HomeMy WebLinkAbout20260067 16 Marion / Ave A Subdivision Extension Applicationr.-p.t , CITY OF SARATOGA SPRI NGS
CHUCK MARSHALL, Chair
PLANNING BOARD MARK PINGEL, Vice Chair
r0. 0 KE RRY MAYO
i-- .__Y, .__
City Hall -474 Broadway WILLIAM MCTYGUE
MICHAEL KING
a ,. . .,.; .; Saratoga Spri ngs, New York I 2866
Tel:5 I8-587-3550 fax:5 I8-580-9480 TONY STELLATO
i
JOSEPH FERRANTEwww.saratoga-springs.org ALEX WH ITE,Alternate
NOTICE OF DECISION
I N TH E MATTE R OF TH E
SUBDIVISION APPLICATION NO. 20240932 oF
ALLEN TANNER
I 6 MARION AVE.
SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY I 2866
Involving the premises with Tax Parcel ID#I 53.I 7-I-8, in the City of Saratoga Springs, on an application for
final plat review of a proposed two-lot subdivision within the Urban Residential—2 (UR-2) District with the
Planning Board who met on January I 6, 2025 and made the following decision(s):
In accordance with SEQRA regulations 6NYCRR Part 6 I 7 and after review and evaluation of the SEQRA short
Environmental Assessment Form Parts I and II, made a motion to issue a Negative SEQRA Declaration on
January I6, 2025;
And, in accordance with the purpose and objectives set forth in the City's Unified Development Ordinance
Article I 4 "Subdivision Approval", the Planning Board issued the following decision—passed 6-0 (Marshall,
Pingel, Mayo, McTygue, King,White):
Q Approve final subdivision plat(dated I 0/08/2024)with the following conditions:
I. Add two street trees on lot 2 to the west of the east along Marion Ave.
2. Final plans shall address all of the technical review comments to the satisfaction of the City Engineers
Office/DPW.
3. Design Review Board approval of the demolition of the one-story portion of the existing residence shall
be obtained followed by removal of that portion of the structure prior to signing by the Chair of the
final plat.
The applicant is required to complete the following prior to signing of the final plat by the Planning Board Chair:
Deliver a letter of credit or cash escrow as a performance guarantee to the City for required on-and
off-site improvements.
Submit one(I)mylar and two(2)paper copies of the final approved subdivision plat for signature by the
Planning Board Chair.
File the signed final subdivision plat with the Saratoga County Clerk within sixty-two (62) days as
provided in Article 3, Section 32 of General City Law.
Approval of the final plat expires within one year after the resolution granting such approval unless all
requirements stated in such resolution have been certified and completed per Article I 4 of the UDO.
January 3 I, 2025
Date filed with Accounts Dept. Chair
cc: Building Dept.,Accounts Dept.,Applicant/Agent, File
P LANNING BOARD
MINUTES DRAFT
THURSDAY, APRIL 10, 2025
6:00 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL ROOM
CALL TO ORDER: Mark Pingel, Chair called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M.
PRESENT: Mark Pingel, Chair, Bill McTygue, Kerry Mayo, Alex White (alternate), Mike King,
Anthony (Tony) Stellato
ABSENT: Joe Ferrante, Co-Chair
STAFF: Susan Barden, Principal Planner, Leah Everhart, City Counsel, James Sallaway,
City Engineer.
A. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES:
B. POSSIBLE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS: None
Note: The intent of a consent agenda is to identify any applications that appear to be
‘approvable’ without need for further evaluation or discussion. If anyone wishes to
further discuss any proposed consent agenda item, then that item would be pulled
from the ‘consent agenda’ and dealt with individually.
Mark Pingel, Chair announced that James Sallaway is now the City Engineer.
Congratulations James! Mark mentioned that it’s his first meeting as chair and it will be tough
to follow-up the two past chairs – Mark Torpey and Chuck Marshall.
C. PLANNING BOARD APPLICATIONS UNDER CONSIDERATION: NOTE: Agenda item
discussion will not begin past 10:00 p.m.
