HomeMy WebLinkAbout20211114 120 S Broadway Demo Application **HANDWRITTEN APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED** 'FOR OFFICE USEl
TOC{ 6:4
CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS
(Application#)
s DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION
CITY HALL-474 BROADWAY (Date received)
SARATOGA SPRINGS, NEW YORK 12866-2296
S
TEL: 518-587-3550 X2533 RPORA TE �'��
www.saratoga-springs.org
(Project Title)
APPLICATION FOR:
ARCHITECTURAL/HISTORIC REVIEW Staff Review
APPLICANT(S)* OWNER(S) (if not applicant) ATTORNEY/AGENT
Stephen P.Ethier STRATEGIES LLC,PERFORMING ASSETS(Stephen P.Ethier) Brien Ragone,RLA
Name
10 East Harrison Street 10 East Harrison Street 900 Route 146
Address
Saratoga Springs,NY 12866 Saratoga Springs,NY 12866 Clifton Park,NY 12065
Phone 518-430-7726 / 518-430-7726 / 518-371-7621
Email SHARK14@nycap.rr.com SHARK14@nycap.rr.com bragone@edpllp.com
Identify primary contact person: E Applicant 0 Owner 0 Attorney/Agent
*An applicant must be the property owner, lessee,or one with an option to lease or purchase the property in question.
Applicant's interest in premises: E Owner 0 Lessee 0 Under option to lease or purchase
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Property Address/Location: 120 South Broadway Tax Parcel #: 178.00 35 _ 1 _ 6
(for example: /65.52-4-37)
Date Acquired by Owner: 01/12/16
T-5 Transect Zone 5
Current Zoning District: Property use: 0 Residential In Non-residential/mixed-use
Type of Review: 0 Architectural IR Historic 0 Extension/modification (of current approval)
Summary description of proposed action:
Applicant is proposing to demolish and remove the 9,000±sf building in its entirety along the southern border and
approximately a 2,100±sf portion of the building along the eastern border. See also Removals Plan included with this
Application.
Has a previous application been filed with the DRC for this property? 0 No IR Yes—date(s)? 9/2021
-App. No.(s)?
Revised 01/2021
**A "complete" application consists of 1 hard copy(original) , and I electronic copy of application &ALL other
materials as required below:
New Construction /Additions
❑ Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures and adjacent properties
❑ Site plan, drawn to scale, showing existing&proposed construction, property lines&dimensions, required &proposed setbacks&lot
coverage, site features (fences,walks,trees, etc.); on no larger than 2'x3' sheet—smaller preferred if legible
❑ Elevation drawings showing design of all sides of existing&proposed construction—label dimensions,colors, materials, lighting(fixture
&lamp type,wattage), etc. - include compass bearing&scale; no larger than 2'x3'sheet—smaller permitted if legible
❑ Floor plans for proposed structure;on sheet no larger than 2'x3'—smaller permitted if legible
❑ Product literature,specifications and samples of proposed materials and colors
Change in exterior building materials (windows, doors, roof, siding, etc.), or color (in non-residential districts only)
❑ Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures and that illustrate affected features
❑ Elevation drawings showing all sides of existing&proposed construction—label dimensions, colors, materials, lighting(fixture&lamp
type,wattage),etc. - include compass bearing&scale; no larger than 2'x3'sheet—smaller permitted if legible
❑ Product literature,specifications and samples of proposed materials and colors
Within front yard setbacks in Historic Districts only (Front setbacks:UR-I &INST-HTR=30';UR-4=25';UR-2,UR-3&NCUD-I=10')
- Installation, removal or change in material of drive- and walkways
- Installation or removal of architectural, sculptural or vegetative screening over 3' in height
- Installation of accessory utility structures or radio/satellite transmission/reception devices (more than 2' diameter)
For any of above:
❑ Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures, and of adjacent properties
❑ Site plan showing existing&proposed construction: include property lines&dimensions, required &proposed setbacks&lot
coverage, site features (fences,walks,trees, etc.) street names, compass bearing&scale; no larger than 2'x3'sheet—smaller
preferred if legible
❑ Product literature, specifications and samples of proposed materials and colors
Signage/Awnings
❑ Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures, and adjacent properties
❑ Plan showing location of proposed sign/awning structure on building/premises: no larger than I I"x 17"
