HomeMy WebLinkAbout20210415 Driscoll Rd Site Plan Correspondence from ABD Engineers to Susan Barden 12.23.21 � ENGINNEERS, LLP.
�
o � 411 Union Street
PARTNERS n p Schenectady,NY 12305
JOSEPH J.SIANCHINE,P,E. ',6' S�$.3��_���� ��� $�$-377-0379 6�.bICA7Ea
LUIGIA.PAL�ESCHI,P,E. j� RESPONSIVE
MARK C,BLACKSTONF,��.s. www.abdex�g.co� PRQF�SSIONAL
December 23, 2021
Re: M�ed-Use Suilding
Dxiscoll Rd&NYS Rte.9
City of Saratoga Springs
ABD Pro.iect#5190A
---- ,,,. ,..,,,,,,,,,,,,,„....._v
Susan B. Sarden, AICP
Pxincipal Planner
Ci�y of Saratoga Springs
�474 Broadway
Saratoga Springs,NY 12866
Daar Susan:
In response to the tecl�nical re�iew camments (in italics) af Creighton Manning's
Memorandum of October 19, 2021, we respond as fo�lows (in bold}:
�z�lication, Environmental Assessment,Fq�;m, and Project Narr�ative
1. The project narrative stc�tes c� water usage of approxirrcttte I,SQp gpd. Typically
the usage and�vaste disposal discharge are simila�; verify the co�rect usage.
The est�irna�ed waste disposal design has been adjusted to accornmodate
1,851f gallons per day. �
�
2. �'he narr�ative should be revised to include carnpliance with NYSDEC �
regul�attons for tntermediate sized wastewater systems. �
See Engineer's Report,which complies with NYSDEC review require�ents.
Some waivers are needed and will be requested.
3. The pNoject i�also locctted ira Zoning Overlay District— Gateway Overlay
District No. .lA, GWOD-1A.
So noted. No response needed.
4. Applicant needs to checl�box thcct the project is located within "S00'af...
county/state highway"(US Raute 9).
Box has been cl�ecked Yes on the revi�sed site pIan review application, see
enclosed capy.
5. Shart EAF answer#2 should be revised to include per�mitting actions consistent
with those described within this merrto (abave).
Short EAF answer#2 has been re�ised as requested to include NYSDEC,
NYSDOH,NYSDOT.
6. Sho�t EAF answe�#8 is incansistent with the Complete Streets Checklist.
Short EAF#8 has been r�vised to match complete streets checklist.
Page 1 of�1
7. Short EAF answer#12,provide carrespondence received from�VYSOPRHP
thc�t confirms the Project will have no impacts to can �rec� designated as sensitive.
See enclased co�y of the no impact Ietter.
8. Short EAF c�nswe�#.13,provide correspondence that confirms the c�gency
hcaving jurisdiction over the wetlands on the p�^operty.
The wetlands onsite are federal wetlands. The applicant has hired Norfh
Cauntxy Ecolagical Services to correspond with ACOE. This documentation
will be provided by them.
SEQRA Environmeratc�l,Assessment For�n
1. For the SEQI2A Lead Agency's considerat.ion, vve recommend that EAFBox 2
be updc�ted for consistency with those per�rtits sufnmarized in this memo.
Consider providing a supplem�ntal pc�ge to the EAF thc�t clearly describes
applicable permits since the Forfn's Box 2 appears to be too smal,l to clearly list
applicable permits.
See response#�5 above.
Site Plan Review Submittal Checkltst
1, ITL'M#1; The checlzlist.asks thc�t cc copy of the originc�l property survey he
included, which in thas case would be the 2019 boundary suy-vey praduced by
Dcar�c�h Land Surveying, PLLC. �
Enctosed is a copy of the original 2U19 property line survey. '
�
Z. I�'EM#8 cand#11:Please include the pro�erty address on the Site Plans Title �
Block and on all fo�rras, �
One DriscoIl Road has been added to the revised forms and site plans. ?
