Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
20240320 3248 S Broadway Verizon Antenna Pole NG148 1/2 Application
Revised 01/2021 APPLICATION FOR: ARCHITECTURAL / HISTORIC REVIEW APPLICANT(S)* OWNER(S) (If not applicant) ATTORNEY/AGENT Name Address Phone / / / Email Identify primary contact person: Applicant Owner Attorney/Agent * An applicant must be the property owner, lessee, or one with an option to lease or purchase the property in question. Applicant’s interest in premises: Owner Lessee Under option to lease or purchase PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Address/Location: Tax Parcel #: . - - (for example: 165.52 – 4 – 37 ) Current Zoning District: Property use: Residential Non-residential/mixed-use Type of Review: Architectural Historic Extension/modification (of current approval) Summary description of proposed action: Has a previous application been filed with the DRC for this property? No Yes – date(s)? _____________________ -App. No.(s)? _________________ Date Acquired by Owner: _________________ **HANDWRITTEN APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED** CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION CITY HALL - 474 BROADWAY SARATOGA SPRINGS, NEW YORK 12866-2296 TEL: 518-587-3550 X2533 www.saratoga-springs.org [FOR OFFICE USE] _______________ (Application #) ____________ (Date received) __________________________ (Project Title) Staff Review _______________ **A “complete” application consists of 1 hard copy (original) , and 1 electronic copy of application & ALL other materials as required below: New Construction / Additions Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures and adjacent properties Site plan, drawn to scale, showing existing & proposed construction, property lines & dimensions, required & proposed setbacks & lot coverage, site features (fences, walks, trees, etc.); on no larger than 2’x3’ sheet – smaller preferred if legible Elevation drawings showing design of all sides of existing & proposed construction – label dimensions, colors, materials, lighting (fixture & lamp type, wattage), etc. - include compass bearing & scale; no larger than 2’x3’ sheet – smaller permitted if legible Floor plans for proposed structure; on sheet no larger than 2’x3’ – smaller permitted if legible Product literature, specifications and samples of proposed materials and colors Change in exterior building materials (windows, doors, roof, siding, etc.), or color (in non-residential districts only) Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures and that illustrate affected features Elevation drawings showing all sides of existing & proposed construction – label dimensions, colors, materials, lighting (fixture & lamp type, wattage), etc. - include compass bearing & scale; no larger than 2’x3’ sheet – smaller permitted if legible Product literature, specifications and samples of proposed materials and colors Within front yard setbacks in Historic Districts only (Front setbacks: UR-1 & INST-HTR=30’; UR-4=25’; UR-2, UR-3 & NCUD-1=10’) -Installation, removal or change in material of drive- and walkways -Installation or removal of architectural, sculptural or vegetative screening over 3’ in height -Installation of accessory utility structures or radio/satellite transmission/reception devices (more than 2’ diameter) For any of above: Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures, and of adjacent properties Site plan showing existing & proposed construction: include property lines & dimensions, required & proposed setbacks & lot coverage, site features (fences, walks, trees, etc.) street names, compass bearing & scale; no larger than 2’x3’ sheet – smaller preferred if legible Product literature, specifications and samples of proposed materials and colors Signage / Awnings Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures, and adjacent properties Plan showing location of proposed sign/awning structure on building/premises: no larger than 11”x17” Scaled illustration of proposed sign/awning structure and lettering (front view & profile): include all dimensions of structure; type, dimensions and style of lettering or logo; description of colors, materials, mounting method and hardware Descriptions, specifications of proposed lighting including fixture & lamp type, wattage, mounting method, and location Product literature, specifications and samples of proposed materials and colors Demolition Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures, and of adjacent properties Site plan showing existing and any proposed structures - include dimensions, setbacks, street names, compass bearing, and scale Written description of reasons for demolition and, in addition: For structures of “architectural/historical significance”, demonstrate “good cause” why structure cannot be preserved For structures in an architectural district that might be eligible for listing on National Register of Historic Places, or for a “contributing” structure in a National Register district (contact City staff), provide plans for site development following demolition - include a timetable and letter of credit for project completion Telecommunication facilities Color photographs showing site/existing structures, and of adjacent properties Site plan showing existing and proposed structures: include dimensions, setbacks, street names, compass bearing, and scale Scaled illustration of proposed structures: include all dimensions; colors, materials, lighting, mounting details Consult Article 240-12.22 of the City’s Zoning Ordinance and City staff to ensure compliance with requirements for visual impact assessment and existing and proposed vegetative screening Revised 01/2021 Revised 01/2021 Request for extension of current approval Identify date of original DRC approval: ______________Current expiration date: ________________ Org. App. No. ____________ Describe why this extension is necessary and whether any significant changes have occurred either on the site or in the neighborhood. SEQR Environmental Assessment Form Applicants proposing the following must complete “Part I” of the SEQR Short Environmental Assessment Form (available here: http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/permits_ej_operations_pdf/seafpartone.pdf): -Construction or expansion of a multi-family residential structure (4 units +) -Construction or expansion (exceeding 4,000 sq. ft. gross floor area) of a principal or accessory non-residential structure -Telecommunications facility, radio antennae, satellite dishes -Demolition Disclosure Does any City officer, employee or family member thereof have a financial interest (as defined by General Municipal Law Section 809) in this application? No Yes - If yes, a statement disclosing the name, residence, nature, and extent of this interest must be filed with this application. Certification I/we, the property owner(s), or purchaser(s)/lessee(s) under contract, of the land in question, hereby request an appearance before the Design Review Commission. By the signature(s) attached hereto, I/we certify that the information provided within this application and accompanying documentation is, to the best of my/our knowledge, true and accurate. I/we further understand that intentionally providing false or misleading information is grounds for immediate denial of this application. I/we hereby authorize the members of the Design Review Commission and designated City staff to enter the property associated with this application for purposes of conducting any necessary site inspections relating to this application. Furthermore, I/we agree to meet all requirements under Article VII for Historic Review or Article VIII for Architectural Review of the Zoning Code of the City of Saratoga Springs. Date: (applicant signature) Date: (applicant signature) If applicant is not the currently the owner of the property, the current owner must also sign. Owner Signature: Date: Owner Signature: Date: Revised 01/2021 INSTRUCTIONS ARCHITECTURAL / HISTORIC REVIEW APPLICATION 1.ELIGIBILITY: An applicant to the Design Review Commission for Architectural Review or Historic Review must be the property owner(s) or lessee, or have an option to lease or purchase the property in question. 2.COMPLETE SUBMISSIONS: Applicants are encouraged to work with City staff to ensure that an application is complete. The DRC will only consider properly completed applications that contain 1 original and 1 digital version of the application and ALL other required materials as indicated on the application. HANDWRITTEN APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED!! 3.ACTIONS REQUIRING REVIEW: Architectural Review District Historic Review District •any exterior changes that require a building permit •any change in exterior building materials •a new, or change to an existing, sign or sign structure •demolition of a structure Within a non-residential zoning district: •a change in exterior building color •installation of an awning •Installation or exterior change to a structure requiring a building or demolition permit •any material change to exterior of a structure including: -addition or removal of exterior architectural features -installation, removal or material changes to exterior building elements such as roof, siding, windows, doors, porches, etc. -enclosure or screening or buildings openings such as windows, doors, porches, etc. -installation of utility, mechanical or misc. accessory structures to the exterior of a building such as HVAC equipment, solar panels, wind turbines, radio/satellite transmission/reception devices, etc. Within a front yard setback: -installation, removal or material changes to drive- or walkways -installation or removal of architectural, sculptural or vegetative screening that exceeds 3’ in height -installation of accessory utility structures or radio/satellite transmission/reception devices over 2’ in diameter •a change in exterior building color within a non- residential zoning district •a new, or change to an existing, sign or awning •installation of telecommunications facilities Note – Ordinary maintenance or repair that does not involve a change in material, design or outer appearance is exempt from Historic or Architectural Review. CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION City Hall - 474 Broadway Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 Tel: 518-587-3550 x2533 www.saratoga-springs.org 4.DESIGN GUIDELINES: The Design Review Commission will evaluate whether the proposed action (construction, alteration or demolition) is compatible with existing structures and surrounding properties using the following criteria: •Height – consistent with historic form and context of site and surrounding properties •Scale – relationship of structure and its architectural elements to human size, form, perception •Proportion – relationship among building elements including front façade, windows, and doors •Rhythm – pattern resulting from repeating building elements such as door/window openings, columns, arches, and other façade elements •Directional Expression – compatibility with horizontal & vertical expression of surrounding structures •Massing & Open Space – relationship of structure to open space between it and adjoining buildings •Setback – compatibility with surrounding structures •Compatibility of the following with surrounding structures/properties: -Major building elements (storefronts, doors, windows, roof) -Building materials -Color – (in non-residential zoning districts only) 5.DECISIONS: The Design Review Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove an application. The DRC may impose appropriate conditions and safeguards in connection with its approval including nature/quality of materials, manner of construction, and design. An applicant may appeal a denied DRC application on the grounds of hardship. Application approvals shall expire within 18 months of the filing date unless the project has sufficiently commenced (i.e. building/demolition permits obtained and construction/alteration begun). Applicants may request up to 2 extensions if requested before expiration date of prior approval. 6.AGENDA DATE: Check City’s website (www.saratoga-springs.org) for meeting dates. Applications are placed on an agenda on first-come, first-served basis as determined by the completeness of the application. 