Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20200440 Crescent Street Subdivision D.E. response letter P452 STATE ROUTE 9 LANBINQ ENGINEERING, PC MALTATE 301 ,NY I'I 2020 T(51E1)1399-5243 F(51E1)889-5245 December 11, 2020 Ms. Kari Donohue Administrative Assistant- Engineering City of Saratoga Springs 474 Broadway Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 RE: Crescent Street Residential Subdivision City Application No. 2020040 Dear Ms. Donohue: Lansing Engineering is pleased to submit this letter in response to the November 10, 2020 comment letter prepared by Donald C. Rhodes, P.E. regarding the above noted project.The following summarizes the comments followed by our response. General Comments 1. Comment:Application number 20200440 should be added to all documents and subsequent correspondence. Response:The Saratoga Springs Application Number has been included on all plan sheets,submission documents, and correspondence information. 2. Comment: The City and this office should be copied on correspondence by the applicant with other agencies involved in permitting or otherwise approving or offering comments on the project. Response:Comment noted. 3. Comment: A pre-demolition inspection report should be prepared for proposed building removal to determine if asbestos or lead abatement will be required. Response:The existing structure has previously been removed from the project site. The City of Saratoga Springs issued a demolition permit for the removal of the existing building on March 9,2020.A copy of the permit is attached for reference.As such, the existing structure has been removed from the site plans as it is no longer situated on the project site. 4. Comment: Documentation of consultation with NYSHPO regarding potential impacts to Archaeological and Historic resources should be obtained by the applicant and provided for review. Response:The services of Hartgen Archeological Associates, Inc. were retained to perform a Phase 1 investigation for the proposed project area.A "no effect"letter has been received from the NYSHPO and is included within Appendix G of the SWPPP. Crescent Street Page 2 of 8 Residential Subdivision December 11, 2020 Project Narrative 5. Comment:The project proposes to abandon an existing undeveloped alley but does not appear to show whether the land is under the sole control of the City.To determine the extent of property interests, a licensed surveyor should be retained to identify any potential easements or property rights that may be influenced by the proposed abandonment of this alley. Response:The services of Thompson& Flemming Land Surveyors were retained for surveying and subdivision purposes. Thompson& Flemming has identified the surrounding properties that will be influenced by the abandonment of the alley. The applicant has indicated the property owners are in favor of the alleyway abandonment and a plan has been developed indicating the areas to be conveyed to the property owners. 6. Comment: The applicant should verify sufficient water and sewer service capacity is available for the proposed project. Response:The City of Saratoga Springs and Saratoga County Sewer District have provided letters stating their ability and willingness to service the proposed project with utility service. The letters are attached for reference. Short Environmental Assessment Form (SEAF) 7. Comment: SEAF No. 15 indicates that the proposed site contains threatened or endangered species which appears to contradict the July 8, 2020 Habitat Assessment Report.The SEAF should be revised if endangered species do not exist on the proposed project site. Response:Following a submission of the Short EAF, the City of Saratoga Springs Planning Board requested the completion of a Full Environmental Assessment Form.A Full EAF was submitted to the City of Saratoga Springs on August 28,2020. Section E.2.o of the Full EAF indicates the proposed site contains threatened or endangered species and the corresponding responses are automatically generated by the NYSDEC Environmental Resource Mapper.As a result, Gilbert Van Guilder Land Surveyors were retained to perform a habitat study and generate the Habitat Assessment Report. The findings of the report concluded that there are no threatened or endangered species on the parcel. Given the section is generated by the NYSDEC Environmental Resource Mapper, Lansing Engineering feels the form should not be modified and the Habitat Assessment Report shall accompany the Full EAF providing the proper documentation that a habitat study was completed on the project site as a result of the automatically generated EAF responses. 