1. #20230877 NYS Route 29 Mixed-Use. Consideration of SEQRA review for a mixed-use
project including multi-family residences and a hotel in the Neighborhood Commercial (T-5)
District.
Bill McTygue recused himself from this project.
Mark Pingel, Chair said this application has been before the board in the past. The board
won’t be making any decisions tonight. They will listen to the presentation, ask questions and
summarize to the applicant what further details are needed.
Jamie Easton represented the applicant, Prime Companies and presented the following:
City of Saratoga Springs – Planning Board Minutes – April 10, 2025 - Page 4 of 10
Tonya Yasenchak, Y Engineering & Engineering America represented the applicant.
Tonya said she was asked by the board to revisit the parking for the existing two-family
residence, and she presented two options:
Option B – a second driveway that would provide parking for two and would require
removing a large tree.
Option A – was sent to the applicant from the city engineer’s office showing a parking
space (indentation) in front of the two-family residence allowing the tree to be
preserved.
Mark asked if the applicant has a preference. Tonya said their preference is to have the
parking in front of the building so the larger tree can be preserved but they’ll do either option.
Mark Pingel, Chair asked if anyone from the public wished to speak.
Deb LaCombe, 11 Marion Ave., also an HOA member said they would prefer plan B to have
two off-street parking spaces. It will be safer and easier to maintain in the wintertime.
Mark Pingel, Chair closed the Public Hearing and asked the individual board members to
state their preference and reasoning for their choice.
Bill – said he prefers the straight curb without the cutout (option B) from a practical street
design standpoint. The cutout presents a problem for 2 cars in the future to be able to park
there. The cutout cheapens the design of the project.
Alex – agrees with Bill and with keeping the off-street parking consistent with the surrounding
neighborhood properties.
Kerry – prefers Option A and preserving the trees. Having cars parked close to the street will
calm the traffic there.
Tony – agreed with Bill and his reasons cited, Option B.
Mike – on-street parking with parking bays is bringing the city into the future. It will have to
be designed wide enough to accommodate snow/snow plowing. He said the material used
for the bay could be a permeable material that would actually help with stormwater runoff. He
agrees with Option A. It will calm traffic, make the street safer, and save the large tree from
being cut down.
After a straw poll it was determined that the board would prefer Option B. Leah said this will
be a modification to the previously adopted SEQRA. The board can adopt a motion stating
that this is a minor modification to the previously reviewed SEQRA action, and it will have no
impacts different or greater than those already considered for SEQRA purposes.
Mark Pingel made a motion that this modification to the previously reviewed and adopted
SEQRA is minor. The motion was seconded by Kerry Mayo. Vote: M. King-Y, T. Stellato-Y,
M. Pingel-Y, K. Mayo-Y, A. White-Y, B. McTygue-Y. 6-0, Motion carried.
Mark Pingel made a motion to rescind their previous subdivision approval. The motion was
seconded by Bill McTygue. Vote: M. King-Y, T. Stellato-Y, M. Pingel-Y, K. Mayo-Y, A.
White-Y, B. McTygue-Y. 6-0, Motion carried.
Mark Pingel made a motion to approve the subdivision at 11 Marion Ave. as defined by the
drawing package that was submitted to the city, to include the parking plan which includes 2
driveways – one on each side of the two-family residence. The motion was seconded by
City of Saratoga Springs – Planning Board Minutes – April 10, 2025 - Page 5 of 10
Tony Stellato. Vote: M. King-N, T. Stellato-Y, M. Pingel-Y, K. Mayo-N, A. White-Y, B.
McTygue-Y. 4-2, Motion carried.
3. #2025132 54 Church St. Sketch site plan. Sketch plan of a proposed mixed-use project in
the Urban Core (T-6) District.
Mark Pingel, Chair said this property is currently a gas station with a small convenience
store.