7.APPLICATION FEE (NON-REFUNDABLE): Make checks payable to the "Commissioner of Finance”. REFER TO THE CURRENT FEE WORKSHEET INCLUDED IN THIS DOCUMENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: More detailed information on Architectural Review, Historic Review and the Design Review Commission responsibilities may be found in the City’s Zoning Ordinance available in City Hall and on the City’s web site at http://www.saratoga-springs.org/544/Zoning-Ordinance. Revised 01/2021 ATTORNEYS AT LAW EXECUTIVE WOODS, FIVE PALISADES DRIVE, ALBANY, NY 12205 Phone: 518-438-9907 • Fax: 518-438-9914 www.youngsommer.com David C. Brennan, Esq. Writer’s Telephone Extension: 224 dbrennan@youngsommer.com April 30, 2024 Via Federal Express Beige Berryman Administrator of OPED City of Saratoga Springs 474 Broadway Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 RE: Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless Application for DRB Approval Utility Pole # NG 148-1/2 - Adjacent to 3248 South Broadway Dear Ms. Berryman: Please find enclosed an application to the Design Review Board for a small cell wireless facility to be added to an existing utility pole. Also enclosed is a check in the amount of $400.00 for the application fee. We look forward to discussing this further with the Design Review Board at an upcoming meeting. In the meantime, if you have any questions concerning this letter or the enclosed materials, please contact me at your convenience. Very truly yours, David C. Brennan, Esq. Encl. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS, SARATOGA COUNTY, NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of ______________________________________________________________ CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a Verizon Wireless Utility Pole # NG 148-1/2 Adjacent to 3248 South Broadway Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 ____________________________________________________________ APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVAL and STATEMENT OF INTENT Submitted by: Verizon Wireless Margaret Hayes, Manager – Network Real Estate 1275 John Street, Suite 100 West Henrietta, New York 14586 (585) 321-5390 Tectonic Engineering & Surveying Consultants, P.C. Steven Matthews, P.E. 36 British American Blvd, Suite 101 Latham, New York 12110 (518) 783-1630 Network Building + Consulting Nico Facey, Site Acquisition Specialist 1777 Sentry Parkway W VEVA 17, Suite 400 Blue Bell, Pennsylvania 19422 (347) 712-9444 Please Direct All Correspondence To: Young/Sommer LLC David C. Brennan, Esq. Executive Woods Five Palisades Drive Albany, New York 12205 (518) 438-9907 Dated: April 30, 2024 1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS SARATOGA COUNTY, NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of ___________________________________________________________________ CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a Verizon Wireless Premises: Utility Pole # NG 148-1/2 Adjacent to 3248 South Broadway Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 ___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF INTENT and APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVAL I. Purpose and Need CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a Verizon Wireless (“Verizon Wireless” or the “Applicant”) proposes the collocation of an unmanned public utility/personal wireless service facility (a "communications facility") at the above location. More specifically, Verizon Wireless is proposing to remove an existing 31.3’ wooden utility pole, replace it with a new 38.5’ wooden utility pole and add equipment to that replacement pole. The Applicant proposes to install on the replacement pole: a single, cylindrical antenna (approximately 24” tall x 14.6” in diameter) mounted at the top of the pole at a tip height of 41.8± feet) along with the installation of electric and telecommunications equipment on the replacement utility pole at a minimum height of 8’ above grade. The property is located in the State right-of- way near 3248 South Broadway, City of Saratoga Springs, Saratoga County, New York (Pole No. NG 148-1/2). [Zoning Site Plan Drawings of Tectonic Engineering & Surveying, PC at TAB 6]. The proposed facility is located on the east side of the northbound lanes of South Broadway, near the entrance to the Design Motel. Upon completion, the proposed facility will provide additional wireless network bandwidth and improved performance to the area along South Broadway, north and south of the hotel. Verizon Wireless is considered a public utility for land use purposes under New York decisional law (Cellular Telephone Company v. Rosenberg 1, 82 N.Y.2d 364 [1993]), and a provider of “personal wireless services” under the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the “TCA”). Verizon Wireless’ equipment will be in operation twenty -four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days a week, three hundred sixty-five (365) days a year. Verizon Wireless is applying for Architectural/Historic Review by the Design Review Board.2 1 In Rosenberg, the State’s highest Court determined that the ordinary variance standard is inapplicable and a cellular telephone company applying for relief need only show that (1) the relief is “required to render safe and adequate service,” and (2) there are “compelling reasons, economic or otherwise,” for needing the variance. Cellular Telephone Company v. Rosenberg, 82 N.Y.2d 364, 372 (1993). 2 For the reasons set forth herein, Verizon Wireless believes that its project complies in all material respects with the provisions of the City of Saratoga Springs Land Use Laws and, consistent with the application process established by the 2 The proposed communications facili ty is unmanned and will be visited for routine maintenance purposes approximately two times per year (only as needed). As such, the project will not have any impact on existing water and sewage services. In addition, neither pedestrian nor vehicular access to the premises will be impacted [see Zoning Drawings at TAB 6]. II. Compliance with City Requirements The proposed communications facility complies in all material respects with City requirements: 1. SEQRA: A Short Environmental Assessment Form is attached as TAB 2. 2. Structural Assessment: A structural assessment is attached as TAB 4. 3. Minimum Visual Impact: As noted above, Verizon Wireless’ proposed facility is designed to have a minimum possible visual effect on the surrounding community and neighborhood [TABS 3 and 6]. 4. Specifications: A specification sheet for the antenna is attached as TAB 4. The specifications for the equipment shroud are located in TAB 6. 