�
3. .ITEM#9: Pravide the vertical datum used fo�the topographic data.
Vertical datum h�s been added to Note#4 on the revised site plan.
4. ITEM#15: Show potentic�l loeations fo�soil stoel�pile (spoil o�bo�row czreas) �
on the Erosion and Sediment Control Plans arad provide a detail fo�stockpile
protection.
Topsoil stockpile and detail have been added to the revised Erosion aud
Sediment Co�trol Plan,Shee#2.
.5. ITEM#.l d: While wetlands indeed a�e shown on plans, the sy�nhod hatching
p�ovides poo�visual clarity for the City's reviewe�s to disceYn. Please improve
the symbal hatching fo�visual cla�ity.
Wetlands hatch has been revised for clarity as requested.
b, ITEM#Z2: Off street pc�rl�ing areas may not be used to satisfy loc�ding a�ec�
requirements. The parking layout should�ie revised to include a designc�ted
loc�ding ar�ea.
Designated loading area is not req�ired by the applicant.
�;L] p D ENGINEERS,LLP Page 2 af].1
7. ITEM#29: The lightirag pdan/details shall be�evised to include the light faxture
manufacturer and model details with an Site Illunainc�tion Plan showing foot
candle values.
A lighting plan with photo metrics are provided on Sheet 6. The site�lan &
details have been updated to pravide more lighting detail.
Architecturctl Fa ade Elevatians and Architect's CoYrespo�adence to Ci
1. The architect should document the elevation c�t the top-most Naofpeak of the
structure. The Bulk Zoning Table on the SYft.e Plans should be updc�ted to reflect
this overc�ll huilding height.
Site plan �able has been apdated to include building height.
General
I. The App2icant should submit the R�etland Delineatian Repa�t that was prepared
by 11Torth Country Ecological Services,
The wetland deline�tion report prepared by Nor�h Country will be provided
ance received.
2. Acca�ding ta the 1VYSDEC Environmental Mapper, NYSDEC wetlands exist
immediately south of Dr�iscoll Roc�d. Since this application involves
improvements to Driscoll Rac�d, the Existing Conditions Plan should sho�a
delineated perimeter of1VYSDEC wetlands along the south side ofDriscall Road
including c�ny required wetland buffe�separation distctnee. If the proposed
Driscoll Road i�np�ovements will occu�-within the wetland buffer, then the
Applicant must see7c app�oval from NYSD�C.
The proposa� does not intend to make major irnpro�eme�.fs beyond existing �
edge of pavement conditions.As no�ed and detaaled on the re�ised plan, �
Driscoll Road is proposing to install tvp coAt only, which is a major �
improvement firom the curxent condition. ;
3. Driscoll Road design i�raprovements are described with a single callout �
reference, "Driscoll Road Irrap�ovement Area pe� City and NYSDOT Standc��ds. " �
.More design and details c�re required about these roadwuy tmprovements, such as �
travel lane widths,pavement cross-section, striping plan, limits of disturhance,
curbs, drecin�ge, etc.for the impravernents �f Driscoll Road.
The revised site plans now�include xxa.ore details of Driscoll Road
improvernents.
4. The Site Plc�ras and Sto�-rnwater Report shc�ll be updctted aceo�dingly to inelude
land disturbance areas, WQv cc�lculations, c�nd othe�necessa�-y site data as the
D�-iscoll Road improve�nent appec�r to be constructed in co�acu�rently with thas
Project development.
Driscoll Road is an existing raadway and does not require WQv since
improvernents will include minimal tap coarse pavement and striping.
S'. The Site Plans should be cir�culcated to the local Fire Depa�tment for�eview of
their emergency vehicle's access and tu�n-around capabiltties th�oughout the site.
