HomeMy WebLinkAbout20230992 140 Grand Demo & Construction ApplicationRevised 01/2021
APPLICATION FOR:
ARCHITECTURAL / HISTORIC REVIEW
APPLICANT(S)* OWNER(S) (If not applicant) ATTORNEY/AGENT
Name
Address
Phone / / /
Email
Identify primary contact person: Applicant Owner Attorney/Agent
* An applicant must be the property owner, lessee, or one with an option to lease or purchase the property in question.
Applicant’s interest in premises: Owner Lessee Under option to lease or purchase
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Property Address/Location: Tax Parcel #: . - -
(for example: 165.52 – 4 – 37 )
Current Zoning District: Property use: Residential Non-residential/mixed-use
Type of Review: Architectural Historic Extension/modification (of current approval)
Summary description of proposed action:
Has a previous application been filed with the DRC for this property? No Yes – date(s)? _____________________
-App. No.(s)? _________________
Date Acquired by Owner: _________________
**HANDWRITTEN APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED**
CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS
DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION
CITY HALL - 474 BROADWAY
SARATOGA SPRINGS, NEW YORK 12866-2296
TEL: 518-587-3550 X2533
www.saratoga-springs.org
[FOR OFFICE USE]
_______________
(Application #)
____________
(Date received)
__________________________
(Project Title)
Staff Review _______________
**A “complete” application consists of 1 hard copy (original) , and 1 electronic copy of application & ALL other
materials as required below:
New Construction / Additions
Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures and adjacent properties
Site plan, drawn to scale, showing existing & proposed construction, property lines & dimensions, required & proposed setbacks & lot
coverage, site features (fences, walks, trees, etc.); on no larger than 2’x3’ sheet – smaller preferred if legible
Elevation drawings showing design of all sides of existing & proposed construction – label dimensions, colors, materials, lighting (fixture
& lamp type, wattage), etc. - include compass bearing & scale; no larger than 2’x3’ sheet – smaller permitted if legible
Floor plans for proposed structure; on sheet no larger than 2’x3’ – smaller permitted if legible
Product literature, specifications and samples of proposed materials and colors
Change in exterior building materials (windows, doors, roof, siding, etc.), or color (in non-residential districts only)
Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures and that illustrate affected features
Elevation drawings showing all sides of existing & proposed construction – label dimensions, colors, materials, lighting (fixture & lamp
type, wattage), etc. - include compass bearing & scale; no larger than 2’x3’ sheet – smaller permitted if legible
Product literature, specifications and samples of proposed materials and colors
Within front yard setbacks in Historic Districts only (Front setbacks: UR-1 & INST-HTR=30’; UR-4=25’; UR-2, UR-3 & NCUD-1=10’)
-Installation, removal or change in material of drive- and walkways
-Installation or removal of architectural, sculptural or vegetative screening over 3’ in height
-Installation of accessory utility structures or radio/satellite transmission/reception devices (more than 2’ diameter)
For any of above:
Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures, and of adjacent properties
Site plan showing existing & proposed construction: include property lines & dimensions, required & proposed setbacks & lot
coverage, site features (fences, walks, trees, etc.) street names, compass bearing & scale; no larger than 2’x3’ sheet – smaller
preferred if legible
Product literature, specifications and samples of proposed materials and colors
Signage / Awnings
Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures, and adjacent properties
Plan showing location of proposed sign/awning structure on building/premises: no larger than 11”x17”
Scaled illustration of proposed sign/awning structure and lettering (front view & profile): include all dimensions of structure; type,
dimensions and style of lettering or logo; description of colors, materials, mounting method and hardware
Descriptions, specifications of proposed lighting including fixture & lamp type, wattage, mounting method, and location
Product literature, specifications and samples of proposed materials and colors
Demolition
Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures, and of adjacent properties
Site plan showing existing and any proposed structures - include dimensions, setbacks, street names, compass bearing, and scale
Written description of reasons for demolition and, in addition:
For structures of “architectural/historical significance”, demonstrate “good cause” why structure cannot be preserved
For structures in an architectural district that might be eligible for listing on National Register of Historic Places, or for a
“contributing” structure in a National Register district (contact City staff), provide plans for site development following demolition -
include a timetable and letter of credit for project completion
Telecommunication facilities
Color photographs showing site/existing structures, and of adjacent properties
Site plan showing existing and proposed structures: include dimensions, setbacks, street names, compass bearing, and scale
Scaled illustration of proposed structures: include all dimensions; colors, materials, lighting, mounting details
Consult Article 240-12.22 of the City’s Zoning Ordinance and City staff to ensure compliance with requirements for visual impact
assessment and existing and proposed vegetative screening
Revised 01/2021
Revised 01/2021
Request for extension of current approval
Identify date of original DRC approval: ______________Current expiration date: ________________ Org. App. No. ____________
Describe why this extension is necessary and whether any significant changes have occurred either on the site or in the neighborhood.
SEQR Environmental Assessment Form
Applicants proposing the following must complete “Part I” of the SEQR Short Environmental Assessment Form (available here:
http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/permits_ej_operations_pdf/seafpartone.pdf):
-Construction or expansion of a multi-family residential structure (4 units +)
-Construction or expansion (exceeding 4,000 sq. ft. gross floor area) of a principal or accessory non-residential structure
-Telecommunications facility, radio antennae, satellite dishes
-Demolition
Disclosure
Does any City officer, employee or family member thereof have a financial interest (as defined by General Municipal Law
Section 809) in this application?
