactly as printed on registration M Sex 1942231 Date of Birth Month Day Year 94 LANCASTER CT Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.-Mat.Haz. Code Released BALLSTON LAKE City or Town NY State 12019-0000 Zip Code LCZ8252 Plate Number NY State of Reg. 2024 HOND Vehicle Year & Make SUBN Vehicle Type 220 Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - A L L I N V O L V E D F E D C B A 8 9 10 11 12 13 17 BY14 15 16 Officer's Rank and Signature PTL 2753 Badge/ID No. 04501 NCIC No.Precint/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat Sector HILTZ, JENNA Reviewing Officer 5/12/2026 15:54 Date/Time Reviewed NICOLLE CHRISTIANSENPrint Name in Full 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3 26-009642 Local Codes AMENDED REPORTNL4215LLBMJR 5 1 2026YearMonth Accident Date Day FRIDAY Day of Week 13:55 Military Time 2Vehicles No. of 0 No. Injured 0 No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Left Scene NoYes Police Photos Accident Reconstructed of PagesPage2 POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) New York State Department of Motor Vehicles - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13 SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER Unknown/Unable to determine Yes No Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 9. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. VEHICLE VEHICLE BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 1 2 3 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 1 2 3 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes milesfeet (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) Reference Marker Latitude/Northing SARATOGACounty City Village Town of Road on which accident occurred at 1) intersecting streetLongitude/Easting W S E N to the curb. V1 had no damage as the tow hitch is what had made contact with V2. V2 had damage to the driver side doors/ quarter panel area. No reported injuries at the time. V1 had a valid VT drivers license but his privilege to operate a motor vehicle in NYS was suspended due to a failure to pay a driver assessment. V1 had insurance through All State, policy number 925753640. Accident Description/Officer's notes - - - - - - - - - - or 2) Place Where Accident Occurred:Coordinates (if available) of VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number State of Lic. Driver Name - exactly as printed on license Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. City or Town State Zip Code Day YearMonth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged Name - exactly as printed on registration Sex Date of Birth Month Day Year Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.Mat.Haz. Code Released City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number State of Lic. Driver Name - exactly as printed on license Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. City or Town State Zip Code Day YearMonth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged Name - exactly as printed on registration Sex Date of Birth Month Day Year Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.Mat.Haz. Code Released City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - A L L I N V O L V E D F E D C B A 8 9 10 11 12 13 17 BY14 15 16 Officer's Rank and Signature PATROLMAN 3561 Badge/ID No. 04501 NCIC No.Precint/Post Troop/Zone Station/Beat Sector STREIM, ANDREW Reviewing Officer 5/28/2026 07:53 Date/Time Reviewed DAVID MORRISSEYPrint Name in Full - 1 - 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 2 SS-011047-26 Local Codes AMENDED REPORTNL4220LN4N7B 5 18 2026 YearMonth Accident Date Day MONDAY Day of Week 10:45 Military Time 1Vehicles No. of 0 No. Injured 0 No. Killed Not Investigated at Scene Left Scene NoYes Police Photos Accident Reconstructed of PagesPage1 POLICE ACCIDENT REPORT MV-104A (6/04) New York State Department of Motor Vehicles - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 4 1 32 M ---SUNDUEV, DENIS VEHICLE DAMAGE CODING: 1-13 SEE DIAGRAM ON RIGHT. 14. UNDERCARRIAGE 15. TRAILER 16. OVERTURNED 17. DEMOLISHED 18. NO DAMAGE 19. OTHER See the last page of the MV-104A for the accident diagram. Unknown/Unable to determine Yes No Cost of repairs to any one vehicle will be more than $1000. ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 9. Circle the diagram below that describes the accident, or draw your own diagram in space #9. Number the vehicles. 1VEHICLE VEHICLE BICYCLIST PEDESTRIAN OTHER PEDESTRIAN 8 19 20 20 21 22 5 23 24 1 25 26 2 27 12 28 15 29 30 more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. 1 1 VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 2 1 2 2 1 3 3 4 4 5 TOW AWAYVehicle By: TOW AWAYTowed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes more than 95 inches wide; more than 34 feet long; operated with an overweight permit; operated with an overdimension permit. VEHICLE DAMAGE CODES 1 2 3 4 5 Vehicle By: Towed To: V E H I C L E Check if involved vehicle is: Box 1 - Point of Impact Box 2 - Most Damage Enter up to three more damage codes milesfeet (Milepost, Nearest intersecting Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) (Route Number or Street Name) 1 7 0 Reference Marker Latitude/Northing SARATOGACounty City Village Town SARATOGA SPRINGSof ROUTE 9Road on which accident occurred 1 7 0 at 1) intersecting streetLongitude/Easting 1 7 0 .22 W S E N E WEST RD V1 was traveling South on State Route 9 when O1 began to fall asleep. V1 then began to swerve in the two southbound lanes until O1 over corrected and went off the roadway. V1 caused damage to the guardrail and the front of V1. No medical. PROPERTY DAMAGED BY VEHICLE #01- GUARDRAIL STATE DOT , WITNESS #1 STEVE MAHONE , (518) 312-6375 Accident Description/Officer's notes - - - - - - - - - - or 2) Place Where Accident Occurred:Coordinates (if available) of 577619349 VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number 1 NY State of Lic. SUNDUEV, DENIS Driver Name - exactly as printed on license 7662 172ND ST Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. FRESH MEADOWSCity or Town NYState 113660000 Zip Code 8 1 1993 Day YearMonth Date of Birth M Sex Unlicensed 01 No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged NPNTECH;CORP, Name - exactly as printed on registration C Sex Date of Birth Month Day Year 96 ROLLING HILL GRN Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.-Mat.Haz. Code Released STATEN ISLAND City or Town NY State 10312 Zip Code 79356NG Plate Number NY State of Reg. 2012 FORD Vehicle Year & Make UTIL Vehicle Type 766 Ins. Code 4220LN4NV0Ticket/Arrest Number(s) 1120AViolation Section(s) - - - - VEHICLE - Driver License ID Number State of Lic. Driver Name - exactly as printed on license Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No. City or Town State Zip Code Day YearMonth Date of Birth Sex Unlicensed No. of Occupants Public Property Damaged Name - exactly as printed on registration Sex Date of Birth Month Day Year Address (Include Number and Street)Apt. No.Mat.Haz. Code Released City or Town State Zip Code Plate Number State of Reg.Vehicle Year & Make Vehicle Type Ins. Code Ticket/Arrest Number(s) Violation Section(s) - - - - A L L I N V O L V E D F E D C B A 8 9 10 11 12 13 17 BY14 15 16 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue 06/08/2026 2025 Existing Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 1 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 30 88 836 71 83 727 Future Volume (vph) 30 88 836 71 83 727 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 200 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1639 0 3429 0 1752 3505 Flt Permitted 0.987 0.170 Satd. Flow (perm) 1639 0 3429 0 314 3505 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 99 7 Link Speed (mph) 35 55 40 Link Distance (ft) 1221 1085 1199 Travel Time (s) 23.8 13.5 20.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 4% 4% 3% 3% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 133 0 1019 0 93 817 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Turn Type Prot NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 3 6 5 1 Permitted Phases 1 Detector Phase 3 6 5 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 20.0 11.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 65.0 65.0 25.0 90.0 Total Split (%) 41.9% 41.9% 16.1% 58.1% Maximum Green (s) 60.0 60.0 20.0 85.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 Recall Mode None Min None Min Act Effct Green (s) 7.5 26.6 37.4 37.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.48 0.68 0.68 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.62 0.21 0.34 Control Delay (s/veh) 14.8 13.8 4.2 4.1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue 06/08/2026 2025 Existing Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 2 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 14.8 13.8 4.2 4.1 LOS B B A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 14.8 13.8 4.1 Approach LOS B B A Queue Length 50th (ft) 10 128 7 41 Queue Length 95th (ft) 59 234 22 81 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1141 1005 1119 Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 Base Capacity (vph) 1584 3307 752 3505 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.31 0.12 0.23 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 155 Actuated Cycle Length: 55.2 Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.62 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 9.6 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: US Route 9 & E West Road 06/08/2026 2025 Existing Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 2 2 21 957 750 2 Future Volume (vph) 2 2 21 957 750 2 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 400 0 375 200 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1504 1346 1736 3471 3471 1553 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.335 Satd. Flow (perm) 1504 1346 612 3471 3471 1553 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 2 2 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 781 1752 2527 Travel Time (s) 17.8 21.7 31.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles (%) 20% 20% 4% 4% 4% 4% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 2 2 23 1052 824 2 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Turn Type Prot Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Protected Phases 7 2 5 1 Permitted Phases 7 5 1 Detector Phase 7 7 2 5 1 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 11.0 20.0 20.0 11.0 11.0 Total Split (s) 50.0 50.0 25.0 75.0 50.0 50.0 Total Split (%) 40.0% 40.0% 20.0% 60.0% 40.0% 40.0% Maximum Green (s) 45.0 45.0 20.0 70.0 45.0 45.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None Min None None Act Effct Green (s) 7.0 7.0 26.2 27.3 18.0 18.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.24 0.91 0.94 0.62 0.62 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.32 0.38 0.00 Control Delay (s/veh) 16.0 13.5 1.4 1.2 6.0 6.0 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: US Route 9 & E West Road 06/08/2026 2025 Existing Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 4 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 16.0 13.5 1.4 1.2 6.0 6.0 LOS B B A A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 14.8 1.2 6.0 Approach LOS B A A Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 0 0 0 2 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 7 6 6 81 176 4 Internal Link Dist (ft) 701 1672 2447 Turn Bay Length (ft) 400 375 200 Base Capacity (vph) 1439 1288 1484 3471 3322 1486 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.30 0.25 0.00 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 125 Actuated Cycle Length: 28.9 Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.38 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 3.4 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 2: US Route 9 & E West Road Lanes, Volumes, Timings 11: US Route 9 & Tree House Entrance Only 06/08/2026 2025 Existing Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 5 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 942 2 0 763 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 942 2 0 763 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 3471 0 1827 3471 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 3471 0 1827 3471 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 406 653 330 Travel Time (s) 9.2 8.1 4.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 4% 4% 4% 4% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 1037 0 0 838 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 13: US Route 9 & Tree House Exit Only 06/08/2026 2025 Existing Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 6 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 2 942 0 0 763 Future Volume (vph) 0 2 942 0 0 763 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Satd. Flow (prot) 1236 0 3471 0 0 3471 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 1236 0 3471 0 0 3471 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 399 330 1085 Travel Time (s) 9.1 4.1 13.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles (%) 33% 33% 4% 4% 4% 4% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 2 0 1035 0 0 838 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM 7th TWSC 13: US Route 9 & Tree House Exit Only 06/08/2026 2025 Existing Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 7 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 2 942 0 0 763 Future Vol, veh/h 0 2 942 0 0 763 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 33 33 4 4 4 4 Mvmt Flow 0 2 1035 0 0 838 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1454 518 0 - - - Stage 1 1035 - - - - - Stage 2 419 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.46 7.56 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.46 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.46 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.83 3.63 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 91 429 - 0 0 - Stage 1 242 - - 0 0 - Stage 2 549 - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 91 429 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 187 - - - - - Stage 1 242 - - - - - Stage 2 549 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 13.43 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 429 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.005 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - 13.4 - HCM Lane LOS - B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 - Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue 06/08/2026 2025 Existing Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 1 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 53 87 829 115 112 871 Future Volume (vph) 53 87 829 115 112 871 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 200 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1692 0 3499 0 1770 3539 Flt Permitted 0.982 0.158 Satd. Flow (perm) 1692 0 3499 0 294 3539 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 63 11 Link Speed (mph) 35 55 40 Link Distance (ft) 1221 1085 1199 Travel Time (s) 23.8 13.5 20.4 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 146 0 984 0 117 907 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Turn Type Prot NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 3 6 5 1 Permitted Phases 1 Detector Phase 3 6 5 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 20.0 11.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 65.0 65.0 25.0 90.0 Total Split (%) 41.9% 41.9% 16.1% 58.1% Maximum Green (s) 60.0 60.0 20.0 85.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 Recall Mode None Min None Min Act Effct Green (s) 9.1 24.3 38.9 38.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.42 0.67 0.67 v/c Ratio 0.46 0.67 0.27 0.38 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue 06/08/2026 2025 Existing Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 2 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Control Delay (s/veh) 20.8 16.7 5.3 5.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 20.8 16.7 5.3 5.0 LOS C B A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 20.8 16.7 5.0 Approach LOS C B A Queue Length 50th (ft) 26 133 11 57 Queue Length 95th (ft) 87 248 32 111 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1141 1005 1119 Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 Base Capacity (vph) 1595 3291 722 3539 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.30 0.16 0.26 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 155 Actuated Cycle Length: 58.4 Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.67 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 11.4 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: US Route 9 & E West Road 06/08/2026 2025 Existing Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 9 25 7 952 1015 4 Future Volume (vph) 9 25 7 952 1015 4 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 400 0 375 200 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 1599 1787 3574 3574 1599 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.220 Satd. Flow (perm) 1787 1599 414 3574 3574 1599 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 27 3 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 781 1752 2527 Travel Time (s) 17.8 21.7 31.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 10 27 8 1035 1103 4 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Turn Type Prot Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Protected Phases 7 2 5 1 Permitted Phases 7 5 1 Detector Phase 7 7 2 5 1 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 11.0 20.0 20.0 11.0 11.0 Total Split (s) 50.0 50.0 25.0 75.0 50.0 50.0 Total Split (%) 40.0% 40.0% 20.0% 60.0% 40.0% 40.0% Maximum Green (s) 45.0 45.0 20.0 70.0 45.0 45.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None Min None None Act Effct Green (s) 7.3 7.3 28.4 27.4 19.9 19.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.88 0.85 0.62 0.62 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.07 0.01 0.34 0.50 0.00 Control Delay (s/veh) 19.0 10.9 1.3 2.5 7.2 6.0 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: US Route 9 & E West Road 06/08/2026 2025 Existing Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 4 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 19.0 10.9 1.3 2.5 7.2 6.0 LOS B B A A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 13.1 2.5 7.2 Approach LOS B A A Queue Length 50th (ft) 1 0 0 0 0 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 17 21 3 74 242 5 Internal Link Dist (ft) 701 1672 2447 Turn Bay Length (ft) 400 375 200 Base Capacity (vph) 1677 1502 1428 3574 3353 1500 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.29 0.33 0.00 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 125 Actuated Cycle Length: 32.1 Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.50 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 5.0 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 2: US Route 9 & E West Road Lanes, Volumes, Timings 11: US Route 9 & Tree House Entrance Only 06/08/2026 2025 Existing Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 5 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 981 68 23 1017 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 981 68 23 1017 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 3504 0 1770 3539 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 3504 0 1770 3539 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 319 653 330 Travel Time (s) 7.3 8.1 4.1 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 1140 0 25 1105 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 13: US Route 9 & Tree House Exit Only 06/08/2026 2025 Existing Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 6 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 11 12 981 0 0 1029 Future Volume (vph) 11 12 981 0 0 1029 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Satd. Flow (prot) 1693 0 3539 0 0 3539 Flt Permitted 0.977 Satd. Flow (perm) 1693 0 3539 0 0 3539 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 336 330 1085 Travel Time (s) 7.6 4.1 13.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 25 0 1066 0 0 1118 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM 7th TWSC 13: US Route 9 & Tree House Exit Only 06/08/2026 2025 Existing Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 7 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 12 981 0 0 1029 Future Vol, veh/h 11 12 981 0 0 1029 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 12 13 1066 0 0 1118 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1626 533 0 - - - Stage 1 1066 - - - - - Stage 2 559 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 93 491 - 0 0 - Stage 1 292 - - 0 0 - Stage 2 536 - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 93 491 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 210 - - - - - Stage 1 292 - - - - - Stage 2 536 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 18.1 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 300 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.083 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - 18.1 - HCM Lane LOS - C - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.3 - Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue 06/08/2026 2025 Existing Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 1 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 51 101 687 146 127 584 Future Volume (vph) 51 101 687 146 127 584 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 200 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1684 0 3462 0 1787 3574 Flt Permitted 0.984 0.181 Satd. Flow (perm) 1684 0 3462 0 340 3574 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 75 19 Link Speed (mph) 35 55 40 Link Distance (ft) 1221 1085 1199 Travel Time (s) 23.8 13.5 20.4 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 9 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 161 0 886 0 135 621 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Turn Type Prot NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 3 6 5 1 Permitted Phases 1 Detector Phase 3 6 5 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 20.0 11.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 65.0 65.0 25.0 90.0 Total Split (%) 41.9% 41.9% 16.1% 58.1% Maximum Green (s) 60.0 60.0 20.0 85.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 Recall Mode None Min None Min Act Effct Green (s) 9.1 22.2 37.4 37.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.39 0.66 0.66 v/c Ratio 0.49 0.65 0.28 0.26 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue 06/08/2026 2025 Existing Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 2 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Control Delay (s/veh) 19.7 16.9 5.4 4.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 19.7 16.9 5.4 4.4 LOS B B A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 19.7 16.9 4.6 Approach LOS B B A Queue Length 50th (ft) 25 116 13 35 Queue Length 95th (ft) 89 225 36 71 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1141 1005 1119 Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 Base Capacity (vph) 1603 3288 753 3574 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.10 0.27 0.18 0.17 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 155 Actuated Cycle Length: 56.9 Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.65 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 12.0 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: US Route 9 & E West Road 06/08/2026 2025 Existing Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 33 29 29 871 644 11 Future Volume (vph) 33 29 29 871 644 11 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 400 0 375 200 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 1599 1787 3574 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.397 Satd. Flow (perm) 1787 1599 747 3574 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 30 11 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 781 1752 2527 Travel Time (s) 17.8 21.7 31.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 34 30 30 907 671 11 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Turn Type Prot Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Protected Phases 7 2 5 1 Permitted Phases 7 5 1 Detector Phase 7 7 2 5 1 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 11.0 20.0 20.0 11.0 11.0 Total Split (s) 50.0 50.0 25.0 75.0 50.0 50.0 Total Split (%) 40.0% 40.0% 20.0% 60.0% 40.0% 40.0% Maximum Green (s) 45.0 45.0 20.0 70.0 45.0 45.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None Min None None Act Effct Green (s) 6.6 6.6 28.7 23.7 16.9 16.