Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20250063 115 Regent St. Addition - Beagle School Lead Observation ReportLead Based Paint Risk Assessment Report For the Dwelling Located at: 115 Regent Street, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 Flatley Read, Inc. P.O. Box 104 Schuylerville, NY 12871 (518) 577-5681 EPA License Number: LBP-F-157741-1 Date of Site Visit: September 7, 2022 This report is valid for the date and time here within. We are not responsible for lead based paint contamination to the home or occupants that could occur if painted surfaces become damaged or deteriorated. In addition we cannot control the introduction of lead contamination from outside sources nor do we assume any liability therefore. Property Address 115 Regent Street, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 Prepared By Flatley Read 12 Spring Street, Suite 102 PO Box 104 Schuylerville, NY 12871 Risk Assessor Michael Jenison: LBP-R-1217373-1 Firm License LBP-F-157741-2 NYS Radioactive Materials License C5744 XRF Analyzer Viken Serial No. 1342 Radioactive Source: Co57 Testing Laboratory (if applicable) Accurate Analytical Testing 30105 Beverly Road Romulus MI 48174 Calibration Action Level* 1.0 mg/cm2 *Factory calibrated with HUD approved reference standards. Calibration accuracy field checked by trained personnel per manufacturer’s recommendations. Executive Summary The object of a risk assessment is to determine and report the existence, nature, severity, and location of lead-based paint hazards in housing through an onsite investigation and the possible means of correcting any hazards identified. This site visit was conducted in accordance with the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regulations at 24 CFR Part 35 and the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) regulations at 40 CFR Part 745. Ultimately, the owner bears responsibility for the condition of the property. The presence or absence of lead-based paint hazards applies only to the date and time of the field visit (conditions may change). Ongoing maintenance and monitoring by the owner is necessary for continued lead hazard control. The scope of the evaluation included testing of the following surfaces with X-ray Fluorescence Analyzer (XRF): •Components scheduled for disturbance during renovation; •Components with deteriorated painted surfaces; •Components with impact surfaces, and; •Components with friction surfaces; •Other accessible components throughout the interior and exterior, as applicable. Specific lead hazards found during the risk assessment are detailed in Table 1 (attached). Please note that the scope of testing was limited to the accessible areas of the property. Not all areas were tested. Interim control measures designed to mitigate the lead hazards should be incorporated into the overall scope of work. Control measures recommended for this property are detailed in accordance with HUD and EPA guidelines for Federally Owned and Assisted Housing. A copy of the following summary must be provided to new lessees (tenants) and purchasers of this property under Federal Law (24 CFR part 35 and 40 CFR 745) before they become obligated under a lease or sales contract. The complete report must also be provided to new purchasers and it must be available to new tenants. Landlords (lessors) and sellers are also required to distribute an educational pamphlet approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and include standard warning language in their leases or sales contracts to ensure that parents have the information they need to protect their children from lead-based paint hazards. All work performed should follow the lead safe work practices procedures described in Title X of the 1992 Housing and Community Development Act and regulations issued pursuant to Title X. In addition, all work should comply with the OSHA Lead in Construction Standard 1926.62 and EPA Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program (RRP). Not all areas were accessible or tested. Tested components are representative of homogeneous areas throughout the unit. Positive results are applicable to all untested components of same type, configuration, vintage, and paint history. Summary of Results The following components were identified by XRF analysis to contain lead in concentrations at or above 1.0 mg/cm² or 0.5% lead by weight, and are therefore potential Lead Based Paint Hazards. A complete list of XRF Analysis is included in Appendix B. Table 1- Summary of Identified Potential Lead Hazards Components observed in defective condition should be treated as an immediate Lead Based Paint Hazard and addressed appropriately with interim controls and/or paint stabilization. Some painted surfaces which tested positive were intact at the time of this site visit. However, the presence of lead in the following components may indicate a potential future hazard should the paint or substrates become deteriorated. 