Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20211114 120 S Broadway Demo Application **HANDWRITTEN APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED** 'FOR OFFICE USEl TOC{ 6:4 CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS (Application#) s DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION CITY HALL-474 BROADWAY (Date received) SARATOGA SPRINGS, NEW YORK 12866-2296 S TEL: 518-587-3550 X2533 RPORA TE �'�� www.saratoga-springs.org (Project Title) APPLICATION FOR: ARCHITECTURAL/HISTORIC REVIEW Staff Review APPLICANT(S)* OWNER(S) (if not applicant) ATTORNEY/AGENT Stephen P.Ethier STRATEGIES LLC,PERFORMING ASSETS(Stephen P.Ethier) Brien Ragone,RLA Name 10 East Harrison Street 10 East Harrison Street 900 Route 146 Address Saratoga Springs,NY 12866 Saratoga Springs,NY 12866 Clifton Park,NY 12065 Phone 518-430-7726 / 518-430-7726 / 518-371-7621 Email SHARK14@nycap.rr.com SHARK14@nycap.rr.com bragone@edpllp.com Identify primary contact person: E Applicant 0 Owner 0 Attorney/Agent *An applicant must be the property owner, lessee,or one with an option to lease or purchase the property in question. Applicant's interest in premises: E Owner 0 Lessee 0 Under option to lease or purchase PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Address/Location: 120 South Broadway Tax Parcel #: 178.00 35 _ 1 _ 6 (for example: /65.52-4-37) Date Acquired by Owner: 01/12/16 T-5 Transect Zone 5 Current Zoning District: Property use: 0 Residential In Non-residential/mixed-use Type of Review: 0 Architectural IR Historic 0 Extension/modification (of current approval) Summary description of proposed action: Applicant is proposing to demolish and remove the 9,000±sf building in its entirety along the southern border and approximately a 2,100±sf portion of the building along the eastern border. See also Removals Plan included with this Application. Has a previous application been filed with the DRC for this property? 0 No IR Yes—date(s)? 9/2021 -App. No.(s)? Revised 01/2021 **A "complete" application consists of 1 hard copy(original) , and I electronic copy of application &ALL other materials as required below: New Construction /Additions ❑ Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures and adjacent properties ❑ Site plan, drawn to scale, showing existing&proposed construction, property lines&dimensions, required &proposed setbacks&lot coverage, site features (fences,walks,trees, etc.); on no larger than 2'x3' sheet—smaller preferred if legible ❑ Elevation drawings showing design of all sides of existing&proposed construction—label dimensions,colors, materials, lighting(fixture &lamp type,wattage), etc. - include compass bearing&scale; no larger than 2'x3'sheet—smaller permitted if legible ❑ Floor plans for proposed structure;on sheet no larger than 2'x3'—smaller permitted if legible ❑ Product literature,specifications and samples of proposed materials and colors Change in exterior building materials (windows, doors, roof, siding, etc.), or color (in non-residential districts only) ❑ Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures and that illustrate affected features ❑ Elevation drawings showing all sides of existing&proposed construction—label dimensions, colors, materials, lighting(fixture&lamp type,wattage),etc. - include compass bearing&scale; no larger than 2'x3'sheet—smaller permitted if legible ❑ Product literature,specifications and samples of proposed materials and colors Within front yard setbacks in Historic Districts only (Front setbacks:UR-I &INST-HTR=30';UR-4=25';UR-2,UR-3&NCUD-I=10') - Installation, removal or change in material of drive- and walkways - Installation or removal of architectural, sculptural or vegetative screening over 3' in height - Installation of accessory utility structures or radio/satellite transmission/reception devices (more than 2' diameter) For any of above: ❑ Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures, and of adjacent properties ❑ Site plan showing existing&proposed construction: include property lines&dimensions, required &proposed setbacks&lot coverage, site features (fences,walks,trees, etc.) street names, compass bearing&scale; no larger than 2'x3'sheet—smaller preferred if legible ❑ Product literature, specifications and samples of proposed materials and colors Signage/Awnings ❑ Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures, and adjacent properties ❑ Plan showing location of proposed sign/awning structure on building/premises: no larger than I I"x 17" ❑ Scaled illustration of proposed sign/awning structure and lettering(front view&profile): include all dimensions of structure;type, dimensions and style of lettering or logo; description of colors, materials, mounting method and hardware ❑ Descriptions,specifications of proposed lighting including fixture&lamp type,wattage, mounting method, and location ❑ Product literature, specifications and samples of