Site plans were provided to the City Planning department for distribu�ion to
�re departrnerits. Na responses r�ceived to date.
b
� D D ENGINEERS,I�LP Page 3 of 11
Site Plc�n Sheet 1 —Lavout. Lightin�„and�andscaping Plan
1. Show�vetland protection fencing to be instc�lled c�long the delir�eated vvetlands.
Wetic�nd P�otection Nates should state that protectian fencing shall be instc�lled
pr�ior lo construction and that protection fencing shall be field located by a
lice�sP lan�l surveyor to not encroc�ch on the derineated wetlands.
Orange construct�an fencing and notes have been added to the revised si�e
plans.
2. The proposed edge of site pc�vement is immediately adjacent to the wetland
boundaYy. We reconamend providing a reasanable separat�ion buf�'e�that will
physically callow constr�uction equipment to perfo�m activity without unwaYranted
wetland irnpcccts.
See response#1 above, which will satisfy this comrnent. The edge of
pavement is 2.5f feet from�he wetland boundary. �
3, The Gateway Zane A Overlc�y District requir�es that the builcling fc��ade be
located hetween 3a'and 50'f�om the Right-af-Way. An c�r�ea va�-iance will be
�equi�ed for c�distance greater thc�n SO'.
Area variance was already granted by ZSA and noted on the revised sitc
pian.
4. YPe recommend the Applicant review the inconsistencies belween the Zoning ?
Bulk Tc�ble and the Cove�-r�ge Statistics Table.
These tables have been revised accordangly, i
S. The Site Plcrns and Nar�ative mention banked parking,please indicate o�a the
Site Plans the location of the banked parking.
Previons site plans had banlzed pa�°k�ing spaces, however,with the inany '
��visions requested by the Plannirtg Board, 'Lonin�Bo�rd and DRC,the �
current layout does not intend to need banked parking spaces. The i
Narrative has been revised accordingly to match the most current site plans.
d, We recammend annotating the dimer�sions of the site featu�es, such as walkway
widths,pavement/curb radii, etc, ;
Dimensians of the site plan features are now labeled, Sidewaiks are
minxmu�x►5 feet wide as noted on detail Sh�et S.
�
Site Plan Sheet 2—,G��ding c� Utilitv Plan
7 For clec�r depiction of the design intent a�ad for futur�e submittals for review by
NYSD.EC, we recammend se�rarate sheets showing the septic design.with c�ll
relc�tive setbacl�s.
The rer�is�d plans and reports have been subrnitted to NYSDEC far review
8. Septic faeld lc��e�al separation distances a�e inconsistent with thP inf ltrcctor
absorption trench detail. Plans show 4'separatior� while details show 6`-
separation.
The de�aii calis out 6 �eet center to center, which �llows 4 feet between the
trenches. Both plan and detail are correct.
!„5 � D ENG�NEERS,LI�P Page� of 11
9. Septic field requi�es that I00%future septic e..xpansion area be p�ovided.
Future expansion axea is now shown on the revised si�e plan.
I0. The Site Plc�ns do not�rovide the required 1VYSDEC rninimum twenty (20)
f'oat separation between septic ccbsorptian fields and foundations.
The building daes not h�ve a basement therefare, this separation is not
needed. A wai�er from NYSDEC will be requested.
Additfonally, the septic systefn and storm inf lt�ation system do not adher�e to the
rninimum 1 DO'sepa�atiora distance to wetlands as outliraed in IVYSDEC
�egxclations.
As proposecl r�vill not irnpact NYSD�C wetlands located on the other side of
Driscall Raado The wetiand specialist will�ook into this further. �
II. �rx acca�dance�vith NYSDEC requi�ements, a mini�num of two (2)
percolations test shall be performed within the proposed a7�sorption faeld. The
plans only show one location for percolcation testing within the waste disposal
system.
