Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20180185 Dawson/Motoholdings Residence Revised app 5-23-19 ITE ( , 1 PAKATAR if66, 24o. till MAY 2 3 2019 L GRoUP, LLC, By PROJECT NARRATIVE Project: 77 South Franklin Street and Adjoining Lots on Cobb Alley Date: May 23,2019 Project Description: The project consists of construction of four new single-family homes on pre-existing non-conforming building lots. The proposed homes are two story,three bedroom homes with attached two car garage. This project has been approved by the Zoning Board of Appeals in April of 2018. The applicant is requesting a modification of this approval to accommodate a change in proposed setbacks„ The lots affected are the three lots on Cobb Alley. The previously proposed and approved front and rear setbacks were 0.50and 7.50' respectively. After discussion and support from Public Works Commissioner Scirocco the setbacks are now proposed to be 4.00' for both front and rear. This will enable safer access for servicing the alley for snow removal and maintenance. All other features and site data remain the same as the original proposal. Respectfully submitted, The Pakatar Group, LLC 74 By: Arthur C,Pakatar, President 27 Cohoes Road Watenliet,New York I 2 1 89 1 5 1 8.874.1 604 1 Fax 2 12.73 1.03721 Nyvvw.thepakatararopp.com AN"$6.1S r*OLS17$19 341141W C1310$3380 tiF U_ 0 OM`SONIC1OH oior it— i 1,091.-PL9(9 Lc) A,'E CA210-Tall,- I- . , ..I.1 68121.AN 1.111/WILYM CO ...o °yob S301-00 h-.?. Mil litSilthiS VC 01.0111.JO A.I.Q i338.1113 PCDIPIVIIJ 1-$1 ries i Arr-r,seal rai t-99191.Ir&IN rill Cfir ''S'II''It'''''"5"'C 07'ClInCte erVIVNVCI 3HI 614ZTZA cri't oNusnoH AllAVAI 110NIS al SO$210N cl WASLA3$:1 AC NC lidiN:PS3C1 . he 0.3NCIS 3+3 ant .8 ,... i. illICELI TT, .,.., , 8AY M 2 4 2019 I i 33'?•/..1.S trillMin,il 1410S I I LT i By _ _ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMII 111.111111 i : —,.. ,.....,- -ftillogiiiiiiiii '---"--------- i (1 - ±-. :.......__.......__ : 1 1 -.. E _c .—. .... ..1 .7 1 re ....•L 3 : ' 0 ! 1 '1 2.- . . ' - :7 ) --1 ;2 e ) , . 1 NO E 115!a .."-----,-•...._........ . -1. ) LL. R . — $ a. ID It ,.,1:, -I__ ' -....._....,....-..........:i 10 L711 ...,=,;,...,..........1.......... t IMMI.,.......7 I Il 3 I . 0 ° , I i, - ,—_—__1 _ . 4 I f a I 1 a.. .,f+- ';`,-, ir, -ci Zi, ;a :! ) I -c ..... 4, 0 2.2 vr. Nr v 3 . ;0 i r t E 1 , b b b P 1 1 * 0 i ;II ' Ili L., .. ...., .,X, .7 II -. .:1.' i, ..?' 'z' ,---- aa izr 0 0.$ b h..- . T. ---__,__ i -.' ., J r , I eb b --:,--J b I e * ae 4 1 g 1 I !op 5 Ita -- ---- -- 411 0 0 - 1 ,m, I i \ Z .1_,- ---------..... ..,,„ I il - ---r- . 13. ' - 1 i .I uj ,i ,. ,,, . 0 = IN( t ' I t. P t ,.-i I I ' i I 11 !I 1ig.ii.ti, 1 I , I1! iI h0 , Cl) ;. w .1 . 10 ,. e Ci 'I I' LU $ N. _ i _ ;I 1 06 — — r i i 0 I Ct ,-,--..--,..--4-4-,------- - --,.....--J I a. 1 --..-- i- -i .. ' 10GI [FOR OFFICE USE1 . \ , .N.,. CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS 414trit (Application#) Cit9 Hall, - 474 131--0-nz4v-tuj 7:, •;/..,:'...4r, . — "Ali • ' lt,J... 50-4-040130-Spp-- 0,--ei N&vv-York/1,2 8 6 6 ..... ., . -Fa,: 51 8-587-3550 fay../. 518-580-q4-80 kb, ,„..,, (Date received) \- APPLICATION FOR: APPEAL TO THE ZONING BOARD FOR AN INTERPRETATION, USE VARIANCE, AREA VARIANCE AND/OR VARIANCE EXTENSION APPLICANT(S)* OWNER(S) (lf not applicant) ATTORNEY/AGENT Anthony Dawson/Moto Holdings, Inc. Name 274 Greenfield Avenue Address Ballston Spa, NY 12020 518-256-0483 Phone / i / Tdawson©planitsalvage.com Email *An applicant must be the property owner, lessee,or one with an option to lease or purchase the property in question. Applicant's interest in the premises: WI Owner ID Lessee 0 Under option to lease or purchase PROPERTY INFORMATION Cobb Alley(aka77 South Franklin) 165 66 2 64 I. Property Address/Location: Street _Tax Parcel No.: - - (for example.- 165.52—4—37) UR-3 2. Date acquired by current owner: 3.Zoning District when purchased: Recycling/Salvage Yard UR-3 4. Present use of property: 5. Current Zoning District: 6. Has a previous ZBA application/appeal been filed for this property? 0 Yes(when? For what? ) 2 No 7. Is property located within (check all that apply)?: Ed Historic District 0 Architectural Review District El SOO' of a State Park, city boundary, or county/state highway? 8. Brief description of proposed action: Replace existing recycling/salvage yard with new single family home on existing. 9. Is there a written violation for this parcel that is not the subject of this application? 0 Yes V No 10. Has the work, use or occupancy to which this appeal relates already begun? E Yes kil No I I. Identify the type of appeal you are requesting (check all that apply): 0 INTERPRETATION (p.2) ID VARIANCE EXTENSION (p. 2) 0 USE VARIANCE (pp. 3-6) 2 AREA VARIANCE (pp. 6-7) Revised 12.120 15 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION FORM PAGE 2 FEES:Make checks payable to the "Commissioner of Finance". Fees are cumulative and required for each request below. 