Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20250566 33-35 Caroline St Site Plan ApplicationRecipient:Shipper: Chair Mark Pingel and PB Members, City of Saratoga Springs 474 Broadway SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY, US, 12866 Charles J. Gottlieb, WHITEMAN OSTERMAN & HANNA LLP One Commerce Plaza Suite 1900 Albany, NY, US, 12260 Reference 118688-001 The following is the proof-of-delivery for tracking number:882299975966 Thank you for choosing FedEx Status: Signed for by: Service type: Special Handling: Delivered To: Delivery Location: Delivery date: Delivery Information: Shipping Information: Tracking number:Ship Date: Weight: Deliver Weekday Shipping/Receiving FedEx Priority Overnight C.Bryants 882299975966 Jun 26, 2025 10:24 14.0 LB/6.36 KG Delivered June 27, 2025 Dear Customer, 474 Broadway Jun 25, 2025 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY, 12866 One Commerce Plaza Charlie J. Gottlieb Albany, New York 12260 Partner 518.487.7600 phone 518.487.7612 phone 518.487.7777 fax cgottlieb@woh.com June 25, 2025 VIA EMAIL & FEDERAL EXPRESS Chair Mark Pingel and Members of the Planning Board City of Saratoga Springs 474 Broadway Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 Re: 33-35 Caroline Street, Mixed Use Development – Site Plan Review Project Site: 33-35 Caroline Street (SBL 160-1-27/28/29) Dear Chair Mark Pingel and Members of the Planning Board: Our Firm represents Oldest Lighthouse, LLC (“Applicant”), the owner of property located at 33-35 Caroline Street in the City of Saratoga Springs, New York (SBL 160-1-27/28/29) (“Project Site”). The Applicant has proposed to construct a mixed-use building on the Project Site that will contain two retail uses on the ground floor (2,396 SF and 2,670 SF) with twenty-five (25) residential dwelling units on the top floors (the “Project”). The proposed residential units include three (3) 1-bedrooms units, eighteen (18) 2-bedroom units, and four (4) 3-bedroom units. The Project also includes 36 parking spaces to be located both below ground and on the first floor, which off-street parking spaces will be dedicated to the residential units and valet services provided. Vehicular access to the Project will be via Pavilion Place. Residential pedestrian access will also be via Pavilion Place, with access to the retail uses to be via Pavilion Place and Caroline Street. We respectfully submit this application to the City of Saratoga Springs Planning Board (“Planning Board”) for site plan approval to allow the Project to proceed. See Exhibit A [Site Plan Application and Related Forms]. The Project is an unlisted action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”) and as such we have enclosed the required short environmental assessment form (“EAF”). See Exhibit B [EAF]. Chair Mark Pingel and Members of the Planning Board June 25, 2025 Page 2 of 4 4910-4667-2720, v. 1 The Project and Related Environmental Review The Project Site is within the City’s Urban Core T6 “UC” zoning district and is surrounded by commercial and other mixed-use developments. See Exhibit C [Aerial Image]. Given its location within the UC zoning district, the Project requires site plan approval as well as architectural review the City’s Design Review Board (“DRB”). The Project is approximately 64 feet in building height, which height bonus was approved by the Planning Board in December of 2024 given that the Project will include one affordable dwelling unit. See Exhibit D [Planning Board Meeting Minutes]. The Project has received several approvals from the City’s DRB after a lengthy review process, which approvals include demolition approval, mass and bulk approval and most recently architectural approval. See Exhibit E [DRB Meeting Minutes]. To assist with the Planning Board’s SEQRA review, we have enclosed correspondence from the State Historic Preservation Office (“SHPO”) dated July 22, 2024, finding that “the design of the proposed new construction is generally appropriate and will not cause harm, physically or visually, to historic character defining features of the surrounding historic buildings and district. In addition, there are no archaeological concerns associated with this project.” See Exhibit F [SHPO Correspondence]. In addition, the EAF indicates that the Project Site includes a small open petroleum spill, which spill was discovered and reported to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (“NYSDEC”) by the Applicant during its due diligence (Spill No. 2309179). We have enclosed a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment for the Project Site, which identified the potential spill. See Exhibit G [Phase 1 ESA]. Given the length of the Phase 1 ESA, we have enclosed the narrative of the Phase 1 ESA herein as Exhibit F and have provided the full Phase 1 ESA electronically. As a result of the Phase 1 ESA, the Applicant’s environmental consultants prepared a Phase 2 Site Investigation Report (“Phase 2 SIR”) to assess the potential contamination of the existing soil on the Project Site. See Exhibit H [Phase 2 SIR]. Per the Phase 2 SIR, the Applicant’s consultant, Northeastern Environmental Geoscience, DPC, reported the identified small petroleum spill to the NYSDEC and the matter was opened by the NYSDEC (Spill No. 2309179). This spill is noted as being a small petroleum spill located on the northeast portion of the Project Site at depths of 7-10 feet below grade. The Applicant and Northeastern Environmental have been communicating with the NYSDEC for the remediation and closure of Spill No. 2309179 during the construction of the Project. The Applicant intends to work with the NYSDEC to prepare a Site Management Plan (“SMP”) that includes the construction of the Project and its related excavation to remediate the spill and close Spill No. 2309179. During construction, all hazardous substances and soils encountered will be removed from the Project Site in accordance with all local, State and federal regulations. Once contaminated soils have been removed from the Project Site, the Applicant will close Spill No. 2309179 ensuring its appropriateness for the Project. The Project will connect to public water and public sewer utilities. The Project Site does not include any waterbodies or wetland areas, has been previously disturbed and is improved with Chair Mark Pingel and Members of the Planning Board June 25, 2025 Page 3 of 4 4910-4667-2720, v. 1 existing vacant buildings (being demolished) and related paved parking areas. The Applicant’s engineer, Bohler Engineering, is working on a water and sewer engineering report, which will be forwarded to the Planning Board once received. We have learned through the City and related surveying that the Caroline Street right-of- way is 50 feet wide. See Exhibit I [Subdivision Map N204A, prepared by All-Points Land Surveying, PLLC, dated last revised August 21, 2004]. We have also enclosed the following updated survey, site plan sheets and architectural plans for the Planning Board’s review: 1) Survey Map for Dempsey Development, prepared by Thompson/Fleming Land Surveyors, P.C., dated December 20, 2023; 2) Site Plan, Sheet C-301, prepared by Bohler Engineering, dated June 12, 2025; 3) Grading, Drainage and Utility Plan, Sheet C-401, prepared by Bohler Engineering, dated June 12, 2025; 4) Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Sheet C-801, prepared by Bohler Engineering, dated June 12, 2025; and 5) Architectural Plans, prepared by 686 Architects, dated June 20, 2025. As demonstrated by the above Site Plan, Grading, Drainage and Utility Plan, and the Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, the Project Site is suitable for the Project and will not result in any need for area variances and will not result in any impacts related to stormwater or drainage. As you can see from the enclosed Architectural Plans, the Project is consistent with the character of the neighborhood, which was confirmed by the City’s DRB. The DRB did condition their approval on replacing the previously proposed double-wide brick feature separating the balcony areas with a metal product, which is satisfactory to the Applicant. Conclusion The Project will revitalize vacant property in the City of Saratoga Springs with a vibrant new mixed-use development that will add needed housing to the City of Saratoga Springs, including one affordable unit. The Project will facilitate the existing walk able community in this downtown urban core area and enhance the street scape. In furtherance of the above we have enclosed five (5) copies of the instant letter and the following exhibits and enclosures: Exhibit A: Application Form, Complete Streets Form, Water Service Agreement; Exhibit B: Short Environmental Assessment Form; Exhibit C: Aerial Image; Exhibit D: Planning Board Meeting Minutes, December 2024; Exhibit E: Design Review Board Meeting Minutes, March 2025; Exhibit F: State Historic Preservation Office Correspondence, July 2024; Exhibit G: Phase 1 ESA, prepared by Northeastern Environmental Geoscience, DPC, dated January 23, 2024; Exhibit H: Site Investigation Report, prepared by Northeastern Environmental Chair Mark Pingel and Members of the Planning Board June 25, 2025 Page 4 of 4 4910-4667-2720, v. 1 Geoscience, DPC, dated February 28, 2025; and Exhibit I: Subdivision Map N204A, prepared by All-Points Land Surveying, PLLC, dated last revised August 21, 2004. The Applicant has also enclosed the following Project plans and updated survey: ▪ Survey Map for Dempsey Development, prepared by Thompson/Fleming Land Surveyors, P.C., dated December 20, 2023; ▪ Site Plan, Sheet C-301, prepared by Bohler Engineering, dated June 12, 2025; ▪ Grading, Drainage and Utility Plan, Sheet C-401, prepared by Bohler Engineering, dated June 12, 2025; ▪ Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Sheet C-801, prepared by Bohler Engineering, dated June 12, 2025; and ▪ Architectural Plans, prepared by 686 Architects, dated June 20, 2025. The Applicant will be sending a check made out to the City of Saratoga Springs, under separate cover, in the amount of $6,650 representing the Planning Board site plan review application fee. Thank you for your attention to and consideration of this matter. We respectfully request to be placed on the Planning Board’s next available agenda. Please do not hesitate to contact our office with any questions. Very truly yours, /s/ Charles J. Gottlieb Charles J. Gottlieb Enclosures cc: James Christopher, 686 Architects (via email) William Christopher, 686 Architects (via email) Caryn Mlodzianowski, Bohler Engineering (via email) Cronan Dempsey, Oldest Lighthouse, LLC (via email) Eric Brodwin, Oldest Lighthouse, LLC (via email) Exhibit A Exhibit A 1 500’ of a State Park, city boundary, or county/state highway APPLICANT(S)* OWNER(S) (If not applicant) ATTORNEY/AGENT Name Address Phone Email Identify primary contact person:  Applicant Owner Agent * An applicant must be the property owner, lessee, or one with an option to lease or purchase the property in question. APPLICATION FOR: SITE PLAN REVIEW (INCLUDING PUD) **HANDWRITTEN APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED** CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS PLANNING BOARD CITY HALL - 474 BROADWAY SARATOGA SPRINGS, NEW YORK 12866-2296 TEL: 518-587-3550 X2533 www.saratoga-springs.org [FOR OFFICE USE] _______________ (Application #) ____________ (Date received) __________________________ (Project Title) Staff Review _______________ **Application Check List - All submissions must include completed application check list and all required items.** Property Address/Location:_______________________________________________________________________ Tax Parcel #: _______________________________ Zoning District:_______________________________ (for example: 165.52-4-37) Project Description: _______________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ Date special use permit granted (if any): ______________Date zoning variance granted (if any):___________ Has a previous application been filed with PB for this property?: NO YES If YES, include Application TYPE _____________________________ and DATE: _________________ Is property located within (check all that apply)?:  Historic District  Architectural Review District Revised 8/2022 City of Saratoga Springs- Site Plan Review Application See cover letter for project narrative. REQUIRED ITEMS: *4 hard copies (1 w/original signature), 1 digital copy of ALL materials (all maps, drawings, or image documents as separate files to maintain their original scale and image resolution). Application Fee: Make checks payable to the "Commissioner of Finance’. REFER TO THE CURRENT FEE WORKSHEET INCLUDED IN THIS DOCUMENT. Check City’s website (www.saratoga-springs.org) for meeting dates. Does any City officer, employee or family member thereof have a financial interest (as defined by General Municipal Law Section 809) in this application? YES NO_ X_. If YES, a statement disclosing the name, residence, nature and extent of this interest must be filed with this application. |, the undersigned owner, leasee’ or purchaser under contract for the property, hereby request Site Plan Review by the Planning Board for the identified property above. | agree to meet all requirements under Article 13 of the Unified Development Ordinance of the City of Saratoga Springs. Furthermore, | hereby authorize members of the Planning Board and designated City staff to enter the property associated with this application for purposes of conducting any necessary site inspections relating to this application. Applicant Signature: ‘Crane euipren Date: & l [3 } 25 If applicant is not current owner, owner must also sign. | D nanos : Owner Signature: Caan heapoy Date: pA / LS Jas X City of Saratoga Springs Site Plan Checklist 1 Listed below are the minimum submittal requirements for site plan review as set forth in The City of Saratoga Springs’ Unified Development Ordinance Article 13.5. The Planning Board reserves the right to request additional information, as necessary, to support an application. The Board also reserves the right to reject the application if these minimum requirements are not met. Please complete the checklist below and provide with your submission. REQUIRED ITEMS: *4 hard copies (1 w/original signature), 1 digital copy of ALL materials and Fee are CHECK EACH ITEM 1.Completed Site Plan Application (4 hard copies - *1 w/original signature - and 1 digital) and Fee 2.SEQR Environmental Assessment Form- short or long form as required by action.   3.Set of plans (prepared by a NYS licensed Engineer, Landscape Architect, or Architect) including: (3) large scale plans (sheets must be 24” x 36”, drawn to a scale of not more than 1”=50 feet), and (1) 11" x 17" copy. One digital version (PDF) of all submittal items printable to scale 4.Basic or Full Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan as required per Article 17. 5.Copy of signed DPW water connection agreement for all projects involving new water connections to the City system 6.Engineering Report for Water and Sanitary 7.Complete Streets Checklist 8.Project Cost Estimate for Letter of Credit (Utilize City Template) REQUIRED ITEMS ON SITE PLAN, AS APPLICABLE:  1.Property line survey prepared by a licensed land surveyor. Site plan must reference such survey with all corners set and marked on plan. Reference NGVD 1929 datum. A copy of the original property survey must also be included. 2.North arrow and map scale 3.Parcel tax map number 4.Site location map (with title block and map key) SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS PLANNING BOARD CITY HALL - 474 BROADWAY SARATOGA SPRINGS, NEW YORK 12866-2296 TEL: 518-587-3550 X2533 www.saratoga-springs.org 5.Incorporate the City's standard engineering details City of Saratoga Springs Site Plan Checklist 2 6.Site vicinity map (all features within 300 feet of property) 7. Identification of zoning district with corresponding dimensional standards 8. Building setback lines shown on plans. 9.Title block with project name; name and address of applicant; and name and address of property owner (if different) 10.Project Name 11.Name of all adjacent property owners within 300 feet (Include both sides of street) 12.Parcel street address (existing and any proposed postal addresses) Yes No N/A 13.Identification of all existing or proposed easements, covenants or legal rights-of-way on this property 14.References to all prior variances or special use permits 15.Existing and proposed contours and spot grades (at 2 foot intervals) extending to property boundary 16.Identification of all spoil, borrow, storage, or staging areas 17. Identification of all watercourses, designated State wetlands, buffers, Federal wetlands, buffers floodplains, rock outcroppings, etc. 18.Erosion and sediment control plan – including designated concrete truck washout area 19.Identification of all existing or proposed sidewalks or pedestrian paths (show type, size and condition) 20.Location, design specifications and construction material for all proposed site improvements (drains, culverts, retaining walls, berms, fences, etc.) 21.Location and distance to fire hydrant 22.Identify size, material, elevations and slopes of all existing and proposed utilities with 400' of site 23.Parking lot layout plan and identification of all loading areas (number all spaces) 24. Calculation of required spaces for vehicle and bicycle parking by proposed use(s) 25.Identification of parking spaces and access points for physically impaired persons 26.Location and screening plan for dumpster or recycling bins 27.Location, design, type of construction and materials, proposed use and exterior dimensions of all buildings (existing and proposed) on site including finish floor elevations to nearest tenth foot. 28.Identification of storage of any potentially hazardous materials 29.Planting plan identifying quantity, species and size of all proposed new plant materials. Label existing plant material to be retained or removed. Identify any existing signficant trees. 30.Lighting plan showing type, location and intensity of all existing and proposed exterior lighting fixtures Checklist prepared by:_________________________________________Date:_________________ City Hall - 474 Broadway City of Saratoga Springs Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 Tel: 518-587-3550 www.saratoga-springs.org Office of Planning & Economic Development Application to City Council FEE Comprehensive Plan amendment Zoning Ordinance amendment Planned Unit Development (PUD) amendment $1,800 + $300/acre $800 + $300/acre $800 + $300/acre Application to Zoning Board of Appeals Use Variance Area Variance - Residential (1 & 2 Family) Area Variance - 3+ Family and Commercial Interpretations Post Work Application Fee Variance extensions $1,400 + $50/app $350/1st var +$50/app +$150/ea add variance $1000/1st var + $50/app+ $200/ ea add variance $650 + $50/app Application Fee x 2 + $50/app 50% of Application fee + $50/app Application to Design Review Commission Demolition Residential Structures - 1 or 2 Family Principal or Accessory Structure Materials Change-roof, windows, siding Facade Change-removal/addition of windows, doors, porch Addition or new construction Approval Extension or Modification 3 + /Multi-Family, Comm, Mixed-Use Principal or Accessory Structure Materials Change-roof, windows, siding, paint color Signs, Awnings Facade Change-removal/addition of windows, doors, porch Addition or new construction Approval Extension or Modification Post Work Application Fee $500 $75 $150 $300 50% of application fee $150 $150 $300 $650 50% of application fee Application Fee x 2 Application to Planning Board Special Use Permit Temporary Use Permit Special Use Permit - extension Special Use Permit - modification $1200 + $50/app $500 $400 $550 + $50/app Site Plan Review - incl. PUD: Sketch Plan Site Plan Full Residential Non-residential Administrative SPR Residential Non-residential Extension Residential Non-residential Subdivision - incl. PUD: Sketch Plan Preliminary Approval Residential: 1-5 lots Residential: 6-10 lots Residential: 11-20 lots Residential: 21+ lots Residential - extension Final Approval Residential Non- Residential Final Approval Modification Residential Non- Residential Final Approval Extension $400 per sketch $400 + $250/unit $800 + $150/1000 sf $400 $800 $250 $350 $400 per sketch $700 + $50/app $1100 + $50/app $1450 + $50/app $1800 + $50/app $350 $1,550 + $200/lot + $50/app $2,400/lot + $50/app $400 + $50/app $800 + $50/app Residential $250 Non- Residential $350 Other: Lot Line Adjustment/Subdivision Administrative Action $400 Letter of Credit - modification or extension $400 Letter of Credit - collection Recreation Fee Land Disturbance Watercourse/Wetland Permit SEQRA EIS Review (Draft & Final) up to 1% of LoC $2000/lot or unit $750 + $35/acre $750 TBD 6 City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Checklist 1 City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Checklist Project Name: __________________________________________________ Date: ____________________ Project Location / Limits: __________________________________________________________________ Project Description: ______________________________________________________________________ Instructions: For each box checked, please provide a brief description for how the item is addressed, not addressed, or not applicable and include supporting documentation. Street Classification (identify street or streets within the project area) Principal arterial Minor arterial Mixed use collector Mixed use local Residential collector Residential local Special use street EXISTING CONDITIONS Item to Be Addressed/ Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Existing Bicycle & Pedestrian Operations Do bicycle and pedestrian accommodations exist? (see page 2 for examples) Existing Transit Operations Do transit facilities exist within the study area, including bus and train stops/stations? Is the project area on a transit route? (CDTA Service Routes) Are there bicycle racks, shelters, or parking for transit riders available? Existing Access and Mobility Do connective opportunities exist with schools, hospitals, senior care or community centers or persons with disabilities within project area? Are there gaps inhibiting continuous access between schools, hospitals, senior care, or community centers or persons with disabilities within project area?” Project Area Context Are there prominent landmarks, recreation, shopping, employment center, cultural centers or other key destinations that offer opportunities to connect this site? Please list and/or describe planning or policy documents addressing bicyclist, pedestrian, transit, or truck/ freight use for the project area. Examples can include: City of Saratoga Springs Comprehensive Plan, City of Saratoga Springs Open Space Plan, Capital District Transportation Committee Bicycle/ Pedestrian Priority Network, City Standard Details, etc. Saratoga Springs Complete Street Policy Vision (May 2012) The City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Policy will encourage the development of a complete streets network throughout the City to create a more balanced transportation system. The Policy shall be consistent with and assist in achieving the goals and recommendations set forth in the City’s Comprehensive Plan and other policy documents. The Policy shall ensure new and updated public and private projects are planned, designed, maintained and operated to enable safer, comfortable and convenient travel to the greatest extent possible for users of all abilities including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists and transit riders. This checklist is intended to assist the City in achieving its vision for complete streets. City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Checklist 2 PROPOSED DESIGN Item to Be Addressed/ Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Complete Streets Design Bicyclist accommodations? Pedestrian accommodations? Access and Mobility accommodations? Transit accommodations? Truck/ freight accommodations? Streetscape elements? Bike Facilities: Off-roadway bike accommodations Yes No NA Dedicated bike lane Yes No NA Shared-use lane Yes No NA Shoulder Yes No NA Acceptable actuated traffic signal bike detection, including turn lanes Yes No NA Do signals allow adequate minimum green time for bicyclist to safely cross intersection? Yes No NA Signage and pavement markings specific to proposed bike facilities Yes No NA Bicycle safe inlet grates Yes No NA Bicycle parking, eg. bike racks, bike lockers Yes No NA Transit Facilities: Transit shelters Yes No NA Bus turnouts Yes No NA Standing pads Yes No NA Has CDTA been contacted? Yes No NA Access and Mobility Facilities: Adequate sidewalk or paved path Yes No NA Acceptable consideration/provision for accessible pedestrian traffic signal features Yes No NA Curb ramps, including detectable warning surface Yes No NA Acceptable slope and cross-slope for driveway ramps, sidewalks, crossings) Yes No NA Have conflicts been reduced among pedestrian, bicyclists, and motor vehicles (access management)? Yes No NA Pedestrian Facilities: Sidewalks on both sides of the street Yes No NA Striped crosswalks Yes No NA Geometric modifications to reduce crossing distances such as curb extensions (e.g. bulb-outs) Yes No NA Acceptable provision for pedestrian traffic signal features (e.g. ped. buttons) Yes No NA Pedestrian signage for crossing & wayfinding Yes No NA Safety islands/medians on roadways with two or more traffic lanes in each direction Yes No NA Enhanced supplemental pedestrian treatments at uncontrolled marked crossings Yes No NA Connectivity: Are there proposed connections to other bike paths, pedestrian facilities, or transit facilities? Yes No NA Are there proposed connections to any key destinations listed on page 1? Yes No NA Are there proposed connections to neighborhoods? Yes No NA Streetscape Elements: Are streetscape elements proposed such as landscaping, street trees, planters, buffer strips, etc? Yes No NA Pedestrian-level lighting Yes No NA Public seating or benches Yes No NA Design Standards and Guidelines Design meets guidelines such as described below for bicycle/pedestrian/bus/transit facilities? Yes No NA Describe *American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) - A Policy on Geometric Design of Highway and Streets, Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities and AASHTO Guide for the Planning, Design, and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities; Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guide(PROWAG); Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD); Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG); National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) - Urban Bikeway Design Guide. New York State Department of Transportation – Highway Design Manual CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS COMMISSIONER UTILITIES DEPARTMENT JOSEPH O'NEILL, III D epartment of Public Works DEPUTY COMMISSIONER 474 Broadway-RM 12 MICHAEL VEITCH Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 BUSINESS MANAGER Telephone 518-587-3550 Email: utilities@saratoga-springs.org www.saratoga-springs.org NEW WATER SERVICE CONNECTION AGREEMENT & APPLICATION FORM Property Owner’s Name Quest Light hovse Project Name (if applicable) 33-95 Catline Street Property Address _ 33-35 Carline Street, Saratoga Springs NY = Tax Map #: _160-1-27/28/29 Size of Tap (check one below) x“ i” 4" __ Greater than 1” A unit of water shall be defined as 14,000 (fourteen thousand) cubic feet of water per year. Contact the Utilities Department for assistance with water use estimation and meter specifications before signing below. 25 Number of Dwellings: Estimated Cubic Feet of Water per Year _ TBD To be completed in full without any contingencies or protest, on or before the Building Inspector approval of the rough plumbing, including the installation of the water meter, or at the time of the issuance of a tapping permit. The undersigned represents to the City that they have full and complete authority to execute this document and find and commit the developer to abide by the City Water Ordinance. This agreement shall be binding on all of the undersigned transferees. The undersigned acknowledges that a copy of this document will be delivered to appropriate and necessary governmental entities Authorized Signature 7 Gch “<wm Name an 1c 6 rod V conoon nue aso O'Gt Lighhouse LC _ 12 Son Sh Rong oe Company Phone Number 2% 331.4335 emai CAi< @ Corre (acl cap ler\ LOM pate S/Zol25 FOGG IOC ICG II A A A i ak ak ak ak OFFICE USE ONLY: Department of Public Works Approval Date: UPDATED 6/8/23 33-35 Carline Street 33-35 Carline Street, Saratoga Springs NY 160-1-27/28/29 25 4" TBD Exhibit B Exhibit B Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project Information Part 1 – Project and Sponsor Information , ag n ) e an erm al Page 1 of 3 Name of Action or Project: Project Location (describe, and attach a location map): Brief Description of Proposed Action: Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: e n al es at be t d i uni d proc d t 2. o, o qu 2. NO YE1.Does th proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, administrative rule, or regulation? If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the e ed n the mu cipality and eed o Part 2 If no continue to q estion 2 N Y S vironmenta re ources tha may b affec Part 1 – Project and Sponsor Information , ag n ) e an erm al Doe propos d a qu pe approv un ny e nm n2.p o al or fu ding from an oth r govern e t Agency? If Yes o s the p o ed ction req ire a p rmit, cy(s name d pe it or approva :NO YES list a e b. ot o be ph di be _________ al eage ( ect nd nt guo ne or on ol d by ppl or proj pon or ______ b. ot o be ph di be _________ al eage ( ect nd nt guo ne or on ol d by ppl or proj pon or ______ 3.a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? __________ acres b To al acreage to p ysically d sturb d? ______ acres c.Tota acrea e proje site an any con ig us properties) own d o co tro led the ap icant o p o ect sp so ? _______ acres Aquatic Other(Specify):□ Forest Agriculture □ Parkland Page 2 of 3 5.Is the proposed action, b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? NO YES N/A YESNO6.Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? ________________________________________________________________________________ 7.Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? If Yes, identify: YESNO c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed action? b.Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? NO Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels?YES8.a. 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES _________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 10.Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? If No, describe method for providing potable water: NO YES 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? ______________________________________If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 12. a. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory? NO YES _____________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ YE b.Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? 13.a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency? If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: NO S b. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for Wetland □ Urban Suburban Early mid-successional Page 3 of 3 14.Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are □□ likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: Shoreline Forest Agricultural/grasslands 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered?NO YES 16.Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan?NO YES _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non-point sources? If Yes, If Yes, briefly describe: YES impoundment:______________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water or other liquids (e.g., retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)? If Yes, explain the purpose and size of the impoundment:_ YES _ _______________________________________________________________________________ 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste management facility? If Yes, describe: YES _______________________________________________________________________________ 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes, describe: YES I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4TheApplicanthasconductedESAPhase1andPhase2andhasopenedasmallspillwiththeNYSDEC,which will be remediated during construction.This is NYSDEC petroleum spill No.2309179 Caryn Mlodzianowski 6/20/2025 Project Manager PRINT FORM EAF Mapper Summary Report Tuesday, May 20, 2025 10:58 AM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources to confirm data provided by the Mapper or to obtain data not provided by the Mapper. Part 1 / Question 7 [Critical Environmental Area] No Part 1 / Question 12a [National or State Register of Historic Places or State Eligible Sites] Yes Part 1 / Question 12b [Archeological Sites]Yes Part 1 / Question 13a [Wetlands or Other Regulated Waterbodies] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Part 1 / Question 15 [Threatened or Endangered Animal] No Part 1 / Question 16 [100 Year Flood Plain]Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Part 1 / Question 20 [Remediation Site]Yes Short Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 1 Exhibit C Exhibit C 33-35 Caroline Street Aerial Image Henry Streetallaproor Lotr yi Cc isa ~ ’ ‘6 Ee py mnie JT AO) asnelza Seleltereey ME OTYOUS fas ~ j hy * “ a. . ‘OF-TKe) tals Stilot ™ ae ee Re =k / = "ae | 7 he , 4 | te an a & iy ! . / . res 1 cea 33-35 Caroline Street Aerial Image Exhibit D Exhibit D P LANNING BOARD MINUTES DRAFT THURSDAY, DECEMBER12, 2024 6:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL ROOM CALL TO ORDER: Chuck Marshall, Chair called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M. PRESENT: Charles (Chuck) Marshall, Chair, Mark Pingel, Vice-Chair, Bill McTygue, Anthony (Tony) Stellato, Mike King, Patty Morrison & Kerry Mayo. ABSENT: STAFF: Susan Barden, Principal Planner, Leah Everhart, City Counsel, James Sallaway, City Engineer. Chuck Marshall, Chair said that this would be Patty Morrison’s last meeting as her term has ended. Patty called out and thanked Leah, Susan, James and the board members individually in appreciation for their talents and for working with them. She said she appreciates the community members’ passion to do good things and for coming to meetings and speaking up. As a sendoff to Patty, Chuck read a letter to Commissioner of Public Works, Hank Kuczynski and to City Hall. Title 5 of the Saratoga Springs City Code indicates that the Commissioner of Public Works shall have the responsibility to inventory, construct and maintain city land. There are instances as a Planning Board where we have seen this board make recommendations to the City Council and particularly the Commissioner of Public Works. Typically, the instances have been where a project infringes on a right-of-way or city owned land. At the November 14, 2024 meeting of the Planning Board, Project #20240682, the subdivision of land at 25 New St., was contemplated. If you’re unfamiliar, 25 New St. is a piece of land between the Price Chopper Plaza on Ballston Ave. and the Railroad Run Trail. The uniqueness is that between the lands controlled by the applicant and Railroad Run is a city-owned piece of land. Today that segment of land is treed, and the Planning Board hopes that the city will ensure that it remains that way. The generation of this request comes from Patricia (Patty) Morrison. Patty originally joined the board in November of 2022 to complete the term of a resigning board member. Patty has been an ardent supporter of historic properties, advocate for pedestrian accommodation and inclusion, and in planting, or in this instance, preservation of trees. We would ask the city to delineate the area as a no-cut buffer with appropriate signage. Patty’s term will expire at the end of the month and the board finds making this request the most appropriate of sendoffs. Respectfully requested, the Saratoga Springs Planning Board. A. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES: City of Saratoga Springs – Planning Board Minutes – B. POSSIBLE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS: December 12, 2024 - Page 2 of 14 Note: The intent of a consent agenda is to identify any applications that appear to be ‘approvable’ without need for further evaluation or discussion. If anyone wishes to further discuss any proposed consent agenda item, then that item would be pulled from the ‘consent agenda’ and dealt with individually. 1. 20240041 35 Caroline – Height bonus. Consideration of height bonus action associated with a redevelopment (mixed-use) project in the Urban Core (T-6) District. Chuck explained how the bonus structure in the city works. Projects are eligible for a height bonus based on affordable housing or energy efficiency. In this instance the applicant is seeking a height bonus based on affordable housing. The DRB has approved the mass and scale of the project, and this board will recommend the height bonus amount. Chuck Marshall made a motion to approve a height bonus for the building at 35 Caroline St., Saratoga Springs, NY. The motion was seconded by Bill McTygue. Vote: C. Marshall–Y, M. Pingel–Y, B. McTygue-Y, T. Stellato–Y, M. King-Y, P. Morrison–Y, K. Mayo-Y. 7-0, motion carried. C. PLANNING BOARD APPLICATIONS UNDER CONSIDERATION: NOTE: Agenda item discussion will not begin past 10:00 p.m. 2. #20240551 453-457 Broadway. Site plan review of an addition to an existing mixed-use building to include 15 new residential units in the Urban Core (T-6) District. Chuck Marshall, Chair said the site is more commonly known as Cooperstown and Compton’s. The project has received Design Review Board approval. Matt Brobston, LA Group represented the applicant and gave a rundown of the project: Compton’s building will not be changed at all. They will attach the proposed building adjacent right up to it and then have a connection on the second level above Compton’s. Long Alley is in the back with access to the parking garage and city parking. They are looking to remove some land out front as part of their civic space and make utility connections on Broadway. As part of the civic space, they will improve the right- of-way and the streetscape. They will increase the size of the planters and landscaped islands over what currently exists and add 2 large trees, 2 benches, a bike rack along the frontage, and a trash can. There are no utility connections in the back, but they will be demolishing what’s there and putting a building in its place. Showed layout for first floor and civic space. There will be a new building behind and above the Cooperstown. The trash will be located toward the rear of the property. The two apartments above Compton’s are in the process of being renovated. There will be three additional stories above Cooperstown Distillery. One apartment in the front, 2 mid building and 2 in the rear on each floor. There will be a total of 19 units. Exhibit E Exhibit E DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES FINAL WEDNESDAY, MARCH 5, 2025 6:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL ROOM CALL TO ORDER: Tammy Ehinger, Chair called the meeting of the Design Review Board to order at 6:00 P.M. PRESENT: Tamie Ehinger, Chair, Rob DuBoff, Co-Chair, Chris Bennett, Leslie DiCarlo, Jeff Gritsavage, Geoff Wood. ABSENT: Tad Roemer STAFF: Susan Barden, City Planner, Julia Destino, Junior Planner, Anthony (Tony) Izzo, City Counsel. A. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES: Rob DuBoff made a motion to accept the minutes from January 29,2025. The motion was seconded by Tamie Ehinger. Vote: R. DuBoff-Y, T. Ehinger-Y, C. Bennett-Y, J. Gritsavage-Y, L. DiCarlo-Y, G. Wood-Y. 6-0 in favor, Motion carried. B. POSSIBLE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS: NOTE: The intent of a consent agenda is to identify any "approvable" applications without the need for further evaluation or discussion. If anyone wishes to further discuss any proposed consent agenda item, that item would then be pulled from the Consent Agenda and considered individually. 1. #20250064 125 Church St. Architectural Review of roof replacement in the Urban Residential-3 (UR-3) District. 2. #20250069 160 South Broadway roof replacement. Architectural review of roof replacement in the Neighborhood Center (NC) District. 3. #20250110 35 Maple Ave. Signage. Historic Review of wall mounted and blade signage within the Urban Core (UC) District. Tamie Ehinger, Chair asked if there were any concerns or comments from the board or audience regarding the consent agenda items. There were none. Tamie Ehinger made a motion to approve the applications for 125 Church St. roof replacement, 160 S. Broadway roof replacement, and 35 Maple Ave. signage, Saratoga Springs NY. The motion was seconded by Jeff Gritsavage. Vote: T. Ehinger-Y, R. DuBoff-Y, C. Bennett-Y, J. Gritsavage-Y, L. DiCarlo-Y, G. Wood-Y. 6-0 in favor. Motion carried. City of Saratoga Springs – Design Review Board Minutes – March 5, 2025 - Page 5 of 24 Rob DuBoff made a motion to approve construction of an addition at 128, 132 Washington Ave., Saratoga Springs NY with the following conditions: This approval does not include fencing or the ramp, items to be reviewed at a later date. Windows on the north and west elevations are to remain. Existing siding and trim to be retained and may be replaced in-kind where it’s too deteriorated to repair and the bracket and front door details are to be submitted administratively. The motion was seconded by Leslie DiCarlo. Vote: T. Ehinger-Y, R. DuBoff-Y, C. Bennett-Y, J. Gritsavage-Y, L. DiCarlo-Y, G. Wood-Y. 6-0 in favor. Motion carried. 6. #20240713 33 to 35 Caroline Construction. Architectural review of new mixed-use development within the Urban Core (T-6) District. Tamie Ehinger, Chair said the board has seen this application many times and provided feedback. The applicant has returned with revisions to the project. Charles Gottlieb, Attorney with Whiteman, Osterman & Hanna represented the applicant, Oldest Lighthouse, LLC. Also present for the applicant; Cronan Dempsey, Eric Brodwin and project architects William “Buddy” Christopher and James Christopher. Charles said they are responding to comments from the January 29th meeting. He said the applicant is eager to get to the planning board for site plan review and are seeking approval with conditions if necessary from the DRB tonight. Some of the proposed changes are as follows: • Change the name of the building to the Kearney Block. • Reducing the wall width that’s separating the balconies on the pavilion elevation. • Signage boards added to the canopies. • Doorways to commercial entrances have been changed to standard glass. • The plan set provided includes additional construction details and building sections. Buddy showed slides regarding the changes mentioned above and asked the board if they had any questions. Tamie said the project has come a long way and reflects and lives up to the historic standards that it should in terms of its location within this very special area of the city. She thanked the applicant for listening to and working with the board to come up with a much better product than what was originally presented. She had no objections to anything presented at the meeting. The mechanical details will be needed at some point and there will be a condition for approval at tonight’s meeting. Regarding the reduction in width of the brick pilaster, Tamie said she’s okay with it either way. The new version does help to emphasize the main entrance. Rob feels the separation between the balconies is for the better. It was discussed in the workshop that maybe the separation could be metal instead of brick (double length). Buddy said if they used the metal clad they would want to use a darker color. Chris agreed with Rob regarding the separation being metal and asked what material would be on the balconies where people would be standing. Buddy said they are considering two materials: a synthetic composite or flooring tiles. The underside is a cement fiber board that will be recessed and painted City of Saratoga Springs – Design Review Board Minutes – March 5, 2025 - Page 6 of 24 sepia, grey. Jeff said the double width brick for the pilaster looks like it could buckle (visually). He would like to see the metal as well. Tamie Ehinger, Chair asked if there were any comments or concerns from the audience regarding this application. There were no comments. Tamie Ehinger made a motion to approve architectural review of new mixed-use development at 33 to 35 Caroline St., Saratoga Springs, NY with the following conditions: The applicant is to replace the double-wide brick feature with a metal product. The applicant is to submit a mechanical plan, venting plan, and lighting details for administrative approval. The motion was seconded by Chris Bennett. Vote: T. Ehinger-Y, R. DuBoff-Y, C. Bennett-Y, J. Gritsavage-Y, L. DiCarlo-Y, G. Wood-Y. 6-0 in favor. Motion carried. 7. #20240720 30-301/2 Caroline St. Building Expansion. Determination of Significance and discussion of partial demolition of an existing building within the Urban Core (T-6) District Tamie Ehinger, Chair said the board will make a Determination of Significance and based on that, they can discuss demolition, perform SEQRA review and give the applicant an opportunity to present any changes that have been made to the proposed new building. Tamie Ehinger, Chair asked if the applicant had provided any information regarding the Determination of Significance. George Olsen, Olsen Associates Architects represented the applicant and said they do not have anything new to submit other than photos of the back of the building. Tamie said she doesn’t see anything of historic or architectural significance and the remaining board members agreed. Tamie Ehinger made a motion finding that the structure noted for partial demolition at 30-30 ½ Caroline St., Saratoga Springs, NY does not have historical or architectural significance. The motion was seconded by Leslie DiCarlo. Vote: T. Ehinger-Y, R. DuBoff-Y, C. Bennett-Y, J. Gritsavage-Y, L. DiCarlo-Y, G. Wood-Y. 6-0 in favor. Motion carried. Tamie Ehinger, Chair said she has no concerns regarding demolition of this portion of the property. There were no concerns among the board members regarding the demolition of this portion of the property. Tamie Ehinger, Chair asked if there were any comments or concerns from the audience regarding demolition of this structure. There were no comments. Tamie Ehinger, Chair moved on to SEQRA Review: SEQRA, Part 2: Exhibit F Exhibit F Division for Historic Preservation P.O. Box 189, Waterford, New York 12188-0189 • (518) 237-8643 • parks.ny.gov ⚫ 518-237-8643 ⚫ https://parks.ny.gov/shpo ⚫ KATHY HOCHUL RANDY SIMONS Governor Commissioner Pro Tempore July 22, 2024 John Cannie Project Attorney Snyder, Kiley, Toohey, Corbett & Cox, LLP 160 West Avenue Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 Re: SEQRA 33-35 Caroline Street 33 Caroline St, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 24PR05849 Dear John Cannie: Thank you for requesting the comments of the Division for Historic Preservation of the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) as part of your SEQRA process. These comments are those of OPRHP and relate only to Historic/Cultural resources. They do not include potential environmental impacts to New York State Parkland that may be involved in or near your project. We note that the proposed project is substantially adjacent to the State and National Register listed Broadway Historic District. The two buildings on the subject building lot are not State and National Register eligible or listed. We have reviewed the SEQRA documentation, site plan, drawings, and renderings for the proposed new residential/ commercial building. Based on this review, we believe that the design of the proposed new construction is generally appropriate and will not cause harm, physically or visually, to historic character defining features of the surrounding historic buildings and district. In addition, there are no archaeological concerns associated with this project. If this project will involve state or federal permitting, funding or licensing, it may require continued review for potential impacts to architectural and archaeological resources, in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act or Section 14.09 of NYS Parks Recreation and Historic Preservation Law. If you have any questions, I can be reached via email or at (518) 268-2164. Sincerely, Weston Davey Historic Site Restoration Coordinator Weston.davey@parks.ny.gov CC: Beige Berryman, Saratoga Springs Planning. Beth Selig, HCS Exhibit G Exhibit G ASTM STANDARD E 1527-21 PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 33 & 35-37 Caroline Street Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 PROJECT # 23.1211015 PREPARED FOR: Cronan Dempsey dba Dempsey Development 54 Minot Street Dorchester, MA 02122 PREPARED BY: NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION PO Box 2167 Ballston Spa, New York 12020 DATED: January 23, 2024 “..... providing integrated geo-environmental services since 1991.....” N NCONSULTING - SITE ASSESSMENTS - GEOTECHNICAL DRILLING & PROBE SERVICES - TANK CLOSURES - SOIL & GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION - WASTE BROKERAGE SERVICES NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NETC PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 General Information .......................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Property Facts ................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Conclusion Summary ........................................................................................................................ 5 1.4 Opinions & Recommendations ......................................................................................................... 6 1.5 Limitations and Exceptions to ASTM E 1527-21 ............................................................................. 6 1.6 Evaluation of “Non-Scope” Items ..................................................................................................... 6 1.7 Declarations ...................................................................................................................................... 7 2.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Purpose .............................................................................................................................................. 8 2.2 Scope of Work .................................................................................................................................. 8 2.3 Significant Assumptions ................................................................................................................... 8 2.4 Limitations and Exceptions ............................................................................................................... 9 2.5 Deviations ......................................................................................................................................... 9 2.6 Special Terms and Conditions .......................................................................................................... 9 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................................. 10 3.1 Location and Legal Description ...................................................................................................... 10 3.2 Activity / Use Limitations ............................................................................................................... 10 3.3 Site and Vicinity Description .......................................................................................................... 10 3.4 Current Use of the Property ............................................................................................................ 10 3.5 Description of Structures and Other Improvements ........................................................................ 10 4.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION ....................................................................................................... 14 4.1 Specialized Knowledge ................................................................................................................... 14 4.2 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues............................................................................... 14 4.3 Owner, Property Manager, and Occupant Information ................................................................... 14 4.4 Reason for Performing Environmental Site Assessment ................................................................. 14 5.0 RECORDS REVIEW .................................................................................................................................. 15 5.1 Standard Environmental Record Sources ........................................................................................ 