HomeMy WebLinkAbout20210755 269 Broadway Site Plan Public Comment (20) Zimbra susanna.combs@saratoga-springs.org
Fwd: Proposed Development at 269 Broadway
From : Susan Barden Wed, Feb 16, 2022 12: 14 PM
<susan.barden@sarat
oga-springs.org>
Subject : Fwd : Proposed
Development at 269
Broadway
To : Susanna Combs
<susanna.combs@sara
toga-springs.org>
Please include email below in 269 Broadway materials.
Susan B. Barden, AICP
Principal Planner
City of Saratoga Springs
474 Broadway
Saratoga Springs, NY
518-587-3550 ext. 2493
From: "Myles Gombert" <mgombert@optonline.net>
To: "Susan Barden" <susan.barden@saratoga-
springs.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2022 6:08:06 PM
Subject: Proposed Development at 269 Broadway
CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City
network. Please contact IT Support if you need
assistance determining if it's a threat before
opening attachments or clicking any links.
Dear Ms. Barden,
My name is Myles Gombert. I live at 268 Broadway here in
Saratoga Springs. Many friends and neighbors along with
approximately 800 citizens of our city have serious
concerns with the proposed development at 269 Broadway.
The purpose of this email is to provide you with additional
information specifically concerning the impact of this
development on traffic and safety. I also included a link to
an informative article about sidewalks as it highlights
Saratoga Springs (https:,[/www.sociallifeproject.org north-
america-main-street-sidewalks/). Land Use Boards are
responsible for similar considerations. We want to make
sure there is a sober response to the developer's studies
and that these data get into the hands of the decision-
makers on the various committees (i.e. DRC and PB). We
feel that the greater opportunity for information obtained
by board members was afforded to the developer without
intelligent rebuttal. I was told that you are the ��conduit" for
this information. You are also an advisor to individuals on
the Board by way of your experience and membership in
the American Association of Certified Planners.
A Revised Traffic Study January 19, 2022
Report (https:[Jlf.saratoga-
springs.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?
id=373883&dbid=0&repo=SaratogaSprings) was delivered
to the Planning Board and is now contained in the archives.
This is a very detailed report filled with numbers, tables,
equations, statistics, assumptions and ��adjustment factors':
The revision was performed as the first TrafFic Study was
performed during the height of COVID and was not
representative of anything close to ��normal': This current
study was performed on Wednesday May 19, 2021, and
that is also during the pandemic reflecting lower transit
through that area. I suspect no one who is not expert in
this and related disciplines is able to properly and
independently interpret these data. Most likely, they will
rely on the one-page ��conclusions and
recommendations".......out of a 104 page document. As you
are aware, statistics of this type, and those in general when
proving a point, can be misleading if not given proper
consideration by an independent statistician. This is
precisely why these comments are being sent to you so
that you can pass them along to those other experts who
can inform the Board of their assessments going forward.
That is not to say your assessments are not important. You
have the bona fides to contribute as well.
There is an Level of Service (LOS) table on page 5 of the
report reflecting several intersections and their ��grades"
from A to F with A being the best and F being the worst.
Table 1 on page two reflects this grading system. The
accompanying text indicated the following......'"�Intersection
design practice, as determined by the NYSDOT, strives to
provide a minimum LOS D or better for each lane group in
urban areas and a minimum of LOS C in rural areas.
Although LOS D is acceptable in urban
environments, LOS C is the preferred minimum for
overall approach LOS. LOS D is acceptable for
specific low volume movements or approaches
within an intersection". The sentence in bold is
significant. A grade of D is ��acceptable" yet an LOS of ��C" is
the preferred minimum for overall approach LOS. Four of
the six measurements obtained a grade of D or worse.
The report stands by itself. It would also be helpful to take
a step back and make personal observations. At each of the
intersections (excluding Hamilton & Congress) transit by
large delivery vehicles is a challenge if not impossible.
These intersections with busy trafFic, narrow streets and
difficult angles are problems not reflected in the data
presented by the developer.
The report mentioned ��heavy vehicles', yet the report does
not define what that means. It could be construed as
reflecting large ��box trucks" (e.g. FedEx) or tractor-trailers.
Deliveries to many establishments farther north on
Broadway have deliveries made by tractor-trailers and these
pose even greater navigation challenges to those
intersections in the report. The report also omitted any
discussion about the required street width and turning radii
at said intersections.
At the time of the counting they recorded only 4 school
buses. Informal counts recently indicated many more buses
dropping students off at the school both in the morning and
afternoon.
Parking is another concern. The report speaks to the
availability of parking on Hamilton St. and Broadway
without noting these spots are already being utilized. A
deeper dive into the claims of the developer that parking
(despite an underground garage) would be minimally
impacted defies common sense.
Another, and likely the most important point to be made, is
this Traffic Study only looked at Hamilton St. It did not take
into account any of the activity on Broadway. 269 Broadway
is the address of this proposed development. Broadway,
despite what the developer presented, will be another
primary point of ingress and egress for individuals utilizing
the building (offices, retail, restaurant) as well as numerous
delivery trucks which will be directed to Broadway by apps
on mobile devices (Google Maps, Apple CarPlay, etc.) and
other internet based platforms. Attached to this email is a
photo representative of this (I realize, after reviewing this
email, I do not have that photo. I will obtain it and send it
to you under separate cover). Broadway is the major
thoroughfare through Saratoga Springs and encompasses
Routes 50 and 9. In addition, the portion of Broadway
between Congress St. and Circular St. is the only portion of
Broadway in the entire city which is one lane in each
direction. As you can imagine, this poses many safety and
transit problems.
Thank you so much for taking the time to review and
distribute these rebuttals to your colleagues in city
government who can then inform the Planning Board of
their expert analyses. At the appropriate time, when there
is opportunity for public comment, we will prepare a
presentation reflecting the above along with other issues
which require further investigation. 269 is a very complex
undertaking and we want to make sure that all information
(pro and con) is reviewed and evaluated along with the
benefit of expert opinion. There is no emergency. We can
all take a step back, take a few deep breaths and not get
locked into an artificial timetable of our own making.
Respectfu I ly su bm itted,
Myles E. Gombert
Email: Above
Cell: 516-652-7647
Confidentiality/Privilege Notice : This e-mail
communication and any files transmitted with it
contain privileged and confidential information
f rom the City of Saratoga Springs and are
intended solely for the use of the individual ( s )
or entity to which it has been addressed . If you
are not the intended recipient , you are hereby
notified that any disclosure, copying,
distribution, or taking any other action with
respect to the contents of this message is
strictly prohibited . If you have received this
e-mail in error, please delete it and notify the
sender by return e-mail . Thank you for your
cooperation .