HomeMy WebLinkAbout20221084 172 Caroline Final Subdivision Application`-`HANDWRI7 i EN APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCE 1 ED*
�'T O G"I
.. 5�� CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS
f' PLANNING BOARD
4
CITY HALL - 474 BROADWAY
`.... SARATOGA SPRINGS, NEW YORK 12866-2296
TEL: 518-587-3550 X2533
www.saratoga-spn;ngs.org
APPLICATION FOR:
n PRELIMINARY II FINAL SUBDIVISION
Property Address/Location: #172 Caroline St.
Tax Parcel #: 166.61-1-7
(for example: 165.52-4-37)
Total Acres: 15,794 +/- sq.ft.
APPLICANTS)*
Name James Stockwell
Address 172 Lake Ave., Saratoga Springs
Phone
Email jtockwell @ roadrunner.com
IhUK uhhluL ubtl
(Application #)
(uate receivea)
(Project Title)
Check if PH Required
Staff Review
Zoning District: U R-3
FIRR/SR1 - Conservation Subdivision Checklist Required
Land to be Subdivided Into: 2
OWNER(S) (If not applicant)
(same)
Lots
ATTORNEY/AG ENT
Engineering America Co.
76 Washington St., Saratoga, NY
518/587 - 1340
tonyay @ nycap. rr.com
Identify primary contact person: ❑ Applicant ❑ Owner M Agent
* An applicant must be the property owner, lessee, or one with an option to lease or purchase the property in question.
Has a previous application been filed with PB for this property? NO Z YES
If YES, include Application TYPE and DATE:
Does any City officer, Does any City officer, employee or family member thereof have a financial interest (as defined by
General Municipal Law Section -809) in this application? YES NO _ . If YES, a statement disclosing the name,
residence, nature and extent of this interest must be filed with this application.
I, the undersigned owner or purchaser under contract for the property, hereby request Subdivision consideration by the
Planning Board for the identified property above. I agree.to meet all requirements under the Subdivision Regulations for
the City of Saratoga Springs.
Furthermore, I hereby authorize memb rs of the Planning Board and designated City staff to enter the property
associated with this appll ati n r p oses of conducting any necessary site inspections relating to this application.
Applicant Signature: Date:
If applicant is not current owner, owner must also sign.
Owner Signature:
Date:
Application Fee: Make checks payable to the "Commissioner of Finance".
REFER TO THE CURRENT FEE WORKSHEET INCLUDED IN THIS DOCUMENT.
Revised 1 /2021
Check Ity s website vvw Saratoga-s.prings.arq or meeting dates.
2021 LAND USE BOARD FEE WORKSHEET
OPED Fees Type
2021 Fee
Application to Zoning Board of Appeals (1] (2]
TOTAL #VARIANCE
Use Variance
$1100+$50/app
Area Variance -Residential
$275/var+$50/app+$125 each add'I variance
AreaVariance- Multi -Family, Comm, Mixed -Use
$660/var+$50/app+$200eachadd'Ivariance
Interpretations
$550+$50/app
Post -Work Application Fee
Add 50%App fee+$50/app
Variance extensions
50%ofApp fee+$50/app
Application to Design Review Commission (11
TOTAL #STRUCTURE
Demolition
$385
Residential Structures
Principal
$55
Accessory
$55
Extension
$35
Modification
$55
Multi -Family, Comm, Mixed -Use Structures
Sketch
$165
Principal
$550
Extension
$200
Modification
$330
Multi -Family, Comm, Mixed -Use Accessory, Signs, Awnings
Principal
$140
Extension
$75
Modification
$140
Post -Work Application Fee
Add 50% App fee
Application to Planning Board (1]
TOTAL #STRUCTURE
Special Use Permit (2]
$990+$50/app
Special UsePermit-extension
$330
Special UsePermit -modification [2]
$450+$50/app
Site Plan Review-incl. PUD:
Sketch Plan
$330
Residential
$330+$200/unit
Residential -extension
$200
Residential -modification
$400
Non-residential
$660+$130/1000 sf
Non -Residential -extension
$300
Non -Residential -modification
$650
Subdivision - incl.PUD:
TOTAL #LOTS
Sketch Plan
$330
Preliminary Approval [21
Residential: 1-5 lots
$660+$50/app
Residential: 6-10 lots
$990+$50/app
Residential: 11-20 lots
$1320+$50/app
Residential: 21+lots
$1650+50/app
Residential -extension
$330
Final Approval (2]
Residential
1720:00
1 1
$1320+$175/lot+$50/app
Non- Residential
$2000/lot+$50/app
Final Approval Modification [2]
Residential
$330 +$50/app
Non- Residential
$550 +$50/app
Final Approval Extension
Residential
$135
Non -Residential
$330
Other:
TOTAL #LOT/ACRE
Post -Work Application Fee
Add 50%App fee
Lot Line Adjustment
$350
Letter of Credit - modification or extension
$440
Letter of Credit - col lection
up to 1%ofLoC
Recreation Fee
$2000/lotorunit
Land Disturbance
$660+$55/acre
SEQRA EIS Review (Draft & Final)
TBD
Legal Noticing if PB requires Public Hearing
$50/app
[1] Fees are based on per structure, except where noted. $ 1,720,00 TOTAL DUE
[21 Legal ad required; includes City processing and publishing
For Administrative Use
Total Paid at Intake
Revised Fee
Balance Due
��— Balance Paid Staff approval
CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS
= PLANNING BOARD
CITY HALL - 474 BROADWAY
SARATOGA SPRINGS, NEW YORK 12866-2296
TEL: 518-587-3550 X2533
www.saratoga-springs.org
PRELIMINARY/ FINAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL
REQUIRED SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Checklist Prepared By: Engineering America Co. - Tonya Yasenchak, PE Date: 3 Z V
1 l
Listed below are the minimum submittal requirements as set forth in The City of Saratoga Springs' Subdivision
Regulations. The Planning Board reserves the right to request additional information, as necessary, to support
an application. The Board also reserves the right to reject the application if these minimum requirements are
not met. Please complete the checklist below and provide with your submission.
