Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
20200205 Kaydeross Ave East Subdivision updated memos and plans 9-18-20
The LA GROUP Landscape Architecture&Engineering P.[_ People.Purport.Pace. 40 Long Alley Saratoga Springs NY 12866 p 518-587-8100 f 518-587-0180 www.thelagroup.corn September 11, 2020 Ms. Susan Barden, AICP Principal Planner City of Saratoga Springs Planning Office 474 Broadway Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 susan.barden©saratoga-springs.orq Re: Kaydeross Avenue East Conservation Subdivision Review Comments Dear Ms. Barden: The LA Group is in receipt of comments regarding the Kaydeross Avenue East Conservation Subdivision Application, dated August 6, 2020. Please see below for comment responses. General Comment 2: The Management Plan indicates that the open space lands will be owned by the owners of Lot 1 and Lot 15, and are proposed to be managed by the City of Saratoga Springs. A maintenance agreement between the City and the property owners will need to be established if the City is willing to accept management responsibilities. The applicant stated that their attorney has discussed this with the City and maintenance responsibilities will be resolved prior to final approval. Please note, based on conversations with the City, it is understood that the City's Department of Public Works is unlikely to agree to a maintenance agreement for open space lands. The applicant will need to coordinate with the City to come to an agreeable solution. Response 2: The applicant's attorney is in discussions with the City regarding the open space lands. Subdivision Comment 4: Please provide a boundary and topographic survey map signed and sealed by the licensed land surveyor. The applicant stated that a signed/sealed boundary and topographic survey map will be provided with final approved drawings. Response 4: No response required. Comment 9: Please detail the proposed septic system layout on the plans, showing the laterals, septic tank and distribution box locations for each lot with dimensions. The applicant has indicated that a detailed septic system design will be provided when building permits applications are submitted. A subdivision should not be approved without proof that all lots can accommodate a septic system. Since the septic systems proposed are alternative mound systems, we recommend that at a minimum the applicant be required to submit the detailed design of the system for Lot 8, the narrowest and steepest lot. If they can accommodate the typical house on this lot they should be able to accommodate systems on the remaining lots. If acceptable to the City, we do not object to deferring the submission of the detailed septic system designs for lots 1 — 7 and 9 to 14 in conjunction with building permit applications. Response 9: A detailed design has been completed for Lot 8 and is shown on Sheet L-6.1. Final design of this septic system will need to be completed at the time the building permit is issued in coordination with the size and location of the residence on Lot 8. Comment 10: Indicate the proposed invert elevations of all septic system components along with top of concrete and the finished grades over each component. The applicant has indicated that final design for the septic systems will be submitted with the building permit application. See additional comment number 9 above. Response 10: See response number 9.A detailed septic system design for Lot 8 has been added to Sheet L-6.1 Comment 12: Indicate the locations of existing and proposed utilities (gas, electric, cable, etc.) on the Utility Plans. The applicant has indicated that the final location of these utilities will be determined by the utility provider and that a note has been added indicating such. In addition, please add the City Standard Detail for Rural Street—Modified to the plans, as a reference for utility locations. Response 12: The City Standard Detail for Rural Street— Modified has been added to the plans on sheet L-8.5, detail 5. Comment 14: Proposed road geometry shall be designed such that the turn around radius of a fire truck can be accommodated. Please verify. The applicant has shown the maneuvers of a fire pump truck entering the site and turning around the cul-de-sac. Additionally, please note that the roadways to Lots 2, 3, and 4 and to lots 9 and 10 will be considered common driveways and shall meet the associated requirements. Paragraph O. 1. of the Subdivision Standards— Standards for Driveways states that driveways shall enter the street right of-way at an angle as near ninety degrees as site conditions permit and in no case less than seventy five or more than one hundred five degrees. The roadway to lots 2, 3, and 4 does not appear to meet this requirement. Please review and revise accordingly. Response 14: The shared driveway to Lots 9 and 10 has been adjusted to meet the main roadway at a 90 degree angle. Per Section 503.1.1 of the Fire Code of NYS, "one-or two-family detached dwellings or not more than two Group R-3 occupancies" are not required to provide a fire apparatus access road. The shared driveways to Lots 2, 3, 9, and 10 meet the exemption requirements, and therefore do not need to provide a turn around for a fire truck. Comment 16: In accordance with the NYSDOH Appendix 75-A Wastewater Treatment Standards and the New York State Design Standards for Intermediate Sized Wastewater Treatment Systems (Design Standards), Section B.4.b, two percolations tests should be performed within the limits of each proposed sewage treatment system. Additional percolation tests should be performed in accordance with these standards. The applicant has indicated that two percolation tests will be performed as part of the final design of the septic system and provided with the building permit application. See additional comment number 9 above. III Response 16: Additional percolation tests will be performed during individual building/septic permit submission. Comment 17: In accordance with Section E.2 of the Design Standards, conventional soil-based treatment systems should be avoided if the percolation rate is slower than 60 mpi. The soil tests provided indicate a percolation rate of"greater than 60 mpi". Please indicate the actual percolation rates on the plans to clarify if the percolation rate is slower or faster than 60 mpi. If the percolation rate is slower than 60 mpi, a conventional soil-based treatment system would not be suitable. Provide design calculations providing appropriate application rates based on soil testing to justify the size of each septic system for on each lot. It appears that the septic system areas shown accommodate seven (7) 60-ft laterals at 6-ft on center. The applicant has indicated that the percolation rate is slower than 60 mpi in these locations and that additional percolation tests will be performed once the final locations of the systems are determined. See additional comment number 9 above. Response 17: See response number 16 above. Comment 18: Test pit results indicate seasonally high water between 16 inches and 42 inches. Please show proposed finished grade at each septic system location to ensure the required separation to groundwater is satisfied, and that the proposed mound system can fit on the site while maintaining required property line setbacks. The applicant indicates that the final design plans for the septic systems will be submitted with the building permit application. See additional comment number 9 above. Response 18: See response number 9 above. Comment 21: As previously noted, test pits indicated seasonally high ground water between 16 and 42 inches deep. Underground structures do not appear to include any ani-flotation measures. Please provide buoyancy calculations for underground structures. The applicant provided a buoyancy calculation on the deepest structure identified on site, MH-1, and assumed groundwater is at the surface. The buoyance calculation provided indicates that the total weight of the manhole and soil is greater than the displaced water. Please also provide buoyancy calculations for the septic tank and pump station. Response 21: Additional buoyancy calculations are provided with this submission. The weight of the structure concrete at both the pump station and the septic tank is greater than the buoyant force from SHGW. The highest SHGW observed on site was 16" below grade; which is the water elevation assumed for these calculations. Note that all proposed septic systems will be designed by a professional engineer during building permit process,who will need to confirm water elevation assumptions and buoyancy calculations. Comment 25: Due to seasonally high groundwater conditions throughout the site, a geotechnical investigation shall be performed to evaluate whether the standard pavement section is suitable for these conditions or if a greater than standard pavement section is required. The applicant has indicated that a geotechnical investigation will be performed, and recommendations will be included in the final plans. Please submit the geotechnical investigation for review. Response 25: A geotechnical investigation was performed by Gifford Engineering. The results of their investigation are included with this response and the recommendations outlined in their report have been incorporated into the roadway cross sections, sheet L-7.0. LA Group had a subsequent conversation with Gifford Engineering on clarification for curbed road sections. Gifford Engineering recommended installing underdrains for curbed sections to drain the subbase. Comment 26: Based on the profile, it appears that portions of the proposed road will be cutting into the seasonally high groundwater elevations.As such, dewatering provisions