HomeMy WebLinkAbout20220202 31-33 Marion Avenue additional information March 18,2024 Creighton
April 14, 2021
Manning
Updated October 20, 2021
Mr. Chuck Marshall
Stewart's Shops
P.O. Box 435
Saratoga Springs, NY 12866
RE: Trip Generation Assessment,Stewart's Shop,City of Saratoga Springs,Saratoga County, New Fork,CM
Project No. 121-044
Dear Mr. Marshall:
Creighton Manning Engineering, LLP has completed a trip generation assessment for the proposed relocation
of an existing Stewort's Shop located at 15 Maple Dell to 33 Marion Avenue in the City of Saratoga Springs.
This evaluation is based on information provided in the "Conceptual Plan," prepared by Stewort's Shops last
revised August 11, 2021 included under Attachment A. -
Proposed Stewart's Figure 1—Project Location
Shop/Liquor Store/
1.0 Project Description Car Wash/Residential
The proposed project consists of the construction of a 3,975 Existing Mobil Gas/
square foot (SF) Stewort's Shop convenience market with 12 i Clean02 Car Wash
fueling positions, an approximate 5,000 SF commercial space - - -
(anticipated liquor store), and four single-family attached
homes at 33 Marion Avenue.This will replace the existing 1,972
SF Mobile Gas Station and service center that currently has 12
fueling positions and the existing 2,872 SF Cleon02 car wash that Existing Stewart's/
has two self-service bays and one automated bay. It is noted East Si de Wine and Spirits
that the proposed Stewort's Shop will reconfigure the car wash
building with two fully automated bays. It is anticipated that the
existing Stewort's Shop and East Side Wine and Spirits liquor
store will relocate to the proposed site on Marion Avenue. The NV R"50
e Existing Goodemote Physical
current parcel currently provides four driveways on Marion Therapy Medical Office
Avenue. The proposed project will maintain the existing
southern driveway and provide a new driveway located approximately 50-feet south of Avenue A.The three
remaining existing driveways will be eliminated which is consistent with access management principles.The
study area is shown on Figure 1 while the proposed development plan is summarized on Table 1.
Table I—Development Plan Summary
Land Use Existing Conditions Proposed Condition
11-15 Maple Dell
Stewart's Shop 2,700 SF
East Side Wine and Spirits Liquor Store 2,000 SF
33 Marion Avenue
Mobil Gas Station(12 fueling positions) 1,972 SF
Clean02 Car Wash(2 self-service and 1 automated bay) 2,872 SF
Stewart's Shop(12 fueling positions and 2 automated car wash bays) 3,975 SF
East Side Wine and Spirits Liquor Store 5,000 SF
Single-Family Attached Homes 4 Units
Creighton Manning Engineering, LLP 1 2 Winners Circle I Albany, NY 12205 1 518.446.0396 1 www.cmellp.com
Mr.Chuck Marshall
Updated October 20,2021
Page 2 of 4
2.0 Trip Generation Assessment
Existing Trip Generation Summary
Trip generation determines the quantity of traffic expected to travel to/from a given site. Trip generation
data was collected at the existing Stewart's Shop convenience market and the East Side Wine and Spirits
liquor store located on Maple Dell during the AM and PM peak hours on February 10 and 11, 2021. In
addition, trip generation data was also collected for the existing Mobil Gas Station and the Clean02 car wash
at the same time. A summary of the existing trip generation for the land uses on Maple Dell and Marion
Avenue is included on Table 2.
Table 2—Existing Trip Generation Summary
Land Use � AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Size
Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total
Stewart's Shop 2,700 SF 49 51 100 44 44 88
v
L Existing Stewarts Pass-By Trips(50%AM/PM) -25 -25 -50 -22 -22 -44
v
East Side Wine and Spirits 2,000 SF 0 0 0 20 22 42
Total Primary Trips 11-15 Maple Dell 24 26 50 42 44 86
Existing Mobile Gas Station 1,972 SF 22 26 48 29 48 77
o c Existing Mobile Gas Pass-By Trips(60%AM/65%PM) -14 -14 -28 -25 -25 -50
2 > Clean02 Car Wash 3 Bays 12 12 24 28 28 56
M Q
Total Primary Trips 33 Marion Avenue 20 24 44 32 51 83
Total Trips 1 3 89 172 121 142 263
Total Pass-By Trips 39 -39 -78 -47 -47 -94
Total Primary Trips 44 50 94 74 95 169
Table 2 indicates that the land uses on Maple Dell and Marion Avenue currently generate 172 total AM peak
hour trips and 263 total PM peak hour trips.
33 Marion Avenue Trip Generation Summary
The Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE) Trip Generation, 111" edition, is the industry standard used for
estimating trip generation for proposed land uses based on data collected at similar uses.The trip generation
of the new Stewart's Shop was estimated using land use code(LUC) 945 for a Convenience Store/Gas Station
while the trips for the four residential units was estimated using LUC 215 for Single-Family Attached Housing.
The existing 2,000 SF liquor store does not generate traffic during the AM peak hour; however, it generates
approximately 21 trips per 1,000 SF during the PM peak hour.The trip generation estimate for the new 5,000
SF commercial space located at 33 Marion Avenue is based on this observed trip rate since it is assumed that
the liquor store will relocate into this larger space. It is assumed that the trips associated with the existing
car wash on Marion Avenue will stay the same after redevelopment of the site since the land use will not
change. It is noted that the construction of the proposed Stewart's Shop will replace/repurpose the existing
Mobile Gas Station and car wash into a new and improved store;therefore,these existing trips were removed
from the total trip generation of the site since they currently exist on Marion Avenue.
