Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
20210291 Maple Ave Final Subdiv. Application
[FOR OFFICE USE1 **HANDWRITTEN APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED** OC;`i (Application#) Cor„ CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS PLANNING BOARD CITY HALL-474 BROADWAY (Date received) °Ro SARATOGA SPRINGS, NEW YORK 12866-2296 1/cORpoRaTEci \ TEL: 518-587-3550 X2533 www.saratoga-springs.org (Project Title) APPLICATION FOR: check if PH Required 1-1 f PRELIMINARY n FINAL SUBDIVISION Staff Review Property Address/Location: 223 Maple Ave., Corner of Green St. & Maple Ave. Tax Parcel#: 166.29-1-63 Zoning District: UR-2 (for example: 165.52-4-37) nRR/SR1 - Conservation Subdivision Checklist Required Total Acres: 0.432 acres (18,813 sq.ft.) Land to be Subdivided Into: 2 Lots APPLICANT(S)* OWNER(S) (If not applicant) ATTORNEY/AGENT Name Todd Bishop & Linda Martelli-Bishop (same) Agent: Engineering America Co Address 223 Maple Ave., Saratoga Springs, NY 76 Washington St., Saratoga Springs Phone 518 / 587 - 1340 Email tonyay@nycap.rr.com Identify primary contact person: 0 Applicant 0 Owner NI Agent *An applicant must be the property owner, lessee, or one with an option to lease or purchase the property in question. Has a previous application been filed with PB for this property? NO TI YES If YES, include Application TYPE and DATE: Does any City officer, Does any City officer, employee or family member thereof have a financial interest (as defined by General Municipal Law Section 809) in this application? YES NO x . If YES, a statement disclosing the name, residence, nature and extent of this interest must be filed with this application. I, the undersigned owner or purchaser under contract for the property, hereby request Subdivision consideration by the Planning Board for the identified property above. I agree to meet all requirements under the Subdivision Regulations for the City of Saratoga Springs. Furthermore, I hereby authorize members of the Planning Board and designated City staff to enter the property associated with this application for purposes of conducting any necessary site inspections relating to this application. Applicant Signature: Todd Bishop Digitally signed by Todd Bishop D tecn2Ttl03B0s9hop,107,3u-gr °nyay@nycap.rr.com,c=US Date: If applicant is not current owner, owner must also sign. Owner Signature: Date: Application Fee: Make checks payable to the "Commissioner of Finance". REFER TO THE CURRENT FEE WORKSHEET INCLUDED IN THIS DOCUMENT. Revised 1/2021 Check City's website (www.saratoqa-sprinqs.orq) for meeting dates. 0. T°c4 6'4 CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS PLANNING BOARD CITY HALL-474 BROADWAY 47, 4 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NEW YORK 12866-2296 TEL: 518-587-3550 X2533 '°/PCRATE© www.saratoga-springs.org PRELIMINARY/ FINAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL REQUIRED SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Checklist Prepared By: Engineering America Co. Date: 3/5/2021 Listed below are the minimum submittal requirements as set forth in The City of Saratoga Springs' Subdivision Regulations. The Planning Board reserves the right to request additional information, as necessary, to support an application. The Board also reserves the right to reject the application if these minimum requirements are not met. Please complete the checklist below and provide with your submission. REQUIRED ITEMS: *3 hard copies (1 w/original signature), 1 digital copy of ALL materials and Fee are required. CHECK EACH ITEM I. Completed Subdivision Application pi 1 a. Conservation Subdivision Checklist if required 111 2. SEQR Environmental Assessment Form-short or long form as required by action. 3. Set of plans including: (2) large scale plans (sheets must be 24" x 36", drawn to a scale of not more than I"=50 feet). One digital version of all submittal items (pdf) shall be provided. 111 4. Basic or Full Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan as required per City Code Chapter 242. 111 5. Copy of signed DPW water connection agreement for all projects involving new water connections to the City system 111 6. Engineering Report for Water and Sanitary 111 7. Complete Streets Checklist 111 8. Project Cost Estimate-Quantities of work items and estimate of costs REQUIRED ITEMS ON SUBDIVISION PLAT, AS APPLICABLE: 1. Name of Subdivision 3. Property line survey prepared by a licensed land surveyor. Subdivision plat must reference such survey with all corners set and marked on plan. Reference NGVD 1929 datum. A copy of the original property survey must also be included. 111 4. North arrow and map scale City of Saratoga Springs Subdivision Checklist 1 Z5. Parcel tax map number 111 6. Site location map 111 7. Site vicinity map (all features within 300 feet of property) 111 8. Identification of current zoning with corresponding area requirements 111 9. Building setback lines, either listed or shown on plans 111 10. Title block with subdivision name; name and address of applicant; and name and address of property owner (if different) 111 I I. Name, address and phone number of subdivision surveyor and/or engineer ❑ 12. Names of all adjacent property owners within 300 feet (include both sides of street) ❑ 13. Identification of size, elevations, material, and slopes of all existing and proposed utilities within 400 ft of site. 111 14. Parcel street address (existing and any proposed postal addresses) Yes No N/A 15. Identification of existing or proposed easements, covenants or legal rights-of-way on this property III III El IIIIII El 16. References to all prior variances or special use permits n n n 17. Existing and proposed contours and spot grades (at 2 foot intervals) ❑ ❑ El 18. Identification of all watercourses, designated State wetlands, buffers, Federal wetlands, floodplains, rock outcroppings, etc. III ❑ ❑ 19. Identification of all existing or proposed sidewalks or pedestrian paths (show type, size and condition of existing sidewalks) n n n 20. Location, design specifications and construction material for all proposed site improvements (drains, culverts, retaining walls, berms, fences, etc.) n n n 21. Location and distance to fire hydrant nn• n 22. Erosion and sediment control plan—including designated concrete truck washout area nn n 23. Approximate location, dimensions and areas for proposed lots and proposed public recreational land nn• n 24. Proposal for utility systems and lateral connections n n n 25. Location and width of proposed streets City of Saratoga Springs Subdivision Checklist 2 2021 LAND USE BOARD FEE WORKSHEET OPED Fees Type 2021 Fee Application to Zoning Board of Appeals[1][2] TOTAL #VARIANCE Use Variance $1100+$50/app Area Variance-Residential $275/var+$50/app+$125 eachadd'I variance Area Variance-Multi-Family,Comm,Mixed-Use $660/var+$50/app+$200 eachadd'I variance Interpretations $550+$50/app Post-Work Application Fee Add 50%App fee+$50/app Variance extensions 50%ofAppfee+$50/app Application to Design Review Commission[1] TOTAL #STRUCTURE Demolition I $385 Residential Structures Principal $55 Accessory $55 Extension $35 Modification $55 Multi-Family,Comm,Mixed-Use Structures Sketch $165 Principal $550 Extension $200 Modification $330 Multi-Family,Comm,Mixed-Use Accessory,Signs,Awnings Principal $140 Extension $75 Modification $140 Post-Work Application Fee Add 50%App fee Application to Planning Board[1] TOTAL #STRUCTURE Special Use Permit[2] $990+$50/app Special UsePermit-extension $330 Special UsePermit-modification[2] $450+$50/app Site Plan Review-incl.PUD: Sketch Plan $330 Residential $330+$200/unit Residential-extension $200 Residential-modification $400 Non-residential $660+$130/1000 sf Non-Residential-extension $300 Non-Residential-modification $650 Subdivision-incl.PUD: TOTAL #LOTS Sketch Plan I $330 Preliminary Approval[2] Residential:1-5 lots $660+$50/app Residential:6-10 lots $990+$50/app Residential:11-20 lots $1320+$50/app Residential:21+lots $1650+50/app Residential-extension $330 Final Approval[2] Residential 1545.00 $1320+$175/lot+$50/app Non-Residential $2000/lot+$50/app Final Approval Modification[2] Residential $330+$50/app Non-Residential $550+$50/app Final Approval Extension Residential $135 Non-Residential $330 Other: TOTAL #LOT/ACRE Post-Work Application Fee Add 50%App fee Lot Line Adjustment $350 Letter of Credit-modification or extension $440 Letter of Credit-collection up to 1%ofLoC Recreation Fee $2000/lotorunit Land Disturbance $660+$55/acre SEQRA EIS Review(Draft&Final) TBD Legal Noticing if PB requires Public Hearing $50/app [1] Fees are based on per structure,except where noted. $1,545.00 TOTAL DUE [2] Legal ad required;includes City processing and publishing For Administrative Use Total Paid at Intake Revised Fee Balance Due / / Balance Paid Staff approval 85 O C S O a SD R. Cli R 0 OXO p O � c a cc #P OW MM a (lip On I. (I O .Q 40. Oe o Of O O D O SD 0 O a O U N 2 Case Simpson DennisW. King n eelen S° Ch Otowski and e° _ cB 2 Lw 2 >k 1690 P 175 — °—°—°—°� Bk 1400 P491 o . o— —°—°— ANGLE IRONco c. 1/2°IR. — c oo Lo z 0 4' HIGH N o/ p �� o STONE WALL Oa 1/2"IR. N29°59'55"- 151.20' Er/ 50.00' o _ O .. O 101.20 i i i i i / / COU DO • O O Q> (N O) ar RID LCS 4 p pml -Th • O > 7 0 8.0' w 1p p W o,\s-\,- 10' l / / / / / CD o 1 0 --lz � -6->\ cp� �O STONE RET. WALL l AWN 9 i �� , a z o _ 2 O 0 cox m - 0,4" 3 s.