The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20240054 128, 132 Washington Garage Demo & Construction Application January 23, 2024 Re: - 128 and 132 Washington Street City of Saratoga Springs, NY Design Review Commission Attn: Amanda Tucker Dear Amanda and members of the Design Review Commission; I am submitting this application on behalf of Lori Sames as the Owner of 128 and 132 Washington Street. The Owner is currently in the process of combining the two parcels into one usable lot so that it will comply with Zoning for a 2- family residence. In addition, the Owner is requesting approval to allow demolition of the garage structure at 128/132 Washington Street. It is not clear on the exact date of construction; however, the Preservation Foundation has indicated the garage was built most likely in the 1920s. It appears on a Sanborn Map as a storage shed. Prior to that, there is an indication of a large barn structure that existed. (reference attached maps) Currently, the garage resides in the SE corner of the lot with 3/4 of the structure encroaching upon the back neighbor's property at 135 Grand Ave. To remedy the encroachment, Jenna Engelstein and Mathieu Digeser are selling Lori Sames a small parcel of land. The garage is not compliant with current zoning setbacks and is in poor structural condition. Structurally, the rafters are undersized for current snow load requirements and the headers over the garage indicate sagging and disrepair. (Existing rafters are true 2 x 4 at +/-18” o.c.) The walls of the existing garage are concrete masonry units. The CMU blocks are porous and there is visual evidence of cracks due to moisture penetration. Due to the moisture, the structural integrity of the wall has been compromised. We request approval to remove the existing garage to construct a new garage and future addition that will comply to required setbacks and current building code. The full design proposal is still being developed and contingent upon approval from the City. Currently, the applicant is only seeking approval to remove the existing garage structure. Respectfully submitted. Susan L. Davis, SD Atelier – Architecture, L.L.C. www.sdatelier.com Garage Exterior – Indication of roof damage and sagging Existing Garage – indicating proximity to adjacent structures. Indication of cracking and settling. Interior – True 2 x 4 rafters spaced +/- 2-0” on center. (undersized) Existing Garage that is over the current property line. Sanborn Map -circa 1950’s Revised APPLICATIONFOR: ARCHITECTURAL/HISTORICREVIEW APPLICANT(S)* OWNER(S) (If not applicant) ATTORNEY/AGENT Name Address Phone / / / Email Identify primary contact person:  Applicant Owner Attorney/Agent * An applicant must be the property owner, lessee, or one with an option to lease or purchase the property in question. Applicant’s interest in premises: Owner Lessee Under option to lease or purchase PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Address/Location: Tax Parcel #: . - - (for example: 165.52 – 4 – 37 ) Current Zoning District: Property use:  Residential Non-residential/mixed-use Type of Review:  Architectural Historic Extension/modification (of current approval) Summary description of proposed action: Has a previous application been filed with the DRC for this property? No  Yes – date(s)? _____________________ -App. No.(s)? _________________ DateAcquiredbyOwner:_________________ **HANDWRITTEN APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED** CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS CIT<+ALL%ROA':A< 6ARATO*A6PRIN*6N(:<OR. T(L:; www.saratoga-springs.org [FOR OFFICE USE] _______________ ASSOicatiRn ____________ DatereceiYed 3rRMectTitlH 6taIIRHYiHZBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 70 Railroad Pl, #305 Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 Lori Sames SD Atelier Architecture/Sue Davis 511 Broadway, 2nd floor Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 lorisames@yahoo.com sue@sdatelier.com 128 and 132 Washington St.165 66 2 86 UR3 See Attached narrative 518-275-5359 518-587-3385 12/22/23 **A “complete” application consists of as required below: New Construction / Additions Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures and adjacent properties Site plan, drawn to scale, showing existing & proposed construction, property lines & dimensions, required & proposed setbacks & lot coverage, site features (fences, walks, trees, etc.); on no larger than 2’x3’ sheet – smaller preferred if legible Elevation drawings showing design of all sides of existing & proposed construction – label dimensions, colors, materials, lighting (fixture & lamp type, wattage), etc. - include compass bearing & scale; no larger than 2’x3’ sheet – smaller permitted if legible Floor plans for proposed structure; on sheet no larger than 2’x3’ – smaller permitted if legible Product literature, specifications and samples of proposed materials and colors Change in exterior building materials (windows, doors, roof, siding, etc.), or color (in non-residential districts only) Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures and that illustrate affected features Elevation drawings showing all sides of existing & proposed construction – label dimensions, colors, materials, lighting (fixture & lamp type, wattage), etc. - include compass bearing & scale; no larger than 2’x3’ sheet – smaller permitted if legible Product literature, specifications and samples of proposed materials and colors Within front yard setbacks in Historic Districts only (Front setbacks: UR-1 & INST-HTR=30’; UR-4=25’; UR-2, UR-3 & NCUD-1=10’) - Installation, removal or change in material of drive- and walkways - Installation or removal of architectural, sculptural or vegetative screening over 3’ in height - Installation of accessory