Tonya Yasenchak, Y Engineering & Engineering America represented the applicant who
purchased the property from Golub Properties. There was a gas station on it that the
applicant leased for a period of time. When he purchased the property he was required to
put in new fuel tanks and pumps which were done within the last 5 years. The cost for these
new utilities for the gas station was over $300,000. The applicant is proposing to remove
some pumps and construct a mixed-use building with commercial space on the first floor and
apartments on the upper floors. Tonya said they are before the planning board with a sketch
plan because the site is unique in size and configuration, and because of the existing utilities
on the site. The address of the site is 54 Church, but the narrower frontage of the property is
along Clinton St. Tonya said according to the UDO if a property is on a corner the narrowest
portion of the lot is considered the front (Clinton St.). Tonya said because there are frontage
requirements and possible zoning variances needed they wanted to get the PB’s thought on
the project first. She showed photos of the site from various angles and a site plan map. She
presented a sketch of the proposed 4-story building to show mass and scale. Tonya said
she’s started discussions with the Preservation Foundation regarding rhythm on the building.
The building will be brick with balconies, and they will add arches and metal work. The
design is in a very preliminary stage. There will be 4 units on each floor 2nd-4th, and a
penthouse unit that steps back 10 or 12 ft. for a total of 13 units.
Mark Pingel, Chair said this is information enough for initial comments from board members:
Mike – in favor of more building downtown. 1. Pointed out that the design standards in
the Urban Core district require buildings to be within zero to 12 ft. and to be built out to
80% of the property frontage of both streets. This does not, so variances will be
required. 2. The UDO for commercial mixed use district design standards says “all
buildings must be oriented toward a primary public street” which in this case
(regardless of where the property is narrower) is Church St. and the building is not
oriented toward that. 3. “All public entrances must include a direct pedestrian
connection which may not be set back more than 10 ft. from the building line” – not
sure this design does that. 4.“Commercial store fronts must include traditional
pedestrian oriented elements”, this will retain a gas station appearance. Mike pointed
out that this board does not consider economic impact ($300,000 spent on new
utilities). He is in favor of the development and if the applicant were to present
something that looked at the entire buildout of the site instead of just phase 1, post gas
station, that might make more sense to the board. Tonya said the plan is very
conceptual and they will also be required to go to the ZBA.
Tony – a gas station in the Urban Core T-6 is not a permitted use. The gas station
that’s currently there is a pre-existing, non-conforming use. There’s a change of use
and that’s what’s being considered. If they want to renovate the gas station, that’s
permissible. If they want to introduce another use on this property (mixed use
ENGINEERING AMERICA CO.
76 WASHINGTON ST. SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866
518 / 587-1340 518 / 580-9783 (FAX)
TRANSMITTAL SHEET
TO: FROM:
Planning Board Tonya Yasenchak
COMPANY: DATE: City of Saratoga Springs SEPTEMBER 25, 2024
FAX NUMBER: TOTAL N O. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER:
6
PHONE NUMBER: SENDER’S REFERENCE NUMBER:
RE: YOUR REFERENCE NUMBER:
Tanner – (2) Lot Subdivision
Water, Sewer & Basic SWPPP
URGENT FOR REVIEW PLEASE COMMENT PLEASE REPLY AS REQUESTED
ENGINEERING REPORT:
INTRODUCTION:
Engineering America Co. has been retained by the applicants, Allen P. Tanner to provide
land planning and site/civil engineering services in connection with the subdivision
application for # 16 Marion Ave. at the corner of Marion Ave. & Avenue A in the City of
Saratoga Springs, Tax Map # 153.17-1-8.
Subdivision approval will be required from the Planning Board which includes all
requirements listed on the City of Saratoga’s Preliminary/Final Subdivision Approval
Required Submittal Checklist. This report is intended to fulfill items 4 & 6 of the
Required Items part of the Preliminary / Final Subdivision approval checklist.
DESCRIPTION OF INTENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT & USE:
The site, #16 Marion Ave. is located at the North West intersection of Marion Ave (aka
NYS Rte. 9) and Avenue A in Saratoga Springs New York. The 14,580 sq.ft. lot
currently has two existing structures with (3) total dwelling units. An existing (2) family
dwelling is accessed via paved driveway from Avenue A. An existing (1) family
dwelling is accessed via gravel driveway from Marion Ave. The lot area is nearly level
across the property. The property is mostly grassy with lawn and a few larger mature
trees along both street frontages.