15 5.1.1 On-Site Database Listings ................................................................................................ 15 5.1.2 Adjoining Property Database Listings .............................................................................. 15 5.1.3 Non-Mapped Database Listings ........................................................................................ 15 5.1.4 Study Area Federal and State Agency Record Review ..................................................... 16 5.2 Additional Environmental Record Sources ..................................................................................... 17 5.2.1 City of Saratoga Springs Attorney’s Office ...................................................................... 17 5.2.2 City of Saratoga Springs Assessor’s Office ...................................................................... 17 5.2.3 City of Saratoga Springs Building Department ................................................................ 17 5.2.4 City of Saratoga Springs Department of Public Works .................................................... 17 5.2.5 Other Agencies ................................................................................................................. 17 5.3 Physical Setting Sources ................................................................................................................. 17 5.3.1 Topography ....................................................................................................................... 17 5.3.2 Soils/Geology ................................................................................................................... 17 5.3.3 Hydrology ......................................................................................................................... 18 5.3.4 Flood Zone Information .................................................................................................... 18 5.3.5 Oil and Gas Exploration ................................................................................................... 18 5.4 Historic Use Information ................................................................................................................ 18 5.4.1 Aerial Photographs ........................................................................................................... 19 5.4.2 Historic (Sanborn Fire Insurance) Maps ........................................................................... 20 5.4.3 City Directories ................................................................................................................. 20 5.4.4 Historical Topographic Maps ........................................................................................... 22 5.4.5 Prior Assessment Reports ................................................................................................. 22 NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NETC PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 5.5 Environmental Liens and Activity/Use Limitations ........................................................................ 22 6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE ....................................................................................................................... 23 6.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions ........................................................................................... 23 6.2 General Site Setting ........................................................................................................................ 23 6.3.1 Solid Waste Disposal ........................................................................................................ 23 6.3.2 Surface Water Drainage .................................................................................................... 23 6.3.3 Wells and Cisterns ............................................................................................................ 23 6.3.4 Wastewater ....................................................................................................................... 23 6.3.5 Additional Site Observations ............................................................................................ 23 6.3.6 Interior Observations ........................................................................................................ 23 6.3.7 Hazardous Materials and Petroleum Products Used or Stored at the Site ......................... 24 6.3.7.1 Unlabeled Containers and Drums ................................................................. 24 6.3.7.2 Disposal Locations of Regulated/ Hazardous Waste .................................... 24 6.3.8 Evidence of Releases ........................................................................................................ 24 6.3.9 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) ................................................................................... 24 6.3.10 Landfills ............................................................................................................................ 24 6.3.11 Pits, Ponds, Lagoons, Sumps, and Catch Basins .............................................................. 25 6.3.12 Aboveground Storage Tanks (AST) & Underground Storage Tanks (UST) .................... 25 6.3.13 Radiological Hazard ......................................................................................................... 25 6.3.14 Drinking Water ................................................................................................................. 25 6.3.15 Additional Hazard Observations ....................................................................................... 25 7.0 INTERVIEWS ............................................................................................................................................. 26 7.1 Interview with Owner....................................................................................................................... 26 7.2 Interview with Local Government Officials ...................................................................................... 26 7.3 Interview with Others ....................................................................................................................... 26 8.0 OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS .............................................................................. 27 8.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM) .......................................................................................... 27 8.2 Lead-Based Paint ............................................................................................................................ 27 8.3 Radon .............................................................................................................................................. 27 8.4 Wetlands ......................................................................................................................................... 28 8.5 Microbial Contamination (Mold) .................................................................................................... 28 8.6 Vapor Encroachment Conditions ...................................................................................................... 29 9.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................ 30 NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NETC PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 APPENDICIES Appendix A EDR Regulatory Report Appendix B Other Supporting Documentation Exhibit B-1 Environmental Questionnaires Exhibit B-2 City of Saratoga Springs FOIA Information Exhibit B-3 NYSDEC FOIA Information Appendix C Historical Research Documentation Exhibit C-1 Aerial Photographs Exhibit C-2 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps Exhibit C-3 Historic Topographic Maps Exhibit C-4 City Directories Exhibit C-5 Prior Reports Appendix D Photographic Documentation Appendix E NETC Resumés and Statement of Services NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NETC PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 General Information Northeastern Environmental Technologies Corporation (NETC) has performed a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the land and improvements located at 33 & 35-37 Caroline Street Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 (hereinafter termed the “Property”). This ESA has been completed for the benefit of Cronan Dempsey dba Dempsey Development (hereinafter termed the “Client”). The purpose of the ESA work is to alert the Client to Recognized Environmental Conditions, Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions, Historic Recognized Environmental Conditions, De Minims Conditions, Significant Data Gaps, and potential Business Environmental Risks at the Property. The means and methods used to complete the ESA work are intended to pursue the goals of ASTM E 1527-21, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, based on Client approval of NETC Task Order & Master Environmental Services Agreement 112923. 1.2 Property Facts The Property, approximately 0.24 acres in size, consists of (3) contiguous parcels located north of Caroline Street in the City of Saratoga Springs, New York. The City of Saratoga records identify the Property as Tax Map ID #’s 165.60-1-27, 165.60-1-28 and 165.60-1-29. Improvements at the Property include a single story restaurant structure ( dba D’Andrea’s Pizzeria) located at 33 Caroline Street and an automotive repair garage (dba Union Coachworks) and wood framed storage shed located at 35-37 Caroline Street. Areas of the Property not occupied by the above noted structures are improved by asphalt or concrete. The Property is equipped with municipal water and sewer services from the City of Saratoga Springs; National Grid also provides natural gas and electric services to the Property. A summary of information considered germane to this ESA is listed below. Property Information: Property Owners: Mr. John G Sigsby and Mr. Burton Schwab Property Improvements: 33 Caroline Street - (1) 1,490 sq. ft. single story restaurant structure constructed with concrete masonry unit (CMU) walls with a brick and wood façade, a flat rubber roof, a concrete foundation & floor, with perimeter asphalt parking and concrete surfaces. 35 -37 Caroline Street – (1) 1,600 sq. ft. single story automotice repair garage constructed with CMU walls with a brick façade, a wood framed asphalt shingle peaked roof, a slab on grade concrete foundation with a partial CMU basement space, ± 40 sq. ft. wood framed storage shed with perimeter asphalt parking and concrete surfaces. Municipality: City of Saratoga Springs Parcel Tax IDs: 165.60-1-27, 165.60-1-28 & 165.60-1-29 Property Size: ± 0.24 acres Utility Services: National Grid Gas & Electric, City of Saratoga Springs Water and Sewer Client: Cronan Dempsey dba Dempsey Development Site Contact: Cronan Dempsey Street Address: 33 & 35-37 Caroline Street Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 Inspection Date: December 29, 2023 Inspection Staff: Matthew Wink Environmental Professionals: Robert Gray III PG & Jeffrey Wink PG NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NETC PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 1.3 Conclusion Summary The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment work has found the Property to be unaffected by Recognized Environmental Conditions (REC), Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions (CREC), Historic Environmental Conditions (HREC), Significant Data Gaps, De Minims Conditions and Buisiness Environmental Risks (BER) with the exception of the following. Condition Location Description of Condition Condition 1 Property Commercial operation that have occurred at the Property are largely undocumented and [in most cases] predate local, state and federal programs that track the handling, storage and disposal of hazardous materials and petroleum products. Significant Data Gap & Potential BER 2 Property Engineering records that document the removal of commercial structures and the abandonment of a former buried stone culvert (i.e., Village Brook) historically located below the Property were not obtained during this ESA. The potential for encountering legacy conditions related to prior structures (i.e., buried construction and demolition debris, buried utilities, foundations, etc.) and conditions related to the historic use of Village Brook exists which has the potential to complicate and add costs to new improvements completed at the Property. Significant Data Gap & Potential BER 3 Property Auto repair practices, and the prior use of underground hydraulic lift equipment, floor drain systems and above ground petroleum storage tank (AST) equipment (as documented by NETC and others) represent legacy commercial activities and conditions that pose a threat to soil and groundwater, and have the potential to complicate and add costs to new improvements completed at the Property. REC & Potential BER 4 Property Visual petroleum impacts to asphalt surfaces below and surrounding a wooden storage shed located at the northeast corner of the Property are attributed to the storage of drummed waste automotive fluids, the use of an unregistered 275 gallon waste oil AST, and represent an unqualified condition documented by NETC and others since 2000. The storage of waste automotive fluids pose a risk to soil and groundwater, and represents a legacy commercial activity that has the potential to complicate and add costs to new improvements completed at the Property. REC, Significant Data Gap & Potential BER 5 Property The use of a single wall steel 275 gallon waste oil AST represents an unpermitted commercial activity subject to NYSDEC Subpart 374-2 Used Oil regulations and Petroleum Bulk Storage regulation 6NYCRR Part– 613. BER 6 Property Given the age of the structures a building material testing program is recommended to alert the Client to potentially hazardous building materials / conditions (i.e., asbestos containing materials, lead paint, PCB, etc.) in the structures that may complicate and /or add cost to demolition activities completed at the Property. Potential BER Notes: Recognized Environmental Condition (REC), per the ASTM Standard E 1527-21 definition, n—(1) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property due to a release to the environment; (2) the likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property due to a release or likely release to the environment; or (3) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. Historic Recognized Environmental Condition (HREC), per the ASTM Standard E 1527-21 definition, a previous release of hazardous substances or petroleum products affecting the subject property that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or authorities and meeting unrestricted use criteria established by the applicable regulatory authority or authorities without subjecting the subject property to any controls (for example, activity and use limitations or other property use limitations). A historic recognized environmental condition is not a recognized environmental condition. Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition (CREC), per the ASTM Standard E 1527-21 definition, a recognized environmental condition affecting the subject property that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or authorities with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to implementation of required controls (for example, activity and use limitations or other property use limitations). Business Environmental Risk (BER), per the ASTM Standard E 1527-21 definition, a risk which can have a material environmental or environmentally driven impact on the business associated with the current or planned use of commercial real estate, not necessarily related to those environmental issues required to be investigated in this practice. Consideration of BER issues may involve addressing one or more non-scope considerations. De minims Condition, per the ASTM Standard E 1527-21 definition, a condition related to a release that generally does not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. A condition determined to be a de minims condition is not a recognized environmental condition nor a controlled recognized environmental condition. Data Gap, per the ASTM Standard E 1527-21 definitions, a lack of or inability to obtain information required by this practice despite good faith efforts by the environmental professional to gather such information. Data gaps may result from incompleteness in any of the activities required by this practice, including, but not limited to, site reconnaissance (for example, an inability to conduct the site visit), and interviews (for example, an inability to interview the key site manager, regulatory officials, etc.). Significant Data Gap, per the ASTM Standard E 1527-21 definition, a data gap that affects the ability of the environmental professional to identify a recognized environmental condition. Vapor Encroachment Condition, per the ASTM Standard E 2600-15 definition, the presence or likely presence of COC vapors in the vadose zone of the target property (TP) caused by the release of vapors from contaminated soil and/or groundwater either on or near the TP. NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NETC PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 1.4 Opinions & Recommendations Information developed during the ESA work demonstrate legacy commercial auto repair activities during the 1991 – 2023 period and the historic use of Village Brook have the potential to impact to soil and groundwater, represent significant data gaps, an unqualified REC and BERs that may complicate and add cost to new improvements completed at the Property. Given the above, the age of the current structures and the Clients redevelopment plans; implementing Phase II site investigation work that established pre-construction responsibilities for soil and groundwater conditions and hazardous building materials (i.e., asbestos containing materials, lead, PCBs, etc.) that may exist in the current structures, is appropriate prior to acquiring title to the Property. Waste oil AST equipment located at the Property should be permitted or permanently abandoned in accordance with NYSDEC Subpart 374-2 Used Oil regulations and Petroleum Bulk Storage regulation 6NYCRR Part– 613. All staged waste petrochemicals and regulated automotive fluids should be manifested, removed, and transported from the Property to permitted facilities with appropriate “cradle to grave” documentation. The need / degree to pursue work beyond the scope of this ESA should be based on the Clients’ risk tolerance to both documented and undocumented Property conditions and the potential they have to complicate / add cost to ownership responsibilities, pending real estate transaction(s), commercial lending and the going forward use of the Property. 1.5 Limitations and Exceptions to ASTM E 1527-21 The following data gaps, limitations and exceptions encountered during this ESA are considered germane to this review. • Title information was not provided to NETC as part of this ESA. It is recommended that the user engage a title company or title professional to undertake a review of reasonably ascertainable recorded land title records and lien records for environmental liens or activity and use limitations recorded against or related to the Property. • NETC was unable to interview prior owners/users of the Property. • NETC has not received a response from a Freedom of information Law (FOIL) request submitted to the City of Saratoga. • Material storage practices in the D’Andrea’s Pizzeria and Union Coachworks structures has in some cases inhibited the visual inspection work. • A completed Site Inspection Interview Form was not received from the owner of D’Andrea’s Pizzeria. The listed data gaps have not inhibited NETC’s ability to render conclusions and recommendations regarding REC, CREC or HREC in connection with the Property. 1.6 Evaluation of “Non-Scope” Items Evaluations of the following “Non-Scope” conditions were included in the ESA scope of work. NETC did not note conspicuous visual and olfactory indications of mold inside the structures. Given the construction periods for the existing structures and the presence of hydraulic lift equipment, the potential for encountering a ACM, lead paint and PCBs containing equipment in the structure exists. NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NETC PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 1.7 Declarations The preparer represents that to the best of the preparer’s knowledge the information contained in this ESA is true and correct and to the best of the preparer’s actual knowledge, no material facts have been suppressed or misstated. Should additional information become available, modifications to this ESA may be appropriate. NETC’s summary of the findings and conclusions of the ESA are provided for convenience in Section 1 of this report. The summary information alone does not constitute the complete assessment. The report must be read in its entirety. I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312. I have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history and setting of the subject Property. NETC has developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. PREPARED BY DATE January 23, 2024 Mr. Robert Gray III PG Project Manager / Geologist REVIEWED BY January 23, 2024 Mr. Jeffrey T. Wink, PG President NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NETC PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 2.0 INTRODUCTION The ESA work NETC has performed at 33 & 35-37 Caroline Street Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 (hereinafter termed the “Property” has been completed on behalf of Cronan Dempsey dba Dempsey Development (hereinafter termed the “Client”). The protocols used to complete this ESA is in general conformance with ASTM E 1527-21, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Environmental Site Assessment Process and NETC Task Order & Master Environmental Services Agreement 112923. A site reconnaissance visit to the Property was performed on December 29, 2023 to assess the possible presence of apparent petroleum and hazardous materials and related chemical impacts at the Property. NETC’s investigation also included a review of aerial photographs, historic maps, city directories, a reconnaissance of adjacent properties, background research, and a review of available local, state, and federal records for the Property. NETC has also utilized regulatory records / information received from and produced by Environmental Data Resources (EDR) including a computer database search for local, state, and federal regulatory records pertaining to potential environmental conditions documented at the Property and properties located in the respective ASTM study areas. 2.1 Purpose The purpose of this ESA is to alert the Client to Recognized Environmental Conditions, Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions, Historic Recognized Environmental Conditions, De Minims Conditions as well as Business Environmental Risks,(as defined by ASTM Standard E 1527-21) in connection with the Property. NETC understands that the Client will use the findings of this study to support pending real estate acquisition and site redevelopment due diligence work responsibilities. 2.2 Scope of Work The scope of work for this ESA is based on Client approval of NETCs Task Order & Master Environmental Services Agreement 112923 and is in general accordance with the requirements of ASTM Standard E 1527-21. NETC warrants that the findings and conclusions contained herein were accomplished in accordance with the scope of work determined necessary as set forth by the Client. These methodologies are described as representing good commercial and customary practice for conducting an Environmental Site Assessment of a property for the purpose of identifying Recognized Environmental Conditions. No warranty is expressed or implied. 2.3 Significant Assumptions There is a possibility that even with the proper application of these methodologies there may exist on the Property conditions that could not be identified within the scope of the assessment, or which were not reasonably identifiable from the available information. NETC believes that the information obtained from the record review and the interviews concerning the Property is reliable. However, NETC cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that the information provided by these other sources is accurate or complete. The methodologies of this assessment are not intended to produce all-inclusive or comprehensive results, but rather to provide the Client with information considered germane to the subject Property. NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NETC PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 2.4 Limitations and Exceptions NETC has utilized information prepared by or on behalf of others exclusively, where available, to compile and address the Property conditions outlined in this report. No attempt was made to independently verify the accuracy or completeness of all information reviewed or received. This ESA was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices pursuant to ASTM Standard E 1527-21, Standard Practices for Environmental Site Assessments; Environmental Site Assessment Process. The findings and conclusions contained herein must be considered not as scientific certainties, but as probabilities based on professional judgment concerning the significance of the data assimilated during this evaluation. No warranty regarding the Property is expressed or implied. The following limitations and exceptions encountered during this ESA are considered germane to this review. • Title information was not provided to NETC as part of this ESA. It is recommended that the user engage a title company or title professional to undertake a review of reasonably ascertainable recorded land title records and lien records for environmental liens or activity and use limitations recorded against or related to the Property. • NETC was unable to interview prior owners/users of the Property. • NETC has not received a response from a Freedom of information Law (FOIL) request submitted to the City of Saratoga. • Material storage practices in the D’Andrea’s Pizzeria and Union Coachworks structures has in some cases inhibited the visual inspection work. • A completed Site Inspection Interview Form was not received from the owner of D’Andrea’s Pizzeria. 2.5 Deviations This ESA substantially complies with the ASTM E 1527-21 scope of work, except for exceptions and limiting conditions discussed in Section 1.5 and 2.4. 2.6 Special Terms and Conditions The conclusions and findings set forth in this ESA report are strictly limited in time and scope to the date of the evaluations. The conclusions presented in the report are based solely on the services described therein, and not on scientific tasks or procedures beyond the scope of agreed-upon services or the time and budgeting restraints imposed by the Client. Unless specifically stated otherwise in the report, no chemical or building material testing services have been performed during the course of this ESA. Some of the information provided in this report is based upon verbal information and research of available documents, records and maps held by the appropriate government and private agencies. This ESA is subject to the limitations of historic documentation, availability and accuracy of pertinent records and the personal recollections of those persons contacted. 2.7 Reliance All reports, both verbal and written, are for the benefit of Cronan Dempsey dba Dempsey Development, exclusively. This report has no other purpose and may not be relied upon by any other person or entity without the written consent of NETC. Cronan Dempsey dba Dempsey Development may authorize the release of all or part(s) of this ESA to third parties. However, any third-party use or reliance upon this report agree that it shall have no legal recourse against NETC or its parent or subsidiaries and shall indemnify and defend them from and against all claims arising out of or in conjunction with such use or reliance. NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NETC PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 3.1 Location and Legal Description The Property is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Caroline St. and Pavilion Place in the City of Saratoga Springs, New York. According to the Saratoga County Real Property Tax Agency and the City of Saratoga Springs the Property as Tax Map ID #’s are 165.60-1-27, 165.60- 1-28 & 165.60-1-29. Figures 1 and 2 depict the relative location of the Property in the study area and the municipal tax map boundary, respectively. 3.2 Activity / Use Limitations No activity / use limitations at the Property have been identified during this ESA. 3.3 Site and Vicinity Description The Property is located on the north side of Caroline Street in the City of Saratoga Springs, New York. The Property is surrounded by commercial shops, restaurants, and taverns with some second- floor residences. The Property is gently sloping to the north and at an elevation of ± 275 feet above mean sea level (amsl). The Property is bordered to the south by Caroline Street beyond which is Dango’s Restaurant; to the west by Pavilion Place beyond which is a commercial parking lot; to the east by Clancy’s Tavern; and to the north by the Grand Pavilion, a mixed use residential & retail commercial structure (see Figure 3). 3.4 Current Use of the Property The Property is currently operating as the Union Coachworks repair garage and D’Andrea’s Pizzeria. 3.5 Description of Structures and Other Improvements Improvements at the Property include the Union Coachworks automotive repair garage located at 35 - 37 Caroline Street. The Union Coachworks automotive repair garage is a (1) 1,600 sq. ft. single story structure constructed with concrete masonry unit (CMU) walls with a brick façade, a wood framed asphalt shingle peaked roof, a slab on grade concrete foundation with a partial CMU basement space. The structure is located at the southeast corner of the Property. The structure contains (2) automotive repair service bays each equipped with above ground electric over hydraulic lifts, gas fired direct vent heating equipment and overhead doors; a restroom and a basement storage area with natural gas-fired boiler and hot water heater and a walk up attic space. A ± 40 sq. ft. wood framed storage shed exists at the northeast corner of the Property and contains (1) 275 gallon waste oil above ground storage tank (AST) and several drums of automotive fluids generated by Union Coachworks automotive repair garage. The western portion of the Property at 33 Caroline Street is improved by a (1) 1,490 sq. ft. single story restaurant structure operated as D’Andrea’s Pizzeria. The D’Andrea’s Pizzeria structure is constructed with CMU walls with a brick and wood façade, a flat rubber roof, a concrete foundation & floor, with perimeter asphalt parking and concrete surfaces. The D’Andrea’s Pizzeria building contains a dining area, a kitchen, a storage room, and bathroom. Both structures at the Property are equipped with municipal water and sewer services from the City of Saratoga Springs and National Grid natural gas and electric services. With the exception of limited areas along the northern and eastern boundary of the Property, areas surrounding the structure are largely represented by asphalt and concrete surfaces. N FIGURE 1: Location Map PROJECT: 33 & 35-37 Caroline Street Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 Project # 23.1211015 Date: 1/3/23Scale: Not to Scale Property 78 / / Bs 8 69.2 1.05 A(C) 9 / 86.5 2 R § § 22 Is S / . is 23 8 / / a 24 ° f / /|-~ 95.5 / iS | —_ 2 / 4 : id (1) T / 1.0) / < / zz 15 @ 744 se / S! / 214g 3 ~ = / = f ene 3.95 / / oO t | / weg ~ =~ © 27 / 2.18 ~8 7:80, 2 S ~ a bs: 228 24.99 2 9.56 / / 149.03 > / /s* /2 29 / 498 iy / - / i / / | 33.09 f ~ $ P hy 30 @) |-—~ r ROL 06 / roperty gy 31 / 3 |e E 2a / [So [742 | / / S 514 1 ~ dhe ls os / a 87 ee ~~ PL 24.99 s ] j® 62 g 3+ gle - Sse / , | / ° be eis 85 co | 2 8 o/© ° —~_J \ \ 74.32 \ | _ ae 798 Ss at 33.08 / [ 89.5 - 18048 8\ | AB . 8 76 a 165.60 62 7 ——*\ \ es . / 7 3\ | “To — [# 55 4 NOTES: All site features are approximate. This site plan is intended for illustration purpose associated with an December 2023 Phase 1 ESA performed on behalf of Cronan Dempsey dba Dempsey Development . 7c s l —~! 4 [—39_ & 7 NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORP. 1476 Route 50, P.O. Box 2167, Ballston Spa, NY 12020 Phone: (518) 884-8545 Fax: (518) 884-9710 FIGURE 2: Tax Map PROJECT: 33 & 35-37 Caroline Street Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 Project # 23.1211015 | Scale: Not to Scale | Date: 1/3/23 Scale: Not to Scale N FIGURE 2: Tax Map PROJECT: 33 & 35-37 Caroline Street Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 Project # 23.1211015 Date: 1/3/23 Property Project # 23.1211015 Scale:Date: 1/3/23 N PROJECT: 33 & 35-37 Caroline Street Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 FIGURE 3: Site Plan Property Boundary Legend 275 Gallon Waste oil AST & Drum Storage Shed Storm Drain Floor Drain Hydraulic Lifts Union CoachworksAuto Repair Garage D'Andrea's Pizzeria Parking Lot NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NETC PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 4.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION Pursuant to ASTM E 1527-21, the Client has provided the User information presented in Section 5.0. Copies of the Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Interview Form and an ASTM Environmental Questionnaires were completed by the Client and by the Property Owner of 33 Caroline Street, Mr. Burt Schwab. Copies of the questionnaires are included in Appendix B, Exhibit B-1. 4.1 Specialized Knowledge NETC inquired with the Property Owner of 33 Caroline Street & the Client regarding any specialized knowledge of environmental conditions associated with the Property. The Property Owner of 33 Caroline Street & the Client were not aware of any environmental conditions associated with the Property. 4.2 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues NETC inquired with the Property Owner of 33 Caroline Street & the Client regarding any knowledge of reductions in property value due to environmental issues. The Property Owner of 33 Caroline Street & the Client were not aware of any valuation reductions associated with the Property. 4.3 Owner, Property Manager, and Occupant Information Records of ownership were not provided to NETC by the User. Information obtained from Saratoga County’s online Real Property Tax Service Agency and from the City of Saratoga Springs Assessor’s office identifies the current owner of the Property as Mr. John G Sigsby and Mr. Burton Schwab. NETC recommends that the User engage a licensed professional title company to perform a review of reasonably ascertainable real property title records, environmental lien records and activity / use limitations that may be recorded on the Property. 4.4 Reason for Performing Environmental Site Assessment The purpose of this ESA was to identify existing or potential Recognized Environmental Conditions (as defined by ASTM Standard E 1527-21) in connection with the Property. This ESA was also performed to permit the User to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on scope of Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. §9601) liability (hereinafter, the “landowner liability protections,” or “LLPs”). ASTM Standard E 1527-21 constitutes “all appropriate inquiry into the previous ownership and uses of the property consistent with good commercial or customary practice” as defined at 42 U.S.C. §9601(35) (B). NETC understands the findings of this study will be used by Cronan Dempsey to support his pending real estate acquisition and site redevelopment responsibilities. NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NETC PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 5.0 RECORDS REVIEW 5.1 Standard Environmental Record Sources Information obtained from standard federal, and state environmental record sources was in some cases provided by Environmental Data Resource (EDR). Data obtained from EDR from governmental agency lists are updated and integrated into one database, which is updated as these data are released. The EDR integrated database also contains postal service data in order to enhance address matching. Records from one government source are compared to records from another to clarify any address ambiguities. The demographic and geographic information available provides assistance in identifying and managing risk. The accuracy of the geocoded locations is approximately +/-300 feet. In some cases, location information supplied by the regulatory agencies to EDR is insufficient. Sites with insufficient location information but are determined to share the same zip code as the Property are listed under the “occurrences not-mapped” section of the EDR report. Regulatory information received from EDR from the following database sources regarding possible recognized environmental conditions (REC) within the ASTM minimum search distance from the Property was reviewed. Specific facilities are discussed below if determined likely that a REC has resulted at the Property from the listed facilities. Please refer to Appendix A for a complete listing. 5.1.1 On-Site Database Listings Union Coachworks, Inc., is listed as a RCRA Non-Gen/NLR (RCRA Non-Generator/No Longer Regulated) site, a MANIFEST site, an ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Information) site and a FINDS (Facility Index System) site. The RCRA Non- Gen/NLR listing indicated the subject Property was identified as a Small Quantity Generator (SQG) in 1992, and a Non-Gen/NLR site in 1999, 2006 and 2007. No violations were found in the RCRA listing. The MANIFEST, ECHO and FINDS listings were related to transport of hazardous waste and compliance tracking under RCRA regulations. No NY Spills or LTANKS listings were associated with the listings. 5.1.2 Adjoining Property Database Listings 45 Caroline Street located east of the Property is listed as a NY Spill site (Spill No. 0302456) based on a release of cooking grease to the roadway and the storm drain located below Caroline Street. Spill No. 0302456 was administratively closed by the NYSDEC in June 2003. 79 Henry Street, located north the Property is a NY Spill (Spill No. 1709298) in response to a report of raw sewage in the basement at 79 Henry Street. Spill No. 1709298 was administratively closed by the NYSDEC in January 2018 but was referred to the NYSDEC Division of Water. Based upon the Property’s ASTM regulatory database listings, NETC solicited additional regulatory information from the NYSDEC via a FOIA request. The information provided by the NYSDEC responsive to that request is included in Appendix B, Exhibit B-2. 5.1.3 Non-Mapped Database Listings Based upon the descriptions contained in the EDR report, the (4) listed non-mapped site is not expected to represent a REC with respect to the subject Property. NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NETC PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 5.1.4 Study Area Federal and State Agency Record Review The following table is a summary of listed regulatory occurrences within the ASTM minimum search distance provided by EDR: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS SEARCH LIST SEARCHED DISTANCE SEARCHED SUBJECT SITE 0.125 0.25 0.5 1.0 TOTAL Federal NPL 1.0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Federal NPL Delisted 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Federal CERCLIS 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Federal CERCLIS NFRAP 0.5 0 0 0 1 - 1 Federal RCRA CORRACTS 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Federal RCRA Non-CORRACTS TSD 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Federal RCRA Generators 0.25 0 4 0 - - 4 Federal IC/EC 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Federal ERNS Site 0 - - - - 0 State/Tribal CERCLIS 1.0 0 0 0 2 4 6 State/Tribal SWLF 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 1 State/Tribal LUST 0.5 0 8 9 10 - 27 State/Tribal UST/AST 0.5 0 15 13 - - 28 State/Tribal IC/EC 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 2 State/Tribal VCP 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 State/Tribal Brownfields 0.5 0 2 0 0 - 2 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS SEARCH LIST SEARCHED DISTANCE SEARCHED SUBJECT SITE 0.125 0.25 0.5 1.0 TOTAL NYS Spill Sites .125 0 27 - - - 27 Other Site – 1.0 3 18 19 - - 40 NETC has reviewed and considered the above noted regulatory occurrences / information; based on the regulatory status, distance, and groundwater flow considerations; the regulatory activities are not expected to represent REC with respect to the Property. NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NETC PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 5.2 Additional Environmental Record Sources 5.2.1 City of Saratoga Springs Attorney’s Office NETC submitted a FOIA request to the City of Saratoga Springs Attorney’s Office for distribution among various municipal departments (see Appendix B, Exhibit B-3). 5.2.2 City of Saratoga Springs Assessor’s Office NETC has requested records on file with the City of Saratoga Springs Assessor’s office. The information provided by the Assessor’s office response to that request is included in Appendix B, Exhibit B-3. 5.2.3 City of Saratoga Springs Building Department NETC has requested records on file with the City of Saratoga Springs Building Department. The information provided by the Building Department responsive to that request is included in Appendix B, Exhibit B-3. 5.2.4 City of Saratoga Springs Department of Public Works NETC has requested records on file with the City of Saratoga Springs Department of Public Works. The information provided by the Department of Public Works responsive to that request is included in Appendix B, Exhibit B-3. 5.2.5 Other Agencies NETC conducted a review of available federal, state, and local records obtained from EDR pertaining to underground storage tanks and the use of hazardous material at the Property. No other records for the Property were received at the time of this report’s assimilation. 5.3 Physical Setting Sources 5.3.1 Topography The United States Geological Survey (USGS) Saratoga Springs 7.5-minute series topographic map dated 2019 depict the Property at the bottom of a valley which gently slopes to the northeast and exists at an average elevation of ± 275 feet above mean sea level (amsl). The topography of the Property is essentially level along Caroline Street, and slightly higher on adjacent properties to the east. The Property topography is sloping to the north. The nearest mapped surface water body is Spring Run located approximately 4,100 feet northeast of the subject Property. 5.3.2 Soils/Geology Based on a Soil survey published by Warren County Soil and Water Conservation District, and a soil map accessed through the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Conservation Service web site, at www.websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov, the Property is mapped with one soil type. • Urban Land (Ur) - This map unit consists of nearly level to strongly sloping areas where asphalt, concrete, buildings, or other impervious materials cover more than 85 percent of the surface. Slopes range from 0 to 15 percent. Areas of this unit are roughly rectangular and range from 3 to more than 500 acres. Typically, in an area of this unit 85 percent or more of the surface consists of parking lots, shopping centers, industrial parks, and urban business centers. In many areas these soils have been disturbed, and the examination and identification of these areas are impractical. NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NETC PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 According to the Surficial Geologic Map of New York-Hudson Mohawk Sheet, the surficial deposits underlying the Property consist of lacustrine sand deposits, consisting of generally well sorted, stratified sands deposited near the shore of a large body of water, with variable thickness (2 to 20 meters). According to the Bedrock Geologic Map of New York-Hudson Mohawk Sheet, the bedrock underlying the Property has been identified as the Lorraine, Trenton and Black River Group, Canajoharie Shale (Middle Ordovician Period), with thickness up to 4,500 feet. 5.3.3 Hydrology According to the United States Geologic Map (www.nationalatlas.gov), the Property is located in the Mid-Atlantic Region Hydrologic Unit in the Lower Hudson River Drainage Basin. According to the EPA Designated Sole Source Aquifers (SSA) in Region 2 website (www.epa.gov/region02/water/aquifer), the Property is not located in an area of a sole source aquifer. Groundwater in the vicinity of the Property is not used for drinking water. The Property is equipped with municipal water from the City of Saratoga Springs. Based on a review of available information, including area topography, groundwater flow in the immediate area of the Property is expected to be toward the north but may be influenced by site-specific urban land preferential pathways including the former buried stone culvert (i.e., Village Brook) documented in 1991 to exist below the Union Coachworks automotive repair garage. 5.3.4 Flood Zone Information A review of Flood Insurance Rate Maps, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, was performed by NETC. According to Community Panel Number 36091C0433E, effective on 08/16/1995, the Property is in an area that has no digital data available. 5.3.5 Oil and Gas Exploration No oil or gas wells exist at the Property. 5.4 Historic Use Information NETC reviewed available Sanborn maps, topographic maps, city directories, and interviewed individuals with knowledge of the Property. Based on the historical sources reviewed as part of this ESA; The Property was originally occupied by three mixed use commercial and residential buildings from the mid-1880s to the mid-1950s. Most notably the Property existed as a furniture store and paint store. While the paint store remained at 33 Caroline Street, 35-37 Caroline existed as a parking lot for nearby businesses from 1960 to the late 1970s. The Union Coachworks (35-37 Caroline St.) structure located at the Property was reportedly built in the late 1970s and has been used for an auto repair and service facility since ± 1990. Additionally, the current D’Andrea’s pizzeria structure has operated as such since the 1990s. The surrounding area was a mix of commercial, restaurant/tavern and mixed-use properties. NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NETC PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 5.4.1 Aerial Photographs Aerial photographs were provided by EDR and reviewed by NETC for the years 1960, 1964, 1979, 1985, 1997, 2001, 2008, 2011, 2015 and 2019. A summary of the historical aerial photographs reviewed is provided below; Years Description 2019/2015/2011 2008/2001/1997 The Property is occupied by the D’Andrea’s pizzeria structure and the Union Coachworks building in the current configuration. Surrounding properties along Caroline Street to the south, east and west are occupied by mixed use commercial buildings, similar to current conditions. The adjacent lot to the north is vacant in the 2019 aerial photograph and occupied by a large structure in prior photos. The configuration of buildings further to the north along Henry Street and Lake Avenue changes often. The west side of Pavilion Row northwest of the Property appears as a parking lot. 1985/1979 The Property is occupied by similar structures. The surrounding area is similar to the conditions described for the 1997 photo. The 1979 photo is grainy, making interpretation difficult. Some structures are present on the west side of Pavilion Row, northwest of the Property, in the 1979 photo 1964/1960 The Property is improved by the D’Andrea’s pizzeria structure while the rest of the Property exists as a vacant lot in these two photos. The surrounding area appears similar to the conditions described for the 1979 photo. Copies of the aerial photographs reviewed as part of this ESA are included in Appendix C, Exhibit C-1 of this report. NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NETC PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 5.4.2 Historic (Sanborn Fire Insurance) Maps Sanborn Insurance maps were reviewed for the years 1884, 1889, 1895, 1900, 1909, 1948, 1950, 1952, 1954, 1972, 1973 and 1976. A summary of the Sanborn Maps reviewed is provided below; Years Description 1976/1973/1972 Portions of the Property are depicted as a paint store (33 Caroline Street) and a parking area (35-37 Caroline Street). A grocery store is adjacent to and east of the Property, with a paint store and other store further east. Other store buildings are located along Caroline Street to the west, south and east, with open space to the southwest and southeast across Caroline Street. A hay and feed store is located on Henry Street to the northeast of the Property. A club, a store and dwellings are located to the northwest, along Pavilion Place. A gasoline filling station is located at 32 Lake Avenue, further to the north. 1954/1952/1950/1948 The subject Property is occupied by the Paint Store, a restaurant (33 Caroline Street) and a furniture store, with rear porches to the 2nd and 3rd floors (35-37 Caroline Street). The paint store is depicted as just a store in the 1950 and 1948 Sanborn maps. A grocery store is adjacent to and east of the Property, with a paint store and other store further east. Other store buildings are located along Caroline Street to the west, south and east, with no open space. Properties to the north, northeast and northwest are similar to those described for the 1972 Sanborn map. 1909/1900 The subject Property is occupied by 6 stores, each with 3 stories and rear porches. Similar store buildings are located to the east, south and west along Caroline Street. A hay and feed store with livery is located on Henry Street to the northeast of the Property. A club, a store and dwellings are located to the northwest, along Pavilion Place. The Sanborn Map depicts the adjacent lot to the northwest on Pavilion Place as vacant (no store), with a club and a spring water pavilion further to the north. 1895/1889 The subject Property is depicted as a studio and milling (33 Caroline Street), as well as a grocer and auction house (35-37 Caroline Street). 1884 The Property is depicted as dwellings (33 Caroline Street) and as a dress maker/day school (35-37 Caroline Street). Similar commercial buildings are depicted surrounding the Property. Copies of the Sanborn Fire Insurance maps are included in Appendix C, Exhibit C-2 of this report. 5.4.3 City Directories NETC reviewed City Directories provided by EDR for the dates 1964, 1968, 1992, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2014, 2017, and 2020. The Property was listed as W.G Sigsby Paints (33 Caroline Street) for the 1964 and 1968 years. Additionally, with the exception of the years 1992 and 2005 the Property was listed as D’Andrea’s Pizza (33 Caroline St.) and Union Coachworks Inc. (35-37 Caroline Street.). A mix of restaurant/tavern and commercial listings were identified for properties along Caroline Street between Pavilion Place and Henry Street from 1992 to 2020. A mix of paint stores, grocers, and other commercial and residential listings were identified on the same part of Caroline Street in 1964 and 1968. A mix of grocers, small commercial and residential listings were identified NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NETC PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 for the same part of Caroline Street in 1938. A mix of tavern, restaurant and commercial listings were identified for the 70-89 block of Henry Street, located east of the subject Property, from 1992 to 2020. The address 79 Henry Street, located adjacent to and north of the subject Property, was identified as Koval Farm & Garden from 1968 to 2005, and Drake Grain & Feed in the 1938 and 1964 city directories. The address 80 Henry Street, located further to the east across Henry Street, was identified as Van Raalte Co (a knitting mill) in the 1964 and 1968 city directories. Copies of the City Directories are included in Appendix C, Exhibit C-3 of this report. NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NETC PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 5.4.4 Historical Topographic Maps NETC reviewed historical USGS 7.5 & 15 minute Topographic Quadrangle Maps of Saratoga Springs, New York dated Historical topographic maps were reviewed for the years 1902, 1934, 1942, 1947, 1949, 1967, 2013, 2016 and 2019. A summary of the historical topographic maps reviewed is provided below. Years Description 2019/2016/2013 1967/1949/1947 The 2013, 2016 and 2016 maps do not show any distinguishing features. The Property is located in a topographic low area which trends essentially north-south, parallel to Henry Street. The topography slopes slightly upward toward the east and west. Earlier maps depict the area surrounding of the subject Property shaded in pink, indicating areas of urban development. 