No Yes - If yes, a statement disclosing the name, residence, nature, and extent of this interest must be filed with this
application.
Certification
I/we, the property owner(s), or purchaser(s)/lessee(s) under contract, of the land in question, hereby request an appearance
before the Design Review Commission.
By the signature(s) attached hereto, I/we certify that the information provided within this application and accompanying
documentation is, to the best of my/our knowledge, true and accurate. I/we further understand that intentionally providing
false or misleading information is grounds for immediate denial of this application.
I/we hereby authorize the members of the Design Review Commission and designated City staff to enter the property
associated with this application for purposes of conducting any necessary site inspections relating to this application.
Furthermore, I/we agree to meet all requirements under Article VII for Historic Review or Article VIII for Architectural
Review of the Zoning Code of the City of Saratoga Springs.
Date:
(applicant signature)
Date:
(applicant signature)
If applicant is not the currently the owner of the property, the current owner must also sign.
Owner Signature: Date:
Owner Signature: Date:
Revised 01/2021
INSTRUCTIONS
ARCHITECTURAL / HISTORIC REVIEW APPLICATION
1.ELIGIBILITY: An applicant to the Design Review Commission for Architectural Review or Historic Review
must be the property owner(s) or lessee, or have an option to lease or purchase the property in question.
2.COMPLETE SUBMISSIONS: Applicants are encouraged to work with City staff to ensure that an application is
complete. The DRC will only consider properly completed applications that contain 1 original and 1
digital version of the application and ALL other required materials as indicated on the application.
HANDWRITTEN APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED!!
3.ACTIONS REQUIRING REVIEW:
Architectural Review District Historic Review District
•any exterior changes that require a building permit
•any change in exterior building materials
•a new, or change to an existing, sign or sign structure
•demolition of a structure
Within a non-residential zoning district:
•a change in exterior building color
•installation of an awning
•Installation or exterior change to a structure requiring a
building or demolition permit
•any material change to exterior of a structure including:
-addition or removal of exterior architectural features
-installation, removal or material changes to exterior
building elements such as roof, siding, windows, doors,
porches, etc.
-enclosure or screening or buildings openings such as
windows, doors, porches, etc.
-installation of utility, mechanical or misc. accessory
structures to the exterior of a building such as HVAC
equipment, solar panels, wind turbines, radio/satellite
transmission/reception devices, etc.
Within a front yard setback:
-installation, removal or material changes to drive- or
walkways
-installation or removal of architectural, sculptural or
vegetative screening that exceeds 3’ in height
-installation of accessory utility structures or
radio/satellite transmission/reception devices over 2’ in
diameter
•a change in exterior building color within a non-
residential zoning district
•a new, or change to an existing, sign or awning
•installation of telecommunications facilities
Note – Ordinary maintenance or repair that does not involve a change in material, design or outer appearance
is exempt from Historic or Architectural Review.
CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS
DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION
City Hall - 474 Broadway
Saratoga Springs, New York 12866
Tel: 518-587-3550 x2533
www.saratoga-springs.org
4.DESIGN GUIDELINES:
The Design Review Commission will evaluate whether the proposed action (construction, alteration or
demolition) is compatible with existing structures and surrounding properties using the following criteria:
•Height – consistent with historic form and context of site and surrounding properties
•Scale – relationship of structure and its architectural elements to human size, form, perception
•Proportion – relationship among building elements including front façade, windows, and doors
•Rhythm – pattern resulting from repeating building elements such as door/window openings, columns,
arches, and other façade elements
•Directional Expression – compatibility with horizontal & vertical expression of surrounding structures
•Massing & Open Space – relationship of structure to open space between it and adjoining buildings
•Setback – compatibility with surrounding structures
•Compatibility of the following with surrounding structures/properties:
-Major building elements (storefronts, doors, windows, roof)
-Building materials
-Color – (in non-residential zoning districts only)
5.DECISIONS: The Design Review Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove an
application. The DRC may impose appropriate conditions and safeguards in connection with its approval
including nature/quality of materials, manner of construction, and design. An applicant may appeal a denied
DRC application on the grounds of hardship.
Application approvals shall expire within 18 months of the filing date unless the project has sufficiently
commenced (i.e. building/demolition permits obtained and construction/alteration begun). Applicants may
request up to 2 extensions if requested before expiration date of prior approval.
6.AGENDA DATE: Check City’s website (www.saratoga-springs.org) for meeting dates. Applications are
placed on an agenda on first-come, first-served basis as determined by the completeness of the application.
7.APPLICATION FEE (NON-REFUNDABLE): Make checks payable to the "Commissioner of Finance”.
REFER TO THE CURRENT FEE WORKSHEET INCLUDED IN THIS DOCUMENT.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
More detailed information on Architectural Review, Historic Review and the Design Review Commission
responsibilities may be found in the City’s Zoning Ordinance available in City Hall and on the City’s web site at
http://www.saratoga-springs.org/544/Zoning-Ordinance.
