The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20210085 Saratoga Honda Expansion Application (2) ��e LA �F��I��` Landscape�r�hitecturQ�.�ngir�e�ri��g P.C_ P�c��lc°./'e�rxrrasc�.Y�'ie�c°. --�� Lc��g�11e� ��r�=�tc�c�a Springs re�� :�1�-:��-��c�� s�8�s��-�� .f 17�1��c=�i�cq��,��.�.��t�� LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: Saratoga Springs Planning Office DATE: 1/29/2021 JOB NO.: 201240.02 City Hall 474 Broadway ATTENTION: Ms. Susan Barden Saratoga Springs,NY 12866 RE: Saratoga Honda Site Plan Amendment WE ARE SENDING YOU ■ Attached 0 Under separate cover via hand delivered the following items ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ■ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 2 Stormwater Management Pollution Prevention Plan 3 Full size plan sets 3 Complete Streets Checklist 3 Application for Site Plan Approval 3 Submittal Check List 3 Cost Estimate for Letter of Credit 3 SEQR Long Form 1 Site plan approval fee check for$600.00 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your records ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Return for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ■ For review and comments ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS: cc: SIGNED: Matthew Brobston If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. "*HANDINRlTTEN APPLI�ATI�I�S UVILL N�T BE AC�EPTED** •�� ;,t � FDR�FF��USE �� '�/. � #� �� TY �F SARAT��A SPRIN�S .;� � � .�. ` � � Pfanning B�ar� ��= f �f �APPlicat��n#} :-. _� :: , _... �� - � .,.______�_�_...______�_______rr__- -� ' �� +� • CiTY HALL-474 BROAa1NAY f � '•J� y . � �f• �'T�}:' � ' SARAT�GA�PRlNGS,NEW Y�RK�2�66-��6 � .��' � ' c� � . {Date re�eivedy � '�'°aRa r�o ��3 TEL:518-58?-�55�. FA}�. �v1&�80-J480 HTZ'P:lMNIf i�1�.SARAT�GA-S P R!N G S.�R� APPLlGATIC�N F�R: SlTE PLAN REV�EW �IN�L�IDIN� PI�L�} **�PPlicat��n �heck Li�t-All submissions us��nc�ude cornpleted a�plication check l�st and all require� items.** Pro�ect , . �ara#� a Ho�da E� ans�� N�m�. � � Prop�rty . Addr • .340� R�ut� 9 �Broadwa , S�rat� a S r�n s NY 'I�8�� sslLoca�r�n, y} � � , � . ��$.-�-�� . . . . ��-'� �nd ��--� Tax Parce!#. �ontng Distnct. �for examp�e: '��5.5��-4-37� Proj�ct Descr�pti�n: ExpansEon ai Sefu�ce area.Expanded park[Rg�ot far�nventbry$nd expansEan�f servlces�ui�ding. �ate spec�al us� permit g�anted �if any}: Date�an�ng variance granted �if any}: ts pr�perty lo�a��d within ��h�ck all that apply�?: ❑ H�st�ric District ❑ A�chit�ctural Review Q�str�ct E�1 5�0' of a State Park, c�ty I��undary, �r c�ur�tylstate hi�hway APPL��ANT�S�* �WNER 5 �f not a ��cant ATT�RNEYI�►GEN`T T�m Hig�i��ISarat��a Handa The LA �rou Name � � �4D2 Raut� 9 �B�oadway], SS 4� L�n AE�� ddre�s � y= Phane �1� 5�� 3�3� �'�$�5$?-81�0 E� 1 thiggins�saratogahanda.�am mbrobston a�thela�roup.��m a1 I��nt�fy pri�ary c�nt�ct per��n: Ll Ap�licant C] �v�►ner B �yent *An appiEcant must be t,i�e pro�er#y owner, lesse�, �r an��►ith an optEon#� lease or purchase the property�r� question. . �.�pli��i�N�r� �� h��f��th� ��t�l �.��.� ��I��r ��a�i� t�� "`��r�i��ir��r� �1U�T ��c�r��r��r ��i�� li��i��. 0 �k��l� F�I�r� - �� Fi�.�I ��t� ��.r� � ��i ��r�t��I � �� I�� it � f��r�-F��id�r��l - �� ,�� . �T. � � M�d i�i��i�n l��i��e�ti�� - �� I��r�ti� � �� I �� k�I � �� I�r�i��i�� li�r� �--�C�� i��''� ��it� �v��`r�r.��ra��ri��.��f�� r��tir�� . C�� it� ��i�c�r�, er�n�l�� r��r�r�il� r��r��r��r�� i��r��i�� t �� r�l f��i�� L�� r-� �� t�i� ��lic��i�� `�� __ f�� . r��'E�, � ��t��r��I��ir�� h� r��r��i ��r��, r��.�d ��r�t ��« ir�t��e�� r�r��t �� il�e� �� I�i� ��li��ti�r�, I, t�� rr��r�� r, I�� h��r �r��e r ��r�tr��r�.h� ��rt�, h�r��r r��s� �i t� Pi�r� ��1�� th� ��r�r�� r�d ��r�� i��ntif�� r�� b��. I ��r�� t� rr�i��t �� r��ir��r�� un�d�r ��i�rr .��-�.� �f��v�rr-�� rdin�r�� th�� it� ��r�� in��. ��rr��r��, I h��r�b� ��t��i�� r��r-r-��r;� �f tl�� l��n�� E��r� �r-�� i��t�� t�r��t� ��r�h� �r��t� ��i�t�� ri#h ��i� ��I��ti�r� f��u r�� f��r��.��i�� i�� r� �i�� i��ti�� r�I�ti n� t� t�i� ��Mi��. - �' ��p�l��n� �� . ��t�: _ � ti ��a�p�I i��r-�t i� ��t ��-r�r�t ��r��, ��v�e�rr��u�� i��. ��r ��r��t�r�: C��t�: � �FOR OFFICE USE� ��'��.�� .� ��.�- -�..� ;.. �� C I TY O F SA RATO G A S P R I N G S A lication# .� _ � � � pP ) � -� �., �.� Plan n i ng Board {,� r- ��- _ � � _�- 4` #� ..ir '� '�"... 1''. � ' � ;� ------------------------------ (Date received) �y Lii .,. �e ' ;�-� :: ��- �-� . • CITY HALL-474 BROADWAY 1 '�� '�� SARATOGA SPRINGS, NEW YORK 12866-2296 � r � 'm '�s��._ f��,�,�, � ��`�� TEL: 518-587-3550. FAX: 518-580-9480 ��'�'��' HTTP://�/�M/W.SARATOGA-SPRINGS.ORG SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Rev.05/2016 Project Name: Saratoga Honda Expansion Listed below are the minimum submittal requirements for site plan review as set forth in The City of Saratoga Springs' Zoning Ordinance Appendix B. The Planning Board reserves the right to request additional information, as necessary, to support an application. The Board also reserves the right to reject the application if these minimum requirements are not met. Please complete the checklist below and provide with your submission. REQUIRED ITEMS: *3 hard copies and 1 digital copy of ALL materials are required. CHECK EACH ITEM '�'�HANDWRITlENAPPLICA TlONS I/I/ILL NOT BEACCEPTED'�'� � 1. Completed Site Plan Application (3 hard copies - *1 w/original signature - and 1 digital) and Fee � 2. SEQR Environmental Assessment Form- short or long form as required by action. 3. Set of plans including: (3) large scale plans (sheets must be 24" x 36", drawn to a scale of � „_ not more than 1 -50 feet). One digital version of all submittal items (pdf) shall be provided. � 4. Basic or Full Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan as required per City Code Chapter 242. 5. Copy of signed DPW water connection agreement for all projects involving new water � NA connections to the City system � 6. Engineering Report for Water and Sanitary � 7. Complete Streets Checklist � 8. Project Cost Estimate-Quantities of work items and estimate of costs REQUIRED ITEMS ON SITE PLAN, AS APPLICABLE: 1. Property line survey prepared by a licensed land surveyor. Site plan must reference such � survey with all corners set and marked on plan. A copy of the original property survey must also be included. � 2. North arrow and map scale � 3. Parcel tax map number � 4. Site location map City of Saratoga Springs Site Plan Checklist 1 � 5. Site vicinity map (all features within 300 feet of property) � 6. Identification of zoning district with corresponding area requirements � 7. Building setback lines, either listed or shown on plans. 8. Title block with project name; name and address of applicant; and name and address of � property owner (if di�ferent) � 9. Topography data tied to NGVD 1929 datum � 10. Name of all adjacent property owners � 11. Parcel street address (existing and any proposed postal addresses) Yes No N/A 12. Identification of all existing or proposed easements, covenants or legal rights-of-way on this � �❑ � property � [� �] 13. References to all prior variances or special use permits � � � 14. Existing and proposed contours and spot grades (at 2 foot intervals) � [Q �] 15. Identification of all spoil or borrow areas 16. Identification of all watercourses, designated State wetlands, buffers, Federal wetlands, � � � floodplains, rock outcroppings, etc. � � � 17. Location of proposed storage 18. Identification of all existing or proposed sidewalks or pedestrian paths (show type, size and � � � condition of existing sidewalks) 19. Location, design specifications and construction material for all proposed site improvements � � � (drains, culverts, retaining walls, berms, fences, etc.) � � � 20. Location and distance to fire hydrant � � � 21. Location, size, and material of all existing and proposed utility services � � � 22. Parking lot layout plan and identification of all loading areas (number all spaces) �J � � 23. Parking demand calculations � � � 24. Identification of parking spaces and access points for physically impaired persons � �❑ � 25. Location and screening plan for dumpster or recycling bins 26. Location, design, type of construction and materials, proposed use and exterior dimensions � � � of all buildings (existing and proposed) on site � �❑ � 27. Identification of storage of any potentially hazardous materials 28. Planting plan identifying quantity, species and size of all proposed new plant materials. � � � Label existing plant material to be retained or removed. 29. Lighting plan showing type, location and intensity of all existing and proposed exterior � � � lighting fixtures � �❑ ❑� 30. Erosion and sediment control plan — including designated concrete truck washout area . Matt Brobston The LA Grou . 1/18/2021 Checklist re ared b . p Date. p p Y City of Saratoga Springs Site Plan Checklist 2 Full Envi�onmental Assessment Fo�m Pa�t 1 -P�oject and Setting Instructions for Completing Part 1 Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subj ect to public review,and may be subj ect to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information; indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor; and,when possible,generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A&B. In Sections C,D&E,most items contain an initial question that must be answered either"Yes"or"No". If the answer to the initial question is"Yes",complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is"No",proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the applicant or project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part 1 is accurate and complete. A.Project and Applicant/Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Proj ect: Saratoga Honda Building Expansion Project Location(describe,and attach a general location map): 3402 Route 9(Broadway),Saratoga Springs,NY 12866 Brief Description of Proposed Action(include purpose or need): 8,000 sf expansion of existing building to incorporate more service and maintenance bays.The parking will be expanded by 19 new vehicle spaces to allow for additional vehicle parking for sale and for customer use. Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone:g55.650.9132 Tim Higgins/Saratoga Honda E-Mail: tim.higgins99@gmail.com Address:3402 Route 9(Broadway) City/PO:Saratoga Springs State:NY Zip Code:12866 Project Contact(if not same as sponsor;give name and title/role): Telephone:518.587.8100 The LA Group,Civil Engineering E-Mail: mbrobston@thelagrou p.com Address: 40 Long Alley City/PO: State: Zip Code: Saratoga Springs NY 12866 Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: Page 1 of 13 B.Government Approvals B.Government Approvals,Funding,or Sponsorship. ("Funding"includes grants,loans,tax relief,and any other forms of financial assistance.) Government Entity If Yes: Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date Required (Actual or projected) a. City Counsel,Town Board, ❑YesmNo or Village Board of Trustees b. City,Town or Village �Yes❑No Saratoga Springs Planning Board January 2021 Planning Board or Commission Site Plan Modification c.City,Town or mYes❑No Village Zoning Board of Appeals d.Other local agencies mYes❑No ,lanuary 2021 Saratoga County Planning Board Advisory Opinion e. County agencies ❑Yes mNo f. Regional agencies ❑Yes mNo g. State agencies ❑Yes mNo h.Federal agencies ❑Yes�No i. Coastal Resources. i. Is the proj ect site within a Coastal Area,or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? ❑Yes CZ�No ii. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? ❑YesmNo iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? ❑YesmNo C.Planning and Zoning C.1.Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption,or amendment of a plan,local law,ordinance,rule or regulation be the m Yes❑No only approval(s)which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? • If Yes,complete sections C,F and G. • If No,proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1 C.2.Adopted land use plans. a.Do any municipally-adopted (city,town,village or county)comprehensive land use plan(s)include the site ❑YesmNo where the proposed action would be located? If Yes,does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action ❑YesmNo would be located? b.Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district(for example: Greenway; ❑YesmNo Brownfield Opportunity Area(BOA);designated State or Federal heritage area;watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes,identify the plan(s): c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, ❑YesmNo or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes,identify the plan(s): Page 2 of 13 C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. �Yes❑No If Yes,what is the zoning classification(s)including any applicable overlay district? Zoned OMB 2 Office Medical Business. A variance was given on 10.15.85 for auto repair,used car sale and automobile sales area. A use variance to construct various additions was also issued in 1992 when the area was zoned C-4. b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? ❑Yes�No c.Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action? ❑Yes�No If Yes, i. What is the proposed new zoning for the site? C.4.Existing community services. a.In what school district is the project site located?Saratoga Springs School District b.What police or other public protection forces serve the proj ect site? City of Saratoaa Sprinqs Police Department c.Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? City of Saratoga Springs Fire Department d.What parks serve the proj ect site? Saratoqa Spa Park is located further down Route 9 on the o�posite side. D.Proj ect Details D.1.Proposed and Potential Development a.What is the general nature of the proposed action(e.g.,residential,industrial,commercial,recreational; if mixed,include all components)? Commercial storage area b. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 10.56 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 1.5 acres c. Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or proj ect sponsor? 10.56 acres c.Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing proj ect or use? �Yes❑No i. If Yes,what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units(e.g.,acres,miles,housing units, square feet)? % 24%building sf Units: � d.Is the proposed action a subdivision,or does it include a subdivision? ❑Yes�No If Yes, i. Purpose or type of subdivision?(e.g.,residential,industrial,commercial; if mixed,specify types) ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? ❑Yes�No iii. Number of lots proposed? iv. Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum Maximum e.Will the proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? ❑Yes�No i. If No,anticipated period of construction: months ii. If Yes: • Total number of phases anticipated • Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) month year • Anticipated completion date of final phase month year � Generally describe connections or relationships among phases,including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: Page 3 of 13 f.Does the proj ect include new residential uses? ❑Yes�No If Yes, show numbers of units proposed. One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Family four or more Initial Phase At completion of all phases g.Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction(including expansions)? ❑Yes�No If Yes, i. Total number of structures 0 ii. Dimensions(in feet)of largest proposed structure: height; width; and length iii. Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: square feet h.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any ❑Yes�No liquids,such as creation of a water supply,reservoir,pond,lake,waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, i. Purpose of the impoundment: ii. If a water impoundment,the principal source of the water: ❑ Ground water❑Surface water streams ❑Other specify: iii. If other than water,identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. iv. Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: million gallons; surface area: acres v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: height; length vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure(e.g.,earth fill,rock,wood,concrete): D.2. Project Operations a.Does the proposed action include any excavation,mining,or dredging,during construction,operations,or both? �Yes QNo (Not including general site preparation,grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i.What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? ii. How much material(including rock,earth, sediments,etc.)is proposed to be removed from the site? • Volume(specify tons or cubic yards): • Over what duration of time? iii. Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged,and plans to use,manage or dispose of them. iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? ❑YesONo If yes,describe. v. What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? acres vi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? acres vii. What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? feet viii. Will the excavation require blasting? �Yes QNo ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: b.Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of,increase or decrease in size of,or encroachment �YesONo into any existing wetland,waterbody,shoreline,beach or adj acent area? If Yes: i. Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected(by name,water index number,wetland map number or geographic description): Page 4 of 13 ii. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland,e.g. excavation,fill,placement of structures,or alteration of channels,banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities,alterations and additions in square feet or acres: iii.Will the proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? ❑Yes�No If Yes,describe: iv. Will the proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? ❑Yes�No If Yes: • acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed: • expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after proj ect completion: • purpose of proposed removal(e.g.beach clearing,invasive species control,boat access): • proposed method of plant removal: • if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used,specify product(s): v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: c.Will the proposed action use,or create a new demand for water? �Yes❑No If Yes: i. Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: gp gallons/day ii. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? �Yes�To If Yes: • Name of district or service area: Saratoga Springs water • Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? �Yes❑No • Is the proj ect site in the existing district? �Yes❑No • Is expansion of the district needed? ❑Yes�No • Do existing lines serve the project site? �Yes❑No iii. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? ❑Yes�No If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this proj ect: • Source(s)of supply for the district: iv. Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? ❑Yes�No If,Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: • Proposed source(s)of supply for new district: v. If a public water supply will not be used,describe plans to provide water supply for the proj ect: vi.If water supply will be from wells(public or private),what is the maximum pumping capacity: gallons/minute. d.Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? �Yes❑No If Yes: i. Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: 8o gallons/day ii. Nature of liquid wastes to be generated(e.g., sanitary wastewater,industrial;if combination,describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): sanitary wastewater iii. Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? �Yes❑No If Yes: � Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: Saratoga County Sewer District#1 � Name of district: Saratoga County Sewer District#1 • Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the proj ect? �Yes❑No • Is the proj ect site in the existing district? �Yes❑No • Is expansion of the district needed? ❑Yes�No Page 5 of 13 • Do existing sewer lines serve the proj ect site? �Yes❑No � Will a line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project? ❑Yes�No If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this proj ect: iv. Will a new wastewater(sewage)treatment district be formed to serve the proj ect site? ❑Yes�No If Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: � What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? v. If public facilities will not be used,describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project,including specifying proposed receiving water(name and classification if surface discharge or describe subsurface disposal plans): vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture,recycle or reuse liquid waste: e.Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff,either from new point �Yes❑No sources(i.e. ditches,pipes,swales,curbs,gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater)or non-point source(i.e. sheet flow)during construction or post construction? If Yes: i. How much impervious surface will the proj ect create in relation to total size of proj ect parcel? Square feet or acres(impervious surface) Square feet or 10.56 acres(parcel size) ii. Describe types of new point sources. Infiltration iii. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed(i.e.on-site stormwater management facility/structures,adjacent properties, groundwater,on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)? Infiltration basins off the parking areas • If to surface waters,identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: • Will stormwater runoff flow to adj acent properties? ❑Yes�No iv. Does the proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces,use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater? �Yes❑No f. Does the proposed action include,or will it use on-site,one or more sources of air emissions,including fuel ❑Yes�No combustion,waste incineration,or other processes or operations? If Yes,identify: i.Mobile sources during project operations(e.g.,heavy equipment,fleet or delivery vehicles) ii. Stationary sources during construction(e.g.,power generation, structural heating,batch plant,crushers) iii. Stationary sources during operations(e.g.,process emissions,large boilers,electric generation) g.Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f(above),require a NY State Air Registration,Air Facility Permit, ❑Yes�No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: i. Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet ❑Yes�No ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) ii. In addition to emissions as calculated in the application,the proj ect will generate: • Tons/year(short tons)of Carbon Dioxide(COz) • Tons/year(short tons)of Nitrous Oxide(Nz0) • Tons/year(short tons)of Perfluorocarbons(PFCs) • Tons/year(short tons)of Sulfur Hexafluoride(SF6) • Tons/year(short tons)of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflourocarbons(HFCs) • Tons/year(short tons)of Hazardous Air Pollutants(HAPs) Page 6 of 13 h.Will the proposed action generate or emit methane(including,but not limited to,sewage treatment plants, ❑Yes�No landfills,composting facilities)? If Yes: i. Estimate methane generation in tons/year(metric): ii.Describe any methane capture,control or elimination measures included in project design(e.g.,combustion to generate heat or electricity,flaring): i.Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes,such as �Yes❑No quarry or landfill operations? If Yes: Describe operations and nature of emissions(e.g.,diesel exhaust,rock particulates/dust): Construction of pavement,site work. j.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial �Yes�No new demand for transportation facilities or services? If Yes: i. When is the peak traffic expected(Check all that apply): ❑Morning ❑Evening ❑Weekend ❑Randomly between hours of to ii. For commercial activities only,projected number of truck trips/day and type(e.g.,semi trailers and dump trucks): iii. Parking spaces: Existing Proposed Net increase/decrease iv. Does the proposed action include any shared use parking? ❑Yes�No v. If the proposed action includes any modification of existing roads,creation of neW roads or change in existing access,describe: vi. Are public/private transportation service(s)or facilities available within 1/2 mile of the proposed site? �Yes�No vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid,electric ❑Yes�No or other alternative fueled vehicles? viii.Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing ❑Yes�No pedestrian or bicycle routes? k.Will the proposed action(for commercial or industrial proj ects only)generate new or additional demand �Yes❑No for energy? If Yes: i. Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: approximately 800 kWh ii. Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project(e.g.,on-site combustion,on-site renewable,via grid/local utility,or other): Grid/Local Utility iii. Will the proposed action require a new,or an upgrade,to an existing substation? ❑Yes�No l. Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply. i. During Construction: ii. During Operations: • Monday-Friday: 9AM-7PM • Monday-Friday: 9AM-7PM • Saturday: 9AM-5PM • Saturday: 9AM-5PM • Sunday: CLOSED • Sunday: CLOSED • Holidays: CLOSED/9AM-5PM • Holidays: CLOSED/9AM-5PM Page 7 of 13 m.Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction, ❑Yes�No operation,or both? If yes: i. Provide details including sources,time of day and duration: ii. Will the proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen? �Yes❑No Describe:The removal of some existing vegetation will be required n.Will the proposed action have outdoor lighting? �Yes❑No If yes: i. Describe source(s),location(s),height of fixture(s),direction/aim,and proximity to nearest occupied structures: The proposed location of the fixtures will be within the expanded parking area to the south. The fixtures,description- GL18-255LA-NW-IS-SINGLE/DOUBLE HEAD,TYPE 3 H55,are dimmable. ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen? �Yes❑No Describe:The removal of some existinq veqetation will be required o. Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day? ❑Yes�No If Yes,describe possible sources,potential frequency and duration of odor emissions,and proximity to nearest occupied structures: p.Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum(combined capacity of over 1,100 gallons) ❑Yes�No or chemical products 185 gallons in above ground storage or any amount in underground storage? If Yes: i. Product(s)to be stored ii. Volume(s) per unit time (e.g.,month,year) lll. Generally,describe the proposed storage facilities: q.Will the proposed action(commercial,industrial and recreational projects only)use pesticides(i.e.,herbicides, ❑Yes �No insecticides)during construction or operation? If Yes: i. Describe proposed treatment(s): ii. Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices? ❑ Yes ❑No r.Will the proposed action(commercial or industrial projects only)involve or require the management or disposal ❑ Yes �No of solid waste(excluding hazardous materials)? If Yes: i. Describe any solid waste(s)to be generated during construction or operation of the facility: • Construction: tons per (unit of time) • Operation: tons per (unit of time) ii. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization,recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste: � Construction: • Operation: iii. Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site: • Construction: • Operation: Page 8 of 13 s.Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility? ❑ Yes� No If Yes: i. Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site(e.g.,recycling or transfer station,composting,landfill,or other disposal activities): ii. Anticipated rate of disposal/processing: • Tons/month,if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment,or • Tons/hour,if combustion or thermal treatment iii. If landfill,anticipated site life: years t.Will the proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation,treatment,storage,or disposal of hazardous❑Yes�No waste? If Yes: i. Name(s)of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated,handled or managed at facility: ii. Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated tons/month iv. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization,recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: v. Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility? ❑Yes�No If Yes:provide name and location of facility: If No: describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility: E. Site and Setting of Proposed Action E.l.Land uses on and surrounding the project site a. Existing land uses. i. Check all uses that occur on,adj oining and near the proj ect site. ❑ Urban ❑ Industrial � Commercial � Residential(suburban) ❑ Rural(non-farm) � Forest ❑ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic ❑ Other(specify): ii. If mix of uses,generally describe: b.Land uses and covertypes on the project site. Land use or Current Acreage After Change Covertype Acreage Proj ect Completion (Acres+/-) • Roads,buildings,and other paved or impervious surfaces 4.87 5.30 +0.43 � Forested .91 0.59 -0.32 • Meadows,grasslands or brushlands(non- agricultural,including abandoned agricultural) • Agricultural (includes active orchards,field,greenhouse etc.) � Surface water features (lakes,ponds,streams,rivers,etc.) � Wetlands(freshwater or tidal) � Non-vegetated(bare rock,earth or fill) � Other Describe:Stormwater,lawn,landscape 4.72 4.61 -0.11 Page 9 of 13 c. Is the proj ect site presently used by members of the community for public recreation? ❑Yes�No i. If Yes: explain: d.Are there any facilities serving children,the elderly,people with disabilities(e.g.,schools,hospitals,licensed �Yes❑No day care centers,or group homes)within 1500 feet of the project site? If Yes, i. Identify Facilities: Four Wlnds Hospital is adjacent to the site. e. Does the proj ect site contain an existing dam? ❑Yes�No If Yes: i. Dimensions of the dam and impoundment: • Dam height: feet • Dam length: feet • Surface area: acres • Volume impounded: gallons OR acre-feet ii. Dam's existing hazard classification: iii. Provide date and summarize results of last inspection: f.Has the proj ect site ever been used as a municipal,commercial or industrial solid waste management facility, ❑Yes�No or does the proj ect site adj oin property which is now,or was at one time,used as a solid waste management facility? If Yes: i. Has the facility been formally closed? ❑Yes❑ No • If yes,cite sources/documentation: ii. Describe the location of the proj ect site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility: iii. Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities: g.Have hazardous wastes been generated,treated and/or disposed of at the site,or does the proj ect site adj oin �Yes❑No property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste? If Yes: i. Describe waste(s)handled and waste management activities,including approximate time when activities occurred: Waste oil is recycled or removed for reuse h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed proj ect site,or have any ❑Yes� No remedial actions been conducted at or adj acent to the proposed site? If Yes: i. Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site ❑Yes❑No Remediation database? Check all that apply: ❑ Yes—Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): ❑ Yes—Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID number(s): ❑ Neither database ii. If site has been subj ect of RCRA corrective activities,describe control measures: iii. Is the proj ect within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database? ❑Yes�No If yes,provide DEC ID number(s): iv. If yes to(i), (ii)or(iii)above,describe current status of site(s): Page 10 of 13 v. Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses? ❑Yes�No • If yes,DEC site ID number: • Describe the type of institutional control(e.g.,deed restriction or easement): • Describe any use limitations: • Describe any engineering controls: • Will the proj ect affect the institutional or engineering controls in place? ❑Yes❑No • Explain: E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Proj ect Site a.What is the average depth to bedrock on the proj ect site? +�_1 p� feet b.Are there bedrock outcroppings on the proj ect site? ❑Yes�No If Yes,what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? % c. Predominant soil type(s)present on proj ect site: DeA 50.5 % DeB 40.2 % WnA 9.3 % d.What is the average depth to the water table on the proj ect site? Average: 1.5'-6' feet e. Drainage status of proj ect site soils:� Well Drained: 90%of site ❑ Moderately Well Drained: %of site � Poorly Drained 10%of site f.Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: � 0-10%: 99 %of site ❑ 10-15%: %of site � 15%or greater: � %of site g.Are there any unique geologic features on the project site? ❑YesmNo If Yes,describe: h. Surface water features. i. Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies(including streams,rivers, ❑Yes�No ponds or lakes)? ii. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site? ❑YesmNo If Yes to either i or ii,continue. If No, skip to E.2.i. iii. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adj oining the proj ect site regulated by any federal, ❑Yes❑No state or local agency? iv. For each identified regulated wetland and waterbody on the proj ect site,provide the following information: • Streams: Name Classification • Lakes or Ponds: Name Classification • Wetlands: Name Approximate Size • Wetland No. (if regulated by DEC) v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired ❑Yes❑No waterbodies? If yes,name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: i. Is the proj ect site in a designated Floodway? ❑Yes�No j. Is the proj ect site in the 100-year Floodplain? ❑Yes�No k.Is the project site in the 500-year Floodplain? ❑Yes�No L Is the proj ect site located over,or immediately adj oining,a primary,principal or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes�No If Yes: i. Name of aquifer: Page 11 of 13 m. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the proj ect site: n.Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community? ❑Yes�No If Yes: i. Describe the habitat/community(composition,function,and basis for designation): Field observation by staff biologist ii. Source(s)of description or evaluation: iii. Extent of community/habitat: � Currently: acres • Following completion of project as proposed: acres � Gain or loss(indicate+or-): acres o. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as ❑Yes�No endangered or threatened,or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species? If Yes: i. Species and listing(endangered or threatened): Field observation by staff biologist p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare,or as a species of ❑YesmNo special concern? If Yes: i. Species and listing: Field observation by staff biologist q. Is the proj ect site or adj oining area currently used for hunting,trapping,fishing or shell fishing? ❑Yes�No If yes,give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Proj ect Site a. Is the proj ect site,or any portion of it,located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to ❑Yes�No Agriculture and Markets Law,Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: b.Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present? ❑Yes�No i. If Yes: acreage(s)on project site? ii. Source(s)of soil rating(s): c. Does the project site contain all or part of,or is it substantially contiguous to,a registered National ❑Yes�No Natural Landmark? If Yes: i. Nature of the natural landmark: ❑Biological Community ❑ Geological Feature ii. Provide brief description of landmark,including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: d. Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area? ❑Yes�No If Yes: i. CEA name: ii. Basis for designation: iii. Designating agency and date: Page 12 of 13 e. Does the project site contain,or is it substantially contiguous to,a building,archaeological site,or district �Yes❑No which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places,or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? If Yes: i. Nature of historic/archaeological resource: ❑Archaeological Site mHistoric Building or District ii. Name:The Saratoga Spa State Park iii. Brief description of attributes on which listing is based: Mineral springs and classical spa and bath houses-size of park is 2,379 acres f.Is the proj ect site,or any portion of it,located in or adj acent to an area designated as sensitive for ❑Yes�No archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)archaeological site inventory? g. Have additional archaeological or historic site(s)or resources been identified on the proj ect site? ❑Yes�No If Yes: i.Describe possible resource(s): ii. Basis for identification: h.Is the project site within fives miles of any officially designated and publicly accessible federal, state,or local �Yes❑No scenic or aesthetic resource? If Yes: i. Identify resource: Saratoga Spa State Park ii. Nature of,or basis for,designation(e.g.,established highway overlook,state or local park, state historic trail or scenic byway, etc.):state park iii. Distance between project and resource: <1 mile miles. i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers ❑Yes�No Program 6 NYCRR 666? If Yes: i. Identify the name of the river and its designation: ii. Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666? ❑Yes❑No F.Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your proj ect. If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal,please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them. G. Verification I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Date Signature Title PRINT FORM Page 13 of 13 C it of Sarato a S pri n s Com plete Streets C heckl ist Y J J Saratoqa Sprinqs Complete Street Policv Vision (May 2012) The City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Policy will encourage the development of a complete streets network throughout the City to create a more balanced transportation system. The Policy shall be consistent with and assist in achieving the goals and recommendations set forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan and other policy documents. The Policy shall ensure new and updated public and private projects are planned, designed, maintained and operated to enable safer, comfortable and convenient travel to the greatest extent possible for users of all abilities including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists and transit riders. This checklist is intended to assist the City in achieving its vision for complete streets. Pro'ect Name: Saratoga Honda , 1/18/2021 � Date. Pro'ect Location / Limits: 3402 Route 9 (Broadway), Saratoga Springs, Ny 12866 1 Pro'ect Descri tion: Expansion of storage area J p Instructions: For each box checked, please provide a brief description for how the item is addressed, not addressed, or not applicable and include supporting documentation. Street Classification (identif street or streets within the pro�ect area) Principal arterial ❑ Minor arterial ❑■ Mixed use collector ❑ Mixed use local ❑ Residential collector ❑ Residential local ❑ Special use street ❑ EXISTING CONDITIONS Item to Be Addressed/ Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Existin Bic cle &Pedestrian O erations Do bicycle and pedestrian accommodations exist? (see page 2 for 0 ❑ ❑ There are existing sidewalks&bike lanes along the frontage examples) Existin Transit O erations Do transit facilities exist within the study area, including bus and 0 ❑ � CDTA Route 540 train stops/stations? Is the project area on a transit route? (CDTA Service Routes) 0 ❑ � Route 540 Are there bicycle racks, shelters, or parking for transit riders 0 ❑ ❑ available? A bike rack is located at Saratoga Honda Existin Access and Mobilit Do connective opportunities exist with schools, hospitals, senior 0 ❑ ❑ care or community centers or persons with disabilities within Project Area is adjacent or contiguous pro�ect area? Are there gaps inhibiting continuous access between schools, 0 ❑ ❑ hospitals, senior care, or community centers or persons with There are no sidewalks existing along the frontage disabilities within pro�ect area?" Pro"ect Area Context Are there prominent landmarks, recreation, shopping, employment 0 ❑ ❑ center, cultural centers or other key destinations that offer Walkable to nearby state park and shopping district opportunities to connect this site? Please list and/or describe planning or policy documents addressing bicyclist, pedestrian, transit, or truck/freight use for the project area. Examples can include: City of Saratoqa Sprinqs Comprehensive Plan, City of Saratoqa Sprinqs Open Space Plan, Capital District Transportation Committee Bicvcle/ Pedestrian Prioritv Network, Citv Standard Details, etc. The project site is within the comprehensive plan. We are not aware of any other planning or policy documents for this site. City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Checklist 1 PROPOSED DESIGN Item to Be Addressed/ Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Com lete Streets Desi n Bic clist accommodations? ❑ ❑ 0 Pedestrian accommodations? ❑ ❑ 0 Access and Mobilit accommodations? ❑ ❑ � Adequate sidewalks Transit accommodations? 0 ❑ � CDTA at Church and Myrtle Truck/frei ht accommodations? ❑ 0 ❑ Streetscape elements? X❑ ❑ � Nothing proposed to change Bike Facilities: Off-roadway bike ❑ Yes ■❑No ❑NA pedestrian Facilities: accommodations Dedicated bike lane Yes ■No NA Sidewalks on both sides of ❑ Yes ❑■No ❑NA � � � the street Shared-use lane ❑ Yes ■❑No ❑NA Stri ed crosswalks Yes ■No NA Shoulder Yes ■No NA p . � � � � � � Geometric modifications Yes ■No NA Acce table actuated traffic Yes ■No NA � � � p � � � to reduce crossin signal bike detection, including g turn lanes distances such as curb Do si nals allow ade uate ❑ Yes ONo ❑NA extensions (e.g. bulb-outs) g q Acceptable provision for ❑ Yes ❑No ONA minimum green time for pedestrian traffic si nal bicyclist to safely cross g intersection? features (e. . ped. buttons) Si na e and avement Yes ■No NA Pedestrian signage for ❑ Yes ❑No ONA g g p � � � crossin &wa findin markings specific to proposed g y g bike facilities Safety islands/medians on ❑ Yes ❑No ONA Bic cle safe inlet rates ❑ Yes ❑No ONA roadways with two or more y g traffic lanes in each direction Bicycle parking, eg. bike racks, 0 Yes ❑No ❑NA bike lockers Enhanced supplemental ❑ Yes ❑No ONA Transit Facilities: pedestrian treatments at Transit shelters Yes ■No NA uncontrolled marked � � � crossin s Bus turnouts ❑ Yes ONo ❑NA Connectivit : Standin pads ❑ Yes ONo ❑NA Are there ro osed 0 Yes ❑No ❑NA Has CDTA been contacted? ❑ Yes ONo ❑NA p p connections to other bike Access and Mobilit Facilities: paths, pedestrian facilities, or Existing Connection Adequate sidewalk or paved ❑ Yes ONo ❑NA transit facilities? path Are there proposed 0 Yes ❑No ❑NA Acceptable ❑ Yes ❑No ONA connections to any key Existing Connection consideration/provision for destinations listed on pa e 1? accessible pedestrian traffic Are there proposed ■❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA signal features connections to Curb ramps, including ❑■ Yes ❑No ❑NA � Existing Connection neighborhoods. detectable warning Streetscape Elements: surface Are streetscape elements ❑ Yes ❑No ❑■NA Acceptable slope and ❑■ Yes ❑No ❑NA proposed such as cross-slope for driveway ramps, landscaping, street trees, sidewalks, crossin s) planters, buffer strips, etc? Have conflicts been reduced ❑■ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Pedestrian-level lighting ■❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA among pedestrian, bicyclists, and motor vehicles (access Public seatin or benches ❑ Yes ❑■No ❑NA management)? Desi n Standards and Guidelines Design meets guidelines such as described below for ❑■ Yes ❑No ❑NA Describe bicycle/pedestrian/bus/transit facilities? *American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials(AASHTO)-A Policy on Geometric Design of Highway and Streets, Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities and AASHTO Guide for the Planning,Design,and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities;Public Ri_qht-of-Wav Accessibilitv Guide(PROWAG);Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices(MUTCD);Americans with Disabilities ActAccessibilitv Guidelines(ADAAG); National Association of City Transportation Officials(NACTO)-Urban Bikeway Desiqn Guide. New York State Department of Transportation— Hi_qhwav Desi_qn Manual City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Checklist 2 Cost Estimate for Letter of Credit PB#xx.xxx Project No: 201240.02 Project: Saratoga Honda-Phase 3 Location: 3402 South Broadway Saratoga Springs, New York Date: 1/22/2021 ON-SI TE WORK Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal Site Preparation and Gradin_q Tree Clearing 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Erosion Control (including silt fence&construction access) 1 LS $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Rough Grading 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 Hardscape Asphalt Pavement 14,615 SF $3.75 $54,806.25 Porous Pavement 19,049 SF $6.00 $114,294.00 Pavement Striping 1 LS $1,500.00 $1,500.00 Concrete Walk 280 SF $5.50 $1,540.00 Site Amenities Landscaping 1 LS $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Topsoil and Seed 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500.00 Deciduous Trees 16 EA $700.00 $11,200.00 Coniferious Trees 3 EA $700.00 $2,100.00 S h ru bs 45 EA $225.00 $10,125.00 Perennials 22 EA $75.00 $1,650.00 Parking Lot Light Pole 2 EA $2,200.00 $4,400.00 Concrete Curb 295 LF $18.00 $5,310.00 Guide Rail 77 LF $40.00 $3,080.00 Site Utilities 4" Underdrain 90 LF $12.00 $1,080.00 8" H D P E 52 L F $22.00 $1,144.00 12" HDPE 55 LF $27.00 $1,485.00 Dry Well 1 EA $3,000.00 $3,000.00 Yard Drain 4 EA $1,500.00 $6,000.00 Flared End Section 2 EA $600.00 $1,200.00 6" DIP Waterline 270 LF $42.00 $11,340.00 On-Site Total $249,754.25 On-Site Total X.25 $62,438.56 OFF-SITE WORK As Built Drawings 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500.00 Off-Site Total $2,500.00 Total Site Work $252,254.25 Letter of Credit Amounts Total off-site work $2,500.00 Total on-site work x.25 $62,438.56 Total $64,938.56 L.O.C. amount $65,000.00 T�� L� �R��P� Lands�c�pe Architectu�e�Engii�eering P.�. 1'r:��e3��lE�.Pre,��xc-,('lr��c. �� 1��11E� '��I't�f[�{�� `��C��t1�S C�`� 1�� ;�18-��-�1��1 ��18-�8r�-O��C� � � �� i��f-,.�-�r`�-fy�i�, r-f191"� E n in e e rin Re o rt g g p Water and Sanitar Sewer y For ARAT A H DA B ILDI N U N E��PA I - PHA E 3 N N SARATOGA SPRINGS NEW YORK � Plannin Board #19.098 g Prepared For: Saratoga Honda 3402 South Broadway Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 Prepared By: The LA Group, P.C. 40 Long Alley Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 �� • �,� � � �� -;�°'` { � �� {� � � � � � � r��` � �� January 22, 2021 I. Pro_j ect Description The project location is the Saratoga Honda located at 3402 Route 9 (South BroadWay) in Saratoga Springs. The proj ect proposes an expansion of vehicle parking via porous asphalt, a building addition, and some changes to the drive aisles to accommodate the building addition. II. Existin�Water and Sanitar_y Sewer Utilities Municipal water service to the site is provided from a municipal 10-inch water main located along Crescent Avenue. There is water service to the existing building via a 4-inch water line that connects into the municipal main along Crescent Avenue, approximately 180' from the intersection with South Broadway. Municipal sewer service to the site is located from a manhole to southeast of the intersection of Crescent Avenue and South Broadway. From the sewer manhole a 6" PVC gravity sewer service is provided to the existing building. III. Pro_j ected Water and Wastewater Flows This proj ect does not propose any changes to existing water and waste water flows. IV. Proposed Water and Wastewater Utilities Proposed Water Utilities There is a 6" DIP water line at the southwest corner of the existing Saratoga Honda building footprint. The new building addition will impact this line since its location is within the foot print of the proposed addition. The proj ect proposes rerouting the 6" DIP water line around the outside of the proposed addition and reconnecting it to the previous connection point at the Saratoga Honda building. There will no additional water flows as a result of this relocation. Proposed Wastewater Utilities There are no new wastewater utilities proposed. .��_? LQt-tg All�� r,�:`�l�-`��3�i'-�i��.]C) � ,.,��,�;�� Sprir�gs �,t�5I8-�8'�'-�18a NY l�S�� v�+ww.thel�t�rt�tap.C�rr� Landscap�Architecture��,�clr�in��ring P.C. ■ ■ ormwa er o u �on reven �on an Prepared in accordance with NYS DEC General Permit GP-0-20-001 for: Saratoga Honda Building Expansion — Phase 3 Own e r/O pe rato r(s): Saratoga Honda 3402 South Broadway Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 SWPPP Contact(s): The LA Group, PC 40 Long Alley Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 1-518-587-8100 1-518-587-0180 SWPPP Preparation Date: January 22, 2021 Table of Contents 1.0 PERMIT OVERVIEW AND REQUIREMENTS..................................................................... 1 1.1 PERMIT OVERVIEW...................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 SWPPP REVIEW, UPDATE.......................................................................................................2 2.1 SWPPP REv1Ew.......................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 SWPPP UPDArr'E.......................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 SITE ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PLANNING.......................................................3 3.1 PROJECT LOCATION..................................................................................................................... 3 3.2 PRE-DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS ................................................................................................ 3 3.3 PROJECT TYPE ............................................................................................................................. 3 3.4 PROJECT SCOPE............................................................................................................................ 3 3.S HISTORIC PRESERVATION DETERMINATION/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT.............................. 3 3.0 RECEIVING WATERS .................................................................................................................... 4 3.7 So1Ls ........................................................................................................................................... 4 4.0 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL................................................................................. 4 4.1 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES........................................................................... 4 4.2 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DRAWINGS........................................................................... 4 4.3 CONSTRUCTION PHASING PLAN AND SEQUENCE OF OPERATIONS................................................ S 4.4 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICE MAINTENANCE.................................................... C 4.S EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL INSPECTION.......................................................................... 6 4.6 CONTRACTOR SEQUENCE FORM .................................................................................................. 7 5.0 POST CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES...................... 7 S.1 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CONTROLS ................................................................................... 7 S.Z GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PRACTICES/RUNOFF REDUCTION TECHNIQUES................................... g S.3 POST CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DRAWINGS ................................................ 9 S.4 HYDRAULIC AND HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS .................................................................................. 9 S.S COMPARISON OF PRE AND POST CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER RUNOFF.................................... 9 6.0 POST CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MAINTENANCE............................................ 10 C.1 MAINTENANCE TO BE PERFORMED ............................................................................................ IO 7.0 CONSTRUCTION WASTE ...................................................................................................... 11 8.0 OFFSITE VEHICLE TRACKING........................................................................................... 12 9.0 TEMPORARY STABILIZATION FOR FROZEN CONDITIONS ..................................... 12 10.0 SPILL PREVENTION PRACTICES....................................................................................... 13 11.0 CERTIFICATIONS.................................................................................................................... 17 12.0 DEFINITIONS............................................................................................................................ 22 Appendices A Notice of Intent (NOI) and MS4 Acceptance Form B Stormwater Management Report and Hydro CAD C Map Set— Location Map and Construction Drawing D SWPPP Inspection Forms —SWPPP Inspection Report E Other SWPPP Forms — Construction Sequence, SWPPP Plan Changes, Spill Response Form, Stormwater Management Practice Maintenance Log F SPDES General Permit GP-0-20-001 G Historic Preservation/Endangered Species Documentation H Deep Ripping and De-compaction (DEC, 2008) I Stormwater Maintenance Agreement Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Saratoga Honda Building Expansion The LA Group Project # 201240.02 1 .0 PERMIT OVERVIEWAND REQUIREMENTS 1.1 Permit Overview This Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is prepared to inform the landowner and construction personnel of the measures to be implemented for controlling runoff and pollutants from the site during and after construction activities. The objective of this plan is to comply with the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activities, Permit No. GP- 0-20-001 requirements. Any material conflicts between this plan and the site plans, specification or instructions, must be brought to the attention of the design professional. The project may have other permits and it is the responsibility of the owner and contractor to know and understand all permits. The operator will be issued a bill from New York State for a one hundred and ten dollar ($110.00) annual fee for the open GP-0-20-001 permit. The operator will also be billed by New York State for a one time one hundred and ten dollar ($110.00) per acre fee for the proposed disturbed soil area listed in the NOI, and finally a one time six hundred and seventy five ($675.00) per acre fee for the proposed increased impervious area listed in the NOI. The operator is responsible to maintain onsite in a secure location that is accessible during normal working hours to an individual performing a compliance inspection, the fol lowi ng i nformation: ✓ the Notice of Intent (NOI), ✓ the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation NOI Acknowledgement Letter, ✓ the SWPPP, ✓ a copy of the General Permit (included in the SWPPP), ✓ MS4 SWPPP Acceptance Form (where applicable), and ✓ All inspection reports. All post-construction stormwater management facilities must be inspected annually by a qualified professional, a report prepared and submitted to the City Engineer documenting the inspections as well as the maintenance activities that were completed during the prior year. Technical standards are detailed in the "New York State Standards and Specifications for Sediment and Erosion and Sediment Control (November 2016)", as well as illustrated on the Construction Drawings included in Appendix C. The design of post- construction stormwater control practices follow the guidance provided by "New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual." � Th� LA GRC�U P L�ndscapeArc}�itecturec9.�nc3ineeringP.C. Page � Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Saratoga Honda Building Expansion The LA Group Project # 201240.02 2.0 SWP P P REVI EW, U P DATE 2.1 SWPPP Review Applicable Federal, State, and local regulatory agencies that have jurisdiction may elect to review this SWPPP and notify the permittee in writing that the SWPPP does not meet the requirements of their regulations. If the SWPPP needs to be revised, the permittee and the site contractor will make the required modifications within seven days of such notification and submit written certification to the notifying agency that the changes have been implemented. A copy of the SWPPP will be kept available on site for review by regulatory agencies, engineers, and su bcontractors. This Project is in the City of Saratoga Springs which is a regulated MS4 Community, so a copy of this SWPPP was sent to the City for review. A copy of the signed MS4 Acceptance form is provided in Appendix A of this SWPPP. 