Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20240535 59 Myrtle Saratoga Hospital Zoning Amendment Application1 1) M 0,•l l _m [ (1) �.l 1 'm I III > [ 1�1 l 211 Church Street, , Saratoga Springs - New York, 12866 Submitted By: Matthew J. Jones, Esq. Jones Stever Grassi L L]P Attorneys for The Saratoga Hospital 68 West Avenue Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 (518) 587-0080 Miones@saratogalaw.com July 5, 2024 °]Clue ]LA Group 40 Long Alley Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 (518) 58 7-8100 mingersoll@thelagroup.com Table of Contents I. Petition II. Application Narrative IV. SEQRA — History and Treatment V. PUD Redline VI. PUD Clean Copy VII. Aerial Photographs VIII. PUD Sketch Plan "HANDWRITTEN APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED" CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS CITY COUNCIL CITY HALL - 474 BROADWAY SARATOGA SPRINGS, NEW YORK 12866-2296 P TEL: 518-587-3550 X2533 www.saratoga-springs.org 1. Name of Petitioner: The Saratoga Hospital 2. Type of Amendment (Map or Text): FN-1 Map Amendment: Site Location: 59 Myrtle Street Tax Parcel #: 165--1-44 Current Zoning: PUD Reason for amendment: See attached Application Narrative Section to be amended: See attached Application Narrative Proposed wording of text amendment (attach additional sheets if necessary): See attached Application Narrative Reason for amendment: See attached Application Narrative Name: Matthew Jones, Esq., Jones Staves Grassi, LLP Phone: 518-587-0080 Address: 68 West Avenue, Saratoga Springs, NY Email: miones@saratogalaw.com Identify primary contact person: 0 Applicant 0 Owner Iiii Agent [FOR OFFICE USE] (Application #) (Date received) (Project Title) Check if PH Required Staff Review 4. Does any City officer, employee or family member thereof have a financial interest (as defined by General Municipal Law Section 809) in this application? YES - NO x . IF YES, a statement disclosing the name, residence, nature and extent of this interest must be filed with this application. Please check the following to affirm information is included with submission. Revised 1/2021 City of Saratoga Springs p. 1 of 2 Application for Zoning Amendment W Environmental Assessment Form - All petitions must, include a completed SEAR Short or Long Form. SEAR forms can be completed at http://www.dec.ny.9 v/germits/6191.htmi. [RAPPLICATION FEE (NON-REFUNDABLE)**-. Make checks payable to the "'Commissioner of Finance". **Refer to the current Fee Schedule for the Planning Department published on the city', website. #Submit 10 copies, and one electronic cop of complete petition and all attachments, W Location map (Map Amendment): Submit (4) large scale 24" x 36", and (10) 11 "x1 7" copies. All completed petitions are to be submitted to the Office of the Mayor for consideration. 1, the undersigned owner or purchaser under contract for the property, hereby request zoning amendment approval by the City Council for the above petition, I agree to meet all requirements under Section 240-10,0 of the Zoning Ordinance for the City of Saratoga Springs. Furthermore, I hereby authorize members of the City Council, Planning Board and designated City staff to enter the property associated with this petition for purposes of conducting any necessary site inspections relating to this petition. Applicant Signature: Name: Jill VanKuren, Pres Address: 211 Church St. Phone: 518-583-8492 E-mail: ivankuren@saratogahospital.org Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 If applicant is not.Date 7�e� _,dw'ner must sign. the C12 - Owner Signature. , 6120124 X� Print Name: im vaAur City of Saratoga Springs p, 2 of 2 Application for Zoning Amendment Application Narrative The Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD July 5, 2024 The Saratoga Hospital petitions the City Council for approval of this PUD Amendment to the Saratoga Hospital. Medical/Professional PUD ("PUD") adopted by the Saratoga Springs City Council on September 8, 1987 and amended on April 19, 1993; January 21, 1997; October 21, 2003; April 7, 2009; March 1, 2011; and March 25, 2013. The PUD is the zoning document that regulates the development of the 28.69 acre parcel on both the east and west sides of Myrtle Street with the main hospital building fronting on Church Street. Over the past ten years the Hospital has identified the pressing need for additional medical offices on its campus. This application is intended to respond to that need beginning with the demolition of the existing 10,200 sf medical office building ("MOB") in Zone B — shown in the attached photographs — that was formerly occupied by the specialized medical practices for OB/GYN and pulmonary care. Thereafter, the Hospital proposes to construct a new MOB with a maximum building height of 50 feet'. The structure will include a maximum of 60,000 sf of medical office space inclusive of common areas, hallways, utility rooms, lavatories, reception areas, and such other support spaces and systems customarily associated with medical office buildings. The building will incorporate medical offices and services designed to support a Center for Successful Aging ("CSA Building") wherein patients can receive medical care from various specialties focused on the aging population. Those specialties may include some or all of the following: primary care physicians, specialists, care coordinators, social workers, pharmacists, and dietitians, among others. The Hospital seeks this PUD amendment to provide the underlying zoning changes needed for the construction of the CSA Building. The Hospital desires to maintain the overall density maximums within the PUD by transferring a portion of the remaining development capacity in Zone A (the main Hospital Building) to Zone B. More specifically, the Hospital's plan is to increase the building square footage capacity in Zone B from the current 31,200 sf to 60,000 sf, an increase sufficient to accommodate the CSA Building. i Building height measured pursuant to UDO Section 21.4(D). Schedule A v7 07.0114 Correspondingly, the Hospital proposes to reduce the surplus capacity in Zone A by 28,800 sf in order to achieve a net zero impact on capacity for the entire campus. Further, to accommodate the full 60,000 sf of medical space within the proposed CSA building, this amendment seeks to extend the maximum building height from the current 40 feet to the proposed 50 feet. In addition to the foregoing, this amendment also seeks the following modifications: 1. Incorporate UDO: Since the adoption of the most recent PUD amendment on March 25, 2013, the City Council adopted the Unified Development Ordinance which became effective on July 15, 2022, replacing the previous Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga Springs. The UDO explicitly maintains the previously adopted PUDs, including the Saratoga Hospital PUD. In addition, references to the previous Zoning Ordinance have been replaced, where appropriate, with references to the UDO. 2. Remove expiration date of site plans: From Article "IX. Projects" the Hospital proposes to remove the language Planned Unit Development zoning approval for the project shall expire for all uncompleted projects if site plan approval is not obtained from the City of Saratoga Springs Planning Board by January 1, 2024. This artificial limitation on site plan approvals does not appear to serve any zoning or planning objective and, as such, the Hospital proposes to remove the paragraph as an alternative to continually extending the date through unnecessary PUD amendments. 3. Permit "daycare" and other uses customary to hospitals: The amendment also seeks to expand the permitted uses by allowing "daycare" throughout the campus along with "such other and further usual and customary uses of hospitals," (Article VI (A) — Zone A). Daycare facilities within the campus are very important to the Hospital staff and the absence of such facilities puts an unnecessary strain on the staff. The latter provision addresses the ever -changing approaches to diagnostics and treatment within the medical community. The 2 Schedule A v7 07.01.24 language is intended to allow the Hospital to be both adaptive and agile as the delivery of medical services continues to advance and evolve. 4. Amend Zone B Parking: Parking within Zone B — the Zone in which the CSA will be built — will maintain the ratio of 1 space/300 feet, but it will require only 75% of the parking spaces to be located within Zone B while the remaining 25% of parking spaces will be available throughout the campus in existing parking lots. 5. Prepare Zone B site for CSA Building: Zone B regulations will be amended to provide for the demolition of the 10,200 sf vacant building currently on the site, removal of the zoning authority within the PUD that would permit the second 31,800 sf B-2 building, and affirmatively provide the zoning authority — following site plan approval — for the construction of the CSA Building to a maximum of 60,000 sf and a maximum building height of 50 ft. 6. Signage: Article XV has been changed to reflect the current Albany Med. Health System/Saratoga Hospital brand guidelines in the appropriate fonts and colors, which will be coordinated by the Saratoga Hospital marketing and communications team in collaboration with the system team." 7. Structured parking: The future demand for parking on the Hospital campus will increase during the ramp up of the CSA medical practices. At a point following full occupancy of the CSA Building, the Hospital contemplates the need for additional parking on the campus. To that end, the Hospital seeks zoning approval in this PUD Amendment Application to build structured parking within Zone E. 8. Miscellaneous and technical changes: Where possible, the amendment attempts to reconcile language throughout the PUD in an effort to simplify and clarify various provisions. These changes are called out in the redline version of the PUD. Schedule A v7 07.01.24 Full Environmental Assessment Form Part I - Project and Setting Instructions for Completing Part I Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part l based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information; indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor; and, when possible, generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A & B. In Sections C, D & E, most items contain an initial question that must be answered either "Yes" or "No". If the answer to the initial question is "Yes", complete the sub -questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is "No", proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the applicant or project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part lis accurate and complete. A. Project and Applicant/Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: The Saratoga Hospital PUD Amendment Project Location (describe, and attach a general location map): 211 Church Street, Saratoga Springs, New York Brief Description of Proposed Action (include purpose or need): This proposed amendment to the Saratoga Hospital Planned Unit Development makes provision for the construction of a new building on the west side of Myrtle Street within the Saratoga Hospital PUD that will provide up to 60,000 sf of medical office space to be known as the Center for Successful Aging ("CSA" ). The project contemplates the removal of a 10,200 sf medical office building on the site to be replaced by the GSA building with a maximum building height of 50 feet. in addition, the Hospital seeks permission to construct a parking structure in the area adjacent to the site of the CSA building. The structure will be designed to accommodate parking for up to 250 vehicles inclusive of the surface parking and two above -ground parking decks. Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone: 518-583-8492 The Saratoga Hospital, Attn: Jill VanKuren, President/CEO E-Mail: JVanKuren@saratogahospital.org Address: 211 Church Street City/PO: Saratoga Springs State: NY Zip Code: 12866 Project Contact (if not same as sponsor; give name and title/role): Telephone: 518-587-0080 Matthew J. Jones, Esq. E-Mail: mjones@saratogalaw.com Address: 68 West Avenue City/PO: State: Zip Code: Saratoga Springs NY 12866 Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: Same as Applicant/Sponsor E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: Page 1 of 13 FEAF 2019 B. Government Approvals B. Government Approvals, Funding, or Sponsorship. ("Funding" includes grants, loans, tax relief, and any other forms of financial assistance.) Government Entity If Yes: Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date Required (Actual or projected) a. City Counsel, Town Board, ❑Yes❑No Saratoga Springs City Council July 2, 2024 or Village Board of Trustees b. City, Town or Village ®Yes❑No Saratoga Spr Planning Board Advisory & Site Plan January 1, 2025 Planning Board or Commission Saratoga Spr DRB - Advisory & Arch. Approval January 1, 2025 c. City, Town or ❑Yes®No Village Zoning Board of Appeals d. Other local agencies F-lYesg]No e. County agencies OYes❑No Saratoga County Planning Board - Advisory f. Regional agencies ❑YesmNo g. State agencies mYeS❑No NYS DOH - Certificate of Need Jan 2026 h. Federal agencies ❑YesmNo i. Coastal Resources. i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area, or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? ❑Yes W]No ii. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? ❑ Yes®No iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? ❑ YesmNo C. Planning and Zoning C.I. Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption, or amendment of a plan, local law, ordinance, rule or regulation be the only approval(s) which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? • If Yes, complete sections C, F and G. • If No, proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1 ❑Yes®No C.2. Adopted land use plans. a. Do any municipally- adopted (city, town, village or county) comprehensive land use plan(s) include the site where the proposed action would be located? If Yes, does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action would be located? ®Yes❑No ®Yes❑No b. Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district (for example: Greenway; Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA); designated State or Federal heritage area•, watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes, identify the plan(s): Architectural Review District mYes❑No c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes, identify the plan(s): ❑Yes❑No Page 2 of 13 C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. ❑Yes❑No If Yes, what is the zoning classification(s) including any applicable overlay district? Planned Unit Development b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? ❑YesVINo c. Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action? ®Yes❑No If Yes, i. What is the proposed new zoning for the site? PUD modifications to permit CSA building, new parking structures, and other changes to PUD CA. Existing community services. a. In what school district is the project site located? Saratoga Springs City School District b. What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? Saratoga Springs Police Department, Saratoga County Sheriffs Department, NYS Police c. Which pre protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? Saratoga Springs Fire Department d. What parks serve the project site? NYS Park, Congress Park D. Project Details D.I. Proposed and Potential Development a. What is the general nature of the proposed action (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial, recreational; if mixed, include all components)? Commercial providing hospital and medical services to the general public b. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 28.69 acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 4.0 acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 48.04 acres c. Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use? ® Yes❑ No i. If Yes, what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units (e.g., acres, miles, housing units, square feet)? % Units: 50,000 sf (CSA); 65,000 sf d. Is the proposed action a subdivision, or does it include a subdivision? ❑Yes ❑No If Yes, i. Purpose or type of subdivision? (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial; if mixed, specify types) ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? ❑Yes ❑No iii. Number of lots proposed? iv. Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum Maximum e. Will the proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? ® Yes❑No i. If No, anticipated period of construction: months ii. If Yes: • Total number of phases anticipated 2 • Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) 12 month 2025 year • Anticipated completion date of final phase 12 month Z028year • Generally describe connections or relationships among phases, including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: The first phase will involve the construction of the new CSA Building, a 60,000 sf medical office building. At a point following construction of the CSA Building, a new parking structure or structures in Zone E will be constructed to accommodate future parking needs. Page 3 of 13 f Does the project include new residential uses? ❑Yes®No If Yes, show numbers of units proposed. One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Family four or more Initial Phase At completion of all phases g. Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction (including expansions)? ®Yes❑No If Yes, i. Total number of structures 2 ii. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 30'-50' height; 130'-210' width; and 160'-310' length iii: Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: 60,000 square feet h. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any ❑Yes®No liquids, such as creation of a water supply, reservoir, pond, lake, waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, i. Purpose of the impoundment: ii. If a water impoundment, the principal source of the water: ❑ Ground water ❑ Surface water streams ❑Other specify: iii. If other than water, identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. iv. Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: million gallons; surface area: acres v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: height; length vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure (e.g., earth fill, rock, wood, concrete)` D.2. Project Operations a. Does the proposed action include any excavation, mining, or dredging, during construction, operations, or both? ❑Yes ✓❑No (Not including general site preparation, grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i . What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? ii. How much material (including rock, earth, sediments, etc.) is proposed to be removed from the site? • Volume (specify tons or cubic yards): • Over what duration of time? iii. Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged, and plans to use, manage or dispose of them. iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? ❑Yes❑No If yes, describe. v. What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? acres vi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? acres vii. What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? feet viii. Will the excavation require blasting? ❑Yes❑No ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: b. Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of, increase or decrease in size of, or encroachment ❑Yes ✓❑No into any existing wetland, waterbody, shoreline, beach or adjacent area? If Yes: i. Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected (by name, water index number, wetland map number or geographic description): Page 4 of 13 ii. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland, e.g. excavation, fill, placement of structures, or alteration of channels, banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities, alterations and additions in square feet or acres: iii. Will the proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? ❑Yes ❑No If Yes, describe: iv. Will the proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? ❑ Yes❑No If Yes: • acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed: • expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion: • purpose of proposed removal (e.g. beach clearing, invasive species control, boat access): • proposed method of plant removal: • if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used, specify product(s): v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: c. Will the proposed action use, or create a new demand for water? ❑Yes ❑No If Yes: i. Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: 6,500 gallons/day ii. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? ❑Yes ❑No If Yes: • Name of district or service area: City of Saratoga Springs • Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? • Is the project site in the existing district? ® Yes❑ No ® Yes❑ No • Is expansion of the district needed? ❑ Yes® No • Do existing lines serve the project site? ® Yes❑ No iii. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? ❑Yes ❑No If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: • Source(s) of supply for the district: iv. Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? ❑ Yes®No If, Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: • Proposed source(s) of supply for new district: v. If a public water supply will not be used, describe plans to provide water supply for the project: vi. If water supply will be from wells (public or private), what is the maximum pumping capacity: gallons/minute. d. Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? m Yes ❑No If Yes: i. Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: 6,500 gallons/day ii. Nature of liquid wastes to be generated (e.g., sanitary wastewater, industrial; if combination, describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): Sanitary waste water iii. Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? ®Yes ❑No If Yes: • Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: SCSD #1 • Name of district: SCSD #1 • Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? ❑Yes ❑No • Is the project site in the existing district? mYes ❑No • Is expansion of the district needed? ❑Yes ❑No Page 5 of 13 • Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? OYes ❑No • Will a line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project? ❑Yes ®No If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: iv. Will a new wastewater (sewage) treatment district be formed to serve the project site? ❑Yes ®No If Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: • What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? V. If public facilities will not be used, describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project, including specifying proposed receiving water (name and classification if surface discharge or describe subsurface disposal plans): vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture, recycle or reuse liquid waste: e. Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff, either from new point ❑Yes ❑No sources (i.e. ditches, pipes, swales, curbs, gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater) or non -point source (i.e. sheet flow) during construction or post construction? If Yes: i. How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? 1ok Square feet or •23 acres (impervious surface) Square feet or acres (parcel size) ii. Describe types of new point sources. Curbs, pipes, swales iii. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed (i.e. on -site stormwater management facility/structures, adjacent properties, groundwater, on -site surface water or off -site surface waters)? Through existing stormwater management facilities. • If to surface waters, identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: • Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties? iv. Does the proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces, use pervious materials or collect and re -use stormwater? El Yes® No ❑ Yes®No f. Does the proposed action include, or will it use on -site, one or more sources of air emissions, including fuel ❑Yes ®No combustion, waste incineration, or other processes or operations? If Yes, identify: i. Mobile sources during project operations (e.g., heavy equipment, fleet or delivery vehicles) ii. Stationary sources during construction (e.g., power generation, structural heating, batch plant, crushers) iii. Stationary sources during operations (e.g., process emissions, large boilers, electric generation) g. Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f (above), require a NY State Air Registration, Air Facility Permit, [-]Yes ®No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: i. Is the project site located in an Air quality non -attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) ❑Yes ❑No ii. In addition to emissions as calculated in the application, the project will generate: • Tons/year (short tons) of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) • Tons/year (short tons) of Nitrous Oxide (N20) • Tons/year (short tons) of Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) • Tons/year (short tons) of Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) • Tons/year (short tons) of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflourocarbons (HFCs) • Tons/year (short tons) of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) Page 6 of 13 h. Will the proposed action generate or emit methane (including, but not limited to, sewage treatment plants, ❑YesV No landfills, composting facilities)? If Yes: i. Estimate methane generation in tons/year (metric): ii. Describe any methane capture, control or elimination measures included in project design (e.g., combustion to generate heat or electricity, flaring): i. Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes, such as ❑Yes®No quarry or landfill operations? If Yes: Describe operations and nature of emissions (e.g., diesel exhaust, rock particulates/dust): j. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial ❑YesW1No new demand for transportation facilities or services? If Yes: i. When is the peak traffic expected (Check all that apply): ❑ Morning ❑ Evening ❑Weekend ❑ Randomly between hours of to ii. For commercial activities only, projected number of truck trips/day and type (e.g., semi trailers and dump trucks): iii. Parking spaces: Existing Proposed Net increase/decrease iv. Does the proposed action include any shared use parking? ❑Yes ❑No v. If the proposed action includes any modification of existing roads, creation of new roads or change in existing access, describe: vi. Are public/private transportation service(s) or facilities available within'h mile of the proposed site? vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid, electric ❑Yes❑ No ❑Yes❑ No or other alternative fueled vehicles? viii. Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing ❑Yes❑ No pedestrian or bicycle routes? k. Will the proposed action (for commercial or industrial projects only) generate new or additional demand ZYes❑No for energy? If Yes: i. Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: 690,000 kwh/year ii. Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project (e.g., on -site combustion, on -site renewable, via grid/local utility, or other): Via the grid iii. Will the proposed action require a new, or an upgrade, to an existing substation? ❑Yes®No 1. Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply. i. During Construction: ii. During Operations: • Monday - Friday: 7AM - 10PM • Monday - Friday: 7AM-4PM • Saturday: 7AM - 5PM • Saturday: • Sunday: • Sunday: • Holidays: • Holidays: Page 7 of 13 m. Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction, operation, or both? If yes: i. Provide details including sources, time of day and duration: ❑ Yes ONo ii. Will the proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen? Describe: ❑ Yes ❑No n. Will the proposed action have outdoor lighting? O Yes ❑No If yes: i. Describe source(s), location(s), height of fixture(s), direction/aim, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: Locations: Exterior lighting on CSA building, parking lots, security lighting, lighting from parking structure; Nearest occupied structures: Existing structures in PUD — Rubin Dialysis, Admin building, 44 Myrtle Street, 48 Myrtle Street ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen? Describe: ❑ Yes ®No o. Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day? If Yes, describe possible sources, potential frequency and duration of odor emissions, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: ❑ Yes ®No p. Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum (combined capacity of over 1,100 gallons) or chemical products 185 gallons in above ground storage or any amount in underground storage? If Yes: i. Product(s) to be stored ii. Volume(s) per unit time (e.g., month, year) iii. Generally, describe the proposed storage facilities: ❑ Yes ®No q. Will the proposed action (commercial, industrial and recreational projects only) use pesticides (i.e., herbicides, insecticides) during construction or operation? If Yes: i. Describe proposed treatment(s): Consistent with current subcontracted services. 0 Yes ❑No ii. Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices? ® Yes ❑No r. Will the proposed action (commercial or industrial projects only) involve or require the management or disposal of solid waste (excluding hazardous materials)? If Yes: i. Describe any solid waste(s) to be generated during construction or operation of the facility: • Construction: 300 tons per year (unit of time) • Operation : .75 tons per week (unit of time) ii. Describe any proposals for on -site minimization, recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste: • Construction: ® Yes ❑ No • Operation: Estimated 20yds of recyclables/week = 1000lbs/week iii. Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on -site: • Construction: 30yd Construction Dumpsters @ Colonie Landfill • Operation: One 10yd dumpster @ Colonie Landfill Page 8 of 13 s. Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes: i. Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site (e.g., recycling or transfer station, composting, landfill, or other disposal activities): ii. Anticipated rate of disposal/processing: • Tons/month, if transfer or other non-corbustion/thermal treatment, or • Tons/hour, if combustion or thermal treatment iii. If landfill, anticipated site life: years t. Will the proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation, treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous ❑Yes ZNo waste? If Yes: i. Name(s) of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated, handled or managed at facility: ii. Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated tons/month iv. Describe any proposals for on -site minimization, recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: v. Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: provide name and location of facility: If No: describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility: E. Site and Setting of Proposed Action E.I. Land uses on and surrounding the project site a. Existing land uses. i. Check all uses that occur on, adjoining and near the project site. ❑ Urban ❑ Industrial ® Commercial ® Residential (suburban) ❑ Rural (non -farm) ❑ Forest ❑ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic V1 Other (specify): Medical health related services ii. If mix of uses, generally describe: b. Land uses and covertypes on the project site. Land use or Covertype Current Acreage Acreage After Project Completion Change (Acres +/-) • Roads, buildings, and other paved or impervious surfaces 18.3 +/- 18.53 +/- +.23 • Forested .9 +/- _9 +/- 0 • Meadows, grasslands or brushlands (non- agricultural, including abandoned agricultural) 10.48 +/- • Agricultural (includes active orchards, field, greenhouse etc.) • Surface water features (lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, etc.) • Wetlands (freshwater or tidal) • Non -vegetated (bare rock, earth or fill) • Other Describe: Lawn 9.49 +/- 9.26 +/- -.23 Page 9 of 13 c. Is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation? ❑ YeSm No i. If Yes: explain: d. Are there any facilities serving children, the elderly, people with disabilities (e.g., schools, hospitals, licensed ®Yes❑No day care centers, or group homes) within 1500 feet of the project site? If Yes, i. Identify Facilities: Division Street Elementary School, Wesley community, Saratoga Hospital (part of existing PUD) e. Does the project site contain an existing dam? ❑YesmNo If Yes: i. Dimensions of the dam and impoundment: • Dam height: feet • Dam length: feet • Surface area: acres • Volume impounded: gallons OR acre-feet ii. Dam's existing hazard classification: W. Provide date and summarize results of last inspection: f. Has the project site ever been used as a municipal, commercial or industrial solid waste management facility, ❑YesmNo or does the project site adjoin property which is now, or was at one time, used as a solid waste management facility? If Yes: i. Has the facility been formally closed? ❑Yes❑ No • If yes, cite sources/documentation: ii. Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility: W. Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities: g. Have hazardous wastes been generated, treated and/or disposed of at the site, or does the project site adjoin ❑Yes©No property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste? If Yes: i. Describe waste(s) handled and waste management activities, including approximate time when activities occurred: h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site, or have any ❑ YeSm No remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site? If Yes: i. Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site ❑ Yes❑ No Remediation database? Check all that apply: ❑ Yes — Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): ❑ Yes — Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID number(s): ❑ Neither database ii. If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities, describe control measures: iii. Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database? ❑ Yes❑ No If yes, provide DEC I,D number(s): iv. If yes to (i), (ii) or (iii) above, describe current status of site(s): Page 10 of 1.3 v. Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses? ❑ Yes❑No • If yes, DEC site ID number: • Describe the type of institutional control (e.g., deed restriction or easement): • Describe any use limitations: • Describe any engineering controls: • Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place? ❑Yes❑No • Explain: E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site a. What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? .2 ft feet b. Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site? ❑ Yes❑No If Yes, what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? % c. Predominant soil type(s) present on project site: Windsor loamy sand 100 % d. What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: 2 feet e. Drainage status of project site soils:❑ WellDrained: % of site 0 Moderately Well Drained: 100 % of site ❑ Poorly Drained % of site f. Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: ❑ 0-10%: 100 % of site ❑ 10-15%: % of site ❑ 15% or greater: % of site g. Are there any unique geologic features on the project site? ❑ YesW]No If Yes, describe: h. Surface water features. i. Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies (including streams, rivers, ❑Yes©No ponds or lakes)? ii. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site? ❑YesWINo If Yes to either i or ii, continue. If No, skip to E.2.i. iii. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal, ❑Yes❑No state or local agency? iv. For each identified regulated wetland and waterbody on the project site, provide the following information: • Streams: Name Classification Lakes or Ponds: Name Classification • Wetlands: Name Approximate Size • Wetland No. (if regulated by DEC) v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality -impaired ❑Yes ❑No waterbodies? If yes, name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: i. Is the project site in a designated Floodway? ❑Yes oNo j. Is the project site in the 100-year Floodplain? ❑Yes ©No k. Is the project site in the 500-year Floodplain? ❑Yes ®No 1. Is the project site located over, or immediately adjoining, a primary, principal or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: i. Name of aquifer: Page 11 of 1.3 in. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site: Typical urban/suburban species n. Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community? ❑YesW]No If Yes: i. Describe the habitat/community (composition, function, and basis for designation): ii. Source(s) of description or evaluation: iii. Extent of community/habitat: • Currently: acres • Following completion of project as proposed: acres • Gain or loss (indicate + or -): acres o. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as ❑ Yes❑No endangered or threatened, or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species? If Yes: i. Species and listing (endangered or threatened): p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare, or as a species of ❑Yes©No special concern? If Yes: i. Species and listing: q. Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting, trapping, fishing or shell fishing? ❑YesWINo If yes, give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site a. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to ❑Yes ❑No Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: b. Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present? ❑Yes©No i. If Yes: acreage(s) on project site? ii. Source(s) of soil rating(s): c. Does the project site contain all or part of, or is it substantially contiguous to, a registered National ❑Yes❑No Natural Landmark? If Yes: i. Nature of the natural landmark: ❑ Biological Community ❑ Geological Feature ii. Provide brief description of landmark, including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: d. Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area? ❑YesONo If Yes: i. CEA name: ii. Basis for designation: W. Designating agency and date: Page 12 of 1.3 e. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district ❑ Yes® No which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? If Yes: i. Nature of historic/archaeological resource: El Archaeological Site ❑Historic Building or District U. Name: X. Brief description of attributes on which listing is based: £ Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for ❑Yes®No archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory? g. Have additional archaeological or historic site(s) or resources been identified on the project site? ❑Yes®No If Yes: i. Describe possible resource(s): ii. Basis for identification: h. Is the project site within fives miles of any officially designated and publicly accessible federal, state, or local ®Yes❑No scenic or aesthetic resource? If Yes: i. Identify resource: All city and state parks within city limits, Yaddo, NYRA ii. Nature of, or basis for, designation (e.g., established highway overlook, state or local park, state historic trail or scenic byway, etc.): State park, Historic gardens, Historic racetrack iii. Distance between project and resource: up to 5 miles. i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers ❑ Yes®No Program 6 NYCRR 666? If Yes: t. Identify the name of the river and its designation: ii. Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666? ❑Yes❑No F. Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project. If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal, please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them. G. Verification I certify that the information pr ided is tru e t of my Knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor e, �tth nes, Esq. Date July 3, 2024 Signature / / `-J Title Project Attorney PRINT FORM Page 13 of 13 SEQRA History and Treatment Consistent with the application requirements of the City of Saratoga Springs Petitions for Zoning Amendments and in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance and the State Environmental Quality Review Act, the applicant submits herewith an executed FEAF for review by the lead agent. As reflected in the Application Narrative, the Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD ("PUD") was adopted by the Saratoga Springs City Council on September 8, 1987 and amended on April 19, 1993; January 21, 1997; October 21, 2003; April 7, 2009; March 1, 2011; and March 25, 2013. With each PUD amendment, the City Council — as lead agent — undertook the SEQRA review. By way of example, we provide the history of the last four SEQRA resolutions beginning in 2003.' On October 21, 2003, Commissioner Stephen Towne moved and Commissioner Thomas Curley seconded that the Council (i) established itself as the lead agent for the SEQRA environmental review because no other involved agencies have challenged this request, (ii) declare that Part II of the SEQRA Long Environmental Assessment Form has been reviewed and is deemed accurate and complete and (iii) issue a negative declaration of environmental significance because the analysis of the information provided and presented in Part II of the Environmental Assessment Form demonstrates that these amendments will not result in any large and important impacts and, therefore, is one that will not have a significant impact on the environment, and (iv) adopt the proposed amendments in the PUD as presented. All five members of the Council voted in the affirmative. On April 7, 2009, Commissioner Franck moved and Commissioner Scirocco seconded to declare a negative declaration under SEQRA for the Saratoga Hospital. PUD Amendment. The Council reviewed each of the 20 questions on Part II of the SEQRA form and answered each of those 20 questions in the negative. The Council then adopted the resolution by unanimous vote. i Minutes of the approval resolutions in 2003, 2009, 2011 and 2013 are attached hereto. On March 1, 2011, Commissioner Franck introduced the zoning amendment to the Council describing the proposed action with the Saratoga Golf and Polo Club, then proceed through each of the questions set forth on the SEQRA form in advance of a motion by Commissioner Franck, seconded by Commissioner Ivins to issue a SEQRA negative declaration. The motion was adopted unanimously by the Council. On October 1, 2013, Mayor Johnson introduced the proposed Saratoga Hospital PUD Amendment and proceeded through the individual questions set forth on the SEQRA form. At the conclusion of that review by the Council, Mayor Johnson moved, and Commissioner Franck seconded, the motion to issue a SEQRA negative declaration. That motion was adopted unanimously. Consistent with the process undertaken the City Council for the last four PUD Amendment Applications, The Saratoga Hospital has submitted a project narrative and a Full Environmental Assessment Form for review and analysis by the City Council. The Council's 37-year history with the review of The Saratoga Hospital PUD and the six amendments thereto have provided the Council with substantial background and familiarity with the campus as it has expanded over the years. With each amendment to the PUD, the Council — serving as lead agent — has undertaken the environmental review of those aspects of each project that are new and different from the environmental impacts evaluated by the Council during previous applications. Continuing in this format, the Hospital urges the City Council to again perform all of the functions as lead agent in order that it fully and properly assess the impacts associated with the development of the Center for Successful Aging and the other smaller changes to the PUD in order that it take a hard look and make a reasoned elaboration of the significance of those impacts. The Hospital looks forward to providing the City Council with all of the information reasonably required by the Council to perform its function fully, thoroughly and with reasonable diligence. CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL ROOM TU���M�� ��������� �1 �O0� .__-__.'.,__.__--.'_.,_--_ P.M. '�'D--' PRESENT: Commissioner Thomas Curley, DPG Commissioner Michael Lenz, Finance Kenneth Klotz, Mayor Commissioner Thomas K4oTygue.DPW Commissioner Stephen E.Towne, Accounts ALSO PRESENT: Anthony Scim000.Supervisor Phil Klein, Supervisor STAFF PRESENT: Bruce Brown, Deputy Commissioner, DPW Erin Dreyer, Deputy Commissioner, DPS Christine GiUmett-Browne.Deputy Commissioner, Finance Deborah Harper, Deputy Commissioner, Accounts Hank Kuczynski, Deputy Mayor (arrived 8:00p.m.) Jeff Wait, City Attorney (arrived 7:1Gp.m.) Mayor Kenneth Klotz said this was a public hearing on a petition submitted by the Saratoga Hospital to amend the Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD at 211 Church Street. He said the required advisory opinion from the City Planning Board was on file. He noted that the Planning Board made a number ofrevisions to the original proposal and they have issued ofavorable advisory opinion onthose revisions. He said on October 14, 2003, the petitioner submitted a set of minor amendments that deleted any reference to a new heliport on the vnnf of the main hospital building and those amendments have been incorporated in the final draft ordinance that was distributed to the Council yesterday by the City Attorney. He said the required proof of notice tonearby byproperty owners has been submitted. Appearing before the Council was Matthew Jones & Stephanie Feradino, attorneys, representing the applicant; Stove Everest; John Oawes, CT W1o|o; Ken VVunston' Creighton Manning; and Steve Fnannhak' Saratoga Hospital. Matthew Jones showed a power point presentation of this project. He reminded Council members that in Ju|y, he appeared before the Council with an overview of the project. He explained that areas B. C. D. & E are the parking lot and area A being the hospital. He said that the focus oftonight=a presentation was Zone A. He said there are two proposed major undertakings inZone A. the radiation unit and patient care addition tothe northwest corner. Hesaid, though, that there had been some minor changes 0mZones B.{|.D &E. He said those changes include additional parking and a five percent change in building space. Matthew Jones said the project originally proposed in July is different from what was before the Council this evening. He explained that the applicant now proposes the possibility of doubling the size of the radiation therapy center from 0.000 to 18'000 square feet by adding a second floor. He said another change to this proposal was the traffic flow. Hesaid they are now proposing towiden Corey Lane from 15feet 0o40feet and along Medical Arts Lane they will donate some land to the City to correct the traffic flow concerns in that area. Hesaid there will also besome allowances for Dr. Byrne=spovce|. He explained that some ofDr. Byrne=s parking is in the public right of way and they will be sure that Dr. Byrne is not disadvantaged in any way through this project. Matthew Jones said if this project is approved this evening, they will return to the Planning Board on NovambarG' the Design Review Commission on November and then onto the Department of Health onNovember 20. Matthew Jones said the second part of this proposal was the patient care addition on the northwest corner. He said originally the building was a rectangular bui|ding, but since meeting with the neighbors, the Planning Board and the City~a Real Estate Committee, the shape ofthe building has been changed tosquare and is Page 1 of 13 City ofSaratoga Springs City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 21.2003 now OU feet from the northerly boundary line and 10 feet from Myrtle Street. He said they have not yet developed the design of the building. Na noted that the ambulance entrance will be located on Myrtle Street and they have also agreed to maintain the mature vegetation between the hospital and the neighbors. He said they will also do many other things to minimize the noise, lighting and other negative environmental impacts to the neighbors inthis area. Matthew Jones summarized the changes noting that the parking along the boundary line near the Golf & Polo Club had been removed and more parking for staff has been added, Corey Lane will be widened, Medical Arts Lane pavement will be oorreotud. Byrne~o needs will be met and they will work with DPW to run a storm drainage system toconnect toamanhole inWoodland Court. Hesaid ifall goes well, they planned tostart the site work in December and they hoped to have the radiation therapy center operating by spring. Matthew Jones said they have also removed the heliport site from the top of the patient care addition, therefore, that was not anitem for discussion this evening. Hesaid that the addition nfthe heliport will require further study. Matthew Jones said the addition of the patient care addition is sorely needed. He said the Emergency Department can comfortably accommodate 22,000 patients per year, but they exceed 30,000. Hesaid this will also allow for the expansion of the ICU and allows for three floors of new patient rooms. He said through this expansion, the hospital would beable k)meet the needs nfthe community. Mayor Kenneth Klotz asked about the timetable for this addition. Matthew Jones said itwould bebetween one and two years before site plan review took place. He said, thuugh, that an the demand for bads and emergency services increases, the timetable will continue tomove up. Mayor Kenneth Klotz clarified that the radiation therapy center and the patient care addition were independent of one another. Matthew Jones said yes. He said they both need separate approvals from the Department of Health. Mayor Kenneth Klotz opened the public hearing. Kathleen Hamill, Vice President & Chief Nurse, said she oversees patient care on a day to day basis. She said because of the growth on patient popu|ation, they have had to hold patients in waiting rooms and postpone elective surgeries. She said this is a very important project that will add more beds and also provides for more privacy for patients. She also noted that the radiation therapy center will also assist patients aothat they do not have totravel 45minutes for treatment. Dr. Timothy 8nooks, Emergency Room direotor, said he has been in this community for more than 10 years. Hosaid when hefirst arrived at the Emergency Department staff saw about 24.U00patients each year, but that number has now increased to about 34.000. He said the hospital has only 16 spots available in the Emergency Department for patients, therefora, although it was unfortunate, the hallway in often used to accommodate patients. He said they are hindered by the physical plant and the additional space will allow for privacy and also allows for different options for patients. Hesaid the radiation therapy center isalso needed so that patients dnnot need tntravel sofar for treatment. Cynthia Giordano, Myrtle Street & Woodland Court, said while she supported this application there are impacts tothe value oftheir homes. She said drainage is difficult in this area and it needed to be addressed in detail. Sal Ferlazzo, attorney representing the neighbors, said he had been working with City staff and the applicants= attorneys onthis matter. He said the neighbors were glad to see that the heliport had been removed from this proposal. He said the neighbors are not opposed to this pnopnsa|, but wanted to be sure that itwent through the proper SEORprocess. Hesaid they were concerned that the SEORprocess had not been followed. 