Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20250163 85 Lincoln Area Variance NOD Brett reasons: following the for approved be dimensions, lesser or plans submitted the per As RELIEF %70 OR 5.6’ 2.4’ 8’ SETBACK YARD IDE S REQUESTED ELIEF R ROPOSED P REQUIREMENT DIMENSIONAL ISTRICT D EQUIREMENT R OF YPE T of amount following the for variance area following the that move I community, the of and fety,sa the to detriment with sapplicant the to the of consideration In .2025 7, April to 2025 24, March from held application said on a of given duly been having notice public and ,residence family-single existing an to addition an permit to City said of UDO the under variance area an for application an being This City. said of Map Assessment the on District 2)-(UR 2-Residential Urban the in ,52-1-84.165 number parcel tax being York New Springs, Saratoga of City the in Avenue 85 at premises the involving Inspector Building the of determination the from 66128 NY , Saratoga Avenue 85 Fuller & Gage Simpson, Chair C ITY OF S ARATOGA Brendan Dailey, Vice Chair Shafer Gaston S PRINGS Amanda Demma Jonah Cohen ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Otis Maxwell  Chris LaPointe C ITY H ALL - 474 B ROADWAY Chris Maslak (Alternate) S ARATOGA S PRINGS, N EW Y ORK 12866 Robert West (Alternate) 518-587-3550 WWW.SARATOGA-SPRINGS.ORG #20250163 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL OF 1. Achievability by Other Means: The applicants have demonstrated this benefit cannot be achieved by other means feasible to the applicants. The applicants would like to renovate and enlarge their primary residence by adding an addition to the second floor of the house. The applicants considered several other design options, but because the house sits at an unusual angle relative to the property line, those alternatives would have required similar encroachments into the side yard setback. The applicants also considered the possibility of placing the addition on the other side of the house, but this option was deemed unsatisfactory to the applicants as it would have necessitated the removal of an existing wooden deck. No additional land is available for purchase. 2. Undesirable Change: The applicants have demonstrated that granting this variance will not create an undesirable change in neighborhood character or detriment to nearby properties. Relative to the existing structure, the applicants’ proposed addition would encroach less than 2 feet farther into the side yard setback. The applicants provided numerous examples of comparable nearby properties with similar encroachments into side yard setbacks, none of which pose a detriment to other nearby properties. The Board notes that the applicants plan to install gutters or other mechanisms to Page 1 of 2 2025 7, April Dated: gutters. e.g. ,area that in installed be shall practi management stormwater ,property neighboring to addition of ximity close ot Note: mitigate stormwater runoff from the roof of the residence. 3. Substantiality: The Board notes that the requested variance may be considered substantial, but this is mitigated by the factors described above. 4. Adverse Effects: This variance will not have a significant adverse physical or environmental effect on the neighborhood or district. Permeability will meet the district requirement. 5. Self-Created Difficulty: The alleged difficulty is self-created insofar as it is motivated by the applicants’ desire to construct an addition to the second floor of the primary residence, but this is not necessarily fatal to the application. Passes by the following votes: AYES: 6 (G. Simpson, B. Dailey, J. Cohen, C. LaPointe, S. Gaston, O. Maxwell) NAYES: 0 This variance shall expire 18 months following the filing date of such decision unless the necessary building permit has been issued and actual construction begun as per the Unified Development Ordinance. I hereby certify the above to be a full, true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Saratoga Springs on the date above mentioned, seven members of the Board being present. SIGNATURE: 04/16/2025 CHAIR DATE RECEIVED BY ACCOUNTS DEPT. Page 2 of 2