-. or soc2°IR. O = = J = `4 ° O 0. ' O ac. GARAGE L— — — — — — o � CONC. p oo cc w a p c`�o DRIVEWAY 0o co r7 N m p —io Ni\ co y O O o N W p\ — Y CONC. PAD 1 DD o wommoI CHIMNEY ATE so H # c i p so \ i o \ \ 25.2' PORCH & STEP I on un U 2 STY. WOOD FRAME HOUSE z R 5 pH Ln OVERHANG OVER ENTRANCE Q M O GAS METER 0 i � pgAn2 Q � � w � wgpwq � p � � o 3 WOOD STEPS p 9.1' i x x x x x x x m Q 2 o a r_ - - 2,400 s.-, or p _ _ 5 w 0,285 Cc. O — cp) 2, 2'1P V a e e n d d /us �O 0 3 CONC. PORCH • 5/8" steel rod set with a tag / & STEPS D n o c STREET BOUNDARY �O.OY' I 50.00' o marker found, labeled 533`48'34'W 150.00' -- CONC. SIDEWALK 0 utility pole overhead wires HYDRANT wood fence IP/ CONC. CURB EDGE OF ASPHALT / M ap #( Avenue Deed Re- erence : Todd K. Bishop and Linda MartelliBishop / Inst. #2014038259 Map Re- erenceo "Subdivision. of Lands of Dee Properties, LLC" prepared by Jammed and Associates filed 11 /6/08 as Map #D447A D. \ o-,_e : SUBDIVISON P A variance for minimum lot width and lot size will be required. SCALE: 1" = 20' DATE DESCRIPTION REVISIONS DATE: Feb. 14, 2019 JOB NO.: S17152.24 DRAWN BY: DES CHKD.BY: WMT TAX MAP: 166.29-1 -63 a R 2 O R - O R Q a R222 \21 SCALE: 1 " = 20' Maximum Percent 0 0 0 20 of Lot to be Minimum Principal Accessory Building b m ll Occupied Yard Dimensions Buildings Minimum Distance to Minimum Side Rear Minimum Mean One Total Maximum Principal Front Zoning Minimum Width Principal Accessory Front Rear Side Side First Floor Height Building Lot Line Lot Lot Percent of District Lot size (feet) Building Building (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Area (feet) (feet) (feet) Line Line Lot to be (square feet) (feet) (feet) Permeable UR-2 6,600 SF 60 30 10 10 25 8 20 Story=900 60 5 10 5 5 25 2 Story=700 Unauthorized alteration or addition to a survey Only apparent easements (if any) are shown map bearing a licensed Land Surveyor's Seal is on this survey. No abstract of title was a violation of Section 7209 subdivision 2 of available. the New York State Education Law. S17-152.24 P:ishop, 223 Maple Ave 017-152arlson17-152 Bishop Subdivision.dwg KT Keith Kaplan,Chair Bishop Subdivision: Vicinity Map (300' Buffer) a CITY OFBishop Subdivision: Site Location Map �� SA Brad Gallagher, Vice Chair �� r ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Cheryl Millsfl. �~ t _ • / s.^ � m �� Christopher Milla ?� �a � + ° •T • .i CITY HALL-474 BROADWAY Suzanne Morris utr l l !�er°,q.°err. i arr ;y�y R {Fi a I r % j -1 �. t. SARATOGA SPRINGS,NEW YORK 12866 1 o • y J..% Y .- _ H:f Gage Simpson u o r Avgrtitill* ► 'q"'-1 PH)518-587-3550 Fx)518-580-9480 Chris Hemstead,alternate _ z .a y ry + ti y' Kathleen O'Connor,alternate s � - "► ,, �•. , c , WWW.SARATOGA-SPRINGS.ORG 'T l $ �RPORATED ,9 t -. , IJ Jr: - - "Nr Gee #20190225 � Z G '� li r s`: Y f r 7F "" �4\ 01;440k ?+ 4!' d/ r : 1 r IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL OF �a c ' fr4.a` r11Xiyeae Avcnu' s w! rTodd Bishop and Linda Martelli Bishop �q;cx i�f • w, t + ., * `� i223 Maple Ave {.' -•1 ; / t. 1, ,Saratoga Springs NY 12866 2,rd.Gt ,,.' '". `' +► ,r ' ;'c°rmant Ave y P�° °6 ' l ii !` �'r\P tfrom the determination of the Buildin Ins ector involvin a arcel at 223 Male Avenue in the Cit of Sarato a a;g P g P P Y g i = ;*a � , ,r v y ;.,ri Springs, New York being tax parcel number 166.29-1-363, in an Urban Residential-2 district on the hi,si t h. • , 1 ' . o Assessment Map of said City. Saratoga Spin Exeo1s14i A" �, •.. kr bre1 ,�. 'saratoga Sp�ngs 0.146 The appellants having applied for an area variance under the Zoning Ordinance of said City to permit a v ^�. t, i140 , �'* h , ` subdivision to create two parcels,in which the currently existing improvements on the property are sited on"Lot N r, sh 4,0 Site Location: 4 0 i.,_ i #" •., , t 1" consisting of 12,400 square feet fronted by both Green St and Maple Ave,and with a new"Lot 2"fronted by °' ;` 1b 3 et 223 Maple Ave. a a at{ ' MIP / T / Maple Avenue consistingof 6,413 square feet, andpublic notice havingbeen dulygiven of a hearingon said /. ° " ,sS" :�• • �` a Ir q s g'''"c',, 44' I . ° R. " application held on the 12th day of August and the 16th day of September 2019. `' T r.�' °+�r., 4 �4�t , , > / ' ver ti $ ¢ , lel I ti 5� �. �, W In consideration of the balance between benefit to the applicants with detriment to the health,safety and welfare 5 "'°'Tr sl 6. a °cam Bo-Wham St r o ` e ;. '� of the community,I move that the following area variances for the following amount of relief: a ° Jr, f °r' '0 '� ,, lit'' • 1t to b `�! i-J1 re �� t ►• /\ 1 TYPE OF REQUIREMENT DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL PROPOSED RELIEF REQUESTED MI,, o ,= St � A \ / • • :- e !�'1� REQUIREMENT ' ii Fiber n Al Avery I n, ,: L ` /'\ + ' . w r r •,46• r .i 4 I ^ t Did 1 �'i' > • t MINIMUM LOT SIZE:LOT 2 6600 SQ FT 6413 SQ FT 187 SQ FT OR b o m c' ' •Y • e Is, w r� . MINIMUM AVERAGE LOT 60' 50' 10'OR 16.7% .. ry :•' `n _.+" laveAsk v" 1:2,257 WIDTH:LOT 2 March 10,2021 1:9,028 March 10,2021 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 mi 0 0.01 0.03 0.05 mi CI Counties r-1 Towns 2020 11 r' , ' . ' I ' L Counties Towns I 11 1 I r r r + 0 0.02 0.04 0.08 km As per the submitted plans or lesser dimensions,be approved for the following reasons: 0 0.07 0.15 0.3 km ElCities Villages Esri,HERE,Gamin,INCREMENT P,Intermap,NGA,USGS E Cities Villages NYS ITS GIS Program Office 1. The applicants have demonstrated this benefit cannot be achieved by other means feasible to the applicant.The applicant notes that there are no available lands to purchase on the eastern side of Lot 2, and even a 1 foot addition to the western lot line bordering Lot 1 would come 0.1'to the allowed setback from the house on Lot 1,risking future complications with repairs or updates to that home.The applicant further notes that a squared-off line on Lot 2,as in the proposed plan,is ideal from planning practices and precludes future maintenance and neighbor issues. 2. The applicants have demonstrated that granting this variance will not create an undesirable change in neighborhood character or detriment to nearby properties. The applicants note that the proposed new boundary and lot configuration will provide sufficient space for a zoning-compliant home on Lot 2.The Board notes novariances are required for Lot l. CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS - STANDARD NOTES: 1.) ALL WORK MUST CONFORM TO ALL FEDERAL, STATE AND CITY CODES, SPECIFICATIONS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS. ��cc� Q Case Simpson s0 Veil) _ Helen S. Cheltowski and H. Dennis W. King 2.) ELEVATIONS ESTABLISHED FROM INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY THE • °-°-°-°-° o CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS ENGINEER'S OFFICE. The applicants further provided the Board with information on comparable lots in the neighborhood, 0,p<<4 o-o-o-°-O-O ANGLE IRON \ BIC 1400 P491 O making it clear that this new Lot 2 would be consistent with neighborhood context.While the Board is 9 o I STONE WALL 4' HIGH N\ 1,_21_13:_ __ __ 1/2"IR. 3.) ALL REFUSE, DEBRIS AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS TO BE REMOVED generally not in favor of creating non-compliant sized new lots,the shortfall in total lot size in this case is 44 %, v I \ - - _1/ - • D -' SHALL BE LEGALLY DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR not significant;see note 3,below. ,l, S _ _F TN29 59'55'E151.2050.00' CO�S �F� _ _ - - - - - - 66 TOA LOCATION APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 3. The Board notes that neither the lot size nor lot width variances are substantial. 