HomeMy WebLinkAbout20250513 20 Vanderbilt Ave Verizon Utility Pole ApplicationRevised 01/2021
APPLICATION FOR:
ARCHITECTURAL / HISTORIC REVIEW
APPLICANT(S)* OWNER(S) (If not applicant) ATTORNEY/AGENT
Name
Address
Phone / / /
Email
Identify primary contact person: Applicant Owner Attorney/Agent
* An applicant must be the property owner, lessee, or one with an option to lease or purchase the property in question.
Applicant’s interest in premises: Owner Lessee Under option to lease or purchase
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Property Address/Location: Tax Parcel #: . - -
(for example: 165.52 – 4 – 37 )
Current Zoning District: Property use: Residential Non-residential/mixed-use
Type of Review: Architectural Historic Extension/modification (of current approval)
Summary description of proposed action:
Has a previous application been filed with the DRC for this property? No Yes – date(s)? _____________________
-App. No.(s)? _________________
Date Acquired by Owner: _________________
**HANDWRITTEN APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED**
CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS
DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION
CITY HALL - 474 BROADWAY
SARATOGA SPRINGS, NEW YORK 12866-2296
TEL: 518-587-3550 X2533
www.saratoga-springs.org
[FOR OFFICE USE]
_______________
(Application #)
____________
(Date received)
__________________________
(Project Title)
Staff Review _______________
Collocation of an unmanned public utility/personal wireless service facility on a replacement wooden
utility pole with the antenna tip 41.7 +/- ft. in height.
**A “complete” application consists of 1 hard copy (original) , and 1 electronic copy of application & ALL other
materials as required below:
New Construction / Additions
Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures and adjacent properties
A detailed scaled site plan is essential for achieving minimal zoning compliance, depicting both current and planned structures
along with all building projections such as decks, porches, steps, roof overhangs, and chimneys. This site plan must show all
setbacks from property boundaries and any easements, in addition to the dimensional and bulk standards relevant to the zoning
district on 17"x11" sheet.
Elevation drawings showing design of all sides of existing & proposed construction – label dimensions, colors, materials, lighting (fixture
& lamp type, wattage), etc. - include compass bearing & scale; no larger than 2’x3’ sheet – smaller permitted if legible
Floor plans for proposed structure; on sheet no larger than 2’x3’ – smaller permitted if legible
Product literature, specifications and samples of proposed materials and colors
Change in exterior building materials (windows, doors, roof, siding, etc.), or color (in non-residential districts only)
Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures and that illustrate affected features
Elevation drawings showing all sides of existing & proposed construction – label dimensions, colors, materials, lighting (fixture & lamp
type, wattage), etc. - include compass bearing & scale; no larger than 2’x3’ sheet – smaller permitted if legible
Product literature, specifications and samples of proposed materials and colors
Within front yard setbacks in Historic Districts only (Front setbacks: UR-1 & INST-HTR=30’; UR-4=25’; UR-2, UR-3 & NCUD-1=10’)
-Installation, removal or change in material of drive- and walkways
-Installation or removal of architectural, sculptural or vegetative screening over 3’ in height
-Installation of accessory utility structures or radio/satellite transmission/reception devices (more than 2’ diameter)
For any of above:
Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures, and of adjacent properties
Site plan showing existing & proposed construction: include property lines & dimensions, required & proposed setbacks & lot
coverage, site features (fences, walks, trees, etc.) street names, compass bearing & scale; no larger than 2’x3’ sheet – smaller
preferred if legible
Product literature, specifications and samples of proposed materials and colors
Signage / Awnings
Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures, and adjacent properties
Plan showing location of proposed sign/awning structure on building/premises: no larger than 11”x17”
Scaled illustration of proposed sign/awning structure and lettering (front view & profile): include all dimensions of structure; type,
dimensions and style of lettering or logo; description of colors, materials, mounting method and hardware
Descriptions, specifications of proposed lighting including fixture & lamp type, wattage, mounting method, and location
Product literature, specifications and samples of proposed materials and colors
Demolition
Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures, and of adjacent properties
