HomeMy WebLinkAbout20240848 22 Avery St. Area Variance ApplicationRevised 01/2021
APPLICATION FOR:
INTERPRETATION, USE VARIANCE,
AREA VARIANCE AND/OR VARIANCE EXTENSION
APPLICANT(S)* OWNER(S) (If not applicant) ATTORNEY/AGENT
Name
Address
Phone / / /
Email
*An applicant must be the property owner, lessee, or one with an option to lease or purchase the property in question.
Applicant’s interest in the premises: Owner Lessee Under option to lease or purchase
PROPERTY INFORMATION
1.Property Address/Location: Tax Parcel No.: ________.______ - ______ - ______
(for example: 165.52 – 4 – 37 )
2. Date acquired by current owner:3.Zoning District when purchased:
4. Present use of property:5.Current Zoning District:
6. Has a previous ZBA application/appeal been filed for this property?
Yes (when? For what? )
No
7. Is property located within (check all that apply)?: Historic District Architectural Review District
500’ of a State Park, city boundary, or county/state highway?
8. Brief description of proposed action:
Yes No
Yes No
9.Is there an active written violation for this parcel?
10.Has the work, use or occupancy to which this appeal relates already begun?
11.Identify the type of appeal you are requesting (check all that apply):
INTERPRETATION (p. 2) VARIANCE EXTENSION (p. 2) USE VARIANCE (pp. 3-6) AREA VARIANCE (pp. 6-7)
Applicant Owner Attorney/AgentPrimary Contact Person:
**HANDWRITTEN APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED** [FOR OFFICE USE]
_______________
(Application #)
____________
(Date received)
__________________________
(Project Title)
Check if PH Required
Staff Review _______________
CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CITY HALL - 474 BROADWAY
SARATOGA SPRINGS, NEW YORK 12866-2296
TEL: 518-587-3550 X2533
www.saratoga-springs.org
Revised 01/2021
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION FORM PAGE 6
AREA VARIANCE – PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING (add additional information as necessary):
The applicant requests relief from the following Zoning Ordinance article(s)
Dimensional Requirements District Requirement Requested
Other:
To grant an area variance, the ZBA must balance the benefits to the applicant and the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood and
community, taking into consideration the following:
1.Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by other feasible means. Identify what alternatives to the variance have
been explored (alternative designs, attempts to purchase land, etc.) and why they are not feasible.
2.Whether granting the variance will produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby
properties. Granting the variance will not create a detriment to nearby properties or an undesirable change in the neighborhood
character for the following reasons:
Revised 01/2021
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION FORM PAGE 7
3.Whether the variance is substantial. The requested variance is not substantial for the following reasons:
4.Whether the variance will have adverse physical or environmental effects on neighborhood or district. The requested variance will not
have an adverse physical or environmental effect on the neighborhood or district for the following reasons:
5.Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created (although this does not necessarily preclude the granting of an area variance). Explain
whether the alleged difficulty was or was not self-created:
Revised 01/2021
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION FORM PAGE 8
DISCLOSURE
Does any City officer, employee, or family member thereof have a financial interest (as defined by General Municipal Law Section 809) in
this application? No Yes If “yes”, a statement disclosing the name, residence and nature and extent of this interest must be filed
with this application.
APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
I/we, the property owner(s), or purchaser(s)/lessee(s) under contract, of the land in question, hereby request an appearance before
the Zoning Board of Appeals.
By the signature(s) attached hereto, I/we certify that the information provided within this application and accompanying
documentation is, to the best of my/our knowledge, true and accurate. I/we further understand that intentionally providing false or
misleading information is grounds for immediate denial of this application.
Furthermore, I/we hereby authorize the members of the Zoning Board of Appeals and designated City staff to enter the property
associated with this application for purposes of conducting any necessary site inspections relating to this appeal.
Date:
(applicant signature)
Date:
(applicant signature)
If applicant is not the currently the owner of the property, the current owner must also sign.