proposed materials and colors Demolition 8 Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures,and of adjacent properties ▪ Site plan showing existing and any proposed structures- include dimensions,setbacks, street names, compass bearing,and scale 8 Written description of reasons for demolition and, in addition: ❑ For structures of"architectural/historical significance",demonstrate "good cause"why structure cannot be preserved ❑ For structures in an architectural district that might be eligible for listing on National Register of Historic Places, or for a "contributing" structure in a National Register district(contact City staff), provide plans for site development following demolition- include a timetable and letter of credit for project completion Telecommunication facilities ❑ Color photographs showing site/existing structures, and of adjacent properties ❑ Site plan showing existing and proposed structures: include dimensions, setbacks,street names, compass bearing, and scale ❑ Scaled illustration of proposed structures: include all dimensions; colors, materials, lighting, mounting details ❑ Consult Article 240-12.22 of the City's Zoning Ordinance and City staff to ensure compliance with requirements for visual impact assessment and existing and proposed vegetative screening Revised 01/2021 Request for extension of current approval ❑ Identify date of original DRC approval: Current expiration date: Org.App. No. ❑ Describe why this extension is necessary and whether any significant changes have occurred either on the site or in the neighborhood. SEQR Environmental Assessment Form ❑ Applicants proposing the following must complete"Part I" of the SEQR Short Environmental Assessment Form (available here: http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/permits_ej_operations_pdf/seafpartone.pdf): -Construction or expansion of a multi-family residential structure(4 units +) -Construction or expansion (exceeding 4,000 sq.ft.gross floor area)of a principal or accessory non-residential structure -Telecommunications facility, radio antennae, satellite dishes - Demolition Disclosure Does any City officer, employee or family member thereof have a financial interest (as defined by General Municipal Law Section 809) in this application? ❑ No 0 Yes- If yes, a statement disclosing the name, residence, nature, and extent of this interest must be filed with this application. Certification I/we,the property owner(s), or purchaser(s)/lessee(s) under contract, of the land in question, hereby request an appearance before the Design Review Commission. By the signature(s) attached hereto, I/we certify that the information provided within this application and accompanying documentation is, to the best of my/our knowledge, true and accurate. I/we further understand that intentionally providing false or misleading information is grounds for immediate denial of this application. I/we hereby authorize the members of the Design Review Commission and designated City staff to enter the property associated with this application for purposes of conducting any necessary site inspections relating to this application. Furthermore, I/we agree to meet all requirements under Article VII for Historic Review or Article VIII for Architectural Review of the Zoning Code of the City of Saratoga Springs. �. (Agent) 11/2/2021 Date: (applicant signature) Date: (applicant signature) If applicant is not the currently the owner of the property, the current owner must also sign. Owner Signature: Date: Owner Signature: Date: Revised 01/2021 , �T0G4 SA,� CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS ° '-- I 4h DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION v o ti't�a .,, City Hall -474 Broadway ' ' -'t Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 4CORPoRATEfl '''' Tel:518-587-3550 x2533 www.saratoga-springs.org INSTRUCTIONS ARCHITECTURAL/HISTORIC REVIEW APPLICATION I. ELIGIBILITY:An applicant to the Design Review Commission for Architectural Review or Historic Review must be the property owner(s) or lessee, or have an option to lease or purchase the property in question. 2. COMPLETE SUBMISSIONS: Applicants are encouraged to work with City staff to ensure that an application is complete. The DRC will only consider properly completed applications that contain 1 original and 1 digital version of the application and ALL other required materials as indicated on the application. HANDWRITTEN APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED!! 3. ACTIONS REQUIRING REVIEW: Architectural Review District Historic Review District • any exterior changes that require a building permit • Installation or exterior change to a structure requiring a • any change in exterior building materials building or demolition permit • a new, or change to an existing, sign or sign structure • any material change to exterior of a structure including: • demolition of a structure - addition or removal of exterior architectural features - installation, removal or material changes to exterior building elements such as roof, siding, windows, doors, Within a non-residential zoning district: • a change in exterior building color porches, etc. • installation of an awning - enclosure or screening or buildings openings such as windows, doors, porches, etc. - installation of utility, mechanical or misc. accessory structures to the exterior of a building such as HVAC equipment, solar panels, wind turbines, radio/satellite transmission/reception devices, etc. • Within a front yard setback: - installation, removal or material changes to drive- or walkways - installation or removal of architectural, sculptural or vegetative screening that exceeds 3' in height - installation of accessory utility structures or radio/satellite transmission/reception devices over 2' in diameter • a change in exterior building color within a non- residential zoning district • a new, or change to an existing, sign or awning • installation of telecommunications facilities Note—Ordinary maintenance or repair that does not involve a change in material, design or outer appearance is exempt from Historic or Architectural Review. Revised 01/2021 4. DESIGN GUIDELINES: The Design Review Commission will evaluate whether the proposed action (construction, alteration or demolition) is compatible with existing structures and surrounding properties using the following criteria: • Height—consistent with historic form and context of site and surrounding properties • Scale— relationship of structure and its architectural elements to human size, form, perception • Proportion — relationship among building elements including front facade, windows, and doors • Rhythm — pattern resulting from repeating building elements such as door/window openings, columns, arches, and other facade elements • Directional Expression —compatibility with horizontal &vertical expression of surrounding structures • Massing & Open Space— relationship of structure to open space between it and adjoining buildings • Setback—compatibility with surrounding structures • Compatibility of the following with surrounding structures/properties: - Major building elements (storefronts, doors, windows, roof) - Building materials - Color— (in non-residential zoning districts only) 5. DECISIONS: The Design Review Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove an application. The DRC may impose appropriate conditions and safeguards in connection with its approval including nature/quality of materials, manner of construction, and design. An applicant may appeal a denied DRC application on the grounds of hardship. Application approvals shall expire within 18 months of the filing date unless the project has sufficiently commenced (i.e. building/demolition permits obtained and construction/alteration begun). Applicants may request up to 2 extensions if requested before expiration date of prior approval. 6. AGENDA DATE: Check City's website (www.saratoga-springs.org) for meeting dates. Applications are placed on an agenda on first-come,first-served basis as determined by the completeness of the application. 7. APPLICATION FEE (NON-REFUNDABLE): Make checks payable to the "Commissioner of Finance". REFER TO THE CURRENT FEE WORKSHEET INCLUDED IN THIS DOCUMENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: More detailed information on Architectural Review, Historic Review and the Design Review Commission responsibilities may be found in the City's Zoning Ordinance available in City Hall and on the City's web site at http://www.saratoga-springs.org/544/Zoning-Ordinance. Revised 01/2021 2021 LAND USE BOARD FEE WORKSHEET OPED Fees Type 2021 Fee Application to Zoning Board of Appeals[1][2] TOTAL #VARIANCE Use Variance $1100+$50/app Area Variance-Residential $275/var+$50/app+$125 eachadd'I variance Area Variance-Multi-Family,Comm,Mixed-Use $660/var+$50/app+$200 eachadd'I variance Interpretations $550+$50/app Post-Work Application Fee Add 50%App fee+$50/app Variance extensions 50%ofAppfee+$50/app Application to Design Review Commission[1] TOTAL #STRUCTURE Demolition I $385 Residential Structures Principal $55 Accessory $55 Extension $35 Modification $55 Multi-Family,Comm,Mixed-Use Structures Sketch $165 Principal $550 Extension $200 Modification $330 Multi-Family,Comm,Mixed-Use Accessory,Signs,Awnings Principal $140 Extension $75 Modification $140 Post-Work Application Fee Add 50%App fee Application to Planning Board[1] TOTAL #STRUCTURE Special Use Permit[2] $990+$50/app Special UsePermit-extension $330 Special UsePermit-modification[2] $450+$50/app Site Plan Review-incl.PUD: Sketch Plan $330 Residential $330+$200/unit Residential-extension $200 Residential-modification $400 Non-residential $660+$130/1000 sf Non-Residential-extension $300 Non-Residential-modification $650 Subdivision-incl.PUD: TOTAL #LOTS Sketch Plan