It can be expected that some trips to the gas station/convenience store originate from traffic that is already
passing the site on Marion Avenue. Pass-by trips are vehicles that will stop at the site before continuing on
to their primary destination. For example, a drivertraveling northbound on Marion Avenue leavingwork may
stop at the convenience store and then continue northbound towards home. This type of trip is considered
VZ%1 Creighton
I Manning
Mr.Chuck Marshall
Updated October 20,2021
Page 3 of 4
a pass-by trip. Based on a review of data published by ITE, a pass-by trip percentage of 60% to 65% was
applied to trips generated by the gas station/convenience store. It is anticipated that trips generated by the
liquor store could also be reduced by a pass-by credit; however, ITE does not provide pass-by credits for this
type of land use. In order to provide a conservative assessment, a pass-by credit was not applied to the liquor
store commercial space.A summary of the trip generation at 33 Marion Avenue is shown in Table 3.
Table 3—Trip Generation Summary on Marion Avenue
Land Use � AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Size
Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total
Existing 33 Marion Avenue
Mobil Gas Station 1,972 SF 22 26 48 29 48 77
-14 -14 -28 -25 -25 -50
�
Clean02 Car Wash 3 Bays 12 12 24 28 28 56
IV Total 33 Marion Avenue 34 38 72 57 76 133
x
"' Total Pass-By Trips 33 Marion Avenue -14 -14 -28 -25 -25 -50
Total Primary Trips 33 Marion Avenue 20 24 44 32 51 83
Proposed 33 Marion Avenue
Proposed Stewart's Shop(LUC 945) 3,975 SF 112 113 225 108 109 217
N Pass-By Trips(60%AM/65%PM) -67 -67 -134 -71 -71 -142
o New Primary Stewart°s Shop Trips 45 46 91 37 38 75
Existing Trips-Car Wash 2 Bays 12 12 24 28 28 56
a u —Proposed Liquor Store 5,000 SF 0 0 0 1 50 55 1 105
a—a°, Single-Family Attached Homes 4 Units 1 1 2 1 1 2
Total Trips 33 Marion Avenue 125 126 251 187 193 380
Total Pass-By Trips 33 Marion Avenue -67 -67 -134 -71 -71 -142
Total Primary Trips 33 Marion Avenue 58 59 117 116 122 238
Total New Trips on Marion Avenue +91 +88 +179 +130 +117 +247
Total Pass-By Trips on Marion Avenue -53 -53 -106 -46 -46 -92
Total New Primary Trips on Marion Avenue +38 +35 +73 +84 +71 +155
Table 3 indicates that the proposed development will generate 73 new primary trips to 33 Marion Avenue
duringthe AM peak hour and 155 new primarytrips to 33 Marion Avenue duringthe PM peak hour; however,
it is noted that the existing Stewart's Shop and East Side Wine and Spirits liquor store on Maple Dell currently
generate traffic during the AM and PM peak hours that will essentially relocate to the new location which
will reduce the overall "new" trips to the area. Table 4 provides an executive summary that shows the
number of new trips to the whole project area.
VZ%1 Creighton
I Manning
Mr.Chuck Marshall
Updated October 20,2021
Page 4 of 4
Table 4—Trip Generation Summary to Project Area
Lana Use AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Enter Exit Total Enter I Exit Total
a, Total Trips 83 89 172 121 142 263
a >
tW 0 a Total Pass-By Trips -39 -39 -78 -47 -47 -94
a c
w n o
LU g Total Primary Trips 44 50 94 74 95 169
125 126 251 187 193 380
o Total Trips to 33 Marion Avenue
0 cu
-67 -67 -134 -71 -71 -142
CL o � > Total Pass-ByTrips to 33 Marion Avenue
m Q
58 59 117 116 122 238
Total Primary Trips to 33 Marion Avenue
Total New Trips to Project Area 42 37 79 66 51 117
v Total New Pass-By Trips to Project Area -28 -28 -56 -24 -24 -48
Total New Primary Trips to Project Area 14 9 23 42 27 69
Table 4 indicates that the proposed project will generate 23 new primary trips to the project area during the
AM peak hour and 69 new primary trips to the project area during the PM peak hour.
3.0 Trip Generation Conclusions
The trip generation analysis indicates that relocation of the uses from 15 Maple Dell and re-development of
the Mobile Gas Station and Cleon02 car wash businesses located at 33 Marion Avenue with a new Stewort's
Shop with car wash bays, a new East Side Wine and Spirit store, and four attached single-family homes will
generate 23 new primary trips during the AM peak hour and 69 new primary trips during the PM peak hour
to the project area.
If you have any questions regarding the above trip generation assessment, please feel free to contact our
office.
Respectfully submitted,
Creighton Manning Engineering, LLP
Mark D. Nadolny
Associate
Attachments
\\CME-FILE01\Company\Projects\2021\121-044Stewarts-Marion Ave Saratoga\Working\Traffic\Reports\121044_trip gen Itr_20211020.docx
Creighton
Manning
Attachment A
Proposed Site Plan
Stewart's Shop
City of Saratoga Springs, New York
w
p � z
$ ago a
n �
R
Q44 m
S � sa i
LU
a
I `\
f
I
--- _ _ =7nN.:3AV NOINHW —— ——
a
LO
LU
1
-
0 �Q� I
°V
�ty
c �
cpT
is L c I
c �L- 0-
,
E m c
a, o o 2 —
cC U a Q
O
a
U
O
LIT d I
�;g 0 O
It
w6 w o g go
a a �6 oa a x w 4 so ES sa g
N
F
r OC
� a m
D iwOF m g X V
ao°z
ILe F
W E
z � �a
°os N z cl
1 /y�
f _---- ' w QQ
1 / Z z u N. q Q aul
_ zI 3�101 N011rybyd35 / OF � d ° w Z
N a
z U
I a
I i z W o p m z p rtml rc
LLI
0 3® / Z
4 C
> rW r
z w a g a o wLL
I z �
LL I 1 I A I A w°
I
W
I _
< Z - o �
1 / d z z °o
o O 9 a y o/Noiivavd3s d35N dSIQ
m
tzb aasodoa'a
N
o No bbbdds / a o F < 3 o a o a
z b1
/ 0 4
� � o
z e r
r z < w
� o z
a
a o z a
d
a � m
I oQ s
i9 o Q J Q w o o w m g w
m o
Z Q - Q 0 a V f �
z W Jl
I b ° _ � � °W w
> S 3 f p
_ rLU
O o 0 4 W z
a m n
o ' w
°o W w o i ° w ziu
�' 3 0 m wLLI
Q z
Z Noii
I / W
aAv9 0/ va'ud3s a3saadsia 9Niisixa
_ N
RL o — mt > F ID oFow
Q�
K p
/ °z V i LL V 4 z°
III III l O —
/� J ° m
IyI l 9N w
� � W
ga m zi S
N
1 ��
m
DI I I N o N o B
I IL J
Q s
S i O
Li
I a
I I �
I
I I ,
I s��
I
zl I I
/
I
I I I
I
I 1
I
I
=�a I
sum I I
I
I '
I 1
I
•
I
I o o o m
Ia
�/ I
MJL z
I z
I ro o
I
, W
U U U
u
ILL1a
1 J O
II �
w
QzLUQ _
i
Q J
i
F- W NNNN
LU
o
F o
N
a
N
- N Z
4 a
No N o B r
LL y "o N
as
J i I
LJ�AflHHIN m
I
I
I ,
�g
r
s s—
mm
I �
qh
EN
� o Q
ck u.ri d
I
1. a a
I _ „
m a
a^
0
d
Q
N
o
w
4
4
ow
p
F W.
