Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20231004 3376 Broadway Treehouse Site Plan DE Comments 539.071.001-Treehouse Brewery -first traffic review-comment letter (ID 3042713).docx-Treehouse Brewing-12-11-23 10 Airline Drive, Suite 200, Albany, NY 12205 · Office: 518-218-1801 · Fax: 518-218-1805 · BartonandLoguidice.com January 16, 2024 Debbie LaBreche, P.E., City Engineer City of Saratoga Springs 474 Broadway Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 Re: Treehouse Brewery-3376 South Broadway Site Plan Review Traffic– DE services PB# 20231004/PO #230813 File: 539.071.001 Dear Ms. LaBreche: Barton & Loguidice, D.P.C. (B&L) has completed a first review of the following reports and information from Bohler for a project located at 3376 South Broadway proposed by Treehouse Microproduction Brewery:  Traffic Impact Study dated November, 2023 as prepared by GTS Consulting; This review was conducted on behalf of the City of Saratoga Springs. The above referenced documents and information were reviewed only with respect to our scope outlined in our task order/proposal. Traffic Study Comments 1. The traffic assessments were completed in accordance with industry accepted practices and methodology. 2. We take no exception to the Travel Speeds or Traffic Gap analyses completed. 3. There are no concerns with the sight distance analysis as there is adequate sight distance. Although not specifically stated in section 2.3, the available sight distances can accommodate passenger cars in addition to single-unit and combination delivery trucks (2 lanes crossed), if necessary. 4. The evening (Friday) and Saturday peak hours of 4:30 to 5:30 PM and 12:15 to 1:15 PM, respectively, are consistent with the mainline and turning movement data collected for the Traffic Impact Study (TIS). 5. Is the projected trip generation and distribution for the 215 approved apartments on Crescent Avenue consistent with the TIS that was developed for that site’s planning board approval? Do any of the trips travel east along Crescent Avenue (entering/exiting) from the proposed site, or do all trips travel west toward US Route 9 as shown on Figure 4 of Appendix D? If there are inconsistencies with the approved apartment TIS, please include updates on Figures 4 and 5. Debbie LaBreche, P.E., City Engineer City of Saratoga Springs January 16, 2024 Page 2 Z:\BL-Vault\ID2\18217AD2-1C71-4823-8927-99D5C4054147\0\3042000-3042999\3042713\L\L\539.071.001-Treehouse Brewery -first traffic review-comment letter (ID 3042713).docx 6. We agree with the pass-by trip rate of 25%. Although, the pass-by trip volumes in the Trip Generation Summary table on Page 8 should be checked and re -calculated. The pass-by trips should only be 25% of the On-Premises Beverage & Pizza generated traffic volumes. The Off-Premises Beverage Sales should not be included in the pass-by trip credit since those are described as pre-orders and would not be trips that are already driving by the site. 7. There is a typographical error in Figure 1 in Appendix D, for the intersection of US Route 9 and Crescent Avenue. The US Route 9 southbound through (thru) movement for Friday Evening should be 753, as shown in Appendix C Traffic Count Data, not 735. Please carry this revision through to the southbound “Passing by the Site” vehicle total of 811 on Figure 1, on Figures 2 and 3 for the same movements, and additionally in Section 3.1 of the Traffic Impact Study. 8. On Figure 1 of Appendix D, please confirm the total number of northbound “Passing by the Site” vehicles. It appears that the northbound directional total is greater than the combined turning count data from the US Route 9 and E. West Road turning count. If any revisions are required, please carry them through to Figures 2 and 3 of Appendix D. 9. Does the traffic growth rate consider any recommendations from the Capital Region Transportation Council (CRTC) and/or is it consistent with growth rate(s) utilized on other Traffic Impact Studies in close proximities to this proposed development? 10. The proposed development is within the jurisdictional boundary of the City of Saratoga Springs. Please confirm if the proposed development will require coordination with the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) and completion of a Commercial Highway Work Permit Application and a Highway Work Permit Application for Non-Utility Work prior to construction. 11. No ITE Trip Generation data sources exist for Off-Premises Beverage Sales. The TIS utilized similar data from three (3) of the same facility types in Massachusetts and averaged the Friday and Saturday average sales trips per hour. In the absence of other available data, we take no exception to this method of estimating trip generation. However, for comparison purposes, what are the services and square footages provided at the sites in Massachusetts? 12. ITE Trip Generation data is limited (Small Sample Size) for LUC-975 during Saturday peak hours. In the absence of better ITE data, please update the peak hour trip generation data with the similar Massachusetts facilities noted in the report? Another potential option could compare traffic projections and/or actual trips at the recently constructed Druthers Brewing facility in Clifton Park, New York if that data is available. 13. We take no exception to the Crash Analyses completed. The interse ction and segment crash rates are equivalent to or below the Statewide Average for similar facilities. Debbie LaBreche, P.E., City Engineer City of Saratoga Springs January 16, 2024 Page 2 Z:\BL-Vault\ID2\18217AD2-1C71-4823-8927-99D5C4054147\0\3042000-3042999\3042713\L\L\539.071.001-Treehouse Brewery -first traffic review-comment letter (ID 3042713).docx Please provide a response letter with detailed responses below DE and City comments in a different font. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, BARTON & LOGUIDICE, D.P.C. Bradley D. Grant Senior Project Manager BDG/bdg Cc via email- James Salaway Matt Zeno