Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20250736 52 York Ave Area Variance Supplemental Information 0918202552 YORK AVENUE COLLIN CHRISTOVICH & MONETTE CARLI AREA VARIANCE APPLICATION Project Narrative The applicants are seeking two area variances to permit a single lot subdivision in connection with a parcel of property known as 52 York Avenue ("Property") in the UR-3 of the Saratoga Springs Unified Development Ordinance ("UDO") (Tax Parcel ID 166.45-3-61). The applicants seek the following relief: 1. Lot 1: 1,150 square feet from the minimum lot area of 6,600 square feet (17%) and 10 feet from the minimum lot width of 60 feet (17%). 2. Lot 2: 1,150 square feet from the minimum lot area of 6,600 square feet (17%) and 10 feet from the minimum lot width of 60 feet (17%). The existing home on York Avenue will remain the home of the applicants. The applicants intend to sell the newly created lot on Middle Avenue. The single lot which exists today is far Larger than needed by one family, so they are excited to help facilitate the creation of additional housing in the neighborhood. 1 1 P a g e 52 YORK AVENUE COLLIN CHRISTOVICH & MONETTE CARLI AREA VARIANCE APPLICATION A. Current Situation The applicants currently reside two blocks away on York Avenue. Upon becoming pregnant, they began seeking a larger home, preferably still on Saratoga's east side. They were excited to learn 52 York Avenue was listed in late 2024 as its larger size would more comfortably accommodate the new baby. The applicants are currently beginning the process of renovating the existing home. Although the additional square footage of 52 York Avenue will greatly help the growing family, they feel the current lot is far larger than needed at 10,901 square feet. They also feel that Saratoga's east side is a wonderful neighborhood and would love to facilitate the creation of additional housing so another family could have the opportunity to enjoy the neighborhood. Given that the existing lot greatly exceeds the UR-3 minimum lot area, the applicants feel that subdividing the existing lot exactly in half would yield two lots of adequate size and would only require small variances. Since the current property fronts on two streets, York Avenue and Middle Avenue, both lots after subdivision would easily connect to existing roads, sidewalks, and utilities. The resulting lots would be consistent with the character of the neighborhood and would support the stated purpose of the UR-3 residential district to "to conserve, maintain, and encourage the development of moderately dense single-family and two-family neighborhoods". B. Area Variance Standards and Applicant's Support for Relief The Property is situated in the Urban Residential-3 zoning district and is subject to minimum lot area requirements of 6,600 square feet for 1-unit and 8,000 square feet for 2-units, and a minimum lot width requirement of 60 feet. The proposed subdivision would create two lots of 5,450 square feet (50ft x 109ft) with a 50-foot minimum lot width. The applicants seek relief from the Unified Development Ordinance Section 3.3's minimum lot area and width requirements through two small 17% variances. The considerations for an area variance are as follows: 1. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can beach I eved by other feasible means Any additional land for the applicants' proposed lots to be conforming would necessarily have to come from their neighbors. However, every adjacent property is non -conforming, and so purchasing any portion of land from the adjacent properties would result in greater non-conformance. 