for constructing roadways and utilities in these conditions shall be detailed on the plans. In order to minimize deterioration of the road due to freeze/thaw conditions, additional provisions such as perimeter drains will need to be installed. The applicant has indicated that a geotechnical investigation will be performed, and recommendations will be included in the final plans. Please submit the geotechnical investigation for review and revise the plans to include perimeter drains where needed. Response 26: See response number 25. SWPPP Comment 31: The proposed pocket ponds do not show the required aquatic bench with plantings. Please revise the design accordingly. The applicant has indicated that since the permanent pool is less than 4-ft, an aquatic bench is not required. Aquatic benches are a required element for all wet ponds since they provide the majority of treatment by preventing erosion, slowing water movement through the pond, hold or convert pollutants, and enhance pollutant uptake and promote evapotranspiration. The NYSSMDM states that the perimeter of all deep pool areas (4 feet or greater) shall be surrounded by two benches, an aquatic bench and a safety bench. An exception is only given for safety benches when side slopes above the water surface are 4:1 or flatter. Since the current design provide side slopes of 4:1 a safety bench is not required. Please revise the plans accordingly. Response 31: The two proposed pocket ponds will have a permanent pool depth of less than 4-feet (3.5-feet proposed). Per Section 6.1.5 of the NYSSMDM "the perimeter of all deep pool areas (four feet or greater in depth)"shall incorporate an aquatic bench. Since the ponds will be less than four-feet an aquatic bench is not required. Note that all ponds will be seeded and aquatic plantings are proposed along the edge of the ponds permanent pool depth. Sincerely, (61).9L . 4,01( Pic. Douglas B. Heller, PE Associate Principal/Civil Engineer dheller@thelagroub.com G:\Proj-2016\2016109_Scott_Kayderross_Ave\2016109Admin\01 Correspondence\2.7Review_Comments\2020-08-25_Comment Response\2020 08-25—Comment Response Ltr._2016109-hafrevl.docx GIFFORD ENGINEERING Geotechnical& Geoenvironmental Services August 20, 2020 Mr. Ken Scott 43 Edgewater Dr Dunedin, FL 34698 Re: Geotechnical Engineering Report for Pavement Drainage Evaluation at New Residential Subdivision, Kaydeross Ave East, Saratoga Springs,NY, File No. 2033 Gentlemen: At the request, of Mr. Douglas Heller of the LA Group, this report presents findings of a subsurface investigation and discusses the pavement drainage evaluation for the referenced project. Mr. Heller reported high groundwater conditions at the site. The City of Saratoga Springs requested this study to evaluate how the subsurface conditions could affect the proposed pavement system and to make recommendations for improved drainage, if deemed necessary. The approximate 80 acre site has parcels on both sides of Kaydeross Ave East. All borings were advanced on the west side of the existing road along the proposed roadway. The proposed roadway will extend perpendicularly from the road across a meadow and up the hill into the woods where the grade flattens and the roadway turns to the north. There are thirteen building lots shown on the site plan. There are two detention ponds planned. The first is south of the proposed roadway and west of Kaydeross Ave East. The second is up on the hill west of the new roadway. There is a residence and barn on the property situated within about 75 feet of the existing road. A pond exists behind (west of)the barn. The site has an open relatively flat meadow fronting on the existing road. Beyond this meadow, the grade rises into a wooded area. The grade flattens soon after the hill where the building lots are located. The woods change from primarily deciduous trees to a pine forest to the north and west. There are many stone walls in these woods. The site appears to have been used for agricultural purposes before the forest. The water level in the pond was estimated at about 5 to 6 feet below the general grade surrounding the pond on the day of the borings. The last few months have been dry compared to normal spring and summer rainfall amounts. Water levels in local ponds and lakes as well as groundwater levels have been lowered by these dry conditions. There are jurisdictional wetlands within this site along Kaydeross Ave East and up on the hill situated in the western part of the site. Up on the hilltop there is a small stream that flows toward the northeast through the wetland and apparently feeds the pond. The subsurface conditions were investigated with hand auger borings that were advanced at locations shown on the attached location diagram. The borings were logged by the geotechnical engineer by examining auger spoils and measuring down the borehole to changes in stratigraphy and water conditions. Boring logs and laboratory test results are attached. Bulk samples were taken from spoils and placed in plastic bags for further examination and laboratory testing. A total of seven hand auger borings were advanced along the roadway. The borings were laid out by LA Group personnel at locations identified by the geotechnical engineer. A location diagram is attached with the laboratory test results. 865 Pearse Road Niskayuna,NY 12309 Tel: (518) 382-2545 giffeng@nycap.rr.com File No. 2033 Pavement Drainage Evaluation at Kaydeross Ave East, Saratoga, NY page 2 At the borings, the ground surface was underlain with a loamy to silty moist topsoil with grass and roots that extend to depths of 2 to 3 inches. At the borings (HA-4 thru HA-7) that were advanced in the wooded areas, the ground surface was covered with forest floor leaves and wood debris. Subjacent to this there are primarily 2 soil types; moist silt with varying amounts of sand, clay, and gravel or moist sand with varying amounts of silt, gravel, and clay. This layer extends to depths of between 12 and 48 inches. Subjacent to this at boring HA-4 there was a layer of moist fine sand with little silt and trace gravel encountered from 48 to 54 inches. That was the deepest boring as other borings were met with refusal at apparent cobbles and boulders. There was no water encountered in any of the borings. This is probably due at least in part to the recent dry weather conditions. These soils are impermeable and have poor drainage capability. Based on published data, the coefficient of permeability or hydraulic conductivity is in the range of 10E-6 to 10E-7 cm/sec for the silt soils and may be as high as 10E-4 to 10E-5 cm/sec for the sand soils encountered. After heavy rainfall events, water will pond on the ground and seep into the soil voids slowly. The soils will be frost susceptible which will cause heaving during freezing periods and settlement during thaw periods. Repeated freeze thaw will lead to pavement cracking, potholes and eventual failure. The most well-known technique to limit damage is to design and install adequate drainage to channel water away from the roadway. The problems will be more severe in areas near the wetlands. The pavement Section 8 by LA Group was reviewed and is attached. Based on the information gained during this investigation and experience on similar project the following recommendations are made. 1. The pavement subgrades should be crowned so water that becomes trapped under the roadway can drain laterally into the ditch sections. The subgrade should not be "boxed out" as this will create a bathtub and will block water from entering the ditch section. 2. The subgrade should be proof rolled with a minimum 10-ton vibratory roller while being observed by a qualified engineer. Soft or pumping areas will need to be removed to firm soil then replaced with a 50/50 mix of l's and 2's crushed stone (NYSDOT 703.4)or Item 4 (NYSDOT 304.2.02 type 2). 3. A woven geotextile such as Mirafi 500X should be installed on the approved subgrade. 4. This should be covered with a 6-inch thick layer of crushed stone. This layer must extend laterally and daylight into the ditch. 5. Another layer of fabric should be placed on the crushed stone. 6. A 6-inch thick layer of Item 4 should be compacted up to pavement subgrade. Beyond the pavement this upper 6-inch layer should be changed to loamy topsoil for grass growth and to shed runoff into the ditch. 7. Pavement thickness as shown on Section 8 is acceptable. If I can be of further assistance in this matter, please contact me. Truly yours, Giffo 'Engineer L l� Sall*te rego 4 P 1 ifford PhD 'E Presi•V t cc Mr. Douglas Heller, PE `4•; ?� LIMIT OF WORK l _----. of t ; New York -' ---- ' --'C� 800-962-7962 250 �^�r/ /1�;'" �� `-�, . „I .d1gsafelynewyork.org / ' /` I 0 Il Before You q9 f \SII\ / / 0 It TFe Requlretl Tlme lyi ', j 11 CO 0 fl WW1, se NM I--" �,,- 0 Respect the mares I Dig Vara [ARCHAEOLOGICAL gRcwAEOLocIOAL 1 , PROTECTION Z0N- v ; ..L. - CB-2 ) " 1 _ STA:2+60.00 OFF-10.005 _ n x k -""✓o" RIM:223.67 (� f�OOE INV 02 2204612" WURISOICTIONAL 12'HDPE f LU 227.6 �V+EETLAND CB-6 , Ce-1 + �Q Dsm Rcvatunc STA:5+65.00 OFF:-10.00E 'A� STA:2+60000FF;10.00E 30' `.r RIM:249.90 I - - RIM 223.67 -- \\ INV 10:237,55 12" r ,1 227.8 INV IN1220 30 15 , -...- k INV IN:237,5512" -�r�� ,227,55 INV IN22030 re STA:i-I JFF;1+GGk INV OUT.237.45 b5" Or ' - -. I\IV-85/T:220.294F• • RIM:251 " 226.5 �I .I" r.Fn-e.RALxoTFs. INV OU"' /50 12 INV OFF 10 0 6 227.64 I _ --.� �/� H AN ren R BURIN.THF Rnm / ,41 I 2. H JN❑ L LR' r LOCATIONS CB-8 227.32 , I .,...,,,,:,11,41 �C CHOSEN BY CL ireawlCAL e c,wwx RIM 231.87 2258 .�^ �"-�~ - / \STT'TAM MIT BY THF TA&ROAR. 1STA: 65.00 OFM:241.R ! - _ -.. _ RIM:2d9.30 INV OUT:226.A012" � � �- _.. -- _" ,, INV OUT:237.7012" 12 HDPE .. r 5+00 -" __- MIASM� �iL � ���' :,. - 221.5 �._,.. ` LEGEND "�ma.