Additional percolation tests have been perfarmed and noted on the plans. �
12. There is missing info�sraation pertine�at to the design of the storrrawuter
�nanagement system, including on the sto�nawate�pipes, stt-uctu�es, c�rad
chamber�s. Please provide rim elevations, invert elevations,pipe lengths, �
chamber elevatians, arad pipe types, �
'I"his infarmation is shown on the grading and utilities plan sheet 4. Details '�
�
are �lso provided on sheet 8. As noted on the plans, shop drawings are j
requi�ed by manu�acturer�rior to construction for review and approval. �
I
13. The Stte Plans include c� closed stor�m d�ainage netwaYk wtth pipe slopes �
below the recammer�ded cleansing velocity. Please provide pfpe ealculatioras to �
show the velocities a�e su�cient. �
Cleansing velocity or� storm pipi�g is not a requirement for private storm '
drainage pipes. Each catch basin has a minimum of 12" sumps to settle out �
larger sedirrient. The maintence of the private storrn pi�ing is the Owners
responsibility.
14. �'he c�r�chitectural plans identify four (4) downspouts; hawever, those are not
shown on the Site Plans.
Dawn s�outs are now shown on the arevis�d plans.
1 S. The Applicant shall erasure c�ll handicapped accessible routes c�nd loading
zones adhere to f1DA requirements.
As designed, handicap spaces,van accessible �reas and accessible rouLes
confarrn to ADA requirements. Addit�onal spot elevations l�ave been added
to the revised plans for clarity.
16. Please include additionc�l spots grc�des in g�ade sensitive locations, such us
ADA c�reas, r�etaining wcall, and edges af pavemer�t.
Additianal spot elevations har�e been added to the revised plans fox ciax�ity.
� o D LNGINEERS,LLP Page 5 of 1�
17. Pravide a wccte�main profiie as well as detccils for transitions between the
va�ious proposed water pipe materic�ls.
A water rnain profi�e�s�now provided on Sheet 74 Other details are�xoted on
plan view, but have also bee� added in the profile�view.
I8. ,S`how the directionc�l boring pits at the water main instc�ilation c�-ossing of
Route 9 c�nd include details fop such installation.
The directional bore pits are now shorvn on the revised pians. All
cann.ections are called out on the plans and pro�le.
19. The praposed wate�lateral extending fram Driscoll Road to the proposed
building�nd bisecting a p�oposed star�rawate�infiltt-ation�ystem. Provide det�tils
far the ver�ticc�l sepa�ation between these features. �
The water lateral locat�on has been re�ised to go around the building and
avoid stormwater system. '
20. Pr�ovide naore detaii on proposed culve�ts, discharge locations, and gr�c�ding at
the main driveway to D�iscoll Road.
Additianal details have been prorTided.
Site Plan,5heet 3-Existing Conditions, E�osion & Sediment Control Pla�x
21. For clarity of sheet specific info�mation, we�ecomrnend p�oviding separc�te
sheets for L'xisting Conditians and Erosion and Sediment Control Plans.
Sheet 2 is sufficient for both erosion control and existing conditions since �
existing site is wooded. `
22. Show the existing tree line, the aereage of t�ees to be removed, and any trees �
over 4 i�aches in dianaeter (dgh}. If ma�e than .l5%of tree� over 4 anches in �
a'ic�rraete�a�e removed, a Land Disturbance Pe�mit will be requi�ed. �
TIZe entire site is wooded. The applicant inte�ds to save as many trees as �
possible. We have noted which txecs to remain on the site plans. A iand �
disturbarnce perrnif will be required and noted on the plan.
Site Plan Sheets 4 and 5—Details
23. Include details fa�: cross wc�lk rrcarkings, inlet protection on pavement, str�eet
signage (one�way, stop sign, etc,), and retaining wall design.
Cxosswalk is not reqaired and has been removec� �'iranri tl�e site plan. Inlet
protection on pavement will be do�te with erosion net�ing as allowed by
SWPPP inspector. Stap sxgn and one-way signage d�tails have been provided
on revised p�a�ns. Retaining wall has b�en revised and detail added, see Sheet
8.