:REQUIRED ITEMS: x hard copies (I wlori inal si nature), 'I digital cop�f of ALL mu�aterials and Fee are reauired.
CHECK EACH ITEM
1.
Completed Subdivision Application 1 a. Conservation Subdivision Checklist if required
2.
SEQR Environmental Assessment Form- short or long form as required by action.
3.
Set of plans including: (3) large scale plans (sheets must be 24" x 36", drawn to a scale of not more
than I "=50.feet). One digital version (PDF) of all submittal items printable to scale
4.
Basic or Full Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan as required per City Code Chapter 242.
5. Copy of signed DPW water connection agreement for all projects involving new water
connections to the City system
6.
Engineering Report for Water and Sanitary
7.
Complete Streets Checklist
8.
Project Cost Estimate for Letter of Credit (utilize City template)
1. Name of Subdivision
2. Property line survey prepared by a licensed land surveyor. Subdivision plat must reference such survey
with all corners set and marked on plan. Reference NGVD 1929 datum. A copy of the original
property survey must also be included.
3. North arrow and map scale
City of Saratoga Springs Subdivision Checklist 1
a4.
Location of proposed home on each lot including finish floor elevation to nearest tenth foot.
R15.
Parcel tax map number
6. Site location map (with title block and map key)
R17.
Site vicinity map (all features within 300 feet of property)
8. Identification of current zoning district with corresponding area and bulk requirements
9. Building setback lines, either listed or shown on plans
Fvl'
10. Title block with subdivision name; name and address of applicant; and name and address of property
owner if different
11. Name, address and phone number of subdivision surveyor and/or engineer
12. Names of all adjacent property owners within 300 feet (include both sides of street)
❑
13. Identification of size, material, elevations, and slopes of all existing and proposed utilities within 400 ft
of site.
14. Parcel street address (existing and any proposed postal addresses)
15. Incorporate the City's standard engineering details.
Yes No N/A
a16.
Identification of existing or proposed easements, covenants or legal rights -of -way on this property
�✓
17. References to all prior variances or special use permits
(�
18. Existing and proposed contours and spot grades (at 2 foot intervals) extending to property boundary
�j
19. Identification of all watercourses, designated State wetlands, buffers, Federal wetlands, floodplains,
rock outcroppings, etc.
❑j�
u
20. Identification of all existing or proposed sidewalks or pedestrian paths (show type, size and
condition)
-�� ❑
21. Location, design specifications and construction material for all proposed site improvements (drains,
culverts, retainingwalls, berms, fences, etc.)
)
❑
22. Location and distance to fire hydrant
El23.
Erosion and sediment control plan — including designated concrete truck washout area
ElEl
24. Approximate location, dimensions and areas for proposed lots and proposed public recreational land
ZEl 1:1
25. Proposal for utility systems and lateral connections
El1:1
Z
26. Location and width of proposed streets
City of Saratoga Springs Subdivision Checklist
Short Environmental Assessment Form
Pant I - Project Information
Instructions for Completing
Part 1— Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the
application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on
information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as
thoroughly as possible based on current information.
Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the
lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item.
Part 1— Project and Sponsor Information
Name of Action or Project:
Stockwell Subdivision
Project Location (describe, and attach a location map):
172 Caroline St., South West corner of Caroline St. & Nelson Ave. intersection with Southern frontage along Talford PI.
Brief Description of Proposed Action:
Subdivision of one existing residential lot into (2) residential lots.
One lot includes the existing residence.
The 2nd lot includes an existing detached garage.
Name of Applicant or Sponsor:
Telephone:
E-Mail: jtockwell@roadrunner.com
James Stockwell
Address:
172 Caroline St.
City/PO:
State:
Zip Code:
Saratoga Springs
New York
12866
1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance,
NO
YES
administrative rule, or regulation?
If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that
may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2.
z
❑
2. Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or finding from any other government Agency?
NO
YES
If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval:
z
1:1
3. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 0,36 acres
b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? al 8 acres
c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned
or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 0.36 acres
4. Check all land uses that occur on, are adjoining or near the proposed action:
5. ® Urban ❑ Rural (non -agriculture) ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial ❑ Residential (suburban)
❑ Forest ❑ Agriculture [] Aquatic ❑ Other(Specify):
❑ Parkland
r -i
5. Is the proposed action,
a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations?
b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan?
NO
YES
N/A
El
7
0-
El
El
FV-1
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape?
NO
YES
F-1
Fv/1
7. Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area?
If Yes, identify:
NO
YES
F7
1-1
8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels?7V/
b. Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action?
c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed
action?
NO
YES
❑
Z-
Z
F-1
❑
9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements?
If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies:
Existing structures are proposed to remain Any new construction will be required to meet the current Energy Conservation
NO
YES
El
14
Construction Code of NYS.
10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply?
If No, describe method for providing potable water:
NO
YES
F-1
F-/-1
11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities?
If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment:
NO
YES
12. a. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district
which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the
Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks,. Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the
State Register of Historic Places?
b. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for
archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory?