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.89 0.74 0.52 0.52 v/c Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.02 0.35 0.36 0.01 Control Delay (s/veh) 16.5 9.2 1.5 3.8 8.0 6.0 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: US Route 9 & E West Road 06/08/2026 2025 Existing Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 4 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 16.5 9.2 1.5 3.8 8.0 6.0 LOS B A A A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 13.1 3.8 7.9 Approach LOS B A A Queue Length 50th (ft) 5 0 1 44 31 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 32 19 7 65 138 9 Internal Link Dist (ft) 701 1672 2447 Turn Bay Length (ft) 400 375 200 Base Capacity (vph) 1730 1549 1392 3574 3425 1532 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.25 0.20 0.01 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 125 Actuated Cycle Length: 32.2 Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.36 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 5.8 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 2: US Route 9 & E West Road Lanes, Volumes, Timings 11: US Route 9 & Tree House Entrance Only 06/08/2026 2025 Existing Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 5 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 918 68 64 662 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 918 68 64 662 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 3504 0 1770 3539 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 3504 0 1770 3539 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 316 653 330 Travel Time (s) 7.2 8.1 4.1 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 1060 0 69 712 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 13: US Route 9 & Tree House Exit Only 06/08/2026 2025 Existing Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 6 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 16 24 918 0 0 731 Future Volume (vph) 16 24 918 0 0 731 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Satd. Flow (prot) 1678 0 3539 0 0 3539 Flt Permitted 0.981 Satd. Flow (perm) 1678 0 3539 0 0 3539 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 315 330 1085 Travel Time (s) 7.2 4.1 13.5 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 43 0 977 0 0 778 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM 7th TWSC 13: US Route 9 & Tree House Exit Only 06/08/2026 2025 Existing Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 7 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 24 918 0 0 731 Future Vol, veh/h 16 24 918 0 0 731 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 1 1 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 17 26 977 0 0 778 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1365 488 0 - - - Stage 1 977 - - - - - Stage 2 389 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 138 525 - 0 0 - Stage 1 326 - - 0 0 - Stage 2 654 - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 138 525 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 252 - - - - - Stage 1 326 - - - - - Stage 2 654 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 16.12 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 366 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.116 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - 16.1 - HCM Lane LOS - C - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.4 - Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue 06/09/2026 2028 Background Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 1 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 31 91 861 73 85 749 Future Volume (vph) 31 91 861 73 85 749 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 200 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1637 0 3429 0 1752 3505 Flt Permitted 0.987 0.162 Satd. Flow (perm) 1637 0 3429 0 299 3505 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 102 7 Link Speed (mph) 35 55 40 Link Distance (ft) 1221 1085 1199 Travel Time (s) 23.8 13.5 20.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 4% 4% 3% 3% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 137 0 1049 0 96 842 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Turn Type Prot NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 3 6 5 1 Permitted Phases 1 Detector Phase 3 6 5 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 20.0 11.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 65.0 65.0 25.0 90.0 Total Split (%) 41.9% 41.9% 16.1% 58.1% Maximum Green (s) 60.0 60.0 20.0 85.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 Recall Mode None Min None Min Act Effct Green (s) 7.6 27.5 38.4 38.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.49 0.68 0.68 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.63 0.22 0.35 Control Delay (s/veh) 15.2 14.0 4.2 4.1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue 06/09/2026 2028 Background Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 2 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 15.2 14.0 4.2 4.1 LOS B B A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 15.2 14.0 4.1 Approach LOS B B A Queue Length 50th (ft) 11 135 8 43 Queue Length 95th (ft) 62 245 23 85 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1141 1005 1119 Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 Base Capacity (vph) 1566 3272 741 3505 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.32 0.13 0.24 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 155 Actuated Cycle Length: 56.4 Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.63 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 9.7 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: US Route 9 & E West Road 06/09/2026 2028 Background Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 2 2 22 986 773 2 Future Volume (vph) 2 2 22 986 773 2 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 400 0 375 200 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1504 1346 1736 3471 3471 1553 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.324 Satd. Flow (perm) 1504 1346 592 3471 3471 1553 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 2 2 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 781 1752 2527 Travel Time (s) 17.8 21.7 31.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles (%) 20% 20% 4% 4% 4% 4% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 2 2 24 1084 849 2 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Turn Type Prot Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Protected Phases 7 2 5 1 Permitted Phases 7 5 1 Detector Phase 7 7 2 5 1 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 11.0 20.0 20.0 11.0 11.0 Total Split (s) 50.0 50.0 25.0 75.0 50.0 50.0 Total Split (%) 40.0% 40.0% 20.0% 60.0% 40.0% 40.0% Maximum Green (s) 45.0 45.0 20.0 70.0 45.0 45.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None Min None None Act Effct Green (s) 7.0 7.0 25.7 27.5 18.3 18.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.24 0.88 0.95 0.63 0.63 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.33 0.39 0.00 Control Delay (s/veh) 16.0 13.5 1.5 1.3 6.0 6.0 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: US Route 9 & E West Road 06/09/2026 2028 Background Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 4 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 16.0 13.5 1.5 1.3 6.0 6.0 LOS B B A A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 14.8 1.3 6.0 Approach LOS B A A Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 0 0 0 2 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 7 6 6 84 183 4 Internal Link Dist (ft) 701 1672 2447 Turn Bay Length (ft) 400 375 200 Base Capacity (vph) 1437 1286 1469 3471 3316 1484 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.31 0.26 0.00 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 125 Actuated Cycle Length: 29.1 Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.39 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 3.4 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 2: US Route 9 & E West Road Lanes, Volumes, Timings 11: US Route 9 & Tree House Entrance Only 06/09/2026 2028 Background Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 5 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 970 2 0 786 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 970 2 0 786 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 3471 0 1827 3471 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 3471 0 1827 3471 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 406 653 330 Travel Time (s) 9.2 8.1 4.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 4% 4% 4% 4% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 1068 0 0 864 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 13: US Route 9 & Tree House Exit Only 06/09/2026 2028 Background Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 6 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 2 970 0 0 786 Future Volume (vph) 0 2 970 0 0 786 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Satd. Flow (prot) 1236 0 3471 0 0 3471 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 1236 0 3471 0 0 3471 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 399 330 1085 Travel Time (s) 9.1 4.1 13.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles (%) 33% 33% 4% 4% 4% 4% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 2 0 1066 0 0 864 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM 7th TWSC 13: US Route 9 & Tree House Exit Only 06/09/2026 2028 Background Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 7 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 2 970 0 0 786 Future Vol, veh/h 0 2 970 0 0 786 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 33 33 4 4 4 4 Mvmt Flow 0 2 1066 0 0 864 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1498 533 0 - - - Stage 1 1066 - - - - - Stage 2 432 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.46 7.56 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.46 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.46 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.83 3.63 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 84 419 - 0 0 - Stage 1 232 - - 0 0 - Stage 2 540 - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 84 419 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 179 - - - - - Stage 1 232 - - - - - Stage 2 540 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 13.65 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 419 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.005 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - 13.6 - HCM Lane LOS - B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 - Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue 06/09/2026 2028 Background Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 1 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 55 90 854 118 115 897 Future Volume (vph) 55 90 854 118 115 897 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 200 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1690 0 3499 0 1770 3539 Flt Permitted 0.981 0.151 Satd. Flow (perm) 1690 0 3499 0 281 3539 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 62 11 Link Speed (mph) 35 55 40 Link Distance (ft) 1221 1085 1199 Travel Time (s) 23.8 13.5 20.4 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 151 0 1013 0 120 934 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Turn Type Prot NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 3 6 5 1 Permitted Phases 1 Detector Phase 3 6 5 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 20.0 11.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 65.0 65.0 25.0 90.0 Total Split (%) 41.9% 41.9% 16.1% 58.1% Maximum Green (s) 60.0 60.0 20.0 85.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 Recall Mode None Min None Min Act Effct Green (s) 9.4 25.6 40.4 40.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.43 0.67 0.67 v/c Ratio 0.48 0.68 0.28 0.39 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue 06/09/2026 2028 Background Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 2 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Control Delay (s/veh) 21.7 17.0 5.5 5.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 21.7 17.0 5.5 5.1 LOS C B A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 21.7 17.0 5.1 Approach LOS C B A Queue Length 50th (ft) 28 142 12 61 Queue Length 95th (ft) 92 262 33 118 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1141 1005 1119 Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 Base Capacity (vph) 1577 3258 702 3539 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.10 0.31 0.17 0.26 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 155 Actuated Cycle Length: 60.2 Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.68 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 11.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: US Route 9 & E West Road 06/09/2026 2028 Background Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 9 26 7 981 1045 4 Future Volume (vph) 9 26 7 981 1045 4 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 400 0 375 200 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 1599 1787 3574 3574 1599 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.210 Satd. Flow (perm) 1787 1599 395 3574 3574 1599 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 28 3 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 781 1752 2527 Travel Time (s) 17.8 21.7 31.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 10 28 8 1066 1136 4 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Turn Type Prot Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Protected Phases 7 2 5 1 Permitted Phases 7 5 1 Detector Phase 7 7 2 5 1 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 11.0 20.0 20.0 11.0 11.0 Total Split (s) 50.0 50.0 25.0 75.0 50.0 50.0 Total Split (%) 40.0% 40.0% 20.0% 60.0% 40.0% 40.0% Maximum Green (s) 45.0 45.0 20.0 70.0 45.0 45.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None Min None None Act Effct Green (s) 7.3 7.3 28.9 28.0 20.4 20.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.88 0.86 0.62 0.62 v/c Ratio 0.03 0.07 0.01 0.35 0.51 0.00 Control Delay (s/veh) 19.4 10.9 1.3 2.5 7.1 6.0 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: US Route 9 & E West Road 06/09/2026 2028 Background Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 4 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 19.4 10.9 1.3 2.5 7.1 6.0 LOS B B A A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 13.1 2.5 7.1 Approach LOS B A A Queue Length 50th (ft) 1 0 0 0 0 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 17 22 3 76 252 5 Internal Link Dist (ft) 701 1672 2447 Turn Bay Length (ft) 400 375 200 Base Capacity (vph) 1673 1499 1397 3574 3346 1497 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.30 0.34 0.00 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 125 Actuated Cycle Length: 32.7 Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.51 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 5.0 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 2: US Route 9 & E West Road Lanes, Volumes, Timings 11: US Route 9 & Tree House Entrance Only 06/09/2026 2028 Background Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 5 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 1010 34 27 1048 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 1010 34 27 1048 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 3522 0 1770 3539 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 3522 0 1770 3539 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 319 653 330 Travel Time (s) 7.3 8.1 4.1 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 1135 0 29 1139 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 13: US Route 9 & Tree House Exit Only 06/09/2026 2028 Background Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 6 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 11 12 1010 0 0 1060 Future Volume (vph) 11 12 1010 0 0 1060 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Satd. Flow (prot) 1693 0 3539 0 0 3539 Flt Permitted 0.977 Satd. Flow (perm) 1693 0 3539 0 0 3539 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 336 330 1085 Travel Time (s) 7.6 4.1 13.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 25 0 1098 0 0 1152 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM 7th TWSC 13: US Route 9 & Tree House Exit Only 06/09/2026 2028 Background Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 7 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 12 1010 0 0 1060 Future Vol, veh/h 11 12 1010 0 0 1060 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 12 13 1098 0 0 1152 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1674 549 0 - - - Stage 1 1098 - - - - - Stage 2 576 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 86 480 - 0 0 - Stage 1 281 - - 0 0 - Stage 2 525 - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 86 480 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 202 - - - - - Stage 1 281 - - - - - Stage 2 525 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 18.62 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 289 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.086 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - 18.6 - HCM Lane LOS - C - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.3 - Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue 06/09/2026 2028 Background Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 1 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 53 104 708 150 131 602 Future Volume (vph) 53 104 708 150 131 602 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 200 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1684 0 3462 0 1787 3574 Flt Permitted 0.984 0.172 Satd. Flow (perm) 1684 0 3462 0 323 3574 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 75 19 Link Speed (mph) 35 55 40 Link Distance (ft) 1221 1085 1199 Travel Time (s) 23.8 13.5 20.4 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 9 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 167 0 913 0 139 640 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Turn Type Prot NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 3 6 5 1 Permitted Phases 1 Detector Phase 3 6 5 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 20.0 11.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 65.0 65.0 25.0 90.0 Total Split (%) 41.9% 41.9% 16.1% 58.1% Maximum Green (s) 60.0 60.0 20.0 85.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 Recall Mode None Min None Min Act Effct Green (s) 9.4 23.0 38.5 38.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.39 0.66 0.66 v/c Ratio 0.50 0.66 0.30 0.27 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue 06/09/2026 2028 Background Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 2 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Control Delay (s/veh) 20.5 17.5 5.5 4.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 20.5 17.5 5.5 4.5 LOS C B A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 20.5 17.5 4.7 Approach LOS C B A Queue Length 50th (ft) 28 124 14 37 Queue Length 95th (ft) 95 241 38 75 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1141 1005 1119 Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 Base Capacity (vph) 1585 3251 736 3574 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.11 0.28 0.19 0.18 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 155 Actuated Cycle Length: 58.4 Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.66 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 12.4 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: US Route 9 & E West Road 06/09/2026 2028 Background Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 34 30 30 897 663 11 Future Volume (vph) 34 30 30 897 663 11 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 400 0 375 200 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 1599 1787 3574 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.388 Satd. Flow (perm) 1787 1599 730 3574 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 31 11 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 781 1752 2527 Travel Time (s) 17.8 21.7 31.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 35 31 31 934 691 11 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Turn Type Prot Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Protected Phases 7 2 5 1 Permitted Phases 7 5 1 Detector Phase 7 7 2 5 1 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 11.0 20.0 20.0 11.0 11.0 Total Split (s) 50.0 50.0 25.0 75.0 50.0 50.0 Total Split (%) 40.0% 40.0% 20.0% 60.0% 40.0% 40.0% Maximum Green (s) 45.0 45.0 20.0 70.0 45.0 45.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None Min None None Act Effct Green (s) 6.7 6.7 28.6 23.7 17.0 17.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.89 0.73 0.53 0.53 v/c Ratio 0.10 0.09 0.03 0.36 0.37 0.01 Control Delay (s/veh) 16.6 9.1 1.5 3.9 8.0 5.9 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: US Route 9 & E West Road 06/09/2026 2028 Background Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 4 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 16.6 9.1 1.5 3.9 8.0 5.9 LOS B A A A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 13.1 3.8 7.9 Approach LOS B A A Queue Length 50th (ft) 5 0 1 46 32 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 32 20 7 67 143 9 Internal Link Dist (ft) 701 1672 2447 Turn Bay Length (ft) 400 375 200 Base Capacity (vph) 1727 1546 1386 3574 3420 1530 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.26 0.20 0.01 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 125 Actuated Cycle Length: 32.3 Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.37 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 5.8 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 2: US Route 9 & E West Road Lanes, Volumes, Timings 11: US Route 9 & Tree House Entrance Only 06/09/2026 2028 Background Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 5 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 946 70 66 682 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 946 70 66 682 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 3504 0 1770 3539 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 3504 0 1770 3539 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 316 653 330 Travel Time (s) 7.2 8.1 4.1 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 1092 0 71 733 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 13: US Route 9 & Tree House Exit Only 06/09/2026 2028 Background Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 6 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 16 25 946 0 0 753 Future Volume (vph) 16 25 946 0 0 753 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Satd. Flow (prot) 1676 0 3539 0 0 3539 Flt Permitted 0.981 Satd. Flow (perm) 1676 0 3539 0 0 3539 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 315 330 1085 Travel Time (s) 7.2 4.1 13.5 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 44 0 1006 0 0 801 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM 7th TWSC 13: US Route 9 & Tree House Exit Only 06/09/2026 2028 Background Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 7 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 25 946 0 0 753 Future Vol, veh/h 16 25 946 0 0 753 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 1 1 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 17 27 1006 0 0 801 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1407 503 0 - - - Stage 1 1006 - - - - - Stage 2 401 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 130 514 - 0 0 - Stage 1 314 - - 0 0 - Stage 2 645 - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 130 514 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 242 - - - - - Stage 1 314 - - - - - Stage 2 645 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 16.46 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 358 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.122 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - 16.5 - HCM Lane LOS - C - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.4 - Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 1 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 36 91 891 80 85 771 Future Volume (vph) 36 91 891 80 85 771 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 200 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1642 0 3429 0 1752 3505 Flt Permitted 0.986 0.152 Satd. Flow (perm) 1642 0 3429 0 280 3505 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 97 7 Link Speed (mph) 35 55 40 Link Distance (ft) 1221 1085 1199 Travel Time (s) 23.8 13.5 20.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 4% 4% 3% 3% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 142 0 1091 0 96 866 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Turn Type Prot NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 3 6 5 1 Permitted Phases 1 Detector Phase 3 6 5 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 20.0 11.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 65.0 65.0 25.0 90.0 Total Split (%) 41.9% 41.9% 16.1% 58.1% Maximum Green (s) 60.0 60.0 20.0 85.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 Recall Mode None Min None Min Act Effct Green (s) 8.0 28.6 39.5 39.