8. Comment: SEAF No. 17 indicates that discharge to adjacent properties and conveyance systems is proposed. Use of green infrastructure practices to reduce runoff is proposed with runoff being directed toward existing storm drains at the intersections of Adams and Crescent. Since plans do not appear to provide green infrastructure details,the SEAF or plans should be revised.An increase in runoff to existing storm drains or adjacent properties should not be allowed. Crescent Street Page 3 of 8 Residential Subdivision December 11, 2020 Response:The EAF has been modified to remove references to green infrastructure practices. The project is residential in nature and will disturb between 1.0 and 5.0 acres. Per Section 242-7(A)(1)of City of Saratoga Springs Zoning Code a Basic SWPPP is required for soil and erosion control. Water Sewer Letter Report 9. Comment:The report concludes that anticipated water and sewer demands for the project are insignificant when compared to the capacity available in the area.The applicant should provide documentation from the City Department of Public Works(DPW)that verifies water and sewer capacity is available and can be reserved for this project. Response:The City of Saratoga Springs and Saratoga County Sewer District have provided letters stating their ability and willingness to service the proposed project with utility service. The letters are attached for reference. Habitat Suitability Report 10. Comment: The applicant should obtain a written determination from the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Natural Heritage Program regarding potential for endangered/threatened species that may occur within the project area. Response: A letter has been provided by the NYSDEC National Heritage Program stating there are no records of rare or state-listed animals or plants, or significant natural communities at the project site. The letter is attached for reference. 11. Comment: The report should be updated to reference findings related to typical species of concern such as the Northern Long-eared and Indiana Bat. Response:The Northern Long-Eared and Indiana Bat are not listed on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's IPaC website as typical species of concern at the project set. The U.S. fish and Wildlife Service IPaC printout is attached for reference.Additionally, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service responded to the project habitat study submission with the following regarding the Karner Blue Butterfly listed for the site; "Thank you for your letter.As you have found no suitable habitat for the Karner Blue Butterfly exists on the project site. We have no further comments." 12. Comment: Additional site investigations and cutting restrictions may be required to ensure that no endangered or protected species will be impacted by this project and all necessary protections should be incorporated into final project plans. Response:There are no clearing restrictions for the project site given the required restrictions for the Northern Long-Eared and Indian Bat are not listed. The species listed for the this site(Karner Blue Butterfly)was determined not to be found onsite following the habitat study investigation and review by the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Crescent Street Page 4 of 8 Residential Subdivision December 11, 2020 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan 13. Comment:Grading limits have been conservatively drawn and final construction will likely expand beyond the 0.98-acre limit shown.Therefore,the project should be considered as proposing to disturb beyond the 1-acre limit and be required to obtain a Stormwater Permit from the NYSDEC. It appears that the only way the project can proceed without a permit is for the applicant to install a construction barrier to prevent disturbance at the proposed grading limits, and be willing to cease activity until a permit is obtained if limits need to be exceeded at any time during construction. Response:As suggested, the grading limits have been extended and encompass approximately 1.24 acres and will be required to obtain a Stormwater Permit from the NYSDEC.See the attached plans for the revised grading limits. 14. Comment: Except for a small area by the hydrant at the intersection of Jackson and Crescent Street,the project proposes grading to the edge of pavement.Since it is unlikely that this small area will remain undisturbed,the grading limit on sheet ESC-1 should be revised to extend the grading limit to the edge of pavement in this area.Silt fence should be adjusted accordingly. Response:The area around the existing hydrant has been included within the disturbed and the silt fence has been adjusted accordingly. 15. Comment: The applicant should review grading limits at the proposed stockpile location to determine if enlargement is needed to access the stockpile as sites are developed without reliance on public roads for stockpile transport. Response:The proposed grading limits have been revised to include approximately 1.24 acres and provide sufficient area for enlargement of the soil stockpile as needed to prevent reliance on public roads for stockpile transport. 