Site plan showing existing and any proposed structures - include dimensions, setbacks, street names, compass bearing, and scale
Written description of reasons for demolition and, in addition:
For structures of “architectural/historical significance”, demonstrate “good cause” why structure cannot be preserved
For structures in an architectural district that might be eligible for listing on National Register of Historic Places, or for a
“contributing” structure in a National Register district (contact City staff), provide plans for site development following demolition -
include a timetable and letter of credit for project completion
Telecommunication facilities
Color photographs showing site/existing structures, and of adjacent properties
Site plan showing existing and proposed structures: include dimensions, setbacks, street names, compass bearing, and scale
Scaled illustration of proposed structures: include all dimensions; colors, materials, lighting, mounting details
Consult Article 240-12.22 of the City’s Zoning Ordinance and City staff to ensure compliance with requirements for visual impact
assessment and existing and proposed vegetative screening
Revised 01/2021
Revised 01/2021
Request for extension of current approval
Identify date of original DRC approval: ______________Current expiration date: ________________ Org. App. No. ____________
Describe why this extension is necessary and whether any significant changes have occurred either on the site or in the neighborhood.
SEQR Environmental Assessment Form
Applicants proposing the following must complete “Part I” of the SEQR Short Environmental Assessment Form (available here:
http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/permits_ej_operations_pdf/seafpartone.pdf):
-Construction or expansion of a multi-family residential structure (4 units +)
-Construction or expansion (exceeding 4,000 sq. ft. gross floor area) of a principal or accessory non-residential structure
-Telecommunications facility, radio antennae, satellite dishes
-Demolition
Disclosure
Does any City officer, employee or family member thereof have a financial interest (as defined by General Municipal Law
Section 809) in this application?
No Yes - If yes, a statement disclosing the name, residence, nature, and extent of this interest must be filed with this
application.
Certification
I/we, the property owner(s), or purchaser(s)/lessee(s) under contract, of the land in question, hereby request an appearance
before the Design Review Commission.
By the signature(s) attached hereto, I/we certify that the information provided within this application and accompanying
documentation is, to the best of my/our knowledge, true and accurate. I/we further understand that intentionally providing
false or misleading information is grounds for immediate denial of this application.
I/we hereby authorize the members of the Design Review Commission and designated City staff to enter the property
associated with this application for purposes of conducting any necessary site inspections relating to this application.
Furthermore, I/we agree to meet all requirements under Article VII for Historic Review or Article VIII for Architectural
Review of the Zoning Code of the City of Saratoga Springs.
Date:
(applicant signature)
Date:
(applicant signature)
If applicant is not the currently the owner of the property, the current owner must also sign.
Owner Signature: Date:
Owner Signature: Date:
Revised 01/2021
INSTRUCTIONS
ARCHITECTURAL / HISTORIC REVIEW APPLICATION
1.ELIGIBILITY: An applicant to the Design Review Commission for Architectural Review or Historic Review
must be the property owner(s) or lessee, or have an option to lease or purchase the property in question.
2.COMPLETE SUBMISSIONS: Applicants are encouraged to work with City staff to ensure that an application is
complete. The DRC will only consider properly completed applications that contain 1 original and 1
digital version of the application and ALL other required materials as indicated on the application.
HANDWRITTEN APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED!!
3.ACTIONS REQUIRING REVIEW:
Architectural Review District Historic Review District
•any exterior changes that require a building permit
•any change in exterior building materials
•a new, or change to an existing, sign or sign structure
•demolition of a structure
Within a non-residential zoning district:
•a change in exterior building color
•installation of an awning
•Installation or exterior change to a structure requiring a
building or demolition permit
•any material change to exterior of a structure including:
-addition or removal of exterior architectural features
-installation, removal or material changes to exterior
building elements such as roof, siding, windows, doors,
porches, etc.
