Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20190861 Evert Residence Application CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 'Az cr- G�vhj Ho L J - 474 6 ro-a-oknta-y • j v ` Sara ga' New-Yo-rk/12866 , .` Tel: 518—587-3550 j 518—580-9480 cii?POA INSTRUCTIONS APPEAL TO THE ZONING BOARD FOR AN INTERPRETATION, USE VARIANCE,AREA VARIANCE AND/OR VARIANCE EXTENSION APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS I. ELIGIBILITY:To apply for relief from the City's Zoning Ordinance, an applicant must be the property owner(s) or lessee, or have an option to lease or purchase the property in question. The Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) shall not accept any application for appeal that includes a parcel which has a written violation from the Zoning and Building Inspector that is not the subject of the application. 2. COMPLETE SUBMISSIONS:Applicants are encouraged to work with City staff to ensure a complete application.The ZBA will only consider properly completed applications that contain I original and I digital version of the following: ❑ Completed application pages I and 8, the pages relating to the requested relief(p. 2 for interpretation or extension, pp. 3-5 for use variance, pp. 6-7 for area variance), and any additional supporting materials/documentation. **HANDWRITTEN APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED** ❑ Completed SEQR Environmental Assessment Form —short or long form as required by action. http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/permits_ej_operations_pdf/seafpartone.pdf ❑ Detailed "to scale" drawings of the proposed project—folded and no larger than 24"x 36". Identify all existing and proposed structures, lot boundaries and dimensions, and the relationship of structures to the lot dimensions. Also, include any natural or manmade features that might affect your property (e.g., drains, ponds, easements, etc.). ❑ Photographs showing the site and subject of your appeal, and its relationship to adjacent properties. 3. APPLICATION FEE (NON-REFUNDABLE): Make checks payable to the "Commissioner of Finance". Fees are cumulative and required for each request below. ❑ Interpretation $400 ❑ Use variance $1,000 ❑ Area variance - Residential use/property $150 - Non-residential use/property$500 ❑ Extensions $150 SUBMISSION DEADLINE: Check City's website (www.saratoga-springs.org) for application deadlines and meeting dates. Revised 12/2015 ZONING BOARD APPEAL APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS PAGE 2 PUBLIC HEARING ADVERTISEMENT The Zoning Board of Appeals is required to hold a public hearing on each submitted application within ninety(90) days from when it is determined to be properly complete by City staff. City staff will prepare a legal notice for the public hearing and arrange to have the public hearing announcement printed in The Saratogian legal notices at least 5 days before the hearing. Applicants must pay The Saratogian for the legal ad and present proof of payment to the ZBA prior to the public hearing. If proof of payment is not presented prior to the hearing, the hearing will be cancelled. PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION Applicants are required to mail a copy of the public hearing legal notice to all property owners within the following distances from the boundaries of the land in question: Type of variance Distance for property owner notification Use variance 250 feet Area variance & Interpretation 100 feet This notice must be sent at least 7 days but not more than 20 days before the date of the public hearing. City staff will email a copy of the"property owner notification letter"to the applicant.The applicant must then send the notification letter to the nearby property owners.Applicants may not include any other materials in this mailing. The mailing must be certified by the U.S. Post Office. Prior to the public hearing, applicants must present the Post Office "certificates of mailing" to the ZBA. If"certificates of mailing" are not presented prior to the hearing, the hearing will be cancelled. Revised 12/2015 q [FOR OFFICE USE] ` CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS -4-1 _//1, (Application#) r_ ' 77C�v�y �la� L 4 74 f3 So-Ta--ga/S i vLgS% N&w"Yo-rk/1-z 8 66 . `', Tth 518-587-3550 518-580-9480 (Date received) 'PoRATED APPLICATION FOR: APPEAL TO THE ZONING BOARD FOR AN INTERPRETATION, USE VARIANCE,AREA VARIANCE AND/OR VARIANCE EXTENSION APPLICANT(S)* OWNER(S) (If not applicant) ATTORNEY/AGENT Denise Evert Balzer &Tuck Architecture