2.2 SWPPP Update The permittee identified in this SWPPP shall amend the SWPPP under the following conditions: ✓ Whenever the current provisions prove to be ineffective in minimizing pollutants in stormwater discharge from the site ✓ Whenever there is a change in design, construction or operation that could have an effect on the discharge of pollutants ✓ To address issues or deficiencies identified during an inspection by the qualified inspector, the Department or other regulatory authority ✓ To identify a new subcontractor that will implement any part of the SWPPP. If modifications are required to the post-stormwater management practices and the Project is within a regulated, traditional land use control MS4, the owner or operator of the Project must notify the MS4 in writing of any planned amendments or modifications to the post-construction stormwater management practice component of the SWPPP. Unless otherwise notified by the MS4, the owner or operator shall have the SWPPP amendments or modifications reviewed and accepted by the MS4 prior to commencing construction of the post-construction stormwater management practice. The SWPPP PLAN CHANGES, AUTHORIZATION, AND CHANGE CERTIFICATION form (Appendix E) must be filled out and a copy retained onsite during construction. If modifications are required to the post-stormwater management practices and the Project is not within a Regulated, Traditional Land Use Control MS4, the changes shall be documented in the SWPPP kept onsite. � Th� LA GRC�U P L�ndscapeArc}�itecturec9.�nc3ineeringP.C. Page 2 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Saratoga Honda Building Expansion The LA Group Project # 201240.02 3.0 SITE ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PLANNING 3.1 Project Location The site is located to the southeast of the intersection of Route 9 and Crescent Avenue, located in the City of Saratoga Springs, NY. See Appendix C for a general site location map. 3.2 Pre-Development Conditions The existing surface cover for the site is a mixture of developed and undeveloped land. The northern portion of the property is a car dealership with associated paved parking lot. The southern portion of the property is undeveloped woods and grass. 3.3 Project Type This project is a combination of new construction and redevelopment. The project has been designed in accordance with Chapter 4 of the NYSDEC Stormwater Management Design Manual, and NYSDEC's General Permit (GP-0-20-001) for construction activities. 3.4 Project Scope The Project includes a building expansion (8,000 square feet) of the car dealership, a new drive aisle, and a new porous pavement parking lot. The remainder of the proposed site improvements includes construction of site lighting and landscaping, and stormwater controls. The total Project soil disturbance will be 1.5 acres. The Project will increase the site impervious area by 0.43 acres for a total of 4.38 acres. 3.5 Historic Preservation Determination/Environmental Assessment A letter from NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and H istoric Preservation (OPRH P) dated April 9, 2014, indicates that the project will have no adverse impact on resources in or eligible for inclusion in the State and National Register of Historic Places (see Appendix G). The Project is within an area that will impact on any listed, proposed to be listed, threatened or endangered species, or a critical habitat. As part of the previous facility expansion site survey was completed by The LA Group's staff biologist and determined that the presence of the listed endangered species were not present onsite. Therefore this project will have no negative impact on listed, proposed to be listed, threatened or endangered species, or a critical habitat. The site survey report can be found in Appendix G. � Th� LA GRC�U P L�ndscapeArc}�itecturec9.�nc3ineeringP.C. Page 3 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Saratoga Honda Building Expansion The LA Group Project # 201240.02 3.6 Receiving Waters The closest receiving waters to the project site is an unnamed tributary to Geyser Brook. The NYSDEC classifies this unnamed tributary to Geyser Brook as C. This stream is not classified as a 303D water or TMDL waters. 3.7 Soils The soil series shown on the Project Site by the USDA/National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey is comprised of Deerfield loamy fine sand. The hydrologic soil group classifications for Deerfield is "A". Soil testing in the form of deep hole test pits were performed in the locations of the proposed stormwater management facilities to identify subsurface soil conditions. The testing was performed on December 10, 2020 by The LA Group observed sand with seasonal high groundwater at a depth of 44" to 60". Refer to Stormwater Management Report in Appendix B for detailed soil information. 4.0 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 4.1 Erosion and Sediment Control Practices Temporary Structural Practices ✓ Silt Fence ✓ Dust Control ✓ Stabilized Construction Entrance Permanent Structural Controls ✓ Grading ✓ Rock Outlet Protection Temporary Stabilization Practices (including vegetative practices) ✓ Seed and mulch bare soil areas within 14 days of disturbance unless construction will resume in that area within 21 days. Permanent Stabilization Practices (including vegetative practices) ✓ Seed and mulch all disturbed areas. Slopes that are 3:1 or steeper should receive a Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP), sodding, and or hydro- seeding a homogenous mixture of wood fiber mulch with tackifying agent. Refer to Construction Drawings attached in Appendix C for detailed information on each practice. 4.2 Erosion and Sediment Control Drawings � Th� LA GRC�U P L�ndscapeArc}�itecturec9.�nc3ineeringP.C. Page 4 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Saratoga Honda Building Expansion The LA Group Project # 201240.02 Erosion and Sediment Control practices are shown on Construction Drawings included in Appendix C. 4.3 Construction Phasing Plan and Sequence of Operations ✓ Temporary structural erosion controls will be installed prior to earthwork as per the attached plans. ✓ Areas to be undisturbed for more than 14 days will be temporarily stabilized by seeding. ✓ Disturbed areas will be reseeded and mulched immediately after final contours are re-established and no more than 14 days after the completion of construction at that site. ✓ Temporary erosion control devices will not be removed until the area served is stabilized by the growth of vegetation and the area is certified as being stabilized by the Erosion Control Superintendent. Reference Construction Activities Sheet Start � Stop Number Sequence must include major items such as, but not limited to, clearing and grubbing, excavation and grading, utility and infrastructure installation and any other activity resulting in soil disturbance. Include installation of erosion and sediment control ractices and timin of installation. Install silt fence and construction entrance Week 1 Clear site and rough grade Weeks 2-5 Begin utility installation Weeks 5-12 Begin building construction Weeks 9- completion Begin parking lot construction Weeks 12-20 Monitor/maintain erosion and sediment control measures Ongoing Remove erosion and sediment control measures upon Ongoing stabilization of contributing areas � Th� LA GRC�U P L�ndscapeArc}�itecturec9.�nc3ineeringP.C. Page 5 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Saratoga Honda Building Expansion The LA Group Project # 201240.02 4.4 Erosion and Sediment Control Practice Maintenance ✓ Silt fence — maintenance shall be performed as needed and material removed when "bulges" develop in the silt fence. ✓ Stabilized construction entrance — entrance shall be maintained in a condition which shall prevent tracking. This may require periodic top dressing with additional aggregate. All sediment tracked onto or spilled on public rights of way shall be removed immediately. When necessary, wheels must be cleaned to remove sediment prior to entrance on public rights of way. When washing is required, it shall be done in an area stabilized with aggregate and wash water shall be directed away from streams or wetlands preferably to a broad grassed area or a stormwater pond. ✓ Rock outlet protection — once a riprap outlet has been installed, the maintenance needs are very low. It should be inspected after high flows for evidence of scour beneath the riprap. Repair should be immediate. ✓ Replace top-soil, mulch and seed where seeding has been disturbed. 4.5 Erosion and Sediment Control Inspection ■ It is recommended that a rain gage be installed at the site. ■ A qualified inspector shall conduct an assessment of the site prior to the commencement of construction and certify in an inspection report that the appropriate erosion and sediment controls described in the SWPPP and required by GP-0-20-001 have been adequately installed to ensure overall preparedness of the site for commencement of construction. ■ This qualified inspector must be a Licensed Professional Engineer, Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control (CPESC), Registered Landscape Architect, or someone working under the direct supervision of, and at the same company as, the licensed Professional Engineer or Registered Landscape Architect, provided they have received 4 hours of Department endorsed training in proper erosion and sediment control principles from a Soil and Water Conservation District, or other Department endorsed entity. After receiving the initial training, the qualified inspector shall receive 4 hours of training every 3 years. ■ The day-to-day erosion control activities on the site will be monitored by the construction manager. The qualified inspector (as defined by the NYS DEC SPDES regulations) and his crews will make at least one inspection every seven (7) days of erosion control devices, and non-stabilized areas during construction. A maintenance inspection report will be completed by the qualified inspector after each inspection. The report form to be completed by the inspector is attached in Appendix D. Reports should be compiled and maintained on-site in the SWPPP 3-ring binder. � Th� LA GRC�U P L�ndscapeArc}�itecturec9.�nc3ineeringP.C. Page 6 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Saratoga Honda Building Expansion The LA Group Project # 201240.02 ■ All measures will be maintained in good working order; if repair is necessary, it will be initiated within 24 hours of report. The qualified inspector shall take photographs of any needed repairs and also photograph when the repairs are completed. These photographs will be time and date stamped and attached to the weekly inspection report. ■ Seeded and planted areas will be inspected for bare spots, washouts, and healthy growth. If necessary, spot reseeding or sodding will be implemented. ■ A trained contractor will be an employee from the contracting company responsible for the implementation of the SWPPP. This person will be onsite when any soil disturbing activities are being conducted. The trained contractor must have received 4 hours of Department endorsed training in proper erosion and sediment control principles from a Soil and Water Conservation District, or other Department endorsed entity. After receiving the initial training, the qualified inspector shall receive 4 hours of training every 3 years. This trained contractor cannot conduct the regular SWPPP compliance inspections unless they meet the qualified inspector qualifications. 4.6 Contractor Sequence Form The operator shall prepare a summary of construction status using the Construction Sequence Form (included in Appendix E) once every month. Significant deviations to the sequence and reasons for those deviations (i.e. weather, subcontractor availability, etc.), shall be noted by the contractor. The schedule shall be used to record the dates for initiation of construction, implementation of erosion control measures, stabilization, etc. A copy of this table will be maintained at the construction site and updated. 5.0 POST CO N STRU CTI O N STO RMWATE R MANAG E M E NT PRACTICES 5.1 Stormwater Management Controls This project will impact existing stormwater management practices (SMPs). There are currently (5) SMPs on site, and this project will impact (3) of them: Ex- SMP-1, Ex-SMP-2, and Ex-SMP-3. Ex-SMP-3 is not being resized to treat additional area but will be impacted by the work. It is currently a pocket pond which drains to a stormwater disposal area. It will be redesigned and flows will instead be directed to an infiltration basin. The proposed Post Construction Stormwater Management controls on this project are listed below: • Pocket Pond (Ex-SMP-1) � Th� LA GRC�U P L�ndscapeArc}�itecturec9.�nc3ineeringP.C. Page 7 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Saratoga Honda Building Expansion The LA Group Project # 201240.02 • Porous Pavement (Ex-SMP-2) • Infiltration Basin (SMP-3) 5.2 Green Infrastructure Practices/Runoff Reduction Techniques The proposed Green I nfrastructure practices or Standard Management practices with Runoff Reduction capabilities on this project are listed below: ✓ Veg etated Swa I e ✓ Porous Pavement ✓ I nfi Itration Basi n The provided runoff reduction volume is 0.116 ac-ft, which is greater than the required water quality volume, 0.094 ac-ft. Soil Restoration Excessively compacted areas and areas of cut and fill on the Project Site will have soil restoration applied as needed and as specified in the table below. Attached in Appendix H is "Deep Ripping and De-compaction, (DEC 2008)." This methodology should be followed for soil restoration as specified in the table below: Type of Soil Disturbance Soil Re storation Re quire me nt Comme nts/Example s Minimal Soil Disturbance Restoration not permitted Preservation of Natural Features Areas where topsoil is stripped Restoration not required Clearin and Grubbin only-no change in grade g g HSG A&B HSG C&D Areas of cut and fill apply 6 inches of Aerate*and apply topsoil 6 inches of topsoil Heavy traffic areas onsite HSG A&B HSG C&D (especially in a zone 5-25 feet around buildings,but not within a Aerate and apply 6 Apply full Soil 5 foot pernneter around �ches of topsoil Restoration** foundation walls) Keep construction equipment from Areas where Runoff Reduction Restoration not required,but may be crossing these areas. To protect and/or inf'�ltration ractices are applied to enhance the reduction newly installed practice from any p ongoing construction activities applie d spe c ifie d for appropriate prac tic e s construct a single phase operation fence area. *Aeration includes the use of machines such as tractor-drawn implements with coulters making a narrow slit in the soi�a roller with many sp�es making indentations in the soi�or prongs which function like a mini subsoiler **Per"Deep Ripping and Decopmpaction,DEC 2008" • If compost amendment is required, 2 to 4 inches of screened compost will be incorporated into the soil. � Th� LA GRC�U P L�ndscapeArc}�itecturec9.�nc3ineeringP.C. Page 8 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Saratoga Honda Building Expansion The LA Group Project # 201240.02 • Prior to application of the deep-ripping and de-compaction, the depth to bedrock or naturally occurring hardpan should be known so that the depth of tillage be adjusted according to those restrictive depths. • Soils with a slope that exceeds 10% will not have full soil restoration with deep-ripping and de-compaction due to potential for erosion from tilled soil. • Any soil tillage (deep or shallow) will not be done on soils that are excessively wet, as this will damage the soil. • Any tillage will not be done within approximately 10' of the drip-line of any existing established trees. • Any large stones that are unearthed during tillage should be removed from the surface prior to final surface preparation and vegetation establishment. 5.3 Post Construction Stormwater Management Drawings Post construction stormwater management controls are shown on Construction Drawings included in Appendix C. 5.4 Hydraulic and Hydrologic Analysis The program utilized for quantifying stormwater runoff rates and volumes was HydroCAD software, produced by Applied Microcomputer Systems of Chocorua, N H. The SCS 24-hour Type I I design storms for 1, 10, and 100-year freq uency rainfall were analyzed. ✓ Hydrologic/hydraulic analysis for all structural components of the stormwater control system for the applicable design storms (see Appendix B). ✓ Comparison of post-development stormwater runoff conditions with pre- development conditions (see Appendix B). ✓ Dimensions, material specifications and installation details for each post- construction stormwater control practice (see Appendix B and C). 5.5 Comparison of Pre and Post Construction Stormwater Runoff Stormwater Quantity. These calculations are based on the HydroCAD analysis. Pre Development Post Development 10 ear, 24 hour storm (Qp) 0.0 CFS 0.0 CFS 100 ear, 24 hour storm Q 0.28 CFS 0.06 CFS Water Quality Volume Calculations The following was utilized to determine water quality volume: WQ�= �P� �R��A� 12 � Th� LA GRC�U P L�ndscapeArc}�itecturec9.�nc3ineeringP.C. Page 9 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Saratoga Honda Building Expansion The LA Group Project # 201240.02 Where: WQv= Water Quality Volume (acre/feet) P = 90% Rainfall Event Rv = 0.05 + 0.009(I) where I is i mpervious cover i n percent A = Subcatchment area in acres Re uired Provided Water Quality Volume (WQv) 0.094 AC FT 0.116 AC FT 6.0 POST CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MAINTENANCE 6.1 Maintenance to be Performed Saratoga Honda will be responsible for the continuous upkeep and maintenance of all post construction stormwater management facilities. Post-construction maintenance for this project will consist of regular inspections of permanent stormwater management facilities and steep slopes. These maintenance procedures are essential to assure continual performance of the stormwater management practices on your site. During the inspection and any maintenance activity to the stormwater management practices, the responsible party should fill out an inspection and maintenance log (Appendix E) to record that it was done. Annual inspections of the post construction stormwater management practices shall be completed and inspection reports shall be sent to the office of the City Engineer for their records. The City of Saratoga Springs shall approve a formal maintenance and inspection agreement in accordance with City Code Chapter 242 for stormwater management facilities to ensure the practices will be properly operated and maintained in accordance with the long term operation and maintenance plans. This agreement shall be binding on all subsequent land owners and recorded in the office of the County Clerk as a deed restriction on the property. Catch Basins (All) ■ Sediment removal with a vacuum truck should be done at least once a year, preferably after spring runoff and then in early fall, or when they are at 50% capacity, whichever comes first. ■ Any mechanical valves should be operated for inspection every two months. Vegetated Swale ■ Any accumulated sediment deposited into these areas needs to be removed by hand or very carefully with small equipment. Any ground disturbance should be minimized. � Th� LA GRC�U P L�ndscapeArc}�itecturec9.�nc3ineeringP.C. Page �O Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Saratoga Honda Building Expansion The LA Group Project # 201240.02 Stormwater Pond (Wet Pond) ■ Should be inspected twice a year and after heavy rain storms. ■ Any erosion or scour occurring in the pond, forebay or outlets shall be repaired and re-vegetated as needed. ■ Sediment removal in the forebay shall occur every five to six years or when 50% full. ■ Regular litter control to be performed as needed. Porous Pavement • During the winter, the spreading of sand or other particles for traction cannot be done. If the area is to be plowed of snow, this should be done carefully so as not to upset the permeable pavement. • Areas that receive high volumes of sediment will require frequent maintenance activities, and areas that experience high volumes of vehicular traffic will clog more readily due to soil compaction. Typical maintenance activities for permeable paving are summarized in the table below: T pical Maintenance Activities Associated with Permeable Pavement Activit Schedule Ensure pavin area is free of debris Monthl Ensure avin dewaters between storms Monthl and after storms >0.5" Ensure area is clean of sediments Monthl Mow upland and adjacent areas and seed As needed bare areas Vacuum sweep frequently to keep surface Typically 1 to 2 times a year free of sediments Inspect the surface for deterioration or Annually spallin ■ Generally, routine vacuum sweeping and high-pressure washing (with proper disposal of removed material and washwater) can maintain infiltration rates when clogged or crusted material is removed. Signs can also be posted visibly within a permeable paving area to prevent such activities as resurfacing, the use of abrasives, and to restrict truck parking. 7.0 CONSTRUCTION WASTE Waste Materials: All waste materials generated during construction will be disposed at a suitable landfill, or transfer station. � Th� LA GRC�U P L�ndscapeArc}�itecturec9.�nc3ineeringP.C. Page �� Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Saratoga Honda Building Expansion The LA Group Project # 201240.02 Hazardous Waste: The project will not be a generator of hazardous waste and it is not anticipated that any hazardous waste will be generated during construction. If there are any materials generated, a licensed hazardous waste carrier will be contracted to dispose the hazardous material at a suitable disposal site. If hazardous materials are d iscovered d u ri ng construction, the work wi I I be stopped u nti I the issue is resolved. Waste: Portable sanitary facilities will be made available to construction personnel and will be serviced regularly. 8.0 OFFSITE VEHICLE TRACKING Excavation equipment involved with the construction will remain on the project site and will not regularly egress or ingress the site. Any trucks used to bring in materials or remove materials via municipal paved roads will do so over a stabilized construction entrance. If any off-site vehicle tracking occurs, the contractor will be directed to initiate, street sweeping program in the immediate vicinity of the site. 9.0 TEMPORARYSTABILIZATION FOR FROZEN CONDITIONS The following temporary stabilization measures MUST be performed when construction is occurring during winter/frozen ground conditions. The following requirements do not supersede any other requirements of this SWPPP as they apply to non-frozen ground conditions. ■ Perimeter erosion control MUST still be installed prior to earthwork disturbance as per this SWPPP. ■ Any areas that can not be seeded to turf by October 1 or earl ier wi I I receive a temporary seeding. The temporary seeding will consist of winter rye seeded at the rate of 120 pounds per acre (2.5 pounds per 1,000 square feet) or stabilized as per the temporary stabilization for winter construction/frozen conditions. ■ Any area of disturbance that will remain inactive for a period of 14 consecutive days MUST be mulched. This includes any previously disturbed areas that are covered with snow. ■ Mulch MUST consist of loose straw applied at the rate of 2 to 3 bales (90 to 100 pounds) per thousand square feet. ■ Mulch MUST be applied uniformly over the area of bare soil or bare soil that is covered with snow. For the latter condition, mulch MUST be applied on top of snow. ■ Using a tracked vehicle, mulch MUST be crimped into the bare soil/snow. The tracked vehicle MUST be driven across the mulched areas in at least two directions to maximize crimping of mulch into the soil/snow. ■ If mulch gets blown off an area to a significant degree, the site inspector WILL require that an area be re-mulched in accordance with � Th� LA GRC�U P L�ndscapeArc}�itecturec9.�nc3ineering P.C. Page �2 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Saratoga Honda Building Expansion The LA Group Project # 201240.02 Items 2 through 5 above, and this area WILL be included on the i nspection checkl ist for the next i nspection. ■ If a particular area repeatedly experiences loss of mulch due to wind, then the inspector WILL require that an alternative method be used to secure the mulch in place. Such alternatives may include the use of netting, tackifier or other methods deemed appropriate by the inspector. ■ During periods when snow is melting and/or surface soils are thawing during daytime hours, mulched areas MUST be re-tracked (crimped) as per Item 5 above at least once every seven days, more frequently if directed by the inspector. Additional mulch may be required to obtain complete coverage of an area. Biodegradable erosion control matting may be required on steeper slopes. ■ Additional stabilization measures for non-frozen ground conditions described in this SWPPP WILL be implemented at the time deemed appropriate by the inspector. During the winter season, if a site has been stabilized and soil disturbing activities have been suspended for the winter, weekly inspections can be suspended. However, monthly inspections must still be conducted. All normal weekly inspections must resume when soil disturbing activities resume. 10.0 SPILL PREVENTION PRACTICES Good Housekeeping and Material Management Practices The following good housekeeping and material management practices will be followed on site during the construction project to reduce the risk of spills or other accidental exposure of materials and substances to stormwater runoff. ■ Materials will be brought on site in the minimum quantities required. ■ All materials stored on site will be stored in a neat, orderly manner in their appropriate containers, and if possible, under a roof or other enclosure. ■ Products will be kept in their original containers with the original manufacturer's label. ■ Substances will not be mixed with one another unless recommended by the manufacturer. ■ Whenever possible, all of a product will be used up before disposal. ■ Manufacturer's recommendations for proper use and disposal will be fol lowed. ■ The construction manager or his designee will inspect regularly to ensure proper use and disposal of materials on site. ■ The contractor shall prohibit washing of tools, equipment, and machinery in or within 100 feet of any watercourse or wetland. ■ All above grade storage tanks are to be protected from vehicle damage by temporary barriers. � Th� LA GRC�U P L�ndscapeArc}�itecturec9.�nc3ineeringP.C. Page �3 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Saratoga Honda Building Expansion The LA Group Project # 201240.02 Inventory for Pollution Prevention Plan The materials and substances listed below are expected to be on-site during construction. ■ Petroleum for fueling vehicles will be stored in above ground storage tanks. Tanks will either be steel with an enclosure capable of holding 110% of the storage tank volume or of a Con-Store, concrete encased type typically employed by NYSDOT. Hydraulic oil and other oils will be stored in their original containers. Concrete and asphalt will be stored in the original delivery trucks. ■ Fertilizer may be stored on site in its original container for a short period of ti me prior to seed i ng. Orig i nal contai ners wi I I be safely pi led on pallets or similar devices to protect from moisture. ■ Paints and other similar materials will be stored in their original containers and all empty containers will be disposed of in accordance with label directions. ■ Portable sanitary facilities, which contain chemical disinfectants (deodorants) will be located on-site, with the disinfectants held in the tank of the toilet. Hazardous Products These practices are used to reduce the risks associated with hazardous materials. ■ Products will be kept in original containers unless they are not re- sealable. ■ Original labels and material safety data sheets will be retained; they contain important product information. ■ If surplus product must be disposed of, manufacturers' or local and State recommended methods for proper disposal will be followed. Spill Prevention The following product specific practices will be followed on site. Petroleum Products: ■ Construction personnel should be made aware that emergency telephone numbers are located in this SWPPP. ■ The contractor shall immediately contact NYSDEC in the event of a spill, and shall take all appropriate steps to contain the spill, including construction of a dike around the spill and placing absorbent material over this spill. � Th� LA GRC�U P L�ndscape Arc}�itecturec9.