I $330 Preliminary Approval[2] Residential:1-5 lots $660+$50/app Residential:6-10 lots $990+$50/app Residential:11-20 lots $1320+$50/app Residential:21+lots $1650+50/app Residential-extension $330 Final Approval[2] Residential $1320+$175/lot+$50/app Non-Residential $2000/lot+$50/app Final Approval Modification[2] Residential $330+$50/app Non-Residential $550+$50/app Final Approval Extension Residential $135 Non-Residential $330 Other: TOTAL #LOT/ACRE Post-Work Application Fee Add 50%App fee Lot Line Adjustment $350 Letter of Credit-modification or extension $440 Letter of Credit-collection up to 1%ofLoC Recreation Fee $2000/lotorunit Land Disturbance $660+$55/acre SEQRA EIS Review(Draft&Final) TBD Legal Noticing if PB requires Public Hearing $50/app [1] Fees are based on per structure,except where noted. $0.00 TOTAL DUE [2] Legal ad required;includes City processing and publishing For Administrative Use Total Paid at Intake Revised Fee Balance Due / / Balance Paid Staff approval ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, LLP. 900 Route 146 Clifton Park,NY 12065 (P)518.371.7621 (F)518.371.9540 edpllp.com November 2, 2021 Amanda Tucker, RA Senior Planner City of Saratoga Springs 474 Broadway Saratoga Springs, NY Regarding: Design Review Commission Submittal 120 South Broadway Demolition Plan Submission Dear Ms. Tucker, Enclosed herewith is the following information for the submittal of a Building Demolition Plan located at 120 South Broadway in the City of Saratoga Springs. • One (1) Copy of the DRC Application • One (1) Copy of the Short Environmental Assessment Form • One (1) Copy of the Removals Plan for 120 South Broadway • One (1) Copy of the Proposed Site Plan (Eventual Build out of sit, concept only) On behalf of Stephen P. Ethier, we respectively request that you place this application on the next available agenda of the Design Revie Commission for Demolition Review. Mr. Ethier will drop of the Application Fee separately. Please feel free to contact our office with any questions or if you require additional information. Thank you. Sincerely, -"D 1304:4—A.. D. Brien Ragone, RLA LEED BD+C Environmental Design Partnership cc: Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project Information Instructions for Completing Part 1—Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1.You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1—Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: Building Demolition for Lands of Stephen P. Ethier Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 120 South Broadway,Saratoga Springs, NY Brief Description of Proposed Action: Applicant is proposing to demolish and remove the 9,000±sf building in its entirety along the southern border and approximately a 2,100±sf portion of the building along the eastern border. See also Removals Plan included with this Application. Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: 518-430-7726 Stephen P. Ethier E-Mail: SHARK14@nycap.rr.com Address: 10 East Harrison Street City/PO: State: Zip Code: Saratoga Springs NY 12866 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that ❑ may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other government Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval:Saratogs Springs Design Review Commission-Demolition and Removals approval. ❑ 3. a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 2.64±acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 0.25±acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 2.64±acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,are adjoining or near the proposed action: 5. ❑Urban ❑ Rural(non-agriculture) 0 Industrial ❑ Commercial ❑ Residential(suburban) 0 Forest ❑ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic ❑ Other(Specify): Adjacent Cemetary ❑Parkland 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? ❑ ❑ ❑✓ b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? ❑ ❑ ✓❑ NO YES 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? ❑ ❑✓ 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: ❑✓ ❑ NO YES 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? ❑ ❑ b. Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? ❑ ❑ c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed ✓❑ ❑ action? 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: ❑✓ ❑ 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: ✓❑ ❑ 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ❑✓ ❑ 12. a.Does the project site contain,or is it substantially contiguous to,a building,archaeological site,or district NO YES which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places,or that has been determined by the ❑ El of the NYS Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? b.Is the project site,or any portion of it,located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ✓❑ archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)archaeological site inventory? 