Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20190017 Gary Stone Commercial Activities Application studioA Landscape Architecture, D.P.C.. Project Narrative—68 Weibel Avenue,Saratoga Springs, NY The 68 Weibel Avenue application is the result of and response to a "Stipulation and Order of Settlement" dated May 17, 2018 between the City of Saratoga Springs, NY and Gary E. Stone, owner of the parcel. Historically, facilities were developed on the parcel including a 900+/-SF office building (now used as an insurance office), 2 metal warehouse buildings (2,400+/-SF and +1-1,500 SF), a mixed use office/retail/storage building (12,500+/-SF) and a golf driving range with a clubhouse (150 SF). Other uses on the site include several clothing drop-boxes, storage of unlicensed vehicles, several temporary structures/membrane type structures and miscellaneous areas of waste building materials storage. Parking on the site is unstructured on gravel parking lots. The access drive and parking area for the 900 SF office building is paved with asphalt, however, the remainder of driveways and parking areas are gravel. Little, if any, buffer landscaping exists to screen parking areas and uses on the site from view of adjacent residential/commercial developments to the north and south or from the Weibel Avenue travel corridor. The above development has originally existed since 1968+/-which included the golf driving range and subsequently the remaining buildings and uses. It is reported that such activities and uses were developed in compliance with previous zoning laws, however, proof of those approvals has apparently been lost and are not available. The current site zoning is T-4 Transect District Urban Neighborhood which allows such uses, however, prescribes "Area and Bulk Requirements" and "Design Requirements" which the existing project conditions do not meet. It is for this reason that the May 17, 2018 "Stipulations and Order of Settlement" between the City of Saratoga Springs and Gary E. Stone was entered into. The intent of this "Stipulation" is to require the property to become compliant with the T-4 Transect Zone District requirements. As such, the following approvals are required as well as site design adjustments: 1. Area Variance (by the Zoning Board of Appeals) for T-4 Zone District Requirements a. Area variance for 1 story buildings (minimum 2 stories are required) b. Build-to distance from the Front Lot Line, 12'-18' required, 161.2 feet proposed (existing) c. Minimum 50% build out frontage required, 0% proposed 2. Special Use Permit (by the Planning Board) (All T-4 Transect Properties require Special Use Permit) a. Uses requested include office (for 900 SF building), warehouses (for 2,400 SF and 1,500 SF metal buildings), mixed office/retail/storage (for 12,500 SF building which is occupied roughly 1/3 office, 1/3 retail, and 1/3 storage) and golf driving range (4 tees) and clubhouse (150 SF building). 3. Site Plan Review (by the Planning Board) 4. Architectural Design Review (by the Design Review Commission) 5. Site Design Adjustments a. Streetscape improvements including sidewalk, decorative street lighting, street trees, and approved signage, b. Buffer parking lots from adjacent uses, c. Buffer perimeter of site from adjacent uses, d. Pave driveways and parking areas, e. Plan for future interconnected vehicular street connections between adjacent properties, and f. Require all exterior lighting to be "Dark Sky" compliant. 6. Mandated corrective measures required by the May 17, 2018 "Stipulation" a. Remove all temporary structures/membrane type structures from the site, b. Remove all unlicensed vehicles from the site, c. Remove all waste building materials from the site, d. Remove all waste containers from the site (other than those dedicated to tenants of the buildings), and e. Remove all "Stone owned enterprises" activities from the site, f. Cease operation of the golf driving range (until a Special Use Permit is issued). It is emphasized that the intent of the above approvals and site design adjustments and required corrective measures are to bring into compliance, as close as possible, the existing conditions on the site with the T-4 Transect Zone District requirements. Most such requirements can be met and or design adjustments accomplished to enable the site as it is developed today, and with the proposed improvements, to be compatible with adjacent uses and not present negative or economically detrimental affects on such adjacent properties. Certain requirements, however, will require area variances to accomplish the above goal as stated above. It is also emphasized that these approvals and adjustments are anticipated to be temporary. The project site is located in an area that has a high potential for re-development for residential and commercial uses. The required approvals are intended to allow existing tenants to occupy the site until such time that the present owners or future purchasers decide to develop the site to its fullest potential and in compliance with T-4 Transect Zone District requirements. PAUL E.PONTIFF KARLA WILLIAMS BUETTNER BARTLETT, PONTIFF, STEWART & RHODES,P.C.ALAN R.RHODES ELISABETH B.MAHONEY ROBERT S.MCMILLEN ATTORNEYS AT LAW JOHN D.WRIGHT PHILIP C.MCINTIRE P.O. Box 2168 JESSICA HUGABONE VINSON MARK A.LEBO‘N ITZ ONE WASHINGTON STREET J.LAWRENCE PALTROWITZ MALcouvi BOHARA GLENS FALLS, NEW YORK 12801-2168 BENJAMIN R.PRArr,JR, . ' PATRICIA E.WATKINS OF COUNSEL MARK E.CERASANO BRUCE O.LIPINSKI TELEPHONE(518)792-2117 RICHARD J.BARTLETT PAULA NADEAU BERVBE FAX(518)792-3309 1926-2015 JONATHAN C,LAPPER EMAIL infer bpsrlaw.com ROBERT S.STEWART JAMES R.BURKETT WEBSITE www.hpsrlaw-corn 1932-2001 STEFANIE DILALLO BITTER BERTRAM J.DUBE SERVICE BY FACSIMILE NOT ACCEPTED 1916-1999 June 15, 2018 Via Hand Delivery Kate Maynard, Principal Planner City of Saratoga Springs 484 Broadway Saratoga Springs NY, 12866 Re: Gary Stone 68 Weibel Avenue Ms. Maynard: In accordance with the terms of the Stipulation and Order of Settlement between the city of Saratoga Springs and Gary Stone, signed by Hon. Jeff Wait on May 17, 2018, we are hereby submitting applications for Special Use