Name 3 Haggerty Lane 468 Broadway, 3rd Floor Address Saratoga Springs NY, 12866 Saratoga Springs NY, 12866 (518)-580-8818 Phone / / / devert©skidmore.edu Tflynn@BalzerTuck.com Email *An applicant must be the property owner, lessee, or one with an option to lease or purchase the property in question. Applicant's interest in the premises: IZ Owner 0 Lessee 0 Under option to lease or purchase PROPERTY INFORMATION 3 Haggerty Lane 192 12 1 17 . Property Address/Location: Tax Parcel No.: - - (for example: 165.52—4—37) 09/30/2016 SR-2 2. Date acquired by current owner: 3.Zoning District when purchased: Single Family Residence SR-2 4. Present use of property: 5. Current Zoning District: Max.Principle building Coverage 6. Has a previous ZBA application/appeal been filed for this property? Min.rear yard setback 0 Yes (when? For what? Min.Front yard setback IZ No Min.side yard setback Min.Total side yard setback 7. Is property located within (check all that apply)?: 0 Historic District 0 Architectural Review District 0 500' of a State Park, city boundary, or county/state highway? 8. Brief description of proposed action: The Owner is seeking an area variance for a proposed detached two car garage; The request involves a proposed 16'-0" frontyard setback(30'-0" required) resulting in a 14'-0"variance request 9. Is there a written violation for this parcel that is not the subject of this application? 0 Yes 12i No 10. Has the work, use or occupancy to which this appeal relates already begun? Yes VI No I. Identify the type of appeal you are requesting (check all that apply): 0 INTERPRETATION (p. 2) 0 VARIANCE EXTENSION (p. 2) 0 USE VARIANCE (pp. 3-6) 0 AREA VARIANCE(pp. 6-7) Revised 12/2015 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION FORM PAGE 2 FEES:Make checks payable to the"Commissioner of Finance". Fees are cumulative and required for each request below. ❑ Interpretation $ 400 ❑ Use variance $1,000 IZ Area variance -Residential use/property: $ 150 -Non-residential use/property: $ 500 ❑ Extensions: $ 150 INTERPRETATION—PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING(add additional information as necessary): 1. Identify the section(s) of the Zoning Ordinance for which you are seeking an interpretation: Section(s) 2. How do you request that this section be interpreted? 3. If interpretation is denied, do you wish to request alternative zoning relief? EYes ❑No 4. If the answer to#3 is "yes,"what alternative relief do you request?❑ Use Variance ❑Area Variance EXTENSION OF A VARIANCE—PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING(add additional information as necessary): 1. Date original variance was granted: 2. Type of variance granted? ❑ Use ❑Area 3. Date original variance expired: 5. Explain why the extension is necessary.Why wasn't the original timeframe sufficient? When requesting an extension of time for an existing variance,the applicant must prove that the circumstances upon which the original variance was granted have not changed. Specifically demonstrate that there have been no significant changes on the site, in the neighborhood, or within the circumstances upon which the original variance was granted: Revised 12/2015 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION FORM PAGE 3 USE VARIANCE—PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING(add additional information as necessary): A use variance is requested to permit the following: For the Zoning Board to grant a request for a use variance, an applicant must prove that the zoning regulations create an unnecessary hardship in relation to that property. In seeking a use variance,New York State law requires an applicant to prove all four of the following "tests". . That the applicant cannot realize a reasonable financial return on initial investment for any currently permitted use on the property. "Dollars&cents" proof must be submitted as evidence.The property in question cannot yield a reasonable return for the following reasons: A. Submit the following financial evidence relating to this property(attach additional evidence as needed): I) Date of purchase: Purchase amount: $ 2) Indicate dates and costs of any improvements made to property after purchase: Date Improvement Cost 3)Annual maintenance expenses:$ 4)Annual taxes: $ 5)Annual income generated from property:$ 6) City assessed value: $ Equalization rate: Estimated Market Value: $ 7)Appraised Value: $ Appraiser: Date: Appraisal Assumptions: Revised 12/2015 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION FORM PAGE 4 B. Has property been listed for sale with ❑Yes If"yes",for how long? the Multiple Listing Service(MLS)? C❑No I)Original listing date(s): Original listing price:$ If listing price was reduced, describe when and to what extent: 2) Has the property been advertised in the newspapers or other publications? ❑Yes ❑No If yes, describe frequency and name of publications: 3) Has the property had a"For Sale" sign posted on it? IYes ❑No If yes, list dates when sign was posted: 4) How many times has the property been shown and with what results? 