HomeMy WebLinkAbout20250089 247 Kaydeross Ave East Final Subdivision SWPPP studloA
Landscape Architecture+Engineering,DPC
STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
247 Kaydeross Avenue East
Saratoga Springs, NY
April 4, 2024
***********************
OWNER:
Frank Scarpinato
247 Kaydeross Ave East
Saratoga Springs, NY 12866
Contractor:
To be determined
PREPARED BY:
Studio A Landscape Architecture+ Engineering, D.P.C.
74 Warren Street
Saratoga Springs, NY 12866
38 High Rock Ave,Suite 3 1 P.O.Box 272 1 Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 1 518.450.4030
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING SITE....................................................................................... P. 1
DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING SOILS .................................................................................... P. 1
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ............................................................... p. 2
CONSTRUCTION PHASING .............................................................................................. p. 2
POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES ............................................................................ p. 2
SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL ................................................................... p. 2
RETENTION OF RECORDS ................................................................................................... p. 3
APPENDCIES
A PROJECT LOCATION MAP
B USDA SOIL SURVEY
C EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DRAWINGS
DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING SITE
The project site is located at 247 Kaydeross Ave East, Chester, NY, south of Crescent Ave and
east of the Adirondack Northway(Tax Map ID: 179.-3-29.211).The lot is approximately 13.35-
acres in size and is located within the Rural Residential (RR) zoning district as designated by the
City of Saratoga Springs.This property is currently developed with a single family residence,
access drive, and various accessory structures such as greenhouses, a garage, and a shed.The
property also contains a small agricultural field and a small portion of a wetland.The remainder
of the site is wooded.
A ridge runs through the center of the site from the southwest to northeast,where the
residence is located.The site slopes back to Kaydeross Avenue East at approximately a 10%
slope. The other side of the ridge slopes back to Cresent Avenue at slopes exceeding 25%.This
portion of the site is not proposed to be developed.
DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING SOILS
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Survey obtained from the Natural
Resource Conservation Service website indicates the surficial soil types on the property to be
90.7% Bernardston silt loam, at slopes from 3 to 25%(BmB through BmD) and 9.3% Pittstown
silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes (PwB).
The BmB through BmD series is identified by the USDA as hydrologic soil group (HSG) "C/D".
These soils exhibit characteristics of HSG "C" when drained, which have a moderate runoff
potential. When saturated these soils exhibit characteristics of soil group "D" which typically has
a high runoff potential.These soils typically consist of silt loam.
The PwB series is identified by the USDA as hydrologic soil group (HSG) "C/D".These soils exhibit
characteristics of HSG "C" when drained, which have a moderate runoff potential. When
saturated these soils exhibit characteristics of soil group "D"which typically has a high runoff
potential.These soils typically consist of silt loam,transitioning to a gravelly loam deeper on the
soil profile.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The parcel is proposed to be subdivided into 3 lots,with one of the lots containing permeant
conservation easement areas and the existing single-family residence. The remaining two lots
are proposed to be developed with a single-family residence. An access drive will be constructed
to provide access to the two proposed lots on the western side of the parcel. Potable water
service lines will be extended from a watermain under crescent avenue and wastewater will be
treated with on-site systems. Anticipated disturbance areas, pervious and impervious areas are
as follows:
Disturbance Area ±110,904 ftZ
Impervious (existing/proposed) ±16,900 ft2/±33,733 ftZ
Pervious (existing/proposed) ±565,454 ftZ/±548,621 ftZ
- 1 -
CONSTRUCTION PHASING
The project is anticipated to be completed in one phase.Areas subject to disturbance will be
cleared and grubbed to accommodate the proposed development. Prior to clearing and
grubbing operation, all erosion and sediment control measures indicated on the attached
drawings shall be in place.The proposed access drive will be constructed up to the furthest lot.
The drive will be completed upon construction of the adjacent road that will be tied into.
Construction of the single family residences will occur based upon buyer demand.
POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES
Any litter on site, including construction debris,will be picked up each day and disposed of into
solid waste containers. The contractor shall provide an approved secondary containment
system for all fuel and petroleum temporarily stored on site. All vehicles on site will be
monitored for leaks and receive regular preventative maintenance to reduce the chance of
mechanical fluid leakage. During the placement of concrete for the building foundations,
measures will be taken to ensure that fresh concrete does not enter any defined drainage paths
and a concrete washout area will be provided by the contractor in accordance with the
construction drawings.
SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL
Prior to commencing any land clearing, silt fences will be installed in accordance with the
construction drawings to collect silt from construction runoff. A stabilized temporary
construction entrance will be installed at the location indicated on the construction drawings
required for use by all construction traffic entering and leaving the site.The contractor is
required to maintain the silt fences,temporary construction entrances and other applicable
erosion and sediment control practices throughout the construction period.
All exposed surfaces not covered with paving, structures, and similar finished surfaces will be
covered with topsoil and seeded to establish a turf covering or will be landscaped and mulched.
The areas receiving seed will be mulched to minimize erosion. Silt fences shall be installed
downslope of the newly seeded areas.
All erosion control measures shall be maintained and replaced, as required, during the course of
construction until a well-established growth of turf is established. Silt fence shall be replaced as
required during the course of construction until a well-established vegetative cover is
established.
Erosion and sediment control measures shall be inspected daily by a trained contractor as
defined in Appendix A of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation SPDES
General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activity Permit No. GP-0-20-001.
Construction inspections shall be conducted in accordance with Part IV.B of GP-0-20-001.
RETENTION OF RECORDS
The contractor shall maintain a copy of this Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) at
the project site. In addition,the contractor shall maintain a site logbook which will contain all
-2 -
storm water and erosion control inspection reports to be prepared by the trained contractor. A
current copy of the construction drawings shall also be kept in the logbook with comments that
may have been added by the trained contractor.
SWPPP Report Prepared by:
Matthew E. Huntington, PE
Principal
For
Studio A I Landscape Architecture+ Engineering
-3 -
APPENDIX A
Project Location Map
ti
� J
45
! r , .......... �
w. FiLj LAKE
LONELY
L }
r, PROJECT SITE
' 1
cn
r o
- Iw
jr
•"R
10 r
APPENDIX B
USDA SOIL SURVEY
USDA United States A product of the National Custom Soil Resource
Department of Cooperative Soil Survey,
Agriculture a joint effort of the United Report for
N
RCS
States Department of
Agriculture and other Saratoga
Federal agencies, State
Natural agencies including the
Resources Agricultural Experiment County, New
Conservation Stations, and local
Service participants
York
1.
0 400 ft
February 14, 2024
Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres)or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist(http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2
alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call (800) 795-3272 (voice)or(202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3
Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
SoilMap.................................................................................................................. 8
SoilMap................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
MapUnit Legend................................................................................................ 11
MapUnit Descriptions.........................................................................................11
Saratoga County, New York............................................................................13
BmB—Bernardston silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes....................................13
BmC—Bernardston silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes..................................14
BmD—Bernardston silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes................................15
PwB—Pittstown silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes......................................... 16
References............................................................................................................18
4
How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
5
Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
6
Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
7
Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
8
Custom Soil Resource Report
M Soil Map
a
v v
600830 600880 600930 600980 601030 601080 601130 601180 601230 601280 601330
43°3'17"N 43°317 N
v
�22
YrS
a v
cro
v _
IT
BmD
10
re
BmB
m
co
r
v
v
V
O
it the
43°3W N '' - `[ 43°3 6"N
600830 600880 600930 600980 601030 601080 601130 601180 601230 601280 601330
3 3
c+
Map Scale:1:2,460 W printed on A landscape(11"x 8.5")sheet.
Meters
N 0 35 70 140 210
rat
0 100 200 400 600
Map projection:Web Mercator Comer coordinates:WGS84 Edge tics:UTM Zone 18N WGS84
9
Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest(AOI) Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
0 Area of Interest(AOI) Stony Spot 1:24,000.
Soils Very Stony Spot
0 Soil Map Unit Polygons Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Wet Spot
P1 0 Soil Map Unit Lines Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
Other misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
� Soil Map Unit Points 9 pp 9 Y
.- Special Line Features line placement.The maps do not show the small areas of
Special Point Features contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
Lo Blowout Water Features scale.
- Streams and Canals
Borrow Pit
Transportation Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
Clay Spot 1-44 Rails measurements.
Closed Depression
Interstate Highways
Gravel Pit Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
US Routes Web Soil Survey URL:
Gravelly Spot Major Roads Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3857)
0 Landfill Local Roads Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
Lava Flow Background projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area.A projection that preserves area,such as the
Marsh or swamp Aerial Photography Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more
Mine or Quarry accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
Miscellaneous Water This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
Perennial Water of the version date(s)listed below.
Rock Outcrop Soil Survey Area: Saratoga County,New York
Saline Spot Survey Area Data: Version 23,Sep 6,2023
Sandy Spot Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales
Severely Eroded Spot 1:50,000 or larger.
