Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20240484 17 MacArthur Drive NOD �TOG,4 CITY OF SARATOGA Gage Simpson,Chair Qg �A Brad Gallagher,Vice Chair Shafer Gaston t SPRINGS Brendan Dailey CIO ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Jonah Cohen Otis Maxwell Chris LaPointe r -µ CITY HALL-474 BROADWAY Robert West(Alternate) ccRPo�ASE� ,�� SARATOGA SPRINGS,NEW YORK 12866 Chris Maslack(Alternate) 518-587-3550 W W W.SARATOGA-SPRINGS.ORG 20240484 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL OF Deborah Madlock P.O. Box 91 Warren Center, PA 18851 From the determination of the Building Inspector involving the premises at 17 MacArthur Drive in the City of Saratoga Springs,New York being tax parcel number 166.14-2-26 on the Assessment Map of said City. The applicant having applied for an area variance under the Unified Development Ordinance(UDO) of said City to permit construction of an addition to an existing single family home in the Urban Residential -1 (UR-1) District and public notice having been duly given of a hearing on said application held on the 8TH and 22nd of July 2024. In consideration of the balance between benefit to the applicants with detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the community, I move that the following area variance for the following amount of relief: TYPE OF DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENT PROPOSED RELIEF REQUESTED REQUIREMENT Max Principal 28% 29.0% 1%(3.6%) Coverage As per the submitted plans or lesser dimensions, be approved for the following reasons: 1. The applicant has demonstrated this benefit cannot be achieved by other means feasible to the applicant. The applicant wants to expand the home at the rear of the house to accommodate a living room and covered passage to the garage, and also to add a new front porch to provide a covered entryway. The applicant considered other options and chose the option that adheres to other rear setbacks in the neighborhood. The lot is substandard in size with no other property for sale. The applicant notes and has provided documentation that the coverage of the structure with addition will not exceed comparable homes in the neighborhood. 2. The applicant has demonstrated that granting this variance will not create an undesirable change in neighborhood character or detriment to nearby properties. The overall design of the home with addition will blend with neighboring homes in mass and scale. 3. The variance is not substantial and is fur5ther mitigated by the points noted above. 4. The Board finds this variance will not have an adverse physical or environmental effect on the neighborhood. Permeability requirements will meet district requirements. 5. The alleged difficulty is self-created insofar as the applicant desires to add to the existing two-family residence, but this is not necessarily fatal to the application. It is so moved. Page 1 of 2 Dated: July 22, 2024 Passes by the following votes: AYES: 4(S. Gaston, O. Maxwell, G. Simpson, B. Dailey) RECUSED: NAYES: 1 (C. LaPointe) This variance shall expire 18 months following the filing date of such decision unless the necessary building permit has been issued and actual construction begun as per the Unified Development Ordinance. I hereby certify the above to be a full, true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Saratoga Springs on the date above mentioned, five members of the Board being present. SIGNATURE: 07/25/2024 OV CHAIR DATE RECEIVED BY ACCOUNTS DEPT. Page 2 of 2