115 Regent Street, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 9/07/2022 Rdg# Room Wall Component Description Substrate Rdg Result Condition 4 Exterior A Siding Wood 1.3 Positive Intact 8 Front Porch Exterior A Spindle Wood 16.3 Positive Intact 9 Front Porch Exterior A Hand Rail Lower Wood 6.8 Positive Intact 10 Front Porch Exterior A Column (D side) Wood 7.6 Positive Deteriorated 11 Front Porch Exterior A Column (B side) Wood 4.6 Positive Deteriorated 12 Front Porch Exterior A Header Wood 9.7 Positive Intact 13 Front Porch Exterior A Rutter Wood 5.3 Positive Intact 14 Front Porch Exterior Ceiling Wood 5.9 Positive Intact 15 Front Porch Exterior A Vertical Trim Wood 1.6 Positive Intact 16 Front Porch Exterior A Door Case Wood 8.1 Positive Intact 17 Front Porch Exterior A Door Stop Wood 7.3 Positive Intact 18 Front Porch Exterior A Door Jamb Wood 2.8 Positive Deteriorated 19 Front Porch Exterior A Door Wood 14.9 Positive Deteriorated 20 Front Porch Exterior Threshold Wood 2.2 Positive Deteriorated 22 Stairwell A Door Wood 17.3 Positive Deteriorated 25 Stairwell C Door Case (first landing) Wood 1.1 Positive Intact 35 Stairwell D4 Window Sash Wood 6.4 Positive Deteriorated 36 Stairwell D5 Window Case Wood 7.1 Positive Deteriorated 40 Stairwell A3 Horizontal Trim Wood 10.5 Positive Intact 55 Living Room A2 Window Sash Wood 1.7 Positive Deteriorated 57 Living Room A2 Window Apron Wood 1 Positive Intact 59 Living Room A2 Window Jamb Ext. Wood 14.6 Positive Deteriorated 60 Living Room A2 Window Sash Ext. Wood 7.3 Positive Deteriorated 61 Living Room A2 Window Case Ext. Wood 1.3 Positive Deteriorated 64 Living Room B Window Case Wood 5.1 Positive Intact 67 Living Room B Window Apron Wood 6.6 Positive Intact 68 Living Room B Window Sash Ext. Wood 1.6 Positive Deteriorated 70 Living Room B Window Stop Wood 3 Positive Deteriorated 72 Living Room B Window Well Wood 2.5 Positive Deteriorated 91 Dining Room B Window Well Wood 1.1 Positive Deteriorated 92 Dining Room B Window Sash Ext. Wood 1.5 Positive Deteriorated 103 Bedroom 1 B Windowsill Wood 1.3 Positive Intact 104 Bedroom 1 B Window Apron Wood 6.1 Positive Intact 105 Bedroom 1 B Window Sash Ext. Wood 2.7 Positive Deteriorated 106 Bedroom 1 B Window Jamb Ext. Wood 2 Positive Deteriorated 107 Bedroom 1 B Window Stop Ext. Wood 2.8 Positive Deteriorated Inspector: Michael Jenison XRF: 1342 115 Regent Street, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 9/07/2022 Rdg# Room Wall Component Description Substrate Rdg Result Condition 121 Bedroom 2 B Window Sill Wood 1.1 Positive Deteriorated 122 Bedroom 2 B Window Apron Wood 6.4 Positive Intact 133 Bedroom 2 C Window Sash Ext. Wood 1.1 Positive Deteriorated 140 Bedroom 3 A Vertical Beam Wood 1.3 Positive Intact 147 Bedroom 3 C Window Jamb Wood 1.1 Positive Deteriorated 155 Bedroom 3 D Windowsill Wood 10.4 Positive Intact 156 Bedroom 3 D Window Apron Wood 6 Positive Intact 157 Bedroom 3 D Window Sash Ext. Wood 4.9 Positive Deteriorated 158 Bedroom 3 D Window Stop Wood 4.7 Positive Deteriorated 159 Bedroom 3 D Window Jamb Wood 7.7 Positive Deteriorated 160 Bedroom 3 D Window Well Wood 5.3 Positive Deteriorated 170 Hall C Door Case Wood 2.3 Positive Intact 171 Hall C Door Jamb Wood 1.5 Positive Deteriorated 172 Hall C Door Stop Wood 1.6 Positive Intact 182 Kitchen D Windowsill Wood 2.7 Positive Intact 183 Kitchen D Window Apron Wood 8.4 Positive Intact 195 Bathroom D Tread Wood 1.7 Positive Intact 196 Bathroom D Riser Wood 2.1 Positive Intact 198 Bathroom D Built In Face Wood 1.7 Positive Intact 201 Bathroom D Window Apron Wood 16.7 Positive Intact Living Room A2 Window Wood Living Room C Well and Window Wood Notes Same Configuration as Wall B's Window 2 Same Configuration Inspector: Michael Jenison XRF: 1342 Visual Assessment A visual assessment was performed for the interior and exterior of the property. Accessible/visible areas were intact at the time of this site visit unless otherwise specified for components tested via XRF analysis. Dust Wipe Samples Laboratory results indicate lead dust in excess of the federal threshold in the following areas: •Front Entry, Floor •Living Room, Floor •Bedroom 2, Floor •Bedroom 3, Window Trough These areas represent other, similar areas throughout the dwelling. A comprehensive lead hazard reduction cleaning is recommended for this home. Soil Samples No soil samples were collected during this field visit. Interim Control and Maintenance - Recommended Control Methods Exterior Surfaces A visual inspection should be conducted annually to check for the following conditions: •Chipping, flaking or peeling paint. •Paint deterioration, such as cracks or dust on the surface •Worn friction surfaces Interior Surfaces A visual inspection should be conducted on all painted surfaces annually to check for the following conditions: •Paint chips, dust or debris •Deterioration of paint, especially on friction or impact surfaces such as doors and windows In addition, the following recommendations apply until the property is certified “lead free”. •All paint stabilization and maintenance work performed should be conducted by a contractor trained in Safe Work Practices (as defined by Title X of the Housing and Community Development Act). •If components which tested positive for lead in excess of federal standards will be disturbed by repair or renovation, the work should take the necessary precautions using Safe Work Practices (as defined by Title X of the Housing and Community Development Act). The above recommendations include abatement and interim controls. All interim control measures are designed to temporarily reduce human exposure to lead based paint hazards, and are not designed to permanently remove the lead hazard. Interim control measures require ongoing monitoring to be effective. Interim Control Strategy – Hazard Elimination: Perform stabilization of all deteriorated surfaces referred to in Table 1. Interim controls and required clearance sampling should be performed in accordance with HUD/EPA protocols (HUD 24 CFR Part 35; 35.1330 Interim Controls and EPA 40 CFR Part 745.227 Work Practice Standards). Interim Control Measures: •Paint stabilization using Lead Safe Work Practices for all deteriorated areas listed above. •No further action is required while components remain intact. Permanent Abatement Strategy: The option of permanent abatement can be selected for any lead- positive surface instead of interim controls. Lead abatement and required clearance sampling should be performed in accordance with HUD/EPA protocols (HUD 24 CFR Part 35; 35.1330 Interim Controls and EPA 40 CFR Part 745.227 Work Practice Standards). Permanent Abatement Methods: •Remove components and install replacement materials. •Encapsulate (cover) components with a permanent material. For more information on lead hazards, lead safe work practices, and finding a certified abatement or RRP firm, visit www.epa.gov/lead or call the National Lead Information Center at 1-800-424- LEAD (5323). The above recommendations include abatement and interim controls. All interim control measures are designed to temporarily reduce human exposure to lead based paint hazards, and are not designed to permanently remove the lead hazard. Interim control measures require ongoing monitoring to be effective. Please note that other options are available to address the hazards identified during this assessment. Flatley Read recommends the measures outlined above. An overview of interim controls and abatement recommendations is outlined below. Conclusions and Recommendations LBP was found in concentrations ≥ 1.0 mg/cm² or 0.5% on the surfaces identified above. This report includes both surfaces that were classified as LBP Hazards and those surfaces observed to be intact and not meeting the EPA/HUD definition of a potential lead hazard. All LBP regardless of condition has the potential to become a LBP hazard if disturbed. Interim Control Strategy: Hazard Elimination: Perform paint stabilization of all deteriorated LBP surfaces referred to in the Executive Summary. Interim controls and required clearance sampling should be performed in accordance with HUD/EPA protocols (HUD 24 CFR Part 35; 35.1330 Interim Controls and EPA 40 CFR Part 745.227 Work Practice Standards). Permanent Abatement Strategy: The option of permanent abatement can be selected for any LBP surface instead of interim controls. Recommended methods for each surface are included in Table 2, above. LBP abatement and required clearance sampling should be performed in accordance with HUD/EPA protocols (HUD 24 CFR Part 35; 35.1330 Interim Controls and EPA 40 CFR Part 745.227 Work Practice Standards). Lead in Dust Recommendations for lead dust include cleaning windows and floors in each of the listed areas where failing results were identified to ensure elimination of lead dust hazards. Cleaning should be performed in accordance with HUD/EPA protocols (HUD 24 CFR Part 35; 35.1330 Interim Controls and EPA 40 CFR Part 745.227 Work Practice Standards). Clearance inspections and dust sampling should be performed upon completion of lead hazard control work in accordance with 24 CFR Part 35 Section 35.1340 Clearance. Lead in Soil Where the lead concentration in soil exceeded the federal thresholds, all bare visible paint chips should be removed by HEPA vacuum or soil removal. Areas of bare soil should be covered with sod or other barrier to prevent access and dust generation. Prioritization of Hazard Reduction Work The HUD Guidelines require elimination of all LBP hazards from a federally subsidized property. The timeframe for hazard reduction is based upon the requirements of the funding program. LBP hazards identified in the Executive Summary should be prioritized based upon the following guidelines: •Units occupied by children under six years of age; •Common areas accessible to children under six years of age; •Remaining units or common areas prioritized based upon concentration of dust levels, number of leaded components, and severity of deteriorated paint. At minimum, interim controls such as paint stabilization, dust cleaning, and soil covering should be performed. Abatement can be substituted for interim controls on any surface. Certification of Results This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the homeowner, in order to comply with federal guidelines for participation in a residential housing program referenced herein. Photocopying or dissemination of this document, in part or in whole, by parties other than those designated by the homeowner, or the use of this document for purposes other than it is intended, is prohibited. The results of this risk assessment are valid only for the date and time of this field visit. Conditions may change. Not all surfaces were tested during the site assessment. Other areas may contain lead based paint. Any painted surface that will be disturbed by rehabilitation or renovation should be addressed by personnel trained in Lead Based Paint Safe Work Practices. Any work that disturbs painted surfaces should be followed by a clearance examination. Assessment was conducted for visible components only; this report is based solely on the data collected during this field visit. Flatley Read is not responsible for lead based paint contamination to the home or occupants that could occur if painted surfaces become damaged or deteriorated. In addition we cannot control the introduction of lead contamination from outside sources nor do we assume any liability therefore. Appendix A – Standards and Guidelines All testing was performed in accordance with the following: •Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead Based Paint Hazards in Housing, as published by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), June 1995, Chapter 7 Inspection, Rev. 1997; •Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead Based Paint Hazards in Housing, as published by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), June 1995, Chapter 5, Risk Assessment; •United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) 40 CFR Part 745.227(b); •United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) 40 CFR Part 745.227(d); •XRF-specific Performance Characteristic Sheet methodology (included herein). Lead Based Paint Threshold Limits In classifying our findings, Flatley Read applied lead-based paint hazard thresholds as established in: •USEPA 40 CFR Part 745 Lead: Identification of Dangerous Levels of Lead; Final Rule (January 5, 2001); •HUD 24 CFR Part 35-Lead: Requirements for Notification, Evaluation and Reduction of LBP Hazards in Housing Receiving Federal Assistance and Federally Owned Residential Property Being Sold (September 15, 1999). The following standards were applied: Paint: At or above 1.0 mg/cm² or .5% lead by weight Dust: Floors less than 10 µg/ft² Window Sills less than 100 µg/ft² Window Wells less than 400 µg/ft² Soil: Play Areas / High Contact Areas 400 ppm Other Bare Soil 1200 ppm A condition assessment was performed for each painted component. A complete list of interior and exterior surfaces tested at each location is included herein. The condition of each component was rated in accordance with the criteria established in Chapter 5 – Table 5.3 Conditions of Paint Film Quality of the HUD Guidelines. Component Intact Deteriorated Exterior components with large surface areas Entire surface is intact More than 10 square feet is deteriorated Interior components with large surface areas (walls, ceilings, floors, doors, etc.) Entire surface is intact More than 2 square feet is deteriorated Interior and exterior components with small surface areas (window sills, baseboards, soffits, trim, etc.) Entire surface is intact More than 10 percent of the total surface area of the component is deteriorated Surfaces containing lead-based paint were classified as potential lead hazards in accordance with the following criteria specified in USEPA 40 CFR 745.65: •Any lead-based paint on a friction surface that is subject to abrasion and where the lead dust levels on the closest horizontal surface exceeds the dust lead standards; •Any damaged or otherwise deteriorated surface that is caused by impact from a related building component; •Any chewable lead-based painted component that bears evidence of teeth marks; •Any other deteriorated lead-based paint in any residential building or child occupied facility or on the exterior of any residential building or child occupied facility. XRF Sampling and Analytical Procedures Testing was performed using X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analysis of painted building components using the Pb 200i unit manufactured by Viken (formerly