NO
YES
1:1
El
F7
13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain
wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency?
b. Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody?
If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres;
NO
YES
0
0-
F-]
E1_
Page 2 of
14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply:
❑ Shoreline ❑ Forest ❑ Agricultural/grasslands ❑ Early mid -successional
❑ Wetland ❑ Urban ❑ Suburban
15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or
Federal government as threatened or endangered?
NO
YES
✓
0-
16. Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan?
NO
YES
❑✓
❑
17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non -point sources?
If Yes,
a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties?
b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)?
If Yes, briefly describe:
NO
YES
El
❑
❑
❑
18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water
or other liquids (e.g., retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)?
If Yes, explain the purpose and size of the impoundment:
NO
YES
W]
F-1
19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste
management facility?
If Yes, describe:
NO
YES
Fv/
F-1
20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or
completed) for hazardous waste?
If Yes, describe:
NO
YES
I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF
MY KNOWLEDGE
Applicant/sponsor/name: Date:
Signature: l>� Title:
i
PRINT FORM Page 3 of 3
EAF Mapper Summary Report
Friday, August 26, 2022 1:01 PM
T66.5•3-1-"_1
:166.53-3-20.1 r{� 166.53 h - :
166.53-1-'47 i `166.53-'i�L4
l r l
16 6?5 3-1-46166.5 3-1-4,5
146+61=1-31 I S
166.6'1-'I -5 • i`i 166.6'1-1-6
Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist
'166.53-1-Jt8' •t66.53.2. 48'I'166 5'-3-24j project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental
assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are
66 53_1.41.161 6.5 3-1-3�' 166.53 2 -4 , answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF
166.53-1-#4 ��r ; 1 6.53-2-47-16�6-53-2�-`1� question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although
r I i the EAF" Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to
- �--- -
6-53-1 �� � �--•j-r—`— DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order
r---
-�^�ti to obtain data not provided by the Mapper. Digital data is not a
substitute for agency determinations.
l Iht on tr cal
'166.6-1-2-217,
166.61-1-7 166.661 2.1 �I 1
166.61-2-u
a toga p'P i gs ' ; I
alt0Td
'ram_
.16� 61-1 J7-
-166.61-1-16166.61'1.10 -
111119. U`(-jq Inten7taj_1, IPJ�'REP��IERJT�',i'A-Cao.. ii )aI)a n, P•.-1
h, r �� Esrp�(-Il�ail�ri fi: f~Jt, c ; ' i Tr-_ b 64P? aP C61-,tli lt-&"
Part 1 / Question 7 [Critical Environmental
Area]
Part 1 / Question 12a [National or State
Register of Historic Places or State Eligible
Sites]
Part 1 / Question 12b [Archeological Sites]
Part 1 / Question 13a [Wetlands or Other
Regulated Waterbodies]
Part 1 / Question 15 [Threatened or
Endangered Animal]
Part 1 / Question 16 [100 Year Flood Plain]
Part 1 / Question 20 [Remediation Site]
�--- Tto T i
-166.6-1-2-5 0 ; �— r r Aak?, rry'
B o<ton
166.61-2-49..tet�t�tl
N
166.61-2-4
16,.: Fitt tu�ar h
j.,:�,� �_nl� n7i E Philadelphia
Tlt Esii � `h ta_ (qc, Iic�P1_jr'YFg� t� (1 P�1E P°1T�'." h'� t_a n. E, ri I �j_,1 r7. P:1 Efl, Es n l�ir_�� (Hong nci k:or�0. E5 ri
tk1 ,
t it'i ! 1 f i �;l y e --,n� 7� . r7it3; cf r ill) alst ,6tf-Aa I; c�ratri t,, ,ryr'4 .11 I �� t,l'_; Ll ser Corn r,l 1-Inibi
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF
Workbook.
Yes
Short Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report
ENGINEERING AMERIC:A_ CO.
76 WASHINGTON S T. SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 1 2 8 6 6
5 1 8 / 5 8 7- 1 3 4 0 E- M A I L: TON Y A Y@ NY CAP. R R C 0 M
TRANSMITTAL SHEET
TO: FROM:
Planning Board Tonya Yasenchak
COMPANY: DATE:
City of Saratoga Springs AUGUST 26, 2022
FAX NUMBER: TOTAL NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER:
6
PHONE NUMBER: SENDER'S REFERENCE NUMBER:
RE: YOUR REFERENCE NUMBER:
172 Caroline St.
Water, Sever & Basic SWPPP
❑ URGENT 0 FOR REVIEW ❑ PLEASE COMMENT ❑ PLEASE REPLY ❑ AS REQUESTED
ENGINEERING REPORT:
INTRODUCTION:
Engineering America Co. has been retained by the applicant / Owner, James Stockwell,
to provide land planning and site/civil engineering services in connection with the 2 lot
subdivision application for 172 Caroline St. in the City of Saratoga Springs, Tax Map #
166.61-1-7.
Subdivision approval will be required from the Planning Board which includes all
requirements listed on the City of Saratoga's Preliminary/Final Subdivision Approval
Required Submittal Checklist. This report is intended to fiilfilt items 4 & 6 of the
Required Items part of the Preliminary / Final Subdivision approval checklist.
DESCRIPTION OF INTENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT & USE:
The site, #172 Caroline St., is located at the South West intersection of Caroline St. and
Nelson Ave. in Saratoga Springs, New York. The 15,794 sq. ft. (0.36 acre) lot has an
existing principle single family residential building with a detached accessory structure
(2 story garage). The existing residence has sidewalk access from both Caroline St. &
Nelson Ave. The detached garage has direct driveway access off the North side of
Talford Pl.