Sinkhole Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Sep 9,2022—Oct 22,
Slide or Slip 2022
oa Sodic Spot The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
10
Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
BmB Bernardston silt loam,3 to 8 5.5 37.5%
percent slopes
BmC Bernardston silt loam,8 to 15 2.4 16.5%
percent slopes
BmD Bernardston silt loam, 15 to 25 5.4 36.7%
percent slopes
PwB Pittstown silt loam,3 to 8 1.4 9.3%
percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest 14.6 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
11
Custom Soil Resource Report
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
12
Custom Soil Resource Report
Saratoga County, New York
BmB—Bernardston silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 9w8y
Elevation: 0 to 1,000 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 36 to 48 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 45 to 48 degrees F
Frost-free period: 125 to 160 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Bernardston and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Bernardston
Setting
Landform:Till plains, hills, drumlinoid ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy, acid, dense till derived mainly from phyllite, shale, slate,
and schist
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 10 inches: silt loam
H2- 10 to 26 inches: channery loam
H3- 26 to 72 inches: channery silt loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 3 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 30 inches to densic material
Drainage class:Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 18 to 24 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low(about 4.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Ecological site: F144AY007CT-Well Drained Dense Till Uplands
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Pittstown
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
13
Custom Soil Resource Report
Manlius
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
BmC—Bernardston silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 9w8z
Elevation: 0 to 1,000 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 36 to 48 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 45 to 48 degrees F
Frost-free period: 125 to 160 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Bernardston and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Bernardston
Setting
Landform:Till plains, hills, drumlinoid ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy, acid, dense till derived mainly from phyllite, shale, slate,
and schist
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 10 inches: silt loam
H2- 10 to 26 inches: channery loam
H3- 26 to 72 inches: channery silt loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 30 inches to densic material
Drainage class:Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 18 to 24 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low(about 4.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
14
Custom Soil Resource Report
Ecological site: F144AY007CT-Well Drained Dense Till Uplands
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Pittstown
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Manlius
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
BmD—Bernardston silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 9w90
Elevation: 0 to 1,000 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 36 to 48 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 45 to 48 degrees F
Frost-free period: 125 to 160 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Bernardston and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Bernardston
Setting
Landform:Till plains, hills, drumlinoid ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy, acid, dense till derived mainly from phyllite, shale, slate,
and schist
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 10 inches: silt loam
H2- 10 to 26 inches: channery loam
H3- 26 to 72 inches: channery silt loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 25 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 30 inches to densic material
Drainage class:Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 18 to 24 inches
15
Custom Soil Resource Report
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Ecological site: F144AY007CT-Well Drained Dense Till Uplands
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Pittstown
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Manlius
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
PwB—Pittstown silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 9wcc
Elevation: 200 to 520 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 36 to 48 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 45 to 48 degrees F
Frost-free period: 125 to 160 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Pittstown and similar soils: 80 percent
Minor components: 20 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Pittstown
Setting
Landform:Till plains, hills, drumlinoid ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy till
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 11 inches: silt loam
H2- 11 to 23 inches: gravelly loam
H3- 23 to 72 inches: gravelly loam
16
Custom Soil Resource Report
Properties and qualities
Slope: 3 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 15 to 30 inches to densic material
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 18 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Ecological site: F144AY037MA- Moist Dense Till Uplands
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Bernardston
Percent of map unit. 10 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Manlius
Percent of map unit. 10 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
17
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres 142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
18
Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nres142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nres142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl 42p2_052290.pdf
19
APPENDIX C
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DRAWINGS
stud *ioA
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I ENGINEERING I PLANNING
5/IR.
TRUST I QUALITY
COLLABORATION I INNOVATION
WOOD) / 5/811IR.
94
I / r 19 4- 74 Warren Street, Suite 1
Saratoga Springs, NY 12866
518.450.4030
LEGEND
/� ow ° ,10'E 255 / `�Oy ��j` PROPERTY LINE
/ / w N� — g8�3�/ W0098'