Permit, Site Plan Review,Area Variances and Architecture Review. These applications are intended to accomplish a significant visual improvement of the property until such time as the current or a future owner proposes a redevelopment project. Please place these matters on the respective board agendas. Very truly yours, BARTLETT, PONTIFF, STEWART ez RHODES, P.C. By: Jo 4than C. Lap'!, Esq, ir ci & (518)832-6434 ect Fax #. (518)824-1034 r irect E-Mail:irlbpsrlmv.corn JCL: Cc: Gary Stone Jeff Anthony studioA Landscape Architecture, D.P, .. Proposed Stormwater Management Concept—68 Weibel Avenue,Saratoga Springs, NY The 68 Weibel Avenue upgrade project proposes no new building construction. Existing gravel driveways and parking areas are proposed to be re-configured and re-surfaced with asphalt to reduce the potential for air borne dusts caused by vehicular traffic during warm weather/dry periods of the year and to conform to T-4 Transect Zone Guidelines. Virtually all re-configured driveways and parking areas are within existing gravel surfaced areas with the exception of the parking lot and driveway at the insurance office building which is currently paved. Some existing gravel surfaces will be removed and restored with lawn and landscaping. Stormwater runoff volumes are expected to remain relatively equal from existing conditions to those that are proposed. There will be no additional roof water runoff since no new or expanded buildings are proposed. The conversion of gravel surfaced parking lots to asphalt will also not increase the volume of runoff. There will be some reduction in runoff from removal of portions of gravel driveways and parking areas at the 12,500 SF mixed use off/retail/storage building. Soils on the site are well drained sands. Three infiltration basins currently exist in the vicinity of the center of the site and one to the south of the mixed use building (See Sketch Plan). They will remain and continue to accommodate related stormwater runoff in those areas. A new rain garden (infiltration basin) is proposed at the west side of the insurance buildings asphalt parking lot to accommodate stormwater runoff from that parking lot and building. Similarly, small rain gardens (infiltration basins) are proposed in the vicinity of the 2,400 SF and 1,500 SF warehouse buildings. Two rain gardens (infiltration basins) are also proposed at the 12,500 SF mixed use office/retail/storage building; one on the north side and one on the south side of the building.These stormwater practices will be engineered in the Final Site Plan submission. In general, there is expected to be no increase in stormwater volume runoff from the proposed activities. It is, however, expected that there will be a slight reduction in volume due to the removal of gravel surfaces and restoring these with lawn. Additionally, the proposed new rain gardens will be an improvement over existing stormwater management conditions on the site. studioA Landscape Architecture, D.P.C.. Traffic Trip Generation—68 Weibel Avenue,Saratoga Springs, NY Expected vehicular trip generation traffic at 68 Weibel Avenue based on the operations at the insurance office, 2 warehouse buildings and the mixed use office/retail/storage were established using the ITE Trip Generation Manual Statistics for the Peak AM and Peak PM periods. They are, by use, as follows: AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Use Arriving Leaving Total Arriving Leaving Total Office (900 SF Insurance Office and 1/3 of 8 2 10 4 8 12 12,500 SF mixed use building) Warehouse (2,400 SF and 1,500 SF warehouse 1 0 1 1 1 2 buildings and 1/3 of 12,500 SF mixed use building Retail (1/3 of 12,500 SF mixed 2 2 4 8 8 16 use building) TOTAL 11 4 15 13 17 30 The above estimated total AM and PM vehicular trips are very low and will not impact traffic on Weibel Avenue which has adequate capacity to accommodate such traffic. It should be noted that the above estimated traffic from 68 Weibel Avenue uses has existed prior to development of the adjacent residential/commercial uses to the north and south of the site as well as the Hannaford Shopping Plaza. City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Checklist Saratoga Springs Complete Street Policy Vision (May 2012) The City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Policy will encourage the development of a complete streets network throughout the City to create a more balanced transportation system. The Policy shall be consistent with and assist in achieving the goals and recommendations set forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan and other policy documents. The Policy shall ensure new and updated public and private projects are planned, designed, maintained and operated to enable safer, comfortable and convenient travel to the greatest extent possible for users of all abilities including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists and transit riders. This checklist is intended to assist the City in achieving its vision for complete streets. Project Name: 68 Weibel Ave Date: 6-15-18 Project Location / Limits: 68 Weibel Ave. Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 Project Description: Zoning Compliance Instructions: For each box checked, please provide a brief description for how the item is addressed, not addressed, or not applicable and include supporting documentation. Street Classification (identify street or streets within the project area) Principal arterial 111 Minor arterial 111 Mixed use collector 111 Mixed use local Ill Residential collector 111 Residential local 111 Special use street 111 EXISTING CONDITIONS Item to Be Addressed/ Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Existing Bicycle & Pedestrian Operations Do bicycle and pedestrian accommodations exist? (see page 2 for p El 0 Asphalt sidewalk examples) Existing Transit Operations Do transit facilities exist within the study area, including bus and LI El ❑ train stops/stations? Is the project area on a transit route? (CDTA Service Routes) ❑ El1:1 Are there bicycle racks, shelters, or parking for transit riders LI ElLI available? Existing Access and Mobility Do connective opportunities