2. That the financial hardship relating to this property is unique and does not apply to a substantial portion of the neighborhood. Difficulties shared with numerous other properties in the same neighborhood or district would not satisfy this requirement. This previously identified financial hardship is unique for the following reasons: Revised 12/2015 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION FORM PAGE S 3. That the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Changes that will alter the character of a neighborhood or district would be at odds with the purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. The requested variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood for the following reasons: 4. That the alleged hardship has not been self-created.An applicant(whether the property owner or one acting on behalf of the property owner)cannot claim "unnecessary hardship" if that hardship was created by the applicant, or if the applicant acquired the property knowing(or was in a position to know)the conditions for which the applicant is seeking relief.The hardship has not been self-created for the following reasons: Revised 12/2015 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION FORM PAGE 6 AREA VARIANCE—PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING(add additional information as necessary): 240-2.7-Table 2:Area The applicant requests relief from the following Zoning Ordinance article(s) Reauirements Dimensional Requirements From To Accessory- Front Yard Setback(30ft) 30.0 ft 16.0 ft Other: To grant an area variance,the ZBA must balance the benefits to the applicant and the health,safety,and welfare of the neighborhood and community,taking into consideration the following: . Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by other feasible means. Identify what alternatives to the variance have been explored (alternative designs, attempts to purchase land, etc.)and why they are not feasible. The Lot is currently an existing non-conforming Lot per the current zoning SR-2. The lot size and minimum mean width restrict the location(s)of the proposed house and detached garage. The house is located to meet all setback requirements and positioned to maintain the current access to the site from Haggerty lane. Two Alternative designs were studied;Alternative design 1 was to locate the proposed garage attached to the house and within the setbacks.Alternative design 2 was to locate the proposed garage to the North of the property;where the proposed turn around/parking area is located. These locations proved to be difficult/not applicable as the owner would not have the appropriate turning radius for vehicular uiruulalion, due to existing topography requiring the owner to back down Haggerty lane. Alternate design 2 could achieve a similarly functioning driveway configuration similar to the proposed site plan, however an additional retaining wall would have to be constructed to the West(Current location of the back of the garage)for a proper turning radii. The proposed garage location utilizes three sides to act as retaining walls, minimizing the economic strain to manage the existing topography. Refer to drawings attached in package for further explaination 2. Whether granting the variance will produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. Granting the variance will not create a detriment to nearby properties or an undesirable change in the neighborhood character for the following reasons: The proposed variance will not create an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood if the application is granted. The majority of the proposed detached garage would be buried into the existing topography minimizing its visible impact on neighbors in all directions.The proposed garage will also feature a vegetated roof, with natural vegetation and maintaining the current view from adjacent properties that are higher in elevation. Revised 12/2015 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION FORM PAGE 7 3. Whether the variance is substantial. The requested variance is not substantial for the following reasons: The variance is not substantial as proposed coverage exceeds beyond the rear setback.A reduction to a setback requirement of 16'-0"for an accessory structure would allow for the proposed garage to meet within the boundaries. The proposed size and square footage for the(2)car detached garage is typical for single family residential homes. 