Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20200754 McAllister Subdivision Application 'FOR OFFICE USEI f�tOGACITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS A - F�� (Application#) ` •' ' ! PLANNING BOARD : Lo 0 % � U *�* (Date received) . —:; *Z.-1J r City Hall-474 Broadway 6'*' , . , .Y Saratoga Springs, New York 12866-2296 Tel:518-587-3550 fax:518-580-9480 Hc'pORATEO ,91y. http://www.saratoga-springs.org Rev.08/2019 PRELIMINARY/ FINAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL REQUIRED SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Project Name: McAllister-2 Lot Subdivisiojn 2. Checklist Prepared By: Tonya Yasenchak Date: October 16, 2020 Listed below are the minimum submittal requirements as set forth in The City of Saratoga Springs' Subdivision Regulations. The Planning Board reserves the right to request additional information, as necessary, to support an application. The Board also reserves the right to reject the application if these minimum requirements are not met. Please complete the checklist below and provide with your submission. REQUIRED ITEMS: *3 hard copies and 1 digital copy of ALL materials are required. CHECK EACH ITEM **HANDWRITTEN APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED** © I. Completed Subdivision Application (2 hard copies-*I w/original signature-and I digital)and Fee ® 2. SEQR Environmental Assessment Form-short or long form as required by action. ® 3. Set of plans including: (2) large scale plans (sheets must be 24"x 36", drawn to a scale of not more than 1"=50 feet). One digital version of all submittal items(pdf)shall be provided. ® 4. Basic or Full Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan as required per City Code Chapter 242. Z 5. Copy of signed DPW water connection agreement for all projects involving new water connections to the City system 1. 6. Engineering Report for Water and Sanitary © 7. Complete Streets Checklist ✓ 8. Project Cost Estimate-Quantities of work items and estimate of costs REQUIRED ITEMS ON SUBDIVISION PLAT,AS APPLICABLE: . Name of Subdivision 3. Property line survey prepared by a licensed land surveyor. Subdivision plat must reference such survey VIwith all corners set and marked on plan. Reference NGVD 1929 datum. A copy of the original property survey must also be included. ® 4. North arrow and map scale City of Saratoga Springs Subdivision Checklist 1 WI5. Parcel tax map number 6. Site location map 17 7. Site vicinity map (all features within 300 feet of property) 8. Identification of current zoning with corresponding area requirements 9. Building setback lines, either listed or shown on plans 10. Title block with subdivision name; name and address of applicant;and name and address of property owner(if different) I I. Name, address and phone number of subdivision surveyor and/or engineer (in process) 12. Names of all adjacent property owners within 300 feet (include both sides of street) (In roc-ss) 13. Identification of size, elevations, material, and slopes of all existing and proposed utilities within 400 ft of site. 14. Parcel street address (existing and any proposed postal addresses) Yes No N/A 15. Identification of existing or proposed easements, covenants or legal rights-of-way on this property 6. References to all prior variances or special use permits 1 17. Existing and proposed contours and spot grades (at 2 foot intervals) nj 18. Identification of all watercourses, designated State wetlands, buffers, Federal wetlands,floodplains, rock outcroppings, etc. 19. Identification of all existing or proposed sidewalks or pedestrian paths (show type, size and condition of existing sidewalks) 20. Location, design specifications and construction material for all proposed site improvements (drains, culverts, retaining walls, berms, fences, etc.) 21. Location and distance to fire hydrant 22. Erosion and sediment control plan —including designated concrete truck washout area 23. Approximate location, dimensions and areas for proposed lots and proposed public recreational land 24. Proposal for utility systems and lateral connections 25. Location and width of proposed streets City of Saratoga Springs Subdivision Checklist 2 JFOR OFFICE USEI ,ATQGA ts,.A • CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS *II s ,: `' Planning Board (Application#) (;-;:44,441.., r CITY HALL-474 BROADWAY SARATOGA SPRINGS, NEW YORK 12866-2296 (Date received) �cORPORnrEo �9 TEL: 518-587-3550. FAX: 518-580-9480 HTTP:/NWVW.SARATOGA-SPRINGS.ORG APPLICATION FOR: SUBDIVISION APPROVAL (Rev:8/8/19) ***Application Check List-All submissions must include completed application check list and all required items. HANDWRITTEN APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED!*** Project Name: McAllister- 2 Lot Subdivision Property Address/Location: #313 Jefferson St., South West Corner of Jefferson St. &Taylor St. Tax Parcel#: 178.52 - 2 - 19.112 Zoning District: UR-2. (for example: 165.52-4-37) Total Acres: 0.47 acres Land to be Subdivided Into: 2 Lots APPLICANT(S)* OWNER(S)(If not applicant) ATTORNEY/AGENT Name James P. McAllister (same) Agent: Engineering America Co. Address 21 Rumson Rd., Little Silver, NJ 07739 76 Washington St.,Saratoga,NY 12866 Phone 518/587 - 1340 Email jimmimic@yahoo.com tonyay@nycap.rr.com Identify primary contact person: 0 Applicant 0 Owner RI Agent *An applicant must be the property owner, lessee, or one with an option to lease or purchase the property in question. Application Fee: A check for the total amount below payable to: "Commissioner of Finance" MUST accompany this application. ❑ Sketch Plan—$300 ❑ Preliminary Subdivision Plat Approval 1-9 Lots $600 51+ $1,500 10-25 Lots $900 26-50 Lots $1,200 Fee submitted $ Final Subdivision Plat Approval 1,440.00 Residential - $1,200 plus $120/lot $ Non-Residential - $1,800/lot $ ❑ Final Approval Modification Residential- $300 $ Non-Residential- $500 $ Submission Deadline—Check City's website(www.saratoga-sprinos.orq) for meeting dates. Does any City officer, Does any City officer, employee or family member the eof have a financial interest(as defined by General Municipal Law Section 809) in this application? YES NO . If YES, a statement disclosing the name, residence, nature and extent of this interest must be filed with this application. I, the undersigned owner or purchaser under contract for the property, hereby request Subdivision consideration by the Planning Board for the identified property above. I agree to meet all requirements under the Subdivision Regulations for the City of Saratoga Springs. Furthermore, I hereby authorize members of the Planning Board and designated City staff to enter the property associated with this application for purposes of conducting any necessary site inspections relating to this application. Applicant Signature: James McAllister Date: Octobe 16,2020 If applicant is not current owner, owner must also sign. Owner Signature: Date: c.N 0G,, CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGSKeith Kaplan,Chair 47 ,fl Brad Gallagher, Vice Chair , fi, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Terrance Gallogly 0 4 'I % u) .;. Cheryl