HomeMy WebLinkAbout20170676 DeVall Subdivision Correspondance DEVALL AND DEVALL
Ltorne,yie Lam) �
59 FRANKLIN STREET
SARATOGA SPRINGS NEW YORK 12866
' 119 E
/1r,
AREA CODE(518)584-8521
RICHARD F.DeVALL JIJN
2c2018
DAVID F.DeVALL
ALSO MEMBER OF THE FLORIDA BAR :L
June 22, 2018
Mr. Mark Torpey, Chairman
Saratoga Springs Planning Board
City Hall-474 Broadway
Saratoga Springs,NY 12866 Via facsimile (518) 580-9480 and Regular Mail
Re: 17.051.1 DeVall Subdivision and Residence, 59 Franklin Street
Dear Mr.Torpey:
Please recall that our matter was before the Planning Board last evening for coordinated SEQR
review and an Advisory Opinion to the ZBA concerning our pending area variance applications.
With respect to the Advisory Opinion,the Planning Board found problematic with what it termed
the "very substantial" amount of dimensional and bulk relief requested. Given that, we requested
tabling of the matter so that we might return to the Planning Board with a revised site plan.
On further reflection this morning, we feel differently.
We hereby withdraw the request to table, and respectfully insist that the Planning Board render
its Advisory Opinion to the ZBA. We request the courtesy of being copied or informed when the
Advised Opinion is transmitted.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Very truly yours,
(2,{(2,6,—fZ
David F DeVall Richard F DeVall
cc: Kate Maynard, Planner via email
Steven Rowland, Chairman asked if there was any further discussion. None heard.
VOTE: Steven Rowland, Chairman, in favor; Tamie Ehinger,Vice Chairman in favor; Leslie DiCarlo, in favor;
Chris Bennett, in favor; Richard Martin, in favor; Cynthia Corbett, in favor; Leslie Mechem, in favor
MOTION PASSES: 7-0
r 2017.116 DEVALL:NEW CONSTRUCTION :59 Franklin Street,sketch discussion(Historic Review)on a proposed
subdivision to permit new construction within the Urban Residential-4 District.
Applicants: David& Richard DeVall,Applicants
Mr. David DeVall stated the applicants are before the DRC this evening for a sketch discussion concerning a subdivision in
the rear of the property. We are proposing the construction of an 1100 square foot home with an attached garage.
This mimics the architecture of the main building on the site. The Planning Board requested we appear before the DRC for
an opinion on the siting of the project. We have spoken with Samantha Bosshart, Saratoga Springs Preservation
Foundation this date. She offered that the mimicking of the main building may not be the way to proceed. She also offered
that the garage for this property should not be attached and perhaps the addition of a breezeway to a detached garage
could be considered.
Bradley Birge,Administrator, Planning and Economic Development provided some background information on this
application. This application went to the ZBA who referred SEQRA to the Planning Board. The Planning Board is looking
for input concerning the siting of the structure on this site.This is a sketch discussion and they are looking for input and
some suggestions. Following SEQRA review,they will appear before the ZBA again for variances needed for this project.
Following this process the application will return before the Commission for Historic Review.
Mr. David DeVall stated Ms. Bosshart provided some history of the site noting the fact that there was a home on this site in
the past. We have completed a site plan which provides precise dimensions on the project. The position we have chosen
seems to be the only one that fits on the lot.
Steven Rowland, Chairman stated Samantha Bosshart referenced in her letter guidelines that are in our ordinance not trying
to replicate a historic structure but something which is sympathetic to the structure.
Tamie Ehinger,Vice Chairman stated the setback seems off. No fronting on Marvin Alley.
Discussion ensued among the Commission concerning the types of designs for the home,the siting of the structure and
Mass and Scale, as well as a detached garage versus an attached garage.
Mr. David DeVall stated they were informed that sidewalks,street trees and street lights would be required. He provided the
Zoning requirements for the site for the Commissions information.
Steven Rowland, Chairman questioned what is required of the Commission this evening.
Bradley-Birge,Administrator, Planning and Economic Development stated the siting of the structure is important,
opinions on Mass and Scale and if there are any issues on the size of the structure proposed.
Steven Rowland, Chairman stated the siting of the structure is not inappropriate,the mass and scale are in context with the
neighborhood. We do not have a formal application so we cannot make a motion however,we can forward our thoughts
and conversation to the Planning and Zoning Boards. We look forward to the applicant returning.
3. 2017.067 INTRADA SARATOGA MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT,Station Lane,Architectural Review
of a mixed-use workforce housing development within the Transect-5 Neighborhood Center District.