24. Annotate the depths on the "wang edge ancl pc�vement detafl," "integral
siclewalk� cu�b detail, "and "Light Pole Base Detcril. "
A CAD layer appeared to be turned aff. T'his is now shown on the revised
plan.
[n} � D ENGINEERS,LLP P age 6 o f 11
25. We recommend the Applicc�nt provide mo�e detail for the F�ee-Standing
Sign(s), including�raposed illufninc�tion of Pach. In c� Gateway Ove�ray Distrtct,
the signccge should cornplement the building muteric�l which should be primc�rily
naturcrl mccterials, sueh as wood und stone.
The free-standing signage has been reviewed and �pproved by DRC and
ZB�A. Variances were also gxanted far number nf signs allowed onsite,The
Town should have copies af this submittal.
SWPPP and Starmwater Mc�nagement RepOYt
l. Clarify whether infiltration testing for the stormwater management areas were
conducted in c�ccordance with Appendix D of the Netiv York State Storrr�water
Design Manual.
Additional iunfiitration testing was completed as �recornmended.Results are
shown on the revised plans.
2. Percolation tests we�e reported to �ange frorra seven (7) to forty�eight(4&)
�nfnutes per inch while the proposed design utilizes fifteen (I S) minutes per inch.
Cla�ify and revise HydroCAD accordingly.
Perca�ation testing for�he stormwater areas resulted in 5 to 7 minutes per
inch. The design of 15 ���u�es per inch for the stormwater areas is
conser�ative. �
�
3. In accordance with the General Permit, the SWPPP.shall include soil testing �
results and locations of test ptts, bo�ings, and percolations test. Fu�the�mo�e, the #
Site Plans do nat p�ovide test pit data ar locations for the no�thern infiltr�ation �
t�eatment ar�ea. Bc�sed on the variability of the reparted sotls data, additionc�l 3
soils data shc�ll be obtained within the a�ea of the northern propo,�ed stor�awuter �
trecatment area.
Additio�ial soil testing has been completed and aresults noted on the re�ised ,
plans.
4. Pre-development drainage figure c�nc�Hyd�oCAD calculations shall be
madified to include the discharge locations on southeast corner and rriain
driveway on Driscoll Rd. Details need to be included to model that conveyance to
the public right of way.
Each discharge point is now indicated and the Hydro CAD �odel has been
updated accordingly.
5. According to the 1VYSSWD,pretreatment volume for infilt�atfon practices is
deter�nined by the veri�ed inf ltration �cate. Based upon the infiltration rate stated,
a pretrea�ment volume equal to or gr�ecater than 50% of the required WQv must he
p�ovided, Verify this volume is provic�ed in the designator�p�e-t�eatment
inf lt�ato�isolato��ow.
Pretreatment calculations are now prav�ded in Appendix A of the
Stortnwater Management Re�oxt. Adequate pretreatment volume is
provided.
W o D �NGII�TEERS,LLP P age 7 o f 11
6. Include information fo�CPv, Overflow Flood Criteria c�nd Extrejne Flood
C�iteria.
The 1�10I has been added to Appendix B of the SWYPP and lists t�e CPv, Qp,
and Qf criteria, Peak d�scharge vaiues for each stvrm eve�nf are also listed in
the S�ormwatex Management Report.
7, The Stormwater Managerraent Report shall include WQv ccrlculation for�all
individual treatment practices. Additionally, the repar�t shall incl�cde a surnYnary
ofpeak staYcrge elevations for each stor^m event in hoth infiltr�ation practices.