Owner Signature: Date:
Owner Signature: Date:
Page 1 of 3
Short Environmental Assessment Form
Part 1 - Project Information
Instructions for Completing
Part 1 – Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the
application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on
information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as
thoroughly as possible based on current information.
Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the
lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item.
Part 1 – Project and Sponsor Information
Name of Action or Project:
Project Location (describe, and attach a location map):
Brief Description of Proposed Action:
Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone:
E-Mail:
Address:
City/PO: State: Zip Code:
1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance,
administrative rule, or regulation?
If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that
may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2.
NO YES
2.Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other government Agency?
If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval:NO YES
3.a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? __________ acres
b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? __________ acres
c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned
or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? __________ acres
4.Check all land uses that occur on, are adjoining or near the proposed action:
Rural (non-agriculture) Industrial Commercial Residential (suburban)
Aquatic Other(Specify):Agriculture
□ Urban
□ Forest
SEAF 2019
Parkland
Page 2 of 3
5.Is the proposed action,
a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations?
b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan?
NO YES N/A
6.Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape?NO YES
7.Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area?
If Yes, identify: ________________________________________________________________________________
NO YES
8.a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels?
b.Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action?
c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed
action?
NO YES
9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements?
If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
NO YES
10.Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply?
If No, describe method for providing potable water: _________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
NO YES
11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities?
If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ______________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
NO YES
archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory?
NO YES
13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain
wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency?
b.Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody?
If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: _____________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
NO YES
12.a. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district
which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the
Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the
State Register of Historic Places?
b.Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for
Page 3 of 3
14.Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply:
□Shoreline □ Forest Agricultural/grasslands Early mid-successional
Wetland □ Urban Suburban
15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or
Federal government as threatened or endangered?NO YES
16.Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan?NO YES
17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non-point sources?
If Yes,
a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties?
b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)?
If Yes, briefly describe:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
NO YES
18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water
or other liquids (e.g., retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)?
If Yes, explain the purpose and size of the impoundment:______________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
_
NO YES
19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste
management facility?
If Yes, describe: _______________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
NO YES
20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or
completed) for hazardous waste?
If Yes, describe: _______________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
NO YES
I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF
MY KNOWLEDGE
Date: _____________________ Applicant/sponsor/name: ____________________________________________________ __________________________
Signature: _____________________________________________________Title:__________________________________
78 Lake Desolation Rd
Middle Grove, New York 12850
T: 518-964-2060 W: FlynnDesignStudio.com
22 Avery St - Sampson
Zoning Responses
1.) Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by other feasible means:
The applicant has explored various alternatives to achieve the desired benefit without requiring a variance.
However, these alternatives were found to be infeasible due to specific constraints and requirements.
Alternatives to the variance that have been explored:
1. Alternative Designs:
o Vehicle Turning Radius and Garage Access: Several alternative designs were considered to
accommodate the minimum vehicle turning radius and provide access to the garage. However,
these designs necessitated shifting the structure and breezeway towards the side yard, which
would still require a variance.
2. Pool Location:
o Vertical Study: The pool location was also studied vertically to minimize the need for a variance.
However, this approach resulted in an increase in impervious area and a reduction in lawn area,
which was not desirable.
o Impact on Garage Location: The pool location impacted the garage’s location, pushing it towards
the rear yard setback. This adjustment was necessary to maintain proper access and functionality
but resulted in the need for a variance.
Reasons why these alternatives are not feasible:
1. Vehicle Turning Radius and Garage Access:
o The minimum vehicle turning radius is a critical requirement for safe and efficient access to the
garage. The alternative designs that were explored could not meet this requirement without
shifting the structure and breezeway towards the side yard, thus necessitating a variance.
2. Pool Location:
o The vertical study of the pool location led to an increase in impervious area, which is not in line
with the zoning regulations and environmental considerations. Additionally, the reduction in
lawn area was not acceptable as it compromised the usability and aesthetic value of the
property.
o The impact on the garage’s location due to the pool placement required pushing the garage
towards the rear yard setback. This adjustment was necessary to maintain proper access and
functionality but resulted in the need for a variance.