Grey Matthew Gutch ;'P: CITY HALL-474 BROADWAY "(7) r' Christopher Mills fir•,, .hti.1 , SARATOGASPRINGS,NEW YORK 12866 ^w.'4'; PH)518-587-3550 Fx)518-580-9480 Gage Simpson ,NcORPORATED �9 WWW.SARATOGA-SPRINGS.ORG Kathleen O'Connor,alternate #20200087 IN THE MATTER OF THEAPPEAL OF JAMES P. MCALLISTER 3 13 JEFFERSON ST. SARATOGA SPRINGS NY 12866 from the determination of the Building Inspector involving the premises at 313 Jefferson St. in the City of Saratoga Springs, New York being tax parcel number 178.52-2-19.112 on the Assessment Map of said City. The appellant having applied for an area variance under the Zoning Ordinance of said City to permit a two-lot subdivision of a single-family residence in UR-2 District and public notice having been duly given of a hearing on said application held on the 3rd day of August through the 14th day of September 2020. In consideration of the balance between benefit to the applicant with detriment to the health,safety and welfare of the community, I move that the following area variance for the following amount of relief: TYPE OF REQUIREMENT DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL PROPOSED RELIEF REQUESTED REQUIREMENT MINIMUM REAR YARD SETBACK 25' 8' 17' OR 68% As per the submitted plans or lesser dimensions, be approved for the following reasons: I. The applicant has demonstrated this benefit cannot be achieved by other means feasible to the applicant. The applicant noted that the current house already exists, and nothing is changing with the structure. Having a portion of the house removed or the house moved are not viable options and no additional property is available for purchase. 2. The applicant has demonstrated that granting this variance will not create an undesirable change in neighborhood character or detriment to nearby properties. The Board notes that no changes are being made to the existing house. 3. The Board does find the variance to be substantial to what is specifically allowed, but notes the relief requested is mitigated by the fact that nothing is proposed to be changing in terms of the existing house's size and proximity to its neighboring properties, 4. The variance is brought about by the change from being a corner lot, to a non-corner lot; no incremental environmental or physical impact will result from that change. 5. The alleged difficulty is self-created insofar as the applicant desires to create a two-lot subdivision for making the property more desirable, but this is not necessarily fatal to the application. Condition: I. Area variance only applies to the existing house. If that structure is demolished, this variance would be voided. Note: 1. Negative SEQRA Declaration issued by the City Planning Board, dated July 16, 2020. Adopted by the following vote: AYES: 5 (K. Kaplan, G.Simpson,C. Mills,C. Grey,T.Gallogly) NAYES: 0 Dated: September 14, 2020 This variance shall expire 18 months following the filing date of such decision unless the necessary building permit has been issued and actual construction begun as per 240-8.5.1. I hereby certify the above to be a full,true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Saratoga Springs on the date above mentioned,five members of the Board being present. SIGNATURE: _ 9/21/2020 C R DATE RECEIVED BY ACCOUNTS DEPT. Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 -Project Information Instructions for Completing Part 1—Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1.You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1—Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: McAllister 2 Lot Subdivision Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 313 Jefferson St.,South West Corner of Taylor and Jefferson St. Brief Description of Proposed Action: Minor two lot subdivision of existing 0.47 acre lot. Proposed Lot#1 will be 0.28 acres with existing house to remain. Proposed Lot#2 will be 0.19 acres and will be available for future single family residential construction. Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: James P.McAllister E-Mail: jimmimlc@yahoo.com Address: 21 Rumson Rd. City/PO: State: Zip Code: Little Silver Rd. New York 07739-1331 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that Z ❑ may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other government Agency? NO YES If Yes, list agency(s)name and permit-orapproval.city of Saratoga Springs zoning board of Appeals,city of Saratoga Water Connection,City Building Permit approval C 3. a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 0,47 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 0.1 +/-acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 0.47 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,are adjoining or near the proposed action: 5. El Urban ❑ Rural(non-agriculture) ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial ® Residential (suburban) ❑ Forest ❑ Agriculture El Aquatic ❑ Other(Specify): ❑ Parkland Page I of 3 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? CElb. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? C I v�l ❑ NO YES 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? C ❑✓ 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes, identify: ❑ NO YES 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? ❑ b. Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? r ❑ ' c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed C El action? 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: Any new residential construction must comply with the current 2015 International Enemy Conservation Code. A RES Check Energy C C Analysis&Report are typically prepared for submittal to the Building Dept.at time of permit application. 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: C Z 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ❑ Ly. 12. a.Does the project site contain,or is it substantially contiguous to,a building,archaeological site,or district 'NO YES which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places,or that has been determined by the El of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? e,_a_any_poition-af it,located-in-or-adjacent-to-an-area-designated-as-sensitive-for I archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)archaeological site inventory? 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? C b. Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? E ❑ If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: Page 2 ol'3 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site.Check all that apply: ❑Shoreline D Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional 0 Wetland ❑ Urban ®Suburban 15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed by the State or NO YES Federal government as threatened or endangered? a Karner Blue,Frosted Elfin 16. Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan? NO YES Z✓ ❑ 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, ❑ a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? 7 LI b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? C ❑ If Yes,briefly describe: 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water NO YES or other liquids(e.g.,retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain the purpose and size of the impoundment: L9. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste NO YES management facility? If Yes,describe: 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: _ E I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor/na ;,tiv.4/./iY �'l4/f ' Eildi61l �`'r /A ,)K kne 7i�(" Date: �-1 Of 2t, 20 �__��..,D. tt tris !fie pP4Sev-hi ,y? Ppe.r s 70444 I Signature: it �Cr -- .._.. Title: if24??' =1�11:47"7V PRINT FORM Page 3 of 3 EAF Mapper SummaryReport Thursday, February 06,2020 4:16 PM Disclaimer: The EAF Mis a screening tool intended to assist ' --_roject'���"�ponsors_--v(EAF).���/-. -_s-questions.a�-� ����paring an --_ l ,,...,,,........:i;,.8:.'42.12:2"...6 :1:7„,:15.2.2,... 84 70.,,,\ ,,,,, " .,, , are ' ' ' ' ' '' , answered by the EAF Mapper.Additional information on any EAF "qm=es=n"on""n=vpm"a,�==� ="=` m '�'"°m�m°�=m' �= � n, -2DEC, mnn�umn�wmmc� v /eumo to obtaindata not provided m�pe,.o/ota/data mnot a / substitute for agency determinations, mv°rdv r ~� �� . . .`, ' ' ` �r | ` \r.. -\-- cL ila tely --- - ' -- .4 it 5'2:2; '4'6''''''''ff;'::17.":'8.1.5.-2-2=20 ' . 1:'' :.-'1:-..,,1"..et—poi ,,,,..,., j?. --'r:I'''''''\1,Ylt51-17,:.14.14,:.„1",4_,,,_„,..'4,:',,,,44,01, t -.~~,ti~ ° =_ ,�° ` ~~=~"~="===^ Part 1 /Question 7 [Critical Environmental Area]. _-_- Part 1 /Question 12o [National or State I No Register of Historic Places or State Eligible Ped1 /OuooU [Archeological S�a� Yes _. | pe� 1 /C>ue��n13 nds or Other No Regulated Waterbodies]-_ _--- ' - - Part I /Question 15 [Threatened or i Yes EndangeredAn| | �� ����/ !!Part 1 /Question 15 [Threatened or 'KarnerBlue,Frosted Elfin !Endangered Animal - Name] , Part 1 /Question 18 [10OYear Flood Plain] Digital 1Digital mappingdata . not availablor are imnmplet . Refer to EAF |VVorhbuok. ' Part 1 /Quemdon20 [Remediation 1i No - ' . Short Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 1 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits, Region 5 232 Golf Course Road, Warrensburg, NY 12885 Phone: (518)623-1240•Fax: (518)623-3603 Website:www.dec.ny.00v NgIV E3ssll Seggos LETTER OF NO JURISDICTION Commissioner ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT March 16, 2020 Ms. Tonya Yasenchak Engineering America 76 Washington Street Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 Re: 313 Jefferson Street Parcel ID#: 178.52-2-19.113 City of Saratoga Springs, Saratoga County Dear Ms. Yasenchak, The Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) has determined that your proposal to develop the above-described parcel in the City of Saratoga Springs is not likely to result in the take of threatened or endangered species. This determination is based on the information submitted by Engineering America and reviewed by staff from the Division of Fish and Wildlife. Though Karner blue butterflies (Plebejus melissa samuelis)and frosted elfins (Callophrys irus)were known to occur near your project location, the subject parcel does not contain suitable habitat for either species and the DEC does not anticipate your proposed action to result in a take. Therefore, no permit is required at this time pursuant to the implementing regulations (6NYCRR Part 182) of the New York State Endangered Species Act (Article 11-0535). Be advised that any changes in location, expansion of the footprint of the project, modifications of the scope, or changes in the timing of proposed actions that are not identified in the submission referenced above may trigger DEC authorization. Please reinitiate contact with this office if such activities are contemplated. Please note that this letter does not relieve you of the responsibility of obtaining any necessary permits or approvals from other agencies or local municipalities. Sincerely, CA- Beth Magee Regional Deputy Permit Administrator <,,,NEWYORK Parks, Recreation, STATE OF OPPORTUNITY. and Historic Preservation ANDREW M.CUOMO ERIK KULLESEID Governor Commissioner March 17, 2020 Tonya Yasenchak Project Engineer Engineering America Co. 76 Washington St. Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 Re: SEQRA McAllister- Proposed Two Lot Subdivision 313 Jefferson St., City of Saratoga Springs, Saratoga County, NY 2OPRO1887 Dear Tonya Yasenchak: Thank you for requesting the comments of the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP). We have reviewed the project in accordance with the New York State Historic Preservation Act of 1980 (Section 14.09 of the New York Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law). These comments are those of the OPRHP and relate only to Historic/Cultural resources. They do not include potential environmental impacts to New York State Parkland that may be involved in or near your prject. Such impacts must be considered as part of the environmental review of the pject pursuant to the State Environmental Quality RevievvAct(NevvYorkEnv|ronmente| ConservaUonLavvArt|c|e8) and |b* inlp|emenbng regulations (6 NYCRR Part 617). Based upon this review, it is the opinion of OPRHP that no properties, including archaeological and/or historic resources, listed in or eligible for the New York State and National Registers of Historic Places will be impacted by this project. If further correspondence is required regarding this pject, please be sure to refer to the OPRHP Project Review (PR) number noted above. Sincerely, ey/ir R. Daniel Mackay Deputy Commissioner for Historic Preservation Division for Historic Preservation Division for Historic Preservation P.O.Box 1oo.Waterford, New York 1u188-g1og^(n18)2oFoa^3^pemooy.gow ENGINEERING AMERICA CO . 76 WASHINGTON ST . SARATOGA SPRINGS , NY 1 2 8 6 6 5 1 8 / 5 8 7 - 1 3 4 0 5 1 8 / 5 8 0 - 9 7 8 3 ( FAX ) TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: FROM: Planning Board Tonya Yasenchak COMPANY: DATE: City of Saratoga Springs October 9,2020 FAX NUMBER: TOTAL NO.OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 8 PHONE NUMBER: SENDER'S REFERENCE NUMBER: RE: YOUR REFERENCE NUMBER: 313 Jefferson St. Subdivision Water,Sewer&Basic SWPPP ❑ URGENT El FOR REVIEW 0 PLEASE COMMENT ❑ PLEASE REPLY 0 AS REQUESTED ENGINEERING REPORT: INTRODUCTION: Engineering America Co. has been retained by the applicant James McAllister, to provide land planning and site/civil engineering services in connection with the subdivision application for 313 Jefferson St., Saratoga Springs, New York 12866, tax map number 178.52-2-19.112. Subdivision approval will be required from the Planning Board which includes all requirements listed on the City of Saratoga's Preliminary/Final Subdivision Approval Required Submittal Checklist. This report is intended to fulfill items 4 & 6 of the Required Items part of the Preliminary/Final Subdivision approval checklist. DESCRIPTION OF INTENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT&USE: 313 Jefferson St. is located at the South West corner of Jefferson St. and Taylor St. in Saratoga Springs New York. The 0.47 acre lot has an existing single family residential building of approximately 1,360 square foot in living area containing one dwelling unit. The