5a| Fadazzo explained that under this zoning, this was a type one action which presumes that an EIS in required. He said there are significant impacts to the neighbors. He said if the 8EOR standards are reduced for this project, the Council would need tofollow suit on other projects. He pointed out that this is o five -story building and it impacts the neighbors. He said the impacts ino|ude, troffio, noiso, property values and drainage and quality of life. He said there have been no studies on the visual impa(t, drainage or traffic. He said they were Page 2 of 13 City of Saratoga Springs City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 21, 2003 also concerned with hazardous materials. He said they were also very concerned that there was some segmentation and that the hospital will bring back the heliport. He then quoted from previous case law on segmentation findings. Sal Ferlazzo said the Council should be going through the environmental process and encouraged the Council to do so. Lew Benton, Planning Board Chair, said the Planning Board worked with all interested parties and crafted changes to the proposal to accommodate the concerns. He said the only change to the proposal since the Planning Board forwarded their favorable advisory opinion was the removal of the heliport. He said one of the more important recommendations of the Planning Board was the establishment of a capital reserve fund that would be used for traffic mitigation. He said they encouraged the Council to channel any fees that the hospital might incur under future applications to be used for traffic related issues. He reminded Council members that at every phase of this project there will be review by the Planning Board and in some cases the Design Review Commission as well. He said the Planning Board has the authority to halt subsequent phases if adequate infrastructure is not in place. He said at each phase of the project there will be negotiation. He noted that the Planning Board had the foot print of the patient care addition reconfigured to accommodate neighbors concerns. Lew Benton said that while the Planning Board is an involved agency, it is the Council is the lead agency on this project. He reminded Council members that the Planning Board recently dealt with the segmentation matter on another project and the case was dismissed. He said a Type I SEQR does not compel a DEIS. He said that what is required is that the applicant complete part one the Council make a determination under part two and the impact and mitigation are identified under part three, if necessary. He said the Planning Board was comfortable that the process had been adhered to. He said the City Council has not violated any SEQR procedures because the Council has not taken any action on this application. Deane Pfeil, 340 Broadway, member of the Saratoga Care Foundation Board, said the hospital adds to the community. She said it was especially nice that residents do not need to travel 45 minutes to get to an emergency room. She said many of the physicians are board certified and they contribute to the health of the community through their excellent medical services provides. She also noted that the hospital is one of the largest employers in the area. She too agreed that the Emergency Department is seeing more patients each year. She said the outpatient services for 2002 were at 188,000 and the hospital is now constructing an ambulatory surgery center in Wilton to assist them in that area. She said they operate close to capacity nearly every day. She urged the Council to approve this application. Joanne Avella, Seward Street, said she supported this application and noted that she was a former hospital board member. She said though that she was concerned with the widening of Corey Lane and the impact it would have on her neighborhood. She said Seward Street already has a lot of traffic and this would only increase that amount. She said she supported the project but hoped the Council would consider the impact to the surrounding neighbors. Anna Alpern, 14 Woodland Court, said she was concerned about the traffic in this area. She said she was also concerned that the heliport proposal would be brought back sooner rather than later. She said the hospital should agree to the neighbors request that it not be brought back for at least five years. Wayne Harrision, 8 Medial Arts Lane, said Medical Arts Lane should remain a City street. He said they need to have access for postal services, plowing, etc. Alice Smith, Woodland Court, said while the hospital expansion is needed, it should be studied carefully. She said she was concerned about the details of the project such as the drainage and traffic. She said she did not believe enough study had been done in those areas. Doug Dockendorf, 48 Myrtle Street, agreed there are a lot of issues that have not yet been addressed. He said the neighbors should be made to feel comfortable with the project. He said he supported the project, but wanted to see studies completed. Page 3 of 13 City of Saratoga Springs City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 21, 2003 ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT Saratoga Hospital PUD (03-165) Commissioner Stephen Towne asked Jeff Wait, City Attorney, to respond to some of the issues raised by the neighbors= attorney. Jeff Wait said he had not heard all of the comments because of his late arrival, therefore, it was not appropriate for him to respond. He said he did hear Lew Benton=s remarks and spoke to Geoff Bornemann, City Planner, and it was their opinion that the requirements which trigger a DEIS were not sufficient and he concurred. Geoff Bornemann clarified that this is not a Type I action because it is 25 acres but because it is adjacent to the historic district. He also noted that a negative SEQR determination has previously been issued by the Council. He said the negative SEQR was issued with an environmental process and not a DEIS. He further explained that the Council must first establish the lead agency and then that will allow the Council to evaluate the environmental assessment work included in the Council=s packet. He said it was the Council=s choice, however, he did not believe that there was anything in the application that was so large that it could not be mitigated. He said if the Council chooses to require a DEIS, the document must be modified because those factors had not been listed. He said just because it is a Type I process does not automatically mean that it needs to go to a DEIS. He said there has been some visual and traffic analysis and those documents exist as part of the record for this project. Commissioner Michael Lenz asked if Council action tonight would violate the SEQR process. Geoff Bornemann said it was up to the Council to determine if the packet was complete. Commissioner Stephen Towne said that pursuant to the Council=s request of July 16, the City Planning Board reviewed the proposed zoning amendments to the Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional Planned Unit Development District. He said the Planning Board reviewed the proposal at their July 23, September 10 and September 17 meetings and as a result of that process they have revised the text and map of the proposed amendments. Those meetings produced several changes to the PUD ordinance as follows: a) several amendments were designed and intended to reduce negative sensory and physical impact on Woodland Court and encourages a more urban design of the patient care addition; b)the changes also recognize potential traffic generating characteristics of several of the improvements to be made and suggested a strategy for advancing traffic improvements. He said these changes include the establishment of a capital reserve fund to be used exclusively to finance necessary traffic improvements on the Church Street corridor. He said at the Planning Board=s September 10 meeting they voted 7-0 to defer lead agency status for this project to the City Council. He said at the Planning Board=s September 17 meeting they voted 7-0 to issue a favorable advisory opinion on the revised proposed amendment for the following reasons: 1. The proposal meets the intent and objective of the PUD as expressed in Article 240-3.5: a) It meets all the general requirements of Article 240-3.5 b) The proposal is conceptually sound in that it meets a community need and it conforms to acceptable design principles in the proposed functional roadway system, land use configuration, open space system, drainage system and scale of the elements, both absolutely and to one another. 2. There are adequate services and utilities available or proposed to be made available in the construction of the development. Therefore, Commissioner Stephen Towne moved and Commissioner Thomas Curley seconded that the Council: 1. Establish itself as the lead agent for the SEQR environmental review because no other involved agencies have challenged this request; 2. Declare that Part II of the SEQR long environmental assessment form has been reviewed and is deemed accurate and complete; 3. Issue a negative declaration of environmental significance because the analysis of the information provided and presented in Part II of the environmental assessment form Page 5 of 13 City ofSaratoga Springs City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 21, 2003 demonstrates that these amendments will not result in any large and important impacts and therefore, is one that will not have a significant impact on the environment; and 4. Adopt the proposed amendments to the PUD as presented. Mayor Kenneth Klotz said that clearly the hospital had mode a great effort towork with the neighbors and number nfthose issues have been resolved. Hosaid for further explanation though nnthe heliport issue. Matt Jones said there had been some discussion that the hospital not bring this matter bank before the Council for five years from the time the building is completed. He said the applicant views this matter differently, though, in that the heliport may never come tofruition. Hesaid there iealso the matter that approach tothe heliport from the southeast could bebetter. Hasaid the applicant was willing tuwork with the neighbors unthis time rnemo. Sal Ferlazzo said on behalf of the neighbors they were willing to compromise at four years. Hesaid they were looking for some comfort level. Matthew Jones said itwould begood ifthe applicant could say that this matter had been resolved and that the neighbors were content, but that was not the case. Sal Fur|azzu said he naaarvea the right on behalf ufthe neighbors to look at their legal options on this matter. He said they were comfortable with many of the other issues such as traffic and drainage and they wanted the same comfort level for the heliport. Commissioner Michael Lenz clarified that if the Council adopts this proposal this evennD, the applicant would return to the Planning Board for further review ofsuch details. Matthew Jones agreed and further noted that they would also appear before the Design Review Commission. Commissioner Stephen Towne said that it was important to note that there is a public benefit to this project. He urged a continued dialogue among all interested parties. He agreed that all of these details need to be looked at under the site plan review process. Mayor Kenneth Klotz asked Jeff Wait ifaType | action requires afull OBS. Jeff Wait said itdoes not require a full DBG. Mayor Kenneth Klotz said the Council could determine that there are environmental impacts but they could be mitigated in ways that do not require o fu||sLudy. Jeff Wait agreed. K4oynr Kenneth Klotz said the Planning Board has recommended that the Council issue anegative SEOR. Jeff Wait said that approval of the motion would be appropriate and he was comfortable with the Council proceeding in this matter. Ayes all. -MAYOR—=S OFFICE Land Acquisition Consultant Mayor Kenneth Klotz said this item appeared on his agenda two weeks ago and he withdrew bfor further review. He asked Jeff Olson to comment. Jeff Olson explained that he had met with Commissioner Stephen Towne to address his concerns. He said they have since reviewed the package and are now ready hoproceed. Hesaid heunderstood that there were two other interested firms wishing an opportunity to review this proposal. He said he talked to both of those firms today and asked them to give him a proposal with a fee structure but he did not receive anything. Therefore, they are ready tmproceed. Hesaid there iasome concern that ifthe committee does not take action soon, these parcels may nolonger beavailable. Hesaid there was already one parcel that was under contract. Mayor Kenneth Klotz moved and Commissioner Thomas McTygue seconded to accept the recommendations of the Land Acquisition Committee for the hiring John Behan Associates as consultants Page 6 of 13 CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS R CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL ROOM r TUESDAY, APRIL 7, 2009 7:00 P.M. PRESENT: Scott Johnson, Mayor John Franck, Commissioner of Accounts Ken lvins, Commissioner of Finance Ron Kim, Commissioner of DPS Anthony Scirocco, Commissioner of DPW PRESENT: Matthew Veitch, Supervisor Joanne Yepsen, Supervisor STAFF PRESENT: Michele Boxley, Deputy Commissioner, Accounts Eileen Finneran, Deputy Commissioner, DPS Kate Jarosh, Deputy Commissioner, Finance Shauna Sutton, Deputy Mayor Joe Scala, City Attorney ABSCENT: Patrick Design, Deputy Commissioner, DPW RECORDING OF PROCEEDING The proceedings of this meeting were taped for the benefit of the secretary. Because the minutes are not a verbatim record of the proceedings, the minutes are not a word-for-word transcript. PUBLIC HEARINGS Citizen Advisory Committee Recommendations for 2009 Entitlement Action Plan Mayor Johnson opened the public comment period at 6:51 p.m. No one spoke. Mayor Johnson closed the public hearing. Street Acceptance - David Lane Mayor Johnson opened the public comment period at 6:52 p.m. No one spoke. Mayor Johnson closed the public hearing. Saratoga Hospital PUD Amendment Mayor Johnson opened the public comment period at 6:55 p.m. No one spoke. Mayor Johnson kept the public hearing open for the public to respond after they hear the presentation. City Council Meeting 4/07/09 Rich Straut advised the Geyser Crest Wellfield is a significant asset of the City's drinking water system. There have been some issues in the past year of so that they have been helping the City address. |tiso major part of the City's supply source. The vve|0e|d has 7 wells and is capable of pumping 187 million gallons of water per day. Currently 4 vve||a are not capable of being used. This past November, the Department of Health inspected the well site and noted several things that needed to be addressed. The biggest issue being that 4 out of the 7 wells one incapable of being used; one of the well pumps has met its |ifespan. Three of the smaller wells can't be used because the storage tank they are hooked to has sprung o leak and had to be shut down. A significant part of the mechanical pumping systems are down and need to be retrofitted. The disinfection of the water has been determined insufficient by the health department. The water is disinfected by liquid chlorine; but what is missing is enough time where the water is in contact with the liquid chlorine before it reaches the residents. The Department of Health has given the City until December 1. 2000 to correct that or all of the people who use the water supply will have to be on o continuous boil water notice. Barton & Loguidioa helped the City earlier this year to secure agrant from NYSEROAtnbegin the engineering analysis onthat. The last upgrade was over20 years ago. NYSERDA'a interest is these wells it to be more energy efficient. The plan includes fixing the disinfection system; this will have to be a fast track fix to be done by December 1st 0uprevent aboil water situation. The project cost io$77O'000for the upgrade; the City had budget approximately $55O,000prior tothe report being done. Commissioner Franck asked what areas the we||fie|dscover. Rich oto8*d the water covers all Geyser Crest; they use about 280'000 gallons per day. Another 4O0'000gallons per day comes back into the City system. Presentation� :: Saratoga Hospital PUD Amendment Stephanie Fernadino of Jones Fernadino presented. In 2003 the Planned Development Unit (pUD) that was made was significant. They added acreage tothe campus to accommodate the radiation oncology center and the emergency room. This amendment is |eno complex and the changes far fewer than in 2003. The current amendments are intended to add 2 properties 1othe PUD. One property at238 Church Street is currently owned by the hospital. The second property is 35 Myrtle Street, which is currently adoc1or's office; they will beusing this parcel for parking. The property at238Church Street will be used as a respite for the doctors who are on call. The hospital aignage is not intended to ohongo, so they are looking for administrative review for asimilar sign. Commissioner Kim asked if there are standards of what will be referred for administrative review. Stephanie advised there approvals that have already been granted. If the sign doesn't fall within that approva|, the sign will have to go through the normal promaaa, where you start at zoning and go through design review. They are asking that the Council take action under SEC)RA. Commissioner |vins asked what has been addressed regarding ground water by taking an existing structure and turning itinto more parking. Stephanie advised they are increasing the pervious surfaces so that the amount of green space located within that lot ieincreased. |tiasufficient tohandle the runoff. EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Johnson moved and Commissioner Soh0000 seconded tomove toexecutive session regarding propoaed, pending or current litigation; personal private information of person or corporation, or matters leading to the appointment, employment, pnomodon, demotion, discipline, suspension, dismissal or removal of a person or corporation. Ayes - ALL Page 4 of 23 City Council Meeting 4/07/09 and our own zoning ordinance and City Charter were raised, discussed, and dismissed by the court. There were 3 claims bong mode: declare the City Council approval of the project violated the City Charter and the state finance law because the project was not included in the Chy's 8 year capital program for 2009, violated city ordinance because the City initially bypassed the Zoning Board of Appeals and did not apply for area variances from that board, and the City violated SEQRA both procedurally and substantively in that such violations mandated the City Council made previously of a negative declaration meaning it had no adverse environmental impact to the chosen site and seeking the forcing of the City to go back a do o 'proper' GE(]RA review of the project. The court dismissed them as being without merit. The court also commented that the alienation issue - the building of the indoor recreation center on this land would constitute alienation of park land that wasn't previously approved by the state department with jurisdiction in that mattor-the court found there was no alienation on this project in this capacity. The court also found in favor nfthe City regarding the deed restrictions on this land which ototoo in the event the land was not used as a playground or for nanvoatinno| purposes, it could possibly revert nrgo back to the ownership of the school district if the City violated the use of land. The court found that the deed restriction was not being violated for the proposed use by the City. These are all relevant findings by the court. This was a complete validation and vindication of the City's position on this project on these issues. Hainpleased toreport tothe community the City was upheld across the board onthese issues. The Department ofLabor stop bid order is still in effect. We are in negotiations hour by hour. He is hopeful they may have the final determination by tomorrow. Accounts Department Announcement: Saratoga County Economic Opportunity Council Volunteers Commissioner Franck announced oothe elected official for the City of SaratogaSprings onthe Board of the Saratoga County Economic Opportunity Council, | wanted toshare some information. The Saratoga County EOC is starting a new initiative to assist individuals who live and vvnnk at the Saratoga Rema Course Backstretch. The EOC will be starting a backstretch community dinner for workers that are on the track grounds at the very beginning and very end of the training seoson, when no other food service is m m � » available on the track. Starting April 15 �hru May 15 and then again October 1�� �hru November 15� . the EOC will be cooking and serving dinner Monday thru Friday from 4:30 - 5:30 pm. The E0Ciolooking for volunteers to maoiat with either cooking or oan/iog. This is a great opportunity for all of us to show support ofour community and lend a hand. He will be serving. If anyone else is inLeresLed, please contact the EC)Cat5O7-3158ext. 37. Discussion and Vote: SEQRA for Saratoga Hospital PUD Amendment (09-91) Commissioner Franck moved and Commissioner Scir0000 seconded to declare a negative declaration under SE[lRAfor the Saratoga Hospital PUOAmendment. The City's Planning Board and Design Review Commission as well as Saratoga County's Planning Board reviewed the Saratoga Hospital PU[} Amendment. All of these boards approved or issued o favorable advisory opinion for this project. The applicant has completed Part 1 of the SEQRA long form and the City Council must onmp|ota Part 2 of the SEORA long form as they claimed lead agency at the City Council meeting held onFebruary 3.2D09� Although the applicant provided a draft copy of how to complete Part 2 of the SEQRA long form, it in the Cnumci[ofinal decision. | will read through each question ofPart 2ofthe 8EQRAform and suggest the appropriate answer tnthe Council. Impact on Land: 1. Will the Proposed Action result inaphysical change tothe project site? NO Page mof 23 City Council Meeting 4/07/09 2. Will there beaoeffect toany unique nrunusual land forms found nnthe site? (i.e.'cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etnj NO 1 Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) NO 4. Will Proposed Action affect any non -protected existing or new body of water? NO 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface orgroundwater quality orquantity? NO 0. Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? NO 7. Will Proposed Action affect air quality? NO & Will Proposed Action affect any threatened orendangered species? NO Q. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non -threatened or non -endangered species? NO Impact on Agricultural Land Resources: 10.Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? NO Impact on Aesthetic Resources: 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (if necessary, use the Visual EAFAddendum |n Section 017.20'Appendix E) NO 13. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of histohc, prehistoric or paleontological importance? NO Impact on Open Space and Recreation: 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? NO 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exception or unique characteristics of chdoa| environmental area (CEA)established pursuant tosubdivision 6NYCRR817.14(g)? NO Impact on Transportation: 15.Will there beoneffect toexisting transportation systems? NO Impact on Energy: 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? NO Noise and Odor Impac: 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? NO Impact on Public Health: 18.Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? NO Impact on Growth and Character of Community or Neighborhood: 19.Will Proposed Action affect the character ufthe existing community? N0 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? NO Commissioner Franck stated he received e-mails in the past from homeowners on Woodland Court. The e-mails were primarily questions, not comments. Stephanie Funodino explained the residents of Woodland Court were more involved during the 2003 amendment because it affected the helipad. Commissioner Franck continued to say since there were no potentially large impacts identified in Part 2. we do not proceed to Part 3. The City Council of the City of Saratoga Springs has reviewed and analyzed Page oof 23 City Council Meeting 4/07/09 Parts 1 and 2 of the full EAF; has fully considered the environmental impacts of the project and hereby determines that the project will not result in any large or important impacts and therefore is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment. Therefore, a negative declaration is hereby issued by the City Council for this project which will be maintained in a file readily accessible to the public as well as required from the SEQRA. Mayor Johnson asked if the planned redevelopment of the intersection of Church Street and Myrtle Street was taken into consideration with the draft answers to these questions. Stephanie Ferradino stated that the engineers were well aware of the fact of the proposed construction, however the answers were provided under the present configuration. Ayes - All Discussion and Vote: Approval of Saratoga Hospital PUD Amendment (09-92) Commissioner Franck stated as just discussed, the City Council approved a negative declaration under SEQRA for the Saratoga Hospital PUD Amendment. Mayor Johnson closed public hearing so a vote can be taken. Commissioner Franck moved and Commissioner Scirocco seconded to approve the zoning amendment request for the Saratoga Hospital PUD as presented to the Council. Ayes - All Discussion and Vote: Support of New York State Records Management Program (09-80) Commissioner Franck moved and Commissioner Ivins seconded to accept the resolution as read. Commissioner Franck advised the Local Government Records Management Improvement Fund was established in 1989 to fund grants to local governments for the management of their records and to fund the provision of related advisory services through nine regional record management offices across the State. The City has benefited immensely from the program; we have received $425,000 in grants to fund many projects including inventories, record storage improvements, microfilming, e-government initiatives, map scanning, record surveys and Novus Agenda. I urge the Council to please support the following resolution to officially demonstrate our continuing support of this prolific and effective program: Resolution of Support for Local Government Records Management Improvement Fund (LGRMIF) Whereas, the New York State Archives and Records Administration's Cultural Education Account and the Local Government Records Management Improvement Fund is primarily supported by fees charged by County Clerks for index numbers of pending Supreme and County Court actions; and Whereas, the Cultural Education Account Funds most of the operations of the State Museum Library and Archives; and Whereas, the Local Government Records Management Improvement Fund (LGRMIF) has been providing technical assistance and grants to establish, improve or enhance records management programs in New York's 4400 local governments since its creation in 1989; and Whereas, the LGRMIF has supported the preservation of over 3 million essential documents throughout New York State, ensuring their continued availability to the public including students, teachers, genealogists, and other researchers, through education and the awarding of over $176 million in records management improvement grants to local governments; and Whereas, since 1989, State Archives staff have conducted 20,000 site visits to local governments to provide hands-on records management guidance and have trained over 10,300 local government officials to manage both paper and electronic records through 130 onsite workshops and webinars offered annually to local governments at no cost to the taxpayers; and Whereas, the City of Saratoga Springs has benefited from technical assistance, training, publications and has received 22 grants totaling $424,923from the LGRMIF to improve and increase access and availability of records and information to the public; and Whereas, the City's records management program continues to be a viable and intrinsic liaison between municipal leadership and the public in striving toward the City's goal of transparency in government; and Whereas, the LGRMIF fee has never been increased since its inception in 1989, Now therefore be it resolved that the City Council of the City of Saratoga Springs supports Assembly Bill A.6783 and Senate Bill S.3460, which propose increases in the fees supporting the Cultural Education Account from $15.00 to $22.50 and the Local Page 12 of 23 March 1, 2011 CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS Meeting 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL SALUTE TO FLAG PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD / 15 MINUTES PRESENTATION(S) 1. WASAD Annual Report City Council EXECUTIVE SESSION: Discussion regarding proposed, pending or current litigation; personal private information of a person or corporation, or matters leading to the appointment, employment, promotion, demotion, discipline, suspension, dismissal or removal of a person or corporation, collective negotiations. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of 2/15/11 City Council Minutes 2. Approval Budget Amendments 3. Approve Budget Transfers 4. Approve Capital Fund Budget Transfers 5. Approve Payroll 2/18/11 $401,533.02 6. Approve Payroll 2/25/11 $425,436.10 7. Approve Warrant 2010 Mid 10MWDEC7 $14,229.89 8. Approve Warrant 2010 Mid 10DEC8 $1,250.00 9. Approve Warrant 2011 Mid 11 MWFEB3 $775,606.42 10. Approve Warrant 2011 Regular 11MAR1 $256,142.33 11. Correction Payroll 2/4/11 $370,158.90 MAYOR'S DEPARTMENT 1. Presentation: 2011 CDBG Funding Recommendations 2. Set Public Hearing: Citizen Advisory Committee Recommendations for 2011 Entitlement Action Plan 3. Discussion and Vote: Indoor Recreation Center American Red Cross Agreements 4. Discussion: Closure of Borders Bookstore ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT 1. Discussion: Basic STAR Income Requirements 2. Discussion and Vote: Creation of a Temporary Clerk Position with State Archives Grant Funds 3. Discussion and Vote: SEQRA for Saratoga Golf and Polo Zoning Amendment 4. Discussion and Vote: Approval of Zoning Amendment for Saratoga Golf and Polo 5. Discussion and Vote: SEQRA for Saratoga Hospital PUD Zoning Amendment 6. Discussion and Vote: Approval of PUD Zoning Amendment for Saratoga Hospital City Council Meeting 3/l/u Commissioner |vinaotated the numbers CommiosionerSor0000 showed have not been audited by his department yet. John Krause of 227Gnand Avenue asked if DPW has completed the project with the sewer line inthe Jefferson Street area. Paul Ma|a, city engineer advised phases have been completed. They have plans to start on Phase 5 this spring. K4c Krause continued to say he can't complain about 2% increase. The water and sewer budget in total is voted on in November as part ofthe comprehensive budget. He understands it is a timing problem; hovvever, he sees that problem as the same problem Commissioner |vino faces when he has to put together an operating budget with information available through September. He wonders ifthere iyoway next October to do trend analysis for the past 5 or 10 years to gain a better idea of the projected water and sewer budget. Commissioner |vinsclosed the public hearing ot0:50p.m. Zoning Amendment for Saratoga Golf & Polo Commissioner |vinaopened the public hearing at8:57p.m. Stephanie Ferradino, attorney for the app|imant, clarified that items 3 & 4 of the Accounts agenda should have Saratoga Hospital removed anitrelates tothe golf and polo club only. Commissioner |v|nsclosed the public hearing ot0:58p.m. PUD Zoning Amendment for Saratoga Hospital Commissioner |vinoopened this public hearing cd8:58p.m. Noone spoke. Commissioner Ivins closed the public hearing at 7:01 p.m. CALL TO ORDER Commissioner |vinacalled the meeting hoorder et 7:01pm. PUBLIC COMENT Commissioner Ivins opened the public comment period at 7:02 p.m. Commissioner Ivina said the puh||m oonnnnmnt period is limited to a imtm| of 15 minutes and individuals are limited totwo minutes each according tmthe rules approved inFebruary mf2884by the City Council. RickThompson of2O Frederick Drive stated he finds it unusual our citizens can't vote on o lawful issue. He read o |atbsr to the editor from the February 28' 2011 8anatogian. This letter was vvhUen by Barbara Thomas of the League of Women Voters. He stated this is an unbiased group that would like to see this proposal onthe ballot. Page 4 ofo City Council Meeting 3/1/11 Discussion and Vote: SEQRA for Saratoga Golf & Polo Zoning Amendment (11-69) Commissioner Franck advised the zoning amendment proposed is for the exchange of land between Saratoga Hospital and Saratoga Golf & Polo Club. The hospital proposes to exchange 1.5 acres of land from the hospital campus on the west side of Myrtle Street, upon which the Saratoga Golf & Polo Club has their driving range, for a .61 acre, "L" shaped portion of land from Saratoga Golf and Polo Club. The City and County Planning Boards reviewed this amendment and both boards approved or issued a favorable advisory opinion. The applicant has completed Part 1 of SEQRA Short Form. Now the City Council must complete Part 2 of the SEQRA Short Form. He proposed the following responses to Part 2 of the SEQRA Short Form: A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.4? No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.6? No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: C1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic pattern, solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? No Impact anticipated. C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? No Impact anticipated. C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? No Impact anticipated. C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources? No Impact anticipated. C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? No Impact anticipated. C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in C1-05? No Impact anticipated. C7. Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy? No Impact anticipated. D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREA (CEA)? No E. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? No Part III Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide, on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination. Commissioner Franck advised based upon the answers to Part 2 of the SEQRA Short Form, it is the City Council's opinion that the project will not result in any large or important impacts, therefore it is one that will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. Commissioner Franck moved and Commissioner Ivins seconded to issue a SEQRA Negative Declaration for this action. Ayes - Al I Discussion and Vote: Approval of Zoning Amendment for Saratoga Golf & Polo (11-70) Commissioner Franck moved and Commissioner Wirth seconded to approve the zoning amendment proposed by Saratoga Golf & Polo Club. Ayes - Al I Discussion and Vote: SEQRA for Saratoga Hospital PUD Zoning Amendment (11-71) Commissioner Franck advised the PUD zoning amendment proposes the following: • Remove a portion of land which is currently located in the PUD and add it to a .6 acre portion of land that is being received from Saratoga Golf and Polo Club. • Increase the size of the proposed C-2 building by 10,000 square feet based on .6 acre property proposed for additional parking. Page 8 of 13 City Council Meeting 3/1/11 * Modify portions of the legislation which are either no longer applicable or consolidate sections that have the same purpose and intent. He continued to say the City and County Planning Boards reviewed this amendment and both boards approved or issued a favorable advisory opinion. The applicant has completed Part 1 ofGEQRA Long Form. Now the City Council must complete Part 2ofthe GEC>RALong Form. Hoproposed the following responses tnPart 2ofthe 8EORALong Form: Land:Impact on 1. Will the Proposed Action result inaphysical change hothe project site? NO 2. Will there be an effect to any unique orunusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., o|iffs, duneo, geological formations, etc.) NO 3. Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) NO 4. Will Proposed Action affect any non -protected existing or new body of water? NO 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface orgroundwater quality orquantity? NO 0. Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? NO 7. Will Proposed Action affect air quality? NO O. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened orendangered species? NO U. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non -threatened or non -endangered species? NO Impact on Agricultural Land Resources: 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? NO Resources:Impact on Aesthetic 11.Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (If necessary, use the Visual EAFAddendum in Section 617.20.Appendix B) NO 12.VWU Proposed Action impact any site or structure of hioboho, prehistoric or paleontological importance? NO Recreation:Impact on Open Space and 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? NO 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exception or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant hosubdivision GNYCRRG17.14(g)? NO Transportation:Impact on 15.Will there beaneffect huexisting transportation systems? NO Energy:Impact on 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? NO Impact:Noise and Odor 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? NO Health:Impact on Public 18.Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? NO Neighborhood:Impact on Growth and Character of Community or 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? NO 20. Is thero, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? NO Commissioner Franck advised since there were no potentially large impacts identified in Part 2.vvodnnot need toproceed toPart 3. The City Council has fully considered the environmental impacts of the project and hereby determines that the project will not result in any large or important impacts and will not have a significant impact nnthe environment. Page 9vfu City Council Meeting 3/1/11 Commissioner Franck moved and Commissioner Ivins seconded to issue a SEQRA Negative Declaration for this action. Ayes - All Discussion and Vote: Approval of PUD Zoning Amendment for Saratoga Hospital (11-72) Commissioner Franck moved and Commissioner Ivins seconded to approve the PUD zoning amendment proposed by Saratoga Hospital. Ayes - Al I FINANCE DEPARTMENT Discussion and Vote: Department of Public Safety Payroll Transfers (11-73) Commissioner Ivins moved and Commissioner Wirth seconded to approve the Department of Public Safety Payroll transfers as previously distributed to the Council. Ayes — All Discussion: 2010 Sales Tax Commissioner Ivins stated there is good news to report for 2010. Consumers spent over $45.5 million more in taxable items in 2010 than in 2009. The total sales tax collected for 2010 is $9,045,606.32. We started to see a change in spending trend in November 2009 with the amount of spending being to the positive. We realized an 8.2% growth in 2010 from 2009. He is confident that the sales tax total will be $9.1 million for 2011. Discussion: Update In -Rem Proceeding Commissioner Ivins stated tax collection is governed by NYS Real Property Law and his office is in compliance with the law. They have a 94% collection rate. Delinquent taxes are subject to a 6% late fee. Liens are held for 2 years before they could be placed in an in -rem proceeding. He started an in -rem proceeding last year. A mailing to each party found to have an interest in a delinquent parcel will be sent with notification of the proceedings. On or about March 151" they will fulfill the publication and posting requirements. Once the judge gives the City the deeds, the Council can choose to move to auction. The total amount owed was $882,697.17 when the proceedings began. The amount still outstanding is $655,809.01. Discussion: City Finances Commissioner Ivins stated the City received a new debt schedule regarding the refinancing of the interest on the 1997 bond. The principal payment will remain the same from August 15, 2011 through August 15, 2017. Under the old term, the City would have paid $202,626.25 in interest for that time period. Under the new terms, the City will pay $82,321.37 in interest; a savings of $120,304.88 in interest over that time period. 111-111[01 IrirLSIN114:274:7-11AI Ti14'111 Discussion and Vote: Authorization for Mayor to Sign Contract with Mahoney Notify Plus (11-74) Commissioner Scirocco stated as a cost savings measure the Department of Public Works eliminated the Verizon lines at the 23 sewer pump stations and contracted with Mahoney Notify. In the event a pump Page 10 of 13 �a lyh 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL SALUTE TO FLAG PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD / 15 MINUTES PRESENTATION(S) 1. 2014 Comprehensive Budget 2. Water Treatment Plant Emergency Generator 3. Vietnam 50t" Commemoration Partnership Program EXECUTIVE SESSION: None. October 1, 2013 City Council Meeting 6:00 P.M. — Workshop: NYS ORPS Re: Basic STAR Registration 6:45 P.M. — P.H. — Amend Capital Budget Water Treatment Plant Emergency Generator 6:55 P.M. — P.H. — Amend Capital Budget — Safe Routes to School CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of 9/16/13 Pre -Agenda Meeting Minutes 2. Approval of 9/17/13 City Council Meeting Minutes 3. Approve Budget Amendments (Increases) 4. Approve Budget Transfers - Regular 5. Approve Payroll 09/20/13 $405,253.14 6. Approve Payroll 09/27/13 $432,888.32 7. Approve Warrant: 2013 Mid — 13MWSEP2 $3,192,135.26 8. Approve Warrant: 2013 REG — 130CT1 $448,461.30 MAYOR'S DEPARTMENT 1. Discussion and Vote: Authorization for Mayor to Sign Agreement with National Landscaping and Lawn Care for East Side Big Baseball Diamond Sod 2. Discussion and Vote: Assuming Lead Agency Status on Saratoga Hospital PUD amendments 3. Discussion and Vote: Determination of Significance Under SEQRA for Proposed Saratoga Hospital PUD Amendment 4. Discussion and Vote: Approval of Zoning Map and Text Amendments for Saratoga Hospital PUD Amendment 5. Discussion and Vote: Amend the Capital Program and 2013 Capital Budget — Safe Routes to School 6. Discussion and Vote: Authorization for Mayor to Sign Agreement with NYS DOT for Safe Routes to School Grant City Council Meeting 10/1/13 all times. The project timeline is to complete design, obtain NYSDOH review and approval by end of October, 2013; order and sign contract by end of November, 2013. Commissioner Franck confirmed the generator runs on fuel. Tim advised the generator is a diesel generator. Commissioner Scirocco read the letter from the DOH from May 17, 2013 into the record as follows: Commissioner Madigan confirmed that he believes the City will be fine with the installation of the generator in 2014 when the letter states the end of 2013. Vietnam 50th Commemorative Partnership Program This presentation was removed from the agenda as Commissioner Mathiesen was not able to make this meeting. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Johnson moved and Commissioner Scirocco seconded to approve the consent agenda as follows: 1. Approval of 9/16/13 Pre -Agenda Meeting Minutes 2. Approval of 9/17/13 City Council Meeting Minutes 3. Approve Budget Amendments (Increases) 4. Approve Budget Transfers — Regular 5. Approve Payroll 09/20/13 $405,253.14 6. Approve Payroll 09/27/13 $432,888.32 7. Approve Warrant: 2013 Mid — 13MWSEP2 $3,192,135.26 8. Approve Warrant: 2013 REG — 13OCT1 $448,461.30 Ayes — All MAYOR'S DEPARTMENT Discussion and Vote: Authorization for Mayor to Sign Agreement with National Landscaping and Lawn Care for East Side Big Baseball Diamond Sod (13-327) Mayor Johnson explained this project totals $8,516 and includes the removal of existing turf and installation of sod to the infield. The project has been approved by the school board as a 2012 capital project. Funds are from line H3657142 / 52000 / 1008. Mayor Johnson moved and Commissioner Scirocco seconded to authorize the mayor to enter into the agreement as listed and described. Ayes - Al I Discussion and Vote: Assuming Lead Agency Status on Saratoga Hospital PUD Amendments (13-328) Mayor Johnson stated the Council sent their intent to the other boards regarding that they wish to take lead agency status. Responses have been received from the City Planning Board, County Planning Board, and Design Review Commission that they do not wish to assume lead agency status. Page 10 of 21 City Council Meeting 10/1/13 Mayor Johnson moved and Commissioner Madigan seconded for the City to assume lead agency status in the SEQRA determination of the Saratoga Hospital PUD amendment. Ayes - All Discussion and Vote: Determination of Significance Under SEQRA for Proposed Saratoga Hospital PUD Amendment (13-329) Mayor Johnson advised Part 1 has been completed and is part of the record. The Council agreed to waive the reading of Part 1. Kate Maynard of the Planning Department suggested changes to Part 1 as follows: page 8, question 25 should have architectural review and site plan review added; question C1 should have architectural review added here again. This should be added by the applicant for Part 1 and resubmitted by the applicant. Mayor Johnson confirmed it should be added as final submission and acceptance by the Council. Kate advised that is correct. Mayor Johnson read the proposed responses for Part 2 of SEQRA into the record as follows: Impact on Land: 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? Yes o Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. Small to Moderate Impact ■ Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change? No 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.) NO 3. Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) NO 4. Will Proposed Action affect any non -protected existing or new body of water? NO 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? NO o Other impacts: Full storm water analysis and protection be required. All storm water will be mitigated to DEC and City standards. 6. Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? NO o Other impacts: Full storm water analysis and protection be required. All storm water will be mitigated to DEC and City standards. 7. Will Proposed Action affect air quality? NO 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? NO 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non -threatened or non -endangered species? NO Impact on Agricultural Land Resources: 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? NO Impact on Aesthetic Resources: 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B) NO o Other impacts: Identified as a City gateway location therefore DRC review is required. 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? YES Page 11 of 21 City Council Meeting 10/1/13 Proposed action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility of site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. Small to Moderate Impact ■ Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change? No Other impacts: DRC issued a favorable advisory opinion for proposed action and DRC architectural review will be required. Impact on Open Space and Recreation: 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? NO 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exception or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.4(g)? NO Impact on Transportation: 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? NO Impact on Enerav: 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? NO Noise and Odor Impact: 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? NO Impact on Public Health: 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? NO Impact on Growth and Character of Community or Neighborhood: 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? Yes o Proposed action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility of site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. Small to Moderate Impact ■ Can Impact be Mitigated by Project Change? No o Other impacts: Planning Board issued a favorable advisory opinion for proposed action. Jobs will be created as a result of the action. 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? NO Mayor Johnson advised the Council does not need to proceed to Part 111. Mayor Johnson stated it is reasonably determined that the project will not result in any large and important impact and therefore is one that will not have a significant impact on the environment; therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. Mayor Johnson moved and Commissioner Franck seconded to adopt the proposed recommendations, responses, as well as the issuance of a negative declaration under purposes of determination of significance under SEQRA. Ayes - Al I Discussion and Vote: Approval of Zoning Map and Text Amendments for Saratoga Hospital PUD Amendment (13-330) Page 12 of 21 City Council Meeting 10/1/13 Mayor Johnson advised the proposed amendment consists of the following: demolition of the Cramer House; construction of a 33,900 square foot surgical suite addition and modification of the PUD boundary to remove the property at 238 Church Street from the PUD. Steps need to be taken to classify the zoning of this parcel. Matt Jones of the Jones Law Firm and attorney for the applicant advised OMBD-2 is the preferred zoning for that location. Mayor Johnson stated he thinks it would be appropriate for that dedication. Mayor Johnson moved and Commissioner Madigan seconded for the City Council to adopt the proposed amendment to the Saratoga Hospital medical/professional PUD of the City of Saratoga Springs Code in a form next hereto and will direct the local law to be filed with the New York State Secretary of State forthwith. Ayes - All Discussion and Vote: Amend the Capital Program and 2013 Capital Budget — Safe Routes to School (13- 331) Mayor Johnson moved and Commissioner Franck seconded to amend the capital program and the 2013 capital budget for the Safe Routes to School item, which is 100% reimbursable grant from New York State in the amount of $246,617 under line item H3015112 / 52021 / 75959. Ayes - Al I Discussion and Vote: Authorization for Mayor to Sian Agreement with NYS DOT for Safe Routes to School Grant (13-332) Mayor Johnson stated this grant is 100% reimbursable. The City will put the money out but will receive the full amount back from New York State. The amount is $246,617. This was in collaboration with the school district to allow people in the Geyser Crest community along Geyser Road to get from their homes to Geyser Road Elementary school. Mayor Johnson stated above is the motion and Commissioner Madigan seconded. Ayes - Al I Discussion and Set Public Hearing: Proposed Adoption of the Master Plan and Phase 1 — Waterfront Park Mayor Johnson stated this is to roll this matter out and set a public hearing. The City took up this project in late 2008. They were looking for a way to develop the parcel. They took members from the original committee and added to it. The result was a proposed master plan that was unveiled in 2009. Due to the economy, there wasn't much that could be done back then and was put on hold. Efforts were taken to open the park and pave the road. The first match grant received was a $200,000 matching grant and a then we received a second matching grant of $325,000. We need to go through a SEQRA of the site and go through a master plan. New York State wants to know what our vision is for the parcel. Two conceptual drawings have been attached to the agenda. Phase I provides us with what the state needs to move forward. Brad Birge of the Planning Department explained the site is 3 tiered. The master plan is long term multi- year, multi -stage. The top area is envisioned to be a parking lot and scenic overlook; the middle stage is smaller and envisioned to be a passive lawn area and potential amphitheater; and the lower tier is by the lake with short term parking and beach front access for swimming. Mayor Johnson set a public hearing for Monday, November 4, 2013 at 6:50 p.m. Page 13 of 21 PUD REDLINE DRAFT CHAPTER 241.3 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO BE KNOWN AS "SARATOGA HOSPITAL MEDICAL/PROFESSIONAL PUD" BE IT ORDAINED, by the City Council of the City of Saratoga Springs, New York, following a public hearing, as follows: This Ordinance shall be known as SARATOGA HOSPITAL MEDICAL/ PROFESSIONAL PUD and amends the Unified Development Ordinance (formerly Chapter 241.3 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga Springs, New York). II. AMENDMENT The City Council of the City of Saratoga Springs, on September 8, 1987, adopted the ordinance creating The Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional Planned Unit Development District. That Planned Unit Development legislation was amended by the Saratoga Springs City Council on April 19, 1993, on January 21, 1997, on October 21, 2003, on April 7, 2009, on March 1, 2011, and on October 1, 2013. The purpose of this legislation is to further amend the , u afie n uses of the original Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional Planned Unit Development District legislation, so as to meet the needs of the institution and the community it serves. This Ordinance amends the City of Saratoga Springs Zoning Map by rezoning the properties described in Appendix "A" and shown on a map attached hereto and made a part hereof and entitled Sketch Plan for Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD, prepared by C.T. Male and dated May 23, 2003, revised January 26, 2009, October 27, 2009, January 10, 2011, March 25, 2013 and from their current zoning designation of "Office/Medical Business District" to "Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional Planned Unit Development District." This Ordinance also amends the Unified Development Ordinance (formerly Chapter 241.3 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga Springs, New York) by identifying certain uses which may be established within the amended boundary of the Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD and describing the review processes necessary to establish said uses. The total area of the Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD, as amended by this ordinance, will consist of 28. 