1942/1934/1902 The maps depict a developed urban area in proximity to the subject Property. Structures are depicted along both sides of Caroline Street, and including the subject Property, on the 1934 and 1902 topographic maps. No major industrial, manufacturing or railroad facilities are depicted in proximity to the Property. Copies of the USGS 7.5- & 15-minute Topographic Maps reviewed during this ESA are included in Appendix C, Exhibit C-4. 5.4.5 Prior Assessment Reports NETC reviewed a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment conducted in July 2023 by Hanson VanVleet, PLLC at 35 Caroline Street Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, as well as a prior Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment conducted in February 2000 by Evergreen Testing & Environmental Services, Inc. at 35-37 Caroline Street Saratoga Springs, NY 12866. Information considered contained in the reports and considered germane to the Clients property acquisition and contemplated site redevelopment plans have been incorporated in the NETC ESA report narrative. Copies of the prior Phase 1 ESA is included in Appendix C, Exhibit C-5. 5.5 Environmental Liens and Activity/Use Limitations No environmental liens or use limitations were identified during this ESA. NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NETC PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 6.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions The Property was inspected by representatives of NETC on December 29, 2023. The weather at the time of the initial site visit was ± 45ºF and cloudy. Photographic documentation of the Property taken during the site reconnaissance inspection work is included in Appendix D. 6.2 General Site Setting The Property is located north of Caroline Street in a mixed use commercial zone of the City of Saratoga Springs, New York. The Property slopes to the northeast and is at an average elevation of 275 ft. 6.3.1 Solid Waste Disposal Domestic solid waste, recyclable items and used cooking grease are placed in a dumpsters along the northern portion of the Property. Used motor oil filters generated at the Union Coachworks during routine automotive maintenance are temporarily containerized using a storage bin located in the wooden shed located at the northeast corner of the Property. Used filters are reportedly disposed of by Sheldon Oil Services; waste disposal records have not been received during this ESA. Used tires and scrap metal auto parts are stored adjacent to the wooden shed for recycling. 6.3.2 Surface Water Drainage Precipitation that falls onto Property is expected to sheet drain following the lay of the land towards the adjacent Caroline Street and Pavilion Place road frontages; a stormwater drain exists adjacent to the Union Coachworks automotive repair facility road frontage. The storm drain that exists along northern side of the automotive repair facility receives discharge form the roof gutter system and overland flow from the paved area of the Property. The storm drain is reportedly connected part of the former Village Brook storm sewer system, which historically has been documented to cross below the Property from the southwest to the northeast. 6.3.3 Wells and Cisterns NETC did not observe any wells or cisterns during their site reconnaissance. 6.3.4 Wastewater No wastewater generation or disposal was observed during NETC’s site reconnaissance visit. Information received during this ESA document that the Property is serviced by the municipal sewer and that floor drain systems located in the Union Coachworks automotive repair facility have been confirmed to be connected to the municipal storm system in 2023. 6.3.5 Additional Site Observations No additional site observations considered germane to this ESA were observed during NETC’s site reconnaissance visit. 6.3.6 Interior Observations The interior of the Union Coachworks structure (35 Caroline St.) consisted of an office area, two service bays, a bathroom and basement storage area. The interior consisted of concrete floors and painted concrete block walls, wood paneling and sheetrock. NETC observed (2) aboveground hydraulic lifts located in the service bays. Other automotive service equipment and supplies were stored on the floors of the service area. The partial NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NETC PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 basement contained retail sized containers of automotive service fluids and supplies stored on the floor and on shelves. The interior of the D’Andrea’s structure (33 Caroline) consisted of a dining area, kitchen, storage room and bathroom. Building materials inside the structure consisted of linoleum floors, painted concrete walls, and painted sheetrock ceilings. Each of the structures at the Property are heated with natural gas fired heating systems and are supplied municipal sewer and water services from the City of Saratoga Springs 6.3.7 Hazardous Materials and Petroleum Products Used or Stored at the Site NETC observed a 55-gallon drum of used anti-freeze, a 30-gallon drum of used oil and an unregistered 275-gallon waste oil AST to be located in a wooden storage shed located at the northeast corner of the Property. According to the owner of Union Coachworks, the used automotive fluids are collected and transported from the Property by Sheldon Oil Services; no waste disposal records have been received during this ESA. 6.3.7.1 Unlabeled Containers and Drums NETC did not observe any unlabeled containers or drums during their site reconnaissance. 6.3.7.2 Disposal Locations of Regulated/ Hazardous Waste No indication to suggest the deliberate disposal of regulated / hazardous waste was observed during the ESA inspection work. 6.3.8 Evidence of Releases Petrochemical stains exist on concrete floor surfaces located in the Union Coachworks structure and below the wooden waste liquid storage shed located at the northeast corner of the Property. 6.3.9 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Older transformers, hydraulic equipment and electrical components can contain polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) at a level that subjects them to regulation by the U.S. EPA. PCBs in electrical equipment are controlled by United States Environmental Protection Agency regulations 40 CFR, Part 761. Under the regulations, there are three categories into which electrical equipment can be classified: • Less than 50 parts per million (PPM) of PCBs – “Non-PCB” transformer • 50 ppm-500 ppm – “PCB-Contaminated” electrical equipment • Greater than 500 ppm – “PCB” transformer NETC did not observe PCB labeled equipment at the Property. Information received during this ESA document a former automotive lift constructed with a below grade hydraulic cylinder was used in the Union Coachworks auto repair garage. The historic use of sub grade automotive lift equipment represents a potential source of PCB contaminated fluids at the Property. 6.3.10 Landfills NETC did not observe any indications of landfilling during their site reconnaissance. NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NETC PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 6.3.11 Pits, Ponds, Lagoons, Sumps, and Catch Basins No pits, ponds, lagoons, sumps or catch basins were documented at the Property. One floor drain exists in the D’Andrea’s Pizza restaurant and the Union Coachworks auto repair garage. Information received during this ESA document dye tests performed in June 2023 confirmed the floor drain discharges from Union Coachworks auto repair garage are directed to the City of Saratoga Springs sanitary sewer system located along Caroline Street. No outfall information has been received for the floor drain located in the D’Andrea’s Pizza restaurant. 6.3.12 Aboveground Storage Tanks (AST) & Underground Storage Tanks (UST) NETC observed (1) unregistered 275-gallon waste oil AST in a wood storage shed located at the northeast corner of the Property. No other evidence of AST or UST equipment (i.e., vent & fill pipes, fuel lines, etc.) were noted at the Property. 6.3.13 Radiological Hazard No potential radiological hazards were observed at the Property. 6.3.14 Drinking Water The City of Saratoga Springs provides municipal water to the Property. 6.3.15 Additional Hazard Observations The remains of an abandoned automotive lift hydraulic cylinder exists in the floor of the Union Coachworks auto repair garage. Information received during this ESA document said lift was previously disassembled and removed by the owner; the below grade cylinder and hydraulic oil reservoir were reportedly filled with sand and topped with concrete. NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NETC PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 7.0 INTERVIEWS 7.1 Interview with Owner The owners were not interviewed as part of this ESA. 7.2 Interview with Local Government Officials Although NETC solicited information from various municipal departments as part of this assessment; no individual officials were available for interview at the time of this report’s assimilation. 7.3 Interview with Others No other individuals were interviewed as part of this ESA. NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NETC PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 8.0 OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS 8.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM) NETC conducted a limited, visual evaluation of interior, accessible areas for the presence of suspect asbestos containing materials (ACM) at the Property. The objective of this visual survey was to note the presence and condition of suspect ACM observed. In addition, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulation 29 CFR 1926.1101 requires certain construction materials to be presumed to contain asbestos, for purposes of this regulation. All thermal system insulation (TSI), surfacing material, and asphalt/vinyl flooring that are present in a building constructed prior to 1981 and have not been appropriately tested are presumed asbestos containing material (PACM). The survey consisted of noting observable materials (materials which were readily accessible and visible during the site reconnaissance) that are commonly known to potentially contain asbestos. This activity was not designed to discover all sources of suspect ACM, PACM, or asbestos at the site; or to comply with any regulations and/or laws relative to planned disturbance of building materials such as renovation or demolition, or any other regulatory purpose. Rather, it is intended to give the lender an indication if significant (significant due to quantity, accessibility, or condition) potential sources of ACM or PACM are present at the Property. NETC did not observe friable ACM or PACM building materials during their site reconnaissance. However considering the construction period for the D’Andrea’s Pizza restaurant and the Union Coachworks auto repair garage the potential for an ACM hazard exist in both buildings. 8.2 Lead-Based Paint In accordance with the scope of services, NETC has conducted a limited, visual evaluation to note the condition of painted surfaces at the Property. The objective of this visual survey was to note the presence and condition of various painted surfaces. Painted areas of the structures appeared to be in fair condition with paint deterioration present. Considering the construction period for the D’Andrea’s Pizza restaurant and the Union Coachworks auto repair garage the potential for a lead- based paint hazard exist in both structures. 8.3 Radon The US EPA has prepared a map to assist National, State, and local organizations to target their resources and to implement radon-resistant building codes. The map divides the country into three Radon Zones; Zone 1 being those areas with the average predicted indoor radon concentration in residential dwellings exceeding the EPA Action limit of 4.0 Picocuries per Liter (pCi/L). It is important to note that the EPA has found homes with elevated levels of radon in all three zones, and the EPA recommends site specific testing in order to determine radon levels at a specific location. However, the map does give an indication of the propensity of radon gas accumulation in structures. Review of the EPA Map of Radon Zones places the Property in Zone 2, where average predicted indoor radon concentrations are expected to be between 2.0-4.0 pCi/L. The NYSDOH maintains additional information on random short-term radon indoor (i.e., basement) air tests which identifies indoor average concentration of 3.61pCi/L for basement spaces and 2.31 pCi/L for first floor for the City of Saratoga Springs. The basement average of 3.61 pCi/L average concentration is below the EPA Action limit 4.0 pCi/L. Radon testing was not performed as part of this assessment. NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NETC PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 8.4 Wetlands Based on wetland data accessed through the NYSDEC’s Environmental Resource Mapping web site, at https://gisservices.dec.ny.gov/gis/erm/, the Property is not depicted to have any NYS regulated wetlands or to be located within a NYS regulated wetland check zone. 8.5 Microbial Contamination (Mold) As part of this assessment, NETC performed a limited visual inspection for the conspicuous presence of mold. Classes of fungi, molds have been found to cause a variety of health problems in humans, including allergic, toxicological, and infectious responses. Molds are decomposers of organic materials, and thrive in humid environments, and produce spores to reproduce, just as plants produce seeds. When mold spores land on a damp spot indoors, they may begin growing and digesting whatever they are growing on in order to survive. When excessive moisture or water accumulates indoors, mold growth will often occur, particularly if the moisture problem remains undiscovered or unaddressed. As such, interior areas of buildings characterized by poor ventilation and high humidity are the most common locations of mold growth. Building materials including drywall, wallpaper, baseboards, wood framing, insulation and carpeting often play host to such growth. Moisture control is the key to mold control. Molds need both food and water to survive; since molds can digest most things, water is the factor that limits mold growth. The EPA recommends the following action to prevent the amplification of mold growth in buildings: • Fix leaky plumbing and leaks in the building envelope as soon as possible; • Watch for condensation and wet spots. Fix source(s) of moisture problem(s) as soon as possible; • Prevent moisture due to condensation by increasing surface temperature or reducing the moisture level in air (humidity). To increase surface temperature, insulate or increase air circulation. To reduce the moisture level in air, repair leaks, increase ventilation (if outside air is cold and dry), or dehumidify (if outdoor air is warm and humid); • Keep heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) drip pans clean, flowing properly, and unobstructed; • Vent moisture-generating appliances, such as dryers, to the outside where possible; • Maintain low indoor humidity, below 60% relative humidity (RH), ideally 30- 50%, if possible; • Perform regular building/HVAC inspections and maintenance as scheduled; • Clean and dry wet or damp spots within 48 hours; • Do not let foundations stay wet. Provide drainage and slope the ground away from the foundation. Although NETC did not note conspicuous visual and olfactory indications of the presence of mold during the site reconnaissance visit, water stained ceilings exist in select areas of D’Andrea’s Pizza restaurant building. NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NETC PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 8.6 Vapor Encroachment Conditions In accordance with the scope of services, NETC has conducted an evaluation for vapor encroachment conditions (VEC) that may negatively affect the Property. The objective of this evaluation was to identify, to the extent feasible pursuant to ASTM Standard E2600-15, if a VEC exists at the Property. ASTM Standard E2600-15 defines a vapor encroachment condition as the presence or likely presence of compound of concern (COC) vapors in the vadose zone of the target property (TP) caused by the release of vapors from contaminated soil and/or groundwater either on or near the TP. Unlike low-permeable soils which contain a high content of clay and silt or both, permeable soils, low in clay and silt, generally tend to promote soil gas migration. Additional factors that aid in the migration of soil gas include, but are not limited to, low soil moisture content, shallow groundwater table, and preferential pathways such as utility corridors and Karst terrains. Although auto repair practices have been documented at the 35 – 37 Caroline Street since ± 1990; no other information has been received to document a VEC exists at the Property. NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NETC PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 9.0 REFERENCES Reports, Plans, and Other Documents Reviewed: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) accessed at http://www.epa.gov/safewater/dwinfo.htm EPA Map of Radon Zones, New York, accessed at: http://www.epa.gov/iaq/radon/zonemap/newyork.htm. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Federal Insurance Administration, National Flood Insurance Program, Flood Insurance Map, accessed at: https://msc.fema.gov/portal. Environmental Data Resource, EDR Report for 33-35 Caroline Street Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 Inquiry Number: 7510947.2s December 01, 2023 Evergreen Testing & Environmental Services, Inc. Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment 35-37 Caroline Street Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, February 2000 Hanson VanVleet, PLLC Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment 35 Caroline Street Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, July 2023 United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, accessed at: http://www.websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov United States Geologic Map accessed at www.nationalatlas.gov United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, accessed at: http://www.websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov United States Geologic Map accessed at www.nationalatlas.gov USGS 7.5 & 15-minute Topographic Maps of Saratoga Springs, New York dated years 1884, 1889, 1895, 1900, 1909, 1948, 1950, 1952, 1954, 1972, 1973 and 1976. Van Diver, B. B., 1985, Roadside Geology of New York, Mountain Press Publishing Company, 397 p. Agencies Contacted: City of Saratoga Springs Attorney’s Office City of Saratoga Springs Assessor’s Office City of Saratoga Springs Building and Planning Department City of Saratoga Springs Clerks Office City of Saratoga Springs Code Enforcement City of Saratoga Springs Historian City of Saratoga Springs Department of Public Works New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Remainder Provided Electronically to the City of Saratoga Springs Planning Board Remainder Provided Electronically to the City of Saratoga Springs Planning Board Exhibit H Exhibit H SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT NYSDEC Spill Case No. 2309179 33 & 35-37 Caroline Street Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 NE Project No. 23.1211015 PREPARED FOR: Mr. Cronan Dempsey c/o DEMPSEY DEVELOPMENT 54 Minot Street Corchester, MA 02122 PREPARED BY: NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCE, DPC P.O. BOX 2167 Ballston Spa, New York 12020 DATED: February 28, 2024 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......cccccsscesssseessessessennceseeeeseassenseesseenseensenseeseceeseaneeeeeeeaseaseesecasceesenseeneecseceansensee 2 Background Information ..........:.ccccccssesscesescssessceseceessecssesecsecesessesecesessecssesscsessecsaeeeseaseaessecsaesessasesseaessaeaseneeeees 2 Discussion & Recommendations...........:ccccccesesscesecsessscsseseesecsseescsecesessecssesscseseecsaeesseseesessecsaeeeesesesseaessaeaseeeseees 3 Declarations. ........ccccccececceeeseceseeeeseeceeceeececeaeeeeseecsaeceacecaaeeeeseecsaeceaaecaaeceeeeesaeceeaeecaaeseneesesaeceeeeesaeeeneeeenaeeeeeeees 4 2.0 METHODOLOGIES ......cecccecsssceseecssscnsceesseensessseneceeseausecsaeseceeeceuneceasceussaueceasseeusesseaseceauseausesaaeneceaseauseaueaeanse 5 2.1 Remote Sensing .........ccccccsesessseseceesescseeeceaeesessecsseeeceaseacsaecsacaccaesacsaeesaeeseesesaaeaeseeseaseaeeeseaseateaseaaees 5 2.2 Soil Boring Program .....0... cece ce cee ccee cee cceeceeeceeceeeeseseseseseseseseseseseaessaessaesssesaaeseaesaeeeaeeeseeeseeesues 5 2.2.1 Soil Sampling ....... cece cece cece ce seeeceeeesesaesesesecseseessaeessesessesessaesesseseessaseeseesesesaeeoaees 5 2.2.2 Soil Gas Screening... eee cece eee eeeeeeeeeeesesescsesssessessaessaeseaeseseseaeeeaeeeseeeseeesngs 6 2.2.3. Groundwater Sampling... cece cece ccee cee ceee snes snes cee ceseoeseeesesessesesseseaessaessaeeeaee 6 3.0 FINDINGS unc cccccceeccstcessscenscessesssssescenseuscesesceuseussensceausceuseesceneseaescauseusceseseeuceuaeseeuseuscessaeausceusesaaeneseassauuaauageanse 8 3.1 Remote Sensing Survey ........ccccccccscscssesecsesseeecsessesecseseseesesseseesesseseesesseeeesesseeeesesseseesesseesesesseeseseeseess 8 3.2 Geo-Environmental Conditions 2.0.00... ccccccceseesesseseescsseseescssseesecsseersecsseessessseassessaeessessaeassessaarsesaaeas 8 3.3 Laboratory Results oo... ccc ce ccecseeecneeeseeseseseseceessessaeeeseaeesesseseaeeseseseaeseseeeseseesaeeesnaeeneea 8 3.3.1 Soil Quality... cece ee ecesecseeeceecsesecsseecsesescssesssesecsessecsseeeasessesecsseseeseseaesaeseseaseaeesecaaens 8 3.3.2 - Groundwater Quality oo... ccc ccccecssecesseeesseceeeaecseeseseeesseceeeaecaecseaeseaeceeesecsaeeeeseseaeeneeae ea 9 4.0 LIMITATION INFORMATION 2... ccccccssssnsseesseensessenecenseausessceseceaescaneaseceseaeeusaeseeaeaeasseaueeseaeneseasseaseateaees 11 4.1 Limitations and Exceptions..........ccccccccccescesssecesseeeseeceeeeecseceeseeeaeceeeeecaeeeeaeeeaeceessesaeeeeaeeeaeeeeeaeenas 11 4.2 Special Terms and Conditions oo... cece eeee cece ceeeseeeeecsessneeaeeeesesnesseesetessesnesaeeeaeenaeeees 11 4.3 Reliance oo. eee ce cce ce ceeeceeeceeeceeeceeeceeeseesaeceseeeeseseseseseseseseeessesesesesesaessaeesaeseaetaesaeseaeeeae 11 APPENDICIES Appendix A Figures Appendix B Field Logs Exhibit B-1 Soil Boring Logs Exhibit B-2 Monitoring Well Logs Appendix C — GPR Survey Data Appendix D PEL Laboratory Reports Appendix E |= NETC Resumés and Statement of Services NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCE, D.P.C 1 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NE PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Information Northeastern Environmental Geoscience DPC (Northeastern) has prepared this Phase II Site Investigation report to document the information developed as a result of remote sensing and invasive testing work completed at D ’Andrea’s Pizzeria and Union Coachworks located at 33 — 37 Caroline Street Saratoga Springs, New York (hereinafter termed the “Site”) during February 2024 (see Appendix A, Figure 1). The SI work; performed in accordance with approvals received from Cronan Dempsey (Client) and a Notice of Change (NOC) Task Order Agreement dated January 29, 2024, addresses Recognized Environmental Conditions * (REC), Significant Data Gaps, and potential Business Environmental Risks** (BER) documented during a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment completed at the Site durmg December 2023 & January 2024. The purpose of the SI work is to alert the Client to undocumented soil and groundwater impacts related to legacy commercial activities and an abandoned buried stone culvert (e.g., Village Brook ) that have the potential to complicate ownership responsibilities and / or add cost to new improvements completed at the Site. Conclusions The near surface geology of the Site is comprised of a buried + 5 — 10 ft. horizon of cultural fill. The cultural fill is composed of a heterogenous mixture of coarse to fine sand that contains brick, concrete, and ash. Below the cultural fill horizon is a fining downward sequence of glaciolacustrine sand & gravel and a varved clay deposit that exceed 15 feet in depth. Drilling refusal was encountered at soil boring locations B-1 and HA-1 at depths of 11 and 5 feet, respectively. Groundwater was encountered at depths ranging from + 7 - 9 feet below grade. Although ground penetrating radar (GPR) signal attenuation was observed in the field during the remote sensing work which inhibited the ability to document conditions below depths of + 4 feet; a computer enhanced desk top review the GPR data documents the apparent location of the abandoned buried stone culvert (Village Brook), a buried storm drainage line located north of the Union Coachworks structure and cut and fill soil conditions across the entire Site. With the exception of location B-5; no visual and olfactory conditions indicative of a reportable chemical release were observed during the soil boring program. Visual and olfactory evidence of a reportable petrochemical release was documented in soil and groundwater samples obtained at soil boring B-5 which was advanced adjacent to a waste oil storage shed used by Union Coachworks. Petrochemical impacts and measurable volatile organic compound (VOC) soil gas detections documented at soil boring B-5 originate at the upper surface of the groundwater table (+ 7.0 feet) and were found to attenuate with depth in the underlying glaciolacustrine deposits. With the exception of soil borings B-1, B-5, and HA-1; VOC soil gas concentrations documented using a hand-held photoionization detector were indicative of background conditions (i.e., < 1.0 part per million). The greatest VOC soil gas concentration identified at the Site (i.e., 72 ppm) was recorded northeast of the Union Coachworks at soil boring B-5 at a depth of + 7 — 10 feet. *Recognized Environmental Condition (REC), per the ASTM Standard E 1527-21 definition, n (1) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property due to a release to the environment; (2) the likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property due to a release or likely release to the environment; or (3) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. **Business Environmental Risk (BER), per the ASTM Standard E 1527-21 definition, a risk which can have a material envir i or envi lly driven impact on the business associated with the current or planned use of commercial real estate, not necessarily related to those environmental issues required to be investigated in this practice. Consideration of BER issues may involve addressing one or more non-scope considerations. * recognized envi 1 condition (REC) & ial business envir tal risks (BER). NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCE, D.P.C 2 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NE PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY With the exception of Lead concentrations in a composite sample of the cultural fill horizon (Comp-1) and Total Xylene concentrations in soil sample B-1 (5-10°); the laboratory results document near surface soil quality conditions at the Site meet the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) “unrestricted use” soil cleanup objectives (SCOs) for the VOC, semi- VOC, PCB and heavy metal compounds of concern (COC) inherent to EPA Methods 8260, 8270, 8082 and RCRA Metals, respectively. The laboratory results also document shallow groundwater quality conditions at the Site are generally unaffected by the COC inherent to EPA Methods 8260 and 8270 or contain low concentrations of select VOC and semi-VOCs. Groundwater impacts documented at soil borings B-5 exceed the NYSDEC 6NYCRR Part 703 standard for the VOC Tetrachloroethene. Groundwater impacts documented at soil borings B-1 & 5 also exceed the NYSDEC 6NYCRR Part 703 standards for the semi-VOC COC Benz(a)anthracene, Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene, Chrysene, and Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene. Based on the findings developed during the SI work, Northeastern notified the NYSDEC to a reportable release based on conditions documented at soil borings B-1, 4 & 5. The NYSDEC has assigned Spill No. 2309179 for its going forward programmatic administration of the Site. Discussion & Recommendations The result of the SI work demonstrate prior commercial activities, the presence of cultural fill and / or conditions related to the historic use of Village Brook have resulted in impacts to soil and groundwater that represent REC and require NYSDEC involvement. With the exception of the detection of the chlorinated VOC Tetrachloroethene in groundwater sample B-5; the soil and groundwater chemical concentrations documented at the Site are consistent with an urban cultural fill site, and although exceedances to programmatic NYSDEC soil cleanup objectives and groundwater standards exist, they are in most cases low in concentration, and [we expect] would not significantly alter the development plans that are being considered for the Site. Our opinions on REC and potential BER matters are based on the going forward availability to use municipal water and sewer services from the City of Saratoga and the Clients development plans which we understand include; removing the D’Andrea’s Pizzeria and Union Coachworks structures, removing all cultural fill, and reducing the existing Site grades to facilitate the construction of a new multi-unit residential structure with a first floor parking garage. Ascertaining the scale to which low concentration detections of VOC, semi VOC and Lead may influence real estate values, development activities and ownership responsibilities requires regulatory negations beyond the spill reporting services completed as part of this SI. Northeastern will provide a copy of this report to the NYSDEC to open a dialogue with the Government to obtain input on regulatory expectations for the conditions documented at the Site. NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCE, D.P.C 3 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NE PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY Declarations The preparer represents that to the best of the preparer’s knowledge the information contained in this Phase II is true and correct and to the best of the preparer’s actual knowledge, no material facts have been suppressed or misstated. Should additional information become available, modifications to this Phase II may be appropriate. This Executive Summary is provided for convenience in Section 1.0 of this report. The Executive Summary information alone does not constitute the complete findings. The report must be read in its entirety. PREPARED BY DATE ; February 28, 2024 Mr. Robert W. Gray IPG C 7 Project Manager / Geologist February 28, 2024 Mr. Jeffrey T. Wink PG President NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCE, D.P.C 4 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NE PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 2.0 METHODOLOGIES 2.1 Remote Sensing Focused ground penetrating radar (GPR) survey work was performed in accessible exterior areas of the Site to alert the Client to undocumented conditions / infrastructures (i.e., abandoned underground petroleum storage tanks, private wastewater disposal systems, dry wells, abandoned Village Brook storm sewer system, etc.), as well as to direct the selection of soil boring sites. Three rectangular reference grids (i.e., Grid 0, 1 and 2) were established in advance of the GPR work using conventional field survey measuring equipment (see Figure 2). Random GPR survey lines were also performed at the site on an as needed basis to assist with the GPR survey. A Noggin 250 plus Smart Cart Profiling System was used to complete the GPR work. The Noggin 250 plus Smart Cart Profiling System transmits electromagnetic signals continuously into the subsurface and then detects, amplifies, and displays reflections of the signal on a graphic recorder and a video display unit. The transmitting / receiving antenna is slowly moved over the ground surface producing radar images of the subsurface. The Noggin 250 plus Smart Cart Profiling System detects subsurface anomalies at depths typically up to + 4.0 - 8.0 feet below grade. The data generated during the GPR survey was graphically plotted in the field and reviewed to identify subsurface anomalies considered germane to this matter. GPR anomalies identified during the survey work were flagged in the field whenever possible using conventional marker paint. 2.2 Soil Boring Program Six exterior soil borings (B-1 through B-6) and (1) interior hand auger boring (HA-1) were advanced at the Site to depths of + 5 - 15 feet below grade to facilitate the acquisition of near surface soil and / or groundwater samples (see Figure 3). Each soil boring was completed in a manner to provide a geological log of the subsurface conditions and / or provide data on the soil and / or groundwater quality condition of the areas evaluated. Each exterior soil boring was advanced utilizing a track mounted Geoprobe 6620DT sampling platform following standard direct push drilling methods. The interior soil boring was completed by manual hand auger sampling techniques. Based on field conditions documented during the soil boring installation work, a PVC monitoring well was installed at soil boring B-5. The monitoring well is composed of two basic components; the well screen and riser or blank. The well screen is the intake portion of the monitoring well. The basic purpose of the riser is to provide storage and a connection to the surface from the well screen. The monitoring well is constructed with threaded, flush joint, schedule 40 PVC pipe with 10 feet of 0.010 inch slotted well screen. The well is constructed to a depth of + 14.75 feet below grade and installed in such a manner as to screen (i.e., straddle) the uppermost groundwater table. The annular space around the well screen has been filled with sand pack (0.010 grade). A + 1.0 foot bentonite seal has been installed above the sand pack. NETC personnel have performed all aspects of the drilling and soil / groundwater sampling program. Copies of the individual soil boring and well completion logs are included as Appendix B. 2.2.1 Soil Sampling A series of macro core and hand auger soil samples were completed at each soil boring location following continuous sampling methods. All soil samples were logged on site as they were extracted, labeled, and retained for additional field volatile organic compound (VOC) soil gas screening measures. New unused clear polyethylene terephthalate macro core sample liners (PETG) were used for all direct push soil sampling work. All soil samples collected were examined and described using the Burmister Soil Classification System. In NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCE, D.P.C 5 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NE PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY compliance with ASTM methods, the samples were labeled with the following information: boring number, sample number and depth of sample penetration record. 2.2.2 Soil Gas Screening As noted, this SI has included field headspace soil gas screening on each soil sample collected at the Site. A properly calibrated photoionization detector (PID — MiniRae Model 3000) was used for the testing work. Photoionization uses ultraviolet light to ionize many trace compounds (especially organic) and the Model 3000 employs this principal to measure the concentration of trace gases. In the Model 3000, a chamber adjacent to the ultraviolet light source contains a pair of electrodes. When a positive potential is applied to one electrode, the field created drives any ions in the chamber to the collector electrode where current is measured. Measured current is proportional to the concentration of organics sampled by the instrument's probe. The useful range of the instrument is from 0.1 to 3,000 ppm. Direct soil gas measurements were obtained from the headspace of each soil sample collected. The field soil gas concentrations were documented on a + 2.0 — 5.0 ft. interval or as deemed necessary for the field conditions. The VOC soil gas testing data was used to document the presence and [if applicable] vertical extent of impacted soil, as well as a means to short list soil samples for additional laboratory analysis. The VOC soil gas concentrations recorded during the SI work are included on the individual soil boring logs (i.e., see Appendix B). Soil samples submitted to Phoenix Environmental Laboratories, Inc. (PEL) for laboratory analysis include samples B-1 (5 — 10’), B-5 (7 — 10°), HA-1 (0 - 5’), HA-1 (2 - 3°) and Comp-1 [a composite of samples B-2 (0 — 5’), B-3 (0 — 5’), and B-4 (0 — 5’)]. Table 1 illustrates the chemical analysis performed on each of the samples. Table 1: Chemical Analysis Chemical Analysis Bee gees cay al PEPAUNietod|| EEA Nteciod™) WAnEAUIechGd FEAR 4 8260 8270 B/N 8080 B-1 (5 — 10°) X X B-5 (7 — 10°) x x x x HA-I (0 - 5°) x x HA-I (2 -3°) x Comp-l xX X X 2.2.3. Groundwater Sampling Groundwater samples were obtained at soil boring locations B-1, 2, 3, 4, and B-6 using a stainless-steel SP-16 screen point sampling system. The SP-16 sampling system was advanced to the desired sampling interval using direct push methods; a 4-foot screen was then exposed to facilitate the collection of groundwater. Each groundwater sample was obtained using a dedicated new unused 3/8-inch poly tube equipped with a stainless-steel check valve. Groundwater samples collected from monitoring well B-5 were obtained using a dedicated new unused * inch polyethylene bailer and monofilament line. The groundwater samples were collected in such a manner as to minimize agitation and other disturbing conditions, which may cause physio-chemical changes and bring about losses due to NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCE, D.P.C 6 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NE PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY volatilization, absorption, redox changes, or degradation. Each groundwater sample was transferred to a set of laboratory prepared sample bottles, provided by PEL, for laboratory analysis. Groundwater samples B-1, 4, 5, and B-6 were submitted to PEL for chemical analysis via EPA Methods 8260 and 8270 BN testing criteria. Groundwater sample B-3 was submitted to PEL and placed on hold. Observations have been recorded regarding weather and surrounding air/water/soil conditions, non-aqueous components of water (e.g., "floaters," surface sheens) and other pertinent field conditions. Chain of custody documentation was maintained throughout the transfer and shipment of samples to the laboratory. NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCE, D.P.C 7 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NE PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 3.0 FINDINGS 3.1 Remote Sensing Survey The field survey and subsequent desk top analysis of the GPR data document the following conditions exist at the Site. - Heterogeneous soil profiles consistent with “cut and fill” urban soil conditions were found to exist in each of the areas evaluated. - One noteworthy GPR anomaly was identified west of the Union Coachworks repair shop in GPR survey Grid 0. The anomaly appears to be large in diameter (1.¢., + 4.0 ft) residing at a depth of approximately 2.5 feet below grade in the area historically occupied by the former Village Brook storm sewer. - Noteworthy GPR anomalies in Grid 1 includes; a continuous shallow (i.e.,+ 1.5 ft) small diameter reflection (i.e., < 15 inch) that appear to extend from the stormwater catch basin, located immediately north of the Union Coachworks repair shop towards the east, and a large heterogenous “cut and fill” soil profile at the northeast corner of the Site also in the area historically occupied by Village Brook. The relative position of suspect anomalies discussed herein, as well as a cross sectional view of the GPR data assimilated for this matter are depicted on Figure 2 and are presented in Appendix C. 3.2 Geo-Environmental Conditions The unconsolidated native deposits encountered during the soil boring services generally consist of a+ 5 - 10 foot layer of urban cultural fill which contains a varying mixture of sand, brick, concrete, and ash. Below the cultural fill exists a fining downward sequence of coarse to fine sands with little to trace amounts of silts, clays and gravel which overlays a varved clay deposit. Shallow groundwater was encountered at a depth of + 7 - 9 feet below grade. Bedrock was not encountered during the soil boring program. Shallow drilling refusal encountered during the soil boring program was limited to borings B-1 and HA-1. Soil samples collected at soil boring B-1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and HA-1 were found to be unaffected by visual or olfactory indications of a petroleum or chemical release. Visual and olfactory petrochemical impacts and elevated VOC soil gas concentrations (1.e., 1.3 - 72 ppm) were documented at soil boring locations B-5 at depths ranging from + 7 — 15 feet below grade. 3.3 Laboratory Results 3.3.1 Soil Quality Soil sample HA-1 (2 - 3°) was reported to be unaffected by the VOC compounds inherent to the EPA Method 8260 testing criteria. With the exception of Total Xylenes reported in soil sample B-1 (5-10); soil samples B-1 (5-10’) and B-5 (7-10’) were reported to contain select VOCs inherent to the EPA Method 8260 testing criteria at concentrations below the NYSDEC’s “unrestricted use” soil cleanup objectives (SCOs) as outlined in 6NYCRR Part 375 Environmental Remediation Programs and CP-51. A summary of VOCs identified in the soil samples analyzed from the Site are listed below in Table 1. NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCE, D.P.C 8 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NE PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY Table 2: VOC Soil Detections a : , : Unrestricted Commercial Use Chemical Compound B-1 (5-10°) B-5 (7-10°) HA-1 (2-3°) Use SCO sco Acetone 26 32 <28 3,600 500,000 Ethylbenzene 11 <44 < 5.6 8,400 390,000 Total Xylenes 850 20 =< 5.6 260 500,000 Note: All concentrations are in ug/Kg ° Where no SCO is listed for unrestricted use individual organic compounds were capped at a maximum value of 100,000 ug/Kg. * Where no SCO is listed for commercial use individual organic compounds were capped at a maximum value of 500,000 ug/Kg. Soil samples B-1 (5-10°), B-5 (7-10"), Comp-1 and HA-1 (0-5’) were each reported to be unaffected by the semi-VOC compounds inherent to the EPA Method 8270 B/N testing criteria. Soil Samples B-5 (7-10), Comp-1 and HA-1 (0-5”) were each reported to be unaffected by the PCB compounds inherent to the EPA Method 8082 testing criteria. Except for Lead (232 mg/Kg) reported in composite soil sample Comp-1, samples B-5 (7- 10’) and Comp-1 were reported to contain select RCRA Metals at concentrations below the NYSDEC’s “unrestricted use” soil cleanup objectives (SCOs) as outlined in 6pNYCRR Part 375 Environmental Remediation Programs and CP-51. A copy of the PEL laboratory report is included in Appendix D. 3.3.2. Groundwater Quality Groundwater sample B-6 was reported to be unaffected (below laboratory detection limits) by the VOC COC inherent to the EPA Method 8260 testing criteria. Groundwater samples B-1, B-4, and B-5 were reported to contain select VOCs inherent to the EPA Method 8260 testing criteria at concentrations above laboratory detection limits. The reported results document groundwater quality exceedances to NYSDEC 6NYCRR Part 703 standards exist at soil borings B-5 for the VOC Tetrachloroethene, only. Table 3: VOC Detections 6NYCRR Part 703.5 & Chemical Compound B-1 B-4 B-5 B-6 TOGS 1.1.1 Groundwater Standards Ethylbenzene = 2.0 11 = 63 = 1.0 5 m&p-Xylene 3.4 4.4 < 250 < 1.0 5 o-Xylene < 2.0 1.7 < 63 <1.0 5 Tetrachloroethene < 2.0 <1.0 74 < 1.0 5 NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCE, D.P.C 9 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NE PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY Groundwater samples B-1 and B-5 were each reported to contain select semi-VOCs at low level concentrations that are above the NYSDEC 6NYCRR Part 703 groundwater quality standards of 0.002 ug/L. Each of the remaining semi-VOCs chemical parameters inherent to the EPA 8270 testing criteria were reported at concentrations below laboratory detection limits. A summary of semi- VOCs identified in the groundwater samples analyzed from the Site are listed in Table 3. Table 4: Semi-VOC Detections 6NYCRR Part 703.5 & Chemical Compound B-1 B-4 B-5 B-6 TOGS 1.1.1 Groundwater Standards Benz(a)anthracene 0.79 =< 0.02 0.18 =< 0.02 0.002 Benzo(a)pyrene 0.95 =< 0.02 0.21 = 0.02 ND Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.83 < 0.02 0.18 < 0.02 0.002 Benzo(k)flouranthene 0.65 < 0.02 0.14 < 0.02 0.002 Chrysene 0.77 < 0.02 0.19 < 0.02 0.002 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.82 =< 0.02 0.17 = 0.02 0.002 Phenanthrene 0.73 < 0.48 < 0.47 < 0.47 50 fote: All concentrations are in ug/l. A copy of the PEL laboratory report is included in Appendix D. NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCE, D.P.C 10 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NE PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 4.0 LIMITATION INFORMATION 4.1 Limitations and Exceptions The findings, conclusions and recommendations outlined herein are based on the data assimilated during the course of the SI evaluation. As with any investigation of a limited scope, should additional information become available modification to the opinions offered may be appropriate. No warranty is expressed or implied. 4.2 Special Terms and Conditions The conclusions and findings set forth in this SI report are strictly limited in time and scope to the date of the evaluations. The conclusions presented in the report are based solely on the services described therein, and the scope of the agreed-upon SI services determined necessary by the Client. Our position on conditions documented at the Site and the need to address and / or correct them are made without programmatic input from the Government. Northeastern is prepared to assist Client seek input from the NYSDEC and / or other agencies on programmatic responsibilities for the conditions documented during the SI work. 4.3 Reliance All reports, both verbal and written, are for the benefit of the Client. This report has no other purpose and may not be relied upon by any other person or entity without the written consent of Northeastern. The Client may authorize the release of all or part(s) of this SI to third parties. However, any third party use or reliance upon this report agree that it shall have no legal recourse against Northeastern or its parent or subsidiaries and shall indemnify and defend them from and against all claims arising out of or in conjunction with such use or reliance. NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCE, D.P.C 11 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NE PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY APPENDIX A FIGURES NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NE PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY APPENDIX A FIGURES NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NE PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY NOTES: All site features aré approximate. This sile plan iz ittended far illustrulior Purpose associated with a February 2024 Site Investigation (SL) performed on behalf of Mr. Cronan Dempsey. lei Ree! Pope 1475 Haute £0. 1.0. Bex 2157 Bs stan Sps, NY 12022 Phors ib19) 884-8b46 =o 1183 864-8710 FIGURE 1: Location Map PROJECT: 33 & 35-37 Caroline Street Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 Project # 23.1211015 | Scale: Not to Scale | Date: 2/28/2024 NO T E S : Al l si t e fe a t u r e s ar e ap p r o x i m a t e . Th i s si t e pl a n is in t e n d e d fo r il l u s t r a t i o n pu r p o s e as s o c i a t e d wi t h a Fe b r u a r y 20 2 4 Si t e In v e s t i g a t i o n (S I ) pe r f o r m e d on be h a l f of Mr . Cr o n a n De m p s e y . Le g e n d 27 5 Ga l l o n Wa s t e oi l AS T & Dr u m St o r a g e Sh e d €) St o r m Dr a i n @ Fl o o r Dr a i n FA Hy d r a u l i c Li f t s NO R T H E A S T E R N AN EN V I R O N M E N T A L GE O S C I E N C E D. P . C . 14 7 6 Ro u t e 50 , P. O . Bo x 21 6 7 , Ba l l s t o n Sp a . NY 12 0 2 0 Ph o n e . (5 1 8 ) 88 4 - 8 5 4 5 Fa x : (5 1 8 ) 88 4 - 9 7 1 0 FI G U R E 2: GP R Su r v e y Ar e a s PR O J E C T : 33 & 35 - 3 7 Ca r o l i n e St r e e t Sa r a t o g a Sp r i n g s , Ne w Yo r k 12 8 6 6 Pr o j e c t # 23 . 1 2 1 1 0 1 5 | Sc a l e : .— - — — . — _ — s — Da t e : 02 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 4 NO T E S : Al l si t e fe a t u r e s ar e ap p r o x i m a t e . Th i s si t e pl a n is in t e n d e d fo r il l u s t r a t i o n pu r p o s e as s o c i a t e d wi t h a Fe b r u a r y 20 2 4 Si t e In v e s t i g a t i o n (S I ) pe r f o r m e d on be h a l f of Mr . Cr o n a n De m p s e y . 27 5 Ga l l o n Wa s t e oi l AS T & Dr u m St o r a g e Sh e d NO R T H E A S T E R N AN EN V I R O N M E N T A L GE O S C I E N C E D. P . C . 14 7 6 Ro u t e 50 , P. O . Bo x 21 6 7 , Ba l l s t o n Sp a . NY 12 0 2 0 Ph o n e . (5 1 8 ) 88 4 - 8 5 4 5 Fa x : (5 1 8 ) 88 4 - 9 7 1 0 €) St o r m Dr a i n oh Bo r i n g Lo c a t i o n @ Fl o o r Dr a i n <5 - Bo r i n g / We l l Lo c a t i o n FA Hy d r a u l i c Li f t s FI G U R E 3: Sa m p l e Lo c a t i o n s PR O J E C T : 33 & 35 - 3 7 Ca r o l i n e St r e e t Sa r a t o g a Sp r i n g s , Ne w Yo r k 12 8 6 6 Pr o j e c t #2 3 . 1 2 1 1 0 1 5 | Sc a l e : am mm , | Da t e : 02 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 4 APPENDIX B LOGS NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NE PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY EXHIBIT B-1 BORING LOGS NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NE PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY PRESENTATION OF IDENTIFICATIONS BASED ON THE BURMISTER SYSTEM Fully Written Descriptions Start the description with the color, first letter of first color capitalized (e.g. Brown, Yellow brown, Yellow and brown) . The color should be the same as field description, since with oxidation the color sometimes changes between the time the sample is recovered and when it is viewed in the laboratory. Determine the primary component (e.g. sand, gravel, or silt) and whether the component represents 50% (by weight) or more of the sample. 