Heuresis) Corporation. HUD Performance Characteristic Sheet is available here: https://www.heuresistech.com/sites/default/files/Heuresis_PCS_Dec_2015.pdf 115 Regent Street, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 9/13/2022 Rdg# Room Wall Component Description Substrate Rdg Result Condition 4 Exterior A Siding Wood 1.3 Positive Intact 5 Exterior A Window Case Wood 0.7 Negative Intact 6 Exterior A Window Sill Wood 0.3 Negative Intact 7 Front Porch Exterior A Hand Rail Upper Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 8 Front Porch Exterior A Spindle Wood 16.3 Positive Intact 9 Front Porch Exterior A Hand Rail Lower Wood 6.8 Positive Intact 10 Front Porch Exterior A Column (D side) Wood 7.6 Positive Deteriorated 11 Front Porch Exterior A Column (B side) Wood 4.6 Positive Deteriorated 12 Front Porch Exterior A Header Wood 9.7 Positive Intact 13 Front Porch Exterior A Rutter Wood 5.3 Positive Intact 14 Front Porch Exterior Ceiling Wood 5.9 Positive Intact 15 Front Porch Exterior A Vertical Trim Wood 1.6 Positive Intact 16 Front Porch Exterior A Door Case Wood 8.1 Positive Intact 17 Front Porch Exterior A Door Stop Wood 7.3 Positive Intact 18 Front Porch Exterior A Door Jamb Wood 2.8 Positive Deteriorated 19 Front Porch Exterior A Door Wood 14.9 Positive Deteriorated 20 Front Porch Exterior Threshold Wood 2.2 Positive Deteriorated 21 Stairwell A Door Case Wood 0.5 Negative Intact 22 Stairwell A Door Wood 17.3 Positive Deteriorated 23 Stairwell B Baseboard Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 24 Stairwell Ceiling Lowest Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 25 Stairwell C Door Case (first landing) Wood 1.1 Positive Intact 26 Stairwell C Door Wood 0.7 Negative Intact 27 Stairwell C Door Jam Wood 0.4 Negative Intact 28 Stairwell C Door Stop Wood 0.3 Negative Intact 29 Stairwell B2 Wall Plaster 0.3 Negative Intact 30 Stairwell B2 Stringer Wood 0.4 Negative Intact 31 Stairwell D2 Horizontal Trim Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 32 Stairwell D2 Wall Plaster 0.3 Negative Intact 33 Stairwell D2 Hand Rail Wood 0 Negative Intact 34 Stairwell D3 Radiator Metal 0.2 Negative Intact 35 Stairwell D4 Window Sash Wood 6.4 Positive Deteriorated 36 Stairwell D5 Window Case Wood 7.1 Positive Deteriorated 37 Stairwell Ceiling Wallboard 0.2 Negative Deteriorated 38 Stairwell A2 Wall Wallboard 0.3 Negative Intact 39 Stairwell A3 Wall Wallboard 0.3 Negative Intact Inspector: Michael Jenison XRF: 1342 115 Regent Street, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 9/13/2022 Rdg# Room Wall Component Description Substrate Rdg Result Condition 40 Stairwell A3 Horizontal Trim Wood 10.5 Positive Intact 41 Stairwell A4 Wall Wallboard 0.2 Negative Deteriorated 42 Stairwell A4 Corner Trim Wood 0.1 Negative Deteriorated 43 Stairwell B3 Door Case Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 44 Stairwell B3 Door Jamb Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 45 Dining Room D Door Stop Wood 0.3 Negative Intact 46 Dining Room D Door Case Wood 0.3 Negative Intact 47 Dining Room D Door Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 48 Living Room A1 Wall Wallboard 0.2 Negative Intact 49 Living Room A1 Door Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 50 Living Room A1 Door Case Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 51 Living Room A1 Baseboard Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 52 Living Room A2 Header (First Reading) Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 53 Living Room A2 Header (Second Reading) Wood 0.3 Negative Intact 54 Living Room A2 Window Case Wood 0.7 Negative Intact 55 Living Room A2 Window Sash Wood 1.7 Positive Deteriorated 56 Living Room A2 Windowsill Wood 0.9 Negative Deteriorated 57 Living Room A2 Window Apron Wood 1 Positive Intact 58 Living Room A2 Window Jamb Int. Wood 0.3 Negative Deteriorated 59 Living Room A2 Window Jamb Ext. Wood 14.6 Positive Deteriorated 60 Living Room A2 Window Sash Ext. Wood 7.3 Positive Deteriorated 61 Living Room A2 Window Case Ext. Wood 1.3 Positive Deteriorated 62 Living Room A2 Window Sill Ext. Wood 0.8 Negative Deteriorated 63 Living Room A2 Radiator Metal 0.2 Negative Deteriorated 64 Living Room B Window Case Wood 5.1 Positive Intact 65 Living Room B Window Sash Wood 0.3 Negative Intact 66 Living Room B Windowsill Wood 0.5 Negative Intact 67 Living Room B Window Apron Wood 6.6 Positive Intact 68 Living Room B Window Sash Ext. Wood 1.6 Positive Deteriorated 69 Living Room B Window Jamb Wood 0.4 Negative Deteriorated 70 Living Room B Window Stop Wood 3 Positive Deteriorated 71 Living Room B Window Jamb Ext. Wood 0.4 Negative Deteriorated 72 Living Room B Window Well Wood 2.5 Positive Deteriorated 73 Living Room B Baseboard Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 74 Living Room C Wall Wallboard 0.3 Negative Intact 75 Living Room C Corner Molding Wood 0.3 Negative Intact