5. Site Plan: The Applicant has provided a Zoning Site Plan that identifies the proposed improvements [TAB 6]. Based upon the foregoing, Verizon Wireless respectfully submits that approval is appropriate in this case. III. Conclusion The communications facility proposed is a public necessity under Rosenberg in that it is required to render adequate and safe service to this area of the City of Saratoga Springs. In an effort to supplement existing telecommunications services to this area of the City, while reducing the need for a new tower or macro cell collocation, Verizon Wireless has identified an appropriate location for the deployment of a small cell facility. Verizon Wireless’ existing macro cell sites in the area do not provide adequate coverage and capacity to this area of the City. The City of Saratoga Springs will be lacking adequate and safe capacity, and the failure to approve this application will eliminate the means to provide necessary capacity . This, combined with the federal mandate to expeditiously deploy advanced wireless services across the nation and Verizon Wireless’ FCC licenses to provide such services in the City of Saratoga Springs, demonstrates that Verizon Wireless’ facility is a public necessity. Without the construction of the communications facility proposed, the public would be deprived of an essential means of communication, which, in turn, would jeopardize the safety and welfare of the community and traveling public . The small cell facility will not be noticeable to the traveling public or nearby property owners. The communications system proposed has been sited to have the least practical adverse visual effect on the environment, and any resulting impact(s) may properly be considered as minimal in nature and scope. City for prior Small Cell applications, that no additional approvals or relief are required. To the extent that an additional approval or relief is required, Verizon Wireless submits these materials in support of such approval(s). 3 Attached to this Application and Statement of Intent are the following: 1) An Application for Architectural/Historic Review by the Design Review Board; 2) A Short Environmental Assessment Form; 3) Photosimulations of the proposed installation and Visual EAF Addendum; 4) Specification Sheet for the Antenna: 5) Structural Assessment of the existing Utility Pole; and 6) Project Zoning Drawings. Kindly place this matter on the agenda for discussion at the next available meeting of the Design Review Board. In the meantime, if you should have any questions or require any additional information concerning this project, I can be reached at (518) 438-9907. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a Verizon Wireless David C. Brennan, Esq. Regional Local Counsel Dated: April 30, 2024 Page 1 of 3 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project Information Instructions for Completing Part 1 – Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1 – Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: Project Location (describe, and attach a location map): Brief Description of Proposed Action: Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, administrative rule, or regulation? If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2. NO YES 2.Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other government Agency? If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval:NO YES 3.a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? __________ acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? __________ acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? __________ acres 4.Check all land uses that occur on, are adjoining or near the proposed action: Rural (non-agriculture) Industrial Commercial Residential (suburban) Aquatic Other(Specify):Agriculture □ Urban □ Forest SEAF 2019 Parkland Page 2 of 3 5.Is the proposed action, a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? NO YES N/A 6.Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape?NO YES 7.Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? If Yes, identify: ________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 8.a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? b.Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed action? NO YES 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 10.Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? If No, describe method for providing potable water: _________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ______________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory? NO YES 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency? b.Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: _____________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 12.a. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? b.Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for Page 3 of 3 14.Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: □Shoreline □ Forest Agricultural/grasslands Early mid-successional Wetland □ Urban Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered?NO YES 16.Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan?NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non-point sources? If Yes, a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)? If Yes, briefly describe: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water or other liquids (e.g., retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)? If Yes, explain the purpose and size of the impoundment:______________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________ _ NO YES 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste management facility? If Yes, describe: _______________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes, describe: _______________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Date: _____________________ Applicant/sponsor/name: ____________________________________________________ __________________________ Signature: _____________________________________________________Title:__________________________________Steven Matthews EAF Mapper Summary Report Tuesday, April 16, 2024 8:59 AM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order to obtain data not provided by the Mapper. Digital data is not a substitute for agency determinations. Part 1 / Question 7 [Critical Environmental Area] No Part 1 / Question 12a [National or State Register of Historic Places or State Eligible Sites] No Part 1 / Question 12b [Archeological Sites]Yes Part 1 / Question 13a [Wetlands or Other Regulated Waterbodies] Yes - Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Part 1 / Question 15 [Threatened or Endangered Animal] No Part 1 / Question 16 [100 Year Flood Plain]Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Part 1 / Question 20 [Remediation Site]No 1Short Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report Page 1 of 2 Agency Use Only [If applicable] Project: Date: Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 2 - Impact Assessment Part 2 is to be completed by the Lead Agency. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept “Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?” No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2.Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3.Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4.Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area (CEA)? 5.Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit, biking or walkway? 6.Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7.Will the proposed action impact existing: a. public / private water supplies? b. public / private wastewater treatment utilities? 8.Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic, archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9.Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources (e.g., wetlands, waterbodies, groundwater, air quality, flora and fauna)? 10.Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion, flooding or drainage problems? 11.Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? SEAF 2019 Page 2 of 2 For every question in Part 2 that was answered “moderate to large impact may occur”, or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short- term, long-term and cumulative impacts. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. _________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Name of Lead Agency Date _________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer _________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 Determination of Significance Agency Use Only [If applicable] Project: Date: Valley Acres Adja cent to 3248 S Bro adwa y Sa ratoga Springs, New Yo rk 12866 118 61 .02 9 !( !( ^_ 02 01 Service Lay er Credit s: Sources: Esri, HE RE, Garmin, Int ermap, incremen t P Corp., GEBCO , USGS, FAO, N PS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN , Kadas ter N L, Ordnance Survey, E sri Japan, MET I, E sri China (Hon g Kong ), (c) O penStreetM ap contribu tors, and the GIS User Comm unity Source: Esri, Max ar, Earths tar G eog raphics , and the GIS User Com m unity µ Phot og ra ph Lo g Legend ^_Propos ed Tower Location !(Photograph Locations 0 100 20050 Feet ± P-1 ± S-1 ± P-2 ± S-2 617.20 Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review VISUAL EAF ADDENDUM This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) 1.Would the project be visible from:0-¼ ¼-½ ½-3 3-5 5+ ! A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available G G G G G to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? ! An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public G G G G G observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? ! A site or structure listed on the National or State G G G G G Registers of Historic Places? ! State Parks?G G G G G ! The State Forest Preserve?G G G G G ! National Wildlife Refuges and State Game Refuges?G G G G G !National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding G G G G G natural features? !National Park Service lands?G G G G G !Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic G G G G G or Recreational? !Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such G G G G G as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? !A governmentally established or designated interstate G G G G G or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? !A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as G G G G G scenic? !County road?G G G G G !State road?G G G G G !Local road?G G G G G 2.Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) GYes GNo 3.Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? GYes GNo !Municipal park, or designated open space?G G G G G DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4.From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within *¼ mile *1 mile Essentially undeveloped G G Forested G G Agricultural G G Suburban Residential G G Industrial G G Commerical G G Urban G G River, Lake, Pond G G Cliffs, Overlooks G G Designated Open Space G G Flat G G Hilly G G Mountainous G G Other G G NOTE: add attachments as needed 5.Are there visually similar projects within: *½ mile GYes GNo 1 mile Yes No 2 miles Yes No 3 miles Yes No *Distance from project site is provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6.The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is ________________? NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7.The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is: FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work G G G G Involved in recreational activities G G G G Routine travel by residents G G G G At a residence G G G G At worksite G G G G Other CX20OMI224-3Hxy NWAV™Cylinder Antenna 20-port cylinder antenna 698-4200 MHz: 4 ports 698-960,8 ports 1695-2690 MHz,and 8 ports 3400-4200 MHz l Small Cell antenna with Heart pattern shape l Supports deployments with 4x4 MIMO capability with all bands l Excellent cross-polar discrimination for enhanced MIMO performance l Center-mounted lift ring for easy installations l Future-proof design to support up to 4200 MHz l Optimal 3400-4200 MHz gain to realize EiRP limit Low band Mid band 3.5 GHz Frequency bands,MHz (2x)698-960 (4x)1695-2690 (4x)3400-4200 Array R1 R2 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 P1 P2 P3 P4 Connector 4 PORTS 8 PORTS 8 PORTS Polarization XPOL XPOL XPOL Horizontal beamwidth (HBW),degrees1 240 240 240 Electrical downtilt (EDT),degrees1 0 2,6,10 0 Configuration Heart omni antenna Connector type (20x)4.3-10 female Dimensions,in.