F ink � P 11
CS
te,«nt's
ftjDa8
November 9, 2021
Honorable Meg Kelly, Mayor
City of Saratoga Springs
474 Broadway
Saratoga Springs, New York 12866
Dear Mayor Kelly and Members of the Saratoga Springs City Council:
write to you as the Engineer of Record (Professional Engineer Lic.#091096)for Stewart's Shops Corp. in
its proposal to redevelop the properties located at Marion Avenue and Maple Dell. As an in-house
engineer at Stewart's for the past 5 years, I have significant experience in the realm of site development,
stormwater management and the associated regulations at both the state and local levels.
Saratoga Springs is a registered Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) participating community.
Chapter 242 of the Saratoga City Code requires the development and implementation of a Full
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)for land disturbance exceeding 0.1 acres, which acreage
we will definitely exceed with our project. As such, we intend on preparing and submitting a SWPPP for
the City's review during the subsequent site-specific review for site plan and special use permit,as
necessary. Included in the SWPPP shall be those activities that take place during construction and the
monitoring of facilities post construction.
It is important to determine that while the Stewart's location is within the Loughberry Lake Critical
Environmental Area (CEA), Section 248(A)1 of the City's ordinance contains a reference to New York
State Stormwater Design Manual which is the technical guide for all of the City's stormwater
management plans. Therefore, Stewart's proposed SWPPP will be prepared and submitted to meet the
City's established regulations. In addition, since the proposed activity is adjacent to the Loughberry Lake
Overlay,the improved stormwater management system that we are proposing to implement will be
considerably better for the overall environment.
Respectfu y submitte
Scott E. Kitchner, P.E.
Stewart's Shops Corp.
P.O. Box 435 Saratoga Springs, NY 12866
S
tewcLjtt's
s� ��
November 9,2021
Honorable Meg Kelly,Mayor
City of Saratoga Springs
474 Broadway
Saratoga Springs,New York 12866
Mayor Kelly and Members of the Saratoga Springs City Council,
While I have not attended any of the previous meetings between Stewart's and the City of Saratoga
Springs regarding the redevelopment of our store,I have been made aware of some of the questions and
concerns. This letter seeks to provide the regulatory references for some of these elements and is offered
as a supplement to the Petroleum Storage Equipment—Design, Installation&Maintenance(attached).
As a point of reference,I am the Class A Operator for the entire Stewart's Shops Petroleum Bulk Storage
program and a Licensed Geologist in the State of New York.
It is our understanding that the City of Saratoga Springs does not have special zoning or building code
requirements for petroleum bulk storage outside the New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation regulation of Petroleum Bulk Storage(PBS)through 6 NYCRR Part 613,many of the
references are below are subparts to this section. Further, it is our understanding that the Loughberry
Lake Critical Environmental Area was established after historic petroleum use at this location and neither
section NYCRR 617.14 nor 617.7 preclude this activity.
Operator Training:
613-2.5(a)General requirements for all UST systems.Not later than October 11,2016,every facility
must ensure that it has designated Class A,Class B,and Class C Operators who meet the requirements of
this section.
(b)Designation of operators.Every facility must designate:
(1)one Class A and one Class B Operator for each UST system or group of UST systems(the same
individual may be designated as both);and
(2)one or more Class C Operators for each UST system or group of UST systems.
Stewart's Position: all shop level partners are trained to the Class C Operator level while only one
required per store.Employees are trained to stop,contain, clean,and report all surface spills to a
Corporate Spill Responder and involve emergency responders as needed.
Tanks Located in Areas Prone to Flooding:
613-2.2(e): Tank systems in locations subject to flooding. For Category 1 and 2 UST systems located in
an area where the UST may become buoyant because of a rise in the water table,flooding,or
accumulation of water,
Where, 613-1.3 Definitions:
(e)Category 1 tank system means any tank system whose tank was installed before December 27, 1986.
(f)Category 2 tank system means any tank system whose tank was installed from December 27, 1986
through October 11,2015.
(g)Category 3 tank system means any tank system whose tank was installed after October 11,2015.
Stewart's Position: Because of their installation date, Stewart's tanks would be"Category 3"and exempt
from this regulation.
P.O. Box 435 Saratoga Springs, NY 12866
Petroleum Bulk Storage Near Sensitive Receptor(Loughberry Lake)
613-4.l(b)(1)(v)(b): applies only to above ground storage, Stewart's tanks are proposed to be
underground.
