Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20250743 112 Fifth Ave. Area Variance NODPage 1 of 2 CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS  CITY HALL - 474 BROADWAY SARATOGA SPRINGS, NEW YORK 12866 518-587-3550 WWW.SARATOGA-SPRINGS.ORG Gage Simpson, Chair Brendan Dailey, Vice Chair Shafer Gaston Amanda Demma Jonah Cohen Otis Maxwell Chris LaPointe Chris Maslak (Alternate) #20250743 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL OF Witt Construction 563 North Broadway Suite 1 Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 from the determination of the Building Inspector involving the premises 112 5th Ave. in the City of Saratoga Springs, New York being tax parcel number 166.14-4-38 on the Assessment Map of said City. The applicant having applied for an area variance under the UDO of said City to permit the construction of a single-family home and driveway in the UR-1 district and public notice having been duly given of hearings on said application on September 29 through November 17, 2025. In consideration of the balance between benefit to the applicants with detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the community, I move that the following area variances for the following amounts of relief: TYPE OF REQUIREMENT DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENT PROPOSED RELIEF REQUESTED MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE 28% 37.8% 9.8% (35%) TOTAL SIDE YARD SETBACK 30 FT 27.8 FT 2.2 FT (7.3%) REAR YARD SETBACK 30 FT 19.4 FT 10.6 FT (35.3%) As per the submitted plans (excluding the driveway) or lesser dimensions, be approved for the following reasons: 1. Achievability by Other Means: The applicant has demonstrated this benefit cannot be achieved by other means feasible to the applicant. The applicant would like to remove an existing home and build a new single-family home. Per the applicant, the existing home does not meet the homeowners’ needs to age in place. No additional land is available for purchase. 2. Undesirable Change: The applicant has demonstrated that granting this variance will not create an undesirable change in neighborhood character or detriment to nearby properties. The Board finds that the applicant has demonstrated that the requested variances align with other properties in the neighborhood. 3. Substantiality: The Board finds that several of these variances are significant. The large variances are mitigated by the nature of the pre-existing, non-conforming undersized lot and the neighborhood context mentioned above. 4. Adverse Effect or Impact: The Board finds that these variances will not have significant adverse physical or environmental effects on the neighborhood or district. Page 2 of 2 5. Self-Created Difficulty: The alleged difficulty is self-created insofar as the applicant desires to build a single-family home with driveway, but this is not necessarily fatal to the application. Condition: Permeable pavers are required for the driveway and patio to maintain compliance with the district requirement. Dated: November 17, 2025 Passes by the following vote: AYES: 6 (G. Simpson, S. Gaston, O. Maxwell, A. Demma, C. LaPointe, S. Harrigan) NAYS: 0 This variance shall expire 18 months following the filing date of such decision unless the necessary building permit has been issued and actual construction begun as per the Unified Development Ordinance. I hereby certify the above to be a full, true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Saratoga Springs on the date above mentioned, seven members of the Board being present. SIGNATURE: CHAIR