Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20170676 DeVall Subdivision Advisory Opinion (2) �'t[]f;:l �l'�. 5j f Tamie Ehinger, Chair ^j�! ; CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS KarenCavotta, ViceChair � Leslie DiCarlo �''- A a-- .J DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION Chris Bennett �� � �'� Leslie Mechem 1'�•_�� City Hall - 474 Broadway Rob DuBoff a -.�. �`='�»�,�.,,;�ti.:;; '�'�� Saratoga Springs, New Yorl< 12866 Ellen Sheehan Tel: 518-587-3550 x.251 5 fax: 518-580-9480 Steven Rowland,Alternate Kenneth Ritzenberg, Alternate ADVISORY OPINION In the matter of the requested advisory opinion to the Planning Board PB#201 70676 (201 7.1 1 8) Devall New Construction 59 Franklin Street Saratoga Springs, New York 1 2866 involving a proposed subdivision and new single-family residence within the Urban Residential-4 district, tax parcel #165.59-1 -54, within the City of Saratoga Springs. Following discussion on this matter on November 6, 2019, the Commission issues the following opinion: 0 Favorable Opinion Considerations: The Design Review Commission notes that in terms of mas sand scale, the revised principal structure and the accessory qarage are now of acceptable proportion and size in relation to the original, historic main structure. With respect to location, the Design Review Commission sugqests that the final location of the principal structure be revised to provide more buffering space between the structure and the sidewalk on the Alley side and to provide for sufficient distance, green space and for a functional porch on the Cherry Street side. Final location is sugqested further away from both front lot lines. In addition, the DRC recommends that the garage be located a�proximately 1 7 feet from the sidewalk to permit the stationing of an auto on the driveway without impeding the access and movement along the sidewalk. With respect to the subdivision of this (and future) historic lot(s), the DRC notes that there is a general concern with the creation of substandard sized lots and, in particular, Page 1 of 2 the reduction of historic properties. However, due to the historic precedence and documentation of previous structures on this site, and in this general location, the DRC would not object to the proposed subdivision in this instance. Record of vote: motion to issue favorable opinion made by LMechem, seconded by ESheehan: passed 6-0 In favor: TEhinger, KCavotta, LDiCarlo, CBennett, LMechem, ESheehan Absent: RDuBoff � / ��/ November 8, 2019 Chair Received by Accounts cc: Building Department File Accounts Dept. Applicant/Agent Page 2 of 2