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.49 0.68 0.68 v/c Ratio 0.46 0.64 0.23 0.36 Control Delay (s/veh) 16.7 14.3 4.4 4.3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 2 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 16.7 14.3 4.4 4.3 LOS B B A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 16.7 14.3 4.3 Approach LOS B B A Queue Length 50th (ft) 15 148 8 47 Queue Length 95th (ft) 69 262 23 92 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1141 1005 1119 Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 Base Capacity (vph) 1548 3222 723 3505 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.34 0.13 0.25 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 155 Actuated Cycle Length: 58 Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.64 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 10.1 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: US Route 9 & E West Road 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 2 2 22 1013 810 2 Future Volume (vph) 2 2 22 1013 810 2 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 400 0 375 200 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1504 1346 1736 3471 3471 1553 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.306 Satd. Flow (perm) 1504 1346 559 3471 3471 1553 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 2 2 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 781 1752 2527 Travel Time (s) 17.8 21.7 31.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles (%) 20% 20% 4% 4% 4% 4% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 2 2 24 1113 890 2 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Turn Type Prot Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Protected Phases 7 2 5 1 Permitted Phases 7 5 1 Detector Phase 7 7 2 5 1 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 11.0 20.0 20.0 11.0 11.0 Total Split (s) 50.0 50.0 25.0 75.0 50.0 50.0 Total Split (%) 40.0% 40.0% 20.0% 60.0% 40.0% 40.0% Maximum Green (s) 45.0 45.0 20.0 70.0 45.0 45.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None Min None None Act Effct Green (s) 7.0 7.0 26.1 27.8 18.6 18.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.24 0.89 0.95 0.63 0.63 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.34 0.41 0.00 Control Delay (s/veh) 16.5 14.0 1.4 1.3 6.1 6.0 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: US Route 9 & E West Road 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 4 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 16.5 14.0 1.4 1.3 6.1 6.0 LOS B B A A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 15.3 1.3 6.1 Approach LOS B A A Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 0 1 0 2 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 7 6 6 87 193 4 Internal Link Dist (ft) 701 1672 2447 Turn Bay Length (ft) 400 375 200 Base Capacity (vph) 1433 1282 1451 3471 3306 1479 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.32 0.27 0.00 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 125 Actuated Cycle Length: 29.4 Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.41 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 3.4 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 2: US Route 9 & E West Road Lanes, Volumes, Timings 11: US Route 9 & Tree House Entrance Only 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 5 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 1007 2 0 813 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 1007 2 0 813 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 3471 0 1827 3471 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 3471 0 1827 3471 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 406 653 330 Travel Time (s) 9.2 8.1 4.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 4% 4% 4% 4% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 1109 0 0 893 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 13: US Route 9 & Tree House Exit Only 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 6 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 2 1007 0 0 813 Future Volume (vph) 0 2 1007 0 0 813 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Satd. Flow (prot) 1236 0 3471 0 0 3471 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 1236 0 3471 0 0 3471 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 399 330 1085 Travel Time (s) 9.1 4.1 13.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles (%) 33% 33% 4% 4% 4% 4% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 2 0 1107 0 0 893 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM 7th TWSC 13: US Route 9 & Tree House Exit Only 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 7 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 2 1007 0 0 813 Future Vol, veh/h 0 2 1007 0 0 813 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 33 33 4 4 4 4 Mvmt Flow 0 2 1107 0 0 893 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1553 553 0 - - - Stage 1 1107 - - - - - Stage 2 447 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.46 7.56 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.46 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.46 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.83 3.63 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 77 405 - 0 0 - Stage 1 220 - - 0 0 - Stage 2 530 - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 77 405 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 169 - - - - - Stage 1 220 - - - - - Stage 2 530 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 13.94 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 405 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.005 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - 13.9 - HCM Lane LOS - B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 - Lanes, Volumes, Timings 15: US Route 9 & North Access 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 8 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 15 19 1006 11 14 788 Future Volume (vph) 15 19 1006 11 14 788 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1700 0 3465 0 1787 3471 Flt Permitted 0.979 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1700 0 3465 0 1787 3471 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 298 272 653 Travel Time (s) 6.8 3.4 8.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 4% 1% 1% 4% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 37 0 1117 0 15 866 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM 7th TWSC 15: US Route 9 & North Access 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 9 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 15 19 1006 11 14 788 Future Vol, veh/h 15 19 1006 11 14 788 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - 150 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 4 1 1 4 Mvmt Flow 16 21 1105 12 15 866 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1575 559 0 0 1118 0 Stage 1 1112 - - - - - Stage 2 464 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.82 6.92 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.82 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.82 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.51 3.31 - - 2.21 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 102 475 - - 627 - Stage 1 279 - - - - - Stage 2 602 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 99 475 - - 627 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 210 - - - - - Stage 1 279 - - - - - Stage 2 588 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 18.43 0 0.19 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 305 627 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.122 0.025 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 18.4 10.9 - HCM Lane LOS - - C B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.4 0.1 - Lanes, Volumes, Timings 16: US Route 9 & South Access 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 10 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 23 19 998 17 14 789 Future Volume (vph) 23 19 998 17 14 789 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 0 3462 0 1787 3471 Flt Permitted 0.974 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1719 0 3462 0 1787 3471 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 319 2527 272 Travel Time (s) 7.3 31.3 3.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 4% 1% 1% 4% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 46 0 1116 0 15 867 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM 7th TWSC 16: US Route 9 & South Access 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 11 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 23 19 998 17 14 789 Future Vol, veh/h 23 19 998 17 14 789 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - 150 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 4 1 1 4 Mvmt Flow 25 21 1097 19 15 867 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1570 558 0 0 1115 0 Stage 1 1106 - - - - - Stage 2 464 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.82 6.92 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.82 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.82 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.51 3.31 - - 2.21 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 102 476 - - 628 - Stage 1 280 - - - - - Stage 2 602 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 100 476 - - 628 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 211 - - - - - Stage 1 280 - - - - - Stage 2 587 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 20.22 0 0.19 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 282 628 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.163 0.025 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 20.2 10.9 - HCM Lane LOS - - C B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.6 0.1 - Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 1 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 64 90 884 126 115 935 Future Volume (vph) 64 90 884 126 115 935 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 200 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1698 0 3495 0 1770 3539 Flt Permitted 0.980 0.142 Satd. Flow (perm) 1698 0 3495 0 264 3539 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 53 12 Link Speed (mph) 35 55 40 Link Distance (ft) 1221 1085 1199 Travel Time (s) 23.8 13.5 20.4 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 161 0 1052 0 120 974 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Turn Type Prot NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 3 6 5 1 Permitted Phases 1 Detector Phase 3 6 5 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 20.0 11.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 65.0 65.0 25.0 90.0 Total Split (%) 41.9% 41.9% 16.1% 58.1% Maximum Green (s) 60.0 60.0 20.0 85.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 Recall Mode None Min None Min Act Effct Green (s) 10.4 27.4 42.4 42.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.43 0.67 0.67 v/c Ratio 0.50 0.69 0.29 0.41 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 2 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Control Delay (s/veh) 24.4 17.6 5.8 5.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 24.4 17.6 5.8 5.4 LOS C B A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 24.4 17.6 5.5 Approach LOS C B A Queue Length 50th (ft) 37 158 13 71 Queue Length 95th (ft) 108 283 35 132 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1141 1005 1119 Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 Base Capacity (vph) 1546 3172 675 3539 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.10 0.33 0.18 0.28 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 155 Actuated Cycle Length: 63.2 Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.69 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 12.3 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: US Route 9 & E West Road 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 9 26 7 1028 1083 4 Future Volume (vph) 9 26 7 1028 1083 4 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 400 0 375 200 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 1599 1787 3574 3574 1599 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.198 Satd. Flow (perm) 1787 1599 372 3574 3574 1599 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 28 3 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 781 1752 2527 Travel Time (s) 17.8 21.7 31.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 10 28 8 1117 1177 4 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Turn Type Prot Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Protected Phases 7 2 5 1 Permitted Phases 7 5 1 Detector Phase 7 7 2 5 1 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 11.0 20.0 20.0 11.0 11.0 Total Split (s) 50.0 50.0 25.0 75.0 50.0 50.0 Total Split (%) 40.0% 40.0% 20.0% 60.0% 40.0% 40.0% Maximum Green (s) 45.0 45.0 20.0 70.0 45.0 45.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None Min None None Act Effct Green (s) 7.4 7.4 29.3 28.7 22.9 22.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.88 0.86 0.69 0.69 v/c Ratio 0.03 0.07 0.01 0.36 0.48 0.00 Control Delay (s/veh) 20.1 11.2 1.3 2.5 6.6 5.8 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: US Route 9 & E West Road 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 4 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 20.1 11.2 1.3 2.5 6.6 5.8 LOS C B A A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 13.6 2.5 6.6 Approach LOS B A A Queue Length 50th (ft) 1 0 0 0 0 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 17 22 3 81 263 5 Internal Link Dist (ft) 701 1672 2447 Turn Bay Length (ft) 400 375 200 Base Capacity (vph) 1665 1491 1381 3574 3329 1490 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.31 0.35 0.00 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 125 Actuated Cycle Length: 33.4 Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.48 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 4.8 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 2: US Route 9 & E West Road Lanes, Volumes, Timings 11: US Route 9 & Tree House Entrance Only 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 5 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 1048 34 27 1095 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 1048 34 27 1095 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 3522 0 1770 3539 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 3522 0 1770 3539 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 319 653 330 Travel Time (s) 7.3 8.1 4.1 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 1176 0 29 1190 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 13: US Route 9 & Tree House Exit Only 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 6 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 11 12 1048 0 0 1107 Future Volume (vph) 11 12 1048 0 0 1107 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Satd. Flow (prot) 1693 0 3539 0 0 3539 Flt Permitted 0.977 Satd. Flow (perm) 1693 0 3539 0 0 3539 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 336 330 1085 Travel Time (s) 7.6 4.1 13.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 25 0 1139 0 0 1203 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM 7th TWSC 13: US Route 9 & Tree House Exit Only 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 7 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 12 1048 0 0 1107 Future Vol, veh/h 11 12 1048 0 0 1107 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 12 13 1139 0 0 1203 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1741 570 0 - - - Stage 1 1139 - - - - - Stage 2 602 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 78 465 - 0 0 - Stage 1 267 - - 0 0 - Stage 2 510 - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 78 465 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 191 - - - - - Stage 1 267 - - - - - Stage 2 510 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 19.34 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 276 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.091 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - 19.3 - HCM Lane LOS - C - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.3 - Lanes, Volumes, Timings 15: US Route 9 & North Access 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 8 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 15 22 1009 20 26 1070 Future Volume (vph) 15 22 1009 20 26 1070 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1694 0 3564 0 1787 3539 Flt Permitted 0.980 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1694 0 3564 0 1787 3539 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 298 272 653 Travel Time (s) 6.8 3.4 8.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 40 0 1119 0 28 1163 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM 7th TWSC 15: US Route 9 & North Access 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 9 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 15 22 1009 20 26 1070 Future Vol, veh/h 15 22 1009 20 26 1070 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - 150 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 2 Mvmt Flow 16 24 1097 22 28 1163 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1746 559 0 0 1118 0 Stage 1 1108 - - - - - Stage 2 638 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.82 6.92 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.82 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.82 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.51 3.31 - - 2.21 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 78 475 - - 626 - Stage 1 280 - - - - - Stage 2 491 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 75 475 - - 626 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 191 - - - - - Stage 1 280 - - - - - Stage 2 469 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 19.03 0 0.26 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 297 626 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.136 0.045 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 19 11 - HCM Lane LOS - - C B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.5 0.1 - Lanes, Volumes, Timings 16: US Route 9 & South Access 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 10 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 26 21 1006 31 24 1061 Future Volume (vph) 26 21 1006 31 24 1061 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 0 3556 0 1787 3539 Flt Permitted 0.973 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1719 0 3556 0 1787 3539 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 319 2527 272 Travel Time (s) 7.3 31.3 3.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 51 0 1127 0 26 1153 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM 7th TWSC 16: US Route 9 & South Access 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 11 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.6 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 26 21 1006 31 24 1061 Future Vol, veh/h 26 21 1006 31 24 1061 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - 150 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 2 Mvmt Flow 28 23 1093 34 26 1153 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1739 564 0 0 1127 0 Stage 1 1110 - - - - - Stage 2 629 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.82 6.92 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.82 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.82 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.51 3.31 - - 2.21 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 79 472 - - 621 - Stage 1 279 - - - - - Stage 2 496 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 76 472 - - 621 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 192 - - - - - Stage 1 279 - - - - - Stage 2 476 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 22.1 0 0.24 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 261 621 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.196 0.042 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 22.1 11 - HCM Lane LOS - - C B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.7 0.1 - Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 1 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 61 104 745 159 131 632 Future Volume (vph) 61 104 745 159 131 632 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 200 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1690 0 3462 0 1787 3574 Flt Permitted 0.982 0.159 Satd. Flow (perm) 1690 0 3462 0 299 3574 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 65 19 Link Speed (mph) 35 55 40 Link Distance (ft) 1221 1085 1199 Travel Time (s) 23.8 13.5 20.4 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 9 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 176 0 962 0 139 672 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Turn Type Prot NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 3 6 5 1 Permitted Phases 1 Detector Phase 3 6 5 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 20.0 11.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 65.0 65.0 25.0 90.0 Total Split (%) 41.9% 41.9% 16.1% 58.1% Maximum Green (s) 60.0 60.0 20.0 85.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 Recall Mode None Min None Min Act Effct Green (s) 10.4 24.9 40.8 40.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.40 0.66 0.66 v/c Ratio 0.52 0.68 0.31 0.28 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 2 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Control Delay (s/veh) 23.1 18.3 5.9 4.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 23.1 18.3 5.9 4.8 LOS C B A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 23.1 18.3 5.0 Approach LOS C B A Queue Length 50th (ft) 37 141 15 43 Queue Length 95th (ft) 112 270 40 86 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1141 1005 1119 Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 Base Capacity (vph) 1557 3180 705 3574 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.11 0.30 0.20 0.19 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 155 Actuated Cycle Length: 61.7 Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.68 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 13.2 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: US Route 9 & E West Road 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 34 30 30 936 708 11 Future Volume (vph) 34 30 30 936 708 11 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 400 0 375 200 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 1599 1787 3574 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.363 Satd. Flow (perm) 1787 1599 683 3574 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 31 11 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 781 1752 2527 Travel Time (s) 17.8 21.7 31.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 35 31 31 975 738 11 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Turn Type Prot Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Protected Phases 7 2 5 1 Permitted Phases 7 5 1 Detector Phase 7 7 2 5 1 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 11.0 20.0 20.0 11.0 11.0 Total Split (s) 50.0 50.0 25.0 75.0 50.0 50.0 Total Split (%) 40.0% 40.0% 20.0% 60.0% 40.0% 40.0% Maximum Green (s) 45.0 45.0 20.0 70.0 45.0 45.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None Min None None Act Effct Green (s) 6.7 6.7 29.0 24.3 17.6 17.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.88 0.74 0.54 0.54 v/c Ratio 0.10 0.09 0.03 0.37 0.39 0.01 Control Delay (s/veh) 17.1 9.4 1.5 3.9 7.9 5.7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: US Route 9 & E West Road 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 4 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 17.1 9.4 1.5 3.9 7.9 5.7 LOS B A A A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 13.5 3.8 7.9 Approach LOS B A A Queue Length 50th (ft) 5 0 1 50 34 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 33 20 7 71 153 9 Internal Link Dist (ft) 701 1672 2447 Turn Bay Length (ft) 400 375 200 Base Capacity (vph) 1720 1540 1368 3574 3407 1524 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.27 0.22 0.01 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 125 Actuated Cycle Length: 32.8 Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.39 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 5.8 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 2: US Route 9 & E West Road Lanes, Volumes, Timings 11: US Route 9 & Tree House Entrance Only 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 5 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 992 70 66 720 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 992 70 66 720 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 3504 0 1770 3539 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 3504 0 1770 3539 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 316 653 330 Travel Time (s) 7.2 8.1 4.1 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 1142 0 71 774 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 13: US Route 9 & Tree House Exit Only 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 6 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 16 25 992 0 0 791 Future Volume (vph) 16 25 992 0 0 791 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Satd. Flow (prot) 1676 0 3539 0 0 3539 Flt Permitted 0.981 Satd. Flow (perm) 1676 0 3539 0 0 3539 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 315 330 1085 Travel Time (s) 7.2 4.1 13.5 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 44 0 1055 0 0 841 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM 7th TWSC 13: US Route 9 & Tree House Exit Only 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 7 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 25 992 0 0 791 Future Vol, veh/h 16 25 992 0 0 791 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 1 1 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 17 27 1055 0 0 841 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1476 528 0 - - - Stage 1 1055 - - - - - Stage 2 421 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 117 495 - 0 0 - Stage 1 296 - - 0 0 - Stage 2 630 - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 117 495 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 228 - - - - - Stage 1 296 - - - - - Stage 2 630 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 17.15 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 340 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.128 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - 17.2 - HCM Lane LOS - C - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.4 - Lanes, Volumes, Timings 15: US Route 9 & North Access 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 8 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 19 26 948 17 22 690 Future Volume (vph) 19 26 948 17 22 690 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1698 0 3564 0 1787 3574 Flt Permitted 0.980 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1698 0 3564 0 1787 3574 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 298 272 653 Travel Time (s) 6.8 3.4 8.