69 ± acres as bounded and described in Appendix "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof. The area is located on the westerly side of the City of Saratoga 5/2024 Morgan &/PUD Legislation clean v 1010.1.13 Update 2024 Traclred Changes, PUD REDLINE DRAFT Springs, north of Church Street, generally east of West Avenue, west of Seward Street, and generally south of Morgan Street. The tax map references are as follows: 1. Map 165, Block 1, Lot 44 2. Map 165, Block 3, Lot 35 3. Map 165.41, Block 1, Lot 28 The Saratoga Hospital has consolidated its lots identified in the 2011 Ordinance and in Appendix "A" to create fewer individual tax parcels for the lots owned by Saratoga Hospital and contained in this Planned Unit Development. The above tax parcels reflect the campus as it was configured in the 2013 Ordinance. If the planned unit development zoning approval for this site expires or is abandoned, or the PUD boundary is otherwise altered, the City Council shall establish the zoning district that will be assigned to any such impacted parcel at that time IV. SKETCH PLAN The Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD shall be developed in general compliance with a sketch plan filed in the Offices of the Planning Board of the City of Saratoga Springs, New York, and attached hereto and made a part hereof as Appendix "C". The plan shall be used by the City and the Hospital as a guide for overall development. The sketch plan may be changed, altered or amended, pursuant to Section 13.16 et seg. of the Saratoga Springs Unified Development Ordinance. V. PURPOSE It is the purpose of this Ordinance to provide a means for the development of the Planned Unit Development, as amended by this ordinance, in which certain economics of scale or creative planning concepts may be utilized by the developer without departing from the spirit and intent of the - �,9 r> �'�� �N^eUnified Development Ordinance of the City of Saratoga Springs. It is further the purpose of this Ordinance to promote flexibility in the development and design of Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD that will result in the more efficient use of land, promote good site design and visual quality, and result in a more pleasing environment than otherwise possible to the maximum extent practicable. VI. USES AND CHARACTERISTICS There may be contained within the boundaries of Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional. PUD, City of Saratoga Springs, buildings for medical, hospital, clinical, diagnostic, da cage' and treatment uses, all of the aforesaid construed in their broadest terms, as well as professional uses and associated support services and customary accessory uses for all of the foregoing. The PUD shall be divided into zones A, B, C, D, and E as depicted on the sketch plan attached hereto as 2 S/2024 NIo���an st/F°UD Legislation clean v 1Q t0.113 U_gdata 2f124 TrackedChan�es PUD REDLINE DRAFT Appendix "C." Within each zone, certain projects described in Article IX of this Ordinance may be constructed consistent with the requirements herein. A. ZONE A The area of Zone A, as amended by this ordinance, consists of 10.45+/- acres. The existing Hospital building in Zone A (including its adjoining structures) is commonly known as 211 Church Street. The existing Hospital building presently covers an area of 148,648± square feet. The principal building has five above grade levels, with a total square footage of 579,935±. Future Hospital building coverage within Zone A may increase the lot coverage by a net of 1,352± square feet to a maximum permitted lot coverage of 150,000 square feet. In addition to the above, the Hospital building may be increased to a total of five above ground levels, not exceeding a height of seventy feet (70'). Within Zone A, principal uses shall be for acute medical/surgical services and related support (non -clinical) systems. These generally may include medicine, diagnostic and treatment, surgery, emergency medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics/gynecology, psychiatry, clinical ancillary, radiation therapy, long term &elder care, daycare business, medical and professional office use, on call physicians' respite area, along with administrative, material support systems and parking for these uses together with such other and further usual and customaj uses ofhospitals. Primary health services may consist generally of in -patient (admission more than twenty- four hours), out -patient (admission for less than twenty-four hours) and an internal support system (administrative services, etc.) necessary for the delivery of acute/medical surgical care. Hospital (a) Maximum number of buildings 1 (b) Maximum building coverage 150,000 sf (c) Maximum building levels 5 (above ground) (d) Maximum building height 70 (e) Total building square footage 579,935± sf I�/C�l►`I Di3 Zone B consists of 3.57 ± acres. Within Zone B uses shall be for primary medical care and ancillary clinical functions, including laboratory, radiology, ultrasound, specialists, care eoordinators, social workers; pharmacists, and dieticians, -amr as well as other like services necessary or desirable to S/2024 Morgan st/F UL9 Legislation clean v 1010.1.13 Ut, ate 2024 Tracked Chan es PUD REDLINE DRAFT support such care, a° �" administrative support services for any or all of the foregoing, and parking. The medical o arefeet All structures in Zone B shall be subject to final site plan atsproval in accordance with the applicable provisions of(i} this Ordinance and (ii) the Unified Development Ordinance. �rsserr�. trrw a k C. ZONE C Zone C consists of 4.86± acres. Within Zone C Medical, and Professional and Hospital Offices for primary medical care, and ancillary clinical functions, including a chronic kidney dialysis center and kidney care center, including laboratory, radiology, ultrasound and other like services necessary to support such care, offices for hospital related functions such as finance, patient accounts, human resources, and family health administration and parking may be permitted. Zone C shall be used, if necessary, for storm water management from Zone B, D and E. Zone E shall be used for any necessary additional parking demands. The kidney dialysis center shall not exceed 10,000 square feet of gross space. Total building coverage is not to exceed 30,000 square feet. 4 S/2024 Vlar an St/PUL3 Le islatiun clean v 1010.1.13 Update 2024 Tracked Changes PUD REDLINE DRAFT All uses in Zone C shall be subject to final site plan approval in accordance with Article VIII of this Ordinance. (a) Maximum number of buildings (b) Maximum building coverage (c) Maximum building height (d) Total building square footage 11001M 15117 Zone D consists of 0.57± acres. Hospital 3 30,000 sf 3 stories or 45 feet 50,000 sf Hospital Accessory Support areas may be established in Zone D. It is anticipated that this zone will be used to complement and support the activities undertaken in Zone A; it may also be used for management of storm water received from Zone B, C, and E. This zone will remain as green space until a further amendment to this Ordinance. This area shall be reserved for further development. All uses in Zone E shall be subject to final site plan approval in accordance with c-1'�the.apnlicable provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. Zone E consists of 9.24± acres. Zone E may support accessory parking for staff associated with activities in Zone A, B, and D. Supplemental parking is provided in Zone E. Parking structures are also permitted thou hoot Zone E, Wholly contained landscaped islands will be provided at the ratio of one planting area per each fifteen vehicles. Planting areas shall be at least 162 square feet or 9 x 18 feet. Planting areas may be located together to increase parking and maintenance efficiencies. All uses in Zone E shall be subject to final site plan approval in accordance with Article VIII of this Ordinance. Zone E contains a heliport. VIL DENSITY 5/2024 Morgan SUPUD Legislation clean v 10 10.1,13 Update 2024 Tracked Chair es PUD REDLINE DRAFT The overall density of the Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD shall not exceed the thresholds defined below. Total PUD Area = � 28.69 acres Total Building Coverage Impervious Area Total greenspace % of PUD occupied 1,249,736 sf 100% 192,826 sf 15% 575,125 sf 46% 481,785 sf 39% Total Building Square Footage , 0 689.935 sf 6-75 5% VIII. REQUIREMENTS FOR ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS Prior to the issuance of a building permit to develop any or all of the area within Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD, the applicant shall receive final site plan approval from the City of Saratoga Springs Planning Board. The final site plan shall show the area of the Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD proposed for development and its relationship to existing development and vacant areas within Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD. The final site plan shall also conform to the;applicable prov�si ns of the UniEed Development Ordinancethe-fequifemen+s-� r. ,.+1n IX. PROJECTS Following the effective date of this Ordinance, projects as described below may be developed within the Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD. Certain projects identified in this Article have been completed prior to the adoption of this amendment and are so identified. The projects listed below may progress in any order. In addition, projects may be undertaken or completed in more than one stage. A. Projects, Zone A Project A-1: Hospital Complex: Completed. Project A-2 - Parking Expansion: Completed. Project A-3 - Ambulatory Care Facility Expansion: Completed. Project A-4 - Future Expansions: Project abandoned. Project A-5: Radiation Oncology Center, Cafeteria, Parking Relocations and Expansion and Driveway Alterations: Completed, except 2nd floor addition on Radiation Oncology Center and additional radiation vault. Radiation Oncology Center Expansion shall not exceed 9,000 sf of additional building coverage. The structure itself may have one or two levels, but it is currently contemplated that the Radiation Oncology Center will occupy only the lower portion of the new 6 5/2024 Morgan St/PUD Legislation clean v 10 10. L13 Update 2024 Tracl ed han es PUD REDLINE DRAFT July 1 2024 building. The upper level, if any, will be utilized for any authorized use in Zone A. Project A-6: Central Plant Expansion: Completed. Project A-7: Patient Care Addition: Phase I completed. Patient Care Addition shall consist of below grade logistical support services, on -grade Emergency Department and critical care beds, and patient care rooms. It will not exceed 30,000 sf of additional building coverage. The structure itself shall have a maximum of five above grade levels, which may be constructed in phases, and 181,500 sf additional building square footage. Project A-8: Physician Respite Area: Project Removed from PUD. Project A-9: Surgical Suite Addition: CqMpleted. B. Projects, Zone B C. Projects, Zone C Project C-1: Existing Hortense and Louis Rubin Dialysis Center: Completed. C-2: Medical Professional Offices: Completed. D. Projects, Zone D Project D-1: Hospital Accessory Support Reserve Area: Completed. No projects are planned for Zone D at the time of this amendment. E. Projects, Zone E 7 5,12024Mor�,n Morgan SUPUD Legislation clean v 10 MIA Update2024 Tracked Changes � —- PUD REDLINE DRAFT July 1 2024 Project E-1: Parking Expansion: Completed. Project E-2: Parking Expansion: Completed. Project E-4: Heliport: Completed. Project E-5: Parking Expansion: Completed. Project E-6: Parking Expansion: Completed. Parking structures are permitted throwout Zone E. F. PUD Site Plan Applications PUD Site Plan Applications for any of the Projects or uses identified in this AAiele- Planned !Lnft_Q!evelopment may be made at any time to the Saratoga Springs Planning Board. X. PARKING Parking demand for the entire PUD is to be met through the provision of a large group parking lot in Zone E, a newly reconfigured parking area on Myrtle Street in Zone E, affdAff4n- the ­pfovisi,.« °�rsmaller parking areas associated with each of the buildings in the respective zones, and parking structures to be constructed in Zone During construction of specific projects in Zones A, B and C, the parking areas in Zones E, may be altered or improved upon. The minimum number of parking spaces shall be provided as shown in the following schedule: ZONE PARKING REQUIREMENTS (RATIO) Zone A. I space/2 in -patient acute beds I space/5 in -patient skilled nursing beds I space/300 sf of out -patient service I space/300 sf of internal support Zone B. I space/300 sf of gross floor space for medical office buildings with 75% of parking spaces to be sited within Zone 8 and the remaining 25!/o ofparkin g- 5,12024 Morgan SUPUD Legislation clean v 10 DO. 1 13 Update 2024 Tracked Chan es PUD REDLINE DRAFT maces to be within the re cinder of the cairinus ' n,,.,,,�r�z�n ��„�,Y,.;�n, r'°�^�° Zone C. 16 spaces for the 10,000 sf kidney dialysis center 1 space/300 sf of gross floor space for medical office buildings Zone D. Green space until a further amendment. Zone E. No parking demand required for heliport. The interior open space is primarily designed for the required parking. All of the buildings will be designed to ensure that the front entrance will be oriented toward the center. All new or revised parking created as a demand of this PUD shall contain landscaping areas at aratio of one 9' x 18' space/15 spaces for vehicles. This landscapiggrggairernenfi shall not apply to �arkn associated with the construction of new parking structures constructed within Zone E. Amendments may be made to this Ordinance by the City of Saratoga Springs City Council. XII. INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS The entire project as set forth herein will be serviced by City water and sanitary sewer lines. These lines will be constructed to City standards, but will not be conveyed to the City of Saratoga Springs. The water and sewer lines will be maintained by the Hospital. Storm water disposal areas shall be constructed and maintained by the Hospital. The roadways and thoroughfares through the project will be private drives maintained by the Hospital. Upon request, the City of Saratoga Springs shall be granted appropriately sized easements for the construction and maintenance of water, sanitary sewer or storm water sewer lines through Zone A of the PUD site. The City, upon request, may take over ownership, control and responsibility for any infrastructure main, pipe, or line presently within or constructed within the PUD site and the City shall further be granted reasonable easements to interconnect with any infrastructure main, line or pipe for which they have taken responsibility. The City is hereby granted the right to enter upon the PUD site for the purpose of making emergency repairs to any privately owned main, pipe or line. The City shall have the right to charge the Hospital or the individual project's sponsor whose pipe or main is repaired for any 9 S/2024 Mare Stll'UL9 Leislatiun clean v 1010.1.13 Update 2024 Tracked Chan es PUD REDLINE DRAFT necessary services. All private water lines connecting into any structure within the PUD site shall be individually metered. XIII. OFF SITE IMPROVEMENTS Project A -I - Hospital Complex: Completed. A-1 was identified in the 1997 Ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. Project A-2 - Parking Expansion: Completed. A-2 was identified in the 1997 Ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. Project A-3 - Ambulatory Care Facility Expansion: Completed. A-3 was identified in the 1997 Ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. Project A-4 - Future Expansion: Project abandoned. A-4 was identified in the 1997 Ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. Project A-5 - Radiation Oncology Center, Cafeteria, Parking Relocations and Expansion and Driveway Alterations: Completed. A-5 was identified in the 2003 Ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. Project A-6 - Central Plant Expansion: None required. Project A-7 - Patient Care Addition: Completed. A-7 was identified in the 2011 Ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. Project A-8 - Physician Respite Area: Project removed from PUD. Proiect A-9 -Surgical Suite Addition: None Project B-I - Existing Saratoga Care Medical Office Building_ This medical office building will be demolished at a ti e deterzriined by the Hospital to allow for the construction of the building(s) identified in Project B-2 below° CoiRed.--BwesA d-in h&4 9? Project B-2 — Construction of Medical Professional Office it i g: Within a timefra e developed by the Hospital and followin ;site plan approval b� the P1am�in 13oard, the Hospital will undertake the construction of one or more new medical office buildings with a total square footage not exceeding_60,000 sf and a maximum 11, } and herein made a pgrt of this PUD amendment. 10 S/2024 Mo�•�an St/FUD Legislation cyan v 1 Q iQ1:13 Update 2024 Tracf�ed C:han�es PUD REDLINE DRAFT Project C-1- Existing Hortense and Louis Rubin Dialysis Center: Completed. C-1 was identified in the 1997 Ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. Project C-2 - Future Medical Professional Offices: Completed. C-2 was identified in the 2011 Ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. Project D-1 - Hospital Accessory Support Reserved Area: Completed. D-1 was identified in the 1997 Ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. Project E-1 - Parking Expansion: Completed. E-1 was identified in the 1997 Ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. Project E-2 - Parking Expansion: Completed. E-2 was identified in the 1997 Ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. Project E-3 - Storage Building: Project abandoned. E-3 was identified in the 1997. Ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. Project E-4 - Accessory Parking and Heliport: Completed. E-4 was identified in the 1997 Ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. Project E-5 - Parking Expansion: Completed. E-5 was identified in the 2003 ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. Project E-6 - Parking Expansion: Completed. E-6 was identified in the 2011 Ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. XIV. SETBACKS ZONE A Any buildings constructed in Zone A on or after the effective date of this Ordinance shall an IUMMIMIUM r . r 11 5/2024 Morgan SVPUD Legislation clean v 10 101.13 Update 2024 Tracked Glean es PUD REDLINE DRAFT be no closer than fifty feet (50') from the exterior boundary of the PUD with the following exceptions: 1) the minimum setbacks along Myrtle Street shall be ten feet (10') for any projects north of Project A-9 and five feet (5') for Project A-9 and south to Church Street; and 2) for Project A-7, the minimum setbacks shall be eighty feet (80') from the northern property line. There shall be no internal setbacks between parcel lines for building, parking, driveways or paved areas. There shall be no setbacks in Zone A for driveways, parking areas, or other paved areas, but during PUD site plan review, the City Planning Board may require special mitigating measures than otherwise possible to the maximum extent practicable (fencing, landscaping, etc.) to provide adequate buffers for neighboring properties. ZONES B C D & E For Zones B, C, D & E, a thirty foot (30') wide (minimum) planted buffer strip shall be maintained or installed along the PUD exterior boundary lines, except as follows: (1) a forty foot (40') and a fifty foot (50') wide (minimum) planted buffer strip as shown on the PUD Sketch Plan shall be maintained or installed along the northern boundary line on Zone C; (2) a ten foot (10') wide (minimum) planted buffer strip shall be maintained along the southern and western boundary lines of Zone E to within 140' of Myrtle Street as shown on the PUD Sketch Plan. No buffer will be required within the remaining 140' southern boundary of Zone E as shown on the PUD Sketch Plan; and (3) Green space buffer is four feet (4') on Myrtle Street Parcels of E — 6. In Zones B, C, D, & E, no structure or parking space will be constructed within the required buffer zone. At least 40% of the installed plant material in the planted buffer strips shall be evergreen. No building in Zones B, C, D & E shall be constructed within forty feet (40') of another building unless the two buildings are connected with an enclosed hallway meeting all local and state building codes. No building in Zones B, C, D & E shall be constructed within thirty feet (30') of the PUD property line or within fifty feet (50') of the Myrtle Street property line. In Zone E-6, no parking space shall be constructed within 5 feet of the boundary lines. XV. SIGNAGE All signs currently located on the Hospital campus are part of an approved signage plan implemented in 2003 and subsequently updated. The approved signage plan categorized the signs into the categories set forth below, and approved the below sign types with the dimensions and other restrictions included herein. The below types of signs currently exist on the hospital campus and have received approval by the Saratoga Springs Zoning Board of Appeals and the Design Review Commission. The Hospital may add or replace signage within the PUD consistent with the guidelines contained in this section, providing the new signs do not exceed the existing specifications, including height and dimensions, for each sign type, as set forth more fully below, and subject to 12 S/2024 Mangan St�FUD Legislatian c3can v 10 10.1,13 Update 2024 Tracked changes PUD REDLINE DRAFT the regulations set forth in this provision. Signs shall be erected and constructed with the purpose of safe and efficient flow of traffic in and through the site. All signs shall be compatible within the context of its visual and physical environment. Sign type Maximum size and height ED.1 Large two-sided campus entrance 66.5 sf identification sign 12 feet height No more than 2 signs ED.2 Medium size vehicular directional 42" X 49" or 14.29 sf sign 6 feet height Signage type shall be limited to use for emergency entrances to the campus. ED.3 Small vehicular directional sign 42" x 30" or 8.75 sf 6 feet height FID.I Large facade -mounted identification 11' 4" X 240" sign No more than 2 signs per establishment FID.2 Small facade -mounted identification 108" X 52" or 39 sf sign 4.25 feet height Only one sign per facade that has street frontage FID.3 Large building entrance 9' x 20" or 15 sf identification sign No more than one sign per public entrance for significant hospital functions (ie. emergency department, maternity, main entrance, radiation oncology, etc) FIDA Small building entrance 24" X 24" or 4 sf identification sign FID.5 Ambulance/ emergency department 60" x 20" or 8.33 sf entrance identification sign 6 feet height Allowable as needed to identify Ambulance and Emergency entrances to the Emergency Department ID.1 Large two-sided outpatient facility 3' x 3' or 9 sf identification sign 6 feet height No more than one sign per outpatient facility IDA Ground -mounted identification sign 54" x 36" ID.5 Tall, ground -mounted identification 24" x 24" or 4 sf sign 9'6" height 13 S/2024 Vlar an St PI I) Legislation clean v 10 10.1.13 Update 2024 Tracked Changes PUD REDLINE DRAFT Ground mounted donor 147.2 sf identification sign 9'6" height PKG.1 Parking lot identification signs 30" X 36" or 6.25 sf 6 feet height Limited to one per entrance to parking lot. Non- smoking facility designation 10" x 14" signs One sign per bench for all outdoor seating Only ED.1 (large two sided campus entrance identification) and ED.3 (small vehicular directional) signage shall be allowed to be located within 150 feet of the signalized intersection of Myrtle and Church Streets. The following types of signs shall be permitted within 50 feet of a non -signalized intersection: ED.I (large two sided campus entrance identification), ED.2 (medium sized vehicular directional), ED.3 (small vehicular directional), ID. I (large two sided outpatient facility identification sign), and any signage located on the facade of the buildings. Throughout the campus, signs shall be permitted to be located within 50 feet of another sign. Within the limitations set forth above, facade signage may be permitted to occur in excess of one sign per facade. The dimensions shall not exceed the sizes noted above within each category. The location or relocation of wall signage shall be completed in a manner that prevents irreversible damage to the facade substrate. Sign anchors in masonry facades shall be limited to mortar joints. Any areas from which wall signage has been removed or relocated shall be repaired to match surrounding facades. k y c • A, ,. The FID.3 (large building entrance identification sign), ED.I (large two sided campus entrance identification sign) and ED.2 (medium vehicle directional sign) signs are designed for internal illumination using florescent lamps which conform to UL and industry standards. Light is contained within the sign, except where the translucent white acrylic letters or symbols have been inserted into the aluminum face. Neon lighting for a back lit halo effect is used for the FID.1 (large facade mounted identification sign) sign near the hospital entrance. LED lights may replace the neon on future installations. The Hospital shall submit documentation to the Saratoga Springs Office of Planning and Economic Development when additional signage in compliance with the above restrictions is 14 S/2024 Morgan S�1PUI) Leif slarian cIEan v 1.01(�113 U�Ilaxe 2024 Tracked Chances PUD REDLINE DRAFT necessary or required on the PUD campus. The documentation shall include information on the proposed location, style, dimensions and height of the proposed sign. The request may be treated as an administrative action. The Planning Board Chair will consider any applications which raise issues of the location of signage. The Design Review Commission Chair will consider any applications pertaining to percentage of blank space on the signs, lighting of the signs and design. The appropriate Chair will seek guidance and input from the Office of Planning and Economic Development in reviewing any applications submitted by the hospital. The Chair or the Hospital, at their option, shall determine if any individual submission shall be decided by the appropriate city board and shall refer such applications for full board consideration. XVL TIME EXTENSIONS For good cause shown, the Hospital may apply for -one or more extensions of an approved PUD site plan. Applications for such requests shall be made to the Planning Board. XVII. CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS All construction standards for buildings, private and public improvements and for utilities shall be prepared and approved by licensed architects, landscape architects, or engineers. All costs associated with this shall be borne by the developer whether the plans are provided by the City of Saratoga Springs or by the developer. Further, all completed construction shall be certified to the City of Saratoga Springs by licensed architects, landscape architects, or engineers as being completed in the manner called for in the plans and shall be certified in accordance therewith. The City may require any or all costs connected with this to be home by the developer. Prior to the construction of any approved Project, a pre -construction conference with the City Engineer and the City Building Department shall be required. At such conference, the City may impose reasonable standards designed to lessen the impact of construction noise, dust and construction vehicle traffic on any adjacent residential area. XVIII. ADDITIONAL FUTURE PROJECTS Although the development of the proposed PUD has been set forth in its entirety and this Ordinance rezones the entire 28.69± acres as a Planned Unit Development, it grants only the actual development of Projects within the PUD area. The remaining undeveloped land will remain as green space until such time as the Hospital and Planning Board of the City of Saratoga Springs agree upon the impact, if any, upon the infrastructure of the City, the meeting of those needs, and the specific development uses. XIX. OWNERSHIP Saratoga Hospital intends to own and/or control, as well as maintain and operate, the roadways and land within its PUD. In the event that ownership of the area wholly encompassed by the Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD is transferred or conveyed to any third person, firm, corporation, partnership or other entity by the applicant herein, the City of Saratoga Springs reserves the right to require proof of financial responsibility of the transferee in accordance with the same procedures set forth in Section 240-3.7 of the Zoning Ordinance of the 15 5/2024 Morgan St/PUD Legislation clean v 10101.13 Update 2024 Tracked han es PUD REDLINE DRAFT July 1 2024 City of Saratoga Springs. XX. MAP A mylar of the final approved sketch plan shall be filed with the City Planning Board and the City Clerk. A copy shall be filed with the City Building Inspector. 