1. If more than 50% sand, the word sand gets fully capitalized. ‘ Preceding the word sand, are the terms coarse, medium and/or fine as follows: Aa If there are approximately equal amounts of coarse, medium and fine sand, the description reads "coarse to fine SAND". If there is more coarse sand, the description reads “coarse (+) to fine SAND". The same holds true for the fine sand predomination. If medium sand predominates, the description reads "coarse medium (+) to fine SAND". In order for a term coarse, medium or fine to be included in a description, it must represent at least 10% of the sand fraction. For example, if a sample contains 70% sand, the sample must contain at least 7% of coarse sand for the word coarse to be included in the description. The above usage of coarse, medium and fine applies to gravel as well as. sand. Unless advised to the contrary on a specific job, the dif- ferentiation between coarse and fine silt shall not be made. A comma always appears immediately after the word sand. Next comes the adjective giving the approximate percentage of soil by weight passing the #200 sieve as follows: and: 35-50% some: 20-35% little: 10-20% trace: 1-103 with a (+) sign indicating the upper third of percentage, a (-) sign indicating the lower third of percentage, and no sign indicating the middle third of percentage. Next comes a description of the soil passing the #200 sieve, based exclusively on plasticity as follows: | PI Description Organic o- 13% Silt (non-plastic) 1- 5% Clayey Silt (Slight P.I.) 5 - 10% Silt & Clay (Low P.I.) 10 - 20% Clay & Silt (Medium P.I.) 20 - 40% Silty Clay (High P.I.) 40% and more Clay {Very High P.I.) If the soil is organic, the term Organic Silt is used instead of the terms listed under "Description" and the terms. listed under "Organic" are used at the very end of the full description (in parentheses). c. A comma is placed immediately after the term describing the soil passing the #200 sieve (e.g. Silt & Clay). Next the usage of and, some, little or trace (with a (+) or (-) if needed) is used to indicate the percent of gravel, followed by the use of coarse, medium and/or fine to de- scribe the gravel gradation, with the word gravel always using a capital "G". d. An illustration of description of a soil having more than 50% sand is as follows: Brown coarse to fine SAND, little Clayey Silt, some (-) medium to fine (+) Gravel. If the major component is less than 50% of the total sample, the description is written exactly as for Item 1 above (with sand coming first), except that in the word sand, only the s is capitalized rather than the full word. If there is more than 50% gravel, the description once more starts with the color, followed by the applicable terms of coarse, medium and fine, followed by the word GRAVEL in all capitals. a. The adjective giving the percentage of all the soil except gravel is placed after the word gravel, and then a comma (e.g. if there is 62% gravel, a partial description would be "Brown medium to fine (+) GRAVEL and (-),...."). The sand is then described by coarse, medium and/or fine with- out its own percent adjective (with only the S in sand being capitalized). A comma is placed immediately after the word Sand, after which the soil passing the #200 sieve is indicated with the adjective for percentage as given in Item lb above. b. An example is: Gray medium to fine (+) GRAVEL and (-), coarse to fine Sand, trace Silt. If there is more than 50% passing the #200 sieve, the de- scription once more starts with the color, followed by the #200 description based exclusively on plasticity as follows: PI Description Organic O- 1% SILT {(non-plastic} l= 5% Clayey SILT (Slight P.I.) 5 - 10% SILT & CLAY (Low P.I.) 10 - 20% CLAY & SILT (Medium P.I.) 20 - 40% Silty CLAY (High P.I.) 40% or more CLAY (Very High P.I.) If the soil is organic, the term Organic SILT is used in- stead of the terms listed under "Description", and the terms listed under “Organic" are used at the very end of the full description (in parentheses). ‘a. The description is written as discussed in Section 3, with sand preceding gravel. b. An example is: Brown Clayey SILT some (+), coarse to fine Sand, trace fine Gravel. c. In the foregoing example, if the fines are organic the identification would be: Brown Organic SILT some (+), coarse to fine Sand, trace fine Gravel (Slight P.I.). : If pockets, layers, etc., of other soil are present in the © sample, include it at the end of the previously written de- scription with a comma at the end of the previously written description. If closely layered (partings, seams, or layers) soils, such as varved clays, are involved, each layer must be completely identified along with a sketch in the remarks column showing layer thicknesses. Organic soils are identified as Organic Silt (as previously described) or as Peat. a. Characteristics of Organic Silt are: (1) Usually light gray to very dark gray (or blacx? color (2) Odor caused by decomposition of plant or animal life imparting H2S, CO z and other organic gases (3) Plastic properties, usually very compressible (4) May contain shells and fragments of partly decayed . vegetable matter b. Characteristics of Peat are: (1) (2) (3) (4) Pibrous aggregate of undecayed or partially decayed vegetable matter, found in swamps Frequently contains organic silt Usually light brown to black in color Distinctive odor, as for organic silt sae MO D I F I E D BU R M I S T E R SY S T E M Fe a t u r e s id e n t i f i c a t i o n / +, -: De f i n e s up p e r or \ / Ma j o r Co n m p e n e n e : Sp e l l e d / Pr o p o r t i o n : Td e n t i f i e lo w e r th i r d of ou t in ca p i t a l qu a n t i t y ; ac t s a pr e p o r t i o n or Fr a c e i o n le t t e r s co n j u n c t i o n . - li g a @) . .. . | Gr Br m! f S| ! ) m! 16 , ly r , oc c In s c S. [ L | Co l o r : Fr a c t i o n s : Id e n t i f i e s Mi n o r Co m p o n e n t (s ) : As id e n t i f i e d in vr a i n si z e ( s ) Sp e l l e d ou t wi t h on l y th e fi e l d . Fi r s t th e fi r s t le t t e r ca p i t a l i z e d le t t e r of ea c h co l o r ab b r e v i a t i o n ca p i t a l i z e d . Z Gr a y Br o w n me d i u m ' ” ) to fi n e SA N D Un a b b r e v i a t e d = —— — li t t l e (- ) me d i u m 't ) Gr a v e l , la y e r e d , de s c r i p t i o n of th e ab o v e ex a m p l e oc c a s i o n a l le n s co a r s e Sa n d (S P ) . Un i f i e d So i l Cl a s s i f i c a t i o n : . Ad e q u a t e fo r a ge n e r a l i z e d , NN \ _. st r a t u m de s c r i p t i o n MA I N : | Mo d i f i e r s : Ad d i t i o n a l VISUAL IDENTIFICATION OF SAMPLES The samples were identified in accordance: with the American Society for Engineering Education System of Definition. J. Definition of Soil Components and Fractions Material Symbal Fraction Sieve Size Definition Boulders Bidr — g” + . Material retained an 9” sieye, Cabbles . Chi — 3” to 9” Material passing the 9* sieve aid retained on the 3” sieve. Gravel G coarse (Cc) 1" to 3” Material passing the 3” sieve medium (m) %” to 1” and retained on the Na, 10 fine (f) Ne. 10 to %” sieve, Sand $ coarse (c) No. 30 to No. 10 Material passing the No. 10 medium (m) No. 60 to No, 30 Sieve and retained on the fine (f) Ho. 200 to No. 60 No. 200 sieve. Silt $ — Passing No. 200 Material passing the No. 200 sieve that is non . (0.074 mm) plastic in character and exhibits little or no streng? Organic Silt (0$) Material passing the No. 200 sieve which exhibits plastic properties within a certain range of moisture content, and exhibits fine granular and organic characteristics. Plasticity Plasticity Index Clayey SILT Cy$ Slight (S!) Ito 5 SILT & CLAY $8&C Low (L) 5 to 10 CLAY & SILT c&$ Medium (td) 10 to 20 Silty CLAY $yC High (H) 20 to 40 CLAY ¢ Very High (VH) 40 plus tl. Definition of Companent Propartions when air dried, Clay-Soil Material passing the No. 200 sieve which can be made to exhibit plasticity and clay qualities within a certain range of moisture content, and which exhibits considerable strength when air-dried. Component Written Proportions Symbol Percentage Range by Weight * Principal CAPITALS — 50 of more Minor Lower Case and a. 35 to 50 some S. 20 to 35 little I. 10 to 20 trace t I to 10 * Minus sign (—) lower limit, plus sign (++) upper limit, no sign middle range. te te a t y CH E S ill. Glossary of Modifying Abbreviations Category Symbol Term Term Term A Barings U/D Undisturbed Exploratory Auget B. Samples C Casing Lost Undisturbed Dd Denison Spoon Wash 0.£ Open End €. Colors bk black gn green wh white ". bl blue of orange yw yellow br brown rd red dk dark gf gray tn tan ft > light D. Organic dec decayed 0 organic veg vegetation Sails dec'g decaying rts roots pt peat lig lignite ts topsoil E Rocks LS Limestone tk rack Shst Schist Gns Gnaiss SS Sandstona Sh Shale F. Fill and bidr {s) boulder (s) cbl (s) cobbles) gls glass Miscellaneous brk {s) brick ¢s) wd wood mise miscellaneous Materials cndr {s) cinder {s) dbr debris rb} rubble &. Miscellaneous do ditto pp pocket ref refusal Terms el, El elevation penetrometer sm small {gint (s) fragment(s} P. i, Plasticity YWeL water level frat _ frequent Index We H. weight of hammer Irg farge P pushed We OR. weight of rods mild mottled pressed no rac na racovery pe (s) piece (5) pen penetration rec or R recovered H. Stratified alt alternating Soils thk thick thn thin W with prt parting — 0 to 1/16" thickness seam seam — L/16 to 4%” thickness lyr layer — ¥ to 12” thickness stra stratum — greater than 12” thickness wd ¢ varved Clay — alternating seams or layers of sand, silt and clay pxt pocket -— small, erratic deposit, usually less than 1 foot Ins lens — fenticular deposit ace accasional — one or less per foat of thickness freq frequent — more than ane per foot of thickness _ Ta b l e 3. 5 Un i f i e d So i l Cl a s s i f i c a t i o n Gr o u p Sy m b o l s La b o r a t o r y Cl a s s i f i c a t i o n Cr i t e r i a Fi e l d Td e n t i f i c a t t o n Pr o c (E x c l u d i n g pa r t i c l e s fa r g e r th a n 3 in , an d ba s i n g fr a c t i o n s on es t i m a t e d we i g h t s ) In f o r m a t i o n Re q u i r e d fo r Ty p i c a l Na m e s De s c r i b i n g So l l s We l l gr a d e d gr a v e l s , gr a v e l - sa n d mi x t u r e s , li t t l e or no fi n e s Wi d e ra n g e In gr a i n si z e an d su b s t a n t i a l re m a d e ” of al l in t e r m e d i a t e pa r t i c l e si r e s GW Gi v e ty p i c a l na m e ; in d i c a t e ap - pr o x i m a t e ja g e s of sa n d an d gr a v e l : ma x i m u m si z e ; an g u l a r i t y , su r f a c e co n d i t i o n , an d ha r d n e s s of th e co a r s e gr a i n s ; lo c a l or ge o l o g i c na m e an d ot h e r pe r t i n e n t de s c r i p t i v e in f o r m a t i o n ; an d sy m b o i s In pa r e n t h e s e s Po o r l y gr a d e d gr a v e l s , gr a v e l sa n d mi x t u r e s , li t t l e or no fi n e s No t me e t i n g al l gr a d a t i o n re q u i r e m e n t s fo r GW Pr e d o m i n a n t l y on e si z e or a ra n g e of si z e r wi t h so m e In t e r m e d i a t e si z e s mi s s i n g GP At t e r b e r g Hm i t s be l o w | Ab o v e “A ' li n e “A ’ li n e , or PI le s s wi t h Pi be t w e e n th a n 4 4 an d 7 ar e At t e r b e r g li m i t s ab o v e sc q a t r l e n us e of “A Li n e , wi t h Pf gr e a t e r th a n 7 du a l sy m b o l s Si l t y gr a v e l s , po o r l y gr a d e d No n p l a s t i c On e s (f o r id e n t i f i c a t i o n pr o - gr a v e l - s a n d - s i l t mi x t u r e s ce d u r e s st e ML be l o w ) GM STIS DAIS F “ON, S[9aABI) BMIBOD JO JIBY UE WOW UBT) 38sef sf won|; Fo r un d i s t u r b e d so l i s ad d in f o r m a - ti o n on st r a t i f i c a t i o n , de g r e e of co m p a c t n e s s , ce m e n t a t i o n , — is t u r e co n d i t i o n s an d dr a i n a g e ch a r a c t e r i s t i c s Cl a y e y gr a v e l s , po o r l y gr a d e d Pl a s t i c fi n e s (f o r Id e n t i f i c a t i o n pr o c e d u r e s , gr a v e l - s a n d - c l a y mi x t u r e s sc e CL be l o w ) Ge sToqasds fenp JO 26M SuLINbo! toses awyjsapsog OS ‘WS ‘(DD "WO dS "MS 'dD'MOD Wi d e ra n g e in gr a i n si z e s an d su b s t a n t i a l Gr e a t e r th a n 6 am o u n t s of al l in t e r m e d i a t e pa r t i c l e 2 sa si z e s 2g 5 Pr e d o m i n a n t l y on e si z e or a ra n g e of si z e s SP wi t h so m e in t e r m e d i a t e si z e s mi s s i n g No n p l a s t i c Gn e s (f o r id e n t i f i c a t i o n pr o - ~ ce d u r e s , se e ML be l o w ) We l l gr a d e d sa n d s , gr a v e l l y sw sa n d s , li t t l e or no fi n e s Be t w e e n I an d 3 Ex a m p l e : Si l t y sa n d , gr a v e l l y ; ab o u t 20 % ha r d , an g u l a r gr a v e l pa r t i c l e s 4- i n . ma x i m u m si z e ; ro u n d e d an d su b s n g u l a r sa n d gr a i n s co a r s e to fi n e , ab o u t 15 % no n - pl a s t i c fi n e s wi t h lo w dr y st r e n g t h ; we l l co m p a c t e d an d mo i s t in pl a c e ; al l u v i a l sa n d ; (S M ) 8) [BLOIBW Jo J7#Y LNT? WoW sT]08 poareit-st1"0> spurs ust Po o r l y gr a d e d sa n d s , gr a v e l l y sa n d s , ji t t i e or no fi n e s No t me e t i n g al ! gr a d a t i o n re q u i r e m e n t s fo r SW q2Zt8 2218 007 “ON UEU 49du07 * (9718 SADIE y ON OY 0} 1UDTBAMbS At t e r b e r g li m i t s be l o w “A b o v e “A li n e “A li n e or Pi j e s s th a n wi t h Pf be t w e e n 5 4 an d 7 ar e 7 bo r d e r l i n e ca s e s At t e r b e r g li m i t s be l o w re q u i r i n g us e of “A v li n e wi t h P/ gr e a t e r th a n 7 du a l sy m b o l s Si l t y sa n d s , po o r l y gr a d e d ta n d - SM si i t mi x t u r e s wT 1 %S MT Be) VOW $B pasn 3Q Aww azis “ul f ay) ‘WONeoYssSE]D [eNsIA 10.5) DZTE DADS & ON %S UEy) FT TSMOf[O} FE PAYISEW[D BIB S106 PIUIEIT 261803 (71s Qaots 007 ain “ON Wey) L2TTEWs UOT19EI)) SUG JO BBT1UZAIEd UO BuIpUsdsg oz1# UlWIs WO) PURE pu’ faaElB JO so®eicoad sumusisq Wey) Joypews ff uote; Cl a y e y sa n d s , po o r l y gr m d e d sa n d - c l a y mi x t u r e s S6309 JO TY UY ZOW spurs Pl a s t i c fi n e s (f o r Id e n t i f i c a t i o n pr o c e d u r e s , se e CL be l o w ) SC | (242 paReu o1 21Q!8}4 aonszed isoq]euIs 3q1 INO" $1 3778 BADIS COZ “ON PLL) Id e n t i f i c a t i o n Pr o c e d u r e s on Fr a c t i o n Sm a l l e r th a n No , 40 Si e v e Si z e To u g h n e s s (c o n s i s t e n c y ne a r pl a s t i c li m i t ) Dr y St r e n g t h (c r u s h i n g ch a r a c t e r - is t i c s ) Di l a t a n c y (r e a c t i o n to sh a k i n g ) 60 T t t t T + a4 t r t- Co m p a r i n g so i l s at eq u a l li q u i d fi m i t {- — —— ee r— To u g h n e s s an d dr y st r e n g t h in c r e a s e x tx wi t h in c r e a s i n g pl a s t i c i t y in d e x ~J ch e Is In o r g a n i c si t t s an d ve r y fi n e sa n d s , co c k fl o u r , si l t y or cl a y e y fi n e sa n d s wi t h sl i g h t pl a s t i c i t y In o r g a n i c me d i u m cl a y s , sa n le a n cl a y s Or g a n i c si l t s an d or g a n i c si f { t - Gi v e t y p i c a l na m e ; in d i c a t e de g r e e an d ch a r a c t e r of pl a s t i c i t y , am o u n t an d ma x i m u m si z e of co a r s e gr a i n s ; co l o u r in we t co n d i t i o n , od o u r if an y , lo c a l or ge o l o g i c na m e , an d ot h e r pe r t i - ne n t de s c r i p t i v e in f o r m a t i o n , an d sy m b o ! In pa r e n t h e s e s Fo r un d i s t u r b e d so i l s ad d In f o r - o v No n e to sl i g h t Qu i c k to mn sl o w No n e cl a y s of lo w to Pl a s t i c i t y , gr a v e l l y ja y s , si l t y cl a y s , Os ued sr; wut pindty Bh9 pur siyis Me d i u m to hi g h No n e to ve r y sl o w Me d i u m N =) N oO mn xapu) AONSe\g OK = oF DONWMP tap! pray Jopun waals se suos ej 3y1 Burdyryweps uy aagns S216 UIEIs I/F) Si g h t to Sl o w Sl i g h t 10 = Cl Lt SiJOs pouress-suty Jajfoes 8) [E1228 jo fey URY? VOW me d i u m cl a y s of lo w pl a s t i c i t y Sl o w to fo n e BZIS DAIS OOZ “ON URL Sl i g h t to me d i u m Sl i g h t to me d i u m In o r g a n i c si l t s , mi c a c e o u s or di s t o m a c e o u s fi n e sa n d y or si l t y so l l s , cl a s t i c si l t s Hi k h to No n e Hi g h In o r g a n i c cl a y s of hi g h pl a s - tl e l t y , fa t cl a y s ma t i o n on st r u c t u r e , st r a t i f i c a - th o n , co n s i s t e n c y in un d i s t u r b e d an d re m o u l d e d st a t e s , mo i s t u r e an d dr a i n a g e co n d i t i o n s Ex e m p l e : 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 10 0 Li q u i d ti m i t 0 ve r y hi g h Me d i u m to No n e to hi g h _v e r y sl o w me d i u m Re a d i l y id e n t i f i e d by co l o u r , od o u r , sp o n g y fe e l an d fr e q u e n t l y by Ab r o u s Pt te x t u r e . Fr o m Wa g n e r , 19 5 7 . ® Bo u n d a r y cl a s s i f i c a t i o n s . So i l s po s s e s s i n g ch a r a c t e r i s t i c s of tw o gr o u p s ar c de s i D Al l si e v e si z e s on th i s ch a r t ar e U. S . st a n d a r d . Fl e l d Id e n t i f i c a t i o n Pr o c e d u r e fo r Fi n e Gr a t n e d So i l s or Fr a c t i o n s Th e s e pr o c e d u r e s ar e to be pe r f o r m e d on th e mi n u s No , 40 si e v e si z e pa r t i c i e s , ap p r o x i m a t e l y 14 4 In , Fo r Me l d cl a s s i f i c a t i o n pu r p o s e s , sc r e e n i n g js no t in t e n d e d , si m p l y re m o v e by ha n d th e co a r s e pa r t i c t e s th a t in t e r f e r e wi t h th e te s t s . Dr y St r e n g t h (C r a s h i n g ch a r a c t e r i s t i c s ) : To u g h n e s s (C o n s i s t e n c y ne a r pl a s t i c li m i t ) : Af t e r re m o v i n g pa r t i c t e s la r g e r th a n No . 40 si e v e si z e , mo u l d a pa t of so i l Af t e r re m o v i n g pa r t i c l e s la r g e r th a n th e No . 40 si e v e si z e , a sp e c i m e n of to th e y of pu t t y , ad d i n g wa t e r if y. Al l o w th e pa t i t o so i l ab o u t on e - h a l f in c h cu b e in si z e , is mo u l d e d to th e co n s i s t e n c y of dr y co m p l e t e l y by ov e n , su n or al r dr y i n g , an d th e n te s t Ms st r e n e t h by pu t t y . If to o dr y , wa t e r mu s t be ad d e d an d if st i c k y , th e sp e c i m e n br e a k i n g an d cr u m b l i n g be t w e e n th e fi n g e r s . Th i s st r e n g t h is a me a s u r e sh o u l d be sp r e a d ou t in a th i n la y e r an d al l o w e d to lo s e so m e mo i s t u r e of th e ch a r a c t e r an d qu a n t i t y of th e co l l o i d a l fr a c t i o n co n t a i n e d in th e by ev a p o r a t i o n , Th e n th e sp e c i m e n is ro t i e d ou t by ha n d on a sm o o t h so i l . Th e dr y st r e n g t h in c r e a s e s wi t h in c r e a s i n g pl a s t i c i t y . su r f a c e or be t w e e n th e pa l m s in t o a th r e a d ab o u t on e - c i g h t in c h In Hi g h dr y st r e n g t h is ch a r a c t e r i s t i c fo r cl a y s of th e CH gr o u p , A ty p i c a l di a m e t e r . Th e th r e a d is th e n fo l d e d an d re - r o l l e d re p e a t e d l y . Du r i n g in o r g a n i c si l t po s s e s s e s on l y ve r y sl i g h t dr y st r e n g t h . Si l t y fi n e sa n d s th i s ip u l a t i o n th e i ec t is gr a d u a l l y re d u c e d an d th e Pl a s t i c i t y ch a r t fo r la b o r a t o r y cl a s s i f i c a t i o n of fi n e gr a i n e d so i l s Cl a y e y fa g t i c ; si l t , br o w n ; sl i g h t l y sm a l ! pe r c e n t a g e of in e sa n nu m e r o u s ve r t i c a l ro o t ho l e s ; fi r m an d dr y tn - pl a c e ; lo e s s ; (A f L ) Os uN) sa)2U2 wun pinbiy ~S i i g h t to Or g a n i c cl a y s of me d i u m to hi g h pl a s t i c i t y SXhBID paw sits Pe a t an d ot h e r hi g h l y or g a n i c so i l s Hi g h l y Or g a n i c So l l s a by « in a t i o n s of gr o u p sy m b o l s , Fo r ex a m p l e GH - G C , we l l gr a d e d gr a v e l - s a n d mi x t u r e wi t h cl a y bi n d e r . Di l a t a n c y (R e a c t i o n to sh a k i n g ) : Af t e r re m o v i n g pa r t i c l e s la r g e r th a n No . 40 si e v e si z e , pr e p a r e a pa t of mo i s t so i t wi t h a vo l u m e of sb o u t on e - h a l f cu b i c in c h , Ad d en o u g h wa t e r if ne c e s s a r y 1) ma k e th e so j } so f t bu t no t st i c k y . Pl a c e th e pa t in th e op e n pa l m of on e ha n d an d sh a k e ho r i z o n t a l l y , st r i k i n g vi g o r o u s l y ag a i n s t th e ot h e r ha n d se v e r a l ti m e s , A po s i t i v e re a c t i o n co n s i s t s of th e ap p e a r a n c e of wa t e r on th e su r f a c e of th e pa t wh i c h ch a n g e s to a li v e r y co n s i s t e n c y an d be c o m e s gl o s s y . Wh e n the sa m p l e P is sq u e e z e d be t w e e n th e fi n g e r s , th e wa t e r an d gl o s s di s a p p e a r fr o m th e su r f a c e , th e pa t st i f f e n s an d fi n a l l y it cr a c k s or cr u m b l e s . Th e ra p i d i t y of ap p e a r a n c e of wa t e r du r i n g sh a k i n g an d of it s di s a p p e a r a n c e du r i n g sq u e e z i n g as s i s t in id e n t i f y i n g th e ch a r a c t e r of th e fi n e s in a so i l . Ve r y fi n e cl e a n sa n d s gi v e th e qu i c k e s t an d mo s t di s t i n c t re a c t i o n wh e r e a s # pl a s t i c cl a y ha s no re a c t i o n . In o r g a n i c si l t s , su c h as a ty p i c a l ro c k fl o u r , sh o w a mo d e r a t e l y qu i c k re a c t i o n . an d si l t s ha v e ab o u t th e sa m e sl i g h t dr y st r e n g t h , bu t ca n be di s t i n g u i s h e d by th e fe e t wh e n po w d e r i n g th e d sp e c i m e n . Fi n e sa n d fe e l s gr i t t y wh e r e a s a ty p i c a l si l t ha s th e sm o o t h fe e l of fl o u r . sp e c i m e n st i f f e n s , fi n a l l y lo s e s it s pl a s t i c i t y , an d cr u m b l e s wh e n th e ta s t i c li m i t ts re a c h e d . Al t e r th e th r e a d cr u m b l e s , th e pi e c e s sh o u l d be Ju m p e d to g e t h e r an d a sl i g h t kn e a d i n g ac t i o n co n t i n u e d un t i l th e Ju m p cr u m b l e s . Th e to u g h e r th e th r e a d ne a r th e pl a s t i c li m i t an d th e st i f f e r th e lu m p wh e n it fi n a l l y cr u m b l e s , th e mo r e po t e n t is th e co l l o l d a l cl a y fr a c t i o n in th e so i l . ‘e a k n e s s of th e th r e a d at th e pl a s t i c li m i t an d qu i c k lo s s of co h e r e n c e of th e lu m p be l o w th e pl a s t i c Ii m i t in d i c a t e ei t h e r In o r g a n i c cl a y of lo w pl a s t i c i t y , or ma t e r i a l s fu c h as ka o t i n - t y p e cl a y s an d or g a n i c cl a y s wh i c h oc c u r be l o w th e A- l i n e . ad ee ee ae d en n : Fu a d ot th e al a e t i o He n t e So i l Ch a r a c t e r i s t i c s Pe r t i n e n t to Ro a d s an d Ai r f i e l d s Ma j o r Di v i s i o n s Le t t e r Na m e Va l u e as Va l u e ss Su b g r a d e Wh e n | Su b b a s e Wh e n (1 ) No t Su b j e c t to No t Su b j e c t to Fr o s t Ac t i o n Fr o s t Ac t i o n Va l u e a¢ Po t e n t i a l Co m p r e s s i b i l i t y Ba s e Wh e n Fr o s t an d No t Su b j e c t to Ac t i o n Ex p a n d o n Fr o a l Ac t i o n Dr a i n a g e Ch a r a c t e r i a t i c s Co m p a c t i o n Eq u i p m e n t Un i t Or y We i g h t Ib . pe r cu , ft . Ty p i c a l De s i g n Va l u e s CB R Q) Su b g r a d e Mo d u l u s k t) . pe r ca . in Go w We l l gr a d e d gr a v e l s or gr a v e l - s a n d Ex c e l l e n t Ex c e l t e n t mi x t u r e s , li t t l e of no fi n e s Go o d No m e to ve r y Al m o s t no n e sl i g h t Ex c e l l e n t Cr a w l e r - t y p e tr a c t o r , ru b b e r - t i r e d ro l l e r , st e e t - w h e e l e d ro l l e r 12 5 - 1 4 0 30 0 . 50 0 GP Po o r l y gr a d e d gr a v e l s or gr a v e l - s a n d | Go o d to ex c e l l e n t | Go o d mi x t u r e s , fi t t l e or no fi n e s Fa i r to go o d No n e to ve r y Al m o s t no n e sl i g h t Ex c e l e n t Cr a w l e r - t y p e tr a c t o r , ru b b e r - t i r e d ro l l e r , st e e l . wh e e l e d ro l l e r 11 9 - 1 4 0 30 0 . 5 0 0 GR A V E L . AN D d Si l t y gr a v e l s , gr a v e l - s a n d . s i l t Go o d to ex c e l l e n t | Go o d GR A V E L L Y mi x t u r e s Fa i r to go o d Sl i g h t to m e d i u m | Ve r y st i g h t Fa i r to po o r Ru b b e r ti r e d ro l l e r , sh e e p s f n o t to t t e r ; cl o s e co n t r o l of mo i s t u r e 12 5 - 1 4 5 30 0 - 5 0 0 , SO U S GM Go o d Fa i r Po o r to no t Sl i g h t to m e d i u m | St i g h t su i t a h l e Po o r to pr a c t i c a l l y im p e r v i o u s Ru b b e r - t i r e d ro l l e r , sh e e p s f o o ro l l e r 11 5 . 1 3 5 20 0 - 5 0 0 oc Ql a y e y gr a v e l s , gr a v e l sa n d . c l a y Go o d Pa i r mi x t u r e s Po n r to no t Sl i g h t t o m e d i u m | Sl i g h t su i t a b l e Po o r to pr a c t i c a l l y im p e r v i o u s Ru h b e r - t i r e d ro l l e r , sh e e p s f o o to l e r 53 0 . 1 4 5 20 0 50 0 CO A R S E : GR A I N F R D sw We l l gr a d e d sa n d s or gr a v e l l y sa n d e , | Go o d Pa i r to go o d So n s li t l e or no fi n e s Po o r No m e to ve r y Al m o s t no n e sl i g h t Ex c e l l e n t Cr a w l e r . t y p e tr a c t o r , ru b b e r - t i r e d ro l l e r 11 0 . 1 3 0 20 0 . 4 0 0 SP Po o r l y gr a d e d sa n d s or gr a v e l l y Fa i r to go o d Fa i r SA N D sa n d s , li m e or no fi n e s Po o r to no t No n e to ve r y Al m o s t no m e su i t a b l e sl i g h t Ex c e l l e n t Cr a w l e r - t y p e tr a c t o r , ru b b e r - t i r e d ro l e s 10 5 . 1 3 5 15 0 - 4 0 0 AN D SA N D Y d Si l t y sa n d s , sa n d - s i l t mi x t u r e s Fa i r to go o d SO N S Fa i r to go o d Po o r St i g h t to hi g h Ve r y sl i g h t Fa i r to po o r Ru b b e r - t i r e d ro l l e r , sh e e p a f o n t ro l l e r ; cl o s e co n t r o l of mo i s t u r e 42 0 - 1 3 5 15 - 4 0 15 0 - 4 0 0 sM f y t— Fa i r Po o r to fa i r No w su i t a b l e Sl i g h t to hi g h Sl i g h t to me d i u m Po o r to pr a c t i c a l l y im p e r v i o u s Ru h h e r - t i r e d ro l l e r , sh e e p s f o o t ro l l e r 10 0 - 1 3 0 10 2 0 10 0 - 3 0 0 sc Cl a y e y sa n d s , sa n d cl a y mi x t u r e s Po o r to fa i r Po o r No w su i t a b l e Sl i g h t to hi g h Sl i g h t to me d i u m Po o r to pr a c t i c a l l y im p e r v i o u s Ru b b e r - t i r e d ro l l e r , sh e e p s f o o t ro l l e r 10 0 - 1 3 5 $- 2 0 10 0 . 3 0 0 ML In o r g a n i c si l t s an d ve r y fi n e sa n d s , Po o r to fa i r No w su i t s b l e ro c k fl o u r , si l t y or cl a y e y fi n e sa n d s Si t s or cl a y e y si l t s wi t h sl i g h t pl a s t i c i t y No t su i t a b l e Me d i u m to ve r y Sl i g h t to me d i u m hi g h Fa i r to po o r Ru b b e r - t i r e d ro l l e r , sh e e p s f o n t ro l l e r ; cl o s e co n t r o l of mo i s t u r e 1S of le s s —| 10 0 20 ) CL A Y S cl In o r g a n i c cl a y * of lo w to me d i u m Po o r to fa i r No t su i t a h t e 1A . pl a s t i c i t y , gr a v e l l y cl a y s , sa n d y cl a y s , 1S LE S S si l t y cl a y s , le a n cl a y s No t su i t s h l e Me d i u m to hi g h Me d i u m Pr a c t i c a l l y im p e r v i o u s Ru b b e r ti r e d ra l l e r , sh e e p s f o m ro l l e r 90 . 1 3 0 IS or le s s 50 . 1 8 0 FI N E : OL Or g a n i c si l t s an d or g a n i c si l t - c l a y s of | Po o r No t su t t a b l e GR A I N E D lo w pl a s t i c i t y No t su i t a b l e Me d i u m to hi g h Me d i u m to hi g h Po o r Ru b h e r - t i r e d ro l l e r , sh e e p s f o m ro l l e r 90 . 1 0 5 So r le s s So s Mu In o e g a n i c si l t e , mi c a c e o u s or Po o r No t au i t a h l e di a t o m a c e o u s fi n e sa n d y of si l l y so i l s , Su i t s el a s t i c si l t s No t su i t a b l e Me d i u m to ve r y Hi g h hi g h Fa i r to po o r Sh e e p s f o o t ro t l e r , ru b b e r - t i r e d ro l l e r RO - J O S 10 oF le s s AN D Ct a y s cH In o r g a n i c cl a y s of me d i u m to hi g h Po o r to fa i r CL s pl a s t i c i t y , or g a n i c si t t s No t su i t a h f e No t su i t a b l e Me d i u m Hi g h Pr a c t i c a l l y im p e r v i o u s Sh e e p s f o m ro l l e r , ru b b e r - t i r e d ro f l e r GR E A T E R TH A N SO on Or g a n i c cl a y s of hi g h pl a s t i c i t y , fa t Po o r to ve r y po o r | No t su i t a b l e cl a y s No t su i t a b l e Me d i u m Hi g h Pr a c t i c a l l y im p e r v i o u r Sh e e p s f o o t ro l l e r , ru b b e r - t i r e d so l f e r Hr o u t y OR G A N I C So I L s Pp Pe a t an d ot h e r hi g h l y or g a n i c so i l s No w su i t a b l e No t su i t a b l e No t su i t a b l e Sl i g h t Ve r y hi g h Fa i t to po o r Co m p a c t i o n no t pr a c t i c a l No t e : (1 ) Un i t Dr y We i g h t s ar e fo r co m p a c t e d so i l at op t i m u m mo i s t u r e co m e n t fo r mo d i f i e d AA S H O co m p a c t i o n ef f o r t . Di v i s i o n of GM an d SM in su b d i v i s i o n of d an d u ar e fo r ro a d s an d ai r f i e l d s on l y . 8 of At t e r b e r g li m i t s ; su f f i x d (e . g . . . GM a ) wi l l be ti c e d wh e n th e li q u i d ti m i t (L L ) is 25 or le s s an d th e pl a s t i c i l y in d e x is 6 of le s s ; th e su f f i x u wi l l he us e d ot h e r w i s e . (2 ) Th e ma x i m u m va l v e th a t ca n be us e d tn de s i g n of ai r f i e l d s is , in so m e ca s e s , li m i t e d by gr a d a t i o n an d pl a s t i c i t y re q u i r e m e n t s , NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCE D.P.C TEST BORING LOG Boring No. B-1 PROJECT: 33-37 Caroline Street Saratoga Springs, NY SHEET NO.: 1 of 1 CLIENT: Cronan Dempsey- Cronan Development JOB NO.: 23.1211015 DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Northeastern Environmental Technologies Corporation M.P. ELEV.: Not Measured PURPOSE: Subsurface Investigation GR. ELEV.: Not Measured DRILLING METHOD: Direct Push Soil Sample GW Sample Sample Method | DATUM: Not Measured DRILL RIG: Geoprobe 6620DT TYPE Macro Tube SP-16 DATE START: 02/07/2024 GROUND WATER LEVEL: + 9.0' DIAM. 2.0" 0.375" 1.0" DATE FINISH: 02/07/2024 MEASURING PT.: Ground Surface Sample Yes No | ---=- DRILLER: M. Wink DATE: 02/07/2024 Screen}; ----- | ----- 4.0' INSPECTOR: R. Gray Peak Unified Depth |Sample} PID Soil GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION REMARKS (feet) ID (ppm) | Class. bkg=0.0} System 1 PSN a IR ee, (4 4.0") 2 Br c-f S, t$; fgmts brk, conc No Odor 3 O-8 0.0 Brown coarse to fine SAND, trace Silt, fragments brick, concretre Dry 2.0") 4 Bre-fS 5 Brown coarse to fine SAND 6 R= 1.2' 7 Same as above (hard drilling at 6-7') No Odor 8 5 - 10' 1.7 Moist a Swamp / 10 (29.0')|Septic Odor Gr Blu c-fS, t $yC, tf G WET 11 10 -11' 0.0 . . , 4 Gray Blue coarse to fine SAND, trace Silty Clay, trace fine gravel R= 1.0 12 End of Soil Boring @ 11.0' - Refusal WET 13 Swamp / Septic Odor 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Groundwater Sample Collected @ 10.0 feet Soil Boring Completed @ 11.0 feet Shipping Address: Mailing Address: 1476 Route 50 Ballston Spa, NY 12020 P.O. Box 2167 Ballston Spa, NY 12020 (518) 884-8545 - Phone (518) 884-9710 - Fax NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCE D.P.C TEST BORING LOG Boring No. B-2 PROJECT: 33-37 Caroline Street Saratoga Springs, NY SHEET NO.: 4 of 1 CLIENT: Cronan Dempsey- Cronan Development JOB NO.: 23.1211015 DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Northeastern Environmental Technologies Corporation M.P. ELEV.: Not Measured PURPOSE: Subsurface Investigation GR. ELEV.: Not Measured Mailing Address: P.O. Box 2167 Ballston Spa, NY 12020 (518) 884-9710 - Fax DRILLING METHOD: Direct Push Soil Sample GW Sample Sample Method |DATUM: Not Measured DRILL RIG: Geoprobe 6620DT TYPE Macro Tube SP-16 DATE START: 02/07/2024 GROUND WATER LEVEL: + 9.0' DIAM. 2.0" 0.375" 1.0" DATE FINISH: 02/07/2024 MEASURING PT.: Ground Surface Sample Yes No | ----- DRILLER: M. Wink DATE: 02/07/2024 Screen} ----- | ---- 4.0' INSPECTOR: R. Gray Peak Unified Depth |Sample} PID Soil GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION REMARKS (feet) ID (ppm) | Class. bkg=0.0| System 1 Asphalt R= 3.25) 5 (4.05) Br c-fS, t $; fgmts brk, conc, cndr No Odor 3 0-5' 0.0 : P ; : Bronw coarse to fine SAND, trace Silt; fragments brick, concrete, cinders Dry 4 5 6 Same as above R= 3.0' 7 No Odor 8 5 - 10' 0.0 Moist 9 (+9.0') Gr Gn c-fS, | $yC 10 Gray Green coarse to fine SAND, little Silty Clay Moist / WET 11 R= 4.0' 12 10 - 12' 0.0 No Odor PE (£12.05) Br vvd C WET 14 12-14 0.0 Brown varved CLAY 15 End of Soil Boring @ 14.0' 16 17 18 19 20 Groundwater Sample Collected @ 10.0 feet Soil Boring Completed @ 14.0 feet Shipping Address: 1476 Route 50 Ballston Spa, NY 12020 (518) 884-8545 - Phone NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCE D.P.C TEST BORING LOG Boring No. B-3 PROJECT: 33-37 Caroline Street Saratoga Springs, NY SHEET NO.: 1 of 1 CLIENT: Cronan Dempsey- Cronan Development JOB NO.: 23.1211015 DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Northeastern Environmental Technologies Corporation M.P. ELEV.: Not Measured PURPOSE: Subsurface Investigation GR. ELEV.: Not Measured Mailing Address: P.O. Box 2167 Ballston Spa, NY 12020 (518) 884-9710 - Fax DRILLING METHOD: Direct Push Soil Sample GW Sample Sample Method |DATUM: Not Measured DRILL RIG: Geoprobe 6620DT TYPE Macro Tube SP-16 DATE START: 02/07/2024 GROUND WATER LEVEL: + 9.0' DIAM. 2.0" 0.375" 1:0" DATE FINISH: 02/07/2024 MEASURING PT.: Ground Surface Sample Yes No | ----- DRILLER: M. Wink DATE: 02/07/2024 Screen} ----- | ----- 4.0' INSPECTOR: R. Gray Peak Unified Depth |Sample} PID Soil GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION REMARKS (feet) ID (ppm) | Class. bkg=0.0| System 1 Asphalt R= 3.5) 2 (t 4.0") Br c-fS, t $; fgmts brk, conc, cndr, coal No Odor 3 0-5' 0.0 ! : : . Brown coarse to fine SAND, trace Silt; fragments brick, concrete, cinders, coal Dry 4 5 6 R= 3.25' 7 5-7' 0.0 No Odor 3 (47.0) Bre-fS Dry 9 7-10! 0.0 Brown coarse to fine SAND 10 (49.5) BrGre-fS,t$ WET 11 Brown Gray coarse to fine SAND, trace Silt R= 4.0' (¢ 11.5’) 12 10-12.5 0.0 Peat No Odor ronmnnnnnnnnnnenncneneeeneeeeeemmhmhmhmhehmh—h (#11.75') 13 Gr Gn c-f §, t Cly$ WET 14 125-15) _ Gray Green coarse to fine SAND, trace Silty Clay (£°43'55) 15 Brvvd C Brown varved CLAY 16 End of Soil Boring @ 15.0 feet 17 18 19 20 Groundwater Sample Collected @ 10.0 feet Soil Boring Completed @ 15.0 feet Shipping Address: 1476 Route 50 Ballston Spa, NY 12020 (518) 884-8545 - Phone NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCE D.P.C TEST BORING LOG Boring No. B-4 PROJECT: 33-37 Caroline Street Saratoga Springs, NY SHEET NO.: 1 of 1 CLIENT: Cronan Dempsey- Cronan Development JOB NO.: 23.1211015 DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Northeastern Environmental Technologies Corporation M.P. ELEV.: Not Measured PURPOSE: Subsurface Investigation GR. ELEV.: Not Measured Mailing Address: P.O. Box 2167 Ballston Spa, NY 12020 (518) 884-9710 - Fax DRILLING METHOD: Direct Push Soil Sample GW Sample Sample Method | DATUM: Not Measured DRILL RIG: Geoprobe 6620DT TYPE Macro Tube SP-16 DATE START: 02/07/2024 GROUND WATER LEVEL: + 8.0' DIAM. 2.0" 0.375" 1.0" DATE FINISH: 02/07/2024 MEASURING PT.: Ground Surface Sample Yes No | ----- DRILLER: M. Wink DATE: 02/07/2024 Screen} ----- | ---- 4.0' INSPECTOR: R. Gray Peak Unified Depth |Sample} PID Soil GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION REMARKS (feet) ID (ppm) | Class. bkg=0.0| System 1 Asphalt R= 2.5) 5 (6 4.0" Br c-fS, t $; fgmts brk, cndr, coal No Odor 3 0-5 0.0 Brown coarse to fine SAND, trace Silt: fragments brick, cinders, coal Dry 4 5 (+ 5.0’) 6 Bre-fS,1$ R= 2.75' 7 Brown coarse to fine SAND, little Silt Dry 8 5 - 10' 0.0 No Odor 9 WET 10 (+ 70.0’) 11 Gr Gn c-f S, | Cly$ R= 4.0' 12 10- 12.5 0.0 Gray Green coarse to fine SAND, little Clayey Silt WET 13 No Odor 14 1125-15] 0.0 ens) “ . Br Gr wd C 15 Brown Gray varved CLAY Dry 16 End of Soil Boring @ 15.0' 17 18 19 20 Groundwater Sample Collected @ 10.0 feet Soil Boring Completed @ 15.0 feet Shipping Address: 1476 Route 50 Ballston Spa, NY 12020 (518) 884-8545 - Phone NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCE D.P.C TEST BORING LOG Boring No. B-5 PROJECT: 33-37 Caroline Street Saratoga Springs, NY SHEET NO.: 1 of 1 CLIENT: Cronan Dempsey- Cronan Development JOB NO.: 23.1211015 DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Northeastern Environmental Technologies Corporation M.P. ELEV.: Not Measured PURPOSE: Subsurface Investigation GR. ELEV.: Not Measured Mailing Address: P.O. Box 2167 Ballston Spa, NY 12020 (518) 884-9710 - Fax DRILLING METHOD: Direct Push Soil Sample GW Sample Sample Method |DATUM: Not Measured DRILL RIG: Geoprobe 6620DT TYPE Macro Bailer Sch40PVC |DATE START: 02/07/2024 GROUND WATER LEVEL: 6.53' DIAM. 2.0" 0.75" 1.0" DATE FINISH: 02/07/2024 MEASURING PT.: Ground Surface Sample Yes No | ----- DRILLER: M. Wink DATE: 02/08/2024 Screen} ----- | ---- 10.0' INSPECTOR: R. Gray Peak Unified Depth |Sample} PID Soil GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION REMARKS (feet) ID (ppm) | Class. bkg=0.0| System 1 Asphalt R= 3.0 5 (8 4.0") Br c-f S; fgmts brk, conc, cndr, wd No Odor 3 0-5' 0.0 ‘ ' ; Brown coarse to fine SAND: fragments brick, concrete, cinders, wood Dry 4 5 6 Same as above R= 2.75' 7 5-7 0.0" Dry / No Odor 8 WET 9 | 7-10 | 72 er) : Br Gr c-f S, | Cly$; fgmts glass, metal Petro Odors 10 Brown Gray coarse to fine SAND, little Clayey Silt; fragments glass, metal (+ 10.0') 11 Gr Gn cf S, 1 Cly$, tf G R= 4.0' 12 10- 12.5) 24.3 Gray Green coarse to fine SAND, little Clayey Silt, trace fine Gravel WET 13 Petro Odor 14 |125-15 1.3 (# 12.5) “ . Br vvd C Dry 15 Brown varved CLAY No odor 16 End of Soil Boring @ 15.0' 17 18 19 20 Groundwater Sample Collected @ 10.0 feet Soil Boring Completed @ 15.0 feet Shipping Address: 1476 Route 50 Ballston Spa, NY 12020 (518) 884-8545 - Phone NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCE D.P.C TEST BORING LOG Boring No. B-6 PROJECT: 33-37 Caroline Street Saratoga Springs, NY SHEET NO.: 1 of 1 CLIENT: Cronan Dempsey- Cronan Development JOB NO.: 23.1211015 DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Northeastern Environmental Technologies Corporation M.P. ELEV.: Not Measured PURPOSE: Subsurface Investigation GR. ELEV.: Not Measured Mailing Address: P.O. Box 2167 Ballston Spa, NY 12020 (518) 884-9710 - Fax DRILLING METHOD: Direct Push Soil Sample GW Sample Sample Method |DATUM: Not Measured DRILL RIG: Geoprobe 6620DT TYPE Macro Tube SP-16 DATE START: 02/07/2024 GROUND WATER LEVEL: ¢ 8.0' DIAM. 2.0" 0.375" 1.0" DATE FINISH: 02/07/2024 MEASURING PT.: Ground Surface Sample Yes No | ----- DRILLER: M. Wink DATE: 02/07/2024 Screen} ----- | ----- 4.0' INSPECTOR: R. Gray Peak Unified Depth |Sample} PID Soil GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION REMARKS (feet) ID (ppm) | Class. bkg=0.0| System 1 Concrete R= 3.2' 2 (+ 4.0") Bre-fS No Odor 3 Oo: Op Brown coarse to fine SAND Dry = ee _ (£2555 a Br c-f S, t $; fgmts wd, brk, conc 5 Brown coarse to fine SAND; fragments wood, brick, concrete 6 R= 2.5' 7 we 7.0) Bre-fS,1$ No Odor 8 5 - 10' . . . Brown coarse to fine SAND, little Silt WET 9 10 "1 R= 4.0' 12 | 10-14' (11.5) - Gr Gne-f $,1Cly $,tfG No Odor tS |Gray Green coarse to fine SAND, little Clayey Silt, trace fine Gravel WET ; (£ 14.0’) 14 14-15 BrwdC 15 Brown varved CLAY Dry 16 End of Soil Boring @ 15.0' 17 18 19 20 Groundwater Sample Collected @ 10.0 feet Soil Boring Completed @ 15.0 feet Shipping Address: 1476 Route 50 Ballston Spa, NY 12020 (518) 884-8545 - Phone NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCE D.P.C TEST BORING LOG Boring No. HA-1 PROJECT: 33-37 Caroline Street Saratoga Springs, NY SHEET NO.: 1 of 1 CLIENT: Cronan Dempsey- Cronan Development JOB NO.: 23.1211015 DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Northeastern Environmental Technologies Corporation M.P. ELEV.: Not Measured PURPOSE: Subsurface Investigation GR. ELEV.: Not Measured DRILLING METHOD: Direct Push Soil Sample GW Sample Sample Method DATUM: Not Measured DRILL RIG: Geoprobe 6620DT TYPE Macro DATE START: 02/08/2024 GROUND WATER LEVEL: ----- DIAM. 2.0" DATE FINISH: 02/08/2024 MEASURING PT..: ----- Sample Yes No DRILLER: M. Wink DATE: ----- Screen INSPECTOR: R. Gray Depth (feet) Sample ID Peak PID (ppm) bkg=0.0 Unified Soil Class. System GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION REMARKS 5.1 6.3 5.4 Concrete Brc-fS Brown coarse to fine SAND 4.0") Br c-f S; Irg fgmts brk, rk Brown coarse to fine SAND; large fragments brick, rock (4 3.0") R= 5.0" No Odor Dry 19 20 End of Soil Boring @ 5.0' Soil Boring Completed @ 5.0 feet Shipping Address: Mailing Address: 1476 Route 50 Ballston Spa, NY 12020 P.O. Box 2167 Ballston Spa, NY 12020 (518) 884-8545 - Phone (518) 884-9710 - Fax EXHIBIT B-2 MONITORING WELL LOGS NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NE PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCE D.P.C. PROJECT NO.: 23.1211015 MONITORING WELL COMPLETION LOG WELLNO. B-5 PROJECT: 33-37 Caroline Street Saratoga Springs, NY DATE DRILLED: 2/7/2024 CLIENT: Cronan Dempsey- Cronan Development DATE DEVELOPED: 2/8/2024 Clean Sand SCREEN ||FILTER PACK WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAIL PVC Ele. NM Ground Ele. NM 0.0' [ree Robert Gray WELL TYPE: Monitoring WATER LEVEL: 6.53' £4,75' MEASURING POINT: Top of PVC WELL DEPTH: + 14.75" BORING DEPTH: 15.0° WDRILLING METHOD: TYPE: Direct Push WCASING: N/A SAMPLING METHOD: TYPE: Macro Core N/A INTERVAL: Continuous ‘WRISER PIPE LEFT IN PLACE: NOT TO SCALE fir RIAL: Sch40PVC LENGTH: 10.0' MATERIAL: Sch40PVC SLOT SIZE: 10 Slot WFILTER PACK: TYPE: Sand GRADE: #1 AMOUNT: 25 lbs SEALS: TYPE: Bentonite TYPE: Sand NM = Not Measured DATE: DIAMETER: DIAMETER: FALL: DIAMETER: JOINT TYPE: DIAMETER: INTERVAL: STRAEGIC UNIT SCREENED: Varved clay, sand and silt INTERVAL: INTERVAL: INTERVAL: INTERVAL: Monitoring well flush with ground surface, no road box installed DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Northeastern Environmental Tech. Corp. 2/8/2024 2.0" 2.0" N/A 1.0" Flush Thread 1.0" + 4.75 - 14.75" +2.0-14.75° +10-20 to00-10 Shipping Address: Mailing Address: P.O. Box 2167 NEENVIRONMENTALTECH.COM 1476 Route 50 Ballston Spa, NY 12020 Ballston Spa, NY 12020 APPENDIX C GPR SURVEY DATA NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NE PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY fn GPR Summary Report Project Name: Grid 0 Survey Date: 2024-02-05 Report Date: 2024-02-06 Client: Cronan J. Dempsey Site Description: 33-37 Caroline Street Saratoga Springs, NY Additional Comments: Enter text here This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. Figure 1 Figure 2 wn Slice(ft)0.000-0.328.png 20 5 0! 45 25 30 35 40 45 Slice(ft)0.328-0.656.png 20 25 on °o a 30 3s 40 45 Grid 0-GRID 0.gfp Slice: 0.000-0.326 ft Lines: Mixed X and Y Vek 0. Freq: 2 WHE Settings S%: 100 C%:0 Bg: total DME: on,on,on AmpEq: Auto (S:0 Interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: [214 x 316]@ 0.200 ft Palette: jet Collected Analyzed: 2024-02 Grd 0-GRID 0.gfp Slice: 0.328-0.656 ft Settings S%: 100 C%:0 BgS: total DME: on,on.on This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. Figure 3 Figure 4 Z Slice(ft)0.656-0.984.png 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Slice(ft)0.984-1.312.png 5 10 1S 20 25 30 35 40 45 Grid 0-GRID 0.ofp Slice: 0.656-0.986 ft Lines: Mixed X and Y Vek 0,328 fins Freq: 250 MHz Settings S%: 100 C%:0 Bgs: total DME: on,on,on AmpEa: Auto (S:0.88 A:5.6 M:74) Interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: [214 x 316]@ 0.200 ft Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-06 Gnd 0-GRID 0.gfp Slice: 0.984-1.312 ft Lines: Mixed X and Y Vek 0,328 fins Freq: 250 MHz Settings. S%: 100 C%:0 BgS: total DME: on,on.on AmpEq: Auto (S:0.88 A:5.6 M:74 interp Im: 3.750 ft Res: (214 x 316}@ 0.200 # Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed; 2024-02-06 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. Figure 5 Figure 6 wn Slice(ft)1.312-1.640.png 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Slice(ft)1.640-1.969.png 0 5 10 1S 20 25 30 35 40 45 Grid 0-GRID 0.ofp Slice: 1.312-1.640 ft Lines: Mixed X and Y Freq: 250 MHz Settings S%: 100 C%:0 BgS: total DME: on,on,on AmpEq: Auto (S:0.88 A:5.6 M74 Interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: [214 x 316]@ 0.200 Palette: jet Gnd 0-GRID 0.9fp Slice: 1.640-1.969 ft Lines: Mixed X and Y Vek 0,328 fi/ns Freq: 250 MHz Settings S%: 100 C%:0 BgS: total DME: on,on.on AmpEq: Auto (S:0.88 A:5.6 M:74 interp Im: 3.750 ft Res: (214 x 316}@ 0.200 f Palette: jet Collected: 2024 02-06 Analyzed: 2024 2024-02-06 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. Slice(ft)1.969-2.297.png ft 0 5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 60 numba Grid 0-GRID 0.9fp Slice: 97 ft 55 50 Settings 45 S%: 100 C%;0 BgS: total DME: on,on.on 40 i Res: [214 x 316]@ 0.200 ft 38 Palette: jet Collected: 2024 = Analyzed: 2024 2s 20 1§ 10 0 Figure 7 Slice(ft)2.297-2.625.png it 0 5 10 1S 20 25 30 35 40 45 60 = Hee 55 50 Settings 45 S%: 100 C%: 0 BgS: total DME: on,on.on 40 4 3s * Analyzed: 2024-02-06 25 20 15 10 0 Figure 8 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. Figure 9 Figure 10 Slice(ft)2.625-2.953.png 30 5 2 25 35 40 45 uiemiitoinn Slice(ft)2.953-3.281.png 20 25 30 35 on °o a 40 45 Hee Settings S%: 100 C%:0 BgS: total DME: on,on,on AmpEq: Auto (S:0.88 interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: [214 x 316]@ 0.200 t Palette: jet Collected; 2024 Analyzed: 2024 -GRID 0.gfp 81 ft Settings S$%: 100 C%:0 BgS: total DME: on,on.on This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. Figure 11 Figure 12 Slice(ft)3.281-3.609.png 25 30 35 40 45 rime BgS: total Palette: jet Collected: 2024 Analyzed: 2024 Grid 0-GRID 0.ofp Settings S%: 100 C%;0 DME: on,on.on AmpEq: Auto (S:0 interp lim: 3 Res: [214 x 316]@ 0.200 ft 750 ft Ra Slice(ft)3.609-3.937.png 20 25 30 35 5 10 15 40 45 Tn BgS: total Analyzed: 20 Grd 0-GRID 0.gfp T ft Settings $%: 100 C%:0 DME: on,on.on This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. aM 2 + 8 sola stele meal LINEY0.png s nm Ung CW) Ver C120 2s 5% 197 0% 2 DZS Hew OUR omer as Asn tien EO) AGING) CPs Figure 13 LINEY1.png “ Une A Vet 0.023 tos 59) 0% 3 Bid OE on ees Gan Are 158.0 A62N S4) Ce Figure 14 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEY2.png y ren ew Se sf & a ir ¢ is Uns JNCY? Var 6.220 ts SB 10) 0% 2 Ege bel OUR cee ss snug SOT GING) Cm Figure 15 LINEY3.png a | Une UMS? Met C022 fos SO) Ce) Rpm OE cnteo Gan Aue A$.2N $4) Come Figure 16 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEY4.png tren am Une ANd Var 6220 try B97 0% 2 BS iw OUR cael ss Gyn uR AGIAN Gt) Cease Figure 17 LINEY5.png Une MESS Net C123 tos SO) Ce Bg id OE once: Gs7 Are ADIN SS) Cm Figure 18 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEY6.png sw nereaoixe &» & War 6222 tes Se 10) 0% 7 BES Fe OWE cmeess GSN uen I59 AGING) Chm Figure 19 LINEY7.png a us ur WT ee a Une MENT Net C12R tos SO) Cae Bgkid VE onee.os Gea ture REO ALIN S) Cae Figure 20 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEY8.png * nereaoeox Dd # Pa SD ra | Une UNCVD Var 6920 tes 5% 197 0% 2 BS Hew OUR cmee3s Asn tien EO AGING) CPs Figure 21 LINEY9.png Une 4 Vet 0.23 tos 5 990 0% 3 Bind WE on ees G50 Are AG.2N $4) Chae This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEY10.png i aeuare six os #& wv a Lee UNTV AG Vee 2120 Are GI ICO OK OgG Teta) DUT ee iy Gale hat (Ges 1 eSs} GF Rene Figure 23 LINEY11.png 4 l Lec UMTYY ‘Wet 3500 fire SI: 166 C5: f Opt cote! DME eeor.on Gelr dat (50 HAS WEED CF hone Figure 24 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEY12.png i aeneitinxeiiaenn Dd & @ Wet 1120 Me GI ICO OK Dg sole) DUE eet ony Gale at (G0 OS est} OF Rone Figure 25 LINEY14.png 2 + z ar’ . } 4 oa k s - mw w a ne a ai e a ir a CT ee Lire: UNE Y94 ‘et 3500 Aire SR: 106 C8: f Gg rete) DME reot.0n Gebr dat (50 HAS WS4p 6 bone Figure 26 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEY15.png i eanrteixkx » #* B 6 Wee TOON ANE GI ICO CR Og vols) DUT ee en Gel det (i es Diese} OF Rona Figure 27 LINEX0.png 2 +t z Pe ae, : & 4“ alae ctoalan aa r : t r WT t en tie I = = 3 =" 2 ae = - 2 46S F aw> as= ac= ase = = ad Se 20> : > te l Une Ae Yet 0 1G0 Ribe SHE C6 Bet eel DME cronce Gebc bei SOR AEDUS4) CF tere lw Figure 28 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEX1.png wen em & we a “a veikae sidinean Hie To c a e te e n y ) an y at e r Rg | Une MOY Wer A220 mire. GIS: He) CMH Byte ney! DUT ae nace Gabe Aas (G0 tae 4) TF tere = o a ra oe Ta en eT 5 si n e me e e ae r a Une MOS “vet 0700 Aire S18: 100 C%- 6 Bed eel DMT oronce Gekc Met (S081 A559 54) Ce tere Figure 30 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEX3.png een em S z Er = y n eu slay Perret " ’ v a | Ung ADC. Wet AION Mike. Gis HG C6 Oph mew! DUT ar nae Gabe Gath 160 Bt ach wat CF heme Figure 31 LINEX4.png @ u ae « ir a Ca 5 si n e me e e ae r a Lie De Set 0 7G0 Aire SIR: 100 O86 Bee wee DMT cronce Gabe Aen (S081 ASD U54) Ce tere Figure 32 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEX5.png sw & a P | ay em a oy ” Te m e te e s an at e r ra | Une MOO: Ver TON Aire. GIS HO CRG Beh ney) DUT ae are Gabe fads 160 FA ae = Figure 33 LINEX6.png v Tu ee @ u aw a ir a Une UO vet 0700 Aire SR: 100 OO Bee wen DME cronce Gabe An (S081 AS 5 ¥54) Ce tere This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEX7.png Pr; 4 sf & aso Ww Hi eR HD LE Ae n sechiae stdin tu n a a v s ” To m e te e s an s a t a e ry | Ung MOT Vet 0 Co0 ire. Gi: le CH Oph ney! DMT ae nace Gee huts (G0 Tt acs P54) CF tere = Figure 35 LINEX8.png 2 + 2 eer’ . y “4 ee ee = 8 Se Ma Te o ir a CT Una a) vet 0.200 Aire 3 Bs Hd CHG Gps tel DME sr orce Gabe dete (S081 AS 3 W54) CF tone Figure 36 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEX9.png ™ v al id a a a = * a = 2 a Pe) » 2 ww “a fT ¥ a 7 as nM “ tu n a = = % 2 = ap met 3 t= Een =th a | Une MCR pr A220 Aire. GIS: 10 CKO Get wey DUD ae nace Gabe As GAR asset (eter Te Figure 37 LINEX10.png t 2 Teer’ . j 4 P - 2 9 P 2 4 a as ae Pre 20D a5= ace as= = = hd ae s0= : > = | Lee: UNEXOD Mab C008 thas Si 092 Ot Ago CHE oo cre Ger dan SE ASIN GL) Chrome = Figure 38 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEX11.png sen Bw Se so ee 2 Be Te m e te e s an at e r Ver CB tees ST Oe 7 Ogee COR en om Geran EN AGING Cham = Figure 39 LINEX12.png v Po oe @ u = « ra | Lec UMEN=2 Web C120 thos Si 32 C4) Sigs tawt OUE on cna Gere dum SE A 4 ING) Come Figure 40 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEX13.png renee dD we BD we ae “a veikae sitinean ae F Feo Een 405 : * 71 Like DAT X*) Vet 1.8 tes 5 0 66D Agi COD eee Geren SE AR INGE Chee i Figure 41 LINEX14.png f ee 2 * 4 ’ x 4 * * . 4 4 4y ‘ y a vaa hue tae r i n r fm rt " r 7 m n f “ v as= a e 2 a at= ast Sen ae = Lire UNEX> 4 Vet 0209 tees SH 09) 0% 0 Bat tet COR coon Gorden (dt AGING) Come Figure 42 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEX15.png reonrRei xe +e BP ee YD = et nf Y marr er Ween oye) To m e te e n y ) an at a e ri | Not WE OR Pas SOO GD DGS COP cn ceo Gym auee SEG ING CPaae = Figure 43 LINEX16.png v Te Mo n e a) a OS ve Ls ou « - & = Ww & « ir a Te Vet (209 tees S092 0%) Bgt tet COR coon Ger Aen (St AGING) Chome This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEX17.png reanreik tb # YP DD WwW tt *R Bom n reer n ” a | Une UNEX ST Ver 1008 tes SOOT G8) AFI CPR cee Gyr duee SBN IN GL Chae Figure 45 LINEX18.png ih e , te Ge = i = TC T Th o « > 5 ci n e ee e me s m a 1 Le: UNE 0D Wet 909 toys S097 0% 0 Sgt tt COR co cnet Ger den (SAIN) Come Figure 46 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEX19.png ene so sf ee Bw To m e te e s an ea t e r Line UNEXS WOE 1.008 tens SM ODT 68) AFI CPD once Ayden SBN AGING Chae = Figure 47 LINEX20.png @ uw ar e a ir a ee Te ae = Lire: UHEX2) Vet 0.928 tees 3% 092 0% 0 Sgt tet COR co cre Ger Aen (SS IN Gt) Chrome Figure 48 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEX21.png ™ v w 7 a a ae =a ms I sae Lo 2 3 : . : , B aa “a F Feo Een 405 3 * if Vet OR tes 5% 998 6) Ossie COD oem Geren S80 4G ING CPeme i Figure 49 LINEX22.png " ogi sth 2 2+ ‘ i ra] a value atwlen aya r i 7" r Mf ras Ou « -» mw Fi a r Z v r T r t u Ta e CO T E Th e e « ir a | Lie: UNEX22 Vet 0.008 ts S099 OD BgSs tet CHE cm cnr Geren So ASIN) Creme Figure 50 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEX23.png e a 2 2 Fay | Line: UNEX2) Web 0108 tes SDT 68) AFI CPP once Gyre SBN AGING Cham Figure 51 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. fn GPR Summary Report Project Name: Grid 1 Survey Date: 2024-02-05 Report Date: 2024-02-07 Client: Cronan J. Dempsey Site Description: 33-37 Caroline Street Saratoga Springs, NY Additional Comments: This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. Slice(ft)0.000-0.328.png 35 40 Grid 1-GRID 1.0fp Slice: 0.000-0.328 ft Lines: Mixed X and ¥ Vel: 0.328 fl/ns Freq: 250 MHz Settings $%: 100 C%:0 BgS: total DME: on,on,on Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 Figure 1 Slice(ft)0.328-0.656.png 25 30 35 40 Grid 1-GRID 1.¢fp Settines S%: 100 C%:0 BoS: total DIME: on,on.on Amp€q: Auto (S:0.98 A:7.3 M114 Interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: [211 x 235}@ 0.200 ft Figure 2 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. Slice(ft)0.656-0.984.png 20 25 30 35 40 Grid 1-GRID 1.9fp Slice: 0.656-0.984 ft a Lines: Mixed X and ¥ Vel, 0.328 fi/ns 35 Freq: 250 MHz | Settings 20 5%: 100 C%:0 BgS: total DIME: on,on,on 25 AmpEa: Auto (S:0.98 A:7.3 M:114) Interp lim: 3.750 ft 4 - Res: [211 x 235}@ 0.200 fi 20 J Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 Figure 3 Slice(ft)0.984-1.312.png 25 30 35 40 Grid 1-GRID 1.9fp Slice: 0.984-1.312 ft Lines: Mixed X and ¥ Vel: 0.228 fllns Freq: 250 MHz Settings S%: 100 C%:0 BoS: total DIME: on,on,on Amp€q: Auto (S:0.98 A:7.3 M114) Interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: (211 x 235}@ 0.200 ft >» RRR Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 Figure 4 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. Figure 5 Figure 6 Slice(ft)1.312-1.640.png 15 20 25 30 35 40 Grid 1-GRID 1.9fp Slice: 1.312-1.640 ft 40 Lines: Mixed X and ¥ Vel, 0.328 fi/ns 35 Freq: 250 MHz | la Settings 20 | | $%: 100 C%:0 | ; mm BgS: total i —— : DIE: on,on,on 25 , AmpEa: Auto (S:0.98 A:7.3 M:114) Interp lim: 3.750 ft 4 Res; [211 x 235)@ 0.200 fi 20 | | ) | Palette: jet | Collected: 2024-02-06 1s A | Analyzed: 2024-02-07 Slice(ft)1.640-1.969.png 40 Grid 1-GRID 1.9fp Slice: 1.640-1.969 ft Lines: Mixed X and Vel: 0.328 flns Freq: 250 MHz Settings S%: 100 C%:0 BgS: total DME: on,on,on AmpEq: Auto (S:0.98 A:7.3 M:114) Interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: (211 x 235)@ 0.200 ft Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. Slice(ft)1.969-2.297.png 40 Grid 1-GRID 1.0fp Slice: 1.989-2.297 ft Lines: Mixed X and ¥ Vel, 0.328 fi/ns Freq: 250 MHz Settings $%: 100 C%:0 BgS: total DME: on,on,on AmpEa: Auto (S:0.98 A:7.3 M:114) Interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: [211 x 235)@ 0.200 fi Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 Figure 7 Slice(ft)2.297-2.625.png 20 25 30 35 40 Grid 1-GRID 1.9fp Slice: 2.297-2.625 ft Lines: Mixed X and Vel: 0.328 fllns Freq: 250 MHz Settings S%: 100 C%:0 BoS: total DME: on,on,on AmpEq: Auto (S:0.98 A:7.3 M114) Interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: [211 x 235)@ 0.200 ft 20 Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 Figure 8 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. Slice(ft)2.625-2.953.png Figure 9 Slice(ft)2.953-3.281.png 0 =) 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Grid 1-GRID 1.9fp Slice: 2.953-3.281 ft Lines: Mixed X and ¥ Vel: 0.328 flns Freq: 250 MHz Settings S%: 100 C%:0 BoS: total DME: on,on,on Amp€q: Auto (S:0.98 A:7.3 M114) Interp iim: 3.750 ft Res: [211 x 235)@ 0.200 ft Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 Figure 10 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. Figure 11 Figure 12 Slice(ft)3.281-3.609.png 20 25 30 35 40 Grid 1-GRID 1.9fp Slice: 3.281-3.809 ft Lines: Mixed X and ¥ Vel: 0.328 fllns Freq: 250 MHz Settings $%: 100 C%:0 _ BgS: total DME: on,on,on AmpEa: Auto (S:0.98 A:7.3 M114 Interp im: 3.750 ft Res: [211 x 235)@ 0.200 fi mm Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 Slice(ft)3.609-3.937.png 40 Grid 1-GRID 1.