Revised 01/2021
OPED Fees Type
Application to Zoning Board of Appeals [1] [2]TOTAL #VARIANCE
Use Variance
Area Variance - Residential
Area Variance - Multi-Family, Comm, Mixed-Use
Interpretations
Post-Work Application Fee
Variance extensions
Application to Design Review Commission [1]TOTAL #STRUCTURE
Demolition
Residential Structures
Principal
Accessory
Extension
Modification
Multi-Family, Comm, Mixed-Use Structures
Sketch
Principal
Extension
Modification
Multi-Family, Comm, Mixed-Use Accessory, Signs, Awnings
Principal
Extension
Modification
Post-Work Application Fee
Application to Planning Board [1]TOTAL #STRUCTURE
Special Use Permit [2]
Special Use Permit - extension
Special Use Permit - modification [2]
Site Plan Review - incl. PUD:
Sketch Plan
Residential
Residential - extension
Residential - modification
Non-residential
Non-Residential - extension
Non-Residential - modification
Subdivision - incl. PUD: TOTAL #LOTS
Sketch Plan
Preliminary Approval [2]
Residential: 1-5 lots
Residential: 6-10 lots
Residential: 11-20 lots
Residential: 21+ lots
Residential - extension
Final Approval [2]
Residential
Non- Residential
Final Approval Modification [2]
Residential
Non- Residential
Final Approval Extension
Residential
Non- Residential
Other:TOTAL #LOT/ACRE
Post-Work Application Fee
Lot L ine Adjustment
Letter of Credit - m odification o r extension
Letter of Credit - c ollection
Recreation Fee
Land Disturbance
SEQRA EIS Review (Draft & Final)
Legal Noticing if PB requires Public Hearing
2021 Fee
$1100 + $50/app
$275/var + $50/app + $125 each add'l variance
$660/var + $50/app + $200 each add'l variance
$550 +$50/app
Add 50% App fee + $50/app
50% of App fee + $50/app
$385
$55
$55
$35
$55
$165
$550
$200
$330
$140
$75
$140
Add 50% App fee
$990 + $50/app
$330
$450 + $50/app
$330
$330 + $200/unit
$200
$400
$660 + $130/1000 sf
$300
$650
$330
$660 + $50/app
$990 + $50/app
$1320 + $50/app
$1650 + 50/app
$330
$1320 + $175/lot + $50/app
$2000/lot + $50/app
$330 + $50/app
$550 + $50/app
$135
$330
Add 50% App fee
$350
$440
up to 1% of LoC
$2000/lot or unit
$660 + $55/acre
TBD
$50/app
[1]Fees are based on per structure, except where noted.
[2]Legal ad required; includes City processing and publishing
__________Total Paid at Intake
__________Revised Fee
__________Balance Due
___/___/___Balance Paid Staff approval _______________
2021 LAND USE BOARD FEE WORKSHEET
For Administrative Use
TOTAL DUE
Proposal for Renovation of 140 Grand Ave, Saratoga Springs, NY, 12866
To the esteemed members of the Design Review Board,
I am writing to seek your approval for the renovation of my property located at 140 Grand Ave,
Saratoga Springs, NY, 12866. This property is recognized as part of the Historical and
Architectural districts of Saratoga Springs and I am deeply committed to preserving the rich
heritage of the building while addressing the structural and safety concerns raised during its
recent evaluation.
The property's original construction dates back to 1880. Over the years, two additions were
made to the rear of the building. The middle addition boasts a foundation, whereas the
rear-most section lacks one. Recent structural assessments conducted by a reputable
engineering firm brought to light a series of moderate to grave structural issues. The findings of
this assessment have underscored the necessity to renovate and restore the property to ensure
its continued safety and longevity.
Outlined below are the specifics of my proposed renovations:
1.Demolition and Rebuilding:Following the engineering firm's recommendations, I propose to
completely demolish the two rear additions (approximately two-thirds of the current structure)
and then proceed with a rebuild.
2.Structural Adjustments:Presently, the building stands over the property line along
Beekman Street. My renovation plan involves rebuilding the new section 12 inches inward,
ensuring the entire structure stays within my property bounds.
3.Expansion:I intend to maximize the building's footprint from its current 1,250 sq. ft. to 1,900
sq. ft., which is within the allowable limit for my lot size.
4.Design Adjustments:While the property presently serves as a duplex, I envision the
renovated building to consist of two side-by-side townhomes, maintaining its duplex nature. The
original building showcases a gable roof, adorned by a brick chimney. The subsequent sections
also have gable roofs and a roll-off roof. My proposal seeks to unify the entire addition under a
singular gable roof, seamlessly integrating it perpendicularly with the main structure.
5.Exterior Changes:
● The main structure's chimney, integral to the building's aesthetics, will be replaced with a
faux look-alike to conserve its exterior appeal.
● The chimney in the middle section will be completely removed from the design.
● Respecting the Historical District's requirements, the main structure will be renovated
with wood siding.
● The newly added section will feature durable cement board siding.
1
● Given that the Anderson 400-series windows adhere to the Historical Guidelines, these
will be used throughout the property, replacing the existing vinyl windows.
Enclosed with this proposal are relevant supporting documents:
●Appendix A: Site Survey for 140 Grand Ave
●Appendix B: Structural Engineering Report for 140 Grand Ave
●Appendix C: Architectural Drawing (Proposal) for 140 Grand Ave
●Appendix D: Exterior Photos of Proposed Renovation Sections
●Appendix E: Exterior Photos of 140 Grand Ave
I am eager to preserve the historical charm of 140 Grand Ave while ensuring it's a safe and
modern dwelling. I trust the Design Review Board will consider this proposal favorably. I am
available to provide any further information or clarification if necessary.