The concluding sentence in the Petroleum Storage Equipment—Design, Installation &Maintenance
states"We simply cannot overstate our commitment to operate safe, compliant,well-maintained
underground storage tank systems for the protection of our neighborhoods and local environment"and
this can be exemplified by our record of handling 640,000,000 gallons of gasoline with only reportable
spill incidents of 68 gallons or 0.00001%.
Should you have any questions,please don't hesitate to reach me at(518)581-1201 ext. 4259.
Respectfully submitted,
OF N�
C ti o2� 'y�yap�
` k
Timothy Johncox, P.G.,Manager ti C'
Environmental Compliance and Remediation �o oosss d
Stewart's Shops Corp. SsroNN,
Full Environmental Assessment Form
Part 1-Project and Setting
Instructions for Completing Part 1
Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,
are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification.
Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to
any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information;indicate whether missing information does not exist,
or is not reasonably available to the sponsor;and,when possible,generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to
update or fully develop that information.
Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A&B. In Sections C,D&E,most items contain an initial question that
must be answered either"Yes"or"No". If the answer to the initial question is"Yes",complete the sub-questions that follow. If the
answer to the initial question is"No",proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any
additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the applicant or project sponsor to verify that the information
contained in Part lis accurate and complete.
A.Project and AppHeant/Sponsor Information.
Name of Action or Project:
Marion Ave-Maple Dell Planned Unit Development
Project Location(describe,and attach a general location map):
Marion Ave(Rt 9)and Maple Dell
Brief Description of Proposed Action(include purpose or need):
Applicant owns several parcels(6.14 acres)along Marion Avenue and Maple Dell which contain a multitude of existing uses and vacant land.Applicant
now seeks to establish a Planned Unit Development that will facilitate the construction of a new store with gas pumps,a car wash,4 residential units,and
professional office space,among other things.The proposed zones include distinct zoning districts that will enable commercial,residential and passive use
of the land. The districts are Conservation Area(2 acres),Commercial Intense(-2 acres),Professional Office Institutional(1.23 acres)and a Residential
area that shall have no more than 4 units built on it.
Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone:(518)581-1201
Stewart's Shops Corp. E-Mail: cmarshall@stewartsshops.com
Address:P.O Box 435
City/PO:Saratoga Springs State:New York Zip Code: 2.66
Project Contact(if not same as sponsor;give name and titlelrole): Telephone:
E-Mail:
Address:
City/PO: State: Zip Code:
Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone:
E-Mail:
Address:
City/PO: State: Zip Code:
Page 1 of 13
B.Government Approvals
B.Government Approvals,Funding,or Sponsorship. ("Funding"includes grants,loans,tax relief,and any other forms of financial
assistance.)
Government Entity If Yes:Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date
Required (Actual or projected)
a.City Counsel.Town Board, OYesE:]No January 2021
Saratoga Springs City Council-Establishment of ary
or Village Board of Trustees PUD
b.City,Town or Village 5?[YeSEINO Saratoga Springs Planning Board-future site plan Spring 2022
—Planning Board or Commission approval
c.City,Town or [3YesE]No
Village Zoning Board of Appeals
d.Other local agencies 5?]Yes[:]No Saratoga Springs Design Review Commission- Spring 2022
Architectural Review
e.County agencies E:]YesElNo
f Regional agencies [3Yes[]No
g.State agencies 0Yes[3No NYSDOT Anticipated Fall 2021
h.Federal agencies E]YesE]No
i. Coastal Resources.
i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area,or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? MYes0No
ii. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? r7lYes0No
iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? MYesONo
C.Planning and Zoning
C.I.Planning and zoning actions.
Will administrative or legislative adoption,or amendment of a plan,local law,ordinance,rule or regulation be the MYes ONo
only approval(s)which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed?
• If Yes,complete sections C,F and G.
• If No,proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part I
C.2.Adopted land use plans.
a.Do any municipally-adopted (city,town,village or county)comprehensive land use plan(s)include the site OYesMNo
where the proposed action would be located?
If Yes,does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action OYes[:]No
would be located?
b.Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district(for example:Greenway; OYesMNo
Brownfield Opportunity Area(BOA);designated State or Federal heritage area;watershed management plan;
or other?)
If Yes,identify the plan(s):
NYS Heritage Areas:Mohawk Valley Heritage Corridor
c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, FlYesi?]No
or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan?;
If Yes,identify the plan(s):
Page 2 of 13
C.3. Zoning
a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. OYes[:]No
If Yes,what is the zoning classification(s)including any applicable overlay district?
The parcels are zoned TRB with the Gateway Overlay and UR-2. The project sits adjacent to the Loughberry Lake Overlay District with a small portion of
the parcel furthest east crossing the line but no development proposed within area.
b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? OYesMNo
c.Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action? EYes[:]No
If Yes,
L What is the proposed new zoning for the site? PUD with professional office,commercial intense,residential and conservation zones.
CA.Existing community services.
a.In what school district is the project site located?Saratoga Springs City School District
b.What police or other public protection forces serve the project site?
City of Saratoga Springs
c.Vdiieh fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site?
City of Saratoga Springs
d.What parks serve the project site?
Congress Park and the Spring Run Trail
D.Project Details
DA.Proposed and Potential Development
a.What is the general nature of the proposed action(e.g.,residential,industrial,commercial,recreational;if mixed,include all
components)?Commercial,residential,office
b.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 6.14 acres
b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 3.14 acres
c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned
or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 6.14 acres
c.Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use? Yes[:]No
L If Yes,what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units(e.g.,acres,miles,housing units,
square feet)? % 15 Units: 4
d.Is the proposed action a subdivision,or does it include a subdivision? FlYes®No
If Yes,
i.Purpose or type of subdivision?(e.g.,residential,industrial,commercial;if mixed,specify types)
Lot line adjustments will be made amongst the existing lots under Applicant'ownership.
ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? MYes®No
iff.Number of lots proposed?
i.v.Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum Maximum
e.Will the proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? F-1YesVlNo
L If No,anticipated period of construction: 9 months
H. If Yes:
• Total number of phases anticipated
• Anticipated commencement date of phase I (including demolition) - month year
• Anticipated completion date of final phase month _____year
• Generally describe connections or relationships among phases,including any contingencies where progress of one phase may
determine timing or duration of future phases:
Page 3 of 13
f.Does the project include new residential uses? PYes[]No
If Yes,show numbers of units proposed.
One Fan& Two Famil Three Family Multiple Family(four or more
Initial Phase 4
At completion
of all phases 4
g.Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction(including expansions)? OYesE]No
If Yes,
i.Total number of structures 3
ii. Dimensions(in feet)of largest proposed structure: 24 height; 60 width; and 84 length
iii.Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: [NEED TO ANSWER] square feet
h.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any OYes[:]No
liquids,such as creation of a water supply,reservoir,pond,lake,waste lagoon or other storage?
If Yes,
i.Purpose of the impoundment:Stormwater
ii.If a water impoundment,the principal source of the water: ❑Ground water[]Surface water streams®Other specify:
Collected sotrmwater
iii.If other than water,identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source.
iv.Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume:- million gallons;surface area:_ acres
v.Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: height;_length
vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure(e.g.,earth till,rock,wood,concrete):
Underground storage will be used with tying into the existing NYSDOT drainage system
D.2. Project Operations
a.Does the proposed action include any excavation,mining,or dredging,during construction.,operations,or both? E1YesRJNo
(Not including general site preparation,grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated
materials will remain onsite)
If Yes:
i What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging?
H.How much material(including rock,earth,sediments,etc.)is proposed to be removed from the site?
• Volume(specify tons or cubic yards):
• Over what duration of time?
iii.Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged,and plans to use,manage or dispose of them.
iv.Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? E]YesF]No
If yes,describe.
v.What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? acres
vi.What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? acres
vii.What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? feet
viii.Will the excavation require blasting? ElyesE]No
ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan:
b.Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of,increase or decrease in size of,or encroachment E1YesRJNo
into any existing wetland,waterbody,shoreline,beach or adjacent area?
If Yes:
i.Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected(by name,water index number,wetland map number or geographic
description):
Page 4 of 13
H.Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland,e.g.excavation,fill,placement of structures,or
alteration of channels,banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities,alterations and additions in square feet or acres:
iii.Will the proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? Myes J�No
If Yes,describe:
iv.Will the proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? F-1 YesFONo
If Yes:
• acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed:
• expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion:
• purpose of proposed removal(e.g.beach clearing,invasive species control,boat access):
• proposed method of plant removal:
• if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used,specify product(s):
v.Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation,following disturbance:
c.Will the proposed action use,or create a new demand for water? ®Yes E]No
If Yes:
i.Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: 5,000.gallons/day
H.Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? ®Yes ONo
If Yes:
• Name of district or service area: City of Saratoga Springs
• Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? 0 YesF-1 No
• Is the project site in the existing district? 0 YesF-1 No
• Is expansion of the district needed? MYesFONo
• Do existing lines serve the project site? W]YesE]No
iii. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? Myesoqo
If Yes:
• Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project:
• Souree(s)of supply for the district:
iv.Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? ❑YesONo
If,Yes:
• Applicantisponsor for new district:
• Date application submitted or anticipated:
• Proposed source(s)of supply for new district:
v. If a public water supply will not be used,describe plans to provide water supply for the project:
vi.If water supply will be from wells(public or private),what is the maximum pumping capacity:_gallonshninute.
d.Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? O Yes E]No
If Yes:
L Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: 5,000 gallons/day
ii.Nature of liquid wastes to be generated(e.g.,sanitary wastewater,industrial;if combination,describe all components and
approximate volumes or proportions of each):
Sanitary wastewater using water in/out approach
iii.Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? ®Yes[--]No
If Yes:
• Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: Saratoga County Sewer District
• Name of district: Distict 1
• Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? OYesONo
• Is the project site in the existing district? R]YesE]No
• Is expansion of the district needed? FlYesoNo
Page 5 of 13
• Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? OYes[]No
• Will a line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project? E]YesoNo
If Yes:
• Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project:
iv.Will a new wastewater(sewage)treatment district be formed to serve the project site? rIYesVNo
If Yes:
• Applicant/sponsor for new district:
• Date application submitted or anticipated:
• What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge?
v. If public facilities will not be used,describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project,including specifying proposed
receiving water(name and classification if surface discharge or describe subsurface disposal plans)-
vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture,recycle or reuse liquid waste:
e.Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create storrawater runoff,either from new point OYes[]No
sources(i.e.ditches,pipes,swales,curbs,gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater)or non-point
source(i.e.sheet flow)during construction or post construction?
If Yes:
L How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel?
Square feet or . 1.75 acres(impervious surface)
Square feet or 3.14 acres(parcel size)
ii.Describe types of new point sources.New sources are the expansion of the commercial activity where lands are currently treed
iii.Where will the stormwater runoff be directed(i.e.on-site stormwater management facility/structures,adjacent properties,
groundwater,on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)?
Stormwater will follow the existing drainage path from structures to conveyance piping and the receiving waterbody.
• If to surface waters,identify receiving water bodies or wetlands:
Spring Run
• Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties? E]YesENo
iv.Does the proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces,use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater? 0 Yes0 No
f. Does the proposed action include,or will it use on-site,one or more sources of air emissions,including fuel [:]YeSZNo
combustion,waste incineration,or other processes or operations?
If Yes,identify:
i.Mobile sources during project operations(e.g.,heavy equipment,fleet or delivery vehicles)
ii. Stationary sources during construction(e.g.,power generation,structural heating,batch plant,crushers)
iii. Stationary sources during operations(e.g.,process emissions,large boilers,electric generation)
g.Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f(above),require a NY State Air Registration,Air Facility Permit, E]Yes ONo
or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit?