0 Interpretation $ 400 ID Use variance $1,000 12 Area variance -Residential use/property: $ 150 -Non-residential use/property: $ 500 Li Extensions: $ 150 INTERPRETATION PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING(add additional information as necessary): I. Identify the section(s)of the Zoning Ordinance for which you are seeking an interpretation: Section(s) 2. How do you request that this section be interpreted? 3. If interpretation is denied,do you wish to request alternative zoning relief? Eyes ONc 4. If the answer to #3 is "yes," what alternative relief do you request?D Use Variance El Area Variance EXTENSION OF A VARIANCE—PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING(add additional information as necessary): I Date original variance was granted: 2. Type of variance granted? 0 Use LI Area 3. Date original variance expired: 5. Explain why the extension is necessary.Why wasn't the original timeframe sufficient? When requesting an extension of time for an existing variance,the applicant must prove that the circumstances upon which the original variance was granted have not changed. Specifically demonstrate that there have been no significant changes on the site, in the neighborhood, or within the circumstances upon which the original variance was granted: Revised 12/2015 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLIC4TION FORM PAGE] USE VARIANCE—PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING(add additional information as necessary): A use variance is requested to permit the following; For the Zoning Board to grant a request for a use variance, an applicant must prove that the zoning regulations create an unnecessary hardship in relation to that property. In seeking a use variance,New York State law requires an applicant to prove all four of the following "tests". I. That the applicant cannot realize a reasonable financial return on initial investment for any currently permitted use on the property. "Dollars&cents"proof must be submitted as evidence.The property in question cannot yield a reasonable return for the following reasons: A. Submit the following financial evidence relating to this property(attach additional evidence as needed): I) Date of purchase: Purchase amount: $ 2) Indicate dates and costs of any improvements made to property after purchase: Date Improvement Cost 3)Annual maintenance expenses:$_ - 4)Annual taxes: $ 5)Annual income generated from property:$ 6) City assessed value: $ Equalization rate: Estimated Market Value: $ 7)Appraised Value: $ - Appraiser: Date: Appraisal Assumptions: Revised MO 15 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION FORM PAGE 4 . . B. Has property been listed for sale with EJYes If"yes", for how long? the Multiple Listing Service(MLS)? UNo 1)Original listing date(s): Original listing price: $ If listing price was reduced, describe when and to what extent: 2) Has the property been advertised in the newspapers or other publications? DYes EI No If yes, describe frequency and name of publications: 3) Has the property had a"For Sale" sign posted on it? ]Yes 0 No If yes, list dates when sign was posted: 4) How many times has the property been shown and with what results? 2. That the financial hardship relating to this property is unique and does not apply to a substantial portion of the neighborhood. Difficulties shared with numerous other properties in the same neighborhood or district would not satisfy this requirement. This previously identified financial hardship is unique for the following reasons: Revised 12/2015 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION FORM PAGE 5 3. That the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Changes that will alter the character of a neighborhood or district would be at odds with the purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. The requested variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood for the following reasons: • 4. That the alleged hardship has not been self-created.An applicant(whether the property owner or one acting on behalf of the property owner)cannot claim "unnecessary hardship" if that hardship was created by the applicant,or if the applicant acquired the property knowing(or was in a position to know)the conditions for which the applicant is seeking relief.The hardship has not been self-created for the following reasons: Revised 1 2/20 1 5 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION FORM PAGE 6 AREA VARIANCE—PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING(add additional information as necessary): Section 2.1, Table 3 The applicant requests relief from the following Zoning Ordinance article(s) Dimensional Requirements From To Minimum Lot Size 6,600 SF 