WQv calcula�ions sheets are alreRdy prov�ded in Appendix A of the
Storrxiwater Managemen�Repart. An additional sheet has been adc�ed to list
each of the two practices. Pcak storage elevations are already listed in the
Hydro CAD section nf the report,but are now surnmarized on page 3 af the
report, as requested. ;
8. Revase the HydroCAD modeling to include the WQv storm event, 1.2 inches.
The WQv storrn event has been added to the Hydro CAD mod�ling,
9. The SWPPP shall include an Ope�ations and Maintenunce plan that ancludes
inspectian and�naintenance schedules and actins to ensure continuous and
effective ope�ation of each post constr�uctian practice. The O&MPlan shall
identify the entity thc�t will provide the long-terrra D&M responsibilities, j
Post-construction insp�c�ion and maintenance procedures are aiready �
provided in section 7 of the �WPPP as well as an isolator row O & M Manual �
in Appendix D. �
�
10, Based on the architectural elevativns provaded,portians of the building are
pi�ched to the east and conveys roaf�unoff towards the pYoposed septic a�ea;
however, do not c�ppecar to be treated for WQv. Clarify how all r�oof�unof�'is
collected, attenuated and directed into a stor�nwate�rnanagemeratprccctice,
Roof drain piping is now shown on the site pIan to con�ey runoff from the
gutters to the undergroand practices.
Engineer's Repo�t fo� Onsite Al�sar�tion Bed
1. The Repo�t should provicle clarificc�tion to the commercial teraant use and the
de�ivation of the assunaed waste demarad rate of O.OS gpd/sf fo�the commercial
partian of the project. Additionally, the Repa�-t states a datly dischc��-ge of 195
gpd, which is hased on histarical data p�ovided fr�om a separ�te rocation, Thas
estirnated discharge is substccntically less than typicccl unit hydraulic loading rates
p�ovided in the NYS Design Standa�ds for Intermediate Sized Wastewater�
T�eatment Systerns.
The wastewate� design rate is based on the historical rnaxiin.a�n water usage
o�ver a 5-year period. The cornmercial dernand rate has been furtl�er
i�creased and trench Ieng�h extended tv provide additional capacily.
[;,� a D ENa1NEER8,LL.P Page 8 of 11
2, The praject includes a veterinawy clinic thc�1 generates high strength
wc�stewater, which will adversely aff'ect a typiccal absarption trench, as described
in the NYS Design Standards for Inter�mediate Sized Wastewater T�eatment
Systems. The plcan.r shc�ll include a pretreatment or cadv�nced treatment of the
wastewc�te�to red'uce the hydraulic%hemistry/quality loading of the t�ecztment
system. Pr�ovide ca plumbing schematic show which systems flow through any
p�etreatrnent and which go directly to the septic tank.
This veterinary clinic is di�'�crent than most because Dr, S�kule on13�performs
on cats. All waste goes into trash, not down the draan. See attached le�ter
from Dr. Sikute.
3. Report stc�tes that the estimc�ted daily demand is 1,705 gpd with c�n assumed
applicataon t-ate of 1.0 gpd/sf for�conventional absorptfon laterals and capplies a
�eduction factor with use o�'tnfaltr�ator chambers. While this red�cction factor is
acceptahle, the Repo�t should�eference the use of irafaltrcato�chambers and theie I
redative reduction factor.
T�e infiltrator chamber allowed fo�reduction by State regs are now
referenced in the Engineers Repo�-t.
4. Report states tha�percolation rates wer�e veri�ed in the fielc�and ranged from
seven (7) to forty-eight(48)minutes pe�-inch. Howeve�, the�lans note the
percalation rate is three (3) minutes per inch, Please clarafy the design
percalcrtiora rate. Test pit and pe�eolc�tion datcs shc�ll provide relevant data and
include, date of co�npletion, by whom, soil composition and pe�colataon rates. �
Additional�esting was done and noted on the plans. Design is based on seven �
€
minutes. Pl�ns and reports have been revised accardingly. �
5. Report states that the�roposed design uses a design rate offive (5) minutes per �
inch, which is less than the seven (7) to forty-eight(4S) minute range obtained in �
the field. �
�ee above responses.
6. Repor�t should include calculations that PVC late�c�l 4"dia�nete�sizing is
adequate and include calculated design flows.
4"PVC calculations are pro�ided in the report as requested.
7. I�eport should include desagn calculations for dosing pum�station to include
but not lirraited to dosing size, �un time, length, head loss, etc.