existing building is accessed by on driveway from Jefferson St. The lot area is nearly level with a maximum elevation difference of 1-2'. The property is mostly grassy along the West side of the lot and treed with mulched cover towards the East side of the lot. The proposed subdivision of this parcel would result in dividing the single lot into two lots. The existing residence would be located on a 0.31 +/- acre lot and require a new driveway to access Taylor St. as well as the installation of new utility connections in Taylor St. as may be required. The second lot,to be created along Jefferson St. would be created and marketed for sale as a residential building lot. This lot is assumed to accommodate a principal structure built in compliance with zoning regulations and be 0.156 acres in area. Compliance with the requirements of Table 3 of the City of Saratoga Springs Zoning Ordinance is as shown on the subdivision plat, S 1. WATER REPORT: Currently, there are 3 bedrooms within the existing single family dwelling unit on the property. Using a standard demand of 110 gallons per capita day (gpcd) the existing property can be estimated to have an annual water consumption usage of 120,450 gallons. Assuming the new lot will accommodate a single family residence with 4 total bedrooms the annual water consumption would increase by 160,600 gallons to 281,050 gallons (increase of 440 gallons per day). There is an 8" water main located in Taylor St. and a 10" water main located in Jefferson St. The existing residence appears to be currently connected to the water main from the Jefferson St. side. A new 1" water service connection will be required for the existing house to connect to the water main in Taylor St. The new lot will reuse the 1" water service line (previously used for the existing house) which connects into the water main on Jefferson St. SANITARY REPORT: There are 3 bedrooms within the existing single family residence. Using a standard sanitary sewer of 110 gallons per capita day (gpcd) the existing property can be estimated to have an annual sanitary load of 120,450 gallons. Assuming the new lot will accommodate a single-family dwelling containing 4 bedrooms the annual sanitary load for the two lots will increase by 160,600 gallons to 441,600 gallons. There is an 8" sanitary sewer main located in Jefferson St. and a 12" main located on Taylor St. An existing on site septic system serves the existing residence. A new sanitary service connection of 4"to 6"diameter PVC will be required for the existing house to connect to the 12" main in Taylor St. The new single dwelling unit building would be expected to use a 4" to 6" diameter PVC service line connecting to the 8" main in Jefferson St. The additional load from the construction of the additional residence is not expected to tax the capacity of the municipal system. 2 STORMWATER & BASIC SWPPP/EROSION CONTROL SOIL CONDITIONS: The Eastern portion of the overall site (in location of existing residence) is nearly level, DeB, Deerfield loamy fine sand in hydrologic soil group B. According to Saratoga County Soil Surveys, the depth to any restrictive feature in this soil type is typically greater than 60 inches. The soil is classified as deep, moderately well drained soil with rapid permeability, slow surface runoff and slight erosion hazard. The Western portion of the overall site (in location of the proposed new lot & residence) is nearly level, WnB, Windsor loamy sand in hyrdrologic group B. According to Saratoga County Soil surveys, the depth to any restrictive feature in this soil type is typically greater than 60 inches. The soil is classified as deep, excessively drained soil with rapid permeability, slow surface runoff and slight erosion hazard. SEDIMENT& EROSION CONTROL: A sediment and erosion control plan has been developed in order to specify minimum controls and measures to reduce sediment runoff during construction. - Construction Entrances: Two construction entrances have been specified to accommodate the new driveway to the existing residence along Taylor St. as well as any new construction on the new lot along Jefferson St. - Topsoil: A potential topsoil storage area for foundation backfill and topsoil will be identified and will be surrounded by silt fencing. In general, excavated soil for foundations that will not be retained for backfill and topsoil grading will be required to be removed from the site daily. - Concrete Wash: Concrete trucks are not allowed to wash on the premises. - Sediment Control: Less than 0.25 acres are anticipated to be disturbed during construction. Silt fencing has been specified around the perimeter of the new driveway for the existing house along Taylor St. Silt fencing has also been specified around the perimeter of the new lot project area to reduce off site erosion migration. 3 McAllister- Soil Map 178.52-2.38 condocomrntinarea 178,62-2-25 178.52-2-19.121 178.52-237 178,52-2-26 178.52-2-27 178.52-2-28 178.52-2-49 178.52-2-3 0 e 0 t!, 178.52-246 thYLOR l'AYLOii Si 1 DeS 11181;, 7 . . 1.17 178.52-245 178.52-241 179.-5-7 DAGGSWnB UV 178.52-2-32 178.52-2-20 170.62-2-34 178.52-243 P 0 z r• 178.524-4.4 178.52-2-402178'52-24" 178.62-24411 f77:52-2-40.1 178.52.2.44-13178.52-2-14.12 , October 9,2020 0 mot 0.011:1128 0.02 ml 1:1 Soils 0 Cities 0 Villages 2019 Labels I , o 0.01 0.02 0.04 km OCounties 0 Towns 2019 Sources Earl,HERE,Elarmln,!Mann*,Increment P Carp.,0E800,USGS, � ;Saratoga County, New York 7J Soil reaction:very strongly acid to slightly acid saturated zone. Selecting sites in better drained, areas may throughout nearbyreduce this limitation.Tile drains '' Surface runoff:slow around foundation footings and protective coatings on hazard:slight basement walls may help to reduce this limitation. Depth to water table: 1.5 to 3 feet at some time during Septic Tank Absorption Fields December through April ft 'Depth to bedrock:greater than 60 inches This map unit is very limited because of the filtering Flooding hazard:none capacity of the soil and depth to saturated zone Use and Suitability (mainly in the spring). Inadequate filtering by the soil above the saturated zone may result in the pollution of Most areas of this map unit are used for agriculture. groundwater.Alternative septic system designs should Some areas are in woodlots, orchards, or are being be considered to insure adequate treatment of used as sites for residential development, effluent. Selecting sites with moderately rapid permeability'in nearby areas may reduce this CroplandPOM-- limitation. This map unit is moderately suited to cultivated The capability subclass is 3w. 1,-gait; crops. It can be used to grow hay, small grains, corn silage,fruits and vegetables.The seasonal high water DeB—Deerfield loamy fine sand, V Y ` table may delay soil preparation and planting. Unless undulating the soil is adequately drained, selection may be limited to crops that are more tolerant to wetness.Adequate This very deep, moderately well drained soil formed drainage outlets are sometimes difficult to locate. In in water sorted sand. It is on glacial outwash plains the summer months,this map unit may be subject to and terraces. Slope ranges from 3 to 8 percent,and is droughtiness. Reduced tillage practices, use of cover complex. Individual areas range mainly from 10 to 30 crops or sod-forming crops, and return of crop acres and are oval or rectangular. residues to the soil help to reduce compaction and The typical sequence, depth, and composition of erosion as well as promotegood soil tilth. the layers of this map unit are as follows— Pasture Surface layer: This map unit is well suited to pasture. However, 0 to 10 inches,very dark grayish brown loamy fine the seasonal high water table may restrict the root sand growth of some legumes. Deferment of grazing in the Subsoil: spring and during other wet periods will help to 10 to 26 inches, mottled, dark yellowish brown loamy maintain tilth and protect sod cover. Proper stocking fine sand rates, nutrient management, and weed control will Substratum: help increase forage yields and maintain sod cover. 