®l�� NIUINI PEI7 -- . orr ,-._. T �` ,,,,,t,'' ,... -.. ,�`- - � BORING LOCATION Allito ! „---14.-87)--A YY �, � T 5 A/Ab ryo- �` � 15"HDPE [/ CB-7 7+00 8+00 12"HDPE m 1"'HDPE �,s i . :_ a_.-1-, •�87A.7+05.00 OFF:10.00E STA:4+30.000FF:-Y9.00L ' ', / .NV CJT:220.0 �. .r/��`" e .2205 .111. 4 KAYDEROSS AVE EAST RIM25100 RIM23157 ,"j c ""**-� CONSERVATION INV IN 2476012" INV IN2282512" ''T OVERFLOW WEIR 221.5 4.. SUBDIVISION INV IN 2488012" INV9N:2282b 12" TOP OFWEI R'22C5� \\\\\ r,vnFROSS AVF FAST INV 10:247.3512" INV'OUT:228.1515" BOTTOM OF WEIR,219,: s+RA1 OCLA SexrvaS,NT 1288, INV OUT 246.25 12" STA:7+06.42 OFF:25.44E SEDIMENT FOREBAY POCKET POND CB-B TOP OF POND:221.5 TOP OF POND 11 221 5 i u:1�Lvc,1nL1:w c BOTTOM OF POND-298.75 I RIM:250.50 - BOTTOM OF POND:214.25 INV OUT:248.70 12" 0` LOCATION DIAGRAM CADFS JCB Hato 8 17 2020 ACOE JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND A.-+NIB,:+* IN ry 20. -., ,O Scpiz:r'-SO' s m_ I _ "l elr_7"`r -- -7---- - _- _ OS Mal 0 } 1 OR HS IlMssOR f 1 Al` Dig�Safely. `� New York ."\ I 1 �-' 800.962-7962 �i /// \ \ d19 felynewyork.0, 1//t"4-;40 �J^ \ \ / I -. vi•.na i.ccrisux Q call Before You Dig 11 I/�j'f�l/+} \ l�\ PT s 0Wa1t The Requlretl Time / 0 co...minty ResPmme J. �14�� , j , .j.. - � FKWA,Wmaa I.1„4 igRespect Me Marks CI DSWIM Care ./ l Ma GRADING NOTES: Wee 4,A,KAP42,41,E3 . v I N f / \\ / \ I ' ` . j/ / 3 I d Ds[c Rcv,Tiunc fir' //// +/ \ / \ ` ,TF.NFRAI NOTFS 61 ' / I PL AN PRI\'TURD In THF LA RO11P .••111 -�� ' F / ` 2. HAND L,,LR BURIN[LOC.TIONS CHOSLN BY GLn1LC1 N1CAL L GINLLIi Hu mg II1} ( / / / I \4FRF i..AID OUT RV THF i.A GRIM`. ` / / lA / PROITZTIONETe (..'" A 4Itt r / v,, LEGEND I ,9 .,../;V/ 7;j�J fiMma ��'a ! 1- BORING LOCATION V ) �I n , - ,dam ,,,.oF.,, � .{�l �..,inn,EE�>oIa I '`47.,;-,7, KAYDEROSS AVE EAST .o:cr,n> � CONSERV ATTON I�� / tn„„'°,: 'ia - SUBDIVISION Barna B. ���! +-+ — I.vnFRSS AVF Fas'r . ..GLrh.I alliinn SARXIOCA SPRIVGS,1,8,, a4 _ � �. 1 1111!',"'MLLRI G ' i on.: n e. lialll j / v (ii \!; LOCATION DIAGRAM q5��r J�� CAD I,106 D 81,,020 /r; "T`'r A—,d 61 YG 11 N 0 /�// ... ,.\ - s .., \. _ -� I Soole:l=100' S ,. ot_ GIFFORD ENGINEERING Geotechnical& Geoenvironmental Services August 19,2020 HAND AUGER BORING LOGS Pavement Drainage Evaluation,Residential Subdivision Project Kaydeross Ave East Saratoga Springs,NY 12866 Hand augered and logged by Mr. Jared Bazan(GE)on August 12,2020. HA- 1 0"-3" Dark brown,moist, Silty topsoil with grass roots and organics. 3"-12" Brown,moist, Silt, some Sand,trace Gravel,ML. Refusal at 12 inches on probable cobble or boulder. Abandoned area due to nearby hornet nest. End of boring at 12 inches. No water encountered. HA— lA(moved about 20 feet east,towards Kaydeross Ave,of HA-1) 0"-3" Dark brown,moist, Silty topsoil with sod. 3"-12" Brown,moist, Silt, some Sand,trace Gravel,ML. Refusal at 12 inches on probable cobble or boulder. End of boring at 12 inches. No water encountered. HA-2 0"-2" Dark brown,moist,loamy topsoil with sod. 2"-23" Brown,moist, Silt and Sand,trace Gravel and Clay,ML,native. Mottled at about 18 inches. Refusal at 23 inches on probable cobble or boulder. End of boring at 23 inches. No water encountered. HA-3 0"-2" Dark brown,moist,loamy topsoil with sod. 2"-24" Brown,moist, Silt and Sand,trace Gravel and Clay,ML,native. Mottled at about 20 inches. 24"-50" Brown,moist, Silt, some Clay,trace Sand and Gravel,ML-CL. End of boring at 50 inches. No water encountered. HA-4 0"-24" Forest floor overlying brown,moist, Sand,trace Silt and round Gravel, SP, native. 24"-48" Brown,moist, Silt, some Clay,trace Sand and Gravel,ML-CL. 48"-54" Light brown,moist,fine Sand,little Silt,trace Gravel, SM. End of boring at 54 inches. No water encountered. HA-5 0"-36" Forest floor overlying grey/brown,moist, Sand, some round Gravel and Silt, SM, native. Refusal at 36 inches on probable cobble or boulder. End of boring at 36 inches. No water encountered. HA-6 0"-16" Forest floor overlying brown,moist, Sand, some Gravel and Silt, SM,native. Refusal at 16 inches on probable cobble or boulder. End of boring at 16 inches. No water encountered. 865 Pearse Road Niskayuna,NY 12309 Tel: (518)382-2545 Email: giffeng@nycap.rr.com File No.: 2033 Hand Auger Boring Logs—Kaydeross Ave East Subdivision Page 2 HA-7 0"-2" Forest floor overlying brown,moist, Silty topsoil. 2"-24" Light brown,moist, Sand, some round Gravel and Silt, SM,native. Refusal at 24 inches on probable cobble or boulder. End of boring at 24 inches. No water encountered. GIFFORD ENGINEERING Geotechnical& Geoenvironmental Services LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Kaydeross Ave East Conservation Subdivision Drainage Kaydeross Ave East, Saratoga Springs,NY 12866 File No. 2033 Grain Size Distribution ASTM D 421,D 422&D 1140 Size/Sieve Percent Passing by Weight HA-2-10" No. 4 99.5% No. 10 98.6% No. 20 96.9% No. 40 95.1% No. 100 89.2% No. 200 70.6% Atterberg Limits ASTM D 4318 of representative samples HA-4-36" Liquid Limit N/A Plastic Limit NON-PLASTIC Plasticity Index NON-PLASTIC Natural Moisture 20% 865 Pearse Road Niskayuna,NY 12309 Tel: (518)382-2545 giffeng@nycap.rr.com r,:,--,...(c....7..r.IT ITI—..1 1. V.,°:Eklz'....I .1-..:.=C:•I!•.:N. ..°S..I:E:21-1°=_. .....-N.z I '11°:..."._ 4.'.::I ,`..',',... _;14.....z.;.;;Vf,V,L) ':',-.!-"..r...1: L.: :1.:.:'.....S.14......_:II,1:.Nri.;-1=KE . -I17.r.... I 4......FFI.:.: .....°: ...%.1-°.:; All .1 :_:n. Jr.i.J .. - •,(...1 -x.i..:E1v1H I-I-.:.:I y II1 ; =.1;".I\FFP VAT"P,=.2! IRF .--.:-:!1. II: 1 -'..!....,! ..'F\T ".. .:°:-II.`.":.N TC.P..-l'...,:-R7A, 1-1-:,-...-: :-...ARRY°T.,-.77.Ii.-.N 0A-1`..C... , PIFEER IF -Elri::EP...::::ii.!sb-rc.-,7:L::: I UIT ll'A. ."-!; . ...-.J. I 1.:....7 TI...%°-7):2..'.1-17R ACI'...G['II\ = 6414.•,h4.7.744.1.644,14, 11 .1°: 1.° - 11-°-.., -I.I..1....... '...1.1.! :CURSE, -111-,-i...::"{.1:.4.:;1 K)N :. : al on w .41,...470,. ...ti.•41V4i t„.111 ''. T I: :ITV ENGINEER l'...1AY 7kEDUIRE :OVPACTION TESTING ri =rK Ikzet,a,"•40:Nel,lk.' BIN,:I-1- I.: ...11),...:-F1-.41 I . te] 'p....Acyratip 49;04 4.40 ...^.1.1_..f..11.?._ .-,..r.:•;,_:_6 I`..7'.V_?,I. .1° I..."..V._'rzNT THICKNESS. qZ,VAii•lita:4.'44V GRADt SL BE PG-64-2'; ALL °E:.-j INH.1,.__EE...% .11 :.1_1z ',ED " I-rz 1Tv ENGINEER N PP:P~ 4 PAPOr" cury.rAcTE::.7.../....,.EL- -E:°.°°.....:.`...I-"... 1._°1-. .1. ....1f....1I-" HIE CH'z".,...._1\zh-!.1;....I1...1....F..:.jr..11111%,11_.r.,IIJRION.1.0 olim* ,.,.. NA N''..S:.:!::I I Y.'_ ..L 1:::.2:2. . .:or..irvi ,..:.:..I N.If..: P..V.Ils,r..: :...:1-. AAMW:.* 1-1.1 I ,frOlir)04, . 6 70, )A-M ..'-i.: .: ' R OA"' AP -'1',','Lr..1C\I TOP EIN2CP. ...-;RA'...EL p!'°... 4.N..›.. `‘,.', ,-... 1 1 ----- ....Pt CCUR5E CULI.c.. 0 ••• I1E..S7AIDE-COMPA.:.7..TE:: -C. 92:.. STANDARD PROCTOR PARKING1-11f2' 2" 8" LOT STANDARD 1-112" 3" 12" ROADWAY ASPHALT PAVEMENT 8 SCALE:NTS GENERAL NOTES DRILLING& SAMPLING SYMBOLS* WATER LEVEL SYMBOLS** SS Split Spoon— 1 3/8" I.D., 2" O.D. WL Water Level ST Shelby Tube—3" O.D. WCI Wet Cave In OS Osterberg Sampler—3" Shelby Tube DCI Dry Cave In DB Diamond Core—NQ, BX, HQ WS While Sampling WR Weight of Rod WD While Drilling WH Weight of Hammer BCR Before Casing Removal RD Rotary Drill Bit ACR After Casing Removal DC Driven Casing, Washed AB After Boring WB Washed Boring HSA Hollow Stem Auger OH Open Hole MT Macro Core MC5 Soil Sampling System *Standard"N" Penetration: Blows per foot of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches on a 2 inch O.D. split spoon, except where noted. ** Water levels indicated on the boring logs are the levels measured in the boring at the times indicated. In pervious soils, the indicated elevations are considered reliable ground water levels. In impervious soils, the accurate determination of ground water elevations is not possible in even several days observation, and additional evidence on ground water elevations must be sought. CLASSIFICATION COHESIONLESS SOILS COHESIVE SOILS* "Trace" 1% - 10% N (Blows/ft) Qc(TSF) "Little" 10% - 20% Very Soft 0— 1 0.00— 0.25 "Some 20% - 35% Soft 2—4 0.25 — 0.49 "And" 35% - 50% Medium 5 — 8 0.50— 0.99 Stiff 9 — 15 1.00— 1.99 Very Loose 0 —3 Blows Very Stiff 16—30 2.00—3.99 Loose 4—9 Blows Hard > 30 >_ 4.00 Medium Dense 10 —29 Blows Dense 30 — 50 Blows Very Dense > 50 Blows * If Clay content is sufficient so that clay dominates soil properties, then Clay becomes the principal noun with the other major soil constituent as modifier: i.e., Silty Clay. Other minor soil constituents may be added according to classification breakdown for cohesionless soils: i.e., Silty Clay, little Sand, trace Gravel. Additional explanation available upon request. See attached Unified Soil Classification sheet. Updated Oct 2019 Table 3.5 Unified Soil Cla55ificalion Field IdentiFea.on Prru[cdorra Gro Inlormarms Nequlrad for labors y CIaasification (E.t.d.,.parlkka larger than 1 in.and basin.fractions on 1 Symbols. Typacal Names Descr�61me Soils n C omits _ estimated weight,/ a Weide range in grain slim andsubstantial Well ➢raid travels. wad- Co Dora Greater than a Of an in.-wadi/Sr yuicle GSW sand rmlurca, Luxor Or Y F,i 5 a.�: '''''sums fin. no 6 typical ndknit E 2 i b Cd iv D'40'.. Between 1 and 3 ea a b and alio. inaiiirlobn Sat Ili.' P tl i ! PP.. award ela.eh,4rave5- U n y CY y angularity.'surface1,d d - ...,,,i..‘,..11 egrsdauon mrqunemcros for C.W li tO u 3 with os uermcerare car radon. sand mra[ures d nor Or no encs sod had f f p _ i''''''''''''inn tiny ude0hfiraion Sill acs grains: local implore name '1',' _.. 62 e apro- y ¢leve', poorly gra roil her pc d s<rots to E' V V. terberg limas o ow q with i L. lion EZ 3 cedures see ML below) CM trivet-sand Sim m arures informarr ation: and ay meets t _ ;.e1 a Pl less with pi belw �,....,�.