16. Comment: We note that a basic SWPPP has been prepared for this project since residential construction is proposed and since total disturbance will not exceed 5-acres. Projects that meet the requirements of a basic SWPPP are not required by the NYSDEC to install post construction stormwater practices. However, as a matter of good practice that the project should be required to meet the following design criteria: a) Stormwater management practices should be installed to prevent discharge of additional stormwater to adjacent properties and public systems. Management practices should be sized to ensure that post development runoff matches existing conditions;and Response:The project is residential in nature and includes soil disturbances greater than 1 acre and less than 5 acres. Per Section 242-7(A)(1)of City of Saratoga Springs Zoning Code and Appendix B of the NYSDEC General Permit GP-0-20-001, a Basic SWPPP is required that only includes erosion&sediment controls.As such, the Basic SWPPP has been prepared and includes the Erosion&Sediment Control Plan. Crescent Street Page 5 of 8 Residential Subdivision December 11, 2020 b) The SWPPP should be revised to provide information regarding the operation and maintenance of each stormwater management practice that will be utilized on this project; and Response:The proposed project does not include the construction of stormwater management practices.As stated in response(a)above, the project is residential in nature and includes soil disturbances between 1 acre and 5 acres.A Basic SWPPP is required that only includes erosion&sediment controls by the City of Saratoga Springs and the NYSDEC. c) Details for the green infrastructure practices proposed in the SEAF should be referenced in the SWPPP, included but not limited to, design calculations and soil testing information assuming infiltration practices will be used. Response: The SEAF has been revised to remove references to green infrastructure practices.As stated in response(a)above, the project is residential in nature and includes soil disturbances between 1 acre and 5 acres.A Basic SWPPP is required that only includes erosion&sediment controls by the City of Saratoga Springs and the NYSDEC. 17. Comment:The report should include calculations for the development of the composite curve numbers used to include land use, hydrologic soil group (HSG) and runoff curve numbers for both pre and post developed conditions.The revised report should include a map showing land use associated with each HSG area. Response:The project is residential in nature and includes soil disturbances greater than 1 acre and less than 5 acres. Per Section 242-7(A)(1)of City of Saratoga Springs Zoning Code and Appendix B of the NYSDEC General Permit GP-0-20-001, a Basic SWPPP is required that only includes erosion&sediment controls.As such, the Basic SWPPP has been prepared and includes the Erosion&Sediment Control Plan. Therefore, the requested calculations are not required and have not been included within the attached Basic SWPPP Report. 18. Comment: The report should include drainage area maps for both pre and post developed conditions.These maps should show the entire drainage area tributary to the stormwater management practice with all sub-catchment areas,time of concentration flow paths and design points indicated on the maps. Response:Refer to response to Comment#17. Therefore, the drainage area maps are not required and have not been included within the attached Basic SWPPP Report. 19. Comment: The SWPPP should include a complete and signed copy of the N01. Response:As part of the NYSDEC requirements, an electronic NOI(eN01)is required and submitted for review prior to issuance of a stormwater permit. The eN01 shall be completed and signed as required by the SWPPP Preparer and Owner once all site approvals have been obtained.A draft NM has been completed and included within Appendix C of the attached Basic SWPPP Report. Crescent Street Page 6 of 8 Residential Subdivision December 11, 2020 20. Comment: NYSHPO consultation correspondence should be included in the SWPPP appendix to replace the map currently provided. Response:The services of Hartgen Archeological Associates, Inc. were retained to perform a Phase 1 investigation for the proposed project area.A "no effect"letter has been received from the NYSHPO and is included within Appendix G of the SWPPP. Project Plans 21. Comment:The final mylar of the subdivision map must be signed and stamped by a Professional Land Surveyor. Response:Comment noted. 