exist with schools, hospitals, senior LI El LI care or community centers or persons with disabilities within project area? Are there gaps inhibiting continuous access between schools, Q El E hospitals, senior care, or community centers or persons with disabilities within project area?" Project Area Context Are there prominent landmarks, recreation, shopping, employment p LI LI center, cultural centers or other key destinations that offer Wilton Mall opportunities to connect this site? Please list and/or describe planning or policy documents addressing bicyclist, pedestrian, transit, or truck/freight use for the project area. Examples can include: City of Saratoga Springs Comprehensive Plan, City of Saratoga Springs Open Space Plan, Capital District Transportation Committee Bicycle/ Pedestrian Priority Network, City Standard Details, etc. City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Checklist 1 PROPOSED DESIGN Item to Be Addressed/ Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Complete Streets Design Bicyclist accommodations? E 1:1 ❑ Pedestrian accommodations? D E LI Sidewalks Access and Mobility accommodations? ElEl fl Transit accommodations? ❑ i:i El Truck/freight accommodations? LI E E Streetscape elements? El0 El Street Trees, Lights Bike Facilities: Off-roadway bike E Yes LINo DNA accommodations Pedestrian Facilities: Dedicated bike lane Yes NoDNA Sidewalks on both sides of LI Yes ENo IZINA Shared-use lane ■ Yes ❑ NINA NA the street Striped crosswalks ['Yes❑ ENA Shoulder ❑Yes ENo ❑NA Acceptable actuated traffici:iYes No ENA Geometric modifications El Yes EINo ENA Acce p ❑ to reduce crossing signal bike detection, including turn lanes distances such as curb signals allow adequate YesLINo❑✓ NA extensions (e.g. bulb-outs) Do q ❑ Acceptable provision for ❑YesflNo NA minimum time for p ❑ greenpedestrian traffic signal bicyclist to safely cross features (e. . ped. buttons) intersection? g Pedestrian signage for or ❑Yes ❑No ENA Signage and pavementEYes ONo ONA crossing &wayfinding markings specific to proposed bike facilities Safety islands/medians on ❑ Yes ENo ENA Bicycle safe inlet grates LIYes❑NoENA roadways with two or more y traffic lanes in each direction Bicycle parking, eg. bike racks, El Yes LIN0 ENA bike lockers Enhanced supplemental EYes EN0 MNA Transit Facilities: pedestrian treatments at uncontrolled marked Transit shelters 0 YesLINoENA crossings Bus turnouts El Yes LINo EINA g Connectivity: Standing pads LI Yes LIN0 EINA Are therero osed ElYes ❑No DNA Has CDTA been contacted? LI Yes LINo LINA p p connections to other bike Access and Mobility Facilities: paths, pedestrian facilities, or Adequate sidewalk or paved E Yes No EINA transit facilities? path Are there proposed D Yes EINo LINA Acceptable E Yes No INA connections to any key consideration/provision for destinations listed on page 1? accessible pedestrian traffic Are there proposed E Yes No ENA signal features connections to Curb ramps, including LI Yes No ONA neighborhoods? detectable warning Streetscape Elements: surface Are streetscape elements ❑✓ Yes No ❑NA Acceptable slope and IZIYes ENo LINA proposed such as cross-slope for driveway ramps, landscaping, street trees, sidewalks, crossings) planters, buffer strips, etc? Have conflicts been reduced IZIYes Ei No E NA Pedestrian-level lighting ❑✓ Yes No ENA among pedestrian, bicyclists, g g and motor vehicles (access Public seating or benches ❑ Yes ONo LINA management)? Design Standards and Guidelines Design meets guidelines such as described below for ElYes LINo DNA Describe bicycle/pedestrian/bus/transit facilities? *American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials(AASHTO)-A Policy on Geometric Design of Highway and Streets, Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities and AASHTO Guide for the Planning,Design, and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities;Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guide(PROWAG);Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices(MUTCD);Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines(ADAAG); National Association of City Transportation Officials(NACTO)-Urban Bikeway Design Guide. New York State Department of Transportation— Highway Design Manual City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Checklist 2 Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 -Project and Setting Instructions for Completing Part 1 Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information;indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor;and,when possible,generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A&B. In Sections C,D&E,most items contain an initial question that must be answered either"Yes"or"No". If the answer to the initial question is"Yes",complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is"No",proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part lis accurate and complete. A.Project and Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: 68 Weibel Avenue Project Location(describe,and attach a general location map): 68 Weibel Avenue Brief Description of Proposed Action(include purpose or need): See Attached Narrative. Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone: Gary E.Stone E-Mail: stonerealestategroup@gmail.com Address:10 PD Harris Road City/PO:Saratoga Springs State:NY Zip Code:12866 Project Contact(if not same as sponsor;give name and title/role): Telephone:518-792-2117 Jon Lapper,esq./Bartlett,Pontiff,Stewart&Rhodes, PC E-Mail: jcl@bpsrlaw.com Address: 1 Washington Street City/PO: State: Zip Code: Saratoga Springs NY 12866 Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: Page 1 of 13 B.Government Approvals B.Government Approvals,Funding,or Sponsorship. ("Funding"includes grants,loans,tax relief,and any other forms of financial assistance.) Government Entity If Yes: Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date Required (Actual or projected) a. City Council,Town Board, ❑Yes 0No or Village Board of Trustees b. City,Town or Village OYes❑No City Planning Board-Special Use Permit&Site 6-15-18 Planning Board or Commission Plan Review c. City Council,Town or 0Yes❑No City Zoning Board of Appeals-Area Variance 6-15-18 Village Zoning Board of Appeals d.Other local agencies OYes❑No Design Review Commission 6-15-18 e. County agencies ❑Yes 0No f. Regional agencies ❑Yes mNo g. State agencies ❑Yes ONo h.Federal agencies ❑Yes 0No i. Coastal Resources. i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area,or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? El Yes IZINo ii. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? ❑YesmNo iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? ❑Yes0No C.Planning and Zoning C.1.Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption,or amendment of a plan,local law,ordinance,rule or regulation be the ❑Yes®No only approval(s)which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? • If Yes,complete sections C,F and G. • If No,proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1 C.2.Adopted land use plans. a.Do any municipally-adopted (city,town,village or county)comprehensive land use plan(s)include the site ®Yes❑No where the proposed action would be located? If Yes,does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action ❑Yes®No would be located? b.Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district(for example: Greenway ®Yes❑No Brownfield Opportunity Area(BOA);designated State or Federal heritage area;watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes,identify the plan(s): NYS Heritage Areas:Mohawk Valley Heritage Corridor c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, ❑Yes0No or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes,identify the plan(s): Page 2 of 13 C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. ®Yes❑No If Yes,what is the zoning classification(s)including any applicable overlay district? T-4 Transect Zone-Urban Neighborhood b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? ®Yes❑No c.Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action? ❑Yes®No If Yes, i. What is the proposed new zoning for the site? C.4.Existing community services. a.In what school district is the project site located?Saratoga b.What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? Saratoga Springs Police Department c.Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? Saratoga Springs Fire Department d.What parks serve the project site? D.Project Details D.1.Proposed and Potential Development a.What is the general nature of the proposed action(e.g.,residential,industrial,commercial,recreational; if mixed,include all components)? Mixed use development including offices, retail, storage, &golf driving range b. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 62.5 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 2.2 acres c. Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 62.5 acres c.Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use? ❑Yes®No i. If Yes,what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units(e.g.,acres,miles,housing units, square feet)? % Units: d.Is the proposed action a subdivision,or does it include a subdivision? ❑Yes No If Yes, i. Purpose or type of subdivision?(e.g.,residential,industrial,commercial; if mixed,specify types) ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? ❑Yes No iii. Number of lots proposed? iv. Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum Maximum e.Will proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? ❑Yes®No i. If No,anticipated period of construction: months ii. If Yes: • Total number of phases anticipated • Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) month year • Anticipated completion date of final phase month year • Generally describe connections or relationships among phases,including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: Page 3of13 f.Does the project include new residential uses? ❑Yes®No If Yes, show numbers of units proposed. One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Family(four or more) Initial Phase At completion of all phases g.Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction(including expansions)? ❑Yes®No If Yes, i. Total number of structures ii. Dimensions(in feet)of largest proposed structure: height; width; and length iii. Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: square feet h.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any ❑Yes®No liquids,such as creation of a water supply,reservoir,pond,lake,waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, i. Purpose of the impoundment: ii. If a water impoundment,the principal source of the water: ❑ Ground water❑Surface water streams ❑Other specify: iii. If other than water,identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. iv. Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: million gallons; surface area: acres v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: height; length vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure(e.g.,earth fill,rock,wood,concrete): D.2. Project Operations a.Does the proposed action include any excavation,mining,or dredging,during construction,operations,or both? flYesNo (Not including general site preparation,grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i.What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? ii. How much material(including rock,earth, sediments,etc.)is proposed to be removed from the site? • Volume(specify tons or cubic yards): • Over what duration of time? iii. Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged,and plans to use,manage or dispose of them. iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? ❑Yes©No If yes,describe. v. What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? acres vi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? acres vii. What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? feet viii. Will the excavation require blasting? flYesNo ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: b.Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of,increase or decrease in size of,or encroachment EYesNo into any existing wetland,waterbody,shoreline,beach or adjacent area? If Yes: i. Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected(by name,water index number,wetland map number or geographic description): Page 4 of 13 ii. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland,e.g.excavation,fill,placement of structures,or alteration of channels,banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities,alterations and additions in square feet or acres: iii. Will proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? ❑Yes❑No If Yes,describe: iv. Will proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? ❑YesENo If Yes: • acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed: • expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion: • purpose of proposed removal(e.g.beach clearing,invasive species control,boat access): • proposed method of plant removal: • if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used,specify product(s): v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: c.Will the proposed action use,or create a new demand for water? ['Yes ONo If Yes: i. Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: gallons/day ii. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? EYes EINo If Yes: • Name of district or service area: • Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? ❑Yes❑No • Is the project site in the existing district? ❑Yes❑No • Is expansion of the district needed? E Yes❑No • Do existing lines serve the project site? E Yes❑No iii. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? EYes EINo If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: • Source(s)of supply for the district: iv. Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? ❑ Yes❑No If,Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: • Proposed source(s)of supply for new district: v. If a public water supply will not be used,describe plans to provide water supply for the project: vi. If water supply will be from wells(public or private),maximum pumping capacity: gallons/minute. d.Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? ❑Yes mNo If Yes: i. Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: gallons/day ii. Nature of liquid wastes to be generated(e.g., sanitary wastewater,industrial;if combination,describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): iii. Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: • Name of district: • Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? ❑Yes❑No • Is the project site in the existing district? ❑Yes❑No • Is expansion of the district needed? ❑Yes❑No Page 5 of 13 • Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? ❑Yes❑No • Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: iv. Will a new wastewater(sewage)treatment district be formed to serve the project site? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: • What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? v. If public facilities will not be used,describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project,including specifying proposed receiving water(name and classification if surface discharge,or describe subsurface disposal plans): Existing on-site septic systems vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture,recycle or reuse liquid waste: e.Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff,either from new point ❑Yes®No sources(i.e. ditches,pipes,swales,curbs,gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater)or non-point source(i.e. sheet flow)during construction or post construction? Post construction runoff will equal or be less than existing If Yes: runoff i. How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? Square feet or acres(impervious surface) Square feet or acres(parcel size) ii. Describe types of new point sources. iii. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed(i.e.on-site stormwater management facility/structures,adjacent properties, groundwater,on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)? • If to surface waters,identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: • Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties? ❑Yes❑No iv. Does proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces,use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater? ❑Yes❑No f. Does the proposed action include,or will it use on-site,one or more sources of air emissions,including fuel ❑Yes®No combustion,waste incineration,or other processes or operations? If Yes,identify: i.Mobile sources during project operations(e.g.,heavy equipment,fleet or delivery vehicles) ii. Stationary sources during construction(e.g.,power generation, structural heating,batch plant,crushers) iii. Stationary sources during operations(e.g.,process emissions,large boilers,electric generation) g.Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f(above),require a NY State Air Registration,Air Facility Permit, ❑Yes No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: i. Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet ❑Yes❑No ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) ii. In addition to emissions as calculated in the application,the project will generate: • Tons/year(short tons)of Carbon Dioxide(CO2) • Tons/year(short tons)of Nitrous Oxide(N20) • Tons/year(short tons)of Perfluorocarbons(PFCs) • Tons/year(short tons)of Sulfur Hexafluoride(SF6) • Tons/year(short tons)of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflourocarbons(HFCs) • Tons/year(short tons)of Hazardous Air Pollutants(HAPs) Page 6 of 13 h.Will the proposed action generate or emit methane(including,but not limited to,sewage treatment plants, UYesNo landfills,composting facilities)? If Yes: i. Estimate methane generation in tons/year(metric): ii.Describe any methane capture,control or elimination measures included in project design(e.g.,combustion to generate heat or electricity,flaring): i.Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes,such as DYesNo quarry or landfill operations? If Yes: Describe operations and nature of emissions(e.g.,diesel exhaust,rock particulates/dust): j.