(mm)24.0/14.6 (609.6/370.8) Maximum composite power,watts (all ports)1000 Radome color Gray (Pantone 420C) Electrical specifications Low Band R1 R2 Frequency range,MHz (2x)698-960 Polarization (2x)±45° Gain,BASTA,dBi 3.6 ±0.5 Gain,MAX,dBi 5.0 Horizontal beamwidth (HBW),3 dB,degrees1 240 Vertical beamwidth (VBW),3dB,degrees1 66.0 Electrical downtilt (EDT),degrees 0 Impedance,ohms 50 VSWR ≤1.5:1 PIM,2x20W carrier,dBc <-153 Isolation,intra-band,dB >25 ©2024 JMA Wireless.All rights reserved.This document contains proprietary information.All products,company names, brands,and logos are trademarks™or registered®trademarks of their respective holders.All specifications are subject to change without notice.+1 315.431.7100 customerservice@jmawireless.com 01/15/24 V4.0 Page1 Electrical specifications Low Band R1 R2 Isolation,inter-band,dB >28 Input power per port,watts 150 Electrical specifications Mid Band Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Frequency range,MHz (4x)1695-2690 Frequency sub-range, MHz 1695-1880 1850-1990 1920-2200 2300-2690 Polarization (4x)±45° Gain,BASTA,dBi 7.8 ±0.5 8.1 ±0.4 8.8 ±0.7 9.2 ±0.5 Gain,MAX,dBi 8.4 8.7 9.5 10.0 Horizontal beamwidth (HBW),3 dB,degrees1 240 240 240 240 Vertical beamwidth (VBW),3dB,degrees1 31.0 28.3 25.0 22.8 Electrical downtilt (EDT),degrees 2 or 6 or 10 Impedance,ohms 50 VSWR ≤1.5:1 PIM,2x20W carrier,dBc <-153 Isolation,intra-band,dB >25 Isolation,inter-band,dB >28 Input power per port, watts 125 Electrical specification 3400-4200 MHz P1 P2 P3 P4 Frequency range,MHz (4x)3400-4200 Polarization (4x)±45° Gain,BASTA,dBi 9.3 ±0.5 Gain,MAX,dBi 9.8 Horizontal beamwidth (HBW),3 dB,degrees1 240 Vertical beamwidth (VBW),3dB,degrees1 19.2 ±2 Electrical downtilt (EDT),degrees 0 Impedance,ohms 50 VSWR ≤1.5:1 PIM,2x20W carrier,dBc <-145 Isolation,intra-band,dB >25 Isolation,inter-band,dB >28 Input power per port,watts 100 1 Typical value over frequency and tilt. Mechanical specifications Dimensions height/diameter,inches (mm)24.0/14.6 (609.6/370.8) ©2024 JMA Wireless.All rights reserved.This document contains proprietary information.All products,company names, brands,and logos are trademarks™or registered®trademarks of their respective holders.All specifications are subject to change without notice.+1 315.431.7100 customerservice@jmawireless.com 01/15/24 V4.0 Page 2 CX20OMI224-3Hxy NWAV™Cylinder Antenna Mechanical specifications Antenna volume (cubic feet)2.32 No.of RF input ports,connector type,and location 20 x 4.3-10 RF,bottom RF connector torque 96 lbf·in (10.85 N·m or 8 lbf·ft) Net antenna weight,lb (kg)36 (16.32) Rated wind survival speed,mph (km/h)150 (241) Frontal wind loading @ 160 km/h,lbf (N)30 (133) Equivalent flat plate @ 100 mph and Cd=2,sq ft 1.17/0.69 Array topology 10 sets of radiating arrays R1:698-960 MHz R2:698-960 MHz Y1:1695-2690 MHz Y2:1695-2690 MHz Y3:1695-2690 MHz Y4:1695-2690 MHz P1:3400-4200 MHz P2:3400-4200 MHz P3:3400-4200 MHz P4:3400-4200 MHz Band RF port 698-960 1-2 698-960 3-4 1695-2690 5-6 1695-2690 7-8 1695-2690 9-10 1695-2690 11-12 3400-4200 13-14 3400-4200 15-16 3400-4200 17-18 3400-4200 19-20 ©2024 JMA Wireless.All rights reserved.This document contains proprietary information.All products,company names, brands,and logos are trademarks™or registered®trademarks of their respective holders.All specifications are subject to change without notice.+1 315.431.7100 customerservice@jmawireless.com 01/15/24 V4.0 Page 3 CX20OMI224-3Hxy NWAV™Cylinder Antenna Front view End view The 0 degree reference arrow corresponds to the 0 degree position in the antenna pattern file.Each antenna pattern file uses a top down orientation view (the patterns are viewed from the top of the antenna looking down). End view details:6 stud bolts for direct mount to the Universal Sleeve (SC- BKT-SLA) Notes on mounting brackets Example bracket configuration l The antenna comes with the bottom mount studs (marked as 1 )factory-installed. l JMA cylinder brackets are compatible with bottom mount via universal cantenna mount sleeve (marked as 2 )(SC-BKT-SLA),sold separately with JMA cylinder mounting systems. l To mitigate potential risk of PIM issues,the recom- mended torque values need to be applied. ©2024 JMA Wireless.All rights reserved.This document contains proprietary information.All products,company names, brands,and logos are trademarks™or registered®trademarks of their respective holders.All specifications are subject to change without notice.+1 315.431.7100 customerservice@jmawireless.com 01/15/24 V4.0 Page 4 CX20OMI224-3Hxy NWAV™Cylinder Antenna Ordering information Antenna model Description CX20OMI224-3Hxy xy=fixed electrical tilt for 1695-2690 MHz in degrees x=arrays Y1 &Y3 y=arrays Y2 &Y4 2ft 20 Port OMNI antenna 4LB 8MB 8CBRS xy=2,6,or 10 deg FET per 4 ports 1695-2690 MHz x=FET value for ports 5,6,9,10 y=FET value for ports 7,8,11,12 Small Cell solutions and mounting systems (sold separately) Side Arm Mounting System SC-BKT-SA-(color)Wide Diameter Pole SC-BKT-WTPE-(color) Steel Pole Mounting System SC-BKT-SLA (color) ©2024 JMA Wireless.All rights reserved.This document contains proprietary information.All products,company names, brands,and logos are trademarks™or registered®trademarks of their respective holders.All specifications are subject to change without notice.+1 315.431.7100 customerservice@jmawireless.com 01/15/24 V4.0 Page 5 CX20OMI224-3Hxy NWAV™Cylinder Antenna Utility Pole Analysis Report Carrier: Verizon Wireless Carrier Designation: WBS #: VZ-00267578.C.9111 MDG #: 5000212225 Site Name: Valley Acres Site Name: Adjacent to 3248 S Broadway, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 Latitude 43.037942°, Longitude -73.789744° Proposed 38.5 ft Tall Wood Pole (45 ft Class 3 Pole) Tectonic Project Number: 11861.029 Tectonic Engineering Consultants, Geologists & Land Surveyors, D.P.C. is pleased to submit this “Utility Pole Analysis Report” to determine the structural integrity of the above-mentioned pole. The purpose of the analysis is to determine acceptability of the pole stress level. Based on our analysis we have determined the pole stress level to be: Structure: Sufficient – 51% Utilization This analysis has been performed in accordance with the ‘2017 National Electrical Safety Code (NESC)’. This structural assessment is also based on a limited visual inspection from the ground and information provided by client. The contractor shall field verify all existing conditions and notify the design