'O 1,,,,„„, `J';? _ - 101.20 I I O T4. "Phis variance will not have a si rfie 58 adverse h sicai or environmental effect on the re uireme t or �L r�0��'P o: o N1 4.) THE C0NTRACTOR MUST SET UP A PRE-CONSTRUCTI0N MEETING district.Permeability of Lot 1 wgII be 58.5%per the applicant,well in excess of the UR-2 requirement of ��f, �9�F �':; I I WITH THE CITY ENGINEER PRI0R TO ANY C0NSTRUCTI0N. "" CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS BY THE CITY ENGINEER OR A 25%. 9r 9 v`°` I 8.0 I (i) ti 9� ;z:rr. I� -1 1Fc o=. s G ����`. �; - -�-,-i I 1 Q DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE ARE REQUIRED. THE COST OF THE I : r5. These areas of relief are self-created insofar as the applicants desire to subdivide this parcel,but that by SI,F,�B 1`0 o10' \ 25.0' MIN.REAR SETBA A\ '\ CONSTRUCTION INSPECTI0N IS THE RESPONSIBILITY 0F THE itself is not fatal to the application. I c? 1,1_ I I :::.:.:::.:::::.:::: .:: \vG I d APPLICANT/DEVELOPER. AN ESCROW ACCOUNT TO COVER `� Ell C THE COST OF THE INSPECTIONS MUST BE ESTABLISHED PRIOR Notes: ?./ft: I I I O _I_ �tiC TONE RET. WALL I 9� I 1 GG P 1. City Planning Board approval needed for subdivision c S ) LAWN F I LO t 2 Z0 �� TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. Q) 2. This subdivision will nullifya Special Use Permitgranted in 1992 fora home occupation on this site. 'f J ` ``' "`...::. P P B O 3. CountyPlanning Boardgranted a favorable opinion on March 29,2019. 0) cG 1 6,413 S.f. O r 1/2"IR. g P �. '<`'' I- 5. THE CONTRACTOR MUST OBTAIN A BLASTING PERMIT FROM THE O \ Condition: 0. 147 ac. I BUILDING INSPECTOR IF ANY BLASTING IS REQUIRED FOR THE Co dto -� d L_ GA.A........... v 1. Removal of existingdrivewayand curb cut on Maple Ave and repair to citystandards with new N H PROJECT. P P �u a Y ' r Q ti 2:?;kr I: DRIVEWAY 0 L.., ^I 6. THE CONTRACTOR MUST OBTAIN A STREET OPENING PERMIT ISSUED I N I _ o W I BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FOR ANY WORK IN THE S I N Adopted b the following vote: T P Y gcolco 2;`';S Wil' STREET OR RIGHT OF WAY OF ANY CITY STREET ROAD OR ALLEY. F P � 0 ON AD C . C ::::::::.::::::::::.::::::::::..:::::::::.::::.:::::::::::::.::::.:::::::::::::.:::::::::::::.::::.::::: AYE 7 K.Kaplan, r Morris,BGallagher,K nn r S. C.Grey,C.Millss G. S. . .O'Connor) 0 Y ti GATE ^ co . o T � N M CH �Y NAYEs: o I m � � � 7. ALL POINTS OF CONSTRUCTION INGRESS AND EGRESS SHALL BE "J.:: N r (nPORCH & STEP :. a t „ MAINTAINED TO PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT OR CDated: September 16,2019 c I I ep U DEBRIS ONTO A PUBLIC ROAD. / I Pu1E f1U I 2CPROPOSEDf'B 1= A.::.:. ::::.::::.: .::::::: cn TY. WOOD o I`t O I � I 2 Sv7 8. NO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL SITE This variance shall ex ire 18 months followin the filin date of such decision unless the necess buildin S �P g g �' g E HOUSE � Ico )AMO� ERHANG OVER ENTRANCE I apermit has been issued and actual construction begun as per 2408.5.1. C, _ WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED Q� K`K�.1, a'<: GAS:a: f1 t : a Ihereb certify the above to be a full true and correct co of a resolution adopted the Board of I a I �N PLANS AND AN AS-BUILT DRAWING HAS BEEN PREPARED IN Y Y copy Y P Y g Q, '9.p t.� ; � ::::::.:::::..:::.. ' ' ' ': ':.� o N o.::1 o I ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY ENGINEER. Appeals of the City of Saratoga Springs on the date above mentioned,five members of the Board being present. L-.14 F9 �,:: I I rp o 1 • �; Vap Lecend . : z':> s0`o ``�'`' Lot 1 Iii:*.. s .P :.: ::::::.:::::::�- 9.1' Z m c s�oti0� I \:::':':_ o I • 5/8 steel rod set with a tag SIGNATURE: 09/17/2019 K� o': 1 r C R DATE RECEIVED BY ACCOUNTS DEPT. fOS, ///,<,, F9�4- >.�`:' 12,400 s.f. or o o I ,- o marker found, labeled � s% =7' ZONING INFORMATION: 0.285 OC. /- - J o " 0 utility pole 94,"(-1 9� ,;:``;;,;I l- - - - I I IP. - . . ZONING DISTRICT: UR-2 TO `` 1 I ,/ \ 1 10.0' MIN FRONT SET ACK I 0 overhead wires '1' o / CONC. PORCH I I MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 6,600 SQ. FT. (WITH WATER AND SEWER) & STEPS Detail wood fence g a l -i-i-i-i- 20,000 SQ FT WITHOUT WATER OR SEWER) h. ':i, 0 - - STREET BOUNDARY - 10.00' _ - - - - - _ - 5_0._00' _ - - (40,000 SQ. FT. WITHOUT WATER AND SEWER) T / S33"48'34'W 150.00' 0 MINIMUM MEAN LOT WIDTH: 60 FT. EXISTING CONC. SIDEWAL. 1::,:,:,1:,:::1::,:, :::,:i::,` �� i MAXIMUM PERCENT OF LOT TO BE OCCUPIED BY: YDRANT I I AIM j�f�� `AVIA PRINCIPAL BUILDING: 30 • 1 t + ' Deed e f e re n c e. ACCESSORY BUILDING: 10% L.," z v` Viva ` `� 1`v MINIMUM YARD DIMENSIONS: �� r ,474�_ EDGF n ASPHALT Todd K. Bishop and Linda Martelli-Bishop FRONT: 10 FT. EXISTING WATER LINEW w w w w w w w w w w w w Inst. #2014038259 REARe ONE SIDE: 8: 25 T FT. / F� F�sT PF�<2,oG F f'F QST SST TOTAL SIDE: 20 FT. c� 0b s '%T 0 '1iT 4�, �Gti ��i0 /'�/� 1 Z� c� K�Kc� F� s G s� G OFcT K`q'I' c PRINCIPAL BUILDING: EXISTING 10" SEWER LINE <<, Q-- �✓ l V �s�ti�, %yT p��9y �cT��� PB�4/ cT�� pBCT O/,pFF 0 1����c� ^ / p MINIMUM FIRST FLOOR AREA: �' F lr F -)f' IV a ef e re n c e: 1 STORY: 900 SQ. FT. / Fp 'Q'k 4,s F 2 STORY: 700 SQ. FT. FO ��9y "Subdivision of Lands of Dee Properties, LLC MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: 60 FT. prepared by Tommell and Associates filed MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM ACCESSORY BUILDING TO: 11/6/08 as Map #D447A-D. PRINCIPAL BUILDING: 5 FT. \ / FRONTLOT LINE: FT. // SIDEIDEF LOT LINE: 5 FT. REAR LOT LINE: 5 FT. MINIMUM PERCENT OF LOT TO BE PERMEABLE: 25% APPROVED UNDER AUTHORITY OF A RESOLUTION BY REVISION 3I SH OP 2 Lot Subdivision ty a # 223 MAPLE AVE., CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS, SARATOGA COUNTY, NY ADOPTED Tax Map: # 166.29-1-63 BY THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY `TI®E ®\AMDEHHO SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS OF SARATOGA SPRINGS LAND SURVEYORS, P.C. MARCH 5, 2021 SCALE: 1" = 20' CHAIRPERSON ENGINEERING AMERICA COMPANY 12 Lake Avenue Voice: (518) 587-5665 76 WASHINGTON ST., SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 (518)587-1340 Saratoga Springs NY Fax : (518) 587-5772 DATE SIGNED 12866 TONYA L. YASENCHAK, P.E. S-2 o N CAST ALUMINUM FINIAL ANDz 0 o ROOF SAME FINISH AS POLE • O 0 SEE PG. 1 OF 2 FOR FIXTURE z 0 a Case Slm Son o Dennis W. 9 4ARC22T5-MDLO3 LED: 64 WATT (n o J & POLE DETAILS J Cho ItOWSkl ;nd H o_o_ P o_ p491 °o �� 2200 COLOR TEMPERATURE, TYPE a (lj • 0 D_ N o-o Helen o S• o . z Q z o 4N H GHIRON N Bk 1400 / o N � 5 DISTRIBUTION, 120-277 VOLT ~ f.,... H � I O� 1 2'IR. N � � � DIMMABLE DRIVER cg J Z Q p STONE WALL �0 1/2"IR. - - O ACRYLIC ACORN LENS O 1 N29�59'S5'E 1_51.20' _ _ lff__________5T TWIST LOCK FITTER / I �OO�\ / _ - - - 01.20 _ 50.00' I • Cp 0 - Y: _ 1 O �. - DRIVER COMPARTMENTiiiiik IR 1- Q'� II I N nJ ELECTRONIC PHOTOCELL Q U_ I^ O (STREET SIDE) 0 Z �- W N.:= 3/4" CHAMFER Q QD > _ .`,r`,r`` `�`jr`�`,r`,r`jr`\jrr FINISHED GRADE n zs; I I A- 8.0' I to U) �jc< CD - \O\r/\ii I®':"V ZINC PLATED ANCHOR BOLT (r) o::. I Q \\i,\�i, /♦fir\�i,\\i,\♦i,♦� ciII,j Z ♦\\ ,\\ppp. ASSEMBLY PER MANUFACTURER'S / . 4: I /-/-/-/-/ 1 '1- �\i\♦G\ .G�/♦\G�\fir RECOMMENDATION cn Q t • 10' -�c � N //� /// r:::-:;;DOS: I - Ov L \il [ :\\\\' ..... ....................N z ;`\'�` :�!.\!!.\!. 25.0' MIN.REAR SETB " PVC SCHEDULE 40 N I d Q NO DIRECT BURIAL LL I-I O o p il `j ��i ry z.,.: 1 WALL 9l ' I GG� 0 P/ �� ��,�, F+iSTONE RET I ' �I L L I (� ♦♦�r� �♦♦�♦♦� GROUND ROD PER N.E.C. 0 ) ; LAWN t�` Lot 2 Z N LJ a IX J \\ .\,. _ J p/� ,/p/\\ 4000 PSI CONCRETE BASE WITH +� Q, 6,413 S.f. O 1/2"IR. RFR IA O z / ✓✓ SONOTUBE FIBER FORM 20" D 0 z O O •-_-_, � 0. 