The proposed subdivision of this parcel would result in dividing the single lot into two
lots. The existing structures are proposed to remain. The existing single family residence
is proposed to be located on the 7,620 sq. ft. lot to the East (designated as Lot 1 on the
map). A new curb cut is proposed at the South East side of the existing Lot 1, intended
for a new driveway along Nelson Ave. to accommodate required off street parking for
the existing residence.
The new lot to be created to the West of the existing structure, would be subdivided from
the main parcel and marketed for sale as a residential building lot. The new Lot 2 is
proposed to be 8,174 sq.ft. in area. The existing detached garage structure will remain on
this lot.
Any development on each lot would be required to be in compliance with the
requirements outlined in the City of Saratoga Springs Unified Development Ordinance.
WATER REPORT:
Currently, there are 4 bedrooms within the existing single family dwelling on the property.
Using a standard demand of 110 gallons per capita day (gpcd), the existing property can
be estimated to have an annual water consumption usage of 160,600 gallons.
Assuming that the new lot will accommodate a single family residence with 3-4 total
bedrooms the annual water consumption would increase by 160,600 gallons per 4
bedroom house per year. Therefore, both houses are expected to have a total demand of
321,200 gal/ year (A total net increase of 160,00 gallons per year from existing
conditions).
There is a 4" D.I.P water main located in Nelson Ave. which services the existing
structure. A 4" D.I.P. water main is located in Caroline St. A new 3/4" water service
connection is proposed for the new lot off of the Caroline St. water main.
SANITARY REPORT:
There are 4 bedrooms within the existing two family residence. Using a standard
sanitary sewer of 110 gallons per capita day (gpcd) the existing property can be
estimated to have an annual sanitary load of 160,600 gallons. Assuming the new lot will
be a single-family dwelling containing 3-4 bedrooms, the annual sanitary load for the
new lot will be approx. 160,600 gallons / year. The total sanitary load is proposed at
3 21 .200 gal/year (net increase of 160,600 gallons per year from existing conditions).
2
There is a 6" sanitary sewer main located in Nelson Ave. directly to the East of the
existing residence. The existing residence is currently connected to this main via a 4"
sanitary service exiting at the South East corner of the structure.
There is a 10" sanitary sewer main located in Caroline St. The proposed new single
family residence on Lot #2 would be expected to use a 4" diameter PVC service line
connecting to this main. The additional load from the construction of the new residence
is not expected to tax the capacity of the municipal system.
STORMWATER & BASIC SWPPP / EROSION CONTROL
SOIL CONDITIONS:
The project site is relatively flat. Soils on this site are, WnA, — Windsor Loamy Sand
with hydrologic group A. According to Saratoga County Soil surveys, this soil is
classified as loamy, very deep and excessively drained with slopes of 0-35%. Soil
properties include high infiltration rate with low potential for surface runoff and high
rate of water transmission. Depth to bedrock in areas of such soils is typically greater
than 60" with no flooding hazard.
SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL:
A sediment and erosion control plan has been developed in order to specify minimum
controls and measures to reduce sediment runoff during construction.
Construction Entrance: One construction entrance has been specified at the far
South East of the existing Lot #1 along Nelson Ave. to accommodate the proposed
new driveway and off street parking for the existing house. A second construction
entrance is specified along the North of Lot #2 along Caroline St. to accommodate
the proposed new driveway and off street parking for any new residence.
- Topsoil: A potential topsoil storage area for foundation backfill and topsoil will
be identified (possibly towards the rear / Southern portion of the new Lot #2 and will
be surrounded by silt fencing. In general, excavated soil for the foundation that
will not be retained for backfill and topsoil grading will be required to be removed
from the site.
Concrete Wash: A Concrete wash area has been noted on the plans.
- Sediment Control: Less than 0.18 acres are anticipated to be disturbed during
construction. Silt fencing has been specified around the perimeter of the proposed'
new Lot 41, within the project area to limit off site erosion migration.
3
Saratoga County, New York
177
Soil Features
Table 24 gives estimates of various soil features.
The estimates are used in land use planning that
involves engineering considerations.
A restrictive layer is a nearly continuous layer that
has one or more physical, chemical, or thermal
properties that significantly impede the movement of
water and air through the soil or that restrict roots or
otherwise provide an unfavorable root environment.
Examples are bedrock, cemented layers, dense
layers, and frozen layers. The table indicates the
thickness of the restrictive layer, which significantly
affects the ease of excavation. Depth to top is the
vertical distance from the soil surface to the upper
boundary of the restrictive layer.
Subsidence is the settlement of organic soils or of
saturated mineral soils of very low density. Subsidence
generally results from either desiccation and shrinkage
or oxidation of organic material, or both, following
drainage. Subsidence takes place gradually, usually
over a period of several years. The table shows the
expected initial subsidence, which usually is a result of
drainage, and total subsidence, which results from a
combination of factors.
Potential for frost action is the likelihood of upward
or lateral expansion of the soil caused by the
formation of segregated ice lenses (frost heave) and
the subsequent collapse of the soil and loss of
strength on thawing. Frost action occurs when
moisture moves into the freezing zone of the soil.
Temperature, texture, density, permeability, content of
organic matter, and depth to the water table are the
most important factors considered in evaluating the
potential for frost action. It is assumed that the soil is
not insulated by vegetation or snow and is not
artificially drained. Silty and highly structured, clayey
soils that have a high water table in winter are the
most susceptible to frost action. Well drained, very
gravelly, or very sandy soils are the least susceptible.