-enclosure or screening or buildings openings such as
windows, doors, porches, etc.
-installation of utility, mechanical or misc. accessory
structures to the exterior of a building such as HVAC
equipment, solar panels, wind turbines, radio/satellite
transmission/reception devices, etc.
Within a front yard setback:
-installation, removal or material changes to drive- or
walkways
-installation or removal of architectural, sculptural or
vegetative screening that exceeds 3’ in height
-installation of accessory utility structures or
radio/satellite transmission/reception devices over 2’ in
diameter
•a change in exterior building color within a non-
residential zoning district
•a new, or change to an existing, sign or awning
•installation of telecommunications facilities
Note – Ordinary maintenance or repair that does not involve a change in material, design or outer appearance
is exempt from Historic or Architectural Review.
CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS
DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION
City Hall - 474 Broadway
Saratoga Springs, New York 12866
Tel: 518-587-3550 x2533
www.saratoga-springs.org
4.DESIGN GUIDELINES:
The Design Review Commission will evaluate whether the proposed action (construction, alteration or
demolition) is compatible with existing structures and surrounding properties using the following criteria:
•Height – consistent with historic form and context of site and surrounding properties
•Scale – relationship of structure and its architectural elements to human size, form, perception
•Proportion – relationship among building elements including front façade, windows, and doors
•Rhythm – pattern resulting from repeating building elements such as door/window openings, columns,
arches, and other façade elements
•Directional Expression – compatibility with horizontal & vertical expression of surrounding structures
•Massing & Open Space – relationship of structure to open space between it and adjoining buildings
•Setback – compatibility with surrounding structures
•Compatibility of the following with surrounding structures/properties:
-Major building elements (storefronts, doors, windows, roof)
-Building materials
-Color – (in non-residential zoning districts only)
5.DECISIONS: The Design Review Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove an
application. The DRC may impose appropriate conditions and safeguards in connection with its approval
including nature/quality of materials, manner of construction, and design. An applicant may appeal a denied
DRC application on the grounds of hardship.
Application approvals shall expire within 18 months of the filing date unless the project has sufficiently
commenced (i.e. building/demolition permits obtained and construction/alteration begun). Applicants may
request up to 2 extensions if requested before expiration date of prior approval.
6.AGENDA DATE: Check City’s website (www.saratoga-springs.org) for meeting dates. Applications are
placed on an agenda on first-come, first-served basis as determined by the completeness of the application.
7.APPLICATION FEE (NON-REFUNDABLE): Make checks payable to the "Commissioner of Finance”.
REFER TO THE CURRENT FEE WORKSHEET INCLUDED IN THIS DOCUMENT.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
More detailed information on Architectural Review, Historic Review and the Design Review Commission
responsibilities may be found in the City’s Zoning Ordinance available in City Hall and on the City’s web site at
http://www.saratoga-springs.org/544/Zoning-Ordinance.
Revised 01/2021
6
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
_______________
MAIN OFFICE (FOR ALL MAIL): 500 FEDERAL STREET, 5TH FLOOR, TROY, NEW YORK 12180
ALBANY OFFICE: 41 STATE STREET, STE 604-12, ALBANY, NEW YORK 12207
_______________
Phone: 518-438-9907 • Fax: 518-438-9914
_______________
www.youngsommer.com
David C. Brennan, Esq.
Writer’s Telephone Extension: 224
dbrennan@youngsommer.com
June 11, 2025
Via Federal Express
Mark Graham
Administrative Assistant for OPED
City of Saratoga Springs
474 Broadway
Saratoga Springs, New York 12866
RE: Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless Application for DRB Approval
Utility Pole No. NG 9-1B - Adjacent to 20 Vanderbilt Ave.
Dear Mr. Graham:
Please find enclosed an application to the Design Review Board for a proposal to add a
wireless small cell antenna and equipment to an existing utility pole in the right of way.