1 47 ac. O I r rr - o d "a' UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE ', \ \ U E - L_ J A A -I Z r, ,.,,- rrG a O r,Wr O r. QW OR COMPACTED TO 90% /r O r rr + O n [� ,./W STANDARD PROCTOR + (1.)1 r:;;..:<:::: r71� N , n �, :._;_;:.>>; EXISTING CONC. .. .... `- -1 �� Z 0 720 d - li a� 0 N r 4" 3" DIA. TAPERED POLEY EWA DRIV 00 0 LL N I Z .„ I ^I .125 WALL THICKNESS I I I Q z �i _ I N Lo W I - __i Q � I N 6063 T6 STRUCTURAL GRADE ALUMINUM 0 Q - vJ . o- N � oI CNC, PA POLE LE WELDED FOR SINGLE Q 0 NOTES: Lu N r C - Q O GATE N UNIT CONSTRUCTION - (n CH �Y E O a 1. INSTALLATION OF DECORATIVE LIGHTS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY ELECTRICIAN - •+7, DO L O� < O AND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. (USE 120V POWER.) 0 O 3`; >` LI O Q 0 � � 2. THE OWNER DEVELOPER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING CONNECTION CHARGES FROM NATIONAL GRID. W O Q z �I O / r� :<a=°°' PORCH & STEP n - z z o oI I U in _ Q (� THE CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS TAKES OVER THE LIGHT ONCE CONNECTED. n I^ Z ;zsi I ui O I--1 H 4) 3. ELECTRIC SERVICE: SWEEPS AT CONCRETE BASES AND BETWEEN BASES USE 2" SCHEDULE >- = I�-I V ?:;I I '': FRAME':'::HOUSE.':':':.':1 PROPOSED d I`� I- J EJcl)Q 40 PVC NON-METALLIC CONDUIT, UNLESS UNDER DRIVEWAYS WHERE SCHEDULE 80 PVC IS 0 (n I N WOOD I' . Li.--: O REQUIRED. FOR WIRE: THHN COPPER STRANDED NUMBER 6 COLORED RED WHITE AND I U 0 I I- IN 2 STY co �/ J I �i OVERHANG OVER ENT H ::':::::':::::.':::::':::::::.'..::':::::::.'.::::: a °p FRAME HOUSE � GREEN. LIGHTS ARE WIRED 120 VOLTS. PROVIDE A SEPARATE HANDHOLE, SYNERTECH � RANGE 1 I O SYN121212HH02, TO BE OWNED BY THE CITY FOR THE DISCONNECT NEAR THE BASE OF THE a_ a Z W ELECTRIC POLE OR BOX AT THE BEGINNING OF SERVICE. PROVIDE AND INSTALL (1) 5/8 INCH LL ( Jk`I ':': . . :' Na BLACK FINISH In COPPER GROUND ROD IN HANDHOLE. WIRE AND CONDUIT FROM HANDHOLE TO POLE OR BOX I I I �` a"s` I N �_ PER NATIONAL GRID'S STANDARDS. IF CONNECTING ONLY ONE LIGHT PROVIDE WATERTIGHT (Y ,_ "IJ I 1 - ) A FUSEHOLDER, FERRAZ SHAWMUT FEB-21-21 1P 600V WITH 5 AMP FUSE WITH INSULATOR - A N3;I 0.i I L. I I co o I _ \/ �r ACCESS DOOR dI BOOTS PART FRZ FSB1 IN HANDHOLE FOR FUSING THE POWER WIRE. IF CONNECTING MORE `� M (�' I ... 1 I al o '~' V a Le c e n d 1, 7 J O THAN ONE LIGHT PUT A 30 AMP FUSE IN WATERTIGHT FUSEHOLDER IN HANDHOLE AND CD v?`'I N D U) P J____ - PROVIDE SEPARATE FUSE HOLDERS, BUSSMAN HEB-AA FUSEHOLDER WITH 5 AMP FUSE, IN J_ O Z T£AS::::: Q - �` Lot 1 .©D..S I m • 5 8" steel rod set with a to PCI I :;::;.:............................;.....�- 9.1' / g Q�=D BASE OF EACH LAMP. RUN #12 THHN COPPER, (RED, WHITE, AND GREEN) FROM BASE TO - Q \.';:';:::::_: 17" DIA. BASE, .750 FLOOR THICKNESS > U' TOP OF LIGHT USE POLARIS CONNECTORS FOR CONNECTIONS IN HANDHOLE AND IN BASE L j O, ;0 1 X..'.' .' . '..1 r - LD l �/ FOUR ANCHOR BOLTS AND ONE GROUND Z OF LIGHTS. THE LIGHT IS TO BE MOUNTED DIRECTLY ONTO CONCRETE BASE USING FENDER o z '>�: 12,400 s.f. or I .,I o marker found, labeled STUD (SEE PG. 2 OF 2 FOR FOUNDATION 0 Z .--I WASHERS, 2 INCH OD 1/2 INCH ID AND 1/8 INCH THICKNESS, AND LOCK WASHERS. i 0 -W / /� 0 utility pole STREET J z ,--1 0.2 8 5 a c. ' DETAILS) Q z \ PHOTOCELL p � � <j z \ � 17" DIA. BASE, 12" DIA. BOLT n •C G1, c2 I / L_ _ _ _ - J o - r1 CIRCLE, DIAMOND PATTERN, FOUR H n a \ I � I O2"IP' - overhead wires 1/2" x 18" ANCHOR BOLTS W >< `n III ) / ^ CONC. PORCH I 10.0' MIN FRONTISET:ACK `J JLIJ / & STEPS Detail -/-/-/-/- wood fence (n q w q 0 - - STREET BOUNDARY - 1 0.00'- - - - - - - _ _ _ 5_0.00' _ ACCESS DOOR / S33'48'34'W 150.00' 0 CATALOG NUMBER: p EXISTING CONC. SIDEWAL. ; : :!.'•! �Ol�/I � I i�i�i�i,�'c 1 PT-D650SRLED-5T-4AR22T5-MDL03-A-PEC/4212T4/BK a, a // Aura . i �,+! JOO�Lr.,,r1� SEE PAGE 2 OF 2 d SEE PAGE 1 OF 2 aYDRANT ti: ,�,, ,I Deed deference : �h. .,a' K _, , .vr+__ , ;,� F1YF OF ASPHALT Todd K. Bishop and Linda Martelli-Bishop EXISTING WATER LINE w w w w w w w w w w w w W w w wF Inst. #2014038259 Maple AvetiF ��G<(,' 4>> EXISTING 10" SEWER LINE / c�4/s S�. gf'F�p V a p of e re n c e: / T�Gc'o��?Fo �'GF "Subdivision of Lands of Dee Properties, LLC" '' prepared by Tommell and Associates filed ki- ��T�ti 11/6/08 as Map #D447A-D. IcF NOTES: * AMENDED TOPSOIL MIXTURE SHALL MAJOR TREES (STREET AND SHADE) SHALL BE SYMBOL BE IN THE FOLLOWING RATIOS BY VOLUME 3" MIN. D.B.H. (DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT) WOVEN WIRE FENCE •--F• 20 PARTS TOPSOIL (MIN. 14 1/2 GAUGE 10'MAX.C.TO C. W/MAX.8"MESH 4 PARTS PEAT MOSS j MINOR TREES (SMALL ORNAMENTALS) SHALL BE SPACING) CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 2 PARTS PEAT HUMUS 2" MIN. D.B.H. or11 �� /\36"MIN.LENGTH FENCE CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 1 PART FERTILIZER (10-6-4) �en����� POSTS DRIVEN MIN. 16" 1.STONE SIZE-USE 2"STONE,OR RECLAIMED OR RECYCLED CONCRETE EQUIVALENT. ��Mn����l�liiRl�1 ����II�■ INTO GROUND. SYMBOL SEE SUBDIVISION CONSTRUCTION REGULATIONS � �IIIi����� �I�®�i®IIIItI 1.WOVEN WIRE FENCE TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO FENCE POSTS WITH WIRE TIES � 50'MIN. ,EXISTING 2.LENGTH- NOT LESS THAN 50 FEET(EXCEPT ON A SINGLE RESIDENCE LOT WHERE FOR RECOMMENDED STREET TREE SPECIES. ��'"��'®��®�M�S ®® ®IIS OR STAPLES. POSTS SHALL BE STEEL EITHER T'OR"U"TYPE OR HARDWOOD. PAVEMENT _ ��®iW A 30 FOOT MINIMUM LENGTH WOULD APPLY). UMW�IILAi'w�.a�'�Be.___AMI(IMmIIfl6� HEIGHT OF FILTER 6 AIN. -� . 3.THICKNESS-NOT LESS THAN SIX(6)INCHES. �� i II �IN'7L10+ /i�l� ����auw = 16"MIN. 2. FILTER CLOTH TO BE TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WIRE FILTER MOUNTABLE BERM _ ALL PLANT LIST SPECIFICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE THE ��n�®�N"'E= FENCE WITH TIES SPACED EVERY 24"AT TOP AND MID SECTION. GROUEXISIND NG 4.POINTS WHERE IWIDTH -TWELVE NGRESS FOOT) EGRESS MOCCURS NOT TVENN--FOUR(24)E FlF00T LL WIDTH SINGLE FOLLOWING INFORMATION, TO BE APPROVED BY THE AT a W yW W SII®ni 8"MIN. FENCE SHALL BE WOVEN WIRE, 12 1/2 GAUGE,6"MAXIMUM MESH OPENING. GROUND CLOTH PEDDLE (OPTIONAL) W W�. W W W 9/..... W W ENTRANCE TO SITE W. W . y W 3.WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF FILTER CLOTH ADJOIN EACH OTHER THEY SHALL BE OVER- 501MIN. CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS: LAPPED BY SIX INCHES AND FOLDED. FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE EITHER FILTER X. 5.FILTER CLOTH-WILL BE PLACED OVER THE ENTIRE AREA PRIOR TO PLACING PERSPECTIVE VIEW OF STONE. + BOTANICAL NAME HEIGHT OR TRUNK DIA. WWI 100X,STABIUNKA T140N,OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. 0 MIN. \V` 38"MIN.FENCE POST EXISTING 6.SURFACE WATER-ALL SURFACE WATER FLOWING OR NERTED TOWARD CON- f 6 COMMON NAME SPACING �_ _ 4. PREFABRICATED UNITS SHALL BE GEOFAB,ENVIROFENCE,OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. GROUND ION ENTRANCES SHALL BE PIPED ACROSS THE ENTRANCE.IF PIPING IS • TOTAL QUANTITY WOVEN WIRE FENCE(MIN. 14 \ '" IMPRACTICAL A MOUNTABLE BERM WITH 5:1 SLOPES WILL BE PERMITTED. 1/2 GAUGE W/MAX. 6"MESH \ 5. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED AND MATERIAL REMOVED WHEN 12'IN. 121MIN. EXISTING ' . SPACING)WITH FILTER CLOTH 20"MIN. "BULGES"DEVELOP IN THE SILT FENCE. �` PAVEMENT 7.MAINTENANCE-THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL - PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBUC RIGHTS-OF-WAY,ALL HOSE � _ SEDIMENT SPILLED,DROPPED,WASHED OR TRACTED ONTO PUBUC RIGHTS-OF-WAY 1111"1-"A ■ �_� UPLAN VIEW NDISTURBED GROUND O'MIN. MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. , WIRE No. 10 GAUGE WRAP: WATERPROOF TREE WRAP- COMPACTED SOIL- 8.WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED,IT SHALL BE DONE ON A AREA STABILIZED WITH APPLY IN 4" WIDE STRIPS EMBED FILTER CLOTH _r- 16"MIN. STONE AND WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICE. A MIN.OF 6"IN GROUND. 0 9.PERIODIC INSPECTION AND NEEDED MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED AFTER EACH / STAKES 2"-2 1/2" DIA. OR SQ. 8' LONG SECTION ViEEW RAN. MULCH -3" MIN. SAUCER USE 3 STAKES FOR OVER 2" CAL. 2 STAKES- 2" CAL. & UNDER FINISHED GRADE / rv'v'v' v i' ige�e_eeee-1.' WA' SILT FENCE N.T.S. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NTS AMENDED TOPSOIL ����������������, IlikW 0"Al~ * ////'/ IRWI ppp///i BASED ON NEW YORK GUIDELINES FOR URBAN EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL. BASED ON NEW YORK GUIDELINES FOR URBAN EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL. MIXTURE ��j/Oj/Oj/0` ' / ��O//O%/O//0���' CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS, NEW YORK CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS, NEW YORK UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE `'\i\�/`,��`�/``i`�/\`p`4``i``p`�i,`�``%/��i�� APPROVED: DWG No APP(12diEED: DWG No �. 1/13/2010 1/13/2010 STANDARD DETAIL / .....././.../ ////// // PLANNING BOARD DATE STANDARD DETAIL Silt Fence ST-13 PLANNING BOARD DATE Stabilized Construction Entrance ST-11 j.12"j. PIT= BALL DIA. + 24" TREE PLANTI \ G DETAIL N.T.S. APPROVED: CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS, NEW YORK DWG No 1/13/2010 PLANNING BOARD DATE STANDARD DETAIL Tree P l a n t i n c L-1 APPROVED UNDER AUTHORITY OF A RESOLUTION BY REVISION 3I SH OP 2 Lot Subdivision ty a # 223MAPLE AVE., CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS, SARATOGA COUNTY, NY ADOPTED Tax Map: # 166.29-1-63 BY THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY `THOMMON AMM11110 EROSION 8c SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 8c DETAILS OF SARATOGA SPRINGS LAND SURVEYORS, P.C. MARCH 5, 2021 CHAIRPERSON ENGINEERING AMERICA COMPANY 12 Lake Avenue Voice: (518) 587-5665 76 WASHINGTON ST., SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 (518)587-1340 Saratoga Springs NY Fax : (518) 587-5772 DATE SIGNED 12866 TONYA L. YASENCHAK, P.E. S-3 1 SAWCUT LINE - SEE DETAIL SS-6 TREE BELT SEE PAVEMENT SECTION DETAIL SS-5 TRENCH WALLS LAID BACK PER OSHA REQ'MTS CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS CONCRETE SPECIFICATIONS OR SHEETING A.O.B.E. FINISHED GRADE ORIGINAL ASPHALT I-V' OR NOTE SIDEWALK WEARING COURSE(S) IN PVMT IN TURF CURB 1 1. THE FOLLOWING CONCRETE SPECIFICATIONS SHALL APPLY TO ALL CONCRETE WORK WITHIN THE •ijijv CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS RIGHT OF WAY AND/OR WITHIN THE APPROVAL AUTHORITY OF THE PAVEMENT BASE COURSE ,,,,,,��.��,�������,, -2,.v.R.•,%•-m.� "�� 4" TOPSOIL, FERTILIZE, LIME, SEED AND MULCH ROADWAY �� ��� = OPV" O��'' '• •+,• + `+' •':`'':• • '• ' `•1 STRUCTURAL (SEE NOTE 3) s` e :`rm5?. i BORROW: WELL GRADED INORGANIC �� �� j��j�j' �� O�O� �� ��lj��� ����jw PLANNING BOARD.ALL MATERIALS MUST BE FROM AN APPROVED NYSDOT SOURCE.QUANTITIES MAY " ' �i� ��i���\/N\� iii ` ��,Z,Z�/� 7,1. SUBBASE COURSE ,°',Mir$•.': l° GRANULAR SOILS AND/OR ROCK, ' ��� �� �'� �' VARY DUE TO VARIATIONS IN MATERIALS.PLANT BATCH TICKETS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON SECTION ,z •11 •, ��� j Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 -Project Information Instructions for Completing Part 1—Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1.You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1—Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: Bishop-Two(2)lot subdivision Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): #223 Maple Ave.;North East corner at intersection of Maple Ave.&Green St. Brief Description of Proposed Action: Subdivision of existing 18,183 sq.ft.(0.432 acre)lot into two(2)residential parcels. Lot#1 includes the existing residence in conformance with zoning requirements having a lot area of 12,400 sq.ft.(0.285 acre)and lot width of 100'. Lot#2 is proposed as a residential lot with an area of 6,413 sq.ft.and lot width of 50'. Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone:p 518/424-7158 Todd Bishop&Linda Martell'Bishop E-Mail: todd@tbassociates.com Address: 223 Maple Ave. City/PO: State: Zip Code: Saratoga Springs NY 12866 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that ❑✓ ❑ may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other government Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval:City of Saratoga Springs Zoning Board of Appeals approval,City of Saratoga Water Connection,City Building Permit Approval ❑ 3. a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 0.432 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 0.147 acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 0.432 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,are adjoining or near the proposed action: 5. ❑Urban ❑ Rural(non-agriculture) ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial m Residential(suburban) ❑Forest ❑ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic ❑ Other(Specify): ❑Parkland 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? ❑✓ ❑ ❑ b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? ❑ ❑✓ ❑ NO YES 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? ❑ ❑✓ 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: ❑� ❑ NO YES 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? ❑ ❑ b. Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? ❑ ❑ c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed ❑ ❑✓ action? 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: The new residence will be required to meet the current International Energy Conservation Construction Code. Most probably the ❑ El design professional will use the RES Check Energy Analysis program to confirm compliance. 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: ❑ ❑✓ 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ❑ ❑✓ 12. a.Does the project site contain,or is it substantially contiguous to,a building,archaeological site,or district NO YES which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places,or that has been determined by the ❑ El of the NYS Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? b.Is the project site,or any portion of it,located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑✓ archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)archaeological site inventory? 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? ❑✓ ❑ b. Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? ❑ ❑ If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: Page 2 of 3 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site.Check all that apply: EShoreline ❑ Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑ Early mid-successional El Wetland ❑ Urban Suburban 15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed by the State or NO YES Federal government as threatened or endangered? ❑✓ ❑ 16. Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan? NO YES ❑✓ ❑ 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, ❑✓ ❑ a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ❑✓ ❑ b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? ❑ n If Yes,briefly describe: 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water NO YES or other liquids(e.g.,retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain the purpose and size of the impoundment: ❑ ❑ 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste NO YES management facility? If Yes,describe: ❑ ❑ 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: ❑ ❑ This has been checked"yes"by the EAF mapper. Further investigation has shown that this particular site and the adjoining sites have NOT been subject to remediation. The EAF mapper is referring to current remediation across Rte.9&Rte.50 nearby. I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor/name: Tonya Yasenchak,PE Date:7/17/19 Signature: Title:Project Representative PRINT FORM Page 3 of 3 City of Saratoga Springs r, ' Department of Public Works A f Anthony J. Scirocco - 7 . 