0114 WALVA 1010111305 1010 Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD shall be developed in compliance with the final approved sketch plan. Any amendments thereto will be made pursuant to the Q+y--of-Saratoga Springs Zo�Unified_Development Ordinance. RVIURV.-Wrilm If any provision of this Ordinance shall be held invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance shall not be affected thereby. K"11MMU This Ordinance shall take effect one day after approval by the Saratoga Springs City Council and posting and publishing in the official newspaper of the City as required by law. ADOPTED: September 8,1987 AMENDED: April 19,1993 AMENDED: January 21,1997 AMENDED: October 21, 2003 AMENDED: April 7,2009 AMENDED: March 1, 2011 AMENDED: October 1, 2013 millammulp APPENDIX 46A99 Amendments to Zone A, Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD THE SARATOGA HOSPITAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 16 S/2024 Morgan SUPUD Legislation clean v 10 19.1.13 �Udat�e-1024TrjgkedChan�,es PUD REDLINE DRAFT PARCELI: All that certain tract, piece or parcel of land situate in the City of Saratoga Springs, County of Saratoga, State of New York, lying Northerly of Church Street (New York State Route 9N) and Easterly of Myrtle Street, and being more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at the point of intersection of the Northeasterly street boundary of Church Street (New York State Route 9N) as described in Document No. 2009019933 with the Easterly street boundary of Myrtle Street; thence from said point of beginning along said Easterly street boundary of said Myrtle Street the following two (2) courses: 1) North 03 deg. 50 min. 09 sec. West 538.98 feet to a point; and 2) North 03 deg. 58 min. 54 sec. West 147.84 feet to its point of intersection with the common division line between the lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital as described in Book 1525 of Deeds at Page 675, Book 991 of Deeds at Page 152, Book 990 of Deeds at Page 792 and Book 1651 of Deeds at Page 293 on the South and the lands now or formerly of Mary Grygiel as described in Book 1099 of Deeds at Page 3, lands now or formerly of Larry D. Fox and Linda C. Fox as described in Book 1336 of Deeds at Page 220, lands now or formerly of Ronald G. Conlee and Diane M. Coulee as described in Book 1054 of Deeds at Page 537, lands now or formerly of Alice A. Smith as described in Book 1373 of Deeds at Page 745, lands now or formerly of Margaret A. MacFarland as described in Book 1097 of Deeds at Page 471, lands now or formerly of Raymond C. Yager and Terry A. Yager as described in Book 866 of Deeds at Page 364, lands now or formerly of Laurence Aryeh Alpern and Anna Alpern as described in Book 1241 of Deeds at Page 750 and lands now or formerly of Irving L. Metzger and Marcia P. Metzger d.b.a. Metzger and Sons as described in Book 1052 of Deeds at Page 872 Deed Parcel No. 6 on the North; thence along said common division line North 86 deg. 15 min. 24 sec. East 550.31 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands of The Saratoga Hospital on the West and the said lands of Irving L. Metzger and Marcia P. Metzger d.b.a. Metzger and Sons as described in Book 1052 of Deeds at Page 872, Deed Parcel No. 6 and No. 10 on the East; thence along said division line South 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. East 203.47 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands of The Saratoga Hospital as described in Book 1651 of Deeds at Page 293 on the South and the said lands of Irving L. Metzger and Marcia P. Metzger d.b.a. Metzger and Sons Deed Parcel No. 10 on the North; thence along said division line North 85 deg. 26 min. 15 sec. East 166.00 feet to its point of intersection with the Westerly boundary of a 20- foot-wide alley (a.k.a. Medical Arts Lane), said point also being the Northwesterly terminus of said alley; thence along said Westerly boundary South 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. East 350.00 feet to its point of intersection with the Northerly boundary of a 15-foot-wide alley (a.k.a. Corey Lane), said point also being the Southwesterly terminus of said 20-foot-wide alley (a.k.a. Medical Arts Lane); thence along the Northerly boundary of said 15-foot-wide alley (a.k.a. Corey Lane) South 85 deg. 26 min. 15 sec. West 166.00 feet to the Northwesterly terminus of said 15-foot-wide alley (a.k.a. Corey Lane) and marking the former Easterly boundary of North Van Rensselaer Street as conveyed to The Saratoga Hospital in Book 1668 of Deeds at Page 317; thence along the Westerly terminus of said 15-foot-wide alley (a.k.a. Corey Lane) and said former Easterly boundary of North Van Rensselaer Street, South 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. East 15.00 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital as described in Book 1668 of Deeds at Page 317 former Van Rensselaer Street on the West and the lands now or formerly of J. J. Byrne as described in Book 887 of Deeds at Page 1.1 on the East; thence along said division line South 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. East 164.28 feet to its point intersection with the 17 5/2024 Morgan SUPUD Legislation clean v 1010.1,13 Ur)date 2024 Tracked Chafes PUD REDLINE DRAFT Northerly street boundary of Church Street (New York State Route 9N); thence along said Northerly street boundary the following two (2) courses: 1) South 84 deg. 27 min. 34 sec. West 53.49 feet to a point; and 2) South 89 deg. 29 min. 56 sec. West 319.29 feet to its point of intersection of the Northerly street boundary of Church Street (New York State Route 9N) as described in Document No. 2009019933; thence along said Northerly and Northeasterly street boundary the following two (2) courses: 1) North 89 deg. 14 min. 23 sec. West 156.10 feet to a point; and 2) North 58 deg. 55 min. 08 sec. West 30.26 feet to the point or place of beginning, containing 10.453± acres of land. Subject to an area granted by easement for parking as described in Book 1682 of Deeds at Page 570 and being more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the division line between the said lands of The Saratoga Hospital as described in Book 1668 of Deeds at Page 317 former bed of North Van Rensselaer Street on the West and lands now or formerly of J.J. Byrne as described in Book 887 of Deeds at Page 11 on the East, said point being situate North 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. West along said division line 39.32 feet from its intersection with the Northerly street boundary of Church Street (New York State Route 9N); thence from said point of beginning through the said lands of The Saratoga Hospital the following twelve (12) courses: 1) South 85 deg. 57 min. 12 sec. West 9.47 feet to a point; 2) South 03 deg. 38 in. 27 sec. East 13.63 feet to a point; 3) South 85 deg. 57 min. 15 sec. West 2791 feet to a point; 4) North 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. West 52.94 feet to a point; 5) South 84 deg. 18min. 53 sec. West 15.60 feet to a point; 6) North 03 deg. 45 min. 12 sec. West 32.52 feet to a point; 7) North 86 deg. 01 min. 11 sec. East 15.43 feet to a point; 8) North 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. West 46.29 feet to a point of curvature; 9) Northeasterly along a curve to the right having a radius of 14.00 feet, an arc length of 21.99 feet and a chord bearing of North 40 deg. 57 min. 15 sec. East 19.80 feet to a point of tangency; 10) North 85 deg. 57 min. 15 sec. East 17.36 feet to a point; 11) South 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. East 9.11 feet to a point; and 12) North 85 deg. 57 min. 15 sec. East 6.12 feet to a point on the above first mentioned division line; thence along said above first mentioned division line South 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. East 122.54 feet to the point or place of beginning. Intending to describe an irregular shaped parcel to be granted by easement for parking. Subject to any easements, covenants or restrictions of record. 18 5/2024 Morgan SUPUD Legislation clean v 10 10.1,13 Update 2024 Tracked Changes PUD REDLINE DRAFT APPENDIX "B" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF ENTIRE AMENDED PUD AREA ZONE A All that certain tract, piece or parcel of land situate in the City of Saratoga Springs, County of Saratoga, State of New York, lying Northerly of Church Street (New York State Route 9N) and Easterly of Myrtle Street, and being more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at the point of intersection of the Northeasterly street boundary of Church Street (New York State Route 9N) as described in Document No. 2009019933 with the Easterly street boundary of Myrtle Street; thence from said point of beginning along said Easterly street boundary of said Myrtle Street the following two (2) courses: 1) North 03 deg. 50 min. 09 sec. West 538.98 feet to a point; and 2) North 03 deg. 58 min. 54 sec. West 147.84 feet to its point of intersection with the common division line between the lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital as described in Book 1525 of Deeds at Page 675, Book 991 of Deeds at Page 152, Book 990 of Deeds at Page 792 and Book 1651 of Deeds at Page 293 on the South and the lands now or formerly of Mary Grygiel as described in Book 1099 of Deeds at Page 3, lands now or formerly of Larry D. Fox and Linda C. Fox as described in Book 1336 of Deeds at Page 220, lands now or formerly of Ronald G. Conlee and Diane M. Coulee as described in Book 1054 of Deeds at Page 537, lands now or formerly of Alice A. Smith as described in Book 1373 of Deeds at Page 745, lands now or formerly of Margaret A. MacFarland as described in Book 1097 of Deeds at Page 471, lands now or formerly of Raymond C. Yager and Terry A. Yager as described in Book 866 of Deeds at Page 364, lands now or formerly of Laurence Aryeh Alpern and Anna Alpern as described in Book 1241 of Deeds at Page 750 and lands now or formerly of Irving L. Metzger and Marcia P. Metzger d.b.a. Metzger and Sons as described in Book 1052 of Deeds at Page 872 Deed Parcel No. 6 on the North; thence along said common division line North 86 deg. 15 min. 24 sec. East 550.31 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands of The Saratoga Hospital on the West and the said lands of Irving L. Metzger and Marcia P. Metzger d.b.a. Metzger and Sons as described in Book 1052 of Deeds at Page 872, Deed Parcel No. 6 and No. 10 on the East; thence along said division line South 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. East 203.47 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands of The Saratoga Hospital as described in Book 1651 of Deeds at Page 293 on the South and the said lands of Irving L. Metzger and Marcia P. Metzger d.b.a. Metzger and Sons Deed Parcel No. 10 on the North; thence along said division line North 85 deg. 26 min. 15 sec. East 166.00 feet to its point of intersection with the Westerly boundary of a 20- foot-wide alley (a.k.a. Medical Arts Lane), said point also being the Northwesterly terminus of said alley; thence along said Westerly boundary South 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. East 350.00 feet to its point of intersection with the Northerly boundary of a 15-foot-wide alley (a.k.a. Corey Lane), said point also being the Southwesterly terminus of said 20-foot-wide alley (a.k.a. Medical Arts Lane); thence along the Northerly boundary of said 15-foot-wide alley (a.k.a. Corey Lane) South 85 deg. 26 min. 15 sec. West 166.00 feet to the Northwesterly terminus of said 15-foot-wide alley (a.k.a. Corey Lane) and marking the former Easterly boundary of North Van Rensselaer Street as conveyed to The Saratoga Hospital in Book 1668 of Deeds at Page 317; thence along the Westerly terminus of said 15-foot-wide alley (a.k.a. Corey Lane) and said former Easterly boundary of North Van. Rensselaer Street, South 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. East 15.00 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital as described in Book 1668 of Deeds at Page 317 former Van Rensselaer Street on the West and the lands now or formerly of J. J. Byrne as described in Book 887 of Deeds at Page 11 on the East; thence along said division line South 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. East 164.28 feet to its point intersection with the Northerly street 19 S/2024 Moran St/PUD Legislation clean v 10 10.113 Update 2024 Tracl ed hanees PUD REDLINE DRAFT boundary of Church Street (New York State Route 9N); thence along said Northerly street boundary the following two (2) courses: 1) South 84 deg. 27 min. 34 sec. West 53.49 feet to a point; and 2) South 89 deg. 29 min. 56 sec. West 319.29 feet to its point of intersection of the Northerly street boundary of Church Street (New York State Route 9N) as described in Document No. 2009019933; thence along said Northerly and Northeasterly street boundary the following two (2) courses: 1) North 89 deg. 14 min. 23 sec. West 156.10 feet to a point; and 2) North 58 deg. 55 min. 08 sec. West 30.26 feet to the point or place of beginning, containing 10.453± acres of land. Subject to an area granted by easement for parking as described in Book 1682 of Deeds at Page 570 and being more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the division line between the said lands of The Saratoga Hospital as described in Book 1668 of Deeds at Page 317 former bed of North Van Rensselaer Street on the West and lands now or formerly of J.J. Byrne as described in Book 887 of Deeds at Page 1 I on the East, said point being situate North 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. West along said division line 39.32 feet from its intersection with the Northerly street boundary of Church Street (New York State Route 9N); thence from said point of beginning through the said lands of The Saratoga Hospital the following twelve (12) courses: 1) South 85 deg. 57 min. 12 sec. West 9.47 feet to a point; 2) South 03 deg. 38 in. 27 sec. East 13.63 feet to a point; 3) South 85 deg. 57 min. 15 sec. West 27.91 feet to a point; 4) North 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. West 52.94 feet to a point; 5) South 84 deg. 18min. 53 sec. West 15.60 feet to a point; 6) North 03 deg. 45 min. 12 sec. West 32.52 feet to a point; 7) North 86 deg. 01 min. 11 sec. East 15.43 feet to a point; 8) North 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. West 46.29 feet to a point of curvature; 9) Northeasterly along a curve to the right having a radius of 14.00 feet, an arc length of 21.99 feet and a chord bearing of North 40 deg. 57 min. 15 sec. East 19.80 feet to a point of tangency; 10) North 85 deg. 57 min. 15 sec. East 17.36 feet to a point; 11) South 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. East 9.11 feet to a point; and 12) North 85 deg. 57 min. 15 sec. East 6.12 feet to a point on the above first mentioned division line; thence along said above first mentioned division line South 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. East 122.54 feet to the point or place of beginning. Intending to describe an irregular shaped parcel to be granted by easement for parking. Subject to any easements, covenants or restrictions of record. Kto] LN10u.M-N 1my0 All that certain tract, piece or parcel of land situate in the City of Saratoga Springs, County of Saratoga, State of New York, lying West of Myrtle Street and North of Church Street, and being more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at the point of intersection of the division line between the lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital, Inc. as described in Book 1.454 of Deeds at Page 41 on the South and the lands now or formerly of Gary P. Dicresce and Nancy L. Dicresce as described in Book 1235 of Deeds at Page 68 on the North with the Westerly street boundary of Myrtle Street and runs thence from said point of beginning along said Westerly street boundary the following six (6) courses: 1) South 04 deg. 12 min. 45 sec. East 223.95 feet to a point; 2) South 04 deg. 08 min. 15 sec. East 490.70 feet to a point; 3) South 03 deg. 25 min. 45 sec. East 50.01 feet to a point; 4) South 04 deg. 30 min. 11 sec. East 19.99 feet to a point; 5) South 04 deg. 42 min. 38 sec. East 29.69 feet to a point; and 6) South 03 deg. 50 min. 09 sec. East 213.10 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital as described in Instrument No. 2009023919 on the North and the lands now or formerly of Ronald A. Loffredo as 20 S/2024 Moran St/PUD Legislation clean v 10 10.1.13 Update 2024 Tracked Changes PUD REDLINE DRAFT described in Book 1083 of Deeds at Page 520 on the South; thence along said division line South 85 deg. 34 min. 34 sec. West 99.32 feet to its point of intersection with the common division line between the lands now or formerly of Saratoga Golf & Polo Club, Inc. as described in Book 831 of Deeds at Page 10 to be conveyed to The Saratoga Hospital on the West and the said lands now or formerly of Ronald A. Loffredo as described in Book 1083 of Deeds at Page 520 and other lands now or formerly of Ronald A. Loffredo as described in Book 1174 of Deeds at Page 80 on the East; thence along said common division line South 04 deg. 25 min. 26 sec. East 230.03 feet to its point of intersection with the Northerly street boundary of Church Street; thence along said Northerly street boundary the following two (2) courses: 1) North 86 deg. 18 min. 19 sec. West 7.26 feet to a point; and 2) North 84 deg. 37 min. 10 sec. West 43.83 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands to be conveyed to The Saratoga Hospital on the East and remaining lands now or formerly of Saratoga Golf & Polo Club, Inc. as described in Book 831 of Deeds at Page 10 on the West; thence along said division line North 04 deg. 25 min. 26 sec. West 464.33 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital, Inc. as described in Book 1454 of Deeds at Page 41 on the East and the said lands now or formerly of Saratoga Golf & Polo Club, Inc. on the West; thence along the said division line North 04 deg. 56 min. 05 sec. West 70.00 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital, Inc. on the North and the said lands now or formerly of Saratoga Golf & Polo Club, Inc. on the South; thence along said division line South 85 deg. 34 min. 45 sec. West 529.19 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital, Inc. on the East and the said lands now or formerly of Saratoga Golf & Polo Club, Inc. on the West; thence along said division line North 03 deg. 50 min. 15 sec. West 10.00 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital, Inc. on the North and the said lands now or formerly of Saratoga Golf & Polo Club, Inc. on the South; thence along said division line South 85 deg. 34 min. 45 sec. West 215.95 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital, Inc. on the Northeast and the said lands now or formerly of Saratoga Golf & Polo Club, Inc. on the Southwest; thence along said division line North 49 deg. 39 min. 29 sec. West 42.60 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital, Inc. on the East and the said lands now or formerly of Saratoga Golf & Polo Club, Inc. on the West; thence along said division line North 04 deg. 53 min. 43 sec. West 230.65 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital, Inc. on the South and the lands to be conveyed by The Saratoga Hospital, Inc. to Saratoga Golf & Polo Club, Inc. on the North; thence along said division line North 71 deg. 36 min. 56 sec. East 26.67 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital, Inc. on the Southeast and the said lands to be conveyed to Saratoga Golf & Polo Club, Inc. on the Northwest; thence along said division line North 33 deg. 09 min. 50 sec. East 112.67 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital, Inc. on the East and the said lands to be conveyed to Saratoga Golf & Polo Club, Inc. on the West; thence along said division line North 15 deg. 57 min. 55 sec. East 249.24 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital, Inc. on the Northeast and the said lands to be conveyed to Saratoga Golf & Polo Club, Inc. on the Southwest; thence along said division line North 48 deg. 47 min. 47 sec. West 167.86 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital, Inc. on the Southeast and other lands now or formerly of Saratoga Golf & Polo Club; Inc. on the Northwest; thence along said division line North 32 deg. 06 min. 27 sec. East 350.00 feet to its point of intersection with the above first mentioned 21 S12024 Moran SUPUD Legislation clean v 10 It).1.13 Update 2024 Tracked Changes PUD REDLINE DRAFT JqjI 1j 2024 division line; thence along said above first mentioned division line South 70 deg. 59 min. 24 sec. East 720.70 feet to the point or place of beginning and containing 18.24 acres of land, more or less. 22 S/2024-Mor,an St/PUD Legislation clean y 10 S PUD REDLINE DRAFT Julv 1, 2024 APPENDIX "C" SKETCH PLAN (On File in the City Planning Board Office) ADOPTED: September 8,1987 AMENDED: April 19,1993 AMENDED: January 21,1997 AMENDED: October 21, 2003 AMENDED: April 7,2009 AMENDED: March 1, 2011 AMENDED: March 25,2013 mss� 23 S/2024 Mom an St/PUD Legislation clean v 10 10. 1. 13 Update 2024 Tracked Chances — CHAPTER 241.3 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO BE KNOWN AS "SARATOGA HOSPITAL MEDICAL/PROFESSIONAL PUD" BE IT ORDAINED, by the City Council of the City of Saratoga Springs, New York, following a public hearing, as follows: This Ordinance shall be known as SARATOGA HOSPITAL MEDICAL/ PROFESSIONAL PUD and amends the Unified Development Ordinance (formerly Chapter 241.3 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga Springs, New York). IL AMENDMENT The City Council of the City of Saratoga Springs, on September 8, 1987, adopted the ordinance creating The Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional Planned Unit Development District. That Planned Unit Development legislation was amended by the Saratoga Springs City Council on April 19, 1993, on January 21, 1997, on October 21, 2003, on April 7, 2009, on March 1, 2011, and on October 1, 2013. The purpose of this legislation is to further amend the uses of the original Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional Planned Unit Development District legislation, so as to meet the needs of the institution and the community it serves. This Ordinance amends the City of Saratoga Springs Zoning Map by rezoning the properties described in Appendix "A" and shown on a map attached hereto and made a part hereof and entitled Sketch Plan for Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD, prepared by C.T. Male and dated May 23, 2003, revised January 26, 2009, October 27, 2009, January 10, 2011, March 25, 2013 and from their current zoning designation of "Office/Medical Business District" to "Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional Planned Unit Development District." This Ordinance also amends the Unified Development Ordinance (formerly Chapter 241.3 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga Springs, New York) by identifying certain uses which may be established within the amended boundary of the Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD and describing the review processes necessary to establish said uses. III. BOUNDARY The total area of the Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD, as amended by this ordinance, will consist of 28. 