Also enclosed is a check in the amount of $650.00 for the application fee.
We look forward to discussing this further with the Design Review Board at an upcoming
meeting. In the meantime, if you have any questions concerning this letter or the enclosed
materials, please contact me at your convenience.
Very truly yours,
David C. Brennan, Esq.
Encl.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS, SARATOGA COUNTY, NEW YORK
In the Matter of the Application of
______________________________________________________________
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP
d/b/a Verizon Wireless
Utility Pole No. NG 9-1B
Adjacent to 20 Vanderbilt Ave
Saratoga Springs, New York 12866
____________________________________________________________
APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVAL
and STATEMENT OF INTENT
Submitted by:
Verizon Wireless
Margaret Baughman, Manager – Network Real Estate
1275 John Street, Suite 100
West Henrietta, New York 14586
(585) 321-5390
Tectonic Engineering & Surveying Consultants, P.C.
Steven Matthews, P.E.
36 British American Blvd, Suite 101
Latham, New York 12110
(518) 783-1630
Pyramid Network Services
Jack Redmond, Site Acquisition Specialist
5845 Widewaters Parkway
Suite 100
East Syracuse, NY 13057
(315) 730-3281
Please Direct All Correspondence To:
Young/Sommer LLC
David C. Brennan, Esq.
500 Federal Street, 5th Floor
Troy NY, 12180
(518) 714-9282
Dated: June 11, 2025
Network Engineering
175 Calkins Road
Rochester, New York 14623
Saratoga REC Center Micro Cell Communications Facility
Radio Frequency Analysis
Verizon is proposing to collocate a new microcell facility on a replacement utility pole near the intersection of
Worth St and Vanderbilt Ave in the City of Saratoga Springs, Saratoga County, New York. This microcell is
needed to improve coverage and network performance to the homes, apartments, Saratoga Springs
Recreation (REC) Center and local roads generally east of Greenridge Cemetery. Due to heavy network
usage generated in downtown Saratoga Springs (particularly during summer months and track season) and
clusters of tightly-spaced buildings and homes along the local roads surrounding the REC Center, Verizon’s
existing neighboring macro sites are not capable of providing reliable mobile voice and data services on its
“mid-band” (1900 MHz, 2100 MHz and 5G 3500 MHz) frequency channels to this specific portion of the city.
General Methodology – Network Design/Micro Cell Placement
The proposed micro cell is a significantly paired down version of a typical macro cell (i.e., a standard 3-
sectored antenna array placed on a tall tower, building or water tank as commonly seen on wireless
communications facilities in Saratoga Springs and the surrounding area - for example the 245 ft. tall guyed
tower off West Ave near Saratoga Springs High School). The proposed micro cell consists of radios and
other ancillary equipment inside an enclosure mounted approximately 12 ft. above ground level and
connected via coaxial cable to a 2 ft. tall canister antenna mounted on top of the existing 38.5± ft. tall utility
pole on Worth St south of the Saratoga Springs REC Center building.
Verizon’s specific “Saratoga REC Center” microcell objectives are to extend reliable wireless service along a
0.3± mile portion of Vanderbilt Ave between Lincoln Ave and Fenlon St, 0.25± mile portion of Jefferson St
between Webster St and Steele St., and in-home/in-building level service across the Senior Housing,
Jefferson Terrace and Vanderbilt Terrace Apartments, and into the Saratoga REC Center building, homes,
and local roads in and surrounding the area generally bounded Lincoln Ave to the north, Jefferson St to the
east, Fenlon St to the south and Vanderbilt Ave to the west.
