Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20230159 672 Crescent Avenue Area Variance NOD �TOG,4 CITY OF SARATOGA Gage Simpson,Chair �g �A Brad Gallagher,Vice Chair Emily Bergmann SPRINGS Cheryl Grey CIO Matthew Gutch �- - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Brendan Dailey LJ r -µ CITY HALL-474 BROADWAY JohnDaley,Alternate ccRPo�ASE� ��1h SARATOGA SPRINGs,NEW YORK12866 Alice Smith,Alternate 518-587-3550 W W W.SARATOGA-SPRINGS.ORG 920230159 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL OF Sid and Lina Hellman 672 Crescent Avenue Saratoga Springs NY 12866 from the determination of the Building Inspector involving the premises at 672 Crescent Avenue in the City of Saratoga Springs,New York being tax parcel number 180.17-2-2 on the Assessment Map of said City. The applicant having applied for an area variances under the UDO of said City to permit the construction of front door roof canopy and eaves to the existing house in a Rural Residential(RR)District and public notice having been duly given of a hearing on said application held on the April 24,May 8 and 22,2023. In consideration of the balance between benefit to the applicant with detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the community, I move that the following area variance for the following amount of relief: TYPE OF REQUIREMENT DISTRICT PROPOSED RELIEF REQUESTED REQUIREMENT MIN FRONT SETBACK 60' 18, 42' (70%) as per the submitted plans or lesser relief,be approved for the following reasons: 1. The applicant has demonstrated this benefit cannot be achieved by other means feasible to the applicant. The applicant wants to create a front entrance including a canopy and eaves to the existing front door. The existing home is built at a front setback of 20' and therefore any changes to the front of the house would trigger a variance. The front porch and canopy was designed to require the smallest variance possible. 2. The applicant has demonstrated that granting this variance will not create an undesirable change in neighborhood character or detriment to nearby properties. The applicant notes that the addition will be an improvement and create a front entryway. 3. The Board notes the requested variance is substantial at 70% however the current home is built at a setback of 20' or 66%. 4. This variance will not have a significant adverse physical or environmental effect on the neighborhood or district. 5. The alleged difficulty is considered self-created insofar as the applicant desires to build the addition. However,this is not necessarily fatal to the application It is so moved. Dated: May 22,2023 Page 1 of 2 Adopted by the following votes: AYES: 5 (G. Simpson, B. Gallagher, B. Dailey E. Bergmann, A. Smith) NAYES: 0 This variance shall expire 18 months following the filing date of such decision unless the necessary building permit has been issued and actual construction begun as per the Unified Development Ordinance. I hereby certify the above to be a full, true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Saratoga Springs on the date above mentioned, five members of the Board being present. ti SIGNATURE: 00.00 05/23/2023 oe CHAIR DATE RECEIVED BY ACCOUNTS DEPT. Page 2 of 2