Frost heave and low soil strength during thawing
cause damage to pavements and other rigid
structures.
Risk of corrosion pertains to potential soil -induced
electrochemical or chemical action that corrodes or
weakens uncoated steel or concrete. The rate of
corrosion of uncoated steel is related to such factors
as soil moisture, particle -size distribution, acidity, and
electrical conductivity of the soil. The rate of corrosion
of concrete is based mainly on the sulfate and sodium
content, texture, moisture content, and acidity of the
soil. Special site examination and design may be
needed if the combination of factors results in a
severe hazard of corrosion. The steel or concrete in
installations that intersect soil boundaries or soil layers
is more susceptible to corrosion than the steel or
concrete in installations that are entirely within one
kind of soil or within one soil layer.
For uncoated steel, the risk of corrosion, expressed
as low, moderate, or high, is based on soil drainage
class, total acidity, electrical resistivity near field
capacity, and electrical conductivity of the saturation
extract.
For concrete, the risk of corrosion also is expressed
as low, moderate, or high. It is based on soil texture,
acidity, and amount of sulfates in the saturation extract.
Water Features
Table 25 gives estimates of various water features.
The estimates are used in land use planning that
involves engineering considerations.
Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of
runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four
groups according to the rate of water infiltration when
the soils are not protected by vegetation, are
thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long -
The four hydrologic soil groups are:
Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low
runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist
mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained
sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate
of water transmission.
11.2
when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of
moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or
well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to
moderately coarse texture. These soils have a
moderate rate of water transmission.
Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when
thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a
layer that impedes the downward movement of water
or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture.
These soils have a slow rate of water transmission.
Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate
(high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These
consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell
potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that
have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface,
and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious
material. These soils have a very slow rate of water
transmission.
If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D,
B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and
the second is for undrained areas.
The months in the table indicate the portion of the
Year in which the feature is most likely to be a concern.
Soil Survey
loamy very fine sand; few patches of light
yellowish brown (10YR 6/4) loamy very fine sand;
massive; firm; strongly acid.
Solum thickness ranges from 20 to 50 inches.
Depth to bedrock is greater than 60 inches. Rock
fragments range from 0 to 5 percent by volume in the
solum, and 0 to 60 percent in the substratum.
Reaction ranges from very strongly acid to moderately
acid in the solum and strongly acid to slightly alkaline
in the substratum.
The A horizon has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 3
or 4, and chroma of 2 through 4. Texture is silt loam or
very fine sandy loam.
The Bw horizon has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 4
or 5, and chroma of 4 through 6. Texture is silt loam or
very fine sandy loam.
The C horizon has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 4
or 5, and chroma of 2 through 4. Texture is silt loam or
very fine sandy loam above 40 inches, but ranges
from fine sandy loam to sand below. The horizon is
massive, single grain, or has weak platy structure.
Wareham Series
Soils of the Wareham series are very deep,
somewhat poorly and poorly drained. They formed in
water sorted sand on glacial outwash plains, lake
plains, and deltas. Slopes range from 0 to 3 percent.
Wareham soils are in a drainage sequence with
excessively drained Windsor soils, well drained
Oakville soils, moderately well drained Deerfield soils,
and very poorly drained Scarboro soils. They are near
the loamy and gravelly Chenango soils, the sandy over
clayey Cosad or Cheektowaga soils, the silty
Raynham soils, and the clayey Rhinebeck soils.
Typical pedon of Wareham loamy sand, in the Town
of Halfmoon, 75 feet west of the entrance road, 830
feet north of Sitterly Road, Twin Lakes Apartments;
USGS Niskayuna topographic quadrangle; (42
degrees, 51 minutes, 10 seconds north latitude, 73
degrees, 46 minutes, 10 seconds west longitude) NAD
1927:
Oi---O to 2 inches; very dark brown (10YR 2/2) slightly
decomposed organic material consisting of
leaves, twigs, grass, and live and dead roots; very
strongly acid; abrupt smooth boundary.
A-2 to 8 inches; very dark gray (10YR 3/1) loamy
sand, grayish brown (10YR 5/2) dry; few fine faint
yellowish brown (10YR 5/8) mottles; weak
medium granular structure; very friable; many fine
and medium, few coarse roots; very strongly acid;
abrupt smooth boundary.
Bg-8 to 11 inches; light brownish gray (10YR 6/2)
loamy sand; few fine faint yellowish brown (10YR
5/8) mottles; weak fine subangular blocky
structure; friable; common fine, few medium roots;
very strongly acid; abrupt wavy boundary.
Bw-11 to 19 inches; yellowish brown (10YR 5/4)
loamy sand; common fine distinct strong brown
(7.5YR 5/8) mottles; weak medium subangular
blocky structure; friable; few fine roots; strongly
acid; clear smooth boundary.
Cg-19 to 72 inches; light brownish gray (10YR 6/2)
sand; common medium distinct strong brown
(7.5YR 5/6) mottles; massive, single grain in the
lower part; very friable; strongly acid.
The thickness of the solum ranges from 17 to 26
inches. Depth to bedrock is greater than 60 inches.
The reaction ranges from extremely acid to strongly
acid throughout. The content of rock fragments makes
up 0 to 15 percent by volume above 40 inches, and 0
to 60 percent below.
The A horizon has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 2
or 3, and chroma of 1 or 2. The dry value is 5 or less.
Texture is loamy fine sand or loamy sand in the fine
earth fraction. Structure is weak, fine, or medium
granular.
The B horizon has hue of 7.5YR or 10YR, value of
4 through 6, and chroma of 1 through 4. Texture is
loamy fine sand, loamy sand or sand in the fine earth
fraction.