Warm regards,
Joseph Snyder
2
GRAND AVE LEGEND:
s 04 °46'25" w
99.50'
2.!' OVER 0
0
[I,/
I
I
X
CONC. WALK
50.00' \
' 2 STORY HOUSE NO. 140
AREA: 4,975 SQ. FT.
°' "2 STORY HOUSE � / 9i o.; V V V V V
LANDS N/F OF
J & A, LLC
BK. 1543, PG. 311
/Rf
x SECTION 165.66 BLOCK 2 LOT 71
X
C/Rf
\ S 85°1J'J5" E 50.00'
x.,_ ______________ ""'4lx LI � I CHAIN LINK FENCE I -IX--X-X· -X-
_
J
i ��I I I
I. 10
I�
LANDS N/F OF
MARLENE ANN GASSER
1 BK. 1609, PG.173 I I
� I I SECTION 165.66 BLOCK 2 LOT 63
I i 11 I
--.....__..___...J.I -----:-;--;:;::;:;;�--;;;-----;:c;;-;;""fi�::::::::::::_""":;:::::_-_::_::_-_::_::_::_::_::_::_-_:_:_:_:_:_:_-_:_:_::_::_::_::_::_::�_...,J::--�--�N. 85"13'35,_"_.W..__ 50.QP'
COBB ALLEY
!Rf <V
MAP REFERENCES:
1."MAP OF VILLAGE LOTS LAID OUT AT SARATOGA SPRINGS
FOR J. ELLSWORTH, DA TED JUNE 3, 1838 AND FILED IN THE
SARATOGA COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE.
2. MAP OF LANDS FOR GEORGE GASSER SITUATE AT BEEKMAN
STREET AND COBB ALLEY, PREPARED BY THOMPSON & FLEMING
LAND SURVEYORS, DATED NOV. 22, 2006, JOB NO, S06-189.11
GENERAL NOTES:
NORTH ORIENTED TO MAP REFERENCE NO. 2.
UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO A SURVEY MAP
BEARING A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR'S SEAL IS A VIOLATION
OF SECTION 7209, SUBDIVISION 2 OF THE NEW YORK STATE
EDUCATION LAW.
ONLY COPIES FROM THE ORIGINAL OF THIS SURVEY MARKED
WITH AN ORIGINAL OF THE LAND SURVEYOR'S INKED SEAL OR
HIS EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE VALID TRUE
COPIES.
20 20
SCALE IN FEET
1n=20'
TAX PARCEL NUMBER:
CITY OF SARATOGA, SARATOGA COUNTY, NEW YORK SEC.
165.66 -BLK. 2 -PARCEL 72
DEED REFERENCES:
1.JAMES E. COKER TO JOSEPH J. SNYDER, DA TED APRIL 27,
2022 AND RECORDED IN THE SARA TOGA COUNTY CLERKS
OFFICE IN INSTRUMENT 2022014969 140 GRAND AVENUE PROPERTY BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE LANDS OF JOSEPH J. SNYDER C/Rf 0
C/RS 0
!Rf 0
/Pf 0
NON
TRANS. □LP [] 1W ..
-0-
H'ITJ Q
-OH-
£1,( □
GN □
SURVEYED FROM RECORD DESCRIPTION AND AS IN POSSESSION.
SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS,
CONDITIONS AND AGREEMENTS OF RECORD. z.,__ _______________________ _ Q CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS SARATOGA COUNTY, N.Y. SURVEY SUBJECT TO ANY RIGHT, TITLE OR INTEREST THE
PUBLIC MAY HAVE FOR HIGHWAY USE.
SURVEY SHOWN IS SUBJECT TO ANY SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
THAT MAY EXIST, IF ANY.
Drawing Name: Z: \PROJEClS\2022\22-3233\dwg\22-32.33.dwg Xref■ Attached: Dato Printed: Sop 14, 2022. 11:32am
en.,__ _______________________ _
cf; SCALE: 1"=20' SEPTEMBER 13, 2022 0:::1----------------------------1 DRAWN BY: VPA PROJECT NO: 22-3233
AUSFELD & WALDRUFF LAND SURVEYORS LLP 323 CLINTON STREET, SCHENECTADY NY PHONE: (518) 346-1595 FAX:(518)770-1655 CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND
CAPPED IRON ROD SET
IRON ROD FOUND
IRON PIPE FOUND
MONUMENT FOUND
ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER
LIGHT POLE
WATER VALVE
UTILITY POLE
HYDRANT
OVERHEAD WIRES
ELECTRIC METER
GAS METER VINCENT P. AUSFELD P.L.S. LICENSE #049597
www.awlsllp.com
Appendix A: Site Survey for 140 Grand Ave
3
333 Kingsley Road, Burnt Hills, NY 12027 • Office (518) 280-3190 • Fax (518) 280-5379
•Rich@nolan-engineering.com • www.nolan-engineering.com
January 8, 2023
SUBJECT: Structural Inspection Report
SITE LOCATION: 140 Grand Ave., Saratoga Springs, NY 12866
Dear Mr. Snyder,
This letter transmits the results of a structural inspection that was performed at the
address cited above. The inspection was performed at your request in order to
determine the structural condition of the building. The inspection was performed on
December 15, 2022.