69 ± acres as bounded and described in Appendix "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof. The area is located on the westerly side of the City of Saratoga Springs, north of Church Street, generally east of West Avenue, west of Seward Street, and S/2024 Morgan St/PUD Legislation clean v 10 10.1.13 Update 2024 Clean Copy generally south of Morgan Street. The tax map references are as follows: 1. Map 165, Block 1, Lot 44 2. Map 165, Block 3, Lot 35 3. Map 165.41, Block 1, Lot 28 The Saratoga Hospital has consolidated its lots identified in the 2011 Ordinance and in Appendix "A" to create fewer individual tax parcels for the lots owned by Saratoga Hospital and contained in this Planned Unit Development. The above tax parcels reflect the campus as it was configured in the 2013 Ordinance. If the planned unit development zoning approval for this site expires or is abandoned, or the PUD boundary is otherwise altered, the City Council shall establish the zoning district that will be assigned to any such impacted parcel at that time I►3=1314Byice a91I11►1 The Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD shall be developed in general compliance with a sketch plan filed in the Offices of the Planning Board of the City of Saratoga Springs, New York, and attached hereto and made a part hereof as Appendix "C". The plan shall be used by the City and the Hospital as a guide for overall development. The sketch plan may be changed, altered or amended, pursuant to Section 13.16 et seq. of the Saratoga Springs Unified Development Ordinance. V. PURPOSE It is the purpose of this Ordinance to provide a means for the development of the Planned Unit Development, as amended by this ordinance, in which certain economics of scale or creative planning concepts may be utilized by the developer without departing from the spirit and intent of the Unified Development Ordinance of the City of Saratoga Springs. It is further the purpose of this Ordinance to promote flexibility in the development and design of Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD that will result in the more efficient use of land, promote good site design and visual quality, and result in a more pleasing environment than otherwise possible to the maximum extent practicable. VI. USES AND CHARACTERISTICS There may be contained within the boundaries of Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional. PUD, City of Saratoga Springs, buildings for medical, hospital, clinical, diagnostic, daycarel and treatment uses, all of the aforesaid construed in their broadest terms, as well as professional uses and associated support services and customary accessory uses for all of the foregoing. The PUD t Must be located within either existing buildings or the to -be -constructed buildings within the campus. 2 S/2024 Morgan St/PUD Legislation clean v 10 10.1.13 Update 2024 Clean Copy shall be divided into zones A, B, C, D, and E as depicted on the sketch plan attached hereto as Appendix "C." Within each zone, certain projects described in Article IX of this Ordinance may be constructed consistent with the requirements herein. The area of Zone A, as amended by this ordinance, consists of 10.45+/- acres. The existing Hospital building in Zone A (including its adjoining structures) is commonly known as 211 Church Street. The existing Hospital building presently covers an area of 148,648± square feet. The principal building has five above grade levels, with a total square footage of 579,935±. Future Hospital building coverage within Zone A may increase the lot coverage by a net of 1,352± square feet to a maximum permitted lot coverage of 150,000 square feet. In addition to the above, the Hospital building may be increased to a total of five above ground levels, not exceeding a height of seventy feet (70'). Within Zone A, principal uses shall be for acute medical/surgical services and related support (non -clinical) systems. These generally may include medicine, diagnostic and treatment, surgery, emergency medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics/gynecology, psychiatry, clinical ancillary, radiation therapy, long term & elder care, daycare, business, medical and professional office use, on call physicians' respite area, along with administrative, material support systems and parking for these uses, together with such other and further usual and customary uses of hospitals. Primary health services may consist generally of in -patient (admission more than twenty- four hours), out -patient (admission for less than twenty-four hours) and an internal support system (administrative services, etc.) necessary for the delivery of acute/medical surgical care. Hospital (a) Maximum number of buildings 1 (b) Maximum building coverage 150,000 sf (c) Maximum building levels 5 (above ground) (d) Maximum building height 70 (e) Total building square footage 579,935± sf B. ZONE B Zone B consists of 3.57 ± acres. Within Zone B uses shall be for primary medical care and ancillary clinical functions, including laboratory, radiology, ultrasound, specialists, care coordinators, social workers, S/2024 Morgan St/PUD Legislation clean v 10 10.1.13 Update 2024 Clean Copy pharmacists, and dieticians, as well as other like services necessary or desirable to support such care, administrative support services for any or all of the foregoing, and parking. The medical office building or buildings in Zone B shall not exceed 60,000 square feet with a maximum building height of 50 feet. All structures in Zone B shall be subject to final site plan approval in accordance with the applicable provisions of (i) this Ordinance and (ii) the Unified Development Ordinance. C. ZONE C Zone C consists of 4.86± acres. Within Zone C Medical, and Professional and Hospital Offices for primary medical care, and ancillary clinical functions, including a chronic kidney dialysis center and kidney care center, including laboratory, radiology, ultrasound and other like services necessary to support such care, offices for hospital related functions such as finance, patient accounts, human resources, and family health administration and parking may be permitted. Zone C shall be used, if necessary, for storm water management from Zone B, D and E. Zone E shall be used for any necessary additional parking demands. The kidney dialysis center shall not exceed 10,000 square feet of gross space. Total building coverage is not to exceed 30,000 square feet. All uses in Zone C shall be subject to final site plan approval in accordance with Article VIII of this Ordinance. (a) Maximum number of buildings (b) Maximum building coverage (c) Maximum building height (d) Total building square footage fl�/C�l►`I � 17 Zone D consists of 0.57± acres. Hospital 3 30,000 sf 3 stories or 45 feet 50,000 sf Hospital Accessory Support areas may be established in Zone D. It is anticipated that this zone will be used to complement and support the activities undertaken in Zone A; it may also be used for management of storm water received from Zone B, C, and E. This zone will remain as green space until a further amendment to this Ordinance. This area shall be reserved for further development. 4 S/2024 Morgan St/PUD Legislation clean v 10 10.1.13 Update 2024 Clean Copy All uses in Zone E shall be subject to final site plan approval in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. E. ZONE E Zone E consists of 9.24± acres. Zone E may support accessory parking for staff associated with activities in Zone A, B, and D. Supplemental parking is provided in Zone E. Parking structures are also permitted throughout Zone E. Wholly contained landscaped islands will be provided at the ratio of one planting area per each fifteen vehicles. Planting areas shall be at least 162 square feet or 9 x 18 feet. Planting areas may be located together to increase parking and maintenance efficiencies. All uses in Zone E shall be subject to final site plan approval in accordance with Article VIII of this Ordinance. Zone E contains a heliport. 1i/1=7=14VI i1 The overall density of the Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD shall not exceed the thresholds defined below. Total PUD Area = A= 28.69 acres Total Building Coverage Impervious Area Total greenspace Total Building Square Footage % of PUD occupied 1,249,736 sf 100% 192,826 sf 15% 575,125 sf 46% 481,785 sf 39% 689,935 sf 55% h/11Ma gel $]In*1►11MkINILYglatamalyImejME$]0:1111n 711"N[!lwoo no1i11T.y Prior to the issuance of a building permit to develop any or all of the area within Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD, the applicant shall receive final site plan approval from the City of Saratoga Springs Planning Board. The final site plan shall show the area of the Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD proposed for development and its relationship to existing development and vacant areas within Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD. The final site plan shall also conform to the applicable provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. S/2024 Morgan St/PUD Legislation clean v 10 10.1.13 Update 2024 Clean Copy IX. PROJECTS Following the effective date of this Ordinance, projects as described below may be developed within the Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD. Certain projects identified in this Article have been completed prior to the adoption of this amendment and are so identified. The projects listed below may progress in any order. In addition, projects may be undertaken or completed in more than one stage. A. Projects, Zone A Project A-1: Hospital Complex: Completed. Project A-2 - Parking Expansion: Completed. Project A 3 - Ambulatory Care Facility Expansion: Completed. Project A-4 Future Expansions: Project abandoned. Project A-5: Radiation Oncology Center, Cafeteria, Parking Relocations and Expansion and Driveway Alterations: Completed, except 2nd floor addition on Radiation Oncology Center and additional radiation vault. Radiation Oncology Center Expansion shall not exceed 9,000 sf of additional building coverage. The structure itself may have one or two levels, but it is currently contemplated that the Radiation Oncology Center will occupy only the lower portion of the new building. The upper level, if any, will be utilized for any authorized use in Zone A. Project A-6: Central Plant Expansion: Completed. Project A-7: Patient Care Addition: Phase I completed. Patient Care Addition shall consist of below grade logistical support services, on -grade Emergency Department and critical care beds, and patient care rooms. It will not exceed 30,000 sf of additional building coverage. The structure itself shall have a maximum of five above grade levels, which may be constructed in phases, and 181,500 sf additional building square footage. Project A-8: Physician Respite Area: Project Removed from PUD. Project A-9: Surgical Suite Addition: Completed.. B. Projects, Zone B Project B: Medical Office Building not exceeding 60,000 sf of medical office space with a building height not exceeding 50 feet measured pursuant to the UDO Section 21.4(D). C. Projects, Zone C Project C-1: Existing Hortense and Louis Rubin Dialysis Center: Completed. 6 S/2024 Morgan St/PUD Legislation clean v 10 10.1.13 Update 2024 Clean Copy Project C-2: Medical Professional Offices: Completed. D. Projects, Zone D Project D-1: Hospital Accessory Support Reserve Area: Completed. No projects are planned for Zone D at the time of this amendment. E. Projects, Zone E Project E-1: Parking Expansion: Completed. Project E-2: Parking Expansion: Completed. Project E-4: Heliport: Completed. Project E-5: Parking Expansion: Completed. Project E-6: Parking Expansion: Completed. Parking structures are permitted throughout Zone E. F. PUD Site Plan Applications PUD Site Plan Applications for any of the Projects or uses identified in this Planned Unit Development may be made at any time to the Saratoga Springs Planning Board. X. PARKING Parking demand for the entire PUD is to be met through the provision of a large group parking lot in Zone E, a newly reconfigured parking area on Myrtle Street in Zone E, smaller parking areas associated with each of the buildings in the respective zones, and parking structures to be constructed in Zone E. During construction of specific projects in Zones A, B and C, the parking areas in Zones E, may be altered or improved upon. The minimum number of parking spaces shall be provided as shown in the following schedule: Zone A. I space/2 in -patient acute beds I space/5 in -patient skilled nursing beds 7 S/2024 Morgan St/PUD Legislation clean v 10 10. 1. 13 Update 2024 Clean Copy I space/300 sf of out -patient service 1 space/300 sf of internal support Zone B. 1 space/300 sf of gross floor space for medical office buildings with 75% of parking spaces to be sited within Zone B and the remaining 25% of parking spaces to be within the remainder of the campus Zone C. 16 spaces for the 10,000 sf kidney dialysis center 1 space/300 sf of gross floor space for medical office buildings Zone D. Green space until a further amendment. Zone E. No parking demand required for heliport. The interior open space is primarily designed for the required parking. All of the buildings will be designed to ensure that the front entrance will be oriented toward the center. All new or revised parking created as a demand of this PUD shall contain landscaping areas at a ratio of one 9' x 18' space/15 spaces for vehicles. This landscaping requirement shall not apply to parking associated with the construction of new parking structures constructed within Zone E. XI. AMENDMENTS TO THIS ORDINANCE Amendments may be made to this Ordinance by the City of Saratoga Springs City Council. XII. INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS The entire project as set forth herein will be serviced by City water and sanitary sewer lines. These lines will be constructed to City standards, but will not be conveyed to the City of Saratoga Springs. The water and sewer lines will be maintained by the Hospital. Storm water disposal areas shall be constructed and maintained by the Hospital. The roadways and thoroughfares through the project will be private drives maintained by the Hospital. Upon request, the City of Saratoga Springs shall be granted appropriately sized easements for the construction and maintenance of water, sanitary sewer or storm water sewer lines through Zone A of the PUD site. S/2024 Morgan St/PUD Legislation clean v 10 10.1.13 Update 2024 Clean Copy The City, upon request, may take over ownership, control and responsibility for any infrastructure main, pipe, or line presently within or constructed within the PUD site and the City shall further be granted reasonable easements to interconnect with any infrastructure main, line or pipe for which they have taken responsibility. The City is hereby granted the right to enter upon the PUD site for the purpose of making emergency repairs to any privately owned main, pipe or line. The City shall have the right to charge the Hospital or the individual project's sponsor whose pipe or main is repaired for any necessary services. All private water lines connecting into any structure within the PUD site shall be individually metered. XHI.OFF SITE IMPROVEMENTS Project A-1- Hospital Complex: Completed. A-1 was identified in the 1997 Ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. Project A-2 - Parking Expansion: Completed. A-2 was identified in the 1997 Ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. Project A-3 - Ambulatory Care Facility Expansion: Completed. A-3 was identified in the 1997 Ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. Project A-4 - Future Expansion: Project abandoned. A-4 was identified in the 1997 Ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. Project A-5 - Radiation Oncology Center, Cafeteria, Parking Relocations and Expansion and Driveway Alterations: Completed. A-5 was identified in the 2003 Ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. Project A-6 - Central Plant Expansion: None required. Project A-7 - Patient Care Addition: Completed. A-7 was identified in the 2011. Ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. Project A-8 - Physician Respite Area: Project removed from PUD. Proiect A-9 —Surgical Suite Addition: None Project B-1 - Existing Saratoga Care Medical Office Buiiding2: This medical office 2 Projects 13-1 and B-2 shall — upon adoption of this PUD amendment — be combined and known as Project B within Zone B as depicted on the PUD Sketch Plan for the Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD, last revised on June 11, 2024 and herein made a part of this PUD amendment. 9 S/2024 Morgan St/PUD Legislation clean v 10 10.1.13 Update 2024 Clean Copy building will be demolished at a time determined by the Hospital to allow for the construction of the building(s) identified in Project B-2 below. Project B-2 — Construction of Medical Professional Office Building: Within a timeframe developed by the Hospital and following site plan approval by the Planning Board, the Hospital will undertake the construction of one or more new medical office buildings with a total square footage not exceeding 60,000 sf and a maximum building height of 50 feet3. Project C-1- Existing Hortense and Louis Rubin Dialysis Center: Completed. C-1 was identified in the 1997 Ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. Project C-2 - Future Medical Professional Offices: Completed. C-2 was identified in the 2011 Ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. Project D-1 - Hospital Accessory Support Reserved Area: Completed. D-1 was identified in the 1997 Ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. Project E-1 - Parking Expansion: Completed. E-1 was identified in the 1997 Ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. Project E-2 - Parking Expansion: Completed. E-2 was identified in the 1997 Ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. Project E-3 - Storage Building: Project abandoned. E-3 was identified in the 1997 Ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. Project E-4 - Accessory Parking and Heliport: Completed. E-4 was identified in the 1997 Ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. Project E-5 - Parking Expansion: Completed. E-5 was identified in the 2003 ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. Project E-6 - Parking Expansion: Completed. E-6 was identified in the 2011 Ordinance and is included for reference and consistency only. XIV. SETBACKS Any buildings constructed in Zone A on or after the effective date of this Ordinance shall be no closer than fifty feet (50') from the exterior boundary of the PUD with the following exceptions: 1) the minimum setbacks along Myrtle Street shall be ten feet (10') for any projects north of Project A-9 and five feet (5') for Project A-9 and south to Church Street; and 2) for 3 Building height measured pursuant to UDO Section 21.4(D). 10 S/2024 Morgan St/PUD Legislation clean v 10 10.1.13 Update 2024 Clean Copy Project A-7, the minimum setbacks shall be eighty feet (80') from the northern property line. There shall be no internal setbacks between parcel lines for building, parking, driveways or paved areas. There shall be no setbacks in Zone A for driveways, parking areas, or other paved areas, but during PUD site plan review, the City Planning Board may require special mitigating measures than otherwise possible to the maximum extent practicable (fencing, landscaping, etc.) to provide adequate buffers for neighboring properties. ZONES B C D & E For Zones B, C, D & E, a thirty foot (30') wide (minimum) planted buffer strip shall be maintained or installed along the PUD exterior boundary lines, except as follows: (1) a forty foot (40') and a fifty foot (50') wide (minimum) planted buffer strip as shown on the PUD Sketch Plan shall be maintained or installed along the northern boundary line on Zone C; (2) a ten foot (10') wide (minimum) planted buffer strip shall be maintained along the southern and western boundary lines of Zone E to within 140' of Myrtle Street as shown on the PUD Sketch Plan. No buffer will be required within the remaining 140' southern boundary of Zone E as shown on the PUD Sketch Plan; and (3) Green space buffer is four feet (4') on Myrtle Street Parcels of E — 6. In Zones B, C, D, & E, no structure or parking space will be constructed within the required buffer zone. At least 40% of the installed plant material in the planted buffer strips shall be evergreen. No building in Zones B, C, D & E shall be constructed within forty feet (40') of another building unless the two buildings are connected with an enclosed hallway meeting all local and state building codes. No building in Zones B, C, D & E shall be constructed within thirty feet (30') of the PUD property line or within fifty feet (50') of the Myrtle Street property line. In Zone E-6, no parking space shall be constructed within 5 feet of the boundary lines. XV. SIGNAGE All signs currently located on the Hospital campus are part of an approved signage plan implemented in 2003 and subsequently updated. The approved signage plan categorized the signs into the categories set forth below, and approved the below sign types with the dimensions and other restrictions included herein. The below types of signs currently exist on the hospital campus and have received approval by the Saratoga Springs Zoning Board of Appeals and the Design Review Commission. The Hospital may add or replace signage within the PUD consistent with the guidelines contained in this section, providing the new signs do not exceed the existing specifications, including height and dimensions, for each sign type, as set forth more fully below, and subject to the regulations set forth in this provision. Signs shall be erected and constructed with the purpose of safe and efficient flow of traffic in and through the site. All signs shall be compatible within the context of its visual and physical environment. S/2024 Morgan St/PUD Legislation clean v 10 10.1.13 Update 2024 Clean Copy Sign a Maximum size and height ED.1 Large two-sided campus entrance 66.5 sf identification sign 12 feet height No more than 2 signs ED.2 Medium size vehicular directional 42" X 49" or 14.29 sf sign 6 feet height Signage type shall be limited to use for emergency entrances to the campus. ED.3 Small vehicular directional sign 42" x 30" or 8.75 sf 6 feet height FID.1 Large facade -mounted identification 11' 4" X 240" sign No more than 2 signs per establishment FID.2 Small facade -mounted identification 108" X 52" or 39 sf sign 4.25 feet height Only one sign per facade that has street frontage FID.3 Large building entrance 9' x 20" or 15 sf identification sign No more than one sign per public entrance for significant hospital functions (ie. emergency department, maternity, main entrance, radiation oncology, etc) FIDA Small building entrance 24" X 24" or 4 sf identification sign FID.5 Ambulance/ emergency department 60" x 20" or 8.33 sf entrance identification sign 6 feet height Allowable as needed to identify Ambulance and Emergency entrances to the Emergency Department ID. l Large two-sided outpatient facility 3' x 3' or 9 sf identification sign 6 feet height No more than one sign per outpatient facility IDA Ground -mounted identification sign 54" x 36" ID.5 Tall, ground -mounted identification 24" x 24" or 4 sf sign 9'6" height Ground mounted donor 47.2 sf identification sign 9'6" height IN S/2024 Morgan St/PUD Legislation clean v 10 10.1.13 Update 2024 Clean Copy PKG.1 Parking lot identification signs 30" X 36" or 6.25 sf 6 feet height Limited to one per entrance to parking lot. Non- smoking facility designation 10" x 14" signs One sign per bench for all outdoor seating Only ED.1 (large two sided campus entrance identification) and ED.3 (small vehicular directional) signage shall be allowed to be located within 150 feet of the signalized intersection of Myrtle and Church Streets. The following types of signs shall be permitted within 50 feet of a non -signalized intersection: ED.1 (large two sided campus entrance identification), ED.2 (medium sized vehicular directional), ED.3 (small vehicular directional), ID.1 (large two sided outpatient facility identification sign), and any signage located on the facade of the buildings. Throughout the campus, signs shall be permitted to be located within 50 feet of another sign. Within the limitations set forth above, facade signage may be permitted to occur in excess of one sign per facade. The dimensions shall not exceed the sizes noted above within each category. The location or relocation of wall signage shall be completed in a manner that prevents irreversible damage to the facade substrate. Sign anchors in masonry facades shall be limited to mortar joints. Any areas from which wall signage has been removed or relocated shall be repaired to match surrounding facades. The Hospital signage should reflect current Albany Med Health System/Saratoga Hospital brand guidelines and appropriate fonts, colors, and style which will be coordinated by the Albany Med Health System Marketing and Communications Team. The FID.3 (large building entrance identification sign), ED.1 (large two sided campus entrance identification sign) and ED.2 (medium vehicle directional sign) signs are designed for internal illumination using florescent lamps which conform to UL and industry standards. Light is contained within the sign, except where the translucent white acrylic letters or symbols have been inserted into the aluminum face. Neon lighting for a back lit halo effect is used for the FID.1 (large facade mounted identification sign) sign near the hospital entrance. LED lights may replace the neon on future installations. The Hospital shall submit documentation to the Saratoga Springs Office of Planning and Economic Development when additional signage in compliance with the above restrictions is necessary or required on the PUD campus. The documentation shall include information on the proposed location, style, dimensions and height of the proposed sign. The request may be treated as an administrative action. The Planning Board Chair will consider any applications which raise issues of the location of signage. The Design Review Commission Chair will consider any applications pertaining to percentage of blank space on the signs, lighting of the signs and design. The appropriate Chair will seek guidance and input from the Office of Planning and Economic Development in reviewing any applications submitted by the hospital. The Chair or 13 S/2024 Morgan St/PUD Legislation clean v 10 10.1.13 Update 2024 Clean Copy the Hospital, at their option, shall determine if any individual submission shall be decided by the appropriate city board and shall refer such applications for full board consideration. For good cause shown, the Hospital may apply for one or more extensions of an approved PUD site plan. Applications for such requests shall be made to the Planning Board. All construction standards for buildings, private and public improvements and for utilities shall be prepared and approved by licensed architects, landscape architects, or engineers. All costs associated with this shall be borne by the developer whether the plans are provided by the City of Saratoga Springs or by the developer. Further, all completed construction shall be certified to the City of Saratoga Springs by licensed architects, landscape architects, or engineers as being completed in the manner called for in the plans and shall be certified in accordance therewith. The City may require any or all costs connected with this to be borne by the developer. Prior to the construction of any approved Project, a pre -construction conference with the City Engineer and the City Building Department shall be required. At such conference, the City may impose reasonable standards designed to lessen the impact of construction noise, dust and construction vehicle traffic on any adjacent residential area. XVIII. ADDITIONAL FUTURE PROJECTS Although the development of the proposed PUD has been set forth in its entirety and this Ordinance rezones the entire 28.69± acres as a Planned Unit Development, it grants only the actual development of Projects within the PUD area. The remaining undeveloped land will remain as green space until such time as the Hospital and Planning Board of the City of Saratoga Springs agree upon the impact, if any, upon the infrastructure of the City, the meeting of those needs, and the specific development uses. XIX. OWNERSHIP Saratoga Hospital intends to own and/or control, as well as maintain and operate, the roadways and land within its PUD. In the event that ownership of the area wholly encompassed by the Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD is transferred or conveyed to any third person, firm, corporation, partnership or other entity by the applicant herein, the City of Saratoga Springs reserves the right to require proof of financial responsibility of the transferee in accordance with the same procedures set forth in Section 240-3.7 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga Springs. 