Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20230161 8 Taylor Patio Area Variance NOD �TOG,4 CITY OF SARATOGA Gage Simpson,Chair Qg �A Brad Gallagher,Vice Chair Emily Bergmann SPRINGS Cheryl Grey CIO ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Matthew Brendan Dailey r -µ CITY HALL-474 BROADWAY John Daley,Alternate ccRPo�ASE� ��1h SARATOGA SPRINGS,NEW YORK 12866 Alice Smith,Alternate 518-587-3550 W W W.SARATOGA-SPRINGS.ORG #20230161 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL OF Gary and Laurie Critelli 8 Taylor Street Saratoga Springs,NY 12866 from the determination of the Building Inspector involving the premises at 8 Taylor Street in the City of Saratoga Springs,New York being tax parcel number 178.52-2-27 on the Assessment Map of said City. The applicants having applied for an area variance under the UDO of said City to permit the placement of a patio in the Urban Residential-2(UR-2)District and public notice having been duly given of a hearing on said application held on April 24 through June 12,2023. In consideration of the balance between benefit to the applicants with detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the community,I move that the following area variances for the following amounts of relief- TYPE OF REQUIREMENT DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENT PROPOSED RELIEF REQUESTED SIDE SETBACK TO PATIO 10, 7' 3' (30%) REAR SETBACK TO PATIO 25' 13' 12' (48%) As per the submitted plans or lesser dimensions,be approved for the following reasons: I. The applicants have demonstrated this benefit cannot be achieved by other means feasible to the applicants. The applicants desire to maintain an existing patio on the property.The Board notes the patio was installed prior to seeking variances for the rear and side setbacks. Per the applicants,there is no additional land for purchase. 2. The applicants have demonstrated that granting this variance will not produce an undesirable change in neighborhood character or detriment to the nearby properties. The existing patio is flush with the ground level and is concealed by a fence. 3. The Board notes the requested variance is considered substantial,however,the impact of this variance is mitigated by the discussion in paragraph number 2. 4. The Board finds this variance will not have an adverse physical or environmental effect on the neighborhood. The property will meet minimum permeability. 5. The alleged difficulty is self-created insofar as the applicants desire to keep the patio,but this is not necessarily fatal to the application. It is so moved. Conditions: The shed on the property is to be moved to meet zoning setbacks. Page 1 of 2 It is so moved. Dated: June 12, 2023 Adopted by the following votes: AYES: 4 (G. Simpson, C, Grey, S. Gaston, B. Dailey) NAYES: 0 RECUSED: 1 (B. Gallagher) This variance shall expire 18 months following the filing date of such decision unless the necessary building permit has been issued and actual construction begun as per the Unified Development Ordinance. I hereby certify the above to be a full, true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Saratoga Springs on the date above mentioned, five members of the Board being present. SIGNATURE: 06/14/2023 CHAIR DATE RECEIVED BY ACCOUNTS DEPT. Page 2 of 2