Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20260311 9 Cleveland Ave. Area Variance NODPage 1 of 2 CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CITY HALL - 474 BROADWAY SARATOGA SPRINGS, NEW YORK 12866 518-587-3550 WWW.SARATOGA-SPRINGS.ORG Gage Simpson, Chair Brendan Dailey, Vice Chair Amanda Demma Jonah Cohen Otis Maxwell Chris LaPointe Steve Harrigan # 20260311 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL OF James Fahey 9 Cleveland Avenue Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 From the determination of the Building Inspector involving the premises at 9 Cleveland Avenue in the City of Saratoga Springs, NY, being tax parcel number 178.52-3-15.1 on the Assessment Map of said City. The applicant having applied for an area variance for a deck addition to an existing single-family residence in the Urban Residential -2 (UR-2) District. Public notice having been duly given of a hearing on said application from June 22nd-July 13th, 2026. In consideration of the balance between the benefit to the applicant with detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the community, I move that the following variance for the following amount of relief: Type of Requirement District Dimensional Requirement Proposed Relief Requested Rear Yard Setback 25’ 15’ 10’ (40%) As per the submitted plans or lesser dimensions, BE APPROVED for the following reasons: 1. Achievability by Other Means: The applicant has demonstrated this benefit cannot be achieved by other means feasible to the applicant. The applicant wishes to expand upon the current rear deck. The expansion will allow for the deck to continue to be flush to the main structure and the current deck could not be expanded to the north due to a basement egress window. The applicant has considered other alternatives, but they were deemed unfeasible to the applicant. The board notes there is no additional land for purchase. 2. Undesirable Change: The applicant has demonstrated that granting this variance will not create an undesirable change in neighborhood character and does not negatively alter the streetscape. Neighborhood comparables for rear setbacks were presented and there was positive feedback via public comment. 3. Substantiality: The requested variance is considered to be substantial but is mitigated by the factors above. 4. Adverse Effect or Impact: The applicant has demonstrated that granting this variance will not have an adverse physical or environmental effect on the neighborhood. District permeability will be met. 5. Self-Created Difficulty: The request for relief is a self-created hardship as the applicant wishes to expand the rear deck but self-creation is not necessarily fatal to the application. Page 2 of 2 It is so moved, July 13th, 2026 Passes by the following vote: AYES: 6 (G. Simpson, B. Dailey, O. Maxwell, A. Demma, C. LaPointe, S. Harrigan) NAYS: 0 This variance shall expire 18 months following the filing date of such decision unless the necessary building permit has been issued and actual construction begun as per the Unified Development Ordinance. I hereby certify the above to be a full, true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Saratoga Springs on the date above mentioned, six members of the Board being present. SIGNATURE: CHAIR