— parent 2 3f. o _man• —_.._ cases r.E„n <— I ��= Plastic fines(for idemificaai0n procedures. Clayey ¢ravers, I ¢railed Forundislurbedf l}add rgrtrsa- - h E Asrerbcrgel be,. dnd I^0r se of V V greater than 7 dual Pon,.er y 1, see CLbcloal GC gravelsand-elay'matures lions 'fi .Qw 1,P • V A"I ill F! —ry come erne::.mouture anmtwninlrao� • • re s ° Wd nvc ala¢rain 8lges ana subsfanhal s drainage ch tics - -o uuw� Ce-Dan Greater than d re - tT of all inmmdntc p000io SW Vsrell grades ands, ala.veily Dlo a n _ - Sands,bilk or no fines Example. (Dtpye ... aetween,1 and 0 O V t; - sous Slily sand,gravelly:about 20 c X ?: C Pro.neo - o hard,a g gravel particles a o� 21,_ - a.vic Predom Indya ears t pf},ret 001110 ands en veils i a -rounded a K Nos meeting all gradatmn requirements. for Sal, a wlch some In[ermed,ate r, mssson SP ands.]i le err no Rocs t. cab la sand Vajnk C , n t74.”'',1' - ..e ¢ e0arsc et hoe,ab0u115"1:non Nbry IaSt a fines(fpr Went hca[[on gorier n h low dry - A retbort limos below Abobb 'JA line per pro sm. Silty d p ry graded sand- sllengrh II p creel and 'A'I 1,c.M Purest Ran dares,see ML below) r.mmrures E with Pdl between -X rets[n place alluvial sand, �r ;. P, u (SMJ -Alterbcrg /Units bele. LeMrrJo... e fir' F` aE�. Platlrcn below) procedures, SC Clayey sands, poorly soiled - AuQry 'A" line with PA mooting 000 Or ser Sand-Clay mixtures creaser than) dud symbols a . r ldentlhunan proocduru an Fraction Smaller than Na-a0 Siece Sou Dry Strength Dilatancy T ghtnl I f f I l t< (crushing a¢ (reaction ( lasiw hating} 1I v - ,,.. 1 I u i -COn+nrin¢wit et eOa!liquid kmil J F F u i)"'”, None to 1 Ing 8 e 0618 a. y e yp� - 50 y = �>= Glvcl I indicate deg, �^ 4111-3=- w. w Ouic res Ndon ML a d k no., silty and eharaclea' f Pla u c 40-l u sun. ,^__ . ac cc shahs slaw c7.•y y R ands worn alsah' amountmaxmumsize a _ - , gY+srkilf iir6ntnrsr t ...___ u u zp' _- plasticity p rs< and of 1 T 30 W nail Ck ...�.__. 9r„ = • T.71Inns clays f l d grain,d 'f y local ....J._ L'E o 2 v, Medium to None to d pt. y g Ily oral,.n a T. Pe' _w - _ , Mdipm CC 7101.11 w e�M Rosh very slow Plays.,sandy Y silty t Y and d bol soils add teal w to Cl -+-ON I 1 Y n 1,r _20 jrni i. z2 51ght To 0"."''"san son yin pare d —_ I mdiu. Sue.- sw—., OLclays of}ow p a y F undisturbed mon a err f-Yss � e matron on structure, ujfica. ;1-Yt alar ali J r SltgRt 10 Sbr 10 $light 1p Ino¢ I : s Or consistencyundisturbed 0 OIL - -- - Km 'v Fr medium nova ancamm MH a- finesanely pr a I„,..,,,rd x mmYlpn 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 80 100 a illy sods,dune 5'104 and drainage conatemrss 'E __� filth to No,, High Cfl Inorganic trays of high pias- Liquid limit •a; very high i l y f clays 1E-sample 1106111111 I0 Nolle to Slight 10 Organicclays f m d o high Cravny orf,. brawn, dllghfly Plasticity chart 104 high very slow medium OR plasljcjty plastic. mall percentage of tar laboratory'clubsitieation of fine grained sails finc1 sand,numerous vertical Readily identified by colour, odour, Peat and other highly organic or holes: firm and dry in Highly Organic Soils spOngy feel and frequently by Ebrout Al soils place:.toast,-1ML1 libloft RUM Wagner,1917 --- ------ - a Aoundary eiottlfcrorlons. Sails possessing chanelerisaiea of two groups arc designated by combinations of group symbols, For example Gal'-GC,well aradd gravel-sand mixture with clay b,nder. b All stove sous On thq chart.are to-S.standard, Field fdrorrOcorion Proerd,-,for Fin.Grodrd Sod,or(rae1iory These proced lire}arc to be performed on the ennui No.losiereaim particles,approximately .rn.For field cbo,,rlca t on purposes screening rt not intended,simply remove by nand Me excite parOKka that intertrrc with lb tact}. Dutdronry(Reaction to shat Intl Dry Serrnp0A(Crush nit charactcast,cs). T Ogrkgear IConsisleney near mastic Tinsley: Atte me parr,¢cs lamer e n No 40 r<+ ,ploparc a pat of Aker«moving p els larger,than No.at)sieve sac mould a par of soil After rempvjnv particle largerthan Ilse No 40 sieve sae.a specimen of moist so,1 wrih a volume of aba,o one-hasf c b lch. Add enough to the consratency ol putty. del A water it necessary Allow the pal to soil about one-half inch cube in sj .m moulded 10 the consistency of f access.,lu make the Seel sofa but nor sleety dry completely by oven sun Pr ai,di ying and then test ts strength by pully_ If roe dry,wale,most be added ant 1 parcejmn. ty,rhe spe Placethe par n the open palm M one hand and shake horilontally,Sinking Oreaking boil Crumbling rte n the fingers1,310[181h s cshould be cora.,o thin 10701 and allowed to lose s rho or her hast several se a A ppsa ve1 on Of the character and quantity o al colloidIrac000nc laby evapoatth ,.Then the d o a lied out by nann morsture narou v ore a 0161 appear be al w r onsurface f alM f hr pm soil. The dry 1 ,110.11,nn h e platnc xy ta,ned ns she tartar.Or between Got P neo 11,0040 about 11,0abs n ae-<jeht h. changes rOnSiSKS ....cry y and becomes glossy When the sampk High dry strength cos craracter,stre f lays of ole Cli troop A,typical diameter.The thread is thenfolded and re-rolled certain:Ay During 1 squcexed 61erwc n.11ee wooers Me water anti aims disappear loom the inorganic glt possesses only Eery align.dry st en4 h Silty fine sands this snampularion rhe re content is gradually redacts and the surface.Inc pa[tilficm andfinall mks. crumblesIncrapidity and shay about Ins a slight dry1[ a spec -d finally LOIS its piastn.ty,and crumbles when rhe of ppc and ofr0s d,sappcaranac during bythe feel who wder m b n an 10111 arlrid tq I 'd f h 2 soli wat,aa r-p ca]Por has the smooth loll of toot. After a orf After thelimitplaNic h a reached. bles the piedshould 1 lumped logeiher and a Vary fine clean sand gr.the liunktsr and 1610114 di foarsion ohm.t whslight kneading a y continued until the lump crumbles a plastic Clay nos 1,0 coa,..or. enorganic SidS,auraas a lip.]rock The tougher the thread near the plastic limit and thestiller the lump when gem,show a_moderately quick 114111.. i1 finally cal mbkt.the more potent 5 the 0011..441 clay!racoon in the t sod. Weakness of the thread a the plank limo and quick loss of coherence of the lump below the piastre limit ndicatc titherinorganic clay or low plasticity.01 malenalc such as kaolin-type clays and organic clays which peter below the A-loot. 1 Highly organic clays have a wary weak and spongy feel am the plastic hmt. Important Information about This Geotechnical-Engineering Subsurface problems are a principal cause of construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. While you cannot eliminate all such risks, you can manage them. The following information is provided to help. The Geoprofessional Business Association (GBA) Typical changes that could erode the reliability of this report include has prepared this advisory to help you—assumedly those that affect: a client representative—interpret and apply this • the site's size or shape; geotechnical-engineering report as effectively • the function of the proposed structure,as when it's as possible. In that way, clients can benefit from changed from a parking garage to an office building,or a lowered exposure to the subsurface problems from a light-industrial plant to a refrigerated warehouse; • the elevation,configuration,location,orientation,or that,for decades, have been a principal cause of weight of the proposed structure; construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and • the composition of the design team;or disputes. If you have questions or want more • project ownership. information about any of the issues discussed below, contact your GBA-member geotechnical engineer. As a general rule,always inform your geotechnical engineer of project Active involvement in the Geoprofessional Business changes-even minor ones-and request an assessment of their Association exposes geotechnical engineers to a impact.The geotechnical engineer who prepared this report cannot accept wide array of risk-confrontation techniques that can responsibility or liability for problems that arise because the geotechnical be of genuine benefit for everyone involved with a engineer was not informed about developments the engineer otherwise construction project. would have considered. This Report May Not Be Reliable Geotechnical-Engineering Services Are Performed for Do not rely on this report if your geotechnical engineer prepared it: Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects . fora different client; Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific • for a different project; needs of their clients.A geotechnical-engineering study conducted • for a different site(that may or may not include all or a for a given civil engineer will not likely meet the needs of a civil- portion of the original site);or works constructor or even a different civil engineer.Because each • before important events occurred at the site or adjacent geotechnical-engineering study is unique,each geotechnical- to it;e.g.,man-made events like construction or engineering report is unique,prepared solely for the client.Those who environmental remediation,or natural events like floods, rely on a geotechnical-engineering report prepared for a different client droughts,earthquakes,or groundwater fluctuations. can be seriously misled.No one except authorized client representatives should rely on this geotechnical-engineering report without first Note,too,that it could be unwise to rely on a geotechnical-engineering conferring with the geotechnical engineer who prepared it.And no one report whose reliability may have been affected by the passage of time, -not even you-should apply this report for any purpose or project except because of factors like changed subsurface conditions;new or modified the one originally