engineer of any discrepancies prior to the installation of the proposed equipment. We appreciate the opportunity of providing our continuing professional services to you and Verizon Wireless. If you have any questions or need further assistance on this or any other projects, please give us a call. Structural analysis prepared by: SG / MC Respectfully submitted by: Tectonic Engineering Consultants, Geologists & Land Surveyors, D.P.C. Steven M. Matthews, PE Managing Director - Engineering Date: March 08, 2024 Utility Pole Analysis Report March 07, 2024 Project Number 11861.029 Page 2 Page 2 of 3 1) ANALYSIS CRITERIA NESC Criteria: 2017 Edition NESC Load case: Rule 250B (Heavy Load Case) Construction Grade: C Wood Pole Class: 45 / 3 Table 1 - Proposed Equipment Loading Information Equipment Level (ft) Carrier Designation Number of Antennas Manufacturer Equipment Model Proposed Mount Type 40.7 Verizon Wireless 1 JMA Wireless CX20OMI224-3P22 Concealfab P/N: 900070 and P/N: 007951 17.3 1 - MOPT Terminal Directly mounted to the pole 14.0 1 Commscope SSC-760249586X1X 14.0 1 Fujitsu Fiber Enclosure On Shroud 10.75 1 Eaton BRP12B100R Load Center Directly mounted to the pole 8.75 1 MILBANK U2048-RL Electric Meter 2) ANALYSIS PROCEDURE Table 2 - Documents Utilized Document Remarks Dated Field Notes & Photos Tectonic 05/10/23 RFDS Verizon 02/08/24 Construction Drawings Tectonic 03/06/24 2.1) Analysis Method O-Calc Pro (Version 7.0.0.8), a commercially available analysis software package, was used to create a three-dimensional model of the pole to calculate the member stresses for a variety of load combinations. A summary of this analysis is attached to the end of this report. 2.2) Assumptions 1) The pole was properly installed and maintained in good condition in accordance with its original design and/or manufacturer’s specifications. 2) Pole wood species is similar to Southern Pine. 3) The pole is embedded into the ground as per the applicable design requirements based on its height above grade. 4) The pole has been embedded such that its soil lateral capacity meets or exceeds the moment capacity of the pole. Utility Pole Analysis Report March 07, 2024 Project Number 11861.029 Page 3 Page 3 of 3 5) Line tensions are assumed to be approximately equal on either side of the pole line’s connection. 6) Relocated lines are assumed to be tensioned similar to existing. 3) ANALYSIS RESULTS & RECOMMENDATIONS The pole has sufficient capacity for the proposed Verizon Wireless installation. No reinforcement or modifications are required at this time. Pole ID:11861.029 -Pole SA.pplx O-Calc® Pro Analysis Report Thursday, March 7, 2024 7:03 AM User:Tectonic PLS TECTONIC OCP:7.00 *Includes Load Factor(s) Page 1 of 5 2 Worst Wind Per Guy Wire 3 Wind At 264.1° Pole Num:#NG 148 1/2 Pole Length /Class:45 / 3 Code:NESC Structure Type:Unguyed Tangent Site Name WO: 11861.029 Species:SOUTHERN PINE NESC Rule:Rule 250B Status:Unguyed Site ID Site Name: Valley Acres Setting Depth (ft):6.5 Construction Grade:C Pole Strength Factor:0.85 Aux Data 3 Client: Verizon Wireless G/L Circumference (in):37.31 Loading District:Heavy Transverse Wind LF:1.75 Aux Data 4 Unset G/L Fiber Stress (psi):8,000 Ice Thickness (in):0.50 Wire Tension LF:1.00 Aux Data 5 Unset Allowable Stress (psi):6,800 Wind Speed (mph):39.53 Vertical LF:1.90 Aux Data 6 Unset Fiber Stress Ht. Reduc:No Wind Pressure (psf):4.00 Latitude:43.037942 Longitude:-73.789744 Elevation:215' 0" Pole Capacity Utilization (%)Height (ft) Wind Angle (deg) Maximum 50.7 0.0 264.1 Groundline 50.7 0.0 264.1 Vertical 15.2 22.4 264.1 Pole Moments (ft-lb)Load Angle (deg) Wind Angle (deg) Max Cap Util 46,436 263.2 264.1 Groundline 46,436 263.2 264.1 GL Allowable 93,217 Pole ID:11861.029 -Pole SA.pplx O-Calc® Pro Analysis Report Thursday, March 7, 2024 7:03 AM User:Tectonic PLS TECTONIC OCP:7.00 *Includes Load Factor(s) Page 2 of 5 2 Worst Wind Per Guy Wire 3 Wind At 264.1° Groundline Load Summary -Reporting Angle Mode: Load -Reporting Angle: 263.2° Shear Load* (lbs) Applied Load (%) Bending Moment (ft-lb) Applied Moment (%) Pole Capacity (%) Bending Stress (+/- psi) Vertical Load (lbs) Vertical Stress (psi) Total Stress (psi) Pole Capacity (%) Powers 316 16.8 11,628 25.0 12.5 815 702 6 821 12.1 Comms 1,029 54.9 23,660 51.0 25.4 1,658 2,101 19 1,677 24.7 GenericEquipments 166 8.8 3,167 6.8 3.4 222 1,279 12 234 3.4 Pole 216 11.5 4,340 9.4 4.7 304 2,247 20 324 4.8 Crossarms 2 0.1 61 0.1 0.1 4 114 1 5 0.1 Risers 143 7.6 3,427 7.4 3.7 240 216 2 242 3.6 Insulators 4 0.2 154 0.3 0.2 11 93 1 12 0.2 Pole Load 1,875 100.0 46,436 100.0 49.8 3,255 6,752 61 3,315 48.8 Pole Reserve Capacity 46,781 50.2 3,545 3,485 51.2 Load Summary by Owner -Reporting Angle Mode: Load -Reporting Angle: 263.2° Shear Load* (lbs) Applied Load (%) Bending Moment (ft-lb) Applied Moment (%) Pole Capacity (%) Bending Stress (+/- psi) Vertical Load (lbs) Vertical Stress (psi) Total Stress (psi) Pole Capacity (%) <Undefined>1,385 73.8 36,225 78.0 38.9 2,539 2,958 27 2,566 37.7 VZW 275 14.7 5,872 12.6 6.3 412 1,547 14 425 6.3 Pole 216 11.5 4,340 9.4 4.7 304 2,247 20 324 4.8 Totals:1,875 100.0 46,436 100.0 49.8 3,255 6,752 61 3,315 48.8 Detailed Load Components: Power Owner Height (ft) Horiz. Offset (in) Cable Diameter (in) Sag at Max Temp (ft) Cable Weight (lbs/ft) Lead/Span Length (ft) Span Angle (deg) Wire Length (ft) Tension (lbs) Tension Moment* (ft-lb) Offset Moment* (ft-lb) Wind Moment* (ft-lb) Moment at GL* (ft-lb) Primary ACSR 1/0 AWG 6/1 RAVEN 36.82 19.83 0.3980 0.50 0.145 84.0 174.0 84.0 1,000 505 124 1,313 1,942 Primary ACSR 1/0 AWG 6/1 RAVEN 36.82 19.83 0.3980 0.55 0.145 90.0 354.0 90.0 1,000 -505 128 1,407 1,030 Primary ACSR 1/0 AWG 6/1 RAVEN 36.82 44.37 0.3980 0.50 0.145 84.0 174.0 84.0 1,000 505 -302 1,313 1,516 Primary ACSR 1/0 AWG 6/1 RAVEN 36.82 44.37 0.3980 0.55 0.145 90.0 354.0 90.0 1,000 -505 -312 1,407 590 Primary ACSR 1/0 AWG 6/1 RAVEN 36.82 44.37 0.3980 0.50 0.145 84.0 174.0 84.0 1,000 505 293 1,313 2,112 Primary ACSR 1/0 AWG 6/1 RAVEN 36.82 44.37 0.3980 0.55 0.145 90.0 354.0 90.0 1,000 -505 302 1,407 1,204 Secondary TRIPLEX 1/0 29.00 6.47 1.0300 1.22 0.399 84.0 174.0 84.0 500 199 60 1,501 1,760 Pole ID:11861.029 -Pole SA.pplx O-Calc® Pro Analysis Report Thursday, March 7, 2024 7:03 AM User:Tectonic PLS TECTONIC OCP:7.00 *Includes Load Factor(s) Page 3 of 5 2 Worst Wind Per Guy