26 to 44 inches, mottled,yellowish brown fine sand Recreation 44 to 72 inches, brown fine sand This map unit is somewhat limited for many Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of recreational uses because of the depth to saturated well drained Oakville soils and somewhat poorly drained zone. For golf fairways, this unit is also somewhat Wareham soils.Also included are areas of sandy over limited by droughtiness.The addition of loamy fill clayey Claverack soils. Included areas are up to 5 material and adequate drainage will greatly improve acres and make up about 25 percent of the unit. conditions for these uses. Soil Properties Woodland Permeability:moderately rapid or rapid in the surface, The potential productivity is high for eastern white rapid in the subsoil, and very rapid in the pine.This map unit is not limiting for most woodland substratum management activities.Trees to manage include red Available water capacity(average for 40-inch profile): pine and European larch. very low or low Dwellings with basements Soil reaction:very strongly acid to slightly acid throughout This map unit is very limited for dwellings with Surface runoff. slow basements because of wetness or the depth to Erosion hazard:slight 80 Soil Survey Depth to water table: 1.5 to 3 feet at some time during Dwellings with basements December through April This map unit i8very limited for dwellings with Depth to bedrock:greater than 60 inches basements because of wetness or the depth to Flooding hazard:none saturated zone.Selecting sites inbetter drained, limitation.nearby areas may reduce this Tile drains ���� Use and around foundation footings and protective coatings on Most areas of this map unit are used for agriculture, basement walls may help to reduce this limitation. Some areas are in woodlotsonohnnje. orarn being Septic Tank Absorption Fields used as sites for residential development. This map unit is very limited because of the filtering Cropland ' capacity of the soil and depth to saturated zone This map unit is moderately suited to cultivated (mainly in the spring). Inadequate filtering by the soil crops. It can be used to grow hay, small grains, corn above the saturated zone may result in pollution of oi|oge, fruits and vegetables. The seasonal high water groundwater.Alternative septic system designs should table may delay soil preparation and planting Unless be considered to insure adequate treatment of effluent the soil is adequately drained selection may be limited Selecting sites with moderately rapid permeability in to crops that are more tolerant to wetness Adequate nearby areas may reduce this limitation drainage outlets are sometimes difficult to locate. In The capability subclass is 3w. the summer months, this soil may be subject to droughtiness. Reduced tillage practices, use of cover EIB—Elmridge very fine sandy loam, 3 to crops or sod-forming cnopm, and return of crop 8 percent slopes residues to the soil help to reduce compaction and erosion as well as promote good soil tilth. This very deep,gently sloping, moderately well drained soil formed inloamy ouhwonhoverlying clayey Pasture sediments. It is on the glacial lake plain and terraces. This map unit is well suited to pasture However Individual areas range mainly from 10 to 25 acres and the seasonal high water table may restrict the root are rectangular or oblong growth of some legumes. Deferment of grazing in the The typical aequenoe, depth, and composition of1. spring and during other wet periods will help to the|ayeraofthiomepunitonaaafoUovva—- nnainbain tilth and protect sod coverProper stocking Surface layer: rates, nutrientmonogennen� andvveedcnntro|vviU ~ ' 0to8 |nohea brovvnvery fine sandy loam help increase forage yields and maintain sod oove� ' Subsoil: Recreation 8to1Ginches, yellowish brown very fine sandy loam This map unit is somewhat limited for many 16 to 18 inches light olive brown very fine sandy loam if recreational uses because of the depth to saturated 18 to 39 inches mottled dark yellowish brown and light zone This unit is very limited for playground use yellowish brown silty clay because of slope The addition of fill material or Substratum: adequate drainage vviUgreatly|n0pnDve conditions for ' 39to47inoheo rnoM|edpale olive clay these usesSomegnad(ngonUnmonth�Dgm�ybo ' 47!n72inches, brown clay needed, particularly for playground use. Included with this soil inmapping are small areas Woodland with slopes less than 3 percent and areas of poorly The potential productivity is high for eastern white drained Shaker soils Also included are areas of pine This map unit is moderately suited to log similar but well drained soils and sandy Oakville or landings and natural road surfaces because of slope moderately well drained Deerfield soils Included Some land leveling may be necessary to efficiently areas are up to 5 acres and make up about 30 percent stack and process logs There is also a moderate of the unit erodibility concern on roads and trailsWateroon�ro| � Soil Properties structures can be installed to divert flowing water away from these passages Trees to manage include red Permeability moderately rapid in the solum slow or pine and European larch very slow in the substratum ` Saratoga County, New York 153 , V-41* Woodland Soil reaction:very strongly acid to moderately acid in sli,:: The potential productivity for northern red oak is the surface and subsoil, and very strongly acid to moderate. This map unit is not limited for most slightly acid in the substratum woodland management activities.Trees to manage Surface runoff slow t Erosion hazard: slight red pine and Norway spruce. include Depth to water table:more than 6 feet Dwellings with basements Depth to bedrock:greater than 60 inches RAciP This map unit is not limited for use as dwellings. Flooding hazard:none '-_.. Areas of disturbed soil should be protected with plant Use and Suitability cover during construction to reduce erosion and Many areas of this map unit are used for blowing of the fine sandy material. agriculture,while an increasingly large acreage is ` Septic Tank Absorption Fields being used for suburban development. Some areas kgoifm L141:41-,-. are in orchards or small woodlots. ,. 