2500 SF Minimum Lot Width 60 Ft 50 Ft Prinicipal Bldg. Coverage 30% 50% y Min Front Yard Setback 10 Ft CAFt Min Rear Yard Setback 25 Ft 7.51rt Other: Refer to Site Plan for specific variance requirements To grant an area variance,the ZBA must balance the benefits to the applicant and the health,safety,and welfare of the neighborhood and community,taking into consideration the following: I Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by other feasible means. Identify what alternatives to the variance have been explored (alternative designs,attempts to purchase land,etc.)and why they are not feasible. When seeking designs for each single lot it was not feasible under current zoning requirements to construct any building. 2. Whether granting the variance will produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. Granting the variance will not create a detriment to nearby properties or an undesirable change in the neighborhood character for the following reasons: The existing use pre-dates zoning laws; at the time the business was started the demographics of the neighborhood was different. • III '11. 410 II I .111 111. 1•410. - - Revised 1 2/20 1 5 .ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION FORM PAGE 7 3. Whether the variance is substantial. The requested variance is not substantial for the following reasons: The variance is riot substantial. The current zoning precludes any structure from being constructed on these lots (area wise not use). Recent projects have similar area features and have proven-to fit in the neighborhood without much notice, 4. Whether the variance will have adverse physical or environmental effects on neighborhood or district. The requested variance will not have an adverse physical or environmental effect on the neighborhood or district for the following reasons: This variance will not have any adverse affects on the neighborhood - in fact it is quite the opposite. Providing housing as a replacement for the recycling and salvage yard is a benefit to the environment and the aesthetics of the neighborhood. 5. Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created(although this does not necessarily preclude the granting of an area variance). Explain whether the alleged difficulty was or was not self-created: This difficulty was not self-created. The current use has been continuous since prior to zoning. When the business was last purchased transactions continued uninterrupted. The business is profitable however the continued operation is becoming more difficult given the logistics of the business and the makeup of the neighborhood Revised 12/2015 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION FORM PAGE 8 DISCLOSURE Does any City officer,employee,or family member thereof have a financial interest(as defined by General Municipal Law Section 809)in this application? 10 No fl Yes If"yes",a statement disclosing the name,residence and nature and extent of this interest must be filed with this application. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I/we,the property owner(s), or purchaser(s)/lessee(s) under contract,of the land in question, hereby request an appearance before the Zoning Board of Appeals. By the signature(s)attached hereto, I/we certify that the information provided within this application and accompanying documentation is, to the best of my/our knowledge, true and accurate. I/we further understand that intentionally providing false or misleading information is grounds for immediate denial of this application. Furthermore, I/we hereby authorize the members of the Zoning Board of Appeals and designated City staff to enter the property associated with this application for purposes of conducting any necessary site inspections relating to this appeal. Date: (applicant signature) Date: (applicant signature) If applicant is not the currently the owner of the property, the current owner must also sign. Owner Signature: Date: Owner Signature: Date: Revised 1 2/20 1 5 ZONING AND BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIAL OF APPLICATION FOR LAND USE AND/OR BUILDING Moto Holdings, Inc 165 66 2 66 APPLICANT: TiAX PARCEL NO.: 77 South Franklin Street UR-3 PROPERTY ADDRESS: ZONING DISTRICT: This applicant has applied to use the identified property within the City of Saratoga Springs for the following: This application is hereby denied upon the grounds that such use of the property would violate the City ZonAg Ordinance article(s) As such,the following relief would be required to proceed: 0 Extension of existing variance 0 Interpretation El Use Variance to permit the following: 0 Area Variance seeking the following relief: Dimensional Requirements From To Other: Note: LI Advisory Opinion required from Saratoga County Planning Board ZONING AND BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE Revised I 212015