¢fp Slice: 3.609-3.937 ft 3 Lines: Med X and ¥ Vel; 0.328 flns - 250 MHz 3 Freq: 250 MH Settings S%: 100 C%:0 BoS: total DME: on,on,on AmpEq: Auto (S:0.98 A:7.3 M114 Interp lim: 3.750 ft / Res: [211 x 235}@ 0.200 ft 205 : | OW Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. Slice(ft)3.937-4.265.png Figure 13 LINEY0.png 17 is wo 2 * Lin NEYO Vel OOD Rie 50.102 CM. Sef: eu OME chee Cam Ade tO STARS ett) CP bate we Figure 14 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEY1.png 7 nahi nznwaems s HEV? Vel 0.308 Mires SH 102 CM: 2 Bytom Dee: Can: Aste (5.097483 ¥e111) Ch bore n O4,50 Figure 15 LINEY2.png B® fH 2H BH aie LNEVD Ved 0.222 Mink BML 10) CML BySitour DME none Cam sate 002402 111) Choon Figure 16 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEY3.png 2m 2 ‘Vel 0.208 Mies SH 102 CM 2 ByS: tomy OME onosen Com Aste (0 97AE Suet) Ch bore Figure 17 LINEY4.png ® tH 02 HH BH EVE Vo 0.222 fink SH. 10] CML 2 BySi tour DME an onen Cam Auto O02AG2 111) Choad Figure 18 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEY5.png 7 Ss 2 2 HEVS Vel 0.308 Nive SH. 10) CM: 2 ByS:teon Dee: Cam Aste (5099482 ¥e111) Ch bore Figure 19 LINEY6.png Bs TH D0 uM BB eine. KEV E Vid 0.222 Mins SH. 10] CM. ByS. tot DME anonen Can Aste 09248.2 0111) Chbore Figure 20 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEY7.png D FF 2 Bes Ss Se eS os ON Line LINEV? Vel 0.308 firs 3%. 102 C22 BgS:teoy DME onosen Cam Aste (LO 97ASS¥c111) CPbowre zs Mw ES 0 Figure 21 LINEY8.png 6 Tf 02 HM Bw BH aint: LKEVE Vit 0.222 Mins SH. 10] CM. BySi tou DME an onen Can Aste 092482 0111) Chbare This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEY9.png nn nme 2 Ube UNEVS Vel 0.202 Mis SH: 102 CM: 2 ByS tow DME on osen Can Aste (SO 97AESue111) Ch bore Figure 23 LINEY10.png BsHHHaAaH HR SE S Aine LAS Y1o ‘Vet 0223 tira S86 70d C&O Ags hte DHE concn on Cal: Aula (EAs IT) Cenc Figure 24 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEY11.png 7 n2eoaew & Vet 0.222 fire SS: "00 C%0 BgS td DUE oncnor Coin: duis (S30 a8 2Neint) Orrenc Figure 25 LINEY12.png Bs fH 0H BH HM bing. LS y12 Vet 0.228 tire S85 100 CK. Ege bid DEES oscaon Cab: Aula (EASE MIT) Cte - Figure 26 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEY13.png 7 . n2eReaew Une. LINE'S Vet 0228 fire SS: 100 CN Bgs ted DHE: oncn on Con: Aula (S300 a8 2 In) Omzerc Figure 27 LINEY14.png CsHHHaBaH HM SE S inc. LEY 14 Vet 0 222 tira £65 500 C&O Ege bid DMEZoscn on Cain: Aula (SARE IT) Cer Figure 28 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEY15.png 7 nrRreaaAaxwseseseas BN S Vet 0928 Mire S86: 100 C% 0 BgS td DUE: onenor Coit: Auls (S30 a8 2 NIT) Omtenc = LINEX0O.png B® fH D2 MH BH HM t 3 8 TO M O CT ee = = ed pl w s & & wo m me n e HED Wot 0525 Wee £100 CK 0 BGS toll OVE ca onos Cain aun (000668 Mart) Choon Figure 30 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEX1.png 1n2e2ane s&s = LINER Net O S25 Uke S% 120 CN 0 BES solal OVE caonoy Cain Au (30.90 4088 Mitt} Chee s TW Mi i Me m e We a p o n s at e & 8 % Figure 31 dine LIKED Vel $528 ee 8% 100 CK 0 BGS tial OVE cn ono Gain Aum (SOA AE MTt) Chace 3 a 8 a = = = a Figure 32 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEX3.png n2e2anes s&s & Ti ME M Me e LINE? Vet 0525 Wee S% P20 CN 0 BGS toll OVE caonoy Cain Au (50.90 488 M11} Chinen Figure 33 LINEX4.png CsHHHaRaHaHKH Ee SEH BS 7 3 a 2 s = - MM U IE OC s & ® we o m a e e * sine) LIKE Wet 0528 es £% 100 CX 0 Bge telat OVE on ono Cain Au S006 8-11) Choome This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEX5.png 1n2e2aes & rt 3B 8 s eC He s s pa e t e n t e & 8 % LINENS Vet 0525 Vie S% P20 CN 0 BGS toll OVE ca onoy Cain uo (50.90 488 M11} Chmene Figure 35 LINEX6.png 1 tT 2 2 = o 5 a MC R CU E OM = = = ER Vol 0528 Dee £% 100 CK 0 BGS toll OVE on onoy Cain Aina (S000468 M2) Choos Figure 36 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEX7.png 7 BmamaHerReaAaew & ft HEX? Vet 0525 Wee S% 100 CX 0 BES wll OVE caonoy Cain Au (3090486 M11) Chea a = = % & & Li we ma n e Figure 37 LINEX8.png 1 tT 2 2 Dee $4. 100 CH 0 Bye. slat OME on ono Cain Aum S0S0AGEMA1t) Chace 2 5 = o w TR U S IC E ) OM s & ® wa i t e Figure 38 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEX9.png ne2eoaoewms &s ts SLINERD Vet 0525 Wee S% 120 CH 0 BGS wwial OVE ca onoy Cain Au (30.90 468 Mnrt} Chinen as s % & & iw Mm at e Figure 39 LINEX10.png ® tf 02 7H BH Une. LNEX1O Vel 2.323 Ras BS 10D CHO ByS: ow! ONE in oece Cain Auto (E000 4S.E M111) CP bane 2 a aw TR C N CI R C E ) OM Figure 40 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEX11.png 7 1 15 1 2B 2 2323 Nis S% 10D CH 0 SyS: woo) OWE cnecen Gan Aude (0 90A8.6 4 111) CPbone Figure 41 LINEX12.png Ung. LINEN {2 Vel 2.523 Ris BR 10D CHO ByS: ul ONE Wy once Con Auto (E000 4S.8 HK t11) Ch bam Figure 42 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. Te MU R 2 e eC uw s % & & a 2 LINEX13.png 7 Lx] nnanwae -s rt 3B 8 a = = % & 8 EE C 2 Line: LEN 1S Wel 2.322 Mes SH 10D CH 2 ByS: was) OME een Can Auto (2090485 111) CPB Figure 43 LINEX14.png BH DH BB MR R Te y 2 5 = w s & wo m a n s & Ane. LEX 14 Wel 3.523 Ris BR 100 C8. 0 ByS: tow! ONE in escn Cain Auto (E00 4a.8 tt) Ch ban This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEX15.png 7 26 ft nneRrmanmws \ ft Line. LEXIS Wel 3.522 Rive 8% 10D CH 2 SySt aa!) OWE megcn Can Aue (50 SDASEM 111) CP bone s ee He a pa e n i at e & 8 % Figure 45 LINEX16.png du ww M Ling. LUREN 18 Wel 2.323 Ris BH 10D CHO By: ous! ONE in oecd Gain Auto (E00 AME tt) Chbane Figure 46 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEX17.png 7 6 tS nna en 3 TU 2 z ss #05 bad as= = = TNE = ne fe ao= = = = z 17 Wel 2522 Nis 8% 10D CH 0 SyS: wows) OWE once Can Aude (50 9048.50 111) CP bone Figure 47 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. fn GPR Summary Report Project Name: Grid 2 Survey Date: 2024-02-05 Report Date: 2024-02-07 Client: Cronan J. Dempsey Site Description: 33-37 Caroline Street Saratoga Springs, NY Additional Comments: This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. Figure 1 Figure 2 30 25 20 10 30 25 20 15 Slice(ft)0.328-0.656.png 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Grid 2-GRID 2.9fp Slice: 0.328-0.656 ft Lines: Mixed X and Y Vel: 0.328 fl'ns Freq: 250 MHz Seitings $%: 100 C%: 0 BaS: total DME: on,on,on Amp€Ea: Auto (S:1.28 4:38.68 M292) interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: [158 x 184])@ 0.200 ft Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 Slice(ft)0.656-0.984.png o on 10 15 20 25 30 Thiniig Grid 2-GRID 2.9fp Slice: 0.656-0.934 ft Lines: Mixed X and Y Vel: 0.328 fins Freq: 250 MHz Settings S%: 100 C%: 0 BgS: iotal DME: on,on.on AmpEq: Auto (3:1.26.4:8.6 M292) interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: [158 x 184]@ 0.200 ff Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. Figure 3 Figure 4 30 25 20 10 30 25 20 15 10 Slice(ft)0.984-1.312.png 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Grid 2-GRID 2.9fp Slice: 0.984-1,312 ft Lines: Mixed X and Y Vel: 0.328 fins Freq: 250 MHz Seitings $%: 100 C%: 0 BaS: total DME: on,on,on AmpEq: Auto (S:1.28 A:8.8 M292) interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: [158 x 184])@ 0.200 ft Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 Slice(ft)1.312-1.640.png 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Grid 2-GRID 2.9fp Slice: 1.312-1.840 ft Lines: Mixed X and ¥ Vel: 0.328 fins Freq: 250 MHz Settings $%: 100 C%: 0 BgS: iotal DME: on,on.on AmpEq: Auto (S:1.26.4:8.6 M:292) interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: [158 x 184]@ 0.200 ff Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 (P R O RO R O S R O R MO R RU R OU RR R S R O MO R OR H RR RO E R N I M R R E R U R H R R O R U U MU S R H R R U R R U R R R M E R R E R ) This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. Figure 5 Figure 6 30 25 20 10 30 25 20 15 Slice(ft)1.640-1.969.png 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Grid 2-GRID 2.9fp Slice: 1.640-1,969 ft Lines: Mixed X and Y Vel: 0.328 flns Freq: 250 MHz Seitings $%: 100 C%: 0 BaS: total DME: on,on,on AmpEq: Auto (S:1.28 A:8.8 M292} interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: [158 x 184])@ 0.200 ft Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 PE E Slice(ft)1.969-2.297.png 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Grid 2-GRID 2.9fp Slice: 1.989-2.297 ft Lines: Mixed X and Y Vel: 0.328 fins Freq: 250 MHz Settings S%: 100 C%: 0 BgS: iotal DME: on,on.on AmpEq: Auto ($:1.26.4:3.6 M:292) interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: [153 x 184]@ 0.200 ft Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 (P R O OO R R S R O RM OR RU S H RR R SR O M U R UR N RR RR O R N IM O RO H OH H H RR R E U MU R R H R R O R R R R R R M E R R E R ) This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. Figure 7 Figure 8 30 25 20 15 10 10 Slice(ft)2.297-2.625.png 15 20 25 30 Slice(ft)2.625-2.953.png Grid 2-GRID 2.9fp Slice: 2.297-2.625 ft Lines: Mixed X and ¥ Vel: 0.328 fl'ns Freq: 250 MHz Settings S%: 100 C%: 0 Bg: total DME: on,on,on AmpEa: Auto (S:1.28 4:38.68 M292) Interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: [158 x 184)@ 0.200 ff Palette: jet Collected; 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 Grid 2-GRID 2.9fp Slice: 2.625-2.953 ft Lines: Mixed X and Y¥ Vel: 0.326 fins Freq: 250 MHz Settings $%: 100 C%:0 BgS: total DME: on,on.on AmpEq: Auto (S:1.26.4:8.6 M:292) Interp lim: 3,750 ft Res: [158 x 184]@ 0.200 ft Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. Figure 9 Figure 10 30 25 20 15 10 Slice(ft)2.953-3.281.png 0 5 10 15 ‘tf | PE E 25 30 Tiinis Slice(ft)3.281-3.609.png Grid 2-GRID 2.9fp Slice: 2.953-3.281 ft Lines: Mixed X and ¥ Vel: 0.328 fl'ns Freq: 250 MHz Settings S%: 100 C%: 0 BaS: total DME: on,on,on AmpEa: Auto (S:1,28 4:98.68 M:292)} Interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: [158 x 184]@ 0.200 ft Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 Grid 2-GRID 2.9fp Slice: 3.281-3.809 ft Lines: Mixed X and Y Vel: 0.326 fins Freq: 250 MHz Settings $%: 100 C%: 0 BgS: total DME: on,on.on AmpEq: Auto (S:1.26.4:8.6 M:292) interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: [153 x 184]@ 0.200 ft Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. Figure 11 Figure 12 30 25 20 10 30 25 20 45 10 0 Slice(ft)3.609-3.937.png 15 20 25 30 Slice(ft)3.937-4.265.png 15 20 25 30 Grid 2-GRID 2.9fp Slice: 3.603-3,937 ft Lines: Mixed X and Y Vel: 0.328 flns Freq: 250 MHz Seitings $%: 100 C%: 0 BaS: total DME: on,on,on AmpEq: Auto (S:1,28 A:8.8 M292} interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: [158 x 1384])@ 0.200 ft Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 Grid 2-GRID 2.9fp Slice: 3.937-4.265 ft Lines: Mixed X and ¥ Vel: 0.328 fins Freq: 250 MHz Settings $%: 100 C%: 0 BgS: iotal DME: on,on.on AmpEq: Auto (S:1.26.4:8.6 M:292) interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: [158 x 184]@ 0.200 ff Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. Slice(ft)4.265-4.593.png 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Grid 2-GRID 2.9fp Slice: 4. 265-4593 ft Lines: Mixed X and ¥ Vel: 0.328 fins Freq: 250 MHz 30 25 Settings S%: 100 C%: 0 BgS: total DME: on,on,on AmpEa: Auto (S:1.264:3.6 M:292) interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: [158 x 184]@ 0.200 ft Palette: jet 20 15 Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 10 Figure 13 LINEY0.png Line: LEVEY Vet 0.522 Mites S% TOD C% 0 BgS' total OME: onceon Gan: Auto (S\0.984:30 M:277) CPbone Figure 14 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEY1.png ‘4 1s g Line: LINE’ 1 ‘Vet 0 S25 Ries S% 108 C%° 0 BigS: total OME: once on Gan: Aute (S056 4:80 M217) CPhone Figure 15 LINEY2.png 4 ] dem ivennana ft Line: LEVEY? Vet 0.325 fins S% 100 C%:0 BgS: total OME: onceon Gan: Auto (S0.S84:20 M:217) CP-bone Figure 16 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEY3.png 14 1s f Line: LINES Vet 0 S28 Ries S% 100 C%° 0 BgS:tntal OME: once on Gan: Auts (S056 4:80 M217) CPhone Figure 17 LINEY4.png 4 i] semaine ft Line: LEVEY4 Vet 0.325 fins S% 100 C%:0 BgS: total OME: on.ce.on Gan: Auto (S.S84:20 M:277) CP-bone Figure 18 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEY5.png f Line: LINEYS Vet 0. 325 Ries S% 108 C%° 0 BigS: total OME: once on Gan: Auto (S0.564:80 M217) CPhose Figure 19 LINEY6.png ft Line: LEVEY Vet 0.525 fins S% 100 C%:0 BgS: total OME: once.on Gam: Auto (S:0.S84:20 M:297) CP-bone Figure 20 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEY7.png ‘4 1§ f Line: LINE’? ‘Vet 0. S25 Ries S% 100 C%° 0 BigS: total OME: onceon Gan: Aut (S056 4:80 M217) CPhone Figure 21 LINEY8.png 4 ] smal vena ft Line: LEVEYS Vet 0.325 fins S% 100 C%: 0 BgS: total OME: once.on Gan: Auto (S:0.984:20 M:277) CPbone Figure 22 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEY9.png 14 1s f Line: LINE’ ‘Vet 0 S26 Ries S% 108 Cte 0 BgS:tntal OME: once on Gan: Auto (S058 450 M207) CPhone Figure 23 LINEY10.png 4 ] semaine ft Line: LIVEY 10 Vet 0.2 tins S% 100 C%: 0 BgS: total OME: on.on on Gain: Auto (S:0.9848 00217) CPbene Figure 24 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEY11.png 44 t2 i4 1§ f | Line LINNEY 1? Vet D328 mins S86 100 C%: 0 BS: total OME: nn oron Gan: 4ute (S:0.58 6.0297) CPbene Figure 25 LINEX0.png ft Line: LEYEXO Vel 0 228 tins S%: 100 C%: 0 BgS: ints) DME: omonon Gan Auto (3:0 934 3.0217) CP mone Figure 26 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEX1.png 14 1s 29 TO Pe U0 ad Line: LINES? Wel 0 S28 tyne S%° 100 CS: 0 BgS: tors! DME: om onnn Gar Auts (S058 AS 0u217) CP mone Figure 27 ft Line: LEVEX2 Vel 0 228 fins S%: 100 C%: 0 BgS: tots! DME: omonon Gam Auto (3:0 934 S3.0N217} CP Done Figure 28 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEX3.png 2% 29 COU EOE ea Line: LINES? Wel: 6 S28 tyne S%°100 C56: 8 BgS: tors! DME-sm enon Gar Auts (SOS AS 0 M21T) CP pone LINEX4.png ft Line: LEVEN4 Vel 0 228 tins S%: 100 C%:0 BgS: tote! DME omon.on Gam Auto (S:05543.0N217) CP pone | Figure 30 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEX5.png i4 1s 2% 29 Ton Ee 0 ad Line: LINERS Wel 6 228 tyne S%°100 CS: 8 Bg: tors! DME- om onon Gar Auts (SOS 450 U217%) CP mone Figure 31 LINEX6.png 4 i] dem ivetind ft Line: LEVENS Vel 0 228 Uns S%:1D0 C%:0 Bg: tote!) DME cmon.on Gam Auto (S:056A 3.0217) CP bone Figure 32 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEX7.png 14 1s Line: LINES? Wel: 0 S28 tyne S%°100 C56: 0 BgS: tors! DME- se onon Gar Auts (SO SAS 0U21T) CP Done Figure 33 LINEX8.png ft Line: LEVEN Vel 0 228 tins S%: 100 C%:0 BgS: tote!) DME cmon.on Gam Auto (S:05643.0M217) CP pone Figure 34 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEX9.png 14 18 Line: LINERS Wel: 0 228 tyne S%- 100 CS: 8 BgS: tors! DME: sm onnn Gar Auts (S056 43.0 M217) CP pone Figure 35 LINEX10.png 4 s] deal inetd ft Line: LIVES'0 Vel 0 328 *Uns S%: 100 C%: 0 BgS: total DWE: on.on.en Gain Auto {S:05845.0 M217) CP pone | Figure 36 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEX11.png 14 1s 2% 29 salar TEL ea Line: LES) Wel O Sat tins S%6° 100 C%:0 BS: tote DME so onen Gar Auto (S098 4°50 M217) CP bone Figure 37 LINEX12.png ft Line: LIVE12 Vel O S28 tUns S%: 100 C%: 0 BgS: total DWE: on.onen Gai Auto (3:0. 984 8.0U217) CP bone Figure 38 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEX13.png i4 1S f Line: LES) Wel O Sat tins S%6"100 C%:0 BgS: tote DME so on.en Gar Auto (S098 4°50 W217) CP bone ns Figure 39 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. fn GPR Summary Report Project Name: Project 0 Survey Date: 2024-02-05 Report Date: 2024-02-07 Client: Cronan J. Dempsey Site Description: 33-37 Caroline Street Saratoga Springs, NY Additional Comments: This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. Slice(ft)0.000-0.328.png 0 5 10 15 20 25 Perr eeeePrerer eerie birienins Figure 1 Slice(ft)0.328-0.656.png 0 5 10 15 20 25 PEPE EPP Ear eee Figure 2 Project 0-PROJECT 0.afp Slice: 0,000-0.328 ft Lines: Y only Vel: 0.328 flins Freq: 250 MHz Settings S%: 100 C%:0 BgS: total DIME: on,on,on AmpEq: Auto /[ Interp lim: 3.75 Res: [75 x 186 Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 W345 Project 0-PROJECT 0.gip Slice: 0.328-0.656 ft ‘only Vel: 0.328 fins Freq: 250 MHz Settings S%: 100 C%:0 BgS: tctal DME: on,on,on AmpEq: Auto (S:0.94 A:9 6 M3 interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: [75 x 1@ 0.200 f Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. Slice(ft)0.656-0.984.png 0 5 10 15 20 25 Per PeeeePr reer reer bernie Project 0-PROJECT 0.ofp Slice: 0.656-0.984 ft Lines: Y only Vel: 0.328 fllns Freq: 250 MHz Settings S%: 100 C%:0 BgS: tetal DME: on, 0n,on AmpEq: Auto (S:0.94 A:9.6 W:345) Interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: [75 x 186]@ 0.200 ft Palette: jet Figure 3 Slice(ft)0.984-1.312.png 0 s 10 15 20 25 PEPE EP ee Pare Project 0-PROJECT 0.gfp Slice: 0.984-1.312 ft Lines: Y only Vel: 0.328 filns Freq: 250 MHz Settings S%: 100 C%: 0 Bg: ictal DME: on,on,on AmpEq: Auto ($:0.94 A:9 6 Mf:345) interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: (75 « 188]@ 0.200 ft Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 Figure 4 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. Slice(ft)1.312-1.640.png 0 5 10 15 20 25 PerrPeeeePr ere reeee bir eenint Project 0-PROJECT 0.ofp Slice: 1,312-1.640 ft Lines: Y only Vel: 0.328 flns Freq: 250 MHz Settings S%: 100 C%:0 BgS: tetal DME: on,on,on AmpEq: Auto (S:0.94 A:9.6 W:345) Interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: [75 x 186]@ 0.200 ft Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 Figure 5 Slice(ft)1.640-1.969.png 15 20 25 PPE EP EPP are eee eee Project 0-PROJECT 0.cfp Slice: 1,640-1.969 ft Lines: Y only Vel: 0.328 filns Freq: 250 MHz Settings S%: 100 C%:0 Ba: ictal DME: on,on,on AmpEq: Auto (S:0.94 A:9.6 M345) interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: [75 x 188]@ 0.200 ft Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 Figure 6 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. Slice(ft)1.969-2.297.png 15 20 25 Peer treet reeeebirienins Project 0-PROJECT 0.ofp Slice: 1,969-2.297 ft Lines: Y only Vel: 0.328 fulns Freq: 250 MHz Settings S%: 100 C%:0 BgS: tetal DME: on,on,on AmpEq: Auto (S:0.94 A:9.6 W:345) Interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: [75 x 186]@ 0.200 ft Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 Figure 7 Slice(ft)2.297-2.625.png 15 20 25 PEEP EPL Parte Project 0-PROJECT 0.cfp Slice: 2.297-2.625 ft Lines: Y only Vel: 0.328 filns Freq: 250 MHz Settings S%: 100 C%: 0 Ba: ictal DME: on,on,on AmpEq: Auto ($:0.94 A:5 6 M:345) interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: [75 x 188]@ 0.200 ft Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 Figure 8 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. Slice(ft)2.625-2.953.png 15 20 25 PE Peeee brent renee bereits Figure 9 Slice(ft)2.953-3.281.png 0 s 10 15 20 25 PEEP EP ee Peer eeeeeee Figure 10 Project 0-PROJECT 0.ofp Slice: 2.625-2,953 ft Lines: Y only Vel: 0.328 fllns Freq: 250 MHz Settings S%: 100 C%:0 BgS: tetal DME: on,on,on AmpEq: Auto (S:0.94 A:39.6 W345) Interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: [75 x 186]@ 0.200 ft Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 Project 0-PROJECT 0.cfp Slice: 2.953-3.281 ft Lines: Y only Vel: 0.328 filns Freq: 250 MHz Settings S%: 100 C%:0 BgS: ictal DME: on,on,on AmpEq: Auto (S:0.94 A:9 6 M:345) interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: (75 « 188]@ 0.200 ft Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. Slice(ft)3.281-3.609.png 0 5 10 15 20 25 Perr PeeeePr ener reer tirienins Project 0-PROJECT 0.ofp Slice: 3.281-3.609 ft Lines: Y only Vel: 0.328 flns Freq: 250 MHz Settings S%: 100 C%:0 BgS: tetal DME: on,on,on AmpEq: Auto (S:0.94 A:9.6 W:345) Interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: [75 x 186]@ 0.200 ft Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 Figure 11 Slice(ft)3.609-3.937.png 0 s 10 15 20 25 PEEP EP eE Pear Project 0-PROJECT 0.cfp Slice: 3.609-3.937 ft Lines: Y only Vel: 0.328 fins Freq: 250 MHz Settings S%: 100 C%:0 Ba: ictal DME: on,on,on AmpEq: Auto ($:0.94 A:5 6 M:345) interp lim: 3.750 ft Res: [75 x 188]@ 0.200 ft Palette: jet Collected: 2024-02-06 Analyzed: 2024-02-07 Figure 12 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINE6.png so 6 rf Pee aaa sD ww Bw za unwnsny,neryx Bw Hui HMM Ly fg pe anna EH ead ee ke i 1 i} ail dat et ji here Laviday ey ye ial 28 = 2a 21 309 ‘ bene: OHO Vet 0.555 fine Ste: 100 C0 UgSiictel OME: oncner Gar Auto 0.77 Act? W218) Cobone | ns Figure 13 LINE5.png 16 47 ema aenweaerwrenae w MW RD vw z Monunuataddayod eed ce doccntianein ae La oh ae Eauamniany tt akey a I abeane tui ate OR LL CL S a n bones HLS Vel Dd fins St 100 Clit gsi ictal DME: an.cnor Gein Abo 0.77 ADT W218) CRbone Figure 14 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINE4.pn 2 Line: ONL Vet 0.025 fine St: 100 Ct: Bos: ictal GME: on.cn.o7 Gain Auto (5.0.77 00.7 W218) CRbene Figure 15 LINE3.png iw ri a bine: NES Vet 9.02) fins Ste: 100 Cie 2 Bg: ictal DME: on.cn,on Gain Auto S077 AT W218) CFbone Figure 16 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINE2.pn 2 bone: ONLE Vet 0.220 tins St: 100 C9 Bg: CME: on.cn,o7 Gain Auto (5.0.77 40.7 W219) CRbene Figure 17 LINE1.png ab Prime Lone UNCI Vet 002d fins St: 100 Cie 2 BgS: ictal DWE: on.cn,07 Gam Auto (5:0. 7 W218) CPbone Figure 18 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. LINEO.pn 12 am 2 gr a n u na n a < TT ec bine: ONLO Vet 0.220 fine Ste: 100 Ct: 0 Bos: ictal OME: on.cn.o7 Gain Auto (5.0.77 0.7 218) CRbene Figure 19 This report is created using a Sensors & Software EKKO_Project software template. All content, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are created by the user and Sensors & Software is not responsible for the reliability or veracity of the contents in this report. APPENDIX D PEL LABORATORY REPORT NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NE PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY PHOENIX = Environmental Laboratories, Inc. Wednesday, February 21, 2024 Attn: Mr. Jeff Wink NETC PO Box 2167 Ballston Spa, NY 12020 ProjectID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET SDG ID: GCQ05214 Sample ID#s: CQ05214, CQ05216 - CQ05223 This laboratory is in compliance with the NELAC requirements of procedures used except where indicated. This report contains results for the parameters tested, under the sampling conditions described on the Chain Of Custody, as received by the laboratory. This report is incomplete unless all pages indicated in the pagination at the bottom of the page are included. All soils, solids and sludges are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted in the sample comments. Ascanned version of the COC form accompanies the analytical report and is an exact duplicate of the original. Enclosed are revised Analysis Report pages. Please replace and discard the original pages. If you are the client above and have any questions concerning this testing, please do not hesitate to contact Phoenix Client Services at ext.200. The contents of this report cannot be discussed with anyone other than the client listed above without their written consent. Sincerely yours, Kab Laboratory Director NJ Lab Registration #CT-003 NELAC - #NY11301 NY Lab Registration #11301 CT Lab Registration #PH-0618 PA Lab Registration #68-03530 MA Lab Registration #M-CT007 RI Lab Registration #63 ME Lab Registration #CT-007 VT Lab Registration #VT11301 NH Lab Registration #213693-A,B 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O. Box 370, Manchester, CT 06040 Telephone (860) 645-1102 Page 1 of 71 | (\ NSS YY), fal ( JENIX Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 PROJECT NARRATIVE Client: NETC Project: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Laboratory Project: GCQ05214 NY # 11301 Page 2 of 71 A N ) wo) == Sa Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06040 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Project Narrative February 21, 2024 NETC 33-37 CAROLINE STREET NY # 11301 SDG I.D.: GCQ05214 Methodology Summary Mercury Prep Soil Sample - USEPA SW-846 Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste Physical/Chemical Methods 3rd Ed. Update IV, Method 7471B. Metals ICP: USEPA SW-846 Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste Physical/Chemical Methods 3rd Ed. Update IV, Method 6010D. Mercury: USEPA SW-846 Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste Physical/Chemical Methods Update III, 7471B Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs): USEPA SW-846 Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste Physical/Chemical Methods 3rd Ed. Update IV, Method 8082A. Volatile Organic Compounds: USEPA SW-846 Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste Physical/Chemical Methods 3rd Ed.Update III, Method 8260D and Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-600/4-79-020, Revised March 1983 (Methods 624) as printed in 40CFR part 136. Page 3 of 71 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06040 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Project Narrative February 21, 2024 NETC 33-37 CAROLINE STREET NY # 11301 SDG I.D.: GCQ05214 Laboratory Chronicle The samples in this delivery group were received at 1.9°C. Collection Prep Analysis Hold Time Sample = Analysis Date Date Date Analyst Met CQ05214 | Semivolatiles, Full Scan 02/07/24 02/12/24 02/15/24 MR Y CQ05214 | Semivolatiles, SIM 02/07/24 02/12/24 02/15/24 AW Y CQ05214 | Volatiles 02/07/24 02/13/24 02/13/24 MH Y CQ05215 | On Hold 02/07/24 02/09/24 02/09/24 Y CQ05216 | Semivolatiles, Full Scan 02/07/24 02/12/24 02/15/24 MR Y CQ05216 | Semivolatiles, SIM 02/07/24 02/12/24 02/15/24 AW Y CQ05216 | Volatiles 02/07/24 02/12/24 02/12/24 MH Y CQ05217 | Semivolatiles, Full Scan 02/07/24 02/12/24 02/15/24 MR Y CQ05217 | Semivolatiles, SIM 02/07/24 02/12/24 02/15/24 AW Y CQ05217 | Volatiles 02/07/24 02/12/24 02/12/24 MH Y CQ05218 | Semivolatiles, Full Scan 02/08/24 02/12/24 02/15/24 MR Y CQ05218 | Semivolatiles, SIM 02/08/24 02/12/24 02/15/24 AW Y CQ05218 | Volatiles 02/08/24 02/12/24 02/12/24 MH Y CQ05219 | Field Extraction 02/07/24 02/07/24 02/07/24 Y CQ05219 | Percent Solid 02/07/24 02/09/24 02/09/24 CV Y CQ05219 | Semivolatiles 02/07/24 02/16/24 02/17/24 MR Y CQ05219 | Volatiles 02/07/24 02/12/24 02/12/24 JLI Y CQ05220 | Arsenic 02/07/24 02/09/24 02/12/24 TH Y CQ05220 | Barium 02/07/24 02/09/24 02/12/24 TH Y CQ05220 | Cadmium 02/07/24 02/09/24 02/12/24 TH Y CQ05220 | Chromium 02/07/24 02/09/24 02/12/24 TH Y CQ05220 | Field Extraction 02/07/24 02/07/24 02/07/24 Y CQ05220 | Lead 02/07/24 02/09/24 02/12/24 TH Y CQ05220 | Mercury 02/07/24 02/12/24 02/12/24 GW Y CQ05220 | Percent Solid 02/07/24 02/09/24 02/09/24 CV Y CQ05220 | Polychlorinated Biphenyls 02/07/24 02/14/24 02/15/24 Sc Y CQ05220 | Selenium 02/07/24 02/09/24 02/12/24 TH Y CQ05220 | Semivolatiles 02/07/24 02/16/24 02/17/24 MR Y CQ05220 | Silver 02/07/24 02/09/24 02/12/24 TH Y CQ05220 | Volatiles 02/07/24 02/12/24 02/12/24 JLI Y CQ05221 | Arsenic 02/07/24 02/09/24 02/12/24 TH Y CQ05221 | Barium 02/07/24 02/09/24 02/12/24 TH Y Page 4 of 71 nu PHOENIX © Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06040 NY #11301 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Project Narrative February 21, 2024 SDG LD.: GCQ05214 NETC 33-37 CAROLINE STREET CQ05221 | Cadmium 02/07/24 02/09/24 02/12/24 TH Y CQ05221 | Chromium 02/07/24 02/09/24 02/12/24 TH Y CQ05221 | Lead 02/07/24 02/09/24 02/12/24 TH Y CQ05221 | Mercury 02/07/24 02/12/24 02/12/24 GW Y CQ05221 | Percent Solid 02/07/24 02/09/24 02/09/24 CV Y CQ05221 | Polychlorinated Biphenyls 02/07/24 02/14/24 02/15/24 SC Y CQ05221 | Selenium 02/07/24 02/09/24 02/12/24 TH Y CQ05221 | Semivolatiles 02/07/24 02/16/24 02/17/24 MR Y CQ05221 | Silver 02/07/24 02/09/24 02/12/24 TH Y CQ05222 | Percent Solid 02/08/24 02/09/24 02/09/24 CV Y CQ05222 | Polychlorinated Biphenyls 02/08/24 02/19/24 02/20/24 KCA Y CQ05222 | Semivolatiles 02/08/24 02/16/24 02/17/24 MR Y CQ05223 | Field Extraction 02/08/24 02/08/24 02/08/24 Y CQ05223 | Volatiles 02/08/24 02/12/24 02/12/24 JLI Y Page 5 of 71 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. NY # 11301 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 SDG Comments February 21, 2024 SDG |.D.: GCQ05214 8260 Volatile Organics: 1,2-Dibromoethane, 1,2,3 Trichloropropane, and 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane do not meet NY TOGS GA criteria, these compounds are analyzed by GC/ECD method 504 or 8011 to achieve this criteria. SIM Analysis: The lowest possible reporting limit under SIM conditions is 0.02 ug/L. The NY TOGS GA criteria for some PAHs is 0.002 ug/L. This level can not be achieved. Please be advised that the NY 375 soil criteria for chromium are based on hexavalent chromium and trivalent chromium. Page 6 of 77 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 NY # 11301 Sample Id Cross Reference February 21, 2024 SDG I.D.: GCQ05214 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Client Id Lab Id Matrix B-1 CQ05214 GROUND WATER B-4 CQ05216 GROUND WATER B-6 CQ05217 GROUND WATER B-5 CQ05218 GROUND WATER B-1 (5-10°) CQ05219 SOIL B-5 (7-10°) CQ05220 SOIL COMP-1 CQ05221 SOIL HA-1 (0-5°) CQ05222 SOIL HA-1 (2-3°) CQ05223 SOIL Page 7 of 71 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 NY # 11301 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Analysis Report FOR: Attn: Mr. Jeff Wink NETC February 21, 2024 PO Box 2167 Ballston Spa, NY 12020 Sample Information Custody Information Date Time Matrix: GROUND WATER Collected by: 02/07/24 11:40 Location Code: NETC Received by: SR1 02/09/24 16:51 Rush Request: Standard Analyzed by: see "By" below P.O: 23.1211015 Laboratory Data SDG ID: GCQ05214 Phoenix ID: CQ05214 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Client ID: B-1 RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference Semi-Volatile Extraction Completed 02/12/24 Z/IMQ SW3520C Volatiles 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 1.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 1.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D 1,1-Dichloropropene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 0.50 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 1.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 0.50 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 0.60 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 1.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D 2-Chlorotoluene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D 2-Hexanone ND 10 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D 2-lsopropyltoluene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D 1 Ver 2 Page 8 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Phoenix 1.D.: CQ05214 Client ID: B-1 RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference 4-Chlorotoluene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND 10 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Acetone ND 50 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Acrylonitrile ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Benzene ND 0.70 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SWé8260D Bromobenzene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Bromochloromethane ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Bromodichloromethane ND 1.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Bromoform ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Bromomethane ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Carbon Disulfide ND 10 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Carbon tetrachloride ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Chlorobenzene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Chloroethane ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Chloroform ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Chloromethane ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SWé8260D cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.50 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Dibromochloromethane ND 1.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SWé8260D Dibromomethane ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Ethylbenzene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Hexachlorobutadiene ND 0.50 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Isopropylbenzene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D m&p-Xylene 3.4 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Methyl ethyl ketone ND 10 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Methylene chloride ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Naphthalene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D n-Butylbenzene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D n-Propylbenzene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D o-Xylene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D p-lsopropyltoluene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D sec-Butylbenzene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Styrene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D tert-Butylbenzene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Tetrachloroethene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Tetrahydrofuran (THF) ND 5.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D 1 Toluene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Total Xylenes 3.4 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.50 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene ND 5.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Trichloroethene ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Trichlorofluoromethane ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Trichlorotrifluoroethane ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D Vinyl chloride ND 2.0 ug/L 2 02/13/24 MH SW8260D QA/QC Surrogates % 1,2-dichlorobenzene-d4 (2x) 98 % 2 02/13/24 MH 70-130 % Ver 2 Page 9 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Phoenix I.D.: CQ05214 Client ID: B-1 RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference % Bromofluorobenzene (2x) 89 % 2 02/13/24 MH 70-130% % Dibromofluoromethane (2x) 96 % 2 02/13/24 MH 70-130 % % Toluene-d8 (2x) 97 % 2 02/13/24 MH 70-130 % Non Target Volatile Compounds Absent 1 02/14/24 MH Semivolatiles, Full Scan 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 7.1 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 4.3 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine ND 7.1 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 3.0 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 4.3 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 2,2'-Oxybis(1-Chloropropane) ND 1.4 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 1 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND 5.0 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND 5.0 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 2-Chloronaphthalene ND 7.1 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 7.1 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 2-Nitroaniline ND 5.0 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND 5.0 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 3-Nitroaniline ND 5.0 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND 7.1 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 4-Chloroaniline ND 5.0 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND 7.1 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 4-Nitroaniline ND 5.0 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Acenaphthene ND 7.1 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Anthracene ND 7.1 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Benzidine ND 5.0 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Benzoic acid ND 50 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Benzyl Alcohol ND 28 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Benzyl butyl phthalate ND 7.1 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND 5.0 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ND 5.0 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Dibenzofuran ND 5.0 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Diethyl phthalate ND 7.1 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Dimethylphthalate ND 7.1 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Di-n-butylphthalate ND 7.4 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Di-n-octylphthalate ND 7.1 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Fluoranthene ND 7.1 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Fluorene ND 7.1 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Hexachloroethane ND 5.0 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E lsophorone ND 7.1 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Naphthalene ND 5.0 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND 7.1 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND 7.1 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND 7.1 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Pyrene ND 7.1 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E QA/QC Surrogates % 2-Fluorobiphenyl 64 % 1 02/15/24 MR 30-130 % % Nitrobenzene-d5 84 % 1 02/15/24 MR 30-130 % Ver 2 Page 10 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Phoenix I.D.: CQ05214 Client ID: B-1 RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference % Terphenyl-d14 23 % 1 02/15/24 MR 30-130 % 3 Semivolatiles, SIM Acenaphthylene ND 0.71 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW = SW8270E (SIM) Benz(a)anthracene 0.79 0.03 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW8270E (SIM) Benzo(a)pyrene 0.95 0.03 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW8270E (SIM) Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.83 0.03 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW = SWé68270E (SIM) Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 0.71 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW68270E (SIM) Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.65 0.03 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW68270E (SIM) Chrysene 0.77 0.03 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW68270E (SIM) Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND 0.71 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW8270E (SIM) Hexachlorobenzene ND 0.04 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW68270E (SIM) Hexachlorobutadiene ND 0.50 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW68270E (SIM) Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND 0.71 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW = SW8270E (SIM) Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.82 0.03 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW8270E (SIM) Nitrobenzene ND 0.40 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW = SW8270E (SIM) Phenanthrene 0.73 0.71 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW = SW8270E (SIM) QA/QC Surrogates % 2-Fluorobiphenyl 68 % 1 02/15/24 AW 30-130 % % Nitrobenzene-d5 102 % 1 02/15/24 AW 30-130% % Terphenyl-d14 31 % 1 02/15/24 AW 30-130 % Non Target Semivolatile Compounds Absent 1 02/19/24 MR Ver 2 Page 11 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Phoenix I.D.: CQ05214 Client ID: B-1 RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference 1 = This parameter is not certified by the primary accrediting authority (NY NELAC) for this matrix. NY NELAC does not offer certification for all parameters at this time. 3 = This parameter exceeds laboratory specified limits. RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level (Equivalent to NELAC LOQ, Limit of Quantitation) ND=Not Detected at RL/PQL BRL=Below Reporting Level L=Biased Low QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not "detected" compounds. Comments: Per 1.4.6 of EPA method 8270D, 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine is unstable and readily converts to Azobenzene. Azobenzene is used for the calibration of 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine. Volatile Comment: Elevated reporting limits for volatiles due to the large amount of sediment in the sample vial. Volatile Comment: To achieve client’s objectives, where the lowest calibration standard or LOD justifies lowering the RL/PQL, the RL/PQL of some compounds have been lowered to meet criteria. Semi-Volatile Comment: To achieve client’s objectives, where the lowest calibration standard or LOD justifies lowering the RL/PQL, the RL/PQL of some compounds have been lowered to meet criteria. Semi-Volatile Comment: Poor surrogate recovery was observed for one acid and/or one base surrogate. The other surrogates associated with this sample were within QA/QC criteria. No significant bias suspected. If you are the client above and have any questions concerning this testing, please do not hesitate to contact Phoenix Client Services at ext.200. The contents of this report cannot be discussed with anyone other than the client listed above without their written consent. A Laboratory Director February 21, 2024 Reviewed and Released by: Greg Lawrence, Assistant Lab Director Ver 2 Page 12 of 71 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 NY # 11301 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Analysis Report FOR: Attn: Mr. Jeff Wink NETC February 21, 2024 PO Box 2167 Ballston Spa, NY 12020 Sample Information Custody Information Date Time Matrix: GROUND WATER Collected by: 02/07/24 15:00 Location Code: NETC Received by: SR1 02/09/24 16:51 Rush Request: Standard Analyzed by: see "By" below P.O: 23.1211015 Laboratory Data SDG ID: GCQ05214 Phoenix ID: CQ05216 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Client ID: B-4 RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference Semi-Volatile Extraction Completed 02/12/24 Z/IMQ SW3520C Volatiles 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.50 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,1-Dichloropropene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 0.25 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 0.50 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 0.25 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 0.60 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 2-Chlorotoluene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 2-Hexanone ND 5.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 2-lsopropyltoluene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1 Ver 2 Page 13 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Phoenix 1.D.: CQ05216 Client ID: B-4 RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference 4-Chlorotoluene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND 5.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Acetone ND 25 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Acrylonitrile ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Benzene ND 0.70 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Bromobenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SWé8260D Bromochloromethane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Bromodichloromethane ND 0.50 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Bromoform ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Bromomethane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Carbon Disulfide ND 5.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Carbon tetrachloride ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Chlorobenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Chloroethane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Chloroform ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Chloromethane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SWé8260D cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.40 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Dibromochloromethane ND 0.50 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SWé8260D Dibromomethane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Ethylbenzene 1.1 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Hexachlorobutadiene ND 0.40 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Isopropylbenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D m&p-Xylene 44 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Methyl ethyl ketone ND 5.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Methylene chloride ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Naphthalene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D n-Butylbenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D n-Propylbenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D o-Xylene 1.7 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D p-lsopropyltoluene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D sec-Butylbenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Styrene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D tert-Butylbenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Tetrachloroethene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Tetrahydrofuran (THF) ND 2.5 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1 Toluene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Total Xylenes 6.1 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.40 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene ND 5.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Trichloroethene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Trichlorofluoromethane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Trichlorotrifluoroethane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Vinyl chloride ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D QA/QC Surrogates % 1,2-dichlorobenzene-d4 98 % 1 02/12/24 MH 70-130 % Ver 2 Page 14 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Phoenix I.D.: CQ05216 Client ID: B-4 RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference % Bromofluorobenzene 92 % 1 02/12/24 MH 70-130 % % Dibromofluoromethane 99 % 1 02/12/24 MH 70-130% % Toluene-d8& 97 % 1 02/12/24 MH 70-130% Non Target Volatile Compounds Absent 1 02/21/24 PS Semivolatiles, Full Scan 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 2.9 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 2.9 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 2.9 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 2,2'-Oxybis(1-Chloropropane) ND 0.95 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 1 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 2-Chloronaphthalene ND 4.8 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 2-Nitroaniline ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 3-Nitroaniline ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 4-Chloroaniline ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 4-Nitroaniline ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Acenaphthene ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Anthracene ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Benzidine ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Benzoic acid ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Benzyl Alcohol ND 19 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Benzyl butyl phthalate ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ND 0.95 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ND 4.8 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Dibenzofuran ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Diethyl phthalate ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Dimethylphthalate ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Di-n-butylphthalate ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Di-n-octylphthalate ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Fluoranthene ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Fluorene ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Hexachloroethane ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E lsophorone ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Naphthalene ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Pyrene ND 48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E QA/QC Surrogates % 2-Fluorobiphenyl 75 % 1 02/15/24 MR 30-130% % Nitrobenzene-d5 79 % 1 02/15/24 MR 30-130 % Ver 2 Page 15 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Phoenix I.D.: CQ05216 Client ID: B-4 RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference % Terphenyl-d14 26 % 1 02/15/24 MR 30-130 % 3 Semivolatiles, SIM Acenaphthylene ND 0.48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW = SW8270E (SIM) Benz(a)anthracene ND 0.02 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW8270E (SIM) Benzo(a)pyrene ND 0.02 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW68270E (SIM) Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND 0.02 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW = SW8270E (SIM) Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 0.48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW68270E (SIM) Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 0.02 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW68270E (SIM) Chrysene ND 0.02 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW68270E (SIM) Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND 0.48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW8270E (SIM) Hexachlorobenzene ND 0.04 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW68270E (SIM) Hexachlorobutadiene ND 0.48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW68270E (SIM) Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND 0.48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW8270E (SIM) Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 0.02 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW68270E (SIM) Nitrobenzene ND 0.38 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW = SW8270E (SIM) Phenanthrene ND 0.48 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW68270E (SIM) QA/QC Surrogates % 2-Fluorobiphenyl 76 % 1 02/15/24 AW 30-130 % % Nitrobenzene-d5 99 % 1 02/15/24 AW 30-130% % Terphenyl-d14 33 % 1 02/15/24 AW 30-130 % Non Target Semivolatile Compounds Absent 1 02/19/24 MR Ver 2 Page 16 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Phoenix |.D.: CQ05216 Client ID: B-4 RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference 1 = This parameter is not certified by the primary accrediting authority (NY NELAC) for this matrix. NY NELAC does not offer certification for all parameters at this time. 3 = This parameter exceeds laboratory specified limits. RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level (Equivalent to NELAC LOQ, Limit of Quantitation) ND=Not Detected at RL/PQL BRL=Below Reporting Level L=Biased Low QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not "detected" compounds. Comments: Per 1.4.6 of EPA method 8270D, 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine is unstable and readily converts to Azobenzene. Azobenzene is used for the calibration of 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine. Volatile Comment: To achieve client's objectives, where the lowest calibration standard or LOD justifies lowering the RL/PQL, the RL/PQL of some compounds have been lowered to meet criteria. Semi-Volatile Comment: To achieve client’s objectives, where the lowest calibration standard or LOD justifies lowering the RL/PQL, the RL/PQL of some compounds have been lowered to meet criteria. Semi-Volatile Comment: Poor surrogate recovery was observed for one acid and/or one base surrogate. The other surrogates associated with this sample were within QA/QC criteria. No significant bias suspected. If you are the client above and have any questions concerning this testing, please do not hesitate to contact Phoenix Client Services at ext.200. The contents of this report cannot be discussed with anyone other than the client listed above without their written consent. yl. Sty. Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director February 21, 2024 Reviewed and Released by: Greg Lawrence, Assistant Lab Director Ver 2 Page 17 of 71 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 NY # 11301 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Analysis Report FOR: Attn: Mr. Jeff Wink NETC February 21, 2024 PO Box 2167 Ballston Spa, NY 12020 Sample Information Custody Information Date Time Matrix: GROUND WATER Collected by: 02/07/24 16:30 Location Code: NETC Received by: SR1 02/09/24 16:51 Rush Request: Standard Analyzed by: see "By" below P.O: 23.1211015 Laboratory Data SDG ID: GCQ05214 Phoenix ID: CQ05217 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Client ID: B-6 RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference Semi-Volatile Extraction Completed 02/12/24 Z/IMQ SW3520C Volatiles 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.50 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,1-Dichloropropene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 0.25 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 0.50 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 0.25 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 0.60 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 2-Chlorotoluene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 2-Hexanone ND 5.