If Yes:
L Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet E]Yes[]No
ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year)
ii.In addition to emissions as calculated in the application,the project will generate:
a Tons/year(short tons)of Carbon Dioxide(CO2)
e To ear(short tons)of Nitrous Oxide(N20)
0 Tons/year(short tons)of Perfluorocarbons(PFCs)
0 -Tons/year(short tons)of Sulfur Hexafluoride(SF6)
Tons/year(short tons)of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflourocarbons(BFCs)
Tons/year short tons)of Hazardous Air Pollutants(HAPs)
Page 6 of 13
h.Will the proposed action generate or emit methane(including,but not limited to,sewage treatment plants, [:]YesENo
landfills,composting facilities)?
If Yes:
L Estimate methane generation in tons/year(metric):
ii.Describe any methane capture,control or elimination measures included in project design(e.g.,combustion to generate heat or
electricity,flaring):
i.Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes,such as FlYesPINo
quarry or landfill operations?
If Yes:Describe operations and nature of emissions(e.g.,diesel exhaust,rock particulates/dust):
j.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial [3YesRJNo
new demand for transportation facilities or services?
If Yes:
L When is the peak traffic expected(Check all that apply): EMoming [I Evening []Weekend
E Randomly between hours of 7 to 9
ii.For commercial activities only,projected number of truck trips/day and type(e.g.,semi trailers and dump trucks):
71 vehicles per morning
iii.Parking spaces: Existing Determined by Site Plan Proposed Net increase/decrease -]No
iv.Does the proposed action include any shared use parking? EyesE
v. If the proposed action includes any modification of existing roads,creation of new roads or change in existing access,describe:
vi. Are public/private transportation service(s)or facilities available within V2 mile of the proposed site? R]Yes[-]No
vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid,electric nYesp]No
or other alternative fueled vehicles?
viii.Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing VYesE]No
pedestrian or bicycle routes?
k.Will the proposed action(for commercial or industrial projects only)generate new or additional demand EYesE]No
for energy?
If Yes:
i.Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action:
To be determined by building size
ii.Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project(e.g.,on-site combustion,on-site renewable,via grid/local utility,or
other):
National Grid service adjacent to site
iii. Will the proposed action require a new,or an upgrade,to an existing substation? E]YesoNo
1.Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply.
i.During Construction: ii. During Operations:
• Monday-Friday: 7AM-7PM 0 Monday-Friday: 5AM-11PM
• Saturday: 7AM-7PM 0 Saturday: 5AM-11PM
• Sunday: a Sunday: 5AM-11PM
• Holidays: 0 Holidays: 5AM-1 1 PM
Page 7 of 13
in.Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction, O Yes nNo
operation,or both?
If yes:
i. Provide details including sources,time of day and duration:
During construction the use of construction equipment will exceed ambient noise levels
ii. Will the proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen? O Yes nNo
Describe:An area of trees will be removed to accommodate proposed development however-2 acres shall be deeded for conservation
n.Will the proposed action have outdoor lighting? OYesE]No
If yes:
i.Describe source(s),location(s),height of fixture(s),direction/aim,and proximity to nearest occupied structures:
All fixtures will be downlit LED mounted and any soffit or ceiling lights(canopy)shall be flush mounted.
ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen? O Yes[]No
Describe:Area of trees outside that being preserved.
o.Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day? n Yes®No
If Yes,describe possible sources,potential frequency and duration of odor emissions,and proximity to nearest
occupied structures:
p.Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum(combined capacity of over 1,100 gallons) O Yes[]No
or chemical products 185 gallons in above ground storage or any amount in underground storage?
If Yes:
i.Product(s)to be stored Petroleum
ii.Volume(s) 25,000 per unit time day (e.g.,month,year)
W. Generally,describe the proposed storage facilities:
Double wall fiberglass tanks. A petroleum bulk storage narrative was submitted as a supplement to this narrative.
q.Will the proposed action(commercial,industrial and recreational projects only)use pesticides(i.e.,herbicides, 0 Yes ®No
insecticides)during construction or operation?
If Yes:
i.Describe proposed treatment(s):
ii.Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices? 1Z Yes []No
r.Will the proposed action(commercial or industrial projects only)involve or require the management or disposal 0 Yes E]No
of solid waste(excluding hazardous materials)?
If Yes:
i.Describe any solid waste(s)to be generated during construction or operation of the facility:
• Construction: 50(esfimated) tons per instance(unit of time)
• Operation: 2 tons per month (unit of time)
ii. Describe any proposals for on-site-minirni a ion,recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste:
• Construction:
• Operation: Cardboard and plastic recycling returns to manufacturing plant for recycling
W.Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site:
• Construction:Landfill
• Operation: Sorted material to be landfilled and others recycled
Page 8 of 13
s.Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility? F1 Yes 0 No
If Yes:
i. Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site(e.g.,recycling or transfer station,composting,landfill,or
other disposal activities):
ii. Anticipated rate of disposal/processing:
0 Tons/month,if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment,or
0 Tons/hour,if combustion or thermal treatment
iii.If landfill,anticipated site life: years
t.Will the proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation,treatment,storage,or disposal of hazardous[]Yes®No
waste?
If Yes:
i.Name(s)of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated,handled or managed at facility:
ii. Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents:
iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated tow/month
iv.Describe any proposals for on-site minimization,recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents:
v.Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility? Yes No
If Yes:provide name and location of facility:
If No:describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility:
E.Site and Setting of Proposed Action
E.I.Land uses on and surrounding the project site
a.Existing land uses.
i. Check all uses that occur on,adjoining and near the project site.
P1 Urban F1 Industrial 0 Commercial 0 Residential(suburban) F1 Rural(non-farm)
F1 Forest F1 Agriculture [] Aquatic [I Other(specify):
H. If mix of uses,generally describe:
b.Land uses and covertypes on the project site.