INSPECTION
According to Zillow.com, the structure was a multi-family dwelling that contained 4
bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, 2,352 square feet and was constructed in 1880. Although the
original structure may have been constructed in 1880, it appeared that the structure has
been added on to over the years. The building was two-stories in height and had gable
and flat roofs. The structure was vacant at the time of the inspection and completely
gutted on the interior.
The front/original and center portion of the home was built on a full basement foundation
consisting of stacked stones and poured concrete walls. The rear/newer portion of the
home appeared to be constructed on-grade and there was no access to the underside.
The exterior of the home had vinyl siding. There were vinyl soffits and aluminum fascia.
There were also areas that had painted wood trim. There were two brick chimneys. The
chimney near the center of the home was in complete structural failure at the base in the
form of missing several bricks. The chimney in the front portion of the home was bricked
closed.
Appendix B: Structural Engineering Report for 140 Grand Ave
4
The wall framing consisted of mostly true dimensional lumber and rough-cut lumber and the
framing technique was post-and-beam. The framing in the front/original structure appeared
to be structurally acceptable and serviceable.
However, in the rear additions off of the main structure, there was wood decay observed at
several locations in the exterior walls and roof rafters. Much of the exterior wall framing was
found to be completed with poor workmanship even for the period of construction. Much of
the exterior wall framing was made up of several non-continuous, misaligned, randomly
orientated, randomly sized wood members. Many of the floor joists were undersized, bowed,
split, cracked and had smaller pieces of wood attached to them. Several of the main beams
supporting the second floor were undersized, bowed and damaged.
The foundation under the front and center portion of the home were inspected. The
underside of the floor was spray foamed which prevented 100% visual inspection of the floor
framing. The foundation walls were found to be plumb and appeared to be structurally
acceptable. What was visible of the floor framing appeared to be structurally acceptable.
CONCLUSION
In my opinion, the front/original section of the home is salvageable. For the rear two-thirds of
the building, there was a large amount of wood decay in the wall and roof framing,
undersized framing members and bizarre, unconventional, unsound, wall framing. There
was no observable foundation under the rear third section and evidence of frost movement
and wood decay at the floors and base of the walls was observed.
RECOMMENDATIONS
In my opinion, the front/original section of the house should remain and can be renovated.
The middle third section should be razed down to the foundation and rebuilt on the existing
foundation/first floor and the rear third section completed razed and reconstructed on an
approved foundation.
These findings and results are based on information available at the time of the inspection
and we reserve the right to change our opinion if new information becomes available. This
report is not meant to be or imply a warrantee against, past, present or future conditions.
Please contact our office if conditions worsen or you have any other concerns or questions.
Sincerely,
Richard E. Nolan, PE Lic. # 083929
Nolan Engineering, PLLC
Appendix B: Structural Engineering Report for 140 Grand Ave
5
Figure 1 – front/original section of home
Figure 2 – left rear of home
Appendix B: Structural Engineering Report for 140 Grand Ave
6
Figure 3 – sample of wood decay in exterior wall and damage to roof rafters
Figure 4 – sample of wood decay in exterior wall
Appendix B: Structural Engineering Report for 140 Grand Ave
7
Figure 5 – chimney located in center of home has bricks missing on entire left side at base
Figure 6 – sample of splits at ends of floor joists, and undersized beam at center section of
home
Appendix B: Structural Engineering Report for 140 Grand Ave
8
Figure 7 – bricked in chimney in front right section of home
Figure 8 – sample unconventional and structurally unsound wall framing
Appendix B: Structural Engineering Report for 140 Grand Ave
9
Figure 9 – sample unconventional and structurally unsound wall framing
Figure 10 – sample unconventional and structurally unsound wall framing
Appendix B: Structural Engineering Report for 140 Grand Ave
10
Figure 11 – sample unconventional and structurally unsound wall framing
Figure 12 – sample rafter, planking and wall framing decay
Appendix B: Structural Engineering Report for 140 Grand Ave
11
Figure 13 – sample unconventional and structurally unsound wall framing
Figure 14 – sample basement area
Appendix B: Structural Engineering Report for 140 Grand Ave
12
Figure 15 – sample basement area
Figure 16 – sample basement area
Appendix B: Structural Engineering Report for 140 Grand Ave
13
Appendix C: Architectural Drawings (Proposal) for 140 Grand Ave
14
Appendix C: Architectural Drawings (Proposal) for 140 Grand Ave
15
Appendix C: Architectural Drawings (Proposal) for 140 Grand Ave
16
Appendix C: Architectural Drawings (Proposal) for 140 Grand Ave
17
Appendix C: Architectural Drawings (Proposal) for 140 Grand Ave
18
Appendix C: Architectural Drawings (Proposal) for 140 Grand Ave
19
Appendix C: Architectural Drawings (Proposal) for 140 Grand Ave
20
Appendix C: Architectural Drawings (Proposal) for 140 Grand Ave
21
Below is an edited Site Survey for 140 Grand Ave highlighting the two sections for demo along
w/ photos from all sides of the house. Dimensions of each section:
●Section 1: ~17’9” X 25’7” (~454 sq/ft of building footprint)
●Section 2: ~11’ X 25’7” (~282 sq/ft of building footprint)
○
Appendix D: Exterior Photos of Proposed Renovation Sections
22
Appendix D: Exterior Photos of Proposed Renovation Sections
23
1
2 3
24
4
5 6
25
7
8 9
26
10
11 12
27
13
14 15
28
15
17 18
29
CD
:I CobbAliey CobbAJ•e,y
�g�t
19
20 21
30
CD :I CobbAlifY Cobb�•e,y
�9�·�
22
23
31
Subject:Request for Window Replacement at 140 Grand Ave,Saratoga Springs,NY 12866
To the Historic Design Review Board (DRB),
The current windows are deteriorating due to water damage.I am seeking approval to replace
them with Anderson 400-Series windows to restore the building's historical character.