❑ Scaled illustration of proposed sign/awning structure and lettering(front view&profile): include all dimensions of structure;type,
dimensions and style of lettering or logo; description of colors, materials, mounting method and hardware
❑ Descriptions,specifications of proposed lighting including fixture&lamp type,wattage, mounting method, and location
❑ Product literature, specifications and samples of proposed materials and colors
Demolition
8 Color photographs showing site/exterior details of existing structures,and of adjacent properties
▪ Site plan showing existing and any proposed structures- include dimensions,setbacks, street names, compass bearing,and scale
8 Written description of reasons for demolition and, in addition:
❑ For structures of"architectural/historical significance",demonstrate "good cause"why structure cannot be preserved
❑ For structures in an architectural district that might be eligible for listing on National Register of Historic Places, or for a
"contributing" structure in a National Register district(contact City staff), provide plans for site development following demolition-
include a timetable and letter of credit for project completion
Telecommunication facilities
❑ Color photographs showing site/existing structures, and of adjacent properties
❑ Site plan showing existing and proposed structures: include dimensions, setbacks,street names, compass bearing, and scale
❑ Scaled illustration of proposed structures: include all dimensions; colors, materials, lighting, mounting details
❑ Consult Article 240-12.22 of the City's Zoning Ordinance and City staff to ensure compliance with requirements for visual impact
assessment and existing and proposed vegetative screening
Revised 01/2021
Request for extension of current approval
❑ Identify date of original DRC approval: Current expiration date: Org.App. No.
❑ Describe why this extension is necessary and whether any significant changes have occurred either on the site or in the neighborhood.
SEQR Environmental Assessment Form
❑ Applicants proposing the following must complete"Part I" of the SEQR Short Environmental Assessment Form (available here:
http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/permits_ej_operations_pdf/seafpartone.pdf):
-Construction or expansion of a multi-family residential structure(4 units +)
-Construction or expansion (exceeding 4,000 sq.ft.gross floor area)of a principal or accessory non-residential structure
-Telecommunications facility, radio antennae, satellite dishes
- Demolition
Disclosure
Does any City officer, employee or family member thereof have a financial interest (as defined by General Municipal Law
Section 809) in this application?
❑ No 0 Yes- If yes, a statement disclosing the name, residence, nature, and extent of this interest must be filed with this
application.
Certification
I/we,the property owner(s), or purchaser(s)/lessee(s) under contract, of the land in question, hereby request an appearance
before the Design Review Commission.
By the signature(s) attached hereto, I/we certify that the information provided within this application and accompanying
documentation is, to the best of my/our knowledge, true and accurate. I/we further understand that intentionally providing
false or misleading information is grounds for immediate denial of this application.
I/we hereby authorize the members of the Design Review Commission and designated City staff to enter the property
associated with this application for purposes of conducting any necessary site inspections relating to this application.
Furthermore, I/we agree to meet all requirements under Article VII for Historic Review or Article VIII for Architectural
Review of the Zoning Code of the City of Saratoga Springs.
�. (Agent) 11/2/2021
Date:
(applicant signature)
Date:
(applicant signature)
If applicant is not the currently the owner of the property, the current owner must also sign.
Owner Signature: Date:
Owner Signature: Date:
Revised 01/2021
, �T0G4 SA,� CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS
° '-- I 4h DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION
v o ti't�a .,, City Hall -474 Broadway
' ' -'t
Saratoga Springs, New York 12866
4CORPoRATEfl '''' Tel:518-587-3550 x2533
www.saratoga-springs.org
INSTRUCTIONS
ARCHITECTURAL/HISTORIC REVIEW APPLICATION
I. ELIGIBILITY:An applicant to the Design Review Commission for Architectural Review or Historic Review
must be the property owner(s) or lessee, or have an option to lease or purchase the property in question.