22. Comment: The Subdivision plan calls for a portion of the undeveloped alley to be conveyed to adjoining landowners.Additional details should be provided to explain how this conveyance will be accomplished. Revisions may be needed to allow the necessary legal descriptions to be prepared for conveyance and consolidation of the alley to adjacent properties. Response:A plan has been developed by Thompson& Flemming Land Surveyors demonstrating how the alleyway will be conveyed to the surrounding property owners. Once the subdivision has been approved, the revisions shall be completed to allow the necessary legal descriptions to be prepared for conveyance and consolidation of the alley to the adjacent properties 23. Comment: A licensed Land Surveyor should complete a title search to determine which properties, if any, have deeded rights to the alleyway that may be impacted by the proposed abandonment.The subdivision map should be revised to show findings accordingly. Review by the City Attorney may also be required since the proposed project involves conveyance of public lands. Response:The deeds into each property owner for their portion of the right of way conveyed from the city will include language which states that as consideration for conveyance of fee title to the portion of the paper street abutting the rear of their property, each property owner waives all rights, title and interest each may have now or may have ever had over any portion of the paper street. 24. Comment: A pre-demolition inspection report should be obtained and provided for City review. Any necessary pre-demolition abatement should be referenced on the sheet ED-1.Abatement specifications may also be required. Response:Refer to the response provided for Comment#3. 25. Comment:Trees within the City right-of-way that are to remain should be specifically called out on relevant plans.A tree protection detail should be added, and plans should be updated to show protection with signage and silt or construction fencing at the dripline of each tree. Crescent Street Page 7 of 8 Residential Subdivision December 11, 2020 Response:The plans have been revised to specify which trees shall remain. Tree protection fencing has been shown on the respective plans around the dree dripline. Additionally, a detail has been added to the Sheet DT-1 and includes fencing and sign location and specifications around the existing trees to be preserved. 26. Comment: The typical lot layout shown on sheet DT-1 should be revised to eliminate the sump pump lateral extending toward the public roadway. In lieu of off-site discharge, details should be added to the plans for on-site management of sump pump flows. Response:The Typical Lot Layout detail has been revised to remove the sump pump lateral extending toward the public roadway. Test pits were completed on October 23, 2020 and confirmed sandy soils are located around the site and seasonal high groundwater is present at an elevation of 300.48. The minimum proposed GFF elevation in the Crescent Street Subdivision is 310.48 providing a first floor FFE of 312.98 and BFF of 302.98 minimum. The basement finished floor elevation is approximately 2.5 feet higher than the elevation of observed seasonal high groundwater, therefore sump pumps and laterals shall not be required for the construction of the single-family residences.Sump pumps are highly recommended regardless of separation to seasonal high groundwater. 27. Comment: Inlet protection does not appear to be shown on ESC-1 but is called for in the notes. Drywells along the roadway should be protected. Response:Sheet ESC-1 has been revised to include inlet protection for the existing drywells located along Crescent Street. 28. Comment: Particular Measures Note 8 on sheet ESC-1 does not appear to apply. Response:Note 8 has been removed from the particular measures section on Sheet ESC-1. 29. Comment:Construction fence or silt fence and signage should be shown along the northern boundary of the project site to prevent off-site construction encroachment. Response:Sheet ESC-1 has been revised to include additional silt fence along the northern boundary of the project site. 30. Comment: Details should be compared against standard requirements of the City of Saratoga Springs and modified as necessary. Response:All details have been compared to the City Standard Details. General details have been included for the remaining details in which the City does not provide a standard detail. 31. Comment: Grading limits from ESC-1 should also be shown on ED-1 and LMG-1. Response:Sheets ED-1 and LMG-1 have been revised to include the grading limits from the Erosion&Sediment Control Plan. Crescent Street Page 8 of 8 Residential Subdivision December 11,2020 Attached is a copy of the revised plan set and submission documents for your review. If additional information is required, please contact our office at your earliest convenience.Thank you. Sincerely, LANSING ENGINEERING, PC Yates tt Lansing, PE,CPESC, CPSWQ CC: Bella Home Builders(Applicant) -r,^v-}aaa.v+a,a,vv a+aavaavrs aF.