Current Windows:
●Vinyl replacement windows (date of installation is not known)
●Not original to the building
●Rotting due to water damage
Proposed Replacement:
●Anderson 400-Series windows
●Recommended by Saratoga City Planners to preserve historical character
I have attached screenshots and Anderson 400-Series cutsheets for your review.This
replacement will enhance energy efficiency and preserve the building's aesthetic appeal while
addressing structural concerns.
Please consider and approve this proposal to preserve our architectural heritage.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Joseph Snyder
140 Grand Ave
Saratoga Springs,NY 12866
Phone:518-400-0555
Email:joseph.j.snyder1@gmail.com
400 SERIES
2021-22 PRODUCT GUIDE FOR PROFESSIONALS
*2020 Andersen brand survey of U.S. contractors.
CONTRACTORSTRUST THE MOST.*
THE WINDOWS
*Visit andersenwindows.com/warranty for details.
**Products with dark bronze and black interiors have matching exteriors.
“Flexacron” is a registered trademark of PPG Industries, Inc.
Dimensions in parentheses are in millimeters.
Printing limitations prevent exact replication of colors and finishes. See your Andersen supplier
for actual color and finish samples.
Naturally occurring variations in grain, color and texture of wood make each window one
of a kind. All wood interiors are unfinished unless a finish is specified.
Distressed bronze and oil rubbed bronze are “living” finishes that will change with time and use.
Standard Lock & Keeper
Black | Gold Dust | Stone | White
Stone is standard with natural interior units.
White comes with prefinished white interiors.
Other finishes optional.
FRAME
A Exterior outer frame members are
covered with a Perma-Shield® rigid
vinyl cladding, minimizing maintenance
and providing an attractive appearance.
B For exceptional long-lasting*
performance, sill members are
constructed with a wood core and
a Fibrex® material exterior. Sill ends
are protected and sealed with
weather-resistant covers.
C Natural wood stops are available
in pine, and prefinished white, dark
bronze and black.**
D A factory-applied rigid vinyl
anchoring flange on the head, sill and
sides of the outer frame helps secure
the unit to the structure.
E An extruded rigid vinyl jamb liner
and fin provide a protective seal against
the outer frame members. Exclusive slide
wash assists make it easy to tilt the sash
into wash mode position.
Unique block-and-tackle balancers
feature sized-to-the-unit, rust-resistant
springs that require no adjustment.
Glass-reinforced nylon balancer shoes
provide smooth, reliable sash operation.
Sash can be removed, without tools, for
drywall pass-through. Jamb liners are
available in white or gray, and must be
specified when ordering. Contact your
Andersen supplier for details.
F Weatherstrip throughout the unit
provides a long-lasting,* energy-
efficient, weather-resistant seal. For
the top and bottom rails, an encased
foam material is used. The head
jamb liner and sill have a rigid vinyl
rib that the weatherstrip material
compresses against. At the meeting
rail, compressible vinyl bulb material
is used. Side jamb liners use leaf-type
weatherstrip with foam inserts.
SASH
Wash assists make it easy to tilt the
sash into wash mode.
G Wood sash members are treated
with a water-repellent preservative for
long-lasting* protection and performance.
Interior surfaces are unfinished pine. Low-
maintenance prefinished white interiors
are also available.
H A polyester-stabilized coat with
a Flexacron® finish is electrostatically
applied to penetrate all exterior
surfaces for maximum protection
and a lustrous finish.
I Sash joints simulate the look
of traditional mortise-and-tenon
construction inside and out.
GLASS
J In addition to stainless steel glass
spacers, black or white glass spacers
are now available to allow the spacer
to blend in with the unit color.
K Silicone bed glazing provides
superior weathertightness and durability.
L High-Performance options include:
• Low-E4® glass
• Low-E4 HeatLock® glass
• Low-E4 SmartSun™ glass
• Low-E4 SmartSun HeatLock glass
• Low-E4 Sun glass
Tempered and other glass options are
available. Contact your Andersen
supplier.
A removable translucent film helps
shield the glass from damage during
delivery and construction, and
simplifies finishing at the job site.
Patterned Glass
Patterned glass options are available.
See page 12 for more details.
BlackForest
Green
Terratone
FEATURES
EXTERIOR & INTERIOR OPTIONS
HARDWARE
White Canvas Sandtone
EXTERIOR COLORS
ESTATE™
Antique Brass | Black | Bright Brass | Brushed Chrome
Distressed Bronze | Distressed Nickel | Gold Dust | Oil Rubbed Bronze
Polished Chrome | Satin Nickel | Stone | White
Bold name denotes finish shown.