2 1 P a g e 52 YORK AVENUE COLLIN CHRISTOVICH & MONETTE CARLI AREA VARIANCE APPLICATION The neighbors for the existing Yorl<Ave address are as follows: West 1166.45-3-2 East 1166.45-3-7 210 — 1 Family ( Undersized Residential 36 ft 280 — Residential Undersized Multiple 50 ft The neighbors for the newly created Middle Ave address will be as follows: Undersized —3,500 sq. ft. Undersized —5,300 sq. ft. West #1 166.45-3-64 210 — 1 Family Undersized Conforming Residential 49 ft —7,800 sq. ft. West #2 166.45-3-4 220 — 2 Family Undersized Undersized Residential 47 ft —5,200 sq. ft. East 166.45-3-8 210 — 1 Family Undersized Undersized Residential 50 ft —5,300 sq. ft. Reviewing the dimensions of the neighboring properties, all properties are nonconforming in width. The only property conforming in area is 166.45-3-64. While augmenting the proposed lots resulting from the subdivision with a portion of land from this neighboring property is technically feasible based on the numbers, it is not realistic nor viable. A hypothetical purchase of adjacent land from 166.45-3-64 would only be able to make one of the subdivided lots conforming in area and would result in both properties having irregular lot lines. Additionally, this land is not for sale and is used by the owners of the property for a shed. A sale of this neighboring land to the applicants would also have further implications for the lot's coverage and setbacks. The below picture shows property 166.45-3-64 highlighted in yellow to illustrate the lot lines discussed above. 3 1 P a g e 52 YORK AVENUE COLLIN CHRISTOVICH & MONETTE CARLI AREA VARIANCE APPLICATION So i 5° 166.45 m,� 7 n1110 3� 1 a6 z 50 " (p/o 37) b 5122 lvi 61 5p00� 1 ,37 ,21 - (Plo 37) 9 u.1 6 Eby e 1 4 so 00 m 50 Based on the information presented above, there is no alternative solution that would deliver the same benefits to the applicants. 2. Whether granting the variance will produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties In assessing the merits of the requested relief, the applicants performed an exhaustive analysis of the properties within approximately 700 feet of the Property to empirically determine the "character of the neighborhood." In all, the applicants reviewed records for 145 properties' within the study area and the results are as follows: 1. Only 15 of 145 (10%) properties are conforming in both minimum lot width and area. This results in a non-conformance rate of 90%. 2. Only 46 of 145 (32%) properties are conforming in minimum lot area. This results in a non-conformance rate of 68%. 3. Only 27 of 145 (19%) properties are conforming in minimum lot width. This results in a non-conformance rate of 81%. 4. Lots with less than 5,450 sq. ft. (i.e., lot area after proposed subdivision) totaled 66. This means that 46% of the neighborhood properties are smaller than the lots resulting from the proposed subdivision. ' The applicants have compiled data on 145 homes surrounding 52 York Avenue as demonstrative of the neighborhood in general. The properties examined came from York Avenue, E Harrison Street, Middle Avenue, Nelson Avenue, Lake Avenue, Circular Street, North Street, and Warren Street. The minimum width, lot area, and use were compiled and analyzed. The information was taken directly from municipal records on https,//s_aratoga.sdgnys_com_/searc_h_as_px,http__s-.