Inspector: Michael Jenison XRF: 1342 115 Regent Street, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 9/13/2022 Rdg# Room Wall Component Description Substrate Rdg Result Condition 76 Living Room C Built In Cabinet Face Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 77 Living Room C Built In Cabinet Shelf Wood 0.1 Negative Intact 78 Living Room C Ceiling WallBoard 0.3 Negative Deteriorated 79 Dining Room A Corner Molding Wood 0.1 Negative Intact 80 Dining Room A Wall Wallboard 0.2 Negative Intact 81 Dining Room A Baseboard Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 82 Dining Room A Quarter Round Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 83 Dining Room Floor Wood 0.1 Negative Intact 84 Dining Room B Wall Wallboard 0.2 Negative Intact 85 Dining Room B Window Case Wood 0.3 Negative Intact 86 Dining Room B Window Sash Wood 0.2 Negative Deteriorated 87 Dining Room B Windowsill Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 88 Dining Room B Window Apron Wood 0.3 Negative Intact 89 Dining Room B Window Jamb Wood 0.3 Negative Deteriorated 90 Dining Room B Window Stop Wood 0.4 Negative Deteriorated 91 Dining Room B Window Well Wood 1.1 Positive Deteriorated 92 Dining Room B Window Sash Ext. Wood 1.5 Positive Deteriorated 93 Dining Room C Wall Wallboard 0.2 Negative Intact 94 Dining Room C Corner Trim Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 95 Dining Room C Passthrough Header Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 96 Bedroom 1 A Wall Wallboard 0.4 Negative Intact 97 Bedroom 1 A Diagonal Support Beam Wood 0.3 Negative Intact 98 Bedroom 1 A Baseboard Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 99 Bedroom 1 A Door Case Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 100 Bedroom 1 A Door Jamb Wood 0.1 Negative Intact 101 Bedroom 1 B Window Case Wood 0.5 Negative Intact 102 Bedroom 1 B Window Sash Wood 0.4 Negative Intact 103 Bedroom 1 B Windowsill Wood 1.3 Positive Intact 104 Bedroom 1 B Window Apron Wood 6.1 Positive Intact 105 Bedroom 1 B Window Sash Ext. Wood 2.7 Positive Deteriorated 106 Bedroom 1 B Window Jamb Ext. Wood 2 Positive Deteriorated 107 Bedroom 1 B Window Stop Ext. Wood 2.8 Positive Deteriorated 108 Bedroom 1 Floor Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 109 Bedroom 1 C Wall Wallboard 0.4 Negative Intact 110 Bedroom 1 D Wall Wallboard 0.3 Negative Intact 111 Bedroom 1 D Door Wood 0.1 Negative Intact Inspector: Michael Jenison XRF: 1342 115 Regent Street, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 9/13/2022 Rdg# Room Wall Component Description Substrate Rdg Result Condition 112 Bedroom 1 D Door Case Wood 0.1 Negative Intact 113 Bedroom 1 D Door Jamb Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 114 Bedroom 2 A Wall Wallboard 0.2 Negative Intact 115 Bedroom 2 A Header Wood 0.1 Negative Intact 116 Bedroom 2 A Quarter Round Wood 0.1 Negative Intact 117 Bedroom 2 A Vent Trim Wood 0.3 Negative Intact 118 Bedroom 2 A Diagonal Support Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 119 Bedroom 2 B Window Case Wood 0.3 Negative Intact 120 Bedroom 2 B Window Sash Wood 0.3 Negative Deteriorated 121 Bedroom 2 B Window Sill Wood 1.1 Positive Deteriorated 122 Bedroom 2 B Window Apron Wood 6.4 Positive Intact 123 Bedroom 2 B Wall Wallboard 0.3 Negative Intact 124 Bedroom 2 B Baseboard Wood 0.1 Negative Intact 125 Bedroom 2 Floor Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 126 Bedroom 2 C Door Wood 0.1 Negative Intact 127 Bedroom 2 C Door Case Wood 0.1 Negative Intact 128 Bedroom 2 C Vertical Support Beam Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 129 Bedroom 2 C Header Wood 0.1 Negative Intact 130 Bedroom 2 C Window Case Wood 0.1 Negative Intact 131 Bedroom 2 C Window Sash Wood 0.1 Negative Deteriorated 132 Bedroom 2 C Window Jamb Wood 0.7 Negative Deteriorated 133 Bedroom 2 C Window Sash Ext. Wood 1.1 Positive Deteriorated 134 Bedroom 2 D Wall Wallboard 0.2 Negative Intact 135 Bedroom 2 D Door Case Wood 0.1 Negative Intact 136 Bedroom 2 D Door Wood 0.1 Negative Intact 137 Bedroom 2 D Door Jamb Wood 0.1 Negative Deteriorated 138 Bedroom 3 A Wall Wallboard 0.2 Negative Intact 139 Bedroom 3 A Diagonal Post Wood 0.8 Negative Intact 140 Bedroom 3 A Vertical Beam Wood 1.3 Positive Intact 141 Bedroom 3 B Wall Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 142 Bedroom 3 B Door Wood 0.1 Negative Intact 143 Bedroom 3 B Door Jamb Wood 0 Negative Deteriorated 144 Bedroom 3 Floor Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 145 Bedroom 3 C Window Case Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 146 Bedroom 3 C Window Sash Wood 0.1 Negative Deteriorated 147 Bedroom 3 C Window Jamb Wood 1.1 Positive Deteriorated Inspector: Michael Jenison XRF: 1342 115 Regent Street, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 9/13/2022 Rdg# Room Wall Component Description Substrate Rdg Result Condition 148 Bedroom 3 C Header