contemplated. codes,standards,or regulations;or new techniques or tools.If your geotechnical engineer has not indicated an`apply-by"date on the report, Read this Report in Full ask what it should be,and,in general,if you are the least bit uncertain Costly problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical- about the continued reliability of this report,contact your geotechnical engineering report did not read it in its entirety.Do not rely on an engineer before applying it.A minor amount of additional testing or executive summary.Do not read selected elements only.Read this report analysis-if any is required at all-could prevent major problems. in full. Most of the "Findings" Related in This Report Are You Need to Inform Your Geotechnical Engineer Professional Opinions about Change Before construction begins,geotechnical engineers explore a site's Your geotechnical engineer considered unique,project-specific factors subsurface through various sampling and testing procedures. when designing the study behind this report and developing the Geotechnical engineers can observe actual subsurface conditions only at confirmation-dependent recommendations the report conveys.A few those specific locations where sampling and testing were performed.The typical factors include: data derived from that sampling and testing were reviewed by your • the client's goals,objectives,budget,schedule,and geotechnical engineer,who then applied professional judgment to risk-management preferences; form opinions about subsurface conditions throughout the site.Actual • the general nature of the structure involved,its size, sitewide-subsurface conditions may differ-maybe significantly-from configuration,and performance criteria; those indicated in this report.Confront that risk by retaining your • the structure's location and orientation on the site;and geotechnical engineer to serve on the design team from project start to • other planned or existing site improvements,such as project finish,so the individual can provide informed guidance quickly, retaining walls,access roads,parking lots,and whenever needed. underground utilities. This Report's Recommendations Are perform their own studies if they want to,and be sure to allow enough Confirmation-Dependent time to permit them to do so.Only then might you be in a position The recommendations included in this report-including any options to give constructors the information available to you,while requiring or alternatives-are confirmation-dependent.In other words,they are them to at least share some of the financial responsibilities stemming not final,because the geotechnical engineer who developed them relied from unanticipated conditions.Conducting prebid and preconstruction heavily on judgment and opinion to do so.Your geotechnical engineer conferences can also be valuable in this respect. can finalize the recommendations only after observing actual subsurface conditions revealed during construction.If through observation your Read Responsibility Provisions Closely geotechnical engineer confirms that the conditions assumed to exist Some client representatives,design professionals,and constructors do actually do exist,the recommendations can be relied upon,assuming not realize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other no other changes have occurred.The geotechnical engineer who prepared engineering disciplines.That lack of understanding has nurtured this report cannot assume responsibility or liability for confirmation- unrealistic expectations that have resulted in disappointments,delays, dependent recommendations if you fail to retain that engineer to perform cost overruns,claims,and disputes.To confront that risk,geotechnical construction observation. engineers commonly include explanatory provisions in their reports. Sometimes labeled"limitations;many of these provisions indicate This Report Could Be Misinterpreted where geotechnical engineers'responsibilities begin and end,to help Other design professionals'misinterpretation of geotechnical- others recognize their own responsibilities and risks.Read these engineering reports has resulted in costly problems.Confront that risk provisions closely.Ask questions.Your geotechnical engineer should by having your geotechnical engineer serve as a full-time member of the respond fully and frankly. design team,to: • confer with other design-team members, Geoenvironmental Concerns Are Not Covered • help develop specifications, The personnel,equipment,and techniques used to perform an • review pertinent elements of other design professionals' environmental study-e.g.,a"phase-one"or"phase-two"environmental plans and specifications,and site assessment-differ significantly from those used to perform • be on hand quickly whenever geotechnical-engineering a geotechnical-engineering study.For that reason,a geotechnical- guidance is needed. engineering report does not usually relate any environmental findings, conclusions,or recommendations;e.g.,about the likelihood of You should also confront the risk of constructors misinterpreting this encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants. report.Do so by retaining your geotechnical engineer to participate in Unanticipated subsurface environmental problems have led to project prebid and preconstruction conferences and to perform construction failures.If you have not yet obtained your own environmental observation. information,ask your geotechnical consultant for risk-management guidance.As a general rule,do not rely on an environmental report Give Constructors a Complete Report and Guidance prepared fora different client,site,or project,or that is more than six Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can shift months old. unanticipated-subsurface-conditions liability to constructors by limiting the information they provide for bid preparation.To help prevent Obtain Professional Assistance to Deal with Moisture the costly,contentious problems this practice has caused,include the Infiltration and Mold complete geotechnical-engineering report,along with any attachments While your geotechnical engineer may have addressed groundwater, or appendices,with your contract documents,but be certain to note water infiltration,or similar issues in this report,none of the engineer's conspicuously that you've included the material for informational services were designed,conducted,or intended to prevent uncontrolled purposes only.To avoid misunderstanding,you may also want to note migration of moisture-including water vapor-from the soil through that"informational purposes"means constructors have no right to rely building slabs and walls and into the building interior,where it can on the interpretations,opinions,conclusions,or recommendations in cause mold growth and material-performance deficiencies.Accordingly, the report,but they may rely on the factual data relative to the specific proper implementation of the geotechnical engineer's recommendations times,locations,and depths/elevations referenced. Be certain that will not of itself be sufficient to prevent moisture infiltration.Confront constructors know they may learn about specific project requirements, the risk of moisture infiltration by including building-envelope or mold including options selected from the report,only from the design specialists on the design team.Geotechnical engineers are not building- drawings and specifications.Remind constructors that they may envelope or mold specialists. GEOPROFESSIONAL BUSINESS - ASSOCIATION Telephone:301/565-2733 e-mail:info@geoprofessional.org www.geoprofessional.org Copyright 2016 by Geoprofessional Business Association(GBA).Duplication,reproduction,or copying of this document,in whole or in part,by any means whatsoever,is strictly prohibited,except with GBAs specific written permission.Excerpting,quoting,or otherwise extracting wording from this document is permitted only with the express written permission of GBA,and only for purposes of scholarly research or book review.Only members of GBA may use this document or its wording as a complement to or as an element of a report of any kind.Any other firm,individual,or other entity that so uses this document without being a GBA member could be committing negligent KAYDEROSS AVENUE EAST CONSERVATION SUBDIVISION SUBDIVISION APPLICATION CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS,NY APRIL 8 2020 REVISED SEPTEMBER 11,2020 '•?- SITE STATISTICS: CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS STANDARD NOTES "r 1 ALL WORK MUST CONFORM TO ALL FEDERALSTATEANDCTYCODES.SPECIFICATIONS.ORDINANCES RULES AND REGULATIONS >,,- RESIDENTIAL AA=aNE NTO 15 LOTS, 2 HE�,arDNeAaE�ATMEaaNTaM. oe�CM,Ae�ARE eASEMDNTHE NATIONAL GEODETIC VEATCuDATUM s. '- PARCEL SEE .87 AG '' RESIDENTIAL 1.11NINILIII LOT SI. 2. 3. APPLICANTBMIT A LETTER OF CREDIT ESTRIATE FOR PROJECT SITE WORK TO THE CI.ENGINEER FOR RENEW VID AL LETTERNIUST OFDREDRFUNDSMUSTBEPOSTEDW.THEGT,PRORTOPLANNNGBDARDCHARBGNATUREONFN.PLAN DTH 2.. d THE CONTRACTOR MUST SET UP A PREACONSTRUCTION NIEETING LATH THE CI.ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION �I :+ CONSTRUCTION. PROFESSION.ARE REQUIREDOR THE . y THECO T OF THE coNTR NN RESPONSIBILITYPENsTHEoFTHEAPPLICANT/PE/EL PER YARD SETBACKS REDIRR o NsERVA„ON - —ta $ FRONT ` 5. ALL PROPOSED 'F"rsORa cHraF.:aDEDICATIONS MUST eFVERIFIED AND APPROVED evTHE CIT A ENGINEER PRCaro '/ ayi tRENA McoNsrwcr DN II- \ !rt 1SDE 20 F 10 FT c SED PROJECT CAN ACCOMMODATE THE TURNING MOVEMENTS OF ANY FIRE TRUCK THAT THE DEPART ENT DESIGNATES YTHEDEPARTENTOFPUBLC ORKSFOR ar,DRNTHE STREET —! � CONSERVATION SUBDIVISION CALCULATIONS: Cor ST - TABLE 1-TOTAL ooEoCALCULATIONS '"12/1/ — e 6OS � STRC oFOREOGNT ESS � EPNAROAPPYD INTOONSRRS .,BENIINEDTEVETRCKINGOSEDIMENT OR .EDSHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE BY THE CONTRACTORA - :{ PRORTORDRJSDONOFTHE LTDR.:MOS PROJECT LOCATION MAP © NTS JURISDICTIONAL P s. a U 7 AC 11 NO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY PALL BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL SITE WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE.ITH THE APPROVED PLANS,.DISTURBED THE OR BARE GROUND NAVE CITYBEEN FULL STABILIZED AVD AN AS.BUILT DRAIN,.HAS BEEN PREPARED IN eeP 30..AC SHEET INDEX: 100 YEAR FLOODPL AIN 1 10 AC REA NSTRAINED ALLOWED LOTS LAND NIDED BY MINIMUM LOT SIZEr. 