Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20250869 38 Beekman Modification Structural Engineering Review Scott Burlingame, P.E. | 900 Rt. 146, Clifton Park, NY 12065 | T: 518-724-0733 | scott@sbengineeringpllc.com October 27, 2025 Reveal Architecture | Design 15 Cider Mill Way Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 Attention: Shawn Corp, AIA Regarding: 38 Beekman Street, Saratoga Springs Existing Roof Framing Dear Shawn: Based on our inspection and structural analysis, the existing roof framing at 38 Beekman Street, Saratoga Springs, is in a state of significant distress and, in my opinion, cannot be effectively repaired in place. We are therefore requesting approval to selectively disassemble and reconstruct the existing roof framing while maintaining the original roof form, proportions, and architectural character of the building. Our findings are summarized as follows: • The existing rafters are undersized for current code requirements and lack sufficient capacity to support the required roof loads. Existing roof rafters are generally 2x6 rafters spaced at 24-inches to 30-inches on center. Current Building Codes would require 2x12 rafters spaced at 16-inches on center. • There is clear evidence that a fire occurred in the attic at some point, resulting in charring and potential loss of structural strength in several members. • Numerous rafters have been previously “sistered” in an attempt to stabilize failed areas, but these repairs are inconsistent and ineffective in addressing the overall structural deterioration. • The roof system’s ongoing failure has pushed the exterior walls out of plumb, indicating significant outward thrust. • The roof’s deformation and sag are visible from the street, detracting from the building’s appearance within the district. It is unlikely that this deformation and sag could be removed if attempting to repair the roof in place. • Attempting to rebuild or reinforce the roof framing from within would be extremely difficult, unsafe, and difficult to achieve the necessary structural performance. • Reconstruction of the existing, failed foundation wall will be safer and more effectively Scott Burlingame, P.E. | 900 Rt. 146, Clifton Park, NY 12065 | T: 518-724-0733 | scott@sbengineeringpllc.com accomplished without the need to shore or temporarily support the deteriorated roof framing. For these reasons, we recommend that the existing roof framing be carefully dismantled and rebuilt using new materials designed to meet current structural standards. The exterior walls can then be plumbed, and the roof reframed with new dimensional lumber rafters. The new roof will match the existing pitch, configuration, and overhangs to maintain the building’s historic proportions and appearance. This approach provides the best balance of life safety, code compliance, and preservation of the building’s historic character, ensuring its continued contribution to the district’s architectural integrity. Respectfully submitted, Scott Burlingame, PE