2. COMPLETE SUBMISSIONS: Applicants are encouraged to work with City staff to ensure that an application is
complete. The DRC will only consider properly completed applications that contain 1 original and 1
digital version of the application and ALL other required materials as indicated on the application.
HANDWRITTEN APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED!!
3. ACTIONS REQUIRING REVIEW:
Architectural Review District Historic Review District
• any exterior changes that require a building permit • Installation or exterior change to a structure requiring a
• any change in exterior building materials building or demolition permit
• a new, or change to an existing, sign or sign structure • any material change to exterior of a structure including:
• demolition of a structure - addition or removal of exterior architectural features
- installation, removal or material changes to exterior
building elements such as roof, siding, windows, doors,
Within a non-residential zoning district:
• a change in exterior building color porches, etc.
• installation of an awning - enclosure or screening or buildings openings such as
windows, doors, porches, etc.
- installation of utility, mechanical or misc. accessory
structures to the exterior of a building such as HVAC
equipment, solar panels, wind turbines, radio/satellite
transmission/reception devices, etc.
• Within a front yard setback:
- installation, removal or material changes to drive- or
walkways
- installation or removal of architectural, sculptural or
vegetative screening that exceeds 3' in height
- installation of accessory utility structures or
radio/satellite transmission/reception devices over 2' in
diameter
• a change in exterior building color within a non-
residential zoning district
• a new, or change to an existing, sign or awning
• installation of telecommunications facilities
Note—Ordinary maintenance or repair that does not involve a change in material, design or outer appearance
is exempt from Historic or Architectural Review.
Revised 01/2021
4. DESIGN GUIDELINES:
The Design Review Commission will evaluate whether the proposed action (construction, alteration or
demolition) is compatible with existing structures and surrounding properties using the following criteria:
• Height—consistent with historic form and context of site and surrounding properties
• Scale— relationship of structure and its architectural elements to human size, form, perception
• Proportion — relationship among building elements including front facade, windows, and doors
• Rhythm — pattern resulting from repeating building elements such as door/window openings, columns,
arches, and other facade elements
• Directional Expression —compatibility with horizontal &vertical expression of surrounding structures
• Massing & Open Space— relationship of structure to open space between it and adjoining buildings
• Setback—compatibility with surrounding structures
• Compatibility of the following with surrounding structures/properties:
- Major building elements (storefronts, doors, windows, roof)
- Building materials
- Color— (in non-residential zoning districts only)
5. DECISIONS: The Design Review Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove an
application. The DRC may impose appropriate conditions and safeguards in connection with its approval
including nature/quality of materials, manner of construction, and design. An applicant may appeal a denied
DRC application on the grounds of hardship.
Application approvals shall expire within 18 months of the filing date unless the project has sufficiently
commenced (i.e. building/demolition permits obtained and construction/alteration begun). Applicants may
request up to 2 extensions if requested before expiration date of prior approval.
6. AGENDA DATE: Check City's website (www.saratoga-springs.org) for meeting dates. Applications are
placed on an agenda on first-come,first-served basis as determined by the completeness of the application.
7. APPLICATION FEE (NON-REFUNDABLE): Make checks payable to the "Commissioner of Finance".
REFER TO THE CURRENT FEE WORKSHEET INCLUDED IN THIS DOCUMENT.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
More detailed information on Architectural Review, Historic Review and the Design Review Commission
responsibilities may be found in the City's Zoning Ordinance available in City Hall and on the City's web site at
http://www.saratoga-springs.org/544/Zoning-Ordinance.