�nc3ineering P.C. Page �4 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Saratoga Honda Building Expansion The LA Group Project # 201240.02 ■ The contractor shall instruct personnel that spillage of fuels, oils, and similar chemicals must be avoided and will have arranged with a qualified spill remediation company to serve the site. ■ Fuels, oils, and chemicals will be stored in appropriate and tightly capped containers. Containers shall not be disposed of on the project site. ■ Fuels, oils, chemicals, material, equipment, and sanitary facilities will be stored/located away from trees and at least 100 feet from streams, wells, wet areas, and other environmentally sensitive sites. ■ Dispose of chemical containers and surplus chemicals off the project site in accordance with label directions. ■ Use tight connections and hoses with appropriate nozzles in all operations involving fuels, lubricating materials or chemicals. ■ Use funnels when pouring fuels, lubricating materials or chemicals. ■ Refueling and cleaning of construction equipment will take place in parki ng areas to provide rapid response to emergency situations. ■ All on-site vehicles will be monitored for leaks and receive regular preventative maintenance to reduce the chance of leakage. Any vehicle leaking fuel or hydraulic fuel will be immediately scheduled for repairs and use will be discontinued until repairs are made. Fertilizers: ■ Fertilizer will be stored in its original containers on pallets with water resistant coveri ngs. ■ Proper delivery scheduling will minimize storage time. ■ Any damaged containers will be repaired immediately upon discovery and any released fertilizer recovered to the fullest extent practicable. Paints: ■ All containers will be tightly sealed and stored when not required for use. ■ Excess paint will not be discharged to the storm water system or wastewater system, but will be properly disposed of according to manufacturers' instructions or State and local regulations. Concrete Trucks: ■ Concrete trucks will be allowed to wash out or discharge surplus concrete or drum wash water only at designated locations on site. Asphalt Trucks: ■ Asphalt trucks shall not discharge surplus asphalt on the site. � Th� LA GRC�U P L�ndscapeArc}�itecturec9.�nc3ineeringP.C. Page �5 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Saratoga Honda Building Expansion The LA Group Project # 201240.02 Spill Control Practices In addition to the good housekeeping and material management practices discussed in the previous sections of this plan, the following practices will be followed for spill prevention and cleanup. The construction manager or site superintendent responsible for the day-to-day site operations will be the spill prevention and cleanup coordinator. He will designate at least three other site personnel who will receive spill prevention and cleanup training. These individuals will each become responsible for a particular phase of prevention and cleanup. The names of responsible spill personnel will be posted in the material storage area and in the onsite construction office or trailer. ■ Manufacturers' recommended methods for spill cleanup will be clearly posted and site personnel will be made aware of the procedures and the location of the information and cleanup supplies. Any spill in excess or suspected to be in excess of two gallons will be reported to the NYSDEC Regional Spill Response Unit. Notification to the NYSDEC (1-800-457-7362) must be completed within two hours of the discovery of the spill. ■ Materials and equipment necessary for spill cleanup will be kept in the material storage area onsite. Equipment and materials will include but not be limited to absorbent pads, brooms, dust pans, mops, rags, gloves, goggles, activated clay, sand, sawdust, and plastic and metal trash containers specifically for this purpose. ■ All spills will be cleaned up immediately after discovery. ■ The spill area will be kept well ventilated and personnel will wear appropriate protective clothing to prevent injury from contact with spilled substance. ■ Spills of toxic or hazardous material will be reported to the appropriate State or local government agency, regardless of the size � Th� LA GRC�U P L�ndscapeArc}�itecturec9.�nc3ineeringP.C. Page �6 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Saratoga Honda Building Expansion The LA Group Project # 201240.02 11 .0 CERTIFICATIONS Preparer Certification of Compliance with Federal, State, and Local Regulations This Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan was prepared in accordance with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activities (Permit No. GP-0-20-001), pursuant to Article 17, Titles 7, 8 and Article 70 of the Environmental Conservation Law. This SPDES General Permit implements the Federal Clean WaterAct pertaining to stormwater discharges. Name: Doug Heller Title: Civil Engineer Signature: Date: Company Name: The LA Group, PC Owner Pollution Prevention Plan Certification 1 certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who are directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. 1 am aware that false statements made herein are punishable as a Class A misdemeanor pursuant to Section 210.45 of the Penal Law. 1 understand that GP-0-20-001 requires site inspections be conducted by a qualified professional once every seven (7) days and when approved in writing by the NYSDEC, disturbances of greater than five (5) acres at one time require site inspections two (2) times every seven (7) days. These inspections shall be performed by a qualified professional as defined by the General Permit. The Owner/Operator will be held financially responsible for any and all fines related to work tasks that are not specified by the Contractor(s)/Subcontractor(s) below. Name: Title: Signature: Date: Company Name: � Th+e LA �R�DU P Lands�ape A��h�teEtu�P�_E��3�,�e��ny N.�. Page 17 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Saratoga Honda Building Expansion The LA Group Project # 201240.02 Contractor and Subcontractor Certification 1 hereby certify that 1 understand and agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the SWPPP and agree to implement any corrective actions identified by the qualified inspector during a site inspection. 1 also understand that the owner or operator must comply with the terms and conditions of the New York State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("SPDES') general permit for stormwater discharges from construction activities and that it is unlawful for any person to cause or contribute to a violation of water quality standards. Furthermore, 1 understand that certifying false, incorrect or inaccurate information is a violation of the referenced permit and the laws of the State of New York and could subject me to criminal, civil and/or administrative proceeding. Name Title Signature Date Company Name Address City, State, Zip Phone Number 1. 2. SWPPP Components You 3. Are Responsi ble For 4. 5. 6. Name of Trained Individual Responsible for SWPPP Implementation Title Signature of Trained Individual Responsible for SWPPP Implementation Date � Th+e LA �R�DU P Lands�ape A��h�teEtu�P�_E��3�,�e��ny N.�. Page 18 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Saratoga Honda Building Expansion The LA Group Project # 201240.02 Contractor and Subcontractor Certification 1 hereby certify that 1 understand and agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the SWPPP and agree to implement any corrective actions identified by the qualified inspector during a site inspection. 1 also understand that the owner or operator must comply with the terms and conditions of the New York State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("SPDES') general permit for stormwater discharges from construction activities and that it is unlawful for any person to cause or contribute to a violation of water quality standards. Furthermore, 1 understand that certifying false, incorrect or inaccurate information is a violation of the referenced permit and the laws of the State of New York and could subject me to criminal, civil and/or administrative proceeding. Name Title Signature Date Company Name Address City, State, Zip Phone Number 1. 2. SWPPP Components You 3. Are Responsible For 4. 5. 6. Name of Trained Individual Responsible for SWPPP Implementation Title Signature of Trained Individual Responsible for SWPPP Implementation Date � Th+e LA �R�DU P Lands�ape A��h�teEtu�P�_E��3�,�e��ny N.�. Page 19 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Saratoga Honda Building Expansion The LA Group Project # 201240.02 Contractor and Subcontractor Certification 1 hereby certify that 1 understand and agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the SWPPP and agree to implement any corrective actions identified by the qualified inspector during a site inspection. 1 also understand that the owner or operator must comply with the terms and conditions of the New York State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("SPDES') general permit for stormwater discharges from construction activities and that it is unlawful for any person to cause or contribute to a violation of water quality standards. Furthermore, 1 understand that certifying false, incorrect or inaccurate information is a violation of the referenced permit and the laws of the State of New York and could subject me to criminal, civil and/or administrative proceeding. Name Title Signature Date Company Name Address City, State, Zip Phone Number 1. 2. SWPPP Components You 3. Are Responsible For 4. 5. 6. Name of Trained Individual Responsible for SWPPP Implementation Title Signature of Trained Individual Responsible for SWPPP Implementation Date � Th+e LA �R�DU P Lands�ape A��h�teEtu�P�_E��3�,�e��ny N.�. Page 20 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Saratoga Honda Building Expansion The LA Group Project # 201240.02 Contractor and Subcontractor Certification 1 hereby certify that 1 understand and agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the SWPPP and agree to implement any corrective actions identified by the qualified inspector during a site inspection. 1 also understand that the owner or operator must comply with the terms and conditions of the New York State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("SPDES') general permit for stormwater discharges from construction activities and that it is unlawful for any person to cause or contribute to a violation of water quality standards. Furthermore, 1 understand that certifying false, incorrect or inaccurate information is a violation of the referenced permit and the laws of the State of New York and could subject me to criminal, civil and/or administrative proceeding. Name Title Signature Date Company Name Address City, State, Zip Phone Number 1. 2. SWPPP Components You 3. Are Responsible For 4. 5. 6. Name of Trained Individual Responsible for SWPPP Implementation Title Signature of Trained Individual Responsible for SWPPP Implementation Date � Th+e LA �R�DU P Lands�ape A��h�teEtu�P�_E��3�,�e��ny N.�. Page 21 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Saratoga Honda Building Expansion The LA Group Project # 201240.02 12.0 DEFINITIONS Construction Activity(ies) - means any clearing, grading, excavation, filling, demolition, or stockpiling activities that result in soil disturbance. Clearing activities can include, but are not limited to, logging equipment operation, the cutting and skidding of trees, tree removal, stump removal and/or brush removal. Construction activity does not include routine maintenance that is performed to maintain the original line and grade, hydraulic capacity, or original purpose of a facility. Construction Phasing Plan - a plan designed to construct particular portions of an individual project at different times. Phasing is often used when a project is very large to limit the disturbance at a single time to 5 acres per phase. Erosion and Sediment Control Practices — temporary measures installed prior to construction and maintained during construction to temporarily treat any stormwater runoff. Once construction is completed and post-construction stormwater management practices are installed and the site is stabilized, the erosion and sediment control practices are removed from the site. Final Stabilization - means that all soil disturbance activities have ceased and a uniform, perennial vegetative cover with a density of eighty (80) percent over the entire pervious surface has been established; or other equivalent stabilization measures, such as permanent landscape mulches, rock rip-rap or washed/crushed stone have been applied on all disturbed areas that are not covered by permanent structures, concrete pavement. Green Infrastructure — in the context of stormwater management, the term green infrastructure includes a wide array of practices at multiple scales to manage and treat stormwater, maintain and restore natural hydrology and ecological function by infiltration, evapotranspiration, capture and reuse of stormwater, and establishment of natural vegetative features. On a regional scale, green infrastructure is the preservation and restoration of natural landscape features, such as forests, floodplains and wetlands, coupled with policies such as infill and redevelopment that reduce overall imperviousness in a watershed or ecoregion. On the local scale green infrastructure consist of site and neighborhood specific practices and runoff reduction techniques. Such practices essentially result in runoff reduction and or establishment of habitat areas with significant utilization of soils, vegetation, and engineered media rather than traditional hardscape collection, conveyance and storage structures. Some examples include green roofs, trees and tree boxes, pervious pavement, rain gardens, vegetated swales, planters, reforestation and protection and enhancement of riparian buffers and floodplains. Impervious Area (Cover) - means all impermeable surfaces that cannot effectively infiltrate rainfall. This includes paved, concrete and gravel surfaces (i.e. parking lots, driveways, roads, runways, and sidewalks); building rooftops, and miscellaneous impermeable structures such as patios, pools, and sheds. � Th+e LA �R�DU P Lands�ape A��h�teEtu�P�_E��3�,�e��ny N.�. Page 22 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Saratoga Honda Building Expansion The LA Group Project # 201240.02 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer (MS4) — a conveyance or system of conveyances (including roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, man-made channels, or storm drains): i. Owned or operated by a state, city, town, borough, county, parish, district, association, or other public body (created by or pursuant to State law) having jurisdiction over disposal of sewage, industrial wastes, stormwater, or other wastes, including special districts under State law such as a sewer district, flood control district or drainage district, or similar entity, or an Indian tribe or an authorized Indian tribal organization, or a designated and approved management agency under section 208 of the CWA that discharges to surface waters of the State. ii. Designed or used for collecting or conveying stormwater iii. Which is not a combined sewer iv. Which is not part of a Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) as defined at 40 CFR 122.2. Notice of Intent — a standardized format notification sent to the NYSDEC to inform them of the proposed activity to be sent after the SWPPP has been completed. Owner or Operator— means the person, persons or legal entity which owns or leases the property on which the construction activity is occurring; and/or an entity that has operational control over the construction plans and specifications, including the ability to make modifications to the plans and specifications. Post-Construction Stormwater Management Practices — permanent devices constructed or installed onsite to treat stormwater from a site when construction is completed. Qualified Inspector— means a person that is knowledgeable in the principles and practices of erosion and sediment control, such as a licensed Professional Engineer, Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control (CPESC), Registered Landscape Architect, or other Department endorsed individual(s). It can also mean someone working under the direct supervision of, and at the same company as, the licensed Professional Engineer or Registered Landscape Architect, provided that person has training in the principles and practices of erosion and sediment control. Training in the principles and practices of erosion and sediment control means that the individual working under the direct supervision of the licensed Professional Engineer or Registered Landscape Architect has received four (4) hours of Department endorsed training in proper erosion and sediment control principles from a Soil and Water Conservation District, or other Department endorsed entity. After receiving the initial training, the individual working under the direct supervision of the licensed Professional Engineer or Registered Landscape Architect shall receive four (4) hours of training every three (3) years. It can also mean a person that meets the Qualified Professional qualifications in addition to the Qualified Inspector qualifications. Qualified Professional — means a person that is knowledgeable in the principles and practices of stormwater management and treatment, such as a licensed Professional � Th+e LA �R�DU P Lands�ape A��h�teEtu�P�_E��3�,�e��ny N.�. Page 23 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Saratoga Honda Building Expansion The LA Group Project # 201240.02 Engineer, Registered Landscape Architect or other Department endorsed individual(s). Individuals preparing SWPPPs that require the post-construction stormwater management practice component must have an understanding of the principles of hydrology, water quality management practice design, water quantity control design, and, in many cases, the principles of hydraulics. All components of the SWPPP that involve the practice of engineering, as defined by the NYS Education Law (see Article 145) , shall be prepared by, or under the direct supervision of, a professional engineer licensed ot practice in the State of New York. Regulated, Traditional Land Use Control MS4 - means a city, town, or village with land use control authority that is required to gain coverage under New York State DEC's SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Municipal Separate Stormwater Sewer Systems (MS4s). Sequence of Operations —the individual steps and their specific order which are undertaken in order to construct a project or a given phase of a project from beginning to end. (i.e. clearing, grading, foundation work, landscaping, etc.) State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) — means the system established pursuant to Article 17 of the Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) and 6 NYCRR Part 750 for issuance of permits authorizing discharges to the waters of the state. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) - a report that is compiled providing detailed information about the proposed activity and the specifics to how the stormwater will be managed during construction and after construction is completed. Surface Waters of the State - shall be construed to include lakes, bays, sounds, ponds, impounding reservoirs, springs, rivers, streams, creeks, estuaries, marshes, inlets, canals, the Atlantic Ocean, within the territorial seas of the state of New York and all other bodies of surface water, natural or artificial, inland or coastal, fresh or salt, public or private (except those private waters that do not combine or effect a junction with natural surface or underground waters), which are wholly or partially within or bordering the state or within its jurisdiction. Waters of the state are further defined in 6 NYCRR Parts 800-941. Temporary Stabilization — means that exposed soil has been covered with material(s) as set forth in the technical standard, New York Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control, to prevent the exposed soil from eroding. The materials can include, but are not limited to, mulch, seed and mulch, and erosion control mats (e.g. jute twisted yarn, excelsior wood fiber mats). Trained Contractor— means an employee from a contracting (construction) company responsible for the day to day implementation of the SWPPP. The trained contractor must have received 4 hours of Department endorsed training in proper erosion and sediment control principles from a Soil and Water Conservation District, or other � Th+e LA �R�DU P Lands�ape A��h�teEtu�P�_E��3�,�e��ny N.�. Page 24 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Saratoga Honda Building Expansion The LA Group Project # 201240.02 Department endorsed entity. After receiving the initial training, the qualified inspector shall receive 4 hours of training every 3 years. It can also mean an employee from the contracting (construction) company that meets the qualified inspector qualifications (e.g. licensed Professional Engineer, Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control (CPESC), Registered Landscape Architect, or someone working under the direct supervision of, and at the same company as, the licensed Professional Engineer or Registered Landscape Architect, provided they have received 4 hours of Department endorsed training in proper erosion and sediment control principles from a Soil and Water Conservation District, or other Department endorsed entity. G:\Proj- 2012\201240_Saratoga_Honda_Consulting\201240.02_Saratoga_Honda_Phase_3\201240.02Enviro\02SWPPP\201240.02_SWP PP.docxlayer � Th+e LA �R�DU P Lands�ape A��h�teEtu�P�_E��3�,�e��ny N.�. Page 25 Appendix A N oti ce of I nte nt (NOI) and MS4 Acceptance Form 1/20/2021 NYSDEC eBusiness Portal System-Saratoga Honda Phase 3 NOI for coverage under Stormwater General Permit for Construction Activ... or covera e un er . ormwa er enera erm� or . . . ons ruc �on c �v� version 1.29 (Submission #: HP5-SGYW-3V60S, version 1) Detai Is Submission Saratoga Honda Phase 3 NOI for coverage under Stormwater General Alias Permit for Construction Activity Originally Kara Tedford Started By Submission ID HP5-SGYW-3V60S Submission New Reason Status Draft Form I n ut p Owner/Operator Information Owner/Operator Name (Company/Private Owner/Municipality/Agency/Institution, etc.) Saratoga Honda Owner/Operator Contact Person Last Name (NOT CONSULTANT) Higgins Owner/Operator Contact Person First Name Tim Owner/Operator Mailing Address 3402 Route 9 C ity Saratoga Springs https://nform-prod.dec.ny.gov/app/#/submissionversion/433ffbd3-a162-4268-a860-e6ce2e6497ad/overview 1/14 1/20/2021 NYSDEC eBusiness Portal System-Saratoga Honda Phase 3 NOI for coverage under Stormwater General Permit for Construction Activ... State NY Zip 12866 Phone 855-650-9132 Emai I tim.higgins99@gmail.com Federal Tax ID 14-1632282 Project Location Project/Site Name Saratoga Honda - Phase 3 Street Address (Not P.O. Box) 3402 Route 9 Side of Street East City/Town/Village (THAT ISSUES BUILDING PERMIT) Saratoga Springs State NY Zip 12866 Cou nty SARATOGA DEC Region 5 Name of Nearest Cross Street Crescent Avenue Distance to Nearest Cross Street (Feet) 0 Project In Relation to Cross Street South https://nform-prod.dec.ny.gov/app/#/submissionversion/433ffbd3-a162-4268-a860-e6ce2e6497ad/overview 2/14 1/20/2021 NYSDEC eBusiness Portal System-Saratoga Honda Phase 3 NOI for coverage under Stormwater General Permit for Construction Activ... Tax Map Numbers Section-Block-Parcel 178.-2-20 Tax Map Numbers NONE PROVIDED 1. Coord i nates Provide the Geographic Coordinates for the project site. The two methods are: - Navigate to the project location on the map (below) and click to place a marker and obtain the XY coordinates. - The "Find Me" button will provide the lat/long for the person filling out this form. Then pan the map to the correct location and click the map to place a marker and obtain the XY coordinates. Navigate to your location and click on the map to get the X,Y coordinates 43.057615,-73.786979 Project Details 2. What is the nature of this project? New Construction 3. Select the predominant land use for both pre and post development conditions. Pre-Development Existing Landuse Commercial Post-Development Future Land Use Commercial 3a. If Single Family Subdivision was selected in question 3, enter the number of subdivision lots. NONE PROVIDED 4. In accordance with the larger common plan of development or sale, enter the total project site acreage, the acreage to be disturbed and the future impervious area (acreage)within the disturbed area. *** ROU N D TO TH E N EAREST TENTH OF AN ACRE. *** Total Site Area (acres) 10.7 Total Area to be Disturbed (acres) 1.5 https://nform-prod.dec.ny.gov/app/#/submissionversion/433ffbd3-a162-4268-a860-e6ce2e6497ad/overview 3/14 1/20/2021 NYSDEC eBusiness Portal System-Saratoga Honda Phase 3 NOI for coverage under Stormwater General Permit for Construction Activ... Existing Impervious Area to be Disturbed (acres) 0.6 Future Impervious Area Within Disturbed Area (acres) 1.0 5. Do you plan to disturb more than 5 acres of soil at any one time? No 6. Indicate the percentage (%) of each Hydrologic Soil Group(HSG) at the site. A (%) 100 B (%) 0 C (%) 0 D (%) 0 7. Is this a phased project? No 8. Enter the planned start and end dates of the disturbance activities. Start Date 04/30/2021 E n d D ate 11/30/2021 9. Identify the nearest surface waterbody(ies) to which construction site runoff will discharge. Unnamed tributary to Geyser Brook 9a. Type of waterbody identified in question 9? Stream/Creek OfF Site Other Waterbody Type Off Site Description NONE PROVIDED 9b. If "wetland" was selected in 9A, how was the wetland identified? NONE PROVIDED https://nform-prod.dec.ny.gov/app/#/submissionversion/433ffbd3-a162-4268-a860-e6ce2e6497ad/overview 4/14 1/20/2021 NYSDEC eBusiness Portal System-Saratoga Honda Phase 3 NOI for coverage under Stormwater General Permit for Construction Activ... 10. Has the surface waterbody(ies in question 9 been identified as a 303(d) segment in Appendix E of GP-0-20-001? No 11. Is this project located in one of the Watersheds identified in Appendix C of GP-O- 20-001? No 12. Is the project located in one of the watershed areas associated with AA and AA- S classified waters? No If No, skip question 13. 13. Does this construction activity disturb land with no existing impervious cover and where the Soil Slope Phase is identified as an E or F on the USDA Soil Survey? No If Yes, what is the acreage to be d istu rbed? NONE PROVIDED 14. Will the project disturb soils within a State regulated wetland or the protected 100 foot adjacent area? No 15. Does the site runoff enter a separate storm sewer system (including roadside d rai ns, swales, d itches, cu Iverts, etc)? No 16. What is the name of the municipality/entity that owns the separate storm sewer system? NONE PROVIDED 17. Does any runoff from the site enter a sewer classified as a Combined Sewer? No 18. Will future use of this site be an agricultural property as defined by the NYS Agriculture and Markets Law? No 19. Is this property owned by a state authority, state agency, federal government or local government? No 20. Is this a remediation project being done under a Department approved work plan? (i.e. CERCLA, RCRA, Voluntary Cleanup Agreement, etc.) No Required SWPPP Components https://nform-prod.dec.ny.gov/app/#/submissionversion/433ffbd3-a162-4268-a860-e6ce2e6497ad/overview 5/14 1/20/2021 NYSDEC eBusiness Portal System-Saratoga Honda Phase 3 NOI for coverage under Stormwater General Permit for Construction Activ... 21. Has the required Erosion and Sediment Control component of the SWPPP been developed in conformance with the current NYS Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control (aka Blue Book)? Yes 22. Does this construction activity require the development of a SWPPP that includes the post-construction stormwater management practice component (i.e. Runoff Reduction, Water Quality and Quantity Control practices/techniques)? Yes If you answered No in question 22, skip question 23 and the Post-construction Criteria and Post-construction SMP Identification sections. 23. Has the post-construction stormwater management practice component of the SWPPP been developed in conformance with the current NYS Stormwater Management Design Manual? Yes 24. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) was prepared by: Professional Engineer (P.E.) SWPPP Preparer The LA Group Contact Name (Last, Space, First) Heller poug Mailing Address 40 Long Alley C ity Saratoga Springs State NY Zip 12866 Phone 5185878100 Emai I dheller@thelagroup.com Download SWPPP Preparer Certification Form Please take the following steps to prepare and upload your preparer certification form: 1) Click on the link below to download a blank certification form 2) The certified SWPPP preparer should sign this form https://nform-prod.dec.ny.gov/app/#/submissionversion/433ffbd3-a162-4268-a860-e6ce2e6497ad/overview 6/14 1/20/2021 NYSDEC eBusiness Portal System-Saratoga Honda Phase 3 NOI for coverage under Stormwater General Permit for Construction Activ... 