0 _ This map unit is very limited because of the filtering e ` capacity of the soil. Inadequate filtering by the soil may Cropland result in the pollution of groundwater.Alternative septic This map unit is moderately suited to cultivated system designs should be considered to insure crops. It can be used to grow small grains,corn silage, V-rlik , adequate treatment of effluent. Selecting sites with hay, and some fruits and vegetables. However, low lo_vmoderately rapid permeability in nearby areas may available water capacity may reduce yields significantly. reduce this limitation. Use of cover crops or sod-forming crops, and return of The capability subclass is 3s. cropresidues to the soil helpto improve moisture �� p retention, reduce erosion, and promote good soil tilth. x WnB—Windsor loamy sand, undulating Pasture This very deep, excessively drained soil formed in This map unit is well suited to pasture. Proper V,t water-sorted sand. It is on glacial outwash plains, stocking rates and timely deferment of grazing can p i kames and terraces. Slopes range from 3 to 8 allow for regrowth after dry periods.Nutrient management r percent, and is complex. Individual areas range mainly and weed control will help increase forage yields. from 10 to 50 acres and are rectangular. e} The typical sequence, depth, and composition of Recreation the layers of this map unit are as follows— This map unit is very limited for playgrounds rt- ' because of the slope. Less sloping areas will require P S Surface layer: less grading and smoothing.An addition of loamy 0 to 2 inches, moderately decomposed pine needles topsoil may reduce droughtiness while improving 2 to 11 inches, very dark grayish brown loamy sand vegetative growth and the soil's ability to withstand ', Subsoil: pedestrian traffic. 11 to 21 inches,yellowish brown loamy sand Woodland 21 to 25 inches,yellowish brown sand Substratum: The potential productivity for northern red oak is 25 to 72 inches, light yellowish brown sand moderate.This map unit is moderately suited to log landings, natural road surfaces, and mechanical f t Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of planting because slope. Some land leveling may be moderately well drained Deerfield soils, and well necessary to efficiently stack and process logs.There drained,fine sandy Oakville soils.Also included are is also a moderate erodibility concern on roads and areas of gravelly Hinckley soils. Included areas are up trails.Water control structures can be installed to 'Al",', -.._ to 5 acres and make up about 20 percent of the unit. divert flowing water away from these passages.Trees Soil Properties to manage include red pine and Norway spruce. Permeability:rapid or very rapid throughout the soil Dwellings with basements Available water capacity(average for 40-inch profile): This map unit is not limited for use as a site for s low or moderate dwellings.Areas of disturbed soil should be protected . L . N' r4S iitfw iFz , 154 Soil Survey , k,d with plant cover during construction to reduce erosion agriculture,while increasingly large acreage is being 4 of the fine sandy material. used for suburban development. Some areas are in Septic Tank Absorption Fields orchards or small woodlots. This map unit is ar :' probable source of sand, and some sites are being a This map unit is very limited because of the filtering excavated. capacity of the soil. Inadequate filtering by soil may result in the pollution of groundwater.Alternative septic Cropland system designs should be considered to insure This map unit is poorly suited to cultivated crops or adequate treatment of effluent. Selecting sites with hay.The main limitations are droughtiness and the I moderately rapid permeability in nearby areas may potential for soil erosion.The low available water ./ reduce this limitation. capacity limits plant growth during many years. On The capability subclass is 3s. long, poorly vegetated slopes, this soil erodes easily. Cross slope tillage, use of cover crops or sod-forming ., WnC—Windsor loamy sand, rolling crops, and return of crop residues to the soil help to reduce erosion,improve available water capacity, and This very deep, excessively drained soil formed in promote good soil tilth. r, water-sorted sand. It is on glacial outwash plains, Pasture kames, and terraces. Slopes range from 8 to 15 percent, and is complex. Individual areas range mainly This map unit is moderately suited to pasture. If { overgrazing occurs, erosion can be a hazard because from 20 to 100 acres and are rectangular. of slope. Proper stocking rates, timely deferment of ,:';q The typical sequence, depth, and composition of grazing, and weed control will help increase forage the layers of this map unit are as follows— yields and reduce the risk of erosion. Surface layer: Recreation 0 to 2 inches, moderately decomposed pine needles 2 to 11 inches, very dark grayish brown loamy sand This map unit is very limited for playgrounds Subsoil because of slope. Choosing less sloping areas will 4r require less grading and smoothing for playground 11 to 21 inches, yellowish brown loamy sand 21 to 25 inches, yellowish brown sand sites.Water erosion is a management concern on x heavily used paths and trails.Water control structures Substratum: can be installed to divert flowing water away from 25 to 72 inches, light yellowish brown sand these passages. , t Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of Woodland , .. moderately well drained Deerfield soils, and well ,, The potential productivity for northern red oak is drained,fine sandy Oakville soils.Also included are ,!_ areas of gravelly Hinckley soils. Included areas are up moderate.This map unit is moderately suited to log m d to 5 acres and make up about 25 percent of the unit. landings, natural road surfaces, and mechanical planting because of the slope. Some land leveling may Soil Properties be necessary to build roads and efficiently process logs.There is also a moderate erodibility concern onL Permeability:rapid or very rapid throughout the soil roads and trails.Water control structures can be i Available water capacity(average for 40-inch profile): installed to divert flowing water away from these low or moderate passages.Trees to manage include red pine and .:,, Soil reaction:very strongly acid to moderately acid in Norway spruce. the surface and subsoil, and very strongly acid to Dwellings with basements • { slightly acid in the substratum Surface runoff:medium This map unit is somewhat limited for dwellings with h x' Erosion hazard:moderate basements because of slope. Some grading and Depth to water table:more than 6 feet smoothingwill be necessaryaround the buildingfor p �4 Depth to bedrock:greater than 60 inches landscaping purposes and erosion control. Flooding hazard:none Areas of disturbed soil should be protected with plant Use and Suitability cover during construction to reduce erosion and blowing of the fine sandy material. Land shaping and Many areas of this map unit are used for grading may reduce the limitation. ' m� City of Saratoga Springs ~ Department of Anthony] Scirocco cJ.5Lo�e/\venue Anthony -3Commissioner` ^ w��' ' Saratoga Springs,- � - ,~R^=p (518) 587-3550 office Joseph J. O'Neill www.saratoga-springs.org Deputy Commissioner NEW WATER SERVICE CONNECTION AGREEMENT & APPLICATION FORM James McAllister McAllister-2 Lot Subdivision Property Owner's Name Project Name (if applicable) 313Jefferson St. |otunTay|orE��) —1�A.