4. Whether the variance will have adverse physical or environmental effects on neighborhood or district. The requested variance will not have an adverse physical or environmental effect on the neighborhood or district for the following reasons: The proposed variance will not have an adverse physical or environmental impact on the neighborhood because the detached garage will have minimal visibility from adjacent neighbors. The proposed garage will not impact the existing infrastructure of the surrounding area. The proposed garage will maintain and improve water management on site. 5. Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created(although this does not necessarily preclude the granting of an area variance). Explain whether the alleged difficulty was or was not self-created: The variance sought is self-created as the owners are full year residents and look to shelter vehicles and necessary equipment/tools for year-round occupancy.Adjacent properties have built similar structures as a result of full year residency. Revised 12/2015 w 3111.11nEFUONWOINWW - •" .14. 1111L, - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION FORM PAGE 8 DISCLOSURE Does any City officer,employee,or family member thereof have a financial interest(as defined by General Municipal Law Section 809)in this application? 121 No 0 Yes If"yes",a statement disclosing the name,residence and nature and extent of this interest must be filed with this application. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I/we,the property owner(s),or purchaser(s)/lessee(s)under contract,of the land in question,hereby request an appearance before the Zoning Board of Appeals. By the signature(s)attached hereto,I/we certify that the information provided within this application and accompanying documentation is,to the best of my/our knowledge,true and accurate.I/we further understand that intentionally providing false or misleading information is grounds for immediate denial of this application. Furthermore, liwe hereby authorize the members of the Zoning Board of Appeals and designated City staff to enter the property associated with this application for purposes of conducting any necessary site inspections relating to this appeal. Date:________ 7 (applicant signature) Date: (applicant signature) If applicant is not the currently the owner of the property,the current owner must also sign. Owner Signature: Date: Owner Signature: Date: Revised 12/l015 _ _ ZONING AND BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIAL OF APPLICATION FOR LAND USE AND/OR BUILDING Denise Evert 192 12 1 17 APPLICANT: TAX PARCEL NO.: - - 3 Haggerty Lane SR-2 PROPERTY ADDRESS: ZONING DISTRICT: This applicant has applied to use the identified property within the City of Saratoga Springs for the following: Single Family Residence This application is hereby denied upon the grounds that such use of the property would violate the City Zoning Ordinance article(s) 240-2.7-Table 2:Area Requirements .As such,the following relief would be required to proceed: ❑ Extension of existing variance 0 Interpretation ❑ Use Variance to permit the following: LZ Area Variance seeking the following relief: Dimensional Requirements From To Accessory_Front Yard Setback 30'-0" 16'-0" Other: Note: ❑Advisory Opinion required from Saratoga County Planning Board ZONING AND BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE Revised 12/2015 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 -Project Information Instructions for Completing Part 1-Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1-Project and Sponsor Information Balzer&Tuck Architecture Name of Action or Project: Haggerty Residence Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 3 Haggerty lane,Saratoga Springs NY 12866 Brief Description of Proposed Action: Construction of a detached garage. Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: (518)-580-8818 ex:12 Balzer&Tuck Architecture E-Mail: tflynn@balzertuck.com Address: 468 Broadway,3rd Floor City/PO: State: Zip Code: Saratoga Springs NY 12866 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that n 0 may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval: Z 0 3.a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? .29 acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? .08 acres c. Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑Urban ❑Rural(non-agriculture) ❑Industrial ❑Commercial m Residential(suburban) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Aquatic ❑Other(specify): ❑Parkland Page 1 of 3 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? 0 ✓ El b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? 0 0 ✓ 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? ✓ 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: Z El 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES Z D b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? ✓ 0 c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? n n 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: D El 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: ✓ El No potable water will be provided at the garage 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ✓ 0 No wastewater is not needed as there are no bathroom facilities. 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? ✓ El b.Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? Z El 13. a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency? ✓ El b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? ✓ El If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: m Shoreline ❑Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional ❑ Wetland ❑Urban ❑Suburban 15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? ✓ 0 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES The Eastern Portion of the Site,Yet No built structures will be located in the flood plain F Z- 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? []NO EYES 0 0 b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: IZI NO ❑YES Page 2 of 3 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: ✓ 20. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: ✓ I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: Trevor Flynn Date: 08/26/19 Signature: 7u ' PRINT FORM Page 3 of 3 BALZER TUCK Architecture F R A M Y Q U R P F R S P F C T I V F 1. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by other feasible means. Identify what alternatives to the variance have been explored (alternative designs, attempts to purchase land, etc.) and why they are not feasible. The Lot is currently an existing non-conforming Lot per the current zoning SR-2. The lot size and minimum mean width restrict the location(s) of the proposed house and detached garage. The house is located to meet all setback requirements and positioned to maintain the current access to the site from Haggerty lane. Two Alternative designs were studied; Alternative design 1 was to locate the proposed garage attached to the house and within the setbacks.Alternative design 2 was to locate the proposed garage to the North of the property; where the proposed turn around/ parking area is located.These locations proved to be difficult/not applicable as the owner would not have the appropriate turning radius for vehicular circulation, due to existing topography requiring the owner to back down Haggerty lane. Alternate design 2 could achieve a similarly functioning driveway configuration similar to the proposed site plan, however an additional retaining wall would have to be constructed to the West (Current location of the back of the garage) for a proper turning radius. The proposed garage location utilizes three sides to act as retaining walls, minimizing the economic strain to manage the existing topography. Refer to drawings attached in package for further explanation. 2. Whether granting the variance will produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. Granting the variance will not create a detriment to nearby properties or an undesirable change in the neighborhood character for the following reasons:' The proposed variance will not create an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood if the application is granted. The majority of the proposed detached garage would be buried into the existing topography minimizing its visible impact on neighbors in all directions.The proposed garage will also feature a vegetated roof,with natural vegetation and maintaining the current view from adjacent properties that are higher in elevation. 