//sIDatiat.v_hh.com/SaretogaMalDV ewer/, and tax maps. 4 1 P a g e 52 YORK AVENUE COLLIN CHRISTOVICH & MONETTE CARLI AREA VARIANCE APPLICATION 5. The most common lot width is 50 ft (i.e., lot width after proposed subdivision). 99 of the 145 properties in the study have lot widths that are 50 ft or less. This means that 68% of the neighboring properties are the same width or smaller than the lots resulting from the proposed subdivision. As these statistics demonstrate, the character of the neighborhood is overwhelmingly nonconforming with today's zoning code. The relief the applicants seek is in no way out of character with the surrounding neighborhood, and will in fact increase uniformity in the neighborhood as there is only one other residential neighborhood property in the data set which has not been similarly cut in half between York Ave and Middle Ave (166.45-3-23). An excerpt of the 166.45 tax map is presented below, where 52 York Ave is highlighted in blue, and 166.45-3-23 is highlighted in yellow. 3. Whether the variance is substantial The applicants seek the following relief: 1. Lot 1: 1,150 square feet from the minimum lot area of 6,600 square feet (17%) and 10 feet from the minimum lot width of 60 feet (17%). 2. Lot 2: 1,150 square feet from the minimum lot area of 6,600 square feet (17%) and 10 feet from the minimum lot width of 60 feet (17%). There is no standard definition for the substantiality of a variance. However, as the prior section demonstrates, the neighborhood is overwhelmingly out of conformance, and often in amounts far greater than 17%. The lots resulting from the subdivision will be in the middle of the pack for the neighborhood, both in width and area. Therefore, the relief sought in this application is not substantial in nature. 5 1 P a g e 52 YORK AVENUE COLLIN CHRISTOVICH & MONETTE CARLI AREA VARIANCE APPLICATION 4. Whether the variance will have adverse physical or environmental effects on the neighborhood or district Due to the minimal nature of the relief requested, there will be no adverse physical or environmental effects on the neighborhood. 5. Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created While the alleged difficulty is technically self-created, the applicants ask that the Board considerallthe information presented as grounds to determine that such self -creation is not fatal to the variance application. C. Recent Variance Precedent There have been two recent subdivisions where similar relief was granted for minimum lot area and width: 124 York Ave: In 2016, the Board granted greater relief to an owner in similar circumstances at 124 York Ave in area variances for two substandard lots within this same neighborhood. The relief requested in that case was more substantial at 20% (width: 60 ft. to 48 ft. and area: 6,600 sq. ft. to 5,279 sq. ft.). 10 Avery Street: In 2015, the Board granted similar relief to an owner in similar circumstances at 10 Avery Street in area variances for two substandard lots within this same neighborhood. The minimum width relief requested in that case was identical at 17% (width: 60 ft. to 50 ft.). The minimum area relief requested was less significant at 3% (area: 6,600 sq. ft. to 6,400 sq. ft.). The reasoning for the relief in these recent subdivision applications was largely the same as that requested in this application: • Neighborhood which is 90% out of conformance with zoning requirements • Proposed lot sizes which are consistent with neighborhood character • Available municipal water and sewer • Street access to both subdivided lots • The inability to purchase land from adjoining neighbors For all these reasons, we ask the Board to consider the precedent established by 124 York Ave and 10 Avery Street variances for minimum lot area and width. 