Land use or Current Acreage After Change
Covertype Acreage Project Completion (Acres+/-)
• Roads,buildings,and other paved or impervious 1.46 2.53 +1.07
surfaces
• Forested 3.43 1.87 -1.56
• Meadows,grasslands or brushlands(non- 0.75 1.24 +0.49
agricultural,including abandoned agricultural)
• Agricultural
(includes active orchards,field,greenhouse etc.)
• Surface water features
(lakes,ponds,streams,rivers,etc.)
• Wetlands(freshwater or tidal)
• Non-vegetated(bare rock,earth or fill)
• Other
Describe:
Page 9 of 13
c.Is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation? OYesn' No
i.If Yes:explain:
d.Are there any facilities serving children,the elderly,people with disabilities(e.g.,schools,hospitals,licensed []YesRJNo
day care centers,or group homes)within 1500 feet of the project site?
If Yes,
i.Identify Facilities:
e.Does the project site contain an existing dam? E1YesV1No
If Yes:
i.Dimensions of the dam and impoundment:
• Dam height: feet
• Dam length: feet
• Surface area: acres
• Volume impounded: gallons OR acre-feet
ii.Danfs existing hazard classification:
iii.Provide date and summarize results of last inspection:
f.Has the project site ever been used as a municipal,commercial or industrial solid waste management facility, E]YesPINo
or does the project site adjoin property which is now,or was at one time,used as a solid waste management facility?
If Yes:
L Has the facility been formally closed? 0 Yesn No
0 If yes,cite sources/documentation:
ii.Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility:
W.Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities:
9.Have hazardous wastes been generated,treated and/or disposed of at the site,or does the project site adjoin nYesPINo
property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat,store and/or dispose of hazardous waste?
If Yes:
i. Describe waste(s)handled and waste management activities,including approximate time when activities occurred:
h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site,or have any E1YesO No
remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site?
If Yes:
i. Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site nYesF-lNo
Remediation database? Check all that apply:
El Yes—Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s):
E] Yes—Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID number(s):
0 Neither database see attached disposal form
ii.If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities,describe control measures:
iii.Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database? W1Yesr1No
If yes,provide DEC ID number(s):546GI 5,V00300,546036
iv.If yes to(i),(ii)or(iii)above,describe current status of site(s):
Page 10 of 13
v.Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses? ❑Yes®No
• If yes,DEC site ID number:
• Describe the type of institutional control(e.g.,deed restriction or easement):
• Describe any use limitations:
• Describe any engineering controls:
• Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place? El Yes nNo
• Explain:
E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site
a.What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? N/A feet
b.Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site? ❑Yes®No
If Yes,what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? %
c.Predominant soil type(s)present on project site: Windsor Loamy Sand 100%
d.What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: feet
e.Drainage status of project site soils:n Well Drained: %of site
❑Moderately Well Drained: %of site
❑Poorly Drained %of site
f.Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: V1 0-10%-. 100%of site
❑ 10-15%: %of site
❑ 15%or greater: %of site
g.Are there any unique geologic features on the project site? ❑Yes®No
If Yes,describe:
h.Surface water features.
i. Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies(including streams,rivers, []YesR]No
ponds or lakes)?
H.Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site? WlYesnNo
If Yes to either i or ii,continue. If No,skip to E.21
iii. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal, OyesE]No
state or local agency?
iv.For each identified regulated wetland and waterbody on the project site,provide the following information:
• Streams: Name Classification
• Lakes or Ponds: Name Loughberry Lake Classification A
• Wetlands: Name Approximate Size
• Wetland No.(if regulated by DEC)
v. Are any of the above water bodies fisted in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired nYesOqo
waterbodies?
If yes,name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired:
i.Is the project site in a designated Floodway? ❑Yes®No
j.Is the project site in the 100-year Floodplain? E]YesR]No
k.Is the project site in the 500-year Floodplain? E]YesoNo
1.Is the project site located over,or immediately adjoining,a primary,principal or sole source aquifer? 0YesE3No
If Yes:
i.Name of aquifer:Principal Aquifer
Page 11 of 13
m. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site:
Prior disturbance
n.Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community`? [:]YesONo
If Yes:
i.Describe the habitat/community(composition,function,and basis for designation):
ii. Source(s)of description or evaluation:
iii.Extent of community/habitat:
• Currently: acres
• Following completion of project as proposed: acres
• Gain or loss(indicate+or-): acres
o.Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as ❑YesoNo
endangered or threatened,or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species?
If Yes:
L Species and listing(endangered or threatened):
p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare,or as a species of [--1YesRJNo
special concern?
If Yes:
i. Species and listing:
q.Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting,trapping,fishing or shell fishing? E]YesR]No
If yes,give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use:
E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site
a.Is the project site,or any portion of it,located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to MYesgNo
Agriculture and Markets Law,Article 25-AA,Section 303 and 304?
If Yes, provide county plus district name/number:
b.Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present? []YesR]No
i.If Yes:acreage(s)on project site?
H. Source(s)of soil rating(s):
c. Does the project site contain all or part of,or is it substantially contiguous to,a registered National [-]YesONo
Natural Landmark?
If Yes:
i. Nature of the natural landmark: ❑Biological Community ❑ Geological Feature
ii.Provide brief description of landmark,including values behind designation and approximate size/extent:
d.Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area? R]YesnNo
If Yes:
i. CEA name: Loughberry Lake Watershed
ii.Basis for designation: Protect Loughberry Lake water supply
iii.Designating agency and date: Agency:Saratoga Springs,City of,Date:6-13-86
Page 12 of 13
e.Does the project site contain,or is it substantially contiguous to,a building,archaeological site,or district M YesONo
which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places,or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS
Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places?
If Yes:
i.Nature of historic/archaeological resource: DArchaeological Site ElIlistoric Building or District
ii.Name:
iff.Brief description of attributes on which listing is based:
See attached SHPO letter of"No Impact'
f.Is the project site,or any portion of it,located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for R1YesEJNo
archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)archaeological site inventory?
g.Have additional archaeological or historic site(s)or resources been identified on the project site? E1YesRJNo
If Yes:
i.Describe possible resource(s):
ii.Basis for identification:
It.Is the project site within fives miles of any officially designated and publicly accessible federal,state,or local RJYesE]No
scenic or aesthetic resource?