The C horizon has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 4
through 6, and chroma of 1 through 3. It is loamy fine
sand to coarse sand in the fine earth fraction, and may
have lenses of fine sandy loam below 40 inches. The
horizon is massive or single grain, and is loose or very
friable.
Windsor Series
Soils of the Windsor series are very deep and
excessively drained. They formed in water -sorted
sand on glacial outwash plains, kames, and terraces.
Slopes range from 0 to 35 percent.
Windsor soils are in a drainage sequence with well
drained Oakville soils, moderately well drained
Deerfield soils, somewhat poorly drained and poorly
drained Wareham soils and very poorly drained
Scarboro soils. They are near gravelly Hoosic or
Saratoga County, New York
219
Hinckley soils, the sandy over clayey Claverack and
Cosad soils, the loamy Bernardston and Pittstown
soils, and the silty Raynham, Scio, and Unadilla soils.
Typical pedon of Windsor loamy sand, nearly level,
in the Town of Moreau, 1200 feet east of Potter Road,
2000 feet south of Butler Road, in a pine plantation;
USGS Glens Falls topographic quadrangle; (43 degrees,
15 minutes, 25 seconds north latitude, 73 degrees, 42
minutes, 28 seconds west longitude) NAD 1927:
Oe-0 to 2 inches; moderately decomposed pine
needles.
Ap-2 to 11 inches, very dark grayish brown (10YR
3/2) loamy sand; weak fine granular structure;
very friable; many fine and few medium roots;
strongly acid; abrupt wavy boundary.
Bw1-11 to 21 inches; yellowish brown (10YR 5/6)
loamy sand; weak fine granular structure; very
friable; many fine and few medium roots; strongly
acid; gradual wavy boundary.
Bw2-21 to 25 inches; yellowish brown (10YR 5/4)
sand; single grain; loose; strongly acid; clear wavy
boundary.
C-25 to 72 inches; light yellowish brown (10YR 6/4)
sand; single grain; loose; strongly acid.
The thickness of the solum ranges from 18 to 36
inches. Depth to bedrock is greater than 60 inches.
The reaction is very strongly acid to moderately acid in
the solum, and very strongly acid to slightly acid in the
C horizon.
The A horizon has hue of 7.5YR or 10YR, value of 3
or 4, and chroma of 1 through 3. Texture is loamy fine
sand or loamy sand.
The B horizon has hue of 7.5YR through 2.5Y,
value of 4 through 6, and chroma of 4 through 8 in the
upper part, and chroma of 3 through 6 in the lower
part. Texture is loamy fine sand or loamy sand in the
upper part, and loamy fine sand, loamy sand, fine
sand or sand in the lower part. Structure is granular or
subangular blocky, or the horizon is massive or single
grain.
The C horizon has hue of 5YR through 5Y, value of
4 through 7, and chroma of 2 through 6. It is sand or
loamy sand.
Wonsqueak Series
Soils of the Wonsqueak series are very deep and
very poorly drained. They formed in well -decomposed
organic material overlying mineral soil in the
Adirondack foothills. The loamy material is at a depth
of 16 to 51 inches. Wonsqueak soils are in
depressional areas or basins that were formerly lakes
or ponds. They receive runoff water from surrounding
areas. Slopes are less than 2 percent.
Wonsqueak soils are near sandy Allagash soils,
and the Skerry and Lyme soils which formed in fine
sandy glacial till.
Typical pedon of Wonsqueak muck, ponded, in the
Town of Greenfield, 100 feet west of Lake Desolation
Road, 4 miles north of Middle Grove; USGS Porter
Corners topographic quadrangle; (43 degrees, 07
minutes, 44 seconds north latitude, 73 degrees, 58
minutes, 12 seconds west longitude) NAD 1927:
Oa1-0 to 13 inches; black (10YR 2/1) broken face
sapric material (muck), black (5YR 2.5/1) rubbed;
15 percent fiber (undisturbed); weak fine granular
structure; slightly sticky; few fine roots; moderately
acid in calcium chloride; clear smooth boundary.
Oa2-13 to 31 inches; black (5YR 2.5/1) broken face
sapric material (muck), black (10YR 2/1) rubbed;
30 percent fiber (undisturbed); contains a 2-inch
thick layer of woody fibers about 0.5 to 1 inch in
size; massive; non -sticky; moderately acid in
calcium chloride; abrupt wavy boundary.
2Cg-31 to 72 inches; gray (5Y 5/1) fine sandy loam;
few fine distinct olive (5Y 5/4) mottles; massive;
slightly sticky, non -plastic; slightly acid in calcium
chloride.
The depth to the contrasting loamy mineral material
ranges from 16 to 51 inches. The organic layers are
almost exclusively highly decomposed herbaceous
material, but may contain some woody fibers. Rock
fragments in the substratum range from 0 to 20 percent
by volume. Reaction in calcium chloride of the organic
layers is extremely acid to slightly acid (but is very
strongly acid to slightly acid in at least one subhorizon),
and is strongly acid to neutral in the substratum.
The surface tier has hue of 2.5YR through 10YR,
value of 2 or 3, and chroma of 1 or 2.
The subsurface tier has hue of 2.5YR through
10YR, value of 2 or 3, and chroma of 1 or 2.
The mineral C horizon is neutral or has hue of 5Y to
5GY, value of 3 through 6, and chroma of 0 through 4.
Texture ranges from fine sandy loam through silty clay
loam.