2
The proposed subdivision of this parcel would result in dividing the single lot into two
lots. The existing (2) family dwelling located on Avenue A would be located on a 6,970
sq.ft lot (designated as Lot 1 on the map). The existing driveway access off of Avenue
A would remain unchanged. The existing electrical utility connection overhead from a
utility pole on the South side of Avenue A remains unchanged.
The new lot (designated as Lot 2 on the map), will be created at the corner of Marion Ave.
& Avenue. The existing (1) family dwelling located at the East of the existing property will
remain but be modified. The one story portion of this existing structure and exterior
stairway will be demolished to allow for the new interior lot line created. The new Lot 2 is
proposed to be 7,609 sq.ft. in area.
Zoning Variances were granted by the City of Saratoga Zoning Board of Appeals on June
10, 2024 (ZBA #20240196) as follows:
- Lot #1: Front Setback – 10’ req./ 3.7’ proposed / 6.3’ variance (63% relief) granted
- Lot #2: Rear Setback – 25’ req. / 3.7’ proposed / 21.3’ variance (85.2%) relief
granted
Compliance with the requirements of Table 3-A of the City of Saratoga Springs Unified
Development Ordinance (UDO) for the lots within a UR-2 District is as shown on the
subdivision plat pages S2 & S3
WATER REPORT :
Currently, there are 2 bedrooms within the existing two-family dwelling which will be on
the resulting Lot #1. There are (2) bedrooms within the existing single-family dwelling
which will be on the resulting Lot #2. Using a standard demand of 110 gallons per capita
day (gpcd) the existing properties can be estimated to have an annual water consumption
usage of 160,600 gallons. As the residences are proposed to remain, there is no assumed
increase of the water usage. In addition, each structure has it’s own water connection to
a water main within Avenue A. The are no proposed modifications to the existing lines
or existing connections.
SANITARY REPORT :
Currently, there are 2 bedrooms within the existing two-family dwelling which will be on
the resulting Lot #1. There are (2) bedrooms within the existing single-family dwelling
which will be on the resulting Lot #2. Using a standard demand of 110 gallons per capita
day (gpcd) the existing properties can be estimated to have an annual sanitary sewer load
of approximately 160,600 gallons.
3
Each building has a separate sewer line connection to the sewer main located within
Avenue A. As the residences are proposed to remain, there is no assumed increase of
the overall sanitary sewer load. There are also no modifications proposed to the existing
sewer lines or sewer connections.
STORMWATER & BASIC SWPPP / EROSION CONTROL
SOIL CONDITIONS:
The project site (in location of the proposed current residences is relatively flat. Soils on
this site are WnB (Windsor B) according to Saratoga County Soil surveys. the depth to
any restrictive feature in this soil type is typically greater than 60”. The soil is classified
as very deep, excessively drained, rapid permeability, slow surface runoff and slight
erosion hazard.
SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL:
A sediment and erosion control plan has been developed in order to specify minimum
controls and measures to reduce sediment runoff during construction.
- Construction Entrance: One construction entrance has been specified to
accommodate the new driveway off of Avenue A to the proposed existing
residence on the new Lot #2.
- Topsoil: A potential topsoil storage area for grading backfill will be identified
(possibly located at the North East corner of the new lot #2) and will be surrounded
by silt fencing. In general, excavation is proposed to be limited to the site
modifications as relative to the demolition of the existing one story portion of
structure on Lot #2. Excavations following demolition is anticipated to be
limited to grading and seeding of a new lawn area. All demolition materials
shall be removed from the site & not buried. No soil is proposed to be
removed from the site.
- Concrete Wash: A Concrete washout location has been proposed at the Eastern
portion of the new Lot #2 towards Marion Ave. Concrete washout details and
instructions are include on page S-4 of the subdivision development plans.
- Sediment Control: Less than 0.06 acres are anticipated to be disturbed during
demolition of the existing portion of building and construction of the new
driveway on Lot #2. Silt fencing has been specified around the perimeter of the
new lot project area to reduce off site erosion migration.
