HomeMy WebLinkAbout20240193 31 Jenna Jo shed area variance NOD �TOG,4 CITY OF SARATOGA Gage Simpson,Chair
Qg �A Brad Gallagher,Vice Chair
Shafer Gaston
t SPRINGS Brendan Dailey
CIO
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Jonah Cohen
Otis Maxwell
Chris LaPointe
r -µ CITY HALL-474 BROADWAY
Robert West(Alternate)
ccRPo�ASE� ,�� SARATOGA SPRINGS,NEW YORK 12866 Chris Maslack(Alternate)
518-587-3550
W W W.SARATOGA-SPRINGS.ORG
#20240193
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL OF
Brett&Nicole Heim
31 Jenna Jo Ave.
Saratoga Springs,New York 12866
from the determination of the Building Inspector involving the premises at 31 Jenna Jo Avenue in the City of
Saratoga Springs,New York being tax parcel number 180.9-1-34 on the Assessment Map of said City.
The applicants having applied for an area variance under the Unified Development Ordinance of said City to permit
the installation of an accessory structure (shed) and a pool in the Oak Ridge PUD and public notice having been
duly given of a hearing on said application held between May 6,2024 through May 20,2024.
In consideration of the balance between benefit to the applicants with detriment to the health,safety and welfare of
the community,I move that the following area variances for the following amounts of relief:
TYPE OF REQUIREMENT DISTRICT PROPOSED RELIEF REQUESTED
DIMENSIONAL
REQUIREMENT
INTERIOR SIDE(POOL EQUIPMENT) 20 FT. 10 FT. 10 FT.(50%)
INTERIOR SIDE(SHED) 20 FT. 10 FT. 10 FT. (50%)
As per the submitted plans or lesser dimensions,be approved for the following reasons:
L The applicant has demonstrated this benefit cannot be achieved by other means feasible to the applicant. The
applicant would like to utilize the previously installed shed and pool where they are currently located. The
applicant submits that there is no other land for purchase.
2. The applicant has demonstrated that granting this variance will not create an undesirable change in
neighborhood character or detriment to nearby properties. The Board finds that the applicant has
demonstrated that the requested variance aligns with other properties in the neighborhood.
3. The Board finds the requested variances are substantial,but notes the character of the neighborhood mitigates
this concern as the proposal is similar to other neighboring properties.
4. The Board finds that these variances will not have significant adverse physical or environmental effect on
the neighborhood or district.The property will adhere to the standard district permeability requirements.
5. The alleged difficulty is self-created insofar as the applicant's desire to utilize the previously installed shed
and pool,but this is not necessarily fatal to the application.
It is so moved.
Dated: May 20,2024
Page 1 of 2
Passes by the following votes:
AYES: 7 (B. Gallagher G. Simpson, S. Gaston, O. Maxwell, C. LaPointe,)
RECUSED:
NAYES:
This variance shall expire 18 months following the filing date of such decision unless the
necessary building permit has been issued and actual construction begun as per the Unified
Development Ordinance.
I hereby certify the above to be a full, true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the
Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Saratoga Springs on the date above mentioned, five
members of the Board being present.
SIGNATURE: 05/29/2024
ov CHAIR DATE RECEIVED BY
ACCOUNTS
DEPT.
Page 2 of 2