20s0 Ac 2 A=ALLOWED NUMBER OF LOTS a COVER 22, a 'A' PROPOSED LOTS 13 S-1 SUBDIVISION MAP S-2 SUBDIVISION MAP e L-1.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS •', - L-2.0 CONSERVATION ANALYSIS TABLE 2-TOTAL SITE-CONSERVATION LAND L-3.0 31 3.2 SITE CLEARING EROSION&SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN PROJECT SREREa L-4.0414.2 SITE LAYOUT PLAN L-5.0 51,5.2 SITE GRADING$DRAINAGE PLAN CONSTRAINED .37 AO }„ / UNCONSTRAINED nese 1c L-6.0 61,6.2 SITE UTILITY PLAN L-7.0 ROAD I UTILITY PROFILE$SECTIONS L-8.0,8.1 SITE DETAILS L-8.2,8.3,8.4,8.5 SITE UTILITY DETAILS NYS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH REALTY SUBDIVISION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: OWNER APPLICANT: z ,. PREPARED BY: / F+ -- 1. TH.THE PROPOSED FACILITIES FOR CATER SUPE K AND SEWAGE COLLECTION AND OR TREATENT SHALL BE INSTALLEDN227 KAYDEROSS AVE.INC. :...Arm A Si: s ,„,,,a CONFORMTY rH SAID PLANS The LA Ln 43 EDGEWATER DRIVE VICINITY MAP: © NTS 2 THAT NO LOT OR REMAINING LAND SH.L BE SUBDIVIDED APPROVED By THE NEeWveRR STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEu.H WITHOUT PLANS FOR SUCH REsueDMsoN BEING sue rrED TO AND GROUP ` 510.7 0100 ...,...,..,.. DUNEDIN,FL 34698 CPw ALL I2 THAT THE DEVELOPEN SHALL FuRriisn EACH PURCHASE,OF A LOP ori INHICH'MATER SUPPLY Arlo.3.,APE THEANAMIT L/A2,24 KA,0,N,m&p, NSTALLED ILS 3.OSANRA FACILITIES. A ODUD HRE ON Or IAPPRO+m AN PLANS AND ACC..I e ASDUILIU PN 0.10 III. vorprathelegroup.com vaiSe 4. THAT THE DEVELOPER SHALL FURNISH EACH PURCH.ER OF A LOT ON WHICH NO WATER SUPPLY ANDIOR SEWAGE TREATMENT FACILRIES INSTALLED NI.A REPRODUCTION OF THE APPROVED PLANS AND SHALL NOTIFY THE PURCH.ER OF THE NECESSIT Y OF INSTALLING SUCH FACILITIES IN ACCORDANCE/LATH THE APPROVED PLANS 0.002 5 THAT PEAR APPAO 7.IS LILITEEP TO/SMEARS AND SHALL EXPIRE ON PINE EXTENSIONS FOA pLAri APIERONAL MAY BE GRANTED BY THE NYS DEP ARTIIENT OF HEALTH BASED UPON DEA ELOPIIENT FACTS AND THE REAL.SUBDNISION REGULATIONS IN EFFECT AT TH.TINIE.A NEW PLAN SUBIIISSION MAY BE REQUIRED TO OBTAIN ANNE EYTENSION. fi THAT THE APPRO,ED PLANS MUST BE FILED EARN THE SARATOGA COUNTY CLERK PRIOR TO OFFERING LOTS FOR SALE AND LATHIN 62 DAYS of THE DATE OF PLAN APPROVAL. Planning Board#1 7.WG.1 7 THAT ALL LOCAL 6ND OTHER PTV.NGENLY RULES 6ND REGULNTIONS S..BE COMPLIED ANITH e ES(I.E.INDNIDUAL WATER NELLS AND seNAGE TREATMENT SYSTEMS)EON THESE LOTS SHALL RE rIr0=P eoa.ao a.,o.Ao ufF= 7(,,,i___---,'�t' 4./ LEGEND g T — The LA GROUP — o E�E ,.w,,.,...�.. / z? 1 r47-7\ ' l' e 1 Yd Inc. s ater Cr e 6 'PI/ . c1 ''/ II an r13��9e U3 d�, .nse.w 'd r• ',4 ��rvE tT '''' , „t, s/v.'s..' - — n t - t n o Y 1 o„- • I - I KaydeSubd oss sio Ave.East ,• 4Sa stopsv sgs.v1E866 bw,_ x.mon ., ..,, : • E d t xisting Coni Ions 1 \Planning Board#1]W G ,, .1 ,, L-1.0 Lg The LA GROUP LEGEND ADJ,GENT AREA (41) K>LE,,,. A.Arripr /— ,' .• -e, 1 0 r \--'—\ ,- „ ....,•••K• • •••••*AI giie41 'C'E''''''''''"D ,,„,, r• / ..0.. t.•• ,',sr.y I Ali 1= ...-' .0'. t• • .0 A 1 DEVELOPMENT AREA .--."a a-- ,/* I rP••••••••• 4.4 ii ..............•A 7 .o- , tis•:***0:0.0‹*' E ISTING 1 1 ,,,a /a'\ 144..41,......." F e'A'R I N I,0 U S,A N. ,b, ..''' ht 1 / ,,,, / — ell ..• ---- / -A — ‘,. _-- AGRICULTURAL n7r-raRTEAc=71='-'"' --- - -----L \ il _ _ AG•CULTURE,E,•AGE L.C.:''•.E, / AAP"EXIST NC / / ,L•nl ROS I CO<ND, sT,E,,,,ALL, , ,,,f RACTSR PATH , POND 1 1 ,,•••••' , , • A' , ,- .• •• 1 ' / •••4 ZNENT/RE/ • 1/ .4•84•••••' ' •• •' ' I I I :.4'...• %•4". , ....•••*a kh, I 1 .." ..:.* ' V,....\4....Z.....44A37.A .,,T47-„:4L-.,____ r••. s*.**SZ:n•c;;;;;?::. .:°^,,,,,,,,, t... 1,...........,_,.,1 _ ,, —-—- !....• "-,:::::::'• :*.'..-0:•.4.1 0. 1 •... • .•° ' 44 0..0.402?.7 1.4.•••10.....:PVII .lit \00,-••••••;x ..........010......:0.X.0.:.••11..•••••4•.•A..14. :*.3.:t.t..:0;1W.1,00.2tali . AZII0:!..W 4 ":•44.. ,;::(tile...Z.Z.:**..0:4::•Y •• •**••''' *** •'•••'4•• ... - \- ',•1 \i 111 '" */s;1.8.•. .*:• ••.:At# .AA.• :••••*"...•••••••• .••„:/.* so. v:........t..........:y ::.:..,:., .....z; ..;;;•:.. ; s*.k '4 / AAA,:....se..)r..::•,.. . . 4. :.......?.............„...•....:•,......... . •4...4 ••••:•:,,,•••..1/ ,,,,,- Kaydeross Ave East Conservation i ! ••• • i ...... •• ••••••••• .00 0.••• • .•.• A •• •• •••• • ,„,„, • • • • •• •• ••••• • • 0 ''`'''Y.,,',-,t`.2,7""liti......N.k.S..•. ......"........0...". ••••k:•:'.. •.......:.• .•.:A OW. • • ...••• ••••••••• • •....• ••..•.0.10. „. ••,,.. ,1•••0 •••••• ••••• •• .*•:•: •• 0"') 0.•.•.*•.• "'" .••••4 f mow M.1.11-,_.Illi•Ill-II.11.111111111". 11 • • •••••••••••••• • • •••••A A•S ••• A • -A .1111.1111-11IV , .. 0.• 0.. ••• 0 040 O.** ••••400.0# ..00 .0• •ib• At :•":..•••••0:1•0: ••:• 0 ••••••:40. .N/•••••)• •v.': ' !),„..•• ,„.,1...X* .•441;•„••4.:•4. .X.r. •....0"•:• .00Y::.4 \ • 0 0.••:,'• .0:•0•0••.... v• •:•••s.84 .7!=..,' •'' Ai." •0"• ••••••• •0.. :VW,„,,1•2•••••:•••••••••4.. ***et :`:'' ,,.,, Conservation Analyss ...,,.. / L-2.0 LEGEND .._mc.xEELnE .xuEE The LA GROUP .56 1:::' 'CULVERT'"R RN it' S09'3S 29 W�, —T—• T ��rva,�orvEVE,u �• :LETT rxo a-nur r ucE .'''':. ...: INV=218.98 47.51 _ 57)1'31'20 YV 7"'' /� .. ^/ / CULVERT MV=218.46! ..oEzoF.roCn.cv vu(E e�de as nye.Inc �:m ra FL 34699 7 S03'54'09'E / i.��.�i_ 80.48' ®u 505'58'41 E SITE PREPARATION NOTES: i 47,3 64.31' .' / A��i 1,HYURAND& rEa .tr WAiEk VALVE x cux,rxu.vcx,c c TEs _ N U DRPNi& —, i15E / r3�rQ k�V/ .x o4..awr_�onmF.. aet ""FE .uvi.aru.u�Fs n�.x l / PROTECTION NOTES .NooU.SVE.xE1mOFAI,a3o1..a z, �_mrLL ,N \, VIVID SERVICE m oow�s HOE�n�.e. s�n�EaLLE,ss.jos un�s��.��. ' 30 HOUSE —IA�I � � .. o la!11n o 1 .1 I�- 1 !t Iij1 ayc fccc .,oxo .a .oeEFFSE cn3rINATFw cF STOWE FF(..x i." • Mail xv.ov. A i��\ x„N,i11°m 1Lm ee—bk i i Subdivision ubd eerrovsaso , REMOVALS NOTES a xst oA nz 1.MS 31E3E5(771SIBIL173,(31EC77133,30231.373MIN7(E1.131311E(73(1ERSPEPRESE33,13E S''''''' ee.cE ast aa ® NvoanNr& 1_-__. c I WATER VALVE n c, �.—r ‘�WAR,�� 7.'1!% � ='" ` ® I C J w. % wr^"f �, �E�Am r.r €ut RT INv,5xys s 3' 1 ""� CuEverer wv21 a.tis = E-�,omr ® ' rdeono Ga. x�.xr x�.,E��,�..TE % fie/ CULVERT 11,1,/,-,./ �a u, ,,,mon r,., 'IVola _.,,, 7 iI / sI0 8'WArERi MAI aaPeonwiAlEKv .. .. ",�AEanc wEsrsCSE�ranvrnriE _,xn i Site Clearing, ' — / / I i WIfiE F Erosion Pl Sediment Control Plan �. I- Planning Board#17.0[6.1 F,L _ _ 35.60% 750 SO]'47'2' Y r � ssz_'2� — _�sa9 49 a� 9552 1 E� x.�,r rr,Fo arob r sa�x,,.. L-3.0 41446. — 0 '_ //'' o$fg'ik '-'s"^^M1 LEGEND /� `�� _ N833403 E� _ E ver SILT FENCE rx anarrueF ".. .tr 83 52 The LA GROUP a A a1RCHEOLOGIC,PROTE,ION CE,O.=o�..,E,I,.:Z r AA 7 X t;l � .,. I : f x�' 4/' pl SITE PREPARATION NOTES �a�, " /' - =oFC Fwxc ,J_ PROTECTION NOTES: - {� s. T ,`� `�, 1y'- REMOVALS NOTES: a, % i1 1 - - y--- r — ow wr6rm �ti �� I-. I �Hr.w4. 2 - If -'''''"N' Nam / , / '�o}im""`{ _ j R'` Kaydeross Ave.East Ili � i. d7 '_' ,�:� � !` Conservation -CC a �1- - —. - - Subdivisionv�ece " O INDIVIDUAL LOT CONSTRUCTION ' q i ti x.mo� II�11 iii!!!!— :_. - - I 4 7 Sc CI ar ng, 44Erosion&Sediment • - _ nj_�nl I��IIi�1 \�. :�.1' Control Plan II���I�IIL III�r I Planning Board#17.0[6.1 „„„ _ _ J48.12 '”"'''.: / oP ��s�2ss si w .' :ro: �s8� ,gzn'o Boob o ce.o. :a L-3.1 , LEGEND Lg ( `14 FENCE WER314PROTEC11014,NCE The LA GROUP ..e.............t.mc 1 I ' Pro*A.P.,•• i , + •• -,,, / - ) ) o ,, WIRE F ii ii ,„„,„..„,,,, . rz „ic„,6,o,.' 1 i t, ot•t#.• ,,e,,it_--t C34 _,--, _-_,, 07474 . ,,, ...-: ,.,, .,„..t.,,.. K N----.L'-' 43 Erigemater Drive t/ 7 47 '4 ; —'7--,-------------- --6-,,E, ., \ ''\ • -A \ .:'/•• — ) \\ 4,- tji, s. o. I 1 SITE PREPARATION NOTES: 4 .4* *' PROTECTION NOTES: % # . KU al-4diEET Lrd0F443CITECIION nilliEd. )4! ' , , .1 REMOVALS NOTES I )'))))) .) )))) ,// ' 0# ,_ . RUM,314Ci rri0 FOR r4P/33,3140iC3. / \ ----4 4 ,'"' L' '7" ., "7,, , \ 4,0-. • ' '' •••••..... 40. • / \ 4 **vs* ; 14/ . 1 / i --'' --:\''' '' HI "/.1 / \'\ " •••• # , ! ,------, ,,4,-,E,F,,±L ; ' ...,., i ,,, ,, , - s••••••• .. Kaydeross Ave.East • Conservation : , )) ),)_„ )) )„.) ))„ ,)))))) )))) ..))) )) ! Ni, \\• 4* 4., Subdivision ) , ) ,,1 ().) );)-- )).)'--))). )))) ) i ) ))' ,)) ,',.)) .N.** # • Sarato,Sprir y3 NY 4436 4$* ../*. . ..... *S.. ' . ' . .- 4,433 d'rr, I . I 4, # Site Clearing, . ) Erosion&Sediment Control Plan , .. ) 1, Planning Board#17.00E1 I I& 1:1-1-:C me? 1,7,10 • ''''''' •=1:ft;=V1iZEF:V.,,, L-3.2 „--- --- , ,.—.rn PLEGEND kg ROAD ALIGNMENT M I rasa as,r„„a ir,F1,1,- 5/CI / ---- The LA GROUP - — - -,-. —--.-, ---.—PROPOSED IREEUNE P...,.../..• F-{1,01.11, EillNEN,-- . :•°/=":7110 'f'=7,1°3 >: ' /I I , ,, - 7,!, ,,,,•`,Z,'• ;4121,we. ,,,,---,0N EU, 81.,1.4. a,1,yd,,A,Inr i I .,/ Moe,FL LOH - - I ! (1,1 r o ,__ijsEsi a Roam ,--. , I ---- PROPERTIES WITHIN 300 FEET LAYOUT NOTES ! i // ' '' -' ,' ' I '2.' 2 hOLT1=1=PAZZNETI-MTST=CSTTI:;HP=C7gIEEM=1=11,E g g /, • -'' ` ''-' '- -' , ...,,I,S ill,11.5„RE Fh1,1,,,E I„.1-0N„IF„P El ill fAI,E I„.1-0N„IF„1.1. --., /' — — —/„- 'I ' =T0L.=oconEg=i'me=,:n===urs .-- \ ,opoSEL,6„iNtiFC01,G:EiC.6SONTRACOR SI I A 1 REPORT WI MC,E„NC1E.S TO 0„NER S -- --- ' I \ NEP NESENTAIVE...ie.CONTHUIWPALI„, lieel . ',7,\ ,..„,...,t2i <, 77ETimgg.:-.%I-- ,, . .