3) Scan the signed form 4) Upload the scanned document Download SWPPP Preparer Certification Form Please upload the SWPPP Preparer Certification NONE PROVIDED Comment NONE PROVIDED Erosion & Sediment Control Criteria 25. Has a construction sequence schedule for the planned management practices been prepared? Yes 26. Select all of the erosion and sediment control practices that will be employed on the project site: Temporary Structural Stabilized Construction Entrance Silt Fence Biotechnical None Vegetative Measures Mulching Seed i ng Topsoiling Permanent Structural Rock Outlet Protection Land Grading Other NONE PROVIDED Post-Construction Criteria * IMPORTANT: Completion of Questions 27-39 is not required if response to Question 22 is No. 27. Identify all site planning practices that were used to prepare the final site plan/layout for the project. Reduction of Clearing and Grading https://nform-prod.dec.ny.gov/app/#/submissionversion/433ffbd3-a162-4268-a860-e6ce2e6497ad/overview 7/14 1/20/2021 NYSDEC eBusiness Portal System-Saratoga Honda Phase 3 NOI for coverage under Stormwater General Permit for Construction Activ... 27a. Indicate which of the following soil restoration criteria was used to address the requirements in Section 5.1.6("Soil Restoration") of the Design Manual (2010 version). All disturbed areas will be restored in accordance with the Soil Restoration requirements in Table 5.3 of the Design Manual (see page 5-22). 28. Provide the total Water Quality Volume (WQv) required for this project (based on final site plan/layout). (Acre-feet) 0.094 29. Post-construction SMP Identification Use the Post-construction SMP Identification section to identify the RR techniques (Area Reduction), RR techniques(Volume Reduction) and Standard SMPs with RRv Capacity that were used to reduce the Total WQv Required (#28). Identify the SMPs to be used by providing the total impervious area that contributes runoff to each technique/practice selected. For the Area Reduction Techniques, provide the total contributing area (includes pervious area) and, if applicable, the total impervious area that contributes runofF to the technique/practice. Note: Redevelopment projects shall use the Post-Construction SMP Identification section to identify the SMPs used to treat and/or reduce the WQv required. If runoff reduction techniques will not be used to reduce the required WQv, skip to question 33a after identifying the SMPs. 30. Indicate the Total RRv provided by the RR techniques (Area/Volume Reduction) and Standard SMPs with RRv capacity identified in question 29. (acre-feet) 0.116 31. Is the Total RRv provided (#30) greater than or equal to the total WQv required (#28)? Yes If Yes, go to question 36. If No, go to question 32. 32. Provide the Minimum RRv required based on HSG. [Minimum RRv Required = (P) (0.95) (Ai) / 12, Ai=(s) (Aic)] (acre-feet) NONE PROVIDED 32a. Is the Total RRv provided (#30) greater than or equal to the Minimum RRv Req u i red (#32)? NONE PROVIDED If Yes, go to question 33. Note: Use the space provided in question #39 to summarize the specific site limitations and justification for not reducing 100% of WQv required (#28). A detailed evaluation of the specific site limitations and justification for not reducing 100% of the WQv required (#28) must also be included in the SWPPP. https://nform-prod.dec.ny.gov/app/#/submissionversion/433ffbd3-a162-4268-a860-e6ce2e6497ad/overview 8/14 1/20/2021 NYSDEC eBusiness Portal System-Saratoga Honda Phase 3 NOI for coverage under Stormwater General Permit for Construction Activ... If No, sizing criteria has not been met; therefore, NOI can not be processed. SWPPP preparer must modify design to meet sizing criteria. 33. S M Ps Use the Post-construction SM P Identification section to identify the Standard SM Ps and, if applicable, the Alternative SMPs to be used to treat the remaining total WQv (=Total WQv Required in #28 - Total RRv Provided in #30). Also, provide the total impervious area that contributes runoff to each practice selected. NOTE: Use the Post-construction SMP Identification section to identify the SMPs used on Redevelopment projects. 33a. Indicate the Total WQv provided (i.e. WQv treated) by the SMPs identified in question #33 and Standard SMPs with RRv Capacity identified in question #29. (acre-feet) NONE PROVIDED Note: For the standard SMPs with RRv capacity, the WQv provided by each practice = the WQv calculated using the contributing drainage area to the practice - provided by the practice. (See Table 3.5 in Design Manual) 34. Provide the sum of the Total RRv provided (#30) and the WQv provided (#33a). NONE PROVIDED 35. Is the sum of the RRv provided (#30) and the WQv provided (#33a) greater than or eq ual to the total WQv req u i red (#28)? NONE PROVIDED If Yes, go to question 36. If No, sizing criteria has not been met; therefore, NOI can not be processed. SWPPP preparer must modify design to meet sizing criteria. 36. Provide the total Channel Protection Storage Volume (CPv required and provided or select waiver (#36a), if applicable. C Pv Req u i red (acre-feet) NONE PROVIDED CPv Provided (acre-feet) NONE PROVIDED 36a. The need to provide channel protection has been waived because: Reduction of the total CPv is achieved on site through runoff reduction techniques or infiltration systems. 37. Provide the Overbank Flood (Qp) and Extreme Flood (Qfi� control criteria or select waiver (#37a), if applicable. Overbank Flood Control Criteria (Qp) https://nform-prod.dec.ny.gov/app/#/submissionversion/433ffbd3-a162-4268-a860-e6ce2e6497ad/overview 9/14 1/20/2021 NYSDEC eBusiness Portal System-Saratoga Honda Phase 3 NOI for coverage under Stormwater General Permit for Construction Activ... Pre-Development (CFS) 0 Post-Development (CFS) 0.28 Total Extreme Flood Control Criteria (Qfi� Pre-Development (CFS) 0 Post-Development (CFS) 0.06 37a. The need to meet the Qp and Qf criteria has been waived because: NONE PROVIDED 38. Has a long term Operation and Maintenance Plan for the post-construction stormwater management practice(s) been developed? Yes If Yes, Identify the entity responsible for the long term Operation and Maintenance Saratoga Honda 39. Use this space to summarize the specific site limitations and justification for not reducing 100% of WQv required (#28). (See question #32a) This space can also be used for other pertinent project information. NONE PROVIDED Post-Construction SMP Identification Runoff Reduction (RR) Techniques, Standard Stormwater Management Practices (SMPs) and Alternative SMPs Identify the Post-construction SMPs to be used by providing the total impervious area that contributes runofF to each technique/practice selected. For the Area Reduction Techniques, provide the total contributing area (includes pervious area) and, if applicable, the total impervious area that contributes runofF to the technique/practice. RR Techniques (Area Reduction) Round to the nearest tenth Total Contributing Acres for Conservation of Natural Area (RR-1) NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Conservation of Natural Area (RR-1) NONE PROVIDED https://nform-prod.dec.ny.gov/app/#/submissionversion/433ffbd3-a162-4268-a860-e6ce2e6497ad/overview 10/14 1/20/2021 NYSDEC eBusiness Portal System-Saratoga Honda Phase 3 NOI for coverage under Stormwater General Permit for Construction Activ... Total Contributing Acres for Sheetflow to Riparian Buffers/Filter Strips (RR-2) NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Sheetflow to Riparian Buffers/Filter Strips (RR-2) NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Acres for Tree Planting/Tree Pit (RR-3) NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Tree Planting/Tree Pit (RR-3) NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Acres for Disconnection of Rooftop Runoff (RR-4) NONE PROVIDED RR Techniques (Volume Reduction) Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Disconnection of Rooftop Runoff(RR-4) NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Vegetated Swale (RR-5) NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Rain Garden (RR-6) NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Stormwater Planter (RR-7) NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Rain Barrel/Cistern (RR-8) NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Porous Pavement (RR-9) 0.4 Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Green Roof (RR-10) NONE PROVIDED Standard SMPs with RRv Capacity Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Infiltration Trench (I-1) NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Infiltration Basin (I-2) 0.8 https://nform-prod.dec.ny.gov/app/#/submissionversion/433ffbd3-a162-4268-a860-e6ce2e6497ad/overview 11/14 1/20/2021 NYSDEC eBusiness Portal System-Saratoga Honda Phase 3 NOI for coverage under Stormwater General Permit for Construction Activ... Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Dry Well (I-3) NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Underground Infiltration System (I-4) NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Bioretention (F-5) NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Dry Swale (O-1) NONE PROVIDED Standard SMPs Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Micropool Extended Detention (P-1) NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Wet Pond (P-2) NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Wet Extended Detention (P-3) NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Multiple Pond System (P-4) NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Pocket Pond (P-5) NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Surface Sand Filter (F-1) NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Underground Sand Filter (F-2) NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Perimeter Sand Filter (F-3) NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Organic Filter (F-4) NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Shallow Wetland (W-1) NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Extended Detention Wetland (W-2) NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Pond/Wetland System (W-3) NONE PROVIDED https://nform-prod.dec.ny.gov/app/#/submissionversion/433ffbd3-a162-4268-a860-e6ce2e6497ad/overview 12/14 1/20/2021 NYSDEC eBusiness Portal System-Saratoga Honda Phase 3 NOI for coverage under Stormwater General Permit for Construction Activ... Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Pocket Wetland (W-4) NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Impervious Acres for Wet Swale (O-2) NONE PROVIDED Alternative SMPs (DO NOT INCLUDE PRACTICES BEING USED FOR PRETREATMENT ONLY) Total Contributing Impervious Area for Hydrodynamic NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Impervious Area for Wet Vault NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Impervious Area for Media Filter NONE PROVIDED "Other" Alternative SMP? NONE PROVIDED Total Contributing Impervious Area for "Other" NONE PROVIDED Provide the name and manufaturer of the alternative SMPs (i.e. proprietary practice(s)) being used for WQv treatment. Note: Redevelopment projects which do not use RR techniques, shall use questions 28, 29, 33 and 33a to provide SMPs used, total WQv required and total WQv provided for the project. Manufacturer of Alternative SMP NONE PROVIDED Name of Alternative SMP NONE PROVIDED Other Permits 40. Identify other DEC permits, existing and new, that are required for this project/faci I ity. None If SPDES Multi-Sector GP, then give permit ID NONE PROVIDED https://nform-prod.dec.ny.gov/app/#/submissionversion/433ffbd3-a162-4268-a860-e6ce2e6497ad/overview 13/14 1/20/2021 NYSDEC eBusiness Portal System-Saratoga Honda Phase 3 NOI for coverage under Stormwater General Permit for Construction Activ... If Other, then identify NONE PROVIDED 41. Does this project require a US Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Permit? No If "Yes," then indicate Size of Impact, in acres, to the nearest tenth NONE PROVIDED 42. If this NOI is being submitted for the purpose of continuing or transferring coverage under a general permit for stormwater runoff from construction activities, please indicate the former SPDES number assigned. N/A M S4 SW P P P Acce pta n ce 43. Is this project subject to the requirements of a regulated, traditional land use control MS4? Yes - Please attach the MS4 Acceptance form below If No, skip question 44 44. Has the "MS4 SWPPP Acceptance" form been signed by the principal executive officer or ranking elected official and submitted along with this NOI? Yes MS4 SWPPP Acceptance Form Download Download form from the link below. Complete, sign, and upload. MS4 SWPPP Acceptance Form MS4 Acceptance Form Upload NONE PROVIDED Comment NONE PROVIDED Owner/Operator Certification Owner/Operator Certification Form Download Download the certification form by clicking the link below. Complete, sign, scan, and upload the form. Owner/Operator Certification Form (PDF, 45KB), Upload Owner/Operator Certification Form NONE PROVIDED Comment NONE PROVIDED https://nform-prod.dec.ny.gov/app/#/submissionversion/433ffbd3-a162-4268-a860-e6ce2e6497ad/overview 14/14 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water � 625 Broadway, 4th Floor ,� Albany, New York 12233-3505 MS4 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Acceptance Form for Construction Activities Seeking Authorization Under SPDES General Permit *(NOTE: Attach Completed Form to Notice Of Intent and Submit to Address Above) I. Project Owner/Operator Information 1.Owner/Operator Name: S a ratog a H o n d a 2.Contact Person: Ti m H igg i ns 3. Street Address: 3402 Route 9 4.City/State/Zip: Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 II. Project Site Information 5.Project/Site Name: Saratoga Honda - Phase 3 6. Street Address: 3402 Route 9 �.City/State/Zip: Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 III. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP)Review and Acceptance Information 8. SWPPP Reviewed by: 9.Title/Position: 10. Date Final SWPPP Reviewed and Accepted: IV.Regulated MS4 Information 11.Name of MS4: City of Saratoga Springs 12.MS4 SPDES Permit Identification Number:NYR20A 2�6 13. Contact Person: AI F I I Ck 14. street aaaress: C ity H a I I, 474 B roadway Is. clty�state�z�p: Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 16. Telephone Number: 518-587-3550 (NYS DEC-MS4 SWPPP Acceptance Form-January 2010) Page 1 of 2 MS4 SWPPP Acceptance Form - continued V.Certification Statement-MS4 Official(principal executive officer or ranking elected official)or Duly Authorized Representative I hereby certify that the final Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP)for the construction proj ect identified in question 5 has been reviewed and meets the substantive requirements in the SPDES General Permit For Stormwater Discharges from Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems(MS4s). Note: The MS4,through the acceptance of the SWPPP,assumes no responsibility for the accuracy and adequacy of the design included in the SWPPP.In addition,review and acceptance of the SWPPP by the MS4 does not relieve the owner/operator or their SWPPP preparer of responsibility or liability for errors or omissions in the plan. Printed Name: Title/Position: Signature: Date: VI.Additional Information Page 2 of 2 Appendix B Stormwater Mana ement Report g H dro CAD y ;ra Long Rlley� ��:�l�-`_��r'-�3��U � :�: ,j,��:�� prings f.�5I8-58�'-C�l�a I��J Y ��S�h w�v�v.tl�el�c�r c��p_�om �.a�lds�ap�Ar�hitectur�8��ngin�errng P.C. ormwa er ana emen e or for: Saratoga Honda—Building Expansion Phase 3 Owner/Operator(s): Saratoga Honda 3402 South Broadway Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 Contact: Tim Higgins SWM Report Contact(s): The LA Group, PC 40 Long Alley Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 1-518-587-8100 Proj ect No. 201240.02 Preparation Date: January 22, 2021 Stormwater Management Report Saratoga Honda Building Expansion 201240.02 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUC TION.................................................................................................................4 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION.................................................................................................4 2.1 SITE LOCATION....................................................................................................................4 2.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION.........................................................................................................4 2.3 SOIL CONDITIONS/SOIL TESTING.........................................................................................4 Z.4 CURVE NUMBERS AND RAINFALL DATA..............................................................................S 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS..................................................................................................5 4.0 PROPOSED CONDITIONS................................................................................................5 5.0 NYSDEC DESIGN CRITERIA...........................................................................................6 S.1 SITE PLANNING TO PRESERVE NATURAL FEATURES............................................................7 S.Z WATER QUALITY VOLUME�WQV�......................................................................................g S.3 RUNOFF REDUCTION VOLUME�RRV�..................................................................................9 S.4 CHANNEL PROTECTION VOLUME�CPV� ............................................................................1 O S.S OVERBANK FLOOD�QP�AND EXTREME FLOOD�QF�ATTENUATION.................................1 O 6.0 PROPOSED STORMWATER FACILITIES..................................................................10 C.1 PRETREATMENT.................................................................................................................1 O 6.Z TREATMENT.......................................................................................................................11 7.0 POST-CONSTRUCTION MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS.................................11 7.1 REFERENCES....................................................................................................................12 Stormwater Management Report Saratoga Honda Building Expansion 201240.02 Attachment A Soil Investigations Soil Survey Natural Resource Map B Existing Conditions Watershed Map and HydroCAD Calculations C Proposed Conditions Watershed Map, HydroCAD Calculations & Frozen Conditions D Storm Data Stormwater Management Report Saratoga Honda Building Expansion 201240.02 1.0 INTRODUCTION The following is a Stormwater Management Report (SWM Report) developed for the Operator, Saratoga Honda, for the Saratoga Honda Building Expansion Project(Phase 3), herein referred to as the "Proj ect." It is prepared in accordance with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Stormwater Management Design Manual, dated January, 2015. The Proj ect has been designed in accordance with Chapter 4 of the NYSDEC Stormwater Management Design Manual (SWMDM), and NYSDEC's General Permit GP-0-20-001 for construction activities. Stormwater calculations were performed utilizing widely accepted engineering methodologies, including TR-55, and the stormwater modeling computer program HydroCAD (version 10.00) produced by HydroCAD Software Solutions, LLC. 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Site Location The site is located to the southeast of the intersection of Route 9 and Crescent Avenue, located in the City of Saratoga Springs,NY. 2.2 Proj ect Description The proposed proj ect involves the construction of a 8.000 square foot building expansion and 18,000 square foot porous asphalt parking lot. The area of the proposed proj ect currently consists of a mixed of grassed, paved, and wooded areas. The remainder of the proposed site improvements includes construction of a site lighting, landscaping and stormwater controls. The proj ect is considered a new development proj ect per Chapters 4 of the SWMDM. The Proj ect Site represents the area that will be disturbed as a result of the Proj ect. 2.3 Soil Conditions/Soil Testing According to the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey, the area surrounding the Proj ect Site is comprised of Windsor loamy sand. The hydrological soil group classification for the soil is `A'. Soil testing in the form of deep hole test pits were performed in the locations of the proposed stormwater management facilities to identify subsurface soil conditions. The testing was performed on December 10, 2020 by The LA Group observed sand with seasonal high groundwater at a depth of 44"to 60". � Th+� LA �RC�U P l;ar-ij�.r_:i�a�'rarr_I�tl�r•i.lr+��a F'�_ +rif�_1 9�t_ 4 Stormwater Management Report Saratoga Honda Building Expansion 201240.02 2.4 Curve Numbers and Rainfall Data The surface cover for the proj ect area is grass and woods. The curve numbers utilized in the modeling were assigned based on cover type and HSG soil classification. The design storms used for the pre-development versus post-development comparison were the l, 10, and 100-year, 24-hour duration, SCS Type II events. The rainfall amounts for these storms are 2.15, 3.75, and 6.20 inches, respectively. 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS The Proj ect area existing condition, for which this stormwater management plan is based, consists of grass, woods, the existing Saratoga Honda building, parking lots and drives. There are five existing stormwater management practices indicated in Attachment B from previous phases of development at this proj ect site. Stormwater is generally infiltrated into underlying soils; but stormwater generally flows towards a wooded area to the south of the proj ect site. This is indicated on the plans as AP-1. Table 3-1 below provides a summary of the existing conditions peak discharge rates for the Proj ect's watershed. Table 3-1 Existin Conditions Peak Dischar e Rates Anal sis Point AP-1 Design Storm (cfs) 10-Year 0.0 100-Year 0.28 Refer to Attachment B for more information on the existing conditions watershed modeling. 4.0 PROPOSED CONDITIONS Under the watershed's Proposed Condition, stormwater from the Project will continue to discharge to the same point as in the Existing Condition (Analysis Point 1). The total watershed has generally remained unchanged, as is shown on the drawing "W-2 Proposed Conditions Watershed Map" contained in Attachment C. To meet NYSDEC requirements (see Section 5.0 NYSDEC Design Criteria of this report) porous pavement has been installed to manage the WQv required for the new impervious area created as a result of the proj ect. The existing capacities of the two existing pocket ponds were evaluated to ensure they could manage flows from additional impervious areas. � Th+� LA �RC�U P l;ar-ij�.r::v��r�rr_I�tl�c'llrt'�F'7� +'rif�_1 9�i_ 5 Stormwater Management Report Saratoga Honda Building Expansion 201240.02 Table 4-1 below provides a summary of the existing conditions versus proposed conditions peak discharge rates for the Project's watershed. Table 4-1 Existing Conditions Versus Proposed Conditions Peak Dischar e Rates Anal sis Point AP-1 Existing Proposed Design Storm (cfs) (cfs) 10-Year 0.0 0.0 100-Year 0.28 0.06 Refer to Attachment C for more information on the proposed conditions watershed modeling. 5.0 NYSDEC DESIGN CRITERIA The New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual, dated January 2015 (The Manual) has been utilized to develop the stormwater management plan. The Manual includes a five-step process that involves site planning and stormwater management practice selection. The five steps include; • Site planning to preserve natural features and reduce impervious cover, • Calculation of the Water Quality Volume (WQv) for the Site, • Incorporation of green infrastructure techniques and standard SMPs with Runoff Reduction Volume (RRv) capacity, • Use of standard SMPs where applicable, to treat the portion of WQv not addressed by green infrastructure techniques and standard SMPs with RRv capacity, and • Design of volume and peak rate control (where required) The approach of the stormwater management plan was to address the stormwater requirements separately. The five steps were reduced to Site Planning to Preserve Natural Features, Water Quality Volume, Runoff Reduction Volume, Channel Protection Volume, and Overbank Flood and Extreme Storm Attenuation, as discussed in the following sections. Attachment D of this report contains detailed calculations for determining and summarizing the required and provided volumes for Water Quality and Runoff Reduction. In general, the required design criteria (WQv and RRv) were calculated for all areas where site disturbance or green infrastructure techniques are proposed. � Th+� LA �RC�U P l;ar-ij�.r::v��r�rr_I�tl�c'llrt'�F'7� +'rif�_1 9�t_ 6 Stormwater Management Report Saratoga Honda Building Expansion 201240.02 5.1 Site Planning to Preserve Natural Features Within Chapter 3 of The Manual, Table 3.1 Green Infrastructure Planning General Categories and Specific Practices includes a list of planning practices utilized in the planning and design of a proj ect. There are two categories, Preservation of Natural Resources and Reduction of . Imperlous Cover. Preservation of Natural Resources includes: • Preservation of Undisturbed Areas • Preservation of Buffers • Reduction of Clearing and Grading • Locating Development in Less Sensitive Areas • Open Space Design • Soil Restoration Reduction of Impervious Cover includes: • Roadway Reduction • Sidewalk Reduction • Driveway Reduction • Cul-de-sac Reduction • Building Footprint Reduction • Parking Reduction A Natural Resource Map for Green Infrastructure Planning has been developed which indicates natural resource areas and critical environmental areas to be protected (where feasible). As required in Section 3.6 of The Manual, the map includes (where applicable): • Jurisdictional Wetlands o There are no wetlands located near the proj ect site. • Waterways o No waterways are impacted by the Project. • Wetland Adj acent Area o There are no wetlands located near the proj ect site. • Floodplains o The proj ect is not within the flood plain. • Forest, vegetative cover o Proj ect is designed to maintain as much of the woods as feasible. • Topography/Steep slopes o There are no steep slopes located throughout the project. • Existing soils, including hydrologic soil groups and soil erodibility o See Section 2.3 of this Report. � Th+� LA �RC�U P` I;�r•ij�.r:,c��I�rr_htl��.-'i.�rc��F�7��..,:a,rir�.;_�q�,_ � Stormwater Management Report Saratoga Honda Building Expansion 201240.02 • Drainage Patterns o See Section 3.0 of this Report. • Bedrock/Significant geological features o See Section 2.3 of this Report. The Natural Resource Plan indicates the areas to be avoided and depicts the area most suitable for development. 5.2 Water Quality Volume (WQv) The Water Quality Volume (WQv) requirement is designed to improve water quality sizing to capture and treat 90% of the average annual stormwater runoff volumes. The WQv is directly related to the amount of impervious cover created at a site. The following equation is used to determine the water quality storage volume. WQv = P Rv A 12 Where: WQv = Water quality volume (acre/feet) P = 90% Rainfall Event(1.15" for Saratoga Springs) Rv = 0.05 + 0.009(I) where I is percent impervious cover A = S ite are a in acre s The required WQv will be provided by porous pavement, a pocket pond, and an infiltration basin, modified and designed in accordance with the SWMDM. The total required WQv for the project is 0.094 ac-ft. Refer to Table 5-1 for a summary of the provided water quality volumes for the Proj ect. Table 5-1 Water Qualit Volume WQv Summar SMP Type Provided (ac-ft) Ex-SMP-1 Pocket Pond 0.025 Ex-SMP-2 Porous Pavement 0.040 SMP-3 Infiltration Basin 0.052 TOTAL 0.116 � Th+� LA �RC�U� l;ar-ij�.r::v��r�rr_I�tl�c'llrt'�F'7� +'rif�_1 9�t_ g Stormwater Management Report Saratoga Honda Building Expansion 201240.02 Refer to Attachment D for detailed WQv calculations. Note that the calculations shown indicate new impervious area and disturbed impervious area. 100% of the disturbed impervious area was treated as part of this proj ect because all impervious areas are currently directed to stormwater management practices. 5.3 Runoff Reduction Volume (RRv) Section 4.3 of the Manual states, "Runoff reduction shall be achieved by infiltration, groundwater recharge, reuse, recycle, evaporation/evapotranspiration of 100 percent of the post- development water quality volumes to replicate pre-development hydrology by maintaining pre- construction infiltration, peak runoff flow, discharge volume, as well as minimizing concentrated flow by using runoff control techniques to provide treatment in a distributed manner before runoff reaches the collection system." The Project achieves 100% runoff reduction of the on-site WQv of the project. Utilizing green infrastructure and stormwater management practices with RRv capabilities throughout the project an RRv of 0.116 acre-feet is provided. See Table 5-2 for a summary of the provided runoff reduction volumes for each green infrastructure practice. Table 5-2 Runoff Reduction Volume RRv Summar SMP Provided (unit) 5.3.1 Conservation of Natural Areas - 5.3.2 Sheetflow to Riparian Buffers/Filter Strips - 5.3.3 Vegetated Open Swales - 5.3.4 Tree Planting/Tree Box - 5.3.5 Disconnection of Rooftop Runoff - 5.3.6 Stream Daylighting - 5.3.7 Rain Garden - 5.3.8 Green Roof - 5.3.9 Stormwater Planters - 5.3.10 Rain Tanks/Cisterns - 5.3.11 Porous Pavement 0.040 Infiltration Basin 0.052 Stormwater Disposal Area(After Pocket Pond) 0.025 TOTAL 0.116 (ac-ft) � Th+� LA �RC�U� I�r-i��.r_:'rra•�ri�"r_Ilflrr'i.lr+* �F�:_ ,:ri�i_��;_ 9 Stormwater Management Report Saratoga Honda Building Expansion 201240.02 5.4 Channel Protection Volume (CPv) The channel protection volume is reduced through the use of green infrastructure practices (infiltration basin). 