3. Existing House Front Yard Setback: The existing house is located further away from the road compared to
most of the houses on Avery St. The house is located at 24ft from the property line compared to 10ft
allowed. The 14ft difference increases the need to locate the garage closer to the rear yard property line.
Zoning Responses 22 Avery Street | Sampson Residence PAGE 2 OF 3
2.) Whether granting the variance will produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a
detriment to nearby properties:
Granting the variance will not create a detriment to nearby properties or an undesirable change in the
neighborhood character for the following reasons:
1. Consistency with Neighborhood Character:
o The existing house and garage are in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. The design
and scale of the structures are harmonious with the surrounding properties, ensuring that the
overall aesthetic and architectural integrity of the neighborhood are maintained. Refer to the
Site Context diagram were there are 14 properties out of the 29 located on the block that have
garage structures with similar size and location near property lines.
o The barn structure to the West is approximately 1ft from the rear property
2. Enhancement through Renovations:
o The exterior renovations to the existing house will add to the character of the neighborhood.
These improvements will enhance the visual appeal of the property, contributing positively to
the neighborhood’s overall appearance.
3. Landscaping Improvements:
o The new landscaping towards the street and in the rear of the house will enhance the property’s
curb appeal and provide additional green space. This will not only beautify the property but also
create a more pleasant and inviting environment for the neighborhood.
4. No Negative Impact on Nearby Properties:
o The proposed changes will not negatively impact nearby properties. The improvements are
designed to be respectful of the neighbors’ privacy and property values, ensuring that the
variance will not result in any adverse effects.
3.) Whether the variance is substantial:
The requested variance is not substantial for the following reasons:
1. Existing Lot Size and Width:
o The existing lot size and width are already established and conform to the neighborhood’s
standards. Therefore, the variance does not introduce any new or significant deviations from the
existing conditions.
2. Side Yard Setback:
o The side yard setback variance is not substantial. The proposed adjustments are minimal and do
not significantly alter the spatial relationships between properties. This ensures that the overall
layout and spacing within the neighborhood remain consistent.
3. Garage Rear Yard Setback:
o While the garage rear yard setback may be considered substantial, it is important to note that
there are similar examples in the neighborhood. These precedents demonstrate that such
variances have been successfully integrated into the community without causing any adverse
effects. The proposed variance aligns with these existing examples, ensuring that it is in harmony
with the neighborhood’s character.
Zoning Responses 22 Avery Street | Sampson Residence PAGE 3 OF 3
4.) Whether the variance will have adverse physical or environmental effects on the neighborhood or district:
The requested variance will not have an adverse physical or environmental effect on the neighborhood or district
for the following reasons:
1. Minimal Physical Impact:
o The proposed changes integrate seamlessly with existing structures and landscape, with minimal
alterations to the physical layout.
2. Environmental Considerations:
o Efforts have been made to minimize impervious surfaces, reducing potential runoff and water
management issues.
3. Landscaping Enhancements:
o New landscaping will enhance green space and contribute positively to the local environment.
4. Consistency with Neighborhood Character:
o The existing house and garage align with the neighborhood’s character, and the renovations will
add to its appeal.
5. Neighborhood Precedents:
o Similar variances have been granted without negative impacts, ensuring the proposed variance
aligns with existing examples.
5.) Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created:
The alleged difficulty was self-created due to the applicant’s desire for a two-car garage for winter use and a pool
for summer enjoyment. However, the inclusion of a cooking appliance in the garage triggers the classification of
the property as a two-family lot, which comes with stricter zoning requirements.