Woodland
Dwellings with basements
Septic Tank Absorption Fields
WnB—Windsor loamy sand, undulating
Surface layer:
Substratum:
Soil Properties
Permeability:
Available water capacity (average for 40-inch profile):
Soil reaction:
Surface runoff:
Erosion hazard:
Depth to water table:
Depthtobedrock:
Flooding hazard:
Use and Suitability
Cropland
Pasture
Recreation
Woodland
Dwellings with basements
Septic Tank Absorption Fields
WnC—Windsor loamy sand, rolling
Surface layer:
Subsoil:
Substratum:
Soil Properties
Permeability:
Available water capacity (average for 40-inch profile):
Soil reaction:
Surface runoff:
Erosion hazard:
Depth to water table:
Depthtobedrock:
Flooding hazard:
Use and Suitability
Cropland
Pasture
Recreation
Woodland
Dwellings with basements
City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Checklist 1
City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Checklist
Project Name: __________________________________________________ Date: ____________________
Project Location / Limits: __________________________________________________________________
Project Description: ______________________________________________________________________
Instructions: For each box checked, please provide a brief description for how the item is addressed,
not addressed, or not applicable and include supporting documentation.
Street Classification (identify street or streets within the project area)
Principal arterial Minor arterial Mixed use collector Mixed use local
Residential collector Residential local Special use street
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Item to Be Addressed/ Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description
Existing Bicycle & Pedestrian Operations
Do bicycle and pedestrian accommodations exist? (see page 2 for
examples)
Existing Transit Operations
Do transit facilities exist within the study area, including bus and
train stops/stations?
Is the project area on a transit route? (CDTA Service Routes)
Are there bicycle racks, shelters, or parking for transit riders
available?
Existing Access and Mobility
Do connective opportunities exist with schools, hospitals, senior
care or community centers or persons with disabilities within
project area?
Are there gaps inhibiting continuous access between schools,
hospitals, senior care, or community centers or persons with
disabilities within project area?”
Project Area Context
Are there prominent landmarks, recreation, shopping, employment
center, cultural centers or other key destinations that offer
opportunities to connect this site?
Please list and/or describe planning or policy documents addressing bicyclist, pedestrian, transit, or truck/ freight use for
the project area. Examples can include: City of Saratoga Springs Comprehensive Plan, City of Saratoga Springs Open
Space Plan, Capital District Transportation Committee Bicycle/ Pedestrian Priority Network, City Standard Details, etc.
Saratoga Springs Complete Street Policy Vision (May 2012)
The City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Policy will encourage the development of a complete streets
network throughout the City to create a more balanced transportation system. The Policy shall be consistent
with and assist in achieving the goals and recommendations set forth in the City’s Comprehensive Plan and
other policy documents. The Policy shall ensure new and updated public and private projects are planned,
designed, maintained and operated to enable safer, comfortable and convenient travel to the greatest extent
possible for users of all abilities including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists and transit riders.
This checklist is intended to assist the City in achieving its vision for complete streets.
City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Checklist 2
PROPOSED DESIGN
Item to Be Addressed/ Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description
Complete Streets Design
Bicyclist accommodations?
Pedestrian accommodations?
Access and Mobility accommodations?
Transit accommodations?
Truck/ freight accommodations?
Streetscape elements?
Bike Facilities:
Off-roadway bike
accommodations
Yes No NA
Dedicated bike lane Yes No NA
Shared-use lane Yes No NA
Shoulder Yes No NA
Acceptable actuated traffic
signal bike detection, including
turn lanes
Yes No NA
Do signals allow adequate
minimum green time for
bicyclist to safely cross
intersection?