6 1 P a g e 52 YORK AVENUE COLLIN CHRISTOVICH & MONETTE CARLI AREA VARIANCE APPLICATION D. Photographs The neighbors for the existing York Ave address are as follows: • West— 166.45-3-2 / Stephanie Wronowski o Property Type 210-1 Family Residential o Significantly undersized, both in minimum width (-36 ft) and area (-3,500 sq. ft. ) 11 50 1 5' 725 1 2 2C (p/o 37) N GI xx .� w 61 °' -SpN Q m o �L7 so- -. - (p/o37) 64 8 166.45 1 1-"'• 1 o This property is undersized, and the driveway backs right up to the property line. There is no spare area to purchase. The picture also shows the roof of the shed behind the white fence. The shed also backs right up to the property line. 7 1 P a g e 52 YORK AVENUE COLLIN CHRISTOVICH & MONETTE CARLI AREA VARIANCE APPLICATION • East— 166.45-3-7 / Kirk & Aleah Wendell o Property Type 280 — Residential Multiple o Undersized, both in minimum width (50 ft) and area (-5,300 sq. ft.) 0 13 31 2 64 166.45 \ I 000 I 37) lP' 879 M il� .� 4 z111 5000 1 oo o This property has multiple residences, and no spare area for purchase. There are also several sheds behind the larger house. 8 1 P a g e 52 YORK AVENUE COLLIN CHRISTOVICH & MONETTE CARLI AREA VARIANCE APPLICATION The neighbors for the newly created Middle Ave address would be as follows: • West #1—166.45-3-64 / Robert & Dawn O'Keefe o Property Type 210 —1 Family Residential o Undersized minimum width (49 ft), but conforming area (-7,800 sq. ft.) 5�5 166.45 ' 7 0.5.0 3 Gt (p/o 37) 6127 61 SGoo 64 l a18 4 w GG 9 A o This property has an irregular shape featuring a larger front width, but the rear width is only 49 ft and is currently used for a shed (visible in rear image of 166.45-3-4 on next page). Even if it was theoretically possible to purchase land from the rear of this property, it would result in the subdivided lot which faces Middle Ave having a very irregular shape. 9 1 P a g e S. B.#49 Islas-2-60.t #49 Tak Avmue I Lands n/( o/ I s.e.L.B 166.45-2-59 #51 York Avenue I S.B.L.# 166.45-2-58 S.B.L.# 166.45-2-57 #fit Y°rk Arcnue S. ill, Landa n/I of # 5J 11 Avenue Landa n/i of Landa n/t of SHIIII Joahua Ramadlll & I Joshua Jennifer Kadson Margg at M. I Albrechtr Dalton I Toga York Avenue LLC Anthony R. Pennell, Cynthia M. Pennell, I — I L— — —`No CAPPED — — — — — Jesslca M. Pannell el Christophe=A. Pennell _................................................................::::.�:::::::::::::::::::: ......... ...................................... YOR K ......................... E.......... .....NUE::: e '::::::::::::. ........ ............ ------- .. :. ..... .. .. ( ,. �.:\ — I CAD S88'35'14-E 50.00" rouNo . -- — IRON TO BE SET _— I I Tw for /% houfsa%e i woodfrom w0 house%a S.B.L.# 1BOAS-J-1 #.a York Avenue Landa n/1 01 I Kristin F. Tchaban y % oofld Iran e 3-10 & - I S, B.L.# lIf of Jeremy Tthaban S.B.L.# 166.45-3-2 #6York A-- Avenue Instrp 2022-8515 I LSand. /f of _ I Landse n/I of Spring HIII WronSteowakl Waldorf School L.1620 p.563 I L.1620 p.563 I = S #5 x O #56 Y°rk Avenue y' Kirk D. Wfnd II I 0.125 CD Aleah R. Wendell (5,450.40 sq.ftCAIPED Instrp 2010-369n L — / NON PIN L I_ 0 BE SET 588'35'14'F 5n nn• S, B.L.# 166.45-3-64 #275 Nelson A-- Landa n/f of Robert 0'K.I & Dawn a'Keafa Instrp 2022-37483 S.B.L.