468 Broadway Saratoga Springs,New York 12866 p 518.580.8818 iv balzertuck.com BALZERFk'41, TUCK 3. Whether the variance is substantial. The requested variance is not substantial for the following reasons: The variance is not substantial as proposed coverage exceeds beyond the rear setback. A reduction to a setback requirement of 16'-0"for an accessory structure would allow for the proposed garage to meet within the boundaries. The proposed size and square footage for the (2) car detached garage is typical for single family residential homes. 4. Whether the variance will have adverse physical or environmental effects on neighborhood or district. The requested variance will not have an adverse physical or environmental effect on the neighborhood or district for the following reasons: The proposed variance will not have an adverse physical or environmental impact on the neighborhood because the detached garage will have minimal visibility from adjacent neighbors. The proposed garage will not impact the existing infrastructure of the surrounding area. The proposed garage will maintain and improve water management on site. S. Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created (although this does not necessarily preclude the granting of an area variance). Explain whether the alleged difficulty was or was not self-created: The variance sought isself-createdas the owners are full year residents and look to shelter vehicles and store necessary equipment/tools for year-round occupancy. Adjacent properties have built similar structures as a result of full year residency. � ���-� X193.29-�- 2. 19329`-2'-35� - i� • 192:-141 12 192.36-1-20 `19329-1-23 193 29x2 4� a193.29 4Y•+ 193.29-1-�4 x92.38-1-19 +ma k2 1.29-2-33193.2 9-221 3593 192.36-1-18y92�36•�18 �� 19329`-2 2.193?29�2�22 192.36'1-17 -,193'2 9- '� � 193.29-231 Imm r 193.29-2-24 �~ '�< 192.36-237 193:29-2-29 , ►193t29�-230193:29-2-28 � 192.36-2-38 193 292,,26 93.29-2-25 ?92 1f �,92T36r2r35� 1M 29'2-27t 192.3�w 1 92 3 8-2 41� 192:36-234 �► f �.~ ��, 192.36-2-33 :192.3 6-23 2 .•••�'� 192'3 6-231 �uo.aa_a _an PROJECT LOCATION VIEW OF EXISTING DRIVEWAY LOOKING NORTH VIEW OF PROPOSED GARAGE LOCATION LOOKING NORTHWEST VIEW OF PROPOSED GARAGE LOCATION LOOKING NORTHWEST VIEW OF PROPOSED DRIVWAY LOCATION FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY LOOKING SOUTHEAST VIEW OF EXISTING DRIVEWAY APPROACH LOOKING NORTHEAST VIEW OF EXISTING DRIVEWAY TOPOGRAPHY LOOKING EAST BALZER A TUCK 468 BROADWAY •SARATOGASPRINGS -NY•12866 Site Context Photographs Nicholson-Evert Residence Architecture P 518.580.8818 • BALZERTUCK.COM • F 518.580.8824 BTA PROJECT NO: 1922 08/26/19 1 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY I� x o r Lands N/F of John J. Gilbert z B:1538 P:627 ff�� 92.12-1-7 F Lands N/F of a Candice Lawrence B:1367 P:207 4� m 192.12 -I -I I .a •7'I O Ad�oininy !louse v IF/� a a 1 a "52" / ) I I I \ �9nea IPF—rye, 7.3'*- To Share 8 62'3'?B_ 19a a m j64.09' - Area/ ft IFF �— 0155 A 4 92 �1ts� / / / / '•I ii'I W1 L�� 0.18 " Ne \ - '�� Saratoga Lake /I 7.49, {{II o' 163 89 1 1 1\ I I 1 I I r PNm� 'S �m<n rsn��.�M�e r N 45'76'x'1" {y IPF 8.8'*- To Shore g og 5 Fax ¢� '_52'"'2 W II a �nwa, \ xT ./ ^ - =mom a s 8s 01 Lands N/F of \ �w w—eF Paul C. Harrington o B:1642 P:539 192.12-1-16 1 \\ \ l I Y E I c _ Area 12789. at Sq. Feet $ IPF\ \ - \ snea 0.29* Acres c9 t N 45` 6'*- To Share O Lands N/F of , d IPS Richard Ege B:1453 P:766 pj G 192.12-I-54 x �m Legend IRF = Iron Rod Found Date: August 16, 2016 IPF= Iron Pipe Found 5-1e 1"=20' UP = Utility Pole BN = Bench Mark = Overhead Utility Wires ❑ - Wood Fence S-1 Metal Fence SHEEP I OF I NICNOL50N D2339 DW6. NO.I6111 BALZER A TUCKExistin Site SurveyNicholson-Evert Residence 468 BROADWAY • SARATOGA SPRINGS • NY • 12866 Architecture P 518.580.8818 • BALZERTUCK.COM • F 518.580.8824 BTA PROJECT NO: 1922 08/26/19 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 6 ;a -am . . SITE BOUNDARY LINE • SITE SETBACK LINE /U R'\yZ CAR GARAGE PROPOSED RESIDENCE A LANDS WF OF PAUL C. HARFINGTON B: 1642P:539 Turning Radius Plan (19212-1-16) Scale 1/81' = 1' - 01' 16'-C PROPOSEDS 7 3 HAGGEFg­Y LANE SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 ALLOWED EXISTING PROPOSED ZONING:SR-2 mom woo MINIMUM LOT SIZE (SF): 20,000 12,790 No Change MINIMUM MEAN WIDTH (FEEL: 100 70 N. Change PRINCIPAL BLDG MIN. YARD SETBACK (FEET): 30 106.2 76.8 Ll FRONT. 30 38.1 38.2 REAR 12 15 178 MIN SIDE (NORTH): 2 19 55 MZ TE (SOUTH): 30 34.1 333 TOTAL SIDE: ACCESSORY BILG MIN. YARD SETBACK (FEED: 5 - 27.2 PRINCIPAL: 30 170 FRONT. 5 30.1 REAR 5 22.7 MN SIDE (NORTH): 5 195 MZ SIDE SOUTH): 30 422 TOTAL SIDE: LOT COVERAGE INFORMATION. 