Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20191085 Black Residence Updated Narrative Zimbra amanda.tucker@saratoga-springs.org Re: 94 York Avenue - Reduced accessory &total coverage From : Gillian Black <gilliandblack@gmail.com> Sat, Jan 18, 2020 10:58 AM Subject : Re: 94 York Avenue - Reduced accessory &total coverage To : Rob Flansburg <dreamscapes.1@live.com> 07 attachments Cc :Amanda Tucker <amanda.tucker@saratoga-springs.org> Thanks Bob. Amanda, Related to Middle Avenue property line setback comps, please find attached. As you can see, the majority of properties are non-conforming. Therefore we respectfully request that the 5' rear setback to our proposed garage accessory structure be maintained as outlined in the code. As for relief from the total allowable accessory structure percentage, we have made considerable concessions (as Bob has outlined), and we ask that the ZBA grant us as outlined in Bob's most recent email. I will follow up with a revised site plan Monday or Tuesday. - A handful of google street view shots of neighboring properties with notes. - Saratoga County GIS map (aerial) showing properties along Middle Ave. with ID numbers corresponding to property setback chart (also attached). - Approximate property setback measurement chart for both sides Middle near the rear border of our 94 York Ave property. Many thanks to you and the ZBA for your time and attention on this matter. My wife Kate and I look forward to resolving this matter in the next ZBA meeting. Please don't hesitate to contact Bob or me should you require additional information. Regards, Gillian Black 518-932-6696 _ _ L_ a --o . �III�II@ IIIIIIIIIIIIII Ili s e n GOO92 '"• Neighboring house facade within 5'feet of front Neighboring houses'facades within feet of their property line. respective front property lines. Il — ,,':..41., ' ••"--7‘ _ 0- -------=------ i , ___i2: !..:,.._ . -, __ _.._ •- �`� ., _ - •,,_ , . 1 7,. ..-,,,„4,"--,..',".,. ':::,- ,.. sr:__ . -,.A....1 Ill I'' —mairaw...-. -• -...... ,,,,,,.....,..-=.: . .. .,___„---,,, .Y k.4 .064, , 4 11 , 1- li - d.- i.._.... .. ....jr„_71w...___ --, _ - c • r. p}t ,, :s _ Driveway entrance j '`,` along rear property line ,,.,,,,,„,;,,--4,,,,.:_;-e- , for 94 York Ave. - + P: "t J Google < > Driveway 1 entrance along rear property line for 94 .� York Ave. 1 Neighboring properties with '... •. , , �'.�: •., f.40,acades within feet of .r- front property line. -'..?.1t.N.,,_ ---,•_'4.K.' "-- ". / to ne.-,... ' Allit416bk __,ILliog V4. I: - , _V r Fin:___ 7_,--.--_,--'17,111111111i41,,--,,,. ,=.. -. its, ,„._ ,,.___ ,.... _:•.:„..,," _ -- _•.....,, .. ._ -,,.-.--:-:, ___,.... ..W.-- Aboiw.„-- ., ...-., -,-.,.. .. Neighboring Two car garage along middle. _ garage properties Rear property line for 177 Lake Ave. � f,. - Two g ge ro erties with One of 3 double lots with rear property • IP"' - along middle.Side facades within feet of boundary on Middle Ave. ;+ '• property line for lig. front property line. 12 Warren St. t iiii011 eh. 4- Google iii w- - • ,'sxty� = !