REMAINS OF SLATE CURBMACADAMAPRON7.9'±OVERHEAD UTILITY LINESFOUND CAPPEDIRON ROD(S77°W 0.45'FROM CORNER)FOUNDIRON PIPE(S45°E 1.11'FROM CORNER)COVERED PORCHELEC.METERMACADAMDRIVEWAYA.C.UNITWOODPORCH& STEPSCHAIN LINK FENCEUTILITY POLES(UTILITIES GOUNDERGROUNDFROM POLE)SHEDTWO STORY HOUSENO. 34 AVERY STREETLANDS OFWILLIAM AND ANNE MARIE SAMPSONDEED NO. 2023023396AREA = 7,082± SQ. FT.LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OFCAROL A. CHRISTENSEN, TRUSTEEDEED NO. 2020022963LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OFLAURA A. HOWENSTEIN AND RICHARD P. BROWN, JR.DEED NO. 2017039222LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OFDAN D. LISA A. IRIZARRYBOOK 1483 OF DEEDS, PAGE 583LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OFKERRY MICHELE WICKERTDEED NO. 2019001046CELLARENTRANCEBRICKFIRE PITFOUNDIRON PIPEWOOD FENCECHAIN LINK FENCEWOOD FENCEGATEELEC.METERGATEROOF LINEAVERYWIDTH OF PAVEMENT = 24± FT.RIGHT OF WAY = 50 FT.STREETRECORD ~ CITY ENGINEER'S OFFICEGATE9.2'±24.0'±10.6'±4.5'±5.5'±CONCRETE SIDEWALKMACADAMDRIVEWAYAPPROXIMATE EDGE OF PAVEMENTOVERHEAD UTILITY LINES1.6'±9.9'±(FENCE COR. TOPROP. LINE)(BARN COR.TO PROP. LINE)TAX MAP PARCEL NO.166.37-2-20XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXS88°00'00"E50.00'S02°00'00"W144.00'N82°37'48"W50.22'N02°00'00"E139.30'DN
DN
(E) HOUSE
(E) DRIVEWAY
(E)
BILCO
DECK TO BE
REMOVED
SHED TO BE
REMOVED
22 AVERY STREET
SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866
ZONING: UR-3
MINIMUM LOT SIZE : 2F (2 Family)
MIN WIDTH (FEET): 2F (2 Family)
MIN. YARD SETBACK PRINCIPAL Bldg (FEET):
FRONT
SIDE (WEST)
SIDE (EAST)
TOTAL SIDE
REAR
MIN. YARD SETBACK ACCESSORY Bldg (FEET):
SIDE
REAR:
HIEGHT:
LOT COVERAGE INFORMATION:
MAX. % Bldg:
MAX. SF Bldg:
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE SF
MAX. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE %:
ALLOWED
8,000 SF
80
10
5
5
12
25
5
5
22' / 65%
40%
2,832 SF
-
70%
PROPOSED
No Change
No Change
21.5
2.5
No Change
13.1
5.5FT
-
-
+/- 21.4'
34%
2,405 SF
4,820
68%
EXISTING
7,082 SF
50
24
9.2
10.6
19.8
67
-
-
-
16%
1,129 SF
1,998
28.2%
RELIEF
918/11%
30'/37%
-
2.5'/50%
-
-
19.5'/78%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-NORTHSCALE 1/2 AS NOTED ON 12X18 SHEET
Existing Stie Plan Sampson Residence
22 Avery St, Saratoga Springs NY09.20.24 - ZBA SUBMISSION
3/16" = 1'-0"1Existing Site Plan