��- —� ��-1q.11� Property Address (newTax Map #: Size of Tap (check one below) Greater than 1" A unit of water shall be defined as 14,000 (fourteen thousand) cubic feet of water per year. Contact the Utilities Department at ext. 2502 for assistance with water use estimation and meter specifications before signing below. (1) New/ (1) y�od�od NunmberofDvveUinQs: Estimated Cubic Feet of Water per Year To be completed in full without any contingencies or protest, on or before the Building Inspector approval of the rough plumbing, including the installation of the water meter, or at the time of the issuance of a tapping permit. The undersigned represents to the City that they have full and complete authority to execute this document and find and commit the developer to abide by the City Water Ordinance. This agreement shall be binding on all of the undersigned transferees. The undersigned acknowledges that a copy of this document will be delivered to appropriate and necessary governmental entities. Tonya Yasenchak, PEAuthorized3ignature Print Name Engine: •4 America CO.. 76 Washington St., Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 Company Name &Address 518 / 587 - 1340 October 14, 2020 Company Phone Number Fax Number Date ****************************************************************************************** Department of Public Works Approval Date: City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Checklist Saratoga Springs Complete Street Policy Vision (May 2012) The City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Policy will encourage the development of a complete streets network throughout the City to create a more balanced transportation system. The Policy shall be consistent with and assist in achieving the goals and recommendations set forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan and other policy documents. The Policy shall ensure new and updated public and private projects are planned, designed, maintained and operated to enable safer, comfortable and convenient travel to the greatest extent possible for users of all abilities including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists and transit riders. This checklist is intended to assist the City in achieving its vision for complete streets. Project Name: McAllister-2 Lot Subdivision Date: October 15,2020 Project Location t Limits: 313 Jefferson St.; North West corner of Jefferson St&Taylor St. Project Description: Subdivision of 0.47 acre lot with existing house to create new 2nd lot for sale &new residence Instructions: For each box checked, please provide a brief description for how the item is addressed, not addressed, or not applicable and include supporting documentation. Street Classification (identify street or streets within the project area) Principal arterial ❑ Minor arterial ❑ Mixed use collector ❑ Mixed use local ❑ Residential collector ❑ Residential local 0 Special use street ❑ EXISTING CONDITIONS Item to Be Addressed/ Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Descri•tion q mow'-, ti,`"� �Jl9Pf�+.i—J��3.���,L-:SS���;.��.� C-A����� ".1-.xrlk',�.'�:�H:r�,.�gt;•-.'�`:�s $trr�t�',vs�.. z,, svt:#a b'+ .,,:�Ss �7a;i;� .v,r, .AY.�,. ,.y. ;r§a+ ,'pro a'rt�t r�tih'� .rtk.;. _ .:.;'_.. Do bicycle and pedestrian accommodations exist?(see page 2 for ❑ ❑ Pedestrian Sidewalks on Taylor examples) �c�' way t s;� Ye@{ yt ,gr.m"l+.'�,�5' '`:..T}, AIU���f���,."•tY�l��.t,.a1i��<£� �'�'ri',�s5 4� r .a 3s��, Do transit facilities exist within the study area, including bus and 4r ❑ ❑ CDTA stop at Lincoln&Jefferson train stops/stations? Is the project area on a transit route? (CDTA Service Routes) ❑ ❑ 'Are there bicycle racks, shelters, or parking for transit riders ❑ ❑ available? +v ita.,. 1„/(:piy�a6/�' )j,',}� � ///ggqy�,1yy,,IIIf Vi �-: ;, +h'' Zf�t "l,'4 5`4'x^/!3;0."it���'�v��X`.C((.A'���+-�"�kXK� 7i f7E ..,, �fL�+& �y;�rq�}�i�s.. ���`'Q�.e�h.r�'W"''"�`d�, Do connective opportunities exist with schools, hospitals, senior ❑ !; ❑ care or community centers or persons with disabilities within project area? Are there gaps inhibiting continuous access between schools, ❑ Cl hospitals, senior care, or community centers or persons with disabilities withinpp •roject/ area?" c i o e,. A. �. r ,X., -� 'tti ,3. ,`s�S�-BCH Sri.'.,.;. r /4 c� r .ti kY 0fiVttC i ;44.'!xMM'ii„"»n,�" Are there prominent landmarks, recreation, shopping, employment ❑ ❑ center, cultural centers or other key destinations that offer Saratoga Casino Resort&Track opportunities to connect this site? Please list and/or describe planning or policy documents addressing bicyclist, pedestrian,transit, or truck/freight use for the project area. Examples can include: City of Saratoga Springs Comprehensive Plan, City of Saratoga Springs Open Space Plan, Capital District Transportation Committee Bicycle/Pedestrian Priority Network, City Standard Details, etc. The City Complete Streets 2016 plan offers insight on pedestrian connectivity. The City Planning Board Subdivision requirements outline the necessity of new sidewalks for future connections. City of Saratoga Springs Complete Streets Checklist 1 PROPOSED DESIGN . Item to Be Addressed/ Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Descri.tion ��o���� .'i/����«� k'X0i`��� ° � � � �� ,� ������ �� �� �� �� � �,' Bic clist accommodations? El E 0 The 1 new lot created will not have bicycle accom. Pedestrian accommodations? W., El New Jefferson St.sidewalk mconnect mTaylor m Access and Mobilit accommodations? D 0 , Accessible crossing������� Transit accommodations? Fl �� ' 0 No new streets are being created Truck!frei.ht accommodations? 0CI0ulot subdivision/oresidential mnature only Streetsca.e elements? r ' Fl Fl New streetlights&street trees along Jefferson St r'P',-.i' Off-roadway bike [] Yes ONoDNA accommodationsirt ,o� uwm/s�um�v��=�����.-,����ua��^'./�� ~.`c Dedicatebike �� Yem��NoF�NA Sidewalks on both sides of ��Yes�lNo0�NA -- -- -- the street Shared-use lane �� Yea��No . �� �� DNAStriped crosswalks 0Yes~ NnDNA Shnu|der 0Yes 0No DNA Geometric modifications [lYea��NoFlNA Acceptable octua�`dtra�o FlYao��NoFlNA �~ ~~ ^~ �~ ~~ �� to reduce crossing signal bike detoction, including distances such as curb turn lanes Do signals allow adequate [l Yes F�Nn DNA extensions(e.g. bu|b'outo) �� ^~ �� Acoeptab|apruviaionfor �lYoo ��NoFlNA minimum green time for �� =" ^� bicyclist to safely cross pedestrian traffic signal intersection? features (e.g. ped. buttons) Signage and pavement FlYeo ��No �lNA podenthmnsignage for FlYes ��No�lNA �� == �� crossing &wayfinding markings specific to proposed Safety islands/medianson FlYeo ��Nn��NA bike facilities ^~ ^~ ~~ Bicycle safe inlet grates �� Yeo No ��NA noadvvayaw�hbwoormony �� �� �� traffic lanes in each direction Bicycle parkingeg. bike �� Ye� ��NoF�NA � racks, �� == �~ Enhanced supplemental ��Yeo ��NoDNA bika |ockom ^~ == _������� pedoethantreatments sd . ` � � uncnninoUedmo�ed Transit shelters ��D�NnF�NA �� ^� �� crossings Bus turnouts 0 Yes IDNo DNA Standing pads D Yes IDNo DNAAre there proposed IDYes []NoINA Has CDTA been contacted? connections to other bike �.te�^px/Aa:.'