# 166A5-4-4 - #276 ry Lantlsa ^//vale, 274-276 Nelson Ave LLC= . .::: Instrp 2018-22471 ::: lift:':::: l:' oTBC I I�IohBE IEr ` ' la g o sN.d I I I '0.125 Acre (5,450.40 sq.ft.) �i I Mi `IszRa9r..n63cra:c-kar-----JI NON PIN 3 I cara� I I I 5.0LN 166.45-3-8 I /69 Midtlle Av°nue Lord, I, of I S.&I-# 166.45-3-9 Joseph P. Saba L.1742 p.273 191 Mddle v°u Lands n/f ale I I William Randolph Turnbow & Martha I. Rica I Instrp 2019-5671 I story wood frame house I j I I I'D FOUND N N88'3514 W 50.00 oN Pin rouno' MIDDLE AVENUE �z. S, #27 1fi6.45-]-60 t 2 da o Avenue s. B.L.M nfi6.45-]-56 iNls s a peep; red °I, filleto Lantl9en/f of #fie Middle venue S.B.L.N Ifi6.45-J-55 ° °Pu U. ° Rabaeea McCarthy Lands In 0l Lend. nAvenof U. °'° au6jvc1 l - & I Samuel Otis Creydt I L d /t t �igni: �ch`.nr of er Brandon McCarthy & Downtown Track eaa e 0 ­1 1 -Id d.e<loe°. Maoghan Elizabeth Creydt Rental, LLC Map Legend: • Iron pin OO Masonry nail ¢ Lightpole Q6 Manhole 06N Catch basins W; Fire hydrant A Water valve Chain -link fence �-.Overhead utilities Detectable warning strip Map Reference: "Map of Lands on New York & Lake Avenues, Saratoga Springs, belonging to William L. F. Warren'. dated July 1, 1860 and re- I hereby certify that this subdivision map .11 prepared by me and corded in the Saratoga County Clerk's Office on May 21, 1981 CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS ZONING DISTRICT: is based on on actual nerd saucy performed by me on January 27. 2.25. as Map number W-58. UR-3 URBAN RESIDENTIAL-3 Bulk requirements: u,Y°s. o4ssol Deed Reference: Minimum lal siz : 6,600 tGft. 0<e°,e n., Eugene E. Sakas, as E.se.tor of the Estate of Edward Contento, 9 Minimum ve ge lot with: 60 ft. Minimum fronlyard building setback: 10 It. to Monette COW and Collin Christovich, dated January 31, 2025 Minimum rearyord building setback: 25 ft. 0 01/27 25 EAC ACS ORIGINAL SURVEY DATE and retarded in the Saratoga County Clerk's Office on February Minimum sideyard building tback: REV. `DATE CHK. DESCRIPTION 13, 2025 as Instrument number 2025-4003. 4 It. each, 12 it. total Certificatians indicated hereon signify that this s rvey w s prepared in cords nee with the SURVEY MAP AND PROPOSED SUBDrMIM PLAN OF LANDS OF ,.:sling Code o1 Practice of Lantl Surveys oda1 ru by the N.Y. State ......o . of Pralea- MONETTE CARLI el Land Surveyors. Soitl oerli/:cations shill run only to the lilt, in i nee company, governmental agency, and lending institution listed hereon and to the assignees of the lending - (T Ago, nstilution. Certifications ore not tronslerahle to additional institutions or subsequent ewners. 4./\1'•111.//7SVr1 !4J •� Unauthorized alteration o addition to a rvey map bearing a licensed land s '"'t s seal LAND SURVEYING AND ENGINE ERInG, P.C. COLLIN CHRISTOVICH olatian of Section r7209. Subdmv ionu 2 of the N.Y. Stara Education Law.0 Only copies AT 52 YORK AVPNUZ S4RATOGA VMGS, NY IDh6 from vno original of this s rvey marked with on original of the loud surveyors embossed I BARNEY ROAD - SUITE 109 seal shall be considered to be valid copies. EU ON PARK. NY 12065 PHONE: (51B) 353-8001 Y: EAC S.B.L. ISBAS-3-61 SCALE: I' OPAWN In aldlip", only copies /ram the original of this survey marked with an original of the lord CHECKED : A. CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS OWG. Na.: 6162A urveyor5 signature in RED shall ba considered to be valid copies. o(c) 2025 Selo Ae.xkl.e P.c NR6I. Res.r.ea' DA E: 01/27/25 SARATOGA COUNTY, NEW YORN REV,: 0 6.DL.q ,-f Yo,k A-2-60.1 /45 Y-rk I Lands n/( of S.B#51 166.45-2-59 /St York nvenue S.B.L.X 166.45-2-58 I -2-57 S.B. At 1. A—. #fit Yen I Linda S. Ramedill, JoehU. Ramedill & Lands n f of /53 -1, Avenue Morgg t M. Lands n/f of I I /fof Lands n/f of Anthony R. Pennell, Jennifer Kadson Albrechtr Dalkon I Tag. York Avenue LLC Cynthlo M. Pennell, — 1 CAPPED rouuD Jesti. M. Pennell & Christopher A. Pennell ................................ :> ;:; ;:; : >; ................................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................................................................. .........................................................�.......�....'::::::::::.'::. �:: Y0 R K U E ':::::::::: ::. e :::: ........................................................................................................................................................... — — -S86'35'14"E 5`010 FOUND 1 CAPPED' P-P BE i0 Er I,Two I story - I _ % )US S.B.L.# 16&45-3-1 q4e Ywk Avtnae I y Lands n/f of w tl fla Kristin F. Tchoban & Jeremy Tehab.n - s .e.L.q tfifis5-3-2 lO I S.B.L.# 113&4s-3-10 #62 von Ave-ae Inatr/ 2022-8515 I /5D Yak Avenue - Lands n/f of 0 �125 I Lands n/f of Spring Hill Stephanie WronowA ski L.1620 p.563 cre Waldorf School L.1620 p.563 _ (5,450.40 q.ft.) S.B.L.# 166,45-3-7 —I I #56 Ywk Avenue l �2'271 T� Lands n/f of ✓�jj�jj��jj�� Kirk D. Wendell I P, Aleah R. Wendell °'f1a 9°'Ope'/1 ^C/• Inet,# 2010-36917 E %to 1//// L "E 1L Go, / a a 588'35'14"E 5000'r� a� / — — RoN I,,APPED ICAPPED TO BE SET TO BE SET W / F ZS.B.Lq I6fi.45 -fi0 -3 / P C r g¢ elan /2La N A onus "I SV / Ce Londe 0 K f F, Robert O'Keefe E ^ :I r------ s'=STR.Ano sc,e.«ynr� Z & Down O'Keefe Instr# 2022-37483 I� I < Iq Ig N 5.6.L.q 166.45-3-8 veofue I 9 uideln/fn /6Lands I an I S.6166.45-3-9 I I Joseph L17a 42 P .273 #.L.N dle Londsn/f al William Randolph Turnbow & Martha I. Rice Ba l O I I Insi,# 2Ol9-5671 - i'0.12 5 Acre / S.B.L.# 166.45-3-4 /276 Nela-a Avenue r.� (5,450.40 aq.ft.) I ,TWO for We IT — lands n/f of .: :':.':..:':.'.:.'. 274-276 Nelson Ave §1 I I ho se ImlrR late-22471 .................. s �:S'rFCFFRF6SET9FR-uRE_____J IRON PIN - I FWNO NBB'35 14 W m. SO.OD • IRON p,,,, ,,,,, � r'— �rou— P MIDDLE AVENUE:`::;:g'>> ....... — - - —' - ' �- ........................................................................................ ..................................................................... ................. .......... � I 166.45-J-fi0 #272 Nela-n Avenue 6.B.L.X ifi6.45-J-56 rvey woe prepared wltNaul 1. benefit e1 op�m-dote e1a1e<1 of tine end la mere- Lands n/f of Rebecca McCarthyands Y #6B uldele Avenue n ! of / I 6.B.Lq i6fi.45-3-55 ns3 I-- A-- e a°bket le °ay aee °II eq.eemeeta. eoadl- as eev<aema <-ae,-e-ta, .ealncuo-a end & I Samuel 011a Creydt Lands n/f of oln<r Brendan McCarthy & Downtown Track I i,ee . 1.1 ale ee 1-1 A ei,i ooy. Meaghan Elizabeth Geydt Rental, LLC e e d' • Iron pin OO Masonry nail O Lightpole Manhole Ill Catch basins AS Fire hydrant A Water valve 0-0---«o Chain -link fence -------41, Overhead utilities Detectable warning strip Map Reference: "Map of Lands on New York & Lake Avenues, Saratoga Springs, hereby is bored on an cartifv that thie subdivision map w s pr¢ d b me and actual field survey performed by me on January 27, 2025. belonging to William L. F. Warren , dated July 1, 1860 and re- corded in the Saratoga County Clerk's Office on May 21, 1981 CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS ZONING DISTRICT: -------- as Map number W-50. UR-3 URBAN RESIDENTIAL-3 teal ni Reference: BullDeed Minim rn .I Sglee 6,600 sq.fl. Eugene E. Sakos, as Executor of the Estate of Edward Conlento, Minimum average lot width: 60 fl. Minimum building E tback: 10 fit. i O6/1R/25 EAC ACS PROPOSED GARAGE & DRIVEwnY LOT t (r.otyard to Mane its Carli and Collin Christovlch, dated January 31. 