„„F.,..FTO,F!Ili., AP* , .,,,...0 ,,,,„. 1=111=11111 =11=1 F"F.ST F°°''''''A. rrr ILLMIORIRI-ff11.7 ":'''''''''''AN'U N''''' ‘'f,1 '''I 1 I 11 I ffITIT:,- :=:=",`;',-="K ':,•:;:t:BE:s...,E. ,:e, : 1114111411T 1 Kaydeross Ave.East 0 TRAIL SURFACE-BARK MULCH I 'POP..igfit, I\ 1 dialigd ' IDC,LE WID Conservation IFAISVICIJ igh .”'"LT imt, c, 2.,s,s, 6 , 7.;,.!r.„. tiEDiEl.71LE F,BPIC 111=111=111=111=111=111 " — - AI-Rourry , Alk-rpaur A.,. 0 TRAIL SURFACE-STONE DUST 8"-E / /1--'-'-'-'------' E...,-rnsr;REET ev -"--- MU"'"'°' i I 1 1 1 I ' I \I-WIRE FENCE i 1 LANDS ILB THE MN OF SARATOGA SPRINGS (L ISOMP.292) GEL.175,29.13 xLmon ,„„[ L sE- - -- i •o• 1 -"'" / 1 / I / - - - Site Layout Plan I ..-- I / I i / Planning Board it 17.0MA ,..,N ..-- lo --.__ _ 00 al-Es''s' I I ,s9_oorrao, _ _ -.-n-,Lotli. 4 ,, h 5/SR 1 — — — — — h',:',A.;.÷‘,:',' :,. ::7- — — • ...„_......, _ _ __,, ,a__,,_ 65/81R. LEGEND Lg The LA GROUP 1 1 --EPISIINP PREELINI /0,00,PPOPPPLP 1121_1_._ 2,1,11,1,10,11_1, OPCPPLAP PLCIPPRIPAL LIPP ----PROPER,LINE 1-PFICPP HOUSE LOSPIIPP Ppern • 41' :I I -UP,PPLAIN SOUPS., / ./' \‘ , -j . 'A I \\ , \ ‘ I I ` J I tb,i1W.PPP PEOLOGIC AL PROPECII011 Ea E • SIPE_IPPPI,P -- SIPPPII.IP,P '.0 P P.7"Paydero,A,Inc ELnAin FL 34E599 "-\ o 0 1020:0 o \:. ,r-47,k '''' 4044, ALIGNMENT I ) , l' \\ / „2-, i ., i , - - ' /2',i/ , \ 2,222.2 \ '. .,' , , / , , , /, / \ \ —. \ - - ,,/,,,, fa ,\\„T. , 2, $0 , „.- ;# . 2.. ... „.....„ 1 , rt I , A\ ,' '-`1. ; ILI---------____ . ,r , ', , .-- V" I —--- I 1' --' - .7: . .-• II'I I I I I/ 1 . I .• ilit. 1 , \• ,,,,, III:--- ns' LAYOUT NOTES 1.9Mil nom,Ink ' PEE'Esn'j'Aini 'PI V filt=P'ST T'jI/ / ,P „OSS.I'Llt 1-PPlig .1111111‘ ,h.....7‘,....„:- PC 0,470 /ilik' I Kaydeross Ave.East Conservation . POPP..1,1,13 PIPISUIIIIL PSPIIP_P'PPEIVEN- j°, 'III., ' jelk aio,uro- I Subdivision NOFLIP-IP PIP ' .. / / 1 ' . ,,,,,—PIP. P.'•„ dr '. PP , - : I / . , CI I among Site Layout Plan - ifirlti : 1 f. 4-4 I=PPP PRPIL'PPR:I-ER,J,I j''-'491IPIPP.,=-,PIPP'PPP PF I M.IIVERIEL I Planning Board A 17.0[6.1 ! o Lpe.UPPRAI PPRI/PPE JIBE. ' ' I .0 P'''FIER'''NE LI/P-PP-PI L-4.1 LEGEND Lc_i _ _,R.,E,,L,. 1 PROPERM,PIE I 1 I The LA GROUP _ SCM,MI,LI, I I I ........,......,m,......._7].711,,I O.II,_ i ---0,SIMICALI[1,77121.7.,UK MIFICAL X0113E L.,1101.1 epe..,......... I ,-- - --- . . . 1 - -IN=FlarriF7,7PF VA 51={0 'fiI:I=TSII / , -" 1 r / I ( I N-WIRE El7NCE — _,E7LAND BOU,LMIRY ..F.LAIN BOU.APY ISI'1IIVI .7'IIIIIIIII'II I''' / I 1 / j “ ' 0! 7 / / II"" 'II. - :IIII;14:SSIII:IE / 5/8"R , .ro / / / cy DARIO A RICH 1 1381386 P89 / J II'11 I /I 5 R f f II / // \ I / 8 ' / LAYOUT NOTES II KANDEROSS WOODS I / I TRAIL I / / \ / „ \ S,2 's nr't I // '2.44'47,g . : E,:, _ ° 1,/ / . I i ,,, ,,, I / `` II.0 D'I',;III'f FIOIEFSK.1Iarj f 1,11.GRAD, / r :1 II ir i -=„F-11- LF - .:-* -11 ....Q / 1 , / j / = • acEr,sEE,— .„1,15,g , ,=4.111,7, Ir. ,.. . tou.A / , th :1 /)„ -- - -11ifiiiiMITA I ......„ 1 H H 11011HTPIIHTP1101HTAIHI : , V> / / Kaydeross Ave.East isEFFECAll R11E11E11E11E111E111E11E10 I /c/ Conservation /\ / Subdivision TRAILHEAD SIGNAGE i / \ / / \ / \ Mm„ .. 4.r ., • 1. 1 L.LJ 1.11'i . CONOPETE 1 IMX,71,7 LI. ,1 , - Site Layout Plan „zsz=gi.„—.4,F,TUHE.,PECIF.10.. Planning Board#17.0[6.1 r..,,,,,, 0 SPLIT RAIL FENCE mi L-4.2 N'•,,,,-' LEGEND 'A � � s e — `��— pN�/- — The LAGRO`UP / // / / ' / / CULVERT iNv 2 / _ _ ( / x �o� �r 46 R ( `t 8' I - // i / / / / / r '� i ` S I JJs GRADING NGTEwS r� . oi .. d 3ao9e Inc zI * ,�I - 1 �YDRPN,& / .` TER VALVE I , �� A I'/ wureR unLVE-'� ,4: j.r 1' ,- z ,,_4 i'T._— / 1 , , ,A. .40 ,,: : � wgrEe sRNce oar a 1 ,E ..FF e., ..�6,rnV,nr ... I � To House V .x i / 1 I �1 oa� a �1 / mei eEaE Ko:u�o. �o:w..:'". \ � our. 1 ��� uceo.� .s4,/ / �ar.r I I � I I I � , 10- I w a Kaydeross Ave.East z daEl.' oae — u \ m ,w. Subdivision x I a -o T ® n T�4 � rn.%by A WATER VALVE 6r .vr�ece —111111016114- F \ L^T '1='!_.J.-4,-66 1111,1041 kif,L f -o� yea, -® CULVERT INV 21 GIR V x.mon ...... s v I I _ \\ 'oeoomocnace Site G radl & 3 � � -TDrainage Plan ,moo / I nei I � "'" c.'" Planning Board ,w �� AE-5.0 — '' - \ _ _— — — I, ,mn -- O L 4i�ire r — LEGEND tbg ���i / The LA GROUP �' ��v y�_�/ IJ'' /' [ o oNC'F\, o�..� v� �o�x�n ��Emo� v .f . ,® 1 ® _ 3,o�s / / �\ / M1 \ / GRADING NOTES � / � )/ / — � �' / ' �. a. ...o.� opo=s. - [ ilif �l�j / >,, Eo,','. l )J r �/ I Kaydeross Ave.East SubdivIsion :smoo.. / / ,/_ / / / // - ■�� � lie 1 IIk' El�I / Site Crading& Drainage Plan % A I Ti � / Planning Board a 170[61 w i _��� 1 m ..6.€ ll — .-�a�, nP a b L-5.1 5 LEGEND , , - , __ iJi .....,....... : / \ ' -----::::::7::L,::,:::, -irliFRI1117F.5,.11 -, PROPOSE-0.10R CON-0, / 1 / 1 7-,.. / 1 -- GRADING NOTES -------,—___ , I 1 _ L', 4 .;•ET,,'"-;,;', i \ , -- ''''`,x _ - .. Kaydeross Ave East Conservation SubdivIsion „ , \ , , — \ --- , , , ,_ -- '' k.\\'', — -- __. , , Site GradIng& Planning Board#170[61 a...------ -- -- L-5.2 . .b.,r,711, 791:nr.'11-iElr-y:EF:Inp,), -- -- _FSI/ / LEGEND r.orEvrv�E ern u.�.u.o ` = — �� The LA GROUP n� 'CULVERT�INVn2 itF,I �m q rv.cr��n.irL�.e xree .4,== sE.unE 9 ureeeox .nw ' ll 1/ 1 ,CULVERT INV=218.46; ,SNE //r7,,, em;.o eaErE�� so.,e� rr3,osa UTILITY NOTES 1 eroRANT& = !warER VALVE .. _ �o.��o _ • rnvRnNr e: k WATER VALVE,- -W7/4'iww/D,ADD LD2A/D/D--/OLADH/AW//wADADW, il/////\ e 1 ii w ,„- „, ,„ ru'EtcreW=ZEsE=,.%=renE=EcEFLttLEueNgELtEe% :-/''''ErL'R ''''''' 1'.:2-E:ill E, I t I/i i i i/ *iti . :,„ „,. ,: „„;,, , ,/,‘„‘,„ ,,,„ , ,„, „,, ,, ._ , , ,,,,,,,, , 1: _.,„.,,, ,. ..,, / , „ „ „ , f z,. ter♦. ! WAfiER SRNCE a FADE n �F. �.BE �.mPwo DER.����. '�� _ I I TO HOUSE a wN _ _ _ _ I P.1. _ 1,-----''/ "I !I' TEST PIT LOG EMI .!I i1 ,' N 1 aln it ' _ 'iI,— cif i ‘,/ Q' BASIS OF DESIGN oro oCnamov. Kaydeross Ave.East I / ' I O Conservation�/i- o I i °. '',1/ Subdivision ��� ��� _ -- - - HYDRANT&' -- _ RV �1� G VERT Lew YTIfE CIN OF T Go'9PRNG: CULVERT INVA21.67 (G R 2`2) SB.L.175 4,613 } �8"WATER,4 IN APPROXIVIATEkV )} ALONG v�TT -oE,-ueAVE"rNT i I ,f 1 y Site Utility Plan _ � :,...„,„, ,,„/ ,,' ./„ _ Planning e�manoosl L 60 ', ' ' tt 4 Tz _ _ _ —� �L � .� ., — o "" Boob o �.a ce.o. ' , O %,�y n J r ' r®�. P F.„,„_„,,F The LA GROUP � � , / '�/ -` , r UTILITY NOTES "nr,D '11/ '';:r.; ; " / � � � Inc \ s j ` ".® >` m{ TEST PIT LOGS .---:- ,'/ �" T. Ear, ,z.zEm ..,:wr,;o.. a j, ® 1 f � io,a ht rF— ' '•'�J ' a Kaydeross Ave.East Subdivision os ,FO,UsoE,�GN„„„,a, '� i BASIS OF DESIGN 1 /c 1.//:1,1//Ill/lz„7 A;7':L.: 111/-ti":"4,237- . / �. ��, '-6 , ,\ ,.‘,.-„i,t,\ ‘‘.:-‘‘ . . / , , ,, ..,-Fig,, , --___-_--:___ !mail ! ! ! I I 1 os; _ E ,� —— , Site U tility Plan / M i' oPlanning Board .,:,,Z,//� ',< \ \''// - I ,zzi ° "` ' -- 5 ! , , , . ,' LEGEND Lc_i = - , The LA GROUP , OVLI,-1,1,,[0111,11kL __,,,--V,,,E2 SeRVICE SF.-IF....-Ti.i. UTILITY NOTES f),..,t).,f71):3r4D6rse ) , , ___,, , 1. REFER TO SI-EET f,.0'OP illILIPII,OTES. ' , : ' ' TEST PIT LOG BASIS OF DESIGN 1 • L''——"0/AS ,..,DI FOR I BEDROOM RESIDENCES I.,GAL.!. , -----; , , ''', ---"--", ''''''I2S/,;'Ft;k•''''''ER ak i/ .' , ' ,, , ,' , ', ,' ', \ )17i,'"':11?rj=',1•(;1-1F-74f Fr''''' , ..... „ , -I- , Kaydeross Ave.East )‘— , -- _„ ,----„---, , - ,'' ', — s „ \\\>\ Slte Utility Plan Planning Board#17.0[6.1 ......,. --„„_,- ------------- - ------- „ ''','.,7-ZZ'''' 1.1r-rata.; ltllcilralo; ,.-- - The LA GROUP rlrlfbl4lall- 7-, r - vcc,„,,,,. . ,r 227 Paydeross Ave Inc. no.. oilaisianan ''diFa.-'.O:Lcio oo MTO'i'o , Jill "' ,'".1 '2 1 r,' R:':7 0 0 :,--0 ',1 '0 0 i:,,R •n! IA -71 0 .0 0 [1,,!: 0 0 ROAD/UTILITY PROFILE i Eh Kaydeross Ave.E.t &yr,ttrrvt,y,tat. Conservation „..„ctaccr tat Subdivision IFE,FrEE'llEt,.7.1 0 TYPICAL ROAD SECTION 1 --,--- f..L'I' Er'EF'.UE'FICE:171. 0 TYPICAL ROAD SECTION 2 Road/Utility Profile&Secfions Planning Board it-17.01)6.1 ao,a. anaaol ==ro=VOi,a3.,113o=inoo, L-7.0 ::GROU: 1 leggig,EjEe.!:— -P,' -• ,---f,--,-0-` -,7P.:Lt. —....---- And.74,747; . . , --41111111. I _,d . , ATirFayEFFF, 0 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE /7....TREE PROTECTION FENCE DETAIL A-2,NOT USED „PT ILL BEPINWP.1F r;V;;P;IPP4IP;;PN-P ttH""'"Pt' ArP;RTREI; i2 N.';, PIEIEL:JELt" STAPLE B;FILL i COMPACT;PIP. 0 el s - ES ;I;BEI;El A EP„SI„P..10 NM 1.10.;;HEI; aPE;atit;NP;116.HT, ;SPLIZ;;; t;; AT BST;;SIGN,.511;NOT BE ;SCUP;Pl;f111;1;11;F; ;11,„„;ry ' .* - .' :: . $. -• xTc.:=7,A=E=s.... ..VETINSALIE ......;;;;;;;;;; IliTXPL=FP, ir' , t--% TEMPORARY STOCKPILE „Aka:N.,' , iN ...E." MOP' -' AX ;ITON OF SIPPE r1=;SPrEPIP.1 IP. ,t;;',P1=PtPt S'P PY PPV11;1=X;;;;Er 1 E ir„c„bab,c-vraraiiiioc 'r rro„rbrravvbr,OPEP ANCI10.<11-EN ;APLESSTAKES„;;;;I2„APTINT„EBOTT;IAPFp:E1,17:C„BACIPILLA;;IP;T„E TRE„;IMPS-WU;„; NOTE R,.;;PESSIBLE ;PEP P.E„. AR.;SPACES,PT, ;1;01 LP,LLLI PP; =cs.PDT's—E,- '711:::::::1:LHi7T"PI:E'1'I:IffITLIE!‘fIC7APJPNHeff'7'7.4'"AT T''.' et' PERSFECTNENEW ''.%''' T=7 0 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET a",ACCESSIBLE PARKING ;11;;;;CIFISAIIIRP ;;; St'EtPS V..9 Kaydeross Ave East ,N o SILT FENCE .,,,,,rs ........ .r, 2,1u,..rErrrEr., .,....= E7uR,,=,..,,,,co, Conservation Subdivision II STP„,1; STA;;;BALP 'P P NE,11 T.P;41P%;;Itl aiL),,n[LE ,Q;rm,,11 ""'If '7i7APC'E'E :Et'. 'VAIPPPRIZt4ltrrn't P.PttP'P Lp.„. - II MIIM L'''' „Ai ----= p„ Hi =Pi IP;;XGEPTEPTILE AO E SPPPIr0;;; III ' PRIP.L.A1;;;41; 0 CONCRETE WASHOUT 0 ASPHALT PAVEMENT trA CONCRETE CURB DETAIL 4.44141, 11;011 Pt P"P Pt "t ERFREE7 40,0411"10 1.0S% I itir 4 „..„. I at'ti Vlidel,;V,4 41.00. 1.11P;I;PI;ER BINCER;PH Site Details 4' 41141010 IllifEEIT , „sE,ATER,AL .aFor.1,ral -Tr„LA„AT rd„FrA w„Fun, 0 FLARED END SECTION DETAIL /7....,PAVEMENT KEY =,,=='%,°;iE717=',,,,,, L-8.0 -- Q) — ""''" , 1 sta— ,.....,.... luz.is.Zi:Or.TOI3=E" ZerEF:'.., '73-1 -.—itfre../ II n - ,...