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 2-lsopropyltoluene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1 Ver 2 Page 18 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Phoenix 1.D.: CQ05217 Client ID: B-6 RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference 4-Chlorotoluene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND 5.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Acetone ND 25 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Acrylonitrile ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Benzene ND 0.70 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Bromobenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SWé8260D Bromochloromethane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Bromodichloromethane ND 0.50 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Bromoform ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Bromomethane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Carbon Disulfide ND 5.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Carbon tetrachloride ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Chlorobenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Chloroethane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Chloroform ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Chloromethane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SWé8260D cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.40 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Dibromochloromethane ND 0.50 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SWé8260D Dibromomethane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Ethylbenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Hexachlorobutadiene ND 0.40 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Isopropylbenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D m&p-Xylene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Methyl ethyl ketone ND 5.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Methylene chloride ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Naphthalene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D n-Butylbenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D n-Propylbenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D o-Xylene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D p-lsopropyltoluene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D sec-Butylbenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Styrene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D tert-Butylbenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Tetrachloroethene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Tetrahydrofuran (THF) ND 2.5 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1 Toluene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Total Xylenes ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.40 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene ND 5.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Trichloroethene ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Trichlorofluoromethane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Trichlorotrifluoroethane ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Vinyl chloride ND 1.0 ug/L 1 02/12/24 MH SW8260D QA/QC Surrogates % 1,2-dichlorobenzene-d4 97 % 1 02/12/24 MH 70-130% Ver 2 Page 19 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Phoenix |.D.: CQ05217 Client ID: B-6 RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference % Bromofluorobenzene 91 % 1 02/12/24 MH 70-130 % % Dibromofluoromethane 96 % 1 02/12/24 MH 70-130% % Toluene-d8& 98 % 1 02/12/24 MH 70-130% Non Target Volatile Compounds Absent 1 02/21/24 PS Semivolatiles, Full Scan 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 2.8 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 2.8 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 2.8 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 2,2'-Oxybis(1-Chloropropane) ND 0.94 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 1 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 2-Chloronaphthalene ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 2-Nitroaniline ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 3-Nitroaniline ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 4-Chloroaniline ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 4-Nitroaniline ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Acenaphthene ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Anthracene ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Benzidine ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Benzoic acid ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Benzyl Alcohol ND 19 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Benzyl butyl phthalate ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ND 0.94 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ND 4.7 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Dibenzofuran ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Diethyl phthalate ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Dimethylphthalate ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Di-n-butylphthalate ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Di-n-octylphthalate ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Fluoranthene ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Fluorene ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Hexachloroethane ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E lsophorone ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Naphthalene ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Pyrene ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E QA/QC Surrogates % 2-Fluorobiphenyl 56 % 1 02/15/24 MR 30-130% % Nitrobenzene-d5 62 % 1 02/15/24 MR 30-130 % Ver 2 Page 20 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Phoenix |.D.: CQ05217 Client ID: B-6 RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference % Terphenyl-d14 13 % 1 02/15/24 MR 30-130 % 3 Semivolatiles, SIM Acenaphthylene ND 0.47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW = SW8270E (SIM) Benz(a)anthracene ND 0.02 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW8270E (SIM) Benzo(a)pyrene ND 0.02 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW68270E (SIM) Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND 0.02 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW = SW8270E (SIM) Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 0.47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW68270E (SIM) Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 0.02 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW68270E (SIM) Chrysene ND 0.02 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW68270E (SIM) Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND 0.47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW8270E (SIM) Hexachlorobenzene ND 0.04 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW68270E (SIM) Hexachlorobutadiene ND 0.47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW68270E (SIM) Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND 0.47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW8270E (SIM) Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 0.02 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW68270E (SIM) Nitrobenzene ND 0.38 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW = SW8270E (SIM) Phenanthrene ND 0.47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW = SW8270E (SIM) QA/QC Surrogates % 2-Fluorobiphenyl 57 % 1 02/15/24 AW 30-130 % % Nitrobenzene-d5 75 % 1 02/15/24 AW 30-130% % Terphenyl-d14 17 % 1 02/15/24 AW 30-130 % 3 Non Target Semivolatile Compounds Absent 1 02/20/24 MR Ver 2 Page 21 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Phoenix |.D.: CQ05217 Client ID: B-6 RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference 1 = This parameter is not certified by the primary accrediting authority (NY NELAC) for this matrix. NY NELAC does not offer certification for all parameters at this time. 3 = This parameter exceeds laboratory specified limits. RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level (Equivalent to NELAC LOQ, Limit of Quantitation) ND=Not Detected at RL/PQL BRL=Below Reporting Level L=Biased Low QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not "detected" compounds. Comments: Per 1.4.6 of EPA method 8270D, 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine is unstable and readily converts to Azobenzene. Azobenzene is used for the calibration of 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine. Volatile Comment: To achieve client's objectives, where the lowest calibration standard or LOD justifies lowering the RL/PQL, the RL/PQL of some compounds have been lowered to meet criteria. Semi-Volatile Comment: Poor surrogate recovery was observed for one acid and/or one base surrogate. The other surrogates associated with this sample were within QA/QC criteria. No significant bias suspected. Semi-Volatile Comment: To achieve client’s objectives, where the lowest calibration standard or LOD justifies lowering the RL/PQL, the RL/PQL of some compounds have been lowered to meet criteria. If you are the client above and have any questions concerning this testing, please do not hesitate to contact Phoenix Client Services at ext.200. The contents of this report cannot be discussed with anyone other than the client listed above without their written consent. yl. Sty. Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director February 21, 2024 Reviewed and Released by: Greg Lawrence, Assistant Lab Director Ver 2 Page 22 of 71 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 NY # 11301 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Analysis Report FOR: Attn: Mr. Jeff Wink NETC February 21, 2024 PO Box 2167 Ballston Spa, NY 12020 Sample Information Custody Information Date Time Matrix: GROUND WATER Collected by: 02/08/24 13:30 Location Code: NETC Received by: SR1 02/09/24 16:51 Rush Request: Standard Analyzed by: see "By" below P.O: 23.1211015 Laboratory Data SDG ID: GCQ05214 Phoenix ID: CQ05218 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Client ID: B-5 RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference Semi-Volatile Extraction Completed 02/12/24 Z/IMQ SW3520C Volatiles 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,1-Dichloropropene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 250 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 250 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 130 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 2-Chlorotoluene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 2-Hexanone ND 500 ug/L 250 02/1 2/24 MH SW8260D 2-lsopropyltoluene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1 Ver 2 Page 23 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Phoenix |.D.: CQ05218 Client ID: B-5 RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference 4-Chlorotoluene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND 130 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Acetone ND 500 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Acrylonitrile ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Benzene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Bromobenzene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Bromochloromethane ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Bromodichloromethane ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Bromoform ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Bromomethane ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Carbon Disulfide ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Carbon tetrachloride ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Chlorobenzene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Chloroethane ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Chloroform ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Chloromethane ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SWé8260D cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Dibromochloromethane ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SWé8260D Dibromomethane ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Ethylbenzene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Hexachlorobutadiene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Isopropylbenzene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D m&p-Xylene ND 250 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Methyl ethyl ketone ND 500 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) ND 250 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Methylene chloride ND 130 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Naphthalene ND 130 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D n-Butylbenzene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D n-Propylbenzene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D o-Xylene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D p-lsopropyltoluene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D sec-Butylbenzene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Styrene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D tert-Butylbenzene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Tetrachloroethene = = 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Tetrahydrofuran (THF) ND 310 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D 1 Toluene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Total Xylenes ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene ND 630 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Trichloroethene ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Trichlorofluoromethane ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Trichlorotrifluoroethane ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D Vinyl chloride ND 63 ug/L 250 02/12/24 MH SW8260D QA/QC Surrogates % 1,2-dichlorobenzene-d4 (250x) 97 % 250 02/12/24 MH 70-130 % Ver 2 Page 24 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Phoenix |.D.: CQ05218 Client ID: B-5 RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference % Bromofluorobenzene (250x) 89 % 250 02/12/24 MH 70-130% % Dibromofluoromethane (250x) 95 % 250 02/12/24 MH 70-130 % % Toluene-d8 (250x) 97 % 250 02/12/24 MH 70-130% Non Target Volatile Compounds Absent 1 02/21/24 PS Semivolatiles, Full Scan 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 2.8 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 2.8 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 2.8 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 2,2'-Oxybis(1-Chloropropane) ND 0.94 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 1 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 2-Chloronaphthalene ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 2-Nitroaniline ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 3-Nitroaniline ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 4-Chloroaniline ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E 4-Nitroaniline ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Acenaphthene ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Anthracene ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Benzidine ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Benzoic acid ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Benzyl Alcohol ND 19 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Benzyl butyl phthalate ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ND 0.94 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ND 4.7 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Dibenzofuran ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Diethyl phthalate ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Dimethylphthalate ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Di-n-butylphthalate ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Di-n-octylphthalate ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Fluoranthene ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Fluorene ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Hexachloroethane ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E lsophorone ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Naphthalene ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E Pyrene ND 47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 MR SW8270E QA/QC Surrogates % 2-Fluorobiphenyl 56 % 1 02/15/24 MR 30-130 % % Nitrobenzene-d5 62 % 1 02/15/24 MR 30-130 % Ver 2 Page 25 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Phoenix |.D.: CQ05218 Client ID: B-5 RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference % Terphenyl-d14 18 % 1 02/15/24 MR 30-130 % 3 Semivolatiles, SIM Acenaphthylene ND 0.47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW = SW8270E (SIM) Benz(a)anthracene 0.18 0.02 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW8270E (SIM) Benzo(a)pyrene 0.21 0.02 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW68270E (SIM) Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.18 0.02 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW = SWé68270E (SIM) Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 0.47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW68270E (SIM) Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.14 0.02 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW68270E (SIM) Chrysene 0.19 0.02 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW68270E (SIM) Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND 0.47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW8270E (SIM) Hexachlorobenzene ND 0.04 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW68270E (SIM) Hexachlorobutadiene ND 0.47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW68270E (SIM) Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND 0.47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW8270E (SIM) Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.17 0.02 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW SW68270E (SIM) Nitrobenzene ND 0.38 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW = SW8270E (SIM) Phenanthrene ND 0.47 ug/L 1 02/15/24 AW = SW8270E (SIM) QA/QC Surrogates % 2-Fluorobiphenyl 56 % 1 02/15/24 AW 30-130 % % Nitrobenzene-d5 181 % 1 02/15/24 AW 30-130% 3 % Terphenyl-d14 22 % 1 02/15/24 AW 30-130 % 3 Non Target Semivolatile Compounds Present 1 02/19/24 MR Ver 2 Page 26 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Phoenix I.D.: CQ05218 Client ID: B-5 RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference 1 = This parameter is not certified by the primary accrediting authority (NY NELAC) for this matrix. NY NELAC does not offer certification for all parameters at this time. 3 = This parameter exceeds laboratory specified limits. RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level (Equivalent to NELAC LOQ, Limit of Quantitation) ND=Not Detected at RL/PQL BRL=Below Reporting Level L=Biased Low QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not "detected" compounds. Comments: Per 1.4.6 of EPA method 8270D, 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine is unstable and readily converts to Azobenzene. Azobenzene is used for the calibration of 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine. Volatile Comment: Elevated reporting limits for volatiles due to dilution for sample matrix. The sample contained a large amount of sediment.. Volatile Comment: To achieve client’s objectives, where the lowest calibration standard or LOD justifies lowering the RL/PQL, the RL/PQL of some compounds have been lowered to meet criteria. Semi-Volatile Comment: Poor surrogate recovery was observed for one acid and/or one base surrogate. The other surrogates associated with this sample were within QA/QC criteria. No significant bias suspected. If you are the client above and have any questions concerning this testing, please do not hesitate to contact Phoenix Client Services at ext.200. The contents of this report cannot be discussed with anyone other than the client listed above without their written consent. ah Laboratory Director February 21, 2024 Reviewed and Released by: Greg Lawrence, Assistant Lab Director Ver 2 Page 27 of 71 Analysis Report February 21, 2024 Sample Information Matrix: SOIL Location Code: NETC Rush Request: Standard P.O.#: 23.1211015 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. \ PHOENIX © 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 NY # 11301 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 FOR: Attn: Mr. Jeff Wink NETC PO Box 2167 Ballston Spa, NY 12020 Custody Information Date Time Collected by: 02/07/24 11:15 Received by: SR1 02/09/24 16:51 Analyzed by: see "By" below Laboratory Data SDG ID: GCQ05214 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Phoenix ID: CQ05219 Client ID: B-1 (5-10°) RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference Percent Solid 82 % 02/09/24 CV SW846-%Solid Field Extraction Completed 02/07/24 SW5035A 1 Soil Extraction for SVOA Completed 02/16/24 H/U SW3546 Volatiles 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI = SWé8260D 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 4.6 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 4.6 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 4.6 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 4.6 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI. SW8260D 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SWé8260D 1,1-Dichloropropene ND 4.6 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 4.6 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 4.6 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 4.6 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 4.6 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 4.6 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI. SW8260D 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 4.6 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 4.6 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI = SWé8260D 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 4.6 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SWé8260D 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 4.6 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 4.6 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI. SW8260D 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 4.6 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 4.6 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D 2-Chlorotoluene ND 4.6 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI. SW8260D Ver 2 Page 28 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Phoenix I.D.: CQ05219 Client ID: B-1 (5-10°) RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference 2-Hexanone ND 23 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D 2-lsopropyltoluene ND 4.6 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D 1 4-Chlorotoluene ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI = SW8260D 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND 23 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D Acetone 26 S 23 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D Acrylonitrile ND 9.3 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI =SW8260D Benzene ND 4.6 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SWé8260D Bromobenzene ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SWé8260D Bromochloromethane ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D Bromodichloromethane ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D Bromoform ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI =SW8260D Bromomethane ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D Carbon Disulfide ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI =SW8260D Carbon tetrachloride ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D Chlorobenzene ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D Chloroethane ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI =SW8260D Chloroform ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D Chloromethane ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D Dibromochloromethane ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SWé8260D Dibromomethane ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D Ethylbenzene 11 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI = SW8260D Hexachlorobutadiene ND 4.6 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D Isopropylbenzene ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI = SW8260D m&p-Xylene 630 440 ug/Kg 50 02/12/24 JLI =SW8260D Methyl Ethyl Ketone ND 23 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SWé8260D Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) ND 9.3 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI =SW8260D Methylene chloride ND 9.3 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D Naphthalene ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D n-Butylbenzene ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SWé8260D n-Propylbenzene ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D o-Xylene 220 220 ug/Kg 50 02/12/24 JLI SWé8260D p-lsopropyltoluene ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI = SW8260D sec-Butylbenzene ND 4.6 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D Styrene ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI + SW8260D tert-Butylbenzene ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI. =SW8260D Tetrachloroethene ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D Tetrahydrofuran (THF) ND 9.3 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI =SW8260D Toluene ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D Total Xylenes 850 220 ug/Kg 50 02/12/24 JLI =SW8260D trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 4.6 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SWé8260D trans-1 ,4-dichloro-2-butene ND 9.3 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D Trichloroethene ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D Trichlorofluoromethane ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D Trichlorotrifluoroethane ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI SW8260D Vinyl chloride ND 46 ug/Kg 1 02/11/24 JLI = SW8260D Ver 2 Page 29 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Client ID: B-1 (5-10°) Phoenix |.D.: CQ05219 RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference QA/QC Surrogates % 1,2-dichlorobenzene-d4 98 % 1 02/11/24 JLI 70-130 % % Bromofluorobenzene 90 % 1 02/11/24 JLI 70-130 % % Dibromofluoromethane 103 % 1 02/11/24 JLI 70-130 % % Toluene-d8& 101 % 1 02/11/24 JLI 70 - 130 % % 1,2-dichlorobenzene-d4 (50x) 94 % 50 02/12/24 JLI 70-130 % % Bromofluorobenzene (50x) 101 % 50 02/12/24 JLI 70-130 % % Dibromofluoromethane (50x) 107 % 50 02/12/24 JLI 70-130 % % Toluene-d8 (50x) 92 % 50 02/12/24 JLI 70-130 % Non Target Volatile Compounds Absent 1 02/12/24 JLI Semivolatiles 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 2,2'-Oxybis(1-Chloropropane) ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 1 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 2-Chloronaphthalene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 2-Nitroaniline ND 1100 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND 1600 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 3-Nitroaniline ND 1100 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 4-Chloroaniline ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 4-Nitroaniline ND 1100 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Acenaphthene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Acenaphthylene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Anthracene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benz(a)anthracene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzidine ND 390 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzo(a)pyrene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzoic acid ND 790 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzyl alcohol ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzyl butyl phthalate ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Chrysene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Dibenzofuran ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/1 7/24 MR SW8270E Diethyl phthalate ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Dimethylphthalate ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Di-n-butylphthalate ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Ver 2 Page 30 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Phoenix I.D.: CQ05219 Client ID: B-1 (5-10°) RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Di-n-octylphthalate ND 280 ug/Kg Fluoranthene ND 280 ug/Kg Fluorene ND 280 ug/Kg Hexachlorobenzene ND 280 ug/Kg Hexachlorobutadiene ND 280 ug/Kg Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND 280 ug/Kg Hexachloroethane ND 280 ug/Kg Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 280 ug/Kg Isophorone ND 280 ug/Kg Naphthalene ND 280 ug/Kg Nitrobenzene ND 280 ug/Kg N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND 280 ug/Kg N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND 280 ug/Kg N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND 280 ug/Kg Phenanthrene ND 280 ug/Kg Pyrene ND 280 ug/Kg QAIQC Surrogates % 2-Fluorobiphenyl 67 % 1 02/17/24 MR 30-130 % % Nitrobenzene-d5 62 % 1 02/17/24 MR 30-130 % % Terphenyl-d14 55 % 1 02/17/24 MR 30-130 % a eo Non Target Semivolatile Compounds Absent 1 02/20/24 MR 1 = This parameter is not certified by the primary accrediting authority (NY NELAC) for this matrix. NY NELAC does not offer certification for all parameters at this time. RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level (Equivalent to NELAC LOQ, Limit of Quantitation) ND=Not Detected at RL/PQL BRL=Below Reporting Level L=Biased Low QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not “detected" compounds. Comments: Per 1.4.6 of EPA method 8270D, 1,2-Diphenyihydrazine is unstable and readily converts to Azobenzene. Azobenzene is used for the calibration of 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine. All soils, solids and sludges are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted in the sample comments. S - Laboratory solvent, contamination is possible. If you are the client above and have any questions concerning this testing, please do not hesitate to contact Phoenix Client Services at ext.200. The contents of this report cannot be discussed with anyone other than the client listed above without their written consent. An Laboratory Director February 21, 2024 Reviewed and Released by: Greg Lawrence, Assistant Lab Director Ver 2 Page 31 of 77 PHOENIX © a? =, Environmental Laboratories, Inc. Analysis Report February 21, 2024 Sample Information Matrix: Location Code: Rush Request: P.O.#: 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 NY # 11301 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 FOR: Attn: Mr. Jeff Wink NETC PO Box 2167 Ballston Spa, NY 12020 Custody Information Date Time SOIL Collected by: 02/07/24 13:05 NETC Received by: SR1 02/09/24 16:51 Standard Analyzed by: see "By" below 23.1211015 Laboratory Data SDG ID: GCQ05214 Phoenix ID: CQ05220 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Client ID: B-5 (7-10°) RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference Arsenic 3.38 0.77 mg/Kg 1 02/12/24 TH SW6010D Barium 27.1 0.38 mg/Kg 1 02/12/24 TH SW6010D Cadmium < 0.38 0.38 mg/Kg 1 02/12/24 TH SW6010D Chromium 6.59 0.38 mg/Kg 1 02/12/24 TH SW6010D Lead 15.8 0.38 mg/Kg 1 02/12/24 TH SW6010D Mercury < 0.03 0.03 mg/Kg 2 02/12/24 GW sW7471B Selenium <15 1.5 mg/Kg 1 02/12/24 TH SW6010D Silver < 0.38 0.38 mg/Kg 1 02/12/24 TH SW6010D Percent Solid 89 % 02/09/24 CV SW846-%Solid Field Extraction Completed 02/07/24 SW5035A 1 Mercury Digestion Completed 02/12/24 K/HL SW/7471B Soil Extraction for PCB Completed 02/14/24 H/U SW3546 Soil Extraction for SVOA Completed 02/16/24 C/A SW3546 Total Metals Digest Completed 02/09/24 LIP SW3050B Polychlorinated Biphenyls PCB-1016 ND 370 ug/Kg 10 02/15/24 SC SW8082A PCB-1221 ND 370 ug/Kg 10 02/15/24 SC SW8082A PCB-1232 ND 370 ug/Kg 10 02/15/24 SC SW8082A PCB-1242 ND 370 ug/Kg 10 02/15/24 SC SW8082A PCB-1248 ND 370 ug/Kg 10 02/15/24 SC SW8082A PCB-1254 ND 370 ug/Kg 10 02/15/24 SC SW8082A PCB-1260 ND 370 ug/Kg 10 02/15/24 SC SW8082A PCB-1262 ND 370 ug/Kg 10 02/15/24 SC SW8082A PCB-1268 ND 370 ug/Kg 10 02/15/24 SC SW8082A QA/QC Surrogates % DCBP 91 % 10 02/15/24 SC 30-150% Ver 2 Page 32 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Client ID: B-5 (7-10°) Phoenix I.D.: CQ05220 RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference % DCBP (Confirmation) 91 % 10 02/15/24 SC 30-150 % % TCMX 86 % 10 02/15/24 SC 30-150 % % TCMX (Confirmation) 86 % 10 02/15/24 SC 30-150 % Volatiles 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 44 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SWs8260D 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI = SW8260D 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 1,1-Dichloropropene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI. SW8260D 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 44 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI. SW8260D 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 44 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SWé8260D 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI = SW8260D 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI = SW8260D 2-Chlorotoluene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 2-Hexanone ND 22 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI = SW8260D 2-lsopropyltoluene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SWé8260D 1 4-Chlorotoluene ND 44 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND 22 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Acetone 32 22 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Acrylonitrile ND 8.8 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Benzene ND 44 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SWé8260D Bromobenzene ND 44 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Bromochloromethane ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Bromodichloromethane ND 44 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Bromoform ND 44 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI = SWé8260D Bromomethane ND 44 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Carbon Disulfide ND 44 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI = SW8260D Carbon tetrachloride ND 44 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Chlorobenzene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI = SW8260D Chloroethane ND 44 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Chloroform ND 44 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Chloromethane ND 44 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SWé8260D cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 44 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Dibromochloromethane ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Dibromomethane ND 44 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Ver 2 Page 33 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Phoenix I.D.: CQ05220 Client ID: B-5 (7-10°) RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference Ethylbenzene ND 44 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Hexachlorobutadiene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SWé8260D lsopropylbenzene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI = SW8260D m&p-Xylene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SWé8260D Methyl Ethyl Ketone ND 22 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI = SWé8260D Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) ND 8.8 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Methylene chloride ND 8.8 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Naphthalene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SWé8260D n-Butylbenzene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D n-Propylbenzene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D o-Xylene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI = SW8260D p-lsopropyltoluene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D sec-Butylbenzene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Styrene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D tert-Butylbenzene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Tetrachloroethene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Tetrahydrofuran (THF) ND 8.8 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Toluene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI = SWé8260D Total Xylenes ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SWé8260D trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SWé8260D trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SWé8260D trans-1 ,4-dichloro-2-butene ND 8.8 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Trichloroethene ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Trichlorofluoromethane ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Trichlorotrifluoroethane ND 44 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Vinyl chloride ND 4.4 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SWé8260D QA/QC Surrogates % 1,2-dichlorobenzene-d4 97 % 1 02/12/24 JLI 70-130 % % Bromofluorobenzene 118 % 1 02/12/24 JLI 70-130% % Dibromofluoromethane 103 % 1 02/12/24 JLI 70-130 % % Toluene-d8 90 % 1 02/12/24 JLI 70-130 % Non Target Volatile Compounds Present 1 02/14/24 JLI Semivolatiles 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 2,2'-Oxybis(1-Chloropropane) ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 1 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 2-Chloronaphthalene ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 2-Methylinaphthalene ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 2-Nitroaniline ND 1100 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND 1500 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 3-Nitroaniline ND 1100 ug/Kg 1 02/1 7/24 MR SW8270E 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 4-Chloroaniline ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Ver 2 Page 34 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Phoenix I.D.: CQ05220 Client ID: B-5 (7-10°) RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference 4-Nitroaniline ND 1100 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Acenaphthene ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Acenaphthylene ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Anthracene ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benz(a)anthracene ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzidine ND 370 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzo(a)pyrene ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzoic acid ND 740 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzyl alcohol ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzyl butyl phthalate ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Bis(2-chloroethoxy methane ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Chrysene ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Dibenzofuran ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Diethyl phthalate ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Dimethylphthalate ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Di-n-butylphthalate ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Di-n-octylphthalate ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Fluoranthene ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Fluorene ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Hexachlorobenzene ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Hexachlorobutadiene ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Hexachloroethane ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Isophorone ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Naphthalene ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Nitrobenzene ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Phenanthrene ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Pyrene ND 260 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E QA/QC Surrogates % 2-Fluorobiphenyl 65 % 1 02/17/24 MR 30-130% % Nitrobenzene-d5 68 % 1 02/17/24 MR 30-130 % % Terphenyl-d14 60 % 1 02/17/24 MR 30-130 % Non Target Semivolatile Compounds Present 1 02/19/24 MR Ver 2 Page 35 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Phoenix I.D.: CQ05220 Client ID: B-5 (7-10°) RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference 1 = This parameter is not certified by the primary accrediting authority (NY NELAC) for this matrix. NY NELAC does not offer certification for all parameters at this time. RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level (Equivalent to NELAC LOQ, Limit of Quantitation) ND=Not Detected at RL/PQL BRL=Below Reporting Level L=Biased Low QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not "detected" compounds. Comments: Per 1.4.6 of EPA method 8270D, 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine is unstable and readily converts to Azobenzene. Azobenzene is used for the calibration of 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine. Please be advised that the NY 375 soil criteria for chromium are based on hexavalent chromium and trivalent chromium. All soils, solids and sludges are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted in the sample comments. S - Laboratory solvent, contamination is possible. If you are the client above and have any questions concerning this testing, please do not hesitate to contact Phoenix Client Services at ext.200. The contents of this report cannot be discussed with anyone other than the client listed above without their written consent. ab Laboratory Director February 21, 2024 Reviewed and Released by: Greg Lawrence, Assistant Lab Director Ver 2 Page 36 of 71 Analysis Report February 21, 2024 Sample Information Matrix: SOIL Location Code: NETC Rush Request: Standard P.O.#: 23.1211015 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. a ae) PHOENIX © 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 NY # 11301 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 FOR: Attn: Mr. Jeff Wink NETC PO Box 2167 Ballston Spa, NY 12020 Custody Information Date Time Collected by: 02/07/24 14:45 Received by: SR1 02/09/24 16:51 Analyzed by: see "By" below Laboratory Data SDG ID: GCQ05214 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Phoenix ID: CQ05221 Client ID: COMP-1 RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference Arsenic 8.04 0.74 mg/Kg 1 02/12/24 TH SW6010D Barium 121 0.37 mg/Kg 1 02/12/24 TH SW6010D Cadmium 0.55 0.37 mg/Kg 1 02/12/24 TH SW6010D Chromium 12.4 0.37 mg/Kg 1 02/12/24 TH SW6010D Lead 232 0.37 mg/Kg 1 02/12/24 TH SW6010D Mercury 0.18 0.03 mg/Kg 2 02/12/24 GW SW7471B Selenium <1.5 1.5 mg/Kg 1 02/12/24 TH SW6010D Silver < 0.37 0.37 mg/Kg 1 02/12/24 TH SW6010D Percent Solid 96 % 02/09/24 CV SW846-%Solid Mercury Digestion Completed 02/12/24 K/HL SW/7471B Soil Extraction for PCB Completed 02/14/24 H/U SW3546 Soil Extraction for SVOA Completed 02/16/24 C/A SW3546 Total Metals Digest Completed 02/09/24 L/P SW3050B Polychlorinated Biphenyls PCB-1016 ND 340 ug/Kg 10 02/15/24 SC SW8082A PCB-1221 ND 340 ug/Kg 10 02/15/24 SC SW8082A PCB-1232 ND 340 ug/Kg 10 02/15/24 SC SW8082A PCB-1242 ND 340 ug/Kg 10 02/15/24 SC SW8082A PCB-1248 ND 340 ug/Kg 10 02/15/24 SC SW8082A PCB-1254 ND 340 ug/Kg 10 02/15/24 SC SW8082A PCB-1260 ND 340 ug/Kg 10 02/15/24 SC SW8082A PCB-1262 ND 340 ug/Kg 10 02/15/24 SC SW8082A PCB-1268 ND 340 ug/Kg 10 02/15/24 SC SW8082A QA/QC Surrogates % DCBP 55 % 10 02/15/24 SC 30-150 % % DCBP (Confirmation) 54 % 10 02/15/24 SC 30-150% Ver 2 Page 37 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Client ID: COMP-1 Phoenix I.D.: CQ05221 RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference % TCMX 61 % 10 02/15/24 SC 30-150 % % TCMX (Confirmation) 56 % 10 02/15/24 SC 30-150 % Semivolatiles 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 2,2'-Oxybis(1-Chloropropane) ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 1 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 2-Chloronaphthalene ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 2-Nitroaniline ND 1000 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND 1400 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 3-Nitroaniline ND 1000 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 4-Chloroaniline ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 4-Nitroaniline ND 1000 ug/Kg 1 02/1 7/24 MR SW8270E Acenaphthene ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/1 7/24 MR SW8270E Acenaphthylene ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Anthracene ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benz(a)anthracene ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzidine ND 340 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzo(a)pyrene ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzoic acid ND 690 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzyl alcohol ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzyl butyl phthalate ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Chrysene ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Dibenzofuran ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Diethyl phthalate ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Dimethylphthalate ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Di-n-butylphthalate ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Di-n-octylphthalate ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Fluoranthene ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Fluorene ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Hexachlorobenzene ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Hexachlorobutadiene ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Hexachloroethane ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E lsophorone ND 240 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Ver 2 Page 38 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Phoenix I.D.: CQ05221 Client ID: COMP-1 RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Naphthalene ND 240 ug/Kg Nitrobenzene ND 240 ug/Kg N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND 240 ug/Kg N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND 240 ug/Kg N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND 240 ug/Kg Phenanthrene ND 240 ug/Kg Pyrene ND 240 ug/Kg QAIQC Surrogates % 2-Fluorobiphenyl 63 % 1 02/17/24 MR 30-130 % % Nitrobenzene-d5 66 % 1 02/17/24 MR 30-130% % Terphenyl-d14 55 % 1 02/17/24 MR 30-130 % — 2 2 2 eS Se Non Target Semivolatile Compounds Absent 1 02/20/24 MR 1 = This parameter is not certified by the primary accrediting authority (NY NELAC) for this matrix. NY NELAC does not offer certification for all parameters at this time. RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level (Equivalent to NELAC LOQ, Limit of Quantitation) ND=Not Detected at RL/PQL BRL=Below Reporting Level L=Biased Low QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not “detected" compounds. Comments: Per 1.4.6 of EPA method 8270D, 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine is unstable and readily converts to Azobenzene. Azobenzene is used for the calibration of 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine. Please be advised that the NY 375 soil criteria for chromium are based on hexavalent chromium and trivalent chromium. All soils, solids and sludges are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted in the sample comments. If you are the client above and have any questions concerning this testing, please do not hesitate to contact Phoenix Client Services at ext.200. The contents of this report cannot be discussed with anyone other than the client listed above without their written consent. Pyle Sto Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director February 21, 2024 Reviewed and Released by: Greg Lawrence, Assistant Lab Director Ver 2 Page 39 of 71 — ; PHOENIX © } Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 NY # 11301 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Analysis Report FOR: Attn: Mr. Jeff Wink NETC February 21, 2024 PO Box 2167 Ballston Spa, NY 12020 Sample Information Custody Information Date Time Matrix: SOIL Collected by: 02/08/24 12:45 Location Code: NETC Received by: SR1 02/09/24 16:51 Rush Request: Standard Analyzed by: see "By" below P.O.