Verizon’s closest wireless facilities to the proposed micro cell are its “Saratoga Gaming & Raceway” site
0.55± miles southeast at Saratoga Casino Hotel, its “Saratoga State Park” site 0.62± miles southwest on the
smoke stack behind the National Museum of Dance, and its “Stonequist” site 0.53± miles northwest on the
Stonequist Apartments rooftop. Due to distance, the dense clusters of trees and buildings across the
targeted area, and the massive amount of wireless network traffic generated in the downtown Saratoga
Springs, State Park / SPAC, and casino portions of the city, coverage and capacity from these and all other
neighboring wireless facilities (particularly in Verizon’s mid-band frequency channels in the 1900 MHz – 3500
MHz range) is unable to the reliably serve the targeted Saratoga REC Center area and generally across the
neighborhoods and local roads between Greenridge Cemetery and Jefferson St.
In researching the existing co-locatable structures at and near the Vanderbilt Ave / Worth St intersection, the
utility pole adjacent to the southeast corner of the REC Center on Worth St was identified as a potential
candidate to achieve Verizon’s intended coverage and capacity objectives. The specific pole was chosen as
it is positioned near the center of the targeted sections of Vanderbilt Ave and Jefferson St where it has
relatively unobstructed views into the Saratoga Springs REC Center and into the surrounding homes and
apartments. A microcell at this location is also able to provide needed network capacity since most if not all
network traffic generated across the targeted improvement area will be served by the proposed REC Center
microcell, enabling the three macro sites described previously to better serve the downtown, state
park/SPAC, and casino areas. Given the chosen pole’s desirable location, Verizon is proposing to collocate
its microcell facility on Utility Pole # NG 9-1B.
2
Calculated coverage from the proposed REC Center microcell facility is shown in the street and aerial maps
at Figure 1 below. When viewing these maps, the blue-shaded area illustrates new and/or improved
coverage from the proposed facility at Verizon’s 2100 MHz frequency band, and the blue semi-circle labeled
“Saratoga REC Center” is placed at the proposed micro cell location (on the existing utility pole). As the
results demonstrate, the proposed micro cell will successfully cover the targeted sections of Jefferson St and
Vanderbilt Ave and into the homes, apartments, and local roads in between. When complete, mobile
devices attempting to access or remain connected to Verizon’s network will seamlessly and reliably connect
via the REC Center microcell site, effectively resolving mid-band 4G/5G coverage and capacity deficiencies
across the targeted area.
Figure 1 – Expected Coverage and Performance Improvement Area (Blue-Shaded Region) from the
Proposed Saratoga REC Center Microcell
Conclusion
To summarize, Verizon is proposing to install a small canister antenna (measuring 24 in. high by 14.6 in.
wide) on top of a replacement 38.5± ft. tall utility pole with associated radios and ancillary equipment inside
an enclosure installed 12 ft above ground level on the pole. The proposed microcell is needed to provide
reliable mid-band coverage and supplement wireless network capacity at and surrounding the Saratoga
Springs REC Center; coverage and capacity is limited in this area due to heavy network usage on Verizon’s
neighboring macro facilities and their inability to adequately serve the cluster of closely-spaced apartment
buildings and homes, and along the local roads and homes generally in the REC Center area of the city.
The proposed facility will resolve this gap in reliable service.
Date: May 20, 2025
Prepared by:
Rick Andras
Rick Andras
Radio Frequency (RF) Design Engineer
Verizon Wireless
Looking east adjacent to 20 Vanderbilt Avenue
Proposed equipment will be visible from this location P-1
12397.059
Looking east adjacent to 20 Vanderbilt Avenue
Proposed equipment will be visible from this location S-1
12397.059
1
1777 Sentry Parkway W. Building 11 • Suite 201 Blue Bell • PA • 19422
Verizon Wireless
Site Compliance Report
Site name - Saratoga REC Cntr
Site Name: Saratoga REC Cntr
Site Address: 20 Vanderbilt Ave, Saratoga Springs, NY,12866
Structure Type: Utility Pole
Report Information
Report Date: April 23, 2025
Report Generated by: Mamta Verma
Customer Contact: Rick Andras
Compliance Statement
Verizon Compliance Statement: Verizon wireless is compliant with FCC rules and regulations in all publicly accessible
areas.