14 S/2024 Morgan St/PUD Legislation clean v 10 10.1.13 Update 2024 Clean Copy XX. MAP A mylar of the final approved sketch plan shall be filed with the City Planning Board and the City Clerk. A copy shall be filed with the City Building Inspector. XXL AMENDMENTS Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD shall be developed in compliance with the final approved sketch plan. Any amendments thereto will be made pursuant to the Saratoga Springs Unified Development Ordinance. If any provision of this Ordinance shall be held invalid, the reminder of the Ordinance shall not be affected thereby. XXIII. EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall take effect one day after approval by the Saratoga Springs City Council and posting and publishing in the official newspaper of the City as required by law. ADOPTED: September 8, 1987 AMENDED: April 19, 1993 AMENDED: January 21, 1997 AMENDED: October 21, 2003 AMENDED: April 7, 2009 AMENDED: March 1, 2011 AMENDED: October 1, 2013 ITUT" 03 15 S/2024 Morgan St/PUD Legislation clean v 10 10.1.13 Update 2024 Clean Copy APPENDIX "A" Amendments to Zone A, Saratoga Hospital Medical/Professional PUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND MAP OF PARCELS TO BE ADDED TO THE SARATOGA HOSPITAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PARCELI: All that certain tract, piece or parcel of land situate in the City of Saratoga Springs, County of Saratoga, State of New York, lying Northerly of Church Street (New York State Route 9N) and Easterly of Myrtle Street, and being more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at the point of intersection of the Northeasterly street boundary of Church Street (New York State Route 9N) as described in Document No. 2009019933 with the Easterly street boundary of Myrtle Street; thence from said point of beginning along said Easterly street boundary of said Myrtle Street the following two (2) courses: 1) North 03 deg. 50 min. 09 sec. West 538.98 feet to a point; and 2) North 03 deg. 58 min. 54 sec. West 147.84 feet to its point of intersection with the common division line between the lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital as described in Book 1525 of Deeds at Page 675, Book 991 of Deeds at Page 152, Book 990 of Deeds at Page 792 and Book 1651 of Deeds at Page 293 on the South and the lands now or formerly of Mary Grygiel as described in Book 1099 of Deeds at Page 3, lands now or formerly of Larry D. Fox and Linda C. Fox as described in Book 1336 of Deeds at Page 220, lands now or formerly of Ronald G. Coulee and Diane M. Coulee as described in Book 1054 of Deeds at Page 537, lands now or formerly of Alice A. Smith as described in Book 1373 of Deeds at Page 745, lands now or formerly of Margaret A. MacFarland as described in Book 1097 of Deeds at Page 471, lands now or formerly of Raymond C. Yager and Terry A. Yager as described in Book 866 of Deeds at Page 364, lands now or formerly of Laurence Aryeh Alpern and Anna Alpern as described in Book 1241 of Deeds at Page 750 and lands now or formerly of Irving L. Metzger and Marcia P. Metzger d.b.a. Metzger and Sons as described in Book 1052 of Deeds at Page 872 Deed Parcel No. 6 on the North; thence along said common division line North 86 deg. 15 min. 24 sec. East 550.31 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands of The Saratoga Hospital on the West and the said lands of Irving L. Metzger and Marcia P. Metzger d.b.a. Metzger and Sons as described in Book 1052 of Deeds at Page 872, Deed Parcel No. 6 and No. 10 on the East; thence along said division line South 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. East 203.47 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands of The Saratoga Hospital as described in Book 1651 of Deeds at Page 293 on the South and the said lands of Irving L. Metzger and Marcia P. Metzger d.b.a. Metzger and Sons Deed Parcel No. 10 on the North; thence along said division line North 85 deg. 26 min. 15 sec. East 166.00 feet to its point of intersection with the Westerly boundary of a 20- foot-wide alley (a.k.a. Medical Arts Lane), said point also being the Northwesterly terminus of said alley; thence along said Westerly boundary South 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. East 350.00 feet to its point of intersection with the Northerly boundary of a 15-foot-wide alley (a.k.a. Corey Lane), said point also being the Southwesterly terminus of said 20-foot-wide alley (a.k.a. Medical. Arts Lane); thence along the Northerly boundary of said 15-foot-wide alley (a.k.a. Corey Lane) South 85 deg. 16 S/2024 Morgan St/PUD Legislation clean v 10 10.1.13 Update 2024 Clean Copy 26 min. 15 sec. West 166.00 feet to the Northwesterly terminus of said 15-foot-wide alley (a.k.a. Corey Lane) and marking the former Easterly boundary of North Van Rensselaer Street as conveyed to The Saratoga Hospital in Book 1668 of Deeds at Page 317; thence along the Westerly terminus of said 15-foot-wide alley (a.k.a. Corey Lane) and said former Easterly boundary of North Van Rensselaer Street, South 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. East 15.00 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital as described in Book 1668 of Deeds at Page 317 former Van Rensselaer Street on the West and the lands now or formerly of J. J. Byrne as described in Book 887 of Deeds at Page I I on the East; thence along said division line South 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. East 164.28 feet to its point intersection with the Northerly street boundary of Church Street (New York State Route 9N); thence along said Northerly street boundary the following two (2) courses: 1) South 84 deg. 27 min. 34 sec. West 53.49 feet to a point; and 2) South 89 deg. 29 min. 56 sec. West 319.29 feet to its point of intersection of the Northerly street boundary of Church Street (New York State Route 9N) as described in Document No. 2009019933; thence along said Northerly and Northeasterly street boundary the following two (2) courses: 1) North 89 deg. 14 min. 23 sec. West 156.10 feet to a point; and 2) North 58 deg. 55 min. 08 sec. West 30.26 feet to the point or place of beginning, containing 10.453± acres of land. Subject to an area granted by easement for parking as described in Book 1682 of Deeds at Page 570 and being more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the division line between the said lands of The Saratoga Hospital as described in Book 1668 of Deeds at Page 317 former bed of North Van Rensselaer Street on the West and lands now or formerly of J.J. Byrne as described in Book 887 of Deeds at Page 11 on the East, said point being situate North 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. West along said division line 39.32 feet from its intersection with the Northerly street boundary of Church Street (New York State Route 9N); thence from said point of beginning through the said lands of The Saratoga Hospital the following twelve (12) courses: 1) South 85 deg. 57 min. 12 sec. West 9.47 feet to a point; 2) South 03 deg. 38 in. 27 sec. East 13.63 feet to a point; 3) South 85 deg. 57 min. 1.5 sec. West 27.91 feet to a point; 4) North 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. West 52.94 feet to a point; 5) South 84 deg. 18min. 53 sec. West 15.60 feet to a point; 6) North 03 deg. 45 min. 12 sec. West 32.52 feet to a point; 7) North 86 deg. 01 min. 11 sec. East 15.43 feet to a point; 8) North 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. West 46.29 feet to a point of curvature; 9) Northeasterly along a curve to the right having a radius of 14.00 feet, an arc length of 21.99 feet and a chord bearing of North 40 deg. 57 min. 15 sec. East 19.80 feet to a point of tangency; 10) North 85 deg. 57 min. 15 sec. East 17.36 feet to a point; 11) South 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. East 9.11 feet to a point; and 12) North 85 deg. 57 min. 15 sec. East 6.12 feet to a point on the above first mentioned division line; thence along said above first mentioned division line South 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. East 122.54 feet to the point or place of beginning. Intending to describe an irregular shaped parcel to be granted by easement for parking. Subject to any easements, covenants or restrictions of record. 17 S/2024 Morgan St/PUD Legislation clean v 10 10.1.13 Update 2024 Clean Copy APPENDIX "B" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF ENTIRE AMENDED PUD AREA ZONE A All that certain tract, piece or parcel of land situate in the City of Saratoga Springs, County of Saratoga, State of New York, lying Northerly of Church Street (New York State Route 9N) and Easterly of Myrtle Street, and being more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at the point of intersection of the Northeasterly street boundary of Church Street (New York State Route 9N) as described in Document No. 2009019933 with the Easterly street boundary of Myrtle Street; thence from said point of beginning along said Easterly street boundary of said Myrtle Street the following two (2) courses: 1) North 03 deg. 50 min. 09 sec. West 538.98 feet to a point; and 2) North 03 deg. 58 min. 54 sec. West 147.84 feet to its point of intersection with the common division line between the lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital as described in Book 1525 of Deeds at Page 675, Book 991 of Deeds at Page 152, Book 990 of Deeds at Page 792 and Book 1651 of Deeds at Page 293 on the South and the lands now or formerly of Mary Grygiel as described in Book 1099 of Deeds at Page 3, lands now or formerly of Larry D. Fox and Linda C. Fox as described in Book 1336 of Deeds at Page 220, lands now or formerly of Ronald G. Conlee and Diane M. Coulee as described in Book 1054 of Deeds at Page 537, lands now or formerly of Alice A. Smith as described in Book 1373 of Deeds at Page 745, lands now or formerly of Margaret A. MacFarland as described in Book 1097 of Deeds at Page 471, lands now or formerly of Raymond C. Yager and Terry A. Yager as described in Book 866 of Deeds at Page 364, lands now or formerly of Laurence Aryeh Alpern and Anna Alpern as described in Book 1241 of Deeds at Page 750 and lands now or formerly of Irving L. Metzger and Marcia P. Metzger d.b.a. Metzger and Sons as described in Book 1052 of Deeds at Page 872 Deed Parcel No. 6 on the North; thence along said common division line North 86 deg. 15 min. 24 sec. East 550.31 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands of The Saratoga Hospital on the West and the said lands of Irving L. Metzger and Marcia P. Metzger d.b.a. Metzger and Sons as described in Book 1052 of Deeds at Page 872, Deed Parcel No. 6 and No. 10 on the East; thence along said division line South 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. East 203.47 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands of The Saratoga Hospital as described in Book 1651 of Deeds at Page 293 on the South and the said lands of Irving L. Metzger and Marcia P. Metzger d.b.a. Metzger and Sons Deed Parcel No. 10 on the North; thence along said division line North 85 deg. 26 min. 15 sec. East 166.00 feet to its point of intersection with the Westerly boundary of a 20- foot-wide alley (a.k.a. Medical Arts Lane), said point also being the Northwesterly terminus of said alley; thence along said Westerly boundary South 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. East 350.00 feet to its point of intersection with the Northerly boundary of a 15-foot-wide alley (a.k.a. Corey Lane), said point also being the Southwesterly terminus of said 20-foot-wide alley (a.k.a. Medical Arts Lane); thence along the Northerly boundary of said 15-foot-wide alley (a.k.a. Corey Lane) South 85 deg. 26 min. 15 sec. West 166.00 feet to the Northwesterly terminus of said 15-foot-wide alley (a.k.a. Corey Lane) and marking the former Easterly boundary of North Van Rensselaer Street as conveyed to The Saratoga Hospital in Book 1668 of Deeds at Page 317; thence along the Westerly terminus of said 15-foot-wide alley (a.k.a. Corey Lane) and said former Easterly boundary of North Van. Rensselaer Street, South 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. East 15.00 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital as described in Book 1668 of Deeds at Page 317 former Van Rensselaer Street on the West and the lands now or formerly of J. J. Byrne as described in Book 887 of Deeds at Page 11 on the East; thence along said division line South 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. East 164.28 feet to its point intersection with the Northerly street 18 512024 Morgan St1PUD Legislation clean v 10 10.1.13 Update 2024 Clean Copy boundary of Church Street (New York State Route 9N); thence along said Northerly street boundary the following two (2) courses: 1) South 84 deg. 27 min. 34 sec. West 53.49 feet to a point; and 2) South 89 deg. 29 min. 56 sec. West 319.29 feet to its point of intersection of the Northerly street boundary of Church Street (New York State Route 9N) as described in Document No. 2009019933; thence along said Northerly and Northeasterly street boundary the following two (2) courses: 1) North 89 deg. 14 min. 23 sec. West 156.10 feet to a point; and 2) North 58 deg. 55 min. 08 sec. West 30.26 feet to the point or place of beginning, containing 10.453± acres of land. Subject to an area granted by easement for parking as described in Book 1682 of Deeds at Page 570 and being more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the division line between the said lands of The Saratoga Hospital as described in Book 1668 of Deeds at Page 317 former bed of North Van Rensselaer Street on the West and lands now or formerly of J.J. Byrne as described in Book 887 of Deeds at Page I I on the East, said point being situate North 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. West along said division line 39.32 feet from its intersection with the Northerly street boundary of Church Street (New York State Route 9N); thence from said point of beginning through the said lands of The Saratoga Hospital the following twelve (12) courses: 1) South 85 deg. 57 min. 12 sec. West 9.47 feet to a point; 2) South 03 deg. 38 in. 27 sec. East 13.63 feet to a point; 3) South 85 deg. 57 min. 15 sec. West 27.91 feet to a point; 4) North 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. West 52.94 feet to a point; 5) South 84 deg. 18min. 53 sec. West 15.60 feet to a point; 6) North 03 deg. 45 min. 12 sec. West 32.52 feet to a point; 7) North 86 deg. 01 min. 11 sec. East 15.43 feet to a point; 8) North 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. West 46.29 feet to a point of curvature; 9) Northeasterly along a curve to the right having a radius of 14.00 feet, an arc length of 21.99 feet and a chord bearing of North 40 deg. 57 min. 15 sec. East 19.80 feet to a point of tangency; 10) North 85 deg. 57 min. 15 sec. East 17.36 feet to a point; 11) South 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. East 9.11 feet to a point; and 12) North 85 deg. 57 min. 15 sec. East 6.12 feet to a point on the above first mentioned division line; thence along said above first mentioned division line South 04 deg. 02 min. 45 sec. East 122.54 feet to the point or place of beginning. Intending to describe an irregular shaped parcel to be granted by easement for parking. Subject to any easements, covenants or restrictions of record. Kto] LN10g -N 17:y 0 All that certain tract, piece or parcel of land situate in the City of Saratoga Springs, County of Saratoga, State of New York, lying West of Myrtle Street and North of Church Street, and being more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at the point of intersection of the division line between the lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital, Inc. as described in Book 1.454 of Deeds at Page 41 on the South and the lands now or formerly of Gary P. Dicresce and Nancy L. Dicresce as described in Book 1235 of Deeds at Page 68 on the North with the Westerly street boundary of Myrtle Street and runs thence from said point of beginning along said Westerly street boundary the following six (6) courses: 1) South 04 deg. 12 min. 45 sec. East 223.95 feet to a point; 2) South 04 deg. 08 min. 15 sec. East 490.70 feet to a point; 3) South 03 deg. 25 min. 45 sec. East 50.01 feet to a point; 4) South 04 deg. 30 min. 11 sec. East 19.99 feet to a point; 5) South 04 deg. 42 min. 38 sec. East 29.69 feet to a point; and 6) South 03 deg. 50 min. 09 sec. East 213.10 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital as described in Instrument No. 2009023919 on the North and the lands now or formerly of Ronald A. Loffredo as 19 S/2024 Morgan St/PUD Legislation clean v 10 10.1.13 Update 2024 Clean Copy described in Book 1083 of Deeds at Page 520 on the South; thence along said division line South 85 deg. 34 min. 34 sec. West 99.32 feet to its point of intersection with the common division line between the lands now or formerly of Saratoga Golf & Polo Club, Inc. as described in Book 831 of Deeds at Page 10 to be conveyed to The Saratoga Hospital on the West and the said lands now or formerly of Ronald A. Loffredo as described in Book 1083 of Deeds at Page 520 and other lands now or formerly of Ronald A. Loffredo as described in Book 1174 of Deeds at Page 80 on the East; thence along said common division line South 04 deg. 25 min. 26 sec. East 230.03 feet to its point of intersection with the Northerly street boundary of Church Street; thence along said Northerly street boundary the following two (2) courses: 1) North 86 deg. 18 min. 19 sec. West 7.26 feet to a point; and 2) North 84 deg. 37 min. 10 sec. West 43.83 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands to be conveyed to The Saratoga Hospital on the East and remaining lands now or formerly of Saratoga Golf & Polo Club, Inc. as described in Book 831 of Deeds at Page 10 on the West; thence along said division line North 04 deg. 25 min. 26 sec. West 464.33 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital, Inc. as described in Book 1454 of Deeds at Page 41 on the East and the said lands now or formerly of Saratoga Golf & Polo Club, Inc. on the West; thence along the said division line North 04 deg. 56 min. 05 sec. West 70.00 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital, Inc. on the North and the said lands now or formerly of Saratoga Golf & Polo Club, Inc. on the South; thence along said division line South 85 deg. 34 min. 45 sec. West 529.19 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital, Inc. on the East and the said lands now or formerly of Saratoga Golf & Polo Club, Inc. on the West; thence along said division line North 03 deg. 50 min. 15 sec. West 10.00 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital, Inc. on the North and the said lands now or formerly of Saratoga Golf & Polo Club, Inc. on the South; thence along said division line South 85 deg. 34 min. 45 sec. West 215.95 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital, Inc. on the Northeast and the said lands now or formerly of Saratoga Golf & Polo Club, Inc. on the Southwest; thence along said division line North 49 deg. 39 min. 29 sec. West 42.60 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital, Inc. on the East and the said lands now or formerly of Saratoga Golf & Polo Club, Inc. on the West; thence along said division line North 04 deg. 53 min. 43 sec. West 230.65 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital, Inc. on the South and the lands to be conveyed by The Saratoga Hospital, Inc. to Saratoga Golf & Polo Club, Inc. on the North; thence along said division line North 71 deg. 36 min. 56 sec. East 26.67 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital, Inc. on the Southeast and the said lands to be conveyed to Saratoga Golf & Polo Club, Inc. on the Northwest; thence along said division line North 33 deg. 09 min. 50 sec. East 112.67 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital, Inc. on the East and the said lands to be conveyed to Saratoga Golf & Polo Club, Inc. on the West; thence along said division line North 15 deg. 57 min. 55 sec. East 249.24 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital, Inc. on the Northeast and the said lands to be conveyed to Saratoga Golf & Polo Club, Inc. on the Southwest; thence along said division line North 48 deg. 47 min. 47 sec. West 167.86 feet to its point of intersection with the division line between the said lands now or formerly of The Saratoga Hospital, Inc. on the Southeast and other lands now or formerly of Saratoga Golf & Polo Club; Inc. on the Northwest; thence along said division line North 32 deg. 06 min. 27 sec. East 350.00 feet to its point of intersection with the above first mentioned m S/2024 Morgan St/PUD Legislation clean v 10 10.1.13 Update 2024 Clean Copy division line; thence along said above first mentioned division line South 70 deg. 59 min. 24 sec. East 720.70 feet to the point or place of beginning and containing 1.8.24 acres of land, more or less. 21 S/2024 Morgan St/PUD Legislation clean v 10 10.1.13 Update 2024 Clean Copy APPENDIX 66U" SKETCH PLAN (On File in the City Planning Board Office) ADOPTED: September 8,1987 AMENDED: April 19,1993 AMENDED: January 21,1997 AMENDED: October 21, 2003 AMENDED: April 7,2009 AMENDED: March 1, 2011 AMENDED: March 25,2013 22 S/2024 Morgan St/PUD Legislation clean v 10 10. 1. 13 Update 2024 Clean Copy Zone E-1 Proposed CSA Site Main Campus Zone E-1 Proposed CSA Site Main Campus Main Campus Zone E-1 Proposed CSA Site Main Campus Proposed CSA Site Zone E-1 XREFS: NONE MAP REFERENCES 1. "Saratoga Hospial P.U.D. Sketch Plan, City of Saratoga Springs, Saratoga County, New York." Prepared by Chazen Engineering Land Surveying Co., PC. dated December 8, 1995. AREA TABULATION PROJECT NUMBER:03.3121 ry w m �0 zo �o W� n-w V) z I W om W� N O W N Of J < �- W< �w oZ J W Q J_ Z tL < � O z� <a ov PROJECT D-1 HOSPITAL ACCESSORY SUPPORT RESERVED P.U.D. ZONE E ACCESSORY PARKING AREA = 9.24 ACRES (TOTAL) TOTAL PARKING SPACES = 619 PROJECT E PARKING TABULATION PROJECT E-1 358 SPACES PROJECT E-3 93 SPACES PROJECT E-5 60 SPACES PROJECT E-6 108 SPACES TOTAL 619 SPACES "ONLY COPIES OF THIS MAP SIGNED IN RED INK AND EMBOSSED WITH THE SEAL OF AN OFFICER OF C.T. MALE ASSOCIATES, P.C. OR A DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE A VALID TRUE COPY". 10' BUFFER ZONE P.U.D. ZONE B MEDICAL/PROFESSIONAL OFFICES AREA = 3.57 ACRES QQ(-21 II ATl(1N1 MAXIMUM NUMBER OF BUILDINGS = 1 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT = 50 FEET BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE = 60,000 SF DDO I�(`T Q—F PARKING EXPANSION AREA = 0.49 ACRES FUTURE PARKING EXPANSION AREA = 0.61 ACR NOTE: "RECORD MAPPING OF IMPROVEMENTS IN AREA E-6 HAVE BEEN SHOWN PER INFORMATION PROVIDED BY SARATOGA HOSPITAL." P.U.D. ZONE C MEDICAL/PROFESSIONAL OFFICES AREA = 4.86 ACRES REGULATION MAXIMUM NUMBER OF BUILDINGS = 3 MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE = 30,000 SF MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT = 45f FEET BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE = 50,000 SF TOTAL PARKING SPACES E.D. PARKING E.D: AMBULANCE PARCEL 1 PARCEL 2 TOTAL 14T11LTMT% A T TlT A T TM CHURCH BAR SCALE 90 0 40 :• 160 • � • :• 10.45 ACRES 18.24 ACRES 28.69 ACRES ririnill5W11115111.11r.1 NOTE: IMPERVIOUS AREAS CALCULATED ON THIS INCLUDE PARKING AREAS, SIDEWALKS, CONCRETE PADS, CURBING, ETC. HNI P.U.D. ZONE A MEDICAL/PROFESSIONAL OFFICES AREA = 10.45 ACRES 0111 MUM IMS MAXIMUM NUMBER OF BUILDINGS = 1 MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE = 150,000f SF MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT = 5 STORIES OR 70 FEET BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE = 579,935 SF as A ' • A HOSPITAL. (COMPLETED) TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE = 148,648 SF TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT = 5 STORIES OR < 70 FEET TOTAL BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE = 419,685 SF TOTAL PARKING = 358 SPACES TOTAL BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE REMAINING = 129,050 SF RADIATION THERAPY CENTER EXPANSION A-10 �1� A.K.A. CORE4 LANE PUBLIC ACCESS 50' EXISTING BUILDING AREA PROPOSED BUILDING AREA