#: 23.1211015 Laboratory Data SDG ID: GCQ05214 Phoenix ID: CQ05222 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Client ID: HA-1 (0-5°) RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference Percent Solid 83 % 02/09/24 CV SW846-%Solid Soil Extraction for PCB Completed 02/19/24 C/U SW3546 Soil Extraction for SVOA Completed 02/16/24 C/A SW3546 Polychlorinated Biphenyls PCB-1016 ND 400 ug/Kg 10 02/20/24 KCA SW8082A PCB-1221 ND 400 ug/Kg 10 02/20/24 KCA SW8082A PCB-1232 ND 400 ug/Kg 10 02/20/24 KCA SW8082A PCB-1242 ND 400 ug/Kg 10 02/20/24 KCA SW8082A PCB-1248 ND 400 ug/Kg 10 02/20/24 KCA SW8082A PCB-1254 ND 400 ug/Kg 10 02/20/24 KCA SW8082A PCB-1260 ND 400 ug/Kg 10 02/20/24 KCA SW8082A PCB-1262 ND 400 ug/Kg 10 02/20/24 KCA SW8082A PCB-1268 ND 400 ug/Kg 10 02/20/24 KCA SW8082A QA/QC Surrogates % DCBP 88 % 10 02/20/24 KCA 30-150 % % DCBP (Confirmation) 94 % 10 02/20/24 KCA 30-150 % % TCMX 75 % 10 02/20/24 KCA 30-150 % % TCMX (Confirmation) 76 % 10 02/20/24 KCA 30-150 % Semivolatiles 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 2,2'-Oxybis(1-Chloropropane) ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 1 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Ver 2 Page 40 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Client ID: HA-1 (0-5°) Phoenix I.D.: CQ05222 RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 2-Chloronaphthalene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 2-Nitroaniline ND 1200 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND 1600 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 3-Nitroaniline ND 1200 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 4-Chloroaniline ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E 4-Nitroaniline ND 1200 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Acenaphthene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Acenaphthylene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Anthracene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benz(a)anthracene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzidine ND 400 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzo(a)pyrene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzoic acid ND 790 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzyl alcohol ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Benzyl butyl phthalate ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ND 330 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Chrysene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Dibenzofuran ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Diethyl phthalate ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Dimethylphthalate ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Di-n-butylphthalate ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Di-n-octylphthalate ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Fluoranthene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Fluorene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Hexachlorobenzene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Hexachlorobutadiene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Hexachloroethane ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Isophorone ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Naphthalene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Nitrobenzene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Phenanthrene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E Pyrene ND 280 ug/Kg 1 02/17/24 MR SW8270E QAI/QC Surrogates % 2-Fluorobiphenyl 70 % 1 02/17/24 MR 30-130 % Ver 2 Page 41 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Phoenix I.D.: CQ05222 Client ID: HA-1 (0-5°) RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference % Nitrobenzene-d5 71 % 1 02/17/24 MR 30-130% % Terphenyl-d14 61 % 1 02/17/24 MR 30-130% Non Target Semivolatile Compounds Present 1 02/19/24 MR 1 = This parameter is not certified by the primary accrediting authority (NY NELAC) for this matrix. NY NELAC does not offer certification for all parameters at this time. RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level (Equivalent to NELAC LOQ, Limit of Quantitation) ND=Not Detected at RL/PQL BRL=Below Reporting Level L=Biased Low QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not “detected" compounds. Comments: Per 1.4.6 of EPA method 8270D, 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine is unstable and readily converts to Azobenzene. Azobenzene is used for the calibration of 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine. All soils, solids and sludges are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted in the sample comments. If you are the client above and have any questions concerning this testing, please do not hesitate to contact Phoenix Client Services at ext.200. The contents of this report cannot be discussed with anyone other than the client listed above without their written consent. Aa Laboratory Director February 21, 2024 Reviewed and Released by: Greg Lawrence, Assistant Lab Director Ver 2 Page 42 of 71 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 NY # 11301 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Analysis Report FOR: Attn: Mr. Jeff Wink NETC February 21, 2024 PO Box 2167 Ballston Spa, NY 12020 Sample Information Custody Information Date Time Matrix: SOIL Collected by: 02/08/24 12:30 Location Code: NETC Received by: SR1 02/09/24 16:51 Rush Request: Standard Analyzed by: see "By" below P.O: 23.1211015 Laboratory Data SDG ID: GCQ05214 Phoenix ID: CQ05223 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Client ID: HA-1 (2-3°) RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference Field Extraction Completed 02/08/24 SW5035A 1 Volatiles 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI = SW8260D 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI = SWé8260D 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI = SW8260D 1,1-Dichloropropene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI. SW8260D 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI = SW8260D 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SWé8260D 2-Chlorotoluene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 2-Hexanone ND 28 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 2-lsopropyltoluene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 1 Ver 2 Page 43 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Phoenix |.D.: CQ05223 Client ID: HA-1 (2-3°) RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference 4-Chlorotoluene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND 28 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI = SW8260D Acetone ND 28 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI = SW8260D Acrylonitrile ND 11 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SWé8260D Benzene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Bromobenzene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Bromochloromethane ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Bromodichloromethane ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SWé8260D Bromoform ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Bromomethane ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Carbon Disulfide ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI = SW8260D Carbon tetrachloride ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Chlorobenzene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Chloroethane ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Chloroform ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Chloromethane ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI = SW8260D Dibromochloromethane ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SWé8260D Dibromomethane ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SWé8260D Ethylbenzene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Hexachlorobutadiene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Isopropylbenzene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI = SW8260D m&p-Xylene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Methyl Ethyl Ketone ND 28 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI =SW8260D Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) ND 11 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI = SW8260D Methylene chloride ND 11 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Naphthalene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI = SW8260D n-Butylbenzene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D n-Propylbenzene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SWé8260D o-Xylene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SWé8260D p-lsopropyltoluene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI. = SW8260D sec-Butylbenzene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Styrene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI = SW8260D tert-Butylbenzene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Tetrachloroethene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Tetrahydrofuran (THF) ND 11 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI = SW8260D Toluene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Total Xylenes ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI =SW8260D trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene ND 11 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Trichloroethene ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Trichlorofluoromethane ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Trichlorotrifluoroethane ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D Vinyl chloride ND 5.6 ug/Kg 1 02/12/24 JLI SW8260D QAI/QC Surrogates % 1,2-dichlorobenzene-d4 96 % 1 02/12/24 JLI 70-130 % Ver 2 Page 44 of 71 Project ID: 33-37 CAROLINE STREET Phoenix 1.D.: CQ05223 Client ID: HA-1 (2-3°) RL/ Parameter Result PQL Units Dilution Date/Time By Reference % Bromofluorobenzene 93 % 1 02/12/24 JLI 70-130% % Dibromofluoromethane 105 % 1 02/12/24 JLI 70-130 % % Toluene-d8 94 % 1 02/12/24 JLI 70-130 % Non Target Volatile Compounds Absent 1 02/14/24 JLI 1 = This parameter is not certified by the primary accrediting authority (NY NELAC) for this matrix. NY NELAC does not offer certification for all parameters at this time. RL/PQL=Reporting/Practical Quantitation Level (Equivalent to NELAC LOQ, Limit of Quantitation) ND=Not Detected at RL/PQL BRL=Below Reporting Level L=Biased Low QA/QC Surrogates: Surrogates are compounds (preceeded with a %) added by the lab to determine analysis efficiency. Surrogate results(%) listed in the report are not "detected" compounds. Comments: Results are reported on an “‘as received” basis, and are not corrected for dry weight. All soils, solids and sludges are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted in the sample comments. If you are the client above and have any questions concerning this testing, please do not hesitate to contact Phoenix Client Services at ext.200. The contents of this report cannot be discussed with anyone other than the client listed above without their written consent. yl Ste Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director February 21, 2024 Reviewed and Released by: Greg Lawrence, Assistant Lab Director Ver 2 Page 45 of 77 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 QA/QC Report NY # 11301 February 21, 2024 QA/QC Data SDG I.D.: GCQ05214 % % Blk Sample Dup Dup LCS LCSD LCS MS MSD MS Rec RPD Parameter Blank RL Result Result RPD % % RPD % % RPD Limits Limits QA/QC Batch 717912 (mg/kg), QC Sample No: CQ05078 2X (CQ05220, CQ05221) Mercury - Soil BRL 0.03 <0.03 <0.03 NC 117. 95.6 3920.1 101 103 2.0 70-130 30 Comment: Additional Mercury criteria: LCS acceptance range for waters is 80-120% and for soils is 70-130%. QA/QC Batch 717806 (mg/kg), QC Sample No: CQ05076 (CQ05220, CQ05221) ICP Metals - Soil Arsenic BRL 0.67 4.11 2.17 NC 98.1 102 3.9 99.3 75-125 30 Barium BRL 0.33 1910 562 109 102 105 2.9 NC 75-125 30 r Cadmium BRL 0.33 1.21 0.95 NC 97.9 102 4.1 95.1 75-125 30 Chromium BRL 0.33 29.7 15.0 65.8 103 108 47 97.7 75-125 30 r Lead BRL 0.33 1120 597 60.9 99.7 103 3.3 43.2 75-125 30) mr Selenium BRL 1.3 <1.7 <1.8 NC 89.7 92.8 3.4 88.4 75-125 30 Silver BRL 0.33 <0.43 <0.44 NC 97.3 102 4.7 100 75-125 30 m = This parameter is outside laboratory MS/MSD specified recovery limits. r= This parameter is outside laboratory RPD specified recovery limits. Page 46 of 71 QA/QC Report Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 NY # 11301 February 21, 2024 QA/QC Data SDG I.D.: GCQ05214 % % Blk LCS LCSD LCS MS MSD MS Rec RPD Parameter Blank RL % % RPD % % RPD Limits Limits QA/QC Batch 718226 (ug/Kg), QC Sample No: CQ04825 2X (CQ05220, CQ05221) Polychlorinated Biphenyls - Soil PCB-1016 ND 33 91 85 6.8 87 90 3.4 40-140 30 PCB-1221 ND 33 40-140 30 PCB-1232 ND 33 40-140 30 PCB-1242 ND 33 40-140 30 PCB-1248 ND 33 40-140 30 PCB-1254 ND 33 40-140 30 PCB-1260 ND 33 94 88 6.6 81 91 11.6 40-140 30 PCB-1262 ND 33 40-140 30 PCB-1268 ND 33 40-140 30 % DCBP (Surrogate Rec) 87 % 92 95 3.2 91 97 6.4 30-150 30 % DCBP (Surrogate Rec) (Confirm 82 % 89 98 9.6 89 99 10.6 30-150 30 % TCMX (Surrogate Rec) 82 % 83 79 4.9 80 84 49 30-150 30 % TCMX (Surrogate Rec) (Confirm 76 % 81 82 1.2 78 86 9.8 30-150 30 QA/QC Batch 718788 (ug/Kg), QC Sample No: CQ08526 2X (CQ05222) Polychlorinated Biphenyls - Soil PCB-1016 ND 33 90 89 1.1 94 85 10.1 40-140 30 PCB-1221 ND 33 40-140 30 PCB-1232 ND 33 40-140 30 PCB-1242 ND 33 40-140 30 PCB-1248 ND 33 40-140 30 PCB-1254 ND 33 40-140 30 PCB-1260 ND 33 95 89 6.5 89 85 4.6 40-140 30 PCB-1262 ND 33 40-140 30 PCB-1268 ND 33 40-140 30 % DCBP (Surrogate Rec) 84 % 92 89 3.3 89 90 1.1. 30-150 30 % DCBP (Surrogate Rec) (Confirm 82 % 89 86 3.4 84 84 0.0 30-150 30 % TCMX (Surrogate Rec) 76 % 80 80 0.0 84 79 6.1 30-150 30 % TCMX (Surrogate Rec) (Confirm 75 % 83 82 1.2 86 83 3.6 30-150 30 QA/QC Batch 718015 (ug/L), QC Sample No: CQ03610 (CQ05214, CQ05216, CQ05217, CQ05218) Semivolatiles - Ground Water 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 3.5 74 79 6.5 30-130 20 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 1.0 73 76 4.0 30-130 20 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine ND 1.6 83 88 5.8 30-130 20 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 1.0 72 74 2.7 30-130 20 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 1.0 70 73 4.2 30-130 20 2,2'-Oxybis(1-Chloropropane) ND 1.0 69 71 2.9 30-130 20 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND 3.5 89 93 4.4 30-130 20 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND 3.5 86 90 4.5 30-130 20 2-Chloronaphthalene ND 3.5 77 86 11.0 30-130 20 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 3.5 81 84 3.6 30-130 20 Page 47 of 71 QA/QC Data SDG I.D.: GCQ05214 % % Blk LCS LCSD LCS MS MSD MS Rec RP Parameter Blank RL % % RPD % % RPD Limits Limits 2-Nitroaniline ND 3.5 162 170 4.8 30-130 20 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND 5.0 84 82 2.4 30-130 20 3-Nitroaniline ND 5.0 98 104 5.9 30-130 20 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND 3.5 80 86 7.2 30-130 20 4-Chloroaniline ND 3.5 90 94 4.3 30-130 20 4-Chlorophenyl pheny! ether ND 1.0 81 88 8.3 30-130 20 4-Nitroaniline ND 5.0 96 103 7.0 30-130 20 Acenaphthene ND 1.5 74 81 9.0 30-130 20 Anthracene ND 1.5 79 85 7.3 30-130 20 Benzidine ND 45 12 112 =161.3 30-130 20 Benzoic acid ND 10 108 105 2.8 30-130 20 Benzyl Alcohol ND 5.0 88 88 0.0 30-130 20 Benzyl butyl phthalate ND 1.5 86 88 2.3 30-130 20 Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND 3.5 79 84 6.1 30-130 20 Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ND 1.0 81 82 1.2 30-130 20 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ND 1.5 82 84 2.4 30-130 20 Dibenzofuran ND 3.5 78 86 9.8 30-130 20 Diethyl phthalate ND 1.5 88 93 5.5 30-130 20 Dimethylphthalate ND 1.5 84 89 5.8 30-130 20 Di-n-butylphthalate ND 1.5 85 90 5.7 30-130 20 Di-n-octylphthalate ND 1.5 87 91 4.5 30-130 20 Fluoranthene ND 1.5 79 86 8.5 30-130 20 Fluorene ND 1.5 81 87 7 30-130 20 Hexachloroethane ND 3.5 77 82 6.3 30-130 20 Isophorone ND 3.5 76 79 3.9 30-130 20 Naphthalene ND 1.5 74 79 6.5 30-130 20 N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND 1.0 72 79 9.3 30-130 20 N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND 3.5 87 88 1.1 30-130 20 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND 3.5 74 80 7.8 30-130 20 Pyrene ND 1.5 80 86 7.2 30-130 20 % 2-Fluorobiphenyl 71 % 71 77 8.1 30-130 20 % Nitrobenzene-d5 77 % 80 80 0.0 30-130 20 % Terphenyl-d14 76 % 69 75 8.3 30-130 20 Comment: ALCS and LCS Duplicate were performed instead of a matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate. Additional 8270 criteria: 20% of compounds can be outside of acceptance criteria as long as recovery is at least 10%. (Acid surrogates acceptance range for aqueous samples: 15-110%, for soils 30-130%) QA/QC Batch 718583 (ug/kg), QC Sample No: CQ05089 (CQ05219) Semivolatiles - Soil 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 180 46 47 2.2 57 50 13.1. 30-130 30 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine ND 230 80 68 16.2 55 60 8.7 30-130 30 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 230 42 43 2.4 55 47 15.7 30-130 30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 230 42 44 4.7 55 48 13.6 30-130 30 2,2'-Oxybis(1-Chloropropane) ND 230 45 44 2.2 47 42 11.2 30-130 30 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND 130 107 92 15.1 74 81 9.0 30-130 30 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND 130 109 95 13.7 77 82 6.3 30-130 30 2-Chloronaphthalene ND 230 89 76 15.8 70 72 2.8 30-130 30 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 230 81 73 10.4 68 68 0.0 30-130 30 2-Nitroaniline ND 330 121 109 +=10.4 78 86 9.8 30-130 30 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND 130 81 84 3.6 46 58 23.1 30-130 30 3-Nitroaniline ND 330 83 93 11.4 57 60 5.1. 30-130 30 4-Bromopheny! phenyl ether ND 230 117 99 16.7 81 88 8.3 30-130 30 Page 48 of 71 QA/QC Data SDG |.D.: GCQ05214 % % Blk LCS LCSD LCS MS MSD MS Rec RP Parameter Blank RL % % RPD % % RPD Limits Limits 4-Chloroaniline ND 230 53 70 27.6 45 45 0.0 30-130 30 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND 230 103 87 16.8 72 78 8.0 30-130 30 4-Nitroaniline ND 230 104 88 16.7 74 78 5.3 30-130 30 Acenaphthene ND 230 84 73 14.0 64 67 4.6 30-130 30 Acenaphthylene ND 130 79 67 16.4 59 62 5.0 30-130 30 Anthracene ND 230 97 82 16.8 68 76 11.1 30-130 30 Benz(a)anthracene ND 230 97 84 14.4 63 70 10.5 30-130 30 Benzidine ND 330 13 53 121.2 25 22 12.8 30-130 30 Imyr Benzo(a)pyrene ND 130 110 95 14.6 71 79 10.7 30-130 30 Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND 160 100 85 16.2 65 72 10.2 30-130 30 Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 230 109 90 19.1 65 68 45 30-130 30 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 230 100 84 17.4 67 75 11.3. 30-130 30 Benzoic Acid ND 670 82 46 56.3 92 105 13.2 30-130 30 r Benzyl Alcohol ND 230 49 49 0.0 46 43 6.7 30-130 30 Benzyl butyl phthalate ND 230 101 85 17.2 65 71 8.8 30-130 30 Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND 230 70 64 9.0 61 58 5.0 30-130 30 Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ND 130 48 47 2.1 54 47 13.9 30-130 30 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ND 230 98 83 16.6 67 74 9.9 30-130 30 Chrysene ND 230 98 84 15.4 63 73 14.7 30-130 30 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND 130 107 90 17.3 67 70 4.4 30-130 30 Dibenzofuran ND 230 91 79 14.1 68 72 5.7 30-130 30 Diethyl phthalate ND 230 93 80 15.0 66 70 5.9 30-130 30 Dimethylphthalate ND 230 96 82 15.7 67 72 7.2 30-130 30 Di-n-butylphthalate ND 670 95 83 13.5 65 73 11.6 30-130 30 Di-n-octylphthalate ND 230 96 83 14.5 64 71 10.4 30-130 30 Fluoranthene ND 230 93 79 16.3 60 70 15.4 30-130 30 Fluorene ND 230 94 81 14.9 68 73 7.1 30-130 30 Hexachlorobenzene ND 130 100 85 16.2 71 79 10.7 30-130 30 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 230 75 73 2.7 79 77 2.6 30-130 30 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND 230 61 53 14.0 50 44 12.8 30-130 30 Hexachloroethane ND 130 46 47 2.2 62 54 13.8 30-130 30 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 230 119 99 18.3 72 76 5.4 30-130 30 Isophorone ND 130 69 62 10.7 60 58 3.4 30-130 30 Naphthalene ND 230 67 63 6.2 64 64 0.0 30-130 30 Nitrobenzene ND 130 63 60 4.9 62 56 10.2 30-130 30 N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND 230 32 35 9.0 44 35 22.8 30-130 30 N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND 130 67 63 6.2 63 59 6.6 30-130 30 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND 130 89 76 15.8 66 71 7.3 30-130 30 Phenanthrene ND 130 96 82 15.7 64 73 13.1 30-130 30 Pyrene ND 230 92 78 16.5 61 71 15.2 30-130 30 % 2-Fluorobipheny| 68 % 83 74 11.5 64 65 1.6 30-130 30 % Nitrobenzene-d5 52 % 57 55 3.6 54 50 7.7 30-130 30 % Terphenyl-d14 61 % 83 71 15.6 55 62 12.0 30-130 30 Comment: Additional 8270 criteria: 20% of compounds can be outside of acceptance criteria as long as recovery is at least 10%. (Acid surrogates acceptance range for aqueous samples: 15-110%, for soils 30-130%) QA/QC Batch 718600 (ug/kg), QC Sample No: CQ05265 (CQ05220, CQ05221, CQ05222) Semivolatiles - Soil 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 180 62 57 8.4 58 56 3.5 30-130 30 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine ND 230 74 72 2.7 73 74 1.4 30-130 30 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 230 61 55 10.3 55 53 3.7. 30-130 30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 230 60 55 8.7 55 53 3.7. 30-130 30 Page 49 of 71 QA/QC Data SDG |.D.: GCQ05214 % % Blk LCS LCSD LCS MS MSD MS Rec RP Parameter Blank RL % % RPD % % RPD Limits Limits 2,2'-Oxybis(1-Chloropropane) ND 230 61 56 8.5 58 56 3.5 30-130 30 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND 130 77 75 2.6 77 77 0.0 30-130 30 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND 130 76 73 4.0 76 76 0.0 30-130 30 2-Chloronaphthalene ND 230 72 67 7.2 69 69 0.0 30-130 30 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 230 71 67 5.8 69 69 0.0 30-130 30 2-Nitroaniline ND 330 148 145 2.0 147 148 0.7. 30-130 30 Im 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND 130 71 71 0.0 76 73 4.0 30-130 30 3-Nitroaniline ND 330 88 86 2.3 86 85 1.2 30-130 30 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND 230 73 70 4.2 71 71 0.0 30-130 30 4-Chloroaniline ND 230 87 80 8.4 82 85 3.6 30-130 30 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND 230 72 69 4.3 71 72 1.4 30-130 30 4-Nitroaniline ND 230 86 84 2.4 87 87 0.0 30-130 30 Acenaphthene ND 230 66 62 6.3 64 64 0.0 30-130 30 Acenaphthylene ND 130 62 58 6.7 61 60 1.7 30-130 30 Anthracene ND 230 72 69 4.3 71 71 0.0 30-130 30 Benz(a)anthracene ND 230 71 68 4.3 69 69 0.0 30-130 30 Benzidine ND 330 84 80 4.9 87 79 9.6 30-130 30 Benzo(a)pyrene ND 130 77 74 4.0 76 76 0.0 30-130 30 Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND 160 71 69 2.9 70 70 0.0 30-130 30 Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 230 76 74 2.7 75 77 2.6 30-130 30 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 230 75 72 4.1 73 73 0.0 30-130 30 Benzoic Acid ND 670 51 59 145 112 92 19.6 30-130 30 Benzyl Alcohol ND 230 72 68 5.7 68 56 19.4 30-130 30 Benzyl butyl phthalate ND 230 77 75 2.6 76 74 2.7 30-130 30 Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND 230 71 67 5.8 68 67 1.5 30-130 30 Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ND 130 70 66 5.9 68 64 6.1 30-130 30 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ND 230 75 72 4.1 72 72 0.0 30-130 30 Chrysene ND 230 72 71 1.4 71 71 0.0 30-130 30 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND 130 75 72 4.1 73 75 2.7 30-130 30 Dibenzofuran ND 230 71 68 4.3 69 70 1.4 30-130 30 Diethy| phthalate ND 230 76 74 2.7 75 75 0.0 30-130 30 Dimethylphthalate ND 230 74 71 41 72 72 0.0 30-130 30 Di-n-butylphthalate ND 670 77 73 5.3 75 74 1.3 30-130 30 Di-n-octylphthalate ND 230 80 77 3.8 77 77 0.0 30-130 30 Fluoranthene ND 230 70 67 4.4 69 69 0.0 30-130 30 Fluorene ND 230 72 69 4.3 72 72 0.0 30-130 30 Hexachlorobenzene ND 130 80 74 7.8 77 77 0.0 30-130 30 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 230 70 64 9.0 63 63 0.0 30-130 30 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND 230 46 36 24.4 49 53 7.8 30-130 30 Hexachloroethane ND 130 68 60 12.5 61 60 1.7 30-130 30 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 230 77 76 1.3 76 78 2.6 30-130 30 Isophorone ND 130 67 64 4.6 65 64 1.6 30-130 30 Naphthalene ND 230 67 62 7.8 63 62 1.6 30-130 30 Nitrobenzene ND 130 74 70 5.6 74 71 4.1 30-130 30 N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND 230 65 62 4.7 65 58 11.4 30-130 30 N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND 130 73 69 5.6 73 70 4.2 30-130 30 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND 130 71 69 2.9 71 71 0.0 30-130 30 Phenanthrene ND 130 71 68 4.3 70 69 1.4 30-130 30 Pyrene ND 230 70 67 4.4 69 69 0.0 30-130 30 % 2-Fluorobipheny| 60 % 63 59 6.6 62 62 0.0 30-130 30 % Nitrobenzene-d5 64 % 68 65 4.5 68 66 3.0 30-130 30 % Terphenyl-d14 59 % 56 54 3.6 55 57 3.6 30-130 30 Page 50 of 71 QA/QC Data SDG I.D.: GCQ05214 % % Blk LCS LCSD LCS MS MSD MS Rec RP Parameter Blank RL % % RPD % % RPD_ Limits Limits Comment: Additional 8270 criteria: 20% of compounds can be outside of acceptance criteria as long as recovery is at least 10%. (Acid surrogates acceptance range for aqueous samples: 15-110%, for soils 30-130%) QA/QC Batch 718015 (ug/L), QC Sample No: CQ03610 (CQ05214, CQ05216, CQ05217, CQ05218) Semivolatiles (SIM) - Ground Water Acenaphthylene ND 0.50 57 63 10.0 30-130 20 Benz(a)anthracene ND 0.50 77 86 11.0 30-130 20 Benzo(a)pyrene ND 0.50 81 90 10.5 30-130 20 Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND 0.50 82 90 9.3 30-130 20 Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 0.50 70 78 10.8 30-130 20 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 0.50 72 80 10.5 30-130 20 Chrysene ND 0.50 70 78 10.8 30-130 20 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND 0.50 85 94 10.1 30-130 20 Hexachlorobenzene ND 0.50 78 89 13.2 30-130 20 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 0.50 79 89 11.9 30-130 20 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND 0.50 34 37 8.5 30-130 20 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 0.50 95 106 10.9 30-130 20 Nitrobenzene ND 0.50 72 79 9.3 30-130 20 Phenanthrene ND 0.50 70 77 9.5 30-130 20 % 2-Fluorobiphenyl 71 % 61 66 7.9 30-130 20 % Nitrobenzene-d5 87 % 77 84 8.7 30-130 20 % Terphenyl-d14 81 % 73 79 7.9 30-130 20 Comment: ALCS and LCS Duplicate were performed instead of a matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate. Additional 8270 criteria:20% of compounds can be outside of acceptance criteria as long as recovery is at least 10%. (Acid surrogates acceptance range for aqueous samples: 15-110%, for soils 30-130%) QA/QC Batch 718113 (ug/L), QC Sample No: CQ04792 (CQ05216, CQ05217, CQ05218 (250X) ) Volatiles - Ground Water 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 1.0 99 115 15.0 70-130 30 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 1.0 92 101 9.3 70-130 30 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.50 107 121 12.3 70-130 30 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 1.0 99 115 15.0 70-130 30 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 1.0 97 112 14.4 70-130 30 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 1.0 96 102 6.1 70-130 30 1,1-Dichloropropene ND 1.0 91 103. 12.4 70-130 30 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 1.0 102 116 12.8 70-130 30 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 1.0 101 117 14.7 70-130 30 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1.0 102 118 14.5 70-130 30 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 1.0 103 120 15.2 70-130 30 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 1.0 104 131 23.0 70-130 30 I 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 1.0 93 116 22.0 70-130 30 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 1.0 101 115 13.0 70-130 30 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 1.0 94 109 14.8 70-130 30 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 1.0 96 111 14.5 70-130 30 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 1.0 102 118 14.5 70-130 30 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 1.0 100 115 14.0 70-130 30 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 1.0 96 114 17.1 70-130 30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 1.0 100 115 14.0 70-130 30 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 1.0 78 89 13.2 70-130 30 2-Chlorotoluene ND 1.0 104 119 13.5 70-130 30 2-Hexanone ND 5.0 87 114 26.9 70-130 30 Page 51 of 71 QA/QC Data SDG I.D.: GCQ05214 % % Blk LCS LCSD LCS MS MSD MS Rec RP Parameter Blank RL % % RPD % % RPD_ Limits Limits 2-lsopropyltoluene ND 1.0 104 117 11.8 70-130 30 4-Chlorotoluene ND 1.0 102 117 13.7 70-130 30 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND 5.0 97 109 11.7 70-130 30 Acetone ND 5.0 89 106 17.4 70-130 30 Acrylonitrile ND 5.0 101 121 18.0 70-130 30 Benzene ND 0.70 96 111 14.5 70-130 30 Bromobenzene ND 1.0 103 119 14.4 70-130 30 Bromochloromethane ND 1.0 99 113 13.2 70-130 30 Bromodichloromethane ND 0.50 98 115 16.0 70-130 30 Bromoform ND 1.0 115 131 13.0 70-130 30 I Bromomethane ND 1.0 109 128 16.0 70-130 30 Carbon Disulfide ND 1.0 95 106 10.9 70-130 30 Carbon tetrachloride ND 1.0 87 96 9.8 70-130 30 Chlorobenzene ND 1.0 99 114 14.1 70-130 30 Chloroethane ND 1.0 99 111 11.4 70-130 30 Chloroform ND 1.0 97 111 13.5 70-130 30 Chloromethane ND 1.0 101 115 13.0 70-130 30 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.0 97 112 14.4 70-130 30 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.40 97 111 13.5 70-130 30 Dibromochloromethane ND 0.50 107 121 12.3 70-130 30 Dibromomethane ND 1.0 96 113. 16.3 70-130 30 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 1.0 91 100 9.4 70-130 30 Ethylbenzene ND 1.0 97 113. 15.2 70-130 30 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 0.40 94 107 12.9 70-130 30 Isopropylbenzene ND 1.0 107 121 12.3 70-130 30 m&p-Xylene ND 1.0 98 115 16.0 70-130 30 Methyl ethyl ketone ND 5.0 92 108 16.0 70-130 30 Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) ND 1.0 95 110 14.6 70-130 30 Methylene chloride ND 1.0 95 107 11.9 70-130 30 Naphthalene ND 1.0 112 130 14.9 70-130 30 n-Butylbenzene ND 1.0 101 115 13.0 70-130 30 n-Propylbenzene ND 1.0 102 118 14.5 70-130 30 o-Xylene ND 1.0 102 118 145 70-130 30 p-lsopropyltoluene ND 1.0 101 117 14.7 70-130 30 sec-Butylbenzene ND 1.0 100 114 13.1 70-130 30 Styrene ND 1.0 102 118 14.5 70-130 30 tert-Butylbenzene ND 1.0 101 116 13.8 70-130 30 Tetrachloroethene ND 1.0 89 100 11.6 70-130 30 Tetrahydrofuran (THF) ND 2.5 96 113, 16.3 70-130 30 Toluene ND 1.0 95 110 14.6 70-130 30 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.0 95 111 15.5 70-130 30 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.40 89 105 16.5 70-130 30 trans-1 ,4-dichloro-2-butene ND 5.0 89 104 15.5 70-130 30 Trichloroethene ND 1.0 94 105 11.1 70-130 30 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 1.0 93 103 10.2 70-130 30 Trichlorotrifluoroethane ND 1.0 89 99 10.6 70-130 30 Vinyl chloride ND 1.0 96 108 3811.8 70-130 30 % 1,2-dichlorobenzene-d4 98 % 100 99 1.0 70-130 30 % Bromofluorobenzene 92 % 96 97 1.0 70-130 30 % Dibromofluoromethane 95 % 96 97 1.0 70-130 30 % Toluene-d8& 97 % 98 99 1.0 70-130 30 Page 52 of 71 QA/QC Data SDG I.D.: GCQ05214 % % Blk LCS LCSD LCS MS MSD MS Rec RP Parameter Blank RL % % RPD % % RPD_ Limits Limits Comment: ALCS and LCS Duplicate were performed instead of a matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate. Additional 8260 criteria: 10% of compounds can be outside of acceptance criteria as long as recovery is 40-160%. QA/QC Batch 718157 (ug/kg), QC Sample No: CQ05017 (CQ05220, CQ05223) Volatiles - Soil (Low Level) 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 5.0 107 108 0.9 70-130 30 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 5.0 110 112 1.8 70-130 30 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 3.0 106 106 0.0 70-130 30 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 5.0 104 108 3.8 70-130 30 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 106 106 0.0 70-130 30 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 112 114 1.8 70-130 30 1,1-Dichloropropene ND 5.0 106 107 0.9 70-130 30 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 5.0 113 114 0.9 70-130 30 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 5.0 96 101 5.1 70-130 30 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 5.0 105 108 2.8 70-130 30 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 1.0 104 106 1.9 70-130 30 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 5.0 108 109 0.9 70-130 30 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 5.0 105 106 0.9 70-130 30 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 106 109 2.8 70-130 30 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 102 107 4.8 70-130 30 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 102 104 1.9 70-130 30 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 1.0 105 105 0.0 70-130 30 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 104 105 1.0 70-130 30 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 103 103 0.0 70-130 30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 107 110 2.8 70-130 30 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 108 108 0.0 70-130 30 2-Chlorotoluene ND 5.0 106 107 0.9 70-130 30 2-Hexanone ND 25 91 95 4.3 70-130 30 2-lsopropyltoluene ND 5.0 108 110 1.8 70-130 30 4-Chlorotoluene ND 5.0 104 107 2.8 70-130 30 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND 25 94 98 4.2 70-130 30 Acetone ND 10 95 102 7A 70-130 30 Acrylonitrile ND 5.0 102 102 0.0 70-130 30 Benzene ND 1.0 104 106 1.9 70-130 30 Bromobenzene ND 5.0 110 110 0.0 70-130 30 Bromochloromethane ND 5.0 109 106 2.8 70-130 30 Bromodichloromethane ND 5.0 106 108 1.9 70-130 30 Bromoform ND 5.0 107 110 2.8 70-130 30 Bromomethane ND 5.0 114 114 0.0 70-130 30 Carbon Disulfide ND 5.0 112 112 0.0 70-130 30 Carbon tetrachloride ND 5.0 114 113 0.9 70-130 30 Chlorobenzene ND 5.0 109 109 0.0 70-130 30 Chloroethane ND 5.0 117 115 1.7 70-130 30 Chloroform ND 5.0 107 108 0.9 70-130 30 Chloromethane ND 5.0 111 111 0.0 70-130 30 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 108 109 0.9 70-130 30 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 5.0 105 107 1.9 70-130 30 Dibromochloromethane ND 3.0 107 109 1.9 70-130 30 Dibromomethane ND 5.0 108 110 1.8 70-130 30 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 5.0 121 118 2.5 70-130 30 Ethylbenzene ND 1.0 107 107 0.0 70-130 30 Page 53 of 71 QA/QC Data SDG |.D.: GCQ05214 % % Bik LCS LCSD LCS MS MSD MS Rec RP Parameter Blank RL % % RPD % % RPD Limits Limits Hexachlorobutadiene ND 5.0 110 109 0.9 70-130 30 lsopropylbenzene ND 1.0 106 104 1.9 70-130 30 m&p-Xylene ND 2.0 105 104 1.0 70-130 30 Methyl ethyl ketone ND 5.0 97 98 1.0 70-130 30 Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) ND 1.0 108 107 0.9 70-130 30 Methylene chloride ND 5.0 107 107 0.0 70-130 30 Naphthalene ND 5.0 109 114 4.5 70-130 30 n-Butylbenzene ND 1.0 109 111 1.8 70-130 30 n-Propylbenzene ND 1.0 106 107 0.9 70-130 30 o-Xylene ND 2.0 107 106 0.9 70-130 30 p-lsopropyltoluene ND 1.0 107 109 1.9 70-130 30 sec-Butylbenzene ND 1.0 106 106 0.0 70-130 30 Styrene ND 5.0 99 99 0.0 70-130 30 tert-Butylbenzene ND 1.0 104 108 3.8 70-130 30 Tetrachloroethene ND 5.0 112 113 0.9 70-130 30 Tetrahydrofuran (THF) ND 5.0 96 95 1.0 70-130 30 Toluene ND 1.0 107 109 1.9 70-130 30 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 112 112 0.0 70-130 30 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 5.0 104 105 1.0 70-130 30 trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene ND 5.0 107 111 3.7 70-130 30 Trichloroethene ND 5.0 111 113 1.8 70-130 30 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 5.0 116 117 0.9 70-130 30 Trichlorotrifluoroethane ND 5.0 119 117 1.7 70-130 30 Vinyl chloride ND 5.0 114 113 0.9 70-130 30 % 1,2-dichlorobenzene-d4 99 % 102 103 1.0 70-130 30 % Bromofluorobenzene 102 % 101 101 0.0 70-130 30 % Dibromofluoromethane 105 % 104 109 4.7 70-130 30 % Toluene-d8 92 % 101 102 1.0 70-130 30 Comment: The Low Level MS/MSD are not reported for this batch. Additional 8260 criteria: 10% of compounds can be outside of acceptance criteria as long as recovery is 40-160%. QA/QC Batch 718157H (ug/kg), QC Sample No: CQ05017 50X (CQ05219 (50x) ) Volatiles - Soil (High Level) m&p-Xylene ND 250 107 106 0.9 93 102 9.2 70-130 30 o-Xylene ND 250 109 106 2.8 95 103 8.1 70-130 30 % 1,2-dichlorobenzene-d4 99 % 102 101 1.0 103 101 2.0 70-130 30 % Bromofluorobenzene 102 % 100 100 0.0 98 99 1.0 70-130 30 % Dibromofluoromethane 103 % 109 101 7.6 107 105 1.9 70-130 30 % Toluene-d8 93 % 102 102 0.0 103 104 1.0 70-130 30 Comment: Additional 8260 criteria: 10% of compounds can be outside of acceptance criteria as long as recovery is 40-160%. QA/QC Batch 718006 (ug/kg), QC Sample No: CQ05278 (CQ05219) Volatiles - Soil (Low Level) 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 5.0 116 118 1.7 114 115 0.9 70-130 30 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 5.0 105 105 0.0 109 107 1.9 70-130 30 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 3.0 103 105 1.9 126 128 1.6 70-130 30 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 5.0 112 113 0.9 105 107 1.9 70-130 30 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 92 92 0.0 95 96 1.0 70-130 30 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 94 94 0.0 95 96 1.0 70-130 30 1,1-Dichloropropene ND 5.0 117 117 0.0 117 115 1.7. 70-130 30 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 5.0 102 102 0.0 41 40 2.5 70-130 30 m Page 54 of 71 QA/QC Data SDG |.D.: GCQ05214 % % Bik LCS LCSD LCS MS MSD MS Rec RP Parameter Blank RL % % RPD % % RPD Limits Limits 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 5.0 98 97 1.0 118 119 0.8 70-130 30 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 5.0 105 105 0.0 50 49 2.0 70-130 30 m 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 1.0 109 110 0.9 113 119 5.2 70-130 30 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 5.0 122 126 3.2 119 117 1.7. 70-130 30 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 5.0 110 111 0.9 108 109 0.9 70-130 30 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 105 105 0.0 88 89 1.1. 70-130 30 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 95 95 0.0 90 92 2.2 70-130 30 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 115 114 0.9 114 115 0.9 70-130 30 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 1.0 109 110 0.9 122 124 1.6 70-130 30 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 110 110 0.0 97 98 1.0 70-130 30 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 112 112 0.0 116 117 0.9 70-130 30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 105 106 0.9 92 94 2.2 70-130 30 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 99 102 3.0 102 99 3.0 70-130 30 2-Chlorotoluene ND 5.0 105 106 0.9 119 119 0.0 70-130 30 2-Hexanone ND 25 97 101 4.0 61 56 8.5 70-130 30 m 2-lsopropyltoluene ND 5.0 113 114 0.9 119 122 2.5 70-130 30 4-Chlorotoluene ND 5.0 107 107 0.0 113 115 1.8 70-130 30 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND 25 104 105 1.0 86 85 1.2 70-130 30 Acetone ND 10 70 72 2.8 NC 46 NC 70-130 30 Acrylonitrile ND 5.0 90 91 1.1 60 62 3.3. 70-130 30 Benzene ND 1.0 114 116 1.7 114 114 0.0 70-130 30 Bromobenzene ND 5.0 100 101 1.0 112 112 0.0 70-130 30 Bromochloromethane ND 5.0 104 104 0.0 109 105 3.7. 70-130 30 Bromodichloromethane ND 5.0 109 110 0.9 102 104 1.9 70-130 30 Bromoform ND 5.0 125 126 0.8 101 105 3.9 70-130 30 Bromomethane ND 5.0 89 89 0.0 81 82 1.2 70-130 30 Carbon Disulfide ND 5.0 99 98 1.0 93 94 1.1. 70-130 30 Carbon tetrachloride ND 5.0 107 105 1.9 104 107 2.8 70-130 30 Chlorobenzene ND 5.0 108 108 0.0 101 102 1.0 70-130 30 Chloroethane ND 5.0 91 89 2.2 94 94 0.0 70-130 30 Chloroform ND 5.0 105 105 0.0 110 107 2.8 70-130 30 Chloromethane ND 5.0 133 134 0.7 137 135 1.5 70-130 30 lm cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 100 100 0.0 99 100 1.0 70-130 30 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 5.0 118 118 0.0 101 101 0.0 70-130 30 Dibromochloromethane ND 3.0 116 117 0.9 110 112 1.8 70-130 30 Dibromomethane ND 5.0 105 106 0.9 99 101 2.0 70-130 30 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 5.0 153 153 0.0 157 157 0.0 70-130 30 Im Ethylbenzene ND 1.0 109 109 0.0 106 107 0.9 70-130 30 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 5.0 106 106 0.0 73 77 5.3 70-130 30 Isopropylbenzene ND 1.0 106 106 0.0 135 136 0.7. 70-130 30 Methyl ethyl ketone ND 5.0 95 96 1.0 NC 24 NC 70-130 30 Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) ND 1.0 85 84 1.2 87 88 1.1. 70-130 30 Methylene chloride ND 5.0 87 86 1.2 94 94 0.0 70-130 30 Naphthalene ND 5.0 104 106 1.9 50 49 2.0 70-130 30 m n-Butylbenzene ND 1.0 115 115 0.0 110 114 3.6 70-130 30 n-Propylbenzene ND 1.0 107 108 0.9 127 129 1.6 70-130 30 p-lsopropyltoluene ND 1.0 114 114 0.0 83 188 77.5 70-130 30 mr sec-Butylbenzene ND 1.0 113 114 0.9 124 128 3.2 70-130 30 Styrene ND 5.0 113 114 0.9 89 90 1.1. 70-130 30 tert-Butylbenzene ND 1.0 109 110 0.9 127 130 2.3. 70-130 30 Tetrachloroethene ND 5.0 115 116 0.9 105 106 0.9 70-130 30 Tetrahydrofuran (THF) ND 5.0 98 101 3.0 95 96 1.0 70-130 30 Toluene ND 1.0 114 114 0.0 99 111 11.4 70-130 30 Page 55 of 71 QA/QC Data SDG |.D.: GCQ05214 % % Blk LCS LCSD LCS MS MSD MS Rec RP Parameter Blank RL % % RPD % % RPD_ Limits Limits trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 96 95 1.0 94 96 2.1 70-130 30 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 5.0 113 113 0.0 93 94 1.1. 70-130 30 trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene ND 5.0 120 122 1.7 115 116 0.9 70-130 30 Trichloroethene ND 5.0 112 112 0.0 107 108 0.9 70-130 30 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 5.0 91 89 2.2 94 95 1.1. 70-130 30 Trichlorotrifluoroethane ND 5.0 96 95 1.0 98 100 2.0 70-130 30 Vinyl chloride ND 5.0 119 119 0.0 122 122 0.0 70-130 30 % 1,2-dichlorobenzene-d4 101 % 100 99 1.0 98 97 1.0 70-130 30 % Bromofluorobenzene 100 % 104 103 1.0 90 90 0.0 70-130 30 % Dibromofluoromethane 94 % 94 92 2.2 102 96 6.1 70-130 30 % Toluene-d8 102 % 102 102 0.0 100 100 0.0 70-130 30 Comment: Additional 8260 criteria: 10% of compounds can be outside of acceptance criteria as long as recovery is 40-160%. QA/QC Batch 718197 (ug/L), QC Sample No: CQ05595 (CQ05214 (2x) ) Volatiles - Ground Water 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 1.0 101 108 6.7 70-130 30 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 1.0 97 105 7.9 70-130 30 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.50 104 112 7.4 70-130 30 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 1.0 97 104 7.0 70-130 30 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 1.0 102 111 8.5 70-130 30 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 1.0 101 111 9.4 70-130 30 1,1-Dichloropropene ND 1.0 101 107 5.8 70-130 30 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 1.0 101 108 6.7 70-130 30 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 1.0 103 107 3.8 70-130 30 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1.0 103 110 6.6 70-130 30 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 1.0 110 117 6.2 70-130 30 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 1.0 100 104 3.9 70-130 30 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 1.0 95 106 10.9 70-130 30 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 1.0 103 110 6.6 70-130 30 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 1.0 97 104 7.0 70-130 30 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 1.0 99 105 5.9 70-130 30 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 1.0 110 117 6.2 70-130 30 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 1.0 104 111 6.5 70-130 30 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 1.0 96 105 9.0 70-130 30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 1.0 103 111 7.5 70-130 30 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 1.0 86 93 7.8 70-130 30 2-Chlorotoluene ND 1.0 109 115 5.4 70-130 30 2-Hexanone ND 5.0 91 105 14.3 70-130 30 2-lsopropyltoluene ND 1.0 110 117 6.2 70-130 30 4-Chlorotoluene ND 1.0 109 113 3.6 70-130 30 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND 5.0 92 98 6.3 70-130 30 Acetone ND 5.0 85 93 9.0 70-130 30 Acrylonitrile ND 5.0 103 106 2.9 70-130 30 Benzene ND 0.70 100 108 7.7 70-130 30 Bromobenzene ND 1.0 104 111 6.5 70-130 30 Bromochloromethane ND 1.0 99 108 8.7 70-130 30 Bromodichloromethane ND 0.50 102 105 2.9 70-130 30 Bromoform ND 1.0 96 111 14.5 70-130 30 Bromomethane ND 1.0 110 120 8.7 70-130 30 Carbon Disulfide ND 1.0 103 111 75 70-130 30 Carbon tetrachloride ND 1.0 97 103 6.0 70-130 30 Chlorobenzene ND 1.0 101 109 7.6 70-130 30 Page 56 of 71 QA/QC Data SDG I.D.: GCQ05214 % % Blk LCS LCSD LCS MS MSD MS Rec RP Parameter Blank RL % % RPD % % RPD_ Limits Limits Chloroethane ND 1.0 107 115 7.2 70-130 30 Chloroform ND 1.0 100 108 7.7 70-130 30 Chloromethane ND 1.0 95 104 9.0 70-130 30 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.0 99 108 8.7 70-130 30 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.40 95 102 7.1 70-130 30 Dibromochloromethane ND 0.50 99 108 8.7 70-130 30 Dibromomethane ND 1.0 97 103 6.0 70-130 30 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 1.0 105 111 5.6 70-130 30 Ethylbenzene ND 1.0 101 111 9.4 70-130 30 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 0.40 100 105 4.9 70-130 30 lsopropylbenzene ND 1.0 114 122 6.8 70-130 30 m&p-Xylene ND 1.0 100 111 10.4 70-130 30 Methyl ethyl ketone ND 5.0 89 96 7.6 70-130 30 Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) ND 1.0 93 101 8.2 70-130 30 Methylene chloride ND 1.0 97 104 7.0 70-130 30 Naphthalene ND 1.0 109 117 7.1 70-130 30 n-Butylbenzene ND 1.0 111 118 6.1 70-130 30 n-Propylbenzene ND 1.0 111 118 6.1 70-130 30 o-Xylene ND 1.0 100 112 11.3 70-130 30 p-lsopropyltoluene ND 1.0 111 119 7.0 70-130 30 sec-Butylbenzene ND 1.0 110 116 5.3 70-130 30 Styrene ND 1.0 99 111 11.4 70-130 30 tert-Butylbenzene ND 1.0 111 117 5.3 70-130 30 Tetrachloroethene ND 1.0 97 102 5.0 70-130 30 Tetrahydrofuran (THF) ND 2.5 93 103. 10.2 70-130 30 Toluene ND 1.0 100 107 6.8 70-130 30 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.0 104 112 7.4 70-130 30 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.40 87 95 8.8 70-130 30 trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene ND 5.0 72 74 2.7 70-130 30 Trichloroethene ND 1.0 100 105 4.9 70-130 30 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 1.0 107 113 5.5 70-130 30 Trichlorotrifluoroethane ND 1.0 104 109 4.7 70-130 30 Vinyl chloride ND 1.0 104 113 8.3 70-130 30 % 1,2-dichlorobenzene-d4 98 % 99 98 1.0 70-130 30 % Bromofluorobenzene 90 % 91 94 3.2 70-130 30 % Dibromofluoromethane 95 % 92 96 4.3 70-130 30 % Toluene-d8 96 % 98 99 1.0 70-130 30 Comment: ALCS and LCS Duplicate were performed instead of a matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate. Additional 8260 criteria: 10% of compounds can be outside of acceptance criteria as long as recovery is 40-160%. |= This parameter is outside laboratory LCS/LCSD specified recovery limits. m = This parameter is outside laboratory MS/MSD specified recovery limits. r= This parameter is outside laboratory RPD specified recovery limits. If there are any questions regarding this data, please call Phoenix Client Services at extension 200. RPD - Relative Percent Difference LCS - Laboratory Control Sample ; LCSD - Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate f - My MS - Matrix Spik . f : MS bus Mobo 6 ike Duplicate PhyllisShiller, Laboratory Director P P P Februdry 21, 2024 NC - No Criteria Intf - Interference Page 57 of 71 We d n e s d a y , Fe b r u a r y 21 , 20 2 4 Cr i t e r i a : NY : GW St a t e : NY Sa m p N o Ac o d e Ph o e n i x An a l y t e Sa m p l e Cr i t e r i a Ex c e e d a n c e s Re p o r t GC Q 0 5 2 1 4 - NE T C Cr i t e r i a Re s u l t RL Cr i t e r i a RL Cr i t e r i a An a l y s i s Un i t s CQ 0 5 2 1 4 CQ 0 5 2 1 4 CQ 0 5 2 1 4 CQ 0 5 2 1 4 CQ 0 5 2 1 4 CQ 0 5 2 1 4 CQ 0 5 2 1 4 CQ 0 5 2 1 4 CQ 0 5 2 1 4 CQ 0 5 2 1 4 CQ 0 5 2 1 4 CQ 0 5 2 1 4 CQ 0 5 2 1 4 CQ 0 5 2 1 4 CQ 0 5 2 1 4 CQ 0 5 2 1 4 CQ 0 5 2 1 6 CQ 0 5 2 1 6 CQ 0 5 2 1 6 CQ 0 5 2 1 6 CQ 0 5 2 1 6 CQ 0 5 2 1 6 CQ 0 5 2 1 6 CQ 0 5 2 1 6 CQ 0 5 2 1 6 CQ 0 5 2 1 6 CQ 0 5 2 1 6 CQ 0 5 2 1 6 CQ 0 5 2 1 6 CQ 0 5 2 1 6 CQ 0 5 2 1 6 CQ 0 5 2 1 6 CQ 0 5 2 1 7 CQ 0 5 2 1 7 CQ 0 5 2 1 7 CQ 0 5 2 1 7 CQ 0 5 2 1 7 CQ 0 5 2 1 7 CQ 0 5 2 1 7 CQ 0 5 2 1 7 $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R tr a n s - 1 , 3 - D i c h l o r o p r o p e n e ci s - 1 , 3 - D i c h l o r o p r o p e n e 1, 2 - D i b r o m o e t h a n e 1 ,2 - D i b r o m o - 3 - c h l o r o p r o p a n e 1, 2 , 3 - T r i c h l o r o p r o p a n e Be n z o ( b ) f l u o r a n t h e n e Be n z o ( a ) p y r e n e Be n z ( a ) a n t h r a c e n e Be n z o ( k ) f l u o r a n t h e n e Ch r y s e n e In d e n o ( 1 , 2 , 3 - c d ) p y r e n e Be n z ( a ) a n t h r a c e n e Ch r y s e n e In d e n o ( 1 , 2 , 3 - c d ) p y r e n e Be n z o ( b ) f l u o r a n t h e n e Be n z o ( k ) f l u o r a n t h e n e To t a l Xy l e n e s To t a l Xy l e n e s 1 ,2 - D i b r o m o - 3 - c h l o r o p r o p a n e 1, 2 , 3 - T r i c h l o r o p r o p a n e 1, 2 - D i b r o m o e t h a n e Ch r y s e n e Be n z ( a ) a n t h r a c e n e Be n z o ( b ) f l u o r a n t h e n e Be n z o ( k ) f l u o r a n t h e n e Be n z o ( a ) p y r e n e In d e n o ( 1 , 2 , 3 - c d ) p y r e n e Be n z o ( b ) f l u o r a n t h e n e In d e n o ( 1 , 2 , 3 - c d ) p y r e n e Ch r y s e n e Be n z o ( k ) f l u o r a n t h e n e Be n z ( a ) a n t h r a c e n e 1, 2 , 3 - T r i c h l o r o p r o p a n e 1 ,2 - D i b r o m o - 3 - c h l o r o p r o p a n e 1, 2 - D i b r o m o e t h a n e Ch r y s e n e Be n z o ( k ) f l u o r a n t h e n e In d e n o ( 1 , 2 , 3 - c d ) p y r e n e Be n z o ( b ) f l u o r a n t h e n e Be n z o ( a ) p y r e n e NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY ~~ ~~ ~~~ OO OKO OOO Sr A TO A HO TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TA G M - Se m i - V o l a t i l e s / Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s TA G M - Se m i - V o l a t i l e s / Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s TA G M - Se m i - V o l a t i l e s / Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s TA G M - Se m i - V o l a t i l e s / Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s TA G M - Se m i - V o l a t i l e s / Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s TA G M - Se m i - V o l a t i l e s / Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TA G M - Vo l a t i l e Or g a n i c s / Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TA G M - Se m i - V o l a t i l e s / Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s TA G M - Se m i - V o l a t i l e s / Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s TA G M - Se m i - V o l a t i l e s / Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s TA G M - Se m i - V o l a t i l e s / Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s TA G M - Se m i - V o l a t i l e s / Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s TA G M - Se m i - V o l a t i l e s / Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TA G M - Se m i - V o l a t i l e s / Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s TA G M - Se m i - V o l a t i l e s / Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s TA G M - Se m i - V o l a t i l e s / Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s TA G M - Se m i - V o l a t i l e s / Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s TA G M - Se m i - V o l a t i l e s / Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s ND ND ND ND ND 0. 8 3 0. 9 5 0. 7 9 0. 6 5 0. 7 7 0. 8 2 0. 7 9 0. 7 7 0. 8 2 0. 8 3 0. 6 5 6. 1 6. 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0. 5 0 0. 5 0 0. 5 0 1. 0 0. 5 0 0. 0 3 0. 0 3 0. 0 3 0. 0 3 0. 0 3 0. 0 3 0. 0 3 0. 0 3 0. 0 3 0. 0 3 0. 0 3 1. 0 1. 0 0. 5 0 0. 2 5 0. 2 5 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 0. 2 5 0. 5 0 0. 2 5 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 0. 4 0. 4 0. 0 0 0 6 0. 0 4 0. 0 4 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 4 0. 4 0. 0 0 0 6 0. 0 4 0. 0 4 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L Pa g e 58 of 71 We d n e s d a y , Fe b r u a r y 21 , 20 2 4 Cr i t e r i a : NY : GW St a t e : NY Sa m p N o Ac o d e Ph o e n i x An a l y t e Sa m p l e Cr i t e r i a Ex c e e d a n c e s Re p o r t GC Q 0 5 2 1 4 - NE T C Cr i t e r i a Re s u l t RL Cr i t e r i a RL Cr i t e r i a An a l y s i s Un i t s CQ 0 5 2 1 7 CQ 0 5 2 1 7 CQ 0 5 2 1 7 CQ 0 5 2 1 7 CQ 0 5 2 1 7 CQ 0 5 2 1 7 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R Be n z ( a ) a n t h r a c e n e Ch r y s e n e Be n z o ( b ) f l u o r a n t h e n e In d e n o ( 1 , 2 , 3 - c d ) p y r e n e Be n z o ( k ) f l u o r a n t h e n e Be n z ( a ) a n t h r a c e n e To t a l Xy l e n e s To t a l Xy l e n e s 1, 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h a n e 1, 2 , 3 - T r i c h l o r o p r o p a n e 1, 3 - D i c h l o r o p r o p a n e Be n z e n e 1, 1 , 2 , 2 - T e t r a c h l o r o e t h a n e Ac e t o n e 4- M e t h y l - 2 - p e n t a n o n e Vi n y l ch l o r i d e 1, 1 - D i c h l o r o e t h a n e 1, 1 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1, 1 , 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e To l u e n e o- X y l e n e Me t h y l e n e ch l o r i d e Tr i c h l o r o e t h e n e Ca r b o n te t r a c h l o r i d e Ca r b o n Di s u l f i d e tr a n s - 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e Tr i c h l o r o t r i f l u o r o e t h a n e Me t h y l et h y l ke t o n e Te t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e Di b r o m o c h l o r o m e t h a n e Ch l o r o f o r m Ch l o r o e t h a n e Ch l o r o b e n z e n e Et h y l b e n z e n e 1, 2 , 3 - T r i c h l o r o p r o p a n e 1, 1 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e 1, 1 - D i c h l o r o p r o p e n e 1, 1 - D i c h l o r o e t h a n e 1, 1 , 2 , 2 - T e t r a c h l o r o e t h a n e 4- C h l o r o t o l u e n e 1, 1 , 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY TA G M - Se m i - V o l a t i l e s / Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TA G M - Vo l a t i l e Or g a n i c s / Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TA G M - Vo l a t i l e Or g a n i c s TA G M - Vo l a t i l e Or g a n i c s TA G M - Vo l a t i l e Or g a n i c s TA G M - Vo l a t i l e Or g a n i c s TA G M - Vo l a t i l e Or g a n i c s TA G M - Vo l a t i l e Or g a n i c s TA G M - Vo l a t i l e Or g a n i c s TA G M - Vo l a t i l e Or g a n i c s TA G M - Vo l a t i l e Or g a n i c s TA G M - Vo l a t i l e Or g a n i c s TA G M - Vo l a t i l e Or g a n i c s TA G M - Vo l a t i l e Or g a n i c s TA G M - Vo l a t i l e Or g a n i c s TA G M - Vo l a t i l e Or g a n i c s TA G M - Vo l a t i l e Or g a n i c s TA G M - Vo l a t i l e Or g a n i c s TA G M - Vo l a t i l e Or g a n i c s TA G M - Vo l a t i l e Or g a n i c s TA G M - Vo l a t i l e Or g a n i c s TA G M - Vo l a t i l e Or g a n i c s TA G M - Vo l a t i l e Or g a n i c s TA G M - Vo l a t i l e Or g a n i c s TA G M - Vo l a t i l e Or g a n i c s TA G M - Vo l a t i l e Or g a n i c s TA G M - Vo l a t i l e Or g a n i c s TA G M - Vo l a t i l e Or g a n i c s / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 74 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 50 0 13 0 63 63 63 63 63 63 13 0 63 63 63 63 63 50 0 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 ono wown wo NwoOWOnNoONWMW WW WH ° ° ° ° HaYM BY HA G vt oNneonnnnn yn 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 onMonwnwo wo NwoOWONW MMW WH WH fon) fon) Buvugw oO x Hwownennnnwnw ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L Pa g e 59 of 71 We d n e s d a y , Fe b r u a r y 21 , 20 2 4 Cr i t e r i a : NY : GW St a t e : NY Sa m p N o Ac o d e Ph o e n i x An a l y t e Sa m p l e Cr i t e r i a Ex c e e d a n c e s Re p o r t GC Q 0 5 2 1 4 - NE T C Cr i t e r i a Re s u l t RL Cr i t e r i a RL Cr i t e r i a An a l y s i s Un i t s CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R 1, 2 , 4 - T r i m e t h y l b e n z e n e 1, 1 , 1 , 2 - T e t r a c h l o r o e t h a n e 1, 1 , 2 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e te r t - B u t y l b e n z e n e Di b r o m o m e t h a n e Di c h l o r o d i f l u o r o m e t h a n e Et h y l b e n z e n e 1, 2 - D i b r o m o - 3 - c h l o r o p r o p a n e Me t h y l et h y l ke t o n e 2- H e x a n o n e n- B u t y l b e n z e n e n- P r o p y l b e n z e n e o- X y l e n e p- l s o p r o p y l t o l u e n e Di b r o m o c h l o r o m e t h a n e St y r e n e ls o p r o p y l b e n z e n e Te t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e Te t r a h y d r o f u r a n (T H F ) To l u e n e tr a n s - 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e tr a n s - 1 , 3 - D i c h l o r o p r o p e n e tr a n s - 1 , 4 - d i c h l o r o - 2 - b u t e n e Tr i c h l o r o e t h e n e Tr i c h l o r o f l u o r o m e t h a n e Tr i c h l o r o t r i f l u o r o e t h a n e Vi n y l ch l o r i d e se c - B u t y l b e n z e n e 2- l s o p r o p y l t o l u e n e 1, 2 - D i b r o m o e t h a n e 1, 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h a n e 1, 2 - D i c h l o r o p r o p a n e 1, 3 , 5 - T r i m e t h y l b e n z e n e 1, 3 - D i c h l o r o p r o p a n e Me t h y l e n e ch l o r i d e 2- C h l o r o t o l u e n e ci s - 1 , 3 - D i c h l o r o p r o p e n e Ac e t o n e Ac r y l o n i t r i l e Be n z e n e Ch l o r o m e t h a n e 2, 2 - D i c h l o r o p r o p a n e NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y ~~~ Se SE SR SE SE EE SE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE EE SE EE EE SE EEE SE SE TS GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 74 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 13 0 50 0 50 0 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 31 0 63 63 63 63 0 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 13 0 63 63 50 0 63 63 63 63 0. 