-avavv•-tea a�avrsYaeii�.vuF�f rt+•�F+f 4,r a+a*a_�a+r+____________________r�,____�,r�___________.__.______________________._______._,-.-ate.-�a��.I isi+rev iava4 .,..b -.-,,.,,T,r ! i ! CFF - BUILDiNG PER]VIIT _:, •, e f.7 16 TO CONSTRUCT ,... 4.-. __A F!! tn. _ lfS' DEl a� .'OLI i IO y . P.-. tl 4thii, e''''--,'-41a Permit Number 20200231PoRA,,, ,,L, F i Date: March 9, 2020 Permission is hereby granted to the below owner or contractor for construction in accordance to application 20200162 together with plans and specifications hereto filed and approved and in compliance with the provisions of the Codes of City of Saratoga Springs,New York. 1 C Permit Issue Date: 03/09/2020 Permit Expiration Date: 03/09/2022 p I 1 LOCATION PERMIT CLASSIFICATION Sect/Block/Lot: 179.29-2-2 Permit Type: B BUILDING Street: 125 JACKSON Work Type: 19 DEMOLITION Zoning District:UR-2 URBAN RESIDENTIAL-2 Prop Usage: Occupy Class: Const.Class: F i ! i OWNER CONTRACTOR BELLA HOME BUILDERS INC GREENBRIAR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES LLC 228 CHURCH STREET 49 WILSHIRE DRIVE 518-376-1505 518-621-6512 APPLICANT GREENBRIAR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES LLC 49 WILSHIRE DRIVE 518-621-6512 Total Value of Work: $10,000 Total Square Feet: Number of Dwelling Units: Number of Bedrooms: Application Date:03/06/2020 Permit Issued By:RT E Permit Fee: $150.00 ! I Scope of Work: DEMOLITION OF ENTIRE HOUSE Comments/Conditions:ANY NEW STRUCTURE PROPOSED WOULD NEED TO MEET CURRENT CITY ZONING ORDINANCE LAWS WHICH INCLUDES LOT SIZE, SET BACK LIMITS,HEIGHT,COVERAGE,PERMEABILITY,ETC. PROPOSED NEW (5)LOT SUBDIVISION WILL REQUIRE PLANNING/ZONING APPROVAL i q '',171 Assistant Building &Construction nspector �a •vaa+auvarvvavrvrF+a«aaaara�r�r'�:v:v'-4�lYl+aa-v+a varvvrv�asir�i-lLi iYF!�llravaaaavaraa}a.�yf}�vaa�av-vv�avvrvva,vs"v-vv-_,_ ______.__..._.__.__...______________ _a__F �--1+�Y•e:�a:�rrvvay.aavv•rvv,^evv-vvv^v,v-vv-vv,^v-v-,vervr�•___f CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS DEBORAI-I M LABRECH E,P.E. ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER I r; OFFICE OF CITY ENGINEER KARI DONOH-IUE - A CITY HALL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT �' t 474 Broadway,Room 10 ' Saratoga Springs,SNew p gsY rok 12866 Telephone 518-587-3550 Fax 518-580-9480 www.saratoga-springs.org November 13, 2020 New York State Department of Health 77 Mohican Street Glens Falls, NY 12801 Re: Lansing Engineering - PB#20200440 - Crescent St. Subdivision Dear New York State Department of Health: This"Will Serve" letter will confirm that the City of Saratoga Springs municipal public water system has adequate capacity, flow and pressure to serve the above location and the City has agreed to provide municipal water supply to this project. Please feel free to let me know if you have any questions at 518-587-3550 ext. 2010. Sincerely, • Deborah LaBreche, P.E, City Engineer cc: A. Scirocco J. O'Neill M. Veitch T. Bianco iiirlita_ ,�pGCqG SARATOGA COUNTY SEWER DISTRICT # 1 P.O.Box 550 Mechanicvrl[e,NY 12118 Co Telephone(518)664-7396 Fax(518)664-6280 ZCP �RarS,���G'C DAN ROURKE,P.E. -- EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR December 7, 2020 Doug Flynn Lansing Engineering, PC 2452 State Route 9 Suite 301 Malta,NY 12020 RE: Crescent Street Residential Development SBL No 228.5-1-38, Town of Ballston Dear Mr. Flynn, Saratoga County Sewer District(SCSD)will allow the discharge of flows from the proposed project into our sewer system once all requirements of the SCSD rules and regulations are met. I may be contacted at (518) 664-7396 for any other information you may need. Sincerely, Ill ,li 'Pit 1041111Fribi"*411'.4 William Bills Maintenance Manager WB/ag COMMISSIONERS: WAYNE A.HOWE,CHRMN. C.DANIEL KEEGAN FRANK J.BISNETT COUNSEL: GEORGE CANNON PAUL HOTALING KYLE M.PILLION STEPHEN M.DORSEY RICHARD C.DOYLE RICHARD M.LOEWENSTEIN JAMES A.THOMPSON SARATOGA COUNTY ATTORNEY NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Division of Fish and Wildlife,New York Natural Heritage Program 625 Broadway,Fifth Floor,Albany,NY 12233-4757 P:(518)402-8935 t F:(518)402-8925 www dec.ny.gov November 20, 2020 Jackie Pitts Gilbert VanGuilder Land Surveyor, PLLC 988 Route 146 Clifton Park, NY 12065 Re: Crescent Street Residential Development County: Saratoga Town/City: City Of Saratoga Springs Dear Ms. Pitts: In response to your recent request, we have reviewed the New York Natural Heritage Program database with respect to the above project. We have no records of rare or state-listed animals or plants, or significant natural