2
1777 Sentry Parkway W. Building 11 • Suite 201 Blue Bell • PA • 19422
Contents
1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................ 3
2. Antenna Inventory ......................................................................................................................................................... 4
3. Analysis ........................................................................................................................................................................... 5
4. Appendix A: Reference Information ............................................................................................................................... 6
3
1777 Sentry Parkway W. Building 11 • Suite 201 Blue Bell • PA • 19422
1. Executive Summary
Verizon Wireless has contracted with Circet USA, an independent Radio Frequency consulting firm, to determine
if the proposed telecommunications facility is in compliance with Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
rules and regulations regarding RF exposure as defined in 47 CFR § 1.1307(b) and 1.1310. This document and the
conclusions herein are based on the information provided by representatives of Verizon Wireless which is assumed
to be true and correct.
All information used in this report was analyzed to determine compliance in publicly accessible areas, in particular
at ground level. The analysis evaluates the telecommunications facility with respect to the General
Population/Uncontrolled Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits. Circet USA has taken into consideration
the Verizon Wireless antenna system as well as any existing antenna systems at the subject location.
Verizon Wireless final antenna count is (1) antenna.
Based on the analysis, Circet USA has determined that:
Verizon Wireless is compliant in all publicly accessible areas with the FCC rules and regulations governing human
exposure to RF electromagnetic fields as described in 47 CFR § 1.1307(b) and 1.1310.
With the proposed Verizon Wireless antenna configuration in service, the composite exposure from this facility in
all areas at ground level will be less than 1% of the General Population MPE limit, or over 100 times less than the
maximum allowed exposure in publicly accessible areas.
4
1777 Sentry Parkway W. Building 11 • Suite 201 Blue Bell • PA • 19422
2. Antenna Inventory
The table below contains data provided by Verizon Wireless representatives and/or gathered by
Circet USA personnel. This data was used to perform the RF exposure analysis.
Notes: Each row with the same number in the Antenna ID column references the same physical antenna. Power values provided by the client and used in the analysis
may be greater than what is initially deployed.
80% TDD Duty Cycle and 100% FDD Duty Cycle are used.
Jumper/connector/coax loss between RRHs and antenna
AWS/PCS: 2 dB
C-band: 2.5 dB
Ant ID Owner Antenna
manufacturer Antenna model Mech. Tilt
(°)
Azimuth
(°)Height (ft)Frequency
band
Elec. Tilt
(°)HBW (°)VBW (°)
Total
power
(Watts)
Gain
(dBd)
ERP
(Watts)
1 Verizon JMA Wireless CX20OMI224-3Hxy 0 60 40.7 PCS1900 2 240 25 63.55 7.35 345.22
1 Verizon JMA Wireless CX20OMI224-3Hxy 0 60 40.7 WCDMA2100 2 240 25 190.6 7.35 1035.65
1 Verizon JMA Wireless CX20OMI224-3Hxy 0 60 40.7 4GHz 0 240 19.2 142.9 7.65 832.05
5
1777 Sentry Parkway W. Building 11 • Suite 201 Blue Bell • PA • 19422
3. Analysis
Circet USA has included the Verizon Wireless antenna system at the subject location in the
analysis. All existing and proposed antennas are listed in the antenna table above. Engineering
assumptions were used when specific antenna or operating parameter information was not
available for the other existing collocated antennas (if applicable).
Using this data, software modeling using IXUS software was performed for all transmitting
antennas located at the site. Circet USA has assumed a 100% duty cycle and maximum radiated
power. The site has been modeled with these assumptions to determine the maximum potential
RF energy density at ground level. Circet USA believes this to be a worst‐case analysis based
on the best available data.
As stated previously, based on this analysis, the calculated ground level exposure from the
Verizon Wireless antenna system alone is less than 1% of the General Population MPE limit.
