Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20220217 17 Park Place New Single-Family and Two-Family Structures DRC - Advisory Opinion Tamie Ehinger, C ITY OF S ARATOGA S PRINGS Chris Bennett Leslie DiCarlo D ESIGN R EVIEW C OMMISSION Rob DuBoff Jeff Gritsavage Tad Roemer City Hall - 474 Broadway Ellen Sheehan Karen Cavotta, Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 Christina Muir Vagvolgyi, Tel: 518-587-3550 x.2515 fax: 518-580-9480 www.saratoga-springs.org A DVISORY O PINION In consideration of the Request for an Advisory Opinion by the Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA App #20220217 17 park Pl New Single and Two-Family Structures 17 Park Place Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 involving the Historic Review of mass, scale, and general design of a proposed single-family and two-family second principal structure within the Urban Residential-4 District, tax parcel #165.84-1-1.2, within the City of Saratoga Springs. Following discussion on this matter on June 29, 2022, the Commission issues the following opinion: Considerations: 1. The mass and scale of the secondary principal two-family structure as presented is not inappropriate. However, the DRC strongly suggests that the applicant reconfigure the lot to allow for more green space, to allow for a detached garage - which is more historically accurate and appropriate, and to allow for the proposed secondary structure to present more as an actual carriage house. 2. The intent of the revised lot configuration is to eliminate the two-car attached garage attached to the primary single-family structure and to modify the design of the secondary two-family structure to present as a full carriage house with a garage on the first floor and a floor above to accommodate living space. 3. As presented, the parking along the driveway with the easement may be appropriate as is. However, if the lot is reconfigured as recommended, it may be more appropriate to combine site access into one shared parking location. 4. In order to accommodate the new lot configuration, the Design Review Commission would find it appropriate to locate the two-family structure closer to the property line if necessary. 5. Should the applicant choose to reconfigure the lot, the Commission strongly encourages that the applicant return to the DRC for further evaluation and advisory opinion of the mass and scale of the revised configuration. Record of vote: motion to approve made by T. Ehinger, seconded by J. Gritsavage: passed 7-0 In favor: T. Ehinger, C. Bennett, L. DiCarlo, J. Gritsavage, T. Roemer, E. Sheehan, K. Cavotta July 22, 2022 Chair Received by Accounts cc: Accounts Dept. Applicant/Agent Page 1 of 1