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 0 1037 0 24 742 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM 7th TWSC 15: US Route 9 & North Access 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 9 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.6 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 19 26 948 17 22 690 Future Vol, veh/h 19 26 948 17 22 690 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - 150 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 20 28 1019 18 24 742 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1447 519 0 0 1038 0 Stage 1 1028 - - - - - Stage 2 418 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.82 6.92 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.82 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.82 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.51 3.31 - - 2.21 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 123 504 - - 672 - Stage 1 308 - - - - - Stage 2 635 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 119 504 - - 672 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 233 - - - - - Stage 1 308 - - - - - Stage 2 613 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 17.4 0 0.33 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 339 672 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.143 0.035 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 17.4 10.6 - HCM Lane LOS - - C B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.5 0.1 - Lanes, Volumes, Timings 16: US Route 9 & South Access 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 10 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 30 24 944 26 20 689 Future Volume (vph) 30 24 944 26 20 689 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 0 3560 0 1787 3574 Flt Permitted 0.973 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1719 0 3560 0 1787 3574 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 319 2527 272 Travel Time (s) 7.3 31.3 3.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 58 0 1043 0 22 741 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM 7th TWSC 16: US Route 9 & South Access 06/09/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 11 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 30 24 944 26 20 689 Future Vol, veh/h 30 24 944 26 20 689 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - 150 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 32 26 1015 28 22 741 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1442 522 0 0 1043 0 Stage 1 1029 - - - - - Stage 2 413 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.82 6.92 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.82 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.82 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.51 3.31 - - 2.21 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 124 502 - - 669 - Stage 1 308 - - - - - Stage 2 639 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 120 502 - - 669 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 234 - - - - - Stage 1 308 - - - - - Stage 2 618 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 19.44 0 0.3 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 307 669 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.189 0.032 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 19.4 10.6 - HCM Lane LOS - - C B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.7 0.1 - 6-7am 7-8am 8-9am 9-10am 10-11am 11-12pm 12-1pm 1-2pm 2-3pm 3-4pm 4-5pm 5-6pm 6-7pm % of AADT* 4.00% 7.10% 6.30% 4.30% 4.25% 4.50% 4.50% 4.45% 4.70% 6.20% 9.00% 9.60% 7.35% EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 approach total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBL 8 15 13 9 9 10 7 7 7 10 14 15 11 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 11 19 17 12 11 12 10 10 11 14 21 22 17 approach total 19 34 30 21 20 22 17 17 18 24 35 37 28 NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 567 1006 893 609 602 638 473 468 494 652 946 1009 773 NBR 6 11 10 7 7 7 9 9 10 13 19 20 15 approach total 573 1017 902 616 609 645 482 477 504 665 965 1029 788 SBL 8 14 12 8 8 9 12 12 13 17 24 26 20 SBT 444 788 699 477 472 499 502 496 524 691 1003 1070 819 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 approach total 452 802 712 486 480 508 514 508 537 708 1028 1096 839 total 1044 1853 1644 1122 1109 1174 1013 1002 1058 1396 2027 2162 1655 *AADT Percentages based on Figure 3-5, Typical variation in hourly volumes on urban streets. Morning volumes (6:00 am to 12:00 pm) are based on morning peak hour volumes. Evening volumes (12:00 pm to 7:00 pm) are based on evening peak hour volumes. Volume of Trips by Time of Day US Route 9 @ North Site Access - 2028 Build Condition 6-7am 7-8am 8-9am 9-10am 10-11am 11-12pm 12-1pm 1-2pm 2-3pm 3-4pm 4-5pm 5-6pm 6-7pm % of AADT* 4.00% 7.10% 6.30% 4.30% 4.25% 4.50% 4.50% 4.45% 4.70% 6.20% 9.00% 9.60% 7.35% EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 approach total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBL 13 23 20 14 14 15 12 12 13 17 24 26 20 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 11 19 17 12 11 12 10 10 10 14 20 21 16 approach total 24 42 37 25 25 27 22 22 23 30 44 47 36 NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 562 998 886 604 597 633 473 468 494 652 946 1009 773 NBR 10 17 15 10 10 11 15 14 15 20 29 31 24 approach total 572 1015 901 615 608 643 488 482 509 672 975 1040 796 SBL 8 14 12 8 8 9 11 11 12 16 23 24 18 SBT 445 789 700 478 472 500 497 492 519 685 995 1061 812 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 approach total 452 803 713 486 481 509 509 503 531 701 1017 1085 831 total 1048 1860 1650 1126 1113 1179 1018 1007 1063 1403 2036 2172 1663 *AADT Percentages based on Figure 3-5, Typical variation in hourly volumes on urban streets. Morning volumes (6:00 am to 12:00 pm) are based on morning peak hour volumes. Evening volumes (12:00 pm to 7:00 pm) are based on evening peak hour volumes. Volume of Trips by Time of Day US Route 9 @ South Site Access - 2028 Build Condition Proposed Multi-Use Development – Saratoga Springs, NY Proposed Site Driveways @ US Route 9 2028 Build Condition 6/8/2026 DEFINITIONS and CHECK of TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS The Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) published by the Federal Highway Administration lists 8 minimum warrants for signalization. Primary ones reviewed follows: Warrant 1: Eight Hour Vehicular Volume Condition A – Minimum Vehicular Volume is met when the traffic volumes for any eight hours of an average day meet the minimum requirements given in Table 4C-1 of the MUTCD based on the number of approach lanes to the intersection. For the major street, the total volume for both approaches is used. For the minor street, the higher volume approach (one direction only) is used. The same 8 hour-period should be used for both the major street and the minor street. • Two through lanes per direction on mainline – Volume must exceed 600 vehicles • One lane on side street – Volume must exceed 150 vehicles o Mainline Thresholds are met for 13 hrs – Both Driveways o Side Street Thresholds are met for 0 hrs – Both Driveways Warrant #1, Condition A: Not Met at Either Driveway Condition B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic accommodates operating conditions where extremely heavy major-street traffic causes excessive delay or hazards to the minor street traffic. The warrant is satisfied when the traffic volumes of any 8 hours of an average day meet the minimum requirements given in Table 4C-1 of the MUTCD and the signal installation will not seriously disrupt progressive traffic flow on the major street. For the major street, the total volume for both approaches is used. For the minor street, the higher volume approach (one direction only) is used. The same 8 hour-period should be used for both the major street and the minor street. • Two through lanes per direction on mainline – Volume must exceed 900 vehicles • One lane on side street – Volume must exceed 75 vehicles o Mainline Thresholds are met for 13 hrs – Both Driveways o Side Street Thresholds are met for 0 hrs – Both Driveways Warrant #1 – Condition B: Not Met at Either Driveway Combination of Conditions A and B recognizes that there are occasional cases in which signalization may be justified but the locations do not meet the minimum requirements of a single warrant. This condition permits a signal installation to be considered where Conditions A and B, are satisfied to the extent of 80% of the established numerical value. For the major street, the total volume for both approaches is used. For the minor street, the higher volume approach (one direction only) is used. The same 8 hour-period should be used for both the major street and the minor street. • 80% Condition A – Mainline greater than 480 vehicles, Side Street greater than 120 vehicles • 80% Condition B – Mainline greater than 720 vehicles, Side Street greater than 60 vehicles Condition A • Mainline Thresholds are met for 13 hrs – Both Driveways • Side Street Thresholds are met for 0 hrs – Both Driveways Condition B • Mainline Thresholds are met for 13 hrs – Both Driveways • Side Street Thresholds are met for 0 hrs – Both Driveways Warrant #1 - Combination of Conditions A and B: Not Met at Either Driveway Warrant 2: Four-Hour Vehicular Volume is based on 4-hour volumes instead of the eight hour volumes used in Warrants 1, 2 and 8. The wording of the warrant states that this warrant is satisfied (for urban locations) when, for each of any 4 hours of an average day, the plotted points representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding vehicles per hour on the higher-volume minor-street approach (one direction only) exceed the curve shown in Figure 4C-1 of the MUTCD. Volume Thresholds are met for 0 hrs – Both Driveways Warrant #2 – Four Hour Vehicular Volume: Not Met at Either Driveway Warrant 3: Peak-Hour is satisfied when all the following conditions are met: • The total delay experienced by the traffic on the side street controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds 4 vehicle-hours for a one lane approach and 5 vehicle hours for a two-lane approach. • The volume on the side-street approaches equals or exceeds 100 vph for a one-lane approach or 150 vph for a two-lane approach. • The total entering volume serviced during this hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four (or more) approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. Delays and volumes without traffic signal do not meet warrant – Both Driveways Warrant #3 – Peak Hour: Not Met at Either Driveway Warrant #4 – Pedestrian Volume – The existing pedestrian volumes are minimal in the area and would not meet the warrant. Warrant #4 – Pedestrian Volume: Not Met at Either Driveway Warrant #5 – School Crossing – not applicable Warrant #5 – School Crossing – Not Applicable at Either Driveway Warrant #6 – Coordinated Signal System – not applicable Warrant #6 – Coordinated Signal System: Not Applicable at Either Driveway Warrant #7 – Crash Experience – not applicable – No significant crash history in study area. Warrant #7 – Crash Experience: Not Applicable at Either Driveway Warrant #8 – Roadway Network – not applicable Warrant #8 – Roadway Network: Not Applicable at Either Driveway Attachment 8 Traffic Responses to Comments 1396 White Bridge Road Chittenango, NY 13037 Tel: (315) 391-5110 July 22, 2026 Bohler Engineering 17 Computer Drive West Albany, NY 12205 Attn: Mr. Steve Wilson Re: Response to 7/17/2026 CME Comments Traffic Impact Study Proposal – Proposed Mixed Use Development US Route 9, Saratoga Springs, NY Dear Mr. Wilson: I have reviewed the July 17th, 2026 comments from Creighton Manning Engineers regarding the June 8th, 2026 updated traffic impact study for the proposed mixed use development on US Route 9 in Saratoga Springs, NY. The following provides a summary of additional comments in bold italics, followed by my responses. It is noted that CME did not maintain the comment numbering from the previous comments (for example, what is noted as comment #21 in the July comments was #24 in the April comments), therefore the original comment numbering was maintained in this response. Comment #11 - The crash analysis that covers the March 2022 to February 2025 time period adequately summarizes crashes on US Route 9. With that being said, it is noted that the “beer-to-go” opening of the Tree House Brewery occurred in December 2024; however, the actual taproom did not open until March of 2025. This indicates that the crash assessment did not capture conditions when this neighboring facility was fully operational. A new request of crashes should be made to summarize current conditions. Has crash frequency increased on this section of US Route 9 since the opening of the Tree House Brewery? GTS Consulting Response: A crash analysis was completed for US Route 9 between Crescent Avenue and E West Road using history reports obtained for a four year period from May 2022 through May 2026. CM Response: A review of the data indicates that the number of crashes generally did not change after development of the Tree House Brewery as summarized in Table 1. Table 1 – Crashes by Year Year Total Crashes May 2022-December 2022 (8 months) 9 January 2023-December 2023 (12 months) 6 January 2024-December 2024 (12 months) 8 Approximate Opening of Tree House Brewery -- January 2025-December 2025 (12 months) 8 January 2026-May 2026 (5 months) 3 No additional response is necessary. Mr. Wilson July 22, 2026 Page 2 of 6 Re: Response to 7/17/2026 CME Comments Traffic Impact Study Proposal – Proposed Mixed Use Development US Route 9, Saratoga Springs, NY Comment #12 - Provide the detailed MV-104 reports for the crashes so that the severity and cause of these incidents can be reviewed. It is noted that there was a fatality in the project corridor on September 30, 2025. GTS Consulting Response: Overall, there were 30 property damage only crashes with 4 injury crashes and 1 fatality crashes. The fatality crash occurred on September 30th, 2025 involving a tractor t railer traveling southbound on US Route 9 striking at pickup truck that stopped on the southbound shoulder of the roadway. CM Response: The MV-104 reports were included in the updated letter. A review of the injury related crashes indicates that two occurred when a southbound motorist failed to yield the right -of-way to a northbound vehicle when turning into the Homewood Suites parking lot. The other injury crash occurred at the E West Road traffic signal when a southbound motorist rear -ended vehicles waiti ng at the traffic light due to alcohol involvement. The other injury crash noted in the letter had nothing to do with the vehicle incident. The driver was taken to the hospital due to an unrelated medical issue. The unfortunate fatal crash occurred when a truck driver failed to keep left and struck a vehicle/driver who had stopped on the shoulder of US Route 9. No additional response is necessary. Trip Generation and Distribution Comment #17 - The trip distribution assumes that the majority of traffic (8 0%) will use the northern driveway; however, the most recent site plan shows that the southern driveway provides access to approximately 55% of the parking spaces and appears to be the main access into the site. The trip distribution should be updated to reflect this. In addition, motorists generally do not pass the first driveway they come to in order to access a development. GTS Consulting Response: Based on existing traffic patterns and population centers in the area, 50% of the new trips generated are expected to travel to/from the south on US Route 9, 40% are expected to travel to/from the north on US Route 9, and 10% are expected to travel to/from the east on Crescent Avenue. The expected arrival/departure distribution is shown in Figure 3. CM Response: There is a minor error on Figure 3 for the southbound through movement at the southern site driveway. This did not impact future trip assignments or analysis. No additional response is necessary. Mr. Wilson July 22, 2026 Page 3 of 6 Re: Response to 7/17/2026 CME Comments Traffic Impact Study Proposal – Proposed Mixed Use Development US Route 9, Saratoga Springs, NY Build Operations Comment #19 - A discussion of int ersection control is not provided for the proposed Site Driveway intersections on US Route 9. The Synchro analysis indicates that these will operate under stop -sign control with a single lane entering and exiting the site; however, the most recent plan shows separate left and right turn lanes exiting the site and two entering lanes at the southern driveway. Provide the anticipated geometry at these locations. Was a traffic signal warrant considered at the site driveway locations? GTS Consulting Response: A signal warrant analysis was completed for the site driveway intersections at US Route 9 to confirm that signals are not warranted at either location with the proposed full build out of the proposed mixed use development. The 2028 weekday morning and evening peak hour build traffic volumes for the approaches to both intersections were extrapolated over a typical day from 6am to 7pm based on the typical variation in hourly volumes on urban streets, developed by the Traffic Institute at Northwestern University. The morning peak hour volumes were extrapolated from 6am to 12pm, and the evening peak hour volumes were extrapolated from 12pm to 7pm. Both the typical variation in traffic graphic and estimated hourly traffic volumes at each intersection have been attached. A traffic signal is not warranted at either of the two proposed site driveways. CM Response: A review of the daily traffic volumes developed at the site access intersections used general hourly variations provided by The Traffic Institute at Northea stern University for an urban road. Since US Route 9 and the proposed uses will generate traffic differently over the course of a typical day, the hourly traffic volumes for the signal warrant should be revised based on the following: • US Route 9 Through Volumes – Use hourly variation data that can be obtained from the existing ATR on US Route 9. • Site Generated Trips – Use the “Time of Day Trip Distribution – Vehicle” data provided by ITE in the Trip Generation Manual Appendix to develop hourly traffic assumptions associated with entering/exiting traffic for each specific land use since apartments, hotels, and commercial spaces generate trips differently over the course of a typical day. A review of the warrant assessment indicates that operating speeds on US Route 9 were not applied to the various volume thresholds. These should be updated since the thresholds are reduced when mainline speeds exceed 40-mph. It is noted that NYSDOT has not provided comments regarding access to the site. Section 5A.4.1.3 of th e Highway Design Manual (HDM) – Chapter 5 Appendix 5A (POLICY and STANDARDS for the Design of Entrances to State Highways) indicates that, “Normally only one driveway shall be permitted for each residential property, minor commercial property, and subdivision. An additional driveway may be permitted by the Department if both sufficient frontage exists, and extenuating circumstances justify a Mr. Wilson July 22, 2026 Page 4 of 6 Re: Response to 7/17/2026 CME Comments Traffic Impact Study Proposal – Proposed Mixed Use Development US Route 9, Saratoga Springs, NY second driveway.” Will a traffic signal be warranted if NYSDOT eliminates one of the driveways or restricts access to one of the curb -cuts in order to minimize conflict points on US Route 9? The signal warrant assessment should be updated to reflect the revised traffic conditions, reduced volume thresholds, and potential access modifications (one or two points of access). As requested, revised hourly traffic volumes were generated assuming a worst case single access driveway on US Route 9. The north/south through volumes on US Route 9 were taken from the existing ATR count on US Route 9. The site generated trips were extrapolated for each land use separately based on the ITE Time of Day Trip Distribution data in the ITE Trip Generation Manual Appendix. The hourly traffic volume calculations have been attached. A revised signal warrant analysis was completed using the 70% volume thresholds given that operating speeds on US Route 9 are over 40mph. Signal Warrant #1 – Condition A – With a single access driveway, the driveway traffic volumes would not meet the reduced 105 vehicle warrant threshold for any hour during a typical weekday. The driveway volumes will certainly not meet the warrant with the two proposed driveways. Signal Warrant #1 – Condition B – With a single access driveway, the driveway traffic volumes would meet the reduced 53 vehicle warrant threshold for 12 hours during a typical weekday by approximately 10-20 vehicles per hour. With traffic volumes projected to be fairly evenly split (55%/45%) between the two proposed driveways, the driveway volumes would not meet the reduced warrant thresholds for any hour during a typical weekday with two driveways. Signal Warrant #1 – Combination A and B - With a single access driveway, the driveway traffic volumes would not meet the reduced 84 vehicle warrant threshold for any hour during a typical weekday. The driveway volumes will certainly not meet the warrant with the two proposed driveways. Signal Warrant #2 – Four Hour - With a single access driveway, the driveway traffic volumes would meet the reduced 60 vehicle warrant threshold for 10 hours during a typical weekday by approximately 10-20 vehicles per hour. With traffic volumes projected to be fairly evenly split (55%/45%) between the two proposed driveways, the driveway volumes would not meet the reduced warrant thresholds for any hour during a typical weekday with two driveways. Signal Warrant #3 – Capacity analyses were completed for a single driveway with combined 2028 build traffic volumes during the three peak hours and have been attached. With a single access driveway, the side approach is projected to operate at LOS D or better during the three peak hours. Delays do not meet the warrant thresholds with a single access and would certainly not with two driveways. The detailed signal warrant analysis has been attached. NYSDOT will make the determination on whether they will permit two driveways as proposed, as well as if a traffic signal is required. It is noted that there will be two separate parcels for the hotel and multifamily uses, which will support NYSDOT’s permitting of the two proposed curb cuts. Mr. Wilson July 22, 2026 Page 5 of 6 Re: Response to 7/17/2026 CME Comments Traffic Impact Study Proposal – Proposed Mixed Use Development US Route 9, Saratoga Springs, NY Attachments Comment #24 - It is unclear if the HV column (Heavy Vehicles) are in addition to the counts noted by movement since they are added to get the total intersection volume. The “Heavy Vehicles” can be added to the peak hour summary sheet by movement and should be provided to confirm that they do not need to be added separately to each intersection movement. GTS Consulting Response: Not answered. CM Response: This comment was not specifically addressed. Please indicate if heavy vehicles are included in the traffic volumes shown on the Figures. There was a response to the April comment, repeated below: The heavy vehicles are included in each separate movement and called out separately to determine approach percentages. They should not be added to the intersection movements. Comment #25 - Why is the Synchro Percentile Delay level of service reports used at the signalized intersections instead of the HCM 7th edition reports? GTS Consulting Response: Not answered. CM Response: This comment was not specifically addressed. Please indicate why the HCM 7th edition was not used. There was a response to the April comment, repeated below: The Synchro reports are used instead the HCM 7th Edition reports because the HCM does not support the phase numbering used by NYSDOT at the signalized intersections. Comment #26 - The analysis for the unsignalized intersections should account for the two -way left-turn lane (TWLTL) since motorists existing the development can make a two -stage left-turn to travel south on US Route 9. GTS Consulting Response: Not applied. CM Response: This comment was not specifically addressed; however, it is noted that the unsignalized intersections operate adequately even without the TWLTL which would improve LOS conditions. This should be updated if the site driveway intersection analysis is updated to address future comments. Mr. Wilson July 22, 2026 Page 6 of 6 Re: Response to 7/17/2026 CME Comments Traffic Impact Study Proposal – Proposed Mixed Use Development US Route 9, Saratoga Springs, NY There was a response to the April comment, repeated below: The two way center left turn lane is included in the analysis models. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call. Sincerely, Gordon T. Stansbury, P.E., P.T.O.E. GTS Consulting Attachments Updated Hourly Volumes Updated Signal Warrant Analysis Single Access Capacity Analysis Printouts Entering Exiting Apartments-128Units-ITELU220 397 397 Retail-9800SF-ITELU822 267 267 Hotel-120Rooms-ITELU310 350 350 DistributionofTrips-50%/50%SplitTo/FromNorthandSouthonUSRoute9 Hour Entering Exiting Entering Exiting Entering Exiting WBLeft WBRight NBRight SBLeft WBLeft WBRight NBRight SBLeft WBLeft WBRight NBRight SBLeft 6-7am 1.4%6.9%0.5%0.5%0.8%2.2%14 14 3 3 1 1 1 1 4 4 1 1 7-8am 2.0%10.8%2.2%2.2%2.4%8.2%21 21 4 4 3 3 3 3 14 14 4 4 8-9am 3.1%8.5%4.5%4.5%3.3%6.3%17 17 6 6 6 6 6 6 11 11 6 6 9-10am 2.9%4.9%5.8%5.8%4.8%6.7%10 10 6 6 8 8 8 8 12 12 8 8 10-11am 2.4%4.8%6.5%6.5%5.9%7.8%9 9 5 5 9 9 9 9 14 14 10 10 11am-12pm 3.8%4.7%6.3%6.3%7.4%8.1%9 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 14 14 13 13 12-1pm 4.5%4.1%6.1%6.1%10.3%6.2%8 8 9 9 8 8 8 8 11 11 18 18 1-2pm 4.0%4.4%6.9%6.9%10.7%7.2%9 9 8 8 9 9 9 9 13 13 19 19 2-3pm 5.6%4.9%6.1%6.1%7.8%8.0%10 10 11 11 8 8 8 8 14 14 14 14 3-4pm 6.9%5.3%7.4%7.4%8.2%7.0%11 11 14 14 10 10 10 10 12 12 14 14 4-5pm 10.1%5.6%8.0%8.0%7.1%7.6%11 11 20 20 11 11 11 11 13 13 12 12 5-6pm 11.4%7.6%8.0%8.0%8.8%6.5%15 15 23 23 11 11 11 11 11 11 15 15 6-7pm 9.7%6.7%8.0%8.0%5.4%4.8%13 13 19 19 11 11 11 11 8 8 9 9 Hour NBThru SBThru WBLeft WBRight NBRight SBLeft WB NB SB 6-7am 503 377 18 18 5 5 36 508 382 7-8am 800 687 39 39 11 11 78 811 698 8-9am 969 680 34 34 18 18 68 987 698 9-10am 848 595 29 29 22 22 58 870 617 10-11am 810 576 32 32 24 24 64 834 600 11am-12pm 929 635 32 32 29 29 64 958 664 12-1pm 915 649 27 27 35 35 55 950 684 1-2pm 859 630 31 31 36 36 61 895 666 2-3pm 803 690 32 32 33 33 64 836 723 3-4pm 855 852 33 33 38 38 65 893 890 4-5pm 952 950 35 35 43 43 70 995 993 5-6pm 1013 846 37 37 49 49 74 1062 895 6-7pm 835 603 32 32 39 39 65 874 642 ITEHourlyDistributionofTrips(PercentageofDailyVolume) TripsGenerated TotalApproachVolumes ProposedMixedUseDevelopment-USRoute9-SaratogaSprings,NY UpdatedHourlyApproachVolumes-AssumingOneAccess Apartments-LU220 Hotel-LU310 ApartmentTripsGenerated RetailTripsGenerated HotelTripsGenerated USRoute9Volumes 2024ATRCount OverallWeekday Retail-LU822 Proposed Multi-Use Development – Saratoga Springs, NY Single Site Driveway @ US Route 9 2028 Build Condition 7/21/2026 DEFINITIONS and CHECK of TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS The Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) published by the Federal Highway Administration lists 8 minimum warrants for signalization. Primary ones reviewed follows: Warrant 1: Eight Hour Vehicular Volume Condition A – Minimum Vehicular Volume is met when the traffic volumes for any eight hours of an average day meet the minimum requirements given in Table 4C-1 of the MUTCD based on the number of approach lanes to the intersection. For the major street, the total volume for both approaches is used. For the minor street, the higher volume approach (one direction only) is used. The same 8 hour-period should be used for both the major street and the minor street. Thresholds have been reduced to 70% due to operating speeds over 40mph on US Route 9. • Two through lanes per direction on mainline – Volume must exceed 420 vehicles • One lane on side street – Volume must exceed 105 vehicles o Mainline Thresholds are met for 13 hrs o Side Street Threshold s are met for 0 hrs Warrant #1, Condition A: Not Met Condition B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic accommodates operating conditions where extremely heavy major-street traffic causes excessive delay or hazards to the minor street traffic. The warrant is satisfied when the traffic volumes of any 8 hours of an average day meet the minimum requirements given in Table 4C-1 of the MUTCD and the signal installation will not seriously disrupt progressive traffic flow on the major street. For the major street, the total volume for both approaches is used. For the minor street, the higher volume approach (one direction only) is used. The same 8 hour -period should be used for both the major street and the minor street. Thresholds have been reduced to 70% due to operating speeds over 40mph on US Route 9. • Two through lanes per direction on mainline – Volume must exceed 630 vehicles • One lane on side street – Volume must exceed 53 vehicles o Mainline Thresholds are met for 13 hrs – Both Driveways o Side Street Thresholds are met for 12 hrs – Both Driveways Warrant #1 – Condition B: Met Combination of Conditions A and B recognizes that there are occasional cases in which signalization may be justified but the locations do not meet the minimum requirements of a single warrant. This condition permits a signal installation to be considered where Conditions A and B, are satisfied to the extent o f 80% of the established numerical value. For the major street, the total volume for both approaches is used. For the minor street, the higher volume approach (one direction only) is used. The same 8 hour -period should be used for both the major street and the minor street. Thresholds have been reduced to 70% due to operating speeds over 40mph on US Route 9. • 80% Condition A – Mainline greater than 336 vehicles, Side Street greater than 84 vehicles • 80% Condition B – Mainline greater than 504 vehicles, Side Street greater than 42 vehicles Condition A • Mainline Thresholds are met for 13 hrs – Both Driveways • Side Street Thresholds are met for 0 hrs – Both Driveways Condition B • Mainline Thresholds are met for 13 hrs – Both Driveways • Side Street Thresholds are met for 12 hrs – Both Driveways Warrant #1 - Combination of Conditions A and B: Not Met Warrant 2: Four-Hour Vehicular Volume is based on 4-hour volumes instead of the eight hour volumes used in Warrants 1, 2 and 8. The wording of t he warrant states that this warrant is satisfied (for urban locations) when, for each of any 4 hours of an average day, the plotted points representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding vehicles per hour on the higher -volume minor-street approach (one direction only) exceed the curve shown in Figure 4C-2 of the MUTCD. Thresholds have been reduced to 70% due to operating speeds over 40mph on US Route 9. Volume Threshold s are met for 10 hrs Warrant #2 – Four Hour Vehicular Volume: Met Warrant 3: Peak-Hour is satisfied when all the following conditions are met: • The total delay experienced by the traffic on the side street controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds 4 vehicle-hours for a one lane approach and 5 vehicle hours for a two -lane approach. • The volume on the side-street approaches equals or exceeds 100 vph for a one -lane approach or 150 vph for a two-lane approach. • The total entering volume serviced during this hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four (or more) approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. Delays without traffic signal do not meet warrant Warrant #3 – Peak Hour: Not Met Warrant #4 – Pedestrian Volume – The existing pedestrian volumes are minimal in the area and would not meet the warrant. Warrant #4 – Pedestrian Volume: Not Met Warrant #5 – School Crossing – not applicable Warrant #5 – School Crossing – Not Applicable Warrant #6 – Coordinated Signal System – not applicable Warrant #6 – Coordinated Signal System: Not Applicable Warrant #7 – Crash Experience – not applicable – No significant crash history in study area. Warrant #7 – Crash Experience: Not Applicable Warrant #8 – Roadway Network – not applicable Warrant #8 – Roadway Network: Not Applicable Lanes, Volumes, Timings 16: US Route 9 & South Access 07/21/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 1 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 38 38 987 28 28 774 Future Volume (vph) 38 38 987 28 28 774 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 0 3460 0 1787 3471 Flt Permitted 0.976 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1711 0 3460 0 1787 3471 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 319 2527 272 Travel Time (s) 7.3 31.3 3.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 4% 1% 1% 4% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 84 0 1116 0 31 851 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM 7th TWSC 16: US Route 9 & South Access 07/21/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 38 38 987 28 28 774 Future Vol, veh/h 38 38 987 28 28 774 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - 150 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 4 1 1 4 Mvmt Flow 42 42 1085 31 31 851 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1587 558 0 0 1115 0 Stage 1 1100 - - - - - Stage 2 487 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.82 6.92 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.82 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.82 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.51 3.31 - - 2.21 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 100 476 - - 628 - Stage 1 282 - - - - - Stage 2 586 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 95 476 - - 628 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 208 - - - - - Stage 1 282 - - - - - Stage 2 558 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 22.37 0 0.39 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 290 628 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.288 0.049 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 22.4 11 - HCM Lane LOS - - C B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.2 0.2 - Lanes, Volumes, Timings 16: US Route 9 & South Access 07/21/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 1 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 41 43 986 51 50 1046 Future Volume (vph) 41 43 986 51 50 1046 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1709 0 3549 0 1787 3539 Flt Permitted 0.976 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1709 0 3549 0 1787 3539 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 319 2527 272 Travel Time (s) 7.3 31.3 3.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 92 0 1127 0 54 1137 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM 7th TWSC 16: US Route 9 & South Access 07/21/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 41 43 986 51 50 1046 Future Vol, veh/h 41 43 986 51 50 1046 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - 150 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 2 Mvmt Flow 45 47 1072 55 54 1137 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1777 564 0 0 1127 0 Stage 1 1099 - - - - - Stage 2 677 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.82 6.92 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.82 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.82 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.51 3.31 - - 2.21 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 75 472 - - 621 - Stage 1 283 - - - - - Stage 2 469 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 68 472 - - 621 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 185 - - - - - Stage 1 283 - - - - - Stage 2 428 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 25.18 0 0.52 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 268 621 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.34 0.087 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 25.2 11.3 - HCM Lane LOS - - D B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.5 0.3 - Lanes, Volumes, Timings 16: US Route 9 & South Access 07/21/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 1 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 49 50 927 43 42 670 Future Volume (vph) 49 50 927 43 42 670 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 0 3549 0 1787 3574 Flt Permitted 0.976 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1711 0 3549 0 1787 3574 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 319 2527 272 Travel Time (s) 7.3 31.3 3.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 107 0 1043 0 45 720 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM 7th TWSC 16: US Route 9 & South Access 07/21/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 49 50 927 43 42 670 Future Vol, veh/h 49 50 927 43 42 670 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - 150 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 53 54 997 46 45 720 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1470 522 0 0 1043 0 Stage 1 1020 - - - - - Stage 2 451 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.82 6.92 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.82 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.82 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.51 3.31 - - 2.21 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 119 502 - - 669 - Stage 1 311 - - - - - Stage 2 612 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 111 502 - - 669 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 229 - - - - - Stage 1 311 - - - - - Stage 2 570 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 22.11 0 0.64 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 315 669 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.337 0.068 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 22.1 10.8 - HCM Lane LOS - - C B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.4 0.2 - Attachment 9 Third-Party Traffic Consultant Sign-Off Letter MEMORANDUM To: City of Saratoga Springs, Office of Engineering Date: August 14, 2026 From: Dale T. (Skip) Francis, PE, Client Manager Mark Nadolny, Traffic Reviewer Mark Sargent, PE, Traffic Reviewer RE: Proposed Rt 9 / South Broadway Special Use Permit – Technical Review #3 City PB# 20250989 CM Project: R250452.07, Task Order 07 Documents Received for Review On July 22, 2026, electronic copies of the following documents were made available to Creighton Manning Engineering & Surveying, PLLC (CM) for review: 1. Response to 7/17/2026 CME Comments – Proposed Mixed Use Development, prepared by GTS Consulting, dated 7/22/26 (16 pages). 2. Second Response to Creighton Manning - Comments Dated July 17, 2026, prepared by Cannie Law PLLC dated July 22, 2026 (5 pages). Technical Review Conclusion Based on our technical review of the above listed information, it is our technical opinion that:  A review of the response to the 7/17/2026 comment letter provided by GTS Consulting and Cannie Law PLLC indicates that the traffic related comments in CM’s Technical Review #2 letter have been sufficiently addressed. All of CM’s previous comments on traffic related matters have been addressed.  CM has no further comments on this application. It is noted that the City should also review comments provided by the New York State Department of Transportation during the site plan approval process.  At this time CM’s technical review services have concluded, unless additional assistance is requested from the City. Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact our office. End of Memorandum. Attachment 10 Revised Traffic Analysis, North Access Right-In/Right-Out Only 1396 White Bridge Road Chittenango, NY 13037 Tel: (315) 391-5110 October 22, 2026 Bohler Engineering 17 Computer Drive West Albany, NY 12205 Attn: Mr. Steve Wilson Re: Revised Build Analysis – North Access Right In/Right Out Only Traffic Impact Study – Proposed Mixed Use Development US Route 9, Saratoga Springs, NY Dear Mr. Wilson: I have reviewed the October 20th, 2026 email comments from NYSDOT regarding the traffic impact study for the proposed mixed use development on US Route 9 in Saratoga Springs, NY. Per their note that the north access will be restricted to right in/right out only and that the southern access should be reduced to one lane entering, I have completed a revised build conditions capacity analysis. The 2028 build traffic volumes have been taken from the updated June 2026 traffic study and are attached as Figure 1. The modified 2028 build traffic volumes with the northern access restricted to right in/right out only movements have been attached as Figure 2. The 2028 build conditions Synchro12 analysis models were revised with the northern access limited to right in/right out only movements and the southern driveway reduced to one lane entering. The results of the revised build conditions analysis indicates that the north access restriction will have no impact on adjacent intersection operations during any of the three peak hours studied. With the restriction of the northern access to right in/right out only movements, the Level of Service for traffic exiting the northern access improves from LOS C to LOS B during all three peak hours. The Level of Service for traffic exiting the southern access remains LOS C during the morning peak hour (+4 seconds average delay), drops to LOS D during the evening peak hour (+5 seconds average delay), and remains LOS C during the Saturday peak hour (+4 seconds average delay) compared to the build analysis in the traffic study. The southbound left turn movement into the southern access remains LOS B during all three peak hours. The detailed Level of Service and Queue summary, and the capacity analysis printouts with the northern access restricted to right in/right out only movements, have been attached. Overall, the restriction of the northern access to right in/right out only movements has only minor impacts to the operations at the site driveways with no impact to adjacent intersection operations. There are no concerns associated with the access restriction. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call. Sincerely, Gordon T. Stansbury, P.E., P.T.O.E. GTS Consulting Attachments Volume Figures 1-2 Level of Service & Queue Summary Capacity Analysis Printouts O N EW GTS Consulting Proposed Mixed Use Development - US Route 9 - Saratoga Springs,NY Not to Scale 2028 Build Traffic Volumes Weekday Morning (Weekday Evening) {Saturday Midday} Peak Hour Figure 1 Proposed Development US Route 9 US Route 9 Crescent Avenue E West Road 22 (7) {30} 1013 (1028) {936} 2 (9){34}2 (26){30} 2 (4) {11} 810 (1083) {708} 91 (90){104} 36 (64) {61} 998 (1006) {944} 17 (31) {26} 891 (884){745} 80 (126) {159} 789 (1061) {689} 14 (24) {20} 771 (935) {632} 85 (115) {131} 1006 (1009) {948} 11 (20) {17} 788 (1070) {690} 14 (26) {22} 1007 (1048) {992} 813 (1107) {791} 2 (12) {25} 0 (11) {16} 1007 (1048) {992} 2 (34) {70) 813 (1095) {720} 0 (27) {66} 19 (21) {24} 23 (26) {30} 19 (22) {26} 15 (15) {19} O N EW GTS Consulting Proposed Mixed Use Development - US Route 9 - Saratoga Springs,NY Not to Scale 2028 Build Traffic Volumes - With North Access Restricted to Right in/Right Out Only Weekday Morning (Weekday Evening) {Saturday Midday} Peak Hour Figure 2 Proposed Development US Route 9 US Route 9 Crescent Avenue E West Road 22 (7) {30} 1013 (1028) {936} 2 (9){34}2 (26){30} 2 (4) {11} 810 (1083) {708} 91 (90){104} 36 (64) {61} 998 (1006) {944} 17 (31) {26} 891 (884){745} 80 (126) {159} 774 (1046) {670} 28 (50) {42} 771 (935) {632} 85 (115) {131} 1006 (1009) {948} 11 (20) {17} 802 (1096) {712} 1007 (1048) {992} 813 (1107) {791} 2 (12) {25} 0 (11) {16} 1007 (1048) {992} 2 (34) {70) 813 (1095) {720} 0 (27) {66} 19 (21) {24} 38 (41) {49} 19 (22) {26} Proposed Mixed Use Development US Route 9 – Saratoga Springs, NY Intersection Level of Service Summary Weekday Morning Peak Hour Intersection Available Storage 2025 Existing 2028 Background 2028 Build 2028 Build North Access RIRO LOS Max Queue LOS LOS LOS Max Queue LOS Max Queue US Route 9 @ Crescent Avenue A(10) A(10) B(11) B(11) WB Left/Right - B(15) 59 B(15) 62 B(17) 69 B(17) 69 NB Through/Right - B(14) 234 B(14) 245 B(14) 262 B(14) 262 SB Left 200 A(4) 22 A(4) 23 A(4) 23 A(4) 23 SB Through - A(4) 81 A(4) 85 A(4) 92 A(4) 92 US Route 9 @ E West Road A(3) A(3) A(3) A(3) EB Left 400 B(16) 7 B(16) 7 B(17) 7 B(17) 7 EB Right - B(14) 6 B(14) 6 B(14) 6 B(14) 6 NB Left 375 A(1) 6 A(2) 6 A(1) 6 A(1) 6 NB Through - A(1) 81 A(1) 84 A(1) 87 A(1) 87 SB Through - A(6) 176 A(6) 183 A(6) 193 A(6) 193 SB Right 200 A(6) 4 A(6) 4 A(6) 4 A(6) 4 US Route 9 @ Tree House Entrance Drive NB Through/Right - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 SB Left 150 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 SB Through - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 US Route 9 @ Tree House Exit Drive WB Left/Right - b(13) 0 b(14) 0 b(14) 0 b(14) 0 NB Through - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 SB Through - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 US Route 9 @ North Access WB (Left)/Right - - - - - c(18) 10 b(13) 3 NB Through - - - - - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 SB Left 150 - - - - b(11) 3 - - SB Through - - - - - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 US Route 9 @ South Access WB Left/Right - - - - - c(20) 15 c(24) 23 NB Through - - - - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 SB Left 150 - - - - b(11) 3 b(11) 5 SB Through - - - - - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 B(12) – Signalized Level of Service (Average Delay per Vehicle in Seconds) a(9) – Unsignalized Level of Service (Average Delay per Vehicle in Seconds) Max Queue – 95th Percentile Queue in Feet Proposed Mixed Use Development US Route 9 – Saratoga Springs, NY Intersection Level of Service Summary Weekday Evening Peak Hour Intersection Available Storage 2025 Existing 2028 Background 2028 Build 2028 Build North Access RIRO LOS Max Queue LOS Max Queue LOS Max Queue LOS Max Queue US Route 9 @ Crescent Avenue B(11) B(12) B(12) B(12) WB Left/Right - C(21) 87 C(22) 92 C(24) 108 C(24) 108 NB Through/Right - B(17) 248 B(17) 262 B(18) 283 B(18) 283 SB Left 200 A(5) 32 A(6) 33 A(6) 35 A(6) 35 SB Through - A(5) 111 A(5) 118 A(5) 132 A(5) 132 US Route 9 @ E West Road A(5) A(5) A(5) A(5) EB Left 400 B(19) 17 B(19) 17 C(21) 17 C(21) 17 EB Right - B(11) 21 B(11) 22 B(11) 22 B(11) 22 NB Left 375 A(1) 3 A(1) 3 A(1) 3 A(1) 3 NB Through - A(3) 74 A(3) 76 A(3) 81 A(3) 81 SB Through - A(7) 242 A(7) 252 A(7) 263 A(7) 263 SB Right 200 A(6) 5 A(6) 5 A(6) 5 A(6) 5 US Route 9 @ Tree House Entrance Drive NB Through/Right - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 SB Left 150 b(11) 3 b(11) 4 b(11) 4 b(11) 4 SB Through - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 US Route 9 @ Tree House Exit Drive WB Left/Right - c(18) 8 c(19) 8 c(19) 8 c(19) 8 NB Through - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 SB Through - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 US Route 9 @ North Access WB (Left)/Right - - - - - c(19) 13 b(13) 5 NB Through - - - - - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 SB Left 150 - - - - b(11) 3 - - SB Through - - - - - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 US Route 9 @ South Access WB Left/Right - - - - - c(22) 18 d(27) 55 NB Through - - - - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 SB Left 150 - - - - b(11) 3 b(11) 8 SB Through - - - - - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 B(12) – Signalized Level of Service (Average Delay per Vehicle in Seconds) a(9) – Unsignalized Level of Service (Average Delay per Vehicle in Seconds) Max Queue – 95th Percentile Queue in Feet Proposed Mixed Use Development US Route 9 – Saratoga Springs, NY Intersection Level of Service Summary Saturday Midday Peak Hour Intersection Available Storage 2025 Existing 2028 Background 2028 Build 2028 Build North Access RIRO LOS Max Queue LOS Max Queue LOS Max Queue LOS Max Queue US Route 9 @ Crescent Avenue B(12) B(12) B(13) B(13) WB Left/Right - B(20) 89 C(21) 95 C(23) 112 C(23) 112 NB Through/Right - B(17) 225 B(18) 241 B(18) 270 B(18) 270 SB Left 200 A(5) 36 A(6) 38 A(6) 40 A(6) 40 SB Through - A(4) 71 A(5) 75 A(5) 86 A(5) 86 US Route 9 @ E West Road A(6) A(6) A(6) A(6) EB Left 400 B(17) 32 B(17) 32 B(17) 33 B(17) 33 EB Right - A(9) 19 A(9) 20 A(9) 20 A(9) 20 NB Left 375 A(2) 7 A(2) 7 A(2) 7 A(2) 7 NB Through - A(4) 65 A(4) 67 A(4) 71 A(4) 71 SB Through - A(8) 138 A(8) 143 A(8) 153 A(8) 153 SB Right 200 A(6) 9 A(6) 9 A(6) 9 A(6) 9 US Route 9 @ Tree House Entrance Drive NB Through/Right - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 SB Left 150 b(11) 9 b(11) 9 b(12) 10 b(12) 10 SB Through - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 US Route 9 @ Tree House Exit Drive WB Left/Right - c(16) 10 c(16) 10 c(17) 10 c(17) 10 NB Through - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 SB Through - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 a(0) 0 US Route 9 @ North Access WB (Left)/Right - - - - - c(17) 13 b(12) 5 NB Through - - - - - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 SB Left 150 - - - - b(11) 3 - - SB Through - - - - - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 US Route 9 @ South Access WB Left/Right - - - - - c(19) 18 c(23) 28 NB Through - - - - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 SB Left 150 - - - - b(11) 3 b(11) 5 SB Through - - - - - a(0) 0 a(0) 0 B(12) – Signalized Level of Service (Average Delay per Vehicle in Seconds) a(9) – Unsignalized Level of Service (Average Delay per Vehicle in Seconds) Max Queue – 95th Percentile Queue in Feet Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 1 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 36 91 891 80 85 771 Future Volume (vph) 36 91 891 80 85 771 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 200 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1642 0 3429 0 1752 3505 Flt Permitted 0.986 0.152 Satd. Flow (perm) 1642 0 3429 0 280 3505 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 97 7 Link Speed (mph) 35 55 40 Link Distance (ft) 1221 1085 1199 Travel Time (s) 23.8 13.5 20.