2025 Minimum a yard building setback: 25 ft. 0 01/27/25 EAC ACS ORIGINAL SURVEY DATE and recorded In the Saratoga Count Clerk's Office on February 9 Y Y 13, 2025 as Instrument number 2025-4003. Minimum sldeyard building setback: 4 fit. each, 12 ft. total REV. DATE BY CHK. DESCRIPTION Certifications indicated hereon Signify that this survey woe prepared in accordance with the SURVEY MAP AND PROMOS® SUBDIMON PLAN OF IANDS OF existing Code of Practice of Lantl Surveys adopted run o the N.Y. Stale Association of Prafee- MONETTE CARLI nal Land B.. PCY.. Said certifications shall run only to the Lille in uronce wmpony, governmental atJl,UU and lending institution listed hereon and t, the assignees of the lending - (Y __ A���� institution. Certifications are not Ironsferable to adtlilional institutions or subsequen( owners.U\YI1171.Ir/#YVI ■/+�' Asm Unauth,ri,,d alteration ora addition to 0 su ey map bering a licensed land survey.:. seal LAND SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING, P.C. COLLIN CHRISTOVICH violation of Section 7209, Subdivision 2 of the N.Y. Stale Eduention Law. Only copies AT 52 YORK AVeRM S4RATOGA SPRINGS, NY 1M from the ariginoi of this a rvey marked with an original of the land surveyor's embossed I BARNEY ROAD • Sun 10 seal shall be considered to be valid copies. CU ON PARK. NY 12065 s PRONE: (51e) 3e3-8001 PRAWN aY: EAC S.B.L./ I66.15-3-fi1 $GALE: 1. In addiliF,, only copies from the original of this 5 rvey marked with an original & the land CHECKED BY: ACS CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS DWG. NO.: 6462A urv¢yars signature ,n RED shall be considered to ube v.11d copies. _a(c)Izozs servo A.ao<ial,a P.c DATE: 01/27/25 SARATOGA COUNm. HEW YORK REV.: I 9/14/25 1 Executive Summary • Area is 10,901 ft2 vs 6,600 ftz UR-3 minimum • Subdivision exactly in half yields two lots of 5,450 ftz (50 ft x 109 ft) • Street access to both subdivided lots (York Ave and Middle Ave, respectively) • Resulting lots would easily connect to existing sidewalks and utilities • Consistent with the character of the neighborhood To conserve, maintain, and encourage development � � the development of moderately dense single-family and two-family neighborhoods" • Creates additional housing in Saratoga's wonderful east side neighborhood S2YORKAVI AREA VARIANCES FOR TWO LOT SUBDIVISION 1 9/14/25 Variance Substantiality & Recent Precedent Proposed L LIR-3 Min Proposed Relief Min LIR-3 Min Lot A; elief Min Lot AwArea Area Area Width rLotWldth i Width 52 York Ave (2025) 16,600 5,450 1,150, 17% 160 50 10, 17% 124 York Ave (2016) 16,600 5,279 1,321, 20% 160 48 12, 20% 10 Avery St (2015) 6,600 6,400 200, 3% 60 50 10, 17% Reasoning for relief granted in recent variances is consistent with 52 York Ave request: Neighborhood which is 90% out of conformance with zoning requirements Proposed lot sizes which are consistent with neighborhood character Both subdivided lots have access to streets and available municipal water and sewer Inability to purchase land from adjoining neighbors Relief requested is not substantial and is consistent with precedent established by recently granted variances. 