City of Saratoga Springs--Design Review Commission Minutes--January 17,2018 - Page 2 of 6
Sill: itog,,i Spring',
Preservation Foundation
January 17, 2018
Mr. Steve Rowland, Chair
PRESERVATION Design Review Commission
V
7F
" R_
FOR -deiYEAS
City Hall.-4,V
* 474 Broadway
- ,r
—.V Saratoga Springs,NY 12866
RE: 59 Franklin Street—New Construction
Dear Steve,
, 1
, . The Saratoga Springs Preservation Foundation has reviewed the materials submitted for a
Design Review Commission advisory opinion on the proposed subdivision of the lot at
59 Franklin Street and the concept drawings for the proposed single-family residence.
Board of Directors The Greek Revival style house located at 59 Franklin Street was constructed circa 1830
Matthew E.Veitch and is a contributing building to the West Side Historic District listed on the National
President Register of Historic Places. This house and the residence at 63 Franklin Street are two of
the best examples of the vernacular Greek Revival style in Saratoga Springs. This
James Gold
Vice President district's period of significance, 1840s to the early 1900s, incorporates a variety and
architectural styles ranging from the Greek Revival style to the later period's Queen
Linda Harvey-Opiteck Anne, Italianate, and Second Empire styles.
Treasurer
Alicia Czwerwinski The Foundation does not object to the subdivision of the lot. However, the Foundation
Secretary
has concerns about the proposed single-family residence. Per the Historic District Design
Caroline Cardone Guidelines for New Construction—New Buildings:
Cynthia Corbett
Brennan Drake
Adam N,Favro • Architectural styles for new construction should reflect and represent the period
Liz Israel in which it was built. The style of new construction should be compatible with
Samantha Kerculi
surrounding buildings, but should not give the false impression of being historic.
Douglas Kerr
Richard King Construction methods and materials can differentiate new construction from
Michelle Paquette-Deuel historic structures.
Cindy Spence
Bill Willard • The placement and orientation of new buildings should be consistent with
Meredith Woollbrd neighboring buildings. Maintaining a consistent streetscape and facade setback
is recommended.
James Kettlewell • Building mass should be appropriate to the size of the lot. A large lot can
emeritus generally accommodate a larger structure, while a small structure is more
appropriate for a smaller lot.
• Building height and scale should be consistent with the existing streetscape and
Samantha Bosshart
neighboring building patterns. Historic streetscapes often have a variation in
Executive Director
building scale and massing that contribute to the visual interest and unique
historic character of the street. Variation is promoted, but extreme difference
should be avoided.
• New construction materials should be compatible with and complement the
surrounding historic buildings. Contemporary materials may be used provided
they do not negatively impact historic character of the neighboring buildings.
The use of vinyl is discouraged.
112 Spring Street, Suite 203
Saratoga Springs, NY ]2866
51g-587-5030
The Foundation objects to the design of the proposed house. It too closely mimics 59
Franklin Street and has the potential to give the false impression of being historic. The
design should be compatible with and take cues from the surrounding buildings, but
should not duplicate historic styles. It does not reflect and represent the period in which it
is built, 2018. An attached garage is not compatible with the district; it should be a
separate structure.
The Foundation respectfully requests that you take these concerns into consideration
when reviewing of this application.
Sincerely,
1414G1/41.1. py:itt
Matthew E. Veitchs#A4i.—(A3100414/
ha Boss fart
President Executive Director
Enclosures: Historic Sanborn Maps
Cc: Richard and David DeVall, Applicant
59 Franklin Street
1884 Sanborn Map
-,fl
.Z. .
,.
iii /77 ' 4
lirnlip, 0
,0 4apAi.
X '!..e kilii 1
if
alic ; k, • N I/
e
ii
\,, En
it
Olt Avg-4"u, f '
1/ 4
' ' 6
0 AVArllytr 4 Allii.4
i Ur
/
CI
aP.
4 Nci,„ ,/
4 1
tv
°tit!" 1' Zi
/ c7 ..,/
4 '
ti
il? ' ilf
Ji if
4 ct i
111111, C.,
......,..
4,7
..........
.......,
............., -2,34,r
. ....z.,...... --Ir
0 co
...Ir.. -13. R c,
.4.-...„......
--,.,iv ....,
-......, q
a "ion KN
k .......
'Nft.....-...
11
-...-.....
--, t'........,...4
ff lii
•
/o
0
Co
4 & #4
c) 4'8 izi
44.25
-..9 ,
rl
‘N
1.--------'-----------_____ 1
1\
59 Franklin Street
1895 Sanborn Map
.. EZ,;.riN
c.,"1 Cr ° Z ir , - 96
\ , 0
. Z i"4111111-..4.444„
Illr;9'4 Z e •
`rhe
4e 1-4:17 ' ,A***
A
II
% Aliff Ell
42 of 4
do) I, 0 e II
II
, it 0
.v n
,* # e
f dr, o
!f
0 0- f IP 0
it
11
/...1"-e.i., ...d. v
a
. 4T "... erly w
T% 4 a' 'A'N --ct) 0 - it;
,V 9 a 3.1$111 y s , .,..