25 7.20 292 MAX % OF LOT COVERAGE PRINCIPAL Bldg: 5,000 921 3,760 IN SQUARE FEET MAX % OF LOT COVERAGE ACCESSORY Bldg: L8 - 61 IN SQUARE FEET:600 MINIMUM % TO REMAIN PERMEABLE REQUIRED — 30I LOT AREA — 12,790 ME PERMEABLE AREA — 8,190 ME PROVIDED — 8,190 SF/ 12,790 SF — 64,00/ ��ff�BF (RESIDENTIAL) AN UNFURNISHED AND UNINHABITABLE STRUCTURE. INCLUDES PRIVATE GARAGES, STORAGE SHEDS, NON-COMMERCIAL GREENHOUSES, SWIMMING POOLS, POOL HOUSES, ANTENNAS & SATELLITE DISHES AND SOLAR/ HEATING/ VENTILATION/ UTILITY EQUIPMENT. MAXIMUM )VERAGIE THE PERCENTAGE OF THE LOT THAT IS COVERED BY THE HORIZONTAL CROSS SECTION OF ALL STRUCTURES, INCLUDING TH OSE STRUCTURES BELOW THE FINISHED LOT GRADE. STRUCTURE: ANY CONSTRUCTED OR PLACED MATERIAL IN OR UPON THE GROUND, INCLUDING BUILDINGS, TOWERS, SHEDS, POOLS, SIGNS AND THE LIKE, BUT EXCLUDING SIDEWALKS, PAVING, GRADING PAT10S AND THE LIKE BALZER* TUCK 468 BROADWAY SARATOGA SPRINGS - NY - 12866 Architecture P 518.580.8818 - BALZERTUCK.COM - F 518.580.8824 Proposed Site Plan Nicholson -Evert Residence BTA PROJECT NO: 1922 08/26/19 1 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY F-7 View of AQproach Looking North on Haggerty 1 —PROPERTY)_-1—PROPOSED16-.'SETBAGK BOUNDARY LINE LANDS N/F OF PAUL C. HARRINGTON • ' B: 1642 P:539 (192.12-1-16) • - III PROPOSED GARAGE I I � -III I III I I I �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII i�� ���_ • =1 = = I 1111111111 =_ . • III • - 11111 = I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIi 17.0= — 0.5 26.6 (,T Y (6') (26 O'9 ,6 0' _ • 1111 L 111 III I I T III = J =ill; Haggerty Site Section - Looking N� orth BALZ E R * TUCK 468 BROADWAY SARATOGA SPRINGS • NY • 12866 Architecture P 518.580.8818 • BALZERTUCK.COM • F 518.580.8824 -ft.• ••� SITE BOUNDARY LINE • • _ • ; ----------- --- • - SITE SETBACK LINE ------- Proposed Turning Radius Plan Scale: 1/81' = 1' -0" PROPOSED TWO STORY WOOD FRAME RESIDENCE r — — — — — I I I I I I I I I I I I 35.4 pA I VEHICLE MANUVERING AREA I GE OF DRIVEWAY III I Z�' P`7 Fi0{ O E Alternative Design 1 Turning Radius Plan Scale: 1/8" = T-0" ALTERNATIVE GARAGE OPTION #1 SITE BOUNDARY LINE • FITS WITHIN SITE SETBACKS • MINIMAL DISTANCE FROM PRIMARY AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES • • • NOS GE REMAINING FOR TURNING RADIUS, • • WOULD REQUIRE ADDITIONAL RETAINING • • WALL TO ACHIEVE PROPER FUNCTION _ • • — • VISIBIUTV OF STRUCTURE ON ALL (4) SIDES • - SITE SETBACK LINE PROPOSED (2) - iCAR GARAGE �i 9n�Lu^ PROPOSED RESIDENCE ------------------ I i 0 P Alternative Design 2 TurningRadius Plan Scale: 1/8" = T-0" Garage Section and Perspective Nicholson -Evert Residence BTA PROJECT NO: 1922 08/26/19 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY __?E%EpE=7r- 0' ,' 2 4' .:.:. .... .. . Alternative Design 1 Turning Radius Plan Scale: 1/8" = T-0" ALTERNATIVE GARAGE OPTION #1 SITE BOUNDARY LINE • FITS WITHIN SITE SETBACKS • MINIMAL DISTANCE FROM PRIMARY AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES • • • NOS GE REMAINING FOR TURNING RADIUS, • • WOULD REQUIRE ADDITIONAL RETAINING • • WALL TO ACHIEVE PROPER FUNCTION _ • • — • VISIBIUTV OF STRUCTURE ON ALL (4) SIDES • - SITE SETBACK LINE PROPOSED (2) - iCAR GARAGE �i 9n�Lu^ PROPOSED RESIDENCE ------------------ I i 0 P Alternative Design 2 TurningRadius Plan Scale: 1/8" = T-0" Garage Section and Perspective Nicholson -Evert Residence BTA PROJECT NO: 1922 08/26/19 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY __?E%EpE=7r- 0' ,' 2 4' 3 Aip, Garage Floor Plan - Proposed EXTEND OF DRIVEWAY.. REFER TO SITE PLAN 4 PROVIDE SCONCE AT ENTRY ANPOOR I LINE OF PROPOSED SETBACK I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 16'-p" PROPOSED SETBACK I ----------- I II North Elevation East Elevation 5 j j 1 ) 3 Garage Roof Plan - Proposed )F PROPOSED 1ANG )FPROPOSED IIOR WALL BELOW South Elevation BALZ ER Ev TUCK 468 BROADWAY • SARATOGA SPRINGS • NY • 12866 Proposed Plans and Elevations Nicholson -Evert Residence Architecture P 518.580.8818 • BALZERTUCK.COM • F 518.580.8824 BTA PROJECT NO: 1922 08/26/19 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY --fM%MFMMMr- 0' ,' 2' 4' 6' p• I = OVE FTE/ VEGETATED ROOF RINI EXT �F�� f�"T�\ 1 ) 3 Garage Roof Plan - Proposed )F PROPOSED 1ANG )FPROPOSED IIOR WALL BELOW South Elevation BALZ ER Ev TUCK 468 BROADWAY • SARATOGA SPRINGS • NY • 12866 Proposed Plans and Elevations Nicholson -Evert Residence Architecture P 518.580.8818 • BALZERTUCK.COM • F 518.580.8824 BTA PROJECT NO: 1922 08/26/19 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY --fM%MFMMMr- 0' ,' 2' 4'