Wood 0.3 Negative Intact 149 Bedroom 3 C Wall Wallboard 0.8 Negative Intact 150 Bedroom 3 C Vertical Post Wood 0.3 Negative Intact 151 Bedroom 3 Ceiling Wood 0.2 Negative Deteriorated 152 Bedroom 3 A Crown Molding Wood 0.1 Negative Intact 153 Bedroom 3 D Window Case Wood 0.4 Negative Intact 154 Bedroom 3 D Window Sash Wood 0.4 Negative Intact 155 Bedroom 3 D Windowsill Wood 10.4 Positive Intact 156 Bedroom 3 D Window Apron Wood 6 Positive Intact 157 Bedroom 3 D Window Sash Ext. Wood 4.9 Positive Deteriorated 158 Bedroom 3 D Window Stop Wood 4.7 Positive Deteriorated 159 Bedroom 3 D Window Jamb Wood 7.7 Positive Deteriorated 160 Bedroom 3 D Window Well Wood 5.3 Positive Deteriorated 161 Hall B Wall Wallboard 0.1 Negative Intact 162 Hall B Door 1 Wood 0 Negative Intact 163 Hall B Door Case 1 Wood 0.3 Negative Intact 164 Hall B Door Stop 1 Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 165 Hall B Door 2 Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 166 Hall B Door Stop 2 Wood 0.2 Negative Deteriorated 167 Hall B Crown Molding Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 168 Hall B Baseboard Wood 0.1 Negative Intact 169 Hall C Door Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 170 Hall C Door Case Wood 2.3 Positive Intact 171 Hall C Door Jamb Wood 1.5 Positive Deteriorated 172 Hall C Door Stop Wood 1.6 Positive Intact 173 Hall C Door Ext. Wood 0.5 Negative Intact 174 Hall D Wall Wallboard 0.4 Negative Intact 175 Kitchen A Wall Wallboard 0.2 Negative Intact 176 Kitchen A Veritcal Post Wood 0.3 Negative Intact 177 Kitchen B Wall Wallboard 0.2 Negative Intact 178 Kitchen C Wall Wallboard 0.2 Negative Intact 179 Kitchen D Wall Wallboard 0.2 Negative Intact 180 Kitchen DHorizontal Beam Under Windows Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 181 Kitchen D Window Case Wood 0.1 Negative Intact 182 Kitchen D Windowsill Wood 2.7 Positive Intact 183 Kitchen D Window Apron Wood 8.4 Positive Intact Inspector: Michael Jenison XRF: 1342 115 Regent Street, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 9/13/2022 Rdg# Room Wall Component Description Substrate Rdg Result Condition 184 Bathroom A Wall Upper Wallboard 0.2 Negative Intact 185 Bathroom A Chair Rail Wood 0.3 Negative Intact 186 Bathroom A Wall Lower Wallboard 0.3 Negative Intact 187 Bathroom Ceiling Wallboard 0.3 Negative Deteriorated 188 Bathroom B Wall Wallboard 0.2 Negative Intact 189 Bathroom C Wall Wallboard 0.3 Negative Intact 190 Bathroom C Door Wood 0.3 Negative Intact 191 Bathroom C Door Case Wood 0.4 Negative Intact 192 Bathroom C Door Jamb Wood 0.4 Negative Intact 193 Bathroom C Door Stop Wood 0.3 Negative Deteriorated 194 Bathroom D Wall Wallboard 0.2 Negative Intact 195 Bathroom D Tread Wood 1.7 Positive Intact 196 Bathroom D Riser Wood 2.1 Positive Intact 197 Bathroom D Built In Shelf Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 198 Bathroom D Built In Face Wood 1.7 Positive Intact 199 Bathroom D Window Case Wood 0.8 Negative Intact 200 Bathroom D Windowsill Wood 0.2 Negative Intact 201 Bathroom D Window Apron Wood 16.7 Positive Intact Living Room A2 Window Wood Living Room C Well and Window Wood Room Wall Component Description Substrate Stairwell B,D Wall Vinyl Reason for Exclusion Walls B,D of Bottom landing Vinyl Notes Window 2 Same Configuration Same Configuration as Wall B's Inaccessible / Excluded Areas Inspector: Michael Jenison XRF: 1342 Page 1 of 2 Certfcate of Analysis : Lead In Dust Wipes by Modifed ASTM 1644-17* and EPA Method 7000B Client Project : 836404 09/12/2022 09/12/2022 Date Reported : Date Analyzed : Date Received : Sampling Date : AAT Project : Phone : Email : Fax : flatleyreadllc@gmail.com 518-577-5681 Michelle DeGarmo Flatley Read LLC Attn : Client : 115 REGENT ST SARATOGA NY 12866Project Location : PVT-115-RA Schuylerville, NY 12871 12 Spring Street Suite 102 30105 Beverly Road Romulus, MI 48174 Ph: 734-629-8161; Fax: 734-629-8431 09/07/2022 09/12/2022 Lab Sample ID Area (Sq ft) Width (inch) Length (inch)Sample DescriptionClient Code Results Lead μg/ft2 Total μg 1 FRONT ENTRY F 1.001212 10.25773341710.25 2 LIVING RM WS 0.25218 82.46773341820.62 3 LIVING RM F 1.001212 74.57773341974.57 4 BEDRM 1 WS 0.25218 26.4677334206.62 5 BEDRM 2 F 1.001212 40.64773342140.64 6 BEDRM 2 WS 0.25218 99.70773342224.93 7 BEDRM 3 WT 0.25218 535.927733423133.98 9 HALL F 1.001212 6.5277334246.52 10 BATHRM 2 F 1.001212 <5.007733425<5 Analyst Signature Alexis Pheeney 836404 AAT Project:Date Printed:09/12/2022 7:39PM AIHA LAP- Lab ID #100986, NY State DOH ELAP -Lab ID #11864, State of Ohio- Lab ID # 10042 ND = Not Detected, N/A = Not Available, RL = Reporting Limit, Analytical Reporting Limit is 5 ug/sample. For true values assume (2) significant figures. AAT internal SOP S205. The method and batch QC are acceptable unless otherwise stated. EPA Regulatory Limits: 10 ug/ft2 (Floors, Carpeted/Uncarpeted), 100 ug/ft2 (Window Sill/Stools), 400 