communities at the project site. Within .5 mile of the project site are documented locations of Karner Blue Butterfly (Plebejus melissa samuelis, state and federally listed as Endangered) and Frosted Elfin Butterfly (Callophrys irus, state-listed as Threatened). For information about any permit considerations for your project, please contact the Permits staff at the NYSDEC Region 5 Office, Division of Environmental Permits, at dep.r5 a@dec.ny.gov, (518) 623-1286. For most sites, comprehensive field surveys have not been conducted. We cannot provide a definitive statement on the presence or absence of all rare or state-listed species or significant natural communities. Depending on the nature of the project and the conditions at the project site, further information from on-site surveys or other resources may be required to fully assess impacts on biological resources. For information regarding other permits that may be required under state law for regulated areas or activities (e.g., regulated wetlands), please contact the Permits staff at the NYSDEC Region 5 Office as described above. Sincerely, i Nicholas Conrad Information Resources Coordinator 1130 New York Natural Heritage Program <LEWYORIC Department of NIn Environmental Conservation 7/8/2020 IPaC:Explore Location IPaC U.S. Fish &Wildlife Service IPaC resource list This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site-specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project-specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information. , Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the N , USFWS office(s)with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands)for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section, Location \1/4.)11\00, Saratoga County, New York o 19 41?1,41,. 4 4 r C:16°S i 7.. S 1 N ‘ 0 , i 7, a II. itt Nie Local office New York Ecological Services Field Office t+ (607) 753-9334 l` (607) 753-9699 3817 Luker Road Cortland, NY 13045-9385 http:/ . r .govinortheastinyfo/es/section-lhtm https:llecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/KCW4LBRG6VGCBK7DMHXX6UIJKA/resources 1/9 7/8/2020 IPaC:Explore Location Endangered s This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts. The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of influence (AOI)for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population, even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site-specific and project-specific information is often required. '+ Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly. For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an official species list by doing the following: 1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE. 2. Click DEFINE PROJECT. SC144' 3. Log in (if directed to do so).4 4. Provide a name and description for your project. 5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST. Listed species and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA FisheriesZ). Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA =-[ heri s for specie under :h it-jiris iction. 1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more information. 2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location: Insects NAME STATUS https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/KCW4LBRG6VGCBK7DMHXX6UIJKA/resources 2/9 7/8/2020 IPaC:Explore Location KarnerBlue Butterfly Lycaeides melissa samuelis Endangered There is proposed critical habitat for this species.The location of the critical habitat is not available. https:/`e:cos.h s.gov/ecpls ecies 66 6 i Cri t cahabitats Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves. THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION_ il\r4Iiii, ,, Migratory birds0 .,, Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act!and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act2. Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below, - vie. 1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.6' 2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940. , 11 A ,........ Additional information can be found using the following links: • Birds of Conservation Concern http://wwwfws+gov/birds/rnanagernentImangdpecies/ Lirdsof-conservation-concern.p i • Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.go birds/re neged lent/ Qjec.t-asse.ssmerpt-tools-ancl-gLIiclance/ conservation-measures.php • Nationwide conservation measures for birds http : ww.fwvs.gov/migrat ry irds pdf/management/nationwidestanda_rdconservationmeasures.pdf The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found In your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the -bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found below. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/KCW4LBRG6VGCBK7DMHXX6UIJKA/resources 3/9