5.5 Overbank Flood (Qp) and Extreme Flood (Qf� Attenuation The primary purpose of the Overbank Flood (Qp) control sizing criterion is to prevent an increase in the frequency and magnitude of out-of-bank flooding generated by urban development. It requires storage and attenuation of the 10-year, 24-hour storm to ensure post- development peak discharge rates do not exceed the pre-development condition. The intent of the Extreme Flood (Q� criteria is to (a) prevent the increased risk of flood damage from large storm events, (b) maintain the boundaries of the pre-development 100-year floodplain, and (c) protect the physical integrity of stormwater management practices. It requires storage and attenuation of the 100-year, 24-hour storm to ensure post-development peak discharge rates do not exceed the pre-development condition. During the 10-year and 100-year 24-hour storm the post-development peak discharge rates do not exceed the pre-development rates. See Table 4-1 of this Report for detailed comparison of pre- and post-development peak rates. 6.0 PROPOSED STORMWATER FACILITIES The Proj ect is proposing two stormwater management practices to treat stormwater: use of an existing pocket pond (Ex-SMP-1) and expansion of the existing porous pavement (Ex-SMP-2). The proj ect is also proposing the modification of an existing pocket pond due to site changes requiring its relocation (Ex-SMP-3); in lieu of a pocket pond the new design is proposing flows are directed to an infiltration basin. The stormwater facilities have been indicated on the plans and HydroCAD reports as Ex-SMP-I, Ex-SMP-2, and Ex-SMP-3 (Pre-Development), SMP-3 (Post-Development), Ex-SMP-4 and Ex-SMP-S are included in the plans and reports but are from previous phases of the proj ect and are included for information only. 6.1 Pretreatment Pretreatment of runoff from the disturbed impervious area for the existing pocket pond (Ex- SMP-1) is provided by a low area (P4.1) and a grass filter strip (2R) ahead of the pocket pond sized in accordance to the SWMDM. � Th+� LA �RC�U P L;�r•ij�.r.;c��farr_htlFc'i.�r.,.�F�7�...,:,,rir�;�9'i_ 1 O Stormwater Management Report Saratoga Honda Building Expansion 201240.02 Pretreatment of runoff from the standard asphalt drive to the porous pavement (Ex-SMP-2) is provided via low areas which hold 100% of the WQv prior to discharging to the porous pavement(P4.2, P4.3, and P4.4). Pretreatment for the infiltration basin (SMP-3) is provided via a vegetated swale and a basin. The vegetated swale worksheet (Appendix D) was used to verify that the WQv flowrate (0.92 cfs) required to provide the necessary pretreatment WQv (561 c�. The depth of flow in the swale at the WQv flowrate was determined using HydroCAD; when the swale receives a flow of 0.92 cfs, the depth of flow will be 0.33' (or 4"). At the WQv flowrate, the swale as designed meets the requirements for a vegetated swale per NYSDEC. The basin that will provide the remaining treatment volume has a capacity to store 1,697 cf of WQv prior to discharging via a weir into the infiltration basin. For all pretreatment calculations, refer to Appendix D. 6.2 Treatment Ex-SMP-1 (pocket pond) has a treatment capacity of 0.124 ac-ft based on the available volume in the pond below the outlet weir. The two subcatchments within the proj ect area that will be contributing to Ex-SMP-1 are 4.1 S and 4.65. The treatment required for the existing watershed is 0.068 ac-ft, and the treatment required for subcatchments 4.1 S and 4.6 S is 0.025 ac-ft. The total treatment required is 0.093 ac-ft, which is less than the current capacity of 0.124 ac-ft. It was therefore determined that the existing layout of Ex-SMP-1 will be adequate to manage contributions from the proj ect area, since the treatment capacity is currently greater than the post-construction contribution. Ex-SMP-1 will continue to outlet to a stormwater disposal area. Treatment at Ex-SMP-2 (porous pavement) will be provided via infiltration into underlying soils. There is currently a porous pavement parking lot in this area that the new porous pavement proposed will be tied into to provide one continuous parking lot. Ex-SMP-3 will be impacted by construction and has been redesigned as a result. SMP-3 is an infiltration basin at the south end of the new porous asphalt parking lot. Treatment will be provided via infiltration into the underlying soils. 7.0 POST-CONSTRUCTION MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS Saratoga Honda will be responsible for the continuous upkeep and maintenance of all stormwater management facilities. Maintenance includes, but is not limited to, cleaning of sediment from drainage inlet sumps, removal of sediment from SMPs, cleaning conveyance piping and channels of obstructions, inspection and repair as required of any outlet control mechanisms, and repairing any other detriments in the design that is resulting in the facilities to not function as intended in the design. � Th+� LA �RC�U P I.:�r•ij�.r;,c�.�farr�iElFc'i.�ri=�F�7�...,:,,rir�ta I'�_ 11 Stormwater Management Report Saratoga Honda Building Expansion 201240.02 7.1 REFERENCES 1. Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds. Published by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C., June 1986. 2. HydroCAD 10.00 Computer Program, by HydroCAD Software Solutions, LLC. 3. NYSDEC Stormwater Management Design Manual. Published by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Updated January 2015. G:\Proj-2012\201240_Saratoga_Honda_Consulting\201240.02_Saratoga_Honda_Phase_3\201240.02Enviro\02SWPPP\201240.02_SWM Report.doc � Th+� LA �RC�U� L-;3r•ij�.r;at��farr�i6lFc'i.�r�=�F�7�..,.�:,,rir�t]I'i_ 12 Attachment A Soil Investigations Soil Survey Natural Resource Map US�A United States A product of the National Custom Soi I Resou rce — Department of Cooperative Soil Survey, Agriculture a joint effort of the United Re ort for States Department of p `J Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State Natural agencies including the Resources Agricultural Experiment Conservation Stations, and local � Service participants : � -_ . � _ , � , : . } � � � . �, .�_ , � � - � - �� 3 _� , ,�.� - f. �, �: �'' �� _ �� '�� y � �� ,. � „-�..� _ � � _ �r � !�_ �� .�'�' ' �' � � �� "�� '� " �� "� .- � � �' � -�� ,�. ., �� , � " ,� t . . ��.� � I � _�� 9� � �` �,�' ' � �� ,�,�.� ■ ,� �, � ��„��,_�" ��,�'�} ,. ,� ,_ , _ �� u - , � � _ _ � ,� �r � �� ` ��.� _ � _ � � r ��_� � � _ . _ � , � � � _ . m ..__ .. � � � � �i� _e . - -� '�!��' -��.- . c ��iY, � _. � —' ;�' . �.,� � � � � �� ` ��,� � �q, �. � � � i I"� i�' E�. � " � � �� i .� � �� y !° • ' i� � �¢ � — � � i _ . � . .. 1�� , —� ; � � j � � 1 p � ' ,�� , '' � M �,� `. .�- . �; _ �r�t��.� - -' �� ,., � � �`' �� , � � ,,�' c II �� fl � a �. �, � � �� .�� , � � � �F, ,� d. � ... � �� . � r - ^�� s � y� � ,. 1 , �. � �.. � _. �J'r ..� _. . �..- _ � _� III '�_ M � � � � 'M h �_ �.i ' .. t. � �, �'�: . �d �� " �' ��, . r. � + � � � u � � � e � � l _ �� "!' � • � .. �t h � .r � 9 � � �� r ' � � I ij - � �! i � +�+ �'� r � �� ,_ � - , I �� _� � ;.`- �. � �� - � �� ,�. � i � �u`� � , May 6, 2013 re ace Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect,or enhance the environment. Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations. Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning,onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://soils.usda.gov/sqi/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center(http://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app? agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist(http://soils.usda.gov/contact/ state_offices/). Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey orwet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Soil Data Mart Web site or the NRCS Web Soil Survey. The Soil Data Mart is the data storage site for the official soil survey information. The U.S. Department of Agriculture(USDA)prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means 2 for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.)should contact USDA's TARGET Center at(202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or(202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 3 on en s Preface....................................................................................................................2 HowSoil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5 SoilMap..................................................................................................................7 SoilMap................................................................................................................8 Legend..................................................................................................................9 MapUnit Legend................................................................................................10 MapUnit Descriptions........................................................................................10 SaratogaCounty, New York...........................................................................12 DeA Deerfield loamy fine sand, nearly level.............................................12 DeB Deerfield loamy fine sand, undulating...............................................13 WnA Windsor loamy sand, nearly level....................................................14 References............................................................................................................16 4 ■ ow o� urve s re a e Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity. Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA. The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform,a soil scientist develops a concept,or model,of how they were formed.Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape. Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries. Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units). Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the 5 Custom Soil Resource Report individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research. The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map. The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil- landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape. Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties. While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil. Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date. After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and identified each as a specific map unit.Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately. 6 ■ o� a The soil map section includes the soil map forthe defined area of interest, a listof soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 7 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map N ' N � ti � � � 0 � � � ~ 598560 598640 598720 598800 598880 598960 599040 43°3'37" 43°3'37" , � - ,� Y, �j - ' � _ ��/� �■y � - ��/� �S./ � 9 � ,.. ..., - .. � \S./ r r ry� E � ry� W .� 3 � :. '�� —_ W _ � .: � �. � ' �-- T �� ,.�� .�' e " '�� I r � FI - � �; � 1 N�j4_� ,�--� f'�; - � � � � .��'� u � '� il s g " ,' �,��, 7 IIl1 Y� J �" �+ "� �.� � � I � .- � � .— - � r. � �.� __ � `��. , � ; ;, I�� ' , � � - , _. _. , � o ,� ��-,� - �, �� , �� , o o � �, - �"� _ , .� _ � - �W„ o � � � � '� -� x'� _ � .� � � I., �_ '�� . w I ! _ �1 � ,s��; � _ �„ - �ik 1� �� ,�,�.� ��' 9 � � � �� — - ' r ► '- � • �� ' 1 — - � .... -1 �� _' � � � w � — ■ � . ��. ��r�. ru1 T� o �d� � � �� jy* � — _ � 00 = 00 � � _ � _ „ � l� - �� y�, .� � � � - � � �- � �� . � � , .. �-- = �� -:� �, . � y�r.� � � � � -- m- _ � n � � � , a � - � 1 � � , � � . � � � .. � �, � � ` � �1'° �i...� �F � - �"� �� _� I - � � � - , _. !�! � � � -� . O ��_ P p � f� , �` � I� y I� � � _ _ M � � � � � � ^� � I' � 1 �� - - � _ - � - - � �� ■�I�u�■ �� - _ '�I� � I -, .�� . � .� ��, _ - �� __ ___ . � _ . � �. � � , � � .-. � � � ti � - ''-- � r` � ;, � W � - ��'.�� wl�, a - � - - I�'`' } .. , - � � � - �w � A ��' � .. �.. � �� . �' 1� 1 I ��P -�� ``��.� � �� . ` O �i � O (.�Q n � e _ . � (�9 ti � � � � ti � � � � ,. ,. __ y� � � �,. !",�''�,e � - � �� D . � � _ r `�i � . i� � .. �i P' � - ' } I � �, _ O �;_- IF,� O 00 - }� 00 (D (D ti � ti � � � � I� � ;� � �� w .. � � — �� + � „ � - n� O — � � �!�.0 O O ' O tD ` : _ t - tD f� ��, �i f` � - � -•- _ ~ ' — � ��p " � � � — c�� _ �� ; _ 43°3'16" � ~n � �K �•- � 43°3'16" 598560 598640 598720 598800 598880 598960 599040 N Map Scale:1:3,090 if printed on Asize(8.5"x 11")sheet. � ti � N Meters � a � "' 0 25 50 100 150 ti ti Fe et 0 100 200 400 600 o � � � � � o — c � � � ca � a� 'o � � � � � � � � r � `� � ' � � p (� � � L }; }, V p C N L U � � � � O N � � �+ O (6 V � (6 � '^ � p . C �,y,� L � � � � � (q U N � � p � � � � � U � O � (6 (/� � L p �1 � ^ � � U � � p � bj � N 0 t6 � � .� O U � cA Z r � � � (6 N � � � � (f� � � � � � O X � � � � � L �M (� � �, � +-% � (� � � � � � � � � � � � � N cA c�i> > � Z � N .U � � a °° � �- o � � o � � � a ' � - � = � L . `- � � .� cn � � � � z Q z N � � `� � }. � N � � c� �� o � a c I♦/ (� L U (6 +� +� � � � i � � LL a � � � � � V V � � � (/) � Q!� O O (a N .� O � � � � � � 0 N � � � N � � �+ > � O � �j � 0 � O � � V � 0 � �' � N O = cA O 0 N � � Z � '� � � � o c�n � � �N � � � o � � � N �' � C � � �+� � C t6 - � � `~ � � �cA � � O cA � � 'L O � � O N V � ~ � � � L N � Q � � �+ � � � N � � � � � a � a--� � � � � � (6 � J � � � > � � � � •� � O � � � � ta > � Z � .. � ^ � O N � t6 � . �� L p � t6 � � � � � >,� � � (6 � � � �N � ,,,� . �--� . � N � t6 � �+ � M >+ � O � � � � � � > �+ � � L � _ O � � O r > p � � � � 0 � � � U) +� � Q � � � � Q� aj � (n N j +� U �+ � � (!) � � C �' � � � (6 •� �= c� .. L � }, � `~ }' O � O � � � N Q � � (� O � �� O .� O � � � � � � � � � (n �� L � � +' (n N L �) � � � C/) � `--� O �Q � ta Q � L (� � V cA (6 t6 � � p N � _ � � � � � � � � >� � •— (a '� � � p >� p � � �p � � � O � � � > W � � cn � � (n > U � � (n (n 0 � U .� O a--� � O Q N � N U � � O � N � O � � � � � � � O `� 0 o V � � � � � � � � •� � � � � i � � = cr� � � � � ca � ca ca U o Q � � � � � � � ca � �, � � �i �' o a� � a`�i � � �' � o � � a� � � � � � � � � � _ �� o � � O C U' C/) O +�' (> i C!) � �' _ � � J J � � � Q � � � � .� � . k � � Q Z �-� �' � � �� ' � C� i W � ' = � �' � � � � � � � o � � (' a � � W J � � � L Q a p �' � a o � � � � � � � a� a� � � N � � � � � � Q � .. � � � �= �, a�i � u�j � � � � � o � � w �� o c� o O — Q � �, a o� � a �, o o � � ca � cn cn �, � � � � � a � � �i o o � � a� a� � � � � � c � a� � � � � v Q � � � — �, � � � cn > > � ca � a� c� a� v � � � Y � � •o � � � •o = a o � o � � � � � � cn � o � c� a� � � o � � i Q C/) '� 00 00 U U U� U� J J � � � � � C/) C/) C!) C/) C/) C/) C/) C/) � a � � � o '� �� •� � � � � � � � + ;�; I�I � .�w �� d�� i �p � a �n Custom Soil Resource Report Ma U n it Le end p J Saratoga County,New York(NY091) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI DeA Deerfield loamy fine sand, nearly level 21.0 50.5% DeB Deerfield loamy fine sand, undulating 16.7 40.2% WnA Windsor loamy sand, nearly level 3.9 9.3% Totals for Area of Interest 41.5 100.0% Ma U n it Descri tions p p The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils.On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management.These are called contrasting, or dissimilar,components.They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that itwas impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If 10 Custom Soil Resource Report intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha- Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. 11 Custom Soil Resource Report Saratoga County, New York DeA—Deerfield loamy fine sand, nearly level Map Unit Setting Elevation: 0 to 1,000 feet Mean annual precipitation: 36 to 48 inches Mean annual air temperature: 45 to 48 deg rees F Frost-free period: 125 to 160 days Map Unit Composition Deerfield and similar soils: 75 percent Minor components: 25 percent Description of Deerfield Setti ng Landform: Deltas, outwash plains, terraces Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Concave Across-slope shape: Convex Parent material: Sandy glaciofluvial or deltaic deposits derived mainly from granite, gneiss, or sandstone Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Moderately well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): H ig h to very h ig h (1.98 to 19.98 i n/h r) Depth to water table:About 18 to 36 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water capacity: Low(about 3.8 inches) Interpretive groups Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Land capability(nonirrigated): 3w Hydrologic Soil Group: A Typical profile 0 to 10 inches: Loamy fine sand 10 to 26 inches: Loamy fine sand 26 to 72 inches: Fine sand Minor Components Oakville Percent of map unit: 10 percent Claverack Percent of map unit: 7 percent Wareham Percent of map unit: 4 percent 12 Custom Soil Resource Report Wareham Percent of map unit: 4 percent DeB—Deerfield loamy fine sand, undulating Map Unit Setting Elevation: 590 to 1,000 feet Mean annual precipitation: 35 to 50 inches Mean annual air temperature: 45 to 48 deg rees F Frost-free period: 120 to 160 days Map Unit Composition Deerfield and similar soils: 75 percent Minor components: 25 percent Description of Deerfield Setti ng Landform: Deltas, outwash plains, terraces Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread, rise Down-slope shape: Concave Across-slope shape: Convex Parent material: Sandy glaciofluvial or deltaic deposits derived mainly from granite, gneiss, or sandstone Properties and qualities Slope: 3 to 8 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Moderately well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): H ig h to very h ig h (1.98 to 19.98 i n/h r) Depth to water table:About 18 to 36 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water capacity: Low(about 3.8 inches) Interpretive groups Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Land capability(nonirrigated): 2w Hydrologic Soil Group: A Typical profile 0 to 10 inches: Loamy fine sand 10 to 14 inches: Loamy fine sand 14 to 26 inches: Loamy fine sand 26 to 44 inches: Fine sand 44 to 72 inches: Fine sand 13 Custom Soil Resource Report Minor Components Oakville Percent of map unit: 10 percent Claverack Percent of map unit: 7 percent Wareham Percent of map unit: 4 percent Landform: Depressions Wareham Percent of map unit: 4 percent WnA—Windsor loamy sand, nearly level Map Unit Setting Mean annual precipitation: 36 to 48 inches Mean annual air temperature: 45 to 48 deg rees F Frost-free period: 125 to 160 days Map Unit Composition Windsorand similarsoils: 80 percent Minor components: 20 percent Description of Windsor Setti ng Landform: Deltas, outwash plains, terraces Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Convex Parent material: Sandy glaciofluvial or deltaic deposits Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Excessively drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.20 to 5.95 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water capacity: Low(about 5.4 inches) Interpretive groups Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Land capability(nonirrigated): 3s Hydrologic Soil Group: A 14 Custom Soil Resource Report Typical profile 0 to 2 inches: Moderately decomposed plant material 2 to 11 inches: Loamy sand 11 to 25 inches: Loamy sand 25 to 72 inches: Loamy sand Minor Components Deerfield Percent of map unit: 10 percent Hinckley Percent of map unit: 5 percent Oakville Percent of map unit: 5 percent 15 e erences American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials(AASHTO).2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31. Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States. Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States. Hurt, G.W., and L.M.Vasilas,editors.Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils i n th e U n ited States. National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://soils.usda.gov/ Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy:A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://soils.usda.gov/ Soil Survey Staff. 2006. Keys to soil taxonomy. 10th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://soils.usda.gov/ Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National forestry manual. http://soils.usda.gov/ United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National range and pasture handbook. http://www.glti.nres.usda.gov/ United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://soils.usda.gov/ United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://soils.usda.gov/ 16 Custom Soil Resource Report United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. 17 _ �,..�� F �1 � Y� �� . �� \\.\ ■ � , • . \\\ • _ • �� • . �_.�� _ � . :- �� . . � ■ � � • ■ \\,_-' 1 . ' ' \\�\ • , ■ • ■ � \. ■ . ■ � ' I•� � � � - . ..� .'� � �� ' • ' / � - , .. N � . , . . � _ � \� _ . , . _. � �- _ � � , . � _ � � �� _ ��_ � f• � � , .,�\ ��\ �� \\ � � , , - ,� .\\\\\ � � ' ` \ • . , �� `� ` ` \ \ . � . ,► . !\\\\\\ \\\�\\ � \\\ �\\\\\`�\�� . .. . , � � �\\\\,\\ �\ � . , .\\\\\ ,� \ �, �.��\\\ � � � �, \\\ \..\\ \ � � .. , ..,. . \\�\\ �,\ , . . � , . �: \\\\\ � � �\\\ � � � \\\\\ \\\�\ \\\\\\\ \\ , � . . . \\\\\ � � \\ • � • �� \\\,\\ \\\\ �\�\\\ � � � • � � , � � \ �� \ \ �� ` . � , . \ \ \�� • �� \\\\\ \\\\ �,.��\\\ , ��, . �� :_, , a � , � .,,.�� ,��\ \\\\ � � ` �\ \\\�\\ � "\ \ \ �k �: � � �.� . -.� � .� � � � � \ \ � �� ,. =� \\'\\'\\ �' \�\�� \\\\\ �� \\\\\\\\ � � \\\`\�\\ - = ,, � � \\'\\'\.\ . �. \\\�\\ 1� � � . \\\\\\\\ � � f' ' �� . . ` \ •• \\\\\ � � \ \ \\\\\\\\ �\\\`..\\\\�\\ ��\'\\�\\ ��.�� \\\\\�\\ ��_�- \\'\\'\\ °\\\\\�\\ ' "� ` .\\'\\\`'\\ ' . � �t��.� \\ • . . . . z�a. . . . , . � . . - �. ; � . . -- . . ! ,_---. • = 1 • 1 /� j � � The LA �F��l�� Landscape A�-chitect�re��ngin�ering}�.C_ Ac�v�+lQ.Pu.rpn,��.P�r�r.e�. =-�0 La��g Alley �t1 r�[�ga Springs I�IY I�� fJ; �18-5�7-�1C�U ��1�-58`�-U18Q �r'��'�f l�'�f.i l��]�c�1,a��.c c��rr To: Doug Heller From: Kara Tedford Date 12-10-2020 Subject: Saratoga Honda Test Pits On December 10, 2020 I observed 3 deep hole test pits and conducted 3 falling head permeability tests at the Saratoga Honda project site located off of Route 9 in Saratoga Springs, NY. Please refer to the attached map for the locations of the test pits. TP-1 0-7"Topsoil 7—44" 10 YR 5/6 Loamy sand, roots to 38" 44—66" 10 YR 4/4 Sand Seasonal high water table (SHWT) observed at 44" Observed water table (OWT): none Falling Head Permeability Test (FHPT) at 24" P1 45 inch/hour P2 45 inch/hour P3 30 inch/hour P4 30 inch/hour P5 30 inch/hour TP-2 0- 12"Topsoil 12—44" 10 YR 5/6 Sa nd, roots to 16" 44—60" 10 YR 4/4 Sa nd Seasonal high water table (SHWT) observed at 60" Observed water table (OWT): none Falling Head Permeability Test (FHPT) at 24" P1 60 inch/hour P2 45 inch/hour P3 45inch/hour P4 45 inch/hour P5 45 inch/hour TP-3 0-8"Topsoil 16—36" 10 YR 5/6 Sa nd 36—60" 10 YR 4/4 Sa nd No roots observed. Seasonal high water table (SHWT) observed at 60" Observed water table (OWT): none Falling Head Permeability Test (FHPT) at 24" P1 90 inch/hour P2 75 inch/hour P3 60 inch/hour P4 60 inch/hour P5 60 inch/hour L.L V O O o J o�x o J�� o� Y J � N �_ � o� N ��o �o � o � o � �� oo � o �'� � v a��A � �C w �� o� � > � � � _ � � 3 � y O ��s �`�� ,�; O z O Q z " � �a � o o = = x �; � � � g y _� �, w � o � c �o� cB�.� � � �C � v. o �y Q ��l�� x o � 4 4Nco ° �. � �� 0 �fa v L � /1� b��co - � ° a--+ p S a; a--�� p Ol o i; � 2 \V o o N c y J L ��p \ �_ �p z c�+� � oi � S m � p v L N � L'_ N ��" .0 .0 � a c'r�.' q'> � (B O� ' (6 � O m �-�v 3 � � 3 � �-� W tn Z � � 7 ca o �r6 �o� •' m C m �-Oa z" � a (/1 m in a (/)0� m v� a o 0 0 � o Z G o � ��_ � �,�i �, � �, � � _� I��i _G �, � ✓�,jz � �I m " � �� Q �� I � � z �� Q �� l �Q Y i � Q 'i ��i Q i � i �� W � � i �i �� _ � �� _ �_ � � � � � �� i Q � o � i �i � �� I I I a� � II � i � �� ds i��i 3� 3� � � �'��' � bS � �; � N �bl I� m ` I � � �� S\ I\\ z z -__.... U o o I—_ b U U U Z o � � �� z� � 00 � —'—'—'—'—� �' 0 \N rS o - � � m\b J �r�i � \ /� S - / � \ \ �/ \ I = � � �-� \/� � �-- � l � c�� cn I I -- � o> Q \ . � c�� o \ / \ - �- 1�'�H d S'� - � I I J� o� / r /� o 0 0 0 � C/ � w z \ I > \ � o � \ /� 3o a� I�I \ � ¢ \ //� V � \3 Iz�� o \ � I I � I" 0 / �� \\�/ / � I II � // _� / � iS I . \ � / \� \ ��\ � I � � c� / I \ � i� I ¢ \ � � I � � \� , � � � � � , z / � � I Q� i o � , �� o � �I I `� �� , �- � � � - � � �� , z ,� ��,, ,� z w- z � � �ii � � ►�, � , / o � o �_ Q , � � � � � �� , �� i i; z � � i �ii �i i , i� � ° z— � i � Y � I I �_ � � � i ��i � �� o-- � c� � � Q � � i o = �— \ � Q /� I� / a � � \ � � � � _ u� � i a � ��I_�_� '� � �° � � � �� __ �� s��s , �s �s , � ,� i ;��i I \� ,� � � �J i ; - il� �.�I I �� , ,� , ��I I II j I /�,o ;� �� 1 _ � r - I , I II� � I I � I I �� \ _ ��IIII�I � � � � � � i� � i o IIIIjI ��___ I III� Q � �� \ `� � ii�iii �� i iili '��° ' �— � �jj�l�l�l ��I III� � ��3 3� 3� �� IIIII III��I�hl I',I � z � � � i �� s� IIII� III��II �I;I ��° �� °�, � �� I �� I I M i ��'�� I.�I I I I I �Lo � ❑ o�� ^� \ J � \ --------------- / I � \ I I � � 1s ^ � / �\'�� I \ '��I I �'`�� I �� 0 � ��Ui� \ � � � � � � � � �i Y`�l I � � � I��I �,1 i;r��`��,�� — � � � , z ��iiii l,-��1 �� ii i'i — � � n �� ; i i i� � ; i i�; � _, i i � �ii i� i ��/�� i�� _ ii �� . � � . � ; i i ��i�i �� ii�d� � � _ i i �� - w �_ i i .i � � � ��i�i �, _ il� i � " �_ w ii w i i � � � � z��I,Y� I�� i � � �� > � � II -�� I � �, I _ � w �� I Q �� i �; I� \ II� Xo��l) ��>��'�I � � j �- � � � II � � 2 � i � \� �I I � w�r I��I I� I �I �� \\ � �,_ � I� l � �� iI�i � �� '�� \ � � � I1 � o = � � ��, (II � II a Y Y = � (7 � � I I(I I I I I• �I �/i �_ � a I I1 � z � �I'�� i, iiiiii � ,--� � �� X ii i� � ii�'� �� o �� _! � �� I I�I��I � � � '�� '� .� _� �- � i��I �� ° i �� I �,��,,� ►,n>> � � —�� _� ; � , � �� i ii i �� . .I � � —�- �� >>�� ,� � � � � _ � � � � ,�. � , '�,�III�'' ''� �'�� _ -------� � '� --$�E_ ��k''� �� :��`� � ,, C � I II . ':.��. ------- - __ /. �� LO� \ / � � �'I� I \ \� �} ; . -sos= i /'� �\ � �(�' � �g',�;�� l ll��`�;;� _�- sa��, Q� �,- ,, ,- = Eo��F � �� i i ��.�� «� � � � _ � i ��; � I��I I�� I I I� �� oE— w�� I r��; r --�'-�/ � ;i; � — i I I I I l ��1 ��_�os££__�� Q°a '` -- --W — �� I ;�j��l �\�� '=_��\ ��Yo ',, _�;� i % �,, 1,� I � ii Nioi ��_`� �:`� �,-��1�i woao o.�� _ �_ � i _ � • ', �; N j,� �� _ � ' i ° � I ' � �ti�- � % i I�I�� , ��—��v�� I �� z` ,;�"s°� ` V ��,, ''— �� i w ' � = �� ;� j I I I � �� , // � �M�, � � �� I ) � �� / _ � I �I�I w � � _�— \ / o r�,, �i I�I��I I � � � �' �: ° � ° I �, LL LL � �I I � � � �� _ , �� 1 �I I� � � � �� ` _ — / � � --_ �t__- -,, — �_ i I I I� 1 �� w ��-;_ �� ''��, -� � � � � � ; ^� _ I�I �1 � ,.-,' _ `�`9p �. . / � I j i l i ' �'' �'` � / I � � —�aE_—__� � �`''�� / �' I I � � �, � �°� `"�'� �� \ I�� /� � � ___ _��l x _30�-- �,�� \ x_x—x x—x—x_x— ��— x x�x _x-x�x � �� ;,�_-r�� _X—x ��II I —�—°�� —X X �� ,� � !�� —°—°, ,� �� __�.. il�' � I� �,�� /�j �, _ � J 6rv�pueldluawtlolaiap�d�PS�vP�HZO�ObZ40ZlE�eyd epuoH e6o�e.ie5 ZO�ObZ40Zl6u�lnsuo�epuoH e6o�eie5 ObZlOZ1ZlOZ-�vdl��J��eNali� Wd86��4lZOZl54/4��alepanes Ob0�031tlbtlN�RgPapold Attachment B Existing Conditions Watershed Map and HydroCAD Calculations L.L ci Vyy o 0 o J o�x� N ��c�L ��U Y Y J O N �_ � � O �' f�f�p t� � lD �W � /-� C V7 In A O o � O �,� � 'O LL �C� ��,� O c � � � � � _ — }+ � � 4�� o' T� � T� �/� } U �L �q�' �� o p o 1 z 1 x z � �� g y __ �, w � \ � � �, c °°� ��,`- � � � � �... � �y,Q al��ia � o �� 4 Q y� � o Q �� Q �� L � /1� o� co - o a--+ p v a--� O .. � — � o �� o�N `y � v �� z .. c, N� o� � y° L N � L' N u c .0. � .0 � �J O c•y �'> 4 (B O� °i (6 � O m v�°1�aj 3 x 3 d'�'z �-Oa z" a (/1 m in a (/)0� m in �o 0 0 o W� o � ��_ � �,�i �, � �� _� I��i _G �, � ✓�,jz � �I m i I i � r�,� /� > � Q / � I < � � �� Q i i Q � � i � m � e � � i �i �� z � � �Z � � �m ..� \ � ��/ I � � S O a S U w I � i I�I� Q II � � � � V] o ✓' I U J U H^ II .� � I J,�III I� � m � Z m x� i II ' i < � � es i�I I� 3� 3� I � � � i (� �^ \"S �i�� ` 1 I a� � b�I I I/ '' m ,� b � � ` I �`� —_ " � �S� I \ z� U �� - b U U U Z o � � �� z� � —�� _'_'_'—'-� �'� o \N bS o — � � � m / � �b � � � S � � _ I � .. \ J II ' � �■■■■�� ■■�■■■■■■� �, � �� , .,. � �M��r■�■-■■t � - � � � �� .—.— � � � � I �♦ ��`�.,� � ■ � �\ 1� �,' � �., � � i�� , ■ �r■ � � �z \ ��1;i �`O�- , �� l��r�� ' � f ■ ■ ■ ■ � —� ■ ■ ■ � ■ ■ ,, ■� � ��'� � � � ■ ■ �� ■ ■ � �� ■ . ■ ■ ■, ; ■ �� • � ■ r — � — --■, ■ �s i `� \ • ■ ' ■ � � � i \� �, / � � � ■,�� I. . ��,�� :� � � �;� . . � � ■ �I ■ ■ 'l ■ ^ � I I I �. / ■ ■ ... ■ � � �. ■ —�— r— — -ll �� ■■■■■� � � �'�� ■■■■■�� _ � `■! � � -w- z � � Y i ■ �'-� i ��II li�' �� _`� � � ■ � .