Woodbridge Series
Soils of the Woodbridge series are very deep and
moderately well drained. They formed in compact
City of Saratoga Springs
Department Public Forks
of
_=
15 Vanderbilt Avenue (temporary address
v a>>
,1 'u4r.
g grana Sarato Springs, NT 12866
PORATEO
(518) 587-3550 office
www.saratoga-springs.org
Property Owner's Name
Property Address
NEW WATER SERVICE CONNECTION
AGREEMENT & APPLICATION FORM
James Stockwell
172 Caroline St.
Size of Tap (check one below)
V 3/ -
4
Number of Dwellings:
1
Project Name (if applicable)
Tax Map #:
166.61-1-7
Anthony J. Scirocco
Commissioner
Joseph J. O'Neill
Deputy Commissioner
1" Greater than C
A unit of water shall be defined as 14,000 (fourteen
thousand) cubic feet of water per year.
Contact the Utilities Department at ext. 2502 for
assistance with water use estimation and meter
specifications before signing below.
Estimated Cubic Feet of Water per Year 21,469 cu.ft.
To be completed in full without any contingencies or protest, on or before the Building Inspector approval of
the rough plumbing, including the installation of the water meter, or at the time of the issuance of a tapping
permit.
The undersigned represents to the City that they have full and complete authority to execute this document
and find and commit the developer to abide by the City Water Ordinance. This agreement shall be binding on
all of the undersigned transferees.
The undersigned acknowledges that a copy of this document will be delivered to appropriate and necessary
governmental entities. f
Authorized Signature �, Print Name
James Stockwell
Company Name & Address
Company Phone Number
172 Caroline St.
Fax Number
Date
Department of Public Works Approval Date:
City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Checklist
Saratoga Springs Complete Street Policy Vision (May 2012)
The City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Policy will encourage the development of a complete streets
network throughout the City to create a more balanced transportation system. The Policy shall be consistent
with and assist in achieving the goals and recommendations set forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan and
other policy documents. The Policy shall ensure new and updated public and private projects are planned,
designed, maintained and operated to enable safer, comfortable and convenient travel to the greatest extent
possible for users of all abilities including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists and transit riders.
This checklist is intended to assist the City in achieving its vision for complete streets.
Project Name:
Stockwell Subdivision
Project Location / Limits:
Project Description:
Date: 8/31 /22
172 Caroline St. - Corner of South West Corner of Caroline St. and Nelson Ave.
Subdivision of (1) lot into (2) lots
Instructions: For each box checked, please provide a brief description for how the item is addressed,
not addressed, or not applicable and include supporting documentation.
Street Classification (identify street or streets within the project area)
Principal arterial ❑ Minor arterial FE-1 Mixed use collector ❑ Mixed use local ❑
Residential collector ❑ Residential local X Special use street ❑
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Item to Be Addressed/ Checklist Consideration
YES
NO
N/A I
Required Description
Existing Bicycle & Pedestrian Operations
Do bicycle and pedestrian accommodations exist? (see page 2 for
❑
❑
Sidewalks exist on both sides of street
examples)`
Existing Transit Operations
Do transit facilities exist within the study area, including bus and
❑
❑
train stops/stations?
Is the project area on a transit route? (CDTA Service Routes)
❑
❑
CDTA Bus routes existing within 2-4 blocks
Are there bicycle racks, shelters, or parking for transit riders
❑
❑
available?
Existing Access and Mobility
Do connective opportunities exist with schools, hospitals, senior
U
❑
❑
care or community centers or persons with disabilities within
Existing sidewalks provide connectivity
project area?
Are there gaps inhibiting continuous access between schools,
❑
❑
hospitals, senior care, or community centers or persons with
disabilities within project area?"
Project Area Context
Are there prominent landmarks, recreation, shopping, employment
P7
❑
❑
center, cultural centers or other key destinations that offer
Downtown, Congress Park & Racetrack
opportunities to connect this site?
Please list and/or describe planning or policy documents addressing bicyclist, pedestrian, transit, or truck/ freight use for
the project area. Examples can include: City of Saratoga Springs Comprehensive Plan, City of Saratoga Springs Open
Space Plan, Capital District Transportation Committee Bicycle/ Pedestrian Priority Network, City Standard Details, etc.
City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Checklist
City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Checklist
Cost Estimate for Letter of Credit: 172 Caroline St.
Planning Board No.:
# xxxxx
Project:
Stockwell - (2) Lot Minor Subdivision
Location:
172 Caroline St.
Saratoga Springs, NY
Date:
11 /29/2022
Firm Name & Preparer:
Engineering America Co. - Tonya Yasenchak, PE
Page 1 of 3
On Site (All infrastructure & amenities on private property)
Item #
Item/Remarks
Quantity
Unit
Unit Cost
Subtotal
% Complete
Reduced $
Site Preparation and Grading
1
Clearing & Grubbing
1
Lot
$1,500.00
$1,500.00
0%
$1,500.00
2
Rough Grading
80
CY
$6.00
$480.00
0%
$480.00
3
Silt Fence
285
LF
$4.00
$1,140.00
0%
$1,140.00
4
Construction Entrance
2
EA
$250.00
$500.00
0%
$500.00
5
Tree / Buffer Protection
0
LF
$2.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
6
Misc. Erosion Control Measures
0
EA
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
Demolition
7
Building Removal (House, Garage & Shed)
0
EA
$10,000.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
8
Asphalt Removal (Cut for Utilities)
120
SF
$4.00
$480.00
0%
$480.00
9
Concrete Removal (Cut sidewalk for new drive)
132
SF
$4.00
$528.00
0%
$528.00
Hard Scape
10
Stone Subbase (Driveway)
19
CY
$25.00
$475.00
0%
$475.00
11
Asphalt Pavement (Driveway)
1,050
SF
$13.00
$13,650.00
0%
$13,650.00
12
CIP Curbing
0
LF
$20.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
13
Concrete Sidewalk
0
SF
$7.50
$0.00
0%
$0.00
14
Retaining Wall
0
LF
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
Site Amenities
15
Traffic Signs
0
EA
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
16
Striping
0
LS
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
17
Crosswalk
0
LS
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
18
Bench
0
EA
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
19
Bike Rack
0
EA
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
20
Site Lighting
0
EA
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
21
Fencing
0
LF
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
Site Water
22
6" DIP Class 52 Water Main
0
LF
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
23
3/4" Type K Copper Water Service
1
EA
$2,000.00
$2,000.00
0%
$2,000.00
24
1" Type K Copper Water Service
0
EA
$2,000.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
25
Water Fittings
0
LS
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
26
Fire Hydrant Assembly
0
EA
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
Stockwell- Cost Estimate
Unit Cost
Page 2 of 3
Item #
Item/Remarks
Quantity
Unit
Subtotal
% Complete
Reduced $
Site Sanitary
27
6" SDR-26 Sanitary Line & Stone
20
LF
$15.00
$300.00
0%
$300.00
28
8" SDR-26 Sanitary Line & Stone
0
LF
$0.00
$0.00
0%
_ $0.00
29
Manhole Structure
0
EA
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
Site Storm
30
6" HDPE Storm Drain & Stone
0
LF
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
31
12" HDPE Storm Drain & Stone
0
LF
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
32
Catch Basin
0
EA
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
33
Manhole Structure
0
EA
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
34
Yard Drains
0
EA
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
Stormwater Management
35
Bioretention Area
0
EA
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
36
UG Infiltration Chambers
0
EA
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
37
Hydrodynamic Separator
0
EA
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
38
Wet Pond
0
EA
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
Landscaping
39
Topsoil/Seed/Mulch
44
CY
$25.00
$1,100.00
0%
$1,100.00
40
Deciduous Trees
0
EA
$250.00
$250.00
0%
$0.00
41
Shrubs
0
EA
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
Total onsite Work
$22,403.00
$22,153.00
Total onsite X.25
$5,600.76
$5,538.25
Off Site (All infrastructure & amenities to
be dedicated to
the City)
Item #
Item/Remarks
Quantity
Unit
Subtotal
% Complete
Reduced $
Road Construction
42
Stone Subbase
5
CY
$30.00
$150.00
0%
$150.00
43
Asphalt Pavement (Binder)
264
SF
$10.00
$2,640.00
0%
$2,640.00
44
Asphalt Pavement (Top)
264
SF
$13.00
$3,432.00
0%
$3,432.00
45
Concrete Curbing
24
LF
$20.00
$480.00
0%
$480.00
46
Concrete Sidewalk
132
SF
$7.50
$990.00
0%
$990.00
Site Amenities
47
Traffic Signs
0
EA
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
48
Striping
0
LS
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
49
Crosswalk
0
LS
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
50
Street Signs
0
EA
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
51
Decorative Street Light
2
EA
$3,550.00
$7,100.00
0%
$7,100.00
Off Site Water
52
6" DIP class 52 Water Main
0
LF
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
53
6" Mueller Gate Valve
0
EA
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
54
8" DIP class 52 Water Main
0
LF
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
55
8" Mueller Gate Valve
0
EA
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
56
S.S. Tapping Sleeve and Valve Connection
0
EA
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
57
3/4" Corp, WSO and Type K water service to PL
1
EA
$1,500.00
$1,500.00
0%
$1,500.00
58
11" Corp, WSO and Type K water service to PL
0
EA
$1,500.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
59
Water Fittings
0
LS
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
60
Fire Hydrant Assembly
0
EA
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
61
Testing & Disinfection
1
LS
$250.00
$250.00
0%
$250.00
Stockwell- Cost Estimate
Page 3 of 3
Item #
Item/Remarks
Quantity
Unit
Subtotal
% Complete
Reduced $
Site Sanitary
62
SDR-35 6" Sanitary Service to PL & Stone
1
EA
$1,500.00
$1,500.00
0%
$1,500.00
63
SDR-35 8" Sanitary Main &Stone
0
LF
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0%_
$0.00
64
Manhole Structure
0
EA
$0.00
0%
$0.00
65
Kor N' Seal connection
1
EA
$125.00
$125.00
0%
$125.00
Site Storm
66
12" HDPE Storm Line & Stone
0
LF
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
67
Catch Basin
0
EA
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
68
Manhole Structure
0
EA
$0.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
Landscaping
69
Topsoil/Seed/Mulch
3.2
CY
$15.00
$48.00
0%
$48.00
70
Removal of Trees in R.O. W
0
EA
$1,200.00
$0.00
0%
$0.00
71
Street Trees
4
EA
$300.00
$1,200.00
0%
$1,200.00
Misc.
72
As -built Drawing
1
LS
$2,400.00
$2,400.00
0%
$2,400.00
Total offsite Work
$21,815.00
$21,815.00
Total On -Site Work X25%
$5,600.75
Total Off -Site work
$21,815.00
Total LOC Amount =
$27,415.75
* New LOC Reduced
Amount =
$27,353.25
City LOC Approval / Date
City LOC Reduction
Approval
/Date
* LOC cannot be reduced to less than 25% of the
original LOC
amount.
Maximum Reduction 75% _
$6,853.94
Stockwell- Cost Estimate