HARDWARE FINISHES
Stone
Distressed
Nickel
Satin
Nickel
Bright
Brass
Gold Dust
Brushed
Chrome
Polished
Chrome
White
Antique
Brass
Oil Rubbed
Bronze
Distressed
Bronze
Black
Dark
Bronze
OPTIONAL HARDWARE Sold Separately
TRADITIONAL
CONTEMPORARY
Antique Brass | Bright Brass
Brushed Chrome | Distressed Bronze
Distressed Nickel | Oil Rubbed Bronze
Polished Chrome | Satin Nickel
Antique Brass | Black | Bright Brass
Brushed Chrome | Distressed Bronze
Distressed Nickel | Gold Dust
Oil Rubbed Bronze | Polished Chrome
Satin Nickel | Stone | White
Optional Estate lock and keeper reduces the clear opening
height by 9 ⁄16" (14). Check with local building code officials
to determine compliance with egress requirements.
Bar Lift Hand Lift Finger Lifts
Bar Lift
Lock & Keeper
INTERIOR OPTIONS
**Black**
Pine White
Dark
**Bronze**
E
L
BC
D
F
E
G
H
I
J
K
G
76
TILT-WASH DOUBLE-HUNG FULL-FRAME WINDOWS
Tilt-Wash
Picture
Grille Patterns
Tilt-Wash
Double-Hung
Tilt-Wash
Transom
Diamond* Prairie A 6-Light Prairie Colonial
CottageEqual CottageEqual CottageEqualCottageEqual
Diamond* Prairie A Colonial Colonial with Simulated Fractional with Simulated Fractional with Simulated Victorian
Modied Modied Colonial Tall Tall Fractional Short Short Fractional
Meeting Rail Meeting Rail Meeting Rail
Low-E4® Insulating Glass
Horizontal Section
1 7⁄8"
(37)
1 7 ⁄8"
(37)
Clear Opg. Width
Unit Dim. Width
Minimum Rough Opening Width
1 ⁄4" (6)
Min.
1 ⁄4" (6)
Min.
1 5 ⁄16"
(33)
4 1 ⁄2"
(114)
Jamb Jamb
Upper Sash 3 5 ⁄16"
(84)
Vertical Section Clear Opg.HeightUnit Dimension HeightMinimum Rough Opening Height4" (102) Sill Stop
to Suboor
Dimension3⁄8" (10)
1" (25)
1 ⁄2" (13)
2 7⁄16" (62)
1 1 ⁄2"
(38)
2 7⁄16"
(62)
4 1 ⁄2" (114)1 5 ⁄16"
(33)
Sill
Insect Screen
Pine Stool
1" (25)
Lower Sash in
Open Position
Head
Meeting Rail
Low-E4® Insulating Glass
Horizontal Section
1 7 ⁄8"
(37)
1 7⁄8"
(37)
Clear Opg. Width
Unit Dim. Width
Minimum Rough Opening Width
1 ⁄4" (6)
Min.
1⁄4" (6)
Min.
1 5⁄16"
(33)
4 1⁄2"
(114)
Jamb Jamb
Upper Sash 3 5 ⁄16"
(84)
Vertical Section Clear Opg.HeightUnit Dimension HeightMinimum Rough Opening Height4" (102) Sill Stop
to Suboor
Dimension3⁄8" (10)
1" (25)
1 ⁄2" (13)
2 7⁄16" (62)
1 1 ⁄2"
(38)
2 7⁄16"
(62)
4 1 ⁄2" (114)1 5 ⁄16"
(33)
Sill
Insect Screen
Pine Stool
1" (25)
Lower Sash in
Open Position
Head
Meeting Rail
Horizontal Section Vertical Section
All window heights except 310 & 46
Tilt-Wash Double-Hung Window Details
Scale 11 ⁄2" (38) = 1'-0" (305) — 1:8
• Light-colored areas are parts included with window. Dark-colored areas are additional Andersen® parts required to complete window assembly as shown.
• Minimum rough openings may need to be increased to allow for use of building wraps, flashing, sill panning, brackets, fasteners or other items. See installation information on pages 210-211.
• Details are for illustration only and are not intended to represent product installation methods or materials. Refer to product installation guides at andersenwindows.com.
• Dimensions in parentheses are in millimeters.
Custom Pattern Examples
Specied Equal Light Examples Custom Pattern Examples
Specied Equal Light Examples
Patterns for double-hung windows are also available in Upper
Sash Only (USO) configurations. For picture window patterns
that require alignment with double-hung window patterns,
identify the sash style (equal, cottage or reverse cottage) when
ordering. Number of lights and overall pattern varies with
window size. Patterns not available in all configurations.
Specified equal light and custom patterns are also
available. For more grille options, see page 14 or visit
andersenwindows.com/grilles.
*Available only in Simulated Divided Light (SDL) configuration and only in 3/4" (19) and 7/8" (22) widths.
Horizontal Section
1 7 ⁄8"
(37)
1 7 ⁄8"
(37)
Clear Opg. Width
Unit Dim. Width
Minimum Rough Opening Width
1 ⁄4" (6)
Min.
1 ⁄4" (6)
Min.
1 5 ⁄16"
(33)
4 1 ⁄2"
(114)
Jamb Jamb
Lower Sash
Upper Sash 3 5 ⁄16"
(84)
Lower Sash in
Open Position
(opens higher
to maintain
clear opening)
Meeting Rail
1 ⁄2"
(51)
Upper Sash Meeting Rail
(higher location on
310 and 46 heights)
Note: Location of support bar on optional insect screen aligns
with meeting rail location on 310 and 46 window heights.