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 4% 4% 3% 3% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 142 0 1091 0 96 866 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Turn Type Prot NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 3 6 5 1 Permitted Phases 1 Detector Phase 3 6 5 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 20.0 11.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 65.0 65.0 25.0 90.0 Total Split (%) 41.9% 41.9% 16.1% 58.1% Maximum Green (s) 60.0 60.0 20.0 85.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 Recall Mode None Min None Min Act Effct Green (s) 8.0 28.6 39.5 39.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.49 0.68 0.68 v/c Ratio 0.46 0.64 0.23 0.36 Control Delay (s/veh) 16.7 14.3 4.4 4.3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 2 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 16.7 14.3 4.4 4.3 LOS B B A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 16.7 14.3 4.3 Approach LOS B B A Queue Length 50th (ft) 15 148 8 47 Queue Length 95th (ft) 69 262 23 92 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1141 1005 1119 Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 Base Capacity (vph) 1548 3222 723 3505 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.34 0.13 0.25 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 155 Actuated Cycle Length: 58 Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.64 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 10.1 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: US Route 9 & E West Road 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 2 2 22 1013 810 2 Future Volume (vph) 2 2 22 1013 810 2 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 400 0 375 200 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1504 1346 1736 3471 3471 1553 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.306 Satd. Flow (perm) 1504 1346 559 3471 3471 1553 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 2 2 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 781 1752 2527 Travel Time (s) 17.8 21.7 31.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles (%) 20% 20% 4% 4% 4% 4% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 2 2 24 1113 890 2 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Turn Type Prot Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Protected Phases 7 2 5 1 Permitted Phases 7 5 1 Detector Phase 7 7 2 5 1 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 11.0 20.0 20.0 11.0 11.0 Total Split (s) 50.0 50.0 25.0 75.0 50.0 50.0 Total Split (%) 40.0% 40.0% 20.0% 60.0% 40.0% 40.0% Maximum Green (s) 45.0 45.0 20.0 70.0 45.0 45.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None Min None None Act Effct Green (s) 7.0 7.0 26.1 27.8 18.6 18.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.24 0.89 0.95 0.63 0.63 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.34 0.41 0.00 Control Delay (s/veh) 16.5 14.0 1.4 1.3 6.1 6.0 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: US Route 9 & E West Road 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 4 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 16.5 14.0 1.4 1.3 6.1 6.0 LOS B B A A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 15.3 1.3 6.1 Approach LOS B A A Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 0 1 0 2 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 7 6 6 87 193 4 Internal Link Dist (ft) 701 1672 2447 Turn Bay Length (ft) 400 375 200 Base Capacity (vph) 1433 1282 1451 3471 3306 1479 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.32 0.27 0.00 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 125 Actuated Cycle Length: 29.4 Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.41 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 3.4 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 2: US Route 9 & E West Road Lanes, Volumes, Timings 11: US Route 9 & Tree House Entrance Only 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 5 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 1007 2 0 813 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 1007 2 0 813 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 3471 0 1827 3471 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 3471 0 1827 3471 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 406 653 330 Travel Time (s) 9.2 8.1 4.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 4% 4% 4% 4% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 1109 0 0 893 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 13: US Route 9 & Tree House Exit Only 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 6 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 2 1007 0 0 813 Future Volume (vph) 0 2 1007 0 0 813 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Satd. Flow (prot) 1236 0 3471 0 0 3471 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 1236 0 3471 0 0 3471 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 399 330 1085 Travel Time (s) 9.1 4.1 13.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles (%) 33% 33% 4% 4% 4% 4% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 2 0 1107 0 0 893 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM 7th TWSC 13: US Route 9 & Tree House Exit Only 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 7 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 2 1007 0 0 813 Future Vol, veh/h 0 2 1007 0 0 813 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 33 33 4 4 4 4 Mvmt Flow 0 2 1107 0 0 893 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1553 553 0 - - - Stage 1 1107 - - - - - Stage 2 447 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.46 7.56 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.46 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.46 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.83 3.63 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 77 405 - 0 0 - Stage 1 220 - - 0 0 - Stage 2 530 - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 77 405 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 169 - - - - - Stage 1 220 - - - - - Stage 2 530 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 13.94 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 405 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.005 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - 13.9 - HCM Lane LOS - B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 - Lanes, Volumes, Timings 15: US Route 9 & North Access 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 8 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 19 1006 11 0 802 Future Volume (vph) 0 19 1006 11 0 802 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1627 3465 0 0 3471 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1627 3465 0 0 3471 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 298 272 653 Travel Time (s) 6.8 3.4 8.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 4% 1% 1% 4% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 21 1117 0 0 881 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM 7th TWSC 15: US Route 9 & North Access 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 9 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 19 1006 11 0 802 Future Vol, veh/h 0 19 1006 11 0 802 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Stop - Free - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 4 1 1 4 Mvmt Flow 0 21 1105 12 0 881 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 553 0 - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 6.92 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.31 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 479 - 0 0 - Stage 1 0 - - 0 0 - Stage 2 0 - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 479 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 12.85 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 479 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.044 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - 12.9 - HCM Lane LOS - B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.1 - Lanes, Volumes, Timings 16: US Route 9 & South Access 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 10 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 38 19 998 17 28 774 Future Volume (vph) 38 19 998 17 28 774 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1739 0 3462 0 1787 3471 Flt Permitted 0.968 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1739 0 3462 0 1787 3471 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 319 2527 272 Travel Time (s) 7.3 31.3 3.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 4% 1% 1% 4% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 63 0 1116 0 31 851 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM 7th TWSC 16: US Route 9 & South Access 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Morning Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 11 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 38 19 998 17 28 774 Future Vol, veh/h 38 19 998 17 28 774 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - 150 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 4 1 1 4 Mvmt Flow 42 21 1097 19 31 851 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1593 558 0 0 1115 0 Stage 1 1106 - - - - - Stage 2 487 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.82 6.92 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.82 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.82 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.51 3.31 - - 2.21 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 99 476 - - 628 - Stage 1 280 - - - - - Stage 2 586 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 94 476 - - 628 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 207 - - - - - Stage 1 280 - - - - - Stage 2 558 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 23.64 0 0.39 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 255 628 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.245 0.049 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 23.6 11 - HCM Lane LOS - - C B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.9 0.2 - Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 1 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 64 90 884 126 115 935 Future Volume (vph) 64 90 884 126 115 935 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 200 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1698 0 3495 0 1770 3539 Flt Permitted 0.980 0.142 Satd. Flow (perm) 1698 0 3495 0 264 3539 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 53 12 Link Speed (mph) 35 55 40 Link Distance (ft) 1221 1085 1199 Travel Time (s) 23.8 13.5 20.4 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 161 0 1052 0 120 974 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Turn Type Prot NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 3 6 5 1 Permitted Phases 1 Detector Phase 3 6 5 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 20.0 11.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 65.0 65.0 25.0 90.0 Total Split (%) 41.9% 41.9% 16.1% 58.1% Maximum Green (s) 60.0 60.0 20.0 85.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 Recall Mode None Min None Min Act Effct Green (s) 10.4 27.4 42.4 42.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.43 0.67 0.67 v/c Ratio 0.50 0.69 0.29 0.41 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 2 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Control Delay (s/veh) 24.4 17.6 5.8 5.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 24.4 17.6 5.8 5.4 LOS C B A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 24.4 17.6 5.5 Approach LOS C B A Queue Length 50th (ft) 37 158 13 71 Queue Length 95th (ft) 108 283 35 132 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1141 1005 1119 Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 Base Capacity (vph) 1546 3172 675 3539 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.10 0.33 0.18 0.28 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 155 Actuated Cycle Length: 63.2 Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.69 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 12.3 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: US Route 9 & E West Road 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 9 26 7 1028 1083 4 Future Volume (vph) 9 26 7 1028 1083 4 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 400 0 375 200 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 1599 1787 3574 3574 1599 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.198 Satd. Flow (perm) 1787 1599 372 3574 3574 1599 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 28 3 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 781 1752 2527 Travel Time (s) 17.8 21.7 31.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 10 28 8 1117 1177 4 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Turn Type Prot Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Protected Phases 7 2 5 1 Permitted Phases 7 5 1 Detector Phase 7 7 2 5 1 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 11.0 20.0 20.0 11.0 11.0 Total Split (s) 50.0 50.0 25.0 75.0 50.0 50.0 Total Split (%) 40.0% 40.0% 20.0% 60.0% 40.0% 40.0% Maximum Green (s) 45.0 45.0 20.0 70.0 45.0 45.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None Min None None Act Effct Green (s) 7.4 7.4 29.3 28.7 22.9 22.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.88 0.86 0.69 0.69 v/c Ratio 0.03 0.07 0.01 0.36 0.48 0.00 Control Delay (s/veh) 20.1 11.2 1.3 2.5 6.6 5.8 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: US Route 9 & E West Road 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 4 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 20.1 11.2 1.3 2.5 6.6 5.8 LOS C B A A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 13.6 2.5 6.6 Approach LOS B A A Queue Length 50th (ft) 1 0 0 0 0 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 17 22 3 81 263 5 Internal Link Dist (ft) 701 1672 2447 Turn Bay Length (ft) 400 375 200 Base Capacity (vph) 1665 1491 1381 3574 3329 1490 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.31 0.35 0.00 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 125 Actuated Cycle Length: 33.4 Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.48 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 4.8 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 2: US Route 9 & E West Road Lanes, Volumes, Timings 11: US Route 9 & Tree House Entrance Only 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 5 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 1048 34 27 1095 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 1048 34 27 1095 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 3522 0 1770 3539 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 3522 0 1770 3539 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 319 653 330 Travel Time (s) 7.3 8.1 4.1 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 1176 0 29 1190 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 13: US Route 9 & Tree House Exit Only 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 6 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 11 12 1048 0 0 1107 Future Volume (vph) 11 12 1048 0 0 1107 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Satd. Flow (prot) 1693 0 3539 0 0 3539 Flt Permitted 0.977 Satd. Flow (perm) 1693 0 3539 0 0 3539 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 336 330 1085 Travel Time (s) 7.6 4.1 13.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 25 0 1139 0 0 1203 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM 7th TWSC 13: US Route 9 & Tree House Exit Only 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 7 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 12 1048 0 0 1107 Future Vol, veh/h 11 12 1048 0 0 1107 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 12 13 1139 0 0 1203 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1741 570 0 - - - Stage 1 1139 - - - - - Stage 2 602 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 78 465 - 0 0 - Stage 1 267 - - 0 0 - Stage 2 510 - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 78 465 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 191 - - - - - Stage 1 267 - - - - - Stage 2 510 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 19.34 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 276 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.091 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - 19.3 - HCM Lane LOS - C - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.3 - Lanes, Volumes, Timings 15: US Route 9 & North Access 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 8 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 22 1009 20 0 1096 Future Volume (vph) 0 22 1009 20 0 1096 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1627 3564 0 0 3539 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1627 3564 0 0 3539 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 298 272 653 Travel Time (s) 6.8 3.4 8.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 24 1119 0 0 1191 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM 7th TWSC 15: US Route 9 & North Access 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 9 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 22 1009 20 0 1096 Future Vol, veh/h 0 22 1009 20 0 1096 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Stop - Free - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 2 Mvmt Flow 0 24 1097 22 0 1191 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 548 0 - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 6.92 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.31 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 483 - 0 0 - Stage 1 0 - - 0 0 - Stage 2 0 - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 483 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 12.85 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 483 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.05 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - 12.8 - HCM Lane LOS - B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.2 - Lanes, Volumes, Timings 16: US Route 9 & South Access 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 10 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 41 21 1006 31 50 1046 Future Volume (vph) 41 21 1006 31 50 1046 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1737 0 3556 0 1787 3539 Flt Permitted 0.968 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1737 0 3556 0 1787 3539 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 319 2527 272 Travel Time (s) 7.3 31.3 3.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 68 0 1127 0 54 1137 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM 7th TWSC 16: US Route 9 & South Access 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Weekday Evening Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 11 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 41 21 1006 31 50 1046 Future Vol, veh/h 41 21 1006 31 50 1046 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - 150 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 2 Mvmt Flow 45 23 1093 34 54 1137 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1788 564 0 0 1127 0 Stage 1 1110 - - - - - Stage 2 677 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.82 6.92 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.82 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.82 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.51 3.31 - - 2.21 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 73 472 - - 621 - Stage 1 279 - - - - - Stage 2 469 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 67 472 - - 621 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 183 - - - - - Stage 1 279 - - - - - Stage 2 428 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 26.9 0 0.52 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 231 621 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.292 0.087 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 26.9 11.3 - HCM Lane LOS - - D B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.2 0.3 - Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 1 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 61 104 745 159 131 632 Future Volume (vph) 61 104 745 159 131 632 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 200 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1690 0 3462 0 1787 3574 Flt Permitted 0.982 0.159 Satd. Flow (perm) 1690 0 3462 0 299 3574 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 65 19 Link Speed (mph) 35 55 40 Link Distance (ft) 1221 1085 1199 Travel Time (s) 23.8 13.5 20.4 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 9 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 176 0 962 0 139 672 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Turn Type Prot NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 3 6 5 1 Permitted Phases 1 Detector Phase 3 6 5 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 20.0 11.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 65.0 65.0 25.0 90.0 Total Split (%) 41.9% 41.9% 16.1% 58.1% Maximum Green (s) 60.0 60.0 20.0 85.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 Recall Mode None Min None Min Act Effct Green (s) 10.4 24.9 40.8 40.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.40 0.66 0.66 v/c Ratio 0.52 0.68 0.31 0.28 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 2 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Control Delay (s/veh) 23.1 18.3 5.9 4.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 23.1 18.3 5.9 4.8 LOS C B A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 23.1 18.3 5.0 Approach LOS C B A Queue Length 50th (ft) 37 141 15 43 Queue Length 95th (ft) 112 270 40 86 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1141 1005 1119 Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 Base Capacity (vph) 1557 3180 705 3574 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.11 0.30 0.20 0.19 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 155 Actuated Cycle Length: 61.7 Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.68 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 13.2 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1: US Route 9 & Crescent Avenue Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: US Route 9 & E West Road 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 34 30 30 936 708 11 Future Volume (vph) 34 30 30 936 708 11 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 400 0 375 200 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 1599 1787 3574 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.363 Satd. Flow (perm) 1787 1599 683 3574 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 31 11 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 781 1752 2527 Travel Time (s) 17.8 21.7 31.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 35 31 31 975 738 11 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Turn Type Prot Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Protected Phases 7 2 5 1 Permitted Phases 7 5 1 Detector Phase 7 7 2 5 1 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 11.0 20.0 20.0 11.0 11.0 Total Split (s) 50.0 50.0 25.0 75.0 50.0 50.0 Total Split (%) 40.0% 40.0% 20.0% 60.0% 40.0% 40.0% Maximum Green (s) 45.0 45.0 20.0 70.0 45.0 45.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None Min None None Act Effct Green (s) 6.7 6.7 29.0 24.3 17.6 17.