■ z � ■ �� a �■■■■i■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■� �� ; -Q- � � � 1 � �i i� �■� � � � �" � � � ■ � \ ■ Q� �r-, > � � ��'� � ` ■ � �� - * � � i � � � � I ii ' � � �-�-� i . � ■ �_, � �� ` � (/� : c�0 ■ y�.��j�,��s �s—� ■ � : � I ' �� °�� : ►� ■ � ; , �.—, �i ;� i - ■ Q,f�� ■ ' � � `�� `, I � � � � I�� ■ ■ `■ � � , � � � ■ ■, � � � �, � ~ � � �■■■■■■� * � �,. � ■ ; I I�II� _� I �■■■�■■■■■■■�■■� ■ ■ � �� :��.� I I I�� ■ ■�, �� * � i ;!�-- � I II�� I : � ' ' ��' � � � � � I��I I I'� I : � � ■■■ � ��`- � � : � �� , ■ I 1 I 1 ��l I I',I � � i i� �■■■■■■�■■■�■■■� 3 ��i �s—� � � : �� s�►�,, ,�� . . : : .��. �C� , � � � . �� i� � ■ . �S I ; ;�-� ' ' : � : � : �'• ■�� =I ,� �I,I �■■■■■■■�■■■■■� � _ • �, � . � ,� ♦■ � � `�� '� �. �- � �� , � �� ■�� _ \� �� -�� ■ �,. �;,�,� \ �� '� � �� M■��■ �� 'i �■■�■■�� I o �� ■ � ��,� � ■ � ■ N _■ ♦ ♦ � ;�'a=�%�� ' i �• � i■�■■'■■■�� z � � ■ ° ■ ■ ♦ ` �■� j � Y � \ � ■ � �r .. � .(�J' ■ . — �.' � ! . I , � � � : f�� n� � ��.�..��..��.�.�...�:�►• � �s . � _ �� , �, 1,, ,�, �,_ � � . , .!� . J ■ '', �'�� ;,�■r��-� �--,—� �`.��I; �� ■ I :I� � � %�� . ,I■ C ��I .I I � � ■ _ � �'� �� — � N ; I I: � / . ,*�� ^ i � ; �� o, �,� � �_ .�;��,• � � ��w �- :;� � �, � � . _ � �i � o � �, : � �;�l �I I��I��'�rt — � I �— � �_ �� I I�� :� i � \� � ' � ■I I� I �I �I■� � � � � � �� `� ■I � \� I � L � � � ; �,i�i� �i ,i�, - � � � � �i i � � �--� ' ` �;; �i i i . ��,�� . � � ■ � �� :ii _� �' ��i'�� i i�� ,.�l L_ . ` �� i� �• i ii�� - 1 .��----�� _ � � � i� � ��' �� ii � �� _ .- � ■ o � � � 1� ,� ■ '� ` � ��f I� _� o �\� , �� .� ,} �, �. � �� !� �j'i� I� 1 \�\ ,, ■ � � �. 0 � ��,,�I ��,.�� ,� � � � � � . � M �. ; A , , i � I�I i I' � �` ■ ■ i ��, � .,r ■■■�`.ti �_,�� ;�,� I —� � ■ � � � ; ■ U�f ��■■■■��.■■■■■■■■r �■■■■■��■■-f■-� �- � �� ,� 't Jf�' � � � `�,'' \�� ♦ , -i��;— — k, ———— �J �� r �`-� sas � � - ?� 1 � � �� ■ v \ � � �� -�� .-, — _--——— —— `�� .�, � �� /�/ ■ ��A �� .� — —o— � — . �� = � /- o - ,� 9 E � �`S�E � �1...\\�\~ _ 90£ �� - �G'i., —��E�Of— /� � \\ 1 ��\ �ry� i �I��'��'�\��; «F;• ■ I � `�� , � °� \ ' �\ `4♦♦ �,,.�=_ 80E�_ • � � � �i M LL \\��r.�. ..j � 5', 0 1 I / , -'�-. "�..�_ �60£ 1 � � l,�♦.: :'__ Oli-`�\� ¢ � �1 c �� /�_� / o\ 1 � / � _ � � � � ��_ � , �� — � � � -.� _� , � � ��\� �� -�_�-�.:ti � � i - � � � � � �� ■ VA ��; .. �1�� ,� \�I - � r,, �.-- �� ,� / _ ��,, ', �� \_��`�,, r1 ` � �,� lr � �_�� ` � � \J,` � I l N �\ s0£�� / �' 1\__.�-'� � - �\ 1�� : �1 �i—�\\\\ =� ` I : \\ ( t \ � \ \ ■ j �\ � �// '� ■ , L;�� `� \ ; � � � ■ \��,�j '�' � ■ / �`� %/ �� _� � —— � � � ■ � � � ��='i__ �� I � ■ / �- ■ _— � 1 � � __ �� _ ■ � � � N �� ■ , ; �- ■ � � � K; � � �: � � �; � � � � �'.; ��' � � � � X � � � � � U� ♦�� ■ w�: ■ w _ � � . � � .. � ■ : � _ _ --.� �, � � � � � ' � � % � � � __ Lof__ •��■■��`� ■��'�� / ' � •�'�� l ■ �� ■�!!-- � —� � ��■ � —_30�-- ■ ��--- � �...•■y■■'''''�� Q : ��,,...•■■■■'''' : ��...••■■■'''''�� ;i'; ,e�■■ � �,�� _-�--j � J 6rv�pueldluawtlolaiap�d�PS�vP�HZO�ObZ40ZlE�eyd epuoH e6o�e.ie5 ZO�ObZ40Zl6u�lnsuo�epuoH e6o�eie5 ObZlOZ1ZlOZ-�vdl��J��eNali� WdlS��BIZOZIOZ/4��alepanes Ob0�031tlbtlN�RgPapold 5.1 S Subcat 5.1S XSMRi S5 c5.2 � 5.4S O Pocket Pond S e Pond Subcat 5.4S E��MP�:� In dtration 1.1S c5 1 O Subc t 5S Culbert I 5.2S 5.3S Subcat 5.25 Subcat 5.35 AP-1 4.1 4.1 S a 0 AP-1 Pond Subcat 4.15 (c�a E;<si��P-a.i EXSMR3 � S3 1..�3 3.25 4S XSMR2 4.2 4.25 V Stormwater Disposal Pocket Pond Swale Culvert ROOF Subcat 4S Permeable Pavement Pond Subcat 4.25 Area X-SMP4 3.4S 3.1 S 4.3 4.3S O O O Permeable Pavement Subcat 3.45 Subcat 1.15 Pond Subcat 4.35 2.1 S 2.2S 2.3S Subcalt 2.1S Subcalt 2.2S Subcalt 2.3S � � � 2.1 2.2 2.3 Pond Pdnd Pond � EXSMRS Permeable�avement � ZS Subcat 2S Subcat Reach Pon Li n k Routing Diagram for Pre-Development Prepared by The LA Group, Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pre-Development Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (sq-ft) (subcatchment-numbers) 83,197 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A (1.1 S, 2.3S, 2S, 3.1 S, 3.4S, 4.1 S, 4.2S, 4.3S, 4S, 5.1S, 5.4S) 159,604 98 Paved parking, HSG A (1.1 S, 2.1 S, 2.2S, 2.3S, 2S, 3.1 S, 3.2S, 3.4S, 4.1 S, 4.2S, 4.3S, 4S, 5.1S, 5.2S, 5.3S, 5.4S) 39,095 30 Woods, Good, H SG A (1.1 S, 3.1 S) 281,896 71 TOTAL AREA Pre-Development Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 3 Soil Listing (all nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (sq-ft) Group Numbers 281,896 HSG A 1.1 S, 2.1 S, 2.2S, 2.3S, 2S, 3.1 S, 3.2S, 3.4S, 4.1 S, 4.2S, 4.3S, 4S, 5.1 S, 5.2S, 5.3S, 5.4S 0 HSG B 0 HSG C 0 HSG D 0 Other 281,896 TOTAL AREA Pre-Development Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 4 Ground Covers (all nodes) HSG-A HSG-B HSG-C HSG-D Other Total Ground Sub (sq-ft) (sq-ft) (sq-ft) (sq-ft) (sq-ft) (sq-ft) Cover N u n 83,197 0 0 0 0 83,197 >75% Grass cover, Good 159,604 0 0 0 0 159,604 Paved parking 39,095 0 0 0 0 39,095 Woods, Good 281,896 0 0 0 0 281,896 TOTAL AREA Pre-Development Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 5 Pipe Listing (all nodes) Line# Node In-Invert Out-Invert Length Slope n Diam/Width Height Inside-Fill Number (feet) (feet) (feet) (ft/ft) (inches) (inches) (inches) 1 C3 307.35 306.50 85.0 0.0100 0.013 12.0 0.0 0.0 2 C5.1 307.90 307.20 70.0 0.0100 0.013 12.0 0.0 0.0 3 C5.2 307.80 307.50 55.0 0.0055 0.013 6.0 0.0 0.0 4 P2.1 307.65 307.45 40.0 0.0050 0.010 4.0 0.0 0.0 5 P2.2 307.65 307.43 45.0 0.0049 0.010 4.0 0.0 0.0 6 P2.3 307.45 307.25 40.0 0.0050 0.010 4.0 0.0 0.0 7 P4.1 306.65 306.45 40.0 0.0050 0.010 4.0 0.0 0.0 8 P4.2 306.45 306.25 40.0 0.0050 0.010 4.0 0.0 0.0 9 P4.3 306.85 306.65 40.0 0.0050 0.010 4.0 0.0 0.0 Pre-Development Type 1124-hr 1-yr Rainfa11=2.15" Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 6 Time span=0.00-48.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 961 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1.1 S: Subcat 5S Runoff Area=70,698 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.00" Flow Length=205' Tc=40.8 min CN=34 Runoff=0.00 cfs 0 cf Subcatchment2.1 S: Subcat 2.1 S Runoff Area=2,404 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.92" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.16 cfs 385 cf Subcatchment2.2S: Subcat 2.2S Runoff Area=4,002 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.92" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.27 cfs 641 cf Subcatchment2.3S: Subcat 2.3S Runoff Area=6,292 sf 98.83% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.82" Tc=6.0 min CN=97 Runoff=0.41 cfs 954 cf Subcatchment2S: Subcat 2S Runoff Area=41,725 sf 97.32% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.72" Tc=6.0 min CN=96 Runoff=2.63 cfs 5,980 cf Subcatchment3.1 S: Subcat 1.1 S Runoff Area=16,257 sf 13.60% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.00" Tc=6.0 min CN=46 Runoff=0.00 cfs 0 cf Subcatchment3.2S: ROOF Runoff Area=13,493 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.92" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.90 cfs 2,162 cf Subcatchment3.4S: Subcat 3.4S Runoff Area=19,144 sf 99.58% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.92" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.28 cfs 3,068 cf Subcatchment4.1 S: Subcat 4.1 S Runoff Area=2,617 sf 96.23% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.72" Tc=6.0 min CN=96 Runoff=0.17 cfs 375 cf Subcatchment4.2S: Subcat 4.2S Runoff Area=2,734 sf 93.57% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.54" Tc=6.0 min CN=94 Runoff=0.16 cfs 350 cf Subcatchment4.3S: Subcat 4.3S Runoff Area=3,856 sf 90.29% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.37" Tc=6.0 min CN=92 Runoff=0.20 cfs 441 cf Subcatchment4S: Subcat 4S Runoff Area=32,920 sf 93.85% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.54" Tc=6.0 min CN=94 Runoff=1.92 cfs 4,217 cf Subcatchment5.1 S: Subcat 5.1 S Runoff Area=42,938 sf 32.33% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.06" Tc=6.0 min CN=58 Runoff=0.01 cfs 222 cf Subcatchment5.2S: Subcat 5.2S Runoff Area=5,783 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.92" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.39 cfs 927 cf Subcatchment5.3S: Subcat 5.3S Runoff Area=6,954 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.92" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.47 cfs 1,115 cf Subcatchment5.4S: Subcat 5.4S Runoff Area=10,080 sf 54.89% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.33" Tc=6.0 min CN=71 Runoff=0.11 cfs 276 cf Pre-Development Type 1124-hr 1-yr Rainfa11=2.15" Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 7 Reach S3: Swale Avg. Flow Depth=0.26' Max Ve1=1.19 fps Inflow=0.90 cfs 2,162 cf n=0.030 L=190.0' S=0.0050 '/' Capacity=30.61 cfs Outflow=0.85 cfs 2,162 cf Reach S5: Swale Avg. Flow Depth=0.21' Max Ve1=0.99 fps Inflow=0.85 cfs 2,332 cf n=0.035 L=175.0' S=0.0057 '/' Capacity=16.38 cfs Outflow=0.80 cfs 2,332 cf Pond C3: Culvert Peak EIev=307.84' Inflow=0.90 cfs 2,162 cf 12.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=85.0' S=0.0100 '/' Outflow=0.90 cfs 2,162 cf Pond C5.1: Culvert Peak EIev=308.37' Inflow=0.85 cfs 2,041 cf 12.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=70.0' S=0.0100 '/' Outflow=0.85 cfs 2,041 cf Pond C5.2: Pond Peak EIev=307.84' Storage=228 cf Inflow=0.11 cfs 276 cf 6.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=55.0' S=0.0055 '/' Outflow=0.00 cfs 69 cf Pond EX-SMP4: Permeable Pavement Peak EIev=306.01' Storage=44 cf Inflow=1.28 cfs 3,068 cf Outflow=1.28 cfs 3,068 cf Pond EXSMP-1: Pocket Pond Peak EIev=305.60' Storage=5,710 cf Inflow=0.80 cfs 2,332 cf Outflow=0.63 cfs 2,332 cf Pond EXSMP-1.1:Infiltration Peak EIev=305.01' Storage=14 cf Inflow=0.63 cfs 2,332 cf Discarded=0.63 cfs 2,332 cf Primary=0.00 cfs 0 cf Outflow=0.63 cfs 2,332 cf Pond EXSMP-2: Permeable Pavement Peak EIev=306.00' Storage=15 cf Inflow=2.13 cfs 4,913 cf Outflow=2.13 cfs 4,913 cf Pond EXSMP-3: Pocket Pond Peak EIev=305.10' Storage=1,835 cf Inflow=0.85 cfs 2,162 cf Outflow=0.78 cfs 2,162 cf Pond EXSMP-3.1:Stormwater Disposal Area Peak EIev=304.10' Storage=101 cf Inflow=0.78 cfs 2,162 cf Outflow=0.58 cfs 2,146 cf Pond EXSMP-5: Permeable Pavement Peak EIev=306.00' Storage=24 cf Inflow=3.41 cfs 7,593 cf Outflow=3.39 cfs 7,593 cf Pond P2.1: Pond Peak EIev=308.46' Storage=134 cf Inflow=0.16 cfs 385 cf Outflow=0.16 cfs 271 cf Pond P2.2: Pond Peak EIev=308.49' Storage=171 cf Inflow=0.27 cfs 641 cf Outflow=0.26 cfs 502 cf Pond P2.3: Pond Peak EIev=308.31' Storage=154 cf Inflow=0.41 cfs 954 cf Outflow=0.40 cfs 840 cf Pond P4.1: Pond Peak EIev=307.46' Storage=154 cf Inflow=0.17 cfs 375 cf Outflow=0.16 cfs 243 cf Pond P4.2: Pond Peak EIev=307.25' Storage=151 cf Inflow=0.16 cfs 350 cf Outflow=0.13 cfs 218 cf Pond P4.3: Pond Peak EIev=307.64' Storage=223 cf Inflow=0.20 cfs 441 cf Outflow=0.07 cfs 236 cf Pre-Development Type 1124-hr 1-yr Rainfa11=2.15" Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 8 Li n k AP-1:AP-1 I nflow=0.00 cfs 0 cf Primary=0.00 cfs 0 cf Total Ru noff Area = 281,896 sf Ru noff Vol ume = 21,113 cf Average Ru noff Depth = 0.90" 43.38% Pervious = 122,292 sf 56.62% Impervious = 159,604 sf Pre-Development Type 1124-hr 10-yr Rainfa11=3.75" Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 9 Time span=0.00-48.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 961 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1.1 S: Subcat 5S Runoff Area=70,698 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.00" Flow Length=205' Tc=40.8 min CN=34 Runoff=0.00 cfs 0 cf Subcatchment 2.1 S: Subcat 2.1 S Runoff Area=2,404 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.52" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.29 cfs 704 cf Subcatchment2.2S: Subcat 2.2S Runoff Area=4,002 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.52" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.48 cfs 1,173 cf Subcatchment2.3S: Subcat 2.3S Runoff Area=6,292 sf 98.83% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.40" Tc=6.0 min CN=97 Runoff=0.74 cfs 1,784 cf Subcatchment2S: Subcat 2S Runoff Area=41,725 sf 97.32% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.29" Tc=6.0 min CN=96 Runoff=4.83 cfs 11,448 cf Subcatchment3.1 S: Subcat 1.1 S Runoff Area=16,257 sf 13.60% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.15" Tc=6.0 min CN=46 Runoff=0.01 cfs 203 cf Subcatchment3.2S: ROOF Runoff Area=13,493 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.52" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.60 cfs 3,953 cf Subcatchment3.4S: Subcat 3.4S Runoff Area=19,144 sf 99.58% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.52" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=2.27 cfs 5,609 cf Subcatchment4.1 S: Subcat 4.1 S Runoff Area=2,617 sf 96.23% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.29" Tc=6.0 min CN=96 Runoff=0.30 cfs 718 cf Subcatchment4.2S: Subcat 4.2S Runoff Area=2,734 sf 93.57% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.08" Tc=6.0 min CN=94 Runoff=0.31 cfs 702 cf Subcatchment4.3S: Subcat 4.3S Runoff Area=3,856 sf 90.29% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.88" Tc=6.0 min CN=92 Runoff=0.41 cfs 924 cf Subcatchment4S: Subcat 4S Runoff Area=32,920 sf 93.85% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.08" Tc=6.0 min CN=94 Runoff=3.68 cfs 8,449 cf Subcatchment5.1 S: Subcat 5.1 S Runoff Area=42,938 sf 32.33% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.56" Tc=6.0 min CN=58 Runoff=0.78 cfs 1,986 cf Subcatchment5.2S: Subcat 5.2S Runoff Area=5,783 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.52" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.69 cfs 1,694 cf Subcatchment5.3S: Subcat 5.3S Runoff Area=6,954 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.52" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.83 cfs 2,037 cf Subcatchment5.4S: Subcat 5.4S Runoff Area=10,080 sf 54.89% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.23" Tc=6.0 min CN=71 Runoff=0.49 cfs 1,030 cf Pre-Development Type 1124-hr 10-yr Rainfa11=3.75" Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 10 Reach S3: Swale Avg. Flow Depth=0.36' Max Ve1=1.41 fps Inflow=1.60 cfs 4,156 cf n=0.030 L=190.0' S=0.0050 '/' Capacity=30.61 cfs Outflow=1.49 cfs 4,156 cf Reach S5: Swale Avg. Flow Depth=0.36' Max Ve1=1.34 fps Inflow=2.26 cfs 6,541 cf n=0.035 L=175.0' S=0.0057 '/' Capacity=16.38 cfs Outflow=2.08 cfs 6,541 cf Pond C3: Culvert Peak EIev=308.03' Inflow=1.60 cfs 3,953 cf 12.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=85.0' S=0.0100 '/' Outflow=1.60 cfs 3,953 cf Pond C5.1: Culvert Peak EIev=308.56' Inflow=1.51 cfs 3,732 cf 12.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=70.0' S=0.0100 '/' Outflow=1.51 cfs 3,732 cf Pond C5.2: Pond Peak EIev=308.04' Storage=372 cf Inflow=0.49 cfs 1,030 cf 6.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=55.0' S=0.0055 '/' Outflow=0.11 cfs 823 cf Pond EX-SMP4: Permeable Pavement Peak EIev=306.01' Storage=77 cf Inflow=2.27 cfs 5,609 cf Outflow=2.23 cfs 5,609 cf Pond EXSMP-1: Pocket Pond Peak EIev=305.69' Storage=6,004 cf Inflow=2.08 cfs 6,541 cf Outflow=1.74 cfs 6,541 cf Pond EXS M P-1.1:I nf i Itration Peak EIev=305.09' Storage=181 cf I nflow=1.74 cfs 6,541 cf Discarded=1.34 cfs 6,560 cf Primary=0.00 cfs 0 cf Outflow=1.34 cfs 6,560 cf Pond EXSMP-2: Permeable Pavement Peak EIev=306.00' Storage=32 cf Inflow=4.52 cfs 10,322 cf Outflow=4.50 cfs 10,322 cf Pond EXSMP-3: Pocket Pond Peak EIev=305.15' Storage=1,917 cf Inflow=1.49 cfs 4,156 cf Outflow=1.42 cfs 4,156 cf Pond EXSMP-3.1:Stormwater Disposal Area Peak EIev=304.46' Storage=514 cf Inflow=1.42 cfs 4,156 cf Outflow=0.71 cfs 4,134 cf Pond EXSMP-5: Permeable Pavement Peak EIev=306.00' Storage=44 cf Inflow=6.13 cfs 14,741 cf Outflow=6.09 cfs 14,741 cf Pond P2.1: Pond Peak EIev=308.49' Storage=145 cf Inflow=0.29 cfs 704 cf Outflow=0.27 cfs 590 cf Pond P2.2: Pond Peak EIev=308.53' Storage=187 cf Inflow=0.48 cfs 1,173 cf Outflow=0.46 cfs 1,033 cf Pond P2.3: Pond Peak EIev=308.44' Storage=204 cf Inflow=0.74 cfs 1,784 cf Outflow=0.60 cfs 1,670 cf Pond P4.1: Pond Peak EIev=307.50' Storage=167 cf Inflow=0.30 cfs 718 cf Outflow=0.28 cfs 586 cf Pond P4.2: Pond Peak EIev=307.30' Storage=168 cf Inflow=0.31 cfs 702 cf Outflow=0.28 cfs 569 cf Pond P4.3: Pond Peak EIev=307.77' Storage=295 cf Inflow=0.41 cfs 924 cf Outflow=0.29 cfs 719 cf Pre-Development Type 1124-hr 10-yr Rainfa11=3.75" Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 11 Li n k AP-1:AP-1 I nflow=0.00 cfs 0 cf Primary=0.00 cfs 0 cf Total Runoff Area = 281,896 sf Runoff Volume = 42,414 cf Average Runoff Depth = 1.81" 43.38% Pervious = 122,292 sf 56.62% Impervious = 159,604 sf Pre-Development Type 1124-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 1 Time span=0.00-48.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 961 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1.1 S: Subcat 5S Runoff Area=70,698 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.25" Flow Length=205' Tc=40.8 min CN=34 Runoff=0.06 cfs 1,456 cf Subcatchment 2.1 S: Subcat 2.1 S Runoff Area=2,404 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.96" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.47 cfs 1,194 cf Subcatchment2.2S: Subcat 2.2S Runoff Area=4,002 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.96" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.79 cfs 1,988 cf Subcatchment2.3S: Subcat 2.3S Runoff Area=6,292 sf 98.83% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.84" Tc=6.0 min CN=97 Runoff=1.24 cfs 3,064 cf Subcatchment2S: Subcat 2S Runoff Area=41,725 sf 97.32% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.73" Tc=6.0 min CN=96 Runoff=8.15 cfs 19,912 cf Subcatchment3.1 S: Subcat 1.1 S Runoff Area=16,257 sf 13.60% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.95" Tc=6.0 min CN=46 Runoff=0.52 cfs 1,289 cf Subcatchment3.2S: ROOF Runoff Area=13,493 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.96" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=2.66 cfs 6,703 cf Subcatchment3.4S: Subcat 3.4S Runoff Area=19,144 sf 99.58% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.96" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=3.78 cfs 9,511 cf Subcatchment4.1 S: Subcat 4.1 S Runoff Area=2,617 sf 96.23% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.73" Tc=6.0 min CN=96 Runoff=0.51 cfs 1,249 cf Subcatchment4.2S: Subcat 4.2S Runoff Area=2,734 sf 93.57% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.49" Tc=6.0 min CN=94 Runoff=0.53 cfs 1,252 cf Subcatchment4.3S: Subcat 4.3S Runoff Area=3,856 sf 90.29% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.27" Tc=6.0 min CN=92 Runoff=0.73 cfs 1,692 cf Subcatchment4S: Subcat 4S Runoff Area=32,920 sf 93.85% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.49" Tc=6.0 min CN=94 Runoff=6.33 cfs 15,074 cf Subcatchment5.1 S: Subcat 5.1 S Runoff Area=42,938 sf 32.33% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.88" Tc=6.0 min CN=58 Runoff=3.18 cfs 6,736 cf Subcatchment5.2S: Subcat 5.2S Runoff Area=5,783 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.96" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.14 cfs 2,873 cf Subcatchment5.3S: Subcat 5.3S Runoff Area=6,954 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.96" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.37 cfs 3,455 cf Subcatchment5.4S: Subcat 5.4S Runoff Area=10,080 sf 54.89% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.06" Tc=6.0 min CN=71 Runoff=1.22 cfs 2,571 cf Pre-Development Type 1124-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 2 Reach S3: Swale Avg. Flow Depth=0.51' Max Ve1=1.71 fps Inflow=3.12 cfs 7,993 cf n=0.030 L=190.0' S=0.0050 '/' Capacity=30.61 cfs Outflow=2.89 cfs 7,993 cf Reach S5: Swale Avg. Flow Depth=0.63' Max Ve1=1.81 fps Inflow=6.55 cfs 15,430 cf n=0.035 L=175.0' S=0.0057 '/' Capacity=16.38 cfs Outflow=5.96 cfs 15,430 cf Pond C3: Culvert Peak EIev=308.34' Inflow=2.66 cfs 6,703 cf 12.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=85.0' S=0.0100 '/' Outflow=2.66 cfs 6,703 cf Pond C5.1: Culvert Peak EIev=308.83' Inflow=2.51 cfs 6,328 cf 12.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=70.0' S=0.0100 '/' Outflow=2.51 cfs 6,328 cf Pond C5.2: Pond Peak EIev=310.64' Storage=694 cf Inflow=1.22 cfs 2,571 cf 6.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=55.0' S=0.0055 '/' Outflow=1.08 cfs 2,366 cf Pond EX-SMP4: Permeable Pavement Peak EIev=306.10' Storage=734 cf Inflow=3.78 cfs 9,511 cf Outflow=2.21 cfs 9,523 cf Pond EXSMP-1: Pocket Pond Peak EIev=305.89' Storage=6,688 cf Inflow=5.96 cfs 15,430 cf Outflow=5.31 cfs 15,429 cf Pond EXSMP-1.1:Infiltration Peak EIev=306.05' Storage=2,623 cf Inflow=5.31 cfs 15,429 cf Discarded=1.97 cfs 15,363 cf Primary=0.27 cfs 102 cf Outflow=2.24 cfs 15,465 cf Pond EXSMP-2: Permeable Pavement Peak EIev=306.00' Storage=52 cf Inflow=7.24 cfs 18,797 cf Outflow=7.22 cfs 18,797 cf Pond EXSMP-3: Pocket Pond Peak EIev=305.23' Storage=2,068 cf Inflow=2.89 cfs 7,993 cf Outflow=2.79 cfs 7,993 cf Pond EXSMP-3.1:Stormwater Disposal Area Peak EIev=305.14' Storage=1,550 cf Inflow=2.79 cfs 7,993 cf Outflow=0.97 cfs 8,004 cf Pond EXSMP-5: Permeable Pavement Peak EIev=306.00' Storage=70 cf Inflow=9.80 cfs 25,762 cf Outflow=9.74 cfs 25,762 cf Pond P2.1: Pond Peak EIev=308.67' Storage=219 cf Inflow=0.47 cfs 1,194 cf Outflow=0.30 cfs 1,080 cf Pond P2.2: Pond Peak EIev=308.69' Storage=258 cf Inflow=0.79 cfs 1,988 cf Outflow=0.60 cfs 1,849 cf Pond P2.3: Pond Peak EIev=310.50' Storage=334 cf Inflow=1.24 cfs 3,064 cf Outflow=1.10 cfs 2,922 cf Pond P4.1: Pond Peak EIev=307.72' Storage=256 cf Inflow=0.51 cfs 1,249 cf Outflow=0.31 cfs 1,117 cf Pond P4.2: Pond Peak EIev=307.54' Storage=264 cf Inflow=0.53 cfs 1,252 cf Outflow=0.32 cfs 1,119 cf Pond P4.3: Pond Peak EIev=308.06' Storage=482 cf Inflow=0.73 cfs 1,692 cf Outflow=0.33 cfs 1,487 cf Pre-Development Type 1124-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 3 Li n k AP-1:AP-1 I nflow=0.28 cfs 1,559 cf Primary=0.28 cfs 1,559 cf Total Runoff Area = 281,896 sf Runoff Volume = 80,020 cf Average Runoff Depth = 3.41" 43.38% Pervious = 122,292 sf 56.62% Impervious = 159,604 sf Pre-Development Type 1124-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 4 Summary for Subcatchment 1.1S: Subcat 5S Runoff = 0.06 cfs @ 13.09 hrs, Volume= 1,456 cf, Depth= 0.25" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Area (s� CN Description 33,022 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 37,676 30 Woods, Good, HSG A 0 98 Paved parking, HSG A 70,698 34 Weighted Average 70,698 100.00% Pervious Area 0 0.00% I mpervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 36.3 100 0.0070 0.05 Sheet Flow, Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 2.60" 4.5 105 0.0060 0.39 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Woodland Kv= 5.0 fps 40.8 205 Total Summary for Subcatchment 2.1S: Subcat 2.1S Runoff = 0.47 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 1,194 cf, Depth= 5.96" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Area (s� CN Description 2,404 98 Paved parking, HSG A 2,404 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope �/elocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2.2S: Subcat 2.2S Runoff = 0.79 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 1,988 cf, Depth= 5.96" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Area (s� CN Description 4,002 98 Paved parking, HSG A 4,002 100.00% Impervious Area Pre-Development Type 1124-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 5 Tc Length Slope �/elocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2.3S: Subcat 2.3S Runoff = 1.24 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 3,064 cf, Depth= 5.84" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Area (s� CN Description 6,218 98 Paved parking, HSG A 74 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 6,292 97 Weighted Average 74 1.17% Pervious Area 6,218 98.83% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Subcat 2S Runoff = 8.15 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 19,912 cf, Depth= 5.73" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Area (s� CN Description 1,117 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 40,608 98 Paved parking, HSG A 41,725 96 Weighted Average 1,117 2.68% Pervious Area 40,608 97.32% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope �/elocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3.1S: Subcat 1.1S Runoff = 0.52 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 1,289 cf, Depth= 0.95" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Pre-Development Type 1124-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 6 Area (s� CN Description 1,420 30 Woods, Good, HSG A 2,211 98 Paved parking, HSG A 12,626 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 16,257 46 Weighted Average 14,046 86.40% Pervious Area 2,211 13.60% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope �/elocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3.2S: ROOF Runoff = 2.66 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 6,703 cf, Depth= 5.96" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Area (s� CN Description 13,493 98 Paved parking, HSG A 13,493 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3.4S: Subcat 3.4S Runoff = 3.78 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 9,511 cf, Depth= 5.96" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Area (s� CN Description 81 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 19,063 98 Paved parking, HSG A 19,144 98 Weighted Average 81 0.42% Pervious Area 19,063 99.58% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope �/elocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Pre-Development Type 1124-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 7 Summary forSubcatchment4.1S: Subcat4.1S Runoff = 0.51 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 1,249 cf, Depth= 5.73" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Area (s� CN Description 99 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 2,519 98 Paved parking, HSG A 2,617 96 Weighted Average 99 3.77% Pervious Area 2,519 96.23% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 4.2S: Subcat 4.2S Runoff = 0.53 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 1,252 cf, Depth= 5.49" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Area (s� CN Description 176 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 2,558 98 Paved parking, HSG A 2,734 94 Weighted Average 176 6.43% Pervious Area 2,558 93.57% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope �/elocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 4.3S: Subcat 4.3S Runoff = 0.73 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 1,692 cf, Depth= 5.27" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Area (s� CN Description 374 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 3,481 98 Paved parking, HSG A 3,856 92 Weighted Average 374 9.71% Pervious Area 3,481 90.29% Impervious Area Pre-Development Type 1124-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 8 Tc Length Slope �/elocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 4S: Subcat 4S Runoff = 6.33 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 15,074 cf, Depth= 5.49" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Area (s� CN Description 2,024 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 30,895 98 Paved parking, HSG A 32,920 94 Weighted Average 2,024 6.15% Pervious Area 30,895 93.85% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 5.1S: Subcat 5.1S Runoff = 3.18 cfs @ 11.98 hrs, Volume= 6,736 cf, Depth= 1.88" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Area (s� CN Description 29,056 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 13,882 98 Paved parking, HSG A 42,938 58 Weighted Average 29,056 67.67% Pervious Area 13,882 32.33% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope �/elocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 5.2S: Subcat 5.2S Runoff = 1.14 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 2,873 cf, Depth= 5.96" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Pre-Development Type 1124-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 9 Area (s� CN Description 5,783 98 Paved parking, HSG A 5,783 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope �/elocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 5.3S: Subcat 5.3S Runoff = 1.37 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 3,455 cf, Depth= 5.96" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Area (s� CN Description 6,954 98 Paved parking, HSG A 6,954 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 5.4S: Subcat 5.4S Runoff = 1.22 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 2,571 cf, Depth= 3.06" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Area (s� CN Description 5,533 98 Paved parking, HSG A 4,547 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 10,080 71 Weighted Average 4,547 45.11% Pervious Area 5,533 54.89% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope �/elocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Reach S3: Swale Inflow Area = 29,749 sf, 52.79% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.22" for 