310 and 46 Height Windows Only:
85 400 Series Tilt-Wash Double-Hung Full-Frame Windows 400 SERIES
*Infringes on the overall net clear opening. Unit clear operable area may not meet egress requirements. See your local building code official for more information.
**Do not add combination units to windows with Low-E4 Sun glass unless window glass is tempered. Combination units may also reduce the overall clear operable area of the window.
See your local code official for egress requirements in your area.
†TruScene insect screens let in over 25% more fresh air than standard Andersen fiberglass insect screens.
Dimensions in parentheses are in millimeters.
ACCESSORIES Sold Separately
400 Series tilt-wash double-hung
full-frame windows are available
with Stormwatch® Protection. Visit
andersenwindows.com/coastal
for more details.
Performance Grade (PG) Upgrades
A high inside sill stop* with exterior
sill brackets and hidden interior
brackets is available to provide
additional structural support for
tilt-wash windows, allowing
standard, non-impact glass units
to achieve higher performance
grade ratings. Performance
Grade (PG) ratings are more
comprehensive than Design
Pressure (DP) ratings for measuring
product performance. For up-to-
date performance information of
individual products, please visit
andersenwindows.com. Use of this
option will subtract 5 ⁄8" (15) from the
clear opening height. PG Upgrade
not available for 72" (1829) and
76" (1930) heights. Contact your
Andersen supplier for availability.
SASH OPTIONS
Cottage Reverse Cottage
CAUTION:
• Painting and staining may cause damage to
rigid vinyl.
• 400 Series windows in Terratone color may be
painted any color lighter than Terratone color
using quality oil-based or latex paint.
• Do not paint 400 Series windows in white,
canvas, Sandtone, dark bronze, forest green
or black exterior colors.
• Andersen does not warrant the adhesion or
performance of homeowner-applied paint over
vinyl or other factory-coated surfaces.
• For vinyl painting instructions and preparation,
contact your Andersen supplier.
• Do not paint weatherstrip.
• Creosote-based stains should not come in
contact with Andersen products.
• Abrasive cleaners or solutions containing
corrosive solvents should not be used on
Andersen products.
FRAME
Extension Jambs
Standard jamb depth is 4 1 ⁄2" (114).
Extension jambs are available in
unfinished pine or prefinished white.
Some sizes may be veneered.
Factory-applied and non-applied
interior extension jambs are available
in 1 ⁄16" (1.5) increments between
5 1 ⁄4" (133) and 7 1 ⁄8" (181). Extension
jambs can be factory applied to
either three sides (stool and apron
application) or four sides (picture
frame casing).
Pine Stool
A clear pine stool is available and
ready for finishing. The tilt-wash stool
is available in 4 9 ⁄16" (116) for use in
wall depths up to 5 1 ⁄4" (133), and
6 9 ⁄16" (167) for use in wall depths up
to 7 1 ⁄8" (181). Works with 2 1 ⁄4" (57)
and 2 1 ⁄2" (64) casing widths.
HARDWARE
Window Opening Control Device
A recessed window opening control
device is available factory applied.
It limits the sash travel to less than
4" (102) when the window is first
opened. Available in white, stone and
black. A field-applied window opening
control device kit is also available.
STORM/INSECT SCREEN
COMBINATION UNIT**
A self-storing storm window combined
with an insect screen provides greater
energy efficiency, while allowing
ventilation when needed.
Constructed with an aluminum frame,
single-pane upper and lower glass
panels, and charcoal powder-coated
aluminum screen mesh. Available in
white, Sandtone and Terratone to
match product exteriors. Canvas,
dark bronze, forest green and black
are available by special order.
Combination units can improve
Sound Transmission Class (STC) and
Outdoor Indoor Transmission Class
(OITC) ratings. Ideal for projects near
airports, busy roadways or other noisy
environments. For example, adding
a combination unit to a 400 Series
tilt-wash double-hung (3862) unit with
Low-E4® glass will improve its STC
rating from 26 to 32. Contact your
Andersen supplier for additional STC
and OITC rating information.
GLASS
Andersen® Art Glass
Available for 400 Series tilt-wash
transom and picture units. Andersen
art glass panels come in a variety
of original patterns. See art glass
section starting on page 173
for more information or visit
andersenwindows.com/artglass.
INSECT SCREENS
Insect Screen Frames
Full and half insect screens are available
for most unit sizes. Frame colors match
product exteriors. Half insect screen
(shown above) allows ventilation without
affecting the view through the upper
sash. Not available on windows with
Stormwatch Protection.
TruScene® Insect Screens
Andersen TruScene insect screens let
in over 25% more fresh air† and provide
50% greater clarity than conventional
Andersen insect screens, all while
keeping out unwanted small insects.
Conventional Insect Screens
Conventional insect screens have
charcoal powder-coated aluminum
screen mesh.
GRILLES
Grilles are available in a variety of
configurations and widths. For double-
hung grille patterns, see page 85.
EXTERIOR TRIM
Available with Andersen exterior trim.
See exterior trim section starting on
page 175.
77 400 Series Tilt-Wash Double-Hung Full-Frame Windows 400 SERIES