If Yes:
i. Identify resource:Saratoga Springs Historic District and Various Individual Entities-see SHPO"No Impact"letter
ii.Nature of,or basis for,designation(e.g.,established highway overlook,state or local park,state historic trail or scenic byway,
etc.):
i.i.i..Distance between project and resource: miles.
i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild,Scenic and Recreational Rivers F1 Yes®No
Program 6 NYCRR 666?
If Yes:
i.Identify the name of the river and its designation:
ii.Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666? nYes[-]No
F.Additional Information
Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project.
If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal,please describe those impacts plus any
measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them.
G. Verification
I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant/Sponsor Name Stewart's Shops Corp. Date November 15,2021
Signature Charles Marshall Title Real Estate Rep
PRINT FORM Page 13 of 13
EAF Mapper Summary Report Wednesday, February 10,2021 4:21 PM
Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist
project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental
Wilton assessment form(EAF).Not all questions asked in the EAF are
teet7fil answered by the EAF Mapper.Additional information on any EAF
question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although
the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to
DEC,you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order
to obtain data not provided by the Mapper.Digital data is not a
4 fi ..%7 substitute for agency determinations.
Ottawa .ki treat
N
u t:
Zrz r
� mR a( Toronto :.
tia •`. i«y'+.,vas'- .,.r. r"«t9` :.r.;ft Lary
:,,c
r
t�rr�ttt€«r�.
ts=
d ttrt
y e X,7lax=r.j A
,. .. . ,. Now York
LL rtttgh
_
a�ta �- Philadelphia
r
p
a�tiitt r t xG.;ll-�ertnalx 1�1�:f�EtdlEC�tTp,.fiRCar�.Es it 1a{aan E��1ET1;Es China Hong k�rn�.E,ri �l'.=4P�aT !'i�C�r�E.«n�:ap�rt f�.�tET€;Esri�Yut7�iN�r7J k«ant�;Esrr
or rEsnrF.nlailalid [IGC-(: ( 01)at5b'e,41:10apcor"butors and the GISll el'COnIrttrItIV �(qp j)tai5b1Al;lapt:Otrtrib rtAVAIe'GlSt_I;�r Collin)unity
B.i.i [Coastal or Waterfront Area] No
B.i.ii [Local Waterfront Revitalization Area] No
C.2.b. [Special Planning District] Yes-Digital mapping data are not available for all Special Planning Districts.
Refer to EAF Workbook.
C,2.b. [Special Planning District-Name] NYS Heritage Areas:Mohawk Valley Heritage Corridor
EA.h [DEC Spills or Remediation Site Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF
Potential Contamination History] Workbook.
E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site- Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF
Listed] Workbook.
E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site- Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF
Environmental Site Remediation Database] Workbook.
E.1.h.iii [Within 2,000'of DEC Remediation Yes
Site]
EA.h.iii [Within 2,000'of DEC Remediation 546015,V00300, 546036
Site-DEC ID]
E.2.g [Unique Geologic Features] No
E.2.h.i[Surface Water Features] No
E.2.h.ii [Surface Water Features] Yes _
E.2.h.iii [Surface Water Features] Yes-Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and
waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook.
E.2.h.v[Impaired Water Bodies] No
E.21 [Floodway] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF
Workbook.
E.2.j. [100 Year Floodplain] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF
Workbook.
E.2.k. [500 Year Floodplain] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF
Workbook.
Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 1
E.2.1. [Aquifers] Yes
E.2.1. [Aquifer Names] Principal Aquifer _
E.2.n. [Natural Communities] No
E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species] No
E.2.p. [Rare Plants or Animals] . No
E.3.a. [Agricultural District] No
E.3.c. [National Natural Landmark] No
E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area] Yes
E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area-Name] Loughberry Lake Watershed
E.3.d.ii [Critical Environmental Area- Protect Loughbery Lake water supply
Reason]
E.3.d.iii [Critical Environmental Area— Date Agency:Saratoga Springs, City of, Date:6-13-86
and Agency]
E.3.e. [National or State Register of Historic Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF
Places or State Eligible Sites] Workbook.
E.3.f. [Archeological Sites] Yes
E.3.i. [Designated River Corridor] No
Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report a
IOppNWY�RKparks'+ Recreation,
E OFORTUNITY. and Historic Preservation
ANDREW M. CUOMO ERIK KULLESEID
Governor Commissioner
May 06, 2021
Charles Marshall
Stewart's Shops Corp.
PO Box 435
Saratoga Springs, NY 12866
Re: SEQRA
Stewart's PUD Marion Ave and Maple Dell
33 Marion Ave, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866
21 PR02830
Dear Charles Marshall:
Thank you for requesting the comments of the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic
Preservation (OPRHP). We have reviewed the project in accordance with the New York State
Historic Preservation Act of 1980 (Section 14.09 of the New York Parks, Recreation and
Historic Preservation Law). These comments are those of the OPRHP and relate only to
Historic/Cultural resources. They do not include potential environmental impacts to New York
State Parkland that may be involved in or near your project. Such impacts must be considered
as part of the environmental review of the project pursuant to the State Environmental Quality
Review Act (New York Environmental Conservation Law Article 8) and its implementing
regulations (6 NYCRR Part 617).
Based upon this review, it is the opinion of OPRHP that no properties, including archaeological
and/or historic resources, listed in or eligible for the New York State and National Registers of
Historic Places will be impacted by this project.
If further correspondence is required regarding this project, please be sure to refer to the
OPRHP Project Review (PR) number noted above.
Sincerely, l
R. Daniel Mackay
Deputy Commissioner for Historic Preservation
Division for Historic Preservation
Division for Historic Preservation
P.O. Box 189,Waterford, New York 12188-0189•(518)237-8643•parks.ny.gov