The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20220827 Richard Ave Subdivision Complete Streets Checklist 221006 City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Checklist . .:, :M�X .. . (May 2 012) The City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Policy will encourage the development of a complete streets network throughout the City to create a more balanced transportation system. The Policy shall be consistent with and assist in achieving the goals and recommendations set forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan and other policy documents. The Policy shall ensure new and updated public and private projects are planned, designed, maintained and operated to enable safer, comfortable and convenient travel to the greatest extent possible for users of all abilities including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists and transit riders. This checklist is intended to assist the City in achieving its vision for complete streets. Project Name: Proposed Three Lot Subdivision Date: 08/08/22 Project Location / Limits: 23 Richard Avenue Project Description: Proposed Three Lot Subdivision of existing parcel located at 23 Richard Avenue p Instructions: For each box checked, please provide a brief description for how the item is addressed, not addressed, or not applicable and include supporting documentation. Street Classification (identify street or streets within the roject area Principal arterial F� Minor arterial ❑ Mixed use collector ❑ Mixed use local El Residential collector ❑ Residential local W Special use street [:] EXISTING CONDITIONS Item to Be Addressed/ Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Existing Bicycle & Pedestrian Operations Do bicycle and pedestrian accommodations exist? (see page 2 for El L El There are existing sidewalks along Richard Avenue examples) Existing Transit Operations Do transit facilities exist within the study area, including bus and train stops/stations? Is the project area on a transit route? Are there bicycle racks, shelters, or parking for transit riders El El 0 available? Existing Access and Mobility Do connective opportunities exist with schools, hospitals, senior care or community centers or persons with disabilities within project area? Are there gaps inhibiting continuous access between schools, El hospitals, senior care, or community centers or persons with Subject parcel is not located nearany of the noted community resources disabilities within project area?" Pro"ect Area Context Are there prominent landmarks, recreation, shopping, employment E El center, cultural centers or other key destinations that offer The parcel is located within a residential neighborhood opportunities to connect this site? Please list and/or describe planning or policy documents addressing bicyclist, pedestrian, transit, or truck/freight use for the project area E f y s, .� Examples p e s can include-c I u d e a S c r 3 n r i etc. do,(`. ..�....,...A.,�...,o.,..w.,.m.a.�...a...,xw ,.,.�.»......,.,.�..M�...�.,�A.... ...�-.., ,.�.,.�,�w..a.,..-.......,..�,,.-....�.,..w....��.., �,o.,�.�.. ....A.o,.,..,.,.,,...........,,_.�..,....w�M.,»......,.,..w..,....,o,..,,.,.,k,....,..-.� m....o.�...........:.1 ,,.,,om�..«.w.a,.,,.»,..,a....,,...,..,w», .............,7 The applicant is proposing to install sidewalks along the frontage of the subdivided lots with Penn Street. ��-"jar t-�-og a S airings Complete Streets Checl�llst PROPOSED DESIGN Item to Be Addressed/ Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Complete Streets Design Bicyclist accommodations? El El The streets do not have dedicated bicyclist accommodations Pedestrian accommodations? El El The applicant will install sidewalks along Penn Street frontage Access and Mobility accommodations? Access ramps will be installed for the sidewalks Transit accommodations? none exist or proposed Truck/freight accommodations? LI Ex] The area is a residential neighborhood Streetsca e elements? 0 0 IStreet trees are being proposed for planting Bike Facilities: Off-roadway bike El Yes *No EINA Pedestrian Facilities- accommodations Sidewalks on both sides of � Dedicated bike laneEl Yes [KNo DNA Yes the street Shared-use lane El Yes [■KNo DNA Striped crosswalksElYes [KNANo Shoulder X Yes [:]Nop Geometric modifications El Yes ■ No MNA Acceptable actuated traffic Yes EMINo EINAp � to reduce crossing signal bike detection, including turn lanes distances such as curb Do signals allow adequate Yes No WNA extensions (e.g. bulb-outs g q 0 Acceptable provision for YesE]No ■NA minimum reen time for p � g pedestrian traffic signal bicyclist to safely cross features (e.g. ped. buttons) intersection?Si na g e and avement Yes No ■ NA Pedestrian signage for [� Yes [:]No WNA g p � � � crossin &wa findin markings specific to proposed bike facilities Safety islands/medians on F� YesE]No XNA Bicycle safe inlet grates El Yes [:]No WN:A roadways with two or more Bicycle parking, . bike racks, El Yes E]No �■ NA traffic lanes in each direction e y p g g Enhanced supplemental 0 Yes No XNA bike lockers pedestrian treatments at Transit Facilities: uncontrolled marked Transit shelters El Yes No RNA crossings Bus turnouts El Yes �No WNA Connectivity: Standing ads F1 Yes E]No XNA Are there ro osed El Yes E]No ONNA Has CDTA been contacted? Yes #No DNA proposed p connections to other bike Access and Mobility Facilities: paths, pedestrian facilities, or Adequate sidewalk or paved X Yes FINo ONA transit facilities? path Are there proposed 0 Yes E]No XNA Acceptable Yes 17No XNA connections to any key consideration/provision for destinations listed on page 1? accessible pedestrian traffic Are there proposed L Yes E]No X NA signal features connections to Curb ramps, including ■ Yes ONo DNA nei hborhoods? detectable warning Streetsca a Elements: surface Are streetscape elements # Yes �N o NA Acceptable slope and �■ Yes ONo DNA proposed such as cross-slope for driveway ramps, landscaping, street trees, sidewalks, crossings) planters, buffer strips, etc? Have conflicts been reduced ' !I�. IN Pedestrian-level lighting W Yes E]No DNA among pedestrian, bicyclists, and motor vehicles (access Public seating or benches 0 Yes No DNA management)? Design Standards and Guidelines Design meets guidelines such as described below for W Yes E]No 7NA Describe Proposed sidewalks will be in accordance with the noted bicycle/pedestrian/bus/transit facilities? *American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials(AASHTO)-A Policy on Geometric Design of Highway and Streets, Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities and AASHTO Guide for the Planning, Design, and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities; =lblic :ra.� I� � 1i.{'1. ('-"i f ;�F-� (..,� ry/ f -' r-' -�n I�'_ r ,.. ... 5 I —{".✓'�t /1 S'1. � �";.1 T� ��..,!.t i 1• �� '�iy�`• �ra - i+•r- /�' r r�.J... "'1. .7 'i 7 q/i�. -�;.1^!..J �', _ t p (F F i j'7 rp{ i'r J j j _''''_3 pie C / �7! e ((i' _ / '�1 t i I l ter✓._.��..�1){./ x� d. f l�',.J,�J' .`E 1 ;t.l /�l1CwI .Ed7 .11 3�� i 111 l ra t `.J�JV�Li:✓ i��v IIC,.✓+�. J��9`w J , !!: .✓I 1� 11�3 1�1f�1 �i�, :1:1i r :J -li E+4✓�.�.t��17�I� �1if tCii�l?`,, National Association of City Transportation Officials NACTO Bil'r,annlat.° New York State Department of Transportation— i� 'iriii?/=' •�,-ji`IIYI'i!fr�'��^I City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Checklist 2