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.88 0.74 0.54 0.54 v/c Ratio 0.10 0.09 0.03 0.37 0.39 0.01 Control Delay (s/veh) 17.1 9.4 1.5 3.9 7.9 5.7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: US Route 9 & E West Road 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 4 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 17.1 9.4 1.5 3.9 7.9 5.7 LOS B A A A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 13.5 3.8 7.9 Approach LOS B A A Queue Length 50th (ft) 5 0 1 50 34 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 33 20 7 71 153 9 Internal Link Dist (ft) 701 1672 2447 Turn Bay Length (ft) 400 375 200 Base Capacity (vph) 1720 1540 1368 3574 3407 1524 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.27 0.22 0.01 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 125 Actuated Cycle Length: 32.8 Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.39 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 5.8 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 2: US Route 9 & E West Road Lanes, Volumes, Timings 11: US Route 9 & Tree House Entrance Only 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 5 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 992 70 66 720 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 992 70 66 720 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 3504 0 1770 3539 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 3504 0 1770 3539 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 316 653 330 Travel Time (s) 7.2 8.1 4.1 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 1142 0 71 774 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 13: US Route 9 & Tree House Exit Only 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 6 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 16 25 992 0 0 791 Future Volume (vph) 16 25 992 0 0 791 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Satd. Flow (prot) 1676 0 3539 0 0 3539 Flt Permitted 0.981 Satd. Flow (perm) 1676 0 3539 0 0 3539 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 315 330 1085 Travel Time (s) 7.2 4.1 13.5 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 44 0 1055 0 0 841 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM 7th TWSC 13: US Route 9 & Tree House Exit Only 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 7 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 25 992 0 0 791 Future Vol, veh/h 16 25 992 0 0 791 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 1 1 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 17 27 1055 0 0 841 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1476 528 0 - - - Stage 1 1055 - - - - - Stage 2 421 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 117 495 - 0 0 - Stage 1 296 - - 0 0 - Stage 2 630 - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 117 495 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 228 - - - - - Stage 1 296 - - - - - Stage 2 630 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 17.15 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 340 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.128 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - 17.2 - HCM Lane LOS - C - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.4 - Lanes, Volumes, Timings 15: US Route 9 & North Access 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 8 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 26 948 17 0 712 Future Volume (vph) 0 26 948 17 0 712 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1627 3564 0 0 3574 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1627 3564 0 0 3574 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 298 272 653 Travel Time (s) 6.8 3.4 8.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 28 1037 0 0 766 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM 7th TWSC 15: US Route 9 & North Access 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 9 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 26 948 17 0 712 Future Vol, veh/h 0 26 948 17 0 712 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Stop - Free - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 0 28 1019 18 0 766 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 510 0 - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 6.92 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.31 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 511 - 0 0 - Stage 1 0 - - 0 0 - Stage 2 0 - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 511 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 12.45 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 511 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.055 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - 12.4 - HCM Lane LOS - B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.2 - Lanes, Volumes, Timings 16: US Route 9 & South Access 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 10 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 49 24 944 26 42 670 Future Volume (vph) 49 24 944 26 42 670 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1741 0 3560 0 1787 3574 Flt Permitted 0.968 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1741 0 3560 0 1787 3574 Link Speed (mph) 30 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 319 2527 272 Travel Time (s) 7.3 31.3 3.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 79 0 1043 0 45 720 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM 7th TWSC 16: US Route 9 & South Access 10/22/2026 2028 Build Conditions - Saturday Midday Peak Hour - RIRO North Access Synchro 12 Report GTS Consulting Page 11 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 49 24 944 26 42 670 Future Vol, veh/h 49 24 944 26 42 670 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - 150 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 53 26 1015 28 45 720 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1480 522 0 0 1043 0 Stage 1 1029 - - - - - Stage 2 451 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.82 6.92 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.82 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.82 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.51 3.31 - - 2.21 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 117 502 - - 669 - Stage 1 308 - - - - - Stage 2 612 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 110 502 - - 669 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 227 - - - - - Stage 1 308 - - - - - Stage 2 570 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 23.11 0 0.64 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 276 669 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.284 0.068 - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 23.1 10.8 - HCM Lane LOS - - C B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.1 0.2 - Attachment 11 Market and Socioeconomic Study Planning & Development Advisors Creating value by unlocking opportunities 101 Lee Avenue Yonkers, New York 10705 914.552.8413 | email: davidbsmith1992@gmail.com December 8, 2025 To: Mark Pingel, Chairman and Planning Board Members From: David B. Smith Re: Socio-Economic Evaluation South Broadway TM (178.-2-17.11/.12 and 178.-2-17.12) Introduction The following is a technical report on selected anticipated economic benefits from the development of the approximately 55.79-acre properties located on the east side of South Broadway (aka NYS Route 9) also known locally as Tax Map 178.-2-17.11/.12 and 178.-2-17.12, (the “Project Site”). The Project Site is currently vacant. This technical evaluation was prepared on behalf of Matrix BDC JV, LLC (the “Applicant”) as part of an on-going site plan and special permit approval process. The area in the vicinity of the Project Site has been the subject of recent development activity consisting of a 113 key Homewood Suites hotel a Tree House Brewing and Saratoga Pet Resort facility. Proposed Program The proposed action calls for a mixed-use development consisting of the following: 120 key extended stay hotel; a mixed-use building consisting of approximately 8,000 square feet of ground floor commercial with 32 residential units; and, 96 multi-family residential units in four separate buildings all supported by 407 at-grade parking spaces Assessment Methodology For analysis purposes, comparable developments located within the City of Saratoga Springs (the “City”) were surveyed with the more recent projects used as comparable examples, refer to Appendix of this report. Based upon desktop survey information provided by Saratoga County GIS, SDG Image Mate Online, and Info-tax Online (Saratoga Springs CSD) relevant comparable projects were identified. For multi-family residential rental apartment projects total taxes paid was applied to the total number of units to arrive at taxes paid per unit which could be applied to the Proposed Project’s residential component. For the retail components the more recent vintage of uses like the retail building with the Kru Coffee located on Marion Avenue were used to generate projected taxes from the proposed program. For the hotel use, the Homewood Suites development located adjacent to the Project Site was used as a comparison using assessed value per square foot. The estimates presented herein provide an order of magnitude of anticipated benefits resulting from the development program with the understanding that the final assessment will be prepared once the buildings are constructed and the units occupied. South Broadway Mixed Use Development Page 2 of 5 Current Real Estate Property Tax The currently under-utilized site has a current assessment of $1.21 million. Table 1 provides a breakdown as to current real estate taxes paid to all taxing jurisdictions. Table 1 Current Real Estate Tax Revenue Taxing District Assessed Value (AV) Tax Rate/$1000 AV Amount Saratoga Springs CSD $1,210,200 20.65097 $24,991.81 General County and NYS Mandates $1,210,200 4.086369 $4,945.32 General City $1,210,200 6.722200 8,135.20 Total $38,072.33 Source: Info-tax Online, City of Saratoga Springs 2025 City & County Tax Bill Projected Real Estate Taxes As noted above real estate taxes anticipated as part of the development of the Project Site were calculated using a desk top survey of a recent and/or comparable developments in the City of Saratoga Springs, refer to Appendix. Table 2 applies the estimated assessed value methodology to the proposed Project. Table 2 Projected Real Estate Taxes Total Project –Market Value Methodology Source: compiled by Planning & Development Advisors Based on the projections in Table 2, the Proposed Project has the potential to yield an overall increase in tax revenue of approximately $415,147 to all selected taxing jurisdictions. Job Generation Construction Related Impacts For projection purposes, the Applicant has estimated, based on his experience developing other comparable projects throughout the region, that project costs for construction of the entire project (hard, soft and land) will be approximately $81.8 million investment in the City of Saratoga Springs. South Broadway Mixed Use Development Page 3 of 5 Based on the Project Team’s experience in the development and construction field, the proposed project is expected to generate approximately 175 to 200 construction related jobs over an approximately 18-month construction period. According to the Bureau of Labor statistics, construction laborers in New York State earned an annual mean wage of $55,010 as of 2024 1 which equates to approximately $9.6 to 11.02 million in wages for temporary construction related employment. In addition, it is anticipated that County sourced construction materials would be used benefitting the local economy. Full Time Employment Based on the Development Team’s experience, the Proposed Project is expected to generate approximately 71 to 83 new full-time jobs depending on seasonality from management to staff, with an annual mean wage ranging from $36,000 to $100,000. Table 3 , Job Generation, shows that the development would generate approximately $3.2 to $3.6 million annually in full-time wages for permanent employment for the life of the development. This income presents a direct economic benefit to the City of Saratoga Springs. Table 3 Job Generation Proposed Use Category of Jobs Projected # of jobs to be created Est. Avg. Salary1 Cumulative Annual Mean Wage Hotel General Manager 1 $90,000 $90,000 Director of Sales 1 $75,000 $75,000 Assistant G.M. 1 $60,000 $60,000 Housekeeping Supervisor 1 $44,000 $44,000 Maintenance Supervisor 1 $44,000 $44,000 Front desk/housekeeping/breakfast attendant/housepersons 17-29 (depending on seasonality) $36,000 $612,000 to $1,044,000 Residential Property Manager 1 $85,000 $85,000 Leasing Manager 1 $75,000 $75,000 Maintenance Supervisor 1 $80,000 $80,000 Maintenance Technician 1 $65,000 $65,000 Retail Supervisor 9 $63,000 $567,000 Cashier 9 $40,000 $360,000 Retail sales 27 $38,000 $1,026,000 Source: Oakfield Hospitality/Matrix Hotels; BDC Group 1 https://www.bls.gov/oes/oes_research_2024.htm South Broadway Mixed Use Development Page 4 of 5 Resident Spending The proposed new residential community will contribute to the local economy through the purchasing power of its residents. This analysis assesses the anticipated economic impact of resident spending by calculating the expected purchasing power of the proposed 128 new households associated with the proposed development. Source: https://www.bls.gov/regions/northeast/news-release/consumerexpenditures_newyork.htm As indicated in the survey referenced above, households can typically be expected to spend approximately 28 percent of pretax household income on goods and services, according to the Consumer Expenditure Survey published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Table 4 provides a breakdown of the projected total discretionary spending power based on a projection of households spending approximately 33% of income on housing and 28% on goods and services. Housing 33% Goods & Services 28% Other (Including Transportation) 39% TYPICAL PRE-TAX SPENDING Housing Goods & Services Other (Including Transportation) South Broadway Mixed Use Development Page 5 of 5 Table 4 Anticipated Discretionary Spending Therefore, it can be estimated that the residents of the 128 market rate units, would inject roughly $5.5 million into the local and regional economy each year. It is not expected that the entirety of these households’ expenditures will be made at the shops and businesses in the City of Saratoga Springs. However, the Proposed Project is located a little over a mile from the downtown shopping district along with the Ballston Avenue Shopping Plaza which the proposed residential households could take advantage of given its location. Summary The Proposed Project takes a currently vacant and under-performing property and through significant investment of approximately $81.8 million creates value that is translated into the following: • Projected increase in real estate tax revenue estimated at $415,147 for City, School and County jurisdictions over existing conditions; • Creation of approximately 175 to 200 construction related jobs and 71 to 83 full time jobs upon project completion; • Injection of an annually projected $5.7 million of discretionary spending into the greater City of Saratoga Springs community economy; and • While not part of this Technical Analysis, it is noted that the Proposed Project will also generate sales tax, occupancy tax and mortgage recording tax, which would further enhance the economic impact to the local economy and community. APPENDIX A Comparable Properties for Assessment Purposes Residential Comps Property Details - 56 Marion Ave, Saratoga Springs, 12866 - 166.30-2-13 - SWIS: 411501 (Saratoga Springs)        Structure Building 1 Number of Identical Buildings 1 Actual Year Built 2016 Effective Year Built Construction Quality 3.0 Condition 4 - Good Building Perimeter 1071 Gross Floor Area 92631 Number of Stories 5.0 Stor y Height 12 Air Conditioning %0% Sprinkler %0% Number of Elevators Basement Perimeter 1071 Basement Sq. Ft 14062 View Property on GIS Map 2025 Final Assessment Information Land Assessed Value $435,200 Total Assessed Value $5,735,400 Equalization Rate 40.50% Full Market Value $14,161,500 Partial Construction No County Taxable $5,735,400 Municipal Taxable $5,735,400 School Taxable $5,735,400 Village Taxable $0 Roll Section 1 Property Description Property Location 56 Marion Ave Property Type 411 - Apartment Neighborhood Code 15194 SWIS 411501 Water Supply 3 - Comm/public Utilities 4 - Gas & elec Sewer Type 3 - Comm/public Zoning NC NC School Saratoga Springs Csd Book 2022 Page 1689 Grid East 686740 Grid North 1551790 Acres 1.00 Front 351.56 Depth 0.00 Survey Map(s)M-720 M-729 M2013213 Agricultural District No Last Proper ty Sale Deed Date 01/13/2022 Deed Book 2022 Deed Page 1689 Contract Date 10/25/2021 Sale Date 12/28/2021 Full Sale Price $24,000,000 Net Sale Price $24,000,000 Usable For Valuation Yes Arms Length Yes Prior Owner Prime Beachwood 2, LLC Owner Information Owner Name Address 1 Address 2 PO Box City State Zip Unit Name Unit Number Hamlet Saratoga Owner LLC 20 Kent St Beacon NY 12508 STE 311 ET AL Hamlet TIC II Owner LLC 20 Kent St Beacon NY 12508 STE 311 Sales Deed Date Deed Book Deed Page Contract Date Sale Date Last Physical Inspection Date Sale Price Net Sale Price Usable for Valuation Arms Length Prior Owner 01/13/2022 2022 1689 10/25/2021 12/28/2021 $24,000,000 $24,000,000 Yes Yes Prime Beachwood 2, LLC 11/22/2016 2016 37166 11/17/2016 $1 $1 No No Saratoga LLC Beechwood Associates/ No Exemption Data Found Land Site #Land Type Acres Front Depth Sq Ft Soil Rating 1 01 - Primary 1.00 Commercial Site Uses Site #Commercial Use Total Units Total Rentable Area (sqft.) 1 A05 - Highrise apt 55 62760 1 D10 - Row retail 0 15810 1 J02 - Small garage 0 14062 Improvements Site #Structure Code SqFt Dimensions Quantity Overall Condition Actual Year Built Effective Year Built 1 RP6 - Porch-up cov 112.00 x 44.00 2.00 3 - Normal 2016 1 RP6 - Porch-up cov 166.00 x 62.00 2.00 3 - Normal 2016 1 RP6 - Porch-up cov 91.00 x 40.00 2.00 3 - Normal 2016 1 RP6 - Porch-up cov 88.00 x 38.00 2.00 3 - Normal 2016 1 RP6 - Porch-up cov 78.00 x 38.00 2.00 3 - Normal 2016 1 RP6 - Porch-up cov 200.00 x 6.00 6.00 3 - Normal 2016 1 RP6 - Porch-up cov 208.00 x 68.00 4.00 3 - Normal 2016 1 RP6 - Porch-up cov 104.00 x 42.00 2.00 3 - Normal 2016 Special Districts Code Description Type Primary Units Secondar y Units SE010 - County sewer dist #1 A 0.00 0.00 Property Details - 25 Whistler Ct, Saratoga Springs, 12866 - 166.-1-22 - SWIS: 411589 (Saratoga Springs)        Structure Building 1 Number of Identical Buildings 2 Actual Year Built 2018 Effective Year Built Construction Quality 2.5 Condition 4 - Good Building Perimeter 440 Gross Floor Area 41700 Number of Stories 4.0 Stor y Height 10 Air Conditioning %100% Sprinkler %100% Number of Elevators Basement Perimeter 432 Basement Sq. Ft 10552 View Property on GIS Map 2025 Final Assessment Information Land Assessed Value $446,700 Total Assessed Value $4,500,000 Equalization Rate 40.50% Full Market Value $11,111,100 Partial Construction No County Taxable $4,500,000 Municipal Taxable $4,500,000 School Taxable $4,500,000 Village Taxable $0 Roll Section 1 Property Description Property Location 25 Whistler Ct Property Type 411 - Apartment Neighborhood Code 15194 SWIS 411589 Water Supply 3 - Comm/public Utilities 4 - Gas & elec Sewer Type 3 - Comm/public Zoning NC NC School Saratoga Springs Csd Book 2017 Page 33454 Grid East 691455 Grid North 1553200 Acres 1.92 Front 167.48 Depth 0.00 Survey Map(s)M-189 E-160 E-164 M2015223 Agricultural District No Last Proper ty Sale Deed Date 10/23/2017 Deed Book 2017 Deed Page 33454 Contract Date Sale Date 10/19/2017 Full Sale Price $1 Net Sale Price $1 Usable For Valuation No Arms Length No Prior Owner Apartments LLC Saratoga Excelsior Owner Information Owner Name Address 1 Address 2 PO Box City State Zip Unit Name Unit Number Apartments I LLC Saratoga Excelsior 1732 Western Ave Albany NY 12203 Sales Deed Date Deed Book Deed Page Contract Date Sale Date Last Physical Inspection Date Sale Price Net Sale Price Usable for Valuation Arms Length Prior Owner 10/23/2017 2017 33454 10/19/2017 $1 $1 No No Apartments LLC Saratoga Excelsior No Exemption Data Found Land Site #Land Type Acres Front Depth Sq Ft Soil Rating 1 01 - Primary 1.92 Commercial Site Uses Site #Commercial Use Total Units Total Rentable Area (sqft.) 1 A05 - Highrise apt 70 0 1 J02 - Small garage 0 21104 No Improvement Data Found Special Districts Code Description Type Primary Units Secondar y Units SE010 - County sewer dist #1 A 0.00 0.00 Property Details - 3 Station Ln, Saratoga Springs, 12866 - 165.-2-76.1 - SWIS: 411589 (Saratoga Springs)        Structure Building 1 Number of Identical Buildings 1 Actual Year Built 2023 Effective Year Built 2023 Construction Quality 3.0 Condition 4 - Good Building Perimeter 1026 Gross Floor Area 14982 Number of Stories 3.0 Stor y Height 9 Air Conditioning %0% Sprinkler %0% Number of Elevators Basement Perimeter Basement Sq. Ft Building 2 Number of Identical Buildings 1 Actual Year Built 2023 Effective Year Built 2023 Construction Quality 3.0 Condition 4 - Good Building Perimeter 990 Gross Floor Area 13902 Number of Stories 3.0 Stor y Height 9 Air Conditioning %0% Sprinkler %0% Number of Elevators Basement Perimeter Basement Sq. Ft Building 3 Number of Identical Buildings 1 Actual Year Built 2023 Effective Year Built 2023 Construction Quality 3.0 Condition 4 - Good Building Perimeter 822 Gross Floor Area 8430 Number of Stories 3.0 Stor y Height 9 Air Conditioning %0% Sprinkler %0% Number of Elevators Basement Perimeter Basement Sq. Ft View Property on GIS Map 2025 Final Assessment Information Land Assessed Value $265,100 Total Assessed Value $2,493,750 Equalization Rate 40.50% Full Market Value $6,157,400 Partial Construction No County Taxable $2,493,750 Municipal Taxable $2,493,750 School Taxable $2,493,750 Village Taxable $0 Roll Section 1 Property Description Property Location 3 Station Ln Property Type 411 - Apartment Neighborhood Code 15841 SWIS 411589 Water Supply 3 - Comm/public Utilities 4 - Gas & elec Sewer Type 3 - Comm/public Zoning NC NC School Saratoga Springs Csd Book 2021 Page 43796 Grid East 677033 Grid North 1549073 Acres 8.44 Front 51.20 Depth 0.00 Survey Map(s)B-113 Agricultural District No Last Proper ty Sale Deed Date 12/03/2021 Deed Book 2021 Deed Page 43796 Contract Date Sale Date 11/24/2021 Full Sale Price $1 Net Sale Price $1 Usable For Valuation No Arms Length No Prior Owner Richard Askew Owner Information Owner Name Address 1 Address 2 PO Box City State Zip Unit Name Unit Number Station Lane LLC 624 New Loudon Rd Latham NY 12110 Sales Deed Date Deed Book Deed Page Contract Date Sale Date Last Physical Inspection Date Sale Price Net Sale Price Usable for Valuation Arms Length Prior Owner 12/03/2021 2021 43796 11/24/2021 $1 $1 No No Richard Askew 04/25/2017 2017 12746 04/19/2017 $165,000 $165,000 Yes Yes Kimberly Martin No Exemption Data Found Land Site #Land Type Acres Front Depth Sq Ft Soil Rating 1 01 - Primary 1.30 1 14 - Wetland 4.21 1 12 - Rear 2.93 Commercial Site Uses Site #Commercial Use Total Units Total Rentable Area (sqft.) 1 A01 - Walk-up apt 30 37314 Improvements Site #Structure Code SqFt Dimensions Quantity Overall Condition Actual Year Built Effective Year Built 1 RP2 - Porch-coverd 110.00 6.00 3 - Normal 2023 1 RP6 - Porch-up cov 110.00 12.00 3 - Normal 2023 1 RP6 - Porch-up cov 50.00 6.00 3 - Normal 2023 1 RP2 - Porch-coverd 50.00 3.00 3 - Normal 2023 Special Districts Code Description Type Primary Units Secondar y Units SE010 - County sewer dist #1 A 0.00 0.00 WA001 - West ave sp dist S 0.00 0.00 Property Details - 151 Jefferson St, Saratoga Springs - 178.44-3-7 - SWIS: 411501 (Saratoga Springs)        Structure Building 1 Number of Identical Buildings 5 Actual Year Built 1973 Effective Year Built 2000 Construction Quality 2.0 Condition 3 - Normal Building Perimeter 972 Gross Floor Area 17520 Number of Stories 3.0 Stor y Height 12 Air Conditioning %0% Sprinkler %0% Number of Elevators Basement Perimeter Basement Sq. Ft View Property on GIS Map 2025 Final Assessment Information Land Assessed Value $824,300 Total Assessed Value $4,567,400 Equalization Rate 40.50% Full Market Value $11,277,500 Partial Construction No County Taxable $4,567,400 Municipal Taxable $4,567,400 School Taxable $4,567,400 Village Taxable $0 Roll Section 1 Property Description Property Location 151 Jefferson St Property Type 411 - Apartment Neighborhood Code 15192 SWIS 411501 Water Supply 3 - Comm/public Utilities 3 - Electric Sewer Type 3 - Comm/public Zoning UR4 UR4 School Saratoga Springs Csd Book 1481 Page 390 Grid East 684403 Grid North 1542913 Acres 4.65 Front 363.50 Depth 0.00 Agricultural District No Last Proper ty Sale No Sales Data Found Owner Information Owner Name Address 1 Address 2 PO Box City State Zip Unit Name Unit Number Court Apartments Whitmore 1732 Western Ave Albany NY 12203 Llc 1732 Western Ave Albany NY 12203 Sales Deed Date Deed Book Deed Page Contract Date Sale Date Last Physical Inspection Date Sale Price Net Sale Price Usable for Valuation Arms Length Prior Owner No data available in table No Exemption Data Found Land Site #Land Type Acres Front Depth Sq Ft Soil Rating 1 01 - Primary 202554 Commercial Site Uses Site #Commercial Use Total Units Total Rentable Area (sqft.) 1 A03 - Garden apt 110 87600 Improvements Site #Structure Code SqFt Dimensions Quantity Overall Condition Actual Year Built Effective Year Built 1 RP6 - Porch-up cov 30.00 x 3.00 20.00 3 - Normal 1973 1 CP6 - Canpy-w/slab 30.00 x 3.00 10.00 3 - Normal 1973 1 RP6 - Porch-up cov 30.00 x 6.00 20.00 3 - Normal 1973 1 CP6 - Canpy-w/slab 30.00 x 6.00 10.00 3 - Normal 1973 1 FC1 - Shed-machine 12.00 x 20.00 1.00 3 - Normal 1973 1 RG4 - Gar-1.0 det 20.00 x 22.00 1.00 3 - Normal 2000 Special Districts Code Description Type Primary Units Secondar y Units SE010 - County sewer dist #1 A 0.00 0.00 Property Details - 130 Excelsior Ave Rear , Saratoga Springs, 12866 - 166.