Pump design ca�culations are on �heet 9 of the re�ised site plans. These
notes have also been inclnded in the revised Ex�gineer's Iteport.
In response to the coinments (ir� italics) of Al F1ick's email of December 7, 2021,
we respond as follows (in �old):
I. P�ovide separate caver sheet, survey map, and plans fo�site layout,
gr�c�ding/dre�inage, utilities, sto�mwate�naanagement, landscaping, and
righting.
See re�ised set of site plans.
Q p D ENGTNEERS,LLP Page 9 a�11
2, Incorparc�te City's Stccndard Details as applical�le (c�vc�ilable on City
website).
See Sheet 1Q of si�e plans.
3. Utilized City's Cost Estimating Template (available on City website).
We were unable to locate this template on the City's website.
4. Driseoll Rocrd improvements shall extend the f'ull frontc�ge of the property.
We recog�nize improvements of Driscoli Road are warranted and the
Applicant has agreed to making irnprovements,but o�ly firom Raute 9
up to the second curb cu�. This i�nprove�ent was discussed from the
begin�ing concept phases of development. The praject cannot afford
major roadw�y improvements the ent�re length of the property. The s�te .
plans have been updated to provide further details for the proposed
improvernents. ,
S. D�iscoll Road imp�ovenaent to be tn accordance wzth City's Standard Detaid
—.Rural Road Section.
See detail on Sheet 10.
6. Driscoll Road inaprovernents ta be accordance with City's Standard Detail— �
Asphalt Pavement. �
See detail on Sheet 10. ;
�
7. 1VYSDOT review and construction �equirements shall apply to f�nprovements �
within the StatP R.4.W. �
Sa noted. NYSDOT permit will be applied for, as noted on the sitc �
p�ans.
8. All new water main to he 8"DRIl HDPE waterpipe installed within public
R.O.W,fa�dedicdtion to the City,
See re�vised pians.
9. Gc��e vcalves and fi�e hydrants to be to City's specif cr�tion as manufactured
by Mueller�.
See revised plans.
10. A fi�e hydrant is required at the end of new water main on Route 9 as well as
Driscoll Road for flushing purposes.
Addit�onal hydrant is not needed at both ends. Flushing can be obtained at
the end of water main on I�riscoll Road.
Enclosed for furtner review and approval are the fallowing:
1. Re�ised project narrative
2. Re�ied site plan applicatian
3. Rerrised short EAF
4. Site Plan Review submittal checklist
[,� � D ENGINEERS,LLP Page 10 0�11
5. Streets checklist
6. Revised site plans (Rev. 5: 12/23/2021)
7. Revised SWP��' with O &M (Revised 12/23/2021)
8. Revised Stormwater Repor� (Revis�d 12/23/2021}
9. Revised Engineer's Report{Revised 12/23/2021)
10. Wefland delineatio� repart{To be provided by North Count�y)
11. Copy of original pxoperty line survey
12. Letter from Dr. Sikule
13, City's Cost Estirnating £orm
14. Lighting cu� sheefis
I5. NYSOPRHP No Impact letter
A11 docum�nts have alsa been emailed. We would greatly a�preciate baing placed
an the January 6th and 13`ll for Planning Board workshop and Pianning Board agenda
meetings.
�l�ou�d yau ha�e any questians or need anything further,please do nof hesi�ate to �
cantact me.
�
Very truly yours, �
ABD E INEERS,LLP �
�
(
� � �
�
L igi A. Palleschi, P.E. �
Partner �
LAP:cIv
encl. �
cc: Susan Sikule w/encl. (via email) F
Pamela Hassett w/ancl. {via ema.�1} �
7osh Wainman w/encl. {via email)
Scott Townsand w/encl. (via email)
Al Flicic wl encl. (via email}
Creighton Manning w/encl. (via email)
5190Aa2021-1223
� o D ENGTNEERS,LL� Pag� 11 of 11