5 Lake Avenue Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 Commissioner (518) 587-3550 office Joseph J. O'Neill www.saratoga-springs.org Deputy Commissioner NEW WATER SERVICE CONNECTION AGREEMENT & APPLICATION FORM Todd Bishop Bishop - Subdivision Property Owner's Name Project Name (if applicable) #223 Maple Ave., Saratoga Springs 166.29-1-63 Property Address Tax Map#: Size of Tap (check one below) X3A " 1" Greater than 1" A unit of water shall be defined as 14,000 (fourteen thousand) cubic feet of water per year. Contact the Utilities Department at ext. 2502 for assistance with water use estimation and meter specifications before signing below. Number of Dwellings: 1 Estimated Cubic Feet of Water per Year 21,471 cu.ft./year To be completed in full without any contingencies or protest, on or before the Building Inspector approval of the rough plumbing, including the installation of the water meter, or at the time of the issuance of a tapping permit. The undersigned represents to the City that they have full and complete authority to execute this document and find and commit the developer to abide by the City Water Ordinance. This agreement shall be binding on all of the undersigned transferees. The undersigned acknowledges that a copy of this document will be delivered to appropriate and necessary governmental entities. Authorized Signature Print Name Todd Bishop Company Name &Address 223 Maple Ave., Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 Company Phone Number 518/ 424-7158 Fax Number Date 3/9/2021 ****************************************************************************************** Department of Public Works Approval Date: EAF Mapper Summary Report Wednesday, July 17, 2019 2:03 PM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist -"U f project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental 165Y 36- , 3 1.66.29-1-53 � assessment form(EAF).Not all questions asked in the EAF are 166.21 51 / f answered by the EAF Mapper.Additional information on any EAF 166:29-1-52-'1.6e...29_1_5 t166.29-1 2 question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although the EAF Mapperprovides the most up-to-date digital data available to / �{ 166.291p p 9 _ '� DEC,you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order 166.2 1 47.2 166.29-1-5 1 66.2 9 148 to obtain data not provided by the Mapper.Digital data is not a . substitute for agency determinations. 1.66.2 9-1-45 . �� 1.66.29-1-64 X 6.29-1-47.1 ;r '1 � M cnlrcal f6 .29-1727.1 rxi :, 29-1-44 It L3 rJ.r• 166.29-1-30 1'6 \ .ratoga Sprin+ S 166.29-1-31 166.29-1-63 166.29-1 I, Toronto J .36-2=69 ' l i r / 1.65,36-2-2.4 "of, Ranh or 1 66.2 9 1 33 ' t�llc Warp' ark 165.36:21'25 166 29-1-67. dli �l ¢ll • Bostvn ryi riWW `' .lSrca�6�efire �* 1657 $ ti36-2`26 Sources.�;.1-1�1'��? i -�'~<-}- GlrwdarlCl 1.66.29-1-41 r Interme# IN+ lEMMlENt F NRCerr -11 - ��k 0 1 6536--7 { , , HERE,Garmin, 165.36--28 %' Japa4IETI,'1E`fahins(Am! .r,. ',Esri SOLI ri, K420. 1.si(Th�ilend}, FRC £-a,"o- ',,Columbus .111t�6rrgh USGIEiIIntbirhap, IN�`REMENT 166.29-1-597 Is 1€5.362-9o c trtirlapco ntriu =ndtheC'ISY. F;tJRCen, EsriJapan, MET!, 165.36-2`39} jlser C,prfimunity 166.29-2 inniii Wa ina ,'Heng Kong), ES ID Part 1 /Question 7 [Critical Environmental No Area] Part 1 /Question 12a [National or State No Register of Historic Places or State Eligible Sites] Part 1 /Question 12b [Archeological Sites] Yes Part 1 /Question 13a [Wetlands or Other No Regulated Waterbodies] Part 1 /Question 15 [Threatened or No Endangered Animal] Part 1 /Question 16 [100 Year Flood Plain] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Part 1 /Question 20 [Remediation Site] Yes Short Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 1 ENGINEERING AMERICA CO . 76 WASHINGTON ST . SARATOGA SPRINGS , NY 1 2 8 6 6 5 1 8 / 5 8 7 - 1 3 4 0 5 1 8 / 5 8 0 - 9 7 8 3 ( FAX ) TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: FROM: Planning Board Tonya Yasenchak COMPANY: DATE: City of Saratoga Springs March 5,2021 FAX NUMBER: TOTAL NO.OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 8 PHONE NUMBER: SENDER'S REFERENCE NUMBER: RE: YOUR REFERENCE NUMBER: Bishop Subdivision:223 Maple Ave. Water,Sewer&Basic SWPPP 0 URGENT Q FOR REVIEW 0 PLEASE COMMENT 0 PLEASE REPLY 0 AS REQUESTED ENGINEERING REPORT: INTRODUCTION: Engineering America Co. has been retained by the applicants, Todd & Linda Bishop, to provide land planning and site/civil engineering services in connection with the subdivision application for 223 Maple Ave. in the City of Saratoga Springs, Tax Map # 166.29-1-63. Subdivision approval will be required from the Planning Board which includes all requirements listed on the City of Saratoga's Preliminary/Final Subdivision Approval Required Submittal Checklist. This report is intended to fulfill items 4 & 6 of the Required Items part of the Preliminary/Final Subdivision approval checklist. DESCRIPTION OF INTENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT& USE: The site, 223 Maple Ave. is located at the East corner of the intersection of Green St. and Maple Ave. in Saratoga Springs New York. The 18,813 sq.ft. lot has an existing single family residential building with attached garage and in-law suite. The existing building is accessed by driveway from Green St. The lot area is nearly level in the area of the existing house, with a slope up to the West and a slope down towards Maple Ave. The property is mostly grassy along the South and North East with a few medium and large size trees. The proposed subdivision of this parcel would result in dividing the single lot into two lots. The existing residence would be located on a 12,400 sq.ft lot (designated as Lot 1 on the map). The existing driveway access off of Green St. would remain unchanged. The existing electrical utility connection across Maple Ave. is proposed to remain unchanged. The new lot to be created to the North East of the existing house,would be subdivided from the main parcel and marketed for sale as a residential building lot. The new Lot 2 is proposed to be 6,413 sq.ft.in area. A zoning variance was granted for the 187 sq.ft. smaller lot,including the 50' lot width(instead of 60' width required). Proposed development on the new lot includes a single family residence in compliance with the City Zoning. Compliance with the requirements of Table 3 of the City of Saratoga Springs Zoning Ordinance is as shown on the subdivision plat, 51 & S2. WATER REPORT: Currently, there are 4 bedrooms within the existing single family dwelling on the property. Using a standard demand of 110 gallons per capita day (gpcd) the existing property can be estimated to have an annual water consumption usage of 160,600 gallons. Assuming the new lot will accommodate a single family residence with 4 total bedrooms the annual water consumption would increase by 160,600 gallons to 321,200 gallons (increase of 440 gallons per day). There is a water main located in Maple Ave. The existing residence appears to be currently connected to this main with services to remain unchanged. A new 3/4" or 1" water service connection will be required for the proposed new residence on the proposed new lot. SANITARY REPORT: There are 4 bedrooms within the existing single family residence. Using a standard sanitary sewer of 110 gallons per capita day (gpcd) the existing property can be estimated to have an annual sanitary load of 160,600 gallons. Assuming the new lot will accommodate a single-family dwelling containing 4 bedrooms the annual sanitary load for the two lots will increase by 160,600 gallons to 321,200 gallons. There is a 10" sanitary sewer main located in Maple Ave. The existing residence appears to be currently connected to this main with services to remain unchanged. The proposed new single dwelling unit building would be expected to use a 4" to 6" diameter PVC service line connecting to this main. The additional load from the construction of the new residence is not expected to tax the capacity of the municipal system. 2 STORMWATER& BASIC SWPPP/EROSION CONTROL SOIL CONDITIONS: The project site (in location of the proposed new lot & current residence) is slightly pitched towards Maple Ave. Soils on this site are, GaB, Galway Loam in hydrologic group B. According to Saratoga County Soil surveys, the depth to any restrictive feature in this soil type is typically 30". The soil is classified as moderately deep, well to moderately drained, with moderate permeability, slow surface runoff and slight erosion hazard. SEDIMENT& EROSION CONTROL: A sediment and erosion control plan has been developed in order to specify minimum controls and measures to reduce sediment runoff during construction. - Construction Entrance: One construction entrance has been specified to accommodate the new driveway to the proposed new residence along Maple Ave. - Topsoil: A potential topsoil storage area for foundation backfill and topsoil will be identified (possibly located at the North East or North West corner of the new lot) and will be surrounded by silt fencing. In general, excavated soil for foundations that will not be retained for backfill and topsoil grading will be required to be removed from the site. - Concrete Wash: Concrete trucks are not allowed to wash on the premises due to the limited lot size. - Sediment Control: Less than 0.18 acres are anticipated to be disturbed during construction. Silt fencing has been specified around the perimeter of the new lot project area to reduce off site erosion migration. 