REMAINS OF SLATE CURBMACADAMAPRON7.9'±OVERHEAD UTILITY LINESFOUND CAPPEDIRON ROD(S77°W 0.45'FROM CORNER)FOUNDIRON PIPE(S45°E 1.11'FROM CORNER)COVERED PORCHELEC.METER& STEPSCHAIN LINK FENCEUTILITY POLES(UTILITIES GOUNDERGROUNDFROM POLE)TWO STORY HOUSENO. 34 AVERY STREETLANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OFCAROL A. CHRISTENSEN, TRUSTEEDEED NO. 2020022963LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OFLAURA A. HOWENSTEIN AND RICHARD P. BROWN, JR.DEED NO. 2017039222LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OFDAN D. LISA A. IRIZARRYBOOK 1483 OF DEEDS, PAGE 583LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OFKERRY MICHELE WICKERTDEED NO. 2019001046CELLARENTRANCEFOUNDIRON PIPEWOOD FENCECHAIN LINK FENCEGATEROOF LINEAVERYWIDTH OF PAVEMENT = 24± FT.RIGHT OF WAY = 50 FT.STREETRECORD ~ CITY ENGINEER'S OFFICEGATE24.0'±5.5'±CONCRETE SIDEWALKMACADAMDRIVEWAYAPPROXIMATE EDGE OF PAVEMENTOVERHEAD UTILITY LINES1.6'±9.9'±PROP. LINE)(BARN COR.TO PROP. LINE)XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXS88°00'00"E50.00'S02°00'00"W144.00'N82°37'48"W50.22'N02°00'00"E139.30'x 5'-0"35'-0"
22 AVERY STREET
SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866
ZONING: UR-3
MINIMUM LOT SIZE : 2F (2 Family)
MIN WIDTH (FEET): 2F (2 Family)
MIN. YARD SETBACK PRINCIPAL Bldg (FEET):
FRONT
SIDE (WEST)
SIDE (EAST)
TOTAL SIDE
REAR
MIN. YARD SETBACK ACCESSORY Bldg (FEET):
SIDE
REAR:
HIEGHT:
LOT COVERAGE INFORMATION:
MAX. % Bldg:
MAX. SF Bldg:
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE SF
MAX. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE %:
ALLOWED
8,000 SF
80
10
5
5
12
25
5
5
22' / 65%
40%
2,832 SF
-
70%
PROPOSED
No Change
No Change
21.5
2.5
No Change
13.1
5.5FT
-
-
+/- 21.4'
34%
2,405 SF
4,820
68%
EXISTING
7,082 SF
50
24
9.2
10.6
19.8
67
-
-
-
16%
1,129 SF
1,998
28.2%
RELIEF
918/11%
30'/37%
-
2.5'/50%
-
-
19.5'/78%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(E) DRIVEWAY
(E)
BILCO
POOL
GARAGE
ADDITION
(E) HOUSE
FP-1,129 SF
(E)
BILCO 5.05.010.0
5.0
(P) DRIVEWAY
Covered Connection
16.09.016.6FENCE
FENCE(E) DRIVEWAY
389SF
164
1,356
1056
POTENTIAL
SOLAR ARRAY
POTENTIAL
SOLAR ARRAY 6 7/16"PROPOSED
EGRESS WELL
2.543351
12.0
21.6
5.5
242
NORTHSCALE 1/2 AS NOTED ON 12X18 SHEET
Proposed Site Plan Sampson Residence
22 Avery St, Saratoga Springs NY09.20.24 - ZBA SUBMISSION
3/16" = 1'-0"1Proposed Site Plan
AVERY ST
NORTH STWARREN STEAST AVEPROJECT SITE:
22 AVERY ST
EXISTING
GARAGE
STRUCTURES
14 OF THE EXISTING 29 LOTS HAVE GARAGE STRUCTURES IN CLOSE PROXIMITY OF THE PROPERTY LINES
SCALE 1/2 AS NOTED ON 12X18 SHEET
Neighborhood Context Imagery - Diagram Sampson Residence
22 Avery St, Saratoga Springs NY09.20.24 - ZBA SUBMISSION