ug/ft2 (Window Trough/Well/Ext Concrete Surfaces). HUD Grantee Regulatory Limits: 10 ug/ft2 (Interior Floors), 40 ug/ft2 (Porch Floors), 100 ug/ft2 (Window Sills), 100 ug/ft2 (Window Troughs). New York City Regulatory Limits: 5 ug/ft2 (Floors), 40 ug/ft2 (Window Sills), 100 ug/ft2 (Window Wells). The laboratory operates in accord with ISO 17025 guidelines and holds limited scopes of accreditation under AIHA-LAP and NY State DOH ELAP programs. These results are submitted pursuant to AAT, LLC current terms and conditions of sale, including the company's standard warranty and limitation of liability provisions. Analytical results relate to the samples as received by the lab. AAT will not assume any liability or responsibility for the manner in which the results are used or interpreted. All Quality Control requirements for the samples this report contains have been met. AAT does not blank correct reported values.Sample data apply only to items analyzed. Results are calculated with wipe dimensions supplied by client. Reproduction of this document other than in its entirety is not authorized by AAT, LLC.* = Validated modified method. Samples are stored for 15 days following report date. Page 2 of 2 Flatley Read LLCTo : Attn : Phone : AAT Project : Client Project : Date Reported : Project Location : Email :Michelle DeGarmo 518-577-5681 flatleyreadllc@gmail.com 836404 PVT-115-RA 115 REGENT ST SARATOGA NY 12866 12 Spring Street Suite 102 Schuylerville, NY 12871 30105 Beverly Road Romulus, MI 48174 Ph: 734-629-8161; Fax: 734-629-8431 09/12/2022 Sample CompletedAnalysis RequestedClient Code Analyst 7733417 09/12/2022Dust Wipe1 Alexis Pheeney 7733418 09/12/2022Dust Wipe2 Alexis Pheeney 7733419 09/12/2022Dust Wipe3 Alexis Pheeney 7733420 09/12/2022Dust Wipe4 Alexis Pheeney 7733421 09/12/2022Dust Wipe5 Alexis Pheeney 7733422 09/12/2022Dust Wipe6 Alexis Pheeney 7733423 09/12/2022Dust Wipe7 Alexis Pheeney 7733424 09/12/2022Dust Wipe9 Alexis Pheeney 7733425 09/12/2022Dust Wipe10 Alexis Pheeney Quality Assurance Coordinator - Robert A. TheysReviewed By 836404 AAT Project:Date Printed:09/12/2022 7:40PM This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify AAT immediately. Thank you. AIHA LAP- Lab ID #100986, NY State DOH ELAP -Lab ID #11864, State of Ohio- Lab ID # 10042 AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC acknowledges that Accurate Analytical Testing, LLC 30105 Beverly Road, Romulus, MI 48174 Laboratory ID: LAP-100986 along with all premises from which key activities are performed, as listed above, has fulfilled the requirements of the AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs (AIHA LAP), LLC accreditation to the ISO/IEC 17025:2017 international standard, General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories in the following: LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAMS INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE Accreditation Expires: ENVIRONMENTAL LEAD Accreditation Expires: September 01, 2023 ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY Accreditation Expires: FOOD Accreditation Expires: UNIQUE SCOPES Accreditation Expires: Specific Field(s) of Testing (FoT)/Method(s) within each Accreditation Program for which the above named laboratory maintains accreditation is outlined on the attached Scope of Accreditation. Continued accreditation is contingent upon successful on-going compliance with ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and AIHA LAP, LLC requirements. This certificate is not valid without the attached Scope of Accreditation. Please review the AIHA LAP, LLC website (www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org) for the most current Scope. Revision19.1: 07/28/2021 _____________________________________ Cheryl O Morton Managing Director, AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC Date Issued: 08/31/2021 Michael C Jenison has fulfilled the requirements of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Section 402, and has received certification to conduct lead-based paint activities pursuant to 40 CFR Part 745.226 as: All EPA Administered Lead-based Paint Activities Program States, Tribes and Territories This certification is valid from the date of issuance and expires October 06, 2023 Certification # LBP-R-I217373-1 Issued On September 22, 2020 Ben Conetta, Chief Chemicals and Multimedia Programs Branch Risk Assessor Flatley Read, Inc. has fulfilled the requirements of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Section 402, and has received certification to conduct lead-based paint activities pursuant to 40 CFR Part 745.226 All EPA Administered Lead-based Paint Activities Program States, Tribes and Territories This certification is valid from the date of issuance and expires November 16, 2024 Certification # LBP-F157741-2 Issued On September 02, 2021 Michelle Price, Chief Lead, Heavy Metals, and Inorganics Branch