3 u785 Saratoga County, New York ri: and timely deferment of grazing in the spring and after The capability subclass for Fluvaquents is 5w, and Frainy periods will reduce compaction and the loss of for Udipsamments is 7s. seeding. Recreation GaB—Galway loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes This map unit is very limited for most recreational This moderately deep, gently sloping,well drained uses because of the depth to the saturated zone and to moderately well drained soil formed in glacial till ponding in the Fluvaquents part. Campsites and over calcareous sandstone or limestone. It is on playgrounds are also very limited because of frequent bedrock controlled landscapes in the uplands. and sometimes rapid flooding in the Fluvaquents part Individual areas range mainly from 5 to 20 acres and of this unit.A higher, drier site should be considered are rectangular. for these uses. The Udipsamments part of this unit is The typical sequence, depth, and composition of only somewhat limited to these uses because of its the layers of this soil are as follows— , high sand content,which may limit vegetative growth and pedestrian traffic.Additional loamy fill material and Surface layer: improved drainage are commonly applied in areas of 0 to 6 inches, dark grayish brown loam , Subsoil: but are not recommended because of Subsoil: the important hydrologic and biologic functions of flood 6 to 28 inches, dark yellowish brown loam plain areas. 28 to 30 inches, mottled dark brown fine sandy loam Woodland 30 inches, creviced gray calcareous sandstone The potential productivity of this unit for wood bedrock l• production is very low. Brush and low-grade timber Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of such as cottonwood, red maple, and poplar will grow deep Charlton soils and shallow Farmington soils.Also in many places and make suitable wildlife habitat. This included are areas of somewhat poorly drained map unit is poorly suited for log landings and natural Newstead soils. Included areas are up to 5 acres and road surfaces because of wetness, ponding, and make up about 35 percent of the unit. frequent flooding in the Fluvaquents part.A higher Soil Properties position on the landscape, perhaps in the Udipsamments part, should be considered for log Permeability:moderate throughout landings as well as harvesting operations.There is Available water capacity(average for 40-inch profile): also a high potential for seedling mortality in the moderate Fluvaquents part of this unit because of wetness. Soil reaction: moderately acid to neutral in the surface Wetness-tolerant species should be selected for these horizon; moderately acid to slightly alkaline in the areas, and more drought resistant species should be subsoil considered for managing in the Udipsamments part. Surface runoff..slow Erosion hazard:slight Dwellings with basements Depth to water table: 1.5 to 3 feet at some time during This map unit is very limited for dwellings with March and April basements because of wetness, ponding, and Depth to bedrock:20 to 40 inches frequent flooding in the Fluvaquents part. Selecting Flooding hazard:none sites in higher, better drained nearby areas is Use and Suitability recommended to reduce these limitations. Most areas of this prime farmland map unit are Septic Tank Absorption Fields used for agriculture. Some areas are woodlots, This map unit is very limited because of its filtering orchards, or Christmas tree and nursery stock capacity, and because of wetness or the depth to plantations. saturated zone, ponding, and frequent flooding in the Cropland Fluvaquents part. Inadequate filtering by the soil above a saturated zone may result in pollution of This map unit is well suited to cultivated crops. It groundwater. Higher, better drained nearby sites can be used to grow small grains, corn silage, hay, lr should be considered for this use. This unit is so fruits and vegetables. On long slopes without variable that on-site evaluations are needed to vegetative cover,this soil may erode easily. Cross properly evaluate individual areas. p tillage, cropssod-formingcrops, slo e use of cover or gin;::. 86 Soil Survey and return of crop residues to the soil help to reduce The typical sequence, depth, and composition of erosion and promote good soil tilth. the layers ofthis soil are aofollows— Pasture Surface layer: 0to6inohoa, dark grayish brown loam Thiomap unit isvery vvo|| audedtopasture. Proper stocking rates, nutrient management, and weed Subsoil: control will help increase forage yields. Deferment of 6 to 28 inches, dark yellowish brown loam grazing during rainy periods can prevent erosion, 28 to 30 inches, mottled dark brown fine sandy loam compaction and destruction of sod cover. 30 inches, creviced gray calcareous sandstone bedrock Recreation Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of This map unit is very limited for playground use deep Chariton soils and shallow Farmington soils.Also because of the slope. Some additional grading and included are areas of somewhat poorly drained smoothing may be needed. Newstead soils. Included areas are up to 5 acres and Woodland make up about 30 percent of the unit. it The potential productivity is moderately high for Soil Properties northern red oak.This map unit is moderately suited to Permeability:moderate throughout log landings and natural road surfaces because of the Available ^ tr /br4O�nchpno�e : ii slope and the na|aUva\ylow moU strength vvithinthe 4- moderate capacity(averageprofile): upper soil profile.Additional fill material and gnadi»ASnilneaotionmod*rete\yacidtn neutral in the surface may be necessary to build roads and efficientlyA horizon; moderately acid to slightly alkaline in the process logs.There is also a moderate erodibility subsoil concern on roads and trailsWateroontro| ntruotureu Surface runoff:medium can be installed to divert flowing water away from tt Erosion hazard:moderate these passages.Trees to manage include red pine, Depth to water table: 1.5 to 3 feet at some time during Norway spruce, and European larch. March and April Dwellings with basements Depth to bedrock:20 to 40 inches Flooding hazard:none This map unit is very limited for dwellings with basements because of the depth to bedrock and the Use and Suitability ' depth to a seasonally saturated zone above the Most areas of this map unit are used for agriculture. bedrock.Very deep inclusions of Charlton soils or Some areas are used for woodlots, orchards, or nearby areas may cost less to build a structure with a Christmas tree and nursery stock plantations. basement. In addition to tile drains around foundations,fill material may be needed to landscape Cropland around basement walls. -,'.. map unit is moderately suited to cultivated Septic Tank Absorption Fields crops. It can be used to grow small grains,corn silage, hay, and some fruits and vegetables. On long slopes, This map unit is very limited for septic systems and especially on areas bare of plant cover,this soil because of the depth to the saturated zone in the erodes easily. Cross slope tillage, the use of cover - spring, d thdepth to bedrock. Selection of very crops orsod-forming oropa. and the return ofcrop deep,vveUdrained, nearby areas, »rincluded areas«[ residues help to reduce erosion and promote good soil Charlton soils may reduce these limitations. tilth. The capability subclass is 2e. Pasture GaC—Galway �� m� und��| ou����m. p�� ~ stocking rates and Unna|ydeferment ofgna�ngcan slopesspnote(t the sod cover and reduce soil erosion, This moderately deep, strongly sloping,well drained especially on sloping areas. Nutrient management and soil formed in glacial till over calcareous sandstone or weed control will help increase forage yields. limestone. It is on bedrock controlled landscapes in Recreation the uplands. Individual areas range mainly from 5 to 20 acres and are rectangular. This map