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? ❑ ❑ b. Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? ❑ ❑ If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: Page 2 of 3 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site.Check all that apply: ❑Shoreline 0 Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands 0 Early mid-successional 0 Wetland ❑ Urban ❑ Suburban 15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed by the State or NO YES Federal government as threatened or endangered? Frosted Elfin, Karner Blue ❑ El 16. Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan? NO YES ✓❑ ❑ 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, ❑✓ ❑ a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ❑ ❑ b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? ❑ ❑ If Yes,briefly describe: 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water NO YES or other liquids(e.g.,retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain the purpose and size of the impoundment: ❑ ❑ 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste NO YES management facility? If Yes,describe: ❑ ❑ 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: ❑ ❑ I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor/name: D. Brien Ragone(Agent) Date: November 1,2021 Signature:_T., ralTitle:Landscape Architect(LA#002135) PRINT FORM Page 3 of 3 EAF Mapper Summary Report Monday, November 1, 2021 1:45 PM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist / I — ' project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental I � _i_ } assessment form(EAF).Not all questions asked in the EAF are fi1.1/ + answered by the EAF Mapper.Additional information on any EAF 1 78.27-1-49 question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although 1 7816-1-5011178-27-1-48 the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to 178 .7-1-1 s DEC,you may alo need to contact local or other data sources in order �r `` to obtain data not provided by the Mapper.Digital data is not a �— _ "°i i 78 '11 substitute for agency determinations. 178.35-1-13 .°' 178..26-1-47 +i rti Monhea! . 178.34-2-2417$.35-1-1 rata (ga Spri •s _ 17 . 5-.1-6 Tor NI to f-.1)a%-.1-I J 178'34-2-3.2 A 1arie B :ta[]rtert178 4-2-3.1 1 78.35-1-12 — 178.35-1-7 cfeyir:rdl Pr •i.r-. i 178.34-2-5 __--- ' fweu York 1110-78735: 727-7 71 p ittsburgli f.rdi t Phitacleiphi.a Ig 111—z19GS, Intemiap;IN REMErITP1 FIR ri,'Esri 1 p,5'rl1.1ET1. , €4,,L7.(u E n EN Er1T'r1 an,Esn Japan, I1ETT,Esn China I,Hon€I kanji,Esn Kir ,.Esri--(Thii nE C i-r °Cpa7Stre,rlap,;3i p .ttt+rr, ri I�r C nuii.r 1ity ClnnDp7Sb? :r.laID.:.3ntribtkaiRiailgie GIS I Iser CommLinty Part 1 /Question 7 [Critical Environmental No Area] Part 1 /Question 12a [National or State No Register of Historic Places or State Eligible Sites] Part 1 /Question 12b [Archeological Sites] Yes Part 1 /Question 13a [Wetlands or Other No Regulated Waterbodies] Part 1 /Question 15 [Threatened or Yes Endangered Animal] Part 1 /Question 15 [Threatened or Frosted Elfin, Karner Blue Endangered Animal - Name] Part 1 /Question 16 [100 Year Flood Plain] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Part 1 /Question 20 [Remediation Site] Yes Short Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 1 wBPREODPx S; R; SITE BE REMOVED OF x BE AND .1 Ill NC-5-11 - • BD�ED 0 , a o I;o R MAIN �ND� s • W �T SITE LOCATION MAP W SCALE z 000 • J Pt ENTIRE 9 OPOZ �d �, TO BE REMOVEDNEAREALTO DBE O Z N AND Ce VERTED TO z W r ii.IAW _ ¢ \ , E TO RE AI ♦ • ` ` l 07 F a h o H -w 44 r sn`Bu �LL ooz • sea+"RAPees �� * W m rc LO coJ out I e 7 I 1 11._EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN 1) ' Ilk ...N11 . III S 0 a (l SCALE 1„=z01" ' 4 ilitilkik_ ,i,u_ii , SUFFT TrtLE . •••. • + •••• • r to • ....0+6IRREMOVALS A t ' 1 PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE SHEP 1 of 1 P- SITE � 3 Ncc 0 S w. r... • ,mv � ''n N i +£ R fF idW 1;4141- re LI w od �t SITE LOCATION MAP w srxE.r=z.000 BLDG#1 BLDG k2 d'a 4-STORY 45TGRY 4.. .'- O Z MO - ` TOWNHOMES Imum TOWNHOMES SITE STATISTICS zo-UNITSimmilli20-UNITS �= o kEasluc NrITTRAASECT 20!= RRDRHDDDDENER ,� ® ® o a h S PARCEL AREA zcancaEs _ --_ - —DO N1C--'��. JH _3 II LI BUILDT UTALON�FRONTA�E TP« — _ ' .' t O `o o Qo BUI DING � � ILLM iia t4m0 Uri „oNT Y.�Ro 0 Alry MUM TOIL Al XIMUM � to Z O 0 S SIDE YARD,ESTER,li A .10 �� J v SIDE YARD EAsrEREvR - REAR veaDisouTHEruvR za MN aum x PROPOSED No.OF UNITS 61 TONNROMEs aa„„, `." �F PROPOSED No OF RUI BINDS PROPOSED P,wallo aRO INTERIOR PARKING 24 SPACES ARAGES EXTERIOR PARKING 22 SPACES TOTAL SU SPACES u 5PER I, oRLnATERII.AOEMENT ONSITE ANOOFFsnE 1 BLDG#3 0 TOED DITEANDOE�ITE E ... _ s 4 a uLEvaRD ENTRANCENAr s URN So TO LANDSCAPE/TURF WITH NTSDOD COROA '" I• I1 OW ` t 1 -1�F _ r, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION _Ink.. ••�•••• r - 44..4 ♦• 1 �� SuCONCEPTUAL i ... SITE PLANA ., - ► Pts � '�• ,� aOf APH C SCALE 1 of 1 1