( . i*#-->-------— igi a ni , -__:-..-_r- --, _ __ , , _-_-----4 if _ .„... • ; .,. iiiii l' IIC'."'11"1 'i. ''''' ' .--''' ' .'"—--- k'• �...t....-�..-.-!� '�` ��.1.1,- ---- IN 0 ....t.0,75% = a IL, � I r '� v t. ''off ' t • -• -w v�i • opop -...„: :.., .. s � *'r�-,Yt -v- ._'.� -t,\.ter.,.. t L...._ ....400;...1.111 '11-. . ,. ,- Google , „. C-\ 6 r,... y. ,o,. oeen, Two car,two story garage sited within feet of rear property line on Middle Ave.across from rear property line of 94 York Ave.This garage sites on a double lot ' _ter;w - belonging to 177 Lake Ave. L _- - '� - -- _ r"Vie--,. -, • .- .,r _-_,,.7 ... ____ _ , r,,., __ _ . r„,, .,, c,.... ON IN li: in ��tr. - gli: Q �, r >U �rr ,-.4,;--?: `rte` f,I<Y �,' :f e y x,Y Google > 1 . ,--..-1-7W74.-... ��' :>.. ri Note proximity of primary and secondary structures to front,side and rear property lines. Note primary and accessorystructureCoverage density.94 York Ave.rear 'r` rr -rproperty line. ./ ......�.+ \ G .: yr , _ PC-319011 1:014ak0D- I. 11 IItiki .4. \ t- 16* 1646 .13-4! ti. + 41k,J111,_ '' ..1110 4 •`- lkaila ®166.46-3-1 i --_- li \\VIIM�\ �g 45:3.-28 4, 166.45,3,71" 1 11 I 166.d6^* 2 •.�� i I. 66zd5�2d __ rii66 .45��3 1 et i r� II - al 113.1...-- D °. 166.46.3--3III .1 .. ��:1.,„66.4111166.45.3-26 1.}.d5�R66, .46 -2 • -A. 66.4529166�45��2e166.45,47 1 ©16 � 15ry46166.45 -2� ' , �.;� �.� �. � 166°45-3-18 ....4111 �''_� � ,,'�► C166.46 13 R{ \;11 166.462-16 '', ., 166:45'3-1 .� 1 ,rte+ 16imi . �17 ,3-14 I I 4 .1 *� 1 wigs,-_ fes+ -,,,,01 i66.d5 33 i. 166."-'16.45-3-36 �166.45�-4� 1:;\ II:1 oiri ( 16645 -47161 3' ® � I.6.46�-2Q 166.46-3-26 �� 0 166.4623 �6d'�a5 166.45,-0B i � 1 166.46-321 r 166. x-24 - 166.'1• + r o Iliii 2 I 156.45 -03i66.d52d iti -V 191 Lake Ave. �166.4 . ,'5�29 16 45,-38166_45-3,5 Commercial parking 0 166-'6-3-4? lot entrance for dental ` .,166 4. officelmixed use r■� ._ 1 i , " W i residential. z_, 177 Lake Ave.Two car, 25 1! i ,.. . or - _Tu.—. two story garage on Middle L., Aire at rear of"double lot" ' 0 property boundary ~.." ' ' ! _ -4 #4,06 Ire\irbi_166!46 -4Q w , I ir * 166.462 11 `114'-3-3 . 3 - On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 5:16 PM Rob Flansburg <dreamscapes.1@live.com> wrote: Hi Amanda, In response to the comments from the board at the last meeting, my clients have agreed to reduce the proposed garage to 28'-0" wide, which equates to 840 s.f. under drip edge (30' x 28' = 840 s.f.) Also, the pool equipment covers an area of 3 ft. x 6'-8" for a total of 20 s.f. There are 2 existing air conditioning units which conservatively represent 13 s.f. Accounting for the above, the following is a breakdown of the Accessory coverage: Revised Accessory Coverage: Pool Water = 581 s.f. Garage = 840 s.f. (30' x 28') under drip edge. Pool Equip. = 20 s.f. AC Units = 13 s.f. Total Accessory Coverage (revised) = 1,454 s.f. (13.3%) This represents a 2.9% reduction in the accessory coverage variance from the initial application. This would bring our Total lot coverage to: 38.0% Principal Res. = 24.7% Accessory = 13.3% Total = 38.0 0/0