Keep in mind that the FCC did not arbitrarily establish their own standards but rather adopted
the recommendations of national and international organizations such as the National Council
on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), the American National Standards Institute
(ANSI) and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). These
recommendations were developed by expert scientists and engineers following extensive
evaluation of the potential biological effects from RF exposure. The FCC MPE limits are based
on thresholds for known adverse effects, and they were designed to provide a substantial
margin of safety. There is a safety factor of 50 built into the General Public MPE limits, and the
predicted Verizon Wireless exposure levels are over 100 times below these very conservative
limits.
In cases where such compliance exists, the subject of electromagnetic field safety is preempted
by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which states: “No state or local government or
instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal
wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions
to the extent that such facilities comply with the (Federal Communication) Commission’s
regulations concerning such emissions.”
The graph below provides a visual depiction of the rather insignificant electromagnetic field
exposure contribution from the Verizon Wireless antenna system out to a distance of 500’ from
the base of the structure. This portrays how low the Verizon Wireless contribution is when
compared to the General Population MPE limit.
6
1777 Sentry Parkway W. Building 11 • Suite 201 Blue Bell • PA • 19422
4. Appendix A: Reference Information
FCC Rules & Regulations
All information used in this report was analyzed as a percentage of the MPE limits as detailed in 47 CFR §
1.1310. The calculated power density at each sample point divided by the limit at each calculated frequency
provides a result in % MPE. Summing the calculated % MPE from all contributors provides accumulative
% MPE at a particular sample point. Wireless carriers use different frequency bands with varying MPE
limits; therefore, it is useful to report results in terms of % MPE as opposed to power density.
All results were compared to the FCC radio frequency exposure rules as detailed in 47 CFR § 1.1307(b) to
determine compliance with the MPE limits for General Population/Uncontrolled environments as defined
below:
Two Classifications for Exposure Limits
Occupational – Applies to situations in which persons
are “exposed as a consequence of their employment”
and are “fully aware of the potential for exposure and
can exercise control over their exposure”.
General Population – Applies to situations in which
persons are “exposed as a consequence of their
employment may not be made fully aware of the potential
for exposure or cannot exercise control over their
exposure”. Generally speaking, those without significant
and documented RF Safety & Awareness training would
be in the General Population classification.
Environment Classification
Controlled – Applies to environments that are restricted
or “controlled” in order to prevent access from members
of the General Population classification.
Uncontrolled – Applies to environments that are
unrestricted or “uncontrolled” that allow access from
members of the General Population classification.
7
1777 Sentry Parkway W. Building 11 • Suite 201 Blue Bell • PA • 19422
The MPE limits defined in 47 CFR § 1.1310 and utilized in this analysis are outlined in the table and diagram
below:
Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure
Frequency Electric Field Magnetic Field Power Density Averaging Time
Range Strength Strength (S) |E|2, |H|2, or S
(MHz) (E) (V/m) (H) (A/m) (mW/cm2) (minutes)
0.3-3.0 614 1.63 (100)* 6
3.0-30 1842/f 4.89/f (900/f2)* 6
30-300 61.4 0.163 1.0 6
300-1500 ‐‐ ‐‐ f/300 6
1500-100,000 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5 6
Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure
Frequency Electric Field Magnetic Field Power Density Averaging Time
Range Strength Strength (S) |E|2, |H|2, or S
(MHz) (E) (V/m) (H) (A/m) (mW/cm2) (minutes)
0.3-1.34 614 1.63 (100)* 30
1.34-30 824/f 2.19/f (180/f2)* 30
30-300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30
300-1500 ‐‐ ‐‐ f/1500 30
1500-100,000 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.0 30
f = frequency in MHz
* = Plane‐wave equivalent power density
NY industrial code rule 753 requires no less than two
working days notice, but not more than ten days notice.
Before You Dig, Drill Or Blast!
CALL US TOLL FREE 1-800-962-7962
UNDERGROUND FACILITIES
PROTECTIVE ORGANIZATION
New York
Dig Safely.
·
·
·