unit is very limited for playground use City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Checklist Saratoga Springs Complete Street Policy Vision (May 2012) The City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Policy will encourage the development of a complete streets network throughout the City to create a more balanced transportation system. The Policy shall be consistent with and assist in achieving the goals and recommendations set forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan and other policy documents. The Policy shall ensure new and updated public and private projects are planned, designed, maintained and operated to enable safer, comfortable and convenient travel to the greatest extent possible for users of all abilities including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists and transit riders. This checklist is intended to assist the City in achieving its vision for complete streets. Project Name: Bishop - 2 Lot Subdivision Date: 3/9/2021 Project Location / Limits: 223 Maple Ave., Corner of Green St. & Maple Ave. Project Description: Subdivision of one lot to two lots, creating a new residential lot plus existing residential lot Instructions: For each box checked, please provide a brief description for how the item is addressed, not addressed, or not applicable and include supporting documentation. Street Classification (identify street or streets within the project area) Principal arterial ❑ Minor arterial ❑ Mixed use collector ❑ Mixed use local ❑ Residential collector ❑ Residential local ■❑ Special use street ❑ EXISTING CONDITIONS Item to Be Addressed/ Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Existing Bicycle & Pedestrian Operations Do bicycle and pedestrian accommodations exist? (see page 2 for Li ❑ ❑ Existing 5.0' sidewalk examples) Existing Transit Operations Do transit facilities exist within the study area, including bus and ❑ 4if ❑ train stops/stations? Is the project area on a transit route? (CDTA Service Routes) ❑ ❑ Are there bicycle racks, shelters, or parking for transit riders ❑ ❑ available? Existing Access and Mobility Do connective opportunities exist with schools, hospitals, senior ❑ q ❑ care or community centers or persons with disabilities within project area? Are there gaps inhibiting continuous access between schools, ❑ ❑ hospitals, senior care, or community centers or persons with Sidewalks not continuous disabilities within project area?" Project Area Context Are there prominent landmarks, recreation, shopping, employment . ❑ ❑ center, cultural centers or other key destinations that offer Shopping in walking distance opportunities to connect this site? Please list and/or describe planning or policy documents addressing bicyclist, pedestrian, transit, or truck/freight use for the project area. Examples can include: City of Saratoga Springs Comprehensive Plan, City of Saratoga Springs Open Space Plan, Capital District Transportation Committee Bicycle/ Pedestrian Priority Network, City Standard Details, etc. The project proposes to include new concrete sidewalks to increase connectivity for pedestrian travel. City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Checklist 1 PROPOSED DESIGN Item to Be Addressed/ Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Complete Streets Design Bicyclist accommodations? ❑ Nif ❑ Pedestrian accommodations? [V ❑ ❑ New 5.0'sidewalks Access and Mobility accommodations? Ni( ❑❑ New transition sidewalk for street crossing Transit accommodations? Truck/freight accommodations? ❑ ❑ Streetscape elements? V ❑ ❑ New street tree and 2 new street lights Bike Facilities: Off-roadway bike ❑ Yes ❑■No ❑NA accommodations Pedestrian Facilities: Dedicated bike lane ❑ Yes ■❑No ❑NA Sidewalks on both sides of ❑ Yes III No ❑NA Shared-use lane ❑ Yes ■❑No ❑NA the street Shoulder ❑ Yes ■❑No ❑NA Striped crosswalks ❑ Yes ❑No DNA Acceptable actuated traffic ❑ Yes ❑■No ❑NA Geometric modifications ❑ Yes ❑No LINA signal bike detection, including to reduce crossing turn lanes distances such as curb Do signals allow adequate ❑ Yes ❑■No DNA extensions (e.g. bulb-outs) minimum green time for Acceptable provision for ❑ Yes ❑No LINA bicyclist to safely cross pedestrian traffic signal intersection? features (e.g. ped. buttons) Signage and pavement ❑ Yes DNo DNA Pedestrian signage for ❑Yes LINO DNA markings specific to proposed crossing &wayfinding bike facilities Safety islands/medians on ❑ Yes ❑No LINA Bicycle safe inlet grates ❑ Yes DNo DNA roadways with two or more Bicycle parking, eg. bike racks, ❑ Yes LINo DNA traffic lanes in each direction bike lockers Enhanced supplemental ❑Yes LINo DNA Transit Facilities: pedestrian treatments at uncontrolled marked Transit shelters ❑ Yes DNo DNA Bus turnouts ❑ Yes DConnectivity: No DNA crossings Standing pads ❑ Yes DNo DNA Has CDTA been contacted? ❑ Yes DNo DNA Are there proposed ■❑ Yes ❑No DNA connections to other bike Access and Mobility Facilities: paths, pedestrian facilities, or Adequate sidewalk or paved LI Yes ❑No DNA transit facilities? path Are there proposed • Yes ❑No DNA Acceptable ❑ Yes ❑No LINA connections to any key consideration/provision for destinations listed on page 1? accessible pedestrian traffic Are there proposed •Yes ❑No DNA signal features connections to Curb ramps, including ❑ Yes DNo DNA neighborhoods? detectable warning Streetscape Elements: surface Are streetscape elements LI Yes ❑No DNA Acceptable slope and D Yes ❑No DNA proposed such as cross-slope for driveway ramps, landscaping, street trees, sidewalks, crossings) planters, buffer strips, etc? Have conflicts been reduced LI Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Pedestrian-level lighting LI Yes ❑No DNA among pedestrian, bicyclists, and motor vehicles (access Public seating or benches ❑ Yes DNo DNA management)? Design Standards and Guidelines Design meets guidelines such as described below for • Yes ❑No DNA Describe bicycle/pedestrian/bus/transit facilities? New sidewalks *American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials(AASHTO)-A Policy on Geometric Design of Highway and Streets, Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities and AASHTO Guide for the Planning, Design, and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities;Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guide(PROWAG);Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices(MUTCD);Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines(ADAAG); National Association of City Transportation Officials(NACTO)-Urban Bikeway Design Guide. New York State Department of Transportation— Highway Design Manual City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Checklist 2 Sitework Cost Estimate Project No.: City Project Number: PB#XX.XXX Project:Bishop-2 Lot Subdivision Date: 3/4/2021 Location: 223 Maple Ave.,Saratoga Springs,NY Rev: 0 Estimater:Tonya Yasenchak,PE No. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Sub Total ROW/Site A Demolition and Site Clearing Tree Removal 1 EA $800.00 $800 Site Remove Sidewalk 60 SF $3.00 $180 ROW Remove Curb-Maple Ave.Curb Cut 12 LF $9.00 $108 ROW B Excavation and Grading Strip Top Soil and Stockpile 150 CY $4.50 $675 Site Stabilized Construction Entrance 20 SY $12.00 $240 Site Install Silt Fencing 250 LF $4.00 $1,000 Site Excavate for Driveway 30 CY $4.00 $120 Site Spread Topsoil 100 CY $16.00 $1,600 Site C Utilites Saw Cut Pavement 5 CY $8.50 $43 ROW Sanitary Line Install(6"SDR-35) 15 LF $25.00 $375 Site Sanitary Line Install(6"SDR-35) 40 LF $24.50 $980 ROW Water Line Install(1"Copper Service) 15 LF $27.50 $413 Site Water Line Install(1"Copper Service) 25 LF $27.50 $688 ROW Sanitary Cleanout 1 EA $750.00 $750 Site D Improvements New 5'Concrete Sidewalk 150 SF $8.50 $1,275 ROW New Concrete Curbing 180 LF $20.00 $3,600 ROW Sternberg LED D650 2 EA $3,250.00 $6,500 ROW Pedestrian Ramps 50 SF $7.50 $375 ROW Asphalt Aprons 100 SF $15.00 $1,500 ROW Asphalt Driveways 800 SF $15.00 $12,000 Site E Landscaping New Street Tree 1 EA $250.00 $250 ROW Fine Grade&Seed 3000 CF $1.50 $4,500 Site Fine Grade&Seed 600 CF $1.50 $900 ROW F As Built Drawing 1 EA 6000 $6,000 ROW Total On Site $34,472.50 25% $8,618.13 Total Off Site(ROW) $22,398.00 100% $22,398.00 Proposed Letter of Credit(LOC)Amount $31,016.13