-1-15.131 - SWIS: 411589 (Saratoga Springs)        Structure Building 1 Number of Identical Buildings Actual Year Built 2017 Effective Year Built Construction Quality 2.5 Condition 4 - Good Building Perimeter 1261 Gross Floor Area 99174 Number of Stories 4.0 Stor y Height 12 Air Conditioning %100% Sprinkler %100% Number of Elevators 2 Basement Perimeter Basement Sq. Ft View Property on GIS Map 2025 Final Assessment Information Land Assessed Value $311,500 Total Assessed Value $4,000,000 Equalization Rate 40.50% Full Market Value $9,876,500 Partial Construction No County Taxable $4,000,000 Municipal Taxable $4,000,000 School Taxable $4,000,000 Village Taxable $0 Roll Section 1 Property Description Property Location 130 Excelsior Ave Rear Property Type 411 - Apartment Neighborhood Code 15194 SWIS 411589 Water Supply 3 - Comm/public Utilities 4 - Gas & elec Sewer Type 3 - Comm/public Zoning NC NC School Saratoga Springs Csd Book 2015 Page 19112 Grid East 687916 Grid North 1551388 Acres 0.43 Front 0.00 Depth 0.00 Survey Map(s)D-179 Agricultural District No Last Proper ty Sale No Sales Data Found Owner Information Owner Name Address 1 Address 2 PO Box City State Zip Unit Name Unit Number 130 Excelsior LLC 9 Hampstead Pl Saratoga Springs NY 12866 Ste 108 Sales Deed Date Deed Book Deed Page Contract Date Sale Date Last Physical Inspection Date Sale Price Net Sale Price Usable for Valuation Arms Length Prior Owner No data available in table No Exemption Data Found Land Site #Land Type Acres Front Depth Sq Ft Soil Rating 1 01 - Primary 0.43 Commercial Site Uses Site #Commercial Use Total Units Total Rentable Area (sqft.) 1 D08 - Small retail 0 2682 1 A01 - Walk-up apt 65 96492 Improvements Site #Structure Code SqFt Dimensions Quantity Overall Condition Actual Year Built Effective Year Built 1 RP6 - Porch-up cov 6.00 x 10.00 4.00 3 - Normal 2017 1 RP2 - Porch-coverd 6.00 x 10.00 2.00 3 - Normal 2017 1 RP6 - Porch-up cov 12.00 x 6.00 28.00 3 - Normal 2017 1 RP2 - Porch-coverd 12.00 x 6.00 14.00 3 - Normal 2017 1 RP2 - Porch-coverd 174.00 2.00 3 - Normal 2017 1 RP2 - Porch-coverd 57.00 x 12.00 1.00 3 - Normal 2017 1 RP6 - Porch-up cov 11.00 x 6.00 4.00 3 - Normal 2017 1 RP2 - Porch-coverd 11.00 x 6.00 2.00 3 - Normal 2017 Special Districts Code Description Type Primary Units Secondary Units SE010 - County sewer dist #1 A 0.00 0.00 Property Details - 246 West Ave , Saratoga Springs, 12866 - 178.33-1-25 - SWIS: 411501 (Saratoga Springs)        Structure Building 1 Number of Identical Buildings 1 Actual Year Built 2018 Effective Year Built Construction Quality 2.5 Condition 4 - Good Building Perimeter 451 Gross Floor Area 18174 Number of Stories 2.0 Stor y Height 10 Air Conditioning %100% Sprinkler %0% Number of Elevators Basement Perimeter 453 Basement Sq. Ft 9203 View Property on GIS Map 2025 Final Assessment Information Land Assessed Value $258,000 Total Assessed Value $1,696,320 Equalization Rate 40.50% Full Market Value $4,188,400 Partial Construction No County Taxable $1,696,320 Municipal Taxable $1,696,320 School Taxable $1,696,320 Village Taxable $0 Roll Section 1 Property Description Property Location 246 West Ave Property Type 411 - Apartment Neighborhood Code 15192 SWIS 411501 Water Supply 3 - Comm/public Utilities 4 - Gas & elec Sewer Type 3 - Comm/public Zoning UN UN School Saratoga Springs Csd Book 2020 Page 532 Grid East 678740 Grid North 1543658 Acres 0.57 Front 77.15 Depth 0.00 Survey Map(s)AA-121 C2P11F2 Agricultural District No Last Proper ty Sale Deed Date 01/07/2020 Deed Book 2020 Deed Page 532 Contract Date 10/11/2019 Sale Date 12/31/2019 Full Sale Price $4,100,000 Net Sale Price $4,100,000 Usable For Valuation Yes Arms Length Yes Prior Owner 246 West Avenue LLC Owner Information Owner Name Address 1 Address 2 PO Box City State Zip Unit Name Unit Number Nanak Management LLC 7 Cinnamon Ln Clifton Park NY 12065 Sales Deed Date Deed Book Deed Page Contract Date Sale Date Last Physical Inspection Date Sale Price Net Sale Price Usable for Valuation Arms Length Prior Owner 01/07/2020 2020 532 10/11/2019 12/31/2019 $4,100,000 $4,100,000 Yes Yes 246 West Avenue LLC 03/07/2019 2019 6341 01/31/2019 $1 $1 No No Hodorowski Holdings LLC 01/17/2017 2017 3195 08/12/2016 01/17/2017 $675,000 $675,000 No No Saratoga West LLC No Exemption Data Found Land Site #Land Type Acres Front Depth Sq Ft Soil Rating 1 01 - Primary 0.57 Commercial Site Uses Site #Commercial Use Total Units Total Rentable Area (sqft.) 1 A01 - Walk-up apt 16 18174 1 J02 - Small garage 0 6340 1 E02 - Walk-up off 0 2070 1 F05 - Row storage 0 793 No Improvement Data Found Special Districts Code Description Type Primary Units Secondar y Units SE010 - County sewer dist #1 A 0.00 0.00 Property Details - 14 Tait Ln, Saratoga Springs, 12866 - 165.-2-90 - SWIS: 411589 (Saratoga Springs)        Structure Building 1 Number of Identical Buildings 1 Actual Year Built 2024 Effective Year Built 2024 Construction Quality 2.0 Condition 4 - Good Building Perimeter 728 Gross Floor Area 9016 Number of Stories 2.0 Stor y Height 10 Air Conditioning %0% Sprinkler %0% Number of Elevators Basement Perimeter Basement Sq. Ft Building 2 Number of Identical Buildings 3 Actual Year Built 2024 Effective Year Built 2024 Construction Quality 2.0 Condition 4 - Good Building Perimeter 684 Gross Floor Area 7708 Number of Stories 2.0 Stor y Height 10 Air Conditioning %0% Sprinkler %0% Number of Elevators Basement Perimeter Basement Sq. Ft Building 3 Number of Identical Buildings 3 Actual Year Built 2024 Effective Year Built 2024 Construction Quality 2.0 Condition 4 - Good Building Perimeter 1288 Gross Floor Area 21628 Number of Stories 3.0 Stor y Height 10 Air Conditioning %0% Sprinkler %0% Number of Elevators Basement Perimeter Basement Sq. Ft Building 4 Number of Identical Buildings 5 Actual Year Built 2024 Effective Year Built 2024 Construction Quality 2.0 Condition 4 - Good Building Perimeter 1434 Gross Floor Area 24306 Number of Stories 3.0 Stor y Height 10 Air Conditioning %0% Sprinkler %0% Number of Elevators Basement Perimeter Basement Sq. Ft No image found for this Parcel. View Property on GIS Map 2025 Final Assessment Information Land Assessed Value $356,900 Total Assessed Value $10,100,000 Equalization Rate 40.50% Full Market Value $24,938,272 Partial Construction No County Taxable $0 Municipal Taxable $0 Property Description Property Location 14 Tait Ln Property Type 411 - Apartment Neighborhood Code 15841 SWIS 411589 Water Supply 3 - Comm/public Utilities 4 - Gas & elec Sewer Type 3 - Comm/public Last Proper ty Sale Deed Date 10/19/2022 Deed Book 2022 Deed Page 33568 Contract Date 07/09/2021 Sale Date 10/19/2022 Full Sale Price $3,000,000 Net Sale Price $3,000,000 School Taxable $0 Village Taxable $0 Roll Section 8 Zoning UN UN School Saratoga Springs Csd Book 2022 Page 33568 Grid East 675858 Grid North 1549215 Acres 13.80 Front 381.53 Depth 0.00 Survey Map(s)S-390 M2021129 Agricultural District No Usable For Valuation Yes Arms Length No Prior Owner Denton Road LLC Owner Information Owner Name Address 1 Address 2 PO Box City State Zip Unit Name Unit Number Development Fund Cor Tait Lane Reserve Housing 1228 Euclid Ave 4th Floor Cleveland OH 44115 Sales Deed Date Deed Book Deed Page Contract Date Sale Date Last Physical Inspection Date Sale Price Net Sale Price Usable for Valuation Arms Length Prior Owner 10/19/2022 2022 33568 07/09/2021 10/19/2022 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 Yes No Denton Road LLC Exemptions Code Description Amount Exemption %Start Year End Year 12350 - PUB AUTH $10,100,000.00 2023 Land Site #Land Type Acres Front Depth Sq Ft Soil Rating 1 01 - Primary 1.00 1 04 - Residual 12.80 Commercial Site Uses Site #Commercial Use Total Units Total Rentable Area (sqft.) 1 A08 - ETPA Cn/Sub Apt 202 218554 No Improvement Data Found Special Districts Code Description Type Primary Units Secondar y Units SE010 - County sewer dist #1 A 0.00 0.00 Retail Comps Property Details - 8 Circular St, Saratoga Springs, 12866 - 165.83-2-62 - SWIS: 411501 (Saratoga Springs)        Structure Building 1 Number of Identical Buildings 1 Actual Year Built 1992 Effective Year Built 2000 Construction Quality 2.0 Condition 3 - Normal Building Perimeter 468 Gross Floor Area 7518 Number of Stories 1.0 Stor y Height 12 Air Conditioning %100% Sprinkler %0% Number of Elevators Basement Perimeter Basement Sq. Ft View Property on GIS Map 2025 Final Assessment Information Land Assessed Value $402,300 Total Assessed Value $869,000 Equalization Rate 40.50% Full Market Value $2,145,700 Partial Construction No County Taxable $869,000 Municipal Taxable $869,000 School Taxable $869,000 Village Taxable $0 Roll Section 1 Property Description Property Location 8 Circular St Property Type 464 - Office bldg. Neighborhood Code 15194 SWIS 411501 Water Supply 3 - Comm/public Utilities 4 - Gas & elec Sewer Type 3 - Comm/public Zoning NC NC School Saratoga Springs Csd Book 2019 Page 5597 Grid East 682755 Grid North 1546115 Acres 0.66 Front 232.00 Depth 0.00 Survey Map(s)C1P10F2 Agricultural District No Last Proper ty Sale Deed Date 02/28/2019 Deed Book 2019 Deed Page 5597 Contract Date 02/01/2019 Sale Date 02/10/2019 Full Sale Price $1 Net Sale Price $1 Usable For Valuation No Arms Length No Prior Owner Dake Bros Inc Owner Information Owner Name Address 1 Address 2 PO Box City State Zip Unit Name Unit Number Stewarts Shops Corp 435 Saratoga Springs NY 12866 Sales Deed Date Deed Book Deed Page Contract Date Sale Date Last Physical Inspection Date Sale Price Net Sale Price Usable for Valuation Arms Length Prior Owner 02/28/2019 2019 5597 02/01/2019 02/10/2019 $1 $1 No No Dake Bros Inc No Exemption Data Found Land Site #Land Type Acres Front Depth Sq Ft Soil Rating 1 01 - Primary 0.66 Commercial Site Uses Site #Commercial Use Total Units Total Rentable Area (sqft.) 1 E02 - Walk-up off 0 3684 1 D08 - Small retail 0 3834 Improvements Site #Structure Code SqFt Dimensions Quantity Overall Condition Actual Year Built Effective Year Built 1 LP4 - Pavng-asphlt 12000.00 x 4.00 1.00 3 - Normal 1980 1 LP3 - Patio-concr 567.00 x 6.00 1.00 3 - Normal 1968 1 CP6 - Canpy-w/slab 447.00 1.00 3 - Normal 1968 Special Districts Code Description Type Primary Units Secondar y Units SE010 - County sewer dist #1 A 0.00 0.00 Property Details - 52 Marion Ave, Saratoga Springs, 12866 - 166.30-2-12 - SWIS: 411501 (Saratoga Springs)        Structure Building 1 Number of Identical Buildings 1 Actual Year Built 2015 Effective Year Built Construction Quality 3.0 Condition 4 - Good Building Perimeter 710 Gross Floor Area 20134 Number of Stories 1.0 Stor y Height 16 Air Conditioning %100% Sprinkler %100% Number of Elevators Basement Perimeter Basement Sq. Ft Building 2 Number of Identical Buildings 1 Actual Year Built 2015 Effective Year Built Construction Quality 3.0 Condition 4 - Good Building Perimeter 702 Gross Floor Area 24456 Number of Stories 2.0 Stor y Height 16 Air Conditioning %100% Sprinkler %100% Number of Elevators Basement Perimeter Basement Sq. Ft View Property on GIS Map 2025 Final Assessment Information Land Assessed Value $465,700 Total Assessed Value $4,000,000 Equalization Rate 40.50% Full Market Value $9,876,543 Partial Construction No County Taxable $4,000,000 Municipal Taxable $4,000,000 School Taxable $4,000,000 Village Taxable $0 Roll Section 1 Property Description Property Location 52 Marion Ave Property Type 451 - Reg shop ctr Neighborhood Code 15194 SWIS 411501 Water Supply 3 - Comm/public Utilities 4 - Gas & elec Sewer Type 3 - Comm/public Zoning NC NC School Saratoga Springs Csd Book 2022 Page 18877 Grid East 686680 Grid North 1551975 Acres 3.44 Front 319.70 Depth 0.00 Survey Map(s)M-720 M-729 M2013213 Agricultural District No Last Proper ty Sale Deed Date 06/06/2022 Deed Book 2022 Deed Page 18877 Contract Date 01/26/2022 Sale Date 04/27/2022 Full Sale Price $16,150,000 Net Sale Price $16,150,000 Usable For Valuation Yes Arms Length Yes Prior Owner Saratoga Retail Owner LLC Owner Information Owner Name Address 1 Address 2 PO Box City State Zip Unit Name Unit Number FM Saratoga LLC 615 Route 32 Highland Mills NY 10930 Sales Deed Date Deed Book Deed Page Contract Date Sale Date Last Physical Inspection Date Sale Price Net Sale Price Usable for Valuation Arms Length Prior Owner 06/06/2022 2022 18877 01/26/2022 04/27/2022 $16,150,000 $16,150,000 Yes Yes Saratoga Retail Owner LLC 01/05/2022 2022 354 10/25/2021 12/29/2021 $16,000,000 $16,000,000 Yes Yes Prime Beechwood, LLC No Exemption Data Found Land Site #Land Type Acres Front Depth Sq Ft Soil Rating 1 01 - Primary 3.44 Commercial Site Uses Site #Commercial Use Total Units Total Rentable Area (sqft.) 1 D04 - Nbhd center 0 20134 1 D06 - Supermarket 0 24456 No Improvement Data Found Special Districts Code Description Type Primary Units Secondary Units SE010 - County sewer dist #1 A 0.00 0.00 Property Details - 170 South Broadway , Saratoga Springs - 178.27-1-9 - SWIS: 411501 (Saratoga Springs)        Structure Building 1 Number of Identical Buildings 1 Actual Year Built 1985 Effective Year Built 2000 Construction Quality 2.0 Condition 3 - Normal Building Perimeter 380 Gross Floor Area 7504 Number of Stories 1.0 Stor y Height 12 Air Conditioning %25% Sprinkler %0% Number of Elevators Basement Perimeter Basement Sq. Ft View Property on GIS Map 2025 Final Assessment Information Land Assessed Value $503,400 Total Assessed Value $875,800 Equalization Rate 40.50% Full Market Value $2,162,500 Partial Construction No County Taxable $875,800 Municipal Taxable $875,800 School Taxable $875,800 Village Taxable $0 Roll Section 1 Property Description Property Location 170 South Broadway Property Type 452 - Nbh shop ctr Neighborhood Code 15191 SWIS 411501 Water Supply 3 - Comm/public Utilities 4 - Gas & elec Sewer Type 3 - Comm/public Zoning NC NC School Saratoga Springs Csd Book 1497 Page 738 Grid East 682447 Grid North 1544986 Acres 0.64 Front 200.00 Depth 140.00 Survey Map(s)EE-49 Agricultural District No Last Proper ty Sale No Sales Data Found Owner Information Owner Name Address 1 Address 2 PO Box City State Zip Unit Name Unit Number Awm Company Llc 511 Broadway Saratoga Springs NY 12866 Fl 1 Sales Deed Date Deed Book Deed Page Contract Date Sale Date Last Physical Inspection Date Sale Price Net Sale Price Usable for Valuation Arms Length Prior Owner No data available in table No Exemption Data Found Land Site #Land Type Acres Front Depth Sq Ft Soil Rating 1 01 - Primary 27878 Commercial Site Uses Site #Commercial Use Total Units Total Rentable Area (sqft.) 1 D04 - Nbhd center 0 7504 Improvements Site #Structure Code SqFt Dimensions Quantity Overall Condition Actual Year Built Effective Year Built 1 RN2 - Cold stor rm 48.00 x 1.00 1.00 3 - Normal 1984 1 LP4 - Pavng-asphlt 9000.00 x 4.00 1.00 3 - Normal 1984 Special Districts Code Description Type Primary Units Secondar y Units SE010 - County sewer dist #1 A 0.00 0.00 Hotel Comp Property Details - 3368 South Broadway , Saratoga Springs, 12866 - 178.-2-16 - SWIS: 411589 (Saratoga Springs)        Structure Building 1 Number of Identical Buildings 1 Actual Year Built 2017 Effective Year Built Construction Quality 2.5 Condition 4 - Good Building Perimeter 1353 Gross Floor Area 105772 Number of Stories 4.0 Stor y Height 12 Air Conditioning %100% Sprinkler %100% Number of Elevators 4 Basement Perimeter Basement Sq. Ft View Property on GIS Map 2025 Final Assessment Information Land Assessed Value $479,400 Total Assessed Value $7,000,000 Equalization Rate 40.50% Full Market Value $17,284,000 Partial Construction No County Taxable $7,000,000 Municipal Taxable $7,000,000 School Taxable $7,000,000 Village Taxable $0 Roll Section 1 Property Description Property Location 3368 South Broadway Property Type 414 - Hotel Neighborhood Code 15194 SWIS 411589 Water Supply 3 - Comm/public Utilities 4 - Gas & elec Sewer Type 3 - Comm/public Zoning GC-R GC-R School Saratoga Springs Csd Book 2022 Page 31739 Grid East 682768 Grid North 1538436 Acres 5.17 Front 400.88 Depth 0.00 Agricultural District No Last Proper ty Sale Deed Date 10/05/2022 Deed Book 2022 Deed Page 31739 Contract Date 07/13/2022 Sale Date 09/27/2022 Full Sale Price $15,250,000 Net Sale Price $15,250,000 Usable For Valuation Yes Arms Length Yes Prior Owner Broadway LLC Turf Pioneer South Owner Information Owner Name Address 1 Address 2 PO Box City State Zip Unit Name Unit Number 3368 S Broadway Hotel LLC 909 Linden Ave Rochester NY 14625 Sales Deed Date Deed Book Deed Page Contract Date Sale Date Last Physical Inspection Date Sale Price Net Sale Price Usable for Valuation Arms Length Prior Owner 10/05/2022 2022 31739 07/13/2022 09/27/2022 $15,250,000 $15,250,000 Yes Yes Broadway LLC Turf Pioneer South 10/17/2016 2016 32600 02/03/2016 $1 $1 No No Turf Saratoga South LLC No Exemption Data Found Land Site #Land Type Acres Front Depth Sq Ft Soil Rating 1 01 - Primary 2.00 1 04 - Residual 3.17 Commercial Site Uses Site #Commercial Use Total Units Total Rentable Area (sqft.) 1 B01 - Hotel 113 103347 1 Z01 - Spa/Pool/YMCA 0 2425 Improvements Site #Structure Code SqFt Dimensions Quantity Overall Condition Actual Year Built Effective Year Built 1 CP6 - Canpy-w/slab 12.00 x 6.00 1.00 3 - Normal 2017 Special Districts Code Description Type Primary Units Secondar y Units SE010 - County sewer dist #1 A 0.00 0.00 Attachment 12 Design Review Board Opinion Page 1 of 2 Tamie Ehinger, Chair Rob DuBoff, Vice Chair Karen Cavotta Karen D’Andrea Leslie DiCarlo Jeff Pfeil Geoff Wood Alison Dockum, Alternate Christina Abele, Alternate CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS D ESIGN R EVIEW B OARD ❖ City Hall - 474 Broadway Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 Tel: 518-587-3550 www.saratogaspringsny.gov ADVISORY OPINION In consideration of the Request for an Advisory Opinion by the Planning Board PB App #20250989 Rt 9/South Broadway Special Use Permit Route 9/South Broadway Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 Advisory opinion to the Planning Board considering a proposed mixed-use development including a 120-room hotel, 128 multi- family residential units, 8,000 sq. ft. retail and associated site work in the Gateway Commercial - Rural (GC-R) district., tax parcel # 178.-2-17.11, 178.-2-17.12, within the City of Saratoga Springs. Following discussion on this matter on September 23, 2026 and October 7, 2026, the Design Review Board offers the following comments with respect to the Planning Board’s request for input with particular attention to height, mass, scale, location, arrangement, size, design and general site compatibility as well as the adherence to the Gateway Rural Commercial (GC -R) design standards. The Design Review Board would like to thank the Planning Board for the opportunity to review the proposal at this early stage in the process. The DRB reviewed and understands the GC-R design standards set forth in the Unified Development Ordinance, and compared those standards to the proposal. Where a specific standard is applicable, it is quoted with the discussion points following. “Site designs must employ techniques such as variation in the height and placement of buildings, as well as clustering of structures and vegetation to reinforce the rural character of the area, and to help preserve scenic views of the surrounding natural landscape.” The Board finds the heights of the proposed structures conform with the GC-R zoning requirements, however, all of the structures on this site are very similar, if not the same, height. The four residential buildings are replicas of one another with little differentiation in height between them, the mixed-use building, and the hotel; thus, not meeting this standard. The applicant does cluster the structures to preserve the surrounding landscape, however, the lack of substantial vegetation within the development area does not align with the intent of the district. “Facades abutting a public right-of-way (excluding alleys) must be divided into multiple ‘modules,’ expressed through significant architectural changes such as a change in materials, a change in pattern elements such as fenestration, column or pilasters, or a change in building setback through recesses or projections. For buildings 80’ in length or greater, such modules may be no wider than 40 feet.” The Board discussed the mass and scale of the mixed-use building and feels that there should be more undulations, architectural elements, material changes and shadowing added to break up its visual impact. The breezeway is an appropriate feature that breaks up the mass, and the rooftop amenity space is an appropriate addition, opening up the roofline creating a dynamic silhouette. However, the mixed-use building still presents as very large, and some architectural elements should be employed to decrease that impact. Additionally, although the mass and scale of the residential buildings are zoning compliant, the mixed-use building and residential buildings feature very similar window fenestrations, materials and modules, therefore not meeting this standard. The Board understands they will have an opportunity to review architectural details at a later date and at that time will closely review and comment on materials, fenestration, façade composition, etc. Page 2 of 2 “Vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems must reflect a rural character through the use of curvilinear forms that acknowledge and work to complement site features such as vegetation and topography.” The hotel entrance is not appropriate as it is proposed. The diagonal presentation to the street, cultivated vegetation at the hotel entrance, large entry road, and the grand porte-cochère present as a suburban, rather than rural design. The architectural design of the porte-cochère can be modified to a rural design with a change in building materials and details, however, the diagonal presentation, large, linear entry and lack of indigenous landscaping do not conform to the standard. “Sites must be designed to ensure safe pedestrian and bicycle access from the public right-of-way, and safe pedestrian and bicycle circulation within the development.” “Vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems must reflect a rural character through the use of curvilinear forms that acknowledge and work to complement site features such as vegetation and topography.” The Board discussed the site design and found that the southern entry presents as a boulevard that crosses through the property rather than as an entry to a self-contained, rural development. The GC-R district should showcase meandering and curvilinear roads, following a subtle change in the landscape rather than the clearcut of land with the addition of a grid of linear streets and buildings. Additionally, the north side of the multi-use building does not have a sidewalk, therefore a pedestrian exiting the north side of Building D or E traveling north would have to go south and through the breezeway of the multi-use building in order to get to the public right-of-way. A sidewalk on the north side of the multi-use building and on the north side of the tree buffer would allow a pedestrian to walk straight from the back of the property to the public right-of-way without having to backtrack to a designated crosswalk. “Off street parking and traffic flow must not interfere with the flow of pedestrian travel or otherwise detract from the aesthetic character of a development or redevelopment. All off-street parking must be screened or aligned so that light from vehicle headlights do not adversely impact abutting properties.” “Existing on-site vegetation and topography must be preserved to the extent practicable. Where topography must be altered, cut and fill slopes must be graded to mimic existing slopes, at a maximum of 1:5, and blend smoothly into the surrounding landform.” The Board understands that the parking on the Broadway side of the mixed-use building is zoning compliant; however, to meet the standards, the landscaping plan for the tree belt/buffer must be carefully developed and reviewed. The applicant should propose a multi-tiered landscaping plan to the Planning Board showing both a best-case scenario regarding the preservation of current vegetation, as well as a carefully developed back up plan if the existing vegetation must be removed. The tree belt should not hide the development, it should be substantial enough to serve its intended purpose of screening the parking while presenting an indigenous, naturally occurring look. Overall, the Design Review Board feels that this project can be successful with some changes to site design, building characteristics and the priority of greenspace in the overall development plan.