�ymo1m / patha, pudeatriantoci|itiee. or� ' _z _� Adequate sidewalk or paved CIYes []NoDNA transit facilities? path Are there proposed ��Yen��No��NA Acceptable 0Yes ONoDNA conne�ionutoanyk� � � � consideration/provision for destinations listed on page 1? accessible pedestrian traffic Are there proposed El signal features connections to �� �� �� Curb ramps, including IDYes ONoDNA neighborhoods? detectable warning ' surface ^ � ° ,~ °°�.e .1,-.1.--„��`^.��."^`''`'-, �~,""+�`,^'`^=,��'. `` Are streetscape elements ID Acceptable slope and �� Yes FlNo ��NA proposed such as ~~ �� ^~ cross-slope for driveway ramps, landscaping, street trees, midewa|ko, crossings) p|ontom, buffer strips, etc? Have conflicts been reduced 0Y*a Fl No ID NA Pedestrian-level lighting El DNA among pedestrian, b\cyuUatn. �~ ^~ and motor vehicles (access Public seating or benches 0 Yes ONo DNA management)? r� - - ����� �� � A. � ��� Design meetguidelines such aedescribed below for DYeo []No DNA Describe ioyo|e/ped�atrian/bua�nanaitfooi|iti�a? New umnwo|x.|�moaonov *American Association of State Highd Transportation Officials(AASHTO) A Policy on Geometric Design of Highway and Streets,Guide for the Development d AASHTO Guide for the Planning,Design, Operation of Pedestrian Facilities;Public Riqht-of-Way Accessibility Guide(PROWAG);Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices(MUTCD);Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines(ADAAG); National Association of City Transportation Officials(NACTO) Urban Bike way Desiqn Guide.New York StateDepartment of Transportation— Hi.hwa Desi.n Manual Sitework Cost Estimate s , t x ' Gt P o ec Number, `W B#XX XXX "` P0p148 fro rz "r r' k3 e '4, .r �t ..: i !..?;. , `' n + �Y.�,,.f.J z, ,rz r fi „ys k�,z :``",s ,, ,, v tt;:k a t: r z� j .� �' , ray, y f x x r°4° rz^^'z' , a .�' s x.02 q - 's {s , ProJect*McAllister '~2 Lot Subdivisiori V ,, a x 1,q 4A}r `, Date { �_ X10 1512020 '- '-` w..,.f �� x s�': :sfb p.v.i' :?*w F t''6 r�w4:Sj'c 1`,,{`'`:zV Sn ° a.. .;1,z t'�. ;t i. X Xfi n,;.:': us ':' "�` a / -sltS`3`+ 1V'31} 3„ Location 8313 Jeff rsoh St °t n , t, r ,..,%,=4: = g Rev :i 0 , " .:x�;��,,�§� x :n.c '��,.,y sr lei "� �� �4� Q�' �. r q r �' �,: i` �� �, k 3`' ',: � ��,�� "°�tx +t .! s 4� y�+, :< tavlb tftr e ;Ton a.Yasepcktak PE.F t M .h R x t * ;y �x t z Y .�..t.fi"�sk �''�. ,�%�,� r �v s��uu,,.,... ...h ,a.�i.d. ,J.'r S<!.r.r,. � ..�"..,a� ...,s., .,. .,.s,�r.�.,,.,.. No. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Sub Total ROW/Site A Demolition and Site Clearing Tree Removal 8 EA $850.00 $6,800 Site Remove Sidewalk 60 SF $3.00 $180 ROW Remove Curb Park Place 20 LF $8.00 $160 ROW B Excavation and Grading Strip Top Soil and Stockpile 65 CY $4.50 $293 Site Stabilized Construction Entrance 50 SY $12.00 $600 Site Install Silt Fencing 410 LF $4.00 $1,640 Site Excavate for Driveway 100 CY $4.00 $400 Site Spread Topsoil 65 CY $16.00 $1,040 Site C Utilites Saw Cut Pavement 4.5 CY $8.50 $38 ROW Sanitary Line Install(6"SDR-35) 65 LF $25.00 $1,625 Site Sanitary Line Install (6"SDR-35) 24 LF $24.50 $588 ROW Water Line Install(1"Copper Service) 40 LF $27.50 $1,100 Site Water Line Install(1"Copper Service) 15 LF $27.50 $413 ROW Sanitary Cleanout 2 EA $750.00 $1,500 Site D Improvements New 5'Concrete Sidewalk 550 SF $7.50 $4,125 ROW New Concrete Curbing 100 LF $20.00 $2,000 ROW Sternberg LED D650 1 EA $3,250.00 $3,250 ROW Pedestrian Ramps 45 SF $7.50 $338 ROW Asphalt Aprons 190 SF $12.00 $2,280 ROW Asphalt Driveways 945 SF $12.00 $11,340 Site E Landscaping New Street Tree 3 EA $250.00 $750 ROW Fine Grade&Seed 1850 CF $1.25 $2,313 Site Fine Grade&Seed 515 CF $1.25 $644 ROW F As Built Drawing 1 EA 6000 $6,000 ROW Total On Site $39,990.00 25% $9,997.50 Total Off Site(ROW) $20,765.00 100% $20,765.00 Proposed Letter of Credit(LOC)Amount $30,762.50 McAllister Subdivision: Vicinity Map (with 300' Buffer) - x rm ti., :. m aw '..'-' ii'1\,' ' .: J-1:0,,,,,.,.... ' , ,,,,„1',,,,T. " , ris i II 4 a ti , ,,, iiiii, ., , .r w I wt ! 313 Jefferson St ! Site Location .., , „ . , ,.,:;,,,,, e - :.,.„ Saratoga Springs -' 1‘, _______,) r ._. ito— 4111. Nw ailf r‘ ii '4 t di" .'1 October 16,2020 1.2,2' 0 0.01 0.03 Counties E Towns 2019 1 ' I I 1 ' 0 0.02 0.04 Cities Villages NYS ITS GIS Program Office 1 < < 1 • 0 \ \ / \ \ > 0 \ \ > 0 N CAST ALUMINUM FINIAL AND CDZ I o ROOF SAME FINISH AS POLE J8".- -------'---------'--- 4ARC22T5-MDLO3 LED: 64 WATT V) o 6° _ 2200 COLOR TEMPERATURE, TYPE 5 DISTRIBUTION, 120-277 VOLT I DIMMABLE DRIVER z 4 0 (24 ACRYLIC ACORN LENS � 0 5T TWIST LOCK FITTER O I =t- DRIVER COMPARTMENT Ir ELECTRONIC PHOTOCELL Q •U (STREET SIDE) Z / _ 00 0 L_ O Z a) a' Li a cr Oz c E O co 0 4"-3" DIA. TAPERED POLE I I .125 WALL THICKNESS +• N 6063-T6 STRUCTURAL ' -i(n GRADE ALUMINUM a Q Ld POLE WELDED FOR SINGLE Q M a > UNIT CONSTRUCTION E 0 o LiJ c. Q 0 EL z -+ 0 0 = 1-4 I- (1) cp 1 L) 1 0 cL 0 Lu w BLACK FINISH . LU - I JjII�� ACCESS DOOR - Q Ga � ✓ 17" DIA. BASE, .750 FLOOR THICKNESS > w C7 SFTUR TUD (SEEHOR PG. 2 BOLTS OF 2NFFORNE GROUND FOUNDATION 0 Z 1` C Z STREET DETAILS) I Q Z \ PHOTOCELL a cv � 17" DIA. BASE, 12" DIA. BOLT z CIRCLE, DIAMOND PATTERN, FOUR n o p e 1/2" x 18" ANCHOR BOLTS W yin+ `J _1wri, L.„ U1 ACCESS DOOR G4 CATALOG NUMBER: 0 PT-D650SRLED-5T-4AR22T5-MDLO3-A-PEC/4212T4/BK p. A.. SEE PAGE 2 OF 2 d [ . I / O N SEE PG. 1 OF 2 FOR FIXTURE z & POLE DETAILS I 0 a (J) 0 FINISHED GRADE \/\j/ /\\ FULL LENGTH OF PIPE CENTERED ON SEWER LINE (SEE NOTES) in t� n E WATER LINE • SANITARY SEWER (GRAVITY OR FORCEMAIN) OR STORM SEWER SEE NOTES SEE NOTES NOTES: (REFERENCE — RECOMMENDED STANDARDS FOR WATER WORKS, 1997 EDITION "TEN STATES STANDARDS") WHEN INSTALLED PARALLEL, ALL WATER AND SEWER LINES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM SEPARATION OF 10', EDGE TO EDGE. IF MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAI\ TAINED, WATER MAIN SHALL BE IN SEPARATE TRENCH OR ON AN UNDISTURBED EARTH SHELF TO ONE SIDE OF SEWER, WITH BOTTOM OF WATER MAIN 18" MINIMUM ABOVE TOP OF SEWER PIPE. WHEN CROSSING MAINS SHALL BE INSTALLED TO INSURE 18" MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN PIPE OUTSIDE TO OUTSIDE. WHERE WATER MAIN IS UNDERNEATH SEWER, ADEQUATE STRUCTURAL SUPPORT SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE SEWER TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO WATER MAIN. WHEN IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO PROVIDE THE ABOVE MINIMUMS, THE SEWER SHALL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED EQUAL TO WATER PIPE, AND SHALL BE PRESSURE TESTED TO ASSURE WATERTIGHTNESS PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. UTILITY SEPARATIONS: PARALLEL AND CROSSING N.T.S. APPROVED: CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS, NEW YORK DW( 1/13/2010 STANDARD DETAIL PLANNING BOARD DATE Utility Separations w