100-yr event I nflow = 3.12 cfs @ 11.97 h rs, Vol u me= 7,993 cf Outflow = 2.89 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 7,993 cf, Atten= 7%, Lag= 3.1 min Pre-Development Type 1124-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 10 Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. �/elocity= 1.71 fps, Min. Travel Time= 1.9 min Avg. Velocity = 0.46 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 6.9 min Peak Storage= 338 cf @ 11.99 hrs Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.51' Bank-Full Depth= 1.50' Flow Area= 9.8 sf, Capacity= 30.61 cfs 2.00' x 1.50' deep channel, n= 0.030 Side Slope Z-value= 3.0 '/' Top Width= 11.00' Length= 190.0' Slope= 0.0050 '/' I nlet I nvert= 306.80', Outlet I nvert= 305.85' � Summary for Reach S5: Swale Inflow Area = 65,754 sf, 48.90% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.82" for 100-yr event Inflow = 6.55 cfs @ 11.99 hrs, Volume= 15,430 cf Outflow = 5.96 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 15,430 cf, Atten= 9%, Lag= 2.6 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 1.81 fps, Min. Travel Time= 1.6 min Avg. Velocity = 0.31 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 9.4 min Peak Storage= 605 cf @ 12.00 hrs Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.63' Bank-Full Depth= 1.00' Flow Area= 7.0 sf, Capacity= 16.38 cfs 3.00' x 1.00' deep channel, n= 0.035 Earth, dense weeds Side Slope Z-value= 4.0 '/' Top Width= 11.00' Length= 175.0' Slope= 0.0057 '/' I nlet I nvert= 307.50', Outlet I nvert= 306.50' � Pre-Development Type 1124-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 11 Summary for Pond C3: Culvert I nflow Area = 13,493 sf,100.00% I mpervious, I nflow Depth = 5.96" for 100-yr event I nflow = 2.66 cfs @ 11.96 h rs, Vol u me= 6,703 cf Outflow = 2.66 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 6,703 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 2.66 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 6,703 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 308.34' @ 11.96 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 307.35' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 85.0' Ke= 0.500 Inlet/Outlet Invert= 307.35' /306.50' S= 0.0100 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.79 sf Primary OutFlow Max=2.61 cfs @ 11.96 hrs HW=308.32' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 2.61 cfs @ 3.35 fps) Summary for Pond C5.1: Culvert Inflow Area = 12,737 sf,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.96" for 100-yr event Inflow = 2.51 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 6,328 cf Outflow = 2.51 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 6,328 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 2.51 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 6,328 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 308.83' @ 11.96 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 307.90' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 70.0' Ke= 0.500 Inlet/Outlet Invert= 307.90' /307.20' S= 0.0100 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.79 sf Primary OutFlow Max=2.46 cfs @ 11.96 hrs HW=308.82' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 2.46 cfs @ 3.26 fps) Summary for Pond C5.2: Pond Inflow Area = 10,080 sf, 54.89% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.06" for 100-yr event Inflow = 1.22 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 2,571 cf Outflow = 1.08 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 2,366 cf, Atten= 12%, Lag= 2.6 min Primary = 1.08 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 2,366 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 310.64' @ 12.01 hrs Surf.Area= 1,025 sf Storage= 694 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 88.3 min calculated for 2,363 cf(92% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 47.0 min ( 878.1 - 831.1 ) Pre-Development Type 1124-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 12 Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 307.40' 694 cf Custom Stage Data (Irregular)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (feet) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) (sq-ft) 307.40 410 145.0 0 0 410 308.40 1,025 170.0 694 694 1,056 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 307.80' 6.0" Round Culvert L= 55.0' Ke= 0.500 Inlet/Outlet Invert= 307.80' /307.50' S= 0.0055 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.20 sf Primary OutFlow Max=0.99 cfs @ 12.02 hrs HW=310.32' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 0.99 cfs @ 5.05 fps) Summary for Pond EX-SMP4: Permeable Pavement I nflow Area = 19,144 sf, 99.58% I mpervious, I nflow Depth = 5.96" for 100-yr event Inflow = 3.78 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 9,511 cf Outflow = 2.21 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 9,523 cf, Atten= 42%, Lag= 0.0 min Discarded = 2.21 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 9,523 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 306.10' @ 12.05 hrs Surf.Area= 19,091 sf Storage= 734 cf Plug-Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 1.3 min ( 741.8 - 740.5 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 306.00' 7,636 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Voids Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (%) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 306.00 19,091 0.0 0 0 307.00 19,091 40.0 7,636 7,636 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 306.00' 5.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=2.21 cfs @ 11.90 hrs HW=306.02' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 2.21 cfs) Summary for Pond EXSMP-1: Pocket Pond Inflow Area = 65,754 sf, 48.90% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.82" for 100-yr event Inflow = 5.96 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 15,430 cf Outflow = 5.31 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 15,429 cf, Atten= 11%, Lag= 2.2 min Primary = 5.31 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 15,429 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs/2 Pre-Development Type 1124-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 13 Starting Elev= 305.50' Surf.Area= 3,081 sf Storage= 5,412 cf Peak Elev= 305.89' @ 12.07 hrs Surf.Area= 3,419 sf Storage= 6,688 cf (1,276 cf above start) Plug-Flow detention time= 219.9 min calculated for 10,006 cf(65% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 8.9 min ( 829.4 - 820.5 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 302.00' 7,060 cf Custom Stage Data (Irregular)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (feet) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) (sq-ft) 302.00 305 105.0 0 0 305 303.00 885 155.0 570 570 1,348 304.00 1,665 205.0 1,255 1,824 2,791 305.00 2,675 275.0 2,150 3,975 5,476 306.00 3,515 255.0 3,085 7,060 6,360 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 305.50' 8.0' long x 15.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63 Primary OutFlow Max=5.18 cfs @ 12.07 hrs HW=305.89' (Free Discharge) L1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir(Weir Controls 5.18 cfs @ 1.68 fps) Summary for Pond EXSMP-1.1: Infiltration Inflow Area = 65,754 sf, 48.90% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.82" for 100-yr event Inflow = 5.31 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 15,429 cf Outflow = 2.24 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 15,465 cf, Atten= 58%, Lag= 10.7 min Discarded = 1.97 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 15,363 cf Primary = 0.27 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 102 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs/2 Peak Elev= 306.05' @ 12.24 hrs Surf.Area= 3,046 sf Storage= 2,623 cf Plug-Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 6.9 min ( 836.3 - 829.4 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 305.00' 4,096 cf Custom Stage Data (Irregular)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (feet) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) (sq-ft) 305.00 1,985 245.0 0 0 1,985 306.00 3,000 270.0 2,475 2,475 3,041 306.50 3,490 270.0 1,621 4,096 3,176 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 305.00' 28.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 306.00' 10.0' long x 10.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Pre-Development Type 1124-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 14 Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 Discarded OutFlow Max=1.97 cfs @ 12.24 hrs HW=306.05' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 1.97 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.26 cfs @ 12.24 hrs HW=306.05' (Free Discharge) L2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir(Weir Controls 0.26 cfs @ 0.54 fps) Summary for Pond EXSMP-2: Permeable Pavement I nflow Area = 42,127 sf, 93.65% I mpervious, I nflow Depth = 5.35" for 100-yr event I nflow = 7.24 cfs @ 11.96 h rs, Vol u me= 18,797 cf Outflow = 7.22 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 18,797 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.2 min Discarded = 7.22 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 18,797 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 306.00' @ 11.97 hrs Surf.Area= 30,895 sf Storage= 52 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 0.1 min calculated for 18,777 cf(100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 0.1 min ( 772.8 - 772.7 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 306.00' 12,358 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Voids Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (%) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 306.00 30,895 0.0 0 0 307.00 30,895 40.0 12,358 12,358 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 306.00' 24.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=17.16 cfs @ 11.97 hrs HW=306.00' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 17.16 cfs) Summary for Pond EXSMP-3: Pocket Pond Inflow Area = 29,749 sf, 52.79% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.22" for 100-yr event I nflow = 2.89 cfs @ 12.02 h rs, Vol u me= 7,993 cf Outflow = 2.79 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 7,993 cf, Atten= 3%, Lag= 1.6 min Primary = 2.79 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 7,993 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Starting Elev= 305.00' Surf.Area= 1,590 sf Storage= 1,672 cf Peak Elev= 305.23' @ 12.05 hrs Surf.Area= 1,830 sf Storage= 2,068 cf (396 cf above start) Plug-Flow detention time= 164.0 min calculated for 6,321 cf(79% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 5.3 min ( 779.0 - 773.7 ) Pre-Development Type 1124-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 15 Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 303.00' 3,814 cf Custom Stage Data (Irregular)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (feet) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) (sq-ft) 303.00 190 150.0 0 0 190 304.00 840 175.0 476 476 857 305.00 1,590 200.0 1,195 1,672 1,626 306.00 2,746 350.0 2,142 3,814 8,197 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 305.00' 10.0' long x 10.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 Primary OutFlow Max=2.78 cfs @ 12.05 hrs HW=305.23' (Free Discharge) L1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir(Weir Controls 2.78 cfs @ 1.20 fps) Summary for Pond EXSMP-3.1: Stormwater Disposal Area Inflow Area = 29,749 sf, 52.79% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.22" for 100-yr event I nflow = 2.79 cfs @ 12.05 h rs, Vol u me= 7,993 cf Outflow = 0.97 cfs @ 12.22 hrs, Volume= 8,004 cf, Atten= 65%, Lag= 10.2 min Discarded = 0.97 cfs @ 12.22 hrs, Volume= 8,004 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs/2 Peak Elev= 305.14' @ 12.22 hrs Surf.Area= 1,749 sf Storage= 1,550 cf Plug-Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 8.2 min ( 787.2 - 779.0 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 304.00' 3,319 cf Custom Stage Data (Irregular)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (feet) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) (sq-ft) 304.00 990 150.0 0 0 990 305.00 1,650 175.0 1,306 1,306 1,657 306.00 2,400 200.0 2,013 3,319 2,426 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 304.00' 24.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.97 cfs @ 12.22 hrs HW=305.14' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.97 cfs) Pre-Development Type 1124-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 16 Summary for Pond EXSMP-5: Permeable Pavement I nflow Area = 54,423 sf, 97.81% I mpervious, I nflow Depth = 5.68" for 100-yr event I nflow = 9.80 cfs @ 11.97 h rs, Vol u me= 25,762 cf Outflow = 9.74 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 25,762 cf, Atten= 1%, Lag= 0.1 min Discarded = 9.74 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 25,762 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs/2 Peak Elev= 306.00' @ 11.97 hrs Surf.Area= 37,499 sf Storage= 70 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 0.1 min calculated for 25,735 cf(100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 0.1 min ( 758.9 - 758.8 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 306.00' 15,000 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Voids Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (%) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 306.00 37,499 0.0 0 0 307.00 37,499 40.0 15,000 15,000 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 306.00' 24.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=20.83 cfs @ 11.97 hrs HW=306.00' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 20.83 cfs) Summary for Pond P2.1: Pond I nflow Area = 2,404 sf,100.00% I mpervious, I nflow Depth = 5.96" for 100-yr event Inflow = 0.47 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 1,194 cf Outflow = 0.30 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 1,080 cf, Atten= 36%, Lag= 4.8 min Primary = 0.30 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 1,080 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 308.67' @ 12.04 hrs Surf.Area= 449 sf Storage= 219 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 98.3 min calculated for 1,080 cf(90% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 47.3 min ( 787.8 - 740.5 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 307.90' 334 cf Custom Stage Data (Irregular)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (feet) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) (sq-ft) 307.90 145 52.0 0 0 145 308.90 570 115.0 334 334 986 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Device 2 308.40' 12.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Pre-Development Type 1124-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 17 #2 Primary 307.65' 4.0" Round Culvert L= 40.0' Ke= 0.500 Inlet/Outlet Invert= 307.65' /307.45' S= 0.0050 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.010 P�/C, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.09 sf Primary OutFlow Max=0.30 cfs @ 12.04 hrs HW=308.67' (Free Discharge) L2=Culvert (Barrel Controls 0.30 cfs @ 3.48 fps) L1=0rifice/Grate (Passes 0.30 cfs of 1.44 cfs potential flow) Summary for Pond P2.2: Pond Inflow Area = 4,002 sf,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.96" for 100-yr event Inflow = 0.79 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 1,988 cf Outflow = 0.60 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 1,849 cf, Atten= 24%, Lag= 3.7 min Primary = 0.60 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 1,849 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs/2 Peak Elev= 308.69' @ 12.02 hrs Surf.Area= 458 sf Storage= 258 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 78.1 min calculated for 1,847 cf(93% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 38.1 min ( 778.6 - 740.5 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 307.90' 362 cf Custom Stage Data (Irregular)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (feet) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) (sq-ft) 307.90 210 68.0 0 0 210 308.90 540 97.0 362 362 600 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Device 2 308.40' 12.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #2 Primary 307.65' 4.0" Round Culvert X 2.00 L= 45.0' Ke= 0.500 Inlet/Outlet Invert= 307.65' /307.43' S= 0.0049 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.010 PVC, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.09 sf Primary OutFlow Max=0.59 cfs @ 12.02 hrs HW=308.68' (Free Discharge) L2=Culvert (Barrel Controls 0.59 cfs @ 3.40 fps) L1=0rifice/Grate (Passes 0.59 cfs of 1.54 cfs potential flow) Summary for Pond P2.3: Pond Inflow Area = 6,292 sf, 98.83% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.84" for 100-yr event Inflow = 1.24 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 3,064 cf Outflow = 1.10 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 2,922 cf, Atten= 11%, Lag= 2.3 min Primary = 1.10 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 2,922 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs/2 Peak Elev= 310.50' @ 12.00 hrs Surf.Area= 570 sf Storage= 334 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 51.7 min calculated for 2,922 cf(95% of inflow) Pre-Development Type 1124-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 18 Center-of-Mass det. time= 23.3 min ( 770.8 - 747.5 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 307.70' 334 cf Custom Stage Data (Irregular)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (feet) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) (sq-ft) 307.70 145 52.0 0 0 145 308.70 570 115.0 334 334 986 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Device 2 308.20' 12.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #2 Primary 307.45' 4.0" Round Culvert X 2.00 L= 40.0' Ke= 0.500 Inlet/Outlet Invert= 307.45' /307.25' S= 0.0050 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.010 P�/C, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.09 sf Primary OutFlow Max=1.10 cfs @ 12.00 hrs HW=310.49' (Free Discharge) L2=Culvert (Barrel Controls 1.10 cfs @ 6.30 fps) L1=0rifice/Grate (Passes 1.10 cfs of 5.72 cfs potential flow) Summary for Pond P4.1: Pond Inflow Area = 2,617 sf, 96.23% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.73" for 100-yr event Inflow = 0.51 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 1,249 cf Outflow = 0.31 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 1,117 cf, Atten= 39%, Lag= 5.1 min Primary = 0.31 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 1,117 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 307.72' @ 12.05 hrs Surf.Area= 440 sf Storage= 256 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 99.2 min calculated for 1,115 cf(89% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 45.3 min ( 799.0 - 753.6 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 306.90' 341 cf Custom Stage Data (Irregular)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (feet) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) (sq-ft) 306.90 200 65.0 0 0 200 307.90 505 90.0 341 341 518 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Device 2 307.40' 12.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #2 Primary 306.65' 4.0" Round Culvert L= 40.0' Ke= 0.500 Inlet/Outlet Invert= 306.65' /306.45' S= 0.0050 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.010 PVC, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.09 sf Pre-Development Type 1124-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 19 Primary OutFlow Max=0.31 cfs @ 12.05 hrs HW=307.72' (Free Discharge) L2=Culvert (Barrel Controls 0.31 cfs @ 3.58 fps) L1=0rifice/Grate (Passes 0.31 cfs of 1.85 cfs potential flow) Summary for Pond P4.2: Pond Inflow Area = 2,734 sf, 93.57% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.49" for 100-yr event Inflow = 0.53 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 1,252 cf Outflow = 0.32 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 1,119 cf, Atten= 40%, Lag= 5.2 min Primary = 0.32 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 1,119 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 307.54' @ 12.05 hrs Surf.Area= 446 sf Storage= 264 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 94.6 min calculated for 1,118 cf(89% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 41.2 min ( 805.2 - 764.0 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 306.70' 341 cf Custom Stage Data (Irregular)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (feet) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) (sq-ft) 306.70 200 65.0 0 0 200 307.70 505 90.0 341 341 518 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Device 2 307.20' 12.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #2 Primary 306.45' 4.0" Round Culvert L= 40.0' Ke= 0.500 Inlet/Outlet Invert= 306.45' /306.25' S= 0.0050 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.010 PVC, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.09 sf Primary OutFlow Max=0.31 cfs @ 12.05 hrs HW=307.54' (Free Discharge) L2=Culvert (Barrel Controls 0.31 cfs @ 3.61 fps) L1=0rifice/Grate (Passes 0.31 cfs of 2.01 cfs potential flow) Summary for Pond P4.3: Pond Inflow Area = 3,856 sf, 90.29% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.27" for 100-yr event Inflow = 0.73 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 1,692 cf Outflow = 0.33 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 1,487 cf, Atten= 54%, Lag= 6.5 min Primary = 0.33 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 1,487 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 308.06' @ 12.07 hrs Surf.Area= 702 sf Storage= 482 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 102.9 min calculated for 1,487 cf(88% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 43.9 min ( 816.7 - 772.7 ) Pre-Development Type 1124-hr 100-yr Rainfa11=6.20" Prepared by The LA Group Printed 1/20/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 00439 O 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 20 Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 307.10' 510 cf Custom Stage Data (Irregular)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (feet) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) (sq-ft) 307.10 325 85.0 0 0 325 308.10 720 115.0 510 510 813 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Device 2 307.60' 12.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #2 Primary 306.85' 4.0" Round Culvert L= 40.0' Ke= 0.500 Inlet/Outlet Invert= 306.85' /306.65' S= 0.0050 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.010 P�/C, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.09 sf Primary OutFlow Max=0.33 cfs @ 12.07 hrs HW=308.05' (Free Discharge) L2=Culvert (Barrel Controls 0.33 cfs @ 3.82 fps) L1=0rifice/Grate (Passes 0.33 cfs of 2.55 cfs potential flow) Summary for Link AP-1: AP-1 I nflow Area = 136,453 sf, 23.56% I mpervious, I nflow Depth = 0.14" for 100-yr event Inflow = 0.28 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 1,559 cf Primary = 0.28 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 1,559 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Attachment C Proposed Conditions Watershed Map and HydroCAD Calculations Frozen Conditions Attachment D Storm Data A endix C Map Set Appendix D SWP P P I ns pecti o n Fo rm Saratoga Honda- Building Expansion WEEKLY SWPPP INSPECTION REPORT Ins ector Name: Date: Si nature re uired : Time: Weather: I nspection #: Soil Conditions dr , saturated, etc : Note: Digital photos, with date stamp required for all practices requiring corrective action, before and after, to be attached to the inspection report. YES N O N/A 1. ❑ ❑ ❑ Routine Inspection. Date of last inspection: 2. Inspection following rain event. Date/time of storm ending: ❑ ❑ ❑ Rainfall amount: Recorded by: 3. ❑ ❑ ❑ Is this a final site inspection? 4. ❑ ❑ ❑ Has site undergone final stabilization? ❑ ❑ ❑ If so, have all temporary erosion and sediment controls been removed? Site Disturbance (Indicate Locations on Plan) YES N O N/A 1. ❑ ❑ ❑ Areas previously disturbed, but have not undergone active site work in the last 14 days? 2. ❑ ❑ ❑ Areas d istu rbed with i n last 14 days? 3. ❑ ❑ ❑ Areas expected to be d istu rbed i n next 14 days? 4. ❑ ❑ ❑ Do areas of steep slopes or complex stabilization issues exist? If"YES" explain: 5. ❑ ❑ ❑ Are there currently more than 5 acres of disturbed soil at the site? If so make sure there is an approval letter from NYS DEC. Additional Comments: Inspection of Erosion and Sediment Control Devices Type of Control Device Accumulation (if any) in % Repairs/Maintenance Needed 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Stabi I ization/Ru noff YES N O N/A 1. ❑ ❑ ❑ Are all existing disturbed areas contained by control devices? Type of devices: 2. ❑ ❑ ❑ Are there areas that require stabilization within the next 14 days? Specify Area: 3. ❑ ❑ ❑ Have stabilization measures been initiated in inactive areas? 4. ❑ ❑ ❑ Is there current snow cover or frozen ground conditions? 5. ❑ ❑ ❑ Rills or gullies? 6. ❑ ❑ ❑ Slumping/deposition? 7. ❑ ❑ ❑ Loss of vegetation? 8. ❑ ❑ ❑ Lack of germination? 9. ❑ ❑ ❑ Loss of mulching? Receiving Structures/Water Bodies (Indicate locations where runoff leaves the project site on the site plan) YES N O N/A 1. ❑ ❑ ❑ Surface water swale or natural surface waterbody? If natural waterbody: Is waterbody located ❑ onsite, or❑ adjacent to property boundary? Description of condition: 2� ❑ ❑ ❑ Municipal or community system? Inspect locations where runoff from project site enters the receiving waters and indicate if there is evidence of: a. ❑ ❑ ❑ Rills or gullies? b. ❑ ❑ ❑ Slumping/deposition? c. ❑ ❑ ❑ Loss of vegetation? d. ❑ ❑ ❑ Undermining of structures? e. ❑ ❑ ❑ Was there a discharge into the receiving water on the day of inspection? f. ❑ ❑ ❑ Is there evidence of turbidity, sedimentation, or oil in the receiving waters? Additional Comments: Inspection of Post-Construction Stormwater Management Control Devices Type of Control Device Phase of Construction Repairs/Maintenance Needed 1. 2. 3. 4. General Site Condition YES N O N/A 1. ❑ ❑ ❑ Have action items from previous reports been addressed? 2. ❑ ❑ ❑ Does routine maintenance of protection components occur on a regular basis? 3. ❑ ❑ ❑ Does cleaning and/or sweeping affected roadways occur, at minimum, daily? 4. ❑ ❑ ❑ Is debris and litter removed on a monthly basis, or as necessary? 5� ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the site maintained in an orderly manner? Describe the condition of all natural waterbodies within or adjacent to the Project that receive runoff from the site: Contractors progress over last 7 days: Anticipated work to be begun in the next 7 days: Additional Comments: Visual Observations YES N O N/A 1. ❑ ❑ ❑ All erosion and sediment control measures have been installed/constructed? 2. ❑ ❑ ❑ All erosion and sediment control measures are being maintained properly? SUMMARY OF ACTION ITEMS TO REPAIR/REPLACE/MAINTAIN/CORRECT DEFICIENCIES Action Reported To (no signature required): Company: Appendix E Other SWPPP Forms Construction Seq uence SWPPP Plan Changes Spill Response Form Stormwater Management Practice Maintenance Log The operator shall prepare a summary of construction status using the Construction Sequence Form below once every month. Significant deviations to the sequence and reasons for those deviations (i.e. weather, subcontractor availability, etc.), shall be noted by the contractor. The schedule shall be used to record the dates for initiation of construction, implementation of erosion control measures, stabilization, etc. A copy of this table will be maintained at the construction site and updated in addition to the individual Inspection Reports completed for each inspection. Construction Sequence Form Construction Activities Date (Identify name of planned practices) Complete 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN PLAN CHANGES, AUTHORIZATION, AND CHANGE CERTIFICATION CHANGES REQUIRED TO THE POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: REASONS FOR CHANGES: REQUESTED BY: DATE: AUTHORIZED BY: DATE: CERTIFICATION OF CHANGES: I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that false statements made herein are punishable as a Class A misdemeanor pursuant to Section 210.45 of the penal code. SIGNATURE: DATE: SPILL RESPONSE REPORT Within 1 hour of a spill discovery less than 2 gallons in volume the following must be notified: Tim Higgins 518-633-4310 Within 1 hour of a spill discovery greater than 2 gallons the following must be notified: Tim Higgins NYSDEC Spill Response Hotline 1-800-457-7362 Spill Response Contractor Material Spilled: Approxi mate Vol u me: Location: Distance to nearest down gradient drainage: Distance to nearest down gradient open water: Temporary control measures in place: Appendix F SPDES General Permit GP-0-20-001 A endix G Historic Preservation/Endan ered Species Documentation g Appendix H Deep Rippin and De-compaction (DEC, 2008) g