/ry A20��>o LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
# / / ,� / 060�(O —SF —SF — SILT FENCE
P a6o EXISTING MAJOR CONTOURS
Z v� w/w / ,�
0
w/ / / / / ,O� J S / EXISTING MINOR CONTOURS
WOODGfe
-7 v WETLANDS
w 1 / / / / / (� ( EXISTING SURFACE
6 / /�Z N T/ \ 0 BE REMOVED
# w E ` / / / 1 5 8'IR.
# w 0°0300 / / \ / TREES TO BE CLEARED
/
STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION
z
� w�j ENTRANCE
w NORTH
o
�W N89 2�
� / 0 5/8"IR. GRAPHIC SCALE
\ �NOODS / / / / I 50 0 25 50 100
4/// I INCH = 50 FEET
LOCATION OF
MUNICIPAL WATER MAIN / / / 1` Q� � l l ON 24 X 36 SHEET
N \
7(,c))6 C/4, BASE MAP
INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM "MAP OF LANDS
OF FRANK SCARPINATO AND DIANE RADEMACHER -
( 76' SCARPINATO, SITUATE AT 247 KAYDEROSS AVENUE EAST,
CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS, SARATOGA COUNTY, NY,'
DATED NOVEMBER 10, 2023 BY THOMPSON FLEMING LAND
,av \ — — ► — — — _ / / / SURVEYORS, P.C.
- - _ r_ - -
� 2 � � ♦ ♦ GREENHOUSE — � DIG SAFE NOTE:
SILT FENCE (TYP )
THIS PLAN SET WAS DRAFTED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF
. ♦ / "DIG SAFE" MARKINGS. UTILITIES SHOWN ARE NOT
1 L-5.10/ / J \ ( REPAIR PORTION OF EXISTING DRIVEWAY AS REQ'D WARRANTED TO BE EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT "DIG SAFE" AT 811 BEFORE
COMMENCING ANY WORK AND SHALL PRESERVE EXISTING
/ ` ♦ UTILITIES WHICH ARE NOT SPECIFIED TO BE REMOVED IN
THIS PLAN SET.
0 1 / EXISTING GREENHOUSE 5/g" s `37p�\ l REVISIONS
SF TO BE RELOCATED
/ Area= o � 33�\ DATE DESCRIPTION
/ 1 3.369 (6C` 4/4/24 SUBDIVISION REVIEW
/ CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA L-5.10
0.155 AC. AREA TO OF TREES TO BE CLEARED 1 I ' / /� �3�,
, /
FOR POTABLE WATER SERVICE CONNECTION ` ` `
1/ SILT FENCE (TYP.) L-5.10 \ 3�560 ` V
70
CIO
v l C, It /
/ v / / / /� / ` / TOPSOIL STOCK PILE 2 4 / / � � IT IS A VIOLATION OF NEW PORK STATE EDUCATION LAW FOR ANY PERSON,
� UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED
0 " PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OR LAND
2 2 / SURROUNDED BY SILT FENCE L-5.10 L-5.10 0 5/8" 2, S33°02 23 W
L-5.10 SILT FENCE (TYP.) / / \ /� SURVEYOR, TO ALTER ANY ITEM IN ANY WAY. IF AN ITEM BEARING THE STAMP
° OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL IS ALTERED, THE ALTERING LICENSED
55.00 PROFESSIONAL SHALL STAMP THE DOCUMENT AND INCLUDE THE NOTATION
"ALTERED BY' FOLLOWED BY THEIR SIGNATURE, THE DATE OF SUCH
mo / / SF / / / 3 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE / ALTERNATION,AND SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION of THE ALTERATION.
z
/�- 2�� L-5.10
SILT FENCE (TYP.)
Q) DRAWINGS
1 / a
EXISTING TREE LINE TO REMAIN NOT FO R
CONSTRUCTION
2 SILT FENCE (TYP.) L-5.10
/ / / ♦ _ 2
L-5.10 SILT FENCE (TYP.)
CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA
PREPARED FOR
I
— � FRANK SCARPINATO
247 KAYDEROSS AVENUE EAST
0
SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE ±2.546AC. / �- �/ � WOODS -
/ o I
/ l 5/8'IR. PROJECT
1 _ _ \ KAYDEROSS SPRINGS
r
0.021 AC. AREA TO OF TREES TO I Ipw 612.46 )��el oprn en t, I n> � CONSERVATION
BE CLEARED FOR ADJACENT \
PARCEL ACCESS IN FUTURE — N83°40 02 / Riley Fa #20220103701
SUBDIVISION
5/8"IRo� GNP , DRAWING TITLE
Q N
DEMOLITION, EROSION , &
Quo n1f
=� w Fad SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
s N Riley
t, Inc. rRil Riley Farm
PROJECT NO. 21008
ww DATE: DRAWING NO.
L<z
4/4/2024 L_O . 30
ww
Q J
a cn�
DWG 4 OF 10