1" = 40'-0"1GIS - Site Context image
NORTH
UP
Refrigerator
UP
DN
DN
DN
WH
STORAGE
REC ROOM
LAUNDRY/ UTILITY
A202
4
ENTRY PORCH
LIVING ROOM
DINING
KITCHEN
ENTRY
BATH
PRIMARY
BEDROOM
BEDROOM 3
BEDROOM 2 HALL
LIN
BATH
WALL TYPES
INDICATES CONCRETE WALL
INDICATES NEW WALL
INDICATES EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN
INDICATES EXISTING WALL TO BE DEMOLISHED
NORTHSCALE 1/2 AS NOTED ON 12X18 SHEET
Existing Floor Plans Sampson Residence
22 Avery St, Saratoga Springs NY09.20.24 - ZBA SUBMISSION
1/4" = 1'-0"1Existing - Lower Level Plan
1/4" = 1'-0"2Existing - Main Level Plan
1/4" = 1'-0"3 Existing - Upper Level Plan
UP
x19'-8"12'-6"
x28'-0"7'-11"
x5'-6"12'-10"
x5'-2"8'-0"
x14'-5"13'-2"
x9'-1"13'-2"
x11'-0"8'-0"
UP
x5'-5"13'-0"
x10'-0"5'-0"
x10'-0"5'-0"
x 7'-0"4'-2"
x 23'-0"26'-6"
x 4'-0"4'-0"x 5'-3"5'-0"x 5'-0"35'-0"
A202
4
A202
3
A201
2
A201
1 24' - 0"3' - 3"3' - 2"3' - 1"
14' - 0"6' - 0"4' - 6"2' - 6"2.526' - 0" BERMUDA - (KYLE'S)12' - 0" BERMUDA22' - 0" ARUBA
11' - 0" ARUBAA202
5
A202
6
30' - 0"16' - 0"2' - 0"8' - 0"27' - 0"
41' - 0"27' - 0"16' - 5 1/2"7' - 0"6' - 0"ENTRY PORCH
LIVING ROOM
DINING
KITCHEN
ENTRY
BATH
MUD ROOM
INCREASE WIDTH OF
STAIRS
CL CAB
BUILT-IN GRILL
MUD PORCH
DECK
GRILL PATIO
GARAGE
ENTRY
POOL EQ/
STORAGE
MECH.
5 1/2"19' - 2 9/16"3' - 8 1/2"6' - 3"SLIDING DOORCOVERED BREEZEWAY
SPEED
OVEN
DRWR
FRIG
ICE
DW48" FRIGT/RPANTRY CABBUFFET TABLE / WALL CABS36" RANGE
CL CABUTILITY CABDROP CAB
5' - 0"
12' - 0"
WALL TYPES
INDICATES CONCRETE WALL
INDICATES NEW WALL
INDICATES EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN
INDICATES EXISTING WALL TO BE DEMOLISHED
NORTHSCALE 1/2 AS NOTED ON 12X18 SHEET
Main Level Floor Plan Sampson Residence
22 Avery St, Saratoga Springs NY09.20.24 - ZBA SUBMISSION
1/4" = 1'-0"1A101 - MAIN LEVEL
SQUARE FOOTAGE (HABITABLE)
LOWER LEVEL 810 SF
FIRST FLOOR 818 SF
ADDITION 90 SF
GARAGE 772 SF
GARAGE - LOFT 665 SF
SECOND FLOOR 852 SF
TOTAL HABITABLE:4007 SF
SQUARE FOOTAGE (NON-HABITABLE)
TOTAL SF:4007 SF
DN
x12'-0"12'-10"
x13'-0"11'-5"
x16'-8"8'-11"
x13'-2"9'-5"
x2'-8"3'-1"
x9'-2"8'-0"
x6'-0"8'-0"
DN
x 12'-6"11'-5"
x 18'-6"19'-3"
x 5'-6"10'-4"
A202
4
A202
3
A201
2
A201
1
PRIMARY
BEDROOM
BEDROOM 3
BEDROOM 2HALL
LIN
CL9' - 3"3 1/2"2' - 5"4' - 0"3' - 4 1/2"
3' - 0"6' - 0"3' - 2"P. BATH
BATH
30" VANITY
32"x60"
32"x60"72" VANITYBUILT-IN CLBUILT-IN CLA202
5
A202
6
6' - 0"13' - 6"4' - 6"5' - 6"26' - 6"
6' - 0"6' - 0"
32' - 0"
NEW POCKET
DOOR
RELOCATE
ATTIC HATCH
NEW
WINDOW
NEW
WINDOW
11' - 6"
32"x60"
GUEST BEDROOM
G LIVING
BATH