-- CATCH BASIN DETAIL 0 STORM MANHOLE STREAM BMW Pitr ' 0 WETLAND PROTECTION FENCE rZN DROP CURB AT RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY W. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII' '''''-'I'''. . I,IUZOIL[...GE HSU.SON.P,EL TOO,. / =ZENT 0 TRANSITION CURB sK.Kre NOT USED .4.E 4, ... ,444 4, 10 DECIDUOUS TREE K.....a....K00,.........rim. 0 Kaydeross Ave.East '. ' ". Conservation Subdivision ELEVATIOr 2.ZV'YEPSETdE‘LA2=EMTS'E=In3=10LirliNC.1111.i. k _„_ A k ' =2,f,17,T=F-,"..1===ru,R=7,,,. -• MIII9!UN EL'. MIUM®SIGN DETAIL/SIGN SCHEDULE II ....el i me.,60"....44.14A 0444,1444.0411.4*tk KA*ei ill......- z`. —I kagtfaiiiiciAtitid00 4,40 4,'.40 4W01104 t' ""..1Z'euergrIfEEFI 0 PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK Inre2Ordr;oN K seleuceuReLFLL ;,,,,t, A.e,,0 0: ),t ) 0) 00. 0. 0); FCRPERFC.TION ;',)0.`220 0,; ' 111 4 ..,..i, m,....... • m SEL.r.=L. WiiiiiiiiiaitiaM IC;g1%Sr=VE Site Details S-NDARD,EVESIEE PERCENT P„SMSIEVE Planning Board#17.0[6.1 SEC,. . ., , ,a7„ ,,,„ 0 PIPE ARCH CULVERT SECTION ®OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE L-8.1 sK.Kre .444r.e D,B „DTE '�-aDD�E nDE The LA GROUP VOTE le,0 TII2EADED TIE TREE E,II '� DB.�_ m_.„E Sil.BOX BET,EEk CURB1CA-RD 30,A1UELLER5,11.10CE_ ��E .B n .���„ rob Dom, Fre DTB,B<,�u. �EnTaEnD E,Y .TEMPORARYssur p�� ns Bammi aE n a ssDB®DIII nbT aTm ]Z K d A .Inc eV w.r .nD 11 iII'� =1111t610r�Tssa cur O TYPICAL WATER SERVICE CONNECTION 0 1 "."��t'' 1=1 Millihift Albt -111 010. MEW OD.E.. FF "OB°-m �� WATER MAIN CONNECTION °EB Or.�O E.BTi i FINISHED Ga,OE---____ ...SPP CONCRETE.xa,aL.<a. was,.,r. �1nDasFr, o =s2-. o= °;:a ,,a, ,aDEF„ . NDD, t�a � ArIONAL �� , CI, GSTOVEBT E ACoan� LIGIIT 0„E CONNECTED. T,VIST1_4„FIrrER =HTANNEBDF �E DTC E„ MTVAMrgIVZ a larPFPRMIZTIM=VanarliVEDTS.FMIn/ITIII.TWOMIE'R'ITZ' 11=:1-47.D'Nr''-'SAn'... "''''SV.-'7''''SV.'".'N,eL.:.,r4.77. PROVIDE„E„,,E11„1„OLE SWIE,ECII , OR E.O,AT TE BEGINNING SF SER.,„CADE VID 4,`,LE.1ELL,,FOR MCI.„Nrr 0 UTILITY CROSSING DETAIL THRUST BLOCK DETAIL i i�"n..wv* K yd Ave.East GREEK,FIRMI BASE TC TOP SF LICK.USE.OL,RIS ,..011,-Er. Conservation CO„IECTOR„ORCCNNECT,S„1.1.1.0LE MIDI, Ili DIRECTLY MD COI,SRETE.SE USW.=END. Subdivision w n D ,SDR rZFUZ7 E n,E aOFF.T Oa..Id'ANCHOR oorrSBR EEnmE• Ek« c,1-2s. = ,Ds.,a ,, -. ,''''''' ". 'g -rvcnru O i" �mixxE DR ` 0. "° B®D N0 r a�ncr T, O DECORATIVE STREET LIGHT O ,o.E.., A a . c. >rFEIN NON,V.S.,RE.11,AL TRENC,EACKFILLS11,BE RrovrBmB 00 III t� ,.w...... /—, r "L'Er�croxDsen DnvE¢ t�oa Da..nE ..TO AR' 11 .. J Ead gt EOLIM.ALL DELDIVG ND E.T.,Eacnor OETx o a RR ',ATM„T. o OF n,F,Ero.oO„...R.a.o,LL A:ATERIALS SHALL EE Site Utility Details 3.Exc,ia.dnsxvEBEKEPT DR,wBBe.>TERED ar.unrds. -. -HDR„Dan,,`MERE-un.[O,ra===BE aarrESEnsoNAL.,anu.w.,TEn-+Bu. Planning Board#1].006.1 OPIPE TRENCH SECTION T, O FIRE HYDRANT DETAIL MEWD 1n,,,0,00 aPo„ 0,,,,,w, L-8.2 .,,, The LA GROUP I' 'l'""I'gil.1 r[)?;;T,,,.,;.,. .:,p4- ,. ,.,.,.'. . ,.•F------7--- ------- -- Vz.',: ; • - 1=13SICOLOR 8 IlE„G PIS "11,01 PLUGS 2'Oa 1.-YCEILA STRIA,FG,“-IAN,ACP-.SS- :217.= %:3r-OM 1.4,28156 ..........p..... 4iitirsi Ei,r,62,01H',/i11 - ''''''•--yvew .2:--‘"-- -- 7 7 7 v s.........-...,.-- Z- ,,,,,,.,„.,,,.. - V,ERWNE,-,01,...,El.,„7.1 I' 2,Paycleross Ave Inc 0 TYPICAL DRIVEWAY CULVERT DETAIL , \ ......-. ,MINN=, 'F;i'iiI:a'.FsrE'i'iiiaTir'*Es STORMWATER POND CROSS SECTIONAL DETAIL aii a° ',Z.,. -.le,"^1.10 B,ANICLL N'IJ, COP/WM.1V. PLANIN,SEE RellAWS 'III a,...:!r..14,' • 1,VERSICCLOR B_JE RAS!, 211.10,PLU. ee0.0 aSSE. 'Vergf Kr.r..„ 'r'[7N7..i'ITIEEIFFA CL,E131.1 UNA,fl,I_1.1,1.1NAI,P,SS nte.-r..... ,FN,PF TIM CIINNFI APPIIii,A1.1CFS FIL-ER FAB,.—./'1,..i.SV Sill..11,SCII_VERTENTRAIY.E,BELO, '.E.Eil'2' TBrIt'.1:1'2. CXECA LAMS AIRE NOT.EVE.ELT TO DAN,. TILT= -..1 ., , 0,3LOCIASE FIRDI.1 DIE....,ED STONE. ZZT,PrI 0 STONE CHECK DAM a 1 Ir F=F=V1,7eZer= PLA.I ' r'" f3',-. ' "''',•-•-----.' ®STORMWATER POND CROSS SECTIONAL DETAIL Ked Ave.Et 0 v„ vvvrovr A.:mai,,SPECIFED.,,M, WIF31:===.4KFurax PI ANA,,...,PFYIllr"MP CIF 0...., Conservation Subdivision 2v-va,...r.bvea„ ,....,.........5......T,, . s Tcp,,r, — ovsoL I.Rg13=1:TC,,,,Jr=k rrN DIFECTIDN OF:ATER FLO,i_LF,BILC NI,BE SEC...,f AE,ENED TOSIIIL SURF>CE.P,CIN:2 Si,LESIN APPROPRIATE NO, L=.,,ON3EGUIIVElakCV,EN,OVE.ENJe.,1 IN:21=.ttE,I111 A...t 0,11T.il./.,.i.A.LEI.V.,.., /.1,1k., ,GGEK,,,Y.,P1 N,ON UENIEK 10 k,illtk . 0..iillrl CONTROL PROMICTS.,_BE INSTA__EL.IN,Pri V.SOPDA1.1/..EV.fri PIANI1fACJIIRFIESRF.711.1PFWATIIINS. ,.,,,LNII,CY,A__HL 0,1,1.1,.2,..\NL.,V,L. 2. 'Arrr.,752=6=1=0Z-PrFT=Inr.RFSFNTA'F 2.FIN,SURF,INC...NOTED ON PLANS. 1`.,.,.. .141,.. 0 ECM OVERFLOW WEIR — 0 WET SWALE 12,1.EllRill BER,1.1>CE Fl AR=r1=1,15F1:1101.1 PERLIANE,EPDSIC.N CONTROL „ 'F'"=2 FAMIC.C.,..,DIjillIMCD ,)„.,,„.., 4*,.•......,...................". .1.°M -oi WV RFONINK.7.4,iTe:'"1'm 2 1" . f . ,....... ,...,..„- '441 CULVERT Site Utility Details J.,STONE FL_ ;,,..,1,LENTA, ,CCIFILLI I. LEVEL SPPE.EP 5 ALL BE CONST,CTED TOPROLICFE SHEET FLON S'-'2.1'L.'''. =M.. 2.It'fil='1,1`nTIT'aUM-ITIN'I',.=11_1(e1,1..ND IC Y1`,1_NI Planning Board it-17.01)6.1 '''EB'"•.%nrir: 1-1,,I.,40.N.1,1,,.. ,..,s 1....L.,...a 0 LEVEL SPREADER A ',';',==„;=„"1„ ',a7,„=.„„„„ L-8.3 The LA GROUP i IMMENI111/ I 0,0,.,,,,,,--, 227 Paydeross Ave Inc rorrorpaBig tadisire 'S,:r:ria'ragnr,'LrIllir "31--r:'n'-'g;A,rE qt,'N'-r N . . 0 TYPICAL LEACH FIELD LAYOUT AND SEPTIC TANK CAPACITIES ' INMIDU::„.,,ITAI:l.,,liNII .., Vra.IV1021'7,1 :::1 I 7.i.V.',,,,,eicriVV,k."*".PV'MCFKRS*TiVkiR1W5,*.',i1044.46, ®ABSORPTION TRENCH DETAIL ........,-, L.I li ,. F.4',,,,11FilLtl'!'tnI,T-11nL'Or1trtitrL'I'lf=NY:=1'; :\ 1'4 ABITIEll'A7L1'OTNHFE:TE'R=PSUrirPEI=LrE ITO=E-102.1,C MIN ' 1,'1,1-',IJ:1:1F.,, ,,il'I'..,,. :4'11,L71%I.t1'11'ItIL:V=I'1111=1,14 !,71,gE,T1;%'g17FWNPE137'(1M7g18=EUPTIVZAn V II I ree_Le.,„„, H.F.Euy:E:.„!;;;;;:r .--- t'.'1,1"run',"1',V,',V''''''''''"L'"''''''"''''''' I I I -,-,., 111 i - ' -"'.".='''=''-,%"H=F,17,.=usr.r..-r`E'F',11"':=2;4=E. Kaydeross Ave E.t I I I "' II ' ZiWOIZI:NDOCS-XTITTIEV=-1,?1,'FTSW''' ',:e.r,e,P,At.g,NZ.,Z4'S Itt. NOTE .L-,T,-,n,':,.)--- PUMP PIT DETAILS TYPICAL HOUSE SEPTIC LAYOUT WASTEWATER DISPOSAL SPECIFICATIONS scr.rcrs acram„-ra / ---- , nOLArd= Site Utility Details Planning Board Pt 17 000 1 c—, O SCHEMATIC SEPTIC SYSTEM PROFILE-MOUND ABSORPTION BED ..... L-8.4 SEPTIC SYSTEM GENERAL NOTES m,....mm..mm..n7:...7,.e7J,„,,....m x.--..•9.,0--,. e..e..i .e,..e ...,.,. ., ,dd..,,,..m, The LA GROUP --- �� /Y/ C\ \ N F ao" of . // ���` / LI !�� 22 rood Ave.Inc Rem ren �/tRI, ,"F'''''' ,o�^ Et a L3�698 di •°7°,=„n=,°"„.7,,„=„1=7„.'„'=„7„,7,„'.„,.,,,nw.d,,.a.de. �, .• . ��� R. .In D���D.�,E ay.w.�"� % �� - .,„ SEPTIC SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION NOTESNum: nnnxAL ws a � nem -REc,zD seioMu�� LmmEs EKE FREEmR ,Num mumms 1,3„nail,.d.".Oe Dem Iment and,e.de,engineer prole we..le.review e.,a.0e.dello,, RURAL STN-_ „AD SECIION o e,..,.,.....«. ,da., APPROVED: 1/1s� .,n0 CITY ON SAR.ITOGA SPRINGS,NEW YORK DwcHe .,Anom. ".D"u=::,E, ..°E PUNNING BOARD DATE ' R,01 Street — Modified ss-4 loll 2 FORCE MAIN TRENCH DETAIL ,�.. 5 RURAL STREET-MODIFIED DETAIL E. WI,Ileld Maccpilen ve.a. ,Em,d a e.em.d OM mm mem,ee.e LD,<..roe.md,. ENrIPE sePnc.tSYSTEM uMITATIONs.°,.e, w,ee e"„r,r �� - ,rE; ,.,.. 11111111111111 2,„„„„ pr2-1,11_,E PPE OUTLET PPE - Ka,deross Ave.East Ie we�a�,..,m..,,„,.m,ee„we,e nee,.ee�gee,.e�deeea e,,e.d..,e�.w.,�.,ee��e. _ Conservation Subdivision e0..,ii.66.z 9.m 66-6.66...., �..wes,c"ffiI. °. *Y.05,.” o w,.- n a P v.zesc SiSNE ........... .......m...e,.,_ 3 SEPTIC TANK DETAIL EeesESEE r:« sd” "=.ESE,,,E , m1.�wn wo n; ..d..�..,,. .,.,w d eea,.,e mm,e,,,,�.ma me O OSEPTIC SYSTEM NOTES ,�E* .e. ,.....,,» 000 Site Utility Details ao ,zw so. oz ?zoo ?zoz n.e.a Planning Board#1].006.1 OWASTEWATER SYSTEM DESIGN CHART :A-„ I,=,=°=%,°'.0:17,=.,„„, L-8.5 PREPARED BY: K. Tedford DATE 08/26/20 LC) the LA group CHECKED BY: DBH DATE Landscape Architecture SUBJECT: Kaydeross Ave. East, Pump Station Buoyancy and Engineering. PC. PROJECT NUMBER 2016109 SHEET 1 OF 1 PUMP STATION BUOYANCY CALCULATIONS DIMENSIONS(OUTSIDE) HEIGHT 8.00 FT DIAMETER 5.00 FT THICKNESS OF WALLS (5") 0.42 FT THICKNESS OF BASE (8") 0.67 FT PS ELEVATIONS: 255.00 FT (RIM ELEVATION 253.67 FT (WATER ELEV) 247.00 FT (BOTTOM OF CB) VOLUME OF PS: 157.08 CF VOLUME OF WATER DISPLACED: 130.90 CF UNIT WEIGHT OF WATER: 62.4 LB/CF WT OF WATER DISPLACED: 8,168 LB VOL. OF CONC OF MANHOLE: 57.09 CF UNIT WT. OF CONC. 150 LB/CF WT OF CONC. MANHOLE: 8,563 LB UNIT WEIGHT OF SOIL: 76 LB/CF HEIGHT OF SOIL ABOVE MANHOL 1.0 FT WT OF SOIL ABOVE: 1,492 LB WT OF MANHOLE AND SOIL: 10,055 LB WT OF MANHOLE AND SOIL >WT OF WATER DISPLACE: YES PREPARED BY: K.Tedford DATE 08/26/20 �/ti ttte LA group CHECKED BY: DBH DATE lam■ Land scapeArchiteclure SUBJECT: Kaydeross Ave. East,Septic Tank Buoyancy and Engineering.PC. PROJECT NUMBER: 2016109 SHEET 1 OF 1 SEPTIC TANK BUOYANCY CALCULATIONS DIMENSIONS(OUTSIDE) HEIGHT 6.16 FT LENGTH 8.00 FT WIDTH 5.33 FT THICKNESS OF WALLS(6") 0.50 FT THICKNESS OF BASE(6") 0.50 FT THICKNESS OF TOP(8") 0.67 FT DIAMETER OF RISERS 2.50 FT HEIGHT OF RISERS 1.00 FT THICKNESS OF RISERS 0.33 FT SEPTIC TANK ELEVATIONS: 255.00 FT(RIM ELEVATION 253.67 FT(WATER ELEV) 248.84 FT (BOTTOM OF CB) VOLUME OF SEPTIC TANK: 262.66 CF VOLUME OF WATER DISPLACED(TANK): 205.81 CF VOLUME OF WATER DISPLACED(RISERS): 9.82 CF UNIT WEIGHT OF WATER: 62.4 LB/CF WT OF WATER DISPLACED: 13,455 LB VOL. OF CONC OF SEPTIC TANK: 64.85 CF VOL. OF CONC RISERS: 4.54 CF UNIT WT. OF CONC. 150 LB/CF WT OF CONC.SEPTIC TANK: 10,407 LB UNIT WEIGHT OF SOIL: 76 LB/CF HEIGHT OF SOIL ABOVE STRUCTURE: 1.0 FT WT OF SOIL ABOVE: 3,820 LB WT OF SEPTIC TANK AND SOIL: 14,228 LB WT OF TANK AND SOIL>WT OF WATER DISPLACE: YES