Revised 01/2021
2021 LAND USE BOARD FEE WORKSHEET
OPED Fees Type 2021 Fee
Application to Zoning Board of Appeals[1][2] TOTAL #VARIANCE
Use Variance $1100+$50/app
Area Variance-Residential $275/var+$50/app+$125 eachadd'I variance
Area Variance-Multi-Family,Comm,Mixed-Use $660/var+$50/app+$200 eachadd'I variance
Interpretations $550+$50/app
Post-Work Application Fee Add 50%App fee+$50/app
Variance extensions 50%ofAppfee+$50/app
Application to Design Review Commission[1] TOTAL #STRUCTURE
Demolition I $385
Residential Structures
Principal $55
Accessory $55
Extension $35
Modification $55
Multi-Family,Comm,Mixed-Use Structures
Sketch $165
Principal $550
Extension $200
Modification $330
Multi-Family,Comm,Mixed-Use Accessory,Signs,Awnings
Principal $140
Extension $75
Modification $140
Post-Work Application Fee Add 50%App fee
Application to Planning Board[1] TOTAL #STRUCTURE
Special Use Permit[2] $990+$50/app
Special UsePermit-extension $330
Special UsePermit-modification[2] $450+$50/app
Site Plan Review-incl.PUD:
Sketch Plan $330
Residential $330+$200/unit
Residential-extension $200
Residential-modification $400
Non-residential $660+$130/1000 sf
Non-Residential-extension $300
Non-Residential-modification $650
Subdivision-incl.PUD: TOTAL #LOTS
Sketch Plan I $330
Preliminary Approval[2]
Residential:1-5 lots $660+$50/app
Residential:6-10 lots $990+$50/app
Residential:11-20 lots $1320+$50/app
Residential:21+lots $1650+50/app
Residential-extension $330
Final Approval[2]
Residential $1320+$175/lot+$50/app
Non-Residential $2000/lot+$50/app
Final Approval Modification[2]
Residential $330+$50/app
Non-Residential $550+$50/app
Final Approval Extension
Residential $135
Non-Residential $330
Other: TOTAL #LOT/ACRE
Post-Work Application Fee Add 50%App fee
Lot Line Adjustment $350
Letter of Credit-modification or extension $440
Letter of Credit-collection up to 1%ofLoC
Recreation Fee $2000/lotorunit
Land Disturbance $660+$55/acre
SEQRA EIS Review(Draft&Final) TBD
Legal Noticing if PB requires Public Hearing $50/app
[1] Fees are based on per structure,except where noted. $0.00 TOTAL DUE
[2] Legal ad required;includes City processing and publishing
For Administrative Use
Total Paid at Intake
Revised Fee
Balance Due
/ / Balance Paid Staff approval
ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN
PARTNERSHIP, LLP. 900 Route 146 Clifton Park,NY 12065
(P)518.371.7621 (F)518.371.9540 edpllp.com
November 2, 2021
Amanda Tucker, RA
Senior Planner
City of Saratoga Springs
474 Broadway
Saratoga Springs, NY
Regarding: Design Review Commission Submittal
120 South Broadway
Demolition Plan Submission
Dear Ms. Tucker,
Enclosed herewith is the following information for the submittal of a Building Demolition Plan
located at 120 South Broadway in the City of Saratoga Springs.
• One (1) Copy of the DRC Application
• One (1) Copy of the Short Environmental Assessment Form
• One (1) Copy of the Removals Plan for 120 South Broadway
• One (1) Copy of the Proposed Site Plan (Eventual Build out of sit, concept only)
On behalf of Stephen P. Ethier, we respectively request that you place this application on the next
available agenda of the Design Revie Commission for Demolition Review. Mr. Ethier will drop of
the Application Fee separately. Please feel free to contact our office with any questions or if you
require additional information. Thank you.
Sincerely,
-"D 1304:4—A..
D. Brien Ragone, RLA
LEED BD+C
Environmental Design Partnership
cc:
Short Environmental Assessment Form
Part 1 - Project Information
Instructions for Completing
Part 1—Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the
application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on
information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as
thoroughly as possible based on current information.
Complete all items in Part 1.You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the
lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item.
Part 1—Project and Sponsor Information
Name of Action or Project:
Building Demolition for Lands of Stephen P. Ethier
Project Location(describe,and attach a location map):
120 South Broadway,Saratoga Springs, NY
Brief Description of Proposed Action:
Applicant is proposing to demolish and remove the 9,000±sf building in its entirety along the southern border and approximately a 2,100±sf portion of
the building along the eastern border. See also Removals Plan included with this Application.
Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: 518-430-7726
Stephen P. Ethier E-Mail:
SHARK14@nycap.rr.com
Address:
10 East Harrison Street
City/PO: State: Zip Code:
Saratoga Springs NY 12866
1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law,ordinance, NO YES
administrative rule,or regulation?
If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that ❑
may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2.
2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other government Agency? NO YES
If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval:Saratogs Springs Design Review Commission-Demolition and
Removals approval. ❑
3. a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 2.64±acres
b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 0.25±acres
c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned
or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 2.64±acres
4. Check all land uses that occur on,are adjoining or near the proposed action:
5. ❑Urban ❑ Rural(non-agriculture) 0 Industrial ❑ Commercial ❑ Residential(suburban)
0 Forest ❑ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic ❑ Other(Specify): Adjacent Cemetary
❑Parkland
5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A
a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? ❑ ❑ ❑✓
b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? ❑ ❑ ✓❑
NO YES
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape?
❑ ❑✓
7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES
If Yes,identify: ❑✓ ❑
NO YES
8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? ❑ ❑
b. Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? ❑ ❑
c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed ✓❑ ❑
action?
9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES
If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies:
❑✓ ❑
10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES
If No,describe method for providing potable water:
✓❑ ❑
11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES
If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment:
❑✓ ❑
12. a.Does the project site contain,or is it substantially contiguous to,a building,archaeological site,or district NO YES
which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places,or that has been determined by the ❑ El
of the NYS Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the
State Register of Historic Places?
b.Is the project site,or any portion of it,located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ✓❑
archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)archaeological site inventory?
13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES
wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? ❑ ❑
b. Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? ❑ ❑
If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres:
Page 2 of 3
14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site.Check all that apply:
❑Shoreline 0 Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands 0 Early mid-successional
0 Wetland ❑ Urban ❑ Suburban
15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed by the State or NO YES
Federal government as threatened or endangered?
Frosted Elfin, Karner Blue ❑ El
16. Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan? NO YES
✓❑ ❑
17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non-point sources? NO YES
If Yes, ❑✓ ❑
a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ❑ ❑
b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? ❑ ❑
If Yes,briefly describe:
18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water NO YES
or other liquids(e.g.,retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)?
If Yes,explain the purpose and size of the impoundment: ❑ ❑
19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste NO YES
management facility?
If Yes,describe: ❑ ❑
20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES
completed) for hazardous waste?
If Yes,describe: ❑ ❑
I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF
MY KNOWLEDGE
Applicant/sponsor/name: D. Brien Ragone(Agent) Date: November 1,2021
Signature:_T., ralTitle:Landscape Architect(LA#002135)
PRINT FORM Page 3 of 3
EAF Mapper Summary Report Monday, November 1, 2021 1:45 PM
Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist
/
I — ' project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental
I � _i_ } assessment form(EAF).Not all questions asked in the EAF are
fi1.1/
+ answered by the EAF Mapper.Additional information on any EAF
1 78.27-1-49 question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although
1 7816-1-5011178-27-1-48 the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to
178 .7-1-1 s DEC,you may alo need to contact local or other data sources in order
�r `` to obtain data not provided by the Mapper.Digital data is not a
�— _ "°i i 78 '11 substitute for agency determinations.
178.35-1-13 .°'
178..26-1-47
+i rti Monhea!
.