11' - 6"6' - 0"6' - 0"6' - 0"
4' - 0"
48" VANITY
ENTRY
CL
CL/ MECH
SLOPED CEILING
4'-6" WALL HEIGHT
4'-6" WALL HEIGHT
8'-1" WALL HEIGHT
NEW
TRANSOM
WINDOW
3' - 3 1/8"3' - 6"
TV WALL
WALL TYPES
INDICATES CONCRETE WALL
INDICATES NEW WALL
INDICATES EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN
INDICATES EXISTING WALL TO BE DEMOLISHED
NORTHSCALE 1/2 AS NOTED ON 12X18 SHEET
Upper Level Floor Plan Sampson Residence
22 Avery St, Saratoga Springs NY09.20.24 - ZBA SUBMISSION
1/4" = 1'-0"1A102 - UPPER LEVEL
UP
x21'-10"12'-6"
x13'-8"12'-6"
x14'-4"12'-6"
x2'-11"4'-8"
x3'-0"7'-7"
A202
4
A202
3
A201
2
A201
1
A202
5
A202
62' - 6"6"RELOCATE
(E) DOOR
QMURPHY BEDBUNK BEDS
TV
36" VANITYMACERATING TOILETSTORAGE
REC ROOM
LAUNDRY/ UTILITY
1/2 BATH
INFILL
EXISTING
STAIR WALL
EGRESS WELL:
SCAPEWEL BY BILCO
GARAGE SLAB (ABOVE)
WALL TYPES
INDICATES CONCRETE WALL
INDICATES NEW WALL
INDICATES EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN
INDICATES EXISTING WALL TO BE DEMOLISHED
NORTHSCALE 1/2 AS NOTED ON 12X18 SHEET
Lower Level Floor Plan Sampson Residence
22 Avery St, Saratoga Springs NY09.20.24 - ZBA SUBMISSION
1/4" = 1'-0"1A100 - LOWER LEVEL
SCALE 1/2 AS NOTED ON 12X18 SHEET
Existing Site Images Sampson Residence
22 Avery St, Saratoga Springs NY09.20.24 - ZBA SUBMISSION
22 AVERY ST LOOKING SOUTH34 AVERY ST LOOKING SOUTH-EAST 20 AVERY ST LOOKING SOUTH-WEST
20 AVERY ST SECONDARY STRUCTURE34 AVERY ST SECONDARY STRUCTURE
22 AVERY ST WESTERN PROPERTY LINE
SCALE 1/2 AS NOTED ON 12X18 SHEET
Exterior Perspectives Sampson Residence
22 Avery St, Saratoga Springs NY09.20.24 - ZBA SUBMISSION
1Axonometric View From SouthEast 2 Axonometric View of House From SouthWest 3 Axonometric View of Garage From NorthEast
APerspective View from DrivewayBPerspective View from Garage D Perspective View from MudroomCPerspective View from Deck
EXISTING GRADE
-2' - 4"
22FT HEIGHT RESTRICTION
19' - 8"BUILDING HEIGHT - MIDPOINT EAVE/RIDGE21' - 4"SCALE 1/2 AS NOTED ON 12X18 SHEET
Proposed Elevations Sampson Residence
22 Avery St, Saratoga Springs NY09.20.24 - ZBA SUBMISSION
1/4" = 1'-0"1Proposed West Elevation
1/4" = 1'-0"2Proposed East Elevation
EXISTING GRADE
-2' - 4"
22FT HEIGHT RESTRICTION
19' - 8"BUILDING HEIGHT - MIDPOINT EAVE/RIDGE21' - 4"SCALE 1/2 AS NOTED ON 12X18 SHEET
Proposed Elevations Sampson Residence
22 Avery St, Saratoga Springs NY09.20.24 - ZBA SUBMISSION
1/4" = 1'-0"3Proposed North Elevation
1/4" = 1'-0"4 Proposed South Elevation
1/4" = 1'-0"6 Proposed South Elevation - Garage
1/4" = 1'-0"5Proposed North Elevation - Garage