Wire 3 Wind At 264.1° Secondary TRIPLEX 1/0 29.00 6.47 1.0300 1.34 0.399 90.0 354.0 90.0 500 -199 64 1,608 1,474 Totals:0 358 11,270 11,628 Comm Owner Height (ft) Horiz. Offset (in) Cable Diameter (in) Sag at Max Temp (ft) Cable Weight (lbs/ft) Lead/Span Length (ft) Span Angle (deg) Wire Length (ft) Tension (lbs) Tension Moment* (ft-lb) Offset Moment* (ft-lb) Wind Moment* (ft-lb) Moment at GL* (ft-lb) Overlashed Bundle 1/4" EHS 23.00 7.08 0.2500 0.54 0.121 84.0 174.0 84.0 1,663 524 53 1,356 1,934 Fiber Fiber 1.0 22.83 7.08 1.0000 0.046 84.0 174.0 84.0 50 764 814 Overlashed Bundle 1/4" EHS 23.00 7.08 0.2500 0.61 0.121 90.0 354.0 90.0 1,663 -524 57 1,453 985 Fiber Fiber 1.0 22.83 7.08 1.0000 0.046 90.0 354.0 90.0 53 819 872 Overlashed Bundle 1/4" EHS 22.00 7.14 0.2500 0.71 0.121 84.0 174.0 84.0 1,663 502 69 1,578 2,148 Fiber Fiber 1.0 21.75 7.14 1.0000 0.046 84.0 174.0 84.0 65 1,005 1,070 Overlashed Bundle 1/4" EHS 22.00 7.14 0.2500 0.81 0.121 90.0 354.0 90.0 1,663 -502 74 1,690 1,262 Fiber Fiber 1.0 21.75 7.14 1.0000 0.046 90.0 354.0 90.0 70 1,077 1,147 Overlashed Bundle 6.6M Strand CATV 21.00 7.20 0.2500 0.64 0.121 84.0 174.0 84.0 1,663 479 63 1,400 1,943 CATV CATV 2.0 20.83 7.20 2.0700 0.096 84.0 174.0 84.0 62 858 920 Overlashed Bundle 6.6M Strand CATV 21.00 7.20 0.2500 0.73 0.121 90.0 354.0 90.0 1,663 -479 68 1,500 1,089 CATV CATV 2.0 20.83 7.20 2.0700 0.096 90.0 354.0 90.0 67 919 986 Overlashed Bundle 6.6M Strand CATV 20.00 7.26 0.2500 0.64 0.121 84.0 174.0 84.0 1,663 456 64 1,334 1,854 CATV CATV 2.0 19.83 7.26 2.0700 0.096 84.0 174.0 84.0 63 817 879 Overlashed Bundle 6.6M Strand CATV 20.00 7.26 0.2500 0.73 0.121 90.0 354.0 90.0 1,663 -456 68 1,429 1,041 CATV CATV 2.0 19.83 7.26 2.0700 0.096 90.0 354.0 90.0 67 875 942 Fiber Fiber Drop VZW 20.00 7.26 0.2370 1.42 0.026 89.0 63.0 89.0 40 -780 -26 83 -722 Overlashed Bundle 6.6M Strand CATV 19.00 7.31 0.2500 0.64 0.121 84.0 174.0 84.0 1,663 433 64 1,267 1,765 CATV CATV 2.0 18.83 7.31 2.0700 0.096 84.0 174.0 84.0 63 775 839 Overlashed Bundle 6.6M Strand CATV 19.00 7.31 0.2500 0.73 0.121 90.0 354.0 90.0 1,663 -433 69 1,358 993 CATV CATV 2.0 18.83 7.31 2.0700 0.096 90.0 354.0 90.0 68 831 899 Totals:-780 1,251 23,189 23,660 GenericEquipment Owner Height (ft) Horiz. Offset (in) Offset Angle (deg) Rotate Angle (deg) Unit Weight (lbs) Unit Height (in) Unit Depth (in) Unit Diameter (in) Unit Length (in) Offset Moment* (ft-lb) Wind Moment* (ft-lb) Moment at GL* (ft-lb) Cylinder CX20OMI218-3P22 VZW 40.70 0.17 0.0 0.0 36.00 24.00 --14.60 -- 0 721 722 Box Pole Top Mount VZW 39.20 0.87 180.0 0.0 100.00 12.00 4.00 --4.00 2 158 160 Box Mount Bracket VZW 37.78 5.87 180.0 0.0 10.00 13.00 2.00 --6.00 1 88 89 Box Mount Bracket VZW 37.78 4.13 360.0 0.0 10.00 13.00 2.00 --6.00 -1 88 87 Cylinder Antenna Mounting Cradle VZW 38.37 0.37 180.0 0.0 5.00 6.38 --11.00 -- 0 144 144 Cylinder Weatherhead VZW 28.50 7.25 135.0 0.0 1.50 6.00 --6.00 -- -1 52 51 Box MOPT Terminal (By Others) VZW 17.30 7.52 135.0 0.0 0.50 12.00 4.00 --4.50 0 70 70 Box Equipment Shroud - SSC-760249586X1X VZW 14.00 19.11 174.0 0.0 475.00 48.00 26.00 --24.00 20 1,414 1,434 Pole ID:11861.029 -Pole SA.pplx O-Calc® Pro Analysis Report Thursday, March 7, 2024 7:03 AM User:Tectonic PLS TECTONIC OCP:7.00 *Includes Load Factor(s) Page 4 of 5 2 Worst Wind Per Guy Wire 3 Wind At 264.1° Box Fujitsu Passive Fiber Enclosure VZW 14.00 35.11 174.0 0.0 10.00 12.00 6.00 --6.00 1 82 82 Box Load Center - BRP12B100R VZW 10.75 7.24 264.0 0.0 15.00 18.75 3.88 --14.31 18 233 251 Box Electric Meter -U2048- RL VZW 8.75 8.42 174.0 0.0 10.00 18.00 6.00 --9.00 0 76 77 Totals:39 3,128 3,167 Crossarm Owner Height (ft) Horiz. Offset (in) Offset Angle (deg) Rotate Angle (deg) Unit Weight (lbs) Unit Height (in) Unit Depth (in) Unit Length (in) Offset Moment* (ft-lb) Wind Moment* (ft-lb) Moment at GL* (ft-lb) Normal CROSSARM 3-3/4 X 4- 3/4 X 8 36.00 5.68 0.0 0.0 60.00 4.75 3.75 96.00 -7 67 61 Totals:-7 67 61 Riser Owner Height (ft) Horiz. Offset (in) Offset Angle (deg) Rotate Angle (deg) Unit Weight (lbs) Unit Height (in) Unit Depth (in) Unit Diameter (in) Unit Length (in) Offset Moment* (ft-lb) Wind Moment* (ft-lb) Moment at GL* (ft-lb) 1.0" Fiber Enclosure 170.0° H:16.8 1.0" Fiber Enclosure VZW 16.80 6.09 170.0 170.0 8.40 201.60 1.25 1.25 201.60 0 171 171 1.5" STD Secondary Conduit 135.0° H:28.5 1.5" STD Secondary Conduit VZW 28.50 6.09 135.0 135.0 28.50 342.00 1.90 1.90 342.00 -9 485 476 4.0" U-Guard 190.0° H:38.5 4.0" U-Guard VZW 38.50 6.09 190.0 190.0 77.00 462.00 4.00 4.00 462.00 11 2,769 2,780 Totals:2 3,425 3,427 Insulator Owner Height (ft) Horiz. Offset (in) Offset Angle (deg) Rotate Angle (deg) Unit Weight (lbs) Unit Diameter (in) Unit Length (in) Offset Moment* (ft-lb) Wind Moment* (ft-lb) Moment at GL* (ft-lb) Pin Pin Insulator - 5 kV 36.20 -19.00 286.7 0.0 6.00 3.50 7.50 0 48 48 Pin Pin Insulator - 5 kV 36.20 44.00 82.6 0.0 6.00 3.50 7.50 0 48 48 Pin Pin Insulator - 5 kV 36.20 -44.00 277.4 0.0 6.00 3.50 7.50 0 48 48 Spool Spool 2.5" 29.00 0.00 270.0 0.0 1.00 2.50 2.12 0 8 8 Bolt Three Bolt 23.00 0.00 270.0 0.0 5.00 3.00 0.10 0 0 0 Bolt Three Bolt 22.00 0.00 270.0 0.0 5.00 3.00 0.10 0 0 0 Bolt Three Bolt 21.00 0.00 270.0 0.0 5.00 3.00 0.10 0 0 0 Bolt Three Bolt 20.00 0.00 270.0 0.0 5.00 3.00 0.10 0 0 0 J-Hook J-Hook VZW 20.00 0.00 90.0 0.0 5.00 3.00 0.10 0 0 0 Bolt Three Bolt 19.00 0.00 270.0 0.0 5.00 3.00 0.10 0 0 0 Totals:0 154 154 Pole ID:11861.029 -Pole SA.pplx O-Calc® Pro Analysis Report Thursday, March 7, 2024 7:03 AM User:Tectonic PLS TECTONIC OCP:7.00 *Includes Load Factor(s) Page 5 of 5 2 Worst Wind Per Guy Wire 3 Wind At 264.1° Pole Buckling Buckling Constant Buckling Column Height* (ft) Buckling Section Height (% Buckling Col. Hgt.) Buckling Section Diameter (in) Minimum Buckling Diameter at GL (in) Diameter at Tip (in) Diameter at GL (in) Modulus of Elasticity (psi) Pole Density (pcf) Ice Density (pcf) Pole Tip Height (ft) Buckling Load Capacity at Height (lbs) Buckling Load Applied at Height (lbs) Buckling Load Factor of Safety 2.00 22.37 33.34 10.99 7.41 7.32 11.88 2.13e+6 60.00 57.00 38.50 44,455 444.24 6.58 NY industrial code rule 753 requires no less than twoworking days notice, but not more than ten days notice.Before You Dig, Drill Or Blast!CALL US TOLL FREE 1-800-962-7962UNDERGROUND FACILITIESPROTECTIVE ORGANIZATIONNew YorkDig Safely.··· ROADWORKAHEADENDROAD WORK