178.34-2-2417$.35-1-1
rata (ga Spri •s
_ 17 . 5-.1-6 Tor NI to
f-.1)a%-.1-I J
178'34-2-3.2 A
1arie
B :ta[]rtert178 4-2-3.1
1 78.35-1-12 — 178.35-1-7 cfeyir:rdl Pr •i.r-.
i
178.34-2-5 __---
' fweu York
1110-78735: 727-7 71 p ittsburgli
f.rdi t Phitacleiphi.a
Ig 111—z19GS, Intemiap;IN REMErITP1 FIR ri,'Esri 1 p,5'rl1.1ET1. , €4,,L7.(u E n EN Er1T'r1 an,Esn Japan, I1ETT,Esn China I,Hon€I kanji,Esn
Kir ,.Esri--(Thii nE C i-r °Cpa7Stre,rlap,;3i p .ttt+rr, ri I�r C nuii.r 1ity ClnnDp7Sb? :r.laID.:.3ntribtkaiRiailgie GIS I Iser CommLinty
Part 1 /Question 7 [Critical Environmental No
Area]
Part 1 /Question 12a [National or State No
Register of Historic Places or State Eligible
Sites]
Part 1 /Question 12b [Archeological Sites] Yes
Part 1 /Question 13a [Wetlands or Other No
Regulated Waterbodies]
Part 1 /Question 15 [Threatened or Yes
Endangered Animal]
Part 1 /Question 15 [Threatened or Frosted Elfin, Karner Blue
Endangered Animal - Name]
Part 1 /Question 16 [100 Year Flood Plain] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF
Workbook.
Part 1 /Question 20 [Remediation Site] Yes
Short Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 1
wBPREODPx S;
R; SITE BE REMOVED
OF
x BE AND
.1
Ill NC-5-11 -
• BD�ED 0 ,
a o
I;o R MAIN �ND� s
• W
�T SITE LOCATION MAP W
SCALE z 000 • J
Pt ENTIRE 9 OPOZ
�d
�, TO BE REMOVEDNEAREALTO DBE O Z
N AND Ce VERTED TO z W r
ii.IAW _ ¢
\ ,
E TO RE AI
♦ • ` `
l 07 F a h o
H -w
44
r sn`Bu �LL ooz
• sea+"RAPees �� * W m rc
LO
coJ out
I e 7
I
1 11._EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN 1) '
Ilk ...N11 .
III S
0
a (l SCALE
1„=z01"
'
4
ilitilkik_ ,i,u_ii , SUFFT TrtLE
. •••. • + ••••
• r to • ....0+6IRREMOVALS
A t ' 1
PLAN
GRAPHIC SCALE SHEP
1 of 1
P- SITE
� 3
Ncc
0
S w. r... • ,mv � ''n N i +£ R fF idW 1;4141-
re
LI
w
od
�t SITE LOCATION MAP w
srxE.r=z.000 BLDG#1 BLDG k2 d'a
4-STORY 45TGRY 4.. .'- O Z
MO - ` TOWNHOMES Imum TOWNHOMES
SITE STATISTICS zo-UNITSimmilli20-UNITS �= o
kEasluc NrITTRAASECT 20!=
RRDRHDDDDENER ,� ® ® o a h S
PARCEL AREA zcancaEs _ --_ - —DO N1C--'��. JH _3
II LI BUILDT UTALON�FRONTA�E TP« — _ ' .' t O `o o
Qo
BUI
DING
� � ILLM iia
t4m0 Uri
„oNT Y.�Ro 0 Alry MUM TOIL Al XIMUM � to Z O 0 S
SIDE YARD,ESTER,li A .10 �� J v
SIDE YARD EAsrEREvR -
REAR veaDisouTHEruvR za MN aum x
PROPOSED No.OF UNITS 61 TONNROMEs aa„„, `." �F
PROPOSED No OF RUI BINDS
PROPOSED P,wallo aRO
INTERIOR PARKING 24 SPACES
ARAGES
EXTERIOR PARKING 22 SPACES
TOTAL SU SPACES u 5PER I,
oRLnATERII.AOEMENT ONSITE ANOOFFsnE 1
BLDG#3
0 TOED DITEANDOE�ITE E
...
_ s 4 a
uLEvaRD ENTRANCENAr
s
URN So
TO LANDSCAPE/TURF WITH NTSDOD COROA '"
I• I1 OW ` t 1
-1�F _ r, NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
_Ink..
••�•••• r - 44..4
♦• 1 �� SuCONCEPTUAL i
...
SITE PLANA .,
- ► Pts � '�• ,� aOf APH C SCALE
1 of 1
1