utility structures or radio/satellite transmission/reception devices (more than 2’ diameter) For any of above: Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures, and of adjacent properties Site plan showing existing & proposed construction: include property lines & dimensions, required & proposed setbacks & lot coverage, site features (fences, walks, trees, etc.) street names, compass bearing & scale; no larger than 2’x3’ sheet – smaller preferred if legible Product literature, specifications and samples of proposed materials and colors Signage / Awnings Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures, and adjacent properties Plan showing location of proposed sign/awning structure on building/premises: no larger than 11”x17” Scaled illustration of proposed sign/awning structure and lettering (front view & profile): include all dimensions of structure; type, dimensions and style of lettering or logo; description of colors, materials, mounting method and hardware Descriptions, specifications of proposed lighting including fixture & lamp type, wattage, mounting method, and location Product literature, specifications and samples of proposed materials and colors Demolition Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures, and of adjacent properties Site plan showing existing and any proposed structures - include dimensions, setbacks, street names, compass bearing, and scale Written description of reasons for demolition and, in addition: For structures of “architectural/historical significance”, demonstrate “good cause” why structure cannot be preserved For structures in an architectural district that might be eligible for listing on National Register of Historic Places, or for a “contributing” structure in a National Register district (contact City staff), provide plans for site development following demolition - include a timetable and letter of credit for project completion Telecommunication facilities Color photographs showing site/existing structures, and of adjacent properties Site plan showing existing and proposed structures: include dimensions, setbacks, street names, compass bearing, and scale Scaled illustration of proposed structures: include all dimensions; colors, materials, lighting, mounting details Consult Article 240-12.22 of the City’s Zoning Ordinance and City staff to ensure compliance with requirements for visual impact assessment and existing and proposed vegetative screening Revised 0 Revised Request for extension of current approval Identify date of original DRC approval: ______________Current expiration date: ________________ Org. App. No. ____________ Describe why this extension is necessary and whether any significant changes have occurred either on the site or in the neighborhood. SEQR Environmental Assessment Form Applicants proposing the following must complete “Part I” of the SEQR Short Environmental Assessment Form (available here: http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/permits_ej_operations_pdf/seafpartone.pdf): - Construction or expansion of a multi-family residential structure (4 units +) - Construction or expansion (exceeding 4,000 sq. ft. gross floor area) of a principal or accessory non-residential structure - Telecommunications facility, radio antennae, satellite dishes - Demolition Disclosure Does any City officer, employee or family member thereof have a financial interest (as defined by General Municipal Law Section 809) in this application? No  Yes - If yes, a statement disclosing the name, residence, nature, and extent of this interest must be filed with this application. Certification I/we, the property owner(s), or purchaser(s)/lessee(s) under contract, of the land in question, hereby request an appearance before the Design Review Commission. By the signature(s) attached hereto, I/we certify that the information provided within this application and accompanying documentation is, to the best of my/our knowledge, true and accurate. I/we further understand that intentionally providing false or misleading information is grounds for immediate denial of this application. I/we hereby authorize the members of the Design Review Commission and designated City staff to enter the property associated with this application for purposes of conducting any necessary site inspections relating to this application. Furthermore, I/we agree to meet all requirements under Article VII for Historic Review or Article VIII for Architectural Review of the Zoning Code of the City of Saratoga Springs. Date: (applicant signature) Date: (applicant signature) If applicant is not the currently the owner of the property, the current owner must also sign. Owner Signature: Date: Owner Signature: Date: Revised 0 INSTRUCTIONS 1. ELIGIBILITY: An applicant to the Design Review Commission for Architectural Review or Historic Review must be the property owner(s) or lessee, or have an option to lease or purchase the property in question. 2. COMPLETE SUBMISSIONS: Applicants are encouraged to work with City staff to ensure that an application is complete. The DRC will only consider properly completed applications that contain 1 original and 1 digital version of th lication and ALL other required materials as indicatedontheapplication. 