Yes No NA
Signage and pavement
markings specific to proposed
bike facilities
Yes No NA
Bicycle safe inlet grates Yes No NA
Bicycle parking, eg. bike racks,
bike lockers
Yes No NA
Transit Facilities:
Transit shelters Yes No NA
Bus turnouts Yes No NA
Standing pads Yes No NA
Has CDTA been contacted? Yes No NA
Access and Mobility Facilities:
Adequate sidewalk or paved
path
Yes No NA
Acceptable
consideration/provision for
accessible pedestrian traffic
signal features
Yes No NA
Curb ramps, including
detectable warning
surface
Yes No NA
Acceptable slope and
cross-slope for driveway ramps,
sidewalks, crossings)
Yes No NA
Have conflicts been reduced
among pedestrian, bicyclists,
and motor vehicles (access
management)?
Yes No NA
Pedestrian Facilities:
Sidewalks on both sides of
the street
Yes No NA
Striped crosswalks Yes No NA
Geometric modifications
to reduce crossing
distances such as curb
extensions (e.g. bulb-outs)
Yes No NA
Acceptable provision for
pedestrian traffic signal
features (e.g. ped. buttons)
Yes No NA
Pedestrian signage for
crossing & wayfinding
Yes No NA
Safety islands/medians on
roadways with two or more
traffic lanes in each direction
Yes No NA
Enhanced supplemental
pedestrian treatments at
uncontrolled marked
crossings
Yes No NA
Connectivity:
Are there proposed
connections to other bike
paths, pedestrian facilities, or
transit facilities?
Yes No NA
Are there proposed
connections to any key
destinations listed on page 1?
Yes No NA
Are there proposed
connections to
neighborhoods?
Yes No NA
Streetscape Elements:
Are streetscape elements
proposed such as
landscaping, street trees,
planters, buffer strips, etc?
Yes No NA
Pedestrian-level lighting Yes No NA
Public seating or benches Yes No NA
Design Standards and Guidelines
Design meets guidelines such as described below for
bicycle/pedestrian/bus/transit facilities?
Yes No NA Describe
*American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) - A Policy on Geometric Design of Highway and Streets, Guide for
the Development of Bicycle Facilities and AASHTO Guide for the Planning, Design, and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities; Public Right-of-Way
Accessibility Guide(PROWAG); Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD); Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG);
National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) - Urban Bikeway Design Guide. New York State Department of Transportation –
Highway Design Manual
Cost Estimate for Letter of Credit: 16 Marion Ave & Avenue A
Planning Board No.: # 2024….
Project: Tanner - (2) Lot Minor Subdivision
Location: # 16 Marion Ave. & Avenue A
Saratoga Springs, NY
Date: 9/24/2024
Firm Name & Preparer: Engineering America Co. - Tonya Yasenchak, PE Page 1 of 3
On Site (All infrastructure & amenities on private property)
Item #Item/Remarks Quantity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal % Complete Reduced $
Site Preparation and Grading
1 Clearing & Grubbing 0 Lot $1,500.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
2 Rough Grading 103 CY $6.00 $618.00 0%$618.00
3 Silt Fence 252 LF $4.00 $1,008.00 0%$1,008.00
4 Construction Entrance 1 EA $250.00 $250.00 0%$250.00
5 Tree / Buffer Protection 0 LF $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
6 Misc. Erosion Control Measures 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
Demolition
7 Building Removal (House, Garage & Shed)1 EA $8,000.00 $8,000.00 0%$8,000.00
8 Asphalt Removal (Cut for Utilities)0 SF $4.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
9 Concrete Removal (On-Site Sidewalk removal)0 SF $4.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
Hard Scape
10 Stone Subbase (Driveway)9 CY $25.00 $225.00 0%$225.00
11 Asphalt Pavement (Driveway)480 SF $13.00 $6,240.00 0%$6,240.00
12 CIP Curbing 0 LF $20.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
13 Concrete Sidewalk 0 SF $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
14 Retaining Wall 0 LF $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
Site Amenities
15 Traffic Signs 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
16 Striping 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
17 Crosswalk 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
18 Bench 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
19 Bike Rack 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
20 Site Lighting 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
21 Fencing 0 LF $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
Site Water
22 6" DIP Class 52 Water Main 0 LF $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
23 3/4" Type K Copper Water Service 0 EA $2,000.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
24 1" Type K Copper Water Service 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
25 Water Fittings 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