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial ❑Yes®No new demand for transportation facilities or services? If Yes: i. When is the peak traffic expected(Check all that apply): ❑Morning ❑Evening ❑Weekend ❑Randomly between hours of to . ii. For commercial activities only,projected number of semi-trailer truck trips/day: iii. Parking spaces: Existing Proposed Net increase/decrease iv. Does the proposed action include any shared use parking? ❑Yes❑No v. If the proposed action includes any modification of existing roads,creation of new roads or change in existing access,describe: vi. Are public/private transportation service(s)or facilities available within V2 mile of the proposed site? ❑Yes❑No vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid,electric ❑Yes❑No or other alternative fueled vehicles? viii.Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing ❑Yes❑No pedestrian or bicycle routes? k.Will the proposed action(for commercial or industrial projects only)generate new or additional demand DYesNo for energy? If Yes: i. Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: ii. Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project(e.g.,on-site combustion,on-site renewable,via grid/local utility,or other): iii. Will the proposed action require a new,or an upgrade to,an existing substation? ❑Yes❑No 1. Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply. i. During Construction: ii. During Operations: • Monday-Friday: • Monday-Friday: • Saturday: • Saturday: • Sunday: • Sunday: • Holidays: • Holidays: Page 7 of 13 m.Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction, ❑Yes®No operation,or both? If yes: i. Provide details including sources,time of day and duration: ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen? ❑Yes®No Describe: n.. Will the proposed action have outdoor lighting? ®Yes❑No If yes: i. Describe source(s),location(s),height of fixture(s),direction/aim,and proximity to nearest occupied structures: One(1)City of Saratoga Light Pole and Base(14'-8.75")to be proposed on Weibel Ave.between sidewalk and road. ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen? ❑Yes®No Describe: o. Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day? ❑Yes®No If Yes,describe possible sources,potential frequency and duration of odor emissions,and proximity to nearest occupied structures: p.Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum(combined capacity of over 1,100 gallons) ❑Yes®No or chemical products 185 gallons in above ground storage or any amount in underground storage? If Yes: i. Product(s)to be stored ii. Volume(s) per unit time (e.g.,month,year) iii. Generally describe proposed storage facilities: q.Will the proposed action(commercial,industrial and recreational projects only)use pesticides(i.e.,herbicides, ❑Yes ®No insecticides)during construction or operation? If Yes: i. Describe proposed treatment(s): ii. Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices? ❑ Yes ❑No r.Will the proposed action(commercial or industrial projects only)involve or require the management or disposal ❑ Yes ®No of solid waste(excluding hazardous materials)? If Yes: i. Describe any solid waste(s)to be generated during construction or operation of the facility: • Construction: tons per (unit of time) • Operation: tons per (unit of time) ii. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization,recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste: • Construction: • Operation: iii. Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site: • Construction: • Operation: Page 8 of 13 s. Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility? ❑ Yes ® No If Yes: i. Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site (e.g., recycling or transfer station, composting, landfill, or other disposal activities): ii. Anticipated rate of disposal/processing: • Tons/month, if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment, or • Tons/hour, if combustion or thermal treatment iii. If landfill, anticipated site life: years t. Will proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation, treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous E]Yes2]No waste? If Yes: i. Name(s) of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated, handled or managed at facility: ii. Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated tons/month iv. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: v. Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility? []YesE]No If Yes: provide name and location of facility: If No: describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility: E. Site and Setting of Proposed Action E.I. Land uses on and surrounding the project site a. Existing land uses. i. Check all uses that occur on, adjoining and near the project site. ❑ Urban ❑ Industrial ® Commercial ® Residential (suburban) ® Rural (non-farm) ® Forest ❑ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic ❑ Other (specify): ii. If mix of uses, generally describe: Commercial, Residential, Retail, Office, Golf Driving Range, Warehouses b. Land uses and covertypes on the project site. Land use or Covertype Current Acreage Acreage After Project Completion Change (Acres +/-) • Roads, buildings, and other paved or impervious surfaces 4.45 4 -.5 • Forested 8.7 8.7 8.7 • Meadows, grasslands or brushlands (non- agricultural, including abandoned agricultural) 49.35 49.8 +.45 • Agricultural (includes active orchards, field, greenhouse etc.) • Surface water features (lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, etc.) • Wetlands (freshwater or tidal) • Non -vegetated (bare rock, earth or fill) • Other Describe: Page 9 of 13 c. Is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation? ® Yes❑ No i. If Yes: explain: Golf Driving Range d. Are there any facilities serving children, the elderly, people with disabilities (e.g., schools, hospitals, licensed W]Yes❑ No day care centers, or group homes) within 1500 feet of the project site? If Yes, i. Identify Facilities: Daycare facility e. Does the project site contain an existing dam? ❑ Yes®No If Yes: i. Dimensions of the dam and impoundment: • Dam height: feet • Dam length: feet • Surface area: acres • Volume impounded: gallons OR acre-feet ii. Dam's existing hazard classification: W. Provide date and summarize results of last inspection: f. Has the project site ever been used as a municipal, commercial or industrial solid waste management facility, ❑ Yesg]No or does the project site adjoin property which is now, or was at one time, used as a solid waste management facility? If Yes: i. Has the facility been formally closed? ❑ Yes❑ No • If yes, cite sources/documentation: ii. Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility: W. Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities: g. Have hazardous wastes been generated, treated and/or disposed of at the site, or does the project site adjoin ❑ Yes❑ No property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste? If Yes: i. Describe waste(s) handled and waste management activities, including approximate time when activities occurred: h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site, or have any ❑ Yes® No remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site? If Yes: i. Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site ❑ Yes[] No Remediation database? Check all that apply: ❑ Yes — Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): ❑ Yes — Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID number(s): ❑ Neither database ii. If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities, describe control measures: W. Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database? ® Yes❑ No If yes, provide DEC ID number(s): 546008 iv. If yes to (i), (ii) or (iii) above, describe current status of site(s): Page 10 of 13 v. Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses? ❑ Yes®No • If yes, DEC site ID number: • Describe the type of institutional control (e.g., deed restriction or easement): • Describe any use limitations: • Describe any engineering controls: • Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place? ❑ Yes ❑No • Explain: E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site a. What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? about +60 feet b. Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site? ❑ Yes [Z]No If Yes, what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? % c. Predominant soil type(s) present on project site: Deerfield Loamy Find Sand 40 % Windsor Loamy Sand 60 % d. What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: 1.5-3 feet e. Drainage status of project site soils:® Well Drained: 60 % of site ® Moderately Well Drained: 40 % of site ❑ Poorly Drained % of site f. Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: ® 0-10%: 100 % of site ❑ 10-15%: % of site ❑ 15% or greater: % of site g. Are there any unique geologic features on the project site? ❑ Yes®No If Yes, describe: h. Surface water features. i. Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies (including streams, rivers, ❑Yes®No ponds or lakes)? ii. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site? W]Yes❑No If Yes to either i or ii, continue. If No, skip to E.2.i. iii. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal, W]Yes ❑No state or local agency? iv. For each identified regulated wetland and waterbody on the project site, provide the following information: Streams: Name Classification • Lakes or Ponds: Name Classification • Wetlands: Name Approximate Size • Wetland No. (if regulated by DEC) v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality -impaired El Yes V1No waterbodies? If yes, name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: i. Is the project site in a designated Floodway? ❑Yes g]No j. Is the project site in the 100 year Floodplain? []Yes [Z]No k. Is the project site in the 500 year Floodplain? ❑Yes g]No 1. Is the project site located over, or immediately adjoining, a primary, principal or sole source aquifer? OYes ❑No If Yes: i. Name of aquifer: Principal Aquifer Page 11 of 13 m. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site: n. Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community? ® Yes ❑No If Yes: i. Describe the habitat/community (composition, function, and basis for designation): Rich Shrub Fen ii. Source(s) of description or evaluation: SEQR Form iii. Extent of community/habitat: • Currently: 5.31 acres • Following completion of project as proposed: 5.31 acres • Gain or loss (indicate + or -): 0 acres o. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as ❑ YesW]No endangered or threatened, or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species? p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare, or as a species of ❑YesmNo special concern? q. Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting, trapping, fishing or shell fishing? ❑Yes g]No If yes, give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site a. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to ❑Yes ®No Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25 -AA, Section 303 and 304? If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: b. Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present? ❑Yes ®No i. If Yes: acreage(s) on project site? ii. Source(s) of soil rating(s): c. Does the project site contain all or part of, or is it substantially contiguous to, a registered National ❑Yes®No Natural Landmark? If Yes: i. Nature of the natural landmark: ❑ Biological Community ❑ Geological Feature ii. Provide brief description of landmark, including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: d. Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area? ❑ Yes®No If Yes: i. CEA name: ii. Basis for designation: W. Designating agency and date: Page 12 of 13 e. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district ❑ Yes® No which is listed on, or has been nominated by the NYS Board of Historic Preservation for inclusion on, the State or National Register of Historic Places? If Yes: i. Nature of historic/archaeological resource: El Archaeological Site ❑Historic Building or District ii. Name: iii. Brief description of attributes on which listing is based: f. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for ❑ Yes ®No archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory? g. Have additional archaeological or historic site(s) or resources been identified on the project site? ❑ Yes ®No If Yes: i. Describe possible resource(s): ii. Basis for identification: h. Is the project site within fives miles of any officially designated and publicly accessible federal, state, or local E] Yes ®No scenic or aesthetic resource? If Yes: i. Identify resource: ii. Nature of, or basis for, designation (e.g., established highway overlook, state or local park, state historic trail or scenic byway, etc.): iii. Distance between project and resource: miles. i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers ❑ Yes®No Program 6 NYCRR 666? If Yes: i. Identify the name of the river and its designation: ii. Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666? E] Yes ❑No F. Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project. If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal, please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them. G. Verification I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Signature Date Title PRINT FORM Page 13 of 13 EAF Mapper Summary Report ratog a Sprin gs �f Monday, June 11, 2018 12:54 PM 'l ur : Er i, H EIS E. 0 arm in, U .E, Inter ms p, IRC H. ENI Erol T P. N Fi a n, ES ri .Js"n , M ET 1, ESr i C h ina I Hong Kong), ESri Kcwea, Ear i Th .9 i Is n �, N GCC C. 9 Op-en.Streefte p ront(i butte , s nod the G 15 User Community B.i.i [Coastal or Waterfront Area] B.i.ii [Local Waterfront Revitalization Area] C.2.b. [Special Planning District] C.2.b. [Special Planning District - Name] E.1.h [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Potential Contamination History] E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Listed] E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Environmental Site Remediation Database] E.1.h.iii [Within 2,000' of DEC Remediation Site] E.1.h.iii [Within 2,000' of DEC Remediation Site - DEC ID] E.2.g [Unique Geologic Features] E .2 . h . i [Surface Water Features] E .2 . h . i i [Surface Water Features] E.2.h.iii [Surface Water Features] E.2.h.v [Impaired Water Bodies] E.2.i. [Floodway] E.2.j. [100 Year Floodplain] E.2.k. [500 Year Floodplain] No No T. i ca PittsWirgh i C)C oI Wmbua C1 n nal, r err. L L.1'1 1 ..y PILew S}LECei ®_ _, — E, Gsrmin, US�-E k ;atEi V,. INCAENIENT R NRCan, E } ri Wa �V%leiET1, ESri Chins Yes - Digital mapping data are not available for all Special Planning Districts. Refer to EAF Workbook. NYS Heritage Areas:Mohawk Valley Heritage Corridor Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Yes 546008 No No Yes Yes - Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. No Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report l Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order to obtain data not provided by the Mapper. Digital data is not a substitute for agency determinations. nr-ih. iI 'l ur : Er i, H EIS E. 0 arm in, U .E, Inter ms p, IRC H. ENI Erol T P. N Fi a n, ES ri .Js"n , M ET 1, ESr i C h ina I Hong Kong), ESri Kcwea, Ear i Th .9 i Is n �, N GCC C. 9 Op-en.Streefte p ront(i butte , s nod the G 15 User Community B.i.i [Coastal or Waterfront Area] B.i.ii [Local Waterfront Revitalization Area] C.2.b. [Special Planning District] C.2.b. [Special Planning District - Name] E.1.h [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Potential Contamination History] E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Listed] E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Environmental Site Remediation Database] E.1.h.iii [Within 2,000' of DEC Remediation Site] E.1.h.iii [Within 2,000' of DEC Remediation Site - DEC ID] E.2.g [Unique Geologic Features] E .2 . h . i [Surface Water Features] E .2 . h . i i [Surface Water Features] E.2.h.iii [Surface Water Features] E.2.h.v [Impaired Water Bodies] E.2.i. [Floodway] E.2.j. [100 Year Floodplain] E.2.k. [500 Year Floodplain] No No T. i ca PittsWirgh i C)C oI Wmbua C1 n nal, r err. L L.1'1 1 ..y PILew S}LECei ®_ _, — E, Gsrmin, US�-E k ;atEi V,. INCAENIENT R NRCan, E } ri Wa �V%leiET1, ESri Chins Yes - Digital mapping data are not available for all Special Planning Districts. Refer to EAF Workbook. NYS Heritage Areas:Mohawk Valley Heritage Corridor Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Yes 546008 No No Yes Yes - Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. No Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report l E.2.1. [Aquifers] E.2.1. [Aquifer Names] E.2.n. [Natural Communities] E.2.n.i [Natural Communities - Name] E.2.n.i [Natural Communities - Acres] E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species] E.2.p. [Rare Plants or Animals] E.3.a. [Agricultural District] E.3.c. [National Natural Landmark] E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area] E.3.e. [National Register of Historic Places] E.3.f. [Archeological Sites] E.3.i. [Designated River Corridor] Yes Principal Aquifer Yes Rich Shrub Fen 5.31 No No No No No Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. No No Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 2 Cost Estimate for Letter of Credit Project No.: 18015 Project: 68 Weibel Avenue Loction: 68 Weibel Avenue Saratoga Springs, NY City PB#: XX.XXX Date: 6/15/2018 No. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal ON-SITE WORK 1 Demolition, Site Preparation, and Grading Erosion Control /Silt Fence 800 LF $3.00 21400 Stabilized Construction Entrance 40 SY $11.00 440 Misc. Demo and Removals 1 LS $5,000.00 5,000 2 Stormwater Improvements Rain Garden #1-5 1 LS $40,000.00 40,000 3 Hardscape Bituminous Asphalt Pavement over existing gravel drives and parking 24500 SF $1.50 36,750 Stripping 50 LF $0.75 38 4 Landscaping Lawn 1700 EA $0.40 680 Pine Trees (3-4' Ht) 40 EA $100.00 4,000 Shrubs 200 EA $30.00 6,000 ON-SITE TOTAL 95,308 ON-SITE TOTAL X.25 23,827 OFF-SITE WORK 1 Demolition, Site Preparation, and Grading Erosion Control/Silt Fence 100 LF $3.00 300 Asphalt Sidewalk Demo 570 SF $2.00 11140 2 Hardscape Concrete Sidewalk 570 SF $10.00 5,700 5 Site Amenities Decorative Street Light Units 1 EA $2,200.00 21200 6 Landscaping Deciduous Trees 4" cal. 2 EA $400.00 800 Lawn 1900 SF $0.40 760 7 As -Built Drawings 1 LS $1,500.00 1,500 OFF-SITE TOTAL 121400 TOTAL SITE WORK 1071708 LETTER OF CREDIT AMOUNTS TOTAL ON-SITE WORK 23,827 TOTAL OFF-SITE WORK 121400 TOTAL 36,227 PROPOSED LETTER OF CREDIT AMOUNT 36,227 stud 480 Broadway, Suite 324 1 PO Box 272 1 Saratoga Springs NY 12866 1 518.832.4005