3. ACTIONS REQUIRING REVIEW: Architectural Review District Historic Review District •any exterior changes that require a building permit •any change in exterior building materials •a new, or change to an existing, sign or sign structure •demolition of a structure Within a non-residential zoning district: •a change in exterior building color •installation of an awning •Installation or exterior change to a structure requiring a building or demolition permit •any material change to exterior of a structure including: - addition or removal of exterior architectural features - installation, removal or material changes to exterior building elements such as roof, siding, windows, doors, porches, etc. - enclosure or screening or buildings openings such as windows, doors, porches, etc. - installation of utility, mechanical or misc. accessory structures to the exterior of a building such as HVAC equipment, solar panels, wind turbines, radio/satellite transmission/reception devices, etc. Within a front yard setback: - installation, removal or material changes to drive- or walkways - installation or removal of architectural, sculptural or vegetative screening that exceeds 3’ in height - installation of accessory utility structures or radio/satellite transmission/reception devices over 2’ in diameter •a change in exterior building color within a non- residential zoning district •a new, or change to an existing, sign or awning •installation of telecommunications facilities Note – Ordinary maintenance or repair that does not involve a change in material, design or outer appearance is exempt from Historic or Architectural Review. City Hall - 474 Broadway Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 Tel: 518-587-3550 x www.saratoga-springs.org 4. DESIGN GUIDELINES: The Design Review Commission will evaluate whether the proposed action (construction, alteration or demolition) is compatible with existing structures and surrounding properties using the following criteria: •Height – consistent with historic form and context of site and surrounding properties •Scale – relationship of structure and its architectural elements to human size, form, perception •Proportion – relationship among building elements including front façade, windows, and doors •Rhythm – pattern resulting from repeating building elements such as door/window openings, columns, arches, and other façade elements •Directional Expression – compatibility with horizontal & vertical expression of surrounding structures •Massing & Open Space – relationship of structure to open space between it and adjoining buildings •Setback – compatibility with surrounding structures •Compatibility of the following with surrounding structures/properties: -Major building elements (storefronts, doors, windows, roof) -Building materials -Color – (in non-residential zoning districts only) 5. DECISIONS: The Design Review Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove an application. The DRC may impose appropriate conditions and safeguards in connection with its approval including nature/quality of materials, manner of construction, and design. An applicant may appeal a denied DRC application on the grounds of hardship. Application approvals shall expire within 18 months of unless the project has sufficiently commenced (i.e. building/demolition permits obtained and construction/alteration begun). Applicants may request up to 2 extensions if requested before expiration date of prior approval. 6.$GEND$D$7E: Check City’s website (www.saratoga-springs.org) for 7. APPLICATION FEE Make checks payable to the "Commissioner of Finance” ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: More detailed information on Architectural Review, Historic Review and the Design Review Commission responsibilities may be found in the City’s Zoning Ordinance available in City Hall and on the City’s web site at http://www.saratoga-springs.org/544/Zoning-Ordinance. Revised Application to City Council FEE Comprehensive Plan amendment $1,800 + $300/acre Zoning Ordinance amendment $800 + $300/acre Planned Unit Development (PUD) amendment $800 + $300/acre Application to Zoning Board of Appeals Use Variance $1,400 + $50/app Area Variance - Residential $350/1st var +$50/app +$150/ea add variance Area Variance - Non-residential $1000/1st var + $50/app+ $200/ ea add variance Interpretations $650 + $50/app Application Fee x 2 + $50/app Variance extensions 50% of Application fee + $50/app Application to Design Review Commission Demolition $500 Residential Structures Principal $70 Accessory $70 Extension $35 Modification $55 Multi-Family, Comm, Mixed-Use Structures Sketch $200 Principal $650 Extension $250 Modification $400 Multi-Family, Comm, Mixed-Use Accessory, Signs, Awnings Principal $150 Extension $100 Modification $150 Application Fee x 2 Application to Planning Board Special Use Permit $1200 + $50/app Temporary Use Permit $500 Special Use Permit - extension $400 Special Use Permit - modification $550 + $50/app Site Plan Review - incl. PUD: Sketch Plan $400 per sketch Site Plan Full Residential $400 + $250/unit Non-residential $800 + $150/1000 sf Administrative SPR Residential $400 Non-residential $800 Extension Residential $250 Non-residential $350 Subdivision - incl. PUD: Sketch Plan $400 per sketch Preliminary Approval Residential: 1-5 lots $700 + $50/app Residential: 6-10 lots $1100 + $50/app Residential: 11-20 lots $1450 + $50/app Residential: 21+ lots $1800 + $50/app Residential - extension $350 Final Approval Residential $1,550 + $200/lot + $50/app Non- Residential $2,400/lot + $50/app Final Approval Modification Residential $400 + $50/app Non- Residential $800 + $50/app Final Approval Extension Residential $250 Non- Residential $350 Other: Lot Line Adjustment/Subdivision Administrative Action$400 Letter of Credit - modification or extension $400 Letter of Credit - collection up to 1% of LoC Recreation Fee $2000/lot or unit Land Disturbance $750 + $35/acre Watercourse/Wetland Permit $750 SEQRA EIS Review (Draft & Final) TBD Post Work Application Fee Post Work Application Fee OFFICE OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FEES - 2023 City of Saratoga Springs OPED FeesPage 1 of 1 1852 Bevan Map 1858 Richard Clark Map 1876 Louis Cramer Map 1888 Burleigh Map 1889 Sanborn Map 1895 Sanborn Map 1900 Sanborn Map 1900 Corrected to 1950 Sanborn Map