26 Fire Hydrant Assembly 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
Tanner Subdiv - Cost Estimate Rev 8-26-24
Page 2 of 3
Item #Item/Remarks Quantity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal % Complete Reduced $
Site Sanitary
27 6" SDR-26 Sanitary Line & Stone 0 LF $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
28 8" SDR-26 Sanitary Line & Stone 0 LF $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
29 Manhole Structure 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
Site Storm
30 6" HDPE Storm Drain & Stone 0 LF $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
31 12" HDPE Storm Drain & Stone 0 LF $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
32 Catch Basin 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
33 Manhole Structure 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
34 Yard Drains 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
Stormwater Management
35 Bioretention Area 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
36 UG Infiltration Chambers 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
37 Hydrodynamic Separator 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
38 Wet Pond 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
Landscaping
39 Topsoil/Seed/Mulch 103 CY $25.00 $2,575.00 0%$2,575.00
40 Deciduous Trees 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
41 Shrubs 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
Total onsite Work $18,916.00 $18,916.00
Total onsite X.25 $4,729.00 $4,729.00
Off Site (All infrastructure & amenities to be dedicated to the City)
Item #Item/Remarks Quantity Unit Subtotal % Complete Reduced $
Demolition
42 Asphalt Removal (Cut for Utilities)0 SF $4.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
43 Concrete Removal (Cut sidewalk for new drive)0 SF $4.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
Road Construction
44 Stone Subbase 3 CY $30.00 $75.00 0%$75.00
45 Asphalt Pavement (Binder)120 SF $10.00 $1,200.00 0%$1,200.00
46 Asphalt Pavement (Top)120 SF $13.00 $1,560.00 0%$1,560.00
47 Concrete Curbing 130 LF $20.00 $2,600.00 0%$2,600.00
48 Concrete Sidewalk 650 SF $7.50 $4,875.00 0%$4,875.00
Site Amenities
49 Traffic Signs 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
50 Striping 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
51 Crosswalk 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
52 Street Signs 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
53 Decorative Street Light 2 EA $3,550.00 $7,100.00 0%$7,100.00
Off Site Water
54 6" DIP class 52 Water Main 0 LF $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
55 6" Mueller Gate Valve 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
56 8" DIP class 52 Water Main 0 LF $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
57 8" Mueller Gate Valve 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
58 S.S. Tapping Sleeve and Valve Connection 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
Tanner Subdiv - Cost Estimate Rev 8-26-24
59 3/4" Corp, WSO and Type K water service to PL 0 EA $1,500.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
60 1" Corp, WSO and Type K water service to PL 0 EA $1,500.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
61 Water Fittings 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
62 Fire Hydrant Assembly 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
63 Testing & Disinfection 0 LS $250.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
Page 3 of 3
Item #Item/Remarks Quantity Unit Subtotal % Complete Reduced $
Site Sanitary
64 SDR-35 6" Sanitary Service to PL & Stone 0 EA $1,500.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
65 SDR-35 8" Sanitary Main & Stone 0 LF $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
66 Manhole Structure 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
67 Kor N' Seal connection 0 EA $150.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
Site Storm
68 12" HDPE Storm Line & Stone 0 LF $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
69 Catch Basin 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
70 Manhole Structure 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
Landscaping
71 Topsoil/Seed/Mulch 12 CY $15.00 $180.00 0%$180.00
72 Removal of Trees in R.O. W 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 0%$0.00
73 Street Trees 2 EA $550.00 $1,100.00 0%$1,100.00
Misc.
74 As-built Drawing 1 LS $3,250.00 $3,250.00 0%$3,250.00
Total offsite Work $21,940.00 $21,940.00
Total On-Site Work X25%$4,729.00
Total Off-Site work $21,940.00
Total LOC Amount = $26,669.00 * New LOC Reduced Amount = $26,669.00
City LOC Approval / Date City LOC Reduction Approval /Date
* LOC cannot be reduced to less than 25% of the original LOC amount.
Maximum Reduction 75% = $6,667.25
Tanner Subdiv - Cost Estimate Rev 8-26-24