,,,0 , ... ,
.. „,
:s.p,
8W ! ct,
N , 4'. it/ 1,. -
rib, i, N.
k
s.fv"Ifikt,....7 , Q
...pc')
l
1
59 Franklin Street
1889 Sanborn Map
'".---....„,41 L.....tz_....„........,...) ------J
1;----7-fr e:` ,
/itiii,4•.z,r
110
ilir 4 9G,_, _______.......„„......_______.„....11C5 ?
4, - .N. 101100.
4.e.,
p ,.,
*1 ii''''Afp.
1
44 it
110
hfr
11
di fx, , .A •Ni Ve r)
iii ,bi,giLV11 Vs . e a
it4, # esst .130
0 . iti3
1
,...... 4. )114 e
. iiii„:e ,,,v,
- ....
%I,
%N., :rt, I 444
..„„,
0
...... ---.. i
-4.,
....„,, ........ eis ke.
I db„.1
....,.. -- , zi
Ji3rb4e, ...0... --4
...1 1141k 4464141741164414 / I\
i ';‘44'
7P ii
-regur›. .,... 41 ,,,,H;
40,
4P
I
59 Franklin Street
1900 Sanborn M a p
ii
di
fi
10
I;
i i P , Z a
ri
0 665j"
C) "I
fl
. •...,,`•..--_,___ 11.1A:10.4,
si
CO it
ofts, iis>.------------"--- ,--/' IA*Ar / r
er,
A 4% r ?I c) ,.;
lz
ii
II
ji 11111111kCji
di
II
. e'
si
+A*If
(7 }'
AVa
ii---- ,,,,,,„
Z''' Fi. .
/ ."
0 (7,,'I: I
II
ti 4
ti ;i
,s?" 11
0 d/
i + ��
. A
...,
.,....... ,, Alii,
--.... ,,...-41414, M
-
•
ra
ii
4
er
-,'.. "ff 9 ,..... _ .4., ...,,
FRANb'cLIN
,....... ...... ,
,...,.4.—„,,
..„... C) oll SQ.
` ' St7
f
r 4
El
if
59 Franklin Street
1900 Sanborn Map Corrected 1950
d , ,
i ... ?
•:. --40.011.
• . . .,..--f Spe:,...
1
2 4 -eis
die,. 0
0 4 CP '"i"----"I'—"------------'''----,—.,,,
d2H'
ni ..................„
111! 1
iv a ...- A
P ft,
:t-------- , 4.
,..
$
...„„,
4.
E 1
i .
0 ill
4
a . cep
li
iA
"
I
11 1 I
y
if i if ;I: Ifr.szo
'-.... _ • ' :
it • 1--4,,
'
I 0 a
- i
;
•• : . /
t .2 •?1,
, 0 0 41
; • k
_ .
...i.
,,...
0.17, li'-'
• 1,„-— dr ii .ra it,at
•,,,, , ..,‘. ii
.........,.... 5,
ii
441,4 . u
. ...... 11
-.. k .
•-liftl) - . a
.•.,
, .11. 0 •
iAivir
. . „ . •
......
..... .
----,,,e.....,,,::..,..,..,,/p..,,:.,,.,.,.,aq,.,:4.4.,„ A , •65,e
t., .
-7---- ti
FRAN Ki.I N
:...... • At.
... .. .....,..., . -
59 Franklin Street
1954 Sanborn Map Corrected
/ imir;z7 / Zo
/ ,/ifOr
t
! :1,If II i
i .k:
., , 0
i --,
1,1
. r-,---
. iii
..,, T,. .
. ...._ MAP vusi
_ ..
: ;',. ._, ..,I- '...,....
' -- AL, Z
0... ---___ t .4.
ii, ‘ - .„
.,.. .....
/
*A. / ip, I. . 0 Or .i . / 4" i e... ellkow
4........ i > '
. 'I 0 :
1
• � 4
J
i se.,..14,41
1
J
,t /1
1 fi.' ++ `
i .?%",.....1/471
I l . r
/i i'l itil ;S
Vi
. r.„,......" 2 k
t
moi'
' f
/ i s
• '''''' ..ca / / ui
r
..''II'' ./ i
•
1
14"''''''''''...........k,„ ' • : ,P*Ab ----,...,.., ''',.- . 0 / I
I 4,
•
.... , , A., a , „ .
ie.
.....„......,„,.....„,,e.....„::frN ....,
.......
. .
- ,
t
r - .r
LI N .5
9 . . ,
t .....
- •• i SQ .
,s
,.
. t
---„, . ,
. r
a