3 Variances Are Only Means To Achieve Subdivision West 166.45-3-2 210-1 Family Undersized Undersized Residential 36 ft —3,500 ftz East 166.45-3-7 280—Residential Undersized Undersized Multiple 50 ft —5,300 ftz West #1 166.45-3-64 210-1 Family Undersized Conforming Residential 49 ft ^7,800 ftz West#2 166.45-3-4 220-2 Family Undersized Undersized Residential 47 ft —5,200 ftz East 166.45-3-8 210-1Family Undersized Undersized Residential 50 ft —5,300 ftz E 166.45 7 6" �1, F 1 j sot 1& (pl. 37) G� 61 0 p _T (PI. 37) s 1 a OA 9/14/25 No Undesirable Change To Neighborhood Character Studied 145 - neighborhood ' properties to �10 determine the "character of the p[[n neighborhood 68% it e o, - e . • 5 No Undesirable Change To Neighborhood Character 6 M 9/14/25 7 Other Area Variance Considerations • No, due to the minimal nature of the relief requested. • Opportunity for positive effects, particularly on Middle Ave. • While the alleged difficulty is technically self-created, please consider all information presented as grounds to determine that such self -creation is not fatal to the variance application. Appendix 10 9/14/25 Neighborhood Study In assessing the merits of the requested relief, the applicants performed an exhaustive analysis of the properties within approximately 700 feet of the Property to empirically determine the "character of the neighborhood" In all, the applicants reviewed records for 145 properties' within the study area and the results are as follows: 1. Only 15 of 145 (10%) properties are conforming in both minimum lot width and area. This results in a non-conformance rate of 90%. 2. Only 46 of 145 (32%) properties are conforming in minimum lot area. This results in a non-conformance rate of 68%. 3. Only 27 of 145 (19%) properties are conforming in minimum lot width. This results in a non-conformance rate of 81 %. 4. Lots with less than 5,450 sq. ft. (i.e., lot area after proposed subdivision) totaled 66. This means that 46% of the neighborhood properties are smaller than the lots resulting from the proposed subdivision. 5. The most common lot width is 50 ft (i.e., lot width after proposed subdivision). 99 of the 145 properties in the study have Lot widths that are 50 ft or less. This means that 68%of the neighboring properties are the same width or smatter than the lots resulting from the proposed subdivision. 'The applicants have compiled data on 145 homes surrounding 52 York Avenue as demonstrative of the neighborhood in general. The properties examined came from York Avenue, E Harrison Street, Middle Avenue, Nelson Avenue, Lake Avenue, Circular Street, North Street, and Warren Street. The minimum width, lot area, and use were compiled and analyzed. The information was taken directly from municipal records on httns://saratopa.sdr,,nys.com/search.asp , httr)s://st)ntigi.vlib.com/SiratopaMapViewer/, and tax maps. I Neighbor — York Ave — West Tax ID 166.45-3-2 Owner Stephanie Wronowski Property Type 210-1Family Residential Width 36 ft Area 3,500 ftz 10 166.45 IPA 3]t „ 9 W B \ „u 5 9/14/25 Neighbor — York Ave — East Tax ID 166.45-3-7 Owner Kirk & Aleah Wendell Property Type 280 —Residential Multiple Width 50ft Area 5,300 ft2 11 Neighbor — Middle Ave — West #1 Tax ID 166.45-3-64 Owner Robert & Dawn O'Keefe Property Type 210 — I Family Residential Width 49 ft Area 7,800 ft2 166.45 7 2 (p/. 37) 61 (pl, 37) U-TrM —mom Am 12 166.45 (PI, 11, PI_ 6, (P/. 37) Yts! i 9/14/25 Neighbor — Middle Ave — West #2 Tax ID 166.45-3-4 Owner 274-276 Nelson Ave LLC Property Type 220 — 2 Family Residential Width 47 ft 5,200 ft2 Area 13 Neighbor — Middle Ave — East Tax ID 166.45-3-8 Owner Joseph Saba Property Type 210 — I Family Residential Width 50ft Area 5,300 ftz 14 166.45 7 Vs (pl. 37) 61 (p'. 37) 166.45 (PI, 37) 7 9/14/25 15 16