0 4 50 50 oOo wo 50 0. 0 0 0 6 0. 6 0. 0 0 0 6 0. 6 ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L Pa g e 60 of 71 We d n e s d a y , Fe b r u a r y 21 , 20 2 4 Cr i t e r i a : NY : GW St a t e : NY Sa m p N o Ac o d e Ph o e n i x An a l y t e Sa m p l e Cr i t e r i a Ex c e e d a n c e s Re p o r t GC Q 0 5 2 1 4 - NE T C Cr i t e r i a Re s u l t RL Cr i t e r i a RL Cr i t e r i a An a l y s i s Un i t s CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 CQ 0 5 2 1 8 $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $8 2 6 0 G W R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R $B N W M - S I M R ci s - 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e Br o m o b e n z e n e Ch l o r o f o r m Ch l o r o e t h a n e Ch l o r o b e n z e n e Br o m o m e t h a n e Br o m o f o r m Br o m o d i c h l o r o m e t h a n e Br o m o c h l o r o m e t h a n e Ca r b o n te t r a c h l o r i d e Be n z o ( a ) p y r e n e In d e n o ( 1 , 2 , 3 - c d ) p y r e n e Ch r y s e n e Be n z o ( k ) f l u o r a n t h e n e Be n z ( a ) a n t h r a c e n e Be n z o ( b ) f l u o r a n t h e n e Be n z o ( k ) f l u o r a n t h e n e Be n z ( a ) a n t h r a c e n e Ch r y s e n e In d e n o ( 1 , 2 , 3 - c d ) p y r e n e Be n z o ( b ) f l u o r a n t h e n e NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY NY / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / TA G M - Se m i - V o l a t i l e s TA G M - Se m i - V o l a t i l e s TA G M - Se m i - V o l a t i l e s TA G M - Se m i - V o l a t i l e s TA G M - Se m i - V o l a t i l e s TA G M - Se m i - V o l a t i l e s TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / TO G S - Wa t e r Qu a l i t y / GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a / Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s / Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s / Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s / Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s / Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s / Gr o u n d w a t e r St a n d a r d s GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a GA Cr i t e r i a ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0. 2 1 0. 1 7 0. 1 9 0. 1 4 0. 1 8 0. 1 8 0. 1 4 0. 1 8 0. 1 9 0. 1 7 0. 1 8 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 0. 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 0. 0 0 2 ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L ug / L Ph o e n i x La b o r a t o r i e s do e s no t as s u m e re s p o n s i b i l i t y fo r th e da t a co n t a i n e d in th i s ex c e e d a n c e re p o r t . It is pr o v i d e d as an ad d i t i o n a l to o l to id e n t i f y re q u e s t e d cr i t e r i a ex c e e d e n c e s . Al l ef f o r t s ar e ma d e to en s u r e th e ac c u r a c y of th e da t a (o b t a i n e d fr o m ap p r o p r i a t e ag e n c i e s ) . A la c k of ex c e e d e n c e in f o r m a t i o n do e s no t ne c e s s a r i l y su g g e s t co n f o r m a n c e to th e cr i t e r i a . It is ul t i m a t e l y th e si t e pr o f e s s i o n a l ' s re s p o n s i b i l i t y to de t e r m i n e ap p r o p r i a t e co m p l i a n c e . Pa g e 61 of 71 PHOENIX = Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 NY #11301 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Project Narrative February 21, 2024 SDG I.D.: GCQ05214 Mercury Narration Were all QA/QC performance criteria specified in the analytical method achieved? Yes. Instrument: MERLIN 02/12/24 08:57 Grace White, Chemist 02/12/24 CQ05220, CQ05221 The method preparation blank, ICB, and CCBs contain all of the acids and reagents as the samples. The initial calibration met all criteria including a standard run at or below the reporting level. All calibration verification standards (ICV, CCV) met criteria. All calibration blank verification standards (ICB, CCB) met criteria. The matrix spike sample is used to identify spectral interference for each batch of samples, if within 85-115%, no interference is observed and no further action is taken. The following Initial Calibration Verification (ICV) compounds did not meet criteria: None. The following Continuing Calibration Verification (CCV) compounds did not meet criteria: None. QC (Batch Specific): Batch 717912 (CQ05078) CQ05220, CQ05221 All LCS recoveries were within 70 - 130 with the following exceptions: None. All LCSD recoveries were within 70 - 130 with the following exceptions: None. All LCS/LCSD RPDs were less than 30% with the following exceptions: None. Additional Mercury criteria: LCS acceptance range for waters is 80-120% and for soils is 70-130%. ICP Metals Narration Were all QA/QC performance criteria specified in the analytical method achieved? Yes. Instrument: ARCOS-3 02/12/24 11:53 Tina Hall, Chemist 02/12/24 CQ05220, CQ05221 The linear range is defined daily by the calibration range. The following Initial Calibration Verification (ICV) compounds did not meet criteria: None. The following Continuing Calibration Verification (CCV) compounds did not meet criteria: None. The following ICP Interference Check (ICSAB) compounds did not meet criteria: None. QC (Batch Specific): Batch 717806 (CQ05076) CQ05220, CQ05221 All LCS recoveries were within 75 - 125 with the following exceptions: None. All LCSD recoveries were within 75 - 125 with the following exceptions: None. All LCS/LCSD RPDs were less than 30% with the following exceptions: None. PCB Narration Were all QA/QC performance criteria specified in the analytical method achieved? Yes. Instrument: Page 62 of 71 PHOENIX = Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 NY #11301 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Project Narrative February 21, 2024 SDG I.D.: GCQ05214 PCB Narration AU-ECD29 02/20/24-1 Keith Aloisa, Chemist 02/20/24 CQ05222 (10X) The initial calibration (PCO206AI) RSD for the compound list was less than 20% except for the following compounds: None. The initial calibration (PCO206BI) RSD for the compound list was less than 20% except for the following compounds: None. The continuing calibration %D for the compound list was less than 15% except for the following compounds:None. AU-ECD3 02/15/24-1 Saadia Chudary, Chemist 02/15/24 CQ05220 (10X), CQ05221 (10X) The initial calibration (PC1128AI) RSD for the compound list was less than 20% except for the following compounds: None. The initial calibration (PC1128Bl) RSD for the compound list was less than 20% except for the following compounds: None. The continuing calibration %D for the compound list was less than 15% except for the following compounds:None. QC (Batch Specific): Batch 718226 (CQ04825) CQ05220, CQ05221 All LCS recoveries were within 40 - 140 with the following exceptions: None. All LCSD recoveries were within 40 - 140 with the following exceptions: None. All LCS/LCSD RPDs were less than 30% with the following exceptions: None. Batch 718788 (CQ08526) CQ05222 All LCS recoveries were within 40 - 140 with the following exceptions: None. All LCSD recoveries were within 40 - 140 with the following exceptions: None. All LCS/LCSD RPDs were less than 30% with the following exceptions: None. SVOA Narration Were all QA/QC performance criteria specified in the analytical method achieved? Yes. Instrument: CHEMO06 02/16/24-2 Matt Richard, Chemist 02/16/24 CQ05219 (1X) For 8270 full list, the DDT breakdown and pentachlorophenol & benzidine peak tailing were evaluated in the DF TPP tune and were found to be in control. For 8270 BN list, benzidine peak tailing was evaluated in the DFTPP tune and was found to be in control. Initial Calibration Evaluation (CHEM06/6_SPLIT_0203): 100% of target compounds met criteria. The following compounds had %RSDs >20%: None. The following compounds did not meet recommended response factors: None. The following compounds did not meet a minimum response factors: None. Continuing Calibration Verification (CHEM06/0216_22-6 SPLIT_0203): Internal standard areas were within 50 to 200% of the initial calibration with the following exceptions: None. 99% of target compounds met criteria. The following compounds did not meet % deviation criteria: 2-Nitroaniline 33%L (30%) The following compounds did not meet maximum % deviations: None. Page 63 of 71 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 NY #11301 Project Narrative February 21, 2024 SDG I.D.: GCQ05214 SVOA Narration The following compounds did not meet recommended response factors: Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 0.299 (0.3), Bis(2- chloroethyl)ether 0.654 (0.7) The following compounds did not meet minimum response factors: None. CHEM36 02/15/24-1 Matt Richard, Chemist 02/15/24 CQ05214 (1X), CQ05216 (1X), CQ05217 (1X), CQ05218 (1X) Initial Calibration Evaluation (CHEM36/36_SPLIT_0206): 100% of target compounds met criteria. The following compounds had %RSDs >20%: None. The following compounds did not meet recommended response factors: None. The following compounds did not meet a minimum response factors: None. Continuing Calibration Verification (CHEM36/0215_03-36_SPLIT_0206): Internal standard areas were within 50 to 200% of the initial calibration with the following exceptions: None. 100% of target compounds met criteria. The following compounds did not meet % deviation criteria: None. The following compounds did not meet maximum % deviations: None. The following compounds did not meet recommended response factors: None. The following compounds did not meet minimum response factors: None. CHEM36 02/16/24-1 Matt Richard, Chemist 02/16/24 CQ05220 (1X), CQ05221 (1X), CQN5222 (1X) Initial Calibration Evaluation (CHEM36/36_SPLIT_0206): 100% of target compounds met criteria. The following compounds had %RSDs >20%: None. The following compounds did not meet recommended response factors: Hexachlorobenzene 0.084 (0.1) The following compounds did not meet a minimum response factors: None. Continuing Calibration Verification (CHEM36/0216_05-36_SPLIT_0206): Internal standard areas were within 50 to 200% of the initial calibration with the following exceptions: None. 100% of target compounds met criteria. The following compounds did not meet % deviation criteria: None. The following compounds did not meet maximum % deviations: None. The following compounds did not meet recommended response factors: Hexachlorobenzene 0.085 (0.1) The following compounds did not meet minimum response factors: None. QC (Batch Specific): Batch 718015 (CQ03610) CQ05214, CQ05216, CQ05217, CQ05218 All LCS recoveries were within 30 - 130 with the following exceptions: 2-Nitroaniline(162%), Benzidine(12%) All LCSD recoveries were within 30 - 130 with the following exceptions: 2-Nitroaniline(170%) All LCS/LCSD RPDs were less than 20% with the following exceptions: Benzidine(161.3%) ALCS and LCS Duplicate were performed instead of a matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate. Additional 8270 criteria:20% of compounds can be outside of acceptance criteria as long as recovery is at least 10%. (Acid surrogates acceptance range for aqueous samples: 15-110%, for soils 30-130%) Additional 8270 criteria: 20% of compounds can be outside of acceptance criteria as long as recovery is at least 10%. (Acid surrogates acceptance range for aqueous samples: 15-110%, for soils 30-130%) Batch 718583 (CQ05089) Page 64 of 71 PHOENIX Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 NY # 11301 Project Narrative February 21, 2024 SDG I.D.: GCQ05214 SVOA Narration CQ05219 All LCS recoveries were within 30 - 130 with the following exceptions: Benzidine(13%) All LCSD recoveries were within 30 - 130 with the following exceptions: None. All LCS/LCSD RPDs were less than 30% with the following exceptions: Benzidine(121.2%), Benzoic Acid(56.3%) Additional 8270 criteria: 20% of compounds can be outside of acceptance criteria as long as recovery is at least 10%. (Acid surrogates acceptance range for aqueous samples: 15-110%, for soils 30-130%) Batch 718600 (CQ05265) CQ05220, CQ05221, CQ05222 All LCS recoveries were within 30 - 130 with the following exceptions: 2-Nitroaniline(148%) All LCSD recoveries were within 30 - 130 with the following exceptions: 2-Nitroaniline(145%) All LCS/LCSD RPDs were less than 30% with the following exceptions: None. Additional 8270 criteria: 20% of compounds can be outside of acceptance criteria as long as recovery is at least 10%. (Acid surrogates acceptance range for aqueous samples: 15-110%, for soils 30-130%) SVOASIM Narration Were all QA/QC performance criteria specified in the analytical method achieved? Yes. Instrument: CHEM27 02/15/24-1 Matt Richard, Chemist 02/15/24 CQ05214 (1X), CQ05216 (1X), CQ05217 (1X), CQ05218 (1X) For 8270 BN list, benzidine peak tailing was evaluated in the DFTPP tune and was found to be in control. Initial Calibration Evaluation (CHEM27/27_SIM18_0129): 100% of target compounds met criteria. The following compounds had %RSDs >20%: None. The following compounds did not meet recommended response factors: None. The following compounds did not meet a minimum response factors: None. Continuing Calibration Verification (CHEM27/0215_10-27_SIM18_0129): Internal standard areas were within 50 to 200% of the initial calibration with the following exceptions: None. 100% of target compounds met criteria. The following compounds did not meet % deviation criteria: None. The following compounds did not meet maximum % deviations: None. The following compounds did not meet recommended response factors: None. The following compounds did not meet minimum response factors: None. QC (Batch Specific): Batch 718015 (CQ03610) CQ05214, CQ05216, CQ05217, CQ05218 All LCS recoveries were within 30 - 130 with the following exceptions: None. All LCSD recoveries were within 30 - 130 with the following exceptions: None. All LCS/LCSD RPDs were less than 20% with the following exceptions: None. ALCS and LCS Duplicate were performed instead of a matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate. Additional 8270 criteria:20% of compounds can be outside of acceptance criteria as long as recovery is at least 10%. (Acid surrogates acceptance range for aqueous samples: 15-110%, for soils 30-130%) Page 65 of 71 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. aparge 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 11301 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Project Narrative February 21, 2024 SDG I.D.: GCQ05214 VOA Narration Were all QA/QC performance criteria specified in the analytical method achieved? Yes. Instrument: CHEMO02 02/12/24-1 Michael Hahn, Chemist 02/12/24 CQ05216 (1X), CQ05217 (1X), CQ05218 (250X) Chem02 is a 25ml purge instrument. The laboratory minimum response factor is set at 0.01 instead of 0.05 for the 25ml purge instruments. EPA method 8260D Table 4 supports this approach. Initial Calibration Evaluation (CHEM02/VT-P020624): 97% of target compounds met criteria. The following compounds had %RSDs >20%: 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 25% (20%), Bromoform 21% (20%), trans-1,4- dichloro-2-butene 29% (20%) The following compounds did not meet Table 4 recommended minimum response factors: 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.156 (0.2), 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.079 (0.2), 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.263 (0.4), 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.325 (0.4), 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.086 (0.2), 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.573 (0.6), 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.175 (0.2), Acrylonitrile 0.036 (0.05), Bromochloromethane 0.099 (0.1), Bromodichloromethane 0.172 (0.3), Bromoform 0.032 (0.1), cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.216 (0.3), Dibromochloromethane 0.099 (0.2), Ethylbenzene 0.281 (0.4), Isopropylbenzene 0.392 (0.4), Tetrahydrofuran (THF) 0.031 (0.05), trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.151 (0.3), trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene 0.038 (0.05), Trichloroethene 0.178 (0.2) The following compounds did not meet the minimum response factor of 0.05: 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 0.017 (0.05), 2- Hexanone 0.044 (0.05), Acetone 0.033 (0.05), Acrylonitrile 0.036 (0.05), Bromoform 0.032 (0.05), Methyl ethyl ketone 0.046 (0.05), Tetrahydrofuran (THF) 0.031 (0.05), trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene 0.038 (0.05) Continuing Calibration Verification (CHEM02/0212_02-VT-P020624): Internal standard areas were within 50 to 200% of the initial calibration with the following exceptions: None. 100% of target compounds met criteria. The following compounds did not meet % deviation criteria: None. The following compounds did not meet maximum % deviations: None. The following compounds did not meet Table 4 recommended minimum response factors: 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.176 (0.2), 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.081 (0.2), 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.278 (0.4), 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.348 (0.4), 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.091 (0.2), 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.178 (0.2), Acrylonitrile 0.040 (0.05), Bromodichloromethane 0.183 (0.3), Bromoform 0.040 (0.1), cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.219 (0.3), Dibromochloromethane 0.113 (0.2), Ethylbenzene 0.295 (0.4), Tetrahydrofuran (THF) 0.031 (0.05), trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.144 (0.3), trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene 0.037 (0.05), Trichloroethene 0.176 (0.2) CHEMO02 02/13/24-1 Michael Hahn, Chemist 02/13/24 CQ05214 (2X) Chem02 is a 25ml purge instrument. The laboratory minimum response factor is set at 0.01 instead of 0.05 for the 25ml purge instruments. EPA method 8260D Table 4 supports this approach. Initial Calibration Evaluation (CHEM02/VT-P020624): 97% of target compounds met criteria. The following compounds had %RSDs >20%: 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 25% (20%), Bromoform 21% (20%), trans-1,4- dichloro-2-butene 29% (20%) The following compounds did not meet Table 4 recommended minimum response factors: 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.156 (0.2), 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.079 (0.2), 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.263 (0.4), 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.325 (0.4), 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.086 (0.2), 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.573 (0.6), 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.175 (0.2), Acrylonitrile 0.036 (0.05), Bromochloromethane 0.099 (0.1), Bromodichloromethane 0.172 (0.3), Bromoform 0.032 (0.1), cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.216 (0.3), Dibromochloromethane 0.099 (0.2), Ethylbenzene 0.281 (0.4), Isopropylbenzene 0.392 (0.4), Tetrahydrofuran (THF) 0.031 (0.05), Page 66 of 71 PHOENIX = Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 NY # 11301 Project Narrative February 21, 2024 SDG I.D.: GCQ05214 VOA Narration trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.151 (0.3), trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene 0.038 (0.05), Trichloroethene 0.178 (0.2) The following compounds did not meet the minimum response factor of 0.05: 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 0.017 (0.05), 2- Hexanone 0.044 (0.05), Acetone 0.033 (0.05), Acrylonitrile 0.036 (0.05), Bromoform 0.032 (0.05), Methyl ethyl ketone 0.046 (0.05), Tetrahydrofuran (THF) 0.031 (0.05), trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene 0.038 (0.05) Continuing Calibration Verification (CHEM02/0213_02-VT-P020624): Internal standard areas were within 50 to 200% of the initial calibration with the following exceptions: None. 99% of target compounds met criteria. The following compounds did not meet % deviation criteria: trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene 32%L (30%) The following compounds did not meet maximum % deviations: None. The following compounds did not meet Table 4 recommended minimum response factors: 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.169 (0.2), 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.078 (0.2), 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.271 (0.4), 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.334 (0.4), 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.087 (0.2), 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.590 (0.6), 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.179 (0.2), Acrylonitrile 0.037 (0.05), Bromodichloromethane 0.175 (0.3), Bromoform 0.033 (0.1), cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.211 (0.3), Dibromochloromethane 0.103 (0.2), Ethylbenzene 0.297 (0.4), Tetrahydrofuran (THF) 0.029 (0.05), trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.131 (0.3), trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene 0.026 (0.05), Trichloroethene 0.180 (0.2) CHEMO3 02/11/24-1 Jane Li, Chemist 02/11/24 CQ05219 (1X) Initial Calibration Evaluation (CHEMO3/VT-L020224): 97% of target compounds met criteria. The following compounds had %RSDs >20%: Acetone 34% (20%), Chloroethane 23% (20%), trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene 22% (20%) The following compounds did not meet Table 4 recommended minimum response factors: None. The following compounds did not meet the minimum response factor of 0.05: None. Continuing Calibration Verification (CHEM03/0211_02-VT-L020224): Internal standard areas were within 50 to 200% of the initial calibration with the following exceptions: None. 99% of target compounds met criteria. The following compounds did not meet % deviation criteria: Acetone 34%L (30%) The following compounds did not meet maximum % deviations: None. The following compounds did not meet Table 4 recommended minimum response factors: None. CHEM18 02/12/24-1 Jane Li, Chemist 02/12/24 CQ05219 (50X), CQ05220 (1X), CQ05223 (1X) Initial Calibration Evaluation (CHEM18/VT-M020824): 99% of target compounds met criteria. The following compounds had %RSDs >20%: Acetone 24% (20%) The following compounds did not meet Table 4 recommended minimum response factors: None. The following compounds did not meet the minimum response factor of 0.05: None. Continuing Calibration Verification (CHEM18/0212_02-VT-M020824): Internal standard areas were within 50 to 200% of the initial calibration with the following exceptions: None. 100% of target compounds met criteria. The following compounds did not meet % deviation criteria: None. The following compounds did not meet maximum % deviations: None. The following compounds did not meet Table 4 recommended minimum response factors: None. QC (Batch Specific): Page 67 of 71 PHOENIX Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 NY #11301 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 Project Narrative February 21, 2024 SDG I.D.: GCQ05214 VOA Narration Batch 718006 (CQ05278) CHEM03 2/11/2024-1 CQ05219(1X) All LCS recoveries were within 70 - 130 with the following exceptions: Chloromethane(133%), Dichlorodifluoromethane(153%) All LCSD recoveries were within 70 - 130 with the following exceptions: Chloromethane(134%), Dichlorodifluoromethane(153%) All LCS/LCSD RPDs were less than 30% with the following exceptions: None. Additional 8260 criteria: 10% of compounds can be outside of acceptance criteria as long as recovery is 40-160%. Batch 718113 (CQ04792) CHEM02 2/12/2024-1 CQ05216(1X), CQ05217(1X), CQ05218(250X) All LCS recoveries were within 70 - 130 with the following exceptions: None. All LCSD recoveries were within 70 - 130 with the following exceptions: 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane(131%), Bromoform(131%) All LCS/LCSD RPDs were less than 30% with the following exceptions: None. ALCS and LCS Duplicate were performed instead of a matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate. Additional 8260 criteria: 10% of compounds can be outside of acceptance criteria as long as recovery is 40-160%. Batch 718157 (CQ05017) CHEM18 2/12/2024-1 CQ05220(1X), CQ05223(1X) All LCS recoveries were within 70 - 130 with the following exceptions: None. All LCSD recoveries were within 70 - 130 with the following exceptions: None. All LCS/LCSD RPDs were less than 30% with the following exceptions: None. The Low Level MS/MSD are not reported for this batch. Additional 8260 criteria: 10% of compounds can be outside of acceptance criteria as long as recovery is 40-160%. Batch 718157H (CQ05017) CHEM18 2/12/2024-1 CQ05219(50X) All LCS recoveries were within 70 - 130 with the following exceptions: None. All LCSD recoveries were within 70 - 130 with the following exceptions: None. All LCS/LCSD RPDs were less than 30% with the following exceptions: None. Additional 8260 criteria: 10% of compounds can be outside of acceptance criteria as long as recovery is 40-160%. Batch 718197 (CQ05595) CHEM02 2/13/2024-1 CQ05214(2Xx) All LCS recoveries were within 70 - 130 with the following exceptions: None. All LCSD recoveries were within 70 - 130 with the following exceptions: None. All LCS/LCSD RPDs were less than 30% with the following exceptions: None. ALCS and LCS Duplicate were performed instead of a matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate. Additional 8260 criteria: 10% of compounds can be outside of acceptance criteria as long as recovery is 40-160%. Temperature Narration The samples in this delivery group were received at 1.9°C. (Note acceptance criteria for relevant matrices is above freezing up to 6°C) Page 68 of 71 PHOENIX * Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823 NY Temperature Narration February 21, 2024 SDG LD.: NY # 11301 GCQ05214 The samples in this delivery group were received at 1.9°C. (Note acceptance criteria for relevant matrices is above freezing up to 6°C) Page 69 of 71 Co o l e r : es lo Co o l a n t : IP K IC E No f NY / N J / P A CH A I N OF CU S T O D Y RE C O R D Te m p , 4 °C Pg Co n t a c t Op t i o n s : 58 7 Ea s t Mi d d l e Tu r n p i k e , P. O . Bo x 37 0 , Ma n c h e s t e r , CT 06 0 4 0 © Ph o n e : Em a i l : Ma k r i n a No l a n , ma k r i n a @ p h o e n i x l a b s . c o m Fa x (8 6 0 ) 64 5 - 0 8 2 3 OD Fa x : Cl i e n t Se r v i c e s (8 6 0 ) 64 5 - 1 1 0 2 C Em a i l : so b n e t e @ n y c a p . r . c o m Cu s t o m e r : NE T C Pr o j e c t : 33 - 3 7 Ca r o l i n e St r e e t Pr o j e c t P. O : —2 3 . 1 2 1 1 0 1 5 Ad d r e s s : PO Bo x 21 6 7 Re p o r t to : Ro b Gr a y Th i s se c t i o n MU S T be Ba l l s t o n Sp a , Ne w Yo r k In v o i c e to : = NE T C co m p l e t e d wi t h QU O T E # : Bo t t l e Qu a n t i t i e s . En v i r o n m e n t a l la b o r a t o r i e s , 1 ae Cl i e n t Sa m p l e - In f o r - Id e n t i f i c a t i o n Sa m p l e r ’ s Si g n a t u r e D a t e : a f ? / 2 o f A n a l y s i s K S y Re q u e s t eS Ma t r i x Co d e : = Lo y DW e = D r i n k i n g Wa t e r GW = G r o u n d Wa t e r SW = S u r f a c e Wa t e r WW = W a s t e Wa t e r cy RW = R a w Wa t e r SE = S e d i m e n t SL = S l u d g e S= S o i l SD = S o l i d W= W i p e f OI L = O i l B= B u l k L= L i q u i d oe PH O E N I X LY Cu s t o m e r Sa m p l e Sa m p l e Da t e Ti m e ‘S SA M P L E # Id e n t i f i c a t i o n Ma t r i x Sa m p l e d Sa m p l e d | A CS a i y B- 1 Gw _ _ | 2/ 7 / 2 0 2 4 | _1 1 : 4 0 OS Q iS B- 3 GW } _2 / 7 / 2 0 2 4 1: 3 0 x x ©S 2 Q (C o B- 4 Gw 2/ 7 / 2 0 2 4 3: 0 0 x Os a (7 B- 6 GW _ | 2/ 7 / 2 0 2 4 4: 3 0 X x xX x oO, Ol MO] mL © OS o f S B- 5 GW 2/ 8 / 2 0 2 4 1: 3 0 Os a 4 B- 1 (5 - 1 0 ' ) 2/ 7 / 2 0 2 4 11 : 1 5 OS a Qo B- 5 (7 - 1 0 ' ) s Ss 2/ 7 / 2 0 2 4 1: 0 5 oe ) \ Co m p - 1 Ss 2/ 7 / 2 0 2 4 2: 4 5 $s Ss <)>] OK] OK] OK] OK] OK) OX) OK HA - 1 (0 - 5 ' ) 2/ 8 / 2 0 2 4 | 12 : 4 5 OS a e > HA - 1 (2 - 3 ) ee n ae al aN Da t e : , Ti m e : Tu r n a r o u n d : ee s BN 2[ e / z y | le s |O 1 ba v (. ] 2D a y s * C KA 1 14 UY oi SU G sa y s : % 2/ 8 / 2 0 2 4 12 : 3 0 x 3 TO G S GW CP - 5 1 SO I L PA . G W 37 5 S C O ° PA Oo Cl e a n Fi l l Li m i t s O Un r e s t r i c t e d So i l oO Re g Fi l l Li m i t s OO LJ Re s . Cr i t e r i a No n - R e s . Cr i t e r i a Im p a c t to GW So i l Cl e a n u p Cr i t e r i a Im p a c t to GW so i l sc r e e n Cr i t e r i a - (_ ] 4 Da y s * V4 G R ; ) 5 Da y s * Co m m e n t s , Sp e c i a l Re q u i r e m e n t s or Re g u l a t i o n s / Da t a Fo r m a t : Hl St a n d a r d 37 5 S C O Re s i d e n t i a l So i l 37 5 S C O Re s i d e n t i a l GW Cr i t e r i a Re s t r i c t e d So i l 37 5 S C O NY EZ ED D Da t a Pa c k a g e : oO sr e e e o So l l St a t e Sa m p l e s Co l l e c t e d ? (A S P ) (7 NJ Re d u c e d De f i v . * {] Ot h e r in d u s t r i a l So i l *M S / M S D ar e co n s i d e r e d si t e sa m p l e s an d wi l l be bi l l e d as su c h in im Gl S / K e y Ot h e r . Cc NY wi t h th e pr i c e s qu o t e d . (J NY En h a n c e d (A S P B) Su b p a r t 5 DW PA So i l Re s t r i c t e d 2OO OO . * SU R C H A R G E [[ ] Ph o e n i x St d Re p o r t ([ ] Ea Q u i s AP P L I E S WH Ex c e l NJ Ha z s i t e ED D PD F PL E A S E HO L D AL L SA M P L E S UN T I L NO T I F I E D PA So i l no n - r e s t r i c t e d gooo0 aa O OU O —7~_ °° (6668 OSAIY4 Sam Runyon Subject: FW: 33-37 Caroline Street Attachments: NYNJCofC.pdf From: Rob Gray <robnetc@nycap.rr.com> Sent: Friday, February 9, 2024 3:30 PM To: Greg Lawrence <greg@phoenixlabs.com>; Makrina Nolan <Makrina@phoenixlabs.com>; Sarah Bell <sarah@phoenixlabs.com> Cc: Jeff Wink <jeffnetc@nycap.rr.com>; mattnetc@nycap.rr.com; NETC12020@gmail.com Subject: 33-37 Caroline Street Good afternoon all, Your carrier should be dropping samples off at the lab today for the 33 -37 Caroline Street. The accompanying COC instructs you to place them on hold until notified. Please accept this e-mail as authorization as notification run all soil and groundwater samples, with the exception of groundwater sample B-3, as indicated on the accompanying COC. For convenience | have also attached a PDF copy of the original COC highlighting the samples | am authorizing to have analyzed. If there are any questions regarding this authorization please give me a call. Have a great weekend! Robert Gray, P.G. Project Manager/Geologist Northeastern Environmental Technologies Corporation & Northeastern Environmental Geoscience DPC 1476 Saratoga Rd. - PO BOX 2167 Ballston Spa, New York 12020 robnetc@nycap.rr.com Tel: 518-884-8545 Fax: 518-884-9710 https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2 fwww.neenvironmentaltech.com&c=E,1,91uYrncrppFVV7gY pgPg O5MpDmTZY61euuT-4jo8a1T43 UYn82b2Cif7dxE-mfcxTvaBQy-L-aDC8ls6-4pmpvWd MvCf3V2QmrNizph9NFw, &typo=1 This e-mail is sent by NETC and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us immediately. Page Ttor7t Phosrix Erviranmartal Laboratories, Inc ‘S37 Fag Midde Turgite 7.0, tea 570 Lab sorts Mancharter 08040 Cobden Date (356-1002 Gots Matin spa comns214 Project: 39:57 CAPCUNE STREET cas Meee oenonid mee BIN CS Non Targit Semtea late Corspource: Percent Salis PKK. PCTSOUD Metaterata Anee veeose2 brine 7unasa Cova 7uana3.s Ghrenzs 73 lad respond Nercury 7439974 Sebotury 772 hee 70224 Repent. VHT PCB IME 12412 reo 1206282 on perrseres Ree 53468233 PBI 22692-2046 PCB ISe 12067. 684 PCB 2E0 166-5 pee geass pepauen nino1e4 tae L-Didtonbenane mason pert re m4er LAD dt crobeniene S4L734 LED Ot crobentene 16A6? 22-Onfaul-cHereprapanel a0eot 2.4 neratchore rere, 26 Mirtrotckvene (06-202 Ot oronsohtha bere 2337 ira phtte herve nse 2titrcardire a 33 -Oschboro bere dine: me Bray candre sos Stromepharnt sharylather amsss S-dderainine rears SOV crag end phvord eter MB. aharcantre 100034 Aceuphthers: one Aceughthyane 208568 Arthecere non? Beretalwrtteacone 565582 Bereta ware severe — Bereoionnthene 206.982 Bereuighipsyiere 191-242 Be ff . 207-089 Berea vd tasa Berey! soothed 100S14 Bereyibutplobthebte a7 roa mai DefacHorodthdltter nies BUZethy tery leteolee 1-67 Chen UES Cerrttd phthalate er92 Ceevocty bhthalate niraea Obontadiertracene 53.2 Obenfurn Bes aah phthalate Onvethyiptttelate 5 Fascearthene 08 Fusceere wets: HerHenctenere uereL Hea oretetad ere Heachorcepchopanted ane Head Webern 2 Rod oyrere Inopterone BiXtraucdogrceynine eK tronod methyl vine HN bros od phere ban ine: hsehtbolere litrctercmve Pharartheene sara Prone 29000 Fel eon. SD Ta 124 trddercbeeera uaa 2d crabtree s 4 2D phon ty dari: 122467 Le-Ddtercbenare sansa LéDidtercbencane Leaner RPO ELC cregrop aed 106501 Ze Dinerotchene Re 2.6 Dirérotchome 06202 2-cheraraghta auset Det ragtthobones ASTS Raarcarire fe7aa 3:-Cuchbrobercidne ay084 Stitrosrire soma Akron ghernl chenplether 10553 .0vceosine 106a78 SCHeraphend phar ther 7008-723 Statrosrdre 100014 Acswohthere a arthescesee ROL ercire ware Dereatcacid xa Bereylakobol 100536 Bereyibitelpithabte 5437 Da(a-chorosthom methane 3931 Bai2chbrosth” ther se BeL-ethy ten Neral te 1317 Chbay atm Chnomrbitronte uae Obenictvan uses (Deathnyt pthal ate 2 (Cen atytphtte late 13115 Frcerthere 26a Frucere 737 Heuchlercethane ert ophercee yes HN Dos OSnprcoy bn ine Rie? NN bros retintavine R69 eM tron od phary lan ine 56506 sgh a120s Pyrene 29000 Somtvolaiteny SHS SWEZTUE (UND haere 2088 Beran |arttnose $6553 Geren pyrene: Sona Berea ethane 20992 imzez Bereab{fucrorthene 200.0639 Onere 28039 Cbd Hurthracare 33703 Hexachleecbencere uprer HeveHerctutadeve w Hench rcoychpitasene meat Indenatt,2 Sco pyrene 185! . a Prenarttrene S013 Vota tes ¥W2EED LAL 2Tetradt croathane LIL2Tetndtorcethane 2-tibeerno-3-chleropr opera 1.2-Libecev0-3.dvleeopr cgare 12-6ovccoproga 13S Thnetirdtercen: AAS Trinathrdbercene Unite uw uw xe w 37S Urhentrited 20 CAEL Zed -Canffuell TOO LIL WEYCATabe2 —PS2 PON Tabled BR S S E S 330 330 330 necea neceo. |: || BE S $4 8 8 8 Bo o e y og e e & ne e Be n e se ye a8 8 3400 170 cans21¢ cans216 consaa7 myoriza ca/ons2a8 a/orj2ae BL be BE Ditties Mut onl uk uk Abvart ed ourt Prevent ort <2000 (2 <20002 <0 03 stp 2 <20002 220002 <20002 <2000 2 <0 Os <20002 <20002 <10 im <0 Osi «20002 <oa 06 <1000 3 <20002 <1000 2 <p 2 <050 0S. supa <1000 2 supa sip <1000 1 <0 as <1000 2 sip <0 0S <0 as 10001 <n 06 10002 <10 01 <1000 4 sip <090 0S. stp 10001 sip sip <1000 1 <0 | as <1000 21 sip <0s0 0S <0 a8 10001 <om 08 <1000 2 <1000 2 s 8 s 8 s oonsz9 yor BiGi07 S08 tak burt burt e <0 D <2 18D << (D <2 20 <2 200 <2 nD <)D <0 D <2 oD sno um <1600 160) <n00 4400 <2 280 <2 <3) 0 <0 1100 <2 oD <2 <u <2) <m™ | 30 <2 0 <7) | (D <2) ( <2 2D <0 0 <2 (eo << | <2 200 <2 nD <m) | (D <m)D <0 ee) < | (D << (D el) <1 er) <2 280 <2 (O <0 <2 nD <2 0 <70 20 <720 280 <2 0 <2 ED <2 20. <2 20 <2 00 <2 (1D <3) 0 .a6 48 <6 46 246 46 <a6 46 <a6 48 +4646 <a6 00 48 <a6 0 46 <a6 46 <ab 48 <a6 46 <a6 0 48 <a6 46 sab 48 <a6 46 <ab 48 <a6 46 00ns220 aloofzas BS Ga01 Sok tout Fret Fret ry EE ted M4 oe <0 (038 659 (Ose ia Ose <008 0.08 <i5 45 <031 Dae <3 amb <3) 9D <3 9D <0 <0 UD <0 oD <0 <7 97D <0 97D <1 <1 <8) 260 <2 2 <1 <1 <3 260 2 2 <2 uD <n uo <1500 150) <0 110) <2 <1 <3 260 <1100 1100 <2 <x 1D 2 260 <6 <sm970 <x 1D <2) 260 <2) 260 <x 1D <0 140 <6 <1 <a D <1 <9) 260 <2) 260 <x 1D <1 < <0 <1 <M 0 <2 <1 <3) 260 <3) 260 <x 10 <1 <m0 <2 26 <1 <1 <2 260 <3) 260 <2 1D <2 <8) 28 cae 48 <b a ab 4 <a 4a sat 48 <ae a <aG 48 <a 4a <b a sat 4a <ae aa cat 4a <ae a <a 4a <ae aa <a 4a <ae a coms222 wo COMPAL Oe rk nn f s tat oa (OSS 037 ale oo <15 is <2) ao <a ety <a) a <3 i <3) ath <3) 3th = uO —™ oO = rd a3 <0 i <1 =o) aro] 2D +1000 1 <0 MO <0 uO — MO =< uO <2 MO <M0 ro < rd <2 MO —™ x oons232 aii Het 10S) 308 rk Fret a <2 00 2am 400 <a 400 <0 00 —-m to <2 40 <a 400 <a 40 <a 400 m0 em 2D <2 260 <2 260 «m1 «m1 <7 260 <7 260 em nD <n bo <1600 10 <20 «1 <2 20 <2 20 <2) <20 am <2 D <2 <m <2) 160 <a 40 <m 10 <2 20 <= 20 m0 <0 70 <2 260 <m 20 <m 10 <m 180 <0 330 <2 20 em 0 <0 <2 20 <m 280 em 0 7m 10 <0 <2m 280 <= 260 <= 20 em 20 «m2 10 <730 2 <2 20 em 20 20 260 260 20 260 2 cons233 jee za8 WEL RSD Ee patos a Aourt <se O56 +56 56 23B 56 <S6 56 <sE 56 <S6 56 sBB 56 <BB 56 +56 56 «BB 56 <S6 $é <BB 56 <S6 56 <BB 56 <S6 $é +3658 <S6 5K 1¢-Ddlercbencene Let dceobawere 2.2-Hidvceopropare 22- Dich croprapare Wesing Ethyl Ketone: Wath (Wath t-buty ether (4 TRE) Wethidl t-bety ether 04 TEE) Tetratwdroturn (THE) bom 12-Dichkoroethene brarn-12Dichloraethare Proper trom] 20khro prope Thich crosthene Tadd croethane Todderetvoronettare Tichlorefharemethare Tichlorctrucroth ane Tid crceituccosthane Viet doris rent chloride Feat Detected PL ncn Crberia See | 3000 40 2700 1800 2300 3400 _m <0 <2 <a 2 en e as Be e a e p t p t p e t P ea e p a e t ep n r e BD Ba h a B® B DB APPENDIX E NETC RESUMES & STATEMENT OF SERVICES NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NE PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY NETC RESUMES NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NE PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY NORTHEASTERN Jeffrey T. Wink, PG “ay ENVIRONMENTAL President GEOSCIENCE DPC 1476 Route 50 - P.O. Box 2167 Baitston Sra, NY 12020 Phone: (518) 884-8545 - Fax: (518) 884-9710 EDUCATION & TRAINING: STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, POTSDAM - BA Geology 1983 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN, MADISON; Water Well Hydraulics & Hydrology 1985 PRINCETON UNIVERSITY; Groundwater Pollution & Hydrology 1986 ASTM ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FOR GROUNDWATER PROFESSIONALS 1989 BUTLER UNIVERSITY - Holcomb Research Institute 1990 OSHA 29 CFR 1920.120(E)(4) H&S Training PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: NYS Professional Geologist License No. 000566-1 2022-Present, Northeastern Environmental Geoscience DPC 1991-Present, Northeastern Environmental Technologies Corporation 1987-1992, Environmental Hydrogeology Corporation 1983-1987, Dunn Geoscience Corporation PROFESSIONAL EXPERTISE: Mr. Wink, a licensed geologist, has been a practicing geologist for over 35 years. He has been and continues to be responsible for the execution and oversight of a wide range of environmental services including consulting, inspection, invasive testing, and remediation services for Northeastern Environmental Technologies Corporation and Northeastern Environmental Geoscience DPC (Northeastern). Prior to founding Northeastern, Mr. Wink acted as the principal hydrogeologist & director of environmental assessment and remediation services for Environmental Hydrogeology Corporation and previously obtained valuable experience as a consulting geologist for Dunn Geoscience Corporation. With the assistance of the Northeastern staff, Mr. Wink continues to implement his geo-environmental experience when pursuing project objectives for clients. An abbreviated list of work completed by Mr. Wink include: ¢ Preparation of environmental site assessments, audits and property divestiture certification reports for commercial lenders, attorney / bankruptcy plan administrators, equity investors, owner / operators, and developers. Work involving ASTM E1527-21 Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, ASTM E1903-19 Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, remediation, waste management & brokerage services. ¢ NYS Brownfield Cleanup Program, including initial ASTM E1527-21 Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment & characterization of impacts; interim remedial measures deemed necessary for legacy improvements, buried infrastructure and soil, groundwater & vapor impacts, final remedy selection to achieve certificate of completion (COC) as well as the design and implementation of post COC site management plan & building mitigation controls during and after end use development construction activities. ¢ Delineation of contamination due to releases at petroleum and chemical bulk storage facilities involving contamination of the vadose zone and underlying aquifer systems. Design, install, operate, and maintain soil, vapor and groundwater treatment systems, post remedy monitoring of air, surface water and groundwater to meet Federal and State regulatory agency requirements. Chemical & petroleum bulk storage permit and spill prevention, control & countermeasure facility response plan administration and compliance. PROFESSIONAL_EXPERTISE _(Cont.): ¢ Investigation of soil and groundwater impacts caused by underground utilities and surface impoundment at commercial, manufacturing, and chemical storage sites. Work including the study of on and off site environmental impacts from organic and heavy metal compounds; risk assessment and remedy selection to achieve programmatic regulatory closure goals. ¢ Investigations of groundwater contamination by organic and inorganic compounds at landfill and surface land spreading waste disposal sites. Work incorporating study of environmental impacts on and off site. ¢ Investigation of the available groundwater resource potential of unconsolidated glacial and carbonate bedrock aquifers at private, industrial, and municipal sites. Work involving geologic and hydrologic evaluation of the unconsolidated deposits and bedrock formations for water supply purposes and subsequent well field development. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: American Water Works Association Emergency Medical Technician (1983-1989) National Ground Water Association - Association of Groundwater Scientists and Engineers National Ski Patrol 1987 - Present, (S&T Examiner 1989 -2004) NYS Professional Geologist - License No. 000566-1 Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce US EPA Asbestos Handler & Inspector (1987-1991) PROFESSIONAL PUBLICATIONS: Carl, J.O., Liptak, A.R. Savitz, S.L., Schmidt, D.T., Scott, S.G., Tom, J.V. & Wink, J.T.,1984; Geochemical Characteristics of Granitoid Plutons in the Penobscot Bay Area, Maine. Northeastern Geology, V.6, No. 1, pp.12-24. Hanson, E.L. & Wink, J.T., Groundwater Occurrences in Southern Dutchess County, In Field Trip Guidebook Natural Association of Geology Teachers, 1987. NORTHEASTERN IN ENVIRONMENTAL Robert Gray III GEOSCIENCE DPC Project Geologist PG 1476 Route 50 - P.O. Box 2167 Battston Spa, NY 12020 Phone: (518) 884-8545 - Fax: (518) 884-9710 EpDuCATION State University of New York, Cortland BS Degree, Geology - May 2003 Adirondack Community College Associates Degree, Math and Science - December 2000 OSHA 29 CFR 1920.120(E)(4) Health & Safety Training OSHA 29 CFR 1910.146(g) Confined Space Awareness Training PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE NYS Professional Geologist License No. 001091-1 Project Geologist 2005 - Present Northeastern Environmental Technologies Corporation and 2022 - Present Northeastern Environmnetal Geoscience DPC ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE ¢ Responsible for project specific environmental consulting Responsible for technical report writing (i.e., ESA, TSP, SI, RI, CAP, etc.) ¢ Project manager for implementation of subsurface investigations, UST and AST closure services, and on site remediation ¢ Experienced in permit application and compliance for SPCC, SPEDS, and Brownfields Experienced in conducting geophysical investigations using EM-31, EM-61MK2 and GPR ¢ Experienced in various drilling and well installation techniques including hollow stem auger, direct push technology (Geoprobe), hand auger, and Shelby tube ¢ Experienced in groundwater sampling techniques including field pH, turbidity, Conductivity, and low flow sampling ¢ Experienced in NYSDOH indoor air sampling techniques via TO-15 including ambient air and sub slab testing ¢ Experienced in design, cost analysis and project management of various remediation techniques including UST and AST removal, soil removal, SVE and AS systems installation, and ORC and HRC application ¢ Proficient with Microsoft and Apple operating systems as well as small office networks (server installation and maintenance) ¢ Proficient with various programs including Surfer, Auto CAD Light, Lotus, Excel, Word, Air Flow SVE, Adobe, FirstSearch, etc. ¢ Proficient in converting text and graphic documents into PDF formats to electronically transmit via the internet Notas_e ProJects ¢ College Park Redevelopment Site Schenectady, New York - Future Home of Golub Corporation (Price Chopper) Headquarters - Brownfields Redevelopment Site ¢ Union Graduate College Schenectady, New York Site Assessment, Soil and Groundwater Construction Management, Groundwater treatment services NoTABLE PROJECTS (CONT.) Sd Union College - College Park Hall and Soccer Field Schenectady, New York Site Assessment, Geophysical Survey, Soil Removal, Soil Management, Groundwater Monitoring Greene County - Various Sites Site Assessment, Soil Remediation, Soil and Groundwater Monitoring, In situ Soil Remediation Cranesville Block - Kingston, New York Site Assessment, Design and Construction of Soil Vapor Extraction System Town of Ballston - Charlton Road Site Site Assessment, Soil Remediation, Groundwater Monitoring K.C. Canary (4) Sites - Clifton Park, Gloversville, Plattsburgh, Gouverneur, NY Site Assessment, Soil and Groundwater Assessment, Geophysical Survey, Groundwater Monitoring Friendly's (11) Sites - Rotterdam, Binghamton, Dewitt, Lockport, Olean, Oneonta, Vestal, Watertown, NY Site Assessment, Soil and Groundwater Assessment, Geophysical Survey, Groundwater Monitoring OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE ¢* ¢ ¢ @¢ @ 6@ Review and writing of contracts, purchase orders, and change orders Budget variances, analysis and accounting Site and building plan take-offs for budget and bid purposes Supervision and coordination of field personnel and contractors Liaison with local, town and state officials Earthwork construction involving density testing of compaction with nuclear density gauge and verification of back fill placement and compaction methods Large scale disposal bed construction involving percolation tests on blended and in situ soils and placement of infiltrating systems Laboratory testing responsibilities include compressive strength tests on concrete, mortar and grout samples, proctor tests, gradations and moisture contents of soil samples Heavy equipment operator experience including, direct push, backhoe, excavator and roller NORTHEASTERN Matthew Wink ENVIRONMENTAL Environmental Consultant GEOSCIENCE DPC 1476 Route 50 - P.O. Box 2167 Battston Spa, NY 12020 Phone: (518) 884-8545 - Fax: (518) 884-9710 EDUCATION State University of New York, Cortland BA Degree, Communication Journalism - May 2009 OSHA 29 CFR 1920.120(E)(4) Health & Safety Training *CPR OSHA 29 CFR 1910.146(g) Confined Space Awareness Training PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2009 — 2015 Field Technician Northeastern Environmental Technologies Corporation 2015-— Present Environmental Consultant Northeastern Environmental Technologies Corporation 2022 -—Present Environmental Consultant Northeastern Environmental Geoscience DPC State University of New York, Cortland BA Degree, Communication Journalism - May 2009 OSHA 29 CFR 1920.120(E)(4) Health & Safety Training *CPR OSHA 29 CFR 1910.146(g) Confined Space Awareness Training ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE . ASTM Phase 1, 2 and 3 Environmental Site Assessment Work Responsible for technical report writing (i.e. ESA, TSP, SI etc) Project Technician for implementation of subsurface investigations, UST and AST closure services, and remedial corrective action programs Experienced in various drilling methods and well installation techniques Experienced in groundwater sampling techniques including field pH, turbidity, Conductivity, and low flow sampling Experienced in EPA and NYSDEC sampling / natural attenuation monitoring techniques Experienced in NYSDOH indoor air sampling techniques via TO-15 including ambient air and sub slab testing . Proficient with Microsoft operating systems . Proficient in converting text and graphic documents into PDF formats to electronically transmit via the internet * Proficient with various programs including Surfer, Lotus, Excel, MSword, Adobe and EDR NOTABLE PROJECT WORK ° Brownfields Redevelopment - College Park Schenectady, New York Golub Corporation (Price Chopper) Headquarters . Spill Remediation - Union Graduate College Schenectady, New York Spill Assessment, Soil and Groundwater Construction Management . Voluntary Cleanup - Union College College Park Hall and Soccer Field Schenectady, New York Site Assessment, Geophysical Survey, Soil Removal, Soil Management, Groundwater Monitoring ° Chemical Release — Washrite Dry Cleaner Fairview Plaza Fairview Avenue Hudson New York In-situ Groundwater Treatment, Monitoring and Soil Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Services ° Residential Fuel Oil Spill Zumbo Property Ray Road Rexford, New York Spill Assessment, Remediation & Construction Management Services OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE ° Participate in contract, purchase orders and change order work ° Supervision and coordination of subcontractors Liaison with local, town and state officials Earthwork construction inspection & compaction testing with nuclear density equipment Equipment operator experience including, direct push, backhoe, excavator and roller Responsible for maintaining a social media & website design STATEMENT OF SERVICES NORTHEASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 33 & 35-37 CAROLINE STREET NE PROJECT # 23.1211015 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY ~< < < a 4 g Co s t Co n s c i o u s Ge o l o g i c & on m e n t a l Se r v i c e s fo r Ov e r 30 Ye a r s ea s t e r n En v i r o n m e n t a l Te c h n o l o g i e s Co r p o r a t i o n ha s bu i l t a re p u t a t i o n ac h i e v i n g pr o j e c t go a l s fo r it s cl i e n t s on ti m e an d on bu d g e t . No r t h e a s t e r n En v i r o n m e n t a l h rp o r a t i o n an d No r t h e a s t e r n En v i r o n m e n t a l Ge o s c i e n c e DP C (N o r t h e a s t e r n ) pr o v i d e a ra n g e of ge o l o g i c , en v i r o n m e n t a l , an d fi e l d su p p o r t se r v i c e s th a t ca n be Si n c e 19 9 1 sp e c i f i c ne e d s . Un d e r s t a n d i n g pr o j e c t ob j e c t i v e s , ou r ro l e & th e co n t e x t of ev e r y jo b is pa r a m o u n t at No r t h e a s t e r n . Gu i d e d by re g u l a t o r y ag e n c i e s , ou r no l o g i e s Co r p ta i l o r e d to me e t ou r cl i e n t s ’ ro a c h pr e s e r v e s th e ba l a n c e be t w e e n ou r co u n t r i e s ’ fi n i t e na t u r a l re s o u r c e s an d th e ob j e c t i v e s of bu s i n e s s & in d u s t r y . ob l e m so l v i n g ap p Ou r Se r v i c e s fe =o ) (o f - 4 [ o m m ol a t el i s e li l ae hy e l a e ) (o s - 4 1 4 Pr o p e r t y Ac q u i s i t i o n & & Ha z a r d o u s Ma t e r i a l Ma n a g e m e n t Se r v i c e s Di v e s t i t u r e Du e Di l i g e n c e Se r v i c e s Ge o t e c h n i c a l Gr o u n d w a t e r Ev a l u a t i o n s Re s o u r c e Ma n a g e m e n t Ne e d mo r e in f o r m a t i o n ? Ge t th e gu i d a n c e yo u ne e d to ma k e th e ri g h t ch o i c e s fo r yo u r pr o j e c t . © 20 2 0 No r t h e a s t En v i r o n m e n t a l Te c h n o l o g i e s Co r p o r a t i o n . Al l Ri g h t s Re s e r v e d . Re m e d i a t i o n E Ya t e Mm (e l a i n e ) a li t s 4 Ge o - E n v i r o n m e n t a l Su p p o r t Se r v i c e s & Co n t a c t Us 51 8 - 8 8 4 - 8 5 4 5 ht t p : / / w w w ne e n v i r o n m e n t a l t e c h . co m / ‘@ (5 1 8 ) 88 4 - 8 5 4 5 Ab o u t Us No r t h e a s t e r n is co m m i t t e d to as s i s t i n g cl i e n t s ac h i e v e go a l s in an ev e r ch a n g i n g bu s i n e s s & re g u l a t o r y en v i r o n m e n t . Ea r n i n g th e tr u s t of ev e r y cl i e n t is jo b on e fr o m da y on e . Je f f r e y Wi n k , th e Pr e s i d e n t at No r t h e a s t e r n , ha s pu r s u e d th i s st a n d a r d fo r hi s en t i r e ca r e e r . Si n c e fo u n d i n g No r t h e a s t e r n , Mr . Wi n k & hi s st a f f ha v e be e n re s p o n s i b l e fo r th e ex e c u t i o n an d ov e r s i g h t of a wi d e ra n g e of ge o - e n v i r o n m e n t a l co n s u l t i n g , te s t i n g an d re m e d i a t i o n pr o j e c t wo r k in Ne w Yo r k , Ne w En g l a n d an d ac r o s s th e ce n t r a l Un i t e d St a t e s . Ou r Te a m No r t h e a s t e r n is co m m i t t e d to bu i l d i n g bu s i n e s s re l a t i o n s h i p s th a t st a n d th e te s t of ti m e th r o u g h th e us e of cr e a t i v e , co n t e x t dr i v e n pr o b l e m so l v i n g to pu r s u e th e wo r k we co m p l e t e . Th e st a f f at No r t h e a s t e r n ar e OS H A 29 CF R 19 2 0 . 1 2 0 ce r t i f i e d & fu l l y in s u r e d . Th e pr o f e s s i o n a l ge o l o g i s t s , sc i e n t i s t s , fi e l d te c h n i c i a n s , as s o c i a t e en g i n e e r s an d op e r a t i o n a l te a m me m b e r s th a t su p p o r t ou r wo r k ar e ex p e r i e n c e d & we l l po s i t i o n e d to pr o v i d e an ar r a y of ge o - e n v i r o n m e n t a l se r v i c e s wh i c h ca n be ta i l o r e d to me e t ou r cl i e n t ’ s ne e d s . Co n t a c t Fe e l fr e e to co n t a c t us , th e NE T C No r t h e a s t e r n te a m lo o k s fo r w a r d to as s i s t i n g yo u wi t h yo u r pr o j e c t ne e d s . HO S H A ht t p : / / w w w . n e e n v i r o n m